pages: CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf, 21
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 21 | would be reviewed by the Planning Board and Transportation Commission before first phase development is approved; an annual reporting process also would be required to evaluate how the program is doing; flexibility is necessary for the TDM Coordinator to respond to user demand. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner Gilmore inquired whether the Transportation Commission and Planning Board could set trip reduction goals and a measuring methodology. The Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative; stated the business deal provides Catellus with some security as to the program cost; $425,000 must be provided to the TDM program for operations each year; the City does not have the ability to come back in three years and unilaterally request $600,000 Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired who determines how to use the $425,000. The Supervising Planner responded the Planning Board and Transportation Commission have the ability to review the TDM program for the first phase of the project; stated the program would be up and running once the first phase development is approved; the manager would oversee the use of the money. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether recommendations would be brought to Council. The Supervising Planner responded in the negative; stated the site phase is at the Planning Board approval level. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner Gilmore inquired whether shuttle use would be contemplated in the TDM program. The Supervising Planner responded the idea was to establish a funding source for an annual operation and allow some flexibility for how best to use the money. *** Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Daysog moved to continue the meeting past midnight. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. *** Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and 10 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission December 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |