{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 1, "text": "MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY - -MARCH 7, 2006- -7:30 P. M.\nMayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 7:49 p.m.\nROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,\nMatarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5.\nAbsent :\nNone.\nAGENDA CHANGES\n(06-106) - Mayor Johnson announced that consideration of change\norder for first floor ceiling treatment [paragraph no. 06-109]\nwould be addressed with the Library Project update [paragraph no.\n06-108]\nPROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS\n(06-107) Presentation of Abbott Diabetes Care.\nArt Autorino, Abbott Diabetes Care Divisional Vice President of\nOperations, provided a brief presentation.\nMayor Johnson stated that Abbott Diabetes Care products are very\nhelpful; diabetes testing can be very painful.\nMr. Autorino stated that technology has improved; current testing\nis painless.\nMayor Johnson stated people are doing a better job in monitoring\nblood sugar levels.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired whether Abbott was researching non-\nintrusive testing.\nMr. Autorino responded in the negative; stated the long-term hope\nis to have a product that measures the glucose level and\ncommunicates the correct dosage through an insulin pump.\nMayor Johnson stated the community is glad to have Abbott Diabetes\nCare in Alameda; thanked the Development Services Department for\nworking closely with Abbott Diabetes Care.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated the Development Services Department\nbecame a model working to retaining business.\nMr. Autorino stated the City, County, and State were very helpful.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n1\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 2, "text": "Mayor Johnson stated that Advanced Cell Technologies is a new\ncompany at the Business Park.\n(06-108) Library Project update.\nThe Project Manager provided a brief presentation.\nREGULAR AGENDA ITEM\n(06-109) Consideration of change order for first floor ceiling\ntreatment for the New Main Library Project.\nMayor Johnson stated that putting items back into the project is\ngood; the wood ceiling would make the New Main Library more\nbeautiful.\nCouncilmember Matarrese stated the change order is a good way to\nspend the additional money; the risk goes down as the project nears\ncompletion; now is the time to invest the money back into the\nproject.\nVice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether there is a difference between\nthe durability of the cherry wood ceiling and the acoustical tiles\nand whether the Library Building Team or Project Manager had a top\npriority add-back.\nThe Project Manager responded the ceiling change order is the only\nchoice; stated the architect asserts to the durability of the\ncherry wood ceiling in his letter; acoustical tiles cannot be\ncleaned; a wood ceiling can be cleaned.\nCouncilmember Matarrese inquired whether there is a number two add-\nback that the money should be spent on.\nThe Project Manager responded other value engineering items cannot\nbe added back due to scheduling restraints; small items could be\nput back.\nCouncilmember Matarrese requested that a value-engineering list be\nprovided to the Council in an Off Agenda Report.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated the New Main Library is for all of\nAlameda: the Council should move forward if the change order\nimproves the beauty of the Library; inquired whether the interest\nearned on Measure O funds would be used, to which the Project\nManager responded in the affirmative.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n2\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 3, "text": "Councilmember Daysog inquired whether redevelopment money could be\nused instead; stated the interest earned on Measure O funds could\nbe used for branch libraries; redevelopment money can only be used\nin redevelopment areas.\nThe Project Manager responded Council approved the contingency\nfunding on December 21, 2004 the order of funding was Measure O\ninterest, branch library funding, and then redevelopment.\nCouncilmember Matarrese inquired whether branch library funding\nwould be guaranteed if redevelopment money were used for the add-\nback.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated the best approach would be to move\nforward with the change order and leave flexibility for staff to\niron out the details.\nVice Mayor Gilmore stated that she understood that the $670,000\nline item was earmarked for branch library upgrades; the concept\nwas to dip into the branch library funding if the New Main Library\nran over budget.\nThe Project Manager stated $2 million was allocated for branch\nlibrary funding.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether branch library funds would be used\nif the New Main Library ran over budget or whether alternate\nsources would be used.\nThe Project Manager responded branch library funds would be used if\nthe New Main Library runs over the $375,000 [Measure O interest ] ;\nstated the final funding source would be redevelopment funds\nMayor Johnson stated the Council could move forward with the change\norder and address the financing issue at a later point.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated that only going $200,000 over on a $20\nmillion project is incredible.\nCouncilmember deHaan moved approval of the change order.\nCouncilmember Matarrese seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated money should be saved\nfor the branch libraries; Alameda can have a great Main Library and\ngreat branch libraries.\nThe Project Manager stated he is lobbying to use the $2 million\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n3\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 4, "text": "[for branch libraries] as another local match for a future bond\nmeasure; the Statewide Library Bond Measure would provide a\nsignificant amount of funding if the Measure passes in June 2006;\nthe Office of Library Construction looks very favorably on Alameda\nbecause of the current project.\nCouncilmember Daysog inquired whether the $2 million was additional\nMeasure O dollars, to which the Project Manager responded in the\naffirmative.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether using the funds as a local match for\nthe Bond Measure would come back to Council, to which the Project\nManager responded in the affirmative.\nOn the call for the question, the motioned carried by unanimous\nvoice vote - 5.\nCONSENT CALENDAR\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar.\nCouncilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by\nunanimous voice vote - 5.\n[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding\nthe paragraph number . ]\n(*06-110) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings\nheld on February 21, 2006; the Special Joint City Council and\nPublic Utilities Board Meeting held on February 27, 2006; and the\nSpecial City Council Meeting held on March 1, 2006. Approved.\n(*06-111) Ratified bills in the amount of $6,255,021.50.\n(*06-112) Recommendation to appropriate $170,000 in Urban Runoff\nFunds and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a\nContract with Regency Centers for repair to public drainage\nfacilities in coordination with construction of the Bridgeside\nShopping Center improvements. Accepted.\n(*06-113) Recommendation to accept the work of Ghilotti Brothers,\nInc. for Park Street Streetscape and Towne Center Project, No. P.W.\n10-02-13. Accepted.\n(*06-114) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report\nfor the period ending December 31, 2005. Accepted.\n( *06-115) - Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Investment Report\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n4\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 5, "text": "for the period ending December 31, 2005. Accepted.\n(*06-116) Resolution No. 13929, \"Ordering Vacation of a Portion of\na 25 -Foot - Wide Public Utility Easement Within Tract 1866, Filed Map\nBook 38, at Page 50 to 54, Alameda County Official Records ;\nVacation of Two 10-Foot Power Easements, Filed RE: 191, Image 107\n#79-196972 O.R. Alameda County Official Records and Acceptance of\nNew 25-Foot Wide Public Utility Easement (Towne Centre) \" Adopted.\n(*06-117) Resolution No. 13930, \"Granting Another Designated Period\nfor Two Years Additional Service Credit as Provided for Under\nContract Amendment between the City and the Public Employees'\nRetirement System, and California Government Code Section 20903.\n\"\nAdopted.\nREGULAR AGENDA ITEMS\n(06-118)\nResolution No. 13931, \"Appointing Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft\nas a Member of the Planning Board. \" Adopted.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated many people apply for various\ncommissions and boards he is concerned about an individual being\nappointed to a board or commission and then be appointed to a\ndifferent board or commission within six months; he does not feel\nthe practice is appropriate; stated he would abstain from voting on\nthe matter.\nMayor Johnson stated that many people serve on more than one board\nor commission; she would not appoint an individual to more than one\nboard or commission; many people have an interest to serve; she\nadvises people that it is acceptable to apply for a preferred board\nor commission if an opening becomes available shortly after\nbeginning to serve on their current appointment; serving more than\neight years or serving a three-year term and then two four-year\nterms is not appropriate; she does not believe this nomination is\ninappropriate because the individual has been on the Economic\nDevelopment Commission for a short period of time and a board\nposition came up that was of more interest; stated the nomination\nis not contrary to Councilmember deHaan's comments.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated the Planning Board had an opening\napproximately four or five months ago; the current situation could\nhave been curtailed if the individual applied for the position\nthen.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated that he served on two boards at the\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n5\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 6, "text": "same time.\nMayor Johnson stated people have served on three boards at one\ntime; she does not believe serving on multiple boards is necessary\nbecause many people are interested in serving.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated the Council should respect the\nnominee's desire to serve; the Mayor has the prerogative to\nnominate individuals; he respects Councilmember deHaan's position.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the\nfollowing voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Gilmore,\nMatarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 4. Abstentions Councilmember deHaan\n- 1 . -\nThe City Clerk administered the Oath and presented a certificate of\nappointment to Ms. Ezzy Ashcraft.\nMs. Ezzy Ashcraft thanked the Council for the honor of being\nappointed; stated she enjoyed serving on the Economic Development\nCommission.\n(06-119) - Public Hearing to consider ZA06-0001 - Zoning Ordinance\nText Amendment/City-wide and revision of Section 30-5.7 of the\nAlameda Municipal Code (AMC), Projections from Buildings and Roof\nPlanes, Permitted Encroachments, and Treatments of Minimum Required\nYards; and\n(06-119A) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal\nCode by Adding a New Subsection 30-5.7 (M) (Extensions of Roof\nPitch and Roof Ridges) to Section 30-5.7 - (Projections from\nBuildings and Roof Planes, Permitted Encroachments and Treatments\nof Minimum Required Yards) of Chapter XXX (Development\nRegulations) to Add a Process for Allowing Additions to Existing\nDwellings with Nonconforming Height. Introduced.\nMayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing.\nThere being no speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of\nthe hearing.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether the proposed amendment relates to\nthe Design Review Guidelines.\nThe Supervising Planner responded the amendment was proposed by the\nCustomer Service Initiative Committee and is part of the on-going\nDevelopment Code review.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n6\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 7, "text": "Mayor Johnson inquired whether the proposed amendment included non-\ndwelling structures, to which the Supervising Planner responded in\nthe negative.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether the proposed amendment was prompted\nby a previously addressed garage issue.\nCouncilmember deHaan responded house additions and design are an\non-going concern; the proposed amendment would allow the aesthetics\nof older homes to be proportional to the existing rooflines when\nadditions are made.\nThe Supervising Planner responded the proposed amendment would\naddress main structures, not accessory structures.\nCouncilmember Daysog stated a Harbor Bay homeowner wanted to build\nan addition without a setback; neighbors were concerned that\nsunlight would be lost without the setback.\nThe Supervising Planner stated neighbors would be notified because\nissues would go through the Design Review process.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether the Customer Service Initiative\nCommittee was working on other issues.\nThe Supervising Planner responded staff would be meeting with the\nCommittee tomorrow; the Committee is working on clarifying the\nbuilding process for the public.\nCouncilmember deHaan moved introduction of the ordinance.\nCouncilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by\nunanimous voice vote - 5.\n(06-120) Public Hearing to consider two parcel maps, PM 05-002 and\nPM 05-003, Marina Berth Condominium Conversion - Marina Village\nProperties;\n(06-120A) Resolution No. 13932, \"Approving Parcel Maps, PM 05-002\nand PM 05-003, at Berth Gates 8 through 11 at Marina Village.\nAdopted; and\n(06-120B) Resolution No. 13933, \"Granting a Non-Exclusive\nFacilities Easement and a Non-Exclusive 8-Foot Wide Ingress and\nEgress Easement between the City of Alameda and Alameda Real Estate\nInvestments within Lot 7 of Tract 6096. \" Adopted.\nMayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n7\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 8, "text": "There being no speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of\nthe hearing.\nCouncilmember Matarrese stated he would recuse himself because he\nowns property within 300 feet of Marina Village and left the room.\nThe Supervising Planner provided a brief report.\nVice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether live-aboards were counted as\nunits under the Housing Element.\nThe Supervising Planner responded in the negative; stated that only\nfloating homes [houseboats] are treated as housing units.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether dues would pay for the maintenance,\nto which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative.\nMayor Johnson inquired how dues would be established, to which the\nSupervising Planner responded that dues would be established\nthrough the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's)\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired whether there are other marina\ncondominiums in the area.\nThe Supervising Planner responded Emerycove in Emeryville has been\nin place for 20 years.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired what was the percentage of ownership\nat Emerycove.\nThe Emerycove Harbor Master responded all 430 slips are privately\nowned.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired what would happen if 100% was not\nsold out.\nThe Emerycove Harbor Master responded the original owner owned the\n430 slips and has sold all but 157 slips.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired what percentage of ownership is\nplanned, to which Don Parker responded 100%.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired what is the percentage of current\nlive-aboards.\nThe Marina Harbor Master Manager responded 10% is allowed, which is\n75 live-aboards. currently, there are 63 live-aboards.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n8\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 9, "text": "Councilmember deHaan inquired whether any parking problems would be\nencountered with the 10% live-aboards.\nThe Marina Harbor Master Manager responded parking was not an issue\nin the past when there were 75 live-aboards.\nVice Mayor Gilmore moved adoption of resolutions.\nCouncilmember Daysog thanked Mr. Parker for the work he has done\nfor Alameda and for transforming Marina Village.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion, Councilmember deHaan stated that Mr. Parker was\nthe first ARRA Executive Officer; learning the conversion and\ndevelopment ropes was an exciting opportunity; Marina Village\nturned into a great development; the City owes a debt of gratitude\nto Mr. Parker for his persistence.\nMr. Parker thanked the Council for recognizing the Marina Village\naccomplishmentsi stated tonight will be the last time he would be\nspeaking before the City Council; he has been in front of 5 Mayors\nover the last 27 years; the experience has been wonderful.\nOn the call for the question, the motion carried by the following\nvoice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, and Mayor\nJohnson - 4. Abstentions: Councilmember Matarrese - 1. [Note\nCouncilmember Matarrese recused himself due to owning property\nwithin 300 feet of Marina Village. ]\n(06-121) Resolution No. 13934, \"Establishing a Long-Term Park Use\nPolicy. \" Adopted.\nThe Acting Recreation and Park Director provided a brief report.\nCouncilmember Daysog inquired who was contacted at the Swim\nAssociation, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director\nresponded the President.\nCouncilmember Matarrese thanked the Recreation and Park Commission\nand Acting Recreation and Park Director for a job well done.\nCouncilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolution.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by\nunanimous voice vote - 5.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n9\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 10, "text": "matter.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n10\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 11, "text": "(06-130) - Councilmember Matarrese stated that Long's is working with\nthe Planning Department on some renovations; suggested using\ncreativity for the corner across from City Hall, such a mini-park.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether the red windows were historic or\ncould be removed from the Long's site.\n(06-131) - Mayor Johnson inquired whether the speed [pole-mounted\nradar ] signs were mobile, to which the City Manager responded some\nsigns are pole-mounted and others are mobile.\nCouncilmember Matarrese stated he would like to have a permanent\nspeed sign at Lincoln Avenue curve area.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether a sign was located on Buena Vista\nAvenue.\nThe City Manager stated that a report on locations would be\nprovided to the Council.\nMayor Johnson requested a temporary or permanent speed sign be\nlocated on Buena Vista Avenue.\nVice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the signs' effectiveness could\nbe measured.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether speeds could be monitored, to which\nthe City Manager responded that she would check.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated a decrease in the number of tickets\nissued would be a good measure of the signs' effectiveness.\n(06-132) Councilmember Daysog stated that he attended a briefing\nco-sponsored - by the League of California Cities East Bay, North\nBay, and Peninsula Divisions; a representative from the Governor' S\noffice addressed the upcoming infrastructure bond plan; Friday is\nthe deadline for the Governor and legislature to place something on\nthe June ballot.\n( 06-133 - ) Mayor Johnson thanked the Recreation and Park Department\nfor providing information on the City facilities naming process ;\nstated she would like to have the policy come back to Council for\ndiscussion along with the street naming policy.\n(06-134) Mayor Johnson welcomed David Brandt to his first City\nCouncil meeting as Assistant City Manager.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n11\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 12, "text": "Councilmember deHaan congratulated the Assistant City Manager for\nthe new addition to his family.\nMayor Johnson thanked the Interim Assistant City Manager for\ndoing a great job for the last two months.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated the Interim Assistant City Manager\nstepped into the position and did not miss a beat.