pages: CityCouncil/2011-02-15.pdf, 20
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2011-02-15 | 20 | Mr. Marshall noted that the City would be talking to ProLogis, not Catellus, if the transfer is not approved; stated everyone involved with the project is leaving as part of the TPG transaction; that he understands the frustration with the lack of progress; however, progress has been made with Stargell; the schedule is tight; the DDA amendments being contemplated are more technical in nature to accommodate the Target building; the amount of square footage allowed south of Mitchell Avenue is limited; a lot [of the amendments] are planning in nature; the issues have been discussed with Community Development staff; staff has liked what Catellus has presented. Chair Gilmore stated that she is not asking the questions because she does not want to give consent; rather, she is letting Catellus know if consent is given and the 2012 deadline is not met, there probably would not be any second chances; Catellus is hearing the community's and Commission's frustration; the economy could not have been predicted, but is turning around; hopefully, the project is a centerpiece; the City expects the project to be aggressively pursued; there will be a serious discussion if the 2012 deadline is missed. Mr. Marshall stated Catellus would do a better job of keeping the City informed. Chair Gilmore stated that she appreciates the sentiment; updates would be helpful going forward. Commissioner Tam stated that she sees the transfer as a fresh start; the lag has been due to the economy; Mr. Marshall has indicated the DDA amendments would be technical changes; the Deputy City Manager - Development Services has implied there would be an adjustment and crediting of the fire that cost $2.2 million and the Stargell project which came in at $9.2 million. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated staff could discuss the matter as part of the DDA amendments; the current DDA does not include anything regarding the fire. Commissioner Tam stated that she recalls the DDA has a demolition requirement. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated the DDA does not address anything regarding the City being reimbursed. Commissioner deHaan stated the building had to be removed after the fire; the City did not have a choice; Catellus did not step up to the plate. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated Catellus would have had to pay for demolition as part of its costs. Commissioner Tam stated the City's costs exceeded the demolition cost. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and 5 Community Improvement Commission February 15, 2001 | CityCouncil/2011-02-15.pdf |