pages: CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf, 25
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 25 | the MOU could be attached to the DDA. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the MOU should be attached as an exhibit. i the DDA notes WABA's desire to limit smaller retailers. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated the retail and residential entitlements have different transportation patterns he can see residential commuters trying to head out of the Webster Street Tube at commute time he is happy with the water shuttle; he would like the land shuttle and ride share described explicitly in the TDM; goals should be described; the goal is not to have a TDM program but is to reduce the number of vehicle trips, provide improved non-auto transit options, and implement metrics to measure successi land shuttle and ride share lots need to be called out but should not be limited. The Supervising Planner stated the Conditions of Approval include the land and water shuttle as required elements of the first phase of the TDM; the Master Plan also calls for an on-sight ride share lot. The Assistant City Manager stated the cross references are generally universal between the DA and the Conditions of Approval exhibits. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated some of the documents, such as the DA and Master Plan, are City documents; the DDA is a CIC document. louncilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated goals should be mentioned. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner Gilmore stated she would like to see something that addresses the potential lag in Tinker Avenue and the alternatives as related to the TDM and capi she understands how Catellus would like to cap responsibilityi she would like some mechanism in place if the City gets into a situation where the project is roaring and then there is a lag between building Tinker Avenue or building an alternative; she would like to see an increase in the amount of money to shuttle people until the Tinker Avenue extension or alternatives are built. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager suggested amending the language to have Council evaluate what should be done with augmenting the TDM with reference to the Tinker Avenue extension when infeasibility is declared. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and 14 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission December 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |