{"body": "CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 1, "text": "APPROVED\nCOMMISSION ON DISABILITY ISSUES\nMEETING MINUTES OF\nMonday, July 22, 2013 6:30 p.m.\n1.\nROLL CALL\nThe meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m.\nPresent: Chair Lord-Hausman, Commissioners Fort, Franco, Fruge, Harp, Tam, Warren, and\nWilkinson\nAbsent: Vice-chair Deutsche\nChair Lord-Hausman presented former Commissioner Kirola with a certificate of\nappreciation. Commissioner Kirola expressed appreciation to the Commission.\nChair Lord-Hausman introduced new Commissioner Wilkinson, who shared her background\nwith the Commission\n2.\nMINUTES\n2-A.\nApproved with changes.\n3.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS/NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)\n3-A.\nBonnie Leber, Mastick Senior Center liaison, distributed information regarding the Annual\nOpen House and Resources Fair scheduled for Sunday, September 15, 2013, 1:00 p.m. - 4:00\np.m. The Commission is offered to have a table at the event. Chair Lord-Hausman asked\nwho would be willing to staff the table, to which, Commissioners Franco and Tam confirmed\ntheir availability.\n3-B.\nCommissioner Fruge inquired about adding sign language to Channel 15 and the local\nnewspapers to which Secretary Akil responded that she will check with the City Clerk.\n3-C.\nCommissioner Fruge inquired about installation of equipment for deaf in the event of a fire.\nChair Lord-Hausman confirmed that there is a program through Alameda Fire Department\nand she will email Commissioner Fruge the contact information. Commissioner Tam stated\nhe spoke with the Fire Chief who confirmed the grant funds are running low. There has been\nprogress made, but these type of issues take time to resolve.\n4.\nNEW BUSINESS\n4-A.\nChair Lord-Hausman discussed her meeting with Public Works regarding the redesign of\nWebster Street intersection to ensure accessibility and pedestrian friendly (push button)\nsignals.", "path": "CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 2, "text": "Commission on Disability Issues\nJuly 22, 2013\nPage 2\n5.\nOLD BUSINESS\n5-A.\nChair Lord-Hausman acknowledged that the September Mastick Senior Center event and the\nOctober Alameda Hospital Community Fair are outreach programs which the Commission\nwill participate in.\nChair Lord-Hausman and Commissioner Fort participated in the Alameda County Pilot\nVolunteer Training Program.\n5-B.\nSecretary Akil distributed the proposed schedule for Alameda Municipal Codes amendments\nand read an appreciation and thanks letter from Andrew Thomas, City Planner, regarding the\nCDI's work on the draft Universal Design Ordinance.\nChair Lord-Hausman acknowledged Commissioner Harp, Vice-Chair Deutsche and\ncommunity member Stephen Beard, for their hard work on drafting the Universal Design\nOrdinance.\nChair Lord-Hausman requested that Commissioner Harp email the latest version of the\nUniversal Design Ordinance to the Commission.\n5-C.\nChair Lord-Hausman acknowledged Public Works and Assistant City Manager, Alex Nguyen\nfor their hard work, regarding the four new benches installed along Park Street. The City\nhopes to install more as funding becomes available. Commissioner Tam stated Mayor\nGilmore acknowledged the benches at one of her community meetings.\n5-D.\nNone.\n5-E.\nChair Lord-Hausman stated she has attended and spoken at the Planning Board regarding\nAlameda Point and Alameda Landing, where Target is being proposed. Chair Lord-Hausman\nis hoping that accessible issues and designs are addressed. Commissioner Tam\nacknowledged that he attended a meeting regarding Alameda Landing and stated that staffis\naware of ADA requirements and will adhere to those requirements.\nChair Lord-Hausman encouraged the Commission to acknowledge their presence as CDI\nmembers at various meetings in support of change and input.\nCommissioner Tam stated he will mention the support at both the Kiwanis Club and Rotary\nregarding design and access.", "path": "CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 3, "text": "Commission on Disability Issues\nJuly 22, 2013\nPage 2\n6.\nSTAFF COMMUNICATIONS\n6-A.\nSecretary Akil welcomed new Commissioner Wendy Wilkinson.\n7.\nANNOUNCEMENTS\n7-A\nCommissioner Tam stated that within AUSD there is an increase in the ESL student\npopulation. They are trying to outreach to those families. Commissioner Tam welcomes any\ninput from the Commission. Commissioner Franco suggested PTA input via parents.\n7-B.\nCommissioner Harp attended the July 13, 2013 Jean Sweeney Open Space walkthrough.\nThere is a Facebook - \"\"ean Sweeney\" and they are looking for Community Volunteers.\nChair Lord-Hausman stated that there is a Planning Committee working on the project, per\nAmy Wooldridge, Alameda Recreation and Park Department Director. Chair Lord-Hausman\nwill invite Amy to the October Commission meeting.\n7-C.\nChair Lord-Hausman stated that Jackie Krause requested that the Commission make a\npresentation on what the Commission is working on or has completed at a Mastick Board\nMeeting. Chair Lord-Hausman will work with Bonnie Leber to schedule.\n7-D.\nChair Lord-Hausman suggested that the Commission recommend to City Council to send a\nletter of support to ratify a United Nations Treaty defending the rights of people with\ndisabilities and to encourage other nations to match the standards set by the United States.\nCommissioner Warren stated she will work with Chair Lord-Hausman on the letter.\nCommissioner Franco will research the treaty and email the link to the Commission. The\nCommission supports the recommendation.\n8.\nADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:41 p.m.\nRespectfully Submitted,\nLucretia Akil,\nBoard Secretary", "path": "CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 1, "text": "APPROVED MEETING MINUTES\nREGULAR MEETING OF THE\nCITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD\nMONDAY, JULY 22, 2013\n1. CONVENE:\n7:03 p.m.\n2. FLAG SALUTE:\nBoard member K\u00f6ster led the flag salute.\n3. ROLL CALL:\nPresident Burton, Vice President Henneberry Board members\nKnox White, K\u00f6ster, Alvarez-Morroni, Tang and Zuppan.\n4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION:\nBoard member Knox White motioned to move item 7.B. to after 7.C.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster seconded the motion.\nMotion carried, 6-0 (Board member Henneberry arrived after the vote)\n5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None\n6. CONSENT CALENDAR: None\n7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:\n7.A. Revised Building Color Scheme for 1700 Park Street . The Planning Board will\nconsider a revised color scheme for the building at 1700 Park Street.\nMr. Andrew Thomas, City Planner, provided a review and update.\nBoard member Zuppan asked about the color continuing around the corner.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster asked if other buildings would be painted, and asked about the\ncondition of approval for the parking lot.\nMr. Thomas stated the parking lot is being worked out.\nPresident Burton asked for clarification on the details of the drawings.\nMr. Thomas stated its the later drawing.\nBoard member Tang asked about the directional signage.\nBoard member Zuppan asked about the color on other buildings or just this one.\nMr. Thomas reported on what happened at the meeting previous.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 1 of 12\nJuly 22, 2013", "path": "PlanningBoard/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 2, "text": "Board member Knox White asked if anything is coming back.\nMr. Thomas stated this is coming back for use permits.\nVice President Henneberry is fine with this moving forward.\nPresident Burton stated the overall colors are a big improvement, but the cornice element\nshould have further detail.\nBoard member Knox White motioned to approve the color scheme\nVice President Henneberry seconded the motion.\nMotion carried, 7-0\n7.B. Draft Guidelines for Installation of Parklets - The Planning Board will consider\nGuidelines for the creation of Parklets that would provide an economical solution to\nincrease public open space and allow the general public to sit and enjoy the area where\nexisting sidewalks would preclude such activities.\nMoved to after 7.C.\n7.C. Alameda Landing Remnant Parcel Design Review and Use Permit Application\nPLN13-0180 Applicant: Catellus. Design Review and Use Permit Application to construct\nthree commercial buildings, landscaping, parking and two drive-thru lanes for a service\nstation, bank and fast food restaurant on a 2.3 acre site located on Stargell Avenue\nbetween Webster Street and Mariner Square Loop.\nMr. Thomas, City Planner, provided an update and presentation.\nMr. Sean Whiskeman, Vice President of Development for Catellus, introduced several\nmembers of the development team.\nMr. David Gates, landscape architect provided a brief presentation and update.\nMr. Steve Stodder, architect for Chase Bank, provided a brief presentation.\nMr. Whiskeman continued with a presentation on the Safeway building.\nBoard member Zuppan asked about the Chase drive-thru and is it even on both sides.\nMr. Stoddard explained the detail.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni asked about the beer and wine condition on Safeway.\nMr. Thomas explained.\nBoard member Tang has concerns on the In-N-Out Burger signage and lighting. He\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 2 of 12\nJuly 22, 2013", "path": "PlanningBoard/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 3, "text": "further asked about the extended hours, and the signage for Chase Bank.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster asked about CalTrans sidewalks and are there dates in place for\napproval.\nMr. Thomas stated it will take 2-3 months for an encroachment permit with CalTrans.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster asked about the Alameda Landing sign.\nMr. Thomas commented the sign has been removed and relocated, but Catellus has\nagreed to remove one sign.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster asked about the gas station kiosk elevation stating that the plans\ndon't match and asked if the item could back to the Board. He further asked if the gas\nstation needs the current canopy or can it be broken up, and can they make it more of a\nhistoric look like Chase did.\nMr. Thomas stated the use permits are the focus tonight, with the exception of the beer\nand wine use permit. He stated some designs are coming back.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster asked about the location of the Stargell entrance.\nMr. Thomas explained.\nBoard member Knox White asked about the site plan and alternatives with the pedestrian\ncrossings.\nMr. Thomas explained. He further stated the alternative site plan needs more work.\nHeba EIGuendy, Supervising Civil Engineer, Public Works Department addressed the\nBoard. She commented on the alternative site plan and provided an explanation.\nBoard member Knox White asked if some use permits can be set-aside to a later date.\nMr. Thomas stated items can be continued, and explained the process.\nVice President Henneberry asked about the security in the center. He asked if Alameda\nPolice Department (APD) has been contacted about a substation at the center, and\ncommented that a robust discussion with APD would benefit residents.\nMr. Whiskeman stated they would employ a private firm based on a security plan. He\nstated they have been communicating with APD.\nPresident Burton opened the meeting for public comment.\nBoard member Knox White motioned for the speaker time be 3 minutes.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 3 of 12\nJuly 22, 2013", "path": "PlanningBoard/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 4, "text": "Vice President Henneberry seconded the motion.\nMotion carried, 7-0\nNancy O'Malley, resident, asked the Board to focus on the future, and asked for them to\nreconsider rerouting the traffic, and there is no extra space on Stargell for another lane.\nShe spoke about public safety. City of Oakland is number one in robbery stats.\nDavid Steele, resident, asked the Board to deny the use permit for the In-N-Out Burger\ndrive-thru.\nValerie Villaraza-Steele, provided a petition of over 500 signatures. She asked the Board\nto consider the comments attached, and requested the approval of the drive-thru be\npostponed.\nCharles Hum supported and recommended approval of the agenda item.\nDoug Biggs, Executive Director of Alameda Point Collaborative, supported the conditional\nuse permits. He commented on the positive aspects of the plan, along with Alameda\nPoint being one of five poorest census tracts in the entire Bay Area. This retail\nopportunity will benefit the community greatly.\nDaniel Hoy, West Alameda Business Association (WABA), appreciated being part of\nmeetings, but feels this isn't the best use of the site. He suggested design review to\ncontinue.\nKari Thompson, President of the Alameda Chamber of Commerce, supports the project\nstating that it is a needed project, and encouraged the community to embrace the permit\nprocess.\nJoyce Linney, resident, stated her main concern is traffic issues stating that there are limits\naccessing the island and it will get very congested. She also mentioned that her husband\nwas hit by a car in a pedestrian walkway on 5th Street recently.\nEleanor Alperton, resident, thanked the Board for the opportunity to speak. She likes the\nChase updates, and hopes that Safeway will be better. She stated concern that\nlandscaping walls can be a graffiti target. She stated concerns with signage.\nNick Cabral, resident, stated he is excited about the project, thanked the Board for their\nwork. He commented that every time a project is proposed Oakland is mentioned. He\nstated In-n-Out Burger is being patronized in Oakland by Alameda youth. He commented\nit is time the West End is due for a big project like this.\nVirginia Jang, resident, stated she is excited for the development in the West End. She\nstated Alameda is a perfect place to retire, it is safe here. She commented this\ndevelopment being close to Cardinal Point, a senior community and traffic is a concern,\nespecially with emergency vehicles.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 4 of 12\nJuly 22, 2013", "path": "PlanningBoard/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 5, "text": "Diane Lichtenstein, resident, stated it is hard to approve the landscape design if buildings\nare not approved. She is in favor of the project.\nAlan Pryor, resident, stated the project is exciting and is in favor of In-n-Out Burger stating\nit is small area and feels the uses fit.\nKristen Jones, stated being a new resident and feels the entry from tube needs more\ncharm. There are a lot of fast food on Webster already.