{"body": "PensionBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 1, "text": "any\nMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING\nOF THE\nPENSION BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA\nHELD 4:30 P.M., JULY 25, 2016\nALAMEDA CITY HALL\n2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE, ALAMEDA\nCONFERENCE ROOM 391\n1.\nThe meeting was called to order by Chair Trish Herrera Spencer at 4:30 p.m.\n2.\nROLL CALL:\nPresent: Chair: Trish Herrera Spencer, Trustees: William Soderlund, Nancy\nElzig, and Nancy Bronstein, Absent: Bruce Edwards\nStaff: Geoffrey Buchheim, Financial Services Manager; Nafisah Ali,\nAdministrative Technician - Human Resources\n3.\nMINUTES:\nMember Bronstein noted the mistake on the April 25th Pension Board meeting\nminutes referencing Member Soderlund instead of Member Edwards being\nabsent from the July 25th Pension Board meeting and that it will be corrected.\nThe minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 25, 2016 was moved for approval by\nMember Elzig and seconded by Member Soderlund. Passed 3-0.\n4.\nAGENDAITEMS:\n4-A. Pension Payroll and Financial Reports - Quarter Ending June 30, 2016\nand City of Alameda Police & Fire Pension Funds Financial Reports for the\nPeriod Ending March 31, 2016.\nFinancial Services Manager, Geoffrey Buchheim summarized the quarterly and\nfiscal year totals. He noted that there is a slight increase for the June Pension\ndue to the quarterly payment of the Uniform Allowance. He also noted as of June\n30th, there are twenty-four (24) members in both 1079 and 1082 Pension Plans.", "path": "PensionBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PensionBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 2, "text": "City of Alameda\nMinutes of the Regular Meeting of the\nPension Board - Monday, July 25, 2016\nPage 2\nThere are eleven (11) in both Fire and Police 1079 Pension Plan and two (2)\nmembers in the 1082 Pension Plan.\nMember Soderlund moved to accept the financial statement as presented.\nMember Elzig seconded. Passed 3-0\n4-B. Memo regarding the death of 1079 Pensioner - Charles Roeder, Police\nOfficer, deceased 05/01/2016, and Consuelo Thompson (widow of Police\nCaptain Ivan Thompson) deceased 06/14/2016, was accepted with regret by\nMember Soderlund and seconded by Member Elzig. Passed 3-0.\nMayor Trish Spencer asked if condolence letters were sent. Administrative\nTechnician, Nafisah Ali confirmed letters were sent to both families.\n5.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT):\nThere was no communication from the public.\n6.\nPENSION BOARD COMMUNICATIONS (COMMUNICATIONS FROM BOARD):\nMember Elzig mentioned the death of Police Officer and former Pension Board\nmember, Robert Follrath and that his daughter, Beverly Johnson, was the former\nCity of Alameda Mayor. Member Soderlund commented that due to his illness, he\nhad made a motion to the Chief to see if he would step down and that is when\nBruce Edwards became part of the Pension Board member. Mayor Trish\nSpencer noted a meeting was adjourned in his name however, would like to send\na condolence letter to the family. Member Bronstein and Administrative\nTechnician, Nafisah Ali agreed to draft a letter to be sent on behalf of the City\nand Pension Board.\nMember Soderlund asked if condolence letters are sent to 1082 deceased\nPensioners. Administrative Technician, Nafisah Ali replied that since she's been\nwith the City she has only sent letters for deceased 1079 Pensioners. Member\nSoderlund commented that since most of the 1082 Pensioners transferred to\nPERS, which could be why letters are not sent.\nMember Elzig commented that during the time Robert Follrath was on the\nPension Board, it was a very active time when money was still being managed\nfor the Pension Plan and discussions on how to manage disability issues.\nMember Soderlund also noted how the Pension Plan wanted to have the City\ndeal with any disability issues. Member Bronstein stated the Human Resources\nDepartment reviews Industrial Disabilities and asked the Board if IDRs are\nsupposed to be reviewed by the Pension Board. Member Soderlund answered it\nshould not due to what was decided between the City and the Pension Plan.", "path": "PensionBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PensionBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 3, "text": "City of Alameda\nMinutes of the Regular Meeting of the\nPension Board - Monday, July 25, 2016\nPage 3\nMember Elzig mentioned how much Robert Follrath petitioned to install a\nseparate City flag pole in front of City Hall next to the existing American flag pole.\nThis flag pole would have been for City employees who have passed but the\nsecondary flag pole did not pass.\n7.\nADJOURNMENT:\nThere being no additional items to come before the board, the meeting was\nadjourned at 4:44 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nmembers\nNancy Bronstein\nHuman Resources Director", "path": "PensionBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 1, "text": "APPROVED MINUTES\nREGULAR MEETING OF THE\nCITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD\nMONDAY, JULY 25, 2016\n1. CONVENE\nPresident Knox White called the meeting to order at 7:00pm.\n2. FLAG SALUTE\nBoard Member K\u00f6ster led the flag salute.\n3. ROLL CALL\nPresent: President Knox White, Board Members Burton, Curtis, K\u00f6ster, Sullivan. Absent:\nBoard Members Mitchell, Zuppan.\n4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION\nItems 7-E and 7-F were continued to the September 12th meeting.\n5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS\n*None*\n6. CONSENT CALENDAR\n6-A 2016-3152\nAnnual Review: Alameda Landing Mixed Use Project Development\nAgreement Applicant: Catellus Alameda Development, LLC. The\napplicant requests a periodic review of two Development Agreements\nrelated to the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Residential Project and the\nAlameda Landing Mixed Use Commercial Project.\nBoard Member K\u00f6ster moved approval of the consent calendar. Board Member Sullivan\nseconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0.\n7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS\n7-A 2016-3156\nBoatworks Project, PLN15-0582 - 2235 Clement Avenue - Applicant:\nPhillip Banta. A Public Hearing to consider and take action on: 1) a\nrequest to approve Development Plan and Density Bonus applications for\nconstruction of 182 residential units and approximately two acres of open\nspace on 9.48-acres located at 2235 Clement Avenue, 2) a request to\napprove Design Review for the waterfront open space, and 3) a request\nfor a two year extension for Tentative Map #8060 originally approved in\n2011. An environmental impact report has been completed for the project\nin compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.\nApproved Minutes\nPage 1 of 11\nPlanning Board Meeting\nJuly 25, 2016", "path": "PlanningBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 2, "text": "Staff Member Thomas introduced the item. The staff report and attachments can be\nfound at:\nttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2782555&GUID=2BD7CA48-\n73CF-42CD-8752-D372F8001235&FullText=1\nBoard Member Curtis asked if the 30 guest parking spaces is in addition to parking for\npublic access to the waterfront.\nStaff Member Thomas said he would review the question while the applicant gave their\npresentation.\nPhillip Banta, project architect, gave a presentation on their project application and the\nprocess that brought them to this point.\nShona Armstrong, project attorney, spoke about the previous settlement agreement that\nthey are basing their position on. She said staff is misleading the Planning Board to\nabrogate rights of the property owner. She said there is no legal impediment to\nextending the tentative map. She said they hope not to be put back at square one if the\nboard approves the staff recommendations.\nStaff Attorney Brown said that the City no longer has any obligations under the\nsettlement agreement. She said the City Engineer sent a letter saying that he could not\nfind the tentative map from 2011 in substantial conformance with the final map that was\nsubmitted.\nBoard Member Curtis asked if they could submit a final map without a tentative map first.\nStaff Member Thomas said the City Council approved the tentative map in 2011 that\nrequired them to get the permits to fill the necessary portion of the bay. He said that\nBCDC condition was the very first condition in the 2011 approval.\nPresident Knox White opened the public hearing.\nDorothy Freeman said she has been commenting on this project for 15 years. She said\nthe new plans are different from the 2011 plan and cannot piggyback on that plan. She\nasked that the board deny the tentative map extension.\nRobert McGillis is a member of the project architect team. He said the settlement\nagreement had been the basis for their work up until just a few months ago when the\nCity decided not to recognize it any further. He said they are so close and would like to\nsee it happen.\nApproved Minutes\nPage 2 of 11\nPlanning Board Meeting\nJuly 25, 2016", "path": "PlanningBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 3, "text": "Sue Field said she likes the open space, but she is worried about the parking in the plan.\nShe said there is a lot of break ins of cars on that section of Clement. She said football\ngame nights will be a big problem. She said she would like to see stop signs on Clement\nat Elm and at Walnut. She said garages are used for storage, not parking cars.\nPresident Knox White closed the public hearing.\nStaff Member Thomas said the guests and visitors are included in the 30 spaces Board\nMember Curtis asked about, but that does not include the on street parking.\nBoard Member Sullivan asked how many parking spaces are included in the property not\nincluding public streets.\nStaff Member Thomas said there would be a minimum of 30 guest spaces and 1.5\nspaces per unit.\nBoard Member Curtis asked if safety aspects of traffic emergencies have been\nconsidered. He said that traffic backs us significantly today without this project.\nStaff Member Thomas said that in an emergency, police and fire would take control of\ngetting cars through intersections. He said they would likely create an all way stop at\nBlanding and Oak. He said the police and fire departments have reviewed and approved\nthe project.\nPresident Knox White said that he was disheartened by the fact that not much happened\nin the year since the last extension was approved.\nBoard Member Burton made a motion to deny the tentative map extension, per staff's\nrecommendation. Board Member Curtis seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0.\nPresident Knox White asked for clarification about whether they were being asked to\napprove a density bonus application tonight.\nStaff Member Thomas said we should modify condition #8 to clarify the number of 182\nunits are contingent upon the density bonus number of very low income units provided.\nHe said that without a functioning density bonus application with 13 very low units, the\nresolution would have to revert back to 140 units. He said they also need to do 6 low\nincome units and 10 moderate units to meet the City's inclusionary housing\nrequirements.\nPresident Knox White said the open space plan is great. He asked if the items would go\nto the City Council.\nApproved Minutes\nPage 3 of 11\nPlanning Board Meeting\nJuly 25, 2016", "path": "PlanningBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 4, "text": "Staff Attorney Brown said that the item could be called for review, or the applicant could\nappeal the Planning Board's decision(s)\nStaff Member Thomas said the tentative map recommendation would go to the Council\neither way.\nBoard Member Sullivan asked if the parking numbers could be adjusted later, or if they\nneeded to address the number tonight.\nPresident Knox White said that building a project with more parking that encourages\nmore traffic would be problematic. He said he would support a motion for staff's\nrecommendation and modifications tonight, including making sure there was a 12 foot\npath connecting to the waterfront.\nBoard Member Burton said he agreed with President Knox White on the parking issue.\nHe said we are in line with where the City is at in providing sufficient parking while\nencouraging transit use.\nStaff Member Thomas said they would amend condition 8.i. to ensure a 12 foot bike and\npedestrian connection to Oak & Blanding and at Elm St.\nBoard Member K\u00f6ster said he agreed that the project is sufficiently parked, citing the\ntransit passes that would be included with the project.\nBoard Member Curtis asked that the motions for the development plan and open space\nplan be separated.\nBoard Member Curtis made a motion to approve the open space plan. Board Member\nSullivan seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0.\nBoard Member Burton made a motion to approve the development plan as outlined by\nstaff, with the conditions: that the number of 182 units is conditioned on meeting\ncondition number 7; that there be 12 foot wide bike and pedestrian paths from Oak &\nClement to the waterfront as well as from Elm St. to the waterfront. Board Member\nK\u00f6ster seconded the motion.\nBoard Member Sullivan said that she believed it was an overcrowded development plan\nand not conducive to young families.\nApproved Minutes\nPage 4 of 11\nPlanning Board Meeting\nJuly 25, 2016", "path": "PlanningBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 5, "text": "The motion passed 4-1 (Curtis). The resolutions can be found at:\nhttps://alamedaca.gov/sites/default/files/document-files/department-\nfiles/Planning/2016 planning board resos july-september.pdf\n7-B 2016-3165\nHold a Public Hearing to Consider Site A West Atlantic Design Review\nApplication, including Final Surface Materials, Street Trees, Storm Water\nRetention Landscaping for Site A and Street Lights for Site A and the\nEntirety of Alameda Point.\nBoard Member Burton recused himself for the item.\nStaff Member Thomas gave the staff presentation. The staff report and attachments can\nbe found at:\ntps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2782557&GUID=D5B5BEE6\nDCFD-492A-971F-A1D34817AB44&FullText=1\nBoard Member K\u00f6ster confirmed that the road for the shared plaza was still raised. He\nasked if the lanes for Main St. could be reduced as part of this plan.\nStaff Member Thomas said that the plan is to reduce Main St. to three lanes in a later\nphase of the Site A development.\nBoard Member Curtis asked if the output from the different street lights were equal.\nStaff Member Thomas said they were, and that they were reviewed by AMP and APD.\nHe said the board is only considering the design aspects.\nPresident Knox White opened the public hearing.\nGeorgia Madden, a local landscape architect, said she is concerned about the choice of\nthe blackwood acacia. She said it would be very problematic. She said they can escape\ncultivation and damage streets and sidewalks. She hoped the board would reconsider\nuse of this tree.\nThe landscape architect confirmed that the tree was a problem and was not included in\nthe final plan.\nPresident Knox White closed the public hearing.\nBoard Member Sullivan said the palm trees chosen were not her favorite and asked why\na more graceful option was not chosen.\nApproved Minutes\nPage 5 of 11\nPlanning Board Meeting\nJuly 25, 2016", "path": "PlanningBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 6, "text": "The landscape architect for Site A said they considered a wide range and settled on\nsomething that could be approved by Public Works and be likely to survive the\nenvironment and be in good supply when needed.\nBoard Member K\u00f6ster said he was happy to see the project moving along. He agreed\nwith staff, preferring the bowed street lamps. He also agreed with option 1 for the\nsidewalk lamps.\nBoard Member Sullivan liked the curved lamp looked better. She worried that the staff\nchoice on the smaller one would not be substantial.\nPresident Knox White agreed with the lamp choices. He said he wanted to make sure\nthe lights that go into these lamps are not the terrible blue lights being installed all over\ntown.\nAndrew Moore, lighting consultant for Site A, explained that they can use a warmer light\nsetting in the new fixtures.\nPresident Knox White said he would like a condition that requires AMP to come back to\nthe Planning Board if the warmer lighting setting is not used. He said the sweeping\ncurves at the corners of W. Atlantic and Main St. are outdated and unsafe and\nencourage unsafe speeds for turning vehicles. He said that the bike lanes stopping short\nof the intersection and dumping the future Cross Alameda Trail into the mix with\npedestrians in the crosswalk was not appropriate.\nStaff Member Thomas listed the proposed changes and conditions: staff's recommended\nlight standards; choosing the warming light setting; look at the radius of the corners;\nextend and identify where the cycle tracks; consider adding softscape at the large corner\nintersection; making sure staff considers maintenance when selecting the final palm\nvariety.\nBoard Member K\u00f6ster made a motion to approve the project with: staff's recommended\nlight standards; warmer 3000K lights; developing the intersections further; and\nconsidering maintenance when choosing the final palm tree species. Board Member\nSullivan seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0.\n7-C 2016-3166\nPLN15-0198 - 1926 Park Street - Applicant: Bridgett Shank on behalf of\nPark Esquina, LLC. Public Hearing to consider Design Review, a Use\nPermit, and a Zoning Text Amendment to construct a mixed use complex\nwith office, retail, and a residential unit on a vacant lot at 1926 Park\nStreet. A Use Permit is required for ground floor office space and outdoor\nApproved Minutes\nPage 6 of 11\nPlanning Board Meeting\nJuly 25, 2016", "path": "PlanningBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 7, "text": "seating in the NP-G (North Park Street, Gateway) zoning district. The\nZoning Text Amendment is being requested to allow for a proposed\nbuilding setback on Blanding Street that does not conform to the existing\nzoning setback requirement. This project is categorically exempt from\nfurther environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental\nQuality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332 - Infill Development\nProjects.\nStaff Member Sablan gave the staff presentation. The staff report and attachments can\nbe found at:\n https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2782558&GUID=703737E4-\n1566-45CB-83BE-4F6CF1EF3417&FullText=1\nBridgett Shank, project architect, gave a presentation on the design of the project.\nBoard Member Curtis asked for details about how the leased parking arrangement would\nwork.\nStaff Member Sablan said there is a 7 year lease with a business at Park St. and\nClement St.\nStaff Member Thomas said the zoning ordinance allows a discretionary decision to allow\nthis type of parking arrangement.\nBoard Member K\u00f6ster asked if the City Council had approved the parking arrangement\nof the previous plan.\nStaff Member Thomas said they approved everything about the project except the use of\nshipping containers.\nStaff Member Tai explained that the parking arrangement is in conjunction with providing\ntransit passes to the occupants of the site.\nPresident Knox White opened the public hearing.\nKen Carvahlo spoke in favor of the project. He said the process has been long and\nexpensive and hopes the property owner can move forward with his project.\nTina Blaine said she liked the design, especially the courtyard. She said the area now is\nbleak and barren. She said she hopes the project moves forward.\nApproved Minutes\nPage 7 of 11\nPlanning Board Meeting\nJuly 25, 2016", "path": "PlanningBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 8, "text": "Rich Krinks said he supported the project and the design is very attractive. He said he\ngets calls every week for people looking for small office space and there is never\nenough.\nChristopher Buckley, AAPS, said the current version is a major improvement. He listed\nconflicts they see in the City's design review manuals.\nPresident Knox White closed the public hearing.\nBoard Member K\u00f6ster asked if the street tree renewal and sidewalk updates would be\ncoming to this section of Park St.\nStaff Member Tai said there is not enough room in the right of way to add street trees at\nthis location.\nBoard Member Curtis said if we approve this plan we have set a precedent for modern\narchitecture, which he liked. He said he would like to see a condition that allows an\nadditional 7 year extension for the parking arrangement.\nBoard Member Sullivan said the new building is a phenomenal improvement. She said\nshe feels badly that the resident will not have parking on site.\nBoard Member K\u00f6ster said adding a door access for tenants 2 and 3 to the courtyard\nwould make it better. He suggested the bike parking be moved to a better location. He\nsaid he was disappointed with City Council's decision to deny the previous design after\nmuch design review and public input.\nBoard Member Burton said he liked the current design and that the project would add a\nstrong presence at the north end of Park St. He said he would like to make sure the\nlarge scale window details are carried through to the windows of the office spaces. He\nsaid he supports the amendments allowing greater setbacks in these types of instances.\nPresident Knox White said he is supportive of the project. He said the public space will\nbe hard to make work as more than a wide sidewalk. He said he thinks there is a way to\nprovide some street trees along Blanding to make the area a little less harsh. He said he\nwould support moving the bike parking to a different location. He said we have dozens of\nbuildings on Park St. that do not provide parking and they are thriving.\nStaff Member Thomas explained options for changing the landscape plan to provide\nstreet trees on Blanding Ave. He said they would have to work it out with Public Works\nand could bring the landscape plan back or just give direction to staff to address the\nquestion before moving forward.\nApproved Minutes\nPage 8 of 11\nPlanning Board Meeting\nJuly 25, 2016", "path": "PlanningBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 9, "text": "Board Member Burton made a motion to approve the zoning text amendment and\nproject design with conditions: adding the window shadow boxes on the entire building;\nadding a seven year option to the shared parking lease; exploring relocating the bike\nparking; bringing the Blanding Ave landscape plan back to the board for approval. Board\nMember K\u00f6ster seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0.\nThe resolutions can be found at: https://alamedaca.gov/sites/default/files/document-\nfiles/department-files/Planning/2016 planning board resos july-september.pdf\n7-D 2016-3167\nPLN14-0517 - 712 Lincoln Avenue - Applicant: Simon Kwan for Kevin\nLam. A public hearing to consider Design Review approval to allow the\nconstruction of an approximately 7,100 square foot two-story mixed-use\ncommercial building on an approximately 20,000 square foot site located\napproximately 96 feet east of the southeast corner of Webster Street and\nLincoln Avenue. The Proposed Project is Exempt from the California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332 In-fill\nDevelopment.\nStaff Member Dong gave the staff presentation. The staff report and attachments can be\nfound at:\nhttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2782559&GUID=8C97D11C-\n6AD7-4683-BFE7-F45F86A28ADA&FullText=1\nBoard Member Curtis asked if staff studied the parking around the area. He said parking\nis very limited in the area.\nPresident Knox White opened the public hearing.\nThomas Comillie said the small building has historic significance from its time as\na\npower station for the rail line and hopes it can be preserved in some way.\nJanet Galera said she was in favor of the project but is concerned about parking.\nDick Rutter spoke about AAPS's desire to preserve and reuse the rail building. He said\nit\ncould be used as an entryway for a setback building.\nChristopher Buckley, West Alameda Business Association, outlined suggestions he felt\ncould improve the design.\nPresident Knox White closed the public hearing.\nApproved Minutes\nPage 9 of 11\nPlanning Board Meeting\nJuly 25, 2016", "path": "PlanningBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 10, "text": "Board Member K\u00f6ster asked if there was a materials palette.\nStaff passed the materials board around the dais.\nBoard Member K\u00f6ster said using the historic building would be a nice addition to the\nsite. He said he would like to see a transom window all the way across. He wondered\nwhy the building had such a high parapet and would be in favor of lowering it a little bit.\nBoard Member Burton said the cornice should either be solid or the piece of the wall\nwhere the trellis comes in becomes stucco. He said continuing the transom window\nmakes sense. He said making sure the siding is smooth is important. He said preserving\nand moving the train building would be very good.\nBoard Member Sullivan said she would love to preserve the train station building in a\npublic place where many people could enjoy it. She supported continuing the transom\nwindows and doing something more with the open trellis.\nPresident Knox White agreed that moving the historic building to a public place in town\nwould be preferable. He said the backyard location would be the last resort.\nStaff Member Thomas suggested bringing two cornice options back on the consent\ncalendar with a staff recommendation.\nStaff Member Tai summarized the conditions to be considered: bring the cornice design\nback; continue the mullion on the first floor windows creating a transom; smooth\nhorizontal siding; window details; relocating the train station.\nBoard Member Sullivan asked whether the bulkhead should be solid.\nBoard Member Sullivan made a motion to approve the building design with the listed\nconditions by Staff Member Tai above. Board Member K\u00f6ster seconded the motion. The\nmotion passed 5-0.\nThe resolution can be found at: https://alamedaca.gov/sites/default/files/document-\nfiles/department-files/Planning/2016 planning board resos july-september.pdf\n7-E 2016-3168\nPublic Hearing to Introduce an Ordinance Amending Chapter 30 of the\nAlameda Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) to Remove Barriers and\nAdd Incentives for Second Units. The proposed amendments regarding\nSecond Units are Statutorily Exempt pursuant to Section 15282(h), for the\nApproved Minutes\nPage 10 of 11\nPlanning Board Meeting\nJuly 25, 2016", "path": "PlanningBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2016-07-25", "page": 11, "text": "adoption of ordinances implementing AB 1866 - Second Unit Law\n(Government Code Section 65852.2).\n7-F 2016-3169\nBoard Elections\nBoard Member Curtis made a motion to continue items 7-E and 7-F to the September\n12, 2016 meeting. Board Member K\u00f6ster seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0.\n8. MINUTES\n8-A 2016-3163\nDraft Meeting Minutes - April 11, 2016\nNo action taken\n9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS\n9-A 2016-2441\nZoning Administrator and Design Review Recent Actions and Decisions\nNo action taken.\n9-B 2016-2442\nFuture Public Meetings and Upcoming Community Development\nDepartment Projects\nStaff Member Thomas said they were off for the month of August and would be back on\nSeptember 12. He outlined the items on the September agenda.\n10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS\n*None*\n11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS\n*None*\n12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS\n*None*\n13. ADJOURNMENT\nPresident Knox White adjourned the meeting at 10:33pm\nApproved Minutes\nPage 11 of 11\nPlanning Board Meeting\nJuly 25, 2016", "path": "PlanningBoard/2016-07-25.pdf"}