pages: CityCouncil/2011-01-04.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2011-01-04 | 3 | likes the idea of document access, which includes an index to ensure accessibility for the community; Closed Sessions are not audio or video recorded; Closed Sessions become open sessions after a period of time except for litigation matters; she would like to understand how State law addresses audio and video recordings; understanding whether Council would have some discretion to improve independent expenditure campaign disclosure that may not be completely defined by federal law would be helpful, particularly regarding outside funding and last minute expenditures by Political Acton Committees and groups. Councilmember Johnson inquired whether a process could be set up for residents to file allegations or complaints for local Brown Act violations. Mayor Gilmore and Councilmember Tam responded the matter is addressed in the proposed ordinance. Mayor Gilmore stated Section 2.13 addresses barriers to attendance; that she agrees with the concept of not having meetings go past 11:00 p.m.; however, in the past, people have wanted to address items of interest; some thought should be given to the issue; the proposed ordinance addresses requiring a majority to call special meetings; inquired whether having a majority getting together and acting on a matter would be a Brown Act issue. Vice Mayor Bonta thanked the Sunshine Task Force for the comprehensive documents; stated having a cheat sheet showing current regulations compared to what is proposed would be helpful; that he has concerns regarding limited release of audio and video of Closed Sessions; the attorney-client privilege should not be waived for litigation matters; that he agrees with the concept of disclosure and transparency; however, the City should be protected; the election period is not described clearly; inquired whether a few more months [to address campaign debt] could be added after an election. Councilmember deHaan stated that he concurs with the legality of Closed Sessions; however, having a record is a benefit for Council to understand what has transpired. The Acting City Attorney stated notes are taken and become public; an audio and video process would be treated the same way. Councilmember Johnson inquired whether a person has a time limit to file a complaint on Brown Act violations. The Acting City Attorney responded different remedies are available; stated a Demand to Cure has a 30-90 day time limit. Councilmember Johnson requested the Acting City Attorney to review Section 4.2 to determine whether 30 days makes sense given other time requirements. CONSENT CALENDAR Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 3 January 4, 2011 | CityCouncil/2011-01-04.pdf |