\nADJOURNMENT\nThere being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the\nRegular Meeting at 9:13 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown\nAct.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n12\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 13, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY - -MARCH 7, 2006- -6:00 P.M.\nMayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:00 p.m.\nRoll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,\nMatarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5.\nAbsent :\nNone.\nThe Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:\n(06-100) Conference with Property Negotiator - Property: Ballena\nIsle Marina; Negotiating parties: City of Alameda and Ballena Isle\nMarina LLP; Under negotiation: Price and terms.\n(06-101) Conference with Real Property Negotiator - Property : 2990\nMain Street and 2 Mecartney Road; Negotiating Parties : City\nof\nAlameda and the Bay Area Water Transit Authority; Under\nNegotiation: Price and terms.\n(06-102) Conference with Labor Negotiators - Agency Negotiators :\nCraig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee Organizations :\nAlameda City Employees Association, International Brotherhood of\nElectrical Workers, and Management and Confidential Employees\nAssociation.\n(06-103) Conference with Labor Negotiators - Agency Negotiators:\nMarie Gilmore and Frank Matarrese; Employee City Attorney\nMayor Johnson called a recess at 7:40 p.m. to hold the Regular\nCouncil Meeting and reconvened the Closed Session at 9:15 p.m.\nFollowing the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened\nand Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Ballena Isle Marina, the\nCouncil obtained briefing from staff and gave direction to real\nproperty negotiators; regarding 2990 Main Street and 2 Mecartney\nRoad, the Council obtained briefing and gave instruction; regarding\nAlameda City Employees Association, International Brotherhood of\nElectrical Workers, and Management and Confidential Employees\nAssociation, the Council obtained briefing from labor negotiators;\nregarding the City Attorney, the Council discussed the City\nAttorney.\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n1\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 14, "text": "Adjournment\nThere being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the\nSpecial Meeting at 10:10 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown\nAct.\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n2\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 15, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND\nCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING\nTUESDAY - -MARCH 7, 2006- -7:25 P.M.\nMayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:45 p.m.\nCouncilmember/Commissioner Daysog led the Pledge of Allegiance.\nROLL CALL-\nPresent : Councilmembers/Commissioners\nDaysog,\ndeHaan,\nGilmore,\nMatarrese,\nand\nMayor/Chair Johnson - 5.\nAbsent :\nNone.\nMINUTES\n(06-104CC-06-007CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council,\nAlameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, Community Improvement\nCommission, and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting\nheld on February 21, 2006. Approved.\nCouncilmember/Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the minutes.\nVice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried\nby unanimous voice vote - 5.\nAGENDA ITEM\n(06-008CIC) Resolution No. 06-140, \"Authorizing and Directing the\nExecution of Loan Agreement Relating to the Issuance of Certain\nBonds by the California Statewide Communities Development\nAuthority, Approving Official Statement Relating to Such Bonds and\nAuthorizing and Approving Other Matters Relating Thereto. \" Adopted.\n(06-008A/CIC) Resolution No. 06-141, \"Approving Authorizing and\nDirecting Execution of an Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of\nPowers Agreement Relating to the California Statewide Communities\nDevelopment Authority. Adopted.\n(06-105/CC) Resolution No. 13928, \"Approving the Borrowing of Funds\nby the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda from\nCalifornia Statewide Communities Development Authority and\nProviding Other Matters Relating Thereto. Adopted.\nThe Development Services Director gave a brief presentation.\nCouncilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the\nresolutions.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council and\n1\nCommunity Improvement Commission Meeting\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2006-03-07", "page": 16, "text": "Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which\ncarried by unanimous voice vote - 5.\nADJOURNMENT\nThere being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the\nSpecial Joint Meeting at 7:49 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger, City Clerk\nSecretary, Community Improvement\nCommission\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown\nAct.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda City Council and\n2\nCommunity Improvement Commission Meeting\nMarch 7, 2006", "path": "CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf"}