{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 1, "text": "MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY--FEBRUARY - - 3, 2015- 7:00 P.M.\nMayor Spencer convened the meeting at 7:22 p.m.\nROLL CALL -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese,\nOddie and Mayor Spencer - 5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nAGENDA CHANGES\n(15-085) Mayor Spencer announced that the Agreement with Power Engineering\n[paragraph no. 15-101 would be continued to February 17, 2015.\nPROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS\n(15-086) Mayor Spencer read the Season of Non Violence daily reading on believing.\n(15-087) Proclamation Declaring the Month of February as Teen Dating Violence\nPrevention and Awareness Month.\nMayor Spencer read the proclamation and presented it to Annie Maltester, Building\nFutures with Women and Children.\n(15-088) Presentation by CalTrans regarding the Bay Farm Island Bridge Deck\nRepairs/Closures.\nRoquel Johnson and Michael Nguyen, CalTrans, gave a Power Point presentation.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquired whether CalTrans will inform the Port of\nOakland on route impacts to the Oakland Airport during construction, to which Mr.\nNguyen responded in the affirmative.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether CalTrans will inform the Harbor Bay\nBusiness Park and the School District of construction impacts.\nMayor Spencer requested Councilmembers hold questions until the end of the\npresentation.\nCouncilmember Oddie inquired whether there will be other bridge closures at the same\ntime.\nThe Public Works Director responded that he would coordinate activity with the County\nto ensure that the bridges will not all be closed at the same time.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n1\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 2, "text": "In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, Ms. Jackson stated the night time\nclosure schedule as: Monday through Thursday: 11:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m., Friday:\nmidnight to 5:00 a.m., Saturday: midnight to 7:00 a.m., and Sunday: 11:00 p.m. to 7:00\na.m.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated there should be electronic signage at the Interstate 880\nexits informing drivers of the bridge closure; he is concerned drivers will have to turn\naround if they are not notified properly.\nIn response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, Ms. Jackson stated changing the official\nname of the bridge has to go through State legislation; CalTrans will use the name \"Bay\nFarm Island Bridge\" on its website to avoid confusion.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated that he would like to know how CalTrans was able to get\nthe Coast Guard to close maritime operations on bridge.\nCouncilmember Daysog inquired whether the closure would preclude emergency\nvehicles.\nMr. Nguyen responded the contractor will be told to allow emergency vehicles to cross\nthe bridge for emergency purposes.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the electronic signage would not be useful notice\nif\nthe Bay Farm Island Bridge name is not used; inquired whether there would be\ndaytime closure.\nMr. Nguyen responded the bike bridge will be closed from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.\nMonday through Thursday.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated CalTrans should coordinate with School District;\nstudents use the bike bridge to get to and from school\nMr. Nguyen agreed to coordinate with the School District and revise the bike bridge\nclosure schedule as necessary.\nVice Mayor Matarrese stated emergency vehicles should be truly coordinated, not just\nby informing the contractor.\nMayor Spencer stated coordinating with the School District is important; the return trip is\nusually 3:00 p.m. and she does not want students stuck on the other side of the bridge.\nIn response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, Ms. Jackson stated CalTrans could\nmake a presentation to the school board.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n2\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 3, "text": "(15-089) Ruth Abbe, Sierra Club, discussed wage and family benefit negotiations for\nAlameda County Industries (ACI) employees.\nJesus Menoz, ACI, reminded Council he and his coworkers work directly for all the\ncitizens of Alameda.\n(15-090) Amy Defibaugh, Alameda, expressed concern over the Shoreline bicycle\nproject and the installation of a bus shelter in front of her building; stated the shelter\nblocks views and decreased parking spaces; stated new development is not beneficial\nand adversely affects commute; urged Council to consider the impacts of their\ndecisions.\nMayor Spencer requested staff to confirm when the Shoreline bicycle project was\napproved.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Planning Board held a series of public\nmeetings at Lum School and all Shoreline Drive residents were invited; stated the\nproject is a construction zone now; the project encourages people to get out of their\ncars.\nMayor Spencer requested staff to clarify when the vote to approve the project took\nplace.\nThe Public Works Director stated the public process for the project started in 2012 and\nwas finally approved in 2014; the project received overwhelming public support during\nthe public engagement process; major projects have big impacts on people, but once\nconstruction is done, Shoreline Drive will be better; he has noticed a reduction in\nspeeding on Shoreline Drive due to the project.\nMayor Spencer stated the matter was decided by the prior Council and is expected to\ncome back for discussion.\n(15-091) Gustavo Nunez, ACI, stated working in recycling is dangerous; recycling\nworkers do not receive the same benefits and salaries as other sanitation employees;\nurged Council to change situation for recycling employees.\nPedro Sanchez, ACI, stated joining ILW Local 6 provided many changes for ACI\nemployees; employees now receive paid holidays and achieving a collective bargaining\nunit is underway; stated employees deserve the same Alameda County standards that\nother cities have; urged Council to implement the same standards in Alameda; thanked\nthe Council for their efforts.\nAgustin Ramirez, ACI employees advocate, stated ACI employees provide an important\nservice to Alameda residents; urged Council's support.\nCouncilmember Oddie thanked the ACI workers and Ms. Abbe for supporting efforts to\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n3\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 4, "text": "combat wage inequality.\n(15-092) Denis Carroll, Alameda, expressed concern over the traffic on the West End;\nstated development potential of Alameda Point and Northern Waterfront has real\nimpacts that need to be assessed; stated there needs to be transit mitigation; urged\nCouncil to have a regional discussion and responsible development.\n(15-093) Mike Henneberry, Alameda, expressed support for ACI workers; stated the\nCity should do everything to increase ACI employee standards.\nCONSENT CALENDAR\nCouncilmember Daysog moved approval of the Consent Calendar.\nVice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -\n5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph\nnumber.]\n(*15-094) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on January 6,\n2015. Approved.\n(*15-095) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,351,231.64.\n(*15-096) Recommendation to Award Contract in the Amount of $176,451, Including\nContingencies, to Subtronic Corporation for Storm Drain Video Inspection, Phase 1,\nP.W. No. 02-14-09. Accepted.\n(*15-097) Recommendation to Amend Contract in the Amount of $450,000 for Rosas\nBrothers Construction, Inc. for Repair of Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway, and Minor\nStreet Patching, Fiscal Year 2014/2015, Phase 15, No. P.W. 05-14-20 for a Total\nAmount of $1,162,732. Accepted.\nREGULAR AGENDA ITEMS\n(15-098) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period\nEnding September 30, 2014 Collected During the Period April 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.\nThe Interim Finance Director gave a Power Point presentation.\nIn response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Interim Finance Director stated City of\nPiedmont data was recently received and not included in past reports.\nThe Assistant City Manager stated Albany and Richmond will be replaced with Walnut\nCreek and Pleasanton, which are comparable to Alameda in size and median income.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n4\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 5, "text": "In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry regarding a 2% drop-off over the\nyear, the Interim Finance Director stated the period ending April to June is not a high\nsales season; high seasons include holiday and back-to-school shopping.\nIn response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry regarding online store\ncompetition, the Interim Finance Director stated sales tax from online sales with no brick\nand mortar presence accrues to a County pool which Alameda shares; the pool has\nincreased over time.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Alameda lagged in gas station sales in the per\ncapita surplus gap comparison; the new Safeway and gas station near the tube\nreceived complaints, but sales tax generation comes from development.\nThe Interim Finance Director stated grocery stores do not generate a great deal of sales\ntax and sales tax on gasoline is decreasing because prices dropped; Alameda will not\nsee a boost in sales tax revenues over the next three or four quarters.\nVice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether $313,000 recovered tax would be spread over a\nnumber of years in arrears.\nThe Interim Finance Director responded she would do research and provide an answer\nlater.\nIn response to Vice Mayor Matarrese's inquiry, the Interim Finance Director stated when\nan error is found, money is given back to the City from the beginning of the error and is\ncorrected going forward.\nVice Mayor Matarrese requested the information be flagged in the next report.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated sales tax is an important revenue source to finance the\nquality of life in Alameda; sales tax increase is driven by business-to-business Alameda\nshould have business attraction and retention strategies; figuring out ways to reduce\nleakage and get residents to spend in town is important; grocery stores are not sales tax\ngenerators but are an overall economic development strategy which drives foot traffic;\ndata should be used as a beginning point for a wide range of strategies.\nIn response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry, the Interim Finance Director stated the\nEconomic Development Manager and staff participate in discussions with HDL when\nreviewing quarterly information; the process is ongoing to secure more data.\nIn response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, the Interim Finance Director stated\nsales tax revenue for Target would be found in \"all other areas\"; stated Alameda\nLanding will be added in the next report.\nCouncilmember Oddie inquired about north of Lincoln Avenue and Webster Street.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n5\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 6, "text": "The Interim Finance Director responded she will have to research; stated she will have\nto dig through all information to pin exact changes.\nCouncilmember Oddie requested future reports to compare sales rates; inquired\nwhether the Exhibit 1 graph shows total per capita.\nThe Interim Finance Director responded in the affirmative; a sales tax rate to support a\nspecific bond issue should not be reported.\nVice Mayor Matarrese stated it is important to point out when car dealerships left\nAlameda 10 years ago to go to San Leandro, there was a precipitous drop in sales tax.\nCouncilmember Daysog inquired whether Peet's Coffee is interested in Webster Street,\nto which the City Manager responded in the affirmative.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification on where Target sales tax\nnumbers would be found.\nThe Interim Finance Director responded in order to get access to Franchise Tax Board\ndata, the data has to be treated as confidential; stated Alameda hired and gave\npermission to HDL to access the information; information on general categories or\ngeographic areas are available; obtaining or releasing information about specific tax\npayers is not possible; assumptions have to be made.\nCouncilmember Oddie inquired whether sales tax data from Alameda Landing would be\nidentifiable in the future, to which the Interim Finance Director responded in the\naffirmative.\nMayor Spencer encouraged residents to continue to shop in the historical, Park and\nWebster Streets districts, and at South Shore; stated Alameda has gas stations on\nWebster Street already; she is concerned about building more retail which provides low-\npaying jobs; she would support entertainment and restaurants to bring in sales tax\nrevenue.\nVice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -\n5.\n(15-099) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ending\nSeptember 30, 2014.\nThe Interim Finance Director gave a Power Point presentation.\nIn response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry the Interim Finance Director\nstated Alameda's Sunshine Ordinance precludes presentation of the report until the\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n6\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 7, "text": "second month after the quarter end in September; Alameda does not receive the data\nuntil the middle of September.\nVice Mayor Matarrese stated the issue is the time required to prepare the report in order\nto comply with Alameda's Sunshine Ordinance.\nThe City Manager stated the Sunshine Ordinance adds 12 days to the original 15-day\nprocess.\nCouncilmember Oddie inquired whether Alameda's investment policy regarding\ncigarette, alcohol or gambling is a Council discretion, to which the Interim Finance\nDirector responded in the affirmative; stated the investment policy is a document that\ncomes before the Council each year and is reviewed by the City Treasurer and staff;\nnew laws that have been passed are reviewed; the California Debt Advisory\nCommission makes recommendations.\nCouncilmember Oddie stated that he hopes Alameda can be more socially responsible\ninvesting money.\nThe City Manager stated investments are purely a policy issue; it is appropriate for\nCouncil to bring investment policy forward, not staff.\nIn response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry the Interim Finance Director stated the\ninvestment policy regarding cigarette, alcohol, and gambling came about as a policy\naction by Council.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated that he prefers security and safety over returns;\nAlameda has always followed instruments with low volatility and a safe holding; he does\nnot want what happened to Orange County in the 1990's to happen in Alameda.\nThe Interim Finance Director stated all the State laws referred to have been as a result\nof what happened in Orange County.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated that he is interested in which long term instruments for\nnon-federal agencies Alameda is invested in.\nVice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether Alameda is tracking book value versus market\nvalue.\nThe Interim Finance Director responded in the affirmative; stated Alameda's portfolio\nmanagers track to ensure values stay within reason; if the market starts to drop the\nmanagers will start liquidating.\nIn response to Vice Mayor Matarrese's inquiry, the Interim Finance Director stated staff\nwill ask the investment advisors to include a conclusion statement in subsequent reports\nto indicate Alameda's trend; however, it would not be included in the next report.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n7\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 8, "text": "Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the matter can be addressed whenever feasible.\nMayor Spencer stated as part of the Quarterly Investment Report it states the City\nTreasurer reviewed the report and found it complies with the investment policy\nestablished.\nCouncilmember Oddie moved approval of the staff recommendation.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice\nvote - 5.\n(15-100) Recommendation to Accept Report on Sale of Successor Agency to the\nCommunity Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda 2014 Bonds.\nThe Interim Finance Director gave a brief presentation.\nCouncilmember Daysog the quality of the City's bond upgrades are a quality of the\nfunction, stability and economic growth of the City.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated staff has worked diligently to chip away at the\ndeficit; efforts were recognized by the market that rewarded Alameda with the upgrade,\nwhich is a huge benefit.\nIn response to Vice Mayor Matarrese's inquiry, the Interim Finance Director stated the\nbond upgrade is not one-time revenue and will carry through the year 2033.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested an explanation on the two credit rating\nweaknesses listed in Exhibit 1.\nThe Interim Finance Director responded the first weakness is moderate tax payer\nconcentration with significant outstanding assessment appeal; stated every parcel is\nassessed and every owner can appeal the assessment each year; Alameda has a\nmoderate concentration of parcels within the redevelopment districts being appealed,\nwhich is a result of the economy; all appeals are expected to be settled in the two-year\ncycle; the second weakness is refunding indenture provisions that do not require the\nagency to set aside full annual debt service on 2014 bonds in the first half of every bond\nyear; the provision is a function of the redevelopment changes the State made;\nAlameda can only file a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) six month\nrequest for money; the State approve the request and forwards the request to the\nCounty; the County pays for just six months; the credit agency would like the City to\nreceive the entire year's debt service in the first six months, but the Department of\nFinance will not do so.\nVice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n8\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 9, "text": "Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -\n5.\n(15-101) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute an\nAgreement in an Amount not to Exceed $290,000 with Power Engineering to Demolish\nthe Todd Shipyard Crane Located at Pier 5, near 2900 Main Street, on the Alameda\nGateway Property. (Continued to February 17, 2015)\nCITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS\n(15-102) The City Manager announced $70 million has been included in the President's\nbudget for Alameda Point Veterans Administration; stated the total project will cost $240\nmillion; Spirits Alley is one of five finalists in Sunset Magazine for Best Municipal\nMakeovers.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\nNone.\nCOUNCIL REFERRALS\n(15-103) Consider Directing Staff to Create a Proposed Ordinance Relative to a\nTransitional Retention Period upon Change of Ownership, Control or Operation of\nGrocery Stores. (Councilmember Oddie)\nCouncilmember Oddie gave a brief presentation.\nDiscussed grocery store consolidation and take-overs; stated Councilmember Oddie's\nreferral is modest; that he supports Council moving forward with the referral: Mike\nHenneberry, Alameda and Lucky Workers' Representative.\nCouncilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is generally supportive of the principles\nand she recommends the City Attorney's office analyze the implications for Alameda;\ndoes not want to adopt the Los Angeles ordinance outright; there are other comparable\nmethods to protect worker's rights; she would like to hear from the business community.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated the Los Angeles ordinance is reasonable and the City\nCouncil should be supportive; he supports Councilmember Oddie's referral; stated in\nterms of the law and court cases, there is a special place for grocery stores that anchor\nand generate foot traffic; beyond land use implications, he is curious about how\nWalmart might impact grocery stores and labor relations.\nVice Mayor Matarrese stated the role of Council protecting workers from large\ncorporations is important; Alameda will see something first-hand; that he would like to\ndirect the City Attorney to craft the draft ordinance for discussion.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n9\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 10, "text": "Mayor Spencer stated that she would like to know which other cities have similar\nordinances; language in the Los Angeles ordinance relates to health and safety\nstandards; she supports protecting the health and safety of employees of grocery stores\nin Alameda; she would like to know which Alameda stores would be impacted;\nAlameda should try to honor what is already tested to avoid litigation; she would like to\nsee differences in the other cities referenced; she is concerned about staff's priorities to\naddress the issue.\nThe City Manager stated that he would confer with the City Attorney; staff has plenty of\ntime to do necessary research and could bring something back to Council in April.\nVice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation.\nCouncilmember Oddie seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion, Councilmember Oddie stated it is important to ensure standards of\nhealth and safety would apply to union and non-union employees.\nOn the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\nCOUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\n(15-104) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft made brief comments on the League of\nCalifornia Cities East Bay Division Meeting that she and Councilmember Daysog\nattended last week.\n(15-105) Councilmember Daysog also made brief comments on the League of\nCalifornia Cities East Bay Division Meeting; stated the City has prevailing wage\nregulations, but living wage is something the City should think about.\n(15-106) Mayor Spencer announced that the City website has an opportunity for anyone\ninterested to sign up to lead the Pledge of Allegiance and additional meetings have\nbeen added to the website calendar; she will speak at the Kiwanis tomorrow;\nparticipated with AMP in the California Municipal Utilities Association Capitol Day where\nshe met Assemblymember Bonta and Senator Hancock.\nADJOURNMENT\n(15-107) There being no further business, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the\nmeeting at 9:43 p.m. in memory of Mayor Gilmore's mother.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n10\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 11, "text": "The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n11\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 12, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY- - FEBRUARY 3, 2015--6:00 P.M.\nMayor Spencer convened the meeting at 6:00 p.m.\nRoll Call -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie\nand Mayor Spencer - 5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nThe meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:\n(15-083) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (54956.8), Property: Oakland Inner\nHarbor Tidal Canal; City Negotiators: John Russo, City Manager; Negotiating With:\nUnited States Army Corp Of Engineers; Issue Under Negotiation: Real Property\nNegotiations Price and Terms Of Payment\nFollowing the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Spencer\nannounced direction was given to staff.\nAdjournment\nThere being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 6:57 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 13, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL\nAND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY\nIMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (SACIC) MEETING\nTUESDAY--FEBRUARY 3, 2015- -6:59 P.M.\nMayor/Chair Spencer convened the meeting at 7:05 p.m. Ruth Abbe led the Pledge of\nAllegiance.\nRoll Call -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers/Agency Members Daysog, Ezzy\nAshcraft, Matarrese, Oddie and Mayor/Chair Spencer\n- -5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nOral Communications\nNone.\nAgenda Items\n(15-084 CC/15-003 SACIC) Recommendation to Accept the First Quarter Financial\nReport for the Period Ending September 30, 2014.\nThe Interim Finance Director gave a Power Point presentation.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated Alameda is spending less than 25% which is good\nnews; each quarter should represent 25% of the budget; transient occupancy grew by\n50% compared to previous years; the Harbor Bay Parkway commercial area is what\ndrives sales tax in Alameda.\nMayor Spencer inquired what is the $313,000 adjustment.\nThe Interim Finance Director responded the Franchise Tax Board reviews Alameda\ncompanies that report sales outside of the City and make adjustments.\nCouncilmember/Agency Member Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the staff\nrecommendation.\nVice Mayor/Agency Member Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by\nunanimous voice vote - 5.\nAdjournment\nThere being no further business, Mayor/Chair Spencer adjourned the meeting at 7:22\np.m.\nJoint Meeting\nAlameda City Council and Successor Agency to\nthe Community Improvement Commission\nJanuary 20, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2015-02-03", "page": 14, "text": "Respectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger, City Clerk\nSecretary, SACIC\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nJoint Meeting\nAlameda City Council and Successor Agency to\nthe Community Improvement Commission\nFebruary 3, 2015", "path": "CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf"}