body,date,page,text,path
GolfCommission,2011-01-19,8,,GolfCommission/2011-01-19.pdf
GolfCommission,2012-10-09,4,,GolfCommission/2012-10-09.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2019-02-27,7,,SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2019-02-27.pdf
GolfCommission,2011-12-13,6,,GolfCommission/2011-12-13.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-12-18,4,,CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-12-18,6,,CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2021-05-13,6,,RecreationandParkCommission/2021-05-13.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-11-03,12,,CityCouncil/2010-11-03.pdf
GolfCommission,2012-09-11,4,,GolfCommission/2012-09-11.pdf
GolfCommission,2011-09-21,6,,GolfCommission/2011-09-21.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2020-11-12,7,,RecreationandParkCommission/2020-11-12.pdf
GolfCommission,2012-12-11,4,,GolfCommission/2012-12-11.pdf
GolfCommission,2011-02-23,14,,GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,78,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,8,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,14,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,15,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,16,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,17,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,18,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,21,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,22,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,25,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,26,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,28,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,29,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,30,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,31,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,32,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,33,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,35,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,36,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,37,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,38,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,44,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,46,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-09-12,52,,RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf
GolfCommission,2012-11-13,6,,GolfCommission/2012-11-13.pdf
GolfCommission,2012-06-12,4,,GolfCommission/2012-06-12.pdf
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce,EconomicRecoveryTaskForce,9,"  https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2781417&GUID=16211D8D-2D63-
4E9A-8531-6366B3DB8COD&Options=&Search=
Panel member Grunt asked about the ferry terminal.
Ms. Ott said that the new Seaplane Lagoon terminal will be right in the heart of the
development in the Enterprise District. This is the number one issue for developers:
when is the ferry terminal coming? It will operate as a joint consolidated service with the
Main Street Terminal. Most likely, the Seaplane Terminal will be the commute ferry with
Main Street/Oakland supplying mid-day and weekend service. We did look at the
relocating the Main Street Terminal, but it would undermine the Oakland service. The
Oakland line cannot sustain itself and depends on Alameda ridership.
Panel member Mik commented that Main Street is the most popular ferry terminal and is at
capacity. They are selling out their boats. They are really adding capacity with the new
terminal.
Ms. Ott added that ferry ridership has grown 60 percent since 2012, which is unheard of
for public transit.
Panel member Chubb asked about the maker space cluster.
Ms. Ott said that the buildings are being redeveloped by master developers. They will
subdivide them into smaller spaces for specialty manufacturing, artist spaces and some
office. One floor will most likely become work/live, with tight restrictions on the residential
component.
Panel member Monteko asked who pays for the infrastructure in Site B.
Ms. Ott said the developer or end user through a negotiated land deal with the City.
Alameda Point's infrastructure costs are approximately $600 million, or $1 million per acre.
Panel member Elsesser asked about the square footage of entitled space and height
limits.
Ms. Ott answered that there is approximately 5.5 million square feet for all of Alameda
Point, which is a lot of entitlement. We do not want low intensity development; we want
jobs or catalyst benefit. The height limit is 100 feet. It is a very permissive, a big
envelope to create a lot of flexibility. We do not know who the end user(s) will be. We
want to create an opportunistic envelope to take advantage of each businesses' vision.
Ideally, we want a diversified base and not just one end user.
Panel member Monteko asked how is Cushman Wakefield advising on the commercial
market for companies being pushed out of San Francisco and moving to Oakland. On the
one hand, it is someone who wants the flexibility to expand quickly but they want it
yesterday. How are you going to address that?
Draft Meeting Minutes
Page 9 of 9
July 20, 2016",Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf
TransportationCommission,2017-09-27,3," https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3158563&GUID=FA3FBDE5
B456-4391-8D95-1AC8D71F82AA&FullText=1
Commissioner Soules asked what the timeline is to meet the stated goals.
Staff Member Ott said the goals were based on a 15 year timeline.
Commissioner Palmer asked what dollar amounts the actual developers are required to
contribute to the plan and not just their residents.
Staff Member Ott gave examples of contributions that developers have been required to
contribute, such as $10,000,000 for a new ferry terminal at Alameda Pt.
Commissioner Palmer asked why 2030 was chosen as the benchmark for measuring the
plan's success.
Bill Hurrell, CDM Smith, said they wanted to pick a horizon that was long enough to
allow the plan to have an impact, but not so long that they would not have confidence in
predicting what would happen in the future.
Vice-Chair Miley opened the public hearing.
Christina Hanson, employee of Harbor Bay Isle and Central Avenue resident, said the
community is concerned about the proposal to add bus lanes on Island Drive. She said
they do not believe this is the right solution for the problem. She said the median and
trees are very important to the community. She said there are also safety concerns
around the elementary school with adding bus lanes there.
Jim Strehlow said we have added 5,000 new homes and asked where the 5,000 new
jobs were to go with them. He said the city should be prioritizing job creation but is in fact
doing the opposite. He said stopping growth is part of the real solution. He said
Alamedans want another bridge or tunnel. He said the public meetings are too rigid for
genuine discussion, or speakers are hand picked. He asked that more discussion time
be allowed for future meetings on these issues. He said when he drives kids for a non-
profit he is a single driver off the island. He said he is mad because this plan is not a
solution to the transportation problem.
Pat Potter, CASA, said she is concerned about the Transportation Awareness
Campaign. She said we need to drill down deep and understand what prevents
individuals from changing their behavior.
Andrea Wuttke, transportation planner and infrastructure economist, said a bus system
is a supplemental mass transit vehicle. She said her plan would be to take 20,000 rides
a day out of the system to connect the island to Oakland via an aerial tramway.
3",TransportationCommission/2017-09-27.pdf
TransportationCommission,2018-12-03,2," https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3760863&GUID=29DE963A-
62EC-4E90-B019-0B7972B1A813&FullText=1
Commissioner Nachtigall asked how the changes would look at the Bay Ship entrance
during shift change.
Staff Member Wikstrom said that if there was a queue of cars entering the Bay Ship
property it could cause a small backup on the westbound lane.
Commissioner Soules asked how long the project would take to complete once started.
Staff Member Wikstrom said it would take less than two weeks to complete. He added
that the project will cost less than $100,000 and can be completed with already allocated
funds.
Commissioner Soules asked for more details about potential traffic impacts and analysis.
Staff Member Wikstrom said the level of service analysis showed that the change would
be acceptable. He said the cars currently waiting behind left turning vehicles are already
delayed. He said the highest 15 minute volumes are about 100 cars. He said the
maximum traffic is about 300 cars per hour. He said a single lane intersection can
handle 500 cars per hour without problem. He said the number of users of the Main St.
terminal will likely decrease when the Seaplane Lagoon terminal opens.
Commissioner Soules asked that in the future the staff reports include details on where
the problems get pushed to.
Chair Miley asked if lowering the 35 mile per hour speed limit was considered.
Staff Member Wikstrom said they did not plan to do that at this time. He said they may
have more of a basis to reduce the speed limit after the changes are implemented.
Chair Miley asked what percentage of the collisions involved bikes or pedestrians.
Staff Member Wikstrom said that most of the data he looked at were vehicle to vehicle.
Commissioner Hans asked how this would impact the overflow parking near the nursery.
Staff Member Wikstrom said there would be no change to the parking conditions.
Commissioner Palmer said we are using 2017 data here and it seems like ridership is up
with the larger boats. She asked what was meant by a ""calming effect.""
Approved Meeting Minutes
Page 2 of 8
December 3, 2018
Transportation Commission",TransportationCommission/2018-12-03.pdf
TransportationCommission,2019-09-25,7," https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4139823&GUID=F4F57230-
D1C1-4647-85B9-C4DCDEB6B4C7&FullText=1
Commissioner Weitze asked if there are punitive or enforcement aspects to Vision Zero.
Staff Member Foster said that increased enforcement is part of other cities' plans. She
said San Francisco initially focused enforcement on locations and violations where
fatalities and collisions were most likely.
Staff Member Wheeler said she sees it as a data driven process to perhaps redistribute
where enforcement occurs in order to have the most impact on behavior, rather than
simply increasing overall enforcement.
Commissioner Weitze asked if reconsidering the standards and process for placement of
stop signs was part of the Vision Zero process.
Staff Member Wheeler said they have not looked at that as a standard to evaluate, given
that federal guidelines exist on stop sign placement.
Chair Soules opened the public hearing.
Jim Strehlow said NACTO implementation in San Francisco did not make him feel safer
while cycling. He said it took him out of his way, compared to the older, more direct route.
He recalled a recent fatality in San Francisco on a NACTO redesigned intersection. He
warned the Commission not to believe that this would be a perfect solution.
Chair Soules closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Kohlstrand said she supports the Vision Zero movement and looks forward
to developing the policy.
Commissioner Yuen said she strongly supports Vision Zero and is excited by the focus on
equity. She said she would like to see a focus on design and engineering over
enforcement, which can be punitive. She asked that the annual report be brought back to
the Transportation Commission.
Commissioner Kohlstrand made a motion that the Vision Zero Policy be
recommended to the City Council with the amendment that the annual report come
to the Transportation Commission. Commissioner Yuen seconded the motion. The
motion passed 5-0.
5-D 2019-7284
Update on Active Transportation Plan
7",TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf
PlanningBoard,2021-04-26,2," https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4913556&GUID=D03018E1-
B78C-4DAE-8B76-1862FE538D8A&FullText=1.
President Teague opened the board's clarifying questions.
Board Member Rona Rothenberg wanted to know why air conditioning was called out as
""baseline"" as opposed to other common applications in this climate which was not as
intensive in air conditioning as a particular application.
Staff Member Mieler said that calling out the air conditioning was standard practice in new
development. She also introduced Farhad Farahmand, a consultant, who had been
advising the staff on this ordinance.
Farhad Farahmand, TRC Energy Consultant, explained the underlining reasons for the air
conditioning assumption.
Board Member Hanson Hom asked for clarification that this ordinance would only apply to
new structures and would not apply to ADU's if the main structure was already gas. Also,
if a person were to completely remodel their kitchen (complete tear-out) he assumed this
ordinance would not apply as well.
Staff Member Mieler said that was correct, this would be for completely new construction.
Board Member Ron Curtis was concerned about low-cost housing and wanted to know
the total difference in utility cost from a completely electric house vs a gas-powered house.
Mr. Farahmand said unfortunately he did not have a complete answer right now. He said
they were currently working on that analysis for the utilities. They were seeing it as being
around seven dollars a month, couple hundred dollars a year based on surrounding
utilities.
Board Member Curtis referred to the table in the presentation that showed that the electric
dryer was six dollars more than a gas dryer, and the electric stove was a few more dollars
a month than the gas stove.
Mr. Farahmand explained how these appliances do add increases but several other
factors decrease. There was a balancing act between everything.
Board Member Curtis asked if a heat pump was more energy efficient than a furnace.
Mr. Farahmand said yes absolutely.
Board Member Curtis said good, he then reiterated his concerns about the monthly
expenses for families in low-cost housing.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 2 of 18
April 26, 2021",PlanningBoard/2021-04-26.pdf
PlanningBoard,2021-07-12,17," https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5015994&GUID=174D0132-
9553-4E86-A703-5637C6E8FF46&FullText=1.
No board member wished to pull any item for review.
9-B 2021-1106
Oral Report - Future Public Meetings and Upcoming Planning, Building and Transportation
Department Projects
Staff Member Tai announced that at the Monday, July 26 meeting they would have a full
agenda and bring back the 1435 Webster which was the Study Session from today. There
would also be a minor planned development amendment to a small setback issue for a
building under construction at the Harbor Bay Business Park. The staff would also bring
forward an architectural design review approval for the medical respite center at McKay
Ave, a draft of the Vision Zero Action Plan, and another General Plan update. He also
updated the board that Board Member Ruiz's question about 53 Killybegs had been
addressed so she had withdrawn her request for a Design Review.
Director Thomas gave an update that at the July 6th City Council meeting they decided to
appeal the RHNA numbers on a 3-2 vote. The appeal was submitted on Friday, July 9th.
President Teague asked about the other 4 items.
Director Thomas said they did not do anything. They debated a bunch of aspects on it and
decided not to do anything with the resolution. He explained the next actions for the staff
and said they should hear back about the appeal in November.
Board Member Hom wanted to know about the rationale for the appeal.
Director Thomas explained that between Article 26, sea-level rise, transportation, and
seismic safety the council believed that it had a strong argument for appeal. The staff had
also introduced the issue of the Navy Cap as an argument. They wanted the region to
know about the Cap to get help for it. He explained more about the appeal process and
what they had asked for. The staff would be working on two paths, one if the appeal was
accepted and the other if it is rejected.
Board Member Rothenberg asked about the Encinal Terminals Action that had been
bundled with the other items. She thought it would be unfortunate if that languished
because the developer needs direction one way or another.
Director Thomas said staff agreed and had made it clear to the council that they would still
be bringing projects forward regardless of the appeal.
President Teague asked what was the current state of the Encinal Terminals.
Director Thomas explained they had an approved 2017 Master Plan with no Tidelands
Exchange and then they also have the Planning Board recommendation for the Tidelands
Exchange Master Plan. They also have the Resolution from the Planning Board
recommending to the council to approve the Tidelands Exchange.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 17 of 18
July 12, 2021",PlanningBoard/2021-07-12.pdf
PlanningBoard,2021-07-26,13," https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5031891&GUID=164AODE7-
A13A-41FF-9A71-993AE1305D2A&FullText=1.
Doug Biggs, the applicant, discussed a few things then introduced the architect for the
project, Chris Ebert of Ankrom Moisan and Sarita Govani of Mantle Landscape
Architecture.
Mr. Ebert presented where he discussed the design intent and goals.
Ms. Govani also presented where she discussed how the landscaping would support the
building design and programming at the facility.
President Teague opened the board clarifying questions.
Board Member Ruiz thanked everyone for their presentations. She asked how users and
visitors would arrive. She wanted more elaboration on why they turned the front door away
from the street.
Mr. Biggs discussed the 3 major uses of the center, a respite center for patients requiring
aftercare, and those patients would be picked up from the hospital and brought to the site
by staff. There would be no walk-in opportunities. The downstairs will be a clinic that would
serve the patients in the respite center but also serve residents of the senior living facility.
Those patients will get to the clinic by a little walkway. The front area will be a resource
center for residents of Alameda only who are at risk of becoming homeless or recently
homeless and will be by appointment only. They normally would have an opening at the
front but one of the concerns by neighbors was that people would loiter at the front or lines
forming on the street. This is why all entrances will be off the street.
Board Member Ruiz then wanted clarification on the materiality of the building.
Mr. Ebert said the plan was for it to be an Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) and
they were thinking of a standard smooth texture.
Board Member Ruiz also asked about the visibility of the vents on the roof.
Mr. Ebert said you would be able to see them a bit but this was the least visible he had
ever used.
Board Member Ruiz asked about the vents and roof design. She also asked if he had
thought about using a concrete tile roof instead of a shingle roof.
Mr. Ebert explained what type of vents they would use and how it would work with the
roof. He said that they had not looked at concrete tiles but had looked at asphalt and
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 13 of 21
July 26, 2021",PlanningBoard/2021-07-26.pdf
TransportationCommission,2021-10-27,2," https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5182985&GUID=6CFE355D-9085-
46A7-84A4-6FB800501F57&FullText=1.
Commissioner Scott Weitze clarified his comments for Agenda item 6-C, his concern was for the
scheduling, he felt the scheduling could be better.
Commissioner Rebecca Kohlstrand clarified her comments for Agenda item 6-B.
Commissioner Weitze made a motion to approve the minutes with these edits and Vice-Chair Tina
Yuen seconded the motion. A vote was taken by a raise of hands and the motion passed 4-0,
Commissioners Nachtigall and Hans abstained due to their absence at this meeting.
6. Regular Agenda Items
6A. Endorse the City Council's Adoption of the Vision Zero Action Plan (Lisa Foster, Senior
Transportation Coordinator) (Action Item)
Lisa Foster, a Senior Transportation Coordinator, introduced the item and gave a presentation. The
staff report and attachments can be found at:
https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5182986&GUID=2C8EE9A4-BCB9-
4772-AAFD-3E9D1F4C119C&FullText=1.
Commissioner Clarifying Questions for #6A
Commissioner Weitze asked about the socially vulnerable area around Webster and the Webster
Tube since there was not much of a population there and asked if another analysis has been done
since the map updates.
Staff Member Foster said they had not done another analysis since removing certain areas but they
were planning on updating the Socially Vulnerable Map.
Commissioner Kohlstrand asked about the High-Injury Corridor Map and wanted to know why
the number differed online from what was in the plan.
Staff Member Foster said she would double-check that information and make sure they had the
most recent map.
Public Comments for #6A",TransportationCommission/2021-10-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2022-01-24,2," https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5379989&GUID=8240DCA5-
261F-4060-AAE5-444187E64F94&FullText=1.
President Saheba opened the board clarifying questions.
Board Member Alan Teague asked for clarification on where the four different doors lead
to. He wanted to know how the residential entrance was distinguished from the retail
entrance.
Hillary Dowden, a developer with UDR, explained the layout and the entrances.
President Saheba opened public comment.
David Israel, the architect, also discussed and explained the difference between retail
entrances and residential entrances.
Betsy Mathieson, an Alameda resident, had questions about the hanger doors. She
wanted to see the South Elevation.
President Saheba closed public comment and opened board discussion.
Board Member Teague was not totally in favor of this design but he would not stand in the
way of its approval. He thought the way it was before made it clear how you were
supposed to get into the building, and this way it kinda blends in.
President Saheba agreed that there was no clarity of entryway. He thought there needed
to be more work, perhaps with the canopy design.
Vice President Teresa Ruiz had requested from the applicant the building plan and thought
there was no confusion and was in support of this amendment.
Board Member Teague made a motion to approve the amendment. Board Member
Xiomara Cisneros seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion
passed 6-0 with Board Member Hom absent.
7-B 2022-1666
A Public Workshop to Review and Comment on the Draft Housing Element Update Zoning
Code Amendments Regarding Definitions and Regulations for Residential and Related
Land Uses.
Director Thomas introduced this item and gave a presentation. The staff report and
attachments can be found at
https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5379991&GUID=F97232D8-
E3DF-44D1-9F85-FOEA8FC27926&FullText=1.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 2 of 6
January 24, 2022",PlanningBoard/2022-01-24.pdf
PlanningBoard,2016-10-24,6," ttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2858659&GUID=A4EF7EBF-
EBF-4FC7-B578-1E63AE0E56C9&Options=&Search=&FullText=1
Board Member Sullivan asked if we have looked at starter homes and senior homes for
middle class people, not just the rich and very poor.
Staff Member Thomas explained what affordability levels would be included. He said
they are working on designing projects that will have units that are available for
households of all income levels by dictating the size of the units.
Board Member Sullivan said that young families cannot live in one bedroom apartments
and we need small starter single family homes.
Staff Member Ott said 9% of the units would be deed restricted moderate income units.
She said the flexibility of building heights and types will make it so that the market rate
units are more affordable to middle income buyers.
Board Member Curtis said that the boom market helps pay for the affordable housing
now, but if the market changes direction, that will not work out for the people who paid
top dollar for the market rate units.
Staff Member Ott explained that the moderate income buyers would not participate in the
upside or downside equity changes that a market rate purchaser would.
Staff Member Thomas explained the origin of the 25% inclusionary requirements of
building at this site.
Board Member Knox White asked what could be built within the Historic Zone within the
strict design guidelines.
Staff Member McPhee said the guidelines were targeted at the non-contributing
buildings in the historic district.
Board Member Mitchell asked if limiting heights to three stories instead of four was
feasible.
Staff Member Ott said they are looking to preserve flexibility in order to make certain
product types viable.
Board Member Zuppan said we need to be incorporating plans for indoor
homework/library spaces for children on this end of town.
Approved Minutes
Page 6 of 9
Planning Board Meeting
October 24, 2016",PlanningBoard/2016-10-24.pdf
PlanningBoard,2021-05-10,2," ttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4928037&GUID=63163F6E-
A2D6-48B5-A4A5-6CE722E8D07D&FullText=1.
President Teague opened public comment.
There were no public speakers.
President Teague closed public comments and opened the board/commission questions
and commentary.
Vice President Asheshh Saheba wanted to know if they had looked at the different parking
requirements for the different programs offered for the city.
Director Thomas said that parking and parking management are going to be a major focus
of the city staff's work, and are working on a comprehensive rewrite of the Off-Street
Parking Zoning Code. He explained how it would be different from how it had been in the
past.
Vice President Saheha believed this was critical to a sustainable future.
Vice-Chair Alysha Nachtigall wanted to know since the plan is to have paid parking at the
ferry terminals if there would also be an increase in transit connections to provide an
incentive for commuters.
Director Thomas said having additional transit connections were critical and AC transit
is
working on a plan with WETA (Water Emergency Transportation Authority). He gave a
background on the work those organizations had been planning for Alameda and when it
is expected to start. He brought up that AC Transit's plan was dependent on Alameda
managing and charging for parking at the ferry terminals as an incentive to take the bus.
Vice-Chair Nachtigall stated that with equity in mind getting the word out about these
services would be critical.
Director Thomas agreed.
Board Member Rothenberg wanted to know if the climate action elements had been
incorporated and if Residential Parking Permits had been addressed and discussed.
Director Thomas said they did acknowledge the progress on the green initiatives and the
General Plan would keep pushing on what else they can do to deal with Climate Change
and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. For parking management, the General Plan did not talk
a lot about the city's existing Residential Permit Parking Program, which is available for
every neighborhood in Alameda. There was a discussion about parking controls in areas
around public transportation.
Board Member Teresa Ruiz wanted to elaborate on the connectivity aspects of the mobility
elements. She wanted to see more specifics (bike/scooter/rideshare) folded into the smart
street planning in terms of storage and parking for those elements. She also wanted to
see specific elements for safety (no right turn on red or cyclist specific traffic lights) to see
if they were appropriate or could be adapted for Alameda. She also gave some ideas on
Approved PB & TC Joint Meeting Minutes
Page 2 of 11
May 10, 2021",PlanningBoard/2021-05-10.pdf
TransportationCommission,2021-07-28,2," ttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5037417&GUID=C108F591-B9D7-
4FAF-9DF2-2CC39C5426ED&FullText=1.
Commissioner Weitze moved to approve as is and Vice-Chair Nachtigall seconded. A vote was
taken by a raise of hands and the motion passed 5-0 with Commissioner Hans abstained since he
had been absent.
5B. Approve Meeting Minutes - May 26, 2021 (Action Item)
https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5037418&GUID=E1EF96FE-5C3C-
4C78-BEF2-DA7C32B4F47D&FullText=1.
Commissioner Kohlstrand moved to approve the minutes as is and Vice-Chair Nachtigall
seconded. A vote was taken by a raise of hands and the motion passed 6-0.
6. Regular Agenda Items
6A. Elect Chair and Vice-Chair of the Transportation Commission (Action Item)
The staff report can be found at
https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5037419&GUID=EFD295E3-0188-
4D90-820E-A52EB8BC601D&Options=&Search=
Public Comments for #6A
There were no public speakers.
Chair Samantha Soules opened the floor for nominations.
Vice-Chair Nachtigall nominated Chair Soules as Chair for the next term and Commissioner
Weitze seconded the motion. A vote was taken by a raise of hands and the nomination passed 6-0.
Chair Soules thanked everyone for their confidence in her leadership.
Chair Soules nominated Commissioner Yuen for Vice-Chair, she had discussed this with her
before the meeting and could confirm her interest in the role. Commissioner Rentschler seconded
the motion. A vote was taken by a raise of hands and the nomination passed 6-0.
6E. Discuss Citywide Roundabout Analysis Results (Discussion Item)
TC Meeting Minutes
2
July 28, 2021",TransportationCommission/2021-07-28.pdf
GolfCommission,2017-11-14,5,"""EXHIBIT A""
South Golf Course Schedule Analysis - Joseph Van Winkle
November 13,2017
November 2014
Closed 9 holes and began import of required soil
July 2015
Closed remaining 9 holes
April 2018
32 months or 2 years and 8 months (assume opening in May)
Includes soil import and construction and grow-in period.
How long should it take?
""Planning and design is mostly done within one year; the construction work typically takes 2-2.5
years, depending on the topography of the site, the quality of soil, the availability of water, the
climatic conditions and of course the expected quality, complexity or playing difficulty of the
designed golf course."" 17% of courses in the study took 2-3 years for construction phase.
Source: KPMG tp://static.golfbenchmark.com/media/2/9/3/9/2939.pd
1. ""Quality of Soil"" - heavy clay, salt build up, zero drainage, still underwater after 4 year
drought. Required significant soil critical to raise grade for optimum drainage. Soil also
provided a protective cap over the old ""dump site.'
2. ""Climatic Conditions"" of unprecedented rains Sept. 2016 - April 2017; highest rain in
100 years; Train of ""Pineapple Express"" storms; an ""Atmospheric River""
3. High Quality Scope:
a. Drainage and Water Management - 6 Bio-swales capture and ""clean"" the water
with native wetland plantings, mile of canals restored and replanted resulting in
abundant aquatic life; 3 lakes rebuilt with 70% increased capacity,
b. Native grasses and shrubs (e.g. Buck Wheat-grown by UC Berkeley Nursery)
often required long lead times.
c.
8-12"" Sand Cap - provides better root structure and drainage to allow carts on
sooner without 90 degree rule, but doubles the amount of effort. Soil has to be
positioned, moved by dozer, shaped/sculpted and then raked by hand and the
d. Quality hardscape - stone bridges, 10' wide cart paths with 12"" recycled road
base, rock work to limit erosion into canals, stone pavers at restrooms, etc.
e. Precision Irrigation - 5000 irrigation heads (3x North course) enabled by satellite
geo-mapping and computer control via wired controllers and sensors
f.
5 tees per hole allow range of player experience
g. Quality for visuals and maintenance with 7 types of grass and 100+ lined bunkers
4. Bird Delay - giving hawk fledglings time to mature in their nests delayed work on holes
5. Neglected. 1970s was the last rebuild. Asbestos pipes and more than 40 years of decay.
Change orders may have added to schedule, but Greenway has absorbed the costs.
By comparison, Palo Alto is also opening a rebuilt course in Spring 2018. Baylands Golf Course
will have cost the City of Palo Alto over $13m in design and construction.",GolfCommission/2017-11-14.pdf
GolfCommission,2017-11-14,6,"""EXHIBIT B""
Informational Report on Corica Park Founding Membership Program
To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Golf Commission
From: Amy Wooldridge, Recreation and Parks Director
Re: Informational Report on Corica Park Founding Membership Program
BACKGROUND
Greenway Golf previously reported to the Golf Commission on the development of a Founding
Membership Program. Greenway is working toward implementing this program and this agenda
item is an opportunity for the Golf Commission to receive detailed information and ask
questions.
DISCUSSION
The table below outlines the details of the Founding Membership Program.
OFFER
Exclusive
20 Members
Term
5 Years from opening of the South Course
One Time Cost
$15,000
Unlimited Access to Golf Facilities.
-
Two 18 hole courses
-
Par 3 course
-
Short Game Practice Area
-
Practice Range
-
Preferred $10 Cart Fees apply
-
Will receive Founding Member Bronze Bag Tag
14 Day advance booking window for tee times
Family Access (spouse and children under age 25 included)
-
3 Complimentary Accompanied Preferred Guests per Quarter.
-
Guest pass valid for play after 11am Monday-Thursday. Guests must be accompanied by the
member.
-
Guests required to pay a cart fee.
-
20% off regular golf rates for accompanied guests at all other times.
-
Weekend play before 12pm on the South Course is limited to Primary Member.
Holidays Excluded (e.g. Christmas, day after Thanksgiving)
Invitations to Member Events - social / golf / wine tasting / other
20% off Pro Shop Apparel (excludes hard good / non-sale items)
Bonus: South Course Advance Preview Play - Valid for Member and one accompanied guest to play",GolfCommission/2017-11-14.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,18,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Cnsultants
Why do we want to do it?
Identify WHY it is important for the Mayor and Council to consider action on projects or
policy initiatives. Please note the list below on DEFINING the Why WE Want to Do IT
How will we do it?
Based on Mayor and Council discussion at the Workshop the staff will develop future
agenda item for their action.
How do we make sure it works?
Determine if the agenda item has a current performance measure, requires a new
performance measure or no performance measure.
DEFINING the Why WE Want to Do IT
To Improve:
Operational Performance
Policies
Procedure
Programs
Racial Justice
Equity
Finances
Risk Management
Technology
Customer Service
Sustainability
Community Well Being
Infrastructure
Other
16
I P a g e",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,17,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
Consultant Recommendations: Consider adding specific timelines for completing the
project/policy identified in the work plan. Determining specific timelines for each project will
allow the Mayor and Council and staff to prioritize what projects/policies can be completed in a
specific fiscal year and which need to be moved to subsequent years.
This is the section of the Workshop where any ideas the Mayor and Council want to consider
for future projects/policies from the information presented on healthy community model,
citizen engagement and the Governance Relations System (GRS). Also potential policies and
projects identified in the confidential Mayor and Council Workshop survey and from the
December, 2019 Workshop (Note: Projects listed in Blue) will be discussed in this section. The
facilitator will guide the Mayor and Council through this Workshop section using the Start With
Why format. Staff will record the results of the discussion on a screen that can be viewed
during the meetings by the participants.
Start With WHY Obridgegroupllc
The Mayor and Council Workshop will focus on creating dialogue and discussion opportunities
between council members and staff. The format that will be used to facilitate this dialogue will
be based on an approach developed by Simon Sinek in the book Start With Why: How Great
Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action. By Starting with ""WHY"" the Mayor and Council and
staff can quickly evaluate the proposed projects and policy discussed at the Workshop by using
a FOUR Questions approach:
1. What do we want to do? (Mayor and Council)
2. Why do we want to do it? (Mayor and Council/Staff)
3. How will we do it? (Staff- Tactical determined after Workshop))
4. How do we make sure it works? (Mayor and Council/Staff- Performance Measurement)
What do we want to do?
Discuss and Identify specific projects or policy initiatives for FY 2021
15 I P a g e",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,12,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
Expectation
Description
Foster teamwork and high
Guide people as a team toward common objectives;
performing organizational
select qualified and highly competent members of the
characteristics.
Leadership Team to implement through the
organization.
Recognize citizens are our
The Council expects that the public will be treated
customers
equitably, with dignity and respect. Assist the Council by
resolving problems at administrative levels and not
through City Council action. Value community
perceptions and understand that customer satisfaction is
important.
Agenda material
Staff will provide concise, accurate and meaningful
agenda material for the Council's review to include the
timely delivery of written/electronic materials.
Value intergovernmental relations
Effectively represent the City's interests when dealing
with other agencies. Participate and cooperate in
intergovernmental activities to have an impact on the
region.
Communicate effectively
Provide information to the public in a timely fashion on
matters, which will cause public reaction. Be candid and
forthright in discussing City business matters with the
Council through various methods that include one on
one meetings with Council members. Be accessible to
Council members.
Proactive Management Style
Show initiative and creativity in dealing with issues,
problems and unusual situations while remaining open
to new ideas and suggestions for change. Be adaptive to
the changing expectations of local government and the
impacts of state and national conditions.
Effective Leadership
Be enthusiastic. Command respect and performance
from the Leadership Team while providing the tools
necessary for effective service delivery. Support a
positive work culture at all times.
Negotiate Effectively
In conjunction with the Legal Staff (when appropriate),
always consider City Residents when determining
negotiating positions or reaching agreement.
No Operational Surprises
Staff will keep the City Council informed on all critical
operational issues.
10 I P a g e",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,15,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
FIGURE 1: Strategic Policy Development System.
STEP 1
Issue
STEP 5
STEP 2
Review and Adjust,
Determine
If necessary
Policy Model
STEP 4
STEP 3
Determine Metrics
Develop
for Success
Policy
Source: Mike Letcher
FIGURE 2: Policy Models.
Opportunity
Compass
Best Practice
Politically
Core
Business/Staft
Source: Mike Letcher
Figure 1 illustrates the process for using the policy models. The process is designed to evaluate
the policy or issue the Mayor and Council are considering
Figure 2 shows policy models that can be a key guidepost to strategic policy development. The
policy models and subsequent definitions are not meant to be all-inclusive. The concepts or
models can be adapted to meet the unique needs of the governing body and staff.
Components of the strategic policy development system can be changed and policy models
altered to fit your particular needs. In my experience working with governing bodies for more
than 30 years, these models represent the key components or drivers that create the push for
public-policy formulation.
Compass approach. Policy development is based on community values, approved plan, or
strategic approach.
Best-practice approach. Policy is based on best-practice principles.
Opportunity approach. Policy development is based on significant community and/or
organizational benefit.
13 I P a g e",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,20,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
Focus Area: Preparing Alameda for the Future
Project/Policy
To Improve
Senge
Department Lead
Rating
Climate Change
Implement CARP, check ins, staffing
2
Assistant City Manager
position, check box on reports
Long-term
Balanced approach to finances,
2
Finance
financial
maximize resources, connect to
strategies
outside assistance,
Traffic Vision
Zero
Focus Area: Encouraging Economic Development across the Island
Project/Policy
To Improve
Senge
Department Lead
Rating
Work/Live Space
Consider adjustment after election,
3
Planning, Building,
broader housing discussion overall
Transportation
New ferry
terminal at
Seaplane Lagoon
Development at
Big picture, establish goals (falls
2
Community Development
Alameda Point
under multiple objectives: livability,
Review Base
economic development, preparing for
Reuse/Property
future), hold a work session
Management
Maintain
More support to districts/smal
1
CMO - COVID Town Hall
active
businesses, COVID messaging -
business
business owners lead, street closures,
districts
near and long term goals,
communicate plans
Capitalizing
Broadband, digital divide (WiFi and
2
IT
on Working
equipment), child care
ARPD/CD - Child care
from Home
18 I Page",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,5,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
Mayor and Council Workshop Overview
Development of the Mayor and Council Workshop Agenda was a collaborative process with the
Mayor and Council, City Manager, and BridgeGroup. A confidential online survey was sent to
the Mayor and each Council Member to get their input on the following Workshop Agenda:
Review and Discuss Alignment and Foundations for High Performing Councils
Review a Systems Approach to Planning COVID-19 Recovery
Review Innovations for Citizen Engagement
Review and Discuss Tools for Supporting Mayor and Council Effectiveness
Determine What Tools to Develop Further for Future Use
Develop Project and Policy Priorities for FY 2021
Discuss and Determine if Alignment Operating Policy is Needed
The Mayor and Council Workshop was held on Saturday, July 25 2020 at the Alameda Main
Library. The following were in attendance at the Workshop:
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft
Vice Mayor John Knox White
Councilmember Tony Daysog
Councilmember Jim Oddie
Councilmember Malia Vella
City Manager Eric Levitt
City Clerk Lara Weisiger
City Attorney Yibin Shen
President/CEO BridgeGroup LLC Mike Letcher
This report provides a summary of the Workshop and some recommendations from the
consultant.
3 I Page",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,16,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
Politically based approach. Policy is based on narrow intent from special-interest groups or
constituents. I would replace this Approach with one titled: Fiscal Sustainability approach
Policy developed takes into account city's ability to fund its operations long term
Core business/staff-recommended approach. Policy is based on the requirement to run
government's core business functions and is recommended by staff to improve services,
internal operations, and policies.
In terms of policy models, more is better. Try out the model and see how it works. Groundwork
has to be done for strategic policy development to work. A number of critical issues also have
to be considered:
Time required, the more the better. Thinking ahead and developing an annual work
plan is important to provide the time to fully evaluate important policies that the
governing board will consider.
Staff capacities to effectively implement the policy. Are there enough worker bees to
get the job done? This needs to be fully evaluated by the governing board and staff
before time is spent developing the policy.
Committee referral before consideration. This is a no-brainer. It always helps to have a
committee recommendation.
Communication of need and outcomes. Unfortunately, the clear and concise
communication of the need for the policy is often overlooked. Get the sound bites
determined before the policy-formulation process starts.
NO EASY ANSWERS
An approach and model for strategic policy development is needed. The approach described in
this article is based on experience and what I have seen work and not work behind the curtain
of policy formulation. Managers know there are no easy answers or solutions to policy
development. But like all journeys, it begins with one step and the compass, map, or GPS to get
you to the destination.
Develop Project and Policy Priorities for FY 2021
Workshop Summary: The Mayor and Council had extensive discussions on the work
priorities from the December 2019 Workshop and new potential projects/policies identified in
the survey. Council expressed concerns about staff's workload and ability to complete all of the
project/policy priorities.
14 I Page",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,7,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
Review Innovations for Citizen Engagement
Workshop Summary: The Mayor and Council discussed having standards for Boards and
Commissions, periodic updates at Council meetings, promoting diversity in membership,
having them do studies on issues to advise the Mayor and Council and considering a Marana,
Arizona Model to consolidate some Board and Commissions.
Consultant Recommendations: Consider implementing the Marana Citizens Forum and
the other ideas discussed under the summary.
Citizen Engagement is essential to creating a thriving community. The following are tools used
by City's to engage their citizens:
MARANA
AZ
ittps://icma.org/success-stories/new-approach-energizes-citizens-
in-marana-arizona
MRSC
Local Government Success  http://mrsc.org/Home/Explore-Topics/Governance/Citizen-
Participation-and-Engagement/Communication-and-Citizen-Participation-Techniques.aspx
click here to sign up, get involved and
https://www.speakupaustin.org/
A
sset
B
ased
ommunity
evelopment
https://www.nurturedevelopment.org/asset-based-community
development/
5 I Page",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,6,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
Review a Systems Approach to Planning COVID-19 Recovery
Workshop Summary: The Mayor and Council liked the Healthy Community model and
discussed how it might be used in COVID-19 recovery and linked to the budget and their
priorities.
Consultant Recommendations: Consider linking the Health Community Model to the
Mayor and Council agenda development process.
Recovery from COVID-19 for communities will be a complicated. What can Alameda potentially
use to guide the city through its COVID -19 recovery efforts? The Arizona Town Hall will be
using the Elements of Health Community Model to work with communities over the next year
on building plans for COVID-19 recovery. The model was developed by the Vitalyst Health
Foundation http://vitalysthealth.org/ in Arizona. The Arizona Town Hall will use the model as a
checklist for communities to take a more comprehensive approach to COVID-19 recovery.
TRANSPORTATION
ACCESS
STA
OPTIONS
TO CARE
SOCIAL
HEALTH
AFFORDABLE QUALITY
JUSTICE
HOUSING
HALE
RESILIENCY
SOCIAL/CULTURA
ELEMENTS OF A
COMMUNITY
COHESION
SAFETY
HEALTHY
COMMUNITY
PARKS AND
ECONOMIC
RECREATION
OPPORTUNITY
COMMUNITY
EDUCATIONAL
DESIGN
OPPORTUNITY
FOOD
ENVIRONMENTAL
ACCESS
QUALITY
The following link provides more information on the Healthy Community model.
 https://www.dropbox.com/s/1h43alxerfmhfx5/Healthy-Communities-and-social-determinants-
final.pdf?dl=0 During the workshop the Mayor and Council can discuss if this model may or may
not be useful to use as a guide for the city as it recovers from COVID-19.
4 I Page",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,8,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
Review and Discuss Tools for Supporting Mayor and Council Effectiveness
Workshop Summary: The Mayor and Council discussed each component of the Governance
Relations System (GRS) and how it may help them work more effectively with each other and
the City Manager.
Consultant Recommendations: Consider hiring a consultant to assist the Mayor and
Council and City Manager in developing the (GRS).
This section of the workshop will introduce two
tools for improving Mayor and Council
effectiveness. The Governance Relations
""Governing boards have been known in one
System (GRS) is designed to provide a system
form or another for centuries. Yet throughout
for establishing expectations for the Mayor
those many years there has been a baffling
and Council and City Manager. GRS will be
failure to develop a coherent or universally
applicable understanding of just what a board
introduced using an example from the City of
is for.""
Goodyear, Arizona. If it's determined at the
Workshop that the GRS would be beneficial to
Carver's Policy Governance Model in
the City, the Mayor and Council can develop it
Nonprofit Organizations
at a future Workshop. The second tool, The
Policy Model can be discussed and developed
at the Workshop if it has value for the City to use in the future.
Governance Relations System (Example Only) Obridgegroupllc
The role of a Governing Board is often difficult to define. It is this lack of clarity within the roles
of the Governing Board that results in a disconnect between the Governing Board and the Chief
Executive. Ideally, the role of an elected Public Board is to set policy. The implementation of
that policy and responsibility for the day-to-day operations of the organization reside with the
Chief Executive or City Manager. What's missing?
The answer is: established expectations that the Board has for the Executive or Manager. The
Governance Relations System (GRS) is designed to create a bridge between the Elected Board's
expectations of their Chief Executive (City Manager) and the execution of the day-to-day
6 I P a g e",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,19,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
Senge Chart
The Senge Chart is an excellent tool the rate the impact of the proposed policy or project and
gauge its difficulty to accomplish. The goal is to focus on projects or policies that are rated 1 or
2.
PROJECT IS EASY TO
PROJECT IS DIFFICULT
ACCOMPLISH
TO ACCOMPLISH
HIGH IMPACT ON City
1
2
LOW IMPACT ON City
3
4
Focus Area Charts
The Focus Area Charts will be used during the Workshop to develop project and policy
initiatives for FY 2021. The Charts will be built on the Focus Areas developed in the Mayor and
Council December, 2019 Workshop. The Charts will include the following:
Focus Areas- The strategic priorities for the City
Project/Policy- The proposed project or policy
To Improve- Reference To Improve list of areas the policy or project will improve
Senge Chart Rating- Rating assigned during facilitation to the policy or project.
17 I P a g e",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,22,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
Strategic Operating Policy
Workshop Summary: The Mayor and Council discussed how the Strategic Operating Policy
would work and its benefits for Alameda.
Consultant Recommendations: The Strategic Operating Policy should be considered for
adoption by the Mayor and Council after any changes recommended by staff.
How can a Strategic Operating Policy help the City of Alameda focus? Implementing key city
priorities takes discipline and collaboration between the Mayor and City Council, City Manager
and Staff.
The City of Alameda will use its annual Priorities and Work Plan to:
1. Develop the operating budget.
2. Consider projects from the Climate Action and Resiliency Plan (CARP). General Plan,
Economic Development Plan and other approved Mayor and Council plans
3. Develop new projects and assign them to specific departments for execution.
What specific steps will Alameda take every year to focus its strategic efforts?
1. The Priorities and Work Plan will be updated annually during the budget process.
2.
Mayor and City Council and City Manager are committed to making sure that staff has
the time and resources to complete the projects in the plan.
3. If new project(s) are added to the work plan after it is approved during the fiscal year, the
Mayor and Council will work with the City Manager to determine what project(s) currently
in the plan need to be reprioritized and moved to a future fiscal year.
CITI Y OF
TFRKA
20 I P a g e",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,4,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
TABLE OF CONTENTS Obridgegroupllo
Content
Page
Mayor and Council Workshop
3-4
Summary Overview
Review a Systems Approach to
4
Planning COVID-19 Recovery
Review Innovations for Citizen
5
Engagement
Review and Discuss Tools for
6-14
Supporting Mayor and Council
Effectiveness
Develop Project and Policy Priorities
14-19
for FY 2021
Strategic Operating Policy
20
PLAN
ACT
CONTINUOUS
IMPROVEMENT
DHO
CHECK
2 I P ag e",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,14,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
The Expectations of Customer Service/Civic Engagement
Expectation
Description
Timely responses
Staff will strive to provide timely responses to
citizens that are easily understood.
Civic engagement
Opportunities to increase citizen engagement
with the City on a social and formal basis will
be a priority.
Educate citizens on services
Staff will continuously develop strategies and
systems to educate citizens on the services
and processes of local government.
Accurate information
Staff will ensure information provided to
citizens is accurate and written for clarity
Links
Carver Policy Governance Model in Nonprofits: http://www.carvergovernance.com/pg-np.htm
Mike Letcher ICMA Public Management Magazine article on Caver Policy Governance Model:
https://icma.org/sites/default/files/2818 Commentary%20-
%20The%20Undiscovered%20Country%20-
%20A%2ONew%20Path%20for%20Local%20Government%20Management.pd
Policy Model©bridgegroupllc
The following is the link to the complete article on the Policy Model
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fehk8nggdn73icf/Policy%20Model%20Article.pdf?dl=0.Themodel
will be discussed at the Workshop for its applicability to Alameda. The specific content or
wording in the model can be adjusted to requirements of the City.
Workshop Summary: The Mayor and Council liked the Policy Model and discussed ways to
link it to the agenda development process.
Consultant Recommendations: The Policy Model should be considered for adoption by
the Mayor and Council after any changes recommended by staff.
12 I Page",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,13,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
The Expectations of the Governing Board
Expectation
Description
Value members' opinions.
You can disagree with each other but provide the space for
each member of the City Council to express their opinion.
Do your homework.
Before the meeting, read information sent by staff to be
informed and prepared for discussion. If a meeting is
missed, become informed of the decisions made or the
information shared.
No surprises at meeting for staff.
If possible, contact staff prior to the meeting when you
have a critical question that requires research.
Disagree with the vote, but do
You can disagree with a vote and express your viewpoint
not undermine the will of the
on why you did not support an item but understand that
Council.
the Council has voted for the item and you are
responsible, as a Council Member, for its successful
implementation.
Practice civility.
As the elected representatives we will strive to be a model
for our community and the region on how an elected body
should work together for the public good.
Support the strategic plan.
City Council Members will support and require a Strategic
Plan for the City.
No public criticism of staff at
No Council Member will criticize City staff at a public
meetings.
meeting. They can discuss their concerns with the City
Manager privately.
No operational interference.
City Council Members will not direct the work of staff. If
they have issues or questions related to operations, they
will be directed to the City Manager or Designee.
Focus on outcomes not positions.
Before taking a position review the outcomes, potential
benefits/results and relationship to the Strategic Plan of a
policy or issue first.
11
I P a g e",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,10,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
The Expectations of the Organization
Expectation
Description
Maintain an Integrated Strategic
The integrated strategic management system will allow
Planning System that is linked to
for strategic projects that require funding to be
the annual budget, strategic
considered during the annual budget process. Current
projects, employee evaluations
and new strategic projects and performance measures
and performance measures.
will also be reviewed and approved at this time.
Strive to be an ""open book""
""Open Book"" means that all critical, not confidential,
organization for its employees.
operational and financial information concerning the City
will be shared and available to employees.
Executive Team is committed to
Employee development and involvement is a high priority
the developing and empowering
for the Executive Team.
employees.
Continuously improve technology
Continuous technology improvements are essential for
for internal and external services.
the City to meet and exceed the expectations of its
customers.
Strive to be a regional model for
Commitment for the City Council and City Manager to
Board Governance.
work collaboratively on continuously improving their
Governance Relations.
Continuously improve internal
Continuous internal process improvement is essential for
processes and procedures.
efficiency and effectiveness of the City.
Be good stewards of the public's
Ensure processes, procedures and practices are in place
money and trust.
to meet this commitment
Focus on developing a learning
Commitment to provide training for employees to ensure
organization.
that the City continues to have talented and well-trained
employees providing leadership and operational response
readiness.
Recognize internal stakeholders
Internal stakeholders should be treated equitably and
are customers too
with respect, as these stakeholder's service timelines
often are dependent upon the work of internal service
providers.
Innovation
Employees are empowered to consider unique options
along with industry inspired alternatives to solving
problems and enhancing service delivery
Transparency
Citizens will have access to key financial and operational
information.
8 I Page",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,11,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
The Performance Expectations of the City Manager
Expectation
Description
Implementing strategic plan
Annual evaluation will include progress on these
projects.
projects.
Assist the City Council with their
Ensure that information is detailed, reliable and
policy- making role.
explained in a thorough manner. Include alternatives
and recommendations.
Any written information provided
Information shared with one City Council Member must
to one City Council Member will be
be sent to all members.
provided to all members.
Plan ahead, anticipate needs and
Seek input to ensure future plans are achievable and
recognize potential problems.
proactively communicate possible shortcomings to
Ensuring attention to detail to
collaborate with the Board when necessary.
avoid error or things ""slipping
through the cracks"".
Implement City Council's policy
Ensures that key information is shared with the Council
regarding expenditures through the
and that the Council's intent is followed.
use of standard financial
management procedures.
Budget recommendations will
Ensures that the City Council understands the basis for
provide rationale and alternatives
budget requests and how decisions were made in the
for Council consideration. Projects
final recommendations.
will be integrated into the budget
using the strategic plan.
Respect the decisions of the City
Implement Council's policies by accurately interpreting
Council.
direction given by the Council, carrying out their
directives as a whole and supporting the actions of the
Council after a decision has been made.
Practice ""collaborative leadership"".
Strive to ensure that your leadership is inclusive and not
exclusive. Involve citizens, employees and other
stakeholders and partners where appropriate.
Ensure positive and supportive
Create and foster an environment that values employees
physical and emotional working
and their contributions. Support an environment that
conditions
assists employees in being successful in the positions
that they hold. Ensure that personnel policies and
practices are administered in an equitable manner.
9 I P a g e",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-25,9,"""Help is on the way""
BridgeGroup LLC
Management Consultants
operations of the organization. The GRS also sets expectations for the Board to support the
success of the Chief Executive.
The GRS includes FOUR areas:
1. Expectations of the Organization
2. Performance Expectation of the Chief Executive
3. Expectations of the Elected Board
4. Expectations of Customer Service/Civic Engagement
5. Expectations for Role of the Mayor (This section could be added to Alameda)
These areas provide general guidelines for how the organization will be managed, the expected
conduct of the Board, the manner in which services will be provided and opportunities for
engagement with citizens. The key to making the GRS work is the partnership/collaboration
between the Elected Board and Chief Executive to set clear expectations on how the
organization will operate. The GRS can be viewed as a series of interconnected gears that drive
the organization and its management and leadership priorities.
The GRS is designed to improve the relationship between the Governing Board and Chief
Executive and their collective effectiveness. The expectations set benchmarks for annually
evaluating the efforts of the Board and the Chief Executive. The expectations can be amended
and adjusted over time to keep them relevant to the municipality. The bar is set high with these
expectations, but the journey in the search for governance excellence is never easy. Each step
forward or times when these expectations are not met, are all part of trying to be the best
governed municipality for the organization's citizens and employees.
7 I P age",CityCouncil/2020-07-25.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-06-25,3,"""Hydrology and Water Quality: contaminated storm water runoffs can
have a potentially significant impact due to the potential for petroleum
product spills and other debris. The applicant is to prepare and implement
a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan.
""Fact: To date there has been no formal study of air quality regarding
asbestos, carbon monoxide and gas emissions along the Otis Drive
corridor, as well as soil erosion with stormwater runoffs impacting water
quality, particularly that of the lagoon opposite of the proposed fuel
station. (The lagoon opposite of the Towne Center is already 400% over
the upper limit for expected fecal coliform.)
""Fact: There was critical facilities (two respite care homes and a hospital)
that will be affected by environmental conditions involving air and water
quality.
""Fact: Alameda is approaching the tipping point of endangering its natural
and healthy environment at its south shore for trying to recoup revenue
leakages.
""Is this best planning practice for a town in such a fragile environment?'
8.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
8-A. Use Permit UP07-0010; Minor Design Review MDR 07-0058; Parking In-lieu
Fees - Applicant: Gary Parker - 2437 Lincoln (ZS). The applicant is
requesting a Use Permit and Design Review approval to establish a dental office
and laboratory on the ground floor of an existing building; reconfigure the parking
lot to increase the number of parking spaces from seven to thirteen; and pay
parking in-lieu fees for five parking spaces. The property is located within a C-C-
T (Community Commercial Theater Combining) zoning district.
Board member Cunningham moved to adopt Planning Board Resolution No. PB-07-23 to
approve a Use Permit and Design Review approval to establish a dental office and
laboratory on the ground floor of an existing building; reconfigure the parking lot to
increase the number of parking spaces from seven to thirteen; and pay parking in-lieu
fees for five parking spaces.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 6
Absent: 1 (Mariani). The motion passed.
Page 3 of 13",PlanningBoard/2007-06-25.pdf
PlanningBoard,2006-09-11,3,"""President Lynch noted that the noticing practices were regulated by the State, and that the City may
want to consider extending often extended the noticing parameters."" He suggested that he leave his
contact information with City staff to be including in the noticing. He recommended that he bring the
videotapes to City staff as well.
7.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
7-A.
Applicant requests a Final Development Plan and Major Design Review to allow five
new buildings totaling approximately 100,795 square feet in floor area with a total of
268 parking spaces to be constructed on a 7.7 acre site (CL). The site is located at 1900 -
1980 North Loop Road within the Harbor Bay Business Park in the C-M-PD, Commercial
Manufacturing, Planned Development Zoning District. Applicant: SRM Associates (FDP06-
0003 and DR06-0071).
M/S Kohlstrand/Member McNamara and unanimous to continue Item 7-A to September 25, 2006.
AYES - 5 (Cook, Mariani absent); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0
7-B.
Applicant requests a Final Development Plan and Major Design Review to allow a one-
story building of approximately 36,899 square feet in floor area with 69 parking spaces
to be constructed on a 4.1 acre site (CL). The site is located at 2275 Harbor Bay Parkway
within the Harbor Bay Business Park in the C-M-PD, Commercial Manufacturing, Planned
Development Zoning District. Applicant: Harbor Bay Acquisition LLC (FDP06-0002 and
DR06-0062)
M/S Kohlstrand/Member McNamara and unanimous to continue Item 7-B to September 25, 2006.
AYES - 5 (Cook, Mariani absent); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0
7-C.
DR06-0027 and V06-0006 - Applicant: Fargo Farnesi Inc. - 2427 Clement Ave. (DG).
The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new two-story commercial
cabinet shop with a penthouse apartment on the third floor, to be used as a caretaker's unit,
and a free-standing single-story wood frame structure to be used as an administrative office
for the cabinet shop. The project will provide four full-size parking spaces and one ADA
compliant parking space. The applicant proposes to pay parking in lieu fees pursuant to
Alameda Municipal Code Section 30-7.13 for any additional spaces that may be required by
the City. The applicant is also applying for a Variance to the City onsite vehicle backup
distance and minimum driveway and parking area perimeter landscaping requirements. The
site is located at 2427 Clement Ave. within an M-2, General Industrial, (Manufacturing)
District. (Applicant requests continuance to the meeting of September 25, 2006.)
M/S Kohlstrand/Member McNamara and unanimous to continue Item 7-C to September 25, 2006.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 3
September 11, 2006",PlanningBoard/2006-09-11.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2008-06-12,2,"""That ARPD staff write a letter to the Police Department and ask for assistance in
the parks on the weekends. The Commission would like to have APD check permits
and make sure there is no alcohol is being consumed in the parks.""
4.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
5.
NEW BUSINESS
A.
Review and Discussion of Lincoln Park Field Renovation Plans - (Information
Item)
PM McDonald reviewed with the Commission the Lincoln Park Field Renovation Plans.
The plans call for new irrigation, new turf, and the ball field will remain in the same location,
dirt area will be leveled where another field used to be in the southeast corner, and some
regrading will be done.
Commissioner Restagno asked if there will be a grass infield. PM McDonald stated there is
an alternate bid for a grass infield. Having a grass infield may be a good idea because the
infield mix is getting very expensive and it needs to be trucked in, etc. Also some of the
homes are very close to the field, and as much as everyone tries to water the field the dust
still ends up on the homes. It would not eliminate all the dirt problems, but would help
alleviate the dust problem.
Commissioner Cooper asked how the field is used. PM McDonald stated that it is strictly
used for hardball play. The only issue is if there are enough funds to do a grass infield.
Commissioner Kahuanui asked how the project will be funded. PM McDonald stated that
funds for the project will come from the General Fund.
Commissioner Sonneman asked for clarification regarding the Rittler Park renovation being
put on hold. PM McDonald stated that the Rittler Park Field Renovation was recently put
out to bid and is scheduled to begin on July 7, 2008.
Commissioner Cooper stated that he thought the City was going to start the Harrison
Center first. PM McDonald stated that the building renovation was postponed at a Council
Meeting and Council moved the field renovation up.
PM McDonald also stated that the City has received notice from EBMUD about water
rationing and it is impossible to keep up a new turf with the specs which require watering
every day. PM McDonald is recommending to the Recreation & Park Commission and
Public Works Department that the Lincoln Park Field Renovation be postponed.
M/S/C
KAHUANUI/BROWN
(approved)
""That Lincoln Park Field Renovation be postponed until after the drought and that
Rittler Field Renovation be done first.""
Approved (7):
Ogden, Restagno, Brown, Cooper, Kahuanui, Mariani, Sonneman
B.
Discussion of Use of Chairs in the Washington Park Dog Park - (Discussion
Item)
- 2 -
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg
Minutes - Thursday, June 12, 2008",RecreationandParkCommission/2008-06-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2005-02-10,4,"""That the per player fee be tabled until alternatives are reviewed. ""
Approved (5):
Ingram, Kahuanui, Johnson, Oliver, Reeves
M/S/C
REEVES/KAHUANUI
(Approved)
That the 2005 fee increases listed below is approved:
BASKETBALL
Adult
$610.00 Resident Team Fee
$660.00 Non-Resident Team Fee
SOFTBALL
Adult
$620.00 Resident Team Fee
$670.00 Non-Resident Team Fee
FLAG FOOTBALL
Adult
$598.00 Resident Team Fee
$615.00 Non-Resident Team Fee
SWIM LESSONS
$ 5.00 each 1/2 hr. lesson - Resident
($50 for two-week session)
$ 6.00 each 1/2 hr. Lesson - Non-Resident
($60 for two-week session)
SWIM TEAMS USE FEE
Hourly Rate:
$5/hr./youth & adult
(currently)
$11/hr./youth
(beginning January 2006)
$12/hr./adult
(beginning January 2006)
$12/hr./youth
(beginning January 2006)
$13/hr. adult (beginning January 2006)
TENNIS
Adult Group Lessons
$ 11/hour
Junior Group Lessons
$ 11/hour
Private Lessons
$ 42/hour
YOUTH
Day Camp
$120/week - Hidden Cove
$135/week - Trails End
$ 60/week - Hidden Cove Extended Care
$ 50/week - Trails End Extended Care
Preschool
$ 4/hour
YOUTH SPORTS
Fall, Winter, Spring
4
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
Minutes
Thursday, February 10, 2005
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service",RecreationandParkCommission/2005-02-10.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2007-03-08,4,"""That the request from Alameda Girls Softball to install a storage container in Krusi
Park be approved."" (Storage container will go where an existing container exists at this
time. This is next to field number three down the first baseline.)
7.
REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK
DIRECTOR
A. Park Division
See March 6, 2007 Activity Report.
B. Recreation Division
See March 6, 2007 Activity Report.
C. Mastick Senior Center
See March 6, 2007 Activity Report.
D. Other Reports and Announcments
-
Status Report on Transportation Master Plan Committee (Commissioner
Johnson)
No report at this time.
8.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL
Commissioner Johnson stated that she would like to recommend some improvements to
the small dog park in Washington Park. Recommendations are possibly planting a tree to
provide shade to patrons using the facility, possibly mowing along the fence to allow
owners of dogs to exercise around the perimeter of the park while their dogs are using it,
and fixing the ADA entrance into the small dog park and making it level.
Director Lillard suggested trying to procure donations to have an arbor put in, like the one in
the center of Mastick Senior Center. Manager McDonald stated that there are parachute
type shades that cover a good size picnic area that cost approximately $15,000.
Director Lillard stated that staff will look at the grading of the dirt at the entrance to the site.
9.
ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA
10.
SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING
April 12, 2007
11.
ADJOURNMENT
- -4 -
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg
Minutes - Thursday, March 8, 2007",RecreationandParkCommission/2007-03-08.pdf
TransportationCommission,2007-04-25,7,"""The City of Alameda has put a great deal of effort into making pedestrian crossings as safe as
possible. Do not take a step backwards!
""Although there are ramps located at the supercrosswalk at Otis, there are unrecognized ADA
problems with putting a bus at Lum School. The only reason to place a bus stop on Otis at
Willow and Grand is to attract riders. There are no cross streets in this area. North of Otis are
one-block dead-end cul de sacs with low-density, single-family houses. South of Otis are four
blocks of housing: two blocks of single family, and two blocks of medium-density apartments
and condos. The bulk of the potential riders reside south of Otis. To get to Otis from the south,
there are two routes: One is Ivy Walk, which leads directly to Otis. The other is Snowberry Walk
which leads you into the back of Lum School, then along a driveway through the Lum School
grounds to Sandcreek Way, approximately one block distance, then along Sandcreek Way for one
block to Otis.
""ADA Problem #1: When school is not in session, there is a chain attached with a padlock across
the driveway through Lum School. I can step over the chain, but a handicapped person cannot.
You will have to tell the principal at Lum School to stop using the chain. Whatever the reason the
chain serves will be eliminated. I do not know, but I suspect the chain reduces the likelihood of
vandalism, as this driveway leads past the office entrance, which is not visible from the street or
from the residences in the area. Also, as this parking lot is not visible from the street, and school
is only in session during the day, and then only 185 days out of a 365 day year, the same reasons
for closing the gates to the parking lot at Crown Beach at sunset would be in play for limiting
access to this parking lot.
""ADA Problem #2: There is no ADA ramp to get up only the sidewalk on Sandcreek Way. My
wife is disabled; we went to vote at Lum School last election. We used the supercrosswalk, but
when we got to the area near the school office where the voting booths were located, there was
no ADA ramp to get off the sidewalk to the driveway that leads to the office. This is the same
driveway that would be used by people cutting through the schoolyard to get to a bus stop,
should one be placed at Lum School.
""The City has indicated the building a bus stop at Ivy Walk would require painting and marking a
crosswalk. I pointed out that the crosswalk at Heather Walk and Heather Isle does not have a
painted crossing. That is the very next bus stop west of Grand. However, I was informed that the
regulations now require newly installed bus stops to have a marked crossing, and the Arlington
Isle stop does not need a crossing because it is grandfathered in under the old regulations. I do
not believe that painting a crosswalk near Ivy Walk will encourage students at Lum School to
cross Otis when they have the supercrosswalk at Lum School.
""To summarize: No one (other than an unnamed person on City staff) wants the bus stops. Shelve
this proposal, and revisit it someday if someone actually expresses a need for a bus stop and you
can buy the extra few minutes of run time that will be needed. And if you are absolutely
compelled to put in a stop, put it on the safe side of crosswalks and intersecting streets so that it
does not interfere with the visibility needed by us old, gray-headed pedestrians crossing this
heavily used street, and vehicles entering the traffic on Otis Drive. A stop at Ivy Walk would be
much safer than a stop at Lum School or a stop at Willow. Sincerely, Peter Muzio.""
7",TransportationCommission/2007-04-25.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2021-01-14,9,"""The Missing Link"" of
Alameda Shoreline Park
On Harbor Bay the San Francisco
Bay Trail is incorporated into the
Shoreline Park Shoreline Park
.
includes both grassy areas and
paths for both pedestrians and
bicyclists to safely access the
views and fresh air. Hundreds of
residents and Harbor Bay
Business Park workers walk and
bike these paths. During the
pandemic use has greatly
increased, which is vital to
physical and mental health.
This photo shows a wide section
of the Shoreline Park concrete
path that ends abruptly,
narrowing into a ragged, asphalt
path.",RecreationandParkCommission/2021-01-14.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-10-22,7,"""big box"" store. The Zoning Code would be further amended to require that the use permit
be amended for a large format retail store, in addition to the standard use permit conditions.
In that case, the key issues could be addressed in terms of its design, operations and the issue
of sale leakage. He noted that this was a new presentation, and that there had not been any
community feedback at this point.
The public hearing was opened.
Ms. Karen Bay noted that she was speaking as an Alameda resident, and was looking
forward to the workshop, which she believed was very timely. She supported amending the
Zoning Code to define and address large format retail stores, and supported the requirement
of a use permit for all large format retail store. She believed the City's retail policy needed
some updating because so much had changed since 2004. She believed that the City had
more clarity and understanding about the retail development process since then. She had
reviewed the DDA as it related to the Alameda Landing project as approved, and believed
that the City had approved a lifestyle center, not a hybrid center, and believed the wording
should be changed to reflect that. She suggested that the term ""lifestyle center"" be defined.
The public hearing was closed for Board discussion.
Mr. Thomas requested the Planning Board's thoughts on the definition, as well as the
idea of requiring a conditional use permit. He noted that there were many people who
would be interested in looking at a prohibition on stores over a certain size. He noted that
the issues of stopping sales leakage and historic buildings were of concern to the
community; he noted that the Del Monte building had been a centerpiece of that debate.
Mr. Thomas noted that care should be taken in the definitions and prohibitions, and added
that there were many in the community who would like a ""big box"" prohibition. He noted
that it would not be possible to write a zoning ordinance that prohibited a particular
retailer, and that naming certain retailers as acceptable, and others as unacceptable, would
not be appropriate.
Member Lynch complimented staff on tackling this complex issue very well. He
cautioned against reinventing the wheel, and did not want any legal troubles to result. He
noted that different ordinances did not need to be created, and that the Planning Board
had the authority to deny a permit. He believed this issue had been over-complicated, and
that the use of the conditional use permit process would generally be adequate. He
preferred to defer to the Economic Development Commission and the previous Boards,
which already had an excellent strategic plan for Alameda.
Member McNamara did not have enough information to move forward on this issue, and
had read information about the model used by Fort Collins, Colorado, with respect to
their very specific and stringent big box retail policy.
Mr. Thomas thanked Doug Garrison for pulling a large amount of information together
for this staff report.
Page 7 of 11",PlanningBoard/2007-10-22.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2015-03-26,5,"""essay"" questions. Staff has secured a booth at the Earth Day Celebration at Washington Park on April 25, and
will order new SSHRB banners for this and other events. Staff also shared that renting space at the Park Street
Spring festival would be very costly, and that Rob Ratto, PSBA Executive Director is trying to arrange for free
or low-cost space at the event. Member Sorensen announced that he will be able to provide free space at the
Jam at Neptune Beach on June 21st and 22nd Members will be needed to staff the booths, and sign-up sheets
for all three events were circulated. Member Sorensen suggested that the Board might also distribute the
survey at the Chamber event on April 10. The committee will continue to work on the survey and SSHRB
brochure, and will report back at the April meeting. The City has offered to provide City of Alameda shopping
bags to all who fill out the survey, but there may be other costs for printing and other materials for the event.
A Motion was made to authorize the committee to spend an amount not to exceed $400 for materials.
M/S Williams / Villareal Unanimous
Staff shared how much each agency would receive if the $6,753 were to be distributed proportionally to
the four applicants.
3.-E
UPDATE ON SSHRB HOMELESS COUNT PRESENTATION TO COUNCIL ON APRIL 7
Discussion and Action item with a suggested time limit of 20 minutes.
President Biggs reported that he had collected photos from the homeless Count conducted in September 2014,
and that he was preparing a PowerPoint presentation to accompany his report to the Council. He will present
his report at the May 5th meeting. This is the same meeting that the Council will hear Public Comment and
vote on the FY 15-16 CBDG funding. Board members are encouraged to attend.
4.
BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
Member Villareal requested that co-sponsorship and the consideration of providing funds for the 6th annual
Alameda Harvey Milk Day celebration be placed on the April agenda.
5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- NONE
6.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:35 PM. M\S Hyman \ Sorensen Unanimous (6-0)
Respectfully submitted by:
Jim Franz
Secretary
5",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2015-03-26.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-09-07,8,"""must encourage status quo;"" the matter is critical and gives the OGC process
effectiveness and power; he does not agree with the use of the term ""should;""
expressed concern about the five year penalty; stated that he does not think the
situation in government has been so troubling for someone to muck up the gears of the
government process; he is not convinced of imposing such a drastic penalty; it is the
right of the people to attend OGC and Council meetings; he does not think Council
should be so heavy handed in the penalty; the penalty is not fair or democratic.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the matter may return to the OGC.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he has concerns over the Null and Void provision;
the OGC does not have the power to declare matters Null and Void; when the OGC
challenges a Council decision, the decisions must be put in abeyance.
Vice Mayor Vella expressed support for the recommendations; stated there have been
several lively conversations with the OGC; the ordinance has been in place for over one
decade; a number of things may need to be changed going forward; the OGC and
Sunshine Ordinance came about from large-scale community conversation; there have
been proposals and differences in opinion on what may or may not be within the
confines of the City Charter; if constituents are interested in seeing certain things
change, proposals to take action through amending the Charter or other alternatives
can occur via robust community conversation; it is a good time to make changes; a
tremendous amount of effort has been put forth in the proposed language before
Council; she is prepared to support the matter; expressed support for all members of
the OGC through the years; stated a substantial amount of time has been put into the
matter; an ordinance has been put forth which will ensure the City is as open and
transparent as possible; she would like to encourage Council, the OGC, staff and the
community to have a larger discussion on the meaning of open government.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 7:47
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Continued July 20, 2021 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
September 7, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-11-27,13,"""primarily"" in ""primarily used to host.""
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired why the Council would not treat the definition of
youth center the same for Alameda Recreation and Park Department (ARPD) recreation
centers and a martial arts studio on Webster Street.
The Assistant City Attorney responded there is more clarity surrounding the definition of
parks than a martial arts studio.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if ARPD requested their centers be left out of
the definition, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the negative.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if ARPD's protection would be removed by
teaching martial arts, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the negative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if staff modified the State definition of youth center to
include ARPD centers, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if Council could eliminate youth center as a sensitive
use and keep the ARPD centers.
The Assistant City Attorney responded doing so is an option; stated the City would want
to ensure certain federal enforcement priorities are effectuated.
Councilmember Oddie stated the definition could instead read: ""a youth center is a
facility determined by the ARPD to be a recreation center"".
Mayor Spencer inquired what the State's recommendation is regarding distance from
schools, to which the Economic Development Manager responded the State's
recommendation is at 600 feet.
Mayor Spencer inquired what is the City's proposed distance, to which the Economic
Development Manager responded 1000 feet.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether having the language read: ""a facility exclusively used
to host recreational or social activities for minors"" would apply to ARPD, to which the
Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated almost all recreation facilities, park events and
classes are offered to minors and adults; inquired if the criteria is a facility exclusively
used by youth.
The Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative, stated ARPD centers would be
carved out as protected.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there was discussion at a previous
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 27, 2018
11",CityCouncil/2018-11-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-11-30,23,"""streamline and expedite permits for businesses"" on page 27; the process is an ongoing issue
for businesses; people of color and women are not included under the list in Section LU-11 on
page 27; the Section needs to include people of color and women; the list should be
alphabetically; people of color are a historically marginalized population; she is saddened to see
the exclusions; the ""partnerships"" should be listed alphabetically; photos included throughout
the General Plan are mostly white people;, she is saddened to see the images.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she does not disagree with Councilmember Herrera Spencer
regarding Section LU-11; she does not think the list was meant to be inclusive or exclusive; the
Section states: ""interventions that break down barriers to employment pre-historically
marginalized populations such as: youth, seniors, people with disabilities. stated that she
would have added unhoused individuals to the list; the term ""such as"" expands the definition;
she would like to ensure the recommendations provided by Councilmember Knox White would
not hamper the Recreation and Parks Department's ability to pursue outside funding; since
Council has not yet approved the project, the actions listed in the General Plan seem to be
jumping ahead.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated that she does not think adding the term ""support""
would hamper either being lead agency or partner on a grant; the term change still shows the
importance to the City; adding the term is fine.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether removing the actions causes any difficulty.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated that she has come to the discussion late and would
like time to read the details and provide an accurate answer.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the recommendations provided should be considered to have staff
look at all the potential ramifications and implications; staff should report back to Council.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated staff can report back to Council; the
list helps identify high priority matters; there is a way to re-write the policy and indicate support
for efforts with partners; staff can list facilitation of seeking funding or pursue mapping, trash
removal, signage, oil spill, public access structure and additional items; the General Plan is a
policy level document; there has not been much Council discussion about the project; the
General Plan takes a good idea and puts it out in the open.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted the section is listed as ""Conservation Climate Action Element;""
Council has held discussions about conservation and climate action; the description includes:
""protecting and restoring natural habitats to support bio-diversity and to prepare for climate
change is a key goal of the General Plan;"" maps which establish a biological inventory should
be done; expressed support for funding being acquired to help with oil spill booms and
protection of sensitive habitat areas affected by oil spills; proposed language can be modified;
however, she would like to give the Recreation and Parks Director and Planning, Building and
Transportation Director the opportunity to confirm; inquired whether Council can provide
direction to staff.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded that he will need to know whether
Council is adopting the General Plan and asking staff to come back with potential revisions; staff
will return after working through tribal language with the Planning Board; the Transportation
Appendix will be worked on with the Transportation Commission; it will be easiest if the General
Continued November 16, 2021 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 30, 2021
23",CityCouncil/2021-11-30.pdf
PlanningBoard,2017-06-12,2,"#2006012091) in 2006. An Environmental Assessment for the Proposed
Master Plan Amendment has been prepared.
Staff Member Thomas gave a presentation The staff report and attachments can be found
at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3066059&GUID=783D43D9-
ABD6-4E81-B2EC-7E52AF26CCE2&FullText=1
Sean Whiskeman, Catellus, gave a presentation detailing their new master plan
application.
Leslie and Alan Cameron, Bay Ship and Yacht, said they are excited to partner with
Catellus and expand Alameda's working waterfront.
Board Member Curtis asked about the change in the staff report from 300 to 600 units.
Staff Member Thomas said that the original plan for all of Alameda Landing included 300
units. He said the 600 number includes the 287 nearly completed units at the current
phase of Alameda Landing.
Board Member Zuppan asked about the size of the park space.
Staff Member Thomas said it would be 4.5 acres, including 100 feet from the water along
the full length of the residential.
Board Member Burton asked how the plan to keep the two warehouses would affect plans
to reinforce the shoreline infrastructure.
Mr. Whiskeman explained that the Bay Ship portion would have to be repaired if they ever
redeveloped their site.
Board Member Mitchell opened the public hearing.
Brent Aboudara expressed concern about construction and warehouse truck traffic and
parking. He said he is glad the hotel is gone from the plan and is sad to see the reduction
in park acreage.
Nick Ellis said he supports the plan and efforts to develop a blue collar incubator.
Diana Maiden Aiken said she looks forward to enjoying the estuary access. She said we
need a diversity of homes.
Tony Daysog said we should keep the focus on creating jobs. He said Catellus has
benefitted from their overall project and we need to conduct a full EIR to evaluate the
change in traffic impacts caused by new housing.
Approved Minutes
Page 2 of 10
June 12, 2017
Planning Board Meeting",PlanningBoard/2017-06-12.pdf
PlanningBoard,2011-10-10,11,"#22- This Conditional Use Permit PLN08-0479, as amended on October 10, 2011 will be
reviewed by the Alameda Planning Board in six months from the date of these conditions of
approval, as modified and upon the receipt of a verifiable complaint which cannot be
resolved by the Community Development Director on an administrative level. [See
amended resolution attached.]
Motion made to approve the conditions of approval as amended above by Board
member Kohlstrand, seconded by Board member Burton. Approved 5-0.
9-B
Use Permit Annual Review - PLN09-0184 - Applicant - Chengben Wang for
Encinal Terminals - An annual review for compliance with conditions for use of the
property located at 1523 Entrance Road/Buena Vista Avenue commonly referred to
as ""Encinal Terminals"".
Andrew Thomas, Planning Services gave an overview of the Use Permit. He reported that
over the last 18 months there has been some progress on the Master Plan although all
three properties are currently in receivership. It is doubtful that there will be any progress
on the project until the financial issues get resolved. He reported that the City has received
calls inquiring about the properties by potential developers. The City needs to make sure
that there is a viable Master Plan in place for who ever develop the sites, which works given
the economic times.
Board member Zuppan asked if any of the calls regarding the property referenced the
Master Plan documents.
Mr. Thomas stated that all of the calls have inquired as to what the City is willing to consider
on the sites. He also stated that the Chipman site has been zoned for residential and the
tentative map was approved, although it has since expired.
President Ezzy-Ashcraft asked what protection the City has against someone purchasing
the property in foreclosure and developing it as they wish.
Farimah Faiz, Assistant City Attorney, responded that the property is zoned MX and any
potential developer would need to get a Master Plan approved by the City prior to any
development of the sites.
Mr. Thomas stated that there is currently an Interim Use Permit for the Encinal Terminals,
which is good for one more year which allows for a variety of uses.
Motion made to accept the report of compliance by Board member Henneberry,
seconded by Zuppan. Approved 5-0.
9-C
PLN11-0220 - Alameda Point Northwest Territories - Interim Use Permit. The
applicant, San Francisco Regional Sports Car Association is proposing to hold
driver's skill events/autocross events on the Northwest Territories at the most north
western area of Alameda Point. The events would occur on weekends. Staff
requests continuance to the meeting of 10/24/2011.
Page 11 of 12",PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf
LibraryBoard,2011-10-12,1,"$
Minutes of the
ALAMEDA FREE LIBRARY BOARD MEETING
WEDNESDAY, October 12, 2011
The regular meeting of the Alameda Free Library Board was called to order at 6:03 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Suzanne Whyte, Board Member
Michael Hartigan, Board Member
Gail Wetzork, Board Member
Staff:
Jane Chisaki, Library Director
Christina Baines, Recording Secretary
Absent:
Catherine Atkin President
Nancy Lewis Vice President
CONSENT CALENDAR
An asterisk indicates items so accepted or approved on the Consent Calendar
A.
*Report from the Library Director Highlighting Activities for the Month of September 2011.
B.
*Draft Minutes of the Regular Library Board Meeting of September 14, 2011.
C.
*Library Services Reports for the Month of August 2011.
D.
*Financial Report Reflecting FY 10 Expenditures by Fund for September 2011.
E.
*Bills for Ratification for the Month of September 2011.
Board Member Hartigan expressed concern with the decline in checkouts across the board at Main, WEB,
and BFI on the August Service Report. Director Chisaki indicated some rebalancing of the collection is
in the process and with the upgrade of the computer system, the number of floating collections will be
increased and this may improve these numbers.
There being no further comments, Board Member Whyte, seconded by Board Member Wetzork moved
approval of the minutes as presented. The motion was carried by a 3-0 vote.",LibraryBoard/2011-10-12.pdf
LibraryBoard,2010-09-08,1,"$
TERILA
ORATEO
Minutes of the
ALAMEDA FREE LIBRARY BOARD MEETING
September 8, 2010
The regular meeting of the Alameda Free Library Board was called to order at 6:01 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mike Hartigan, President
Suzanne Whyte, Vice President
Catherine Atkin, Board Member
Gail Wetzork, Board Member
Absent:
None
Staff:
Jane Chisaki, Library Director
Marsha Merrick, Recording Secretary
CONSENT CALENDAR
An asterisk indicates items so accepted or approved on the Consent Calendar.
A.
*Report from the Library Director Highlighting Activities for the Months of August and
September 2010. Accepted.
B.
*Draft Minutes of the Regular Library Board Meeting of July 14, 2010. Approved.
C.
*Library Services Reports for the Months of June and July 2010. Accepted.
D.
*Financial Reports Reflecting FY10 Expenditures by Fund for July and August 2010. Accepted.
E.
*Bills for Ratification for the Months of July and August 2010. Approved.
President Hartigan asked why there were no budget dollars in the individual line items; the Finance
Department has not dropped them in yet. Hartigan then asked why the payroll dollars looked so out-of-
whack from one month to the next, almost tripling these expenditures from July to August. Staff will
talk with Finance to see what happened and report back at the next meeting.
Vice President Whyte asked how the book machine was doing. Director Chisaki said it had been having
some issues which the company in Germany fixed, and testing continues. The Library does not yet have
the software that will alert us if the machine is down, but that is coming.
Board Member Atkin proclaimed the End of Summer Reading Ceremony a great success, and thanked
Vice President Whyte for her eloquent remarks. President Hartigan said this is the first time in 8-9 years
that he has missed it.",LibraryBoard/2010-09-08.pdf
GolfCommission,2007-02-11,3,"$1
$1
$0
$0
Juniors Non-Resident*
$8
$10
$8
$2
$0
CART FEES:
Current
Recommended
Change
Single Rider (Non-Shared Cart)
$14
$15
$1
Senior M-F per player
$11
$13
$2
Late Twilight
$9
$10
$1
Mif
$8
MONTHLY PASSES:
Current
Surcharge
Recommended
Surcharge
Change
Res. Sr. (M-Th + Fri (JC only)
$85
$0
$100
$0
8.1.5
Resident (M-Th + Fri (JC only)
$100
$0
$115
$0
$15
Non-Res. (M-Th + Fri (JC only)
$130
$3
$195
$0
$65
TOURNAMENTS:
Current
Recommended
Green Fees
Cart Req
Merch
EF/JC
Cart Req
Merch*
Mon Thurs
$30
no
$6
$50/$48
yes
$5
Mon Thurs (Senior)
$30
no
$6
$38/$36
yes
$0
Friday
$35
yes
$6
$52/$50
yes
$5
Weekends and Holidays
$35
yes
$6
$60/$56
yes
$5
Mif 9-HOLE COURSE RATES:
Current
Recommended
Change
Regular Weekday
$9
$10
$1
Driving Current
Recommended
Change
Regular Weekend
$11
$12
$1
Range
Senior Weekday
$7
$8
$1
Small
$0
$3
$3
Replay Rate
$7
$7
$0
Medium
$4
$5
$1
Junior Resident
$1
$1
$0
Large
I
$6
$7
$1
Junior Non-Resident
$4
$5
$1
X-Large
$8
$9
$1
Practice Area: $5 w/ small bucket
*EF Mon-Fri after 12:00: Weekends &
Holidays after twilight only
** Can be waived
Chuck Corica Golf Complex
Page 3
Revised format only 3/5/07
Golf Commission Minutes",GolfCommission/2007-02-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-05-19,2,"$1,091,000; Encinal: $1,433,000].
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the County has identified items that need to
be fixed, to which Mr. Shemwell responded the County has not come out and identified
items to be repaired; stated the County could come out at any time and direct that any
outstanding compliance issues have to be repaired.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the School District bond measure included
any operational or capital funding for pools, to which Mr. Shemwell responded in the
negative.
Councilmember deHaan stated liability has been discussed; inquired whether both
parties are comfortable regarding liability issues, to which Mr. Shemwell responded in
the affirmative around the particular drain issues.
Following School Board discussion, Councilmember Tam questioned whether slide 3
amounts on operation and maintenance for both swim centers show payments are
closer to a 50-50 split, rather than the agreed upon 60-40 split.
Mr. Shemwell responded the agreement expired in 2000; stated the pools have been
operating on a handshake agreement to continue the 60-40 split; the School District has
taken on utility costs and has been billed for 60% of the City expenses.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the District has paid 47% and the City has paid
53% since the Agreement expired, to which Mr. Shemwell responded in the negative;
stated the School District took on the utilities and has been billed for operational costs in
the last two or three years.
The Recreation and Park Director stated the 60-40 split was occurring for both
operations and utilities until two years ago when the District staff could not determine
whether the meters were separate and agreed to discontinue billing the City for utilities
until the matter could be resolved.
In response to Councilmember deHaan's inquiry regarding the division of use from 3:00
p.m. to 10:00 p.m., the Recreation and Park Director stated figures are based on the
total hours of operations; during the summer, pools are used from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00
p.m.; use is: 25% for School District programs, such as swimming and water polo, 25%
for City programs, such as Swim to Live, and 50% for a variety of non-profits, including
children swim teams and adult masters swim.
The Acting City Manager noted the City sponsored programs are during the summer
and on Saturdays.
Vice Mayor Bonta stated since the City and School District both have 25% of the use
and the remaining 50% is the community, one fair suggestion would be splitting the
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
Board of Education
2
May 19, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-05-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-10-03,5,"$124,310."" Adopted.
(*17-582) Ordinance No. 3190, ""Approving an Amended and Restated Lease and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the
Terms of an Amended and Restated Lease Agreement with Mr. Hi Chi Chen and Mrs.
Lena Muy Chiv, a Married Couple, DBA Hometown Donuts, for 1930 Main Street.""
Finally passed.
(*17-583) Ordinance No. 3191, ""Approving a Grant of Non-Exclusive Easement and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the
Terms of Grant of Non-Exclusive Easement to Alameda Boys & Girls Club and Alameda
Unified School District for Access and Maintenance."" Finally passed.
(*17-584) Ordinance No. 3192, ""Approving a Purchase and Sale Agreement of Building
40, Located at 800 West Tower Avenue at Alameda Point, with Bladium, Inc, a
California Corporation.' Finally passed.
(17-585) Ordinance No. 3193, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code Section 4-4
(Disposable Food Service Ware) to Prohibit Certain Single-Use Plastics such as Straws
and Clarifying Compostable Food Service Ware Requirements.' Finally passed.
Mayor Spencer stated that she left the last meeting on Council business before the
ordinance was introduced; thanked Council for supporting the ordinance.
Expressed support for the ordinance; stated CASA will work with the restaurant
community to transition to compostable take-out packaging: Ruth Abbe, CASA.
Mayor Spencer stated letters were received from Edison Elementary School students in
support of the green efforts.
Councilmember Oddie thanked Mayor Spencer for bringing the referral forward; stated
Thursday at 6:30 p.m. there will be a CASA workshop for updating the City's Local
Action Plan for climate protection.
Mayor Spencer thanked staff for their work.
Councilmember Matarrese moved final passage of the ordinance.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(17-586) Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to the Mayor's Fourth of July
Parade Committee Members, Followed by the Committee Members Presenting a Check
to the USS Hornet.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
October 3, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-10-03.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2016-11-10,4,"$20,000.00 to support parks and health and wellness programs. The Bike for the Parks was also
successful with 531 riders and positive comments from participants. Alameda Rotary gave a lot of
support along with ARPD staff who were the backbone of the event. There were 5 major sponsors that
stepped up and donated to cover the costs and $20,000 was secured from the event.
C. Recreation and Parks Director Report
Parks:
Ball Field Renovation at Krusi Park, fence repair and pruning completed over at Tillman, fence
repaired for access at Sweeney Park, two additional Memorial Benches were installed at Franklin
and Shoreline Parks.
Recreation:
Mayor's Tree Lighting will take place on December 3 at City Hall, sign-ups for Breakfast with Santa
is on December 10 and Santa Home Visits are underway, TGIF and Non School Day Programs
coming up for the Holiday week, Bike for the Parks was extremely successful. A big shout out to the
Gene Oh who was the driving force behind the event, the committee and Friends of the Park
Foundation for raising over $20,000.00 for funding that will go to the Park programs. Women's
Softball league has begun on Friday nights at lower Washington.
Mastick Senior Center:
Mastick's annual Halloween dance was held in the social hall on October 27th at 1:00 PM with an
attendance of 92 Mastick members which was the highest in the past three years. Teens Teaching
Technology is a very popular joint program held by Mastick Senior Center and the Underground
Teen Center where middle school and high school students help seniors with questions they have
about their electronic devices. The Ukulele Jam and Sing-Along was another popular class with 20
members participating. Heavenly Hair at 50 was held by Brandon Stanford and his staff at
Compliments Salon who gave demonstration and tips on how to care for aging hair. The workshop
was successful with an attendance of 40 people and a waitlist of 20.
Projects:
There will be a public meeting at Woodstock Center on December 1st at 6:00 PM to review the three
design concepts for the Woodstock Playground renovation. The Alameda Recreation and Park
Department and Architects has met to create conceptual design specifications for the new Krusi Park
Recreation Building and hope to have the RFP ready to go by early 2017. Estuary Park project is
well underway and hoping to finish early 2017.
Commissioner Limoges was concerned that the Alameda Sun had that the Recreation and Park
meeting was canceled. Pat Russi talked to the editors of the Sun to correct the problem.
ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA:
SET NEXT MEETING DATE: Thursday, December 8, 2016
ADJOURNMENT: Chair Tilos adjourned the meeting at 9:08 p.m.
4",RecreationandParkCommission/2016-11-10.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-10-04,14,"$200,000 and Capital Improvement Projects Fund Budget by $100,000. Introduced.
The Community Development Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired if the Public Art Commission (PAC) made the
recommendations to appropriate $100,000 to Jean Sweeny Public Art and use part of
the $100,000 for maintenance.
The Community Development Director responded in the negative; stated the Council is
the body that appropriates funds; the Public Art Ordinance states that maintenance of
public art is an eligible expense of the public art fund.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the PAC makes recommendations to the
Planning Board.
The Community Development Director responded the PAC expressed interest in the
ordinance being drafted to create a mandatory requirement that money be paid into the
art fund; because of the zoning ordinance, the City cannot dictate how a developer
decides to use the funds; developers have to be given the choice between paying into
the fund or providing art onsite.
Councilmember Daysog inquired if the PAC had input, to which the Community
Development Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether there discussion on how to capture cultural
art.
The Community Development Director responded cultural art should be free and open
to the public; the criteria could be added to the Request for Proposal (RFP) process.
Councilmember Daysog suggested codes could be implemented for people to look up
and see cultural event that happened years ago.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if the Council adopted a Master Plan for Jean Sweeny
Park, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if there was a public art component in the Master Plan,
to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if the estimated cost of the public art component was
$100,000.
The Community Development Director responded the $100,000 is a way to jump start
the public art design and fabrication.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the estimate is for the entire Jean Sweeny
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 4, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-10-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-02-07,12,"$200,000 or $35,000; the resolution is correct in stating that the
matter should be brought to the CIC at the earliest convenience if
the estimated costs exceeds $35,0000.
The General Counsel stated the policy was adopted by the Council on
September 6; noted Page 2, Item #3 states ""Comply with the
Community Improvement Commission Policy regarding Procedures for
Hiring of Special Legal Counsel.
Chair Johnson stated that the policy and resolution state two
different things ARRA may have the same inconsistency the intent
was that matters be brought to the CIC if estimated outside counsel
legal fees are more than $35,000.
Commissioner deHaan stated the Commission would approve the
resolution.
Commissioner Gilmore and Chair Johnson concurred with Commissioner
deHaan.
Commissioner Matarrese stated the ground rule should be that the
matter comes to the appropriate governing body if the estimate is
over $35,000 but General Counsel can spend up to $35,000 per matter
to initiate the process.
Chair Johnson stated that bullet point 1 [General Counsel is
authorized by CIC to spend up to $35,000 per matter from
appropriate project budget without prior CIC approval] should be
omitted; the correction should be made to the ARRA policy also.
Commissioner deHaan moved adoption of the resolution and approval
of the policy with modification to omit bullet point 1 [General
Counsel is authorized by CIC to spend up to $35,000 per matter from
appropriated project budget without prior CIC approval].
Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
AGENDA ITEM
(06-057CC/06-003CIC) Recommendation to accept Quarterly Financial
Report and approve mid-year budget adjustments, including General
Fund reserve policy and infrastructure review.
The Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
The Public Works Director gave a brief update on the December 6,
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
2
Community Improvement Commission
February 7, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-06-28,2,"$230,000."" Adopted.
Councilmember Tam requested an explanation for the urgency to purchase a
replacement disk storage solution.
The Information Technology Manager stated systems have been running on servers
and the EMC Storage Area Network system for a number of years; storage has been
depleted because of email growth and graphics; email is 90% full; messages cannot be
retrieved when a server is out of disc space; disk space has not been increased over
the last six years.
Councilmember Tam stated the staff report notes that the current system does not have
the ability to recover lost information if the system crashes.
The Information Technology Manager stated system backups are stored on unreliable
legacy magnetic tapes; multiple tapes are needed as disk space continues to grow;
space is not available to hold all of the data.
Mayor Gilmore stated storage space is cheap; inquired why the Replacement Disk
Storage Solution is so expensive.
The Information Technology Manager responded the Storage Area Network allows
everyone to share data and provides fault tolerance.
Councilmember Johnson inquired whether the proposed storage platform is the best
price.
The Information Technology Manager responded four proposals were submitted; stated
Compellent, Dell's midrange system, is the fastest growing vendor in the industry; price
is not the only issue; technology is important; Compellent provides options and provides
more disk space for the money; Compellent uses 60% disk drive versus other vendors
using 50%.
Councilmember deHaan inquired what type of on-going support would be needed.
The Information Technology Manager responded the vendor would provide a three-year
warranty; stated training would be provided to allow staff management of many
features.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether a support contract would be needed, to which
the Information Technology Manager responded definitely.
Vice Mayor Bonta inquired how long the City's needs would be met with the proposed
solution.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Community
Improvement Commission and Alameda
2
Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
June 28, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-06-28.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-07-20,23,"$28 million is likely not the correct amount to allocate; the analysis of the sale will drive
the funding amounts; $20 million is too high for the project; dedicating so much of the
ARPA funds toward one project is not going to fly; ; the project's proximity to amenities
makes the Marina Village Inn an asset; Council should not miss the opportunity;
expressed concern about groundwater; stated groundwater is something that cuts
across the City; expressed support for taking advantage of the storm water system.
Vice Mayor Vella expressed support for spending ARPA funding as needed based off
assessments for the Marina Village Inn; stated the project is a good use of funds; equity
is about helping those who need the most; there will be times when significant amounts
of resources will be used in order to have an impact on those who need help; Council
can do something positive with the project; Council has addressed issues related to
budget shortages; further cuts should not be made to services; expressed support for
ensuring the budget is being taken care of; expressed concern about additional budget
cuts; stated that she would like to find a way to maximize the use of ARPA funds for
housing needs; questioned other ways to maximize and assist with housing needs;
stated matters are being discussed at the State level, including UBI; there will be
multiple layers of assistance coming to families and those in need; Council can make
the greatest impact using ARPA funds for housing.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council should think big; ARPA funds have been described
as a once in a lifetime opportunity; outlined the staff report; stated that she agrees with
using ARPA funds to purchase the Marina Village Inn; however, not using $20 million;
different funding sourcs will be incorporated; in addition to federal funding, there will be
money coming in from the State and County which can be used towards operating
costs; outlined a meeting with Alameda Justice Alliance, Transform Alameda and
Alameda Renters Coalition; expressed support for a Alameda Hospital program similar
to the White Bird Clinic, which provides mental health and substance abuse programs
and acts as a respite day center for those needing to get off the street; participants do
not need to be admitted or stay overnight; the City Manager is working with similarly
sized neighboring cities to find funding mechanisms; there is exciting potential for the
City to provide the program and alternative services; the program will help Alameda
Hospital, residents and business centers; there is a pot of money for pilot programs,
such as UBI; funding will be directed towards youth exiting the foster care system;
outlined the foster care exit process; stated UBI can provide assistance; funding can
also be used for pregnant mothers within specific income categories; she supports
investments being made for youths; outlined a Mayor's Conference discussion of a
Stockton's UBI pilot program; stated that she is intrigued by the idea of a community
land trust; the City of Oakland has provided a community land trust along with other
cities; the opportunity arises when distressed or foreclosed property is able to be
purchased by the City and used for affordable housing; she is interested in a community
resiliency hub and would like to receive further information; inquired whether staff has
enough direction from Council.
The City Manager stated sufficient direction has been provided; however, a specific
motion would be helpful.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
July 20, 2021
16",CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf
GolfCommission,2010-01-21,6,"$300 which totals $2,475. Chair Sullwold asked Matt Wisely to convey to
management to make sure employees are having juniors sign the NCGA form for
proper reimbursement.
4-C Update on Golf Complex Finances
Chair Sullwold stated that the financial report had not been received from the City.
Bob Sullwold stated that the Fry and Clark courses were down in rounds and
revenue. For the first six months of the fiscal rounds are down about 11%,
revenue is down roughly $60,000 or 4.5%. The financial performance is worse this
year than last year.
4-D Consideration of Memorial Bench Program for the Golf Complex
Matt Wisely and John Vest have researched concrete benches, and according to
Dale Lillard, the benches that are used at the parks run about $500 or $600. That is
the price just for the bench, not for the plaque. Chair Sullwold asked if they could
get some pictures of the iron wood benches.
5
ORAL REPORTS
5-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
None
5-B
Golf Complex Maintenance activities report by Matt Wisely
Matt Wisely stated that we received over 5 inches of rain since Saturday. Four trees
were lost, two gigantic eucalyptus trees on number one North alongside the pond on
the right hand side, one behind number one green on the Mif, and one leaning on
the driving range on the Mif. He is trying to get on ETA on the second pump that
was removed back in September. There is widespread flooding on the course and
they are trying to get the course back open for the weekend. There is a 50% chance
of rain tomorrow. All the sloughs are backed up and the water is above the rocks on
number five on the North in the fairway. The two trees that fell on number one North
is because the slough between eighteen and one is now passed the cart path.
There may be no carts allowed this weekend. They are constantly moving water
and cleaning debris. The bridge between 15 North and the maintenance yard is
under water. The course was closed today due to possible winds resulting in risks of
trees falling. As of January 1, we have 11 new staff members (four are ex City
employees) and seven new employees. Labor has been cut back due to the
weather. The Par 3 course is being mowed everyday as well as changing the cups
daily. Matt responded to a question from Chair Sullwold regarding the Coastal
Redwoods stating that they cannot handle salt, since they are watered with non-
potable water. An arborist was out and stated the same. The trees are watered
along with the rest of the golf course. He believes that had we had winters like we're
- 6 -
Golf Commission Minutes -Thursday, January 21, 2010",GolfCommission/2010-01-21.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2016-03-24,2,"$33,556 (ECHO/TL)). The Public Services funds available for distribution total $147,812.
He added that, since the Board will not be considering the HFH application and BFWC's
application for rental assistance, and because the remaining five agencies are requesting a total
of $ 129,136, the Board can fully fund the five remaining agencies, and still have an additional
$18,676 to allocate.
President Biggs then introduced the first speaker.
Kate Rosenbaum, Development Associate for Legal Assistance for Seniors (LAS)
Ms. Rosenbaum thanked the city for their level of support, adding that, without it, they would not be
able to offer the level of service they currently provide. They enjoy being a part of the Alameda
community, especially their relationship with Mastick Senior Center. She added that their Executive
Director has initiated discussion with AHA staff, Claudia Young, regarding a future housing project.
She concluded saying that she is available to answer any questions the Board might have.
Patricia Bidar, Director of Development and Communications, Building Futures with Women
and Children (BFWC)
Ms. Bidar began her presentation by thanking the City of Alameda for its on-going support of
BFWC, and that it makes a tremendous difference in their clients lives.
She went on to speak to the withdrawal of their application for rental assistance, stating that BFWC
staff will continues to provide tenant-based rental assistance, and will be inviting the families on
Central Ave., who are being displaced, to a housing workshop. She added that the challenge of
identifying affordable units in which to place their clients is one of the reasons they withdrew their
application.
Ms. Bidar then made a request that the additional CDBG Public Service funds available be added
to
the BFWC grant, and that their scope of work be expanded to include the provision of emergency
housing services.
In conclusion, she shared that the change in how Emergency Solutions Grants State funding for
emergency shelters is now allocated, has resulted in the County receiving much less than they had
received in the past. Last year, funding was allocated based on quality of services, and BFWC
received nearly all of the county's allocation.
Erin Scott, Exec. Dir. Family Violence Law Center (FVLC)
Ms. Scott began by thanking the Board for its support, and for the careful consideration of the
proposals. She added that, from FY 2013 - 14 to FY 2014 - 15, FVLC has seen a 17 percent
increase in the DV calls they receive from Alameda residents. She added that there seems to be
a
reorganization at APD as to how they handled DV calls. In the past, an investigative team would
take the felonies, and the misdemeanors were handled at the patrol level. While FVLC is still written
into the protocol of APD, and still receives all the calls, all the investigation is now being done at the
patrol level. She said that they will watch it very closely, and be in contact with the police
department, to assure that domestic violence is still considered a high priority.
Ms. Scott went on to say that a study at New York University in 2015 showed the positive impact
civil legal assistance has on domestic violence survivors and on the community. Furthermore, civil
legal assistance, which is what is being funded through this CDBG grant, helps reduce domestic
2",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2016-03-24.pdf
GolfCommission,2011-04-20,4,"$470,000. The net available cash balance at the end of March is down to $217,000.
Fortunately, Acting City Manager Lisa Goldman announced that the $300,000 loan
from the Enterprise Fund to ARRA will be repaid before the end of the fiscal year.
She also announced that PILOT and surcharge will be eliminated in fiscal year
2011-12, and that the Cost Allocation amount will be reevaluated.
6.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (Public Comment)
None
7.
OLD BUSINESS
None
8.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Included in the Commission packet was a memorandum to the Finance Department
showing a surcharge payment for March 2011 of $4,000. The year-to-date total to
the General Fund is $67,488 for FY 2010/2011.
9.
ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING'S AGENDA
Status Report on Long Term Lease, Mif Albright Negotiations, and proposal for
Golf Complex reconfiguration by Ron Cowan and Harbor Bay Isle Associates,
including Golf Commission recommendations, if any
Update on Golf Complex Finances
10.
ANNOUNCEMENTS/ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:18 p.m.
The agenda for the meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown
Act.
4
Golf Commission Minutes -Wednesday, April 20, 2011",GolfCommission/2011-04-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-05-20,9,"$504,334 including contingencies, to Redgwick Construction for
Fernside Boulevard bike path and street improvements, San Jose
Avenue to north of Otis Drive, No. P.W. 03-08-10. Accepted.
(
*08-219) Recommendation to set a Public Hearing for delinquent
integrated Waste Management charges for June 17, 2008. Accepted.
(08-220) Resolution No. 14210, ""Approving an Amendment to
Memorandum of Understanding between the Management and Confidential
Employees Association and the City of Alameda for the Period
Commencing January 1, 2005 and Ending December 20, 2008. "" Adopted.
The Human Resources Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson stated Council is very happy that the Management and
Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) consented to enter into
an agreement to extend the existing Memorandum of Understanding for
one year; requested that the Building Official advise who is in
MCEA; stated MCEA came forward before negotiations started.
The Building Official stated MCEA consists of approximately 130
membersi the MCEA is fully aware of the City's revenue issues and
thought that it was important to make the offer to the City; 80% of
the membership was in favor of the recommendation.
Mayor Johnson requested that the Building Official pass on
Council's appreciation.
The Building Official stated that he would be happy to do so.
Councilmember Gilmore moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(*08-221) Resolution No. 14211, ""Intention to Levy an Annual
Assessment on the Alameda Business Improvement Area of the City of
Alameda for Fiscal Year 2008-2009 and Set a Public Hearing for June
3, 2008. "" Adopted.
( *08-222 - ) Ordinance No. 2981, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
by Amending Chapter XIII (Building and Housing) by Creating a Civic
Green Building Ordinance. Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM
(08-223 - ) Resolution No. 14212, ""Implementing the National Incident
Management System (NIMS) as the Official Regulatory Guidance for
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
May 20, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-05-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-06-01,16,"$593 per square foot for a 2500 square foot house ends up with a house priced at
$1,347,000; EPS started with the all residential bucket at $582,000, as opposed to the
single family bucket at $666,000, which ends up with a price of $1,462,000 for a 2500
square foot single family house using the EPS methodology; EPS estimates that the
average premiums at Alameda Point to be 1% of sale price; the SunCal estimate is
6.4%; explained the basis for SunCal's estimate; stated SunCal disagrees with the 1%;
regarding absorption, SunCal is not opposed to changing to the City and EPS's
recommendation; if the City wants to take a slower absorption, it is fine with SunCal; for
single family construction costs, SunCal estimates $115 versus EPS's estimate of $130;
explained the basis for SunCal's estimate; further stated another area that has been
discussed is what should be anticipated as the real growth in home prices over time;
SunCall's pro forma includes 2% starting in 2012; ESP recommends 1.4%; both sides
have gone back and forth over the analysis; long term construction cost trends range
from -0.7% to 0.5%; SunCal included a 0% real price growth; all of SunCal's prices are
increased by CPI throughout the term of the project; there have been some clear
mistakes in the EPS methodology as to price; EPS's premium analysis is simple;
SunCal has done a lot more research on direct construction costs; regarding SunCal's
Albuquerque, New Mexico project with D.E. Shaw being put into bankruptcy, it is fair to
say any large real estate player, particularly in residential, has struggled in the past
several years; assets have gone through a devaluation; SunCal and its partners have
been severely hurt; in the Albuquerque example, $180 million in D.E. Shaw and
SunCal's combined equity is in danger of being lost, which is an unfortunate
circumstance that is part of the price and risk of working in development; the good news
is D.E. Shaw continues to invest along side of SunCal and to express faith that SunCal
will go forward, as evidenced by the continuing investment in the Alameda process in
terms of the millions of dollars spent to date; SunCal would like to complete the process;
a project that the Council, Planning Board, citizens, D.E. Shaw and SunCal could be
proud of will be presented to Council for consideration in the next 18 months to two
years; SunCal looks forward to the opportunity to complete the process.
Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated the question is whether there
would be sufficient funding to pay for public amenities and community benefits
envisioned in the Master Plan; the answer is yes as demonstrated by two EPS pro
formas delivered to the City on April 8th and April 26th; the density bonus option pro
forma was sent to the Deputy City Manager - Development Services on April 26, 2010;
inquired whether the pro forma was incorporated in the staff report.
The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded the pro forma is an
attachment to tonight's staff report.
Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired why staff has a different
conclusion than SunCal regarding the density bonus option pro forma relating to
payment of public amenities.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Alameda
Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and
5
Community Improvement Commission
June 1, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-06-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-08-19,7,"$700,000 deficit; stated a fee structure that would totally
eliminate the deficit was never examined.
Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the increase in play over the last
five months could offset any potential decline as a result of the
proposed fee increases.
The Interim Golf Manager responded the increase in rounds was from
the short course and was a direct result of fee reductions; stated
the downward trend will continue for the next couple of years; the
economy is in tough shape; further stated the original surcharge
was not earmarked for capital improvements, but went back into the
General Fund.
The City Manager stated the original surcharge was established in
1991.
Councilmember Matarrese requested a progress report for the last
two months, including revenues and rounds by course; further
requested continual tracking; stated that he would like to approve
the increases, see how things go, and review the real numbers when
the RFP's come back.
The Interim Golf Manager stated that reports are provided to the
Golf Commission each month; reports can be forwarded to Council.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the $700,000 shortfall had a
write-off of $400,000 [in golf cart savings)
The Interim Golf Manager responded $400,000 is not included in the
next few years; some of the money should be made back; the monthly
golf cart lease payment would go to the vendor in the next three
years.
Jon Hasegaw, Alameda, stated that he is against the fee increase;
more people will come back to play if the fee is reduced.
Mayor Johnson inquired what is the cost per round based on
operations, to which the Interim Golf Manager responded just under
$39.00.
Mayor Johnson stated almost everyone is paying less than the cost
per round.
The Interim Golf Manager stated there are other revenue sources
such as golf cart rentals and restaurant concessions; golf cart
rentals generate approximately $20,000 per year.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
August 19, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-11-07,5,"$750,000 Each, to the Following: BKF, HEI, and Schaaf & Wheeler for On-Call Civil
Engineering Consulting Services. Accepted.
(*18-610) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a One-
Year Contract Amendment, with the Option of Three One-Year Extensions, for an
Amount not to Exceed $150,000 Each, for a Total Five Year Expenditure not to Exceed
$750,000 Each, to the Following: Baseline Designs, Inc., Habitat Engineering &
Forensics, Inc., JMEC Engineering, and Oakley & Oakley for On-Call Structural
Engineering Consulting Services. Accepted.
(*18-611) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a
Contract in the Amount Not to Exceed $5,299,614, Including Contingency, to McGuire
and Hester for the Cross Alameda Trail -Ralph Appezzato Memorial Parkway
Improvements, No. P.W.03-18-11. Accepted; and
(*18-611A) Resolution No. 15452, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2018-19 Capital Projects
Fund Budget for the Cross Alameda Trail (Main to Constitution) Project by $1,794,060
from Various Funding Sources."" Adopted.
(*18-612) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a Three-
Year Agreement in an Amount Not to Exceed $500,000 with Centro Legal de la Raza
for Tenant Legal Services. Accepted; and
(*18-612A) Resolution No. 15453, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2018-19 General Fund
Budget of the City Attorney's Office to Appropriate the Remaining $400,000 for Tenant
Legal Services. Adopted.
(18-613) Adoption of Resolution Amending Previous Authorization of a Portion of the
City Base Allocation and Required Match Amount for Site A/Eden Affordable Senior
Project and Affordable Family Project for Application to County Rental Housing
Development Fund. Not heard.
(18-614) Resolution No. 15454, ""Declaring November 11 through 17 United Against
Hate Week in the City of Alameda, in Conjunction with the Alameda Unified School
Board and other Bay Area Cities."" Adopted.
Expressed gratitude to staff for the consideration of the item; stated the proposed
material would benefit from alternate language being considered: Rasheed Shabazz,
Alameda.
Mayor Spencer requested the first line be struck; stated the proposed language comes
from other cities; the intent is to focus on being a nation of immigrants.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the first line is worth striking.
Mayor Spencer outlined the new text.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
November 7, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-11-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-10-17,3,"(
*06-518) Resolution No. 14029, ""Authorizing the Purchase of Two
New Type-3 Fire Ambulances Using the North County Fire Protection
District's Competitive Bid Award and Approving a Purchase Agreement
with Leader Industries in an Amount Not to Exceed $268,925.29.
Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(06-519) Public Hearing to consider a General Plan Amendment
(GP05-0001) to remove a 4.6-acre portion from the 10-acre planned
Estuary Park in the MU-5 (Specified Mixed Use - Northern
Waterfront, Willow Street to Oak Street), and rezoning (R05-003)
for properties located at 2241 and 2243 Clement Street from M-2
General Industrial (Manufacturing) District to R-4/PD Neighborhood
Residential/Planned Development Combining District in order to
allow for residential development of up to 242 dwelling units. The
properties are located north of Clement Street, west of Oak Street,
and adjacent to the Dakland-Alameda Estuary. Applicant Francis
Collins dba Boatworks and
(06-519A) Introduction of Ordinance Rezoning Portions of Property
Located at 2241 and 2243 Clement Avenue from M-2, General
Industrial (Manufacturing) District to R-4, Neighborhood
Residential and PD, Planned Development Combining District (R-
4/PD). Introduced.
The Supervising Planner provided a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing.
Proponents (In favor of General Plan Amendment) : Robert McGillis,
Philip Banta Associates Architecture (provided handout) ; Greg
Harper, Attorney for Applicant.
Opponents (Not in favor of General Plan Amendment) : Joseph Woodard,
Estuary Park Action Committee (EPAC) (provided handout) ; Dorothy
Freeman, EPAC; Sue Field; Alameda Jay Ingram, Alameda; Deb Greene,
EPAC; Doug Siden, East Bay Regional Park District; Jon Spangler,
Alameda: Jason Snyder, Alameda.
***
ouncilmember Daysog left the dais at 8:26 p.m. and returned at
8:28 p.m.
***
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public
portion of the hearing.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
October 17, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-05-16,6,"( *06-264) Resolution No. 13956, ""Amending the Management and
Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) Salary Schedule by
Establishing the Salary Range for the Classification of Web
Technical Producer. "" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
( 06-265) Resolution No. 13957, ""Appointing Jeanette L. Copperwaite
as a member of the Film Commission. (Historic Experience Seat)
Adopted;
(06-265A) Resolution No. 13958, ""Appointing Kenneth I. Dorrance as
a member of the Film Commission. Realty/Property Management
Professional Seat) Adopted;
(06-265B) Resolution No. 13959, ""Appointing David J. Duffin as
a
member of the Film Commission. "" (Film/Video Industry Seat) Adopted
(06-265C) Resolution No. 13960, ""Appointing Liam Gray as a member
of the Film Commission. (Arts/Cultural Seat) Adopted;
(06-265D) Resolution No. 13961, ""Appointing Orin D. Green as a
member of the Film Commission. "" (Film/Video Industry Seat) Adopted
(06-265E) Resolution No. 13962, ""Appointing Patricia A. Grey and a
member of the Film Commission. (Film/Video Industry Seat) Adopted;
(
06-265F Resolution No. 13963, ""Appointing Tamar Lowell as a
member of the Film Commission. (Water/Marina Based Experience
Seat) Adopted; and
(06-265G) Resolution No. 13964, ""Appointing Theatte (Teddy) B.
Tabor as a member of the Film Commission. (Community-at-Large
Seat) Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented certificates of
appointment to Film Commission members.
Mayor Johnson announced that Allison Bliss is the Chamber of
Commerce representative, Tricia Collins-Levi is the West Alameda
Business Association representative, and Robb Ratto is the Park
Street Business Association representative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
May 16, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-08-01,3,"( *06-387) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings
held on July 18, 2006, and the Special City Council Meetings held
on July 20, 2006 and July 26, 2006. Approved.
(*06-388) Ratified bills in the amount of $8,054,736.54
(*06-389) Recommendation to adopt Specifications and authorize Call
for Bids for the Purchase/Lease of two greens mowers, two reel
mowers, one tractor, five electric utility vehicles, one sweeper,
and one self powered aerator. Accepted.
(*06-390) Recommendation to amend Agreement with Masayuki Nagase to
modify the dates of deliverables for Library Art Work for the New
Main Library Project. Accepted.
(*06-391) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code by Deleting Section 2-63.10, Third Party Claims, and by Adding
a New Section 2-65, Disposition of Property Consisting of Sections
2-65.1 through 2-65.5, to Article V, Administrative Policies and
Procedures Introduced.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(06-392) Public Hearing to consider Introduction of Ordinance
Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Article XVIII
Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Wood Frame One and Two
Story Residential Structures to Chapter XIII (Building and
Housing) Introduced.
The Building Official gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether upgrades would be required
for hazardous plumbing, mechanical, electrical, and fire/life
safety systems, to which the Building Official responded in the
affirmative.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired what was the rationale for a flat
fee, to which the Building Official responded a flat fee would
provide an incentive to homeowners.
Vice Mayor Gilmore opened the public portion of the hearing.
David Kirwin, Alameda, stated multiple units should be included in
the proposed program; he fears that seismic retrofitting would
become mandatory; the 88,000 housing units referenced by the
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) already have survived
more than a 6.9 magnitude earthquake on the Hayward Fault.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
August 1, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-08-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-01-18,3,"(*05-035) Public Hearing to consider Amendment to Zoning Map to
rezone approximately 7,800 square feet (1/5 acre) at 1410 Everett
Street, APN 070-170-15, from R-5 Hotel Residential to C-C Community
Commercial and
(*05-035A) - Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map to
Designate APN 070-170-15, Approximately One-Fifth Acre, from R-5
Hotel Residential to C-C Community Commercial, on Central Avenue at
Everett Street. Continued to February 1, 2005.
(*05-036 - ) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning
Board's denial of Variances, V04-0006, 0007, 0008 and 0010, and
denial of Major Design Review, DR04-0026, for all development
projects at 3017 Marina Drive; and adoption of related resolution.
The site is located within an R-1, Single-Family Residential Zoning
District. The development project includes expansion of the
residence into the estuary and installation of rear yard decks.
Approval is being sought for the following: 1) Variance to AMC
Subsection 30-4.1(d) (3) (Maximum Main Building Coverage exceeding
48%) i 2) Variance to AMC Subsection 30-4.1(d) (7) and Section 30-2
(Rear Yard) because the building extends across the rear property
line into the estuary 3) Variance to AMC Subsection 30-5.7(a)
(Roof Eaves) and 30-5.7(d) (Bay Windows) because the roof leaves
above the bay windows encroach to within 3 feet from the side
property line and bay windows are not permitted to encroach into
side yards; 4) Variance to AMC Subsection 30-5.7(c) (1) (Rear Yard) ,
Subsection 30-2 (Definitions) (Yard-Rear) and Subsection 30-
4. 1 (d) (7) (Rear Yard) because decks over 36-inches in height extend
into the required side and rear yard setbacks 5) Variance to AMC
Subsection 30-5.14(c) (Barrier Heights) because the windscreens
around the patios exceed the maximum permitted - -foot height. The
Planning Board found that the Variance for the bay window
encroachment be withdrawn because encroachment is in compliance,
subject to Design Review approval. Applicant/Appellant: Rita
Mohlen. To be noticed for a later date.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
( (05-037) Resolution No. 13811, ""Opposing the Proposed Lower Lake
Rancheria-Koi Nation Casino in the City of Oakland. "" Adopted.
Michael John Torrey, Alameda, stated that it is important to make
sure that the Rancheria-Koi Nation does not get the land trust.
Melody Marr, Alameda Chamber of Commerce, stated that the Chamber
supports the Resolution; submitted a packet of information from the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
January 18, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-02-15,2,"(*05-075) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report
for the second calendar quarter of 2004. Accepted.
( *05-076) Resolution No. 13815, ""Appointing an Engineer and an
Attorney for Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2. ""
Adopted.
(*05-077) Resolution No. 13816, ""Appointing an Engineer and an
Attorney for Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 (Marina Cove) .
Adopted.
(*05-078) Resolution No. 13817, ""Amending the International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Salary Schedule by
Establishing a Salary Range for the Position of Inventory Control
Clerk. "" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(05-079) Resolution No. 13818, ""Appointing Dennis J. Hanna as a
Member of the Social Service Human Relations Board.' Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented Mr.
Hanna with a Certificate of Appointment.
(05 -080 - ) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code to Increase the Composition of the Golf Commission from Five
to Seven Members by Amending Subsections 2-9.1 (Commission Created;
Composition), 2-9.2 (Membership; Appointment; Removal) and 2-9.3
(Voting) of Section 2-9 (City Golf Commission). Introduced.
Mayor Johnson stated that she suggested the membership increase
because there is a lot of upcoming activity at the golf course,
including the new clubhouse; having two more members would help
with the workload; the Golf Commission Chair supports the idea.
The Interim City Manager stated the golf course has become a large
operation; the golf budget is over $5 million; there will be major
changes at the golf course that require financial overview in the
next few years.
Councilmember deHaan stated the Transportation Commission was
lowered from nine to seven members; the Recreation and Park
Commission has five members; inquired whether the membership of the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
February 15, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,2,"(*05-201) Recommendation to authorize Call for Bids for Legal
Advertising for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2006. Accepted.
(*05-202) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Investment Report
for period ending March 31, 2005. Accepted.
(*05-203) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Financial Report
for the period ending March 31, 2005 and approve third quarter
budget adjustments. Accepted.
(*05-204) Recommendation to set Hearing to establish Proposition 4
Limit for Fiscal Year 2005-06 for May 17, 2005. Accepted.
(*05-205) Recommendation to accept the work of SpenCon
Construction, Inc. for Repair of Portland Cement, Concrete
Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway and Minor Street Patching Phase 5,
Fiscal Year 2004-05, No. P.W. 08-04-08. Accepted.
( *05-206) Recommendation to approve an Agreement with Alameda
County to continue participation in the Alameda HOME Consortium and
authorize the Acting City Manager to negotiate and execute
necessary documents. Accepted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
05-207) - Resolution No. 13836, ""Appointing Ray A. Gaul as a Member
of the Golf Commission. Adopted.
(05-207A) Resolution No. 13837, ""Appointing Bill T. Schmitz as a
Member of the Golf Commission. "" Adopted.
(05-207B) Resolution No. 13838, ""Appointing Jane Sullwold as a
Member of the Golf Commission. Adopted.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented certificates of
appointment to the Golf Commission members.
(05-208 ) Ordinance No. 2940, ""Reclassifying and Rezoning Certain
Property within the City of Alameda by Amending Zoning Ordinance
No. 1277, N.S., from R-5 (General Residential) Zoning District to
C-C (Community Commercial) Zoning District, for that Property
Located at 2507 Central Avenue at Everett Street. Finally passed.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-17,4,"(*05-232) Recommendation to accept Quarterly Sales Tax Report for
the Period Ending March 31, 2005 for sales transactions in the
Fourth Calendar Quarter of 2005. Accepted.
( *05-233) Recommendation to adopt Specifications and authorize Call
for Bids for one animal control vehicle. Accepted.
(*05-234) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and
authorize Call for Bids for Cyclic Sewer Repair Project, Phase 4,
No. P.W. 05-03-11. Accepted.
(05-235) Recommendation to authorize installation of an All-Way -
Stop Control at the intersection of Santa Clara Avenue and Sherman
Street.
Don Patterson, Alameda, stated that he opposes the four-way stop
sign; the Transportation Technical Team (TTT) did not address the
real problem of why Sherman Street is operating as a major
thoroughfare; the General Plan Traffic Element's goal and intent is
to have a transportation plan with traffic controls and techniques
that direct and keep traffic on major streets; questioned how the
City can make decisions without the advice of a professional
traffic engineer on staff; stated said position has been vacant
since October 2003; urged Council to direct the Acting City Manager
to hire a traffic engineer suggested the application be withdrawn;
noted the individual who filed the application has not participated
in any of the public hearings and must not be very serious about
the request stated the stop sign should only be addressed in the
context of a total transportation plan, not a band-aid approach
that would only exacerbate the problem by moving traffic faster
along Sherman Street.
Stanton Scott, Alameda, stated that he has witnessed many accidents
at the intersection; increased traffic has become more aggressive;
that he supports some form of traffic controls; stop signs would be
good.
Mary Amen, Alameda, stated that she represents a group of Santa
Clara Avenue residents who are opposed to the stop sign; she
gathered signatures in the four blocks directly affected; the
residents would like the City to implement traffic calming devices
before deciding to have 7000 cars a day stop in front of homes,
including 12 buses per hour; accident statistics dropped to one per
year after the City addressed visibility issues; buses and cars
travel at 40 miles per hour (mph) during peak times; cross traffic
could pass safely if cars traveled at the 25 mph speed limit; the
U.S. Department of Transportation and CalTrans guidelines indicate
stop signs should not be used for speed control; the Police
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
May 17, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-17,10,"(*05-239) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code to Increase the Composition of the Recreation and Park
Commission from Five to Seven Members by Amending Subsections 2-7.2
(Membership; Appointment ; Removal). 2-7.3 (Qualification: Voting of
Section 2-7 (City Recreation and Park Commission) Introduced.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(05-240 ) Public Hearing to establish Proposition 4 Limit
(Appropriation Limit for Fiscal Year 2005-06; - and
(05-241) Resolution No. 13944, ""Establishing Appropriations Limit
for Fiscal Year 2005-06. Adopted.
Councilmember Daysog moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(05-242) Public Hearing to consider collection of Delinquent
Business License Fees via the Property Tax Bills.
Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing.
Huong Anh Silver, SOS Urethane Foam Roofing, stated the company has
been closed since 1996 and does not have a contractor license.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether Ms. Silver contacted the Finance
Department, to which Ms. Silver responded in the affirmative;
stated the Finance Department stated paperwork was not adequate and
SOS Urethane Foam Roofing has been listed in the telephone book.
Sherman Silver, SOS Urethane Foam Roofing, stated that he shut down
the roofing company ; that he is keeping his license with the State
contractors board until he dies; he removed the sign in his front
yard tonight; outlined his medical condition; stated he is not
roofing anymore.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether Council could vote on the rest and
hold over SOS Roofing to allow staff to take a closer look, to
which staff responded in the affirmative.
In response to Mr. Silver's question about review of his materials,
Mayor Johnson stated the Finance Director would review everything.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public
portion of the Hearing.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
May 17, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-10-18,2,"(*05-502) Resolution No. 13902, ""Approving and Adopting the
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Overall Annual Goal of
11% for Federal Fiscal Year 2005-2006. "" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(05-503) Resolution No. 13903, ""Appointing Avonnet M. Peeler as a
Member of the Civil Service Board. Adopted;
(05-503A) Resolution No. 13904, ""Appointing Audrey M. Lord-Hausman
as a Member of the Commission on Disability Issues. "" Adopted; and
(05-503B) Resolution No. 13905, ""Appointing Janet W. Iverson as a
Member of the Historical Advisory Board. (Landscape Architect,
Architect, Building Design Seat). "" Adopted.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented Ms. Peeler with
a certificate of appointment.
05-504) Recommendation to approve the proposed change in roof
color for the Alameda Free Library - New Main Library Project, No.
P.W. 01-03-01.
The Project Manager gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the architect recommended a roof
color.
The Project Manager responded that the architect favored the
lighter gray, but would be comfortable with either gray; stated the
lighter gray has more reflectivity and would keep the structure
cooler.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Library Building Team (LBT) had
a strong color preference.
The Assistant City Manager responded that the darker gray color was
the LBT's unanimous selection.
Councilmember Matarrese requested a report outlining items removed
through value engineering; requested a run down of cost
differences; stated that copper roofs are extremely durable;
inquired whether the proposed roof would have yearly maintenance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
October 18, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-10-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-03-21,3,"(*06-146) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and
authorize Call for Bids for installation of rubberized sidewalks,
No. P. W. 02-06-05. Accepted; and
*06-146A) Resolution No. 13935, ""Authorizing Open Market Purchase
Pursuant to Section 3-15 of the Alameda City Charter for Rubberized
Sidewalks. Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(06-147 ) Ordinance No. 2947, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
by Adding a New Subsection 30-5.7 (M) (Extensions of Roof Pitch and
Roof Ridges) to Section 30-5.7 (Projections from Buildings and Roof
Planes, Permitted Encroachments and Treatments of Minimum Required
Yards) of Chapter XXX (Development Regulations) to Add a Process
for Allowing Additions to Existing Dwellings with Nonconforming
Height. Finally passed.
Councilmember deHaan moved final passage of the ordinance.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese stated that the ordinance
recognizes the work of the Task Force.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice
vote - 4. [Absent: louncilmember Daysog - 1.
]
(06-148) - Public Hearing to consider Zoning Amendment R 05-0002 to
add a Planned Development overlay to a property located within the
R-4 (Neighborhood Residential) Zoning District and to consider
Parcel Map, PM 06-0001, to allow the division of an existing 14,602
square foot residential lot into two parcels, each with an existing
detached duplex. The project site is located at 1810 and 1812
Clinton Avenue;
(06-148A) Introduction of Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning
Certain Property Within the City of Alameda by Amending Zoning
Ordinance No. 1277, N.S., from R-4 (Neighborhood Residential)
Zoning District to R-4-PD (Neighborhood Residential Planned
Development) Zoning District for that Property Located at 1810 and
1812 Clinton Avenue. Introduced; and
(06-148B) Resolution No. 19336, ""Approving Parcel Map PM 06-0001 to
Allow the Division of a 14,602 Square Foot Parcel into Two Lots at
1810/1812 Clinton Avenue. "" Adopted.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
March 21, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-03-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-09-05,3,"(*06-434) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report
for the Period Ending March 31, 2006. Accepted.
( *06-435) Recommendation to amend the Consultant Agreement with
Consolidated Construction Management extending the term, scope of
work and price for the Alameda Free Library, New Main Library
Project, No. P.W. 01-03-01. Accepted.
( (*06-436) Recommendation to reject Bids for the Modular
Recreational Building and Site Improvements at Washington Park.
Accepted; and
(*06-436A) Resolution No. 14006, ""Authorizing Open Market
Negotiation of Contract Pursuant to Section 3-15 of the Alameda
City Charter for the Modular Recreational Building and Site
Improvements at Washington Park, No. P.W. 05-06-17, and Authorizing
the City Manager to Enter into Such an Agreement for $650,000,
Including a 10% Contingency. Adopted.
(06-437) Resolution No. 14007, ""Authorizing Open Market Purchase of
Twelve Vehicles from Good Chevrolet, Alameda in an Amount Not to
Exceed $251,230.00. Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the staff report indicates the
alternate fuel vehicle policy was considered but alternate fuel
vehicles are not recommended; inquired whether the use of mini
pickups was analyzed; stated a mini pickup was used for a recent
dedication ceremony and an electric flatbed could have been used.
The Public Works Director responded use is reviewed and discussed
with departments; stated the Recreation and Parks Director
indicated a flatbed could not have been used at the dedication
ceremony based on bed size; the vehicles being replaced carry
equipment, tools, parts and chemicals for pool maintenance, which
could not be accommodated by the size of the electric flatbed.
Public Works mini trucks travel outside of the City; the most
reliable electric flatbeds on the market only travel 25 miles per
hour, which would not work for travel out of Alameda.
