pages: CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf, 10
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2005-09-06 | 10 | Councilmember Matarrese stated that the "H" designation is for old houses that may have the potential to be historic, but need to be studied more; houses may not be worth further study; a withdrawal process for non-historic houses may be necessary; the project's character issues can be addressed in design review. Councilmember deHaan stated that 500 Central Avenue is a historical structure. The Supervising Planner stated that 500 Central Avenue has an "S" designation. Councilmember deHaan stated that 30% demolition for 500 Central Avenue was unrealistic and should have been at 80%; stated that he has concerns with how tonight's decision would impact the two other outstanding projects. The Acting Planning and Building Director stated that tonight's decision would only affect 500 Central Avenue; the other property was not a listed building; there is another set of criteria for ore-1942 houses; there was a whole different set of facts regarding 500 Central Avenue; the owner was aware of what he was doing. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the owner's awareness was a distinction that could be used. The Acting Planning and Building Director responded that he thought so; the owner tore down a house on the same property last year without permits. Mayor Johnson stated not setting precedents is important; inquired whether the Appellant would have been successful in removing the property from the historical list at either the HAB or Council level. The Acting Planning and Building Director responded that staff believes that the Appellant would have been granted a certificate of approval for demolition if sought prior to demolition; the house has been significantly remodeled in the past 100 years; the house is very similar to a building that received a certificate of approval for demolition from the HAB; the Appellant was denied after the fact. Mayor Johnson stated that contributing factors are part of the ordinance. The City Manager stated that the ordinance needs to be reviewed in terms of options and penalties each project will be reviewed and Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 10 September 6, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf |