{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2011-11-28", "page": 1, "text": "CITY COUNCIL/AUSD SCHOOL BOARD\nSPECIAL MEETING OF AUSD SUBCOMMITTEE\nNovember 28, 2011\n2263 Santa Clara Ave - Room 360\nAlameda, CA 94501\nUNADOPTED MINUTES\nSPECIAL SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING: The special sub-committee meeting of the AUSD City/School joint sub-\ncommittee was held on the date and place mentioned above.\nCALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by President Mooney and Mayor Gilmore at 9:00 AM.\nPRESENT for AUSD BOARD: Members Mooney and Sherratt\nABSENT: None\nPRESENT for CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Gilmore and Councilman Bonta\nABSENT: None\nCALL TO ORDER / GENERAL INTRODUCTION: City Council Members, Board Members and their respective\nstaff introduced themselves.\nPURPOSE OF SUBCOMMITTEE & MEETING SCHEDULE: Subcommittee members provided a brief background\nof the subcommittee's work and purpose and noted the next meeting would be tentatively scheduled sometime in\nFebruary.\nORAL COMMUNICATION: none.\nCITY/SCHOOL DISTRICT ISSUES - CITY PRIORITIES:\nAlameda Point - Next Steps\nStaff members from the City and the District noted there is a meeting scheduled in December to discuss the process\nmoving forward and the existing agreement on the 12-acre parcel. Next steps include drafting initial revisions. Staff\nfurther noted the City agreed to limitations regarding housing; housing never pays for itself; demand for services increases\nwhile\nthe rise in property tax decreases; current number of new houses to be added; and both entities working together on\nthe generation rates.\nRedevelopment Funds\nStaff noted this issue relates to housing, specifically with the pass-through arrangement agreed-upon over 13 years ago.\nSince that time, the pass-through fund has accumulated almost $4M for affordable housing. There is interest from both\nentities in exploring strategies for use of these funds. District staff noted the District's interest in obtaining the funds\nwithout having to serve as landlords as originally intended. The District may have an interest in selling that land. Both\nentities further discussed the inability to do a rider. The City will share legal opinions with District staff prior to their\nmeeting on December 7th. if at that meeting an agreement cannot be reached, the suggested course of action is to have\nSuperintendent Vital and City Manager Russo sit down and see how this issue can be resolved. If not, this item will be\nbrought back for further group discussion at the next Subcommittee meeting.\nTidelands\nCity staff proposed resolving the Alameda Point issue discussed earlier prior to discussing strategies to deal with the\nTidelands property issue. Scoping of the Tidelands issue will also be part of the discussion when staff members meet on\nDecember 7th.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2011-11-28.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2011-11-28", "page": 2, "text": "Joint Use Agreements - Pools Update\nThe pools are still open, with the current agreement set to expire in June. District staff noted there have been\nconversations with community members interested in some kind of long-term conversation regarding pool facilities in\nAlameda. Staff also has to consider lead abatement at Emma Hood with an estimated cost of $120K. The District is\nlooking at our facilities plan and will be evaluating all of our school facilities. City staff noted interest in perhaps\nacquiring land somewhere central in Alameda in order to build a City Swim Center. Another option would be the use of a\nhangar on the former naval base for a private, for-profit swim center concept.\nAlameda City Emergency Readiness\nCity Evacuation Sites/School Facilities/Student Management: District staff asked if the Board should expect to take a\nrole as part of emergency readiness measures, and commended City emergency services staff for the joint drill held at\nAlameda High School. City staff clarified that Board Members have no specifically defined roles, but would be providing\ncopies of the City's Disaster Plan to the District Office and would invite the Board Members to future disaster\npreparedness training. Subcommittee Members noted that in the event of a real emergency, both entities would work\ntogether to reassure and communicate to parents with a singular message.\nCity staff noted they would be seeking feedback from the Principal about the drill in general and to solicit staff and\nstudent feedback. Both entities agreed that a refresher course at the beginning of every school year would be helpful for\nnew principals and staff.\nNEW BUSINESS\nNone at this time.\nAdjournment\nPresident Mooney and Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 10:06 AM.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2011-11-28.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2012-03-19", "page": 1, "text": "CITY COUNCIL/AUSD SCHOOL BOARD\nSPECIAL MEETING OF AUSD SUBCOMMITTEE\nMarch 19, 2012\n2200 Central Avenue,\nSuperintendent's Conference Rm\nAlameda, CA 94501\nUNADOPTED MINUTES\nSPECIAL SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING: The special sub-committee meeting of the AUSD City/School joint sub-\ncommittee was held on the date and place mentioned above.\nCALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by President Sherratt and Mayor Gilmore at 9:03 AM.\nPRESENT for AUSD BOARD: Members Mooney and Sherratt\nABSENT: None\nPRESENT for CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Gilmore and Councilman Bonta\nABSENT: None\nCALL TO ORDER / GENERAL INTRODUCTION: City Council Members, Board Members and their respective\nstaff introduced themselves.\nAPPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes from the November 28, 2011 meeting were considered.\nMOTION: Member Mooney\nSECOND: Member Sherratt\nThat the minutes from the November 28, 2011 meeting be approved as submitted.\nMOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY\nORAL COMMUNICATION: none.\nCITY/SCHOOL DISTRICT ISSUES - CITY PRIORITIES:\nCity Ballot Measure: Recreation & Parks / Pool Location and Preliminary Specifications\nThe Subcommittee discussed the City Council vote last Wednesday regarding the half cent sales tax measure for the June\nballot. This special tax will require a 2/3 majority vote and the use for such tax will need to be specifically identified.\nSuch specific projects might include vehicles and a new fire station; pools; Carnegie building; golf course; and/or\nan\nall-\nweather lighted turf field.\nThe Subcommittee discussed the pools, with staff noting that one 50 meter pool costs about $5M. This size allows for\n17\nlanes and would require about 7 acres (3-4 for the pool and another 3-4 for parking). Alameda High School does not have\n7 acres available to accommodate such a swim center. One idea is to have satellite parking with a shuttle to the pool if\nadequate acreage is not available. The Subcommittee clarified that the pool at Alameda High School is on school district\nproperty and does not belong to the City.\nThe Subcommittee discussed the possibility of locating a pool on the former naval base and the difficulties in\ntransporting/shuttling students for physical education classes.\nThe Subcommittee discussed the possibility of hosting meets, noting that parking will be an issue when considering at\nleast 2 spectators per swimmer at such events. The Subcommittee discussed the possibility of building a small hotel to\naccommodate out-of-area swimmers and families.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2012-03-19.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2012-03-19", "page": 2, "text": "Vacant Building HAHS\nThe Subcommittee noted interest in Kofman Auditorium is a separate issue and not part of the pools discussion. The\nSubcommittee noted that in the event of a major earthquake, only the Kofman lobby and auditorium have been retrofitted\naside from the student classrooms. District staff has been directed to look for interim space for the District Office but\nvacating the site will require fencing around the area. The Board plans to hold larger public meetings to discuss the cost of\nretrofitting vs. tear down costs.\nA member of the public noted that a single swim center would have to figure out how to accommodate students at both\ncomprehensive public high schools.\nReport on Redevelopment\nWith the dismantling of redevelopment agencies, the Subcommittee discussed the City as a successor entity with 80%\neconomic development and 20% affordable housing with the Housing Authority serving as a separate entity. The City will\nbe putting together an oversight Board of 7 members.\nThe Subcommittee noted the school board has nominated Board Member McMahon to serve on the oversight Board. The\nDistrict and the City will discuss two agreements - Mastick and the pass through ($4M) before the oversight Board\nmeetings. Staff will meet at the end of the month to discuss these issues further and are working jointly on a resolution.\nTidelands, Eagle Avenue, Next Steps\nThe Subcommittee noted the redevelopment agreement between the City and the District is an unusual one and required\nmore engagement and discussion of options.\nA member of the public asked about the proposed Project Leaf community garden idea for the former Island High School\nsite on Eagle Avenue. The Subcommittee noted staff is waiting to hear back from the state regarding a $2.5M grant to\ndevelop the property.\nThe Subcommittee noted that the District must follow the law in terms of how surplus property is disposed of and the\nDistrict has little control over who owns the property and no discretion to prefer one project over another.\nAlameda Point Next Steps\nThe Subcommittee noted that the disposition strategy will be going before the Planning Board in 12-18 months and that\nCity staff will be consulting with the District to discuss where the District would like acreage. Currently the set aside site\nis near the proposed business park, and the District may prefer to be located closer to the residential areas. The\nSubcommittee noted prior to going before the Planning Board, staff will work with the District on the location of the 12\nacres; this project is at least 4 years away.\nRollover MOU for Pools for 2012-13\nThe Subcommittee noted the MOU expired in June and suggested a rollover. The Subcommittee noted that lead abatement\nis not part of the agreement and added that staff is hopeful some nonprofit and/or community organization would be\nwilling to help support the lead abatement fix.\nNew Business\nNone at this time.\nAdjournment\nPresident Sherratt and Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 9:57 AM.\nTHIS MEETING WAS RECORDED (AUDIO ONLY) AND IS AVAILABLE ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AT\nhttp://www.cityofalamedaca.gov/City-Hall/Document-Archives\n.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2012-03-19.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2012-06-27", "page": 1, "text": "CITY COUNCIL/AUSD SCHOOL BOARD\nSPECIAL MEETING OF AUSD SUBCOMMITTEE\nJune 27, 2012\nAlameda City Hall, Room 360\n2263 Santa Clara Avenue\nAlameda, CA 94501\nUNADOPTED MINUTES\nSPECIAL SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING: The special sub-committee meeting of the AUSD City/School joint sub-\ncommittee was held on the date and place mentioned above.\nCALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by President Sherratt and Mayor Gilmore at 9:10 AM.\nPRESENT for AUSD BOARD: Members Mooney and Sherratt\nABSENT: None\nPRESENT for CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Gilmore\nABSENT: Councilman Bonta\nCALL TO ORDER / GENERAL INTRODUCTION: Mayor, Board Members and their respective staff introduced\nthemselves.\nAPPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes from the March 19, 2012 meeting were considered.\nMOTION: Member Mooney\nSECOND: Mayor Gilmore\nThat the minutes from the March 19, 2012 meeting be approved as submitted.\nMOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY\nORAL COMMUNICATION: none.\nCITY/SCHOOL DISTRICT ISSUES:\nAlameda Point Plan as Approved\nCity Staff provided a brief presentation regarding the Point Development Plan. The Subcommittee discussed the zoning in\nplace, project-level Environmental Impact Report (EIR), conveyance in 3 large segments, and the overall infrastructure\nplan. The Subcommittee further discussed a potential transportation grant, the 12-acre District parcel area, the hospital\nlocation, and the possibility of the hospital pulling sewer lines all the way across the Base.\nStaff clarified the timing on rezoning and the EIR, noting it must first go to the Counsel with the specific scope and would\nhopefully result in a contract in September. The 1st version draft EIR could be about 6 months and would be a public\nprocess which could result in an additional 9 months to 18 months. The goal is to have the zoning and EIR done in the last\nhalf of 2014. Staff will be working with the Planning Board, Commissions, and the School Board on soliciting public\ninput. Talks would begin this fall and include a discussion of where a school might be needed as far as actual placement.\nThe Subcommittee further discussed the 282 units formerly occupied by the Coast Guard and the surplussing process;\nscreening the property for the public; 8 acres estuary park; homeless accommodation under HUD jurisdiction; Navy\ndisposition in 2013; recommendation for a multi-family overlay zone; infrastructure needs and impact.\nStaff clarified that the Tidelands presents serious issues that need to be addressed separately. These issues will be worked\nout in pieces between the City and the District. Board Members asked for as much information in advance as possible to\nallow maximum flexibility. District staff mentioned the former Island High School site, noting the City expressed interest.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2012-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2012-06-27", "page": 2, "text": "Pros/cons have to be laid out regarding flexibility and generation rates currently show at 4800. There would be a need for\nelementary, middle, and high school seats availability but it may be an investment property if the District determines we\ndon't need a school. If it is determined to be surplus property, the District is required to offer it first to certain entities and\nany purchase would be obligated to pay fair market value. Although specific needs have not been identified at this time,\nthe District would like to be flexible.\nCity Staff clarified that currently the Base plan shows 1400 housing units at the Point with an additional 700 outside. The\nDistrict requested that City staff work with District staff to discuss and agree upon generation rates because developers\noften have different numbers.\nSwimming Pools\nThe Subcommittee discussed the continuance of the pools through this fiscal year, but noted in 2013/14 and beyond things\nmay change.\nCity staff noted the City Manager had met with members of the swimming pool community this week and some expressed\nan interest in taking over the management of the pools.\nThe Subcommittee further discussed the importance of District input and the newspaper noting that the City intends to end\nthe pools agreement with the District next June. Mayor Gilmore noted the City has not definitely agreed or decided what\nto do, but the potential to not renew the agreement exists. Board Members noted it would be most helpful to start figuring\nout a solution in January rather than waiting until May for a final decision.\nRedevelopment Pass Through Agreement\nStaff will work through potential solutions. Tax increment funds are allocated as an enforceable obligation. The County\nauditor and controller is in \"hold\" mode at this point but City Staff will keep District staff abreast of any developments.\nDistrict staff reminded everyone that the Board would need to take public action to allow the District to negotiate this\nitem.\nAdjournment\nPresident Sherratt and Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 10:01 AM.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2012-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2013-07-24", "page": 1, "text": "CITY COUNCIL/AUSD SCHOOL BOARD SUBCOMMITTEE\nSPECIAL MEETING\nJuly 24, 2013\nAlamaeda Unified School District\nMarina Conference Room\n2060 Challenger Drive,\nAlameda, CA 94501\nUNADOPTED MINUTES\nSPECIAL SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING: The special sub-committee meeting of the Alameda\nUnified School District (AUSD) City/School joint sub-committee was held on the date and place\nmentioned above.\nCALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Mayor Marie Gilmore at 11:04 AM.\nATTENDANCE:\nMarie Gilmore - Mayor, City of Alameda\nKirsten Vital - Superintendent, Alameda USD\nLena Tam - Member, Alameda City Council\nBarbara Kahn - Member, Alameda USD Board of Education\nNeil Tam - Member, Alameda USD Board of Education\nRobert Shemwell - CBO, Alameda USD\nDennis McDaniels - Alameda Recreation & Park Department\nAmy Wooldridge - Director, Alameda Recreation & Park Department\nAlex Nguyen - Assistant City Manager, City of Alameda\nDennis Berkshire - Consultant, Aquatic Design\nA. CALL TO ORDER:\n1. CALL TO ORDER / GENERAL INTRODUCTION: City Council Members, Board Members and\ntheir respective staff introduced themselves.\n2. Purpose of Subcommittee and Meeting Schedule:\nMayor Gilmore stated the purpose of the meeting: to have a breakout discussion between the City of\nAlameda and AUSD School Board and bring these discussions back to each respective board.\nThe Subcommittee agreed to have staff come together and arrange a schedule for upcoming meetings.\nB. REVIEW AND DISCUSS:\n1. Discussion of possible long-term solution for Emma Hood and Encinal High Swim Centers.\nThe Subcommittee discussed the pools, with staff noting that one 50 meter pool costs about $5M. This\nsize allows for 17 lanes and would require about 7 acres (3-4 for the pool and another 3-4 for parking).\nAlameda High School does not have 7 acres available to accommodate such a swim center. One idea is to", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2013-07-24.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2013-07-24", "page": 2, "text": "have satellite parking with a shuttle to the pool if adequate acreage is not available. The Subcommittee\nclarified that the pool at Alameda High School is on school district property and does not belong to the\nCity.\nThe Subcommittee discussed the possibility of locating a pool on the former naval base and the\ndifficulties in transporting/shuttling students for physical education classes.\nThe Subcommittee discussed the possibility of hosting meets, noting that parking will be an issue\nwhen considering at least 2 spectators per swimmer at such events. The Subcommittee discussed\nthe possibility of building a small hotel to accommodate out-of-area swimmers and families\n2. Discussion of Alameda Little League donation to City of Alameda and Alameda Unified School\nDistrict to install lights at Rittler and Wood Baseball fields.\nThe Subcommittee noted interest in Kofman Auditorium is a separate issue and not part of the pools\ndiscussion. The Subcommittee noted that in the event of a major earthquake, only the Kofman lobby and\nauditorium have been retrofitted aside from the student classrooms. District staff has been directed to look\nfor interim space for the District Office but vacating the site will require fencing around the area. The\nBoard plans to hold larger public meetings to discuss the cost of retrofitting VS. tear down costs.\nA member of the public noted that a single swim center would have to figure out how to accommodate\nstudents at both comprehensive public high schools.\nReport on Redevelopment\nWith the dismantling of redevelopment agencies, the Subcommittee discussed the City as a successor\nentity with 80% economic development and 20% affordable housing with the Housing Authority serving\nas a separate entity. The City will be putting together an oversight Board of 7 members.\nThe Subcommittee noted the school board has nominated Board Member McMahon to serve on the\noversight Board. The District and the City will discuss two agreements - Mastick and the pass through\n($4M) before the oversight Board meetings. Staff will meet at the end of the month to discuss these issues\nfurther and are working jointly on a resolution.\nTidelands, Eagle Avenue, Next Steps\nThe Subcommittee noted the redevelopment agreement between the City and the District is an unusual\none and required more engagement and discussion of options.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2013-07-24.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2013-07-24", "page": 3, "text": "A member of the public asked about the proposed Project Leaf community garden idea for the former\nIsland High School site on Eagle Avenue. The Subcommittee noted staff is waiting to hear back from the\nstate regarding a $2.5M grant to develop the property.\nThe Subcommittee noted that the District must follow the law in terms of how surplus property is\ndisposed of and the District has little control over who owns the property and no discretion to prefer one\nproject over another.\nAlameda Point Next Steps\nThe Subcommittee noted that the disposition strategy will be going before the Planning Board in 12-18\nmonths and that City staff will be consulting with the District to discuss where the District would like\nacreage. Currently the set aside site is near the proposed business park, and the District may prefer to be\nlocated closer to the residential areas. The Subcommittee noted prior to going before the Planning Board,\nstaff will work with the District on the location of the 12 acres; this project is at least 4 years away.\nRollover MOU for Pools for 2012-13\nThe Subcommittee noted the MOU expired in June and suggested a rollover. The Subcommittee noted\nthat lead abatement is not part of the agreement and added that staff is hopeful some nonprofit and/or\ncommunity organization would be willing to help support the lead abatement fix.\nNew Business\nNone at this time.\nAdjournment\nMayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 12:08 p.m.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2013-07-24.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2013-07-24", "page": 4, "text": "THIS MEETING WAS RECORDED (AUDIO ONLY) AND IS AVAILABLE ON THE CITY'S\nWEBSITE AT http://www.cityofalamedaca.gov/City-Hall/Document-Archives.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2013-07-24.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2014-03-04", "page": 1, "text": "CITY COUNCIL/AUSD SCHOOL BOARD SUBCOMMITTEE\nSPECIAL MEETING\nMarch 4, 2014\nAlameda City Hall\n2263 Santa Clara Avenue\nAlameda, CA 94501\nUNADOPTED MINUTES\nSPECIAL SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING: The special sub-committee meeting of the Alameda\nUnified School District (AUSD) City/School joint sub-committee was held on the date and place\nmentioned above.\nCALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Mayor Marie Gilmore at 11:04 AM.\nATTENDANCE:\nMarie Gilmore - Mayor, City of Alameda\nJohn Russo - City Manager, City of Alameda\nKirsten Vital - Superintendent, Alameda USD\nLena Tam - Member, Alameda City Council\nMargie Sherratt - Member, Alameda USD Board of Education\nTrish Spencer - Member, Alameda USD Board of Education\nRobert Clark - CBO, Alameda USD\nChad Pimentel - General Counsel, Alameda USD\nA. CALL TO ORDER:\n1. CALL TO ORDER / GENERAL INTRODUCTION: City Council Members, Board Members and\ntheir respective staff introduced themselves.\n2. Purpose of Subcommittee and Meeting Schedule:\nMayor Gilmore stated the purpose of the meeting: to have a breakout discussion between the City of\nAlameda and AUSD School Board and bring these discussions back to each respective board.\nThe Subcommittee agreed to have staff come together and arrange a schedule for upcoming meetings.\nB. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - -minutes from the July 24, 2013 City/School Subcommittee Meeting:\n1. The City Council and Board members approved the minutes from the July 24, 2013 City/School\nSubcommittee Meeting.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2014-03-04.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2014-03-04", "page": 2, "text": "C. REVIEW AND DISCUSS:\n1. Discussion and Update on the Proposed Negotiated Agreement among the City of Alameda, Alameda\nUnified School District, and the Alameda Housing Authority.\nThe Subcommittee discussed the exchange agreement amongst the City of Alameda, Alameda Unified\nSchool District and the Alameda Housing Authority. The Subcommittee clarified that the pool at\nAlameda High School is on school district property and does not belong to the City. The\nSubcommittee discussed how the city and school district had been able to work together on the\ntransition. The Subcommittee noted interest in resolving all pools concerns. The Board announced\nplans to hold larger public meetings to discuss the cost of retrofitting vs. tear down costs.\nA member of the public, Dick Rutter, suggested ted that the City Council and the Board should\nprovide the public with appraisal information for all the land swap properties.\nThe Subcommittee noted that the District must follow the law in terms of how surplus property is\ndisposed of and the District has little control over who owns the property and no discretion to prefer\none project over another.\nA member of the public, Doug DeHaan, sugessted that the City Council and the Board should\nprovide the public with full disclosure of all negotiated agreements, because most discussions\nwere held in closed session meetings.\nA member of the public noted that the City Council and the Board should review developer fees, especially\nthe impact on the boating docks.\nD. NEW BUSINESS:\nThe City Council and the Board discussed dates for bringing the final negotiated agreements before the\nCity of Alameda, Alameda Unified School District, and the Alameda Housing Authority.\nAdjournment\nMayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 11:25 a.m.\nTHIS MEETING WAS NOT VIDEO RECORDED AND NO AUDIO IS AVAILABLE", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2014-03-04.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2015-09-16", "page": 1, "text": "CITY COUNCIL/AUSD SCHOOL BOARD SUBCOMMITTEE\nSPECIAL MEETING\nSeptember 16,2015\nDistrict Office\n2060 Challenger Drive\nAlameda, CA 94501\nUNADOPTED MINUTES\nSPECIAL SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING: The special meeting of the Alameda\nCity/School joint sub-committee was held on the date and place mentioned above.\nCALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Mayor Trish Spencer at 3:24pm.\nATTENDANCE:\nTrish Spencer - Mayor, City of Alameda\nMarilyn Ezzy Ashcraft - Vice Mayor, City of Alameda\nLiz Warmerdam - Interim City Manager, City of Alameda\nBarbara Kahn - Board Member, Alameda USD Board of Education\nPhil Hu - Board Member, Alameda USD Board of Education\nSean McPhetridge - Superintendent, Alameda USD\nAmy Wooldridge - Recreation and Parks Director\nBob Haun - Public Works Director\nShariq Khan - Interim CBO, Alameda USD\nA. CALL TO ORDER:\n1. CALL TO ORDER / GENERAL INTRODUCTION: City Council Members, Board\nMembers and their respective staff introduced themselves.\n2. Purpose of Subcommittee and Meeting Schedule:\nMayor Spencer stated the purpose of the meeting: to have a breakout discussion\nbetween the City of Alameda and AUSD School Board and bring these discussions\nback to each respective board. The Subcommittee agreed to have staff come together\nand arrange a schedule for upcoming meetings.\nB.\nAPPROVAL OF MINUTES -minutes from the March 4, 2014 City/School\nSubcommittee Meeting:\n1. The City Council and Board members approved the minutes from the March 4, 2014\nCity/School Subcommittee Meeting.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2015-09-16.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2015-09-16", "page": 2, "text": "C. REVIEW AND DISCUSS:\n1. Traffic Impacts on Bay Farm Island and Lincoln Bell Schedule\nThe Subcommittee discussed the traffic on Bay Farm Island's bridge between the hours\nof 7:20am - 9:00am and the possibility of working together on a transportation study.\nThe study could include A.C. Transit route number 631.\nThe Subcommittee discussed Lincoln Middle School's and Earhart Elementary School's\nsupervised and non-supervised morning drop-off timeframes. The members expressed\nsupport for the Transportation Commission reaching out to AUSD parents, bargaining\nunits, and for the formation of school bike groups.\nThe Subcommittee reviewed traffic pattern reports from zip codes 94502 traveling\nthrough 94501.\n2. Disaster Preparedness: Care and Shelter Coordination / Emergency Operations Center\nRepresentation\nThe Subcommittee discussed the importance of all facilities becoming certified by\nFEMA (i.e. all gyms at high schools, Boys & Girls Club, St. Joseph Notre Dame High\nSchool; Chinese Christian School). Each site will have requirements of maintaining\nidentification services. FEMA certification includes accessibility to national databases\nand emergency generator distribution guarantees within 48hours.\nThe Subcommittee selected Robbie Lyng, Director of Maintenance, Operations, and\nFacilities (MOF), as the Emergency Operations Center Representation from AUSD to the\nCity. Completion of training courses and training modules are required by FEMA.\nThe Emergency Operations Center implementation will occur within the next year.\nAUSD will follow City lead towards implementation.\n3. Swim Center Improvements Update and Ongoing Maintenance\nThe Subcommittee discussed the twenty percent (20%) completion status of the swim\ncenter improvement project. Compliance with all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)\nrequirements are pending approval with the Division of the State Architect.\nThe Subcommittee expressed support for partnership fees for all required sidewalk ADA\ncompliance upgrades. The City will meet and confer with the City Attorney's office to\ndiscuss municipal code regulations for the sidewalk repair fees at the swim center.\nThe Subcommittee discussed the $220,000.00 of soil repair complications at the swim\ncenter.\nThe Subcommittee discussed the necessity for revised joint-use agreements and reviewed\nCity's sunshine ordinance requirements for good revisions.\nThe Subcommittee expressed support for new rental fees at the new swim center facility\nand requested a comparison study of all rental fees from other swim facilities.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2015-09-16.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2015-09-16", "page": 3, "text": "The Subcommittee selected Shariq Khan, Chief Business Officer, and Robbie Lyng,\nDirector of Maintenance, Operations, and Facilities (MOF), to attend future City of\nAlameda's Standards and Maintenance of Fees committee meetings.\n4. Otis School / Krusi Park Easement\nThe Subcommittee discussed the proposed improvements to the City of Alameda's\nproperty known as Krusi Park located at 900 Mound Street, Alameda, CA 94501. The\nimprovements include the development of an access road which would require the\nDistrict to license a small portion of their property at Otis Elementary School located at\n3010 Fillmore Street, Alameda, CA 94501.\nThe Subcommittee discussed classroom portables, access gates, future uses, additional\nADA parking, and the City's contribution to the cost for fences.\n5. Encinal Boat Ramp - Easement\nThe Subcommittee discussed the renewal of the existing easement between the City of\nAlameda and Alameda Unified School District to install, construct, maintain, repair, and\nuse a public boat ramp and appurtenances to be used for recreational purposes at the\nproperty owned by the District on Encinal Junior and Senior High School property.\nThe Subcommittee referred Encinal Junior and Senior High School Boat Ramp/Easement\nfor further legal review by AUSD's General Counsel.\n6. Central Avenue Street Concept Proposal\nThe Subcommittee discussed existing portable classroom spaces, impacts on Encinal\nJunior and Senior High School from the proposed right of way, realigning the project in\nand around portables classroom spaces, and the overall benefits to Alameda Unified\nSchool District's students and Alameda citizens.\nD. NEW BUSINESS:\nThe City Council and the Board discussed possible dates for a special meeting on\nthe following topics:\nWood Middle School Playground\nCoordination of Parcel Tax Ballot Measures in 2016\nSynthetic Turf\nAlameda Point Track\nEstuary Park\nAdjournment\nMayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 5:18 p.m.\nTHIS MEETING WAS NOT VIDEO RECORDED AND NO AUDIO IS AVAILABLE", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2015-09-16.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-02-10", "page": 1, "text": "CITY COUNCIL/AUSD SCHOOL BOARD SUBCOMMITTEE\nSPECIAL MEETING\nFebruary 10, 2016\nCity Hall\n2263 Santa Clara Avenue, Room 360, 3rd Floor\nAlameda, CA 94501\nUNADOPTED MINUTES\nSPECIAL SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING: The special meeting of the Alameda\nCity/School joint sub-committee was held on the date and place mentioned above.\nCALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Mayor Trish Spencer at 10:37am.\nATTENDANCE:\nTrish Spencer - Mayor, City of Alameda\nMarilyn Ezzy Ashcraft - Vice Mayor, City of Alameda\nLiz Warmerdam - Interim City Manager, City of Alameda\nSolana Henneberry - Board Member, Alameda USD Board of Education\nGray Harris - Board Member, Alameda USD Board of Education\nSean McPhetridge - Superintendent, Alameda USD\nAmy Wooldridge - Recreation and Parks Director, City of Alameda\nBob Haun - Public Works Director, City of Alameda\nShariq Khan -CBO, Alameda USD\nRobbie Lyng - Director, Alameda USD\nGlen Steiger - General Manager, City of Alameda/AMP\nGail Payne - Transportation Coordinator, City of Alameda\nDebbie Potter - Community Development Manager, City of Alameda\nA. CALL TO ORDER:\n1. CALL TO ORDER / GENERAL INTRODUCTION: City Council Members, Board\nMembers and their respective staff introduced themselves.\n2. Purpose of Subcommittee and Meeting Schedule:\nMayor Spencer stated the purpose of the meeting: to have a breakout discussion\nbetween the City of Alameda and AUSD School Board and bring these discussions\nback to each respective board. The Subcommittee agreed to have staff come together\nand arrange a schedule for upcoming meetings.\nB. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: minutes from the September 16, 2015 City/School\nSubcommittee Meeting:\n1. The City Council and Board members approved the minutes from the September 16, 2015\nCity/School Subcommittee Meeting.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-02-10.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-02-10", "page": 2, "text": "C. REVIEW AND DISCUSS:\n1. Traffic concerns around Otis School (Otis/Mound intersection and Court/Calhoun drop\noff) and signage at Earhart Elementary drop off\nThe Subcommittee discussed the traffic impacts at Otis School. Mayor Spencer\nexpressed her concerns of parent parking and gridlock including the loading zone areas.\nPresident Henneberry recommended to observe the morning drop-off at 8am. There are\nthree regular parking stalls and one handicapped parking stall. Mayor Spencer expressed\nconcerns for more disabled parking stalls. The Subcommittee discussed extending the\nwhite zone areas. Bob Haun stated that he will perform traffic counts and analysis for\nOtis/Mound intersection and Court/Calhoun corners. Signage will be up in 30 days for\nEarhart Elementary school.\n2. City Presentation on Development Plans\nThe Subcommittee discussed upcoming development plans and the necessity of the City\nand the District to work together regarding negotiations with the developer to ensure the\ncapacity of new students are being met as a result of new development projects. Shariq\nKhan discussed a developer fee analysis performed yearly.\n1) Alameda Landing: 300 housing units, phases 1 & 2 completed, phase 3\ncomplete in 2016, Stargell Commons (32 units of affordable rental housing)\nunder construction, 300,000 sq. ft. commercial, 400,000 sq. ft. office, 8-Acre\nWaterfront Park. Project to be completed in 2016.\n2) Marina Shores: 89 townhome units (including 16 affordable units), 50 SF, 39\nMF townhomes. Project was completed in 2016, and homes are just beginning to\nbe sold.\n3) 2100 Clement: 2.78 acres, 52 units (seven affordable), construction 2016-17.\nSuperintendent McPhetridge requested Food Services Warehouse located at 2130\nClement Avenue (Mulberry/Clement) to be clearly zoned as a mixed-use zone.\nDebbie Potter will review and analyze the zoning codes and the general plan for\nFood Services Warehouse located at 2130 Clement Avenue. Bob Haun stated that\nthe City may potentially give back the Mulberry easement to the District. Robbie\nLyng stated to be very careful about football field egress.\n4) 2437 Eagle Avenue: Alameda Housing Authority, 22 affordable rental housing\nunits, entitlements received, funding application March 2016, construction 2017.\nSuperintendent McPhetridge met with Alameda Housing Authority about the\npotential for an early childhood education center located inside 2437 Eagle\nAvenue. Debbie Potter will inform the Community Development department of\nthe idea and will pass it to them about the early childhood education center.\n5) Del Monte Warehouse: dedicated to senior housing, 11.05 acres, 3 building\npads, 380 units, 55 affordable, 32 units for senior rental housing, 23 moderate-\nincome units, secured planning approvals, construction 2017-18. Building plan\ncurrently being checked.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-02-10.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-02-10", "page": 3, "text": "6) Boatworks: 9.4 acres, 2 acres open space, 7.4 acres residential, 182 units\napproved, other entitlements in progress (e.g., final map, design review, etc.),\nconstruction 2018-20.\n7) Site A: 68 Acres, 800 housing units, including 200 affordable units, 400,000\nsf commercial, 20 acres of parks, subsequent approvals underway, construction\n2017-27.\n8) Alameda Marina 1800-2033 Clement: 22 acres (non-tidelands), mixed use w/\nMF overlay (30 du/acre), master plan underway, no planning application received\nto date. Environmental Review (ERI) required.\n9) Encinal Terminals: 19 acres mixed use/MF overlay (including Tidelands\nproperty), master plan underway, no planning application received to date.\n10) North Housing - US Navy Property, 13 acres - Housing Authority (90 units\nfor formerly homeless), 2 acres - Habitat for Humanity (30 units self-help\nhousing), 19 acres to be sold at public auction by Navy, 435 housing unit cap,\nland conveyance 2016-17.\n3. Central Avenue Complete Streets Project Update\nThe Subcommittee discussed Wood Middle School receiving a dedicated bus route from\nAC Transit. Staff will bring the project to the City Council meeting for approval on\nFebruary 24, 2016. The Subcommittee expressed appreciation to Superintendent\nMcPhetridge for attending the Transportation Committee meeting. Robbie Lyng\nrequested to review the restriping plan for the grass in front of Encinal High School.\nMayor Spencer requested City staff to double-check the all the parking stalls at EHS.\n4.\nPublic, Educational and Government (PEG) Funds - Joint Use - Opportunity for a Cable\nStudio\nThe City will send PEG funding analysis to the District. AUSD expressed interest in\npartnering with independent programmers Terry Telles and Nanette Deetz. Amy\nWooldridge expressed interest in keeping the PEG funds local. PEG funding is only\nspent on capital and equipment costs, not operating costs.\nPublic Speakers:\nNanette Deetz - addressed the Subcommittee in support of the Public, Educational and\nGovernment (PEG) funds being utilized for a cable studio. She expressed partnership\ninterest as an independent producer and supporter of educational programing.\nTerry Telles - addressed the Subcommittee in support of the Public, Educational and\nGovernment (PEG) funds being utilized for a cable studio. He expressed partnership\ninterest as an independent producer and supporter of educational programing.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-02-10.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-02-10", "page": 4, "text": "5. Bachelor Officers' Quarters (BOQ) - Alameda Unified School District (AUSD)\nEmployee Housing\nThe Subcommittee discussed the funding streams for AUSD employee housing located at\nthe Bachelor Officers' Quarters (BOQ). AUSD discussed the intent to attract and retain\nteachers through accessibility of employee housing.\n6. Revenue Measure Update\nThe Subcommittee discussed the City Council reviewing poll results first in an upcoming\nmeeting slated for March 2016. Amy Wooldridge supports the recommendation of a\nmodification of any existing City tax. Member Harris supports a partnership of bringing\nboth taxes together. Superintendent McPhetridge expressed interest in AUSD's tax\nadvisors meeting with the City's tax advisors. Mayor Spencer stated she is unsure of\nhow her support will go. Vice Mayor Ashcraft expressed interest in AUSD and the City\nattorneys to be on notice and provide legal expertise on the potential partnership. The\nSubcommittee agreed that both tax advisors will meet.\nD. NEW BUSINESS:\nThe City Council and the Board discussed possible dates for a special meeting on\nthe following topics:\nWood Middle School Playground\nCoordination of Parcel Tax Ballot Measures in 2016\nSynthetic Turf\nAlameda Point Track\nEstuary Park\nAdjournment\nMayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:10 p.m.\nTHIS MEETING WAS NOT VIDEO RECORDED AND NO AUDIO IS AVAILABLE", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-02-10.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 1, "text": "CITY COUNCIL/AUSD SCHOOL BOARD SUBCOMMITTEE\nSPECIAL MEETING\nJune 27,2016\n2263 Santa Clara Avenue, Room 391\nAlameda, CA 94501\nUNADOPTED MINUTES\nSPECIAL SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING: The special meeting of the Alameda\nCity/School joint sub-committee was held on the date and place mentioned above.\n1. CALL TO ORDER / GENERAL INTRODUCTION: The meeting was called to order by\nMayor Trish Spencer at 4:30 p.m. City Council Members, Board Members and their respective\nstaff introduced themselves. The Following people were in attendance:\nTrish Spencer - Mayor, City of Alameda\nMarilyn Ezzy Ashcraft - Councilmember, City of Alameda\nJill Keimach - City Manager, City of Alameda\nCarolyn Hogg - IT Director, City of Alameda\nJennifer Ott - Base Reuse Director, City of Alameda\nRebecca Irwin - Assistant General Manager, Alameda Municipal Power\nBarry Leska - Assistant General Manager, Alameda Municipal Power\nDebbie Potter - Community Development Director, City of Alameda\nIrma Glidden - Assistant City Clerk, City of Alameda\nSean McPhetridge - Superintendent, Alameda USD\nShariq Khan -CBO, Alameda USD\nGray Harris - Board Member, Alameda USD Board of Education\nSolana Henneberry - Board Member, Alameda USD Board of Education\n2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: minutes from the February 10, 2016 City/School\nSubcommittee Meeting:\nA. The City Council and Board members approved the minutes from the February 10, 2016\nCity/School Subcommittee Meeting.\n3. ORAL COMMUNICATION NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)\nNone.\n4. CITY/SCHOOL DISTRICT ISSUES:\nA. East Bay Broadband Internet Connection\nThe IT Director gave a brief presentation and provided a handout. The Subcommittee discussed the\navailable internet accessibility, including the Boys and Girls Club, Alameda Point Collaborative, the Main\nLibrary, and a computer lab at Ruby Bridges School. The Superintendent stated the District is happy to\nsupport and partner with the City on an initiative, originally agreed upon, that was not going to cost\nanything. The IT Director stated the item was for informational purposes a way for the District to identify\nstudents who might benefit from a computer center. The Superintendent stated Ruby Bridges was a focus\nbecause the school is at the center of the digital divide with 72% students receiving free or reduced meals.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 2, "text": "B. AUSD and City Coordination with Developers to Address Potential Impacts\nShariq Khan gave a brief presentation. The AUSD will be sending a formal request the District be\nincluded in the CEQA process, so that Environmental Impact Reports are received by the District in a\nformal notice. Gray Harris inquired whether there has been discussion on where students would be attending\nschool, to which Mayor Spencer responded in the negative. Shariq Khan stated AUSD has been receiving\ninformation from the Development Review Team (DRT) meetings on a regular basis. The AUSD also has\na demographer to generate student generation rates to determine which schools they will attend. Mayor\nSpencer stated the information is usually provided after the City approves the project; the AUSD should\nprovide input sooner; expressed concern that the schools are full and lotteries may be needed. In response\nto Gray Harris' inquiry, Shariq Khan stated there are schools that have room, including Paden which can\naccommodate 300 more students, Ruby Bridges can take 70 more, and Maya Lin can take 300 more. Mayor\nSpencer inquired about Middle and High School vacancies, to which Shariq Khan responded Encinal High\nSchool, including Junior Jets (middle school), can accommodate approximately 300 more students. The\nSuperintendent stated student enrollment can increase with the development of Alameda High School,\nwhich will create more spaces at Encinal High School. There will be an opportunity to right-size schools\nthat are under-enrolled. Shariq Khan stated formalizing the relationship with the Navy and CEQA will\nallow the District to get the CEQA documents ahead of time to evaluate any impacts and notify the City in\na timely manner.\nThe Subcommittee discussed concerns regarding school-placement issues other Cities are facing. The\nSuperintendent stated the law does not provide any way for the District to guarantee any particular school\nplacement.\nThe Base Reuse Director stated department staff coordinated the EIR for Alameda Point very closely with\nthe prior Superintendent.\nShariq Khan stated Alameda's student generation rate is not as stable compared to other cities. In response\nto Mayor Spencer's inquiry about affordable housing, Mr. Khan stated he does not have the information at\nhand but will follow up.\nThe Community Development Director stated once information is compiled from the demographer and\nother pertinent issues such as the economy, etc., the Subcommittee could meet again to discuss further with\na more complete picture.\nC. Community Solar\nRebecca Irwin gave an update on Net Energy Metering and energy efficiency projects being done in the\nschools, including Energy Plus, a program for commercial customers. AUSD was an early participant of\nEnergy Plus. LED lighting retrofits for exterior areas, gyms, and multipurpose rooms will provide AUSD\nan estimated cost savings of $65,000 per year; and an estimated AMP rebate of $87,833.\nBarry Leska gave a brief presentation and provided a handout on Alameda Municipal Power's (AMP) Net\nEnergy Metering (NEM) program and Community Solar program. He stated the NEM program is coming\nto an end; AMP had a State mandated commitment to install 3.6 megawatts. AMP will make a proposal to\nthe Public Utilities Board on the Successor Program at the July meeting.\nThe Community Solar program is 90% defined. AMP is working with Community Development for the\nsite, and an RFPs for system supply and program management will go out in the fall. The program is\nmodeled for future AUSD partnership.\n5. NEW BUSINESS", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 3, "text": "Mayor Spencer discussed the Orlando tragedy incident, Superintendent stated October is LGBTQ History\nMonth and proposed having an LGBTQ proclamation by the City Council that month.\nThe Subcommittee agreed to schedule the next meeting once more information from City staff is obtained.\nAdjournment\nMayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 5:55 p.m.\nMinutes submitted by Irma Glidden, Assistant City Clerk, City of Alameda\nTHIS MEETING WAS NOT VIDEO RECORDED. AUDIO IS AVAILABLE.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 4, "text": "Regional Consortia and Civic Leaders\nJoin Forces to Close the Digital Divide\nDel\nRural Regional Consortia\nNorte\nSiskiyou\nModoc\nRedwood Coast Connect\n-\nNortheastern California Connect Consortium\nShasta\nLassen\n.\nUpstate California Connect Consortium\nTrinity\nHum-\nboldt\nConnected Capital Area Broadband Consortium\nTehama\nPlumas\n-\nGold Country Broadband Consortium\nMendo-\nGlenn\nButte\nEast Bay Broadband Consortium\nSierra\ncino\nNevada\nColusa\nCentral Sierra Connect\nYuba\nLake\nSutter\nPlacer\nCentral Coast Broadband Consortium\nYolo\nEl\nDorado\nNapa\nSacra\nAlpine\nSonoma\nS\u00f3lano\nmento\nmador\nSan Joaquin Valley Regional Broadband Consortium\nCala-\nMarin\nTuo-\n.\nEastern Sierra Connect Regional Broadband Consortia\nContra\nSan\nveras\nSan\nlumme\nCosta\nJoaqu\u00edn\nMono\nLos Angeles County Regional Broadband Consortia\nFrancisco\nSan llameda Stanislaus Mariposa\nInland Empire Region Broadband Consortium\nMateo\nSanta\nMerced\nSanta Clara\nMadera\nSan Diego Imperial Regional\nCruz\nBroadband Consortium\nSan\nBenito\nFresno\nInyo\nTulare\nMonterey\nKings\nSan\nLuis\nKern\nObispo\nSanta\nSan Bernardino\nGrant Impact\nBarbara\nVentura Los\nAngeles\nRiverside\nOrange\nCETF\nSan Diego\nImperial\nCALIFORNIA EMERGING TECHNOLOGY FUND\n6.27.2016\ncity/Ansd\nLLA Handhord Subcommittee Mth", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 5, "text": "EBB(\"\nEAST BAY BROADBAND CONSORTIUM\nSTRATEGIC PLAN\nCONTEXT\nThe East Bay Broadband Consortium (EBBC) is a regional initiative covering Alameda, Contra\nCosta, and Solano counties. EBBC has 41 formal organizational and institutional members and\nhas been endorsed by 25 leadership organizations. EBBC has received a three year grant from\nthe California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). The first year of the grant was devoted to the\nproduction of this Strategic Plan and Years 2 and 3 will be used to implement the Strategic Plan.\nThe Steering Committee for EBBC is composed of the Contra Costa Economic Partnership, the\nEast Bay Economic Development Alliance (East Bay EDA), the Solano Economic Development\nCorporation (Solano EDC), and the East Bay Community Foundation. The Contra Costa\nEconomic Partnership is serving as fiscal agent for EBBC and Sustainable Systems and Applied\nDevelopment Economics are serving as consultants to EBBC.\nThe regional planning process that has led to the formation of EBBC identified seven key\naspects of an East Bay Strategic Framework with a specific vision statement associated with\neach aspect. The seven key aspects and their vision statements are as follows:\n1. Broadband Infrastructure: a) The East Bay is progressing toward becoming an\ninternational leader in both wireline and wireless secure broadband infrastructure with\nan effective plan for accomplishing and maintaining that leadership. b) Broadband\ninfrastructure investments are being leveraged and connected. c) The East Bay is also\nbecoming a \"Smart Region\" with smart buildings, smart workplaces, a smart grid, and\nsmart transportation leading to a more sustainable economy and way of life.\n2. Digital Inclusion: a) The digital divide is being eliminated in the East Bay, with digital\nliteracy leading to digital mastery and digital advocacy. b) Increasingly, the region's\nresidents and workforce are bettering their lives by connecting to affordable Broadband\nand by becoming more effective at using it in their homes, schools, workplaces, public\naccess locations, and/or through smart mobile devices and in their access to education,\njobs, health care, social services, public safety/emergency services, and civic\nengagement.\n3. Economic Development: a) Businesses throughout the East Bay are attaining business\nadvantage through better Broadband connectivity. b) The East Bay region is home to a\ngrowing and thriving Broadband-oriented business cluster. c) Broadband-related\n1", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 6, "text": "technology transfer from the Universities and National Labs in the East Bay is leading to\nbusiness development. d) The East Bay region is becoming a national leader for\nBroadband enabled home-based businesses, virtual companies, and flexible production\nnetworks\n4. E-Education: a) K-12 schools are becoming increasingly effective with Broadband-\nenabled curriculum and parent involvement and schools are connecting electronically\nwith the households of students. b) Educational institutions are improving at using\ntechnology to gather data to inform themselves in relation to policies and strategies,\nand to connect with school families. c) Universities/community colleges/workforce\nagencies are offering widely available Broadband access to a growing range of\ncurriculum/distant learning and providing Broadband-related entrepreneurship,\nmanagement, and workforce education.\n5. Telehealth: a) The California Telehealth Network is becoming fully built out so that\nproviders/patients have access to records and services. b) Established health care\nproviders have improving Broadband technology systems for delivery of services. c) A\ngrowing number of clients have the access/understanding to receive digitally- enabled\nhealth care including facilitating communication between practitioners and patients and\nhome access. d) Educational institutions/workforce training providers are offering\neducation and training that is producing a well-trained health information technology\nworkforce.\n6. Social Services: a) Social Services throughout the region are becoming fully Broadband-\nenabled. b) Social Services providers in the region are connected to digital literacy\nprograms, enabling their clientele to become digitally literate and to acquire Broadband\naccess. c) Social Service providers are beginning to use Broadband to work together in\nteams with government and educational institutions to address coordinated\nneighborhood improvement in challenged neighborhoods\n7. E-Government: a) Jurisdictions throughout the East Bay utilize Broadband to help\nfacilitate more widespread, user-friendly citizen participation and engagement. b)\nResidents can access public services and resources electronically. c) Most public\nlibraries/recreation centers provide free Broadband. d) Public safety agencies and local\nand regional emergency services are becoming optimally Broadband-enabled.\nTo produce a Strategic Plan guided by this vision, EBBC has used a Broadband Technology\nCommittee meeting, three East Bay Broadband Roundtables, and a Funders' Forum in 2012, all\nleading up to the 1st East Bay Broadband Summit in 2013.\nThe Broadband Technology Committee, made up of IT Directors and CTOs from throughout the\nEast Bay, considered the current state of East Bay Broadband infrastructure and the\ninfrastructure needed.\n2", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 7, "text": "The East Bay Broadband Roundtables addressed different aspects of the Broadband Strategic\nFramework:\nRoundtable One: Broadband Infrastructure and Economic Development.\nRoundtable Two: Digital Inclusion, Telehealth, and Social Services.\nRoundtable Three: E-Education and E-Government, including citizen participation,\nemergency services, and public safety.\nEach of these Roundtables provided input on those aspects of an overall Strategic Plan that the\nRoundtable addressed. By the completion of the third Roundtable, EBBC had developed a first\napproximation draft Strategic Plan for the East Bay\nThe Funders' Forum obtained the response of funders to the draft Strategic Plan in preparation\nfor presentation of the Strategic Plan at the First East Bay Broadband Summit.\nAt the same time, EBBC commissioned Tellus Venture Associates to produce a set of maps\nassessing Broadband coverage in the East Bay for residences and businesses and providing a\ngrading system for evaluating residential service in the different counties and cities\nAlong with keynotes from Sunne Wright McPeak, President and CEO of the California Emerging\nTechnology Fund and Kish Rajan, Director of the California Governor's Office of Business and\nEconomic Development, the East Bay Broadband Summit received presentations on the\nBroadband maps and grading system and on the Strategic Plan. The Summit discussed and\nresponded enthusiastically to the maps and the Strategic Plan.\nThe Strategic Plan is structured as two primary initiatives:\n1. The East Bay Broadband Infrastructure Initiative (addressing Broadband Infrastructure,\nEconomic Development, and E-Government).\n2. The East Bay Connects Digital Inclusion Initiative (addressing Digital Inclusion, Telehealth,\nSocial Services, and E-Education).\nINSIGHTS\nThe East Bay Broadband Strategic Plan and its two initiatives are guided by a set of insights that\nemerged from the Roundtables and the Mapping Project:\n1. East Bay Broadband Infrastructure is slightly above average for California, but\nsubstantially behind world leaders. According to the evaluation done by Tellus Venture\nAssociates, the region gets a \"C\" rating overall. There are some interesting new models\nemerging-such as the Lit San Leandro fiber ring providing up to 100 mbps Broadband\nto business users-and some significant gaps. In general, there is an important\nopportunity to move the region into more of a leadership position in relation to\nBroadband infrastructure.\n3", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 8, "text": "2. Broadband is definitely a key to regional economic development. It affects companies'\ndecisions to locate and remain in the region, significantly impacts companies' ability to\ngrow, enables the emergence of Broadband related industry clusters, and is required for\nrobust research, development, and technology transfer.