{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2022-04-28", "page": 1, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY- -APRIL 28, 2022- -7:00 P.M.\nMayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 5:06 p.m. Councilmember Herrera Spencer led\nthe Pledge of Allegiance.\nROLL CALL -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White,\nand Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. [Note: Vice Mayor Vella\narrived at 6:33 p.m. and the meeting was conducted via\nZoom.]\nAbsent:\nNone.\nREGULAR AGENDA ITEM\n(22-282) Adoption of Uncodified Urgency Ordinance to Take Effect Immediately Upon Its\nAdoption Concerning Rent Control and Limitations on Evictions Applicable to Maritime\nResidential Tenancies including Floating Homes. [Requires four affirmative votes]; and\n(22-282 A) Introduction of Uncodified Ordinance Concerning Rent Control and Limitations on\nEvictions Applicable to Maritime Residential Tenancies including Floating Homes.\nSpecial Counsel gave a brief presentation.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether approval of the ordinances includes the\nCapital Improvement Plan (CIP); stated there have been reference to fee and rent increases for\ntenants; inquired whether approval of the matter would allow staff to review whether or not\nrelated expenses can be passed through.\nThe City Attorney stated the ordinance as provided exempts two current provisions of the rent\ncontrol ordinance: temporary relocation and CIPs if Council believes provisions should also\napply, Council can direct staff to amend the language.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether Council would like to discuss the reason\nbehind excluding the two provisions.\nMayor Ezzy Ashcraft responded Council can discuss the matter or hear public comment;\nrequested the City Attorney provide clarification.\nThe City Attorney stated the reason for excluding the provisions is due to being less applicable\nfor marine tenancies; the temporary relocation provision usually applies to a situation where a\nbathroom is taken out of commission at a regular apartment and repairs need to be made where\nthe tenant cannot stay in the apartment; floating home tenants actually have control over the\nfixtures and the rent is different from typical tenants in an apartment; Council may provide staff\ndifferent direction if it so desires.\nMayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like to hear the difference between a maritime\ntenancy and a typical apartment tenancy; inquired whether the difference is due to maritime\ntenants actually owning the structure.\nThe City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated the scenario is akin to mobile homes; the\nresident owns the structure and has control over electrical and plumbing; however, the land is\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 28, 2022\n1", "path": "CityCouncil/2022-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2022-04-28", "page": 2, "text": "rented; apartment tenancies are different; everything, including fixtures and utilities, are rented\nand not within a tenant's control; the difference is the reason staff proposed excluding the two\nprovisions.\nCouncilmember Daysog inquired whether Council could include the CIP policies if a property\nowner desires to perform substantial rehabilitation to a seawall or boat slip.\nSpecial Counsel responded the difficulty in enlarging the CIP program with respect to the entire\nmarina would be figuring out what falls under the CIP as defined in the current policy; Council\ncould amend what would be included in the policy and allow for a recovery or amortized cost\nrecovery for the owner; currently, the CIP does not encompass said type of reconstruction.\nThe City Attorney stated the City's rent program currently has a process where owners can\nrecover investments into their property in order to make a constitutional right of return; the\nprocess could be available to the marina owners, the same as any other landlord.\nCouncilmember Knox White stated Council has already given direction to come back with a CIP\nupdate; Council can adopt the emergency ordinance as written and provide direction to return\nwith any recommendations.\nSpecial Counsel stated staff will bring back the CIP policy sometime in June; Council may wish\nto include the related types of improvements.\nMayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification that Councilmember Knox White wishes to have the\nCIP policy return to Council.\nCouncilmember Knox White stated Council should discuss the matter under Council discussion.\nDiscussed the rent increases; expressed concern about the ordinance effective date; requested\nthe date be changed: Leila Minnis, Alameda.\nStated the proposed rent increases will result in displacement of homeowners; urged the rent\nprotections and ordinance be adopted: Beth Remenap, Alameda Floating Home Association.\nExpressed support for the urgency ordinance and the residents living at Barnhill Marina; stated\nthe same protections are needed for people renting on land and water; Council has the power to\nremedy the issue and bring relief: Andrey Shmakov, Alameda.\nExpressed support for enacting rent stabilization at Barnhill Marina; stated that she is appalled\nat the rent increases proposed by the new owner; the increases will result in financial hardship\nfor many senior residents; urged Council to extend rent protections: Carolyn Foster, Alameda.\nOutlined conditions and average fair rent at other floating homes in the area; stated the data\nshows average rent at other marinas being $570 per month with docks in better condition;\ndiscussed rent increase percentages; urged Council pass the ordinance: Mayumi Stroy,\nAlameda.\nStated that she is concerned about the issues being brought up; discussed her rent increase\nof\nover 100%; stated that she is in support of the matter: Alice Gore, Alameda.\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 28, 2022\n2", "path": "CityCouncil/2022-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2022-04-28", "page": 3, "text": "Expressed concern about any misinformation and negotiation team tactics; stated the\ncomments should be heard through the context of a community that is terrified and cannot find\nlegal representation; urged Council hear everything from all speakers: Liz Williams, Alameda.\nStated approximately half of the residents are seniors and on a fixed income; expressed\nconcern about displacement of the most vulnerable; stated the urgency ordinance protects at-\nrisk neighbors: Rosemary Reilly, Alameda.\nOutlined the purchase and sale of Barnhill Marina; provided information on the landlord; stated\nthe increase leaves her facing eviction; urged Council to pass the urgency ordinance: Ashley\nMullins, Alameda.\nOutlined the purchase and sale process for floating homes; stated there is only one lender for\nfloating homes; the lender has expressed concern over the introduction of unregulated and\nexcessive rent increases and new lease terms; discussed the lease's force majeure clause;\nstated the vulnerability is breathtaking and there are multiple paths to displacement; urged\nCouncil pass the ordinance: Steve Cardenas, Alameda.\nStated floating home values have been lower than comparable land homes; floating homes\nhave been naturally occurring affordable housing; discussed a ban on new floating home\nmarinas; stated there is no place to move: James Morgenroth, Alameda.\nDiscussed the history of Barnhill Marina; stated rents have increased and the docks have\nimproved over the years; the proposed ordinances give residents a chance to be relieved from\nvulnerability; urged Council to protect the residents and pass the ordinance: John Crossley,\nAlameda.\nStated residents of Barnhill Marina are a part of the community and woven into the City;\nresidents rent berths; residents' vulnerability allows landlords to easily take advantage;\nresidents are asking to be treated like all other renters in Alameda: Lisa Cannelora, Alameda.\nOutlined rent negotiations the past few weeks; urged adoption of the urgency ordinance: Robert\nHoulihan, Alameda.\nStated floating home owners own their property and pay to maintenance and insurance; the\nberths are rented from the marina owner; floating home residency law states tenants must be\nprotected from constructive or actual eviction; the lease terms are designed to create rolling\ndisplacement; urged Council pass the ordinance: Lynn Houlihan, Alameda.\nStated that she had no idea the ordinance was being proposed until a reporter contacted her on\nMonday; she is deeply invested in a sustainable future for the marina and floating homes; urged\nCouncil to consider a much broader set of data before making a decision; discussed running a\nsustainable operation; expressed concern over the future of floating home marinas in Alameda;\nstated the matter is a one-sided presentation of facts: Drishti Narang, Barnhill Marina.\nStated that she is in support of the residents at Barnhill Marina; urged Council to come together\nto vote to ensure the community is protected; discussed Council granting rent relief and\nprotections for Alameda residents; stated residents of Barnhill Marina should be granted the\nsame protections: Meredith Hoskin, Alameda.\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 28, 2022\n3", "path": "CityCouncil/2022-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2022-04-28", "page": 4, "text": "Urged Council further consider the catastrophe that would follow if floating homes are not\nincluded in rent stabilization; stated that she and her neighbors will be displaced and homes will\nbe lost; residents are facing a mortgage default crisis that few can afford: Tara Flanagan,\nAlameda.\nStated there is a question of how to address the ordinances; the owners of Barnhill Marina take\nthe community concerns seriously; in order to fashion an appropriate solution addressing the\nconcerns, Council must be adequately informed of many more issues and facts; there has not\nbeen an opportunity to gather facts; expressed concern about the ordinances not tailoring\nlanguage and the long-term viability of Barnhill Marina: Galin Luk, Attorney, Barnhill Marina.\nUrged Council to protect the distinct neighborhood; stated floating homes are a naturally\noccurring form of affordable housing and need protection; the values of the Barnhill Marina\ncommunity reflect the values of the City; expressed support for the creation of more affordable\nhousing; expressed concern over rent increases: Laura Thomas, Alameda.\nExpressed concern over losing his home; urged Council to do what is right and protect residents\nby passing the ordinance: Dominick Drisdon, Alameda.\nStated that he owns a sailboat that lies within one of the few live-aboard slips at Barnhill Marina;\ndiscussed his learning of possible threats of eviction and strong arm tactics tripling rents; urged\nCouncil to pass the ordinance: Brian Linke, Alameda.\nStated that he has lived at Barnhill Marina for 40 years and is on a low, fixed income; he and\nother marina residents are at risk of losing life savings and being evicted; his rent increase is\n178%; many only have the option of eviction or homelessness on May 1st; urged Council to pass\nthe ordinance: Walter Knox, Alameda.\nStated that he would like the ordinance to be effective April 1, 2022, not April 14, 2022: Rick\nMinnis, Alameda.\nDiscussed things that make the Barnhill Marina community special; stated many neighbors have\nprovided help when needed; urged Council to help keep the community: Robert Knop, Alameda.\nMayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the public comments; stated speakers have been\narticulate and eloquent; she has heard both heartbreaking and heartwarming remarks; she is\ncertain calling a special meeting was the right thing to do; expressed support for passing the\nemergency ordinance and introducing the other ordinance; stated that she has heard many\nalarming accounts from residents of Barnhill Marina; part of preventing homelessness is not\nallowing homelessness to happen; the Bay Area's largest growing segment of the homeless\npopulation includes seniors 55 years and older; for people living on the street, 55 is similar to 75\ndue to rapid aging; the owner's background does not excuse the kind of behavior experienced\nby the residents of Barnhill Marina; there has been communication between Council, the City,\nthe District Attorney's office and tenants to work out resolutions; the communications have been\none-sided and the opportunity for sharing information has been present all along; the\ninformation Council has is egregious; more than one resident has alluded to payment plans that\namounted to the owner taking a lien out on the property or a reverse mortgage; expressed\nsupport for the District Attorney's office being made aware of the practice; stated the State of\nCalifornia is strict on who is able to offer said financial instruments; floating homes are naturally\noccurring affordable housing; Alameda's rent ordinance recognizes that landlords need to make\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 28, 2022\n4", "path": "CityCouncil/2022-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2022-04-28", "page": 5, "text": "a reasonable return on their property; the marina property is unique; expressed concern about\nconstructive evictions; stated that she is looking forward to doing the right thing by the residents\nof Barnhill Marina; inquired whether the ordinance effective date can be modified to April 1st.\nThe City Attorney responded staff considered which date to choose for the ordinance; stated\ntypically ordinances are effective upon adoption when urgent or 30 days after second reading\nfor regular ordinances; retroactive dates back to the date of publication was the option that has\na reasonable risk-benefit calculation; public speakers have requested a further reach back that\npotentially creates more protection; however, it also creates additional risk due to the date\nreaching back prior to publication; Council may choose to reach back further and staff can make\nany modifications directed by Council.\nMayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is seeking an approach which is legally defensible; she\nexpects the owners of Barnhill Marina to challenge the ordinance in court; inquired the safest\ncourse of action, to which the City Attorney responded it is safer not to retroactively date an\nordinance beyond the publication date of the staff report.\nCouncilmember Knox White stated it is clear that people who live in Barnhill Marina are\nresidents, similar to all other residents of Alameda; he does not understand why the City would\nhave separate rules for people depending on where they live.