pages: CityCouncil/2010-11-16.pdf, 18
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-11-16 | 18 | Vice Mayor/Commissioner deHaan inquired what is the percentage of [allowed] live- aboards, to which the Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded 10%. The Panning Services Manager stated the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) limit live-aboards to 10%. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of giving direction to ensure that the CIC's interest in preserving and promoting industrial and commercial use serving the maritime community, specifically the Alaska Packers building, be highlighted as a CIC interest. Councilmember/Commissioner Tam inquired whether Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese is giving direction on the ENA. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese responded the direction is to enter into the ENA and ensure that the CIC's interest be highlighted to maintain and promote commercial activity, specifically the Alaska Packers building. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services requested clarification on whether the ENA would be modified or the direction is being provided to staff separately, to which Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese responded direction is being provided to staff. Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore inquired at what point parking would be discussed if the ENA were approved. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded in the first several months, Warmington Residential would perform soil and environmental assessments; stated an update could be provided in thirty days; staff would have a better understanding of Grand Marina lease negotiations at that time. Councilmember/Commissioner Tam stated that she understands the sentence in the staff report noting "if Warmington elects not to proceed with the project and terminates the ENA, the CIC will reimburse Warmington within 60 days for the actual costs of the geotechnical and environmental testing for an amount not-to-exceed $100,000;" she does not understand the reciprocity with the City; inquired whether the City could terminate the ENA if an appropriate site for the Animal Shelter and Corporation Yard could not be located. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded the ENA term would expire if locations could not be found. Councilmember / Commissioner Gilmore stated the question Councilmember / Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority and 3 Community Improvement Commission November 16, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-11-16.pdf |