pages: CityCouncil/2005-03-15.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2005-03-15 | 4 | permit the conversion of an existing detached garage to be used as a dwelling unit. " Adopted. The Supervising Planner gave a brief oral report. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the Planning Board made a recommendatior to Council, to which the Supervising Planner responded that the Planning staff denied the variances. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the Hearing. Proponents ( In favor of Appeal) : Frank Mulligan, Appellant (submitted handout) i Jeff Kassow, Alameda: Walter DeCalle, Alameda; Christina Locklear, Alameda. Opponent (Not in favor of Appeal) : Leo Beaulieu, Alameda. After Mr. Mulligan's comments, Councilmember deHaan inquired how Mr. Mulligan obtained the referenced photo album, to which Mr. Mulligan responded that the trustee provided him with the album. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the permit provided to Council is the one on file with the Planning Department, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative; stated the "SFD" notation on the permit is for the use of the lot. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether there was anything at the location before the structure was built. Mr. Mulligan responded that he did not know; stated there may have been a garage, but no driveway. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there are any records that indicate that there was a previous garage, to which the Supervising Planner responded there was a permit for demolition of a garage dated April 1984; a second permit for a new garage was issued in June of 1984 and finaled in October 1984. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the City issued plumbing and mechanical permits which would be necessary for a kitchen and a bathroom, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the negative. Mayor Johnson stated that a dwelling unit could not have been built on a zero property line in 1984; inquired whether building a dwelling unit with a garage permit would have been legal in 1984, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the negative; the permit would lack the rear and side set back and separation between Regular Meeting 4 Alameda City Council March 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-03-15.pdf |