pages: CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf, 10
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2007-01-02 | 10 | approved in 2003 have not been met but must be met before the buildings designs are approved, to which the Planning and Building Director responded in the negative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the proposed project violates any conditions of phase completion. The Planning and Building Director responded the east/west sidewalk is the key condition. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether anything prevents Council from approving the designs of the buildings while withholding the occupancy permits until the issue is resolved with the Planning Board. In response to Councilmember Matarrese's inquiry, Mr. Kyte requested clarification on what issue needs to be resolved. Councilmember Matarrese stated an east/west pedestrian way was to be constructed by Phase 2-B. Mr. Kyte stated the condition was modified; compliance is with a north/south sidewalk in lieu of the east/west sidewalk; the installation of the east/west sidewalk would be easy to accept if the developer had control of all the properties; the developer is working with staff to figure out how to accommodate the sidewalk; the issue is being addressed under the current PDA. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the north/south sidewalks are intended to be in place of the east/west sidewalks. Mr. Kyte responded in the affirmative; stated the developer thought that the requirement was met. Councilmember Matarrese stated a condition was placed on phasing; someone made an administrative decision on a condition that was put in place by the Planning Board. The Planning and Building Director stated one of the resolutions requires that the administratively changed condition go back to the Planning Board for a proper hearing to see what is feasible now Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the action could be taken at the next Planning Board meeting. The Planning and Building Director responded a month might be needed to go through the engineering and feasibility and for the developer to talk with the property owners to gain support for an Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 10 January 2, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf |