{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 1, "text": "58\nMINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY- -APRIL 1, 2014--7:00 P.M.\nMayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 7:17 p.m. Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft led the\nPledge of Allegiance.\nROLL CALL -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers Chen, Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Tam\nand Mayor Gilmore - 5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nAGENDA CHANGES\nNone.\nPROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY & ANNOUNCEMENTS\nNone.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\nNone.\nCONSENT CALENDAR\nCouncilmember Tam moved approval of the Consent Calendar.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.\nMayor Gilmore noted that she would recuse herself from the resolution ordering\nacceptance of two grants of easement [paragraph no. 14-110].\nOn the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Note:\nMayor Gilmore abstained from voting on the resolution ordering acceptance of two\ngrants of easement [paragraph no. 14-110].] [Items so enacted or adopted are\nindicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.]\n(*14-108) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting, the Special Joint City Council\nand Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission Meeting, and the\nRegular Meeting held on March 4, 2014. Approved.\n(*14-109) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,755,666.70.\n(14-110) Resolution No. 14903, \"Ordering Acceptance of Two Grants of Easement to\nthe City of Alameda from Private Residents for a Proposed Sewer Main Easement\nLocated at the End of Hawthorne Street, 1200 Hawthorne Street, and 1231 Hawthorne\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 1, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-04-01.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 2, "text": "59\nStreet in Exchange for Valuable Consideration and Request Recordation of Grants of\nEasement.\" Adopted.\nNote: Mayor Gilmore abstained from voting on the resolution.\n(*14-111) Resolution No. 14904, \"Approving Revisions to the Part Time Classifications\nSalary Schedule and Establishing the Classification of Administrative Specialist III.\"\nAmended and adopted.\nNote: Staff provided a revised exhibit and resolution.\n(*14-112) Resolution No. 14905, \"Approving Continued Participation in the Alameda\nCounty HOME Consortium and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the HOME\nConsortium Cooperative Agreement with Alameda County.\" Adopted.\n(*14-113) Ordinance No. 3089, \"Approving the Lease Agreement for Six Years with Five\nThree Year Options with Google Inc. in Building 11 Located at 1050 W. Tower Avenue\nand Building 19 Located at 2175 Monarch Street at Alameda Point.\" Finally passed.\n(*14-114) Ordinance No. 3090, \"Approving the First Amendment to the Lease and\nAuthorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the\nTerms of the Lease with Complete Coach Works for Twelve Months in a Portion of\nBuilding 24 at Alameda Point, 2301 Monarch Street.\" Finally passed.\n(*14-115) Ordinance No. 3091, \"Approving the Second Lease Amendment for Twelve\nMonths with Margaret Su dba Wonky and Wonky Kitchen, LLC in Building 119 Located\nat 151 West Seaplane Lagoon at Alameda Point.\" Finally passed.\n(*14-116) Ordinance No. 3092, \"Conveying Approximately 20 Acres of Property from the\nCity of Alameda to the City of Alameda Housing Authority at the Former Naval Air\nStation Alameda (Alameda Point).\" Finally passed.\nREGULAR AGENDA ITEMS\n(14-117) Resolution No. 14906, \"Reappointing Fayleen Allen as a Member of the\nHousing Authority Board of Commissioners.\" Adopted;\n(14-117 A) Resolution No. 14907, \"Reappointing Cullen Jones as a Member of the\nHousing Authority Board of Commissioners.\" Adopted; and\n(14-117 B) Resolution No. 14908, \"Reappointing Stuart Rickard as a Member of the\nHousing Authority Board of Commissioners.\" Adopted.\nCouncilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolutions.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -\n5.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 1, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-04-01.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 3, "text": "60\nThe City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented Mr. Jones with a\nCertificate of Appointment.\n(14-118) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City\nManager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease with\nNavigator Systems For Seven Years with an Additional Five Year Option in Building 14\nLocated at 1800 Ferry Point at Alameda Point. Introduced.\nThe Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft suggested future staff reports for leases include adjacent use\nto add context.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved introduction of the ordinance.\nCouncilmember Tam seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion, Councilmember Tam inquired about doing roof repairs on the building\nwhich will end up being torn down.\nThe Community Development Director responded the minimum amount of repairs would\nbe done to make the building habitable since redevelopment may entail demolition.\nStacey McCarthy, PM Realty, stated the roof is leaking quite badly; the repair is\nnecessary and will only be partial.\nCouncilmember Tam inquired whether a new roof would not be done, to which Ms.\nMcCarthy responded in the affirmative.\nMayor Gilmore stated art is being created; that she is thrilled to see the lease move\nforward.\nOn the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\n(14-119) Introduction of Ordinance Adding Section 30-5.17 to the Alameda Municipal\nCode to Provide Regulations Regarding Reasonable Accommodation in Compliance\nwith the Federal Fair Housing Act, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, and\nCalifornia Housing Element Law; Action is Categorically Exempt pursuant to California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15305, Minor Alterations in Land\nUse Limitations. Introduced.\nThe Development Services Director gave a brief presentation.\nCouncilmember Chen requested an example of a reasonable accommodation\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 1, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-04-01.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 4, "text": "gross receipts; the maximum fee for retail in the district's core area is $1,915.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether implementation of the Phase 2 Recycling\nand Organic Waste Program would address trash receptacles overflowing on\nweekends; stated a business owner expressed concern over missed pickups and did\nnot know who to call.\nRobb Ratto, Park Street Business Association (PSBA), responded the problem is being\naddressed; stated that he met with Public Works and Alameda County Industries (ACI)\nstaff two week ago; ACI will do the pickup between 6:00 and 7:00 a.m.; ACI\nmanagement staff and Public Works staff would check to ensure the pickups are done;\nreplacing the garbage cans is being discussed; a temporary plan is being created;\nimplementation of the recycling and waste will take until June because funding issues\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 1, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-04-01.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 5, "text": "62\nneed to be resolved; people with concerns can contact him.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted a street cleaning competition will be held; stated the\nmaintenance improvement committee is working on improving bicycle parking;\nsuggested PSBA work with Bike Walk Alameda and bicycle shop owners.\nMr. Ratto noted Bike Walk Alameda representatives have been invited to the meetings\nand could even join the committee.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Economic Revitalization Committee working with\nSouth Shore makes perfect sense.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated that he looks forward to the Economic Revitalization\nCommittee working on the gateway arch; inquired about the California Main Street\nAssociation membership.\nMr. Ratto responded PSBA belonged to the State funded program; stated the State\ndefunded the program; PSBA found out the State has started the program again and\njoined as an associate member to find out if being certified will be beneficial; if so, PSBA\nwill become certified.\nCouncilmember Tam inquired whether Lot P could have latent potential.\nMr. Ratto responded the City leases the property for $1,000 per month; PSBA charges\n$80 per month for a parking space, which is the highest price lot in the District; the\nBoard has not raised the rate; there have been discussions about dropping the\nprogram; PSBA is open to suggestions.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the Park Street BIA annual assessment\nreport; adoption of the resolution of intention to levy an annual assessment on the Park\nStreet BIA for Fiscal Year 2014-15; and setting a public hearing on May 6, 2014.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -\n5.\nCITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS\n(14-121) The City Manager announced that, pursuant to the Sunshine Ordinance, he is\nannouncing the commencement of bargaining with the Electric Utility Professionals of\nAlameda (EUPA) and Alameda Municipal Power Unrepresented Employees (AMPUE);\nstated a Memorandum of Understanding and compensation plan will be presented to\nCouncil on May 20, 2014.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\n(14-122) Irma Garcia, Protect Alameda, provided a handout; stated that she would like\nto stop the Anti-Terrorism and Contraband Enforcement Team Enforcement Site from\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 1, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-04-01.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 6, "text": "63\ncoming to Alameda and would like the matter placed on a Council agenda.\nCOUNCIL REFERRALS\nNone.\nCOUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\n(14-123) Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she and Councilmember Tam\nattended a benefit for the Midway Shelter.\nCouncilmember Tam thanked the Police Department for sending a representative to the\nevent.\n(14-124) Councilmember Tam announced that she and Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft\nattended the League of California Cities East Bay Division meeting on March 27th;\ndiscussed PG&E's pipelines pathway and massage parlors, which were addressed at\nthe meetings.\n(14-125) Councilmember Daysog announced that he attended an event to restart the\npark t-Shirt league.\n(14-126) Councilmember Daysog stated staff should ensure the Transient Occupancy\nTax (TOT) is being collected for travelers using AirBNB; suggested that the City\ncontemplate a reasonable TOT increase, perhaps of 1%, in order to fund a visitor\nserving strategy.\n*\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft left the dais at 8:12 p.m. and returned at 8:13 p.m.\n(14-127) Mayor Gilmore complemented Public Works staff for preventing and quickly\nresolving any flooding due to the recent storms.\nADJOURNMENT\n(14-128) There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:14\np.m. in memory of Ann Taylor.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 1, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-04-01.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 7, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY-- -APRIL 1, 2014--6:00 P.M.\nMayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 6:03 p.m.\nRoll Call -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers Chen, Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Tam and\nMayor Gilmore - 5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nThe meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:\n(14-106) Conference with Labor Negotiators (54957.6); City Negotiator: Elizabeth\nWarmerdam, Assistant City Manager and Ronald Stassi, Interim General Manager\nOrganizations; Represented: Electric Utility Professionals of Alameda (EUPA) and\nAlameda Municipal Power Unrepresented Employees (AMPUE); Issues Under\nNegotiation: Proposed Memorandum of Understanding with EUPA and Proposed\nCompensation plan for AMPUE. Both including wages, hours, benefits and working\nconditions\n(14-107) Public Employee Performance Evaluation; Pursuant to Government Code \u00a7\n54957; Positions Evaluated: City Attorney Janet Kern\nFollowing the closed session, the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Gilmore\nannounced that regarding Labor, direction was given to staff.\n*\nMayor Gilmore called a recess at 7:11 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:15 p.m.\nFollowing the closed session, the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Gilmore\nannounced regarding Performance Evaluation, no action was taken.\nAdjournment\nThere being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:37 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 1, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-04-01.pdf"}
{"body": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 1, "text": "Social Service Human Relations Board\nMinutes of the Special Meeting, April 1, 2014\n1.\nCALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL\nPresident Biggs called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. Present were members Radding, Watkinson, and\nBlake. Absent were Vice President Villareal, and members Williams and Robles-Wong\n1-A.\nSEASON FOR NON-VIOLENCE DAILY READING\nPresident Biggs explained that each year, the Board partners with the ACCYF and community organizations to\nsupport activities and events during the Season For Non-Violence which begins on January 30, and ends on\nApril 4. Daily words and readings have been created for elementary, middle, and high school students in\nhopes of inspiring and guiding them into a safer, more peaceful world. Like the City Council, AUSD Board,\nand ACCYF, SSHRB traditionally begins ITS meetings during the Season For Non Violence with the Word\nand Reading of the day.\nCommitment\nToday's principle from A Season for Nonviolence is COMMITMENT. Do you feel a commitment to\nnonviolence? Can you think of a way to express that commitment today?\n2.\nAPPROVAL OF MINUTES\nThe Minutes of the Special Meeting, February 19, 2014 were approved as presented.\nM/S Radding\\Biggs Unanimous\n3.\nAGENDA ITEMS\n3-A.\nREVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\nBLOCK GRANT (CDBG) NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC SERVICES\nFUNDING ALLOCATION FOR FY 2014-15\nCLAUDIA YOUNG - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM MANAGER, CITY OF\nALAMEDA\nMs. Young began her presentation by introducing Victoria Johnson, the Housing Authority's new Director of\nHousing and Community Development. She went on to explain that HUD has now provided information as to\nwhy year's funding is less than was anticipated and used to formulate the staff recommendations presented to\nthe Board at its Special Meeting on February 19, 2014. The maximum amount of CDBG Entitlement funds\navailable for Public Services is 15% of the total grant, and is $161,058 for FY 2014 - 15. This, added to\n$30,000, which represents 15% of $200,000 in Reprogrammed Funds, makes a total of $191,058 available for\nPublic Services. This leaves $5,433 more to work with, compared to the amount available and recommended\nfor funding by staff at the February meeting.\nB\\PACKETS\\2014Apri 1, 2014\\MINUTES April 1, 2014.doc", "path": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2014-04-01.pdf"}
{"body": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 2, "text": "Speakers: (A number of speakers arrived after the Board had entered into the discussion phase of the agenda\nitem. However, all were given the opportunity to speak, and are listed below in the order they spoke)\nAll of this evening's speakers were also present and spoke at the Board's meeting on February 19.\nAdditional information on their programs can be found in the minutes of that meeting.\nErin Scott, Executive Director -- Family Violence Law Center\nMs. Scott reiterated how important the services of the Family Violence Law Center were to victims of\ndomestic violence, and shared that contact with her agency is written into the Alameda Police Department\nDomestic Violence protocol. She added that in addition to assistance with the initial Restraining Order\nimmediately after the incidents of domestic violence, the agency also assists with other restraining orders\ndealing with custody, pets, housing, and other issues. In response to a question from President Biggs, she\nresponded that the CDBG funds received are used for legal services only.\nBarbara Bernstein, Executive Director -- Eden I&R, Inc.\nMs. Bernstein shared that the funds provided by each city for the program are based on a \"fair & equitable\nfunding plan\", with its $1.5 million annual costs of the service being divided into thirds (1/3 cities; 1/3 county;\n1/3 private sector - based on population). She asked that the Board approve the staff recommendation of\n$20,000 funding, because \"cities look to one another for equity\" She stated that, while Eden I & R would still\ncontinue to serve Alameda residents, if it did not receive funding from the city of Alameda, they are already\nnot able to pick up 20,000 calls a year, because of loss of staffing. While the 211 program records a clients\nincome as stated over the phone, many of the services to which clients are referred require verification of\nincome at the point of service.\nAngie Watson-Hajjem, Fair Housing Specialist -- ECHO Housing\nMs. Watson-Hajjem shared that the $15,000 SSHRB recommendation for funding for ECHO would restrict its\nability to serve clients. ECHO performs intake over the phone, and does not verify income.\nIn response to the question as to which of ECHO's services are mandated, Ms. Johnson / AHA staff responded\nthat it was the Fair Housing component.\nEbony Brown , Program Director Family Support Services/Family Support Center\nAlameda Family Services\nBIPACKETS\\2014Apri 1, 2014\\MINUTES April 1, 2014.doc", "path": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2014-04-01.pdf"}
{"body": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 3, "text": "Ms. Brown shared that if its program were to be recommended for funding, the main part of the grant would\ngo to provide a part-time case manager for housing stability issues that would be different than that provided\nby ECHO and Legal Aid for Seniors. One of the challenges working with seniors is that they often require that\nmore time be spent with them during the case management process. Their experience to date has been an\naverage of 90 minutes per meeting, with two meetings per client, but in some cases as many as nine meetings.\nTheir services would also include home visits, which is required for some seniors with mobility issues and\nadded that these type of services also help with seniors with a sense of independence\nLiz Varela, Executive Director - Building Futures with Women and Children\nMs. Varela thanked the Board and staff for their continued high level of funding and support of Midway\nShelter and the Homeless Prevention Services provided by Building Futures. The support from the community\nthrough donations to the Alameda Homeless Network, and local support in general, also make a big\ndifference. She added that, with the possibility of additional loss of state funding, Building Futures is\nanticipating that it may need to close one of its shelters San Leandro. She suggested that, if Alameda Family\nServices were to provide Homelessness Prevention case management and qualify their clients for rental\nassistance, Building Futures might be able to provide direct services.\nIn response to questions about the $5,000 in their grant to staff the Domestic Violence Task Force, she stated\nthat they have been very fortunate to be able to leverage funds from congregations and foundations, and have\nhad active and positive participation from all of the Task Force partners.\nDiscussion\nPresident Biggs shared with Members Watkinson and Blake, who were not present at the February 19\nmeeting, that he and Member Radding had the opportunity to review and evaluate all of the grant applications.\nPrimary elements of the Board's discussion are summarized in the three underlined paragraphs below\nexcerpted from Social Service Human Relations Board recommendations to the Mayor and City Council\nregarding the proposed FY14-15 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) public service funding levels\nand programs.\nFollowing the RFP process, City staff ranked and selected proposals for funding. Deviating from the practice\nof previous years, members of SSHRB were not included in an objective ranking of the proposals. Eight\nagencies applied for funding, and staff selected seven of the agencies for funding. All eight agencies proposed\nservices are important to the community, but not all proposals addressed the safety need priority as identified\nby SSHRB. Two of the proposals - for 211 and Echo Housing - were submitted for services that historically\nhave been funded by the City out of non-public service funds; (one of them, the 211 program was originally\nfunded out of General Fund) however at staff's discretion, they were included in the public service pool this\nyear. This was done to fulfill a HUD mandate and/or expectation that the City must fund these programs.\nHowever that mandate does not, and historically has not, meant that they must be funded out of public service\nfunds that should be used to serve community needs. While both of the selected programs provide a useful\nservice, neither program addresses the limited safety net priority identified by the SSHRB. Despite this and\nother weaknesses in the proposals, both of these programs were recommended for funding by staff.\nBIPACKETS\\2014April 1, 2014\\MINUTES April 1, 2014.doc", "path": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2014-04-01.pdf"}
{"body": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 4, "text": "Several agencies submitted proposals that addressed the emerging need of services for seniors, including one\nproposal to provide services for an increasing number of Alameda seniors who are becoming homeless.\nDespite evidence that this was a real and immediate community-identified need, and that it clearly addressed\nthe priorities laid out by SSHRB, staff chose not to recommend funding this proposal. In reviewing the system\nused for scoring applications, SSHRB has raised concerns that there were flaws in the way scoring was\napplied among programs that influenced the selection process.\nThe revised staff allocations, presented at this evening's meeting, ignored the recommendations of SSHRB\nand continued to deny funding for homeless and at-risk seniors. At the meeting staff did assure members of\nSSHRB that they recognized the need for services for homeless and at-risk seniors and were diligently seeking\nout alternate sources of funds for the 211 and ECHO housing services in the hopes that by the time the City\nCouncil considers the allocations, all programs can be appropriately funded.\nIn response to questions from President Biggs, Ms. Johnson shared that Alameda Housing Authority continues\nto recommend that no CDBG Admin Funds be used for any of the Public Service Programs, including ECHO\nand Eden I&R 211 program, so no changes to the current staff were made. She added that she did, however,\nsupport efforts to try to identify additional sources that would make it possible to fund all applicants, and that\nshe had had conversations with Debbie Potter, Community Development Director in this regard.\nMember Radding suggested that the Board use its recommendation formulated at the February meeting as a\nstarting point, and determine where it might add the funds necessary to reach the total of $191,058.\nIt was agreed that the additional funds could be obtained between ECHO Housing and Eden I&R's 211\nprograms. (See chart in ATTACHMENT A for funding recommended by Board).\nMotion to recommend FY 2014-15 CDBG Public Service Funding at the levels discussed by the Board that\ninclude full funding of Alameda Family Services and partial funding of ECHO Housing and Eden I&R's 211\n(SEE ATTACHMENT A), with the acknowledgment of the value of the services provided by all of the\nagencies who applied for CDBG funding, including Echo and Eden I&R, and with the hope that staff will be\nable to identify additional funding to fully support these programs. The letter would also express concerns\nregarding the process for scoring the applications. It was agreed that President Biggs and Member Radding\nwould draft the letter to the Mayor and Council, and that they would both be available to work with staff on a\nfunding recommendation agreeable to all, before the May 6 Council Meeting.\nM/S Radding/Watkinson Unanimous\n4. BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA - Information - 10 minutes\nPresident Biggs shared that Board had received an email from a West End resident expressing concern\nregarding homeless individuals on Webster Street. President Biggs asked that an item be placed on the agenda\nfor the regular April meeting to address this concern.\n5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - Information - 3 minutes per speaker\n6. ADJOURNMENT\nBIPACKETS\\2014Apri 1, 2014\\MINUTES April 1, 2014.doc", "path": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2014-04-01.pdf"}
{"body": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard", "date": "2014-04-01", "page": 5, "text": "The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 PM. M)S Watkinson\\ Blake UNANIMOUS\nRespectfully submitted by:\nJim Franz\nSecretary\nB\\PACKETS\\2014Apri 1, 2014\\MINUTES April 1, 2014.doc", "path": "SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2014-04-01.pdf"}