{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 1, "text": "MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL\nTUESDAY - - APRIL 5, 2005 - - 7:30 P. M.\nMayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 9:07 p.m.\nROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,\nMatarrese and Mayor Johnson - 5.\nAbsent :\nNone.\nAGENDA CHANGES\nNone.\nPROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS\n(05 -136 - ) Proclamation declaring April 3-9, 2005 as the Week of the\nYoung Child.\nMayor Johnson read and presented the proclamation to Peter\nStensrud, Woodstock Child Development Center.\nMr. Stensrud stated that after school programs are essential;\nthanked the Council for the proclamation.\n(05-137) Update on the new main library project.\nThe Project Manager gave a brief project update.\nMayor Johnson stated there have been comments regarding noise\nissues. that a suggestion was made to hand out flyers to property\nowners in the area.\nThe Project Manager stated that he will talk with the property\nowners and tenants beginning next week; noted the noisiest part of\nthe project is now; stated that he plans to post a weekly update at\nthe Times Star building directory.\nCouncilmember Matarrese suggested advising the public on how to\nutilize the web camera for updates.\nThe Project Manager stated the web camera is accessible from the\nCity and Library websites.\nCONSENT CALENDAR\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n1\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 2, "text": "Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous\nvoice vote - 5.\n[ Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding\nthe paragraph number. . ]\n(*05-138 - ) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting, the Special\nJoint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting,\nand the Regular City Council Meeting held on March 15, 2005; and\nSpecial City Council Meetings held on March 22, 2005. Approved.\n(*05-139) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,165,275.22.\n(*05-140) Recommendation to accept the City of Alameda Investment\nPolicy. Accepted.\n( *05-141) Recommendation to approve two-month Contract extension\nfor William C. Norton for City Manager services. Accepted; and\n( *05-141A) Resolution No. 13824, \"Requesting that the Public\nEmployee Retirement System Board Waive the 960-Hour Rule for\nWilliam C. Norton. \" Adopted.\n(*05-142) Resolution No. 13825, \"Approving Revised Memorandum of\nUnderstanding and Salary Resolution Between the Alameda Police\nOfficers Association Non-Sworn Unit and the City of Alameda for the\nPeriod Commencing December 28, 2003 and Ending December 24, 2006. \"\nAdopted.\n(*05-143) Introduction of Ordinance Approving and Authorizing\nExecution of Lease Between the City of Alameda (Lessor) and the\nCounty of Alameda (Lessee) for Real Property Located at 1429 Oak\nStreet. Introduced.\nREGULAR AGENDA ITEMS\n(05-144) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning\nBoard's approval of Rezoning, R04-0002, to rezone 1/2 acre from R-5\nto C-C; Variance, V04-0018, for a second driveway when one driveway\nis permitted by the Alameda Municipal Code; Use Permit, UP04-0013,\nfor expansion of the vet clinic, and Design Review, DR04-0101, to\nallow a 5,300 square foot new commercial building (veterinary\nhospital) to replace approximately 2,000 square feet of commercial\nbuildings, with a parking lot expansion to 23 spaces. The property\nis located at 1410 Everett Street, 2501 Central Avenue and 2507\nCentral Avenue, in the C-C Community Commercial and R-5 General\nResidential Zoning Districts. Applicant Mary Applegate and Cathy\nWydner. Appellant: John Barni, Jr. ; and\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n2\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 3, "text": "(05-144A) Resolution No. 13826, \"Upholding the Planning Board's\nRecommendation to Approve Rezoning R04-002, Variance V04-018, Use\nPermit UP04-013 - and Major Design Review, DR04-101, for Construction\nof a Veterinary Clinic, with an amendment to include that the\nApplicant has a dog walking policy and that kenneling is limited to\nclients. Adopted.\nThe Supervising Planner provided a brief presentation on the\nproject.\nMayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing.\nProponents (In favor of appeal) : John Barni, Jr., Appellant\n(provided diagram) ; Monica Pena, Alameda; Heather Beales, Alameda;\nand Joe Meylor, Alameda.\nOpponents (Not in favor of appeal) : Lawrence Henderson, Alameda;\nSusan Corlett, Alameda: Helen Mohr Thomas, Alameda; Diane Schaffer,\nOakland; Cathy Wydner, Applicant; Steve Busse, Park Centre Animal\nHospital Geni Manchester; Mary Applegate, Applicant; Nancy\nMatthews, Alameda (submitted letter) ; and Robb Ratto, Park Street\nBusiness Association (PSBA)\nThere being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the Public\nHearing.\nVice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the Public Works Department\nreviewed the current site plan and verified that the plan met\nvehicle standards for safety and setbacks.\nThe Supervising Planner responded that there are hundreds of\ninstances where buildings are up to the edge of the sidewalk in the\ncommercial districts; stated that she would assume there were no\nrestrictions since the Public Works Department reviewed the plan\nand did not raise the issue.\nThe Acting City Manager stated that the Engineering Department\nwould have commented if the site distance were a problem.