\nCouncilmember Knox White moved approval of adoption of the urgency ordinance with direction\nfor staff to look at the CIP issues and address issues of shared infrastructure in the same way\nthe City is addressing the matter for multi-family buildings with common areas.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer requested clarification on the appropriateness of the motion\nincluding direction regarding the CIP.\nMayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for attaining a second for the motion to allow for\nCouncil discussion.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer stated based on information provided by the City Attorney, the\nCIP language currently included in the City's rent ordinance can be included; the CIP language\ncould be included in the current ordinance and fine-tuned at a later date; expressed support for\nreceiving clarification from the City Attorney.\nMayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the motion on the floor needs a second in order for Council\ndiscussion to follow; inquired whether Councilmember Herrera Spencer is making an\namendment to the motion, to which Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like\nto hear from the City Attorney.\nIn response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft, Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like\nto\nmake a friendly amendment to the motion and have the CIP language put into the ordinance\nsimilar to the existing rent control ordinance if possible.\nMayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would not support the friendly amendment.\nCouncilmember Knox White stated the current CIP language relates to rental units; adding the\nlanguage to the urgency ordinance would not have a strong, material impact for Barnhill Marina;\nif Council looks at shared infrastructure, the approach would have to be unique due to rental\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 28, 2022\n5", "path": "CityCouncil/2022-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2022-04-28", "page": 6, "text": "differences.\nMayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is concerned about pass through costs being sought from\nthe landlord; renters of Barnhill Marina already pay property taxes, which is not paid by other\nrenters.\nThe City Attorney stated the current CIP policy is out-of-date; Council has given direction to\nupdate the CIP; Council may direct staff to include the CIP language; however, the language\nwould be difficult to apply; few landlords have applied for CIP; staff is working on bringing an\namendment to Council for consideration.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the process when an owner has repairs and is trying\nto pass through fees and costs.\nThe City Attorney responded Council can offer protection in a couple ways; stated the way for\nan owner to apply pass through is to apply for a fair return petition; in the petition, an\nindependent hearing officer would compare the owner-submitted capital plans to expenditures in\norder to make a constitutional right of return and adjust rents, if necessary, under guidance of\nfederal and State law; staff can bring back a CIP policy that provides more options on how to\nbroadly apply it to both regular land tenancies and marine tenancies in the coming months.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether there are other things which could be added\nto the emergency or non-emergency ordinance for protection.\nThe City Attorney responded applying the existing rent control to marine tenancies is\nadministratively the most expedient path forward; stated rent staff are already trained to\nadminister the ordinance.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the date will be retroactive to April 14th, to\nwhich Councilmember Knox White responded in the affirmative.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated the shabby treatment of Barnhill Marina\nresidents must not continue; it is vital for Council to extend the rent control provisions to the\nresidents along and on the water; he supports the matter moving forward; the residents, children\nand seniors especially have very limited options and Council must take a stand.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer outlined the City's history of supporting rent stabilization;\nstated there have been times where Council has been asked to step-up; the matter goes\nbeyond Barnhill Marina and is unfortunate; the emotional drain on someone subjected to rent\nincreases is difficult; the stress has to end; she is confident that the ordinances will pass.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated it is possible the current matter is not the end; he will continue to\nsupport the residents that are being treated badly.\nVice Mayor Vella stated that she is disappointed that the situation got this far; staff had been\ntrying to reach out to the owners of Barnhill Marina to see if a solution could be reached; she\nhas supported tenant rights and protections for the duration of her time on Council; this matter is\nno different; it is unfortunate that Council is having to take the emergency ordinance action and\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 28, 2022\n6", "path": "CityCouncil/2022-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2022-04-28", "page": 7, "text": "that better behavior with more consideration was not provided to the residents of Barnhill\nMarina.\nCouncilmember Knox White inquired whether language needs to be added to the current\nordinance in order to clarify the instructions for the tenants who have already paid their rent with\nthe increase due to the date being April 14th.\nThe City Attorney responded the argument could be made with the existing language; stated the\nexisting language allows a potential resident to argue that the rent in effect is not what was\nannounced; if there be desire to make the language clearer, another sentence can be added on\npage 4, Section 2 of the urgency ordinance stating: \"rent being paid as of April 14th is defined as\nrent being paid, not rent that was announced to be paid in the future.\"\nCouncilmember Knox White amended the motion to include the proposed language.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the amended motion, which carried by the following\nroll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella:\nAye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.\nCouncilmember Knox White moved approval of introduction of the ordinance.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the language of the ordinance needs to\ninclude the language proposed for the urgency ordinance.\nThe City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated that he recommends Council insert the\nexact same language from the urgency ordinance into Section 2-E.\nCouncilmember Knox White amended his motion to include the language from the urgency\nordinance.\nCouncilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call\nvote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and\nMayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\n(22-283) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft made brief comments thanking the City Manager.\n(22-284) The City Manager thanked current and former City Councilmembers; stated that he\nhas appreciated the opportunity to work with everyone; Council has always stepped up and\nworked for the community; expressed support for City staff.\nADJOURNMENT\nThere being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:49 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 28, 2022\n7", "path": "CityCouncil/2022-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard", "date": "2022-04-28", "page": 1, "text": "City of Alameda, California\nSOCIAL SERVICE HUMAN RELATIONS BOARD\nTHURSDAY, April 28, 2022\nAPPROVED MINUTES\n1. CALL TO ORDER\nPresident Sarah Lewis called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m.\n2. ROLL CALL\nPresent: President Sarah Lewis, Vice President Kristin Furuichi Fong, Board members\nDianne Yamashiro-Omi, Samantha Green, Scott Means and Priya Jagannathan.\nCity staff: Eric Fonstein, Lois Butler, Veronika Cole, and Marcie Johnson\n3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES\n3-A Review and Approve March 24, 2022 Draft Minutes\nA motion to approve the minutes of March 24, 2022 was made by Board member\nYamashiro-Omi and seconded by Board member Means. Ayes: President S. Lewis, Vice\nPresident Furuichi Fong, Board members Yamashiro-Omi, Green, and Means. Nays: none.\nNote: Board Member Jagannathan abstained due to absence from meeting. Motion passed\n5-0.\n4. PUBLIC COMMENTS\nNone.\n5. AGENDA ITEMS\n5-A Discuss the Creation of a Permanent SSHRB Homelessness Subcommittee\nStaff member Fonstein made a short presentation of Brown Act, Sunshine Ordinance,\nand logistical considerations in creating a subcommittee indicating that creating a\nsubcommittee would require a formal vote, which can be placed on next month's agenda.\nPresident Lewis opened the floor for Board discussion. The following is a summary of\ndiscussion points and questions:\nBoard member Yamashiro-Omi asked for additional information on the\nsubcommittee roles. President Lewis responded, to provide relevant oversight of\nthe City's Homelessness Strategic Plan, such as the community convener and\npublic education components. SSHRB's role would be to help with public\neducation and promotion of homelessness issues.\nBoard member Yamashiro-Omi asked if it needed to be a formal subcommittee or\nif there was an option to meet informally.\nBoard member Means asked who on SSHRB would be interested in taking the\nlead in chairing the subcommittee. President Lewis, Vice President Furuichi Fong,", "path": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard", "date": "2022-04-28", "page": 2, "text": "and Board member Green agreed that it is important for SSHRB to take the lead\non homelessness activities and to be involved.