{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 1, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY-JUNE 19, 2018- 5:00 P.M.\nMayor Spencer convened the meeting at 5:02 p.m.\nRoll Call -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie, Vella and\nMayor Spencer - 5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nThe meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:\n(18-354) Public Employee Appointment/Hiring Pursuant to Government Code \u00a7 54957;\nTitle/description of positions to be filled: Acting City Manager and City Manager\n(18-355) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code section\n54956.8); Property: Northwest Territories, Alameda Point; City Negotiators: Elizabeth D.\nWarmerdam, Acting City Manager; and Jennifer Ott, Director of Base Reuse &\nTransportation Planning; Potential Tenant: East Bay Regional Park District; Issue Under\nNegotiation: Real Property Negotiations Price and Terms of Payment.\nFollowing the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk\nannounced that regarding Public Employee Appointment/Hiring and Real Property\ndirection was given to staff and no vote was taken.\nAdjournment\nThere being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 6:47 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 2, "text": "MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY--JUNE 19, 2018- 7:00 P.M.\nMayor Spencer convened the meeting at 7:06 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.\nROLL CALL -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie,\nVella, and Mayor Spencer - 5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nAGENDA CHANGES\nNone.\nPROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS\n(18-356) Presentation by the College of Alameda on the New Center for Liberal Arts\nBuilding.\nTimothy Karas, College of Alameda gave a Power Point presentation.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\n(18-357) Phillip Redd, Alameda, stated cannabis businesses not located in Alameda\ndeliver to Alameda and will put Alameda's one dispensary out of business.\n(18-358) Phillip James, Alameda, stated Alameda is fortunate to have Vice Mayor Vella;\nCouncil and staff need to work together for a shared future and the collective good.\nCONSENT CALENDAR\nMayor Spencer announced the legal notices contract [paragraph no. 18-364 was\nremoved from the Consent Calendar for discussion.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.\nCouncilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote\n- 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph\nnumber.]\n(*18-359) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on May 15,\n2018, and the Special City Council Meeting on May 18, 2018. Approved.\n(*18-360) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,812,847.18.\n(*18-361) Recommendation to Award a Three-Year Contract to Maze & Associates\nAccountancy Corporation (Maze) for an Amount Not to Exceed $437,023, including\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n1\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 3, "text": "Contingency, with the Option of Two One-Year Extensions, for a Total Five-Year\nExpenditure Not to Exceed $737,877, including Contingency, for Independent Auditing\nServices. Accepted.\n(*18-362) Recommendation to Approve the City of Alameda Investment Policy. Accepted.\n(*18-363) Recommendation to Authorize the Acting City Manager to Execute an\nAmendment to the Agreement with Susan Mayer, to Extend the Term by Nine Months\nand Increase Compensation in an Amount Not to Exceed $50,000, for a Total Agreement\nCompensation Not to Exceed $124,998, for Financial Services in Connection with\nCompleting the Implementation of the Cost Allocation Plan and Indirect Cost Rate\nProposal (ICRP). Accepted.\n(18-364) Recommendation to Award a Contract for the Publication of Legal Notices to the\nAlameda Journal for Fiscal Year 2018-19.\nThe City Clerk gave a brief presentation.\nStated the Alameda Journal is looking forward to being able to work with the City again:\nJulie Bouslog, Alameda Journal/Bay Area News Group.\nMayor Spencer inquired whether staff recommends the Alameda Journal this year, to\nwhich the City Clerk responded in the affirmative.\nVice Mayor Vella stated factual reporting is really important; it is a bit ironic that the City\nhas a contract with a paper that has sloppy reporting; she has a problem spending public\ndollars for said reason; she was disconcerted only two bids were submitted.\nCouncilmember Oddie concurred with Vice Mayor Vella; stated there is nothing\nresponsible about the Bay Area News Group; he would much rather have public money\ngo to a local newspaper.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved approval of awarding the legal advertising contract to\nthe Alameda Sun.\nVice Mayor Vella seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion and in response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the City\nClerk stated there have been some publication errors with the Alameda Sun.\nDennis Evanosky, Alameda Sun, addressed the publication errors; stated out of 132 legal\nads placed by the City, there were three mistakes; expressed apologies; stated he will\nhave someone on staff, or himself, do more thorough review to avoid any mistakes in the\nfuture.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City and Council must do its part to support local\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n2\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 4, "text": "businesses.\nMayor Spencer stated that she will support the Alameda Sun; she appreciates its support\nof the City.\nOn the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\n(*18-365) Recommendation to Authorize the Acting City Manager to Execute a Sixth\nAmendment to the Emergency Medical Services First Responder Advanced Life Support\nand Ambulance Transport Service Agreement with the County of Alameda to Extend the\nAgreement to June 30, 2023 with an Option to Extend for an Additional Five-Year Period.\nAccepted.\n(*18-366) Recommendation to Accept the Finalized 2018-2019 City Council Workplan.\nAccepted.\nREGULAR AGENDA ITEMS\n(18-367) Resolution No. 15390, \"Appointing Robert Barde as a Member of the Civil\nService Board.' Adopted;\n(18-367A) Resolution No. 15391, \"Reappointing Marguerite Malloy as a Member of the\nCivil Service Board.' Adopted;\n(18-367B) Resolution No. 15392, \"Reappointing Elizabeth Kenny as a Member of the\nCommission on Disabilities.' Adopted;\n(18-367C) Resolution No. 15393, \"Appointing Leslie Morrison as a Member of the\nCommission on Disabilities.\" Adopted;\n(18-367D) Resolution No. 15394, \"Reappointing Edward Downing as a Member of the\nGolf Commission.' Adopted;\n(18-367E) Resolution No. 15395, \"Appointing Alvin Lau as a Member of the Historical\nAdvisory Board.' Adopted;\n(18-367F) Resolution No. 15396, \"Appointing Bachir Hadid as a Member of the Housing\nAuthority Board of Commissioners.\" Adopted;\n(18-367G) Resolution No. 15397, \"Reappointing Sandra Kay as a Member of the Housing\nAuthority Board of Commissioners.' Adopted;\n(18-367H) Resolution No. 15398, \"Reappointing Stuart Rickard as a Member of the\nHousing Authority Board of Commissioners.' Adopted;\n(18-3671) Resolution No. 15399, \"Reappointing Amber Bales as a Member of the Library\nBoard.\" Adopted;\n(18-367J) Adoption of Reappointing Audrey Hyman as a Member of the Social Service\nHuman Relations Board.' Not adopted; and\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n3\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 5, "text": "(18-367K) Resolution No. 15400, \"Reappointing Sherice Youngblood as a Member of the\nSocial Service Human Relations Board.' Adopted.\nCouncilmember Oddie requested the resolution appointing Ms. Hyman be separate.\nCouncilmember Oddie moved adoption of the remaining resolutions.\nCouncilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote\n- 5.\nMayor Spencer inquired whether there is motion to apppoint Ms. Hyman, then withdrew\nthe question; stated the appointees could be sworn in.\nThe City Clerk administered the oath of office and presented certificates of appointment\nto Mr. Barde, Ms. Kenny, Ms. Morrison, Mr. Lau, Ms. Hadid, Ms. Kay, and Mr. Rickard.\n(18-368) Mayor's State of the City Address.\nMayor Spencer gave a Power Point presentation.\n***\nMayor Spencer called a recess at 7:59 p.m. to hold the special joint meeting and\nreconvened the meeting at 9:12 p.m.\n***\n(18-369) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15402, \"Amending Master Fee\nResolution No. 12191 to Add and Revise Fees, Including a Rent Stabilization Program\nLate Fee.\" Adopted.\nThe Finance Director gave a brief presentation.\nMayor Spencer inquired whether the business license late fee is part of the master\nagreement, to which the Finance Director responded in the affirmative; stated the late fee\nis 10% per month, not to exceed 60%.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether it is possible to stipulate that the late fee\nassessed cannot be passed on to the tenant.\nThe Assistant City Attorney responded an ordinance amendment would be needed to\nmake the stipulation.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the tenant has no control over whether the fee is\npaid in a timely manner; asked staff to come back with an amendment.\nThe City Attorney stated the rent fee is capped at a 5% increase; the landlord's costs are\nnot delineated; whether or not there could be pass-throughs was previously discussed;\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n4\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 6, "text": "late fees are not the fault of the tenant, and neither is increase in utilities.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated a pass-through was considered at one point; waiting\nuntil after the November election might be prudent.\nThe Finance Director continued presentation.\nMayor Spencer inquired what the 10% per month is based on, to which the Finance\nDirector responded the 10% late fee is the same as late fee for business licenses; stated\nstaff proposed the fee to entice on-time payment; it can be changed if Council desires.\nMayor Spencer stated that she thinks 10% per month is high and cannot support it.\nVice Mayor Vella inquired how the 10% per month was decided.\nThe Finance Director responded the 10% fee mirrors the business license late fee; stated\ntwo years ago, the late fee was brought to Council; other cities surveyed to determine\nAlameda's late fee; the fee can be changed if Council does not think 10% is appropriate.\nVice Mayor Vella inquired whether the types of businesses are differentiated, such as\nhome-based businesses, and are being impacted by the fee structure.\nThe Finance Director responded the fee varies depending on the business type and\ncategory it falls under; stated there are a variety of taxes; in some cases, the tax depends\non gross receipts; whether the business is in a home or office does not matter.\nVice Mayor Vella inquired how long ago the fee was voted on, to which the Finance\nDirector the last vote was in 1965.\nIn response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Finance Director stated the 10% fee is not\nconsidered a tax and was approved by Council.\nMayor Spencer stated that she wants to make sure it is clear that the 10% late fee was\nnot voted on by the people.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.\nCouncilmember Oddie seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion, Mayor Spencer stated credit card fees average 16%, compared to the\n60% in six months for the rent business license late fee.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the purpose of the fee is to help fund the program\nin order to serve tenants and landlords; the fee is meant to incentivize timely payments;\nshe supports the fee.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n5\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 7, "text": "- 1.\n(18-370) Public Hearing to Establish the Proposition 4 (Appropriations) Limit for Fiscal\nYear (FY) 2018-19 and Resolution No. 15403, \"Establishing the Appropriations Limit for\nFY 2018-19.' Adopted.\nThe Finance Director gave a brief presentation.\nCouncilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice\nvote - 5.\n(18-371) Public Hearing to Consider Collection of Delinquent Integrated Waste\nManagement Accounts Via the Property Tax Bills.\nThe Finance Director gave a brief presentation.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion, Mayor Spencer inquired whether there has been any contact from\nowners regarding their ability to pay, to which the Finance Director responded in the\nnegative.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft noted the list seems shorter than in previous years.\nOn the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\n(18-372) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15404, \"Approving the Engineer's\nReport, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering the Levy of Assessments,\nMaintenance Assessment District 01-1 (Marina Cove). Adopted.\nThe Public Works Coordinator gave a brief presentation.\nCouncilmember Vella moved adoption of the resolution\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n6\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 8, "text": "Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice\nvote - 5.\n(18-373) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15405, \"Approving the Engineer's\nReport, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering the Levy of Assessments,\nIsland City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2, All Zones.\" Adopted.\nCouncilmember Matarrese recused himself and left the dais.\nThe Public Works Coordinator gave a brief presentation.\nIn response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Public Works Coordinator stated services\nhave been right-sized to match the total maximum assessment instead of having a one-\ntime contribution as presented in May.\nCouncilmember Oddie suggested separating assessments in future reports when a\nCouncilmember has to recuse themselves.\nCouncilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice\nvote - 4. [Absent: Councilmember Matarrese - 1.]\n(18-374) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Purchase and Sale Agreement with 1703\nGrand LLC, for the Former Fire Station #3, Located at 1703 Grand Street, Alameda, CA\nfor a Total of $800,000. [In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),\nthis project is Categorically Exempt under the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (c) -\nExisting Facilities and 15312 (Surplus Government Property Sales). ] [Requires Four\nAffirmative Votes]; Introduced; and\n(18-374A) Recommendation to Authorize the Use of the Proceeds from the Sale of the\nAbove Property, Net of Prior $450,000 Budget Allocation and Closing Transaction Costs,\nto Be Used for Partial Repayment of an Equipment Replacement Internal Service Fund\nLoan.\nThe Assistant Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.\nVice Mayor Vella stated correspondence relative to the property sale addressed the need\nfor affordable housing; inquired what the process was and whether other parcels have\nbeen identified.\nThe Assistant Community Development Director responded the site was considered for\nrefugee housing, but was not suitable; stated the shell structure has to be kept; there are\nlimits on what could be done with zoning and historic designation.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n7\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 9, "text": "Ted Anderson, Cushman and Wakefield, stated instruction and direction was sought from\nthe Planning Board and the Historical Advisory Board; the recommendation was the\nhighest and best use for the property is single-family or duplex; the structure cannot be\ndemolished.\nVice Mayor Vella stated the City is in a unique position and has property throughout the\nCity; would like to consider any other parcels.\nThe Assistant Community Development Director stated there was a request to look at\nother City property for potential development for affordable housing; staff is looking at the\nproperties right now.\nStated land is one of the most expensive items to build affordable housing: she thinks\nit\nis bordering on criminal to give the property away and a sad use of public land; the\nproblem of affordable housing cannot be solved; urged Council to look beyond for a\nsolution: Catherine Pauling, Alameda.\nVice Mayor Vella stated that she is willing to move forward with conditions; the City owns\nland and other parcels across the City, which need to be added to the affordable housing\nstock; part of the money is already allocated in the budget for the EOC; the project will\ncreate two housing units; she understands it is cost and structurally prohibited for the\nhistoric aspect; she would like funds to be used to help build more affordable housing\nunits.\nCouncilmember Oddie concurred with Vice Mayor Vella; stated that he wishes more could\nhave been done with the property; he supports the agreement as long as Vice Mayor\nVella's conditions are included in the motion.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated seeking sources and sites for affordable housing is\nalways on-going; she does not think there is any money left over from the sale to go\ntowards affordable housing; the proceeds should be used to pay down loans for the new\nFire Station 3 and EOC.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved approval of authorizing the sale [introduction of the\nordinance] and use of the proceeds to pay down the costs of the EOC, and examining\nother City properties for the purpose of developing affordable housing units.\nVice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\n(18-375) Recommendation to Determine Council's Interest in Authoring a Ballot Argument\nAgainst the Initiative Measure that Proposes to Amend the City Charter by Incorporating\ninto the Charter, Ordinance 3148 Rent Stabilization and Limitations on Evictions, with\nCertain Modifications on the November 6, 2018 Ballot.\nThe City Clerk gave a brief presentation.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n8\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 10, "text": "Councilmember Oddie moved approval of Council drafting and signing a ballot argument\nin opposition to the initiative.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired who would draft the ballot argument, to which\nCouncilmember Oddie stated Council would assign a subcommittee to draft the\nargument; his motion is moot if not all Councilmembers plan to sign the ballot argument.\nMayor Spencer stated that she does not plan on signing; it is appropriate to have a\nsubcommittee, which is how it has been done in the past; she does not recall the last\nballot argument coming back to Council; discussed a ballot argument drafted by\nCouncilmembers Oddie and Ezzy Ashcraft, which she and Councilmember Daysog were\nnot able to sign.\nCouncilmember Matarrese stated there is enough time to bring a draft back to the Council\nat the next meeting; inquired whether Council would be able to see a draft of a ballot\nargument before Council votes on it; suggested assigning a subcommittee tonight and\nbring something back at the next meeting on July 10th; stated if approved, it can be\nsubmitted on July 11th.\nThe City Clerk responded the July 10th Council packet is published next Thursday, June\n28th; stated the ballot argument is typically kept confidential until the deadline; noted\nCouncil would be showing its cards if drafted in open session.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she likes the subcommittee idea; asked if Vice\nMayor Vella would consider authoring the ballot argument with her.\nIn response to Vice Mayor Vella's inquiry, the City Clerk stated three measures were on\nthe last ballot; two were City measures and one was an initiative measure.\nMayor Spencer stated there was a process; a subcommittee allows Councilmembers to\nsign the ballot argument in the Clerk's office.\nThe City Clerk listed the authors of past arguments; stated the argument against the\ninitiative measure, M1, was signed by Mayor Spencer and Councilmember Daysog; the\nrent stabilization measure, L1, argument in favor was signed by Councilmembers Ezzy\nAshcraft and Oddie.\nMayor Spencer stated she recalled not being able to sign the L1 argument.\nThe City Clerk stated Measure the Utility Modernization Act (UMA), K1, was authored by\nMayor Spencer and signed by Vice Mayor Matarrese.\nCouncilmember Matarrese stated he has no problem drafting an argument in a public\nsession.\nVice Mayor Vella inquired how many days prior to the meeting is the filing deadline, to\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n9\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 11, "text": "which the City Clerk responded one day.\nVice Mayor Vella stated drafting an argument should be done publicly; the goal is to have\nall Councilmembers put out something that is united.\nThe City Clerk stated the subcommittee could have more time if a special meeting is\nscheduled and the agenda would not have to be published until July 3rd.\nVice Mayor Vella stated the point is the published document might not be the final draft;\nthis is Council's ordinance that is being challenged; she is fine with the process.\nThe City Clerk stated if Council authors a rebuttal argument, it will not have the same\nluxury of coming back at a regular meeting; a decision would have to be made regarding\nthe rebuttal.\nMayor Spencer inquired whether the decision on a rebuttal argument could be resolved\nat the July 10th meeting, to which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated he is fine with having a special meeting to give more time,\nbut he will not volunteer to be on the subcommittee; who will sign the argument should\nbe decided today.\nIn response to Vice Mayor Vella's inquiry, Mayor Spencer stated that she does not intend\nto sign anything until she can review the language; she was not given the same\nopportunity last time.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Councilmember Matarrese and Vice Mayor Vella\nwould be a great team.\nCouncilmember Matarrese and Vice Mayor Vella agreed to be on the subcommittee.\nStated that she is happy that Council would write an argument; a number of laws are\nchanging at the State level; discussed the need for data collection: Catherine Pauling,\nAlameda.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of directing the subcommittee to draft a\nballot argument in opposition; inquired whether the subcommittee would also draft the\nrebuttal.\nCouncilmember Matarrese stated he is fine with drafting the rebuttal; Councilmembers do\nnot have to sign the argument if they do not like it.\nCouncilmember Oddie inquired whether Councilmembers would have the first right of\nrefusal to sign both, to which Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded in the affirmative.\nVice Mayor Vella stated the City Clerk could lay out the structure and notify\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n10\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 12, "text": "Councilmembers if they would like to sign the rebuttal without violating the Brown Act.\nThe City Clerk stated the documents could be left in Clerk's office for individual signatures.\nIn response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, the City Clerk stated the purpose of the\nrebuttal is to respond to the argument submitted in favor.\nThe City Clerk clarified that Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's motion is to designate the\nsubcommittee to draft a direct argument which will come back to Council on July 10th, and\nauthor a rebuttal, and Councilmembers have first right of refusal to sign both arguments.\nCouncilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\nCITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS\nNone.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\nNone.\nCOUNCIL REFERRALS\n(18-376) Consider Directing Staff to Provide Background Information on the Crab Cove\nProperty Prior to Any Council Actions on the Property. (Mayor Spencer)\nMayor Spencer made brief comments regarding the referral.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she received a summary of the history of the\nproperty and has the information needed to make a decision that would come before\nCouncil in the future.\nVice Mayor Vella stated that she is trying to understand the request; inquired whether the\nreferral is for questions raised by various groups to be answered and supporting\ninformation to be provided.\nMayor Spencer responded in the affirmative; stated that she is looking for a\ncomprehensive timeline, to know when the property went from one parcel to two parcels,\nand any other action that was taken regarding the property.\nIn response to Vice Mayor Vella's inquiry, the Assistant City Attorney stated staff has\ndone preliminary research and will conduct additional research to verify facts.\nVice Mayor Vella stated there are some questions the Council cannot consider as a body;\ninquired whether questions were posed to other bodies that have authority or jurisdiction.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n11\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 13, "text": "The Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated Mayor Spencer wants a\ncomplete picture of what has happened to date; the City Attorney's office is verifying the\ninformation regarding when the federal government parcels were separated.\nThe City Attorney stated her office can do as much research as the Council directs;\nit\nsounds like more of an information piece; Council is asking staff to do more research than\nwhat has already been done; the Assistant City Attorney is advising there is a lot of work\nto be done and staff cannot control the responses.\nCouncilmember Matarrese stated information is already on the City's website in the form\nof Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's); it is important to provide the public information\non what actions are taken by whom in a timeline; the City does not need to involve the\nGeneral Services Administration (GSA); Council has heard input on what should be\nincluded in the staff report; there is no need to do anything more.\nMayor Spencer stated she would like staff to reach out to the federal government so the\ninformation could be requested regarding the parcels; it would be great idea to add to the\nFAQs but she would like staff to go farther back; it would be good to have Council weigh\nin.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she cannot support the referral; there is no\nobligation for the City to do the homework for the opponents; the information has already\nbeen provided and will come back to Council in the form of a staff report; she does not\nsee the need to burden legal staff.\nVice Mayor Vella stated that she views the referral as giving staff the opportunity to have\na conversation about the types of information various Councilmembers are hoping to have\nwhen the item comes back; she does not want to create unnecessary work; there is a\nneed to provide services for homeless and homeless veterans; if there are going to be\ndifferent challenges, the City would need to have answers to challenges; she trusts\ninformation is being reviewed by staff; the FAQs are helpful since information is coming\nfrom other agencies; letting the public know that the City has requested the information\nis being transparent; Council should be cognizant of the Council's jurisdiction on the\nissue.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated there is a lot of time for all the pertinent questions to be\nanswered; homelessness was identified as the top issue during the priority setting\nworkshop two years ago and again this year; there is an opportunity to approve a project\nthat could meet homeless needs and he would like to do so; connecting homeless people\nwith services is the best thing that can be done; hopefully, when a Councilmember has\nquestions, the questions will be answered.\nMayor Spencer stated Council is agreeable to reach out to the different agencies; it is\nappropriate to confirm what other organizations are saying.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved approval of referring the matter to staff to start\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n12\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 14, "text": "gathering information as soon as practical; in preparation of the staff report which will\naccompany the City Council action related to the referral, there should be a timeline that\nincludes the decision points and who makes the decision.\nThe Acting City Manager stated the City Attorney's office provided a lot of information and\ndid a lot of research; more research is being requested and staff just wants to make sure\nthe Council is okay with staff spending the additional time to provide the information.\nThe City Attorney stated staff worked with Community Development to put together what\nwould happen going forward; staff is now being asked to research historic information\nabout the parcel which the City does not have; the parcel separation was done by the\nfederal government; staff will do its best to gather and provide the information.\nMayor Spencer clarified that she wrote the referral before knowing the City Attorney's\noffice did any research; the historic information she is requesting dates back to 2008.\n(18-377) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider remaining items.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved approval.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice\nvote - 5.\nIn response to Vice Mayor Vella's inquiry, Councilmember Matarrese stated the\ninformation he is looking for is what steps have to happen when a G-overlay comes before\nCouncil; the information is not for the Council, but for the public so they know and\nunderstand what is happening; he does not see the need to go back for further research\nexcept in the staff report, which will be published before action is taken.\nThe City Attorney stated staff has already provided the timeline Councilmember\nMatarrese described.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated the matter will probably come up in December; the City\nAttorney's office could decide what to do knowing the question will be asked.\nThe Acting City Manager stated the matter is not on the work plan for December.\nThe City Attorney stated that she hears Councilmember Oddie and does not ignore\nCouncil requests.\nMayor Spencer stated her referral goes to wanting to know the history of the ownership\nof the property dating back to 2008 when the people voted on Measure WW; it is important\nto request the information from the other agencies even if there is no response; inquired\nwhether her referral is included in the motion.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n13\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 15, "text": "Councilmember Matarrese responded that his motion assumes that the historical\ninformation would be included in the staff report when it comes to Council for action.\nVice Mayor Vella stated there has been significant direction; the City Attorney's office\nknows the expectation to include the information in the staff report and that the matter will\ncome up.\nMayor Spencer inquired whether Vice Mayor Vella's comments could be added as a\nfriendly amendment to Councilmember Matarrese's motion, to which Councilmember\nMatarrese responded in the affirmative.\nVice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the motion carried by the\nfollowing voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Matarrese, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 3.\nNoes: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft - 1. Abstention: Councilmember Oddie - 1.\n(18-378) Consider Directing Staff to Prioritize Efforts to Increase Safety and Reduce\nCrime. (Mayor Spencer)\nCouncilmember Matarrese questioned who would vote against increasing safety and\nreducing crime; stated that he believes Alameda is already doing this.\nCouncilmember Oddie concurred with Councilmember Matarrese; stated violent crime\nhas not increased; people might or might not attribute a slight increase to Proposition 47;\npeople should not get caught up in the statistics, which should not be relied upon to prove\na point.\nVice Mayor Vella stated that she supports reducing crime but draws the line at fourth\namendment protections and civil rights; she does not support the referral if it is to bolster\nsupport for expediting the cameras; the conversation still needs to be had and is already\non the agenda; at the budget workshop, the Council heard from the Police Chief that the\nPolice department will be at full staffing.\nMayor Spencer stated that she brought the referral because she believes efforts to reduce\ncrime an increase safety should be prioritized; she understands the matter was going to\ncome back in December and was moved up.\nThe Acting City Manager noted the Automated License Plate readers would come back\nto Council.\nMayor Spencer stated the matter should come back as soon as possible.\nThe Acting City Manager stated the matter would come back on September 4th\n(18-379) Consider Directing Staff to Draft an Ordinance Banning the Use of Gas-Powered\nLeaf Blowers. (Mayor Spencer).\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n14\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 16, "text": "Mayor Spencer made brief comments regarding the referral.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved approval of the referral.\nVice Mayor Vella seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she appreciates giving the\nreferral a low priority; she does not want to take Police off the street to pursue leaf blower\nissues.\nThe Public Works Director stated an in-house team has convened to talk through the\nreferral; 19 cities have banned gas leaf blowers; five cities have banned both [gas and\nelectric]; 60 cities have timed usage; there were three Code Enforcement complaints\nregarding leaf blowers in the last 10 years; enforcement would be the challenge; the\nRecreation and Parks Department has already implemented a mini pilot program with\nelectric leaf blowers; an explicit bullet point in scope of work in the Climate Plan requires\noutreach this fall and winter; staff recommends the Climate Plan be the vehicle to move\nthe issue.\nVice Mayor Vella stated the issue could be part of the Climate Plan; a more effective\napproach would be to educate people first rather than just have a ban from the start.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated incentivizing is a good, softer approach; there should be\noutreach to the industry rather than just doing a ban.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated gas leaf blowers are not healthy for people and the\nenvironment; partnering with local businesses that might offer electric blowers would be\ngood; outreach should be bi-lingual.\nMayor Spencer inquired when the item would come back to Council, to which the Public\nWorks Director responded a first draft of the plan could be back in January or February.\nMayor Spencer stated that she is concerned the issue is just one component; the Climate\nAction Plan covers many things; she is not sure leaf blowers can be packaged with the\nPlan; inquired whether the Plan could be expedited, to which the Public Works Director\nresponded in the negative.\nVice Mayor Vella stated the referral is listed as a low priority; having it come back in six\nor seven months is fairly fast.\nOn the call for the question, the motion carried by the unanimous voice vote - 5.\nCOUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\n(18-380) Designation of Voting Delegates and Alternates for the League of California\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n15\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 17, "text": "Cities Annual Conference.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved approval of designating Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft\nas the voting delegate and Councilmember Oddie and Vice Mayor Vella as alternates.\nMayor Spencer seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\n(18-381) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Civil Service Board,\nCommission on Disabilities, Golf Commission, Historical Advisory Board, Housing\nAuthority Board of Commissioners, Library Board, Planning Board, Public Utilities Board\n(PUB), Recreation and Parks Commission, Social Service Human Relations Board and\nTransportation Commission.\nMayor Spencer nominated Shelby Sheehan for appointment to the PUB and Adrienne\nAlexander and Eric Robbins for appointment to the Recreation and Parks Commission.\n(18-382) Vice Mayor Vella announced that she attended the Alameda County Lead\nAbatement Board meeting; stated there was a first-ever soil sampling booth; 47% of the\nsamples showed medium lead contamination, which is alarming.\n(18-383) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to continue the meeting past 11:00\np.m.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of continuing the meeting.\nVice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote- - 5.\n(18-384) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the League of California Cities will oppose\nthe lead paint initiative; gave a brief summary of the League's Policy Committee\ndiscussion on affordable housing.\nADJOURNMENT\n(18-385) There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 11:06\np.m. in memory of Carl Halpern.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n16\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 18, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE\nCITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY\nTO THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (SACIC)\nTUESDAY-JUNE 19, 2018- 7:01 P.M.\nMayor/Chair Spencer convened the meeting at 7:59 p.m.\nROLL CALL -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers/Commissioners\nEzzy\nAshcraft,\nMatarrese, Oddie, Vella and Mayor/Chair Spencer -\n5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nAGENDA ITEM\n(18-386 CC) Resolution No. 15401, \"Approving and Adopting the City of Alameda\nOperating and Capital Budget Mid-Cycle Update for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-19.\"\nAdopted;\n(18-007 SACIC) Resolution No. 18-01, \"Approving and Adopting the Successor Agency\nto the Community Improvement Commission (SACIC) Budget for FY 2018-19.\"\nAdopted;\n(18-386 A CC) Resolution No. 15406, \"Approving Workforce Changes in the Community\nDevelopment Department, Base Reuse and Transportation Planning Department, Fire\nDepartment and Information Technology Department.\" Adopted; and\n(18-387 CC) Resolution No. 15407, \"Amending the City of Alameda City Employees\nAssociation (ACEA) Salary Schedule and the Salary Schedule of the Executive\nManagement (EXME) Compensation Plan.\" Adopted.\nThe Acting City Manager made brief comments.\nThe Finance Director gave a Power Point presentation.\nIn response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Finance Director stated the difference of\nthe forecast is almost a $20 million swing, which is largely due to the transfer tax and\nproperty tax increases from new development.\nMayor Spencer stated that the growth in property taxes will continue on the same level\ncannot be assumed.\nThe Finance Director continued presentation.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council and Successor Agency\nto the Community Improvement Commission\n1\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 19, "text": "The Community Development Director stated direction was given at the May workshop\nto set up a three year pilot program with $500,000 for legal aid for low income renters;\nat the June 5th meeting, there were subsequent questions about whether or not the\nprogram would include other legal services; staff would like to confirm the direction,\nwhich is a legal aid program for low income renters.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there is a way means testing could be\ndone; stated it would be good to know if individual landlords could be limited by number\nof units, income and assets; stated landlords want to make sure they are abiding by the\nordinance.\nIn response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Community Development Director stated\nthe program administration staff gives direction to landlords and helps clarify what is\nneeded to be compliant with the ordinance; staff does not provide individual advice on\nindividual cases.\nVice Mayor Vella stated landlords can go to the Housing Authority to get clarification\nwithout violating the ordinance; having a separate office where tenants could get advice\nwould be helpful; the program should be bifurcated; inquired whether providers could\nlook at income levels before taking a case as part of the Request for Proposals (RFP).\nThe Community Development Director responded that she does not know how means\ntesting is done; she does not believe legal services attorneys would take landlord cases;\nif Council directs legal services be provided to both low income tenants and landlords,\nstaff would recommend doing more research on how the process would work on the\nlandlord side and move forward only with the tenant side at this time.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated the direction is clear that Council wants to assist tenants;\nhe does not understand why free legal service would be given to landlords when\ntenants need it.\nThe Acting City Manager stated the $500,000 in restricted fund balance is set aside;\nthere has been discussion of both landlord and tenant services; staff wants to get\nclarification on the direction.\nMayor Spencer stated Council agreed to allocate the money; suggested coming back to\ndiscuss the matter.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the topic to provide services to both landlords and\ntenants was raised and is valid to consider; landlords have access to legal services;\nthere are not enough resources so the focus should be on providing services to tenants.\nThe Community Development Director confirmed the direction is for staff to issue the\nRFP and come back to Council with a contract.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council and Successor Agency\nto the Community Improvement Commission\n2\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 20, "text": "Mayor Spencer inquired when the matter will come back to Council, to which the\nCommunity Development Director stated it would come back in October so staff could\nmove forward with the RFP.\nIn response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Community Development Director stated\nstaff could come back with a proposed contract regarding tenant services if the Council\ndesires.\nMayor Spencer stated Council should weigh in on the type of legal services offered.\nCouncilmember Matarrese stated Council is trying to level the playing field and will have\nan opportunity to do so when staff brings the contract back; the ball needs to get rolling.\nThe Finance Director continued presentation.\nCouncilmember Oddie inquired about the requirements to get the Fire Marshall position\nbuilt into the cost study.\nThe Deputy Fire Chief responded it is not appropriate to include the Fire Marshall\nposition; costs included are for personnel, equipment, response and amount of time it\ntakes for each activity.\nCouncilmember Oddie inquired how the position could be brought back without a cost\nstudy, to which the Acting City Manager responded staff is updating the Master Fee\nSchedule, which will be brought back in September.\nCouncilmember Oddie inquired how can cost recovery be included in the study without\nthe position, to which the Deputy Fire Chief responded he does not have an answer;\nstated the position cannot be included in the study since it does not exist.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated there will never be a cost recovery study until Council\nauthorizes the Fire Marshall position.\nThe Acting City Manager stated staff is able to develop the fee knowing there would be\nfuture cost.\nIn response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, the Deputy Fire Chief stated when the\ncost study is done this fall, it will not include the Fire Marshall position.\nIn response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, the Acting City Manager stated staff will\nlook into the issue and come back to Council.\nVice Mayor Vella questions whether it is possible for staff to include the position if\nCouncil has not supported putting the position in the existing budget.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council and Successor Agency\nto the Community Improvement Commission\n3\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 21, "text": "Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she met with the Deputy Fire Chief over some\npoints; the Fire Department is looking at an impressive list of measures and programs;\nseeing how everything materializes would be helpful, rather than basing an expenditure\non projected revenue increases; more information is needed.\nVice Mayor Vella inquired whether it is possible for Council to approve the position but\nnot fund it, to which the Acting City Manager responded more research needs to be\ndone; staff would need to talk to legal and understand what should come first; she\ncannot provide an answer tonight, but will come back with more information.\nCouncilmember Oddie inquired whether the budget needs to be approved tonight, to\nwhich the Acting City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the budget needs to\nbe adopted by June 30th\nThe Finance Director stated her request would be that Council adopt the budget and\nbring the Fire Marshall position back.\nMayor Spencer inquired how fire inspections were handled under the previous Fire\nChief and why it is an issue now.\nThe Deputy Fire Chief responded it is an issue because of the increase in the volume of\nthe work in the division; there was not much work in Fire Prevention under the previous\nChief; the department took a substantial hit and City services were cut because of the\ndownturn in the economy; the department is now working its way back, but work is\nincreasing faster than staffing.\nMayor Spencer stated perhaps non-sworn positions could do the inspections if the Fire\nDepartment is having trouble keeping up.\nThe Acting City Manager stated staff would need direction on the issue.\nMayor Spencer stated that she would like the item to come back; how to best utilize\nsworn fire firefighters to serve the community should be considered; she would like to\nreconsider non-sworn position to efficiently and effectively do inspections.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated the previous Chief did ask for the Fire Marshall position\nand it was turned down; the ghost ship fire in Oakland is a good example of the Fire\nDepartment being short staffed; he does not want to risk the safety of Alameda\nresidents with non-sworn people in the position.\nCouncilmember Matarrese stated the issues is important enough to come back with real\nnumbers; he would like to know the consequences of not having a Fire Marshall and\nother options.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council and Successor Agency\nto the Community Improvement Commission\n4\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 22, "text": "The Acting City Manager stated that she would like to make sure there is a consensus;\nthe task includes coming back with ways to pay for a Fire Marshall and addressing the\nnon-sworn issue.\nCouncilmember Matarrese stated said direction was given at the workshop; the Fire\nChief presented an ask with a promise that there would be money behind it and it was\ninsufficient.\nIn response to the Acting City Manager's inquiry regarding the non-sworn issue,\nCouncilmember Matarrese stated the issue could be left to the Chief's imagination;\nusing non-sworn is cheaper and could fit in the budget.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated he would not support that.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated there should be follow up with Chief on projected\nrevenue sources funding the position in perpetuity by the revenue sources; regarding\nthe sworn/non-sworn issue, the Chief should decide how he wants to allocate his\nresources; there is a lot of value in having a balanced budget right now; if the position is\nfunded by the revenue increases, she is ready to support, but it is premature at this\ntime.\nThe Finance Director continued the presentation.\nMayor Spencer stated annual activity expenses are higher than projected revenues by\n$8,000.\nThe Finance Director stated expenditures continue to grow; revenues are growing as\nwell, but just not at the same pace.\nMayor Spencer inquired whether reserves are being used to cover the $8,000, to which\nthe Finance Director stated the $8,000 will be drawn down.\nIn response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Acting City Manager stated the negative\n$8,000 is the difference between revenues and expenditures and does not affect\nreserves.\nMayor Spencer stated that she wants to underscore the projected budget shows\nexpenses are more than projected revenues.\nThe Acting City Manager stated $8,000 is next to nothing in a $100 million budget; the\nbudget does not include future development in Site A or the Northern Waterfront; many\nthings can be done to make sure by 2021 the City does not have a deficit of $5 million;\nthe City needs to continue to be conservative and diligent.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council and Successor Agency\nto the Community Improvement Commission\n5\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 23, "text": "Mayor Spencer stated the same could be said if Council accepts the mid-cycle budget\nrequests and does not make cuts.\nThe Acting City Manager stated the City has a balanced budget this year.\nThe Finance Director continued the presentation.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated he appreciates that other cities are using Alameda's\nCalPers policy as a model.\nThe Finance Director continued the presentation.\nExpressed appreciation to Council for approving funding for tenant legal services; stated\ntenants have no equity, credit, or ability to access legal assistance: Eric Strimling,\nAlameda Renters Coalition.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.\nMayor Spencer requested the motions be bifurcated.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution approving and adopting the\nCity of Alameda operating and capital budget mid-cycle update.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by the following\nvoice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Vella - 3. Noes:\nCouncilmember Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 2.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the SACIC budget resolution.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice\nvote - 5.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved adoption of approving the workforce changes.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by the following\nvoice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Vella - 3. Noes:\nMayor Spencer - 1. Abstention: Councilmember Oddie - 1.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved adoption of resolution approving the ACEA and\nEXME salary schedules.\nVice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:\nCouncilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie and Vella - 4. Noes: Mayor Spencer\n- 1.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council and Successor Agency\nto the Community Improvement Commission\n6\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2018-06-19", "page": 24, "text": "ADJOURNMENT\nThere being no further business, Mayor/Chair Spencer adjourned the meeting at 9:06\np.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk and Secretary, SACIC\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council and Successor Agency\nto the Community Improvement Commission\n7\nJune 19, 2018", "path": "CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf"}