pages: CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf, 23
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-04-20 | 23 | The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded in the affirmative; stated the Notice of Preparation will have a footnote describing the difference between Measure B and density bonus option; Measure B and the density bonus option are essentially the same in terms of residential units; the density bonus option includes one additional acre of open space and additional commercial square footage. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan questioned why SunCal had a Measure A non-compliant proposal because the numbers are the same. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated the [modified OEA] project is Measure A compliant. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the density bonus is Measure A compliant. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded a density bonus application has not been submitted; the [density bonus] project is foreseeable and needs to be studied under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because SunCal submitted a project description letter. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired whether there are any obligations to outreach to Chinatown regarding the scooping session. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded a Notice of Preparation would be sent to Chinatown. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired whether Chinatown would need to attend the public scooping session and the City would not have a special session with Chinatown, to which the Deputy City Manager - Development Services regular meetings are scheduled with Chinatown; a special meeting can be discussed. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether there is committee with Planning Board Members. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded in the affirmative; stated the committee meets monthly; stated the Planning Services Manager represents the City and would raise the issue; the Chinatown Committee would receive the Notice of Preparation and be invited to attend the May 10th meeting. In response to Mayor/Chair Johnson's inquiry regarding the agreement with Chinatown capping the number of housing units at 1,100 until a transportation solution is in place, the Planning Supervises Manager stated the agreement with Chinatown is designed to ensure coordination with Chinatown in the preparation of the EIR; the 1,100 figure is not a cap; the agreement states that the City would provide a specific amount for Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 3 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission April 20, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf |