{"body": "PublicArtCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 1, "text": "Final\nMINUTES OF THE PUBLIC ART COMMISSION\nREGULAR MEETING OF Wednesday, September 25, 2019\nCOUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL\n2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 6:00 PM\n1. CALL TO ORDER\nStaff Member Lois Butler called the meeting to order at 6:05pm\n2. ROLL CALL\nPresent: Commissioners Sherman Lewis, Liz Rush, Adam Gillitt, Mark Farrell.\nAbsent: Commissioner Kirstin Van Cleef (excused).\nLois Butler (PAC Secretary) and Amanda Gehrke (staff) are present as staff to the Commission.\n3. MINUTES\n2019-7292 A motion to approve the minutes was made by Commissioner Lewis and seconded by\nCommissioner Gillitt. The motion carried 4-0.\n4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS\nNone.\n5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS\n5-A. 2019-7288 Appreciation for Outgoing Public Art Commission Member. The Public Art\nCommission will present a Certificate of Appreciation to Outgoing Public Art Commission\nChairperson Daniel Hoy.\nCommission members, Lois Butler and Amanda Gehrke expressed appreciation for\nOutgoing Public Art Commission Chair Daniel Hoy, and presented him with a Certificate\nof Appreciation.\nDaniel Hoy expressed his appreciation for the opportunity to serve, received certificate,\nand departed meeting.\n5-B. 2019-7289 Selection of Chairperson. The Public Art Commission will select a new\nChairperson\nDiscussion of end of term for each member: Gillitt in 2020, Farrell in 2021, Lewis in\n2020, Rush in 2023, Van Cleef in 2023\nDiscussion of duties of Chairperson: review agenda previous to meeting, chairs meeting,\nappoints subcommittees.\nCommissioner Farrell made a motion to elect Gillitt as Chairperson. Commissioner Lewis\nseconded. Motion carried 4-0.\nChairperson Gillitt assumed role of chairing remainder of meeting.\n5-C. 2019-7290 Selection of Vice Chairperson. The Public Art Commission will select a new Vice-\nChairperson\nCommissioner Farrell made a motion to elect Commissioner Rush as Vice Chairperson.\nCommissioner Lewis seconded. Motion carried 4-0.\n5-D. 2019-7287 Public Art Small Grants Pilot Program", "path": "PublicArtCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PublicArtCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 2, "text": "Minutes of the Public Art Commission\nRegular Meeting\nWednesday, September 25, 2019\nPresentation by Staff Member Gehrke of staff report, Public Arts Small Grants Program\nDescription, and Public Art Small Grants Application. Key points of presentation were to\nkeep process simple, explanation of grant brackets, timeline of program, criteria for\nevaluating applications, makeup of subcommittee, and requirements for recipients.\nCommissioners asked clarifying questions:\nChairperson Gillitt: Can awardees utilize grant money for required business license?\nStaff Member Butler clarified administrative costs can be included in grant requests.\nCommissioner Farrell: How are artists required to acknowledge City of Alameda in\nphysical art pieces? Staff Member Gehrke clarified plaque is not required, but City\nmust be acknowledged onsite in some way.\nCommissioner Farrell: Is City Council approval required? Staff Member Butler clarified\nit is not, unless artwork is a large piece.\nCommissioner Farrell: Is there a limit on number of grants per organization? Staff\nMember Gehrke clarified there should be one grant per event, but consideration will\nbe made for awarding multiple grants per year if multiple events.\nVice Chairperson Rush asked about multiple grant amount requests per application.\nStaff Member Butler recommends that there should be one application per event or\nphysical artwork.\nCommissioner Farrell raised formatting concern. Staff Member Butler will have\napplication formatting changed to allow editing of draft applications.\nCommissioner Lewis asked if physical submission of application is required. Staff\nMember Butler clarified that electronically signed applications are adequate.\nCommissioner Lewis expressed concern that grant ranges are unclear on application.\nAll agreed to discuss and resolve during discussion.\nWritten Communication was submitted for this item.\nCommissioner Farrell requested clarification on price of art events. Staff Member\nButler clarified that events receiving grant must be free to be in compliance with\nordinance.\nCommissioner Lewis requested clarification on events taking place in 21+ venues or\nart that is for 18+. Staff Member Butler offered to get clarification from City Attorney's\nOffice if the event that art falls into this category.\nDiscussion. Encourage applicants to apply for smaller grants. Make applicants aware of\nmaximum annual grant limits. Ratio of $250-level (Micro) grants to $2000-level (Small)\ngrants. Suggestion to award Micro grants first, or to reserve some funds exclusively for\nMicro grants. Suggestion to assess on a case-by-case basis. Agreement that grants are\nnot limited to non-profits.\nMotion by Commissioner Farrell to make four changes on application and instructions:\n1) change from three to two grant brackets (Micro and Small); 2) add line to application\nfor requested amount and description of fund-use; 3) add explanation of funding-\ncategories to application instructions; and 4) include how City of Alameda will be\nrepresented on physical art pieces. Seconded by Vice Chairperson Rush. Motion carried\n4-0.\n2", "path": "PublicArtCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PublicArtCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 3, "text": "Minutes of the Public Art Commission\nRegular Meeting\nWednesday, September 25, 2019\n5-E. 2019-7291 Selection of Regular Meeting Date. The Public Art Commission will select a\nregular meeting date\nStaff Member Butler updated commission members that the sunshine ordinance\nrequires meetings be held at regular intervals and location. If schedule changes,\ncancellation notice must be posted. Additionally, if meeting held outside regular\nmeeting time, it shall be called a Special Meeting.\nDiscussion: best day for and frequency of meeting. All council members approve first or\nthird Monday of the month. Staff members will check city calendar and select best of\ntwo options.\n5-F. 2019-7286 Eligibility of Upcoming Projects for the Public Art Requirement. Staff to provide\nthe Public Art Commission with a status update on the eligibility of upcoming projects for the\nPublic Art Requirement\nStaff Member Gehrke provided update on upcoming eligible art projects and grant\ncontributors.\nCommissioner Farrell asked clarifying question regarding city's approval process for\napplications. Staff member Butler clarified city evaluates/approves site, public access,\nand grant amount.\nJim Corter, local artist and resident, asked what qualifies as public art. Commissioner\nclarified what qualifies as art (physical or event), and that developers can either\ncontribute to public art fund or have public art as part of development.\n6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS\nStaff Member Butler introduced new Commissioner Kirstin Van Cleef (absent), has\npublic art experience in Scottsdale, AZ. Introduction and biography to be shared at next\nmeeting.\nStaff Member Gehrke provided Art In City Hall Program update: very successful, lottery\nsystem working well, continue program in 2020.\nStaff Member Gehrke provided information on California Art Council Grant Program.\n7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS\nNone.\n8. COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS\nClarified that next PAC priority is Ordinance.\n9. ADJOURNMENT\nChairman Gillitt adjourned the meeting at 7:15pm.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLois Butler, Economic Development Manager\nSecretary\nPublic Art Commission\n3", "path": "PublicArtCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "TransportationCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 1, "text": "APPROVED MINUTES\nREGULAR MEETING OF THE\nCITY OF ALAMEDA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION\nWEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2019\nChair Soules convened the meeting at 7:01 pm.\n1. ROLL CALL\nPresent: Vice Chair Soules, Commissioners Nachtigall, Yuen, Kohlstrand, Weitze.\nAbsent: Commissioners Hans, Johnson.\n2. AGENDA CHANGES\nNone.\n3. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PUBLIC COMMENT\n3-A Transportation Commission Meeting: Wed, Nov 20 at 7 p.m.\n3-B Tsunami Presentations: Thurs, Sept. 19 at 6:30 p.m. (boating community) and Wed,\nOct. 30 at 6:30 p.m. (citywide) - City Hall, Council Chambers\n3-C Alameda Bike for the Parks - Community Bike Ride - Sat, Sept 28\n3-D International Walk and Roll to School Day - Wed., Oct 2\n3-E Smart Driver Refresher Course by AARP at Mastick Senior Center - Wed., Oct 9 - 9\na.m. to 1:30 p.m.\n3-F Electric Vehicle 101, City Hall Council Chambers: Wed, Oct 16 at 6:30 p.m.\n3-G Transportation 101 + Clipper Card Registrations at Mastick Senior Center - Tues, Oct\n22 at 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.\n3-H Transportation Services Survey for Seniors and People with Disabilities at Mastick\nSenior Center or on-line at www.AlamedaParatransit.com by Thurs, Oct 31\n3-I Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) 2019 Trainings in October: register\non Fire Department web page\n3-J\nUpcoming\nGrant-Funded\nBicycle\nSafety\nEducation\nClasses:\nhttps://bikeeastbay.org/alamedabikeed\n3-K Emergency Alerts for Alameda - Subscribe at AC Alert web page:\nhttps://www.acgov.org/emergencysite/\n1", "path": "TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "TransportationCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 2, "text": "3-L\nRegional\nEmergency\nTransportation\nAlerts\n-\nSubscribe:\n ttps://511.org/alerts/emergencies/511Alert\n3-M Clipper Card (adults) - order on line or at Walgreens or set up Autoload to add value\nautomatically: https://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/getTranslink.do\n3-N Clipper Card Discounts for youth, seniors and people with disabilities -\nhttps://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/discounts/index.do\n3-O FasTrak or new toll tag for upcoming I-880 Express Lanes: on line or at Walgreens\n(except not Park Street location) and then register on line:\nhttps://www.bayareafastrak.org/en/signup/signUp.shtm\nChair Soules recognized and congratulated Commissioner Kohlstrand on her recent\nretirement and described some of the highlights of her career in Transportation Planning.\nCommissioner Kohlstrand said she looks forward to giving back to the community during\nher retirement.\n4. CONSENT CALENDAR\n4-A 2019-7280\nDraft Meeting Minutes - July 24, 2019\nCommissioner Nachtigall made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner\nKohlstrand seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0.\n5. NEW BUSINESS\n5-A 2019-7281\nUphold the Public Works Director's Decision to Remove One Parking Space at the Corner\nof Walnut Street at San Antonio Avenue to improve intersection visibility and safety\nScott Wikstrom, City Engineer, gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can\nbe\nfound\nat:\nttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4139789&GUID=7EAB8214-\nOBE2-4480-A488-5C82AE7E4927\nCommissioner Kohlstrand asked if the request for improved visibility came from someone\nin the neighborhood.\nStaff Member Wikstrom said that the request came in via SeeClickFix.\nCommissioner Weitze noted that in 2012 the warrants for an all way stop sign were not\nmet and asked if that was still the case.\n2", "path": "TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "TransportationCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 3, "text": "Staff Member Wikstrom said that they have not done updated traffic counts. He said the\ncounts were 30% below the threshold in 2012 and that he would not expect that large of\na change at this intersection since 2012.\nSteve Mack, appellant, gave a presentation.\nChair Soules asked what the rest of the conditions of the intersection are, such as signage\nand striping.\nStaff Member Wikstrom said that there are no marked crosswalks and that the aerial image\ndisplayed is accurate.\nCommissioner Kohlstrand asked whether Walnut was considered a local street or a\ncollector in the City's street classification system.\nStaff Member Wikstrom said that Walnut is a local street.\nCommissioner Weitze asked if there were any other examples of four way stops in\nAlameda that did not meet the thresholds, but were installed because of community input.\nStaff Member Wikstrom said he is not aware of any recent examples that would meet that\ncriteria.\nChair Soules opened the public hearing.\nSean McGowan said that high schoolers zip through the intersection. He said that parking\nis very difficult during the school year. He said the neighborhood cannot afford to lose a\nparking space. He said they need a stop sign to reduce speeding.\nBob Ralston said the High School students take up all the available parking during the\nday. He said drivers like to speed through the intersection. He said they need a stop sign\nbefore someone gets killed.\nShemaiah Stanton said that the primary issue is not visibility, but speeding. He said things\nhave changed a lot since 2012. He asked that staff take a fresh look at the need for a stop\nsign.\nJane Kramer said we don't need to eliminate parking spaces. She said she stops at that\nintersection automatically when driving, but most people don't know what to do there. She\nsaid visibility is not a problem and that it needs a four way stop.\nDenyse Trepanier, Bike Walk Alameda, said we are trying to make our streets safer. She\nsaid safety has to come as a higher priority than parking. She said every study shows that\n3", "path": "TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "TransportationCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 4, "text": "daylighting improves safety. She said a stop sign would be nice, but it would not remove\nthe need for daylighting.\nRichard Thomas said parking does not take precedence over safety, but that the\nintersection would still need a stop sign.\nJim Strehlow said that a similar situation happened in 2009 on Buena Vista. He said an\nargument was made that Safe Routes to Schools concerns could override the lack of\nwarrants for three stop signs that were desired. He said a similar argument could be made\nhere.\nChair Soules closed the public hearing.\nCommissioner Weitze asked what it would cost to conduct a new study of the intersection\ntoday.\nStaff Member Wikstrom said he does not have exact numbers, but suggested it would take\nseveral hundred dollars and several hours of staff time. He said for warrants they typically\ndo traffic counts, not speed surveys. He said speed surveys would add additional cost and\nstaff time. He cautioned the Commission that there are probably 50 intersections in town\nthat we could be having this exact same discussion about.\nChair Soules asked what it would take for the intersection to meet the warrants.\nStaff Member Wikstrom said there are two primary warrants that enter into the decision.\nHe said one was collision history. He said that if the collision warrant is met, they must be\nable to say that all other potential improvements have been made, including improving\nvisibility.\nCommissioner Kohlstrand said the attached policy emphasizes arterials and collectors.\nShe said that these are both local streets and asked if this is where we should be\nprioritizing improving visibility.\nStaff Member Wikstrom said that the crash history is sufficient to merit addressing visibility\nat the intersection. He said that would be a required step before consideration of installing\na four way stop where the traffic volumes do not meet the thresholds.\nCommissioner Kohlstrand asked if limiting the height of vehicles parked near the corner\ncould be the first step.\nStaff Member Wikstrom said that could be the first step, but they are recommending the\nparking space removal as well. He said this would enable them to say that all efforts have\nbeen exhausted if collisions continued to occur and there was a desire to install a four way\nstop sign in the future.\n4", "path": "TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "TransportationCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 5, "text": "Commissioner Yuen asked if there were other measures which could be taken to reduce\nspeeds and improve safety at the intersection without removing a parking space.\nStaff Member Wikstrom said that after education and enforcement, from an engineering\nstandpoint, improving visibility is the logical action to take to increase safety at the\nintersection.\nChair Soules asked if Alameda High School has any educational programs for their new\ndrivers to promote safe driving in the community.\nRochelle Wheeler, Senior Transportation Coordinator, said the Safe Routes to Schools\nprogram is looking to expand to High Schools and Alameda hopes to be one of the pilot\ncities for that program. She said she is not aware of any activities that are happening now\nat Alameda High.\nChair Soules asked if planning staff has evaluated residential permit parking policies.\nStaff Member Payne said that the neighborhood around the Harbor Bay Ferry Terminal\nhas implemented permit parking through their HOA. She said that it was resident initiated.\nCommissioner Kohlstrand said that there were discussions about the issue during her\ntenure on the Planning Board, but nothing was ever implemented.\nCommissioner Nachtigall said she visited the intersection to better understand the visibility\nand parking situation. She said she believed the daylighting would be helpful. She said\nthat need not contradict the possibility of a four way stop in the future.\nCommissioner Weitze asked Commissioner Nachtigall if she noticed any available parking\nin the area when she visited at 6:45 p.m.\nCommissioner Nachtigall said she saw one space on Walnut and several spots on San\nAntonio between Walnut and Willow.\nCommissioner Kohlstrand said that she understands the need for parking but needs to\ncome down on the side of safety. She said it is unfortunate that we have to wait until there\nare accidents before safety improvements are made or stop signs added. She added that\nshe understood that traffic engineers have to balance safety with the need to move people\nthrough an area.\nCommissioner Yuen thanked the residents for coming out and sharing how the loss of\nparking would impact their daily lives. She said she saw the issue as both/and not either/or.\nShe said we should increase visibility and reduce speeding. She said she would support\n5", "path": "TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "TransportationCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 6, "text": "daylighting the intersection and encouraging staff to look at other engineering options to\nslow traffic at the intersection.\nChair Soules said that she would support preserving parking and limiting height of\nvehicles, but does not think that is sufficient, noting that many children are shorter than\ncars. She said the tradeoff between improved safety and visibility against the\ninconvenience of having to park further away is a necessary one.\nChair Soules made a motion to approve the staff recommendation. Commissioner\nKohlstrand seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0.\n5-B 2019-7282\nDiscuss Tsunami Awareness\nCaptain Sharon Oliver, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator, gave a presentation. The staff\nreport\nand\nattachments\ncan\nbe\nfound\nat:\nttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4139806&GUID=969322E6-\n5B51-43F1-A87A-OCDD2C2C9F09&FullText=1\nCommissioner Yuen asked what level of coordination there is with Oakland on this issue.\nCaptain Oliver said she does coordinate with her counterparts in Oakland and with both\npolice departments to coordinate evacuation plans.\nChair Soules asked how vulnerable populations that do not and cannot drive are being\naddressed.\nCaptain Oliver said we have our own shuttle and also partner with paratransit. She said\nthey are at the beginning of the conversation and are working on the transportation plan,\nbut it is not complete yet.\nChair Soules opened the public hearing.\nJim Strehlow said this is what he fears most about the overdevelopment in Alameda. He\nsaid we should know what the evacuation rates are of our exits and we should know how\nmany people will die because we have overpopulated the island. He said he remembers\nregular flooding events that created dangerous conditions for driving and most evacuation\nroutes are vulnerable to flooding.\nChair Soules closed the public hearing. Informational item, no action was taken.\n5-C 2019-7283\nRecommend City Council Adoption of Vision Zero Policy\nStaff Member Wheeler and Lisa Foster, Transportation Planner, gave a presentation. The\nstaff\nreport\nand\nattachments\ncan\nbe\nfound\nat:\n6", "path": "TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "TransportationCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 7, "text": " https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4139823&GUID=F4F57230-\nD1C1-4647-85B9-C4DCDEB6B4C7&FullText=1\nCommissioner Weitze asked if there are punitive or enforcement aspects to Vision Zero.\nStaff Member Foster said that increased enforcement is part of other cities' plans. She\nsaid San Francisco initially focused enforcement on locations and violations where\nfatalities and collisions were most likely.\nStaff Member Wheeler said she sees it as a data driven process to perhaps redistribute\nwhere enforcement occurs in order to have the most impact on behavior, rather than\nsimply increasing overall enforcement.\nCommissioner Weitze asked if reconsidering the standards and process for placement of\nstop signs was part of the Vision Zero process.\nStaff Member Wheeler said they have not looked at that as a standard to evaluate, given\nthat federal guidelines exist on stop sign placement.\nChair Soules opened the public hearing.\nJim Strehlow said NACTO implementation in San Francisco did not make him feel safer\nwhile cycling. He said it took him out of his way, compared to the older, more direct route.\nHe recalled a recent fatality in San Francisco on a NACTO redesigned intersection. He\nwarned the Commission not to believe that this would be a perfect solution.\nChair Soules closed the public hearing.\nCommissioner Kohlstrand said she supports the Vision Zero movement and looks forward\nto developing the policy.\nCommissioner Yuen said she strongly supports Vision Zero and is excited by the focus on\nequity. She said she would like to see a focus on design and engineering over\nenforcement, which can be punitive. She asked that the annual report be brought back to\nthe Transportation Commission.\nCommissioner Kohlstrand made a motion that the Vision Zero Policy be\nrecommended to the City Council with the amendment that the annual report come\nto the Transportation Commission. Commissioner Yuen seconded the motion. The\nmotion passed 5-0.\n5-D 2019-7284\nUpdate on Active Transportation Plan\n7", "path": "TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "TransportationCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 8, "text": "Staff Member Wheeler and Megan Wooley-Ousdahl, Toole Design, gave a presentation.\nThe\nstaff\nreport\nand\nattachments\ncan\nbe\nfound\nat:\nhttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4139824&GUID=46062EA4-\nSEOC-4F62-8938-8DC2CD9B2970&FullText=1\nCommissioner Yuen asked if the Technical Advisory Committee has changed to the\nCommunity Advisory Group.\nStaff Member Wheeler said that it has indeed changed to a Community Advisory Group.\nShe said they would still use the Vision Zero Task Force in order to gather technical\nfeedback.\nCommissioner Yuen asked how we were recruiting for the Community Advisory Group.