pages: CityCouncil/2006-06-07.pdf, 5
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-06-07 | 5 | Under discussion, Commissioner Gilmore inquired how authorizing additional funds would affect the Development Services or general fund budgets. The Development Services Director responded additional funding would not affect the General Fund budget stated the Development Services budget can accommodate the funding out of the regular operating budget for supplies and general services. Chair Johnson stated the motion allows Development Services to decide to spend less. Commissioner deHaan stated some preliminary work has been completed; requested to see the findings and the questions after EDC review. Commissioner Matarrese stated an expert is being hired to work with a subcommittee of the EDC to craft the questions. Commissioner Daysog stated the consultant indicated the questions would be provided to the Commission. Chair Johnson clarified the process would be to have the contract go forward in order have questions prepared. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEM (06-028) - Recommendation to reject the Sole Bid and authorize a 60- - day negotiation with Qualified Contractors for the Restoration and Rehabilitation of the Historic Alameda Theater. The Development Services Director provided a brief presentation. Commissioner Daysog inquired what Option 2, revise the bid document, means. The Development Services Director responded staff would have to look for a way to make the bid document more enticing to contractors; stated revising the bid document could involve additional engineering or architectural work to have a finite process for the least costly approach and could take a significant amount of time. Speakers in support of Option 5 (Reject the bid, terminate the project Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) and re-scope Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 5 June 7, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-07.pdf |