{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 1, "text": "MEETING MINUTES\nREGULAR MEETING OF THE\nCITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD\nMONDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2011\n1. CONVENE:\n7:08 pm\n2. FLAG SALUTE:\nBoard member Burton\n3. ROLL CALL:\nPresent: President Ezzy Ashcraft, Board members Burton,\nKohlstrand, and Zuppan.\nAbsent: Vice-President Autorino and Board member Henneberry\n(arrived at 8:20 p.m.)\n4. MINUTES:\nMinutes from the Regular meeting of April 25, 2011 Postponed due to lack of quorum.\nMinutes from the Regular meeting of September 26, 2011. (Pending)\n5. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION:\nNone\n6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:\nWritten Report\n6-A Future Agendas\nMargaret Kavanaugh-Lynch, Planning Services Manager, provided an overview of\nupcoming projects.\nBoard member Zuppan inquired about the after hours zoning code enforcement procedures\nand when the discussion will be coming to the Planning Board. Ms. Kavanaugh-Lynch\nstated that the item will come before the Board in early 2012.\n7. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:\nNone\n8. CONSENT CALENDAR:\nNone\n9. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:\n9-A PLN08-0479 - 1051 Pacific Marina Review of Compliance with Conditions of\nApproval\nMargaret Kavanaugh-Lynch, Planning Services Manager, provided an overview of the Use\nPage 1 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 2, "text": "Permit and the need for review. The review is to complete a determination of compliance of\nthe conditions of approval for application PLN08-0479. On August 24, 2009, the Planning\nBoard approved a Use Permit to allow a banquet and catering facility to be operated within\na portion of an existing building at 1051 Pacific Marina. One of the Conditions of Approval\nfrom the August 2009 report stated that the Use Permit would be reviewed by the Planning\nBoard every six months for a period of a year. Due to staff changes this review period was\noverlooked. Stating in January of 2011, numerous verbal and written complaints were\nreceived by staff regarding the operation of the event center from neighbors that live in\nclose proximity of the subject property. There was a public hearing held on July 11, 2011 to\nreview the conditions of approval and the reported violations. At that meeting it was\ndetermined that the item should be reviewed for compliance again at the October 10, 2011\nmeeting. She also mentioned that since January 2011 the Police Department has received\nfive disturbing the peace complaints at the location. Ms, Kavanaugh-Lynch stated that the\noptions for the Planning Board will be to either:\n1. Propose conditions that will allow the applicant to operate a small business in a\nprimarily residential setting, while protecting the right of peaceful enjoyment of its\nneighbors; or\n2. Set the use permit for a revocation hearing.\nMs, Kavanaugh-Lynch reported that the possible violations of the conditions of approval\npresented to the City include (numbering reflects the order of the original conditions of\napproval):\n12. All events held at the facility shall be private and not open to the general\npublic.\n14. All events shall end by 10 p.m. Sunday - Thursday and 11:00 p.m. on\nFriday and Saturday.\n20. The applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that all permanent\nemployees, contractors, hired part-time or hourly staff, security personnel,\ncaterers, and entertainers adhere to these conditions of approval and shall\nensure compliance of same to these conditions of approval.\nMs, Kavanaugh-Lynch reported that staff has compiled the following suggestions for\nmodifying the conditions:\nAll events held at the facility shall be private and not open to the general public.\nIt was suggested that the condition of approvals # 5 and #12 be modified to address the\npurpose of the original condition, limiting the total number of persons present at any one\ntime at an event.\n5. A maximum of 275 individual guests shall be permitted for any single event held at\nthis facility.\n12. All guests must have a ticket for admission into the event center. A maximum of 275\nticket holders may be in the event center at any one time.\nPage 2 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 3, "text": "All events shall end by 10 p.m. Sunday - Thursday and 11:00 p.m. on Friday and\nSaturday.\nShe stated that the lessee has mentioned that she has experienced challenges in booking\nthe event center with the hours of operation that are currently stipulated. Staff believes that\nsome alteration to these limitations could be supported while still safeguarding the\nresidential neighbor's enjoyment of their homes. Staff suggests that the condition of\napproval #14 be modified as follows:\n14. All events shall end by 11:00 p.m. Sunday - Thursday and 12:00 midnight on Friday\nand Saturday.\nThe applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that all permanent employees,\ncontractors, hired part-time or hourly staff, security personnel, caterers, and\nentertainers adhere to these conditions of approval and shall ensure compliance of\nsame to these conditions of approval.\nStaff has clarified that all users of the event center must comply with the conditions of\napproval stated in #20. The lessee has agreed to enforce this condition, as proposed.\nIn addition to the condition modifications discussed above, the lessee has requested a\nslight alteration to condition #11.\nNo amplified sound equipment shall be used outside the facility. All doors and\nwindows of the facility must remain closed when public address systems are used or\nwhen amplified sound systems are in operation, bands are playing, or recorded\nmusic or video is being operated inside the facility. However, doors and windows\ncould be opened for a maximum of fifteen minutes a night, if it is necessary to allow\nfresh air into the facility.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch mentioned that the adjacent yacht club does not have any restriction\nput upon their establishment stating that they need to have their doors and windows closed\nduring events with amplified music.\nIn reviewing the conditions of approval, staff identified several items that could be modified\nto make them more enforceable from a practical standpoint and to possibly provide\nclarification for both the current lessee and any interested party. Staff suggested the\nfollowing condition of approval be amended as follows:\n#3. Alcoholic beverages at this facility may only be served by caterers that hold a\nvalid and proper class of Alcoholic Beverage Control license issued by the State of\nCalifornia. Patrons, guests, attendees, staff, and owners are not allowed to consume\nany alcoholic beverages outside, except for in the enclosed patio area.\nAnd the following condition be removed completely due to the redundancy to #3:\n#4. Any sale of alcoholic beverages shall only be done in conjunction with events\nand then only by caterers that hold a valid and proper class of Alcoholic Beverage\nPage 3 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 4, "text": "Control license issued by the State of California. No facility owner, facility owner\nstaff, patron, guest, or attendee is allowed to bring or serve any alcoholic beverage\nat any event held at this facility.\nIn reference to conditions #8 and #9 Ms. Kavanaugh-Lynch suggested the following\nmodifications:\n8. Applicant shall coordinate with other uses at Pacific Marina for events with more\nthan 135-200 attendees.\n9. Before any event with more than 135 200 attendees, applicant must secure a\nshared parking agreement with a neighboring commercial property parking lot owner\non a form approved by the City Attorney.\nShe stated that the reason for changing the number of attendees is to have the threshold at\na rounder number for the cooperation with the other parking lots would kick in. The Parking\nStudy prepared by Abrams and Associates in July of 2009 discusses the parking\nconsiderations for the project area. It states, \"The existing parking area for Pacific Marina\nvillage has 398 parking spaces that can be shared by all the uses within Pacific Marina\".\n\"These parking spaces are subject to the reciprocal parking rights contained in the\nAgreement of Reciprocal Easements, Covenants and Restrictions dated September 26,\n1989 as amended on March 19, 1991\" \"There are an additional 80 spaces that are limited\nto use by Marina Vista Towers\". \"Therefore, the total amount of parking for area business\nand residential use, including the reserved spaces is 478\". The existing limit of requiring\ncoordination when ticket sales equals 135 attendees is a subjective number and staff\nbelieves that 200 is just as viable an amount to trigger a request of coordination with the\nvarious users of the common lot. It is also noted that security personnel will be present in\nthe parking lots throughout any event and will be able to ensure that any parking issues can\nbe addressed as persons are parking in the lot.\nAlso, regarding condition #9, staff does not want the City Attorney to be required to review\nlanguage on each shared parking agreement. Staff could provide a template if necessary\nand instruct the lessee to use it whenever the neighboring parking lot is needed but the City\nAttorney will not be reviewing each agreement.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft asked it there was any condition currently stating that the City\nwould provide the form.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch stated that the owner/lessee can provide their own form. The City\nwould want to see the form being used to ensure that the City's interest is being protected.\nMs, Kavanaugh-Lynch reported that some language in the original conditions of approval\nappear to create a level of control that is not enforceable. Staff suggests the following\nmodifications to reflect a more practical level of enforcement.\n16. The applicant will post signs educating all clients, caterers, staff, owners and\nguests for each event to exit quietly and observe the posted speed limits in the\nPacific Marina Parking area and on adjacent streets.\nPage 4 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 5, "text": "17. Security guards shall be provided at events in the following ratios to insure\ncompliance of patrons, caterers, and staff with all mandates of this resolution.\nBetween 100 - 200 attendees - Minimum of one security guard\nGreater than 200 attendees - Minimum of two security guards\nSecurity services and its staff shall be uniformed, and visible during all events held at\nthis facility. Security guards must be on duty at the facility and parking areas before\nany event commences and be employed to stay on duty during all events and remain\non duty until the last patron leaves the immediate common parking area.\n18. The applicant shall be responsible for educating patrons and employees to not\npark vehicles in private residential areas.\nStaff also suggests using a modified level of review needed to recall use permit to the\nPlanning Board as follows:\n22. This Conditional Use Permit PLN08-0479 as amended on October 10, 2011 will\nbe reviewed by the Alameda Planning Board upon the receipt of a verifiable\ncomplaint which cannot be resolved by the Community Development Director on an\nadministrative level.\n23. Planning staff shall mail a notice indicating the date, time, and location of any\nreview required in condition #22, to all property owners, tenants, and homeowner\nassociations within 500 feet of the project site so interested parties are notified and\nmay to attend these meetings.\nAnd condition #25 which states that the Use Permit will expire in two years is removed as it\nis no longer applicable to the subject property.\nBoard member Kohlstrand asked whether or not the adjacent yacht clubs were allowed to\nhave amplified music.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch replied that she had heard from the residents that they do have\namplified music.\nBoard member Kohlstrand asked if staff had discussions with the club managers or the\nadjacent residents during the reworking of the conditions.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch replied that she didn't speak to the club managers but spoke to one\nof the neighbors numerous times regarding the revised conditions.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft asked if the yacht clubs have made any of the complaints\nregarding the venue.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch replied that the Police Department can't release the source of the\ncomplaints.\nPage 5 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 6, "text": "Board member Zuppan asked what the foundation was for the parking revision from 135 to\n200.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch replied that she that the 200 number would mostly fill up the\nimmediate parking and that the agreement should be put in place at that point.\nBoard member Burton asked who the applicant is for this item.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch replied that there actually isn't an applicant because it is based on\nthe original conditions of approval for it to be reviewed. Although staff has been in\ndiscussions with the lessee, Hannah's on the Bay, the original applicant was the building\nowner and different lessee, who has since vacated the site.\nBoard member Burton stated that the original Use Permit was for a banquet center and\ncatering events although currently it seems that a number of the events being held seem to\nbe music performances. He was wondering if an additional Use Permit is necessary or\ndoes it fall under the same one.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch stated that it is a broadly defined category and events are part of the\nUse Permit so it would open it to events with music.\nBoard member Burton asked if the events must have food or can it be strictly music.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch stated that the way it is written now there needs to be catering\nincluded.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft asked if the current lessee have all the proper licenses to operate\nthe facility in the capacity of the conditions of the Use Permit.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch replied that Hannah's on the Bay does not have a license to operate\nthe commercial kitchen at the site, but they do have a catering license under another name\nthrough the County. The commercial kitchen has a license to operate it held by the owner\nof the building. In regards to the Alcoholic Beverage Control license, every cater is required\nto have their own license.\nBoard member Zuppan mentioned that it appears that the business license with the City\nwas obtained a year after the business commenced.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch confirmed that the business did operate without a license and that\nwas one of the first violations reported to staff.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft opened the public comment period. Due to the large number of\nspeaker slips the motion was made and seconded to reduce the speaker time to 3 minutes.\nThomas Charron, resident, spoke in opposition of revising the conditions of approval.\nDenis Carroll, resident, spoke in opposition of revising the conditions of approval.\nJim Jessie, Oakland Yacht Club, spoke in opposition of revising the conditions of approval.\nPage 6 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 7, "text": "Robert Martin, resident, spoke in opposition of revising the conditions of approval.\nMaria Bush, Hannah's on the Bay owner, spoke in favor of revising the conditions of\napproval.\nMichael Hershey, Oakland Yacht Club, spoke in opposition of revising the conditions of\napproval.\nTommie Winston, Hannah's on the Bay, spoke in favor of revising the conditions of\napproval.\nVincent Goldman, Hannah's on the Bay, spoke in favor of revising the conditions of\napproval.\nReverend J.R. Hall, spoke in favor of revising the conditions of approval.\nDerick Hughs, Dahway Music, spoke in favor of revising the conditions of approval.\nBernice Johnson, L.I.F.E. Development, spoke in favor of revising the conditions of\napproval.\nAdele Alexander, resident, spoke in opposition of revising the conditions of approval.\nDorothy Shemick, resident, spoke in opposition of revising the conditions of approval.\nAndre Ward, T25GL Entertainment, spoke in favor of revising the conditions of approval.\nBoard member Kohlstrand asked Mr. Ward what his primary interest in the venue was.\nMr. Ward responded that he dealt strictly with the music at the venue and Hannah's on the\nBay handled all of the catering.\nBoard member Kohlstrand asked if food was served when the musical performance were\nheld\nHe replied yes.\nRichardo Scales, Hannah's on the Bay, spoke in favor of revising the conditions of approval.\nRon Konkle, Oakland Yacht Club, spoke in opposition of revising the conditions of approval.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft closed the public comment period.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft stated that the Board needs to try and strike a balance to allow a\nbusiness to be able to succeed at the facility. She doesn't feel that the Board can go back\nto the original conditions for the reasons of enforcement.\nBoard member Kohlstrand stated that she appreciated having some of the performers\nspeak at the meeting and it gives her a better understanding of what sort of events have\nPage 7 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 8, "text": "been held at the venue. She is concerned that the business began operations without the\nproper licenses. She originally opposed the original Use Permit because of the extreme\nconditions that were placed on the facility and saw no way for a business to operate under\nsuch constraints. She stated that throughout the entire process she has not heard any of\nthe residents say that the business should be closed down but are trying to find conditions\nthat are workable for the business. She believes that the Board cannot place conditions on\na use just to have them continually violated.\nBoard member Zuppan stated that she has concerns about inconsistencies. She previously\nbelieved that the weekend closing time of 11:00 p.m. was unrealistic but the weekday\nclosing should stay at 10:00 p.m.\nBoard member Burton was also skeptical about the revisions to the conditions and the lack\nof clarity about what business entities were actually working out of the facility and who was\nresponsible for the compliance of the conditions. Although it still seems unclear who has\nwhat licenses the connection between Hannah's by the Bay and T25GL Entertainment is.\nShould the conditions of approval be revised the Board needs to provide as much clarity as\npossible as to what the responsibilities of the operators are and what the repercussions are\nupon failure to comply and the avenues of recourse people have.\nBoard member Henneberry asked how the condition of the patrons requiring a ticket allows\nthe events to remain private.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch replied that the goal of the condition was to assure that the capacity\nof the event would not exceed a set number of participants and should a complaint be\nreceived it could be verified by the number of tickets.\nBoard member Henneberry questioned the extended hours.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft replied that the modified hours were an attempt to help the lessee\nstay competitive in the industry.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch added that there are no restrictions on the adjacent yacht clubs in\nregards to hours of operation.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft reiterated that the Board needs to achieve a balance and we are in\nthe middle of challenging economic times. She mentioned that the lessee has made it hard\nto be on their side due to the lack of conformance to the existing conditions. She\nmentioned that if the facility were a restaurant it would not have these stringent conditions.