pages: CityCouncil/2010-11-03.pdf, 16
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-11-03 | 16 | responsible for large capital items. Councilmember Tam inquired whether the City and School District had an eight-year agreement, which has lapsed. The Recreation and Park Director responded the Agreement was signed in the 1960's, renewed in 1982, and amended in 1994; the maintenance staff was all School District staff prior to 1994; to increase efficiencies, the City took back maintenance staff back in 1994; the intent was to start the clock in 1994 and go to 2014, but it did not get into the final agreement; the Agreement ended in 2002; the City has been operating under the old agreement. Councilmember Tam inquired whether the concept would be to get a more uniform, holistic arrangement for all facilities under one umbrella agreement. The Recreation and Park Director responded having one entity schedule everything would be more efficient. Councilmember Tam inquired whether part of the effort would be to help the School District market and maximize use and revenue through leases. The Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative; stated a rate structure and priority use would be established. Councilmember Tam inquired whether complaints regarding rates would fall on the Council, to which the Recreation and Park Commission responded complaints would go through the Recreation Commission. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the agreement would include capital and maintenance, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded the agreement would include everything. Mayor Johnson stated performing an inventory and assessment is important to ensure an analysis of conditions and regular, appropriate maintenance. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired what is the percentage of recovery through fees, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded minimal. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired where funding would come from for the additional fields. The Recreation and Park Director responded funding would be part of negotiations with the School District. The Interim City Manager stated that she included the Kaufman Auditorium because revenue generated from the use of the auditorium could offset another recreational asset. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 2 November 3, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-11-03.pdf |