\n3. The Public Policy Institute of California publishes a study on the demographic\nbreakdown of the digital divide in California. According to this study, the percentages of\npeople on the wrong side of the digital divide include:\nAsian - 27%\nBlack - 24%\nLatino - 42%\nWhite - 16%\nLow-income - 40%\nDisabled - 44%\nOver 55 - 37%\nNaturalized - 36%\nNoncitizen - 49%\nThe geographic breakdown for the percentage of people on the wrong side of the digital\ndivide in the East Bay is as follows:\nAlameda - 23.5%\nContra Costa - 17.4%\nSolano - 24.5%\nEast Bay - over 20%\nCA - over 25%\n4. Digital Medicine is the future of health care and the East Bay is a leader in Telehealth,\nwith Kaiser Permanente, Sutter Health, and John Muir all taking leadership. However,\nDigital Medicine and Telehealth all require a digitally literate clientele.\n5. Social Services are also increasingly relying on Broadband, online applications, and\nrecords, but this reliance also requires a digitally literate clientele.\n6. Broadband is transforming education with flip class rooms where students view\nteacher's presentations on line, new curriculum, self-directed learning, parent portals,\nand other approaches, but these innovations require Broadband devices in students'\nhomes, digital literacy, parent engagement, and multi-institutional support.\n7. Broadband is essential for community participation, public safety, and emergency\nservices and progress is being made, but this requires a digitally literate community and\nthe addressing of inter-agency operability, record access, and other issues.\n4", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 9, "text": "OVERARCHING VISION\nBased on these insights, this Strategic Plan is guided by an overarching vision:\nPublic agencies, businesses, community organizations, educational institutions,\nphilanthropic organizations, and residents understand the importance of Broadband\nand the benefits of addressing it regionally.\nThese entities and individuals have become an organized and effective constituency for\nsupporting regional Broadband deployment, access, and adoption.\nImplementation of the East Bay Broadband Strategic Plan is supported by a variety of\nphilanthropic, corporate, and public funding sources.\nThe region is making good progress becoming a \"Smart Region\" - smart buildings, smart\nworkplaces, a smart grid, and smart transportation leading to a sustainable\neconomy/way of life.\nEBBC has decided that the most effective way to utilize its limited resources to accomplish this\nvision, is to organize its Strategic Plan into two related regional initiatives-the East Bay\nBroadband Infrastructure Initiative and the East Bay Connects Digital Inclusion Initiative.\nEAST BAY BROADBAND INFRASTRUCTURE INITIATIVE\nThe East Bay Broadband Infrastructure Initiative (Infrastructure Initiative) is the primary vehicle\nfor addressing the Broadband Infrastructure, Economic Development, and E-Government\naspects of the East Bay Broadband Strategic Framework.\nInfrastructure Metrics\nThe EBBC Infrastructure Initiative is modeled in part on the Joint Venture Silicon Valley Wireless\nCommunications Initiative, which is seeking to accomplish 4G wireless coverage for all cities in\nthe South Bay.\nHowever, EBBC has included three other metrics to guide its actions and assess its progress in\nmoving toward optimal Broadband infrastructure in the East Bay. The four metrics are:\n1. All parts of the East Bay have wireline and/or wireless coverage of at least 6 mbps\ndownload and 1.5 mbps upload.\n2. All cities and metro areas have 4G wireless coverage.\n3. All major cities have Broadband access of at least 15 mbps.\n5", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 10, "text": "4. Major job centers and the National Labs have Broadband access at 100 mbps.\nInfrastructure Initiative Action Steps\nThe Infrastructure Initiative will proceed according to a set of seven action steps.\nAction Step One: EBBC will release a Request for Proposals (RFP) and hire a campaign\nconsultant to assist in organizing the Infrastructure Initiative and then work with the consultant\nto develop a public awareness campaign to communicate the importance of Broadband and the\nregion's resources, gaps, and opportunities\nAction Step Two: EBBC will work with the consultant to formulate a presentation on the\nimportance of Broadband infrastructure; the East Bay Broadband situation, based on the maps\nand grading system EBBC commissioned; the promise of a becoming smart region; model\ncommitments, policies, ordinances, and other actions that public jurisdictions can take; and\nactions that businesses and community leaders can take to support optimal East Bay\nBroadband Infrastructure.\nAction Step Three: The consultant will work with EBBC to use the presentation widely\nthroughout the East Bay, addressing County Boards of Supervisors, City Councils, business\norganizations, community groups, and neighborhood organizations.\nAction Step Four: The consultant and EBBC will facilitate community dialogue about the\nimportance of Broadband and assist everyone interested to become an organized constituency\nthat understands what is needed and that coordinates action to accomplish that.\nAction Step Five: The consultant will work with EBBC to establish an on-going Broadband\neducation process-involving public agencies, businesses, and community organizations-th:\nincludes a website, a blog, a social media presence, and forums and presentations addressing\nissues such as:\nBroadband and business development.\nThe frontiers of Broadband research and development.\nThe Broadband-related business cluster.\nBroadband and public safety/emergency services, including regional coordination and\nco-location opportunities.\nCivic engagement.\nAction Step Six: The consultant will present a report on the Infrastructure Initiative to the\nsecond annual East Bay Broadband Summit in January 2014 and obtain feedback and\nrecommendations for how to expand the Initiative and whether any mid-course corrections are\nnecessary.\n6", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 11, "text": "Action Step Seven: Based on the feedback from the Summit, the consultant and EBBC will\ndetermine how to proceed with the Infrastructure Initiative in 2014.\nIt should be noted that implementation of the Infrastructure Initiative Action Steps is\nproceeding well. The REP for a consultant was issued. The consultant, Full Court Press\nCommunications, has been hired. The communications campaign has been designed. The\npresentation is being completed. And, the first public uses of the presentation have been\nscheduled.\nEAST BAY CONNECTS DIGITAL INCLUSION INITIATIVE\nThe East Bay Connects Digital Inclusion Initiative (East Bay Connects) is the vehicle for\naddressing the Digital Inclusion, Telehealth, Social Services, and E-Education aspects of the East\nBay Broadband Strategic Framework.\nEast Bay Connects Action Steps\nEast Bay Connects will proceed by accomplishing seven action steps:\nAction Step One: Identify and test the range of affordable Broadband subscriptions available\nfrom different providers.\nAction Step Two: Partner with Oakland Technology Exchange West (OTX-West) and ReliaTech\nto establish the East Bay Connects Digital Inclusion Solution. In the Digital Inclusion Solution,\ncombine:\nPurchase of an affordable Broadband subscription.\nPurchase of a very low cost home computer (as low as $50 with a new Broadband\nsubscription).\nReceipt of three hours of free digital literacy training.\nCommitment for a year of free tech support.\nAction Step Three: Establish an East Bay Connects Contact Center, in association with the\nStride Center, that people can use by phone (and on-line) to access information about\nBroadband and affordable Broadband subscription options, to receive assistance in signing up\nfor an affordable Broadband subscription, and to sign-up for the other aspects of the Digital\nInclusion Solution.\nAction Step Four: Use the Contact Center to:\nConnect people to the Digital Inclusion Solution.\nEncourage and document Broadband adoption.\nProvide information about on-line resources for education, employment, Telehealth,\nand Social Services.\n7", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 12, "text": "Action Step Five: Produce an East Bay Connects Video showing vignettes of people, from\npopulations with high percentages on the wrong side of the digital divide, who are using\nBroadband in ways that benefit their lives. The purpose of the Video is to promote the\nimportance of Broadband, the uses of Broadband, and East Bay Connects and the East Bay\nConnects Contact Center and phone number as a way to sign-up for affordable Broadband and\nthe other elements in the Digital Inclusion Solution.\nAction Step Six: Show the video and make presentations widely through social service and\nother public agencies, health care organizations, community groups, faith-based organizations,\non local television and internet networks, and on the East Bay Connects website.\nAction Step Seven: Present, discuss, and evaluate the results of East Bay Connects at the\nSecond Annual East Bay Broadband Summit in January 1014 and make any mid-course\ncorrections as needed.\nImplementation of the Action Steps for East Bay Connects is also proceeding well. The Digital\nInclusion Solution is in place. The Contact Center has been established and is being tested now.\nThe phone number is 866-460-7439. The East Bay Connects Video has been completed and is\navailable on the East Bay Connects website which is up at www.eastbayconnects.com,\nEast Bay Connects Metrics\nThe primary metric for evaluating the success of East Bay Connects is the production of\ndocumented Broadband adoptions.\nEast Bay Connects is pursuing 1,100 documented adoptions in year 2 and 1,900 documented\nadoptions in year 3.\nAs secondary metrics, East Bay Connects will document the number of showings of the video,\nthe number of presentations in association with the video, and audiences for these\npresentations as well as the number of people who participate in the Digital Inclusion Solution.\nSCHOOL2HOME\nIn a separate related project, not funded by the grant from the CPUC, EBBC is partnering with\nthe California Emerging Technology Fund (CETF) to support School2Home pilots at Frick Middle\nSchool and West Oakland Middle School in Oakland and exploring the possibility of a\nSchool2Home pilot in Richmond. School2Home provides:\nFree Broadband devices to all students.\nTraining for teachers in on-line educational systems and techniques.\nOrientation for parents.\nOrganization of human services teams in relation to the neighborhoods surrounding the\nschools to help create optimal school/neighborhood learning environments.\n8", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 13, "text": "EBBC is helping organize the Human Services Teams in relation to Frick and West Oakland\nMiddle Schools and, right now, pursuing funding for a pilot in Richmond. Since I've been\na\nfounding member for the consortium, / can get this program here in Alameda if you are\ninterested\nRELATIONS WITH CPUC AB1758 (attached as an Appendix is critical to our proposed\npartnership)\nEBBC's relations with the CPUC are structured through a mutually agreed upon Work Plan and\nBudget, which are organized according to five goals, as follows:\nGoal 1, Deployment, which focuses on the East Bay Broadband Infrastructure Initiative.\nGoals 2 and 3, Access and Adoption, which focus on the East Bay Connects Digital\nInclusion Initiative.\nGoal 4, Mobilization, which addresses the East Bay Broadband Summits.\nGoal 5, Project Management and Coordination, which includes EBBC administration,\nsupport for the two initiatives and the summits, and reporting to the CPUC.\nSince it received its funding commitment, the launch and implementation of EBBC has\nproceeded according to plan, producing the Strategic Plan in Year 1 and moving into\nimplementation of the Strategic Plan in Year 2. The EBBC Steering Committee is working well\ntogether and accomplishing significant results, including:\nContracting with Full Court Press to structure a communications campaign for the East\nBay Broadband Infrastructure Initiative and to develop a presentation to be given widely\nin the East Bay.\nCoordinating with OTX-West and ReliaTech to create the Digital Inclusion Solution.\nCollaborating with the Stride Center to establish an East Bay Connects Contact Center.\nProducing an East Bay Connects Video and Website.\nEBBC looks forward to continued substantial progress in implementing its Strategic Plan\nthrough its two Initiatives.\n9", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 14, "text": "Appendix\nAB1758 link:\n ttp://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?billi id=201520160AB1758\n10", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 15, "text": "4/6/2016\nOTX West Home\nT\nOakland Technology\n(/)\nus.html)\nExchange West\nAbout (/about.html)\nServices (/services.html)\nDonate (/donate.html)\n11k\nVolunteer (/volunteer.html)\nLinks (/links.html)\nAffordable Internet\n:\nFree Computer\nDIGITALEQUITY\nFree Training\nFree Tech Support\nBringing Digital Equity To The East Bay\nBeing digitally connected is integral for members of our community to be successful in school,\naccess governmental and health services, and contribute to our modern economy. However,\nfamilies served\nnearly 40% of Oakland students and their families do not have access to a computer and high-\nlast year\nspeed Internet at home.\nricisco\n0.0\nOTX West partners with educators and community advocates to provide digital access solutions\nfor all East Bay residents.\nReusing The Past Building The Future\nSchools and organizations can\nWe divert computers from the e-waste\nWe provide free and low-cost computers to low-\npurchase our refurbished\nstream. We accept donated computers and\nincome students and families. (/for-\ncomputers (lfor-schools-\nswap faulty components, install fresh software\nindividuals.html) We offer training courses and\norganizations.html) for 1/3 of the\nand prepare the units for a new home.\nwarranties on computers to keep our users connected.\nprice of buying new. With our\nquality machines, we include full\ninstallation and warranty support.\nSince 1995 We Have:\nProvided 15,000+ computers to public school families free of charge.", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 16, "text": "4/6/2016\nOTX West Home\nProvided 20,000+ computers to public school classrooms, non-profits, and park and\nTweets by @OTXWest\nrecreation centers.\nDiverted over 700 tons of electronic waste from landfills for productive use or responsible\nrecycling.\n(T)\nOTX West\n@OTXWest\n#dayofactionOAK launched by @billclinton &\n@MoneyLynch. Volunteers are helping us clear\nunwanted tech from schools\nCLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE\nUNIVERSIVY\n03 Apr\nSupport a family with a free computer!\nT\nOTX West\n@OTXWest\nVolunteers with Clinton Global Initiative day of action\ntps://osf.secure.nonprofitsoapbox.com/otxwest-free-internet)\nare helping us clean out unwanted ift.tt/1X9sOSA\nEmbed\nView on Twitte\n4\nOakland Technology Exchange West\n1680 14th Street, Oakland, CA 94607\ninfo@otxwest.org\n(510) 893-4822", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 17, "text": "6/27/2016\nSchool2Home Initiative I California Emerging Technology Fund\nContact Us\nSearch\nCETE\nCommunicate\n+\nConnect\nCompete\nCALIFORNIA EMERGING TECHNOLOGY FUND\nEnglish\n+x Chinese\n#20 Korean\nEspa\u00f1ol Spanish\nSchool2Home Initiative\nSchool2Home is an innovative cost-effective program that is tackling two of\nCalifornia's most critical and related challenges: closing both the Achievement Gap\nand the Digital Divide by integrating computing and\nbroadband technologies into teaching and learning in\nlow-performing middle schools and providing a\nunique focus on parent engagement. School2Home\nprovides the essential framework anchored in best practices, formulated around 10\nCore Components, to improve student achievement at lowperforming middle schools\nand provide the requisite platform to help students master competencies under the\nCommon Core Standards. Once School2Home has been fully implemented in all grades, rooting the culture of\nusing technology to engage parents and drive education improvement, schools show significant gains in academic\nperformance that outpace comparable schools and statewide averages. Milestone accomplishments include:\nSchool2Home currently is being implemented in 19 schools in 10 districts, reaching 298 teachers and more\nthan 6,400 students and their parents in high-poverty communities: Los Angeles Unified Schools District\n(LAUSD); Riverside Unified School District (RUSD); Oakland Unified School District (OUSD); West Contra\nCosta Unified School District (WCCUSD); Winters Joint Unified School District (WJUSD); Inglewood Unified\nSchool District (IUSD); Sacramento City Unified School District (SCUSD); Bayshore and Jefferson Elementary\nSchool Districts in collaboration with the San Mateo County Office of Education (SMCOE); and San Bernardino\nCity Unified School District (SBCUSD). The partnership with SBCUSD is a different model of collaboration,\nalthough is evolving to embrace the School2Home approach. School2Home currently involves 300 teachers\nand more than 6,500 students and their families\nResponses from 2,228 students to the 2015 annual School2Home Student Survey showed the following\nimprovements since 2011-2012: 85% increased computer and Internet access at home to support learning,\nup from 73%; 84% use the technology for writing assignments, up from 60%; 90% access the Internet for\nresearch related to schoolwork, up from 68%.\nCETF is providing input to state and federal education policy based on the success of School2Home.\nSuperintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson has endorsed School2Home, encouraging funders to\ninvest in the program.\nPlease read the School2Home: Empowering Students - Transforming Lives.\n(/files/School2Home Briefing Packet TORLAKSON 151206.pdf)\nOverview\nInvestment Reports\nPerformance\nEvaluation\nStatus of Grants\nInvestment Portfolio\nInternet For All Now!\n(IFAN)\nGet Connected!\nInitiative\nDigital Literacy\nInitiative,\n-", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 18, "text": "Energy Efficiency Projects\nAUSD is participating in AMP's Energy Plus\ndirect-install program.\n12 schools were chosen based on Prop 39 &\nMeasure I bond projects.\nLED lighting retrofits for exterior areas, gyms,\nand multipurpose rooms\nEstimated AMP rebate: $87,833\nEstimated AUSD energy cost savings: $65,000/yr\nALAMEDA\nMUNICIPAL POWER\n6.27.2016 A Department of the City of Alameda City/ANSD\n4-C Handout", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 19, "text": "Net Energy Metering Program Status\nNEM KW through 6/21\nInterconnected = 2,904 KW, Remaining = 696 KW\n(Residential = 1,177 KW Commercial = 1,727 KW)\n1000\n3600\n903\n900\n3100\n800\n2600\n700\n600\n2100\n500\n1600\n429\n400\n1100\n300\n234\n211\n214\n600\n200\n143\n141\n156\n99\n114\n100\n57\n71\n47\n58\n100\n27\n0\n0\n0\n0\n-400\n2008\n2009\n2010\n2011\n2012\n2013\n2014\n2015\n2016\nResidential\nCommercial\nTotal\nALAMEDA\nMUNICIPAL POWER\nA Department of the City of Alameda", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}
{"body": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard", "date": "2016-06-27", "page": 20, "text": "Other Solar Programs\nNEM Successor Program\n- Under development.\n- Present proposal to PUB @ July meeting.\nCommunity Solar\n- Program 90% defined\n- Working with Community Development for site\n-\nRFP for system supply in late August\n- RFP for program management in late October\n- Model for future AUSD partnership(s)\nALAMEDA\nMUNICIPAL POWER\nA Department of the City of Alameda", "path": "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf"}