pages: CityCouncil/2006-06-07.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-06-07 | 2 | Commissioner deHaan inquired whether 300 samplings were already done, to which the Base Reuse and Community Development Division Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the sampling would be a different type. The Base Reuse and Community Development Division Manager responded the samplings are the step-outs from the twenty hot spots ; clarified three samples are taken at each location; stated there will be three depths at some locations sampling will be done at twenty locations, for a total of 45 samples. Commissioner Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Commissioner deHaan stated he would not support the motion and did not support the motion in the past; his concern is the property use is not finalized. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes Commissioners Daysog, Gilmore, Matarrese and Chair Johnson - 4. Noes: Commissioner deHaan - 1. (06-027) Recommendation to approve a Contract with Strategy Research Institute, Inc. for $14,500 to conduct a survey of local residents for the update of the City of Alameda Economic Development Strategic Plan. The Development Manager gave a brief presentation. Commissioner Daysog stated the sample size is 300 150 community at large participants and 150 registered voters; the staff report indicates the survey would be statistically valid with a confidence level of 95%; inquired whether 300 participants are needed to have a statistically valid survey of either registered voters or community at large participants. George Manross, Ph.D., Strategic Research Institute, Inc. responded in the affirmative; using two separate groups increases the sampling error. Chair Johnson and Commissioner Daysog noted just having community at large participants would make the survey more statistically valid. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 2 June 7, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-07.pdf |