{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 1, "text": "MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY--JULY 3, 2012--7:00 P.M.\nMayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 7:16 p.m. Councilmember deHaan led the\nPledge of Allegiance.\nROLL CALL -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam, and\nMayor Gilmore - 5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nAGENDA CHANGES\nNone.\nPROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY & ANNOUNCEMENTS\n(12-352) Presentation of Certificates of Service to Harry Dahlberg, Economic\nDevelopment Commission; Peter Holmes, Public Utilities Board; and Kathy Moehring,\nTransportation Commission.\nMayor Gilmore presented certificates to Mr. Holmes and Ms. Moehring.\n(12-353) Proclamation Recognizing the City's Antique Fire Apparatus Volunteers.\nThe presentation was postponed, recipients were not in attendance\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\n(12-354) Michael John Torrey, Alameda, made an announcement regarding an\nupcoming blood drive. with American Red Cross on the 21st of July.\n(12-355) Ken Peterson, Alameda, discussed budget shortfalls.\n(12-356) Diane Lichtenstein, Alameda, did not speak.\nCONSENT CALENDAR\nCouncilmember Tam moved approval of the Consent Calendar.\nVice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\n[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph\nnumber.]\n(*12-357) Minutes of the Special City Council Meetings Held on May 29, 2012; the\nSpecial and Regular City Council Meetings Held on June 6, 2012, and the Special City\nCouncil Meeting Held on June 12, 2012. Approved.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n1\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 2, "text": "(*12-358) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,115,712.05.\n(*12-359) Recommendation to Approve an Additional Advance and Modification\nAgreement for the Alameda Islander Motel Project Adding $120,000, for a Total HOME\nLoan Amount of $1.42 Million and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the\nAgreement and Related Documents. Accepted.\n(*12-360) Recommendation to Approve the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners'\nRecommendation that the Islander Motel be Renamed \"The Park Alameda Apartments.\"\nAccepted.\n(*12-361) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $246,500, Including\nContingencies, to Engineered Soil Repairs, Inc. for Walnut Street Seawall Repair, No.\nP.W. 01-12-02. Accepted.\n(*12-362) Resolution No. 14714, \"To Approve an Agreement with the Alameda County\nFlood Control Water Conservation District Providing for Implementation of the Alameda\nCountywide Clean Water Program and Authorize the City Manager to Execute all\nRequired Documents.\" Adopted.\n(*12-363) Resolution No. 14715, \"Authorizing the City Manager to Renew an Agreement\nwith Carducci Landscape Architects to Provide the Design and Project Management\nServices for the Renovation of Krusi Park, in an Amount Not to Exceed $320, 188.'\nAdopted.\n(*12-364) Resolution No. 14716, \"Declaring the Canvass of Returns and Results of the\nConsolidated Special Municipal Election Held on Tuesday, June 5, 2012.\" Adopted.\n(*12-365) Ordinance No. 3050, \"Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending\nArticle Il (Boards And Commissions) of Chapter Il (Administration) and by Amending\nSection 2-12.2(A) to Revise the Membership of the Recreation and Park Commission.\"\nFinally passed.\n(*12-366) Ordinance No. 3051, \"Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding\nSection 2-67 Relating to Prevailing Wages.\" Finally passed.\nREGULAR AGENDA ITEMS\n(12-367) Resolution No. 14717, \"Accepting Parks Master Plan and Technical Studies for\nUrban Greening Plan.\" Adopted.\nLinda Gates, Gates & Associates, gave a Power Point presentation about Parks Master\nPlan\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired how School District assets and playing fields are\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n2\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 3, "text": "incorporated.\nMs. Gates responded standards are set for the number of fields; Stated the plan shows\nhow many fields can be accomplished at different sites; the Recreation and Parks\nDepartment wants to continue to work with the School District to meet needs, yet not be\ndependent on each other; standards are the most important thing.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired why certain fields are not available in the equation.\nMs. Gates responded the guidelines show the ratios used to determine hours of play\nneeded; the ratios are adapted for types of fields; and public and private facilities and\nhours of play can be pro-rated.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired whether regional needs were considered.\nMs. Gates responded in the affirmative, stated staff talked to the East Bay Regional\nPark District about Alameda Point meeting the need for trails and open space; the\nlocation has challenges because of lease agreements and tideland trust; however, there\nare multiple ways to close gaps.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired whether the use of the swimming pool at the Base is\ntoo expensive to consider.\nMs. Gates responded in the affirmative; stated School pools were also too expensive.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired whether the Base pool was worthwhile keeping for\nother recreational uses.\nMs. Gates responded there are opportunities for public private partnerships with\nrevenue generation.\nThe Recreation and Park Director stated staff is working with an organization called\nRamprats; the group is getting an inspection to determine the feasibility of using the\npool for a skate and BMX facility.\nMs. Gates noted there are challenges in putting active recreation in tideland trust land;\nhowever, existing structures can be reused.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired staff is recommending moving the Teen Center out of\nthe Veterans building, which is not an ideal space.\nMs. Gates responded in the affirmative, stated renovation does not make sense due to\ncost.\nVice Mayor Bonta inquired if analysis was done regarding the possibility of hosting\ntournaments.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n3\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 4, "text": "inquired whether the need for quality softball facilities was addressed.\nMs. Gates stated the recommendation is one 90 foot diamond filed and three 60 foot\ndiamond fields are needed; one 60 foot diamond filed could be dedicated to softball.\nCouncilmember Johnson requested staff to ensure there is at least one quality facility\nfor the girls.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n4\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 5, "text": "Urged consideration of previous ideas for use of the Beltline property: Jim Sweeney,\nAlameda; Dorothy Freeman, Alameda; and Aaron Thies, Alameda.\nThe City Manager stated decisions regarding open space have been made; the Beltline,\nwould be brought to the Recreation and Park Commission for a discussion; California\nEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) review would be needed; accepting the report does\nnot endorse details.\nVice Mayor Bonta moved adoption of the resolution.\nCouncilmember Johnson seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion, Councilmember deHaan stated acceptance should include following\nthe spirit of Jean Sweeney's ballot measure regarding open space.\nThe City Manager stated Jean Sweeney elaborated on different designs, including BMX\ntrails and pools; Mrs. Sweeney clearly wanted a lot of open space, which is probably the\ndirection the City will follow; a healthy vigorous debate should be informed and inspired\nby what Jean Sweeney did; everyone is thankful for all she did.\nMayor Gilmore stated the motion was to accept the staff recommendation.\nOn the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\n(12-368) Recommendation to Approve an Amended and Restated Legally Binding\nAgreement (LBA) Between the City of Alameda, Housing Authority of the City of\nAlameda, Alameda Point Collaborative and Building Futures with Women and Children\nfor a Homeless Accommodation at the North Housing Parcel.\nThe Housing Development Program Manager gave a brief presentation.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired whether the City's environmental liability issues have\nchanged, to which the Housing Development Program Manager responded in the\nnegative; stated the City retained the provision that requires environmental insurance be\nsecured at a reasonable cost prior to taking title; if the City is unable to do so, there is\nno obligation or requirement to accept title.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired whether the City taking title is necessary, to which the\nHousing Development Program Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the\nhomeless accommodation title goes from the Navy to the local Reuse Authority and\nthen on to the homeless service providers; transfer is simultaneous, the City would own\nthe property for an instant.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired where the North Housing Parcel is located.\nThe Housing Development Program Manager responded the location of the North\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n5\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 6, "text": "Housing parcel is east of Main Street across from the Base; stated there are 282\nboarded-up units previously occupied by the Coast Guard.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired whether or not the Agreement would provide any\nfinancial stream for basic City services, to which the Housing Development Program\nManager responded the accommodation is intended to be a 90-unit project that would\nprovide permanent affordable housing to formerly homeless people.\nUrged approval of the staff recommendation: Doug Biggs, Executive Director of\nAlameda Point Collaborative.\nVice Mayor Bonta moved approval of the staff recommendation.\nCouncilmember Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote\n- 5.\n(12-369) Resolution No. 14718, \"Approving Amendments to the Housing Element of the\nGeneral Plan.\" Adopted; and\n(12-369 A) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda Municipal Code Section 30\nDevelopment Regulations to Ensure Consistency between the Alameda Municipal\nCode, the Alameda General Plan, and State of California Government Code Pertaining\nto the Regulation of Housing Development. Introduced.\nThe Planning Services Manager gave a Power Point presentation.\nMayor Gilmore stated the pictures are very helpful.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated the big elephant in the room is Measure A, and inquired\nthe Housing Element coincides with the Charter.\nThe Planning Services Manager responded the situation is similar to the density bonus\nordinance; stated federal law generally trumps State law and State law generally trumps\nlocal law if there is conflict; the State says cities have to provide housing and cannot\nhave a local ordinance prohibiting housing. State law does not say there is a problem\nwith Measure A zoning; every city in California has something like Measure A; State law\nis saying Measure A cannot apply to the entire City; multifamily residential zoning has to\nbe permitted in areas; just enough has been provided to meet the regional obligation.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired whether the State is dictating Measure A would be\ntrumped by the Housing Element.\nThe Planning Services Manager responded just as with State density bonus, the City\nhas to adopt an ordinance providing a certain amount of affordable housing, which\nwaives Measure A.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n6\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 7, "text": "Councilmember deHaan inquired how many stories tall are Summer Homes, to which\nthe Planning Services Manager responded four stories.\nIn response to Councilmember deHaan's further inquiry regarding Summer Homes, the\nPlanning Services Manager stated the density is low because the site is huge; a four\nstory building on Santa Clara has lower density.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired whether Alameda Point is excluded from the Housing\nElement.\nThe Planning Services Manager responded Alameda Point is not addressed because\nState law penalizes cities that do not make land available during the period.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired how many homes could be built, to which the Planning\nServices Manager responded 2,400 units total.\nThe City Manager stated the City is not committed to building or developing the units;\nthe City is committed to making the sites available; the seven year Housing Element is\nfive years late.\nCouncilmember Johnson stated getting a certified Housing Element is important;\ninquired how certain is staff that State law trumps the Charter.\nThe City Attorney stated the matter is of State-wide, not municipal concern; therefor\nState law trumps the City.\nThe City Manager stated the State can condition money on General Plan and Housing\nElement compliance; the State legislature is placing strings on its money.\nCouncilmember Johnson stated she has no doubt that the State would do so.\nUrged the Housing Element be approved: Darin Lounds, Executive Director of the\nHousing Consortium of the East Bay and Board President of East Bay Housing\nOrganizations; Diane Lichenstein, HOMES; Patricia Burke; Marylin Ezzy Ashcraft, Laura\nThomas, President, Renewed Hope Housing Advocates; Austin Tam; Lynette Lee,\nRenewed Hope and Buena Vista Methodist Church; Deni Adaniya; Amie Fishman,\nExecutive Director, East Bay Housing Association; David de la Torre, Gene Oh, Chair,\nBuena Vista Community Institute, and owner of Alameda Bicycle; William Smith, Vice\nPresident, Renewed Hope; Alan Pryor.\nUrged the Housing Element not be approved: Angela Fawcett, Park Webster\nHomeowner Association; Ken Petersen; Darcy Morrison.\nIn response to the City Manager's request, the Planning Services Manager stated the\nCity has to show sites for its regional fair share requirement of 2,400 units; the amount\nof land and number of units shown in prior Housing Elements is not increasing; the\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n7\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 8, "text": "issue is housing type and density; the same sites can be used for the next round if the\nsites are still available.\nThe City Manager reiterated the sites identified today, unless built out, remain available\nagain for the next round.\nMayor Gilmore stated the City has gone through the Housing Element process many\ntimes; identified sites might not be built; given the economy, all of the sites are probably\nstill going to be available in the next cycle.\nThe City Manager stated projects have to go through the standard regulatory process to\nexamine impacts, mitigation, CEQA analysis on some level. This all still has to happen\non any given project, so the approval tonight is for the Housing Element General Plan, it\ndoes not dispose of any specific project on any specific site, nor does it preclude the\nCity from identifying these sites again in 2015, which will have a lower number\napparently than in this particular housing element based on the earlier numbers.\n*\nFollowing Corinne Lambden's comments, Councilmember Tam left the dais at 9:26 p.m.\nand returned at 9:32 p.m.\nVice Mayor Bonta moved adoption of the resolution and introduction of the ordinance.\nVice Mayor Bonta inquired the last time the City had a certified Housing Element, to\nwhich the Planning Services Manager responded the 1990 Housing Element.\nVice Mayor Bonta inquired whether Measure A still exists in the City no matter what the\nCouncil does tonight.\nThe City Attorney responded in the affirmative, stated the Housing Element is consistent\nwith State law requirements and does not eliminate Measure A.\nVice Mayor Bonta stated the City should be compliant with the State laws in order to\neligible for transportation funding; the Housing Element is the right thing to do from a\nsocial and economic justice perspective, housing options should be provided for the\nentire population, including affordable housing.\nCouncilmember Tam seconded the motion.\nCouncilmember Tam stated the Housing Element is about Alameda planning for a\nsustainable future that preserves open space and provides a mix of housing to support\nthe needs of working families; control over planning, including Measure A, is being\npreserved within the City instead of being taken over by the courts like other cities;\nnoted the City has to start again in two years.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n8\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 9, "text": "Planning Services Manager responded in the negative, stated the Collins project has\nbeen approved, but not built due to the economy.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated the amount is being increased to 48 units, which is a\nquantum step above 29 units.\nIn response to Councilmember Johnson's request, the Housing Development and\nPrograms Manager briefly discussed affordable housing.\nCouncilmember Tam inquired about affordable housing funding.\nThe Housing Development and Programs Manager stated Assembly Bill (AB) 1484 was\nsigned into law on Friday to clean up to AB26; provisions provide a bit of affordable\nhousing relief; a document transfer tax passed the Senate, but is not out of the\nAssembly; hopefully the bill will create a permanent funding source for affordable\nhousing and replace redevelopment funds.\nCouncilmember Johnson requested a review of the extensive opportunity for public\ninput.\nThe City Manager noted tonight is the fourth public hearing since December.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n9\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 10, "text": "Councilmember Tam inquired whether there was opposition at the Planning Board\nmeetings.\nThe Planning Services Manager responded there has been very little opposition\nthroughout the process.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired whether the configuration is different, but regardless\nthe City still needs to zone to allow the required number of housing units.\nThe Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the previous\nHousing Element for approximately 2,000 housing units was never fully certified by the\nState because only one type of housing, single family residential, was included; a full\nrange of housing types, including the multifamily rental, is included in the proposed\nHousing Element; the number of units is 2,400 because the City was not successful in\ngetting the last round certified; the Housing Element has to be certified before the\nstatutory deadline because if not, the City will be penalized.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired what is the City's obligation to do an Environmental\nImpact Report (EIR).\nThe Planning Services Manager responded an environmental assessment was done;\nthe 2008 Transportation Element data was used, which reviewed transportation impacts\nfrom building 5,000 housing units Citywide over a 20 year period; the 2003\nenvironmental document for the last Housing Element was also used; every project\nwould still require environmental and design review, and discretionary approval from\nPlanning Board.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired about the Chinatown agreement.\nThe Planning Services Manager replied there is no relationship; stated the agreement\nonly relates to Alameda Point.\nMayor Gilmore stated the City has not had a certified Housing Element during her time\non the Planning Board and Council; the issue involves economic and social justice;\nproviding housing for range of different families with different housing types is important.\nOn the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:\nCouncilmembers Bonta, Johnson, Tam and Mayor Gilmore - 4. Abstention:\nCouncilmember deHaan - 1.\n(12-370) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City\nManager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of the Lease with\nDelphi Productions, Inc. for Five Years in Building 39 at Alameda Point, 950 West\nTower Avenue. Introduced.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n10\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 11, "text": "The Economic Development Division Manager gave a brief presentation.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired why the term is only five years.\nThe City Manager responded the City does not want to tie the building down for more\nthan five years.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated that he is surprised the renewal is only five years, since\nthe company is very successful and has been at Alameda Point for a very long period of\ntime.\nThe City Manager stated the tenant is very happy with the lease.\nVice Mayor Bonta inquired the length of the prior lease and number of renewals, to\nwhich the Economic Development Division Manager responded the tenant has been at\nAlameda Point since 1998 and has had multiple renewals.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated their initial lease was around 8 to 10 years.\nCouncilmember Johnson moved introduction of the ordinance.\nVice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\n(12-371) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City\nManager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of the Lease with\nAmerican Bus Repair LLC, Doing Business As Coach Specialties, for Two Years in a\nPortion of Building 24 at Alameda Point, 2301 Monarch Street. Introduced.\nThe Economic Development Division Manager gave a brief presentation.\nCouncilmember Johnson moved introduction of the ordinance.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired why the renewal is only for two years, to which the\nEconomic Development Division Manager responded the tenant is occupying one of\nthree bays in Building 24; stated another Building 24 tenant, Rockwall Winery, would\nlike to expand.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired if staff is looking for another facility for American Bus,\nto which the City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated staff should be able to\nwork out something to help everybody expand and create more jobs.\nCouncilmember Johnson moved introduction of the ordinance.\nCouncilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote\n-\n5.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n11\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 12, "text": "CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS\n(12-372) The City Manager complimented the Council for tonight.\nMayor Gilmore stated the certified Housing Element should be framed.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\nNone.\nCOUNCIL REFERRALS\nNone.\nCOUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\n(12-373) Councilmember deHaan discussed the Staffing For Adequate Fire and\nEmergency Response (SAFER) grant, fire boats, and salt water pumps; inquired if the\nSAFER grant would give us two more years.\nThe Assistant City Manager responded the current grant would expire on September\n10th; the grant is for two and half years from September 10th\nCouncilmember deHaan thanked the Assistant City Manager for the information.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired about the fire boat grant from Homeland Security.\nThe Assistant City Manager responded the City received a security grant from\nHomeland Security.\nThe City Manager stated the estimate is the City would be required to pay 25% match.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired if the boat cost $1/2 million, to which the City Manager\nresponded in the affirmative.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired about securing a homeland security grant for salt\nwater pumps.\nThe City Manager responded salt water pumps have been addressed; $1/2 million per\npump; the City needs 24 pumps which would cost $12 million; a report on the matter\nwould come to the Council before the year is over.\nVice Major Bonta inquired whether the fireboat has fire pumping capabilities, to which\nthe City Manager responded in the affirmative.\nVice Major Bonta stated the grants are great examples of leveraging outside funding to\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n12\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 13, "text": "help with budget challenges.\nThe City Manager commended staff for the team effort to obtain the grants.\nADJOURNMENT\nThere being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 10:22 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n13\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2012-07-03", "page": 14, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY--JULY 3, 2012--6:00 P.M.\nMayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 6:00 p.m.\nRoll Call -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam, and\nMayor Gilmore - 5.\n[Note: Councilmember Johnson arrived at 6:02 p.m. and Vice\nMayor Bonta arrived at 6:07 p.m.]\nAbsent:\nNone.\nThe meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:\n(12-349) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (Pursuant to\nsubdivision (c) of Section 54956.9) Number of Cases: One. Not heard.\n(12-350) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (54956.9); Name of Case:\nSCC Alameda Point, LLC, et al V. City of Alameda, et al.; U.S. District Court Case No\nCV-10-5178; this is to discuss strategy regarding a lawsuit brought by our former\ndeveloper, SunCal, based on the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement.\nFollowing the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Gilmore\nannounced that regarding Existing Litigation, the Council gave direction to staff.\nMayor Gilmore called a recess at 7:10 p.m. to hold the regular meeting and reconvened\nthe closed session at 10:24 p.m.\n(12-351) Conference with Labor Negotiators (54957.6); Agency Negotiators:\nCouncilmembers deHaan and Johnson; Unrepresented Employee: City Clerk;\nAnticipated Issues: All (Wages, Hours, Benefits, and Working Conditions)\nFollowing the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Gilmore\nannounced that regarding Labor, the Council gave direction to the negotiators.\nAdjournment\nThere being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 10:44 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nJuly 3, 2012", "path": "CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf"}