pages: CityCouncil/2009-01-20.pdf, 8
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2009-01-20 | 8 | Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether a right turn lane could happen on any street, to which the Planning and Building Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Tam inquired whether a GPA generally accompanies a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) . The Planning and Building Director responded just for a change in the land use designation, not a policy; stated a GPA is needed from time to time for a specific project. Councilmember Tam inquired whether a GPA could be made in a streamlined fashion, to which the Planning and Building Director responded possibly. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired how long the process would take, to which the Planning and Building Director responded approximately six months depending on whether an environment review would be needed. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired how the proposal would affect existing projects. The Planning and Building Director responded entitled projects would not be affected. Councilmember Gilmore stated parking has always been a hot topic; inquired how congestion and on-street parking removal would be balanced. The Planning and Building Director responded policies would need to be reviewed; stated the Environmental Impact Review (EIR) focuses on transportation, not parking. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the Planning Board would balance removing parking versus street widening ; further inquired whether the matter would need to go to the Transportation Commission also. The Planning and Building Director responded transportation issues are referred to the Transportation Commission; stated the Planning Board would analyze everything else. The Transportation Coordinator continued the Power Point presentation. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 8 January 20, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-01-20.pdf |