Councilmember Matarrese requested that the level of detail provided
by the Public Works Director be included in staff reports in the
future; inquired whether diesel fuel was evaluated for the one ton
dump trucks and three quarter ton pickup trucks.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated
diesel is more expensive, which is one reason diesel was not
selected; that he is working on converting three existing vehicles
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
September 5, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-11-14,2,"(*06-538) Recommendation to appropriate in the General Fund the
2006-2007 Citizen's Option for Public Safety Program (COPS AB 3229)
Grant Funding in the amount of $144,820 to enhance frontline police
services. Accepted.
(06-539 - ) Resolution No. 14031, ""Setting Free All-Day Parking for
the Park Street and the West Alameda Business Districts on All
Saturdays Between Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day."" Adopted.
The Development Services Director requested that the Resolution be
amended to include the Saturday following Thanksgiving similar to
the request last year.
Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the Resolution as amended by
the Development Services Director.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the meters in front of the High
School would be included.
The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative;
stated all metered parking would be free.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
( *06-540) Resolution No. 14032, ""Superceding and Rescinding
Resolution No. 13277 Designating the Person to Perform the Duties
of the City Manager in the Event of His/Her Absence or Disability.
Adopted.
( *06-541) Resolution No. 14033, ""Resolution Approving Revised
Memorandum of Understanding Between the International Brotherhood
of Electrical Workers (IBEW) and the City of Alameda for the Period
Commencing January 1, 2005 and Ending December 31, 2008. "" Adopted.
(*06-542) Resolution No. 14034, ""Resolution Approving Revised
Executive Management Compensation Plan for the City Clerk,
Assistant City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Human Resources
Director and the Executive Management Team Commencing June 25, 2006
and Ending June 23, 2007. Adopted; and
( *06-542A) Resolution No. 14035, ""Resolution Approving Revised
Salary and Establishing a Five-Day Workweek Alternative Option with
Corresponding Salary for the Classification of Fire Chief.""
Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM
Adjourned Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
November 14, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-11-14.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-11-21,9,"(*06-557) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,446,282.87.
( *06-558) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report
for the period ending June 30, 2006. Accepted.
(*06-559) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Investment Report
for the period ending September 30, 2006. Accepted.
( *06-560) Recommendation to execute a Five Year Contract in the
amount of $200,609.04 to John Deere, Inc. for the lease of two
greens mowers, two reel mowers, one tractor and five electric
utility vehicles. Accepted.
(*06-561) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and
authorize Call for Bids for Citywide Sewer Mains and Laterals Video
Inspection, No. P.W. 10-06-21. Accepted.
(*06-562) Resolution No. 14036, ""Approving Parcel Map No. 8891
(2201 Harbor Bay Parkway) . "" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(06-563) Resolution No. 14037, ""Appointing Margaret A. Hakanson as
a Member of the Commission on Disability Issues. "" Adopted;
(06-563A) Resolution No. 14038, ""Appointing Joy Pratt as a Member
of the Housing Commission. Adopted;
(06-563B) Resolution No. 14039, ""Appointing Joseph S. Restagno as a
Member of the Recreation and Park Commission. "" Adopted;
(06-563C) Resolution No. 14040, ""Appointing Jonathan D. Soglin as a
Member of the Social Service Human Relations Board. Adopted;
(06-563D) Resolution No. 14041, ""Appointing Srikant Subramaniam as
a Member of the Transportation Commission. Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath to Markaret A. Hakanson, Joy
Pratt, Jonathan D. Soglin and Arikant Subramaniam and presented
certificates of appointment.
(06-564) Recommendation to appropriate $107,200 in Measure B
Paratransit Funds to renew the Holiday Shuttle and purchase
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
November 21, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-11-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-02-20,9,"(*07-087) Ordinance No. 2963, ""Repeal the Existing Time Limit for
Incurring Debt in the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project. ""
Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(07-088) Resolution No. 14072, ""Appointing Walter Schlueter as a
member of the Housing Commission. Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented a certificate of
appointment to Mr. Walter Schlueter.
Mr. Schlueter stated that he looks forward to serving on the
Housing Commission.
(07-089) Public Hearing to consider Parcel Map No. 9286, (1900,
1910, 1920, 1930, 1950, 1960, and 1980 North Loop Road) to merge
six existing parcels into five parcels with each parcel
accommodating new flexible use building (warehouse, distribution,
light manufacturing and administrative office) The site is located
within the Harbor Bay Business Park in the C-M-PD, Commercial
Manufacturing, Planned Development Zoning District; and
(07-089A) Resolution No. 14073, ""Approving Parcel Map 9286 (TM 06-
0005) for the Purpose of Establishing Five Commercial Lots Located
at 1900-1980 North Loop Road. Adopted.
The Planning and Building Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese stated good progress has
been made; he looks forward to having commercial, non-retail
development since the Quarterly Sales Tax report shows a decrease
in business-to-business taxes.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the area is parceled out.
The Planning and Building Director responded the Ferry Terminal
area is still undeveloped.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
February 20, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-05-15,3,"(*07-231) Resolution No. 14089, ""Approving a Second Amendment to
the Agreement for Additional Funding from the State of California
Coastal Conservancy to Implement Spartina Eradication and
Mitigation Measures and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into
All Associated Agreements. Adopted.
(*07-232) Resolution No. 14090, ""Accepting $138,000 in Fiscal Year
2007-2008 - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Funds for the
Signal Coordination and Interconnect for Eighth Street, Park
Street, and Otis Drive Projects. Adopted.
(*07-233) Resolution No. 14091, ""Authorizing Open Market Purchase
from Moss Brothers Dodge, Riverside, California Pursuant to Section
3-15 of the Alameda City Charter for One Dodge Charger in an Amount
Not to Exceed $23,470. Adopted.
(*07-234) Resolution No. 14092, ""Authorizing the City Manager to
Complete and Execute a Cooperative Agreement Between the City of
Alameda and the State of California Department of Transportation
for the Stargell (Formerly Tinker) Avenue Extension Project (CIP
No. 04-105/CalTrans Project No. EA448200) Adopted.
(*07-235) Resolution No. 14093, ""Resolution of Intention to Levy an
Annual Assessment on the Alameda Business Improvement Area of the
City of Alameda for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 and Set a Public Hearing
for June 5, 2007 ""
Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(07-236)
-
)
Public Hearing to consider a Call for Review/Appeal of
the Planning Board's appointment of an Ad Hoc Committee to work
with the Planning and Building Director on a Housing
Element/Measure A Workshop.
The Planning and Building Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing.
Proponents (In favor of Appeal) : former Councilmember Barbara Kerr,
Appellant; Pat Bail, Appellant Dr. Alice Challen, Appellant; Diane
Coler-Dark, Appellant; Jim Sweeney, Appellant; former Councilmember
""Lil"" Arnerich, Appellant; ""Lil"" Arnerich for Norma Arnerich,
Alameda; former Councilmember Barbara Thomas, Appellant Robert
Pardee, Alameda Dorothy A. Freeman, Alameda; Joseph Woodard,
Alameda; Susan Battaglia, Alameda; Eric Scheuermann, Alameda; David
Howard, Action Alameda; Scott Brady, Alameda; Ashley Jones,
Alameda; Len Grzanka, Alameda; Nita Rosen, Alameda; Noel Folsom,
Alameda; Robert Rodd, Alameda; Robert Todd, Alameda: and Mercedes
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
May 15, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-05-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-06-05,2,"(*07-252) Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of
$320,000, including contingencies, to McNabb Construction, Inc. ,
for Godfrey Park Playfield Renovations, No. P. .W. 03-07-06.
Accepted.
(*07-253) Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of
$250,368, including contingencies, to Golden Bay Construction,
Inc. , for the replacement of curb, gutter, and related improvements
to address Street Ponding Citywide, No. P.W. 02-07-04. Accepted.
(*07-254) Recommendation to allocate $100,000 in Sewer Funds and
award Contract in the amount of $1,935,000, including
contingencies to Gallagher & Burk, Inc. for the repair and
resurfacing of certain streets, Phase 27, No. P.W. 04-07-17.
Accepted.
( (07-255) Recommendation to set a Public Hearing for delinquent
Integrated Waste Management charges for July 17, 2007.
louncilmember deHaan stated that he is not sure whether tying
delinquent bills to property taxes is the best wayi he has
requested that the City Manager look into the cost related to the
City overseeing the process.
Councilmember deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(07-256) Recommendation to reject bids for the Ford Crown Victoria
Police Interceptors, adopt new Specifications, and authorize Call
for Bids for two marked Dodge Charger Police vehicles.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he wants to ensure that the Police
Department is completely comfortable with the Dodge Charger and
compromises are not being made.
The Police Captain stated a lot of time was spent reviewing both
the Crown Victoria and Dodge Charger platforms the Crown Victoria
package will be phased out; Dodge is re-entering the market; a
number of agencies have purchased the Dodge Charger; the Police
Department is satisfied that the Dodge Charger meets the
requirements; the vehicle will be evaluated and tested to see
whether the Police Department will continue with the Dodge
platform.
Councilmember Matarrese commended the Police Department ; stated the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
June 5, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-06-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-06-19,3,"(*07-290) Ordinance No. 2966, ""Containing a Description of the
Community Improvement Commission's Program to Acquire Real Property
by Eminent Domain in the Alameda Point, Business and Waterfront,
and West End Community Improvement Project Areas. Finally passed.
(*07-291) Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 14106,
""Approving Parcel Map PM06-0002 to Allow the Division of an
Existing 14,400 Square Foot Residential Lot into Four Parcels at
471 Pacific Avenue The property is Located in a R-4-PD,
Neighborhood Residential Planned Development Zoning District.
Applicant : William De Mar. "" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(07-292) Public Hearing to consider Certification of a Final
Environmental Impact Report and approval of Northern Waterfront
General Plan Amendment (GPA 07-0002) and Citywide Childcare
Policies: General Plan amendment to designate approximately 110
acres of northern waterfront industrially designated properties to
a specified mixed-use designation and adopt certain general plan
policies to guide the future development of the area, guide future
development citywide, and guide decisions regarding childcare
citywide. The Northern Waterfront project area is generally
bounded by Sherman Street on the west, Buena Vista Avenue on the
south, Grand Street on the east, and the Oakland/Alameda Estuary on
the north; and
(07-292A) Adoption of Resolution Certifying the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the Northern Waterfront General Plan Amendment
(State Clearinghouse #2002102118)
;
( (07-292B) Adoption of Resolution Making Findings Regarding
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Making Findings
Concerning Alternatives, Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program and Adopting a Statement of Overriding
Considerations in Accordance With the California Environmental
Quality Act for the Northern Waterfront and Child Care Policy
General Plan Amendment (State Clearinghouse #2002102118) ; and
( (07-292C) Adoption of Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment,
GPA07-0002 General Plan Amendments to: (A) Amend the General Plan
Land Use Diagram to Change the Designation of Approximately 110
Acres Within the Northern Waterfront to Specified Mixed Use and
Medium Density Residential, and (B) Amend Sections and Associated
Tables of the General Plan. Continued to July 17, 2007.
(07-293 - ) Resolution No. 14107, ""Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute an Agreement to Allow the City of Alameda to Participate as
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
June 19, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-10-16,2,"(*07-500) Resolution No. 14148, ""Approving the Development Plan and
Time Schedule for the Sewer System Management Plan as Adopted by
the State Water Resources Control Board. "" Adopted.
(07-501) - ) Resolution No. 14149, ""Approving the Prioritized List of
Projects for Consideration in the 2008 Countywide Transportation
Plan. "" Adopted.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the prioritized list includes bike
and pedestrian projects.
The City Engineer responded bike projects are included in the
City's Bike Plan; stated a certain amount of money is allocated to
each of the planning areas and is applied to bike projects; the
Cross Alameda Trail Project is included in the Countywide Bike
Plan.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Plan has a list of prioritized
projects.
The City Engineer responded projects are prioritized through the
Congestion Management Agency (CMA); stated Alameda has
approximately 12% of the high priority projects and has less than
3% of the total East Bay Area projects.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether Council would be approving the
City's list of priorities tonight.
The City Engineer responded Council would be approving the projects
that would go on the Countywide Transportation Plan, not the Bike
Plan.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Cross Estuary Project is
included on the [County's list.
The City Engineer responded in the negative; stated the Bike Plan
will be coming to Council in the next year or so; Council will have
the opportunity to look at projects within the City Bike Plan; a
list will be forwarded to the County once the City's Bike Plan is
prioritized.
Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
( *07-502) Resolution No. 14150, ""Authorizing Open Market Purchase
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
October 16, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-10-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-01-02,2,"(*08-005) Recommendation to approve Amendment No. One to the
Agreement between the Navy and the City for conveyance of the Fleet
Industrial Supply Center (FISC) property attaching as a new
""Exhibit J"" a Memorandum of Agreement among the Navy, City and
Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (PAC) allowing PAC to carry out
remediation of the FISC property in order to construct the Alameda
Landing Development. Accepted.
(*08-006) Resolution No. 14163, ""Approving an Amended Boundary Map
for Community Facilities District No. 03-1 (Bayport Municipal
Service District) Adopted.
(*08-007) Resolution No. 14164, ""Approving Revised Part-Time
Classifications Salary Schedule Effective January 1, 2008. ""
Adopted.
(*08-008) Ordinance No. 2977, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
by Adding Section 4-4 to Article I (Littering and Maintenance of
Property) of Chapter IV (Offenses and Public Safety) to Prohibit
Polystyrene Foam Food Service Ware and Amending Section 1-5.6 of
Chapter I (General) to Authorize Additional City Employees to Serve
as Code Enforcement Officers. Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(08-009) - Resolution No. 14165, "" Appointing Michelle Blackman as a
Member of the Youth Commission. "" Adopted;
(08-009A) Resolution No. 14166, ""Appointing Hannah Bowman as a
Member of the Youth Commission. "" Adopted;
(08-009B) Resolution No. 14167, ""Appointing Jordon Flores as a
Member of the Youth Commission. "" Adopted;
(08-009C) Resolution No. 14168, ""Appointing Ilya Pinsky as a member
of the Youth Commission. Adopted;
(08-009D) Resolution No. 14169, ""Appointing Anguli Sastry as a
Member of the Youth Commission. "" Adopted
( 08-009E) Resolution No. 14170, ""Appointing Priscilla Szeto as a
Member of the Youth Commission. Adopted;
(08-009F) Resolution No. 14171, ""Appointing Ben Ulrey as a Member
of the Youth Commission. Adopted; and
Regular Meeting
2
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-01-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-02-05,3,"(*08-053) Recommendation to approve the Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement for the City Attorney. Accepted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(08-054) - Resolution No. 14183, ""Setting a Greenhouse Gas Reduction
Goal of 25% Below the 2005 Baseline Level, Adopting the Local
Action Plan for Climate Protection, and Dissolving the Climate
Protection Task Force. Adopted.
The Supervising Planner gave a Power Point Presentation.
Stanley Schiffman, Climate Protection Task Force Chair, read a
letter outlining the Climate Protection Task Force recommendations;
urged Council to adopt the resolution.
The Supervising Planner summarized the Climate Protection Task
Force recommendations.
Proponents: Bill Smith, Alameda; David Burton, Climate Protection
Task Force Member; Stanley Schiffman, Climate Protection Task
Force.
Councilmember deHaan stated Assembly Bill 32 requires a reduction
in greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020; inquired what
was the 1990 level.
Mr. Schiffman responded the level is lower now because the former
Naval Base closed.
Councilmember deHaan inquired how Assembly Bill 32 mandates would
intertwine [with the Local Action Plan].
The Supervising Planner responded Assembly Bill 32 is an emissions
reduction for the State and will be implemented by the Air
Resources Board; stated nothing will be seen until 2009; 2005 was
chosen as the baseline because data was available; 1990 data is not
available.
Councilmember deHaan stated that many of the priorities are every
day staff actions; questioned whether some priorities would require
additional staff time; stated that he would like to see
accountability for funding requirements.
The Supervising Planner stated staff would come back with funding
sources during the next budget cycle; currently, staff is
negotiating with a consultant on sustainable and green building
ordinances.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council Meeting
3
February 5, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-02-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-03-04,2,"(*08-096) Ratified bills in the amount of $6,452,067.26.
(*08-097) Recommendation to approve amendments to existing
Professional Services Agreements with Lamphier Gregory and Harsh
Investment Realty for the evaluation of potential environmental
impacts associated with the proposed expansion of the Alameda Towne
Centre. Accepted.
( (*08-098) Recommendation to allocate $860,522 from Fund 310.1 Fleet
Industrial Supply Center Catellus Traffic Mitigation Fee for the
construction of Bayport traffic mitigation improvements at Ralph
Appezzato Memorial Parkway and Webster Street, Constitution Way and
Mariner Square Drive. Accepted.
(*08-099) Resolution No. 14186, ""Approving the Power Purchase
Agreement between Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) and
Western GeoPower, Inc., for the Purchase of Power from a New
Geothermal Power Plant at a Fixed Price of $98.00/MWh Over an
Initial 20-Year Term and Authorize the General Manager to Execute
the Third Phase Agreement for Members of NCPA to Participate in the
Proposed Project. "" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
( 08-100) Recommendation to consider an appeal of the
Transportation Commission's decision to install parking
restrictions at the existing westbound bus stops on the northerly
side of Encinal Avenue at the intersection of Mound Street.
The Program Specialist II gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired how many parking spaces would be
removed by red curbing the Mound Street bus stop, to which the
Program Specialist II responded three.
Councilmember deHaan inquired how many riders use the bus stop.
The Program Specialist II responded five people board and three
people get off at the Encinal Avenue and Mound Street bus stop per
day.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether any safety issues were
addressed; further inquired whether there are any problems with
where buses stop now.
The Program Specialist II responded that he has not heard of any
complaints.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
March 4, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-03-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-03-18,2,"(*08-115) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,004,609.80
( *08-116) Recommendation to accept the work of SpenCon
Construction, Inc. for the first amendment to Agreement for the
Fiscal Year 2005-2006 repair of portland cement concrete sidewalk,
curb, gutter, driveway, and minor street patching, Phase 7, P.W.
03-06-06. Accepted.
(*08-117) Recommendation to approve the Proposition 1B Local
Streets and Roads Funding Proposal for Fiscal Year 2007-2008,
allocate $61,000 in Congestion Management Agency Transportation
Improvement Plan Funds, and authorize the City Manager to execute
all necessary documents. Accepted.
(08-118) Recommendation to address rent increases and maintenance
concerns at 101, 123, and 127 Crolls Garden Court.
Vice Mayor Tam inquired what is the status of the code violations.
The Planning and Building Director responded outstanding items
include defective rain gutters, several hairline cracks on two
interior windows, and interior dry rock under the rug of one unit;
fire code issues include patching sheetrock in the water heater
closets; removing storage under the stairways cleaning lint from
dryer vents; and providing proof of five-year service on private
fire hydrants.
Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether there has been any success in
getting the property owner to the mediation table with the tenants.
The Housing Development Manager responded the Rent Review Advisory
Committee (RRAC) met on December 3, 2007 and in January 2008 to
review the matter ; stated the owner did not attend either meeting
and has not responded to the RRAC's recommendations.
Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the property owner was here
tonight, to which the Housing Development Manager responded in the
negative.
Mandy Olson, Alameda, stated that the mold in her apartment was
never properly cleaned; the soft boards in public walkways have not
been fixed; rain gutters are falling apart.
Winter Ladue, Alameda, stated her heater and stove were replaced
after the compliance date; interior repairs have not been made; her
unit has dry rot on the outside.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
March 18, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-03-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-04-15,4,"(*08-162) Ordinance No. 2980, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
by Adding Section 3-53 (Claims) to Division VIII (Refunds and
Corrections) to Chapter III (Finance and Taxation) to Establish
Uniform Requirements and Procedures Applicable to the Presentation
and Processing of Claims for Money or Damages with the City of
Alameda That Are Not Currently Covered by State Law or Other
Provisions of the Alameda Municipal Code.' Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
( 08 - 163 ) Public Hearing to consider a recommendation to adopt the
Fiscal Year 2008-2009 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Action Plan and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute
related documents, agreements, and modifications.
The Community Development Program Manager gave a Power Point
presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired how much money would be going to the Blight
Buster program, to which the Community Development Program Manager
responded $180,000.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether other funding sources are available
for said program since Alameda Point is on federal property.
The Community Development Program Manager responded the City is
passing demolition costs on through the Development Agreement.
The Development Services Director stated demolition costs would be
passed on to the developer once the former Base is developed.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether funds would be advanced and then
Regular Meeting
4
Alameda City Council
April 15, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-04-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-06-03,2,"(*08-239) Recommendation to allocate $1,210,409 in Proposition 1B
Local Streets and Roads Funds, and award a Second Amendment to the
Contract in the amount of $2,965,000, including contingencies, to
Gallagher & Burk, Inc., for the repair and resurfacing of certain
streets, Phase 28, No. P.W. 04-08-12. Accepted.
(*08-240) Recommendation to accept the work of Bay Line Concrete,
Cutting, Coring, and Drilling, Inc. for the Grand Street Bridge and
Ballena Boulevard Bridge Repair and Resurfacing, No. P.W. 11-06-24.
Accepted.
(*08-241) Recommendation to accept the work of Golden Bay
Construction, Inc. for the replacement of curb, gutter, and related
improvements to address street ponding Citywide, No. P. . W. 02-07-04.
Accepted.
(*08-242) Recommendation to accept the work of Power Engineering
Contractors, Inc. for the Grand Street Sewer Pump Station, No.
P.W. 04-07-16. Accepted.
( (*08-243) Resolution No. 14214, ""Approving a Third Amendment to the
Agreement for Additional Funding from the State California Coastal
Conservancy in an Amount up to $57,000 to Implement Spartina
Eradication and Mitigation Measures, and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute All Associated Agreements and Documents. ""
Adopted.
(*08-244) Resolution No. 14215, ""Requesting and Authorizing the
County of Alameda to Levy a Tax on All Real and Personal Property
in the City of Alameda as a Voter Approved Levy for the General
Obligation Bonds Issued Pursuant to a General Election Held on
November 7, 2000. "" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(08-245) Public Hearing to consider collection of delinquent
business license fees via the property tax bills.
The Finance Director provided an updated list and a brief
presentation.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the amount of uncollected
business license fees is typical, to which the Finance Director
responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether reimbursement comes from the
County, to which the Finance Director responded in the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
June 3, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-06-17,3,"(*08-267) Resolution No. 14218, ""Authorizing the City Manager to
Submit a Request and Execute All Required Agreements and Documents
to the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency for the
Transportation for Clean Air Grant Applications, in the Amount of
$315,000 for the Signal Coordination and Transit Signal Priority
Along Constitution Way Between Mariner Square Drive and Atlantic
Avenue. Adopted.
(*08-268) Resolution No. 14219, ""Amending Resolution No. 9460 to
Reflect Current Positions and Entities to be Included in the City
of Alameda's Conflict of Interest Code and Rescinding Resolution
No. 14094. "" Adopted.
(08-269) - Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code by Amending Subsection 8-26. 1 (Use of Coasters, Roller Skates,
and Similar Devices Restricted) of Section 8-26 (Coasters, Skates,
Etc. ) of Chapter VIII (Traffic, Motor Vehicles, and Alternative
Transportation Modes) and Subsection 23-1.3 (Riding of Bicycles and
Skateboards in Parks, Etc. ) of Section 23-1 (Parks and Squares) of
Chapter XXIII (Parks, Recreation Areas and Public Property) to
Expand the Prohibition to Include Skateboards and Their Use in City
Owned or Leased Property, Buildings or Structures Unless Authorized
by Subsection 23-1.3. Introduced.
Vice Mayor Tam stated that the intent of the ordinance to address
skateboarding in the parking structure makes a lot of sense; her
concern is that there might be some unintended consequences that
would prevent bicyclists from riding to the parking garage racks or
across a parking lot; inquired whether there is some way to isolate
skateboarding concerns in parking structures owned by the City.
The City Attorney responded that there was never an intent to stop
bicyclists from riding through the parking structure in order
secure bikes at racks or lockers; stated the ordinance does not
create a prohibition until a sign is posted; an exception could be
made regarding riding a bicycle to or from a locker or rack within
the parking garage.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the proposed ordinance would
prohibit riding a bicycle in any public park, playground, school
property, City parking lot or parking structure; bicyclists would
not be able to get to racks or lockers behind the Library or
parking structure; an exception should be made for bicyclists going
to racks or lockers: inquired whether bicycles are governed by the
rules of the road, and skateboards are not.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
June 17, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-08-05,3,"(*08-324) Ratified bills in the amount of $9,112.893.30
(*08-325) Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of
$511,680, including contingencies, to Golden Bay Construction, Inc.
for repair of Portland cement concrete sidewalk, curb, gutter,
driveway, and minor street patching, Fiscal Year 2008-2009 Phase
9, No. P.W. 05-08-13. Accepted.
( *08-326) Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of
$211,543, including contingencies, to D&D Pipelines, Inc. for
Woodstock storm drain improvements, No. P.W. 06-08-18. Accepted.
(*08-327) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and
authorize Call for Bids for pruning of City trees for Fiscal Year
ending June 30, 2009, No. P.W. 07-08-20. Accepted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(08-328) - Resolution No. 14254, ""Appointing Leslie Krongold as a
Member of the Commission on Disability Issues. Adopted; and
(08-328A) Resolution No. 14255, ""Appointing Donna Milgram as a
Member of the Economic Development Commission (Community-at-Large
Seat) "" Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent : Councilmember Gilmore - 1. ]
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented Ms.
Krongold and Ms. Milgram with certificates of appointment.
(08-329) Public Hearing to consider an appeal of the Planning
Board's denial of a variance and Major Design Review to build first
and second-story covered decks at the rear of an existing four-unit
apartment building located at 2243 Santa Clara Avenue within the R-
6, Hotel Residential Zoning District; and
(08-329A) Resolution No. 14256, ""Overturning the Planning Board's
Decision to Deny Major Design Review and Variance (PLN07-0020) -
Allowing the Construction of a Two-Story Covered Deck Located Seven
Feet and Three Inches from the Rear Property Line at 2243 Santa
Clara Avenue. Adopted.
The Planning Services Manager gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
August 5, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-08-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-08-19,3,"(*08-351) Recommendation to appropriate $46,600 in Dwelling Unit
Tax monies to Rittler Park irrigation and field renovation
improvements, No. P.W. 11-07-34. Accepted.
(*08-352) Resolution No. 14260, ""Approving Final Map and Accepting
Associated Dedications and Easements for Tract 9689 (Esplanade). .
""
Adopted.
(*08-353) Resolution No. 14261, ""Approving Street Names for the
Grand Marina Project. Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(08-354) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning
Board's Conditional Approval of a Major Design Review for an
Addition and a Remodel that Includes Raising a Single-Family
Structure and Constructing a Detached Two-Story Dwelling Unit at
3327 Fernside Boulevard, Within the R-2, Two-Family Residential
Zoning District; and adoption of related resolution. Withdrawn.
(08-355) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning
Board's denial of a Variance and Major Design Review to build an
868 square foot hobby woodworking structure at 1607 Pearl Street /
2622 Edison Court, within the R-1, One Family Residence District;
and adoption of related resolution. Withdrawn.
(08-356) Recommendation to adopt the Alameda Theatre Community Use
Policy and Fee Schedule.
The Redevelopment Manager gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson stated the Theatre is an unusual facility for the
City to have and is even more unusual because there is a Theatre
operator; minimum attendance should be 400 or 500 people; the ""O""
Club could be used for 200 people; the Theatre should not be closed
down for an event for 200 people; staffing should be set at a
minimum level; the level could be increased based on the event;
staffing should be provided by the Theatre; the security deposit
needs to be higher for non-profits; the Theatre should not be made
available to non-profits seven days a week; days and hours should
be restricted; that she does not like the idea of first-come,
first-serve; a prioritization process should be in place; local
government and the School District should have first priority; the
Theatre could be available to non-profits if there are days left
over; non-profits should have to complete an application and
selection process.
The Redevelopment Manager stated staff discussed a prioritization
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
August 19, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-10-21,2,"(*08-444)
Recommendation to accept the Annual Report for the
Managed Investment Portfolio for Fiscal Year 2007-2008. Accepted.
(*08-445) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and
authorize Call for Bids for Signal Coordination on Eighth Street,
Otis Drive, and Park Street/San Jose Avenue, No. P.W. 01-08-03.
Accepted.
(*08-446) Resolution No. 14277, ""Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute the Grant Contract Between the State of California
Department of Boating and Waterways and the Alameda Police
Department. Adopted.
(*08-447) Resolution No. 14278, ""Approving an Agreement with
Ameresco Butte County LLC for the Purchase of Power from Landfill
Gas Generation for a 20-Year Term. Adopted.
(*08-448) Resolution No. 14279, ""Recommending Opposition to
Proposition 7."" Adopted.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(08-449) Discuss the principles and framework for the potential
cuts to balance the City's Fiscal Year 2009-1 budget.
The City Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the meeting.
Tony Santare, Mastick Senior Center Advisory Board (submitted
comments) ; Ewart A. Wetheral, Mastick Senior Center (submitted
comments) ; Barry Christensen, Mastick Senior Center; Jim Thomas,
Mastick Senior Center; Virginia Fierro, Mastick Senior Center;
Arlene Talbot, Alameda; Patricia Meier, Alameda: Olga Crowe,
Alameda; Domenick Weaver, Alameda Firefighters (submitted study) ;
Albert J. Hahane, Residents for Cardinal Point; Ken Gutletsen,
Alameda; Robbie Dileo, Alameda Museum; Chuck Millar, Alameda
Museum.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public
portion of the meeting.
Councilmember Matarrese stated decisions will not be made on
potential cuts tonight that he would like Council to give
direction on policy standards to provide measurement and flattening
and restructure the organization, which have been addressed at
prior budget hearings; cuts should be made farthest away from the
Regular Meeting
2
Alameda City Council
October 21, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-10-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-12-16,2,"(*08-534) - Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on
November 18, 2008; the Special City Council Meeting held on
November 25, 2008; the Special Joint City Council and Alameda Reuse
and Redevelopment Authority Meeting held on December 2, 2008.
Approved.
(*08-535) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,218,632.51.
(*08-536) Recommendation to accept the Impact Fee Report for Police
and Fire services (Fund 161) . Accepted.
( *08-537) Recommendatior to accept the work of Gallagher & Burk,
Inc. for the repair and resurfacing of certain streets, Phase 28,
No. P.W. 04-08-12. Accepted.
(
*08-538) Recommendation to accept the annual report for the Public
Art Fund as required by the Public Art Ordinance. Accepted.
(*08-539) Resolution No. 14291, ""Authorizing the City Manager to
Enter into a Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Alameda and
the State of California Department of Transportation for Funding
the Realignment of the Path at the North Side of the Bay Farm
Island Bicycle Bridge in the amount of $40,000."" Adopted.
(*08-540) Resolution No. 14292, ""Approving an Amendment to the
Memorandum of Understanding Between the Alameda City Employees
Association and the City of Alameda for the Period Beginning
January 1, 2009 and Ending December 31, 2009. "" Adopted.
***
Mayor Johnson called a recess at 8:36 p.m. and reconvened the
Regular Meeting at 9:12 p.m.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(08-541) The City Manager and Deputy City Manager discussed federal
stimulus funding.
Mayor Johnson stated the U.S. Conference of Mayors is pushing for
funding to go directly to cities; Trenton, New Jersey is applying
for funding to help convert city buildings into green buildings.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the report is good and
comprehensive; requested that the report be posted to the website.
The Deputy City Manager stated the unfunded Community Improvement
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
December 16, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-12-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-04-07,3,"(*09-132) Resolution No. 14320, ""Authorizing the Acting City
Manager to Submit an Application for Measure B Paratransit Funding
for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 and to Execute All Necessary Documents to
Implement the Project. Adopted.
(*09-133) Resolution No. 14321, ""Authorizing the Acting City
Manager to Submit a Request to the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2009/2010
Transportation Development Act, Article 3 Funding, in the Amount of
$68,000 to Fund the Local Match for the Safe Routes to School
icycle/Pedestrian Improvement Projects and Authorize the Acting
City Manager to Execute All Necessary Documents. "" Adopted.
( *09-134) Ordinance No. 2992, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
by Adding Section 24-10 (Cost Recovery for Recurring Calls for
Service to Respond to and/or Abate Properties Due to Specified
Conditions or Owner Neglect) to Chapter XXIV (Public Health) . ""
Finally passed.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(09-135) Mayor Johnson welcomed Interim City Manager Ann Marie
Gallant.
(09-136) The Fire Chief discussed the recent fire at the
Old Navy Hospital and Supply Depot.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated the community has concerns regarding the
ashes; requested an analysis be completed.
The Fire Chief stated that the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District (BAAQMD) sampled the air and did not find any asbestos or
lead in the air; debris has not been sampled; asbestos is not
airborne, does not burn, and is not in the smoke.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the BAAQMD or County Health
Department could post the results.
The Fire Chief responded that he would consult with the BAAQMD ;
stated BAAQMD furnished raw data but the data was not interpreted.
Councilmember Tam stated posting results would be helpful for the
sake of disclosure.
The Fire Chief noted the City Watch system needs to be updated.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City pays for the system, to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
April 7, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-04-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-05-05,3,"(*09-176) Recommendation to authorize Call for Bids for Legal
Advertising for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2010. Accepted.
(*09-177) Recommendation to award a Contract in the amount of
$495,000 to Harris & Associates for Construction Management
Services for the Webster Street/Wilver ""Willie"" Stargel] Avenue
Intersection Project, No. P. W. 10-08-26. Accepted.
(*09-178) Recommendation to award a Contract in the amount of
$145,670, to Bellecci and Associates for Engineering Construction
Support for the Webster Street/Wilver ""Willie"" Stargell Avenue
Intersection Project, No. P.W. 10-08-26. Accepted.
(09-179) Recommendation to approve reopening the Mif Albright
Course and authorize the expenditure of $50,000 in associated
expense from the Golf Budget.
Speakers: James Leach, Alameda; Sherry Sherman, Alameda: Norma
Arnerich, Alameda; Rita Albright-Scott, Alameda.
Vice Mayor deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(*09-180) Resolution No. 14327, ""Endorsing EveryOne Home, the
Alameda Countywide Homeless and Special Needs Housing Plan.""
Adopted.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
( 09 -181 - ) Status Report on Neighborhood Library Improvement Projects
The Library Director gave a presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired when construction would start for the second
branch library, to which the Library Director responded July or
August 2010.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether bids would go out now, to which the
Library Director responded bids would go out at the same time for
both branches.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the West End and Bay Farm Island
library usage remained the same after the Main Library re-opened.
The Library Director responded initially usage dipped because
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
May 5, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-05-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-06-16,3,"(*09-248) - Ordinance No. 2996, ""Approving and Authorizing the
Sale of the Remnant Parcel at the Northeast Corner of the
Intersection of Ron Cowan Parkway and Harbor Bay Parkway and
Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute All Necessary
Documents. Finally passed.
( *09-249) Ordinance No. 2997, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code by Deleting Chapter XX (Flood Damage Prevention) and Adding
a New Chapter XX (Flood Plain Management) to Meet the
Requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Flood Insurance Program and Approve Updated Flood Insurance Rate
Maps. "" Finally passed.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(09-250) The Fire Chief provided a briefing on a recent
structure fire.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether fire fighters returned
to the scene because the fire re-ignited.
The Fire Chief responded the fire rekindled in the roof area at
approximately 3:00 a.m.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired what equipment returned to the
scene.
The Fire Chief responded that he assumes a full first response
team returned; further stated the building was fully involved
[the first time fire fighters responded] i adjacent homes are
very close in proximity; fire fighters did a commendable job
protecting other structures.
Mayor Johnson inquired when initial responders left the scene.
The Fire Chief responded that he left the scene at approximately
8:30 p.m.; stated the crew left at midnight or so.
Councilmember Tam inquired how the less injured fire fighter is
doing.
The Fire Chief responded the fire fighter was wearing gloves but
grabbed an iron hand railing and received second degree burns to
the palm of the hand through the glove.
Regular Meeting
3
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-11-03,5,"(*09-436) Resolution No. 14396, ""Authorizing the Interim City
Manager to Enter into an Agreement with the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District for Carl Moyer Program Grants to Replace Two
Ferry Vessel Diesel Engines, Conduct an Open Market Purchase of Two
Ferry Vessel Diesel Engines and Two Diesel Generators Pursuant to
Section 3-15 of the Alameda City Charter, and Execute All Necessary
Documents. Adopted. [Contract: Valley Power Systems)
(*09-437) Resolution No. 14397, ""Adopting the City of Oakland's
Deficiency Plan for State Route 185, Acknowledge that the
Implementation of the Deficiency Plan will be Monitored Biennially
by the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency as Required by
State Law, and that the Schedule and Progress for Implementation of
the Deficiency Plan will be Considered as Part of the Annual
Conformity Requirements for the Congestion Management Program.
""
Adopted.
(09-438) Resolution No. 14398, ""Authorizing the Interim City
Manager to Modify the Measure B Para transit Program for Fiscal
Year 2009-2010 and Make the Appropriate Revenue and Expenditure
Budget Adjustments Based on the Proposed Changes. "" Adopted.
Speaker : Former Councilmember Barbara Kerr.
Mayor Johnson stated staff is working very hard to make the Para
transit Program known; Former Councilmember Kerr's ideas are good.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the fiscal year 2009-2010
Premium Taxi Service budget would not be changed.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated
Council would review any possible changes next year; having only a
few months of shuttle service data is not sufficient; a year of
data is needed to measure the success of the shuttle service.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether inquired why Meals on Wheels
is not anticipated to be an ongoing component of the City's Para
transit Program.
The Public Works Director responded the Alameda County
Transportation Improvement Authority (ACTIA) has concerns regarding
whether some of the programs are reaching the Para transit
community; stated some programs will need to be revised in order to
support the shuttle service on an extended basis; Meals on Wheels
would be discontinued if the shuttle service continues.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the City has funded Meals on
Wheels for two years, to which the Public Works Director responded
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 3, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-11-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-11-17,2,"(*09-460 ) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,435,478.11.
( *09-461) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Treasurer's
Report for the Period Ending September 30, 2009. Accepted.
(09-462) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report
for the Period Ending June 30, 2009.
Vice Mayor deHaan inquired why taxable sales transactions
decreased 21% from the same quarter in the prior fiscal year.
The Interim City Manager responded not every quarter has the
same number of weeks; stated the decline is a trickle down of
the recession; the last sales tax report was much better because
the report reflected the Christmas holiday sales quarter.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether other jurisdiction comparisons
could be provided in the future, to which the Interim City
Manager responded in the affirmative.
In response to Councilmember Tam's inquiry, the Interim City
Manager stated the City needs more aggressive business
development ; sales tax may not be performing well but property
taxes are doing very well compared to other cities.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Vice Mayor deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(*09-463) Recommendatior to Appropriate $750,000 in State Water
Resources Control Board Grant Funding and $50,000 in Urban
Runoff Funds, and Award a Contract in the Amount of $549,450,
Including Contingencies I to Power Engineering Contractors for
the Installation of Mechanical Trash Racks at Stormwater Pump
Stations, No. P.W. 08-09-23. Accepted.
( *09-464) Recommendation to Authorize the Replacement of Alameda
Fire Department Command Vehicle through the State of
California's Contract Bid Process and the Purchase of Ancillary
Equipment, Total Cost Not to Exceed $100,000. Accepted.
( *09-465) Resolution No. 14400, ""Amending Resolution No. 9460 to
Reflect Current Positions and Entities to be Included in the
City of Alameda's Conflict of Interest Code and Rescinding
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
November 17, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-11-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-12-15,3,"(*09-504) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,023,008.98.
( *09-505) Recommendation to Accept the Special Tax and Local Bond
Measure Annual Report. Accepted.
(*09-506) Recommendation to Accept the Police and Fire Services Fee
Report. Accepted.
(09-507) Recommendation to Accept the Annual Report for the Public
Art Fund as Required by the Public Art Ordinance.
In response to Councilmember Matarrese's inquiry regarding
administrative costs, the Planning Services Manager stated the
amount is the cost for staff to support the Public Art Commission.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether money would be spent on
art; stated that he does not recall seeing the Public Art Plan,
which is supposed to be updated annually.
The Planning Services Manager responded there have been discussions
regarding updating the Plan and the Public Art Ordinance; stated
Commissioners are working to identify a piece of public art, but
are having trouble finding a location.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the ordinance requires an
Annual Plan, to which the Planning Services Manager responded that
he would have to check.
Councilmember Matarrese questioned why the fund is being drawn down
without producing public art.
Mayor Johnson stated that she does not recall that staffing was to
be paid for out of the Public Art Fund.
The Interim City Manager stated Community Development staffs the
Commission; staff time would have to be charged to a fund that has
challenges; the ordinance requires reporting out on the cash in the
fund; Council can request that more details be provided.
buncilmembers Matarrese stated the fund is being drawn down
without delivering art.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether staffing costs would still occur
with or without art projects, to which the Planning Services
Manager responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the issue would be reviewed, to
which the Interim City Manager responded in the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
December 15, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-12-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-02-03,3,"(*10-048) Resolution No. 14415, ""Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney for
Maintenance Assessment District 01-1 (Marina Cove). "" Adopted.
(*10-049) Resolution No. 14416, ""Approving a Revised Memorandum of Understanding
Between the Alameda Police Managers Association and the City of Alameda for the
Period of January 6, 2008 Through February 27, 2010.' Adopted.
(*10-050) Resolution No. 14417, ""Designating Alameda as a Preserve America
Community and Authorizing the Submission of an Application for Preserve America
Grant Funding."" Adopted.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(10-051) 24/7 Residential Property Managers for Large Multi-Family Housing
Complexes
The Building Official gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Johnson stated the State requirements seem fine; a lot of fire calls are received
for situations that should be handled by building managers; State requirements could be
put into effect by a certification on the business license; Fire Department protocols
should include having a building manager meet the Fire Department on site for non-
emergency calls.
Councilmember Gilmore stated a fine has been implemented for non-emergency calls;
that she would like to know how the fine is working; determining whether the fine is
enough and is a deterrent should be reviewed.
Mayor Johnson stated that she hopes the fines are having an impact on reducing
maintenance calls to the Fire Department; the City should have contact information for
both on-site and off-site managers.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the Municipal Code conforms with the State and does
not need to be changed; ensuring that multiple unit buildings have a business license,
certified contact information for on-site managers, and posted contact information for
smaller units is a step in the right direction.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he has a concern with communication procedures
between departments.
The Deputy City Manager stated that she is not aware of any reporting procedure but
would look into the matter.
Councilmember Matarrese stated procedures need to be in place for instances when
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
February 3, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-02-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-02-16,2,"(*10-063) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Public Utilities Board Meeting
and the Regular City Council Meeting held on February 3, 2010. Approved.
(*10-064) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,314,561.14.
(10-065) Recommendation to Approve Consent to Assignment of Lease and Estoppel
Certificate Between the City of Alameda, Ballena Isle Marina, L.P., and CNL Income
Ballena Marina, LLC.
The Economic Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated the public needs to know what is transpiring; inquired
whether CNL Income Ballena Marina, LLC would be the leaseholder.
The Economic Development Director responded CNL would be the new lessee; stated
CNL knows that the City has concerns with property conditions; immediate plans are in
place to make commercial building improvements.
Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether established timetables would change.
The Economic Development Director responded in the negative; stated the trigger has
not been hit to start extensions; extension terms would not begin unless investments
are made.
Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether CNL is planning on making improvements over
and above existing requirements.
The Economic Development Director responded that she is not sure; stated
requirements are quite extensive and include complete reconstruction of the entire
Marina.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated reporting back on the plans would be nice.
The Economic Development Director stated that she feels the City is assigning the
Lease to a company that does the right thing for the type of property.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated CNL's portfolio is quite interesting.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether CNL would take over the terms of the existing Lease,
which do not have milestones, to which the Economic Development Director responded
in the affirmative.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether improvements have been discussed.
The Economic Development Director responded the City does not have any leverage
with the existing terms but has leverage regarding future extensions.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
February 16, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-02-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-04-06,2,"(*10-137) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on March 16, 2010.
Approved.
(*10-138) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,746,491.75.
(*10-139) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for the Alameda Point Multi-Use Field Upgrades, No. P.W. 04-09-11. Accepted.
(*10-140) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $1,499,600, Including
Contingencies, to Sausal Construction for the Neighborhood Library Improvement
Project, No. P. W. 10-09-29. Accepted.
(*10-141) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $97,978, Including
Contingencies, to Schaaf & Wheeler Civil Engineers, for Design and Preparation of
Plans and Specifications for the Upgrades to the Northside Storm Drain Pump Station,
No. P.W. 02-10-06. Accepted.
(10-142) Recommendation to Approve First Amendment to the Contract in the Amount
of $24,315, Including Contingencies, to Ninyo & Moore, for Geotechnical Support,
Materials Testing, and Environmental Services for the Webster Street/Wilver ""Willie""
Stargell Avenue Intersection Project, No. P.W. 10-08-26.
Councilmember Tam stated costs ended up being 33% more than budgeted due to
unforeseen conditions, such as underground fixtures from the former Naval base and
drive-in theater and unsuitable sub-grade and multiple subsurface pavement layers;
inquired whether said conditions would be typical for the area.
The City Engineer responded Webster Street has two sub-layers; stated the Alameda
College area had a drive-in theater; abandoned utility lines were found; Ninyo & Moore
checked the compaction of the soil; some of the soil was lime treated, which eliminated
a lot of the excavation costs; construction was expedited on the Stargell Avenue portion
of the project; Naval properties would have a larger magnitude of unforeseen conditions
than the rest of the City.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the Sewer Fund loan is starting to be paid back,
to which the City Engineer responded the loan would start to be paid back in June.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(*10-143) Recommendation to Approve a Letter of Understanding Between
the
International Association of Firefighters and the City of Alameda on the Fire
Investigation Program and Not Filling the Assistant Fire Marshall Assignment.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
April 6, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-04-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-07-06,3,"(*10-329) Resolution No. 14464, ""Designating a City Consultant as the Authorized
Representative to Examine Certain Sales and Use Tax Records."" Adopted.
(*10-330) Resolution No. 14465, ""Calling for a General Municipal Election to be
Consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be Held in the City of Alameda on
Tuesday, November 2, 2010, and Requesting the Alameda County Board of
Supervisors to Permit the Registrar of Voters to Render Specified Services to the City
Relating to the Conduct of Said Election."" Adopted.
(10-331) Ordinance No. 3018, ""Approving Amendment to Master Plan MP05-01 for
Grand Marina Village to Reduce the Number of Required Affordable Housing Units.""
Finally passed.
Councilmember Tam stated at the June 15, 2010 meeting, she stated that having a pro
forma would be helpful to understand how Warmington Homes' bottom line would be
affected with four less affordable units.
The Planning Services Manager stated that he is sorry that said information has not
been included in tonight's staff report; the Warmington Homes' pro forma has not been
reviewed; usually, staff does not review private project pro formas; Warmington Homes'
financing is based upon 15% affordable housing; Warmington Homes has financing for
the first phase; without the change to the Master Plan, Warmington Homes would not be
able to continue without finding financing for remainder of the project.
Councilmember Tam stated that she thought the project was a few years in the making;
Warmington Homes would have had to secure financing before 2009.
The Planning Services Manager stated Warmington Homes obtained financing under
the assumption that the 25% to 15% citywide rollback would apply to the project.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether Warmington Homes obtained financing with the
expectation that Council would allow a rollback to 15%.
The Planning Services Manager responded Warmington Homes thought that the project
would automatically be changed with the 15% rollback; Council changed the affordable
housing requirement from 25% to 15% Citywide before construction started; the City
previously adopted a Master Plan which stated that the Grand Marina Project would
have 25% affordable housing units.
Councilmember Gilmore stated Council did not change the affordable housing
requirement until December 2009; inquired when Warmington Homes applied for
financing.
Mike McClellan, Warmington Homes, responded Warmington Homes delayed the
project until last year; stated Warmington Homes knew that Grand Marina was the only
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
July 6, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-07-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-09-21,3,"(*10-440) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Treasury Report. Accepted.
(10- -441) Request for Settlement Authority of Workers' Compensation Claim #ALAO-
004385. Not heard.
(*10-442) Recommendation to Award a First Amendment in the Amount of $53,385 to
Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Webster Street/Wilver ""Willie"" Stargell
Avenue Intersection Project - Landscape and Irrigation Improvements, No. P.W. 06-09-
18. Accepted.
(10-443) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Negotiate and
Execute the Fifth Amended Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the City of
Alameda and East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD). Accepted.
Councilmember Tam noted that she would recuse herself and left the dais because she
is employed by EBMUD.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired how much the EBMUD is paid for system
maintenance.
The Public Works Director responded EBMUD is paid over $750,000 per year for water
consumption.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether some of the $750,000 is offloaded to tenants.
The Public Works Director responded tenants pay towards water consumption, which is
outlined in leases; stated the $750,000 is what the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment
Agency (ARRA) pays for water used at Alameda Point; each tenant has a rate that is
charged to lease revenue.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether Alameda Point meters are separate.
The Public Works Director responded not all meters are separate; stated EBMUD does
not read individual meters, only the master meter; EBMUD wants to know when larger
tenants would be individually metered.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether water leaks are charged to the master meter.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated recently, the wharf had
leaks; EBMUD's policy states a bill will be reduced by half if a water leak is
documented; the other [EBMUD] payment is for ongoing water facility repair and
maintenance; the Public Works Department does not have the expertise to maintain and
repair water lines; EBMUD is paid anywhere between $100,000 to $300,000 per year
for repairs; water main breaks have lessened over the years.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
September 21, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-09-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-10-05,5,"(*10-474) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,963,240.25.
(*10-475) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for the Annual Fuel Delivery, No. P.W. 09-10-22, and Amend the Contract in the
Amount of $200,000, Including Contingencies, with Valley Oil Company for the Annual
Fuel Delivery Through December 31, 2010. Accepted.
(*10-476) Recommendation to Authorize Administrative Approval of Down Payment
Assistance Loans of up to $80,000. Accepted.
(*10-477) Ordinance No. 3021, ""Amending Ordinance No. 1277, N.S. to Rezone
Approximately .085 Acres Located at 709 Lincoln Avenue APN 073 041801400 from
CC-Community Commercial Zoning District, to R-5, General Residential Zoning
Designation.' Finally passed.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(10-478) Presentation on Public Power Week and Energy Awareness Month Activities
for October.
The Alameda Municipal Power General Manager - Customer Resources gave a Power
Point presentation.
Councilmember Matarrese stated compact fluorescent bulbs cannot go into the trash;
inquired whether staff is working on the matter.
The Alameda Municipal Power General Manager - Customer Resources responded a
flyer informs customers how to property dispose compact fluorescent bulbs; stated
people can take the bulbs to Encinal Hardware and Pagano's Hardware for disposal.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the issue needs to be amped up; hazardous bulbs
end up in landfill.
The Alameda Municipal Power General Manager - Customer Resources stated more
customer outreach could be done.
Mayor Johnson stated the City should have more drop off locations.
Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether drop offs could be done at City Hall.
Mayor Johnson responded batteries could be dropped off at City Hall.
The Alameda Municipal Power General Manager - Customer Resources stated the
practice is to drop hazardous bulbs at Encinal Hardware and Pagano's Hardware.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether public outreach could be done in classrooms or
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
October 5, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-10-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-11-16,2,"(*10-545) Resolution No. 14505, ""Retaining Local Control Over Critical Land Use
Decisions and Requesting Local Government and Public Participation in the Proposed
Bay Conservation and Development Commission Climate Change Bay Plan
Amendment 1-08."" Adopted.
(*10-546) Resolution No. 14506, ""Ordering Vacation of Portions of Existing 10 Foot
Wide Power Easement and 25 Foot Wide Public Utility Easement, Within Parcel 2 of
Parcel Map 2542, Recordation of Quitclaim, and Acceptance of Two New Power
Easements (Alameda Towne Centre)."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM
(10-547) Resolution No. 14507, ""Appointing Susan T. Deutsch to the Commission on
Disability Issues."" Adopted;
(10-547A) Resolution No. 14508, ""Appointing Sim ""Kame"" Richards to the Economic
Development Commission (EDC) (Marine/Waterfront Seat). Adopted; and
(10-547B) Resolution No. 14509, ""Appointing Robert Robillard to the EDC
(Retail/Commercial Seat). Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented Certificates of
Appointment to Ms. Deutsch and Mr. Richards.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(10-548) Presentation of Vision for Webster Street
Barry Long, Urban Design Associates, gave a Power Point presentation.
Speakers: David Baker, Alameda; Kevin Frederick, Alameda (gave presentation);
Nancy Hird, Alameda; Corrine Lambden, Alameda (submitted picture); Kathy Moehring,
West Alameda Business Association; Travis Wilson, Alameda; Michael John Torrey,
Alameda; Christopher Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society; Jon
Spangler, Alameda.
Following Ms. Lambden's comments, Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Webster
Street Tube is on the National Historic Register, to which Ms. Lambden responded that
she does not know.
Mayor Johnson stated funding might be available for restoration if the Webster Street
Tube is on the Register.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
November 16, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-11-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-01-18,2,"(*11-030) Recommendation to Appoint Mr. Michael Krueger to the Oakland Chinatown
Advisory Committee. Accepted.
(*11-031) Resolution No. 14541, ""Authorizing the Acting City Manager to File an
Application for $62,500 in the Urban Forestry Grant Program Funding Through
Propositions 40 and 84 Entitled, ""An Urban Forest for Every City,"" Appropriate $25,000
in General Funds as the Necessary Local Match, and Execute all Necessary
Documents.' Adopted.
(*11-032) Resolution No. 14542, ""Approving an Agreement Between the City
of
Alameda and the State of California's Department of Boating and Waterways to
Recover Costs for Dismantling and Disposing of Abandoned Watercraft."" Adopted.
(*11-033) Resolution No. 14543, ""Fixing the Annual Salaries for the Auditor and
Treasurer Pursuant to the 2008 City Charter Amendment of Section 2-4."" Adopted.
(11-034) Resolution No. 14544, ""Amending Resolution No. 12121 Setting the Order of
Business of City of Alameda City Council Meetings. Adopted.
Speakers: Adam Gillitt, Alameda; Jon Spangler, Alameda; and Michael John Torrey,
Alameda.
Councilmember deHaan stated individuals have stayed until 1:00 a.m. to get a point
across; Council would be willing to try the proposed change; nothing would be locked in
stone; the 15-minute idea is bothersome but doable.
Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
- 4. [Absent: Mayor Gilmore - 1.]
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(11-035) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's Request for Qualifications for a
Second Campus
The Acting City Manager provided a handout and gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Johnson inquired how the land transfer would be handled.
The Acting City Manager responded the City would enter into a long-term lease with a
purchase option under the current Lease in Furtherance of Conveyance (LIFOC).
Councilmember Johnson inquired whether staff has discussed the proposed use with
the Navy.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
January 18, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-01-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-03-15,2,"(*11-124) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,899,097.07.
(*11-125) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $69,390 Annually for
a Period of Five Years to Accela, Inc. for Accela Automation Land Management and
Citizen Access Software Licenses and Managed Service Fees, and Authorize the Acting
City Manager to Execute the Contract and Related Documents. Accepted.
(*11-126) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $279,000, and
Authorize a $40,000, Approximately Fourteen Percent Contingency, to Urban Metro
Environmental, Inc. for the Demolition of Boarded and Vacant Structures at 136, 140,
144, 146 & 148 Barbers Point Road & 104 Glenview Road and 105 & 106 Norfolk Road
and Authorize the Acting City Manager to Execute the Contract and Related
Documents. Accepted.
(11-127) Recommendation to Approve Modifications to the Paratransit Shuttle Service,
Appropriate $24,000 in Measure B Funds and Authorize the Acting City Manager to
Execute all Necessary Documents; and
(11-127A) Recommendation to Approve Modifications to the Paratransit Taxi Service,
Appropriate $5,000 in Measure B Funds, and Authorize the Acting City Manager to
Execute all Necessary Documents.
The Transportation Coordinator gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the eligibility age for the shuttle service would
be reduced from 62 to 55, to which the Transportation Coordinator responded in the
affirmative.
Speaker: Michael John Torrey, Alameda.
In response to Mr. Torrey's comments, the Transportation Coordinator stated currently,
the West Loop recommendation does not include the Main Street ferry stop; hopefully,
the stop will be included in the future.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he is impressed; indications show great success.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
-
5.
(*11-128) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for Otis Drive Rehabilitation, No. P. W. 08-10-2. Accepted.
(*11-129) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications, and Authorize a Call for
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
March 15, 2010",CityCouncil/2011-03-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-04-05,4,"(*11-166A) Resolution No. 14560, ""Approving Amendment to the Memorandum of
Understanding Between the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1245
for the Period Commencing January 1, 2009, and Ending December 18, 2010, and
Extended through March 26, 2011.' Adopted;
(*11-166B) Resolution No. 14561, ""Approving Amendment to the Memorandum of
Understanding Between the Management and Confidential Employees Association for
the Period Commencing January 1, 2005 and Ending December 20, 2008, Extended
through December 12, 2009, Extended Again through December 18, 2010 and
Extended Again through March 26, 2011. Adopted.
(*11-167) Ordinance No. 3028, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code to Amend
Chapter XIII (Building and Housing) by Repealing Article I (Uniform Codes Relating to
Building, Housing and Technical Codes) in its Entirety and Adding a New Article
I
(Uniform Codes Relating to Building, Housing and Technical Codes) to Adopt the 2010
California Building Code, the 2010 California Residential Code, the 2010 California
Historical Building Code, the 2010 California Electrical Code, the 2010 California
Plumbing Code, the 2010 California Mechanical Code, the 2010 California Energy
Code, the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code, the 1997 Uniform Housing
Code, and the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous
Buildings, and Amend Chapter XV (Fire Prevention) by Repealing Section 15-1 in its
Entirety and by Adding a New Section 15-1 to Adopt the 2010 California Fire Code.
Finally passed.
(*11-168) Ordinance No. 3029, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Repealing
Article Il (Boards and Commissions) of Chapter Il (Administration) in Its Entirety and by
Repealing Subsection 30-65.7 (Public Art Commission) of Chapter XXX (Development
Regulations) in Its Entirety and Adding a New Article II (Boards and Commissions).
Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(11-169) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending Section 30-7
of the Alameda Municipal Code Related to the Off-Street Parking and Loading Space
Regulations. Amended and introduced.
The Planning Services Manager gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired what ""unbundling parking costs from leases"" means.
The Planning Services Manager responded a person would have the option of
purchasing a condominium without purchasing the associated parking spaces.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the Planning Services Manager means existing parking
spaces.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
April 5, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-04-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-04-19,2,"(*11-195) Ordinance No. 3030, ""Amending Section 30-7 of the Alameda Municipal Code
Related to the Off-Street Parking and Loading Space Regulations."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
None.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(11-196) Report from the Fire Department Regarding Disaster Preparedness in
Alameda.
The Fire Division Chief gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether anyone focuses on business continuity planning for the
City, to which the Fire Division Chief responded Captain Oliver is responsible.
Mayor Gilmore stated Information Technology (IT) is a very important part of
infrastructure but has been neglected over the years.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether digital off-site storage funding has been
explored.
The Fire Division Chief responded in the affirmative; stated grants have not been
explored but could be; the Fire Department has been very successful in obtaining other
grants; National Incident Management System (NIMS) compliance is very important.
Mayor Gilmore stated grants might not be available purely from an IT standpoint;
approaching grants from a disaster preparedness and public safety standpoint might be
more fruitful.
The Fire Division Chief noted the federal government prefers to provide grants for
regional solutions.
Councilmember Tam stated the community has concerns regarding calling departments
and not having employees know what is going on; inquired whether there is a way to
help improve internal communications
The Fire Division Chief responded the Fire Department has initiated a comprehensive
communications plan; stated one element is developing a cross department work group;
staff has contacted the Police Department, Hospital, and School District.
Councilmember deHaan stated citizens were very concerned after the earthquake
occurred in Japan; communications are very important; inquired whether the seventeen
Citizen Emergency Response Teams (CERT) are located throughout the City.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
April 19, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-05-03,5,"(*11-219) Recommendation to Authorize Call for Bids for Legal Advertising. Accepted.
(*11-220) Recommendation to Authorize the Purchase of a Sewer Inspection Cargo
Van in the Amount of $301,000 and Authorize the Acting City Manager to Execute All
Necessary Documents. Accepted.
(*11-221) Recommendation to Authorize the Purchase of a Bio-Diesel Fuel Vactor 2103
Jet-Rodder on an International Chassis in the Amount of $215,085 and Authorize the
Acting City Manager to Execute All Necessary Documents. Accepted.
(*11-222) Resolution No. 14563, ""Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring
the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing the
Notice of Public Hearing on June 21, 2011 - Island City Landscaping and Lighting
District 84-2."" Adopted.
(*11-223) Resolution No. 14564, ""Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring
the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing the
Notice of Public Hearing on June 21, 2011 - Maintenance Assessment District 01-01
(Marina Cove).' Adopted.
(*11-224) Resolution No. 14565, ""Authorizing the Acting City Manager to Submit an
Application for Measure B Para transit Funding in the Amount of $210,625 for Fiscal
Year 2011-2012 and to Execute all Necessary Documents."" Adopted.
(*11-225) Ordinance No. 3031, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Repealing
Section 12-17 (Preferential Parking Zones) of Article III (Permit Parking) of Chapter XII
(Designated Parking) in Its Entirety, and by Adding a New Section 12-17 (Preferential
Parking Zones) to Modify the Procedures Relating to the Designation of Preferential
Parking Zones."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(11-226) Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Community
Development Block Grant Action Plan and Authorize the Acting City Manager to
Negotiate and Execute Related Documents, Agreements, and Modifications.
The Housing Development and Programs Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Speakers: Cynthia Wasko, Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB) (submitted
correspondence); and Doug Biggs, SSHRB.
Following Ms. Wasko's comments, Mayor Gilmore stated the people in Washington,
D.C. making the cuts do not have to live with the cuts; the City has a lobbying firm in
Washington; Council should discuss how to use said firm to lobby for some compassion
for less fortunate community members.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
May 3, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-06-07,2,"(*11-287) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,053,457.33.
(*11-288) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $84,202 including
Contingencies, to E2 Consulting for the Smoke Testing of the City of Alameda's
Sanitary Sewer System, No. P.W. 03-11-06. Accepted.
(*11-289) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $598,000, Including
Contingencies, to Gallagher & Burk, Inc. for Repair and Resurfacing of Certain Streets,
Phase 30, No. P.W. 10-10-26. Accepted.
(*11-290) Resolution No. 14569, ""Requesting and Authorizing the County of Alameda to
Levy a Tax on All Real and Personal Property in the City of Alameda as a Voter
Approved Levy for the General Obligation Bonds Issued Pursuant to a General Election
Held November 7, 2000."" Adopted.
(*11-291) Ordinance No. 3032, ""Amending Ordinance No. 1277, N.S. to Rezone
Approximately .06 Acres located at 1348 Weber Street, APN 073 039702600 from C-1,
Neighborhood Business Zoning District, to R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning
Designation."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(11-292) Resolution No. 14570, ""Appointing David Burton as Member of the Planning
Board.' Adopted; and
(11-292 A) Resolution No. 14571, ""Appointing Mike Henneberry as Members of the
Planning Board."" Adopted.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4.
[Absent: Mayor Johnson -1.]
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented certificates to Mr. Burton
and Mr. Henneberry.
(11-293) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14572, ""Confirming the Business
Improvement Area Report for FY 11-12 and Levying an Annual Assessment on the
Alameda Business Improvement Area of the City of Alameda for FY 11-12."" Adopted.
The Deputy City Manager - Development Services gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
June 7, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-06-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-06-21,3,"(*11-323) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Enter into an Agreement
with Carducci Landscape Architects to Provide the Design and Project Management
Services for the Renovation of Krusi Park in the Amount Not to Exceed $301,250.
Accepted.
(*11-324) Resolution No. 14574, ""Authorizing Acceptance of $25,000 in California
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Grant Funding to Enhance Existing Alcohol-
Related Enforcement.' Adopted.
(11-325) Resolution No. 14575, ""Approving Revised Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) Between the International Association of Firefighters, Local 689 and the City of
Alameda for the Period Commencing January 3, 2010, and Ending June 29, 2013.""
Adopted.
The Human Resources Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether putting off the MOU would have consequences.
Joe Wiley, Chief Negotiator, responded the City would most likely find itself a
respondent in an unfair labor practice charge filed by the International Association of
Firefighters (IAFF).
Mayor Gilmore stated the public feels that they have not had an opportunity to comment
throughout negotiations.
Mr. Wiley stated the comment period would need to come at the beginning of the
bargaining process, not the end; the law does not require the City or a labor
organization to provide a comment period.
Mayor Gilmore noted Mr. Wiley is the City's labor negotiator and outside legal counsel
for the City.
Councilmember deHaan requested further explanation of the 48/96 proposal.
Mr. Wiley stated the work schedule would change from one day on and one day off to
two days on and four days off; the schedule would be a trail for both parties; either side
could stop the proposed work schedule if the schedule does not work; an evaluation
would be done at the end of the year.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the 48/96 schedule and other items in the MOU
are part of the list presented in November 2009.
Mr. Wiley responded that he does not know without reviewing his notes, stated the
48/96 schedule has been discussed for a considerable length of time.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
June 21, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-06-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-10-18,3,"(*11-498) Resolution No. 14626, ""Amending the Management and Confidential
Employees Association Salary Schedule."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(11-499) Resolution No. 14627, ""Appointing Emani Pollard as a Member of the Youth
Advisory Commission."" Adopted;
(11-499A) Resolution No. 14628, ""Appointing Mackenzie Prince as a Member of the
Youth Advisory Commission."" Adopted;
(11-499B) Resolution No. 14629, ""Appointing Angus Storm as a Member of the Youth
Advisory Commission."" Adopted; and
(11-499C) Resolution No. 14630, ""Appointing Sonia W. Xu as a Member of the Youth
Advisory Commission."" Adopted.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented certificates of
appointment to Ms. Pollard, Ms. Prince, Mr. Storm and Ms. Xu.
(11-500) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding
Article VIII (Sunshine Ordinance) to Chapter Il (Administration) Establishing Local
Standards to Ensure Public Access to Public Meetings and Public Records. Introduced.
The Acting City Attorney gave a brief presentation.
Proponents: Gretchen Lipow, Sunshine Task Force Member; Jon Spangler, Alameda;
and Carol Gottstein, Alameda.
Proponents with suggestions to revise the ordinance: Tracy Jensen, League of Women
Voters; John Knox White, Sunshine Task Force Member; and Robb Ratto, PSBA.
Councilmember Tam commended the Acting City Attorney, City Manager, and City
Clerk for helping with community efforts; stated finding ways to encourage people to be
informed and participate is important; encouraged people not to let perfect be the
enemy of good.
Vice Mayor Bonta thanked staff and community volunteers; applauded the City
Manager's efforts to implement items in the ordinance early.
In response to Vice Mayor Bonta's inquiry, the City Manager stated a twelve-day
noticing period is being practiced; the ordinance states eleven days.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
October 18, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-10-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-11-15,2,"(*11-556) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on October
18, 2011; the Special City Council Meetings Held on October 25, 2011; and the Special
City Council Meeting Held on October 27, 2011. Approved.
(*11-557) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,420,996.46.
(*11-558) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period
Ending June 30, 2011. Accepted.
(*11-559) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2011. Accepted.
(*11-560) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Consulting
Services Agreement with Public Financial Management Inc. (PFM). Accepted.
(*11-561) Recommendation to Appoint Deborah Wright to Existing Membership of
America's Cup Ad Hoc Committee. Accepted.
(*11-562) Recommendation to Approve Reinstatement for Michael D'Orazi in Order to
Recognize Prior Service with the City of Alameda. Accepted.
(*11-563) Ordinance No. 3037, ""Authorizing the Execution of Lease of Real Property
Located at 1525 Bay Street Between City, as Lessor, and Karen Zimmerman and
Kenneth Edgerly, as Lessee, for Operation of ABC Preschool."" Finally passed.
[Note: Vice Mayor Bonta recused himself from voting on the ordinance.]
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(11-564) Recommendation to Approve Moving Forward with Surveys as the Next Step
in the Boards and Commissions Evaluation Process.
The Senior Management Analyst gave a brief presentation.
Suggested changes to the surveys: John Knox White, Alameda.
Councilmember deHaan requested clarification of Survey Monkey.
The Senior Management Analyst stated Survey Monkey is an on-line survey tool; a
paper version would be made available to Boards and Commissions through staff
secretaries as an alternative.
Vice Mayor Bonta stated that Mr. Knox White's question [where work would go if a
Board or Commission disbanded] should be added to the survey; the public input
process should be expanded; holding subcommittee meetings should be added; open
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
November 15, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-11-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-12-06,3,"(*11-581) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Gallagher and Burk, Inc. for the
Parking Rehabilitation of the Main Street and Harbor Bay Ferry Terminals, No. P.W. 05-
11-14. Accepted.
(*11-582) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Power Engineering for the
Installation of Mechanical Trash Racks at Stormwater Pump Stations, No. P.W. 08-09-
23. Accepted.
(*11-583) Resolution No. 14636, ""Resolution of Intention to Approve an Amendment to
the Contract Between the Board of Administration California Public Employees'
Retirement System and the City Council of the City of Alameda to Include Provisions
Pursuant to Government Code 20516 ""Cost Sharing"" for Local Police Members and for
Local Fire Members."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(11-584) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease
Agreement with the Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter for the Operation of the
Alameda Animal Shelter. Introduced.
***
Councilmember deHaan left the dais at 7:31 p.m. and returned at 7:32 p.m.
The Police Chief gave a brief presentation.
In response to Councilmember Johnson's inquiry, the Acting City Attorney stated that
Section 10.1 states that the landlord shall maintain the foundation, structural system
including exterior walls [exclusive of all glass and exterior doors], roofs, and electrical,
plumbing, and heating/ventilation/air condition systems.
Councilmember Johnson inquired what type of security system is at the Animal Shelter,
to which the Police Chief responded alarms and cameras.
Councilmember Johnson inquired who would maintain the security system, to which the
Police Chief responded the Police Department.
Councilmember deHaan inquired who would take care of outside maintenance.
The Assistant City Manager responded the City would be responsible for paving and the
Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter (FAAS) would be responsible for landscaping.
The Police Chief stated both parties have agreed to address any issues that might
arise; FAAS would set their operating hours and the Police Department would mirror the
operating hours as much as possible.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
December 6, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-12-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-12-20,2,"(*11-598) Recommendation to Accept the Special Tax and Local Bond Measure Annual
Report. Accepted.
(*11-599) Recommendation to Accept the Citywide Development Fee and Fleet
Industrial Supply Center/Catellus Traffic Fee Report. Accepted.
(*11-600) Recommendation to Accept the Police and Fire Services Fee Report.
Accepted.
(*11-601) Recommendation to Accept the Annual Report for the Public Art Fund as
Required by the Public Art Ordinance and Accept a Status Update on the Public Art
Program. Accepted.
(*11-602) Recommendation to Conduct the Affordable Housing Ordinance Annual
Review Consistent with Section 27-1 of the Alameda Municipal Code and California
Government Code Section 66001 and Accept the Annual Report. Accepted.
(*11-603) Resolution No. 14637, ""Setting the 2012 Regular City Council Meeting Dates.'
Adopted.
(*11-604) Resolution No. 14638, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Grant
Funding Agreement with the Transportation Fund for Clean Air Program Manager Fund
for $230,900 for the Local Match for the Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant
for the Park Street Safety Improvement Project and to Execute all Necessary
Documents."" Adopted.
(*11-605) Resolution No. 14639, ""Approving the Northern California Power Agency
Market Purchase Agreement."" Adopted.
(11-606) Resolution No. 14640, ""Ceasing the Transfer of the Surcharge From the Golf
Enterprise Fund to the General Fund."" Adopted; and
(11-606 A) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
Amending Subsection 3-28.9 (Payment In-Lieu of Taxes) of Section 3-28 (Payment of
Taxes) of Chapter III (Finance and Taxation) to Exempt the Golf Fund from the Payment
In-Lieu of Taxes. Not introduced.
The Assistant City Manager gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam stated that she has no problem with adopting the resolution;
however, she has a problem with exempting the Golf Fund from the Payment In-Lieu of
Taxes (PILOT); Alameda Municipal Power (AMP) could use money to pay for
[increased] costs in medical benefits for their employees if Council would allow an
exemption for AMP; implications on other Enterprise Funds should be reviewed and
consideration should be given to delay the PILOT exemption until the day that Golf is no
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
December 20, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-12-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-01-17,2,"(*12-023) Resolution No. 14645, ""Authorizing Examination of Sales, Use and
Transactions Tax Records in Connection with City Claims Against the State of
California."" Adopted.
(*12-024) Resolution No. 14646, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Grant
Contract Between the State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and the
Alameda Police Department for the Purchase of Marine Patrol Equipment.' Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(12-025) Resolution No. 14647, ""Appointing Michele Bellows as a Member of the
Transportation Commission."" Adopted,
(12-025 A) Resolution No. 14648, ""Christopher A. Miley as a Member of the
Transportation Commission."" Adopted, and
(12-025 B) Resolution No. 14649, ""Rajiv Sharma as a Member of the Transportation
Commission."" Adopted.
Councilmember Johnson moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4.
[Absent: Mayor Gilmore - 1.]
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented Certificates of
Appointment to Ms. Bellows and Mr. Miley.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(12-026) The City Manager and Community Development Director made brief
comments on the customer service improvements in Building Services.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(12-027) Councilmember Tam welcomed the new City Attorney.
(12-028) Acting Mayor Bonta stated that he has been working with a coalition of
transportation advocates regarding the Alameda County Transportation Commission
Transportation Expenditure Plan.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
January 17, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-01-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-03-06,2,"(*12-099) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,670,605.57.
(12-100) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for Repair and Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 31, No. P.W. 02-12-04.
Postponed to March 20, 2012.
(*12-101) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Sun Light & Power to Provide
Turnkey Design-Build Services for Photovoltaic (Solar) Generation System, No. P.W.
05-10-12. Accepted.
(*12-102) Recommendation to Adopt Tow Specifications and Authorize a Request for
Proposals for an Emergency Vehicle Towing Services Contract for the Alameda Police
Department. Accepted.
(*12-103) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Contribute an Additional
$46,154 Toward the Wind Down of the Associated Community Action Program.
Accepted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(12-104) Resolution No. 14658, ""Appointing Nan E. Joesten as a Member of the
Housing Commission."" Adopted.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the Resolution.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(12-105) Recommendation to Select One the Following Two Options Relating to the
Chuck Corica Golf Complex (1) (a) Approve the Memorandum of Agreement with
Harbor Bay Isle Associates (HBIA) in Connection with a Potential Exchange of 12.2
Acres on North Loop Road Owned by HBIA for 12.2 Acres of the 14-Acre Mif Albright
Course Owned by the City Including Receipt by the City of Approximately $7.2 Million in
Recreational Facility Improvements; (b) Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate the
Terms of a Long-Term Lease with KemperSports to Operate, Improve, Manage and
Maintain the Golf Complex; and (c) Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate the Terms
of a Development and Long-Term Management and Maintenance Agreement with
Alameda Youth Sports Foundation for a Proposed North Loop Road Sports Complex; or
(2) Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate with Two Respondents to the City's
Request for Proposal for Long-Term Management and Improvement of the Golf
Complex, Specifically Greenway Golf and KemperSports.
The City Manager gave a presentation.
Mayor Gilmore stated the City would still have a 45-hole golf course, including the Mif
Albright Course, regardless of which option is selected; that she has extended the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
March 6, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-03-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-05-01,3,"(*12-195) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,684,521.63.
(*12-196) Recommendation to Authorize Call for Bids for Legal Advertising for Fiscal
Year Ending June 30, 2013. Accepted.
(*12-197) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for Walnut Street Seawall Repair, No. P. W. 01-12-02. Accepted.
(*12-198) Recommendation to Authorize Expenditure of Up to $35,030 from the Public
Art Fund for Consultant Fees for an Update of the City's Public Art Program. Accepted.
(*12-199) Resolution No. 14669, ""To Preliminarily Approve the Annual Report Declaring
the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for
Notice of Public Hearing on June 19, 2012 - Island City Landscaping and Lighting
District 84-2."" Adopted.
(*12-200) Resolution No. 14670, ""To Preliminarily Approve the Annual Report Declaring
the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for
Notice of Public Hearing on June 19, 2012 - Maintenance Assessment District 01-01
(Marina Cove).' Adopted.
(*12-201) Resolution No. 14671, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Submit an Application
for Measure B Paratransit Funding in the Amount of $184,000 for Fiscal Year 2012-
2013 and to Execute all Necessary Documents."" Adopted.
(*12-202) Ordinance No. 3044, ""Extending the Agreement Between the City of Alameda
and Waste Management of Alameda County Inc. for Solid Waste Disposal Services for
a Five-Year Period, Until September 30, 2017."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(12-203) Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of the FY12-13 Community Development
Block Grant/HOME Partnership Investment Program Action Plan and Authorize the City
Manager to Negotiate and Execute Related Documents, Agreements, and
Modifications.
The Community Development Program Manager gave a brief presentation,
Expressed appreciation for funding for the Midway Shelter and urged approval: Patricia
Bidar, Building Futures with Women and Children (BFWC) read a letter from Liz Varela,
Executive Director of BFWC, urging council to support staff's recommendation.
Vice Mayor Bonta inquired what principles drove the decision to cut specific programs
due to the limited funding this year.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
May 1, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-05-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-05-15,4,"(*12-232) Recommendation to Appropriate $850,000 in Measure B Funds, $150,000 in
Construction Improvement Tax Funds, $20,000 in Marina Cove Assessment District
Funds, and Award a Contract in the Amount of $2,177,800, Including Contingencies, to
MCK Services, Inc. for Repair and Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 31, No. P.W.
01-12-04. Accepted,
(*12-233) Recommendation to Appropriate $10,000 in Transportation Systems
Management/Transportation Demand Management Funds and Award a contract in the
Amount of $200,000, Including Contingencies, to transMetro, Inc. for the Estuary
Crossing Shuttle Service to Continue Operations. Accepted.
(12-234) Recommendation to Appropriate $10,000 and Execute a Second Amendment
to Contract with Clean Lakes, Inc. for Vegetation Management, Debris Management,
and Water Quality Monitoring for South Shore Lagoons, No. P.W. 07-10-19.
Councilmember Tam recused herself and left the dais.
Vice Mayor Bonta moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
- 4. [Absent: Councilmember Tam - 1.]
(*12-235) Recommendation to Accept Staff's Responses to the Regional Sustainable
Communities Strategy - Jobs Housing Connection Scenario. Accepted.
(*12-236) Resolution No. 14674, ""Resolution of Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment
on the Park Street Business Association Business Improvement Area of the City of
Alameda for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 and Set a Public Hearing for June 5, 2012 to Levy
an Annual Assessment on the Park Street Business Association Business Improvement
Area."" Adopted.
(*12-237) Resolution No. 14675, ""Resolution of Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment
on the West Alameda Business Association Business Improvement Area of the City of
Alameda for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 and Set a Public Hearing for June 5, 2012 to Levy
an Annual Assessment on the West Alameda Business Association Business
Improvement Area.' Adopted.
(*12-238) Resolution No. 14676, ""Resolution in Opposition to AB 391 (Pan), a Bill
Related to Electronic Reporting for Secondhand Dealers and Pawnbrokers."" Adopted.
(*12-239) Ordinance No. 3045, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of the Lease with Pacific
Shops, Inc. for an Initial Term of 25 Years with a 41 Year Option for the Tidelands
Property Located along Clement Street between Alameda Marina Drive and Willow
Street, Generally Known as Alameda Marina."" Finally passed.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
May 15, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-05-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-06-06,4,"(*12-284) Resolution No. 14679, ""Resolution in Support of Assembly Bill 1648
(Brownley), a Bill Related to Disclosures on Political Advertisements."" Adopted.
(*12-285) Resolution No.14680, ""Calling an Election in the City of Alameda on
November 6, 2012, for the Purpose of Submitting to the Electors an Initiative Entitled
""Charter Amendment Changing Requirements for When a Citywide Ballot Measure is
Needed to Authorize Certain Sales or Disposals of City Parks."" Adopted.
(*12-286) Ordinance No.3046, ""Amending Article II (Boards and Commissions)
of
Chapter II (Administration) of the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Sections 2-
13.2(a); 2-15.2(a); 2-21.2(a) to Reduce the Membership of the Golf, Economic
Development, and Youth Advisory Commissions; Amending Section 2-17 through 2-
17.5 to Change the Name of the Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals
Board to Commission, and Repealing Section 2-20 to Dissolve the Film Commission.
Finally passed.
(*12-287) Ordinance No.3047, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code to Revise the
Regulations Governing the Location of Massage Therapists and Associated Uses
Including Tattoo in the Community Commercial District."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(12-288) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14681, ""Confirming the Park Street
Business Association (PSBA) Business Improvement Area for FY12-13 and Levy an
Annual Assessment on the Park Street Business Association Business Improvement
Area (BIA). Adopted;
(12-288 A) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14682, ""Confirming the West
Alameda Business Association (WABA) Business Improvement Area for FY12-13 and
Levy an Annual Assessment on the West Alameda Business Association Business
Improvement Area."" Adopted.
The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
In response to Councilmember Johnson's inquiry about membership, the Community
Development Director stated there are approximately 430 members in PSBA and 140 in
WABA; the precise count is difficult due to business turn over.
Urged revisions to the PSBA program: Al Wright, Alameda Resident and Business
Owner; Dr. Michael Torres, Alameda Resident and Business Owner; Barbara Mooney,
Alameda Resident and Business Owner; and Kate Pryor, Alameda Business Owner.
Urged approval of the staff recommendation: Lars Hansson, PSBA; Carolyn Lantz,
WABA; Donna Layburn, PSBA; Bruce Reeves, PSBA; Deb Knowles, PSBA; and former
Councilmember Hadi Monsef, Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
June 6, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-06-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-06-19,9,"(*12-321 A) Resolution No. 14703, ""Electing to Receive a Portion of the Tax Increments
from the Original Area of the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project and the
West End Community Improvement Project Area Pursuant to Health and Safety Code
Section 33607.7. Adopted.
(12-322) Resolution No. 14704, ""Supporting Renaming the Eastshore State Park to the
McLaughlin Eastshore State Park."" Adopted.
Speaker: Alan Carlton, Eastshore State Park Committee member, stated Ms.
McLaughlin was founder of Save the Bay.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(12-323) Adoption of Resolution to Accepting Parks Master Plan and Technical Studies
for Urban Greening Plan. Moved to July 3, 2012.
(12-324) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14705, ""Approving the Engineer's
Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessments,
Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2, All Zones."" Adopted.
Councilmember Johnson recused herself and left the dais.
The Public Works Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
4. [Absent: Councilmember Johnson - 1.]
(12-325) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14706, ""Approving the Engineer's
Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessments,
Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 (Marina Cove).' Adopted.
The Public Works Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
(12-326) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14707, ""Establishing Integrated
Waste Collection Ceiling Rates and Service Fees for Alameda County Industries, Inc.,
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
June 19, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-06-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-06-26,2,"(*12-338) Recommendation to Accept the City of Alameda Investment Policy. Accepted.
(*12-339) Resolution No.14708, ""Agreeing to Establish of a Reciprocal Tax Sharing
Agreement Between the City of Alameda and the Franchise Tax Board"". Adopted.
AGENDA ITEMS
(12-340) Public Hearing to Consider Establishment of the Proposition 4 (Appropriations)
Limit for FY 12-13 and Resolution No. 14709, ""Establishing the Appropriations Limit for
FY 12-13."" Adopted.
The Controller gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
- 5.
(12-341) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14710, ""Amending Master Fee
Resolution No. 12191 to Revise Fees."" Adopted.
The Controller gave a brief presentation.
Staff responded to Council questions regarding the proposed automated business
license fee process; the Affordable Housing Inclusionary fee; Building Department fees;
using kiosk parking slips at multiple locations within a business district; taxicab permit
fees; and false alarm and ambulance fees.
Vice Mayor Bonta moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(12-342) Public Hearing to Consider Collection of Delinquent Business License Taxes
and Delinquent Integrated Waste Management Accounts Via the Property Tax Bills and
Payment Plans.
The Controller gave a brief presentation.
Indicated they do not have a business in Alameda: Zika Zivanovic, 2 Square Properties
Co. and Crystal Glantz, Alameda.
Following Mr. Zivanovic's comments, Mayor Gilmore inquired whether Mr. Zivanovic has
paid business license taxes to the City prior to this year, to which Mr. Zivanovic
responded in the negative.
In response to Mayor Gilmore's inquiry, the Controller stated staff uses a variety of
methods to determine whether someone has a business in Alameda; a business does
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
June 26, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-06-26.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-07-03,2,"(*12-358) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,115,712.05.
(*12-359) Recommendation to Approve an Additional Advance and Modification
Agreement for the Alameda Islander Motel Project Adding $120,000, for a Total HOME
Loan Amount of $1.42 Million and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the
Agreement and Related Documents. Accepted.
(*12-360) Recommendation to Approve the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners'
Recommendation that the Islander Motel be Renamed ""The Park Alameda Apartments.""
Accepted.
(*12-361) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $246,500, Including
Contingencies, to Engineered Soil Repairs, Inc. for Walnut Street Seawall Repair, No.
P.W. 01-12-02. Accepted.
(*12-362) Resolution No. 14714, ""To Approve an Agreement with the Alameda County
Flood Control Water Conservation District Providing for Implementation of the Alameda
Countywide Clean Water Program and Authorize the City Manager to Execute all
Required Documents."" Adopted.
(*12-363) Resolution No. 14715, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Renew an Agreement
with Carducci Landscape Architects to Provide the Design and Project Management
Services for the Renovation of Krusi Park, in an Amount Not to Exceed $320, 188.'
Adopted.
(*12-364) Resolution No. 14716, ""Declaring the Canvass of Returns and Results of the
Consolidated Special Municipal Election Held on Tuesday, June 5, 2012."" Adopted.
(*12-365) Ordinance No. 3050, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Article Il (Boards And Commissions) of Chapter Il (Administration) and by Amending
Section 2-12.2(A) to Revise the Membership of the Recreation and Park Commission.""
Finally passed.
(*12-366) Ordinance No. 3051, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding
Section 2-67 Relating to Prevailing Wages."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(12-367) Resolution No. 14717, ""Accepting Parks Master Plan and Technical Studies for
Urban Greening Plan."" Adopted.
Linda Gates, Gates & Associates, gave a Power Point presentation about Parks Master
Plan
Councilmember deHaan inquired how School District assets and playing fields are
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
July 3, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-07-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-07-17,2,"(*12-381) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on June 19,
2012. Approved.
(*12-382) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,389,511.51.
(*12-383) Recommendation to Approve a One-Year Contract With Graphtek Advertising
and Design in an Amount Not to Exceed $6,000 for Technical Support for the City's
Website. Accepted.
(*12-384) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for Repair of Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway, and
Minor Street Patching, FY12-13, Phase 13, No. P.W. 04-12-08. Accepted.
(*12-385) Recommendation to Reject the Sole Bid and Authorize a New Call for Bids for
Urban Forest Maintenance Services (Citywide), No. P.W. 06-11-16. Accepted.
(*12-386) Recommendation to Allocate $80,000 from the Sewer Enterprise Fund and
Award a Contract in the Amount of $430,000, Including Contingencies, to Roto Rooter
for Sewer Point Repairs and Asphalt Concrete Replacement within the City of Alameda,
No. P.W. 05-12-09. Accepted.
(*12-387) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $107,000, Including
Contingencies, to Clean Lakes, Inc. for Vegetation Management, Debris Management,
and Water Quality Monitoring for the South Shore Lagoons, No. P.W. 05-12-11, Subject
to Funding Approval by the Alameda West Lagoon Homeowners Association's Board of
Directors. Accepted.
Note: The staff recommendation passed by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers
Bonta, deHaan, Johnson and Mayor Gilmore - 4. Abstention: Councilmember Tam - 1.
(*12-388) Recommendation to Allocate $37,500 from the Sewer Enterprise Fund and
Approve a Second Amendment to the Contract with Waterworks Engineers for the
Preparation of Engineering Documents for the Upgrade of the City of Alameda Sewer
Pump Stations, Phase 3: Bay Farm Island Pump Station Rehabilitation, No. P.W. 12-10-
35. Accepted.
(*12-389) Recommendation to Endorse the East Bay Economic Development Alliance's
Open for Business Pledge. Accepted.
(*12-390) Resolution No. 14719, ""Ratifying the Public Utilities Board's Approval of the
Northern California Power Agency Legislative and Regulatory Program Agreement.""
Adopted.
(*12-391) Resolution No. 14720, ""Ratifying the Public Utility Board's Approval of the
Amended and Restated Market Purchase Program Agreement with the Northern
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
July 17, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-07-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-10-16,2,"(*12-499) Resolution No. 14734, ""Amending Resolution No. 9460 to Reflect Current
Positions and Entities to be Included in the City of Alameda's Conflict of Interest Code
and Rescinding Resolution No. 14476."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(12-500) Resolution No. 14735, ""Reappointing Ray Gaul as a Member of the Golf
Commission."" Adopted;
(12-500A) Resolution No. 14736, ""Reappointing Bill Schmitz as a Member of the Golf
Commission. Adopted;
(12-500B) Resolution No. 14737, ""Reappointing Jane Sullwold as a Member of the Golf
Commission."" Adopted;
(12-500C) Resolution No. 14738, ""Reappointing Jeffrey Wood as a Member of the Golf
Commission."" Adopted;
(12-500D) Resolution No. 14739, ""Appointing Timothy Scates as a Member of the Golf
Commission. Adopted;
(12-500E) Resolution No. 14740, ""Appointing Sherman Lewis as a Member of the
Public Art Commission."" Adopted;
(12-500F) Resolution No. 14741, ""Appointing Jennifer Williams as a Member of the
Social Service Human Relations Board.' Adopted;
(12-500G) Resolution No. 14742, ""Appointing Jennifer Watkinson as a Member of the
Social Service Human Relations Board."" Adopted; and
(12-500H) Resolution No. 14743, ""Appointing Kimberly N. Walter as a Member of the
Youth Advisory Commission."" Adopted.
Vice Mayor Bonta moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
4. [Absent: Councilmember Tam - 1.]
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented certificates to Ray Gaul,
Bill Schmitz, Jane Sullwold, Timothy Scates, Sherman Lewis, Jennifer Watkinson and
Jennifer Williams.
(12-501) Public Hearing to Consider Ordinance No. 3057, ""Amending Section 30-4.9A
of the Alameda Municipal Code Related to the C-C, Community Commercial Zone to
Revise Setbacks for Commercial Buildings Adjacent to Residential Uses."" Finally
passed.
The Acting City Planner gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Bonta moved final passage of the ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
October 16, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-10-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-11-20,2,"(*12-535) Recommendation to Accept Report of No Disclosure of Closed Session
Minutes or Documents of the Alameda City Council for the Period February 2012 to July
2012, per the Alameda Sunshine Ordinance Sections 2-91.8(a) and 2-91.12(e).
Accepted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(12-536) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of the Lease with
the Alameda Soccer Club for the Use and Management of the Alameda Point Soccer
Fields, located on the green between Buildings 2,3, and 4, for a total of 3 Years.
Introduced.
The Recreation and Parks Director gave a brief presentation.
Urged approval of the Lease: Peter Holmes, Alameda Soccer Club; and Jon Pecson,
Alameda Soccer Club.
Councilmember deHaan inquired when the City entered the lease agreement with
Piedmont Soccer Club, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded 2005.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether Alameda Soccer has complete control of
scheduling, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember deHaan inquired if there is a written shared field agreement.
Mr. Holmes responded the agreement includes a master use practice schedule, which
includes a pro rata maintenance expense relative to field usage; Alameda Soccer Club
starts with about 10% usage.
In response to Councilmember deHaan's inquiry regarding expenses, Mr. Holmes
stated maintenance expenses include water and mowing; expenses were previously
handled by East Bay United and Piedmont under the last lease.
Mr. Pecson stated the expenses are very significant because labor costs are included;
East Bay United uses a huge amount of volunteer labor to take care of the fields.
Councilmember deHaan stated Alameda Soccer cannot gain access to the fields and
10% usage does not seem enough.
Mr. Holmes stated Alameda Soccer depends on opponents to field inter-community
rather than intra-Alameda competitions; unlike other sports, Alameda Soccer plays
other communities; stated there are currently 95 teams.
Councilmember deHaan inquired if these fields are now considered part of the
Recreation Field Master Plan.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
November 20, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-11-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-12-18,5,"(*12-588 CC) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,899,568.03.
AGENDA ITEM
(12-589 CC) Ordinance No. 3061, ""Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract
Between the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement
System and the City of Alameda."" Adopted.
The Human Resources Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Johnson moved adoption of the urgency ordinance.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:22
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
Secretary, CAFA and SACIC
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, City of Alameda
2
Financing Authority, and Successor Agency to
the Community Improvement Commission
December 18, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-12-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-01-14,2,"(*13-018) Recommendation to Approve a Contract with David Sams for Management of
Golf Course Improvements. Accepted.
(*13-019) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Ranger Pipelines, Inc. for Cyclic
Sewer Repair Project, Phase 9, No. P.W. 03-11-05. Accepted.
(*13-020) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Fort Bragg Electric, Inc. for the
Dublin Sewer Pump Station Backup Generator Installation Project, No. P.W. 04-10-10.
Accepted.
(*13-021) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Mountain Cascade, Inc. for the
Upgrade of the City of Alameda Sewer Pump Stations, Bay Farm Island Pump Station
Rehabilitation, No. P.W. 12-10-35. Accepted.
(*13-022) Recommendation to Allocate $29,120 in Contingencies and Award a Contract
in the Amount of $194,280 to Harris & Associates for Engineering Consulting Services
Related to Alameda Landing. Accepted.
(*13-023) Resolution No. 14761, ""Appointing Ryan Clausnitzer as Trustee to the
Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District Board."" Adopted.
(13-024) Adoption of Resolution to Establish an Alternate Work Arrangement Policy.
Not adopted; and
(13-024 A) Adoption of Resolution to Establish a Reduced Work Time Option Policy.'
Not adopted.
The Human Resource Director gave a brief presentation.
In response to Councilmember Tam's inquiry, the Senior Management Analyst
responded employees would have the two-thirds and three-quarters options because
PERS health requires employees to work a minimum of 20 hours per week; if the
employee has a 36-hour work week, reduction to 50% would be 18 hours, which does
not meet the PERS healthcare requirement.
Councilmember Tam inquired if a 40-hour work week reduced by 50% would meet the
PERS requirement of 20 hours, to which the Senior Management Analyst responded
in the affirmative.
Councilmember Tam stated the reason Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exempt
employees get administrative days and additional compensation is because they do
not get overtime; she struggles considering the benefit for FLSA exempt employees
versus hourly employees; if an FLSA employee wants to work two-thirds or three-
quarters, or even 50%, succession planning and promotional opportunities would be
beneficial.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
January 14, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-01-14.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,2,"(*13-084) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,513,672.40.
(*13-085) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period
Ending September 30, 2012. Accepted.
(*13-086) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ended
December 31, 2012. Accepted.
(*13-087) Resolution No. 14776, ""Changing the Authorized Signors for
the City's Investment in the State's Local Agency Investment Fund."" Adopted.
(*13-088) Ordinance No. 3063, ""Approving and Authorizing Conveyance by Grant Deed
of Meyers House Museum and Garden Located at 2021 Alameda Avenue, to the
Alameda Museum, a Non-Profit Corporation."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(13-089) Resolution No. 14777, ""Appointing La Donna Franco as a Member of the
Commission on Disability Issues.' Adopted;
(13-089 A) Resolution No. 14778, ""Appointing Judith Frugé as a Member of the
Commission on Disability Issues."" Adopted.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Chen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented a Certificate of
Appointment to Ms. Franco.
(13-090) Recommendation to: (1) Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Letter of
Support to the United States Navy for Modification to the Surplus Determination of Land
at the Former Naval Air Station Alameda; (2) Approve a Non-Binding Term Sheet
between the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the City of Alameda
in Substantial Conformance with the Proposed Term Sheet.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired who currently owns the land being discussed, to which the
Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the U.S. Navy.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the Navy is contemplating a deal with the VA, which is
another federal entity.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-04-16,3,"(*13-165) Recommendation to Approve an Amendment to the Contract with Columbia
Electric, Increasing the Budget by $40,000 for a Total Amount of $320,800, to Complete
the Woodstock to Webster Street Neighborhood Improvement Project, and Authorize
the City Manager to Execute the Amendment. Accepted.
(*13-166) Resolution No. 14791, ""Approve Designation of the Alameda County Source
Reduction and Recycling Board as the Local Task Force Under State Law for the
Purpose of Reviewing and Commenting on County Integrated Waste Management Plan
Amendments."" Adopted, and
(*13-166 A) Resolution No. 14792, ""Approving an Amendment of the Joint Exercise of
Powers Agreement Creating the Alameda County Waste Management Authority.
Adopted.
(*13-167) Resolution No.14793, ""Amending the City of Alameda Management and
Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) Salary Schedule Establishing the
Classifications of Public Safety Communications Supervisor, Police Records
Supervisor, Public Safety Information Technology Systems Coordinator, Information
Technology Systems Coordinator, Communications Engagement Specialist, Senior
Human Resources Analyst, Human Resources Analyst II, and Human Resources
Analyst I."" Adopted.
(13-168) Final Passage of Ordinance Amending Various Sections of the Alameda
Municipal Code Contained in Chapter XXX (Development Regulations) Related to the
North Park Street Planning Area. Amended and introduced.
The City Planner gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired when the design manual would be ready.
The City Planner responded the draft guidelines for taller buildings would be presented
to the Planning Board in late June or early July.
Mayor Gilmore inquired how the design guidelines would allow residential buildings to fit
with commercial buildings in the mixed use zone.
The City Planner responded mixed use properties are a mix of residential use and
businesses which have legally opened over the last 50 years; stated businesses in the
district are typically in buildings which were built as residential buildings and are not
concrete block commercial buildings; the design guidelines and new zoning would allow
lighter commercial uses to continue in the mixed use zone; the guidelines show how
new buildings accommodating commercial uses can be built to look like residential
buildings to avoid inconsistent new commercial buildings in the area.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a sentence can be added to Table A which
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
April 16, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-04-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-05-07,5,"(*13-217) Resolution No. 14806, ""Amending Resolution No. 14747 to Move the July 16,
2013 Regular City Council Meeting to July 23, 2013."" Adopted.
(13-218) Ordinance No. 3065, ""Amending the Contract Between the Board of
Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council
of the City of Alameda to Provide the Option for Local Fire Members to Purchase Service
Credit for Permanent Career Civilian Federal Firefighter or Permanent Career State
Firefighter Service."" Finally passed.
The Assistant City Manager gave a brief presentation.
Expressed concern about costs not being known; urged an actuarial be completed: Jane
Sullwold, Alameda.
Discussed costs and provided background information: Domenick Weaver, Alameda
Firefighters.
Encouraged financial calculations be done prior to Council action: Former Councilmember
Doug deHaan, Alameda.
Expressed concern with buybacks and not setting caps: Janet Gibson, Alameda.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft thanked the speakers and stated the matter is one of
fundamental fairness; the playing field is not level because firefighters who worked six or
seven years at the Naval Air Station lost retirement contributions in the transition; not
proceeding would not solve the City's budget problem.
Councilmember Chen concurred with Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft; inquired what would
happen if Council does not pass the ordinance and does not abide by the Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU).
The City Attorney responded the pension was bargained-for in the MOU with the unions;
stated the Council not going forward with the ordinance would be a violation and a breach
of the MOU by the City.
Councilmember Chen inquired if such violation would subject the City to potential liability
or lawsuit, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Daysog stated that making firefighters retirement whole is not a moral
imperative; it is not the City Council's job to make the situation whole and fair; that he finds
supporting the proposition hard; the firefighters working for the City are getting a pretty
good retirement package.
Councilmember Tam stated the cost of implementation is being factored into the budget;
the Council agreed to the provision in a prior contract; it is important that Council honors
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
May 7, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-05-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-06-18,3,"(*13-301) Recommendation to Approve a First Amendment to the Landscape
Maintenance Management Agreement in the Amount of $301,701 to Marina Village
Commercial Association to Maintain the Landscape and Lighting District, Zone 6,
Marina Village. Accepted.
(*13-302) Recommendation to Approve a First Amendment to Agreement in the Amount
of $57,000 to Waterworks Engineers for the Preparation of Engineering Documents for
the Relocation of the Lagoon Seawall and the Clinton Avenue Extension, No. P.W. 01- -
12-03. Accepted.
[Note: Mayor Gilmore recused herself from voting on the matter.]
(*13-303) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $122,055 to SAK
Construction to Perform a Cured-in-Place Pipe Sewer Pipe Lining, Allocate $27,945 in
Contingencies, and Authorize the City Manager to Execute All Necessary Documents.
Accepted.
(*13-304) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $224,422 and
Allocate $44,885 in Contingencies to National Plant Services, Inc. for Citywide Sewer
Mains Video Inspection and Cleaning, Phase 6, No. P.W. 01-13-01. Accepted.
(*13-305) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Suarez & Munoz, Inc. for the Park
Street Streetscape Project, No. P.W. 10-09-30. Accepted.
(*13-306) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Columbia Electric for Streetlight
Installation and Planting of Trees within the Woodstock to Webster Neighborhood
Improvement Project Area. Accepted.
(*13-307) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to
an Agreement with Russell Resources for Environmental Consulting Services for
Alameda Point Extending the Term for 12 Months and Adding $144,500 to the Project
Budget. Accepted.
(*13-308) Resolution No. 14819, ""Amending the Memorandum of Understanding
Between the City of Alameda and the Alameda Fire Chiefs Association, June 30, 2013 -
June 24, 2017, and Approve First Amended Appendix A, Salary Schedule."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(13-309) Resolution No. 14820, ""Appointing Zara Santos as a Member of the Civil
Service Board"" Adopted;
(13-309 A) Resolution No. 14821, ""Appointing Nielsen Tam as a Member of the
Commission on Disability Issues"". Adopted;
(13-309 B) Resolution No. 14822, ""Appointing Ethel Warren as a Member of the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
June 18, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-06-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-09-17,7,"(*13-404) Ratified bills in the amount of $6,945,821.36.
(*13-405) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ended June
30, 2013. Accepted.
(*13-406) Recommendation to Award Contracts in the Amount of up to $70,000 each to
WRA Environmental Consultants, Tetra Tech, and Huffman Broadway Group, Inc. for
On Call Environmental Consulting Services, and Permit an Annual Extension of each
Contract On a Year to Year Basis, for up to Three Additional Years, and Up to $280,000
Total Compensation for each Contract, at the Sole Discretion of the Public Works
Director, Based Upon Satisfactory Performance of all Aspects of the Contract.
Accepted.
(*13-407) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $567,415 to Rosas
Brothers Construction for the Repair of Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Curb,
Gutter, Driveway, and Minor Street Patching, FY13 14, Phase 14, No. P.W. 05-13-15
and Allocate $85,115 in Contingencies. Accepted.
(*13-408) Resolution No. 14856, ""Formally Establishing a Monthly Mileage Allowance
for City Council Members."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(13-409) Resolution No. 14857, ""Appointing Beverly Blatt as a Member of the Golf
Commission. Adopted;
(13-409 A) Resolution No. 14858, ""Appointing Malia (Mary) Vella as a Member of the
Historical Advisory Board."" Adopted; and
(13-409 B) Resolution No. 14859, ""Appointing Gregory Morgado as a Member of the
Transportation Commission."" Adopted.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Chen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented Certificates of
Appointment to Ms. Blatt, Ms. Vella and Mr. Morgado.
(13-410) Resolution No. 14860, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate the Terms
of a $1.15 Million Loan to the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) for the Encinal
Swim Center Renovation."" Adopted; and
(13-410 A) Recommendation to Extend the Current Joint Use Operating Agreement with
AUSD for the Operation of the District Swimming Pools to October 21, 2013.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
September 17, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-09-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-11-05,2,"(*13-494) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period
Ending March 31, 2013 Collected During the Period Ending June 30, 2013. Accepted.
(*13-495) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Report on Litigation and Liability
Claims Settlements Paid During the Period July to September 2013. Accepted.
(*13-496) Recommendation to Approve a Five Year Professional Services Agreement
with George Hills Company for Third Party Liability Claims Administrator Services for an
Annual Amount of No More Than $63,500 Per Year. Accepted.
(*13-497) Resolution No. 14865, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Acquire Temporary
Construction Easements in Relation to the Sewer Pump Station Renovations for
Reliability and Safety Improvements Project (All Groups).' Adopted.
(*13-498) Resolution No. 14866, ""Amending the City of Alameda Executive
Management (EXME) Compensation Plan to Establish the Classification of
Administrative Services Director and Modify the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point
Salary Range.' Adopted.
(*13-499) Resolution No. 14867, ""Amending the Management and Confidential
Employees Association (MCEA) Salary Schedule and Establishing the Classifications of
Assistant Community Development Director, Economic Development Manager, Media
and Communications Coordinator, Compliance Superintendent, and System Operations
and Field Service Superintendent."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(13-500) Resolution No. 14868, ""Approving a General Plan Text Amendment to the
Land Use Policies in the MU-2 Mariner Square Specified Mixed Use Area to Facilitate
the Development of an Assisted Living Facility at 2400 Mariner Square Drive."" Adopted.
The Supervising Planner gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she thinks Mariner Square Drive is a great
location for an assisted living facility; she voted against a proposal for office space at
the location when on the Planning Board; the special needs and challenges of dementia
need to be met and this facility will provide for said needs.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Tam concurred with Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft that
the site is a highly compatible use for an assisted living facility.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
November 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-11-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-12-17,5,"(*13-569) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2013. Accepted.
(*13-570) Recommendation to Accept the Citywide Development Fee and Fleet
Industrial Supply Center (FISC)/Catellus Traffic Fee Report. Accepted.
(*13-571) Recommendation to Accept the Police and Fire Services Fee Report.
Accepted.
(*13-572) Recommendation to Accept the Special Tax and Local Bond Measure Annual
Report. Accepted.
(*13-573) Recommendation to Accept the Annual Report for the Public Art Fund.
Accepted.
(*13-574) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Enter into Purchase
Agreements Not to Exceed $66,000 for the Replacement of Two Recreation and Park
Vehicles. Accepted.
(*13-575) Summary: Award a One-Year Contract (with Options for Four One-Year
Renewals) for Landscaping Maintenance Services at Marina Village to Trimacs
Company.
Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $47,370 to Trimacs for
Landscape Maintenance of the Public Areas within Landscape and Lighting
Assessment District 84-2, Zone 6, Marina Village, Permit an Annual Extension on a
Year-to-Year Basis for up to Four Additional Years at the Sole Discretion of the Public
Works Director, Based Upon Satisfactory Performance of all Aspects of the Contract,
and Allocate $9,474 in Contingencies.
(*13-576) Resolution No. 14875, ""Setting the 2014 Regular City Council Meeting Dates.'
Adopted.
(*13-577) Resolution No. 14876, ""Accepting Membership into the Rockefeller
Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities Network which Includes Support Hiring the Mayor's
Resiliency Officer, as well as Support Planning and Implementing Resiliency Efforts.""
Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(13-578) Adoption of Resolution_Amending Master Fee Resolution 12191 to Add and
Revise Recreation and Park Fees. Continued to January 21, 2014.
(13-579) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute an
Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement with VF Outdoor to Increase the
Reimbursement Cap by $1 Million, for a Total Reimbursement not to Exceed $2 Million,
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
December 17, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-12-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-01-21,2,"(*14-017) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Report on Litigation and Liability
Claims Settlements Paid During the Period October to December 2013. Accepted.
(14-018) Recommendation to Approve a License Agreement with the Alameda Soccer
Club for the Use and Management of the Hornet Soccer Field for a Total of 5 Years.
Urged approval of the staff recommendation: Bill Shiber and Jon Pecson, Alameda
Soccer Club.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
- 5.
(14-019) Resolution No. 14884, ""Entering Into an Agreement with Verde Design to
Provide Design Services for the Estuary Park Renovation, in an Amount Not to Exceed
$174,145."" Adopted.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated creating a field for special needs children has been
discussed and funds have been raised; that she does not want said use to fall by the
wayside; the Recreation Director confirmed the use is still moving forward although it
was not mentioned in the staff report.
Spoke on behalf of the special needs children in Alameda; stated a field is needed to
serve the group of kids: Roberta Rockwell, Alameda.
In response to Councilmember Tam's inquiry, the Recreation Director stated the field
would be used for special needs children; Alameda Little League has verbally confirmed
interest in participating in a challenger league, which has a different infield from a
Miracle League field; the current budget includes funding for a standard red dirt field,
not a synthetic infield; however, nothing prevents moving towards a synthetic infield in
the future.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether there could be a synthetic infield at the site or
another site, to which the Recreation Director responded in the affirmative; stated
funding needs to be identified for a rubberized infield; Estuary Park and other smaller
fields could be considered; noted rubberized fields are expensive.
In response to Councilmember Tam's inquiry regarding cost, the Recreation Director
stated that she does not have an exact cost estimate; a small rubberized playground
was recently built, which cost $40,000; her rough guess would be $100,000 to
$150,000.
Councilmember Daysog stated the decision tonight is to approve a contract with Verde
Design; staff went through a process to select Verde Design; read background
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 21, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-01-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-02-18,3,"(*14-054) Recommendation to Approve the Services Agreement with the Housing
Authority to Provide Housing Services for the City of Alameda and for the City of
Alameda to Provide Additional Policing Services for the Housing Authority. Accepted.
(*14-055) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement
with Carlson Barbee & Gibson for Civil Engineering and Surveying Consulting Services
for Alameda Point in the Amount of $158,000. Accepted.
(14-056) Resolution No. 14894, ""Amending Resolution No. 7477 to Allow Bargaining
Units to Petition for Unit Modifications Throughout the Year, at the Discretion of the City
Manager."" Adopted.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what a unit modification is and why the matter is
before the Council.
The Administrative Services Director responded a unit modification is done when a
group of people with a commonality of interests request to form a new or separate
bargaining unit; stated the modification requests are only reviewed once a year in
November; the City Manager requested the amendment to allow flexibility for unit
modifications to be received throughout the year.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(*14-057) Resolution No. 14895, ""Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney for Island
City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2."" Adopted.
(*14-058) Resolution No. 14896, ""Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney for
Maintenance Assessment District 01-1."" Adopted.
(14-059) Resolution No. 14897, ""Authorizing Application for Housing Related Parks
Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development for Estuary
Park Athletic Fields.' Adopted.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she wanted to recognize the Recreation and Park
Director for finding grant funding; stated the City is able to apply for grants from the
State because Alameda has a certified Housing Element determined to be compliant
with Housing Authority law; the City will receive an over $250,000 grant award that will
help Alameda develop another park.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Chen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 18, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-02-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-02-18,4,"(*14-060) Resolution No. 14898, ""Authorizing Application for Local Grant Funds from
the East Bay Regional Park District Under Measure WW Park Bond Extension for
Estuary Park Athletic Fields."" Adopted.
(*14-061) Ordinance No. 3086, ""Amending Zoning Map at 2350 Harbor Bay Parkway
from O (Open Space) to C-M PD (Commercial-Manufacturing, with a Planned
Development Overlay) with Specified Conditions."" Finally passed.
(*14-062) Ordinance No. 3087, ""Levying Special Taxes within the City of Alameda
Community Facilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District).'
Finally passed.
(*14-063) Ordinance No. 3088, ""Amending Various Sections of the Alameda Municipal
Code Contained in Chapter XXX (Development Regulations) to Ensure Consistency
between the City of Alameda General Plan and the City of Alameda Municipal Code for
those Lands Generally referred to as ""Alameda Point."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(14-064) Mayor's State of the City Address.
Mayor Gilmore gave the State of the City Address.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(14-065) The City Manager announced upcoming public meetings on the City's
proposed performance measures; the Community Development Director reviewed
upcoming ordinances; the City Manager noted the employees' relations ordinance is
outdated and staff would bring an updated ordinance by the end of the year, as well as
the City's Civil Service rules.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(14-066) Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she and several Councilmembers
attended the Innovation Awards Ceremony.
ADJOURNMENT
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 18, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-02-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-03-04,3,"(*14-075) Resolution No. 14900, ""Approving the Final Map and Bond, Authorizing
Execution of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Accepting the Dedications
and Easements for Tract 8131 (Alameda Landing Residential, Phase 1).' Adopted.
(*14-076) Resolution No. 14901, ""Approving Housing Element Annual Progress Reports
for the Years 2009 through 2013 and Authorizing Submittal to the California Department
of Housing and Community Development and the Governor's Office of Planning and
Research and Finding that the Approval is Categorically Exempt from California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15306
(Information Collection) and 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies). Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(14-077) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for the Shore Line Drive/Westline Drive/Broadway Bikeway Project.
The Transportation Coordinator gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired if loading is restricted to weekdays, to which the Transportation
Coordinator responded in the negative; stated weekends are included, but there is a
time restriction requiring loading to occur between 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. daily.
Councilmember Chen inquired whether motorists would be able to legally go around a
delivery van double-parked on the street, to which the Transportation Coordinator
responded in the affirmative; stated there will be striped center line which allows
motorists to pass legally.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a crosswalk at Shoreline Drive in front of the
Post Office could be moved to other side near the Willows Condominiums because the
existing crosswalk goes directly into a planting bed.
The Transportation Coordinator responded that she would look into moving the
crosswalk; continued the presentation.
Councilmember Chen inquired what the traffic study determined the impacts would be
of converting four lanes into two lanes.
The Transportation Coordinator responded the traffic study revealed the level of service
received A and B grades; stated the project's emphasis on the new eastbound left turn
pockets makes the street ideal with no significant delays; the Federal Highway
Administration recommends ""road diets"" if streets have 15,000 cars or lower on average
per day, Shoreline Drive is below 8,000.
Councilmember Chen inquired whether the test results conclude there is no significant
impact to traffic, to which the Transportation Coordinator responded in the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 4, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-03-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-06-03,4,"(*14-234) Resolution No. 14929, ""Requesting and Authorizing the County of Alameda to
Levy a Tax on All Real and Personal Property in the City of Alameda as a Voter-
Approved Levy for the General Obligation Bonds Issued Pursuant to a General Election
held November 7, 2000 for the Alameda Library.' Adopted.
(*14-235) Ordinance No. 3096, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of Third Lease Amendment
with Artemis Racing, USA for Twenty-Four Months with Two Additional Options for
Eighteen Months and Six Months in Building 12 Located at 1050 West Tower, a Portion
of Taxiway H and Access to the Seaplane Lagoon at Alameda Point."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(14-236) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $431,200, Including
Contingencies, to Brown, Reynolds & Watford to Provide Professional Services for the
Design, Construction Documents, and Contract Administration for Fire Station Number
3.
The Public Works Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(14-237) Adoption of Resolution Establishing Integrated Waste Collection Ceiling Rates
and Service Fees for Alameda County Industries, Inc. for Rate Period 13 (July 2014 to
June 2015). Continued to June 17, 2014.
(14-238) SUMMARY: Approve Actions Related to Proposed Open Space Initiative
Recommendation to Consider Options Pertaining to the Initiative Measure to Amend
City of Alameda General Plan including the 2007-2014 Housing Element and the Zoning
Ordinance to Classify Approximately 3.8999 Acres of Land Adjacent to McKay Avenue
as Open Space: Option 1 - Adopt the Ordinance; Option 2 - Adopt a Resolution
Submitting the Ordinance to the Voters, Decide Interest in Drafting Arguments and
Direct City Attorney to Prepare Impartial Analysis; or Option 3 - Order a Report on the
Effect of the Proposed Initiative Measure. Approved.
The City Clerk gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired what the additional cost would be if Council puts the Initiative on
the November Ballot, to which the City Clerk responded $5,000; stated when Council
calls the General Municipal Election, the total cost of the Election will be approved.
Mayor Gilmore stated the initiative would change the General Plan Zoning Amendment
and Housing Element; inquired what would be the potential fiscal impacts of rezoning
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 3, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-06-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-06-17,2,"(*14-255) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ended March
31, 2014. Accepted.
(*14-256) Recommendation to Award Contract for Legal Advertising for Fiscal Year
2014-15. Accepted.
(*14-257) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $1,885.144.50 and
Allocate $471,286.13 in Contingencies to MCK Services, Inc. for Repair and
Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 33, No. P.W. 02-14-04. Accepted.
(*14-258) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $1,299,000 and
Allocate $195,000 in Contingencies to Dixon Marine Services, Inc., for Alameda South
Shore Lagoon Dredging, No. P. W. 11-13-26. Accepted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(14-259) Resolution No. 14932, ""Reappointing Marguerite Malloy as a Member of the
Civil Service Board.' Adopted;
(14-259 A) Resolution No. 14933, ""Appointing Elizabeth Kenny as a Member of the
Commission on Disability Issues."" Adopted;
(14-259 B) Resolution No. 14934, ""Reappointing Timothy Scates as a Member of the
Golf Commission."" Adopted;
(14-259 C) Resolution No. 14935, ""Appointing Chee Chan as a Member of the Historical
Advisory Board."" Adopted;
(14-259 D) Resolution No. 14936, ""Appointing John Piziali as a Member of the Historical
Advisory Board.' Adopted;
(14-259 E) Resolution No. 14937, ""Reappointing Catherine Atkin as a Member of the
Library Board."" Adopted;
(14-259 F) Resolution No. 14938, ""Reappointing David Burton as a Member of the
Planning Board.' Adopted;
(14-259 G) Resolution No. 14939, ""Reappointing Kristoffer Köster as a Member of the
Planning Board.' Adopted;
(14-259 H) Resolution No. 14940, ""Reappointing William Delaney as a Member of the
Recreation and Park Commission."" Adopted;
(14-259 !) Resolution No. 14941, ""Appointing Mario Mariani as a Member of the
Recreation and Park Commission."" Adopted;
(14-259 J) Resolution No. 14942, ""Appointing Ruben Tilos as a Member of the
Recreation and Park Commission."" Adopted.
(14-259 K) Resolution No. 14943, ""Appointing Audrey Hyman as a Member of the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
June 17, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-06-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-07-01,3,"(*14-281) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting, Regular City Council Meeting,
and the Joint City Council and Successor Agency of the Community Improvement
Commission (SACIC) Meeting Held on June 3, 2014. Approved.
(*14-282) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,392,304.88.
(*14-283) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $269,307 to National
Plant Services, Inc. for Citywide Sewer Mains Video Inspection and Cleaning, Phase 7,
No. P.W. 03-14-13. Accepted.
(*14-284) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for the Repair of Concrete Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway, and Minor Street
Patching, FY14-15, Phase 15, No. P.W. 05-14-20._Accepted.
(*14-285) Resolution No. 14948, ""Calling for a General Municipal Election to be
Consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be Held in the City of Alameda on
Tuesday, November 4, 2014 and Requesting the Alameda County Board of Supervisors
to Permit the Registrar of Voters to Render Specified Services to the City Relating to the
Conduct of Said Election Pursuant to Section 10403 of the Elections Code."" Adopted.
(*14-286) Ordinance No. 3097, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease with Pacific Automated, LLC
Doing Business As Brix Beverage for Five Years with an Additional Five Year Option in a
Portion of Building 25 Located at 1951 Monarch Street at Alameda Point."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(14-287) Resolution No. 14949, ""Reappointing Madeline Deaton as a Member of the
Public Utilities Board.' Adopted.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented Ms. Deaton with a
certificate of appointment.
(14-288) Summary: Consider Updating the City's Development Impact Fees (DIF) and
Related Sections of the Alameda Municipal Code Public Hearing to Consider
Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda Municipal Code Chapter XXVII, Section
27-3 (Citywide Development Fees); Adding Section 27-4 (Alameda Point Development
Impact Fees); Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
Amending Charter XXVII (Development Fees) by Repealing Section 27-2 (Police and
Fire Fee Requirements) in Its Entirety and by Amending Chapter III (Finance) by
Repealing Section 3-60 (Residential Dwelling Unit Tax) in Its Entirety; and Approving
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
July 1, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-07-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-10-21,3,"(*14-439) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute
Documents, Agreements, and Modifications Related to the Alameda County HOME
Partnership Investment Program (HOME) Consortium Funds for a Tenant Based Rental
Assistance (TBRA) Program Administered by Building Futures with Women and
Children. Accepted.
(*14-440) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Report on Litigation and Liability
Claims Settlements Paid During the Period April to September 2014. Accepted.
(*14-441) Recommendation to Approve City Attorney Employment Agreement.
Accepted.
(*14-442) Resolution No. 14975 ""Amending the Executive Management Compensation
Plan to Add One Week of Paid Administrative Leave Per Year and to Revise the
Medical Benefits for the Classifications of Fire Chief and Chief of Police to Match the
Medical Benefits Offered to the Alameda Fire Chiefs Association (AFCA) and the
Alameda Police Managers Association (APMA). Adopted.
(14-443) Adoption of Resolution Amending the City of Alameda Management and
Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) Salary Schedule Establishing the
Classifications of Public Works Project Manager I, Public Works Project Manager II, and
Public Works Project Manager III, and Recommendation to Approve Workforce Change
in the Community Development Department to Add One Administrative Services
Coordinator Classification. Not heard.
(*14-444) Ordinance No. 3112, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease with Watertight
Restoration, Inc. for Three Years in a Portion of Building 43 Located at 2440 Monarch
Street, Suite 200 at Alameda Point."" Finally passed.
(*14-445) Ordinance No. 3113, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease with Steeltown
Winery LLC for Ten Years with Two Additional Five-Year Options in a Portion of
Building 43 Located at 2440 Monarch Street, Suite 100 at Alameda Point."" Finally
passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(14-446) Adoption of Resolution Honoring Former City Councilmember Hadi Monsef for
His Many Contributions to the City of Alameda. Not heard.
Mayor Gilmore announced the resolution would be heard on November 18, 2014.
(14-447) Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to the Fiscal Years 2008-2014
Community Development Block Grant Action Plans, and Authorize the City Manager to
Negotiate and Execute Related Documents, Agreements, and Modifications.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
October 21, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-10-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-12-02,6,"(*14-493) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Purchase Playground
Equipment and Safety Surfacing from MRC/GameTime for Longfellow Park in an
Amount Not To Exceed $133,000, Including Contingencies. Accepted.
(*14-494) Resolution No. 14983, ""Authorizing Submittal of Application for All CalRecycle
Grants for which the City is Eligible, which Authorizes the City Manager to Submit a
Grant for the CalRecycle Tire-Derived Product Grant Program for Playground Surfacing
at Longfellow Park and to Execute All Necessary Documents."" Adopted.
(*14-495) Resolution No. 14984, ""Approving the Application for Land and Water
Conservation Fund Jean Sweeney Open Space Park Project, which Authorizes the City
Manager to Submit a Grant Application to the Land and Water Conservation Fund to
Design and Construct a Portion of the Jean Sweeney Open Space Park and to Execute
All Necessary Documents."" Adopted.
(*14-496) Resolution No. 14985, ""Approving the Application for Land and Water
Conservation Fund Estuary Park Project, which Authorizes the City Manager to Submit
a Grant Application to the Land and Water Conservation Fund to Construct Phase 1 of
Estuary Park and to Execute All Necessary Documents.' Adopted.
(*14-497) Resolution No. 14986, ""Amending Resolution 14512 to Update Signing
Authority for the State's Local Agency Investment Fund."" Adopted.
(*14-498) Resolution No. 14987, ""Setting the 2015 Regular City Council Meeting Dates.'
Adopted.
(*14-499) Resolution No. 14988, ""Declaring Canvass of Returns and Results of the
Consolidated General Municipal Election Held on Tuesday, November 4, 2014.'
Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(14-500) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Negotiate and Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a
Lease with Bay Ship and Yacht Company for Sixty Months in Building 292 Located at
1450 Ferry Point at Alameda Point. Introduced.
***
Councilmember Tam left the dais at 8:09 p.m. and returned at 8:11 p.m.
***
The Economic Development Division Manager gave a brief presentation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
December 2, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-12-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-01-06,4,"(*15-013) Recommendation to Accept the Police and Fire Services Fee Report.
Accepted.
(*15-014) Recommendation to Consider the Appointment of Three Members to the
Open Government Commission. Accepted.
(15-015) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Dixon Marine Services, Inc., for
Alameda South Shore Lagoon Dredging, No. P.W. 11-13-26. Not heard.
(15-016) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for the City of Alameda Park Street Pedestrian Safety Improvements, No. P.W. 06-
13-18.
Expressed support for the intersection redesign; suggested redesign be considered for
other similar intersections: Audrey Lord-Hausman, Bike Walk Alameda.
Stated the Park Street Business Association (PSBA) supports the plan to improve
pedestrian safety; urged approval: Robb Ratto, PSBA.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
(*15-017) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for Installation of Pedestrian Push Button Upgrades Proposed for Visually-Impaired
Individuals, No. P.W. 12-14-17. Accepted.
(*15-018) Resolution No. 14998, Approving Parcel Map No. 10263 - A Parcel Map for
the Proposed Subdivision of the Parcel at 2531 and 2533 Clement Avenue into Two
Parcels."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(15-019) Introduction of Ordinance Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of the Lease with Wrightspeed,
Inc., a Delaware Corporation for a Lease for Seven Years with Two Five-Year Options
and an Opportunity to Purchase Building 41 Located at 650 West Tower Avenue at
Alameda Point. Introduced.
The Economic Development Division Manager and lan Wright, Wrightspeed, gave
Power Point presentations.
Vice Mayor Matarrese thanked Mr. Wright for outlining reasons for locating in Alameda;
stated the lease is very important to Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 6, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-01-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-01-20,4,"(*15-040) Minutes of the Special and Regular Meetings Held on December 16, 2014.
Approved.
(*15-041) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,951,104.22
(15-042) Ordinance No. 3119, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease with Wrightspeed,
Inc., a Delaware Corporation, for Seven Years with Two Additional Five-Year Options
and an Opportunity to Purchase Building 41 Located at 650 West Tower Avenue at
Alameda Point."" Finally passed.
Stated solar collectors on the building would collect 20,000 mega watt hours (MWH) of
electricity; suggested use of thermal collectors be considered: Ken Peterson, Alameda.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated a press event was held today at Alameda Point
regarding the signing of the lease; the current 150 employees will hopefully grow to 300;
employees are renters who would like to live in the same city in which they work; the
focus is on getting the adjacent Site A development going.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved final passage of the ordinance.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer clarified that the motion pertains strictly to
Wrightspeed and does not include Site A.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(15-043) Resolution No. 15000, ""Appointing Bruce Edwards as Member of the Pension
Board.' Adopted.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented a Certificate of
Appointment to Mr. Edwards.
(15-044) Resolution No. 15001, ""Commending Alameda Fire Department Chief Michael
D'Orazi for His Contributions to the City Of Alameda.' Adopted.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
January 20, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-01-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-03-03,5,"(*15-157) Resolution No. 15006, ""Appointing an Engineer-of-Work and an Attorney-of-
Record for Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2."" Adopted.
(*15-158) Resolution No. 15007, ""Appointing an Engineer-of-Work and an Attorney-of-
Record for Maintenance Assessment District 01-1."" Adopted.
(*15-159) Resolution No. 15008, ""Approving the Final Map and Bond, Authorizing
Execution of Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Accepting Dedications and
Easements for Tract 8118 (Marina Shores). Adopted.
(*15-160) Ordinance No. 3120, ""Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute
Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of the Lease with Complete Coach
Works, a California Corporation, for a Lease for Two Years and Nine Months in a
Portion of Building 24 Located at 2301 Monarch Street at Alameda Point."" Finally
passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(15-161) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a 60 Year Lease
Agreement and Approve a Temporary Right of Entry Permit with Water Emergency
Transportation Authority (WETA) for 0.73 acres of Undeveloped Upland Real Property
and 3.4 acres of Submerged Lands located along West Hornet and Ferry Point Streets
at Alameda Point.
The Economic Development Manager gave a brief presentation.
