pages: CityCouncil/2010-06-01.pdf, 25
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-06-01 | 25 | second item [Setting a Public Hearing for Decision on the SunCal Modified Optional Entitlement Application and/or Extension of the ENA from Governing Bodies of Alameda by July 20, 2010]; staff is looking at either July 6th or July 20th. Councilmember/Boaro Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated that he is puzzled why the matter is being addressed tonight when an ARRA meeting was scheduled for tomorrow but was cancelled; monthly ARRA meetings need to be reestablished. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of setting a Public Hearing on July 6th 7th, or 20th to decide on the SunCal Modified OEA and/or extension of the ENA. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion. Under discussion, the Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated staff would come back with a recommendation on which date. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated that he prefers to have the public hearing at the regular July 7th ARRA meeting which would not conflict with Council business. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired whether staff expects to have the submittal that occurred over the weekend, the determination of completeness, resolution of financial issues, and transportation plan issues available. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded a definitive answer on the incompleteness [of the application] can be provided by June 15th; stated follow up on the financial information could be provided in the next two weeks; staff would be reporting back on transportation questions on June 15th Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated the density bonus leaves a lot of question in his mind; 1,310 homes is low density; high density is 3,531; the project is not new development throughout but is adaptive reuse and infill; that he needs clarification on 29 areas on the reuse of the Batchelor's Enlisted Quarters (BEQ). The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated the total number of units would increase by 30%; density, in terms of the number of units per acre, occurs through a density bonus transfer; a density bonus plan cannot be achieved without the density bonus option and density transfer. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated high density housing is outside the quarter mile and actually goes beyond the quarter mile; more homes would be outside the density corridor; provided a handout; stated the orange area is high density and goes outside the quarter mile; inquired whether high density commercial is Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and 14 Community Improvement Commission June 1, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-06-01.pdf |