{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 1, "text": "MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY--MARCH - - 15, 2011--7:00 - P.M.\nMayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 7:12 p.m. Councilmember deHaan led the\nPledge of Allegiance.\nROLL CALL -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and\nMayor Gilmore - 5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nAGENDA CHANGES\nNone.\nPROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY & ANNOUNCEMENTS\n(11-121) Proclamation Declaring the Month of March \"Women's History Month.\" Not\nheard.\n(11-122) Proclamation Declaring March 14-21 as Women's Military History.\nMayor Gilmore read and presented the proclamation to Mildred Nolan, World War II\nVeteran.\nMs. Nolan thanked the Council for the proclamation and invited everyone to attend a\ncelebration on March 19th at the United Methodist Church.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\nNone.\nCONSENT CALENDAR\nMayor Gilmore announced that the paratransit service matter [paragraph no. 11-127\nwas removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.\nCouncilmember Tam moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.\nCouncilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -\n5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph\nnumber.]\n(*11-123) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting Held on February 19, 2011; the\nSpecial and Regular City Council Meeting held on March 1, 2011; and the Special City\nCouncil Meeting Held on March 2, 2011. Approved.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n1\nMarch 15, 2010", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 2, "text": "(*11-124) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,899,097.07.\n(*11-125) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $69,390 Annually for\na Period of Five Years to Accela, Inc. for Accela Automation Land Management and\nCitizen Access Software Licenses and Managed Service Fees, and Authorize the Acting\nCity Manager to Execute the Contract and Related Documents. Accepted.\n(*11-126) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $279,000, and\nAuthorize a $40,000, Approximately Fourteen Percent Contingency, to Urban Metro\nEnvironmental, Inc. for the Demolition of Boarded and Vacant Structures at 136, 140,\n144, 146 & 148 Barbers Point Road & 104 Glenview Road and 105 & 106 Norfolk Road\nand Authorize the Acting City Manager to Execute the Contract and Related\nDocuments. Accepted.\n(11-127) Recommendation to Approve Modifications to the Paratransit Shuttle Service,\nAppropriate $24,000 in Measure B Funds and Authorize the Acting City Manager to\nExecute all Necessary Documents; and\n(11-127A) Recommendation to Approve Modifications to the Paratransit Taxi Service,\nAppropriate $5,000 in Measure B Funds, and Authorize the Acting City Manager to\nExecute all Necessary Documents.\nThe Transportation Coordinator gave a brief presentation.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired whether the eligibility age for the shuttle service would\nbe reduced from 62 to 55, to which the Transportation Coordinator responded in the\naffirmative.\nSpeaker: Michael John Torrey, Alameda.\nIn response to Mr. Torrey's comments, the Transportation Coordinator stated currently,\nthe West Loop recommendation does not include the Main Street ferry stop; hopefully,\nthe stop will be included in the future.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated that he is impressed; indications show great success.\nCouncilmember Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation.\nCouncilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote\n-\n5.\n(*11-128) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for\nBids for Otis Drive Rehabilitation, No. P. W. 08-10-2. Accepted.\n(*11-129) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications, and Authorize a Call for\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n2\nMarch 15, 2010", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 3, "text": "Bids for Park Street Streetscape, Lincoln Avenue to Webb Avenue and Central Avenue\nto San Jose Avenue, No. P.W. 10-09-30; and\n(*11-129A) Resolution No. 14555, \"Authorizing the Selection of Holophane Streetlights\nand a Call for Bids to Holophane Distributors for Park Street Streetscape, Lincoln\nAvenue to Webb Avenue and Central Avenue to San Jose Avenue, No. P.W. 10-09-30.'\nAdopted.\n(*11-130) Resolution No. 14556, \"Ratifying the Public Utilities Board's Approval of\nAmendment Two to Agreement for Construction, Operation and Financing of\nGeothermal Project Number 3; Amended and Restated Geothermal Project Operating\nAgreement between Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) and the Geothermal\nProject Participants; and Amendment Number One to NCPA Facilities Agreement.\"\nAdopted.\n(*11-131) Resolution No. 14557, \"Appropriating $1.3 million in Federal HOME Funds\nand Authorizing the Acting City Manager to Negotiate and Execute the Necessary\nDocuments to Complete the Loan to Resources for Community Development for the\nRehabilitation of 2428 Central Avenue (Islander Motel). Adopted.\nREGULAR AGENDA ITEMS\n(11-132) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda\nMunicipal Code to Amend Chapter XIII (Building and Housing) by Repealing Article I\n(Uniform Codes Relating to Building, Housing and Technical Codes) in its Entirety and\nAdding a New Article I (Uniform Codes Relating to Building, Housing and Technical\nCodes) to Adopt the 2010 California Building Code, the 2010 California Residential\nCode, the 2010 California Historical Building Code, the 2010 California Electrical Code,\nthe 2010 California Plumbing Code, the 2010 California Mechanical Code, the 2010\nCalifornia Energy Code, the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code, the 1997\nUniform Housing Code, and the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of\nDangerous Buildings, and Amend Chapter XV (Fire Prevention) by Repealing Section\n15-1 in its Entirety and by Adding a New Section 15-1 to Adopt the 2010 California Fire\nCode. Introduced.\nThe Chief Building Official gave a presentation.\nIn response to Mayor Gilmore's inquiry, the Chief Building Official stated current\n[electrical] codes apply to a house built after May 2, 1989 or remodeled since 1989.\nMayor Gilmore inquired how codes are communicated to the public, specifically the\nrealty community.\nThe Chief Building Official responded handouts are provided; stated the proposed\nordinance has very few changes; the new Green Residential Building Code is\nmandatory now; information could be posted on the City's website; noted that he\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n3\nMarch 15, 2010", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 4, "text": "regularly meets with realtors.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired how the 1989 date was selected, to which the Chief\nBuilding Official responded the 1989 date was the last time electrical requirements were\nchanged.\nCouncilmember Johnson stated most complaints come from Harbor Bay residents;\ninquired how many Harbor Bay homes would need to have [electrical] kitchen updates.\nThe Chief Building Official responded houses built in the 1980's would need to upgrade\nto the Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter (GCFI); stated spacing [between outlets] went\nfrom six feet to four feet in the early 1990's.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired whether the spacing is a health and safety issue.\nThe Chief Building Official responded the real issue is the GFCI, which has proven to be\na life safety issue.\nCouncilmember Tam stated a dedicated, high voltage garage circuit is needed for\nelectric cars; inquired whether staff is preparing for issuing permits, to which the Chief\nBuilding Official responded said permits are addressed in the Electrical Code.\nCouncilmember Tam responded what is the cost, to which the Chief Building Official\nresponded approximately $75.\nThe Acting City Manager noted electric car manufacturers are encouraging residents to\ndo electrical upgrades.\nMayor Gilmore stated Alameda Municipal Power (AMP) is systematically\nundergrounding older Alameda areas; electrical service upgrades are required; inquired\nwhether or not upgrades would be enough to plug in an electrical car.\nThe Chief Building Official responded perhaps not; stated the issue may be the same as\nfor hot tub installation, which might require an upgrade.\nMayor Gilmore stated people interested in getting an electric car should talk to AMP.\nThe Chief Building Official stated people should talk to the Building Department also.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated retrofitting permit costs have been a concern in the past;\nreducing electrical permit costs should be considered.\nThe Chief Building Official stated the cost is relatively low.\nCouncilmember Tam noted Nissan has 32,000 Leaf electric cars on order.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n4\nMarch 15, 2010", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 5, "text": "Vice Mayor Bonta inquired whether permits are valid for twelve months, to which the\nChief Building Official responded the permits are valid for three years, which has helped\nin this economy.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired whether a permitting process has been implemented\nfor spacing outlets four feet apart instead of six feet, to which the Chief Building Official\nresponded the proposed amendment would be less stringent than what is currently\ndone.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired whether some cities just require a GFCI and not four\nfoot spacing.\nThe Chief Building Official responded that he will look into the matter; stated\nadjustments could be made if necessary.\nCouncilmember Tam moved introduction of the ordinance.\nVice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\n(11-133) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by\nRepealing Article II (Boards and Commissions) of Chapter Il (Administration) in Its\nEntirety and by Repealing Subsection 30-65.7 (Public Art Commission) of Chapter XXX\n(Development Regulations) in Its Entirety and Adding a New Article Il (Boards and\nCommissions). Introduced.\nThe Senior Management Analyst gave a presentation.\nMayor Gilmore requested an explanation on term expirations.\nThe City Clerk stated the remainder of a term would be filled if there is a vacancy so\nthat terms remain staggered; the person would serve a partial term and would still be\neligible to serve two full terms; all terms would end July 31st but in different years.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired whether Section 2-6.2 [Membership; Appointment;\nTerm of Office; Removal; Vacancies] is the same as the Charter language.\nThe Senior Management Analyst responded the language is similar; stated additional\nlanguage has been added.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired whether the language is consistent with the Charter,\nto which the Senior Management Analyst responded in the affirmative.\nCouncilmember Tam stated the Disaster Council is being proposed for elimination\nbecause of the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP).\nThe Senior Management Analyst stated Disaster Council functions have been replaced\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n5\nMarch 15, 2010", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 6, "text": "by the EOP, which has been approved by the Council and meets current State and\nfederal requirements.\nThe Acting City Manager stated the Disaster Council enabled the Fire Department to\nconvene meetings; the City has an active Disaster Preparedness program; the\nCommunity Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program is very active within the\ncommunity.\nThe Senior Management Analyst stated disaster preparedness constantly evolves and\nneeds to evolve more quickly than the ability to amend the Municipal Code let alone the\nCharter.\nCouncilmember Tam stated future consolidation or re-morphing of the ten Commissions\nhas been discussed.\nThe Acting City Manager stated an analysis is being conducted; staff resources for\nsupporting all the Commissions have declined; staff is reviewing the matter to see if\nsome Commission duties can be subsumed by other Commissions or Boards; bringing\nthe matter back before adopting the Fiscal Year 2011-2012 budget would make sense.\nCouncilmember Tam stated that she would like more input on how the matter could be\nmore interactive with the community.\nVice Mayor Bonta stated a core issue would be the level of public engagement; that he\nwould advocate for public participation in crafting the overall look; an ad hoc\ncommission could review the Commissions and make suggestions on the most efficient\nway to have public participation and engage the community.\nMayor Gilmore stated having public participation would be good but should come later\nrather than earlier because staff resources are limited; members of the public would not\nnecessarily understand resource limitations; that she would prefer to have staff take the\nfirst step and then have the public provide feedback.\nCouncilmember deHaan concurred with Mayor Gilmore; stated appointing ad hoc\ncommittees has been very successful in the past and should be considered as a fall\nback position.\nCouncilmember Johnson stated that she understands the idea of eliminating the Cable\nTelevision Committee and Disaster Council; more public involvement is needed for\ndisaster preparedness; that she has never been totally satisfied with the emergency\nresponse plan; the plan is not where it needs to be; public involvement is important so\nthat the public is aware and understands the process; that she does not think the CERT\nProgram fulfills the roll; perhaps the public could sit in on the meetings that the Fire\nDepartment organizes.\nThe Acting City Manager stated that she would talk to the Interim Fire Chief.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n6\nMarch 15, 2010", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 7, "text": "Councilmember Johnson stated that she is not convinced that the City has adequate\nevacuation routes.\nThe Acting City Manager stated that she would look into the matter.\nCouncilmember Johnson stated scientists must know whether or not water would rise in\nthe Bay even though the City would not get a main part of a tsunami and whether\npeople would need to be evacuated.\nThe Acting City Manager stated that she would get back to Council on the matter; the\nBoard and Commission item could be brought back as a discussion item, not an action\nitem; emails could be sent out to the Boards and Commissions and other community\ngroups to allow public input; recommendations could be brought back to Council.\nMayor Gilmore stated staff was on top of the game after the tsunami hit Japan; the\nInterim Police Chief advised her that staff was in contact with East Bay Regional Park\nDistrict, School District, Public Works, and the County; things were being monitored and\nstaff was prepared.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated the public wants to be engaged in the process but may\nnot understand the involvement.\nCouncilmember Johnson moved introduction of the ordinance.\nVice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\nCITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS\n(11-134) Presentation on the Abatement Fund\nThe Building Official gave a Power Point presentation.\nCouncilmember Johnson requested an explanation on the economics of the Abatement\nFund.\nThe Chief Building Official stated first the City would spend money to abate a property;\nthen the City would lien the property to the County through tax rolls; the County would\ncollect the money, the City would be repaid, and the money would go back into the\nrevolving Abatement Fund.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired whether the County is successful in getting liens paid.\nThe Chief Building Official responded in the affirmative; stated the City is paid up front.\nCouncilmember Johnson inquired whether staff would need to get permission [to do\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n7\nMarch 15, 2010", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 8, "text": "abatement] from the property owner.\nThe Chief Building Official responded in the negative; stated all due processes would be\ncompleted prior to proceeding with abatement.\nVice Mayor Bonta inquired whether the lien would be added to the property owner's\nproperty tax bill and would appear on the next tax roll, to which the Chief Building\nOfficial responded in the affirmative.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired whether certain properties have been earmarked, to\nwhich the Chief Building Official responded in the affirmative.\nCouncilmember Johnson stated in the past, the court system was unfamiliar with the\nprocess.\nThe Chief Building Official stated staff did a receivership in 2007 for 865 Cedar Street;\nthe judge finally ordered that the house be sold after over thirty court appearances; the\nhouse is now being renovated; the courts now understand the process.\nVice Mayor Bonta inquired how many properties would be eligible.\nThe Chief Building Official responded approximately thirty buildings have citations;\nstated ten of the buildings would be inexpensive to abate.\nCouncilmember Johnson stated property at 300 or 500 Central Avenue is a good\nexample of needed abatement.\nThe Chief Building Official stated the property would be out of the initial City investment\n[$25,000 to $50,000] range.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\nNone.\nCOUNCIL REFERRALS\nNone.\nCOUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\n(11-135) Vice Mayor Bonta stated the School District's Measure A passed; Council\nunanimously voted to support the Measure; the community came together and took\npride in investing in children.\nCouncilmember Tam concurred with Vice Mayor Bonta; congratulated the business\ncommunity in coming forward with an alternative.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n8\nMarch 15, 2010", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 9, "text": "Mayor Gilmore congratulated everyone who worked so hard; stated the job was well\ndone.\nADJOURNMENT\n(11-136) There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:19\np.m. in memory and honor of those lost and suffering from the natural disaster in Japan.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n9\nMarch 15, 2010", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 10, "text": "announced regarding Alameda Gateway, Council was briefed on the lawsuit and\nprovided direction to the Acting City Attorney; regarding case number CV 10-5178, the\nattorneys provided a briefing on the federal lawsuit; regarding case number RG\n10537988, the attorneys provided a briefing on the State litigation.\nAdjournment\nThere being no further business, Mayor/Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:11\np.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger, City Clerk\nSecretary, CIC\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and\nRedevelopment Authority, and Community\nImprovement Commission\nMarch 15, 2011", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 11, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL,\nALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA), AND\nCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING\nTUESDAY--MARCH - 15, 2011-- -7:01 P.M.\nMayor/Chair Gilmore convened the meeting at 8:20 p.m.\nROLL CALL -\nPresent:\nCouncilmembers / Board Members / Commissioners\nBonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Mayor/Chair\nGilmore - 5.\nAbsent:\nNone.\nCONSENT CALENDAR\nCouncilmember/Board Member Tam announced that she would recuse herself from the\nEBMUD JPA [paragraph no. 11-138 CC/11-11-030 ARRA], which was removed from\nthe Consent Calendar.\nCouncilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Johnson announced that she would\nabstain from voting on the March 8th minutes.\nCouncilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the\nremainder of the Consent Calendar.\nVice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Bonta seconded the motion, which was\ncarried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an\nasterisk preceding the paragraph number.]\n(*11-137 CC/11-029 ARRA/11-018 CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council,\nARRA, and CIC Meeting Held on February 15, 2011; the Special Joint City Council,\nCIC, and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners (HABOC) Meeting Held on March\n1, 2011; the Special CIC and HABOC Meeting Held on March 2, 2011; and the Special\nJoint City Council and CIC Meeting Held on March 8, 2011. Approved.\n[Note: Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Johnson abstained from voting on\nthe March 8th minutes.]\n(11-138 - CC/11-030 ARRA) CC Resolution No. 14558/ARRA Resolution No. 53,\n\"Authorizing the Acting City Manager and the Acting Executive Director to Execute the\nJoint Exercise of Powers Agreement to Inspect, Operate, and Maintain the Alameda\nPoint Water System in Preparation for Transfer of Potable Water Infrastructure with\nEast Bay Municipal Utility District.\" Adopted.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council, Alameda Reuse\nand Redevelopment Authority, and\n1\nCommunity Improvement Commission\nMarch 15, 2011", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 12, "text": "Councilmember/Boaro Member Tam left the dais at 7:06 p.m. and returned at 7:08 p.m.\nCouncilmember/Board Member deHaan moved adoption of the resolution.\nVice Mayor/Councilmember Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by the following\nvoice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers/Board Members Bonta, deHaan, Johnson and\nMayor/Chair Gilmore - 4. Abstention: Councilmember/Board Member Tam - 1.\nAGENDA ITEMS\n(11-139 CC/11-031 ARRA) Recommendation to Authorize the Acting Executive Director\nand Acting City Manager to Bind Pollution Legal Liability Insurance Coverage for\nAlameda Point with XL Environmental for a Cost of $720,112.\nThe Acting City Attorney/Legal Counsel gave a brief presentation.\nVice Mayor/Board Member Bonta inquired whether XL Environmental would not cover\nanything that was previously covered.\nPatrician Blau, Marsh Risk Services, responded unfortunately, in the last ten years,\ninsurance carriers have found that the loss has not been favorable so no market is\noffering coverage.\nCouncilmember/Board Member deHaan inquired whether any claims have been filed, to\nwhich the Risk Manager responded not at Alameda Point.\nCouncilmember/Board Member Johnson inquired whether the new policy would have\nadditional exclusions that were not in the previous policy.\nThe Risk Manager responded some additional exclusions would be overridden through\nendorsements, such as an early transfer restriction; under an early transfer, XL\nEnvironmental would not be responsible to clean up anything that is known, only what is\nunknown.\nCouncilmember/Board Member Johnson inquired whether the Navy still considers the\ntransfer an early transfer.\nThe Acting City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded the Navy would still be on the hook\nfor clean up.\nCouncilmember/Board Member Johnson inquired whether the insurance would cover a\nprivatized clean up.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council, Alameda Reuse\nand Redevelopment Authority, and\n2\nCommunity Improvement Commission\nMarch 15, 2011", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2011-03-15", "page": 13, "text": "The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded the policy would not\nhave a cost-cap and would not cover clean up of known substances.\nCouncilmember/Board Member Johnson questioned whether staff is being careful\nregarding early transfer language; stated the Navy still refers to the entire transfer as an\nearly transfer.\nThe Acting City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded early transfer was excluded all\ntogether; the [proposed] coverage is better now and there would only be an exclusion\nfor some situations of early transfer; a known condition that the transferee plans to\nclean up would be excluded.\nCouncilmember/Board Member Johnson inquired whether there are any other additional\nexclusions.\nThe Risk Manager responded the marsh crust; stated XL Environmental would pay for\nany accidental penetration and subsequent pollution but would not pay for anything\nintentional or willful.\nCouncilmember/Board Member deHaan inquired whether staff delineated what to\ninclude in the policy and Chubb just missed it; further inquired whether staff provided\nChubb with an opportunity to update the policy.\nThe Risk Manager responded many opportunities were provided; stated Chubb would\nnot come to the table with respect to asbestos and lead paint which would be the more\nlikely scenarios for future property damage and bodily injury.\nCouncilmember/Board Member Johnson moved approval of the staff recommendation.\nCouncilmember/Board Member deHaan seconded the motion, which was carried by\nunanimous voice vote - 5.\nADJOURNMENT\nThere being no further business, Mayor/Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:34\np.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger, City Clerk\nSecretary, CIC\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council, Alameda Reuse\nand Redevelopment Authority, and\n3\nCommunity Improvement Commission\nMarch 15, 2011", "path": "CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf"}