Kevin Connolly, WETA, gave a Power Point presentation.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired who would be responsible for spills and containment, to
which Mr. Connolly responded spills and containment would be part of WETA's
regulatory responsibility with the Coast Guard.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether the City would be protected from any liability, to
which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether WETA is committed to building the haul out
prior to dismantling the current one.
Mr. Connolly responded in the affirmative; stated WETA will work with City staff to
identify the best location and timing for building the haul out.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft clarified that pages in the lease agreement address fuel
storage facilities which are required to have adequate measures for containment; stated
that she wants to make sure no one confuses the fuel storage with the estuary spill.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 3, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-03-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-05-19,4,"(*15-340) Recommendation to Approve a First Amendment to the Agreement with
Faithful & Gould Inc. to Add the Amount of $74,786, Including Contingencies, for a Total
Amount of $149,785 for Facility Condition Assessments. Accepted.
(15-341) Resolution No. 15035, ""Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring the
City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments, and Providing for
Notice of Public Hearing on July 7, 2015 - Island City Landscaping and Lighting District
84-2."" Adopted.
Councilmembers Daysog and Vice Mayor Matarrese recused themselves and left dais.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
3. [Absent: Councilmembers Daysog and Matarrese - 2.]
(*15-342) Resolution No.15036, ""Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring
the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for
Notice of Public Hearing on July 7,2015 - Maintenance Assessment District 01-01
(Marina Cove). Adopted.
(*15-343) Resolution No. 15037 ""Initiating Proceedings for a Proposed Increase in
Assessments and the Filing of an Assessment Engineer's Report for Island City
Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2, Zone 4 (Park Street). Adopted; and
(*15-343A) Resolution No. 15038, ""Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring
the Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing Notice of
Public Hearing on July 7, 2015, Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2, Zone
4 (Park Street). Adopted.
(15-344) Resolution No. 15039, ""Approving the Alameda County Transportation
Commission Measure BB Master Programs Funding Agreement and Authorizing the
Interim City Manager to Execute all Documents."" Adopted.
Expressed concern over the Fruitvale Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system; suggested an
expressed bus be used instead; urged greater public input: Darcy Morrison, Alameda.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Transportation Engineer stated the master
funding agreement is for direct local distribution for infrastructure improvements
including bike, pedestrian, and streets; the project is not a capital project part of
Measure BB.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
May 19, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-05-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-15,5,"(*15-550) Ratified bills in the amount of $7,969,788.62.
(*15-551) Recommendation to Amend the Current Contract in the Amount of $72,450 to
$139,200 with Lucity, Inc. for a More Comprehensive Computerized Maintenance
Management System. Accepted.
(*15-552) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $4,237,790.29,
Including Contingencies, to Ranger Pipeline Inc. for Cyclic Sewer Rehabilitation Project,
Phase 12, No. P.W. 01-15-01. Accepted
(*15-553) Resolution No. 15084, ""Approving Final Map and Bond, Authorizing Execution
of Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Accepting Easements for Tract 8213
(Mapes Ranch). Adopted.
(*15-554) Resolution No. 15085, ""Approving a One Year Time Extension for Tentative
Map 8060 for the Boatworks Project at 2229 through 2241 Clement Avenue."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(15-555) Adoption of Resolution Appointing Carol Gottstein as a Member of the
Commission on Disability Issues. Not adopted;
(15-555A) Resolution No. 15086, ""Appointing Tony Lewis as a Member of the
Commission on Disabilities Issues."" Adopted;
(15-555B) Resolution No. 15087, ""Reappointing John McCahan as a Member of the
Housing Authority Board of Commissioners.' Adopted;
(15-555C) Resolution No. 15088, ""Appointing Kathleen Kearney and as a Member of
the Library Board."" Adopted; and
(15-555D) Resolution No. 15089, ""Gertrude Woods as Members of the Library Board.""
Adopted.
Mayor Spencer moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion.
Expressed support for Carol Gottstein and Tony Lewis on the Commission on Disability
Issues: Carrie Wilson, Alameda;
Urged Council to listen to the folks on ARC to help disabled citizens: Leonard Margado,
Alameda;
Read a letter from Ann Steiner supporting Carol Gottstein: Virginia Burgstrom, Alameda.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he would like Council to consider another candidate
besides Ms. Gottstein on the Commission on Disability Issues.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
September 19, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-01-19,5,"(*16-028) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for Park Street Corridor Safety and Operations Improvements, No. P.W. 03-15-03.
Accepted.
(*16-029) Recommendation to Extend the Fourth Amendment to the AMPCO System
Parking Agreement for an Additional Six-Month Term for the Operation and
Maintenance of the Civic Center Parking Structure in the Amount of $75,000. Adopted.
(*16-030) Ordinance No. 3145, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Four Year Lease with Five
Three-Year Extension Options and Right of First Negotiation to Purchase with Google
Inc. for Building 400A Located at 1190 West Tower Avenue at Alameda Point. [In
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this project is
Categorically Exempt under the CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (c) - Existing
Facilities.]' Finally passed.
(16-031) Ordinance No. 3146, ""Amending Alameda Municipal Code Section 30-5.15
regarding Medical Marijuana Dispensaries to Define and Prohibit the Commercial
Cultivation of Medical Marijuana in the City of Alameda to Protect the City's Jurisdiction
Regarding Cultivation, While Preserving the Opportunity to Have a Robust Discussion
About Medical Marijuana Cultivation at a Later Date.' Finally passed.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he voted no when the ordinance first came to
Council; he believes there has not been adequate public discussion.
Councilmember Daysog stated if the City of Alameda does not make a decision
regarding medical marijuana cultivation, then the State will supersede; medical
marijuana is an issue that cities need to look at broadly; he feels that it might be good in
terms economic development or personal health.
Mayor Spencer clarified the ordinance is to protect local control.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft noted the title indicates there is opportunity to have a
robust discussion about medical marijuana at a later date.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved final passage of the ordinance.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 4.
Noes: Councilmember Oddie - 1.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(16-032) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $395,000, Including
Contingency, to CDM Smith to Prepare the Citywide Transit and Transportation
Demand Management (TDM) Plans and to Amend the Measure B and Base Reuse
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-02-24,3,"(*16-078) Resolution No.15122, ""Approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Between the Alameda Police Officers Association-Nonsworn (PANS) and the City of
Alameda for a Three-Year Term Commencing December 27, 2015 and Ending
December 26, 2018."" Adopted.
(*16-079) Resolution No. 15123, ""Approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Between the Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) and the
City of Alameda for a Three-Year Term Commencing December 27, 2015 and Ending
December 26, 2018."" Adopted.
(*16-080) Resolution No. 15124, ""Approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
between the Alameda Municipal Power Electrical Utility Professionals of Alameda
(EUPA) and the City of Alameda for a Three Year Term Commencing on December 27,
2015 and Ending December 26, 2018. Adopted.
(*16-081) Resolution No. 15125, ""Approving a Compensation Plan between Alameda
Municipal Power Unrepresented (AMPU) Employees and the City of Alameda for a
Three Year Term Commencing December27, 2015 and Ending December 26, 2018.'
Adopted.
(*16-082) Resolution No. 15126, ""Approving a Revised Executive Management
Compensation Plan between the Executive Management Employees (EXME) and the
City of Alameda for the Period Commencing December 27, 2015 and Ending December
26, 2018."" Adopted; and
(16-082A) Resolution No. 15127, ""Amending the City of Alameda Executive
Management (EXME) Compensation Plan to Retitle the Classification of Chief
Operating Officer - Alameda Point to Director of Base Reuse."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM
(16-083) Recommendation to Approve the Central Avenue Complete Streets Concept
Including Safety and Other Street Improvements.
Council discussed the time limit for speakers and agreed to keep the 3 minute time limit.
Students expressed support for the bike lanes for a safer Alameda: Cosmo Hondrogen,
Maya Lin School; R.J. Pimentel, Saint Joseph School; Charlotte Morgan, Academy of
Alameda (AOA); Olive Little, Wood Middle School; Audrey Wismar, AOA; Theo Wismar,
Alameda; Miles Quale, Alameda; Niko, Alameda; Scarlet Corbly, Encinal Junior Jets;
Mateo Hamilton, Encinal Junior Jets; Luke Samford, AOA: Fin, Alameda; Marisa Wood,
Alameda Community Learning Academy (ACLC); Skyler, ACLC; Nicky, ACLC.
Urged Council to make the decision in support of bicyclists; stated motorists threaten
the safety of bicyclists: John Corbly, Alameda.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 24, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-02-24.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-04-05,3,"(*16-148) Minutes of the Special City Council Meetings Held on February 24, 2016; the
Continued City Council Meeting Held on February 29, 2016; and the Continued and
Regular City Council Meeting Held on March 1, 2016. Approved.
(*16-149) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,233,486.85.
(*16-150) Recommendation to Consider the Appointment of Four Members to the
Underground Utility District Nomination Board. Accepted.
(*16-151) Recommendation to Authorize the Public Utilities Board to Sell Obsolete and
Unnecessary Personal Property in Excess of Ten-Thousand Dollars Pursuant to the
Requirements of Article XII, Section 12-3 (A) of the City Charter and to Recycle or
Scrap Obsolete Vehicles and Electrical Equipment. Accepted.
(*16-152) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $1,582,635, Including
Contingencies, to Ranger Pipelines, Inc., for the Construction of the Lagoon Seawall
Trunk Sewer Relocation Project, No. P.W. 01-12-03. Accepted.
(*16-153) Recommendation to Reject All Bids and Authorize a Call for Rebid for the
Construction of the Park/Otis Force Main Replacement Project, No. P.W. 10-15-19.
Accepted.
(*16-154) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Enter into an Agreement
with ENGEO in the Amount of $91,500 to Prepare a Geotechnical Report for the
Proposed Seaplane Lagoon Ferry Terminal at Alameda Point and Amend the Base
Reuse Fund Expense and Revenue Budgets by Increasing Each by $91,500. Accepted.
(*16-155) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $70,752 Annually for
a Period of Five Years to Accela, Inc. for Accela Automation Land Management and
Citizen Access Software Licenses and Managed Service Fees and Mobile Office, and
Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Contract and Related Documents. Accepted.
(16-156) Recommendation to: Approve a Nine-Month, $713,000 Services Agreement
between the City of Alameda and the Housing Authority Concerning Program
Administrator Services for the Rent Review, Rent Stabilization and Limitations on
Evictions Ordinance and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement; and
(16-156A) Appropriate $493,000 in General Fund Monies to Fully Fund the Agreement.
Mayor Spencer stated that she is concerned people cannot go into the Housing
Authority and speak to a live person; residents are complaining it takes 3 days to get a
return phone call; people should be able to stand in line to make an appointment to
speak with someone.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired if Mayor Spencer is objecting to spending the money to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 5, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-04-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-04-05,5,"(*16-157) Resolution No. 15138, ""Adopting a Policy Concerning Capital Improvement
Plans for Rental Units in the City of Alameda for Substantial Rehabilitation Pursuant to
the Rent Review, Rent Stabilization and Limitations on Evictions Ordinance."" Adopted.
(16-158) Ordinance No. 3150, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents
Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Ten-Year Lease with Two Ten-Year Renewal
Options and an Option to Purchase with Alameda Point Redevelopers, LLC for Building
8, Located at 2350 Saratoga Street at Alameda Point."" Finally passed.
Expressed support for the project; stated the project is of tremendous value to Alameda
and will bring permanent jobs and construction jobs to Alameda: Michael McDonough,
Chamber of Commerce.
Mayor Spencer stated valuation did not include the work/live units; the units do not
count as housing per the City's Code and do not impact the number of housing units the
City is required to have per the State; inquired whether the maximum number of
work/live units has changed from 73 to 86.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded the City's work/live
ordinance sets a maximum number of units based on the size of the property; the 73
number is based on the specific amount of land available to the project today; there is a
small piece of land that will become a part of the project once the Navy conveys it to the
City; once that land becomes available, the number will be 86; the developer cannot
construct a single unit without a conditional use permit that needs to be approved by the
Planning Board and Council; there cannot be more than 86 units.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the number of work/live units does need to be discussed
but is not a current agenda item; stated that he would like to call for the question.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved final passage of the ordinance authorizing the
City Manager to execute documents necessary to implement the terms of a ten-year
lease with two ten-year renewal options and an option to purchase with Alameda Point
Redevelopers, LLC, for Building 8, located at 2350 Saratoga Street at Alameda Point.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated the buildings are so decrepit that the
City needs people willing to take the risk; he is satisfied with the project; stated due
diligence has been done on behalf of the residents of Alameda.
The City Attorney stated there is a call for question which eliminates further discussion.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Mayor
Spencer - 1.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 5, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-04-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-05-03,5,"(*16-205) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,723,002.80.
(*16-206) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ending
December 31, 2015. Accepted.
(*16-207) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Second
Amendment to an Agreement with Verde Design to Add $69,975, for a Total Amount of
$279,420 for Design and Construction Administration Services for Estuary Park.
Accepted.
(*16-208) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $208,985, Including
Contingency, to Coastland Company for Construction Management and Inspection
Services for the Lagoon Seawall Trunk Sewer Replacement Project, No. P.W.01-12-03.
Accepted.
(*16-209) Recommendation to Authorize Call for Bids for Legal Advertising for the Fiscal
Year Ending June 30, 2017. Accepted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(16-210) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 1277, N.S. to Rezone 101-
223 Brush Street (Esperanza - APN 74-475-1-7) and 719-727 Buena Vista Avenue
(Rosefield Village - APN 73-426-5) Removing the ""G"" (Government) Overlay Zoning
District. [The Proposed Amendment is Categorically Exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, Minor
Alternations to Land Use Limitations.] Introduced.
The City Planner gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(16-211) Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)/HOME Partnership Investment Program Action Plan
and Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Related Documents,
Agreements, and Modifications.
The Housing Authority Rent and Community Programs Director gave a Power Point
presentation.
Doug Biggs, Social Services Human Relations Board (SSHRB), gave a brief presentation.
Thanked the Council and SSHRB for their ongoing support: Erin Scott, Family Violence
Law Center.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 3, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-06-07,4,"(*16-271) Resolution No. 15153, ""Terminating a Portion of an Existing Public Utility
Easement Within Parcel Map 10086, 2650 Fifth Street, and Recordation of Quitclaim
Deed."" Adopted.
(*16-272) Resolution No. 15154, ""Approving the Support Services Program Agreement
with the Northern California Power Agency and Alameda Municipal Power (AMP). ""
Adopted.
(*16-273) Resolution No. 15155, ""Requesting and Authorizing the County of Alameda to
Levy a Tax on All Real and Personal Property in the City of Alameda as a Voter
Approved Levy for the General Obligation Bonds Issued Pursuant to a General Election
Held November 7, 2000 for the Alameda Library.' Adopted.
(*16-274) Ordinance No. 3153, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Chapter 30 Clarifying Text Amendments to Sections 30-58 through 30-59.3 of the
Zoning Ordinance Related to Water Efficient Landscaping.' [The Proposed
Amendments are Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, Minor Alterations to Land Use
Limitations]. Finally passed.
(*16-275) Ordinance No. 3154, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Various Sections of Article IV (Contracts) and Article V (Administrative Procedures and
Policies) Concerning Conformance of Alameda's Bidding Procedures on Public Works
Projects to Public Contract Code 22032 and California Uniform Public Construction Cost
Accounting. Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(16-276) Recommendation to Direct Staff to Prepare a Ballot Measure for the November
2016 Election to Update and Modernize the Existing City of Alameda Utility Users Tax
Ordinance and Reaffirm Alameda Municipal Power's General Fund Transfer to Support
the Provision of Essential City Services.
The City Manager made brief introductory comments and the Assistant City Manager
gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether staff will be describing how modernizing the existing
laws and practices will be applied, to which the Assistant City Manager responded in the
affirmative.
The Assistant City Manager continued the presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if the Utility Users Tax (UUT) is paid when
homeowners pay their property tax.
The Assistant City Manager responded in the negative; stated the tax is on the cable
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
June 7, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-06-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-07-19,3,"(*16-360) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on June 21,
2016. Approved.
(*16-361) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,974,775.44.
(16-362) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $456,800, and
Authorize the City Manager to Approve Contract Changes, if Necessary, Up to a Ten
Percent Contingency in the Amount of $45,680, for a Total Amount of $502,480, to
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, Inc. for the Interim Inspection, Testing, Preliminary
Analyses and Reporting Services for Rehabilitation of Piers 1, 2 and 3 at Alameda
Point.
The Assistant Community Development Director gave a brief presentation and showed
a map and pictures of pier conditions.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what is the importance of U.S. Maritime
Administration (MARAD).
The Assistant Community Development Director responded that the MARAD ships are
ready reserve fleets that are deployed in the event of natural disasters.
Councilmember Daysog stated the ships represent 6% of all the energy consumed out
of Alameda.
The Assistant Community Development Director stated when there is a blackout the
ships convert to their own power source to not draw power from the City; the ships are a
major consumer and have the ability to support themselves, all of which helps the City.
Councilmember Daysog stated the MARAD ships supports a lot of the maritime industry
in the Bay Area.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if the ships could be used to evacuate a large
number of citizens, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded
in the affirmative, continued the presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired how sewage is processed on Pier 2.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded Pier 2 had a major sewer
line break; stated the sewage is under the piers; not many contractors want to work
under the piers; currently, the sewage is on the ships in tanks; the City is paying to have
the tanks pumped out and the waste trucked out; the Council approved a sewer
replacement project that will be completed next month.
Councilmember Oddie stated the pictures draw attention to how the piers have
deteriorated.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
July 19, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-07-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-08-08,2,"(*16-394) Ordinance No. 3160, ""Approving Two Leases and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of Leases with
National Response Corporation, Environmental Services (NRC) for Building 15 Located
at 1605 Ferry Point and Building 616 Located at 1750 Orion Street at Alameda Point for
Five and Two Years, Respectively.' Finally passed.
(*16-395) Ordinance No. 3161, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager
to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of Lease with Wonky
Kitchen LLC for Ten Years in Building 44 Located at 2400 Monarch Street at Alameda
Point."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(16-396) Resolution No. 15190, ""Calling an Election to be Consolidated with the City's
Next General Municipal Election on November 8, 2016, and Submitting to the Voters at
That Election a Measure, the Rent Stabilization Act, that Proposes to Have the Voters
Confirm Ordinance 3148, which Amended the Alameda Municipal Code by (a) Adding
Article XV to Chapter VI concerning (1) Review of Rent Increases Applicable to Certain
Rental Units and (2) Limitations on Evictions and the Payment of Relocation Assistance
Applicable to All Rental Units; (B) Amending Section 2-23.4 Concerning the Duties of
the Rent Review Advisory Committee and (c) Suspending Article XIV of Chapter VI in
Its Entirety."" Adopted; and
(16-396A) Consider Authoring a Direct and Possible Rebuttal Argument.
The City Clerk gave a Power Point presentation.
The City Manager made brief comments.
Councilmember Daysog inquired if all 5 Councilmembers could be included as the
signatories on the ballot arguments.
The City Clerk responded in the affirmative; stated that if Council decides to author the
argument, a subcommittee of two would write it, then all 5 Councilmembers can sign it;
only two Councilmembers can write the argument, otherwise it has to be written in open
session.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the signatories is one of four options to
decide upon.
The City Clerk responded in the affirmative; stated there could be a mix of
Councilmembers and other people that sign the argument.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if the City Clerk could recap the changes with the
proposals since the last Council meeting.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
August 8, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-08-08.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-01-17,4,"(*17-033) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager, or Her Designee, to
Negotiate and Execute a Purchase Agreement with Tri Tech Software Systems on
Forms Acceptable to the City Attorney to Furnish, Install, and Implement an Upgrade to
the Police Department's Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Records Management
Systems (RMS) Utilizing Previously Approved Funds, in an Amount not to Exceed
$995,000, in a Technology Account, Resulting in No Additional Costs to the City, and
Accompanying Five Year Software Support Agreement. Accepted.
(*17-034) Recommendation to Amend the Contract With Ray's Electric to Increase the
Contract Amount by $58,000, Including Contingency, for the Main Street Ferry Terminal
Access Improvement Project for a Total of $176,320. Accepted.
(*17-035) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Approve the Assignment
of Lease for Building 9 from 707 West Tower Avenue, LLC to 651/707 West Tower
Avenue, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. Accepted.
(*17-036) Resolution No. 15224, ""Amending Fiscal Year (FY) 2016-17 Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership Program
(HOME) Funds Budget for Prior Fiscal Year Unspent Entitlement and Program Income
Allocations.' Adopted.
(*17-037) Ordinance No. 3173, ""Approving the Lease of Building 397, Located at 1690
Orion Street at Alameda Point, with Astra Space, Inc., a Delaware C-Corporation for a
Two-Year Lease with Three One-Year Extension Options. [In accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this Project is Categorically Exempt under
the CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(c) -Existing Facilities.]"" [Requires Four Affirmative
Votes]. Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(17-038) Presentation of Accreditation Award to the Public Works Department from the
American Public Works Association.
Edric Kwan, American Public Works Association, presented the Accreditation Award.
The Interim Public Works Director gave a brief presentation.
(17-039) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending the
Disposition and Development Agreement between Alameda Point Partners, LLC (APP)
and the City of Alameda for Site A at Alameda Point to Extend the Phase 1 Outside
Closing Date from December 12, 2016 to April 11, 2017 to Allow for Additional Time to
Complete Property Due Diligence and to Secure Additional Financial Commitments.
Introduced.
The Base Reuse Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 17, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-01-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-01-03,2,"(*17-06) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,765,219.60.
(17-07) Recommendation to Accept Report on the Appointment of One Member to the
Open Government Commission.
Councilmember Vella made brief comments regarding Ms. Little's background.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Ms. Little.
(*17-08) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to
the Agreement with Ruggeri-Jensen-Azar for Survey and Mapping Services in
Connection with the Proposed Transfer of the Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal for an
Additional 6-Month Term for a Total Term of 16-Months and in an Amount Not to
Exceed $20,000 for a Total Amount Not to Exceed $218,000; and
(*17- 08A) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Amendment
to the Agreement with Chicago Title Company for Title and Escrow Services in
Connection with the Proposed Transfer of the Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal for an
Additional 6-Month Term for a Total Term of 16-Months, Paid Prior to Close of Escrow,
Plus Title Premiums and Escrow Fees Paid at Close of Escrow. Accepted.
(*17-09) Resolution No. 15219, ""Approving Workforce Changes at Alameda Municipal
Power (AMP) to Add Two New Positions Effective January 8, 2017: One Customer
Service Representative and One Utility Project Manager."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(17-10) Resolution No. 15220, ""Appointing Norman Sanchez as a Member of the
Historical Advisory Board."" Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Mayor Spencer seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Mayor Spencer
interviewed all three candidates.
Mayor Spencer responded that her recollection was one person was interviewed
previously and two new candidates were interviewed; further stated her recollection
is
three were interviewed.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
January 3, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-01-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-21,3,"(*17-118) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meeting Held on January 17,
2017. Approved.
(*17-119) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,309,335.54.
(*17-120) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period
Ending September 30, 2016 Collected During the Period April 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016.
Accepted.
(17-121) Recommendation to Receive the 6-Month Status Update on the Enterprise
District Development Approach (July 2016 to December 2016).
Stated business parks should not be built without housing; housing is needed;
commercial development should be leveraged for affordable housing: Angela
Hockabout, Renewed Hope.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Base Reuse Director stated the
development is part of a larger mixed-use development; the area focuses on jobs;
18,000 jobs were lost when the Base closed causing an imbalance of housing and jobs;
the no-cost conveyance is supposed to replace jobs; a condition of getting the land
under the no-cost, economic conveyance agreement with the Navy requires focusing on
a mixed-use community and bringing jobs that were lost when the Base was closed; the
20 to 30 year plan makes sure commercial land is available.
Mayor Spencer stated if more than 1,400 homes are built, the City would have to pay
$50,000 per unit, which will be inflated over time.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the point of closed military bases is to replace lost
jobs; the need for balance is important; jobs left, but houses did not leave.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft Seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice
votes - 5.
(*17-122) Resolution No. 15230, ""Amending Resolution No. 9460 to Reflect Current
Positions and Entities to be included in the City of Alameda's Conflict of Interest Code
and Rescind Resolution No. 14992."" Adopted.
(*17-123) Resolution No. 15231, ""Approving Two Workforce Changes at Alameda
Municipal Power: Delete One Position, Senior Account Clerk; Add One New Position,
Utility Information Systems Billing Specialist; and Amend the Salary Schedule of Electric
Utility Professionals of Alameda (EUPA) to Retitle Engineering Supervisor to
Engineering Manager, Effective March 5, 2017. Adopted.
(17-124) Resolution No. 15232, ""Appointing an Engineer-of-Work and an Attorney-of-
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
February 21, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-02-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-03-07,4,"(*17-150) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,601,195.91.
(*17-151) Recommendation to Substitute a Revised Exhibit A to the License Agreement
with the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) for a Fire Safety Access Route
Through Otis Elementary School to Krusi Park. Accepted.
(*17-152) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to
an Agreement with ENGEO, Incorporated to Extend the Term until March 2018 and Add
the Amount of $9,400 for a Total Contract Amount of $100,900 for Geotechnical
Services Related to the Seaplane Lagoon Ferry Terminal; and
(17-152A) Resolution No. 15238, ""Amending the Operating Budget for Fiscal Year
2016-17 by Adding $9,400 to the Base Reuse Fund."" Adopted.
(*17-153) Resolution No. 15239, ""Declaring Intention to Establish a Community
Facilities District (CFD) and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein - Alameda
Point Public Services District."" Adopted.
(*17-154) Resolution No. 15240, ""For Authorization to Apply for Housing Related Parks
Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development for the
Annual Playground Replacement Program."" Adopted.
(*17-155) Ordinance No. 3175, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a 3 Year Lease with No
Extension Options with Williams-Sonoma, Inc. a Delaware Corporation, for Building
169, Suite 102 Located at 1680 Viking Street, Alameda Point."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(17-156) Recommendation to Approve Pre-Commitment of $6.0 million of the City's
Base Allocation of Funding through the Alameda County Affordable Housing Bond
Program for the Eagle Avenue and Site A Affordable Housing Projects.
The Community Development Director and Base Reuse Director gave a Power Point
presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council inquired whether the County will support
the applications for the Eagle Avenue project and closing the gap on Site A funding, to
which the Community Development Director responded staff is planning to engage with
the County starting tomorrow.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether staff will be meeting with County
Supervisor Wilma Chan, to which the Community Development Director responded staff
has not met with Supervisor Chan yet but it is an excellent suggestion.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
March 7, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-03-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-05-02,6,"(*17-285) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on April 4, 2017. Approved.
(*17-286) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,333,238.21.
(*17-287) Recommendation to Authorize Call for Bids for Publication of Legal Notices in
the Official Newspaper for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2018. Accepted.
(*17-288) Recommendation to Direct Staff to Transmit the City of Alameda 2016
Housing Element Annual Report to the State of California Department of Housing and
Community Development. Accepted. [Approval of an annual report is not subject to
review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), nor is an annual report
defined as a ""project"" under CEQA. No future review is required.]
(*17-289) Recommendation to Accept the Work of MCK Services, Inc. for Repair and
Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 35, No. P.W. 03-16-03. Accepted.
(*17-290) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Mountain Cascade, Inc. for
Construction of Group 2 - Sewer Pump Station Renovations for Reliability and Safety
Improvements Project, No. P.W.03-14-10. Accepted.
(*17-291) Ordinance No. 3179, ""Approving a First Amendment to a Lease and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the
Terms of a First Amendment to the Lease Agreement with Advanced Roofing Services,
Inc. a California Corporation, for Building 612 Located at 1450 Viking Street at Alameda
Point."" Finally passed. [In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), this project is Categorically Exempt under the CEQA Guidelines Section
15301(c) - Existing Facilities.]
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(17-292) Recommendation to Accept Update on the Status of the Underground Utility
District (UUD) Program.
The Alameda Municipal Power (AMP) Interim Engineering Manager gave a Power Point
presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the statement listed on the report that
says 1% of commuters that are bike riders includes school children riding to and from
school.
The AMP Interim Engineering Manager responded he is not sure if children are
included.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the number is growing.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
May 2, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-05-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-09-19,6,"(*17-544) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Issue a Notice to Proceed
with Macks Craic Inc. (dba Mack5) for Construction Management Services for the Jean
Sweeney Open Space Park - Phase A in the Amount of $191,400 Using the Jean
Sweeney Open Space Park Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project 91309.
Accepted.
(*17-545) Resolution No. 15304, ""Authorizing the Golden State Warriors, Good Tidings
Foundation, Aquafina, and Alameda Theatre and Cineplex Logos on the Washington
Park Outdoor Basketball Courts."" Adopted.
(*17-546) Resolution No. 15305, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Accept, on Behalf of
the City, Certain Surplus Federal Property, and to Accept, Execute, and Record
Conveyance Documents in Substantial Conformance with Conveyance Documents
Received from the United States of America, Acting by and through the Department of
the Navy, to Implement the Economic Development Conveyance Agreement for the
Former Naval Air Station, Alameda (Phase 3B Alameda Point Conveyance). Adopted.
(*17-547) Resolution No. 15306, ""Of Consideration to Alter the Rate and Method of
Apportionment of Special Taxes for Community Facilities District No. 13-1 (Alameda
Landing Public Improvements). Adopted.
(*17-548) Ordinance No. 3189, ""Repealing Ordinance No. 3180 in Its Entirety.' Finally
passed.
[Note: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft voted no, so the motion carried by the following
vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Matarrese, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft - 1.]
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(17-549) Resolution No. 15307, ""Reappointing Lynn Jones as a Member of the
Historical Advisory Board.' Adopted;
(17-549 A) Resolution No. 15308, ""Reappointing Norman Sanchez as a Member of the
Historical Advisory Board.' Adopted;
(17-549 B) Resolution No. 15309, ""Appointing Mark Farrell as a Member of the Public
Art Commission.' Adopted;
(17-549 C) Resolution No. 15310, ""Appointing Alan Teague as a Member of the
Planning Board.' Adopted; and
(17-549 D) Adoption of Resolution Appointing Patricia Lamborn as a Member of the
Planning Board. Not adopted.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested the votes on the boards be bifurcated.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 19, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-09-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-10-17,8,"(*17-622) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute Amendment to
the Agreement with SLR International Corporation (SLR) to Provide Groundwater
Investigation and Monitoring Services for the Jean Sweeney Open Space Park for an
Amount Not To Exceed $163,900 for a Total Contract Amount of $518,060. Accepted.
(17-623) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $4,124,520, Including
an 8% Contingency, to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. for Jean Sweeney Open
Space Park Phase A Project, No. P.W. 05-16-09; and
(17-623A) Resolution No. 15316, ""Appropriating $1,000,000 to the Capital Projects
Fund Sweeney Park Project (91309) from the General Fund, $13,000 from the Historical
Advisory Board Fund and $25,000 of Kiwanis and $25,000 of Alameda Community
Fund Donations for a total of $1,063,000 to the Project."" Adopted.
Mayor Spencer stated she would like to publicly share that without donations the project
could not have been completed.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated Alameda Kiwanis and Alameda Community
Foundation donated money towards a playground component and Alameda Rotary
donated money that will fund the picnic pavilion.
Expressed support for the recommendation; thanked the Recreation and Parks Director;
urged moving forward: Jim Sweeney, Jean Sweeney Open Space Park Fund.
Urged approval of the project: Dorothy Freeman, Jean Sweeney Open Space Park
Fund.
Stated Bike Walk Alameda is excited about the progress on the trail; noted funds have
been borrowed from other areas of the Cross Alameda Trail: Brian McGuire, Bike Walk
Alameda.
The City Manager expressed her appreciation for the Recreation and Parks Director's
work.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the item.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer expressed her appreciation for Mr. Sweeney and Ms.
Freeman.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(*17-624) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager, or Her Designee, to
Negotiate and Execute Purchase Agreements not to Exceed $308,000 for the
Replacement of Seven Police Department Vehicles and One Police Motorcycle.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 17, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-10-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-11-07,3,"(*17-657) Ratified bills in the amount of $10,140,056.00.
(*17-658) Resolution No. 15321, ""Reclassifying an Administrative Services Coordinator
Full Time Equivalent Position to a Management Analyst Full Time Equivalent Position in
the Community Development Department."" Adopted.
(*17-659) Ordinance No. 3195, ""Amending Alameda Municipal Code Section 30-25
Appeals of Calls for Review."" Finally passed.
(*17-660) Ordinance No. 3196, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Ground
Lease Agreement Between Eden Housing, Inc., and the City of Alameda for a 70-Unit
Family Affordable Housing Project on Block 8 within Site A at Alameda Point."" Finally
passed.
(*17-661) Ordinance No. 3197, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Ground
Lease Agreement Between Eden Housing, Inc., and the City of Alameda for a 60-Unit
Senior Affordable Housing Project on Block 8 within Site A at Alameda Point."" Finally
passed.
(17-662) Ordinance No. 3198, ""Amending Alameda Municipal Code to Add Section 30-
18 Universal Residential Design."" Finally passed.
Thanked staff for the work on the Universal Design Ordinance: Beth Kenny, Alameda.
Stated universal design is not only for disabled people: Arnold Brillinger, Alameda.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved final passage of the ordinance.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(*17-663) Ordinance No. 3199, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Chapter 30 (Zoning Ordinance) to Update and Improve the Regulations Governing the
Public Art Ordinance."" Finally passed.
(*17-664) Ordinance No. 3200, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Section 2-19 (Commission on Disability Issues) to Change the Name to Commission on
Disability.' Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(17-665) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15322, ""Amending Master Fee
Resolution No. 12191 to Revise Fire Department Transport Fees."" Adopted.
The Interim Fire Chief gave a brief presentation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 7, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-03-20,3,"(*18-153) Resolution No. 15355, ""Allowing Electronic Filing of Campaign Finance
Disclosure Forms."" Adopted.
(18-154) Resolution No. 15356, ""Confirming a Ground Lessor's Consent and Estoppel
Certificate and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to
Implement the Terms of the Ground Lessor's Consent and Estoppel Certificate with
Encinal Marina, Ltd., Doing Business as Grand Marina."" Adopted.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would like the public understand the request.
The Assistant Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the current lease provides for the possibility of
changes; expressed concerns with the lease locking the City into more than the current
lease.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded a lease can be amended at
any time with mutual agreement by all parties; stated nothing more is being tied into the
agreement.
The City Attorney stated the City is consenting to collateral security so the City cannot
arbitrarily withdraw; changes would have to be an arrangement the tenant would make
with the bank; the City the lease would be approved for the term of the loan.
Mayor Spencer inquired when the City would be able to change the term.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded the lease expires in April of
2029.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the lease is being extended, to which
the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the negative.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether there are any other instances where the tenant uses
the City's property as the security.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated
staff ensures proceeds are used to benefit the property.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the recommendation in the staff report
and allow the security to go forward [adoption of the resolution].
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(*18-155) Resolution No. 15357, ""Approving the Application for Grant Funds for
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
March 20, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-03-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-04-17,6,"(*18-215) Minutes of the Special City Council Meetings Held on March 20, 2018.
Approved.
(*18-216) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,828,272.29.
(18-217) Recommendation to Accept the Work of McGuire and Hester for Cross
Alameda Trail - Jean Sweeney Open Space Park, No. P.W. 05-16-11.
Showed a video and gave a historical overview: Dorothy Freeman, Alameda.
Suggested the gates be open when there is not active construction: Brian McGuire,
Alameda.
In response to Vice Mayor Vella's request, the Recreation and Parks Director stated
future contracts would allow access; outlined current issues preventing the trail from
opening.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft suggested staff get an estimate about temporary fencing
costs; stated another community work day could be done.
Mayor Spencer expressed her appreciation for the work done to get the funding
extension.
Vice Mayor Vella expressed support for future phases allowing access; concurred with
the suggested to have another work day.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(*18-218) Recommendation to Authorize the Acting City Manager to Execute a Second
Amendment to an Agreement with Placeworks to Add the Amount of $40,773 for a Total
Agreement Amount of $804,730 for the Design of the Jean Sweeney Open Space Park.
Accepted.
(*18-219) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Ranger Pipeline Inc. for Cyclic Sewer
Rehabilitation Project, Phase 13, No. P.W. 05-16-08. Accepted.
(*18-220) Recommendation to Accept the Work of McGuire and Hester for Construction
of Group 3 - Sewer Pump Station Renovations for Reliability and Safety Improvements
Project, No. P.W. 03-14-11. Accepted.
(*18-221) Recommendation to Approve Agreement Appointing Elizabeth D.
Warmerdam as Acting City Manager and Approve Acting City Manager Pay at $257,403
Annually. Accepted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
April 17, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-04-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-05-15,3,"(*18-287) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,911,579.29.
(*18-288) Recommendation to Approve the Execution of a Reciprocal Tax Information
Sharing Agreement between the City of Alameda and the Franchise Tax Board of the
State of California. Accepted.
(*18-289) Recommendation to Set June 19, 2018 for a Public Hearing to Consider
Collection of Delinquent Business License Taxes and Delinquent Integrated Waste
Management Accounts Via the Property Tax Bills. Accepted.
(*18-290) Recommendation to Accept the Work of MCK Services, Inc. for Repair and
Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 36, No. P.W. 04-17-24. Accepted.
(*18-291) Recommendation to Amend the Contract with MCK Services, Inc. to Extend
the Term and Increase Compensation by $5,300,000, Including Contingency, for a Total
Cumulative Contract Amount of $20,378,600.41 for Repair and Resurfacing of Certain
Streets, Phase 37, No. P.W. 01-18-01. Accepted; and
(*18-291A) Resolution No. 15378, ""Amending the Measure B and BB Fund Budgets for
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 and Fiscal Year 2018-2019. Adopted.
(*18-292) Resolution No. 15379, ""Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring
the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for
Notice of Public Hearing on June 19, 2018 - Island City Landscaping and Lighting
District 84-2 (Various Locations). Adopted.
[Note: Councilmember Matarrese recused himself. The matter carried by the following
vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 4.
Absent: Councilmember Matarrese - 1.]
(*18-293) Resolution No. 15380, ""Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring
the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for
Notice of Public Hearing on June 19, 2018 - Maintenance Assessment District 01-01
(Marina Cove).' Adopted.
(18-294) Summary Title: Approve Actions to Implement the Alameda Point
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan
Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the City of Alameda to Ratify the TDM Fee Amount
for Existing Tenants in Alameda Point;
(18-294A) Recommendation to Allow a Pass Through of the TDM Fees from Existing
Tenants in Alameda Point to the Alameda Transportation Management Association
(TMA); and
(18-294B) Recommendation to Allow a Pass Through of the Special Taxes Generated
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 15, 2018
3",CityCouncil/2018-05-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-06-05,3,"(*18-326) Recommendation to Authorize the Acting City Manager to Execute a Third
Amendment with Parsons Transportation Group, Inc., to Increase Compensation by
$20,000 for a Total Not to Exceed $94,999, with the Option of Two One-Year
Extensions with Compensation Not to Exceed $20,000 Per Year, for a Total Aggregate
Compensation Not to Exceed $134,999, to Continue Providing Technical and Strategic
Engineering Support for Major Transportation Projects. Accepted.
(18-326) Summary Title: Approve Actions to Implement the Alameda Point
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan
Resolution No. 15383, ""Authorizing the City of Alameda to Ratify the TDM Fee Amount
for Existing Tenants in Alameda Point."" Adopted;
(18-326A) Recommendation to Allow a Pass Through of the TDM Fees from Existing
Tenants in Alameda Point to the Alameda Transportation Management Association
(TMA); and
(18-326B) Recommendation to Allow a Pass Through of the Special Taxes Generated
for Transportation Purposes from Property Owners within Community Facilities District
17-1 (CFD 17-1) at Alameda Point to the Alameda TMA.
Expressed concern over the assessments, which pose a serious financial challenge for
the Hornet; urged the plan be tabled until a comprehensive demand analysis can be
reviewed to determine visitor and employee benefits for the Hornet: Michael McCarron,
USS Hornet.
The Acting Assistant City Manager gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there is a special category for non-profit
businesses and whether concerns were raised during the process.
The Acting Assistant City Manager responded there was a lot of discussion about
whether different uses fall into certain categories; stated there was one rate originally;
different rates were proposed because of the different uses and to try to address issues
raised; due to the Hornet's square footage, work was done to reduce and minimize the
rate; all businesses, including the Alameda Point Collaborative, are paying the fee;
there are many reasons employers would want to be exempt; exemptions would open
the door to having less than full participation and would undermine the program.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding possibly losing the Hornet, the Acting
Assistant City Manager stated the rate was negotiated with the Hornet's previous
Executive Director; tonight is the first she heard the assessment would be a financial
hardship.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding revising the assessment, the Acting
Assistant City Manager stated the decision falls on the Council; other tenants also had
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
June 5, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-09-18,6,"(*18-509) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Rosas Brothers Construction for the
Repair of Concrete Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway, and Minor Street Patching, Fiscal
Year 2017-18, Phase 18, No. P.W. 02-17-21. Accepted.
(18-510) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $286,763, Including
Contingency, to Parisi/CSW Design Group for the Outreach, Planning and Design
Services for the Otis Drive Traffic Calming and Safety Improvements Project.
Expressed support for the contract; discussed excessive speed of drivers on the street:
Joe Kaiser, Alameda.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Mayor Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye; Councilmember
Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Spencer: Aye. Ayes: 5.
(*18-511) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute an
Agreement with CSG Consultants Inc. for Professional Plan Check Services for a 60-
Month Term in an Amount not to Exceed $1,750,000. Accepted.
(*18-512) Recommendation to Approve the Public Art Commission's Recommendations
for Physical Public Art in Alameda; and
(*18-512A) Resolution No. 15431, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2018-19 Tidelands Fund
Budget to Appropriate $360,000 for Physical Art."" Adopted.
(*18-513) Resolution No. 15432, ""Authorizing the Mayor to Sign a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) Regarding the Formulation and Implementation of Sister City
Relations Between the City of Varazze, Italy and the City of Alameda, United States of
America."" Adopted.
(*18-514) Ordinance No. 3223, ""Amending Alameda Municipal Code Chapter XXX
(Zoning Ordinance) regarding the Residential Private and Common Open Space
Requirements to Allow Greater Variety of Residential Open Space Types and Amenities
Subject to Design Review Approval."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(18-515) Resolution No. 15433, ""Appointing Cheryl Harawitz as a Member of the Social
Service Human Relations Board."" Adopted.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
September 18, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-09-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-10-16,5,"(*18-572) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on September
18,2018. Approved.
(*18-573) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,725,693.06.
(*18-574) Recommendation to Receive a Report on the Continuation of the Art in City
Hall Program. Accepted.
(*18-575) Recommendation to Approve the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to Reuse
the Alameda Carnegie Building. Accepted.
(*18-576) Recommendation to Award a Contract to Oregon Romtec Inc. in the Amount
of $970,613 for the Krusi Park Recreation Center Replacement Project. Accepted.
(*18-577) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a Second
Amendment to the Agreement with Nute Engineering, to Extend the Term One Year and
Increase Compensation in an Amount Not to Exceed $394,390 for a Total Agreement
Compensation Not to Exceed $727,459 for Engineering Design Services for Cyclic
Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Phase 16. Accepted.
(*18-578) Resolution No. 15439, ""Amending the General Fund and the Capital
Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Year 2018-19 for the Jean Sweeney Open
Space Park Project to Fund Immediate Possession of Four Remnant Parcels Totaling
Approximately 2.8 Acres Owned by Union Pacific."" Adopted; and
(*18-578 A) Recommendation to Direct the City Attorney to Deposit the Sum of
$1,098,000 with the Condemnation Deposits Fund and Seek an Order for Prejudgment
Possession of the Subject Property. Accepted.
(*18-579) Recommendation to Expand the Façade Grant Program Boundaries; and
(*18-579 A) Resolution No. 15440, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2018-19 Base Reuse
Fund Budget to Appropriate $50,000 for the Façade Grant Program.""
(*18-580) Resolution No. 15441, ""Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Enter into a
Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JPA) Establishing and Governing Operation of the
Collection System Technical Advisory Committee, and a Defendant's Side Agreement
to Facilitate the Environmental Protection Agency Sewer Consent Decree Compliance.'
Adopted.
(*18-581) Resolution No. 15442, ""Opposing Proposition 6 on the November 2018 Ballot,
which would Repeal the Recent Gas Tax Increase and Eliminate $15 Million in
Transportation Funding for Alameda."" Adopted.
(*18-582) Resolution No. 15443, ""Supporting Proposition 2 on the November 2018
Ballot, which would Authorize the State of California to Use Revenue from Previously
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
October 16, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-10-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-11-27,5,"(*18-641) Ordinance No.3230, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding
Article XVII (Tobacco Retailers) to Chapter VI (Businesses, Occupations and Industries)
to Require Licensure of Tobacco Retailers and Prohibit the Sale of Flavored Tobacco
Products.' Finally passed.
Mayor Spencer stated there are 37 speakers for the item; those not in favor expressed
concern over the shortened time for public comment; inquired how Council would like to
proceed and whether Council is agreeable to inquiring how many speakers are in favor
versus not in favor.
Vice Mayor Vella stated the regulations and rules do not specify between support or
oppose; this is the second reading of the item; she is inclined to follow what the rules
stipulate and shorten the time.
Mayor Spencer stated that a previous rent item was handled differently; inquired if
Council would be okay with a one minute speaking time.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if it is possible to let the tobacco store
proponents speak first.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of lowering the time to one minute.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie and Vella - 4. Noes: Mayor Spencer
- 1.
Expressed concern over losing businesses; suggested capping the number of retailers
and the measurement distance be door to door: Jaime Rojas, Alameda.
Suggested a 55 tobacco license cap and 300 feet door to door; stated 18 business will
lose their life savings: Linda Asbury, West Alameda Business Association (WABA).
Expressed concern over zoning and taking away licenses: Samir Saleh, Alameda.
Stated the proposal will not make a difference since youth make purchases online;
suggested State regulations rather than regulating businesses locally: Alex Korade
Foster, Alameda.
Showed a maps of businesses; suggested changes: Paul Sekhon, Alameda.
Urged Council to put health before profits: Kimberly McGowan, Lincoln Parent Teachers
Association.
Expressed concern over high schoolers vaping, provided statistics related to youth
vaping: Randy Uang, Breathe California Golden Gate Public Health Partnership.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 27, 2018
3",CityCouncil/2018-11-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-12-18,4,"(*18-670C) Resolution No. 15464, ""Consenting to Inclusion of Properties within the City's
Jurisdiction in the Golden State Finance Authority Community Facilities District to
Finance Renewable Energy Improvements, Energy Efficiency and Water Conservation
Improvements and Other Authorized Improvements and Approving Associate
Membership in the Joint Exercise of Powers Authority Related Thereto. Adopted;
(*18-670D) Resolution No.15465, ""Joining the Figtree Pace Program; Authorizing the
California Enterprise Development Authority to Conduct Contractual Assessment
Proceedings and Levy Contractual Assessments within the Territory of the City of
Alameda; and Authorizing Related Actions.' Adopted; and
(*18-670E) Resolution No. 15466, ""Consenting to the Inclusion of Properties within the
Territory of the City in the California Municipal Finance Authority Open PACE Programs;
Authorizing the California Municipal Finance Authority to Accept Applications from
Property Owners, Conduct Contractual Assessment Proceedings and Levy Contractual
Assessments within the Territory of the City; and Authorizing Related Actions."" Adopted.
(*18-671) Resolution No.15467, ""Amending Resolution No. 9460 to Reflect Current
Positions and Entities to be Included in the City of Alameda's Conflict of Interest Code
and Rescind Resolution No. 15230.' Adopted.
[
(*18-672) Resolution No.15468, ""Declaring Canvass of Returns and Results of the
Consolidated General Municipal Election Held on Tuesday, November 6, 2018,
including Enacting Ordinance No. 3231, Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
Adding Section 3-63 (Transaction and Use Tax) to Division IX (Taxes) of Article II
(Taxation) of Chapter III (Finance and Taxation) Imposing a Transaction and Use Tax to
be Administered by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration."" Adopted.
(*18-673) Ordinance No. 3232, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Section 30-5.15 of Chapter XXX (Zoning Ordinance) to Adopt New Bird-Safe Building
Standards and Update Outdoor Lighting Regulations Consistent with Dark Skies
Standards."" Finally passed.
(18-674) Ordinance No. 3233, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Various Provisions of Article XVI (Cannabis Businesses) of Chapter VI (Businesses,
Occupations and Industry), Including but not Limited to (a) Modify the Definition of
""Youth Centers"" as a Sensitive Use, Including Specifically Excluding Certain Uses
(Martial Arts/Combat Sports, Cultural or Similar Education, and Physical Fitness); (b)
Modify the Definition of ""Cannabis Business Owner"" to Conform with State Law; and (c)
Make Any Other Conforming Amendments."" Finally passed.
Inquired who the City Council and staff work for; urged Council to pause and get staff to
answer questions: Don Sherratt, Alameda.
Discussed focusing on justice; stated a location on Park Street was turned down for
Ruby's Tumbling, but a location with a martial arts business next door is being allowed:
Serena Chen, Alameda.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
December 18, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-12-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-02-05,10,"(*19-073) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,671,061.85.
(*19-074) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a Five-
Month Contract, with the Option of Four One-Year Extensions, with St. Francis Electric
for the Operations and Maintenance of Municipal Street, Park Pathway, and Parking Lot
Lighting Systems, for a Five-Month Amount not to Exceed $147,813 and a Total Five
Year Expenditure of $1,296,651, Including Contingency. Approved.
(*19-075) Recommendation to Receive an Informational Report Regarding the Actuarial
Impact of a Change in Dental Benefits for Public Safety Retirees Who Currently Receive
Dental Benefits Through Memorandums of Understanding with the City of Alameda's
Four Public Safety Bargaining Units (International Association of Firefighters, Alameda
Fire Chiefs Association, Alameda Police Officers Association and Alameda Polices
Management Association), and Direct the City Clerk to Provide Public Access to its
Contents for a Period of at Least Two Weeks from February 5, 2019 to February 19,
2019. Accepted.
(19-076) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Negotiate and
Execute a Third Amendment to the Agreement with the County of Alameda Extending
the Term of the Community Paramedicine Pilot Program by 12 Months; and
(19-076 A) Resolution No. 15486, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2018-19 Budget for the
Fire Grants Fund by $125,000 for Costs Associated with the Extension of the
Community Paramedicine Pilot Program and the General Fund by $125,000 for the City
Contribution to Fund the Program."" Adopted.
The Fire Chief made brief comments.
Councilmember Daysog stated the program has previously been funded by the County;
the program is research based to gather information in order to improve health system
delivery and is not a core mission of the Fire Department.
The Fire Chief stated the first two years of the program are fully funded from a State
grant, passed onto the County of Alameda; a partnership agreement was created, with
one-third funded by General Fund, one-third from the County Emergency Medical
Services (EMS) Agency, and one-third from the County's hospital system including
Alameda Hospital; the allocation of funds remains the same as the previous three years;
the County is supplying $104,000 and staff is requesting Council approval to allow for
negotiation; outlined local leadership of the Alameda Hospital has changed; stated that
he is confident staff will return with an agreement for the remaining funding third from
the hospital system; the program is a core mission of the Fire Department; outlined the
paramedic program and funding; stated staff will return will additional details.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the program is a great savings for the hospital; outlined
program benefits; stated the Fire Chief is confident there will be reimbursement from the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
February 5, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-02-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-03-19,7,"(*19-165) Resolution No. 15507, ""Finding that the Harbor Bay Entities [Harbor Bay
Village Four Associates (HBV4), Harbor Bay Village Five Associates (HBV5), and
Harbor Bay Isle Associates (HBIA)] Have Demonstrated Good Faith Compliance with
the Terms and Conditions of Development Agreement, DA-89-1.' Adopted.
(19-166) Resolution No. 15508, ""Amending the Concession Agreement with Dialemi,
Inc. (known as Jim's on the Course), to Provide an Extension for Completion of the
Event Center at the Corica Park Golf Complex."" Adopted.
The Interim Assistant City Manager gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether there is a 30-day timeline as mentioned in
correspondence related to the item.
The Interim Assistant City Manager responded that she has spoken with Greenway Golf
and the owner of Jim's on the Course; the goal is to provide a final product of a quality
that aligns with the facility; she recommends an amendment to allow 45 days for the
City to approve all furnishings, fixtures and equipment (FFE); provided examples of
FFE; she recommends the landscape plan be approved by the City within 45 days of
signing the amendment; stated heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) is to be
included in the project.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the level of approval for FFE.
The Interim City Manager responded she would approve the FFE.
Councilmember Oddie inquired where the 45 days is listed.
The Interim City Manager responded it needs to be added.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if Council is allowed to make an amendment to the
current item.
Councilmember Vella inquired if there will be delays if Greenway has a discrepancy.
The Interim Assistant City Manager responded discretion and approval lies with the
City; stated that her goal is to have a quality product that benefits the golf course and
the City and to match the look of the facility.
Stated that he would like the event center to have consistent quality; stated most Jim's
patrons are not golfers; he supports the extension with the 45 day condition: George
Kelley, Greenway Golf.
Stated the Golf Commission unanimously voted in favor the staff recommendation: Ed
Downing, Golf Commission.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
March 19, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-03-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-05-07,8,"(*19-273) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First
Amendment to the Alameda Animal Shelter Services Agreement (Agreement
Amendment) with Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter (FAAS) for Animal Shelter
Services Extending the Term by Two Years in an Amount not to Exceed $1,779,832,
including a One-Time Expenditure of $50,000 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-20 for Additional
Staff Support, for a Four-Year Total Compensation Not to Exceed $3,464,800, plus an
Escalator in 2020-21 Based on the Bay Area Consumer Price Index. Accepted; and
(*19-273A) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a First Amendment to the Lease
Agreement (Lease Agreement) and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a First
Amendment to the Lease Agreement with Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter
(FAAS) Extending the Term by Two Years with the Same Terms and Conditions, for the
Facility located at 1590 Fortmann Way, Alameda, CA 94501. Introduced.
(*19-274) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Second Amendment to a Lease and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the
Terms of the Second Amendment to a Lease with Advanced Roofing Services, Inc. for
Twenty-Four Months at 1450 Viking Street, Building 612, at Alameda Point. Introduced.
(19-275) SUMMARY: Consider Final Passage of Four Cannabis Related Ordinances as
Follows: Two Ordinances (A and B) Repeal the Existing Cannabis Regulations; and
Two Ordinances (C and D) Adopt the Same Regulations
(A) Ordinance No. 3236, ""Repeal in Its Entirety Ordinance No. 3228 Concerning
Cannabis Regulations in Alameda Municipal Code Article XVI (Cannabis Businesses) of
Chapter VI (Businesses, Occupations and Industries) that, Among Other Things,
Establishes the Number of Retail Cannabis Dispensaries to be Open to the Public
(including Delivery), Disperses Their Operations, Creates a Buffer Zone from Sensitive
Uses, and Permits the Sale of Non-Medicinal Cannabis.' Finally passed;
(19-275A) (B) Ordinance No. 3237, ""Repeal in Its Entirety Ordinance No. 3227
Concerning Land Use Requirements in the Zoning Ordinance of Alameda Municipal
Code Section 30-10 (Cannabis) that, Among Other Things, Permits Retail Cannabis
Dispensaries in Certain Zoning Districts Subject to a Conditional Use Permit and
Permits the Sale of Non-Medicinal Cannabis in Certain Zoning Districts."" Finally passed;
(19-275B) (C) Ordinance No. 3238, ""Concerning Cannabis Regulations in Alameda
Municipal Code Article XVI (Cannabis Businesses) of Chapter VI (Businesses,
Occupations and Industries) that, Among Other Things, Establishes the Number of
Retail Cannabis Dispensaries to be Open to the Public (including Delivery), Disperses
Their Operations, Creates a Buffer Zone from Sensitive Uses, and Permits the Sale of
Non-Medicinal Cannabis."" Finally passed;
(19-275C) (D) Ordinance No. 3239, ""Concerning Land Use Requirements in the Zoning
Ordinance of Alameda Municipal Code Section 30-10 (Cannabis) that, Among Other
Things, Permits Retail Cannabis Dispensaries in Certain Zoning Districts Subject to a
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 7, 2019
7",CityCouncil/2019-05-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-05-21,4,"(*19-315) Resolution No. 15538, ""In Support of the 2020 Census."" Adopted.
(*19-316) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a First Amendment to a Lease and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Amended Lease Agreement with Kai
Concepts, LLC, for Building 168, Suite 300, Located at 1651 Viking Street at Alameda
Point. Introduced.
(*19-317) Ordinance No. 3241, ""Approving a Second Amendment to a Lease and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the
Terms of the Second Amendment to a Lease with Advanced Roofing Services, Inc. for
Twenty-Four Months at 1450 Viking Street, Building 612, at Alameda Point."" Finally
passed.
(*19-318) Ordinance No. 3242, ""Approving a First Amendment to the Lease Agreement
(Lease Agreement) and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a First Amendment to
the Lease Agreement with Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter (FAAS) Extending the
Term by Two Years with the Same Terms and Conditions, for the Facility Located at
1590 Fortmann Way, Alameda, CA 94501. Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(19-319) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
Amending Article XV of Chapter VI to Eliminate ""No Cause"" (Notice to Vacate) as a
Grounds for Eviction from Ordinance No. 3148 (City of Alameda Rent Review, Rent
Stabilization, and Limitations on Evictions Ordinance). Introduced.
Vice Mayor Knox White stated State law requires recusal in cases where the land under
discussion represents less than 25% of the City's land; requested to join Council
discussion after public comment if allowable; recused himself and left the dais.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether he should recuse himself.
The City Attorney inquired whether Councilmember Daysog is operating as a landlord,
to which Councilmember Daysog responded that he lives in the housing unit.
The Assistant City Attorney stated Councilmember Daysog is not required to recuse
himself.
The Community Development Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Vella inquired about the focus groups.
The Community Development Director responded the group included the Alameda
Renters Coalition, East Bay Realtors Local Government Relations Committee and
Alameda Housing Providers Association.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
May 21, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-05-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-06-04,4,"(*19-334) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting Held on April 22, 2019; the
Special Joint City Council and Alameda Public Finance Authority Meeting and the
Regular Meeting Held on May 7, 2019; and the Special City Council Meetings Held on
May 15, 2019 and May 16, 2019. Approved.
(*19-335) Ratified bills in the amount of $6,344,343.98.
(*19-336) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Reporting
Period Ending March 31, 2019 (Funds Collected During the Period October 1, 2018 to
December 31, 2018). Accepted.
(*19-337) Recommendation to Approve the City of Alameda Investment Policy.
Accepted.
(*19-338) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Three-Year
Agreement with Nossaman LLP to Provide Grant Funding Development, Grant Proposal
Writing, and Grant Funding Follow Up, in an Amount not to Exceed $72,000 with the
Option of Two Three-Year Extensions, for a Nine-Year Amount Not to Exceed
$216,000. Accepted.
(*19-339) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager (or Designee) to Execute a
One-Year Agreement with OpenGov, Inc., for the Communications and Reporting for
Citizen Engagement and Operational Performance Solutions, in an Amount Not to
Exceed $114,438, with the Option of Four One-Year Extensions, for a Total Five-Year
Compensation Not to Exceed $382,897. Accepted.
(*19-340) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement
with Chuck Todd for a 25-Month Term in an Amount Not to Exceed $125,000 for
Infographics, Artwork and Design of City Documents. Accepted.
(*19-341) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Second
Amendment to the Service Provider Agreement with Revel Environmental
Manufacturing Inc., for Storm Drainage Trash Capture Device Maintenance, Extending
the Agreement for Fiscal Year 2019-20 in an Amount not to Exceed $72,110 for a Total
Expenditure Under the Agreement of $145,060. Accepted.
(19-342) Recommendation to Authorize the Public Works Director to Enter into a Letter
of Agreement between the City of Alameda and the West Alameda Business
Association for the Administration of a Monthly Parking Permit Program in City-Owned
Lot W. Not heard.
(19-343) Recommendation to Authorize the Public Works Director to Enter into Letters
of Agreement between the City of Alameda and the Downtown Alameda Business
Association for the Administration of a Monthly Parking Permit Program in City-Owned
Lots A and C. Not heard.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
June 4, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-06-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-06-04,5,"(*19-344) Resolution No. 15539, ""Requesting and Authorizing the County of Alameda to
Levy a Tax on All Real and Personal Property in the City of Alameda as a Voter
Approved Levy for the General Obligation Bonds Issued Pursuant to a General Election
Held November 7, 2000 for the Alameda Library."" Adopted.
(*19-345) Ordinance No. 3243, ""Approving a First Amendment to a Lease and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Amended Lease Agreement with Kai
Concepts, LLC, for Building 168, Suite 300, Located at 1651 Viking Street at Alameda
Point."" Finally passed.
(19-346) Ordinance No. 3244, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Article XV of Chapter VI to Eliminate ""No Cause"" (Notice to Vacate) as a Grounds for
Eviction from Ordinance No. 3148 (City of Alameda Rent Review, Rent Stabilization,
and Limitations on Evictions Ordinance). Finally passed.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved final passage of the ordinance.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: No; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye and Mayor Ezzy
Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(19-347) Resolution No. 15540, ""Appointing Ron Carlson as a Member of the Golf
Commission. Adopted;
(19-347A) Resolution No. 15541, ""Appointing Claire Loud as a Member of the Golf
Commission."" Adopted; and
(19-347B) Resolution No. 15542, ""Appointing Peter Pizzino as a Member of the Golf
Commission.' Adopted.
Councilmember Vella moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented certificates of
appointment to Ms. Loud and Mr. Pizzino.
(19-348) Recommendation to Approve Otis Drive Traffic Calming and Safety
Improvement Project Design Concept Recommendations.
The City Engineer and David Parisi, Parisi Transportation Consulting, gave a brief
presentation reviewing the Power Point presentation included in the packet.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
June 4, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-06-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-06-18,4,"(*19-368) Minutes of the Special City Council Meetings Held on May 21, 2019.
Approved.
(*19-369) Ratified bills in the amount of $5,461,351.98.
(*19-370) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute: 1) An
Emergency Medical Services First Responder Advanced Life Support Agreement with
the County of Alameda, for Five Years with the Option of Five One-Year Extensions;
and 2) An Ambulance Transport Services Agreement with the County of Alameda, for
Five Years with the Option of Five One-Year Extensions. Accepted.
(*19-371) Recommendation to Award a Contract for the Publication of Legal Notices to
the Alameda Sun for Fiscal Year 2019-20. Accepted.
(*19-372) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Two-Year
Agreement, Substantially in the Form of the Attached Agreement, Between the Housing
Authority of the City of Alameda and the City of Alameda to Provide Housing Services
for the City of Alameda and Additional Policing Services for the Housing Authority of
the City of Alameda. Accepted.
(*19-373) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to: 1) Execute an Agreement
with National Purchasing Cooperative, dba BuyBoard for Participation in Cooperative
Purchasing; and 2) Execute an Agreement with Public Restroom Company for
Purchase and Installation of a Restroom at Encinal Boat Launch Facility in an Amount
Not to Exceed $136,968. Accepted.
(*19-374) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement
with Chrisp Company for the Replacement of Pavement Markings and Signs, No. P.W.
03-19-15, in an Amount Not to Exceed $602,219, Including Contingency. Accepted.
(*19-375) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute Water Main
Extension Agreements with East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) for Alameda
Point's Adaptive Reuse Areas Phase 1 and Phase 2 and Pay $212,072 and $153,885,
Respectively, for the Required Design and Estimated Construction Cost Deposit.
Accepted.
(19-376) Resolution No. 15547 ""Authorizing the City Manager to Apply for and Accept
up to Three Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($310,000) in Senate Bill (SB) 2 Planning
Grants Program Funds for Work on General Plan Updates, Zoning Ordinance
Amendments, and Environmental Review Consistent with State Laws to Streamline
Housing Production."" Adopted.
Councilmember Daysog stated the item is seeking State funds to update the General
Plan; questioned whether staff is able to provide ways Council can follow through on
threshold requirements under item 3 of SB2 ""Nexus to accelerating housing production"".
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 18, 2019
2",CityCouncil/2019-06-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-07-02,3,"(*19-398) Resolution No. 15561, ""Determining That Special Taxes Shall Cease to be
Levied on Property in the City of Alameda Community Facilities District No. 4
(Demolition and Back Bone Infrastructure - Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC) and
East Housing Sites) and Directing Recordation of Notice of Cessation of Special Tax.""
Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(19-399) Resolution No. .15562, ""Appointing Hanson Hom as a Member of the Planning
Board."" Adopted;
(19-399A) Resolution No. 15563, ""Appointing Teresa Ruiz as a Member of the Planning
Board.' Adopted;
(19-399B) Resolution No.15564, ""Reappointing Laura Giuntini as a Member of the
Public Utilities Board. Adopted;
(19-399C) Resolution No.15565, ""Appointing Tara Navarro as a Member of the
Recreation and Park Commission."" Adopted; and
(19-399D) Resolution No. 15566, ""Appointing Kristin Furuichi Fong as a Member of the
Social Service Human Relations Board."" Adopted.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the resolutions of appointment.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
The Assistant City Clerk administered the oath of office and presented certificates of
appointment to Mr. Hom, Ms. Ruiz, Ms. Giuntini, Ms. Navarro and Ms. Furuichi Fong
(19-400) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda Municipal Code Sections 8-8.5
and 8-1.2 to Authorize the Public Works Director to Improve Safety and Visibility at
Alameda Intersections. Introduced.
The City Engineer gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the 300-foot noticing radius is being used for
daylighting.
The City Engineer responded the requirement is being struck, but can be continued as a
courtesy.
Councilmember Vella inquired whether there are plans to maintain the red paint.
The City Engineer responded a Capital Project has recently been approved to refresh
striping and crosswalks throughout the western portion of the City; stated a master plan
approach will enable staff to be more systematic with regular maintenance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
July 2, 2019
2",CityCouncil/2019-07-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-07-16,11,"(*19-436) Resolution No. 15568, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Capital Projects
Fund Budget for the Seaplane Lagoon Ferry Terminal Project by $10,200,000 Funded
by an $8,200,000 Grant from Alameda County Transportation Commission and a
$2,000,000 Grant from the Water Emergency Transportation Authority."" Adopted.
(*19-437) Resolution No. 15569, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Execute
a
Supplement No. 2 to Acquisition Agreement Relating to Community Facilities District
No. 13-1."" Adopted.
(*19-438) Resolution No. 15570, ""Approving Tentative Map No. 8500 for the Proposed
Subdivision of the Alameda Marina Property Located at 1815 Clement Avenue.
Applicant: Alameda Marina, LLC. The Environmental Effects of the Proposed Project
Were Considered and Disclosed in the Alameda Marina Master Plan Environmental
Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #2016102064). No Further Environmental Review
is Required Under the California Environmental Quality Act."" Adopted.
(19-439) Ordinance No. 3245, ""Amending Alameda Municipal Code Section 8-8.5 and
8-1.2 to Authorize the Public Works Director to Improve Safety and Visibility at Alameda
Intersections."" Finally passed.
Expressed concern over not fully discussing allowing street furniture and bike racks: Jim
Strehlow, Alameda.
Councilmember Oddie Moved final passage of the ordinance.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
(19-440) Ordinance No. 3246, ""Concerning the Establishment of an Annual General
Adjustment, a Rent Registry, Banking, and a Petition Process for an Upward and
Downward Adjustment of Rents."" Finally passed.
Submitted information and discussed rent increases and tenant turnover: Karen Miller,
Alameda.
Stated that she is opposed to using Consumer Price Index (CPI) for rent increases:
Marilyn Schumacher, Alameda.
Expressed concern over renters being displaced: Julian Critobal, Filipinos Advocates for
Justice.
Stated the compromises on rent increase at the last meeting were fair; urged Council
approval: Zac Bowling, Alameda.
Discussed rent control impacting development: Christopher Sparacino, Sparacino
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
July 16, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-07-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-12-03,4,"(*19-664) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First
Amendment to the Service Provider Agreement with CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering
Group, dba Parisi/CSW Design Group to Retroactively Extend the Term through June
30, 2021 for Outreach, Planning and Design Services for the Otis Drive Traffic Calming
and Safety Improvement Project. Accepted.
(*19-665) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to
the Service Provider Agreement with Centro Legal de la Raza to Revise the Scope of
Services, with No Change to the Compensation, for Legal Services to Lower-Income
Tenant Households in Alameda. Not heard.
(*19-666) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager, or Their Designee, to Enter
into an Agreement with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to
Accept and Allocate Fiscal Year 2019 Port Security Grant Program Funds in the Total
Amount of $365,608; Award a Bid Contract to the Sole Bidder to Build and Provide a
New Marine Patrol Boat and Trailer in the Amount Not to Exceed $487,477 to Safe
Boats International. Accepted; and
(*19-666A) Resolution No. 15613A, ""Amending Fiscal Year 2019-20 Police Grants Fund
Revenue and Expenditures Budget in the Amount of $365,608 for the Port Security
Grant."" Adopted.
(*19-667) Resolution No. 15614, ""Setting the 2020 Regular City Council Meeting Dates.""
Adopted.
(*19-668) Resolution No. 15615, ""Amending the Management and Confidential
Employees Association (MCEA) Salary Schedule, Effective December 8, 2019, to
Reflect a New Salary for the Construction Inspection and Survey Supervisor
Commensurate with an Increase in Scheduled Working Hours.' Adopted.
(*19-669) Resolution No. 15616, ""Approving Tentative Map No. 8532 for the Subdivision
of Six Lots on 20.1 Acres for the Second Phase of the Site A Development Plan at
Alameda Point for Residential, Commercial and Public Parking."" Adopted.
(*19-670) Ordinance No. 3256, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Various Provisions of Section 3-61 (Transient Occupancy Tax) of Division IX (Taxes) of
Article Il (Taxation) of Chapter Il (Finance and Taxation), Clarifying and Restating
Hosting Platforms' Responsibility to Collect and Remit Transient Occupancy Taxes.
Finally passed.
(19-671) Ordinance No. 3257, ""Authorizing the City Manager, or Their Designee, to
Execute an Amendment to the Lease with Pacific Shops, Inc. for the Tidelands Property
Located along Clement Street between Alameda Marina Drive and Willow Street,
Commonly Referred to as Alameda Marina, to Allow Pacific Shops, Inc. to Exercise Its
Lease Option. Finally passed.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 3, 2019
2",CityCouncil/2019-12-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-02-18,13,"(*20-096) Ordinance No. 3260, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager or
Designee to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a One-Year
Lease With Four One-Year Extension Options, Each Subject to Reasonable
Discretionary Approval of the City Manager, with Shelter In Peace, Inc., a California
Non-Profit Corporation, for 2815 San Diego Road Located at Alameda Point to Operate
Transitional Housing for Refugees.' Finally passed.
(20-097) Ordinance No. 3261, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Various Provisions of Article VIII (Sunshine Ordinance) of Chapter Il (Administration),
including Provisions Related to Public Access to Public Meetings and Public Records,
and Sunshine Ordinance Enforcement, Including Recommendations to Eliminate the
""Null and Void"" or ""Order to Cure"" Remedies and Replace Such Remedies With the
Authority for the Open Government Commission to Issue Recommendations to Cure
and Correct."" Finally passed.
Note: Final passage of the ordinance carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Oddie and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 3. Noes: Vice Mayor Knox
White and Councilmember Vella - 2.
(*20-098) Ordinance No. 3262, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by: (1) Adding
New Section 23-9 (Personal Wireless Service Facilities in the Public Right-Of-Way); and
(2) Amending Section 2-59.3 (Limitation and Power to Make Contracts) to Exempt
Master License Agreements for Use of Public Assets for Personal Wireless Service
Facility Installation.' Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(20-099) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Memorandum
of
Understanding (MOU) with the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) Related to the
Northwest Territories Regional Shoreline at Alameda Point, and to Approve the Finding
that the Northwest Territories Regional Park Disposition is Exempt from the Surplus
Lands Act, as Amended, as the Property is Proposed to be Leased to Another Local
Agency (EBRPD) for the Agency's Use and Because It is Located on Public Trust
Lands.
The Community Development Director and Recreation and Parks Director gave a
Power Point presentation.
***
Councilmember Vella returned at 8:34 p.m. during the presentation.
Expressed support for moving forward; suggested a workshop be held before a year
passes; stated the public should be apprised; when agreement was not reached on
proceeding with a wildlife refuge, there was no input from the public or the City;
discussed work being done by the Navy: Richard Bangert, Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 18, 2020
11",CityCouncil/2020-02-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-03-03,6,"(*20-130) Ordinance No. 3265, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending:
(1) Article I (Uniform Codes Relating to Building, Housing and Technical Codes) of
Chapter XIII (Building and Housing) to Adopt the 2019 Edition of the California Building
Code, the 2019 Edition of the California Residential Code, the 2019 Edition of the
California Historical Building Code, the 2019 Edition of the California Electrical Code,
the 2019 Edition of the Plumbing Code, the 2019 Edition of the California Mechanical
Code, the 2019 Edition of the California Energy Code, the 2019 Edition of the California
Green Building Standards Code; and (2) Amending Section 15-1 of Chapter XV (Fire
Prevention) to Adopt the 2019 Edition of the California Fire Code with Alameda Local
Amendments."" Finally passed.
(*20-131) Ordinance No. 3266, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Revising
Section 2-59.3 (Limitation and Power to Make Contracts) of Article IV (Contracts) of
Chapter Il (Administration), Authorizing the City Manager and the City Attorney to Settle
Liability Claims up to $75,000 Unless Otherwise Limited by Law and to Settle Liability
Claims Involving Payments by Excess Liability Coverage.' Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(20-132) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Councilmember Vella would like to address the
gun safety ordinance [paragraph no. 20-134 and budget [paragraph no. 20-136];
inquired whether Council would consider hearing the Midway item [paragraph no. 20-
133] and park priorities item [paragraph no. 20-137 to wait for Councilmember Vella to
be present.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of amending the order of the agenda items.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the park priorities could wait
for Councilmember Vella if it is a split vote.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft responded in the affirmative.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent:
Councilmember Vella - 1.]
***
(20-133) Recommendation to: 1) Direct Staff to Conduct a Four-Week Request For
Qualifications (RFQ) Solicitation Process for the Development of the West Midway
Project; 2) Approve Debbie Potter, Community Development Director; Michelle Giles,
Base Reuse Manager; Lisa Maxwell, Assistant City Attorney; and Eric Levitt, City
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 3, 2020
3",CityCouncil/2020-03-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-03-17,15,"(*20-167 CC) Recommendation to Consent to the Form of the Partial Assignment and
Assumption Agreement (Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use
Commercial Project) - Remainder Residential Parcel) to Pulte Homes Company LLC,
and Authorize the City Manager, or Designee, to Execute the Required Documents.
Accepted.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at
8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
Secretary, SACIC
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and Successor Agency
to the Community Improvement Commission
2
March 17, 2019",CityCouncil/2020-03-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-06-02,16,"(*20-372) Resolution No. 15657, ""Authorizing the Commencement of Proceedings for
the Formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD), Designating Consultants,
Approving a Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement, and Authorizing and Directing Certain
Related Actions For the Alameda Marina Project.' Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(20-373) Public Hearing to Consider an Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2019-20
Community Development Block Grant Action Plan and Authorize the City Manager to
Negotiate and Execute Related Documents, Agreements and Modifications.
The Housing Authority Management Analyst gave a brief presentation.
The Community Development Director noted proposed providers from Building Futures,
Family Law Center and the Food Bank are available.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired what assumes an impact has been made to an
applicant's salary; stated that he is unclear whether the salary is being used to
determine whether an applicant is above or under the Area Median Income (AMI) due to
COVID-19; requested clarification of the intention.
The Housing Authority Management Analyst responded for CDBG purposes, the
income is at the time of receiving the benefit, which is post-COVID; stated pre-COVID
status will be reviewed to verify there is a significant change or substantial loss of
income.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how the funds for rent relief work with the funds being
raised and allocated in the community fund, Alameda Strong; stated the rent money will
be paid directly to the landlord up to $3,500; inquired whether the programs are parallel.
The Housing Authority Management Analyst responded rather than advertising two
separate programs, consistent messaging will be used with a single portal and
application, which will be processed and administered on the back-end; stated those
that do not qualify for CDBG funds can be referred to the Alameda Strong program; the
process for applicants will be seamless and the end goal is to ensure the tenant gets
their rent paid.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether or not there would be duplications in payment
from both Alameda Strong and rent relief, to which the Housing Authority Management
Analyst responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the number of domestic violence calls for the month of April
2020 had increased 41.5% over April 2019; noted those booked for domestic violence
are not detained due to COVID shelter in place orders and are allowed to return to the
same residence; stated the emergency shelter program is important.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
June 2, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-06-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-21,9,"(*20-514) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Third
Amendment to the Agreement with Earth Island Institute, dba Kids for the Bay for
Educational Services for the Alameda Schools, in an Amount Not to Exceed of $54,108,
for a Total Cumulative Amount Not to Exceed $118,728. Accepted.
(*20-515) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First
Amendment to Agreement with Terraphase Engineering for Marsh Crust
Reconnaissance Sampling and Environmental Oversight for Construction of Alameda
Point's Adaptive Reuse Areas Phase 1 and Phase 2, in an Amount Not to Exceed
$238,074, for a Total Contract Amount Not to Exceed $312,572. Accepted.
(*20-516) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a One-Year
Agreement with McGuire and Hester for 2020 Pavement Management, Phase 39, Hot
Mix Asphalt Overlay and Base Repair, No. P.W. 05-20-26, in an Amount Not to Exceed
$1,476,225.60, Including Contingency, with the Option of Four One-Year Extensions, for
a Total Five-Year Expenditure Not to Exceed $7,682,337.29 Accepted.
(*20-517) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Second
Amendment to the Agreement with Stearns, Conrad and Schmidt Engineers Extending
the Term of the Agreement by One Year and Increasing the Compensation by an
Amount Not to Exceed $290,000, for Targeted Zero Waste Technical Assistance for
Commercial Businesses and Multi-Family Accounts, for an Aggregate Amount Not to
Exceed $734,978. Accepted.
(*20-518) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First
Amendment to the Agreement with GS Management Company, for Management of the
Public Special Benefit Work in City of Alameda Island City Landscape and Lighting
District 84-2 Zone 6 - Marina Village, to Extend the Term for Four Additional Years and
Increase Compensation by $255,362, for a Cumulative Amount Not to Exceed
$309,362. Accepted.
(*20-519) Recommendation to Authorize the Mayor to Sign Letters of Support for State
Legislation on Police Reforms. Accepted.
(*20-520) Resolution No. 15676 Amending the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Transportation
Planning Division Fund Revenue and Expenditures Budget by $88,000 to Accept and
Allocate the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's Vehicle Trip Reduction Grant
for Electronic Bicycle Lockers, and Allocate $60,400 in Local Measure B/BB Bicycle and
Pedestrian Funds for the Required Matching Funds Mandated by the Grant.' Adopted;
and
(*20-520A) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Issue a Purchase Order
with eLock Technologies for $145,400. Accepted.
(*20-521) Resolution No. 15677, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Utilize up to $1.605
Million in the Capital Projects Seaplane Lagoon Ferry Terminal Project for the Seaplane
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 21, 2020
3",CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-10-06,5,"(*20-641) Ordinance No. 3289, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding a
New Article XVIV (Third Party Food Delivery Services) of Chapter VI (Businesses,
Occupations and Industries) Establishing a Temporary Limit on Charges Imposed by
Third-Party Delivery Services During the Locally Declared State of Emergency Related
to the COVID-19 Pandemic."" Finally passed.
(*20-642) Ordinance No. 3290, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Various Provisions of Article VIII (Sunshine Ordinance) of Chapter Il (Administration)
Concerning Special Meetings, including the Setting and Noticing of Such and Other
Meetings.' Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(20-643) Resolution No. 15700, ""Appointing Ben Finkenbinder as a Member of the Golf
Commission."" Adopted;
(20-643A) Resolution No. 15701, ""Reappointing Bachir Hadid as a Member of the
Housing Authority Board of Commissioners."" Adopted;
(20-643B) Resolution No. 15702, ""Appointing Elizabeth Kuwada as a Member of the
Housing Authority Board of Commissioners.' Adopted;
(20-643C) Resolution No. 15703, ""Reappointing Sandra Kay, as a Member of the
Housing Authority Board of Commissioners."" Adopted;
(20-643D) Resolution No. 15704, ""Reappointing Kenji Tamaoki, as a Member of the
Housing Authority Board of Commissioners.' Adopted;
(20-643E) Resolution No. 15705, ""Appointing Vadim Sidelnikov, as a Member of the
Housing Authority Board of Commissioners."" Adopted;
(20-643F) Resolution No. 15706, ""Appointing Xiomara Cisneros as a Member of the
Planning Board."" Adopted; and
(20-643G) Resolution No. 15707, ""Reappointing Ron Curtis as a Member of the
Planning Board.' Adopted.
Councilmember Vella moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft introduced the commissioners.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Mr. Finkenbinder, Mr. Hadid, Ms.
Kuwada, Ms. Kay, Mr. Tamaoki, Mr. Sidelnikov and Mr. Curtis.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
October 6, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-10-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-10-20,11,"(*20-668) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Purchase Light Emitting
Diode Lamps and Fixtures from Wesco Distribution, Inc. in an Amount Not to Exceed
$243,833.92. Accepted.
(*20-669) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement
with Bayside Stripe & Seal, Inc. for the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Sign and Striping
Maintenance Project, No. P.W. 02-20-13, in an Amount Not to Exceed Amount of
$281,843. Accepted; and
(*20-669A) Resolution No. 15717, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Capital Budget
by Reducing Revenue and Expenditure Appropriations in Capital Improvement Program
91811 by $328,524 and Increasing Revenue and Expenditure Appropriations for Capital
Improvement Program 96011 by $328,524."" Adopted.
(20-670) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Contract
Amendment with Ray's Electric for the Signal Installation at Harbor Bay Parkway/North
and South Loop Road and Harbor Bay Parkway/Penumbra Place and South Loop
Road, No. P.W.04-19-23, in an Amount Not to Exceed $280,890, for a Total Not to
Exceed Expenditure of $873,690; and
(20-670A) Resolution No. 15718, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Capital
Improvement Program Budget by Allocating $200,000 in Transportation Improvement
Fee Funds to the Capital Improvement Program 96012 to Construct Signal Installation
at Harbor Bay Parkway/North and South Loop Road and Harbor Bay
Parkway/Penumbra Place and South Loop Road Project."" Adopted.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the City spent $592,800 and realized an
additional $280,890 was needed or has the City not yet spent the initial $592,800 and
still realized the need for an additional $280,890; stated that he has a problem with the
City initially spending $592,800 and realizing an additional $280,890 is needed; noted
the project may need to be re-bid if the calculations were incorrect.
The City Manager responded the additional $280,890 was needed due to unseen
issues as the project was ending; stated the project has gone over-time and was initially
approved in 2019.
The City Engineer stated a short while after the project began, the contractor
encountered issues with sand, which were incorrectly characterized at the initial
evaluation; the City has spent a significantly higher amount of money on foundations;
materials have already been ordered and the project is too far along to turn back; power
source needs were not clearly communicated to Alameda Municipal Power (AMP),
which requires significantly more trenching.
Councilmember Daysog stated the staff report is unclear on the current spending of the
project; noted the clarification provided allows more understanding; stated staff will need
to internally discuss procedures to take in order to catch these issues sooner rather
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 20, 2020
10",CityCouncil/2020-10-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-11-04,4,"(*20-689) Minutes of the Special City Council, Joint City Council and Successor Agency
to the Community Improvement Commission and the Regular City Council Meetings
Held on October 6, 2020. Approved.
(*20-690) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,787,880.46.
(*20-691) Recommendation to Accept the Work of McGuire & Hester for the Cross
Alameda Trail/Ralph Appezzato Memorial Parkway Improvements, No. P.W. 03-18-11.
Accepted.
(*20-692) Resolution No. 15721, ""Ratifying the Proclamation of the Director of
Emergency Services and Continuing the Declaration of the Existence of a Local
Emergency in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Consistent with Government
Code Section 8630(c). Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(20-693) Presentation on Tsunami Awareness.
The Fire Captain gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft outlined a recent major earthquake near Turkey and Greece;
stated it is important to not spectate tsunamis.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the City is conducting [tsunami] drills.
The Fire Captain responded staff has been working with the Alameda Unified School
District (AUSD); stated conducting drills is part of being tsunami-ready; AUSD has been
working on safe locations for students and providing information to parents; the Fire
Department is working on zone havens for evacuations.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether outreach to Home Owner Associations (HOAs)
has been conducted for Bay Farm Island and Harbor Bay; stated HOAs are able
to
effectively communicate to home-owners; inquired whether there is an evacuation plan
for Cardinal Point.
The Fire Captain responded staff has not reached out to Cardinal Point directly; stated
the first outreach was to the boating community; many residents live on boats and any
effects are most probable within the boating community; due to the low probability of
impacts, outreach is conducted with the most effected community first; information has
been publicized; however, COVID-19 has slowed the process; staff is moving forward
with planning and zone haven information; outlined the need for cooperation from the
City of Oakland should Alameda need to evacuate; stated staff has been in contact with
the City of Oakland in an effort to coordinate evacuations.
Councilmember Vella stated that she is aware of the amount