pages: CityCouncil/2009-09-01.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2009-09-01 | 4 | unique, have very deep lots, and usually have two houses with one in the back. Councilmember Gilmore stated there seems to be some property confusion; the pictures do not show any construction or a large house; the neighbors have an issue with a different property. Mayor Johnson stated the neighbors are concerned with what type of development could be done after the proposed subdivision; the lag in time should not have occurred. The Planning Services Manager stated that he concurs with Mayor Johnson; the property owner was trying to meet Planning Board requirements. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether a full public process would be required to do an ad on or exterior renovations, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether building an additional structure in the backyard would be more difficult if the property is subdivided. The Planning Services Manager responded without subdividing, there would be one less property line to deal with and one less parking space required. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there could be greater density in the back part of the lots [if not subdivided], to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the same number of units would be allowed with or without the subdivision, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired why the project was not sent back to the Planning Board, to which the Planning Services Manager responded the application seemed to be straight forward. Councilmember Matarrese stated the Planning Board needs to take another look at the project. Councilmember Gilmore stated the underlying issue seems to be straight forward; there is a potential for four units regardless of approving or disapproving the subdivision; the mass of the units that could be built on the site is much greater without a subdivision; the owner fulfilled the Planning Board's requirements. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 1, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-09-01.pdf |