\nMs. Helen Souse, stated the entrance to the remnant parcel needs to be a little more\nattractive. The traffic concerns can be addressed by a community workshop. Regarding\nthe security perhaps a camera system connected to APD would work. The uses would\ncreate needed jobs and she appreciates the Board hearing the comments.\nMr. Bruce Knopf, would like to echo Nick Capral's comments. He feels it is time for the\nWest End to be supported. When the Theater was being built there were a lot of\nnaysayer's and that area is thriving now. He would like to see the gas station approved,\nand values more late night restaurants being available.\nMs. Kerry\n, stated concerns with crime. She is worried about housing prices being\naffected. She would like to see a holistic financial analysis done.\nMs. Karen Bey, stated the highest and best use of this gateway site is not an In-n-Out\nBurger. There should be a story of the City entering the city. She commented there should\nbe more meetings regarding this parcel.\nMr. Mario Marioni, commented in favor of In-n-Out Burger. He stated his business has\nbeen focused on bringing retail to the west end. He stated when there is something new\ncoming to town, there is always opposition.\nMr. Jerry Cerventi, spoke in support in the project. He would like for Safeway to come back\nwith a better gas station plan. This project will bring people into Alameda. The signage\nshould be better.\nPresident Burton closed the meeting to public comment.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster thanked Catellus for their work, and appreciated all the public\ncomments. He had concerns with traffic and safety on Stargell and entrances, He liked\nthe signage changes, and the corner could be better, lettering could be smaller, more\nbalanced with the College sign. The drive thru for Chase he could go either way,\nextended hours for the gas station he is in favor. The drive thru at In-n-Out Burger\nhe\nwanted comment from the business staff.\nMr. Ken Kennedy, In-Out Burger has three of 283 without drive thru. They don't build\nwithout drive thru. 50% goes through the drive thru. He explained the details of what is\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 5 of 12\nJuly 22, 2013", "path": "PlanningBoard/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 6, "text": "proposed.\nHenneberry asked why does the Mill Valley shop have a drive thru?\nMr. Kennedy explained the Mill Valley shop.\nBoard member Tang asked if they have a hiring programs that include local community.\nMr. Kennedy stated they are choosy for their applicants, and do encourage local members\nof the community.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni asked if drawing were forthcoming and will they look like\nthe Chase model.\nMr. Kennedy commented they are still working on the drawings, they have their own\napproval process.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni asked about the traffic back-up, and is there an average.\nMr. Kennedy commented that there is from 2.5 minute to 4 minutes.\nBoard member Zuppan asked about the number of grills in Oakland.\nMr. Kennedy was not sure.\nBoard member Knox White commented on the need for a crosswalk and if there isn't one\nthis plan should not move forward. The decisions for this site was made years ago when\nthey did the land swap with the College and Catellus. He commented on options. He is\nopposed to this project moving forward until CalTrans provides permission/approves a\ncrosswalk. Option B is what he is in favor of. The landscaping is a good plan. He would\nlike to see a path through the College that connects the corner. He would like to see the\nAlameda Landing sign moved, it is not at the location for the Landing. He stated there are\nchanges needed in the Resolution. He further commented on a 2nd left turn lane and\nwould like the language removed. He is in favor of the In-n-Out Burger. He is in favor of\nthe fuel center use permit, would like the hours reviewed in 6mos., and both drive thru's.\nBoard member Zuppan reiterated this Board does not select the businesses that come to\ntown, and options are limited. Her concern was with the gateway design, but likes how the\nlandscaping is coming along. She doesn't want the canopy of the fuel station to be the\nfirst thing one sees coming into the City. She agrees this is an automobile site over a\npedestrian site. She met with the applicant and walked the site, and would like to see\nsomething in the conditions that addresses the prevention of crime. The gateway sign\nshould be balanced, and likes the idea of public art there. The issue of emergency vehicles\nthey can still get around the back of the portal. The residents concerns can be balanced.\nShe is willing to approve the drive-thru's with check in conditions, and is fine with the fuel\nstation if landscape is better. The crosswalk at Stargell is a safety concern and should be\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 6 of 12\nJuly 22, 2013", "path": "PlanningBoard/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 7, "text": "a stop. The fencing being open to graffiti is a good point.\nBoard member Knox White motioned to continue meeting after 10:30 p.m.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster seconded the motion.\nMotion carried, 7-0\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni commented to approve the use permits with the staff and\nBoard recommendations. She is not thrilled with the look of the fuel station and\nsuggested another submission be brought back. She would like to see the In-n-Out\nBurger plans. She has been to the site and noticed pedestrians and bicycles crossing at\nthe existing crosswalk, is another crosswalk needed at this dangerous intersection. She\nlikes the proposed crosswalk by Mariners Square and defers to experts. She appreciates\nthe community coming out and commenting and the petition circulated.\nBoard member Tang asked if the traffic light at the proposed crosswalk is there an\napproximate time for elderly to cross, and what are the options.\nMr. Thomas stated there are meetings with CalTrans scheduled to discuss the\nintersection. Staff commented the average is 3' per second for crossing.\nBoard member Tang asked about the In-n-Out Burger being compared to the McDonalds\ndrive thru on Shoreline. He is neutral on the drive-thru approval. He looked at the\nwebsite for Alameda Landing and the language for the Bayport residents was very\npositive, and hopes this will foster communication. He is fine with approval of all items\nand agreed with Knox White on the intersection / crosswalk issue. The signage for\nAlameda Landing could hopefully capture what the area can offer.\nVice President Henneberry stated he is fine with signage, and it can easily become\noverwhelming, but likes the sail design. Landscaping looks great. He wants option B\nregarding the intersection, and suggested bring in our Assemblyman for support.\nSupports the comments of both Knox White and Zuppan.\nPresident Burton stated the landscaping is great and pleased with the designers. The art\npiece will be a good addition. He commented on the signage and the size of lettering,\nagreed there should be a balance with other signage in area. He requested option B for\nthe crosswalk, and getting CalTrans in the discussion is great. He mentioned the length\nof the road and the stacking of cars in a drive-thru would be more than 25 to reach into the\ntube. He agreed with Knox White in assuring the crosswalk with CalTrans before\napproving the drive-thru at In-n-Out. He agreed to strike language from Resolution, and\nthe check-in for use hours.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni asked about the lettering size on signage.\nPresident Burton explained.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 7 of 12\nJuly 22, 2013", "path": "PlanningBoard/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 8, "text": "Mr. Thomas clarified.\nVice President Henneberry motioned to continue meeting past 11:00 p.m.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster seconded the motion.\nMotion carried, 7-0\nMr. Thomas reviewed the recommendations for non-approval and approval.\nPresident Burton concurred.\nBoard member Zuppan commented on not supporting the right-of-way to be removed area\nso the City can negotiate that at a later time. She further commented on attaching\nlanguage for the intersection to the use permit for In-n-Out Burger.\nMr. Thomas commented on the public appeal process.\nBoard member Zuppan asked about the College of Alameda path suggestion and how that\nwould be incorporated into the Resolution.\nMr. Thomas commented and suggested a couple options, and the main issue would be\nfunding.\nBoard member Zuppan motioned to approve the use permits per comments and edits.\nBoard member Knox White seconded the motion.\nMotion carried, 7-0\nBoard member Knox White suggested to the applicant to listen to comments from this\nBoard and City Council regarding Union 76 use permit for guidance.\nPresident Burton continued the item and requested comments on the designs. He called\nfor public comment.\nMr. Daniel Hoy, design review for WABA commented on the canopy becoming a large\narchitectural piece, and provided some ideas.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster commented on comparing to other service stations in the nation.\nHe shared pictures and ideas. He stated instead of one large canopy, perhaps breaking\nthem up into three. He commented on Chase design moving forward in maybe a more\nhistoric look. The lines have a lot of up and down, but likes the direction its going.\nLandscaping design he likes the sail idea.\nBoard member Zuppan liked the Chase design, and the canopy to be more garden like\nwould be nice. She would like to see more cohesiveness with Chase, Safeway and\nIn-n-Out.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni thanked K\u00f6ster for the pictures. She stated with the tube\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 8 of 12\nJuly 22, 2013", "path": "PlanningBoard/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 9, "text": "renovation and the Chase looking more historic she likes where its going. She would\nprefer to see something with more character.\nBoard member Tang commented on the fuel station. He is concerned with the lighting\nunder the canopy. He's fine with Chase.\nVice President Henneberry is looking forward to the In-n-Out Burger coming back. The\nremnant parcel being an island by itself and gives Alameda an opportunity to spice up the\ngateway.\nPresident Burton would like to see Safeway move in a little different direction. He agreed\nthe lighting in canopy is a concern, especially while coming from the tube. He offered\nvariations. Chase still needs a bit simpler, but likes the direction its going. He further\ncommented on the windows.\n7.B. Taken out of order.\nMr. Thomas provided a briefing and background. He reported the Transportation\nCommission approved with the condition to be prohibited in residential neighborhoods. He\nfurther stated that if neighbors agreed, this could be approved.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster asked about a business that borders a residential area.\nMr. Thomas stated this is with neighbor approval, and this will be on a one year trial.\nPresident Burton opened the item for public comment.\nMr. Daniel Hoy, WABA, asked if this will connect with the public art Ordinance.\nMr. Thomas stated this would not.\nBoard member Zuppan stated parking is not an official consideration and would like that\nchanged.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni are these temporary or limited.\nPresident Burton stated have to renew every year for the permit.\nBoard member Knox White stated the original idea was to challenge the open space\nconcept as parking is considered open space.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster commented that sidewalk space could be extended. This is a\nbenefit to business. He asked about the cable size limitation. He asked if the city would\nlose revenue if the meter was not being used.\nPresident Burton clarified these areas will be open to anyone, not only used for the\nbusiness. He commented that the meter revenue loss would be much lower than San\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 9 of 12\nJuly 22, 2013", "path": "PlanningBoard/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 10, "text": "Francisco.\nBoard member Tang how does the applicant and sign off happen with neighbors, and do\nthey all share the funding costs.\nBoard member Knox White clarified.\nVice President Henneberry commented that parklets have worked in many other cities.\nPresident Burton stated the one-day build last year had a great turn-out. He commented\non the language.\nBoard member Alvarez-Morroni motioned to approve the guidelines to include residential\nareas, along with other edits.\nVice President Henneberry seconded the motion.\nMotion carried, 7-0\n7.D. PLN12-0255- 1710 Jay Street Design Review- Design Review and Variance\nApplications to Legalize an Approximately 200 sq. ft. Second Story Addition that\nExceeds the Maximum Building Coverage of 50% in an R-4, Neighborhood\nResidential District. Staff is requesting a continuance to a future meeting. Item will\nbe re-noticed.\nBoard member Knox White motioned to approve the continuance.\nBoard member K\u00f6ster seconded the motion.\nMotion carried, 7-0\n8. MINUTES:\nMinutes of July 8, 2013 (Pending)\nMinutes of June 10, 2013 (Pending)\nMinutes of May 29, 2013\nBoard member Knox White requested to continue the minutes of May 29, and June 5 to\nthe next meeting.\nVice President Henneberry motioned to table the minutes.\nBoard member Knox White seconded.\nMotion carried, 7-0\nMinutes of June 5, 2013 (Pending)\n9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:\n9.A. Future Agendas\nMr. Thomas reported on upcoming items.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 10 of 12\nJuly 22, 2013", "path": "PlanningBoard/2013-07-22.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2013-07-22", "page": 11, "text": "9-B. Zoning Administrator and Design Review Pending and Recent Actions and\nDecisions. The Planning Board will consider whether to call for review any design\nreview actions or Zoning Administrator actions taken since the last Planning Board\nmeeting.\nNone\n10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None\n11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:\n11.A. Report from Alameda Point Town Center Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee\n-\nThe subcommittee met twice and President Burton suggested an update next meeting.\n12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None\n13. ADJOURNMENT: President Burton adjourned the meeting at 11:55 p.m.\nApproved Regular Meeting Minutes\nPage 11 of 12\nJuly 22, , 2013", "path": "PlanningBoard/2013-07-22.pdf"}