\nBoard member Means liked the idea of embedding an item in SSHRB's regular\nagenda to make the discussion a part of SSHRB's regular meetings.\nStaff member Butler recommended that a formal subcommittee, if created by\nSSHRB, be composed of two SSHRB members.\nPresident Lewis summarized the SSHRB consensus: starting with SSHRB's next\nmeeting, make this item a part of SSHRB's regular agenda so all members can\nparticipate in the discussion.\n5-B Continue the Discussion of the Development and Implementation of the 2022\nCommunity Needs Assessment\nBoard member Green and Jagannathan went through community indicators and\ndiscussed limitations. The following is a summary of discussion points and questions:\nBoard member Jagannathan would like for SSHRB to review/provide input, on the\ncurrent data collection points and overall end product appearance. The idea is for\nit to be presented to City Council as a power point documents with the data at the\nend of the report.\nStaff member Butler emphasized that need for a variety of data collection, to\nensure SSHRB is covering indicators identified by City Council and members of\nthe public.\nBoard member Green stated that there are limitations to data, and believes the\nCommunity Needs Assessment (CNA) will need focus groups to fill in the data\ngaps.\nBoard member Yamashiro-Omi asked about available funding to hire a individual\nwho could facilitate/draft a narrative. And recommended that board members\nreview, Portland and Richmond's, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) strategic\nplan as an appraisal for the CNA. The Board agreed that it could prepare the\ndocument in house, but requested a consultant for facilitating the focus groups.\nStaff member Butler confirmed that there is funding available in the current fiscal\nyear to hire a focus group facilitator. Stating that this individual(s) would need to\nbe on contract, performing work, before June 30.\nPresident Lewis asked for input on what the focus groups would look like, logistically. The\nfollowing is a summary of discussion points:\nBoard member Means suggested, day events at senior centers and\nevening/weekends for working families.\nBoard member Jagannathan suggested, compensating people or providing food\nduring participation, as well as presenting data to the focus groups and asking\nthem if it matches reality.\nBoard members Green and Yamashiro-Omi suggested focus groups for individual\ndemographics.\nBoard suggested five to six focus groups, with eight to twelve people.\nPresident Lewis provided a summary of the action items for next meeting:", "path": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard", "date": "2022-04-28", "page": 3, "text": "Board member Yamashiro-Omi will reach out to consultant and put them in\ncontact with staff member Fonstein.\nBoard member Jagannathan will provide current list of indicators/data collection\nsources to staff member Fonstein (who will blind distribute to SSHRB members).\nBoard members will continue to think about additional data sources and focus\ngroup possibilities.\n5-C Workgroup Reports\nDomestic Violence (Furuichi Fong): Next meeting is scheduled for May 19.\n6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS\n6-A Status Report on Homeless Services\nStaff member Cole provided the following update:\nHHAP Contract: The City of Alameda has contracted with Alameda County to\nprovide funding ($287,767) for the Village of Love, Safe Parking, Day Center\n(extended hours) and Overnight Services programs. Services will be provided\nthrough 2023.\nCommunity Development will be issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a\nHomeless Outreach Team, in May.\nEmergency Housing at Alameda Point: Item was moved to the May 3, City Council\nmeeting. Recommended that SSHRB members attend, if available.\nHomeless Encampments: Monthly clean-up will be increasing to two times a month\n(second and fourth Tuesdays).\n7. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\nBoard member Green wanted to address to open board seat, and requested for a youth\nmember to be considered. Staff member Fonstein provided background information from\nprevious years, highlighting the potential issue of student time constraints.\nBoard member Means stated, every May, the Administration for Community Living (ACL)\nleads the nation's observance of Older Americans Month (OAM).\n8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS\nStaff member Butler shared that she will be stepping back from her participation in SSHRB\nmeetings, but will continue to oversee board projects.\n9. ADJOURNMENT\nPresident Lewis adjourned the meeting at 8:27 p.m.\nRespectfully Submitted,\nEric Fonstein, Board Secretary", "path": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-04-28.pdf"}