pages: CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf, 22
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-04-20 | 22 | The Economic Development Director responded the language would automatically change the requirements for Alameda Landing based upon any subsequent code modifications the City would make. Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMUNICATION (10-181 CC/ARRA/10-21 CIC) Semimonthly Update on SunCal The Deputy City Manager - Development Services provided a handout and gave a brief presentation. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese requested expansion on the Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) gas system issue. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated currently, ARRA owns the Alameda Point gas system; PG&E operates and maintains the gas system; the operating agreement expired years ago; PG&E is still meeting all [agreement] obligations; ARRA has options to either enter into an operating agreement to pay PG&E a certain amount annually or convey the system to PG&E; preliminary discussion have been held; operating costs could be included in the rates if PG&E owns the system, which would eliminate ARRA operation and maintenance costs. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would scope the [modified Optional Entitlement Application (OEA)] project or the density bonus option, to which the Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded both. In response to Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan's inquiry regarding the public scoping session the Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated the Planning Board meeting would have staff and EIR consultant presentations and public comment. The Planning Services Manager stated the purpose of the scoping session is to provide an opportunity for the public to identify issues to be addressed in the EIR, which has not been written yet. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated the public session would be significant; inquired whether there has been discussion regarding similarities between Measure B and the density bonus option. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 2 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission April 20, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf |