pages: CityCouncil/2006-06-06.pdf, 6
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-06-06 | 6 | control; more information is needed prior to entering into negotiations; he attended one of two public meetings in which ten people attended; questioned whether the attendance was representative of the true passions for the Harbor Bay Maritime Service; stated he is not ready to enter into negotiations. Councilmember deHaan stated past meetings had high attendance regarding fare box issues; the same individuals need to provide strong input. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he draws a line between relinquishing the service and the negotiating process i the negotiating process is timely and provides an opportunity to explore conditions and guarantees. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated proceeding with negotiations is the first step in the process and would involve a lot of public input. Councilmember Daysog stated he would like to see plans regarding the ferry service from Harbor Bay to Alameda Point and on to San Francisco; he is concerned that a regional agency, such as WTA, relies on regional, State or federal money that is not guaranteed; pressures to rationalize operations could develop basic, general discussions are needed before negotiations. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation excluding the recommendation to authorize the City Manager to enter into negotiations with (WTA). Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Mayor Johnson - 1. ] Councilmember deHaan requested the motion include the caveat that there is a certain threshold of anticipation for guarantees that the City wants, and that concerns raised would be discussed and fulfilled. Councilmember Matarrese inquired how said information would come back to Council; stated negotiations are timely because funding streams are available; inquired whether the reporting back could be structured around timeframes and milestones. The City Manager responded the Council would be informed throughout the processi timeframes and milestones would be provided to Council. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether negotiation starting points have been established; stated the points should be discussed Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 6 June 6, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-06.pdf |