pages: CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf, 5
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-02-21 | 5 | language regarding the decision being final unless appealed; questioned whether an appeal would include the Call for Review procedure. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she has a philosophical problem with the phrase "paving over open space" unless referring to recreational-type - facilities. City Manager inquired whether temporary tents would be acceptable, to which Mayor Johnson responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would prefer to have temporary tent requests come to the Council for approval; a lot of money is invested in the parks and; the parks should be treated like gold; private parties should pay dearly for exclusive use of the parks. Mayor Johnson stated a distinguishing factor could be a non-profit having a public event versus a non-profit having an event that excludes the public. Councilmember Matarrese stated exclusive use means groups would determine who could enter the park and who cannot. The Acting Recreation and Park Director stated the paragraph at the bottom on the page states : "Park and recreation facilities are designated for public use. Therefore entities requesting approval for long-term use of park land and recreation facilities must be able to accommodate participation from the general public and not be limited by membership association. Mayor Johnson stated the term "exclusive use" should not be used. The City Manager suggested using the term "designated use" Mayor Johnson stated non-profits are not defined. The City Manager stated non-profits could be defined by the type of corporation. Mayor Johnson inquired about unincorporated organizations. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded a definition for non-profit status is available. Mayor Johnson stated the definition should be included in the policy. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 5 February 21, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf |