{"body": "PensionBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 1, "text": "GOVY\nOF\nMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING\nOF THE\nPENSION BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA\nHELD 4:30 P.M., APRIL 28, 2014\nALAMEDA CITY HALL\n2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE, ALAMEDA\nCONFERENCE ROOM 391\n1.\nThe meeting was called to order by Trustee, Interim Human Resources\nManager/Secretary to the Pension Board, Jill Kovacs at 4:36 p.m.\n2.\nROLL CALL:\nPresent: Trustees: William Soderlund, Nancy Elzig, Jill Kovacs.\nAbsent: Marie Gilmore and Robert Follrath\nStaff: Fred Marsh, Finance Director, Lelia Faapouli, Administrative Technician,\nHuman Resources.\n3.\nMINUTES:\nThe minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 27, 2014 was moved for approval\nby Trustee Soderlund and seconded by Trustee Elzig. Passed 3-0\n4.\nAGENDA ITEMS:\n4-A. Pension Payroll and Financial Reports - Quarter Ending March 31, 2014\nand City of Alameda Police & Fire Pension Funds Financial Reports for the\nPeriod Ending March 31, 2014 was presented by Fred Marsh, Finance Director.\nThe reports were moved for approval by Member Soderlund and seconded by\nMember Elzig. Passed 3-0\n5.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)\nThere were no oral communications.", "path": "PensionBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "PensionBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 2, "text": "City of Alameda\nMinutes of the Regular Meeting of the\nPension Board - Monday, April 28, 2014\nPage 2\n6.\nPENSION BOARD COMMUNICATIONS (COMMUNICATIONS FROM BOARD)\nForm 700 was received by Trustees Elzig and Soderlund. Board trustees were\nreminded that Sunshine Training was also required. They were advised that\ntraining would be conducted in the Council Chambers on 5/15/14 and 5/29/14 or\nthat they could take it online. Sunshine Training acknowledgement forms were\ndistributed via email.\nThe Pension Board was concerned about Pension Board Trustee Robert\nFollrath, who has been absent from meetings due to health issues. The Board\nwants Trustee Follrath to know he is in their thoughts and that they wish him\ngood health and that he would be able to attend future meetings.\n7.\nADJOURNMENT:\nThere being no further business to come before the board, the meeting was\nadjourned at 4:46 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nif\nJill K\u00f3vacs\nInterim Human Resources Manager\nand Secretary to the Pension Board", "path": "PensionBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 1, "text": "APPROVED MEETING MINUTES\nREGULAR MEETING OF THE\nCITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD\nMONDAY, APRIL 28, 2014\n1. CONVENE:\n7:05 p.m.\n2. FLAG SALUTE:\n3. ROLL CALL:\nPresent:\nPresident Burton, Vice President Henneberry,\nBoard members Knox White, K\u00f6ster, and Alvarez-Morroni, and\nTang. Board member Zuppan was late.\n4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION:\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni requested getting feedback from Board members that\nwere not on the Alameda Point Town Center subcommittee who are not present tonight.\nShe would also like to hear feedback on written communications.\nPresident Burton motioned to move item 7.C. to first item on regular agenda.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni seconded.\nMotion carried, 5-1-0 (Knox White opposed)\n5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:\nMs. Vicky Vargees, resident of Harbor Bay originally purchased her home in the area\nbecause of the Harbor Bay Club as an amenity. They are still active members of the\nClub. She is requesting for the site not be rezoned, and keep the facility where it is. Mr.\nCowan doesn't live in Alameda and doesn't understand the community, and there are no\nbenefits to moving the Club.\nMr. Doug deHaan commented on the dissolution of the Economic Development\nCommission (EDC). It was the understanding that the PB would take on the roles or work\nof the EDC. He asked staff why is the PB taking on the role of all issues the EDC once\nhad. He would like to see where those issues are being dealt with by either Boards or staff.\n6. CONSENT CALENDAR:\n6.A. Alameda Landing Residential Street Names\nBoard member Knox White motioned to pull the item from Consent.\nBoard member Knox White provided a handout with updated street names, and provided a\nbrief background and reviewed a couple of rules for names being street names. He would\nlike to see \"People of Note\", and examples used were Barbara Manning, Don Grant, Lewis\nMcCall, Houchian, BoHowl, George Miller, Nelly Takada, and Arushia. He requested\nremoving navy vessels from the list. The list he provided is equal to the number of streets\nin the development.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 1 of 10\nApril 28, 2014", "path": "PlanningBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 2, "text": "Vice President Henneberry agreed with Knox White and would like to see this come back\none more time. He suggested a couple other edits to remove generic names, and to add\nTerry LaCroix.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni asked if streets could be alphabetized.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster asked if things like patriot and freedom be removed from the list,\nand thanked Knox White for the extra effort.\nPresident Burton supported the suggested names and for this to move forward.\nBoard member Knox White motioned to accept the additional 16 names, and ask staff to\nassign street names in alphabetical order.\nVice President Henneberry seconded.\nMotion carried, 7-0\nBoard member Knox White reported he has many other names for street naming and will\nsubmit that to staff in the near future.\n7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:\n7.C. Public Review of the Draft Alameda Point Waterfront Town Center Plan\n(Plan)- No Action Will be Taken\nMr. Christopher Buckley, AAPS, commented on a letter he had also sent to the PB. He\nprovided an overhead, and reported the main complaint of the Plan is the height of the\nbuildings in front of the Hangers. This height limit should be lower. The in-fill portion of\nthe report is not clear as there seem to be something missing. They recommend that any\nnew buildings be subordinate to any existing structures. He would like for the sense and\ntime and place be preserved.\nBoard member Zuppan thanked everyone who worked on the Plan. She stated that she\nwould like to hear more on iconic new structures and new development being subordinate.\nPresident Burton commented on the subordinate area being along the view area and on\nthe structures there currently. The iconic building being in the location of approaching the\nwaterfront is the focus.\nBoard member Zuppan asked that Mr., Buckley's comments be added.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster asked if there was a way to do preliminary renderings of what the\napproach to the waterway could possibly look like. He agreed with the height limits, and\nis concerned with the water being accessible. He would like to see public slips in the\nmarina area. Specifically, a public dock for short term visiting sailors.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 2 of 10\nApril 28, 2014", "path": "PlanningBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 3, "text": "President Burton referred to the pages in the Plan for the boat launch and a small launch.\nBoard member Knox White asked about the Phasing chapter, he asked about the\nhighlighted pre-phase portion of the project.\nMr. Thomas reported this was added because that area of the town center still needs to be\ncleaned.\nMs. Ott stated there should be a development schedule in place within the next year.\nMr. Thomas stated that staff is taking public comments until May 15, 2014, and\nencouraged interested to submit their comments.\nBoard member Zuppan motioned to continue this item to the May 12, 2014 meeting.\nVice President Henneberry seconded.\nMotion carried. 7-0\n7.A.\nPublic Review of the Draft Housing Element (HE) for 2015-2023 - No Action\nwill be taken.\nMr. Andrew Thomas, City Planner, provided a briefing and reported on the timeline for\nupcoming public hearings. The draft HE policy has been reorganized to make it easier to\nfollow. Many public comments and PB comments have been incorporated into the draft\nHE. There will be improvements made to the background report per a letter received from\nthe State Dept. of Housing. Staff needs to look further into the raising rent issues and feels\nthis shouldn't be part of the HE at this time.\nPresident Burton opened the public comment period.\nMs. Anne DeBardeleben, Alameda Association of Realtors (AAOR), requested the PB\nmove forward with the draft HE and not to address the rent stabilization issues. She\nreported the Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC) within the City has been a\nsuccessful mechanism for rent disputes with a very high success rate.\nMs. Angie Watson-Hajjem, ECHO Housing, reported many people have been forced out of\nAlameda by rent increases. ECHO cannot advocate for or against rent stabilization, but\nshe is a private citizen here in Alameda and can voice that she implores the Board to look\ninto the issue. She also stated that the RRAC does not have any teeth, and landlords don't\nhave to appear at meetings.\nMs. Catherine Johnson, resident, stated she had a 25% rent when she opened a daycare\nin her home, five months later she had another increase, and was told in another few\nmonths she would have another increase. She will not be able to sustain the rent\nincreases, and will lose her home and business, which will result on less child care for the\ncommunity. She asked that the City review Renewed Hope's proposal on rent\nstabilization.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 3 of 10\nApril 28, 2014", "path": "PlanningBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 4, "text": "Mr. Jeffery Levin, East Bay Housing Organizations (EBHO), stated that EBHO is an\naffordable housing organization and has worked with many cities on their HE's. He\nthanked staff and the Board for the work put in. He asked for policies on prevention of\ndisplacement, include policies to monitor and study a rent stabilization measure. Alameda\nPoint welcomes the commitment of 25% affordable housing and asked for studying the\nincentives. He suggested an annual progress report should be a formal policy within the\nHE.\nMs. Margorie Rocha, ECHO Housing, explained the agency's role with the City of\nAlameda, mainly tenant / landlord disputes and many go to the RRAC. She advocates for\nthe tenants being displaced, as owners /landlords are not required to appear at the RRAC\nmeetings and some of the tenants have been in Alameda many years. She asked the City\nto look at how to improve the policy for mediation.\nMs. Kelly Harp, City of Alameda Disability Commission, thanked the speakers. She stated\nthat the Commission has formed a working group to gather comments for the HE. She\nreported the need for more senior housing as well as disabled accessible housing as there\nis a continued need for barrier free housing. The accommodation ordinance has been\nimplemented. She asked that the Universal Design regulations be implemented into the\nnew HE, and asked for the PB to move this program through the process.\nMr. Bill Smith, Renewed Hope, commended staff for the draft HE, and was glad to see that\nAP isn't part of the HE. Renewed Hope supports ECHO Housing, and the HE cannot be\nsupported without a rent element into the HE. There needs to be an assessment for the\ncurrent rental policy within the City, with a study of alternatives. He reported there is a\nneed for something to protect renters. He provided a letter sent to the PB, opposing the\nHE.\nMs. Debra Arbuckle, resident, reported there is a big need for rental rights being protected\nin the City. She stated if there isn't something in the HE, there is a good chance this issue\nwill not be taken care of.\nMs. Marilyn Schumaker, landlord, stated that her understanding is if there are comments\nfor rent stabilization in the HE, then the issue rolls up to the state level. The RRAC is a\nCity committee and perhaps the City can get behind the RRAC more. Rent stabilization is\nnot the answer.\nMr. Donald Hardiman, addressed the board and was heard by the RRAC. The rents in his\nbuilding went up 67%, and noticing for the increases were not done properly. Some of the\nrenters had a disabled child. This wasn't an isolated incident, and it appears new owners\ncan charge anything they want and get away with it. There is a distinction with large\ndevelopers and owners with a small number of units. This issue cannot be overlooked.\nMs. Louis Pryor, Renewed Hope, she stated that it is vital to include a policy for addressing\nhigher rents.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 4 of 10\nApril 28, 2014", "path": "PlanningBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 5, "text": "President Burton closed the public comment period.\nMr. Thomas reported the City is not prepared to make a promise to the state that the City\nwouldn't be able to keep. We don't want to be coming back to the PB and say we haven't\ndone the work as promised, i.e. Universal Design. There aren't enough resources for\nthings like tracking rents, gathering data, analyzing data, reporting data, etc. In terms of\ncontrol, the state doesn't control rents but there has been more legislation. Once a\nprogram gets into the HE we are required to report annually on this program. The City\nCouncil would oversee rent control, not the state.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni commended staff for the boiled down version.\nBoard member Tang commented on the housing crisis and there is a limited supply of\nrental units. Building more affordable rentals could alleviate the problem, but landlords\ncannot raise the rents suddenly after no increases for many years. Perhaps long term\ngoals with developers would be a good idea, increase supply.\nBoard member Zuppan stated that rent stabilization needs to be addressed, but having it in\nthe HE at this time may not be the way to go. Criticizing resources that are available isn't\nthe best use of time, and the RRAC is an affective body. The Universal Design seems\nmore critical to get this into the HE.\nMr. Thomas hopes to have the draft ordinance of Universal Design by end of 2014. All\ndevelopers have been talked to as a requirement for all projects.\nBoard member Zuppan commented on transportation around new developments. She\nasked about new policy for this issue. She asked staff if there is more we can do. She\nwanted to thank RRAC for their service.\nVice President Henneberry stated there isn't expertise in getting a rent stabilization policy\ninto the HE, but they can request for City Council to look into this. He suggested adding a\nsentence in the HE under RRAC to include this comment.\nBoard member Knox White stated that he strongly supports and encourages a program to\naddress the issue of rent stabilizing, and a process for all parties to be at a table to talk\nabout the issue. He would also like to see a timeline for when this would be addressed.\nHe suggested changes to the Universal Design language (deadline). Creating transit\nfriendly neighborhoods and green building should include our housing stock be built to be\nincluded. There is a 45 year old parking plan for residential. Housing and transit costs\nshould be monitored. He asked that all new landlords check a box stating they\nunderstand a business license is required.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster commented on the need for senior housing, secondary units and\ncould the quantified measure be included. He appreciated the pipeline document from the\nHousing Authority. He agreed with the rent comments from the others.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 5 of 10\nApril 28, 2014", "path": "PlanningBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 6, "text": "President Burton thanked all who spoke and staff for the work on the HE. He commented\non the annual review and could this be on the schedule. He commented that the rent\nstabilization is an issue as half of the residents rent. He agreed this needed to be a very\nthoughtful process starting with a community wide forum. He agreed with a sentence or\ntwo being added to the RRAC process.\nBoard member Tang asked about turning residential areas to commercial property and\nsuggested if they aren't using the property for residential require them to build affordable in\nanother area of the city.\nMr. Thomas stated this will be back in early June 2014.\n7.B. Public Workshop to Consider a Draft Master Plan (PLN14-0059) for the\nRehabilitation, Reuse, and Redevelopment of the Former Del Monte Warehouse Site\nlocated at 1501 Buena Vista Avenue\nMr. Thomas provided a report on the project.\nMr. Michael O'Harra, Tim Lewis Communities, introduced his team. He provided an update\nof the adaptive reuse to the project, and reviewed the Master Plan.\nMs. Paula Krugmeir, Architect, provided an update and presentation on the project.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster asked about the parking spaces around the outside of the building.\nMs. Krugmeir there is one stall on site per unit, some more depending on size of unit. The\nspaces on the street are public, on site are private.\nVice President Henneberry asked about the paseo entrance, which doors enter the\nbuilding.\nMs. Krugmeir stated this is a work in progress, which is why it looks unbalanced.\nPresident Burton commented on the completion of Clement Street and how it connects\nwith other businesses. He asked about the cross Alameda Trail cutting through Jean\nSweeney Open Space.\nMr. Thomas reported on Clement Street extension the intersection at Sherman will be\ncompletely redone, and brought forward where the edge of Windriver. The north side will\nbe\nbike and walking trails. The Alameda Trail will cross the extension. This has been in\nthe works for the past ten years.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni asked for the timeline on getting this project completed.\nMr. Thomas stated building permits by Fall 2014. This is the first serious proposal for this\nbuilding in the past 12 years.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 6 of 10\nApril 28, 2014", "path": "PlanningBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 7, "text": "Board member K\u00f6ster asked for staff comments on the transit hub.\nMr. Thomas stated there is currently a shuttle from BART to Windriver. This project will pay\ninto that service, but staff is hopeful a private water service can be in place across the\nestuary.\nPresident Burton opened the public comment period.\nMr. Lester Cabral, resident, stated the project is too dense for the area and will affect the\nneighborhood. He feels the building is too high, and doesn't want government controlled\nparking. There should be two spaces per unit and additional visitor parking\nMr. Gabriel Wise, resident, spoke on the parking issues and green space. There should be\nno un-coupled parking for the project. Financial burden cannot be placed on the residents\nin the area. The open space is planned, but no green space in the area until Jean\nSweeney Open Space Park is completed. He suggested a contingency that timing\nconnect both projects be completed at the same time.\nMs. Alison Green, resident, stated that Littlejohn Park is busy on weekends but this is a\nfine thing. She talked about comparing parking issues with SF and Berkeley, and there\nare no services to the project. The retail space probably won't have medical care. The\nhousing numbers don't jive in the plan and the density numbers. Affordable housing\nowners shouldn't have to pay to support services like a water taxi.\nMs. Deborah Arbuckle, resident, spoke on the density and effects on LittleJohn Park. The\nproject is too big and too dense and doesn't fit the neighborhood. There won't be enough\nmoney to support the water service or shuttles.\nMs. Dorothy Freeman, resident, spoke on the density affecting Littlejohn Park, and the\nproject should help fund the non-funded project of Jean Sweeney Open Space Park\n(JSOSP). She spoke on problems arising with visitors or owners of the project using the\nparking lots at Windriver and JSOSP.\nMr. Nick Cabral, resident, spoke on the density and traffic in the area stating it is very loud\nand disruptive. He stated it has been 40 years of talking about this project. Not\neveryone will be pleased about the project. He wasn't to see a positive turnout for the\nproject. He praised staff and PB, they are trying to improve the neighborhood.\nMr. Frank Thorsberg, spoke on traffic and parking and doesn't want to pay a fee to park\nin his neighborhood. He is concerned with the trucks in the area, and will the road change\nbe done in connection with the project being completed.\nMr. Christopher Buckley, AAPS, sent a letter and commented. He is pleased the project\nis moving forward. He commented on the building height, and suggested story poles be\nin place in the plan. He reported on the design changes, and materials, windows, doors\nand stated the rhythm is off.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 7 of 10\nApril 28, 2014", "path": "PlanningBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 8, "text": "Mr. William Smith, Renewed Hope commented on the use of multi-family overlay and\naffordable housing are exciting. He commented as a resident on the parking being an\nissue. Affordable housing people shouldn't have to pay for services especially if they\naren't using the services. The role of the vehicle is changing, youth don't want cars. He\nstated density helps to expand on open space or green space.\nMs. Karen Bey, commented on being excited about the project and agrees the market is\nright for the development. She was excited to see the list of public benefits. She asked\nfor the approval of the project. She commented on Tang's issue of demand and supply.\nMr. Doug deHaan, spoke on the need for the developer to pay for amenities and services\nfor the project. He commented on the high density in the area. He warned of examples\nof the past, and the need for open spaces. Funding should be provided upfront from the\ndevelopers.\nPresident Burton closed public comment.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster reported on this is a great project. He would like to see more ideas\non the transit hub, and the retail side. He would like to know about the live/work units.\nHe commented on the paseo and had safety concerns connecting to the park. He is glad\nto hear the development helping JSOSP, and commented on the area being underserved\nby open space. He is concerned about noise traveling through the corridors. He agreed\nwith Mr. Buckley's comments, and likes option 2 for the opening. He stated the need for\nnatural light in bathrooms over walk in closets.\nBoard member Knox White asked about the street cross sections.\nMr. Thomas stated the Master Plan is to provide as much detail as possible.\nBoard member Knox White commented on planted medians in the road should be used as\nbike lanes instead, on the north side of the road. He commented on the 'exclusive transit\nstreet' detail. He commented on Entrance Road being three lanes. He would like to see\nsome changes to Buena Vista, perhaps strips of green space. He asked the number of\ntruck trips for Del Monte and the number seemed high (25). He spoke on language for\ntransit related streets. He wanted the plan to address sea level rise. He suggested an\nopen space in-lieu fee. He agreed to unbundle the parking. He liked the design.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni commented on residents paying for parking permits\ninstead of just being issued. She saw the developer give a thumbs-up for supporting the\nJSOSP development. She thanked staff.\nBoard member Tang commented on the project being positive, and the issues of parking\nand open space need to be addressed. Perhaps enhancing LittleJohn Park can be done,\nand add some lighting. He asked where the divide is with Windriver with public land. He\nsuggested a weekend parking agreement.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 8 of 10\nApril 28, 2014", "path": "PlanningBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 9, "text": "Board member Zuppan talked also on a shared parking agreement with Windriver for\nweekend use. She is excited about the project, and is familiar with the area, parking and\ntraffic issues. She suggested Lincoln and Benton be a better pedestrian intersection.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster motioned to continue meeting past 11:00 p.m.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni seconded.\nMotioned carried, 5-2 (Knox White and Henneberry opposed)\nBoard member Zuppan commented on the waterfront with the truck route and no\nlandscaping on the waterfront. She asked about land ownership along the water.\nMr. Thomas explained where \"Clement Future\" is owned by Windriver. There needs to be\na conversation with Windriver to acquire land. This will be the slowest truck route in town.\nBoard member Zuppan suggested street signage for slowing traffic, and would like to see\nmore info in the next packet. She commented on LittleJohn being active and JSOSP is a\npassive space and that should be addressed. She agreed with Knox White seeing sea\nlevel rise being addressed. She stated there is currently a lack of parking in the area, and\nsuggested more community meetings. She agreed with AAPS comments on colors.\nVice President Henneberry stated all the comments he had have already been made. He\nagreed with Mr. Buckley's comments and is in favor of the project.\nPresident Burton reported on being pleased with the proposal. He commented on liking\nhow the streets will tie the project together. The breaking up of the mass with courtyards\nwill be successful, promenade will be good too. He agreed with Knox White and doesn't\nlike the strip of parking along Buena Vista, perhaps this can be looked at. He would like\nto see better access for bicycles. The entrance road needs to be narrowed, and agree the\ntruck route dropping part of the right-of-way. He agreed the green median is useless. He\nwants to see the cross Alameda Trail on the plans. He wants sea level rise to be on the\nplan, and is pleased to have the developer help with the JSOSP plan. He liked the design\nof old and new connecting, but stucco work should be reconsidered. The courts seem to\nbe too narrow for people looking across. The infill doors could be a little more fine scale\nfor the store fronts. He agreed with Zuppan for more community meetings.\n8. MINUTES:\nMinutes of the Regular meeting, March 10, 2014\nBoard member Knox White motioned to approve minutes as amended.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster seconded.\nMotion carried, 7-0\n9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:\n9.A. Future Agendas - Mr. Thomas reported on upcoming agenda items.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 9 of 10\nApril 28, 2014", "path": "PlanningBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2014-04-28", "page": 10, "text": "9.B. Staff Communications - Zoning Administrator and Design Review Recent\nActions and Decisions - Mr. Thomas reported there were two approvals since the last\nmeeting.\n10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None\n11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:\n11.A. Report from Alameda Point Town Center Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee - None\n12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None\n13. ADJOURNMENT:\n11:20 p.m.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 10 of 10\nApril 28, 2014", "path": "PlanningBoard/2014-04-28.pdf"}