pages: CityCouncil/2011-01-25.pdf, 14
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2011-01-25 | 14 | which the Acting City Manager responded the meeting would be very late. In response to Mayor Gilmore's inquiry about a date shortly thereafter, the Acting City Manager responded March 1st is the next meeting. Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the matter could be added to the March ARRA night, to which the Acting City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated that she would check to see if Kemper is available. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a special meeting could be held, to which the Acting City Manager responded Council could be polled. Councilmember Tam inquired whether February 16th would work. Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the Clerk could poll for February 16th Councilmembers indicated availability. Mayor Gilmore stated the preferred date is February 16th; March 2nd would be the alternate date depending on Kemper's availability. Mr. Van Winkle inquired whether Wadsworth's attendance could be considered since the company is a critical member of moving forward. In response to Mayor Gilmore's inquiry regarding a reason to do so, Mr. Van Winkle stated Wadsworth is going to advise Junior Golf how it will work, including renovation; renovation plans need to work together; waiting until March 2nd might allow Wadsworth to attend. Mayor Gilmore stated Wadsworth could be invited either date. Councilmember Tam suggested Mr. Van Winkle share the plans with Wadsworth. Mayor Gilmore stated the Council direction is to bring the matter back on February 16th or March 2nd Ms. Sullwold inquired whether she could request that information on the Kemper proposal be provided to the Golf Commission, to which Mayor Gilmore responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether more direction could be given on the information that would be provided back; that he is not sure everyone wants to go said direction, but both options [27 and 36 holes] should be reviewed; data would be provided to the Golf Commission; that he would like to understand what will happen to the other 9 holes if the 27 hole option is chosen; he wants to know costs and needs to understand water runoff; he wants said feedback at the next meeting. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 12 January 25, 2011 | CityCouncil/2011-01-25.pdf |