pages: CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf, 22
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-03-16 | 22 | The Interim City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated there would be no reason to make any changes until a final decision is made; all pieces of the puzzle need to fit. Mr. Sullwold stated negotiating a license with Alameda Junior Golf would not take 180 days; discussing negotiations with Kemper can be done after fitting the Mif Albright course in the puzzle. Ms. Sullwold stated Council needs to ask the people who made pledges whether they are willing to come forward with pledges without a contract. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether a timeline could be established to review the full analysis. The Interim City Manager responded that she understands the plan; stated non-profit negotiations will go faster than the number crunching for the 36 holes; the uses cannot be competing and need to dovetail into each other; insurance, indemnification, etc. for the non-profit have not been resolved yet; a decision cannot be made in a vacuum. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether a certain amount of negotiations could be made upfront for both parties without finalizing with Kemper within 60 days. The Interim City Manager responded a business term sheet could be developed within 90 to 120 days to deal with questions in the original motion in terms of cost, numbers, and the analysis, but the final document [agreement] could not be completed; 90 to 120 days is reasonable for a term sheet for both sides to see if pieces fit; legal documents could be drafted if Council blesses the business terms which would take another 90 days. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether preferences should be discussed at this time. | CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf |