pages: CityCouncil/2009-03-03.pdf, 7
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2009-03-03 | 7 | Councilmember Tam inquired whether the house would no longer be eligible to be on the National Register of Historic Places list if 80-90% of the materials were replaced. The Planning Services Manager responded the historic resource would not be preserved if the original siding and windows were replicated; further responded that the historic building study list was developed in late 1970's and listed properties in Alameda that were afforded historic preservation the house no longer retains eligibility on the State list; a subsequent change in the zoning code gave historic consideration to buildings built prior to 1942. Councilmember Tam inquired whether a demolition permit would not be needed if the house were removed from the list. The Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the HAB would still need to grant a Certificate of Approval because the house was built prior to 1942. Vice Mayor deHaan stated it is hard to believe that only 10% of the building would remain in tact; the roof, siding, and interior walls would remain; a house located at 1423 Morton Street was on the historical building study list. staff recommended upholding the HAB's denial of a request to tear the house down; the only difference in tonight's situation is retail upgrading. The Planning Services Manager stated the Buena Vista house was placed on the historical building study list because it is a Queen Anne Victorian cottage; that he feels that the house is no longer eligible for inclusion of the State Historic Resource Inventory because of deterioration, streetscape changes, and that the architect, designer and builder are unknown. Vice Mayor deHaan stated consistency is important; inquired whether staff is helping the owner to relocate the house to the former Island High School site. The Planning Services Manager responded the matter has been considered; stated specifics have not been discussed with the property owner. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether dialogue has been closed regarding relocation. The Planning Services Manager responded in the negative; stated the property owner is still willing to entertain proposals to relocate the house. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 7 March 3, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-03-03.pdf |