\nThe Board did receive a comment from a resident living adjacent to the site stating that she\nhas never caused any noise intrusion the events and has never had any parking problems\nduring an event. She asked that the Board not put the business out of business. She\nstated that she is mostly satisfied with the revised conditions. She is not completely\ncomfortable with condition #22 which takes the review period of 6 months out and leaves it\nas a complaint driven review if necessary.\nBoard member Burton stated that he was comfortable with condition #22, stating that he\nhas faith in the staff to be able to make an intelligent decision. He also believes it would\ngive the parties involved a faster way to resolve any problems that may come up.\nPage 8 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 9, "text": "Board member Kohlstrand stated that she is comfortable with the condition and also wanted\nto raise a general issue about the Conditional Use Permit and what she thinks is an\nexpansion of what was originally envisioned and feels the Board needs to discuss that. She\nadded that the Conditional Use Permit runs with the land and not a particular business.\nBoard member Zuppan stated that she feels the Use Permit should come back to the\nPlanning Board in 6 months for review at which time if the conditions are being adhered to\nthe condition can be removed.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft questioned what a verifiable complaint meant.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch responded that it would be a complaint that could be supported\ninstantly and the complainant was willing to come in and discuss it with staff.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft was concerned that there would be two sides of the story and how\nwould staff decipher the truth. She also stated that there is only one trash receptacle in the\narea to facilitate the event center and the two yacht clubs which seems inefficient.\nBoard member Henneberry asked if the procedure to review a Use Permit through a public\nhearing upon receipt of a complaint was standard for all permits.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch stated that the review is standard procedure.\nBoard member Henneberry stated that he is comfortable with condition #22.\nBoard member Kohlstrand reviewed the original issue from 2009 and what the Board\nenvisioned at the site. She stated that the use of banquet and catering event center she\nwas envisioning a venue for weddings and private parties. In the original discussions the\nidea of ticket sales was for fundraising events but now it is being considered for music\nevents which are different. She is concerned that the music events could turn into concerts\nunder another operator at the site since the Use Permit runs with the land and the Board is\nnot going to have control over every lessee that is in the facility. She feels that the other\nlanguage that cleans up the conditions to make them more enforceable are fine but the\nBoard needs to look at the expansion of the hours of operation and the parking\nrequirements.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch stated that the expansion on the hours of operation and the parking\nrequirement was an attempt to allow the business to function. She also stated that prior to\nthe hearing staff had only received comments from one resident in opposition to the revised\nconditions since the release of the Planning Board packet.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft stated that although the Use Permit runs with the land, meaning it\ncarries over from tenant to tenant, it can always be changed if it turns out that the extended\nhours are just to late and the parking situation worsens. She also stated that the City wants\na business to succeed.\nBoard member Kohlstrand stated that the new condition expands the maximum number of\nattendees that triggers the parking conditions and she does not see documentation to\nsupport that decision.\nPage 9 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 10, "text": "Ms. Kavanaugh-Lynch stated that the parking study done in 2009 reported that there are\nenough parking spaces available for up to 275 attendees.\nBoard member Zuppan stated that she has been at the venue in the past and has had\nproblems parking and feels that the maximum number of attendees needs to be brought up\nto 200. She also stated that she does not feel that the hours of operation should be\nextended on the weekdays, she is fine with the hours being extended to 12:00 or 12:30 a.m.\non the weekends. She asked about holidays as in New Year's Eve, and if the hours could\nbe extended.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch stated that a Special Events Permit can be obtained for extended\nhours on certain dates.\nBoard member Zuppan also would like to see the wording regarding educating the\nemployees and such about leaving the premises quietly needs to be more directive. She\nalso questioned what the Fire Marshal limit for the building is.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch stated that the fire capacity occupancy for the building is 466 people.\nBoard member Zuppan also questioned condition #12 regarding the capacity of 275 ticket\nholders in attendance at any one time.\nMs. Kavanaugh-Lynch stated that it is a way for the business owner to have multiple\nseatings for an event in one day and also serve as a way that the City could investigate if\nthere was an allegation of over 275 people in attendance at one time.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft stated that she agrees with the parking requirements.\nBoard member Henneberry asked if a member from the Oakland Yacht Club could address\nthe hours of operation for their facility.\nDenis Carroll of the Oakland Yacht Club stated that they cut off events by 11:00 p.m. and\nthe bar can be open until 2:00 a.m.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft and the board amended conditions of approval as follows:\n#14- All events shall end by 10:00 p.m. Sunday - Thursday and 12:00 midnight on Friday\nand Saturday.\n#15- The applicant is responsible for instructing all clients, caterers, entertainers, staff,\nowners and guests to quietly vacate the parking lots by 10:30 p.m., Sunday - Thursday and\n12:30 am on Friday (Saturday morning) and Saturday (Sunday morning) and must notify all\nclients, caterers, entertainers, staff, owners and guests that the site is located next to\nresidential neighborhoods and that they must be respectful of residents of these\nneighborhoods. No alcohol consumption, disruptive, noise, commotion, or unnecessary\nvehicle noise is allowed in the common Parking Area of Pacific Marina or in the Alameda\nMarina City Park which abuts this facility.\nPage 10 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 11, "text": "#22- This Conditional Use Permit PLN08-0479, as amended on October 10, 2011 will be\nreviewed by the Alameda Planning Board in six months from the date of these conditions of\napproval, as modified and upon the receipt of a verifiable complaint which cannot be\nresolved by the Community Development Director on an administrative level. [See\namended resolution attached.]\nMotion made to approve the conditions of approval as amended above by Board\nmember Kohlstrand, seconded by Board member Burton. Approved 5-0.\n9-B\nUse Permit Annual Review - PLN09-0184 - Applicant - Chengben Wang for\nEncinal Terminals - An annual review for compliance with conditions for use of the\nproperty located at 1523 Entrance Road/Buena Vista Avenue commonly referred to\nas \"Encinal Terminals\".\nAndrew Thomas, Planning Services gave an overview of the Use Permit. He reported that\nover the last 18 months there has been some progress on the Master Plan although all\nthree properties are currently in receivership. It is doubtful that there will be any progress\non the project until the financial issues get resolved. He reported that the City has received\ncalls inquiring about the properties by potential developers. The City needs to make sure\nthat there is a viable Master Plan in place for who ever develop the sites, which works given\nthe economic times.\nBoard member Zuppan asked if any of the calls regarding the property referenced the\nMaster Plan documents.\nMr. Thomas stated that all of the calls have inquired as to what the City is willing to consider\non the sites. He also stated that the Chipman site has been zoned for residential and the\ntentative map was approved, although it has since expired.\nPresident Ezzy-Ashcraft asked what protection the City has against someone purchasing\nthe property in foreclosure and developing it as they wish.\nFarimah Faiz, Assistant City Attorney, responded that the property is zoned MX and any\npotential developer would need to get a Master Plan approved by the City prior to any\ndevelopment of the sites.\nMr. Thomas stated that there is currently an Interim Use Permit for the Encinal Terminals,\nwhich is good for one more year which allows for a variety of uses.\nMotion made to accept the report of compliance by Board member Henneberry,\nseconded by Zuppan. Approved 5-0.\n9-C\nPLN11-0220 - Alameda Point Northwest Territories - Interim Use Permit. The\napplicant, San Francisco Regional Sports Car Association is proposing to hold\ndriver's skill events/autocross events on the Northwest Territories at the most north\nwestern area of Alameda Point. The events would occur on weekends. Staff\nrequests continuance to the meeting of 10/24/2011.\nPage 11 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}
{"body": "PlanningBoard", "date": "2011-10-10", "page": 12, "text": "9-D\nPark Street Code Scoping Session\nStaff requests continuance to a future date.\n10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None.\n11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: None.\n12. ADJOURNMENT: 10:30 p.m.\nPage 12 of 12", "path": "PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf"}