pages: CityCouncil/2010-04-06.pdf, 19
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-04-06 | 19 | provisions, force majeure, and term, can be negotiated without knowing the actual financial deal or project description. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether staff is waiting on the pro forma; further inquired whether SunCal is working on the pro forma. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded staff is waiting and has requested the pro forma. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether there is a time frame when the document will be provided, to which the Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded staff has not been given a specific time frame for when the information will be provided. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired when the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) expires, to which the Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded July 20. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated the time line does not seem adequate to put things in proper perspective; a whole lot of work has not been presented to staff for analysis; it [the document submitted by SunCal] seems very incomplete and does not appear close to an "A" paper. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated staff would be meeting with SunCal on Thursday and would be requesting information. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan provided a handout; stated when the City started negotiating with SunCal, the Preliminary Development Concept (PDC) was used as the baseline to make determinations regarding the number of residences, commercial use and various land use issues; the handout breaks down the PDC, the Measure B Specific Plan that was voted down [February 2, 2010], and the modified Optional Entitlement Application (OEA); the OEA could generate more residential units than the Measure B Specific Plan because of the Density Bonus, which was not requested in the [Measure B] Specific Plan; that he compared the PDC and the residential project grew 144% under the modified OEA; the PDC included 2,116 residential units; the maximum SunCal could have [under the modified OEA] is 5,162, which is a substantial growth; in the commercial area, 3.4 million [square feet in the PDC] has been moved up to 4.6 million square feet [in the modified OEA], which is a 34% increase according to his figures; questioned whether the [modified OEA] path is repeating the [Measure B] Specific Plan, which is not what the City requested; further stated even though the modified OEA is going to be Measure A compliant, the project is incompatible with the 2006 PDC; the direction seems bizarre and out of line with what the voters voted against; everything goes up; there are more houses than the [Measure Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and 2 Community Improvement Commission April 6, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-04-06.pdf |