pages: CityCouncil/2006-10-03.pdf, 6
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-10-03 | 6 | The Recreation and Park Director responded thought has been given to having a very open and collaborative process, with a great deal of community involvement. Mayor Johnson requested that the process be brought back to Council for approval. Councilmember deHaan requested an explanation on the dwelling unit tax fund. The Finance Director stated the dwelling unit tax fund is a tax that is assessed at the building permit process stage; approximately one-sixth goes to the Library construction fund; the remainder goes to Recreation and Park; there are no requirements addressing us of the funds; typically, the funds are used for park construction and revitalization. Councilmember deHaan inquired how much money is in the fund. The Finance Director responded she did not know; stated funding usage depends on the building cycle. Mayor Johnson stated funding and ballot measure questions have been raised; she has requested that the City Attorney respond to some of the questions and provide an overview on the Beltline open space issue. The City Attorney provided a brief presentation. Councilmember Daysog stated ordinances have two readings; inquired whether the ordinance could be introduced but no finally passed until the process is completed. The City Attorney responded the first ordinance reading would not jeopardize the City's position with on-going litigation; stated rezoning action would not be taken until the second reading. *** Councilmember Daysog left at 8:45 p.m. and returned at 8:47 p.m. *** Councilmember deHaan inquired whether money is set aside and earmarked for Estuary Park. The Recreation and Park Director responded the money was earmarked as a match for a grant the City applied for through the State; the City did not receive the grant. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 6 October 3, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-10-03.pdf |