pages: CityCouncil/2006-05-02.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-05-02 | 2 | Councilmember deHaan stated there are structural concerns with the historic building; inquired whether there are ways to ensure that the asset stays in tact. The Project Manager responded in the affirmative; stated plywood bracing could be applied to the interior and corners. Mayor Johnson inquired whether spending money on cosmetic improvement makes sense if structural work is not performed to make the building sound; the community considers the building to be a historic asset; the building should be painted for the grand opening; grant money should not be spent on the façade if the owner is not committed to perform structural work. The Project Manager stated the façade grant money could pay for a decent paint job and window replacement. Councilmember deHaan stated the question is whether the building is in jeopardy of being lost; inquired whether the owner's application addresses the shoring up of the building. The Project Manager responded that the current application includes a foundation replacement and structural stabilization; stated he has not been in the building for over six years; the building appears to have a five-degree tilt towards the back; the permit addresses using the structure as a tearoom, which prompted the involvement of the Health Department. Councilmember deHaan stated that he would like to see other City departments engaged in the process, particularly the Planning Department. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the owner was hung up with the County Health Department and whether the City could concurrently process the rest of the application The Project Manager responded Health Department requirements trigger other requirements stated a straight rehabilitation application could move forward fairly quickly. Mayor Johnson inquired whether an application went to the Historic Advisory Board (HAB) . The Project Manager responded that the HAB issued a partial demolition permit for up to 30% of the structure. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the application was for the historic structure alone, to which the Project Manager responded in the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 2 May 2, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-02.pdf |