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired whether the commercial area was\nwilling to have dogs walk in the area, to which Mr. Ratto, PSBA,\nresponded absolutely.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated dog walking in neighborhoods has always\nbeen a problem; that he feels more comfortable with the concessions\n[made by Applicant regarding dog walking] that have been made\ntonight ; that he is very satisfied with the architectural design\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n3\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 4, "text": "changes ; that he can live with the client only boarding concession;\nthat he did not hear dogs barking at the site; noted that the site\nis a very professional and confined operation; a lot of dogs have\nto stay in kennels for a period of time and are picked up later in\nthe day; that in mind, he feels comfortable with moving forward\nwith the project.\nMayor Johnson stated that the Applicant has been very\naccommodating.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution upholding\nthe Planning Board's recommendation.\nVice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion.\nUnder discussion, Councilmember deHaan inquired how the recommended\nconcessions [regarding kenneling and dog walking would be\nreflected in the motion.\nThe Supervising Planner stated the conditions of approval do not\ninclude the Applicant's agreement that only patients be kenneled on\nsite, not general kenneling; as to walking in the neighborhood, a\ncondition could be crafted that encourages use of streets other\nthan Regent Street and the south side of Central Avenue, which\nmight be difficult to enforce.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether the approval could reflect that the\nApplicant has an adopted dog walking policy, to which the\nSupervising Planner responded the dog walking policy could be\nincorporated.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether including the policy was acceptable\nto the Applicant, to which the Applicant responded in the\naffirmative.\nCouncilmember Matarrese amended his motion to incorporate reference\nto the Applicant's dog walking policy as well as the kenneling of\nclient animals only.\nVice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous\nvoice vote - 5.\n(05-145) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning\nBoard's approval of Design Review, DR04-0113, and Planned\nDevelopment, PD04-0004, for the construction of a new 6,000 square\nfoot community center and four detached sixteen-car garages,\nexterior modifications to existing apartment buildings, and other\nsite modifications at the 615 unit Harbor Island Apartments\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n4\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 5, "text": "Complex. The site is located at 433 Buena Vista Avenue within the\nR-4 PD, Neighborhood Residential Planned Development Zoning\nDistrict. Applicant: Chris Auxier for Alameda Multi Family Ventures\nLLC. Appellant: Lorraine Lilley; and\n(05-145A) - Resolution No. 13827, \"Upholding the Planning Board of\nthe City of Alameda's Decision to Approve Design Review DR04-0113\nand Planned Development PD04-0004 to Construct a 6,000 Square Foot\nCommunity Center and Four Detached Garages, Exterior Modifications\nto Existing Buildings, and Other Site Modifications at the 615 Unit\nHarbor Island Apartment Complex Located at 433 Buena Vista Avenue,\nLocated in an R-4 PD, Neighborhood Residential Planned Development\nZoning District. Adopted.\nThe Supervising Planner provided a brief presentation on the\nproject.\nCouncilmember Matarrese inquired whether asbestos abatement is part\nof the permitting process.\nThe Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative.\nMayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing.\nProponents (In favor of appeal) : Lorraine Lilley, Harbor Island\nTenant Association; Modessa Henderson, Harbor Island Tenant\nAssociation; Lynette Lee, Oakland; Delores Wills Guyton, Harbor\nIsland Tenant Association; Eve Bach, Arc Ecology ( submitted\nhandout ) ; Reginald James, Alameda; and Michael Yoshi ( submitted\nhandout) .\nOpponent (Not in favor of appeal) : Mark R. Hartney, Alameda Multi\nFamily Ventures.\nFollowing Ms. Henderson's comments, Mayor Johnson inquired what\ntype of engineering review must be done to ensure the building is\nstructurally safe.\nThe Supervising Planner responded that all of the plans would be\nreviewed.\nThe Project Architect stated that work must conform with the 2001\nCalifornia Building Code (CBC) ; noted that he is unaware of any\npart of the existing building that is not structurally sound;\nstated that the Building Department would have notified the\nproperty owners if the building was not structurally sound.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether that is how the process works.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n5\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 6, "text": "The Supervising Planner responded that plans reviewed by the\nBuilding Department would be checked against the Alameda Building\nCode; stated any new construction has to be done according to the\n2001 CBC ; that any rehabilitation to the existing buildings needs\nto be done to Code, but not necessarily the 2001 CBC .\nMayor Johnson inquired whether there would be any work done that\nwould trigger a requirement for all buildings to be brought up to\ncode, to which the Supervising Planner responded that she was not\nqualified to answer the question; stated the Building Official\nwould need to respond.\nCouncilmember Matarrese inquired whether any safety issues would be\naddressed by the Building Official before the buildings were\nreoccupied and whether a Certificate of Occupancy would need to be\nissued.\nThe Supervising Planner responded that the Building Code requires\nthat only safe buildings be occupied.\nThe Project Architect stated that he was not aware that the\nBuilding Department identified any structural problems.\nVice Mayor Gilmore inquired how the balconies would be checked.\nThe Project Architect responded that a Structural Engineer would\nmake sure that the existing balconies are structurally sound.\nMr. Hartney stated that the Community Center and any additional\nwork on the old building needs to be built to 2001 CBC ; noted that\nthe Planning Department would check the safety of every building\nbefore a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.\nThe Acting City Manager stated that the exterior work is primarily\ncosmetic; noted that nothing was being done that would structurally\nchange the balconies; stated that he would ensure that the Building\nOfficial check the balconies and that the American with\nDisabilities Act (ADA) trigger would be reviewed.\nThe Project Architect stated that the 2001 CBC has a provision that\nexcludes any upgrades from complying with the ADA for residential\nbuildings built and occupied before 1991; noted that any new work\ndone to the Community Center needs to conform with the current\nstandards.\nCouncilmember Daysog inquired whether the building would implement\nfire safety measures.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n6\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 7, "text": "The Acting City Manager responded that the Fire Marshall determined\nthat there were some Fire Code problems and notified the property\nowner; stated a report from the Fire Marshall indicated the\nproblems were repaired with the exception of the fire alarm system\nand elevator.\nThe Project Architect stated that agreements have been developed\nwith the Building, Planning and Fire Departments regarding the\nlevel of upgrades that need to be satisfied.\nThere being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the Public\nHearing.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether the Planning Department was under a\ndeadline for the project.\nThe Supervising Planner responded that there is a statutory\ndeadline under the Permit Streamlining Act; stated that once a\nproject has been deemed complete, action needs to be taken within\n[60 days].\nCouncilmember Daysog inquired whether the approval for the\nCommunity Center was via the Permit Streamlining process and\nwhether there are other aspects of the overall project that would\nbe subject to the Permit Streamlining process.\nThe Supervising Planner responded that all discretionary permits\nare subject to the Permit Streamlining process which includes the\nDesign Review and the Planned Development amendment for the\nCommunity Center and the new garage buildings.\nCouncilmember Daysog inquired whether there are issues other than\nwhat is being addressed tonight that are subject to the Permit\nStreamlining process.\nThe Supervising Planner responded that the structural issues are\nnot part of the Permit Streamlining processi stated the structural\nand plumbing issues are not under the Planning Board's purview.\nMayor Johnson stated the Building Code Appeals Board reviews\nbuilding code deviations.\nThe Supervising Planner stated that the Building Code Appeals Board\naddresses instances where a building permit is not issued because\nof a technical requirement when the applicant believes that an\nalternate method for construction would be appropriate.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n7\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 8, "text": "Councilmember Daysog stated that it appears that acceptance of the\nCommunity Center design green lights thee project and that\nstructural issues would be dealt with administratively\nMayor Johnson inquired whether structural findings could be brought\nback.\nThe Acting City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated an off\nagenda report would be provided.\nCouncilmember Daysog inquired what is the tenant status, to which\nthe Acting City Manager responded there are four tenants remaining\non leases or have approval from the property owners to stay for two\nor three months.\nMr. Hartney stated that there is a 60-day timeframe for the Permit\nStreamlining Act; that the deadline was in February the Planning\nBoard requested another study session and an extension, which was\ngranted; stated that three tenants would be remaining as of\ntomorrow at noon; noted that the remaining tenants are under long-\nterm leases.\nVice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the cosmetic work would trigger\na requirement to upgrade the electrical or plumbing, to which the\nSupervising Planner responded that she would provide Council\ninformation on the matter.\nVice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the Community Center was\nconsidered an amenity to the project and whether the City has any\nway of regulating the size or square footage of a building that can\nbe deemed a Community Center.\nThe Supervising Planner responded that there is no regulation;\nstated that the Fifteen Group wanted to provide an opportunity for\nsome amenities but the building would not be a sufficient size to\nhold tenant meetings.\nVice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the prior use of two units as\noffice space was an expansion of use and whether there is an issue\nwith Measure A, to which the Supervising Planner responded that\nstaff would provide Council information on the matter.\nMr. Hartney stated that the plans show that the building was\npermitted for 615 units; noted that it is not a change of use if\nthe owner chooses to take two units off the market to use for its\nown purpose, and then put the units back on the market.\nVice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether there would still be 615 units\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n8\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 9, "text": "if the two office space units return to rented units, to which Mr.\nHartney responded in the affirmative.\nCouncilmember deHaan inquired what was the intent to upgrade the\nelectrical and plumbing.\nThe Project Architect responded that drawings for improvements need\nto be submitted for a building permit; stated the drawings would be\nreviewed to ensure conformance with the conditions of approval and\nagreements that were negotiated through the Design Review processi\nnoted that interior upgrade permits have already been submitted.\nMayor Johnson inquired whether the elevators, to which the Project\nArchitect responded in the affirmative.\nCouncilmember Matarrese requested a review on the process of safety\nissues prior to occupancy and clarification on lead and asbestos\nabatement. inquired how the sewer issues are connected with the\nprocess of upgrading the exteriors of the buildings and whether\nsprinklers would be required in the building.\nThe Acting City Manager responded lead and asbestos abatement and\nsewer problems are not addressed as part of the exterior review but\nwould take place in the ministerial part of the building permits\nnoted a qualified contractor would need to perform the lead and\nasbestos abatement work; stated that the sewer issue would probably\nnot be triggered but should be addressed.\nCouncilmember Matarrese inquired whether the sewer work would be\nrequired to be done, to which the Acting City Manager stated that\nthe sewer work should be reviewed.\nThe Project Architect stated that the sewer work is a condition of\napproval i noted that some of the work has already been done and\npresented to the Public Works Department.\nThe Acting City Manager stated that there are parts of the project\nwhich would require sprinklers.\nThe Project Architect stated that public hallways and common areas\nwould be protected with a fire sprinkler system and the fire alarm\nsystem would be upgraded; stated that reports from the Applicants\nare required as part of the demolition permitting process; noted\ntesting has been done for lead in the water and the reports have\ncome back clean.\nCouncilmember deHaan stated that he would like to have a commitment\nto look at the transportation mode.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n9\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 10, "text": "The Project Architect stated that parking has been a concern since\nthe beginning; noted that eliminating the carports has maximized\nthe amount of parking on the site; stated that he cannot guarantee\nthat there will not be an overflow.\nCouncilmember Daysog noted that the Judge made a decision and the\nredevelopment project must go forward.\nMayor Johnson concurred with Councilmember Daysog stated that\ninformation has been requested on issues raised.\nCouncilmember Daysog moved adoption of resolution denying the\nAppeal.\nCouncilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by the\nfollowing voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, and\nMayor Johnson -5. Noes Vice Mayor Gilmore and Councilmember\nMatarrese - 2.\n(05-146) - Ordinance No. 2937, \"Amending the Alameda Municipal Code\nby Amending Section 30-2 (Definitions) ; Amending Subsection 30-3.2\n(Combining Districts) i Adding a New Subsection 30-4.22 ( T-Theater\nCombining District) ; and Reclassifying and Rezoning Certain\nProperties Within the City of Alameda to Include the Theater\nCombining District. Finally passed.\nCouncilmember deHaan moved final passage of Ordinance.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by\nunanimous voice vote - 5.\n(05 - 147 ) Ordinance No. 2938, \"Amending the Alameda Municipal Code\nby Amending Section 30-2 (Definitions) of Article I (Zoning\nDistricts and Regulations) of Chapter XXX (Development Regulations)\nby Adding a New Section 30-6 (Sign Regulations) to Chapter XXX\n(Development Regulations) \" Finally passed.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved final passage of Ordinance.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by\nunanimous voice vote - 5.\nORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA\n(05-148) Michael McGhee, Alameda, stated that he wants to develop\na resource guide of veterans' services available in Alameda; the\nHousing Authority should refer veterans seeking housing to\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n10\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 11, "text": "Operation Dignity; that he welcomes help from the City Council or\nprivate businesses.\n(05-149) Deborah James, Alameda, stated that Redding Property\nManagement Group is trying to evict tenants without going through\ndue process.\n(05-150) Reginald James, Alameda, stated that there are\nreoccurring fires from a malfunctioning dryer at the Esperanza\nCommunity Center; noted problems should be addressed.\nCOUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS\n(05-151) Selection of Councilmember and alternate to serve as the\nAssociation of Bay Area Governments representative.\nCouncilmember Matarrese moved that Vice Mayor Gilmore serve as the\nAssociation of Bay Area Governments representative and\nCouncilmember deHaan serve as the alternate.\nCouncilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by\nunanimous voice vote - 5.\n(05-152) Mayor Johnson read the names of the members of the newly\nformed Task Force: Vice Mayor Gilmore, an Alameda Unified School\nDistrict Board Member, Acting City Manager Bill Norton or designee,\nLorraine Lilley, Tom Matthews, Kendra Holloway, Steve Edrington,\nHadi Monsef and Carol Martino.\nCouncilmember Matarrese inquired what was the timeframe for\nproviding findings, to which the Acting City Manager responded 60\ndays.\nCouncilmember Matarrese inquired about the goal of the Task Force,\nto which the Acting City Manager responded preventing future mass\nevictions and creating more affordable housing.\nCouncilmember Matarrese inquired whether the focus would be centric\nto the surrounding Harbor Island Apartments or to a broader area.\nThe Acting City Manager responded there is more opportunity in the\nWest End but possibilities should not be limited.\nMayor Johnson noted that information is not coordinated enough ;\nstaff in different departments reviewed building code violations\nand fire code violations in the Harbor Island Apartments staff\nshould review the issue of coordinating that information.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n11\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 12, "text": "(05-153)\nCouncilmember Daysog requested that staff respond to a\nresident' inquiry regarding the rules of operating a roving coffee\nshop.\nMayor Johnson stated the resident wants to operate a coffee truck\nin the City parking lot by the Dog Park; the resident indicated\nthat East Bay Regional Park representative Doug Siden supports the\nidea.\n(05-154) ouncilmember deHaan stated that the Cineplex and parking\nstructure designs are dove tailing together; requested the designs\nbe presented at the same time and an overall design provided.\nADJOURNMEN'T\nThere being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the\nRegular Meeting at 11:37 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown\nAct.\nRegular Meeting\nAlameda City Council\n12\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 13, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING\nTUESDAY - -APRIL 5, 2005- -5:30 P. .M.\nMayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 5:45 p.m.\nRoll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,\nMatarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5.\nAbsent :\nNone.\nThe Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:\n(05-133) Public Employee Performance Evaluation: Title: City\nAttorney.\n(05-134) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators:\nHuman Resources Director and Craig Jory Employee Organizations :\nPolice Association Non-Sworn (PANS) International Brotherhood of\nElectrical Workers (IBEW) and Management and Confidential Employees\nAssociation (MCEA) .\nFollowing the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened\nand Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Public Employee\nPerformance Evaluation, the Council provided direction; and\nregarding Conference with Labor Negotiators, the Council obtained a\nbriefing from Labor Negotiators.\nAdjournment\nThere being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the\nSpecial Meeting at 7:25 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger\nCity Clerk\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown\nAct.\nSpecial Meeting\nAlameda City Council\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 14, "text": "MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND\nCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING\nTUESDAY - - - APRIL 5, 2005 - - - 5:31 P.M.\nMayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:25 p.m.\nROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners\nDaysog,\ndeHaan,\nGilmore,\nMatarrese,\nand\nMayor/Chair Johnson - 5.\nAbsent :\nNone.\nThe Special Joint Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to\nconsider:\n(05-135CC/05-013CIC Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing\nLitigation: Name of cases : Alameda Belt Line V. City of Alameda,\nAlameda Belt Line V. City of Alameda, and City of Alameda V.\nAlameda Belt Line.\nFollowing the Closed Session, the Special Joint Meeting was\nreconvened and Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the\nCouncil/Commission obtained briefing from Legal Counsel.\nAdjournment\nThere being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the\nSpecial Joint Meeting at 7:28 p.m.\nRespectfully submitted,\nLara Weisiger, City Clerk\nSecretary, Community Improvement\nCommission\nThe agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown\nAct.\nSpecial Joint Meeting\nAlameda Cit Council and\nCommunity Improvement Commission\nApril 5, 2005", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}
{"body": "CityCouncil", "date": "2005-04-05", "page": 15, "text": "APRIL 5, 2005 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT\nCOMMISSION MINUTES PLACEHOLDER\nThe April 5, 2005 CIC Minutes have not been approved by the\nCommission.", "path": "CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf"}