\nStaff Member Wheeler said they are reaching out to people now from different groups and\ndemographics in the city to attempt to identify a diverse representation of the community.\nCommissioner Weitze asked why we are doing all the audits and data collection before a\nmajor piece of infrastructure like the Cross Alameda Trail is complete.\nStaff Member Wheeler said most of the data collection has been gathering the existing\ndata rather than generating new data. She said there are lots of other facilities and areas\nof the city that have identified issues that they want to move forward with. She said there\nwill be an automatic bike counter on the new trail which will provide an ongoing source of\ndata.\nChair Soules asked how the survey sample size will ensure an accurate representation\nand not oversample or under sample certain populations.\nMs. Wooley-Ousdahl said the community survey would be statistically significant with a\nprofessional research firm that has methods to ensure a proper sample. She added that\nthe focus groups would be another area where they can be very deliberate about who they\nreach out to for input.\nChair Soules said that equity in lifestyle, not just demographics, is important to achieve a\ntrue mix of Alamedans, and that transparency in that area will be important.\nCommissioner Nachtigall said she is not sure that what is described as a focus group is a\ntrue focus group.\nStaff Member Wheeler explained the way staff envisioned conducting the focus groups\nwith specialized subsets of people such as park users, business groups, or disabled\nresidents.\n8", "path": "TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "TransportationCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 9, "text": "Commissioner Weitze asked if the survey results would be broken out by renter versus\nhomeowner.\nStaff Member Wheeler said that is not something that has been looked at yet for this\nsurvey, but that staff can consider it further.\nCommissioner Kohlstrand said that transit should be considered as part of the assessment\nin how pedestrians and bicyclists access the city.\nStaff Member Wheeler said that connections with transit are part of their analysis.\nCommissioner Kohlstrand said we should take care to ensure that the West End and Bay\nFarm are adequately represented in the surveys.\nChair Soules suggested having events at mode connections would be a good way to\ncapture folks and get information on the first and last mile issues.\nCommissioner Yuen said capturing input from disadvantaged and underrepresented\ncommunities comes in multiple forms, including geographic areas that lack active\ntransportation facilities, looking at collision data for areas that are disproportionately\nimpacted, and looking at demographics such as income, race, ethnicity, and age. She said\nshe appreciates the many ways people can get involved in the planning process.\nCommissioner Weitze suggested the West End Art Walk as a good place to find survey\nparticipants.\n6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS\n6-A 2019-7285 Status Report on Activities Related to Transportation Policies and Plans\nStaff Member Payne gave an update. The report can be found\nat:\nhttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4139839&GUID=BF2758A2-\n715F-42CD-9795-E9BA6541F532\nStaff Member Wheeler said the expected opening of the Cross Alameda Trail segment\nunder construction is now slated for December. She reported on the theft of the Cycles of\nChanges storage truck from outside of Maya Lin School, and their fundraising appeal in\norder to get back in service.\nStaff Member Wikstrom explained that the bike lanes on Pacific from Main Street to 4th\nStreet would be delayed due to federal funding requirements and the language in the\nenvironmental clearance.\n6-B Potential Future Meeting Agenda Items\n1. Citywide Parking Management Plan - Expansion for Alameda Point and Ferry\nTerminals\n9", "path": "TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}
{"body": "TransportationCommission", "date": "2019-09-25", "page": 10, "text": "2. Electric Vehicle Adoption\n3. Line 19 Promotional Program Evaluation\n4. Long-term Goals and Objectives for AC Transit Service in Alameda\n7. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PUBLIC COMMENT\nJim Strehlow told a story of bicycling in the park above the Transbay Terminal on a quiet\nSaturday morning. He said multiple police officers stopped him for riding his bicycle even\nthough there was no signage saying it was not allowed. He asked if this body was the right\nplace to find out if cycling was permitted there or not, since he has not had success getting\nresponses from AC Transit in the past.\n8. ADJOURNMENT\nChair Soules adjourned the meeting at 9:44 p.m.\n10", "path": "TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf"}