pages: CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf, 23
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-03-16 | 23 | Mayor Johnson stated the motion does not include picking a configuration; inquired whether it would make sense to have a workshop to explain options at the golf course during the period of negotiations; stated tonight's meeting is not the best place to discuss what would work. Vice Mayor deHaan stated a different concept has been presented tonight; that he would like to have more defined direction; he is not sure about having a workshop. Mayor Johnson stated golfers should have the opportunity to provide input. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she has a very clear understanding of what golfers want; financial feasibility is the only issue. Mayor Johnson stated that she does not believe a decision will be a specific option; there will be tradeoffs. Councilmember Matarrese stated financial boundaries need to be reviewed. Mayor Johnson stated that she understands the issue regarding the two 18-hole courses; that she does not believe the issue is black and white. Vice Mayor deHaan stated everything is open for discussion; that he would like to be able to provide what he prefers. Mayor Johnson stated that everyone agrees with having two 18-hole courses; the question is economic feasibility. Ms. Sullwold inquired whether a joint City Council and Golf Commission workshop could be held after 60 days to discuss ideas. The Interim City Manager stated a business term sheet could be provided in July and could be turned into a lease or license agreement between one or two parties. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of negotiating with both parties with the understanding that components are needed for a par 3, driving range, and two 18-hole championship courses; stated the starting point would be two 18-hole courses and looking for financial feasibility; direction is to come back with a business term sheet based on the starting point, incorporating the non-profit aspect for operating the par 3 and working backwards from there. Vice Mayor deHaan seconded the motion with the modification that the Mif Albright course portion not be addressed after the fact. Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese stated the motion started with the need for a par 3 course. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 23 March 16, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf |