pages: CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-10-17 | 4 | Following Jay Ingram's comments, Mayor Johnson inquired whether the park space would remain at ten acres. The Supervising Planner responded the General Plan calls for ten acres of open space; stated only a portion of the ten acres is within the applicant's property. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the ten acres would be kept as open space under all circumstances. The Supervising Planner responded residential rezoning would not be recommended for the ten acres. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the green area was ten acres and would stay proposed open space, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative. Following Robert McGillis' comments, Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether Mr. McGillis stated that he did not think a General Plan Amendment was necessary, to which Mr. McGillis responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson requested further explanation on Project Site #9. Mr. McGillis stated Project Site #9 shows what the shoreline would look like, which would include a boardwalk, boat docks, a pier, walkway, and bikeway. Mayor Johnson inquired what are the structures, to which Mr. McGillis responded two family units. Mayor Johnson stated the structures look very high; inquired what would be the height of the structures. Mr. McGillis responded the structures would be 35 foot, three-story townhomes. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether 42 duplexes were proposed for the 7.2 acres in 2001. Mr. McGillis responded in the affirmative; stated Mr. Collins only owned one of the two parcels at that time. Councilmember deHaan inquired how many acres are on the additional parcel, to which Mr. McGillis responded 2. 4 acres. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether approximately 115 units would Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 4 October 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf |