{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 1, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY- -FEBRUARY - 4, 2014- -5:00 P.M.\nMayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 5:08 p.m.\nRoll Call - Present:\nCouncilmembers Chen, Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Tam and\nMayor Gilmore - 5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nThe meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:\n(14-028) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (54956.9); Case Name:\nEast Bay Regional Park District V. City of Alameda, et al.; Superior Court of the State of\nCalifornia, County of Alameda; Case No. RG120655685\n(14-029) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Initiating litigation\npursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9; Number of cases: One (As Plaintiff - City\nInitiating Legal Action)\n(14-030) Conference with Legal Counsel - Significant Exposure to Litigation; Significant\nexposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9; Number of cases:\nOne (As Defendant City Exposure to Legal Action)\nFollowing the Closed Session the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Gilmore\nannounced that regarding Existing Litigation, direction was given to attorneys to\nproceed with formal mediation; regarding Anticipated Litigation, direction was given to\nstaff; and regarding Significant Exposure to Litigation, direction was given to staff.\nAdjournment\nThere being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:04 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 2, "text": "MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY--FEBRUARY - 4, 2014- -7:00 P.M.\nMayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 7:17 p.m.\nROLL CALL -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers Chen, Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Tam\nand Mayor Gilmore - 5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nAGENDA CHANGES\n(14-031) Mayor Gilmore announced that the NBS Contract [paragraph no. 14-044\nwould be heard before the Alameda Point Hearing [paragraph no. 14-045].\nPROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY & ANNOUNCEMENTS\n(14-032) The Public Works Administrative Services Manager, Park Manager, Public\nWorks Superintendent, Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point and Fire Chief gave a\nPower Point presentation on the City's efforts to reduce water use.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\n(14-033) Carlos Cadiente, Alameda, discussed the proposed Emergency Operations\nCenter plans.\n(14-034) Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association (PSBA), thanked Public Works\nfor the Holiday lights.\n(14-035) Isabel Cortes, Office of Senator Hancock, introduced herself and encouraged\nthe Council and public to use her as a resource.\nCONSENT CALENDAR\nMayor Gilmore announced that the Consultant Agreement with Public Agency\nRetirement Services [paragraph no. 14-040 was removed from the Consent Calendar\nfor discussion and the Ordinance Amending Zoning Map at 2350 Harbor Bay Parkway\n[paragraph no. 14-041 was continued to February 18, 2014.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.\nCouncilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\n[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph\nnumber.]\n(14-036) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on January 7, 2014.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 3, "text": "Approved.\n(14-037) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,416.016.62.\n(14-038) Recommendation to Approve the City of Alameda Investment Policy.\nAccepted.\n(14-039) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Enter Into a\nGrant Agreement with the Rockefeller Foundation for the Cost of Funding the Mayor's\nChief Resilience Officer; to Receive Other Resilience Services; and Upon Receipt of\nSufficient Grant Funds for the Term of the Grant, Add an Additional Division Chief\nPosition to Fire Department Authorized Positions to Serve as the Chief Resilience\nOfficer and to Backfill Regular Fire Staff, Including the Hiring of a Limited Term\nFirefighter. Accepted.\n(14-040) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a\nConsultant Agreement with Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) for a Post-\nEmployment Retirement Benefit (OPEB) Plan; and\n(14-040 A) Resolution No. 14887, \"Authorizing the Establishment of an Internal\nRevenue Code (IRC) Section 115 Irrevocable Trust (OPEB Trust) with PARS to Prefund\nPost-Employment Benefits for Eligible Retirees.\" Adopted.\nThe Finance Director gave a brief presentation.\nUrged Council to move forward; noted funds must be put into the account to accrue\ninterest: Former Councilmember Doug deHaan, Alameda.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the staff recommendation and adoption of\nthe resolution.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion, Councilmember Daysog\nOn the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\n(14-041) Final Passage of Ordinance Amending Zoning Map at 2350 Harbor Bay\nParkway from O (Open Space) to C-M PD (Commercial-Manufacturing, with a Planned\nDevelopment Overlay) with Specified Conditions. Continued to February 18, 2014.\n[Hold for final passage; New file: 460-20]\n(*14-042) Ordinance No. 3085, \"Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to\nNegotiate and Execute Amendments and Other Corresponding Documents Necessary\nto Implement the Terms of a Lease with Proximo Distillers, LLC for Ten Years with an\nAdditional Ten Year Option in a Portion of Building 22 Located at 2505 Monarch Street\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 4, "text": "at Alameda Point.\" Finally passed.\nREGULAR AGENDA ITEMS\n(14-043) Summary: Consider forming City of Alameda Community Facilities District\n(CFD) No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District) and, if no majority\nprotest, (a) authorize the levy of a special tax within the District and the issuance of\nbonded indebtedness, (b) call for a special election within the District to establish an\nappropriations limit, (c) declare the results of the election and, if two-thirds (2/3) or more\nof the votes cast are in favor of the District, (d) direct a notice of special tax lien be\nrecorded and (e) introduce an ordinance levying special taxes within the District.\nContinued Public Hearing to Consider Formation of City of Alameda Community\nFacilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District);\n(14-043 A) Resolution No. 14888, \"Resolution of Formation of the City of Alameda\nCommunity Facilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District)\nAuthorizing the Levy of a Special Tax within the District, Preliminarily Establishing an\nAppropriations Limit for the District, and Submitting Levy of the Special Tax and the\nEstablishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the District.\"\nAdopted;\n(14-043 B) Resolution No. 14889, \"Calling Special Election within the City of Alameda\nCommunity Facilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District). \"\nAdopted;\n(14-043 C) Conduct Special Election;\n(14-043 D) Resolution No. 14890, \"Declaring Results of Special Election and Directing\nRecording of Notice of Special Tax Lien - Alameda Landing Municipal Services District\n(MSD).\" Adopted; and\n(14-043 E) Introduction of Ordinance Levying Special Taxes within the City of Alameda\nCommunity Facilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District).\nIntroduced. [Hold for final passage: 345-60]\nThe Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.\nMayor Gilmore opened the public hearing.\nThere being no speakers, Mayor Gilmore closed the public hearing.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how the public safety provision amount of $97,949\nwas calculated.\nThe Community Development Director responded a fiscal impact analysis was prepared\nby Keyser Marsten for the Bayport and Alameda Landing areas; stated the numbers are\nderived from a per capita analysis.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 5, "text": "Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if the public safety services includes both Police and\nFire, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired why the annual tax assessment is a flat rate of\n$1,200 instead of based on square footage.\nThe Community Development Director responded the $1,200 flat rate is the negotiated\namount contained in the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA); stated the\nsame amount was assessed at the Bayport MSD.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated the MSD for Bayport was created because the City still\nhad obligations through the development after redevelopment was over.\nCouncilmember Daysog moved adoption of the resolution forming the district.\nCouncilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution calling the election.\nCouncilmember Chen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\nMayor Gilmore asked the City Clerk to announce the results of the election.\nThe City Clerk announced there were 49 votes in favor and none against.\nMayor Gilmore announced the Council may proceed with the final actions.\nCouncilmember Chen moved adoption of the resolution declaring the results of the\nspecial election.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -\n5.\nCouncilmember Chen moved introduction of the ordinance.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -\n5.\n(14-044) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $40,050 to NBS for\nBalloting Property Owners for Assessment Increases in the Island City Landscaping and\nLighting District 84-2, Zones 2, 3, and 4.\nThe Public Works Administrative Services Manager gave a Power Point presentation.\nCouncilmembers Daysog and Chen recused themselves and left the room.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 6, "text": "Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how soon the proposed improvements would be\nseen.\nThe Public Works Administrative Services Manager responded bids could be sent out\nonce the assessments for the next year are determined; stated improvements could be\nseen by September 1, 2014.\nNoted maintenance is costly; stated the PSBA Board unanimously approved a plan to\ndouble the assessment over the next three years and have a Consumer Price Index\nincrease annually thereafter: Robb Ratto, PSBA.\nMayor Gilmore inquired if the PSBA and West Alameda Business Association (WABA)\nelections are separate, to which the Public Works Administrative Services Manager\nresponded in the affirmative; stated the elections are independent and separate.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether garbage overflow clean-up would be paid if\nthere is enough funding.\nThe Public Works Administrative Services Manager responded in the affirmative; stated\noverflow garbage could be maintained by someone onsite.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted the design of the garbage containers could also be an\nimpediment.\nCouncilmember Tam stated there have been issues because of absentee property\nowners; inquired if the proposal is broadly supported.\nThe Public Works Administrative Services Manager responded balloting is based on\nvotes casts; stated the WABA Board has voted unanimously in favor of the proposal\nand are willing to do outreach to educate members; the proposal will pass as long as\n50% vote in favor.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of awarding the contract to NBS.\nCouncilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 3.\n[Absent: Councilmember Chen and Daysog - 2.]\n(14-045) Summary: This is a public hearing to address the following items: (1) certifying\nAlameda Point's Final Environmental Impact Report, a document assessing\nenvironmental impacts associated with the Alameda Point project, (2) approving\nchanges to the City's General Plan as it relates to Alameda Point which will result in\nincreased employment opportunities and will modify the street network supporting a\ntransit-oriented development, (3) amending the zoning code, and (4) approving a\nMaster Infrastructure Plan to establish standards for backbone infrastructure to\naccommodate the redevelopment of Alameda Point.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 7, "text": "Public Hearing to Consider Certifying the Environmental Impact Report, and Approving\na General Plan Amendment, Zoning Ordinance Amendment, and Master Infrastructure\nPlan for the Alameda Point Project:\n(14-045 A) Resolution No. 14891, \"Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report,\nand Adopt Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, Mitigation Measures,\nand a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Programs for the Alameda Point Project.\"\nAdopted;\n(14-045 B) Resolution No. 14892, \"Approving a General Plan Amendment to Modify\nGeneral Plan Table 2-7 to Provide Additional Opportunities to Increase Employment at\nAlameda Point Consistent with the 1996 Community Reuse Plan and to Modify\nTransportation Element Street Network to Support a Transit Oriented Mixed Use\nDevelopment at Alameda Point.\" Adopted;\n(14-045 C) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Various Sections of the Alameda\nMunicipal Code Contained in Chapter XXX (Development Regulations) to Ensure\nConsistency between the City of Alameda General Plan and the City of Alameda\nMunicipal Code for those Lands Generally referred to as \"Alameda Point.\" Introduced;\n[Hold for final passage; New file: 440-25; cross reference: 460-20, 440-60] and\n(14-045 D) Resolution No. 14893, \"Recommending Approval of the Master\nInfrastructure Plan (MIP) Establishing the Requirements and Standards for the\nBackbone Infrastructure to Support the Redevelopment and Reuse of Alameda Point.'\nAdopted.\nThe City Planner provided a handout and gave a Power Point presentation.\nMayor Gilmore stated the Alameda Country Transportation Commission formed a\nsubcommittee on which she and Councilmember Tam sit; the subcommittee arrived at a\nconsensus that the solution does not only involve efficient ways to move cars in\nOakland China Town and has made a commitment to do another traffic-pedestrian\nstudy to evaluate the impacts on pedestrians in China Town; two productive meetings\nwere held with a lot of input from China Town; Alameda is interested in a solution,\nwhatever it may be.\nThe City Planner concurred with Mayor Gilmore; stated the transportation issue is a\nregional problem requiring the cooperation of Alameda and Oakland; continued his\npresentation.\nCouncilmember Tam inquired if Alameda Point was way over capacity with 18,000 jobs\nat the Naval Air Station during its heyday.\nThe City Planner responded in the affirmative, stated the Navy was the only employer;\n24-hour workday shifts were staggered, however, the Tube was still backed up every\nafternoon; capacity in the tube under the regional model only looks at peak commute\nperiods of the morning and evening.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 8, "text": "Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the GPA reduces the number of housing units;\ninquired if the number is flexible and whether residential units could be added in the\nfuture to make the job-housing balance more vibrant.\nThe City Planner responded in the affirmative; stated any changes are possible but\nwould involve public hearings; the City has a Conveyance Agreement with the Navy; not\nall the property has been conveyed; the Navy has completed their environmental review\nwhich only includes 1,425 housing units; the plan improves the job-housing balance\nCitywide.\nCouncilmember Daysog inquired whether the emphasis on Transportation Demand\nManagement (TDM) in today's documents reflect Alameda Point changing.\nThe City Planner responded in the affirmative; stated Alameda Point will be more job\nheavy; today's TDM plays to Alameda's strengths and is a program that Alameda can\naccomplish, commit to, and fund; an aggressive TDM will accommodate growth by\nchanging behaviors.\nCouncilmember Chen stated there has been lots of staff hours spent to ensure the\nsuccess of the TDM and to attract more transit oriented residents; a lot depends on\nOakland mitigation and cooperation; inquired what if the plan does not work.\nThe City Planner responded the plan will happen in phases over 20 to 25 years; Council\nwill be provided annual reports monitoring trip data and determining whether or not\ngoals are being met; the Council will ultimately have control and the ability to decide on\nalternatives.\nThe City Manager stated the City would maintain control and engage in transactions\nthat are financially sound; the pace of development could be controlled; there are two\nimportant characteristics: 1) the City never loses control, and 2) there is flexibility based\non market signals.\nThe Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point concurred with the City Manager; stated\nstaff is working closely with highly qualified professionals, and the plan has been\ncompletely vetted.\nStated there will be economic opportunities; urged moving forward: Doug Biggs,\nAlameda Point Collaborative.\nPresented a brief power point regarding transit: Ethan Clifton, Alameda.\nUrged a comprehensive traffic study for China Town and Alameda: Carl Chan, Oakland\nChinatown Chamber.\nProvided submittal and reviewed East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) comments\non the EIR: Larry Tong, EBRPD.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 9, "text": "Expressed supports for the EIR; stated that she is looking forward to next design steps:\nDiane Lichtenstein, HOMES.\nAdvocated for quality development and urged next steps to continue in the open with\npublic comment: Helen Sause, Alameda Homes.\nUrged more discussion on impacts of traffic in the Tubes: Denis Carroll, Alameda.\nExpressed supports for the proposed zoning changes: Leslie Cameron, Bay Ship &\nYacht.\nUrged using Tacoma, Washington as model city for water and transit; provided history\nof Alameda Point planning: former Councilmember Hadi Monsef, Alameda.\nUrged removal of Charter constraints on housing: Bill Smith, Renewed Hope Housing.\nStated the waterfront and restaurants will attract residents; a utopia without cars does\nnot make sense: Jim Strehlow, Alameda\nStated Alamedan's quality of life is priority; commented on de-emphasizing automobiles\nand emphasizing BART and ferry ridership: former Councilmember Doug deHaan,\nAlameda.\nStated Alameda will be the next Sausalito: Bobeck Paradian, Owner, Caf\u00e9 Jolie,\nAlameda.\nStated that she is excited to see Alameda move forward and bring a 21-year entitlement\nprocess to a close: Karen Bey, Alameda.\nUrged that new development not compromise the historical district: Christopher\nBuckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society.\nStated the City should pay attention to the effects of development on harbor seals and\nall wildlife at Alameda Point: Rachel Campos, Alameda.\nStated that she is impressed with report; the community is very informed and was\ninvolved in the process: Gretchen Lipow, Alameda.\nStated the proposal was fully vetted by the Planning Board; that he supports moving\nforward, Mike Henneberry, Alameda.\nStated the policies and guidelines lay good ground work; that she is impressed with\ntraffic management ideas: Laura Thomes Renewed Hope Housing Advocates.\nCouncilmember Chen stated bullet points in the draft EIR indicate there is significant\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 10, "text": "impact to pedestrian safety at 8th Street & Harrison Avenue in Oakland China Town;\nencouraged finding a common, united solution; inquired if a source of funding has been\nidentified for building the levy in the MIP.\nThe Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the affirmative; stated there\nare three primary funding sources: 1) land sale proceeds, 2) CFD assessments placed\non property owners, and 3) impact fees, which require every project and parcel to pay a\nfair share of infrastructure costs.\nCouncilmember Tam thanked staff; stated there is a concern the City does not have a\nPlan B; that she would like to have assurances in the resolution that any Alameda Point\nmitigation does not compete with the rest of the Island for funding.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed a letter submitted by the Alameda Preservation\nSociety requesting language be changed in the EIR; stated she would not want staff to\nchange the language in the EIR at this point; a ferry system is a great solution for\nAlameda Point and the Public Works Department can address parking problems; the\ncycle tracks is a transit oriented alternative to automobiles.\nCouncilmember Daysog thanked residents for their comments and for coming to the\nmeetings; stated tonight is an historic night for the City; early planning documents and\nland use plans discussed trophy-like traffic mitigations which are seared into the minds\nof residents; that a shift emphasizing jobs, instead of housing, is needed to influence the\nTDM and alter behavior of residents; other transportation ideas are not discounted, but\nare more reasonable as part of the maturation process; there are still controls in place\nto guide the development, the zoning, and the General Plan land uses and intensities\ncontemplated.\nMayor Gilmore concurred with one of the speaker's comments that the public has been\nwell informed with regard to Alameda Point and the EIR; thanked staff and the Planning\nBoard for taking time and explaining step by step; expressed gratitude to the public for\ntaking time to be educated, being engaged, and lending input to the process; the public\nprocess was the best run she had the privilege to be involved in; she is confident\nAlameda can deal with transit issues; the same ideas and methods have worked in\nother cities; she was skeptical with the City taking lead, but there are sincere efforts to\nput jobs first; if the issue is passed tonight, it is not the end.\nVice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the EIR resolution.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call\nvote: Councilmembers Chen: Aye; Daysog: Aye; Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Tam: Aye; and\nMayor Gilmore: Aye. Ayes: 5. Noes: 0.\nCouncilmember Chen moved adoption of the General Plan Amendment resolution.\nCouncilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 11, "text": "Councilmembers Chen: Aye; Daysog: Aye; Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Tam: Aye; and Mayor\nGilmore: Aye. Ayes: 5. Noes: 0.\nCouncilmember Daysog moved introduction of Ordinance amending the AMC.\nCouncilmember Chen seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:\nCouncilmembers Chen: Aye; Daysog: Aye; Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Tam: Aye; and Mayor\nGilmore: Aye. Ayes: 5. Noes: 0.\nCouncilmember Tam moved adoption of Master Infrastructure Plan resolution with\namendment to addendum to include MIP will be consistent with adopted fiscal neutrality\npolicy.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call\nvote: Councilmembers Chen: Aye; Daysog: Aye; Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Tam: Aye; and\nMayor Gilmore: Aye. Ayes: 5. Noes: 0.\nCITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS\nNone.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\nNone.\nCOUNCIL REFERRALS\nNone.\nCOUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\n(14-046) Councilmember Daysog announced that he attended the League of California\nCities meeting on January 22nd.\n(14-047) Councilmember Tam announced that she also attended the East Bay division\nmeeting of the League of California Cities; the Environmental Water Quality Committee\nfocused on the drought, and the political landscape of East Bay was discussed; she\nalso attended the license plate reader briefing.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2014-02-04", "page": 12, "text": "ADJOURNMENT\nThere being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 10:42 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nFebruary 4, 2014", "path": "CityCouncil/2014-02-04.pdf"}