pages: CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf, 5
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2011-03-15 | 5 | Vice Mayor Bonta inquired whether permits are valid for twelve months, to which the Chief Building Official responded the permits are valid for three years, which has helped in this economy. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether a permitting process has been implemented for spacing outlets four feet apart instead of six feet, to which the Chief Building Official responded the proposed amendment would be less stringent than what is currently done. Councilmember Johnson inquired whether some cities just require a GFCI and not four foot spacing. The Chief Building Official responded that he will look into the matter; stated adjustments could be made if necessary. Councilmember Tam moved introduction of the ordinance. Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (11-133) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Repealing Article II (Boards and Commissions) of Chapter Il (Administration) in Its Entirety and by Repealing Subsection 30-65.7 (Public Art Commission) of Chapter XXX (Development Regulations) in Its Entirety and Adding a New Article Il (Boards and Commissions). Introduced. The Senior Management Analyst gave a presentation. Mayor Gilmore requested an explanation on term expirations. The City Clerk stated the remainder of a term would be filled if there is a vacancy so that terms remain staggered; the person would serve a partial term and would still be eligible to serve two full terms; all terms would end July 31st but in different years. Councilmember Johnson inquired whether Section 2-6.2 [Membership; Appointment; Term of Office; Removal; Vacancies] is the same as the Charter language. The Senior Management Analyst responded the language is similar; stated additional language has been added. Councilmember Johnson inquired whether the language is consistent with the Charter, to which the Senior Management Analyst responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Tam stated the Disaster Council is being proposed for elimination because of the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP). The Senior Management Analyst stated Disaster Council functions have been replaced Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 5 March 15, 2010 | CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf |