pages: CityCouncil/2007-01-16.pdf, 8
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2007-01-16 | 8 | any functionality beyond architectural diversity. The Supervising Planner responded the third story provides two additional rooms. Vice Mayor Tam stated Mr. Buckley proposed incorporating the third story into the roofline. The Supervising Planner stated staff could work with the Applicant on roof design. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether Council needs to help modify the third-story condition to be more explicit in terms of what staff is directed to do. Mayor Johnson stated Councilmember Gilmore suggested using Mr. Buckley's examples. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether direction needs to be explicit in the condition. Mayor Johnson responded the condition should be revised to make the changes explicit; stated the design changes are significant inquired whether the design changes should go back to the Planning Board for review. The Supervising Planner responded staff could work with the Applicant stated residential guidelines do not address new three- story buildings, only additions. Mayor Johnson stated the changes are not small. The Applicant stated Mr. Buckley referenced a Centax project where the third floors go from side to side; one side has a three-story wall and the other side has a two-story wall in the current design; the third-floor pop-up would be closer to the street. Mayor Johnson stated she likes the Murano project design better. The Applicant stated a jewel box design was used. Councilmember deHaan stated more space could be gained with the Murano project design. The Applicant stated he would prefer to work with staff and not go back to the Planning Board. Councilmember deHaan stated that he has concerns with the material Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 8 January 16, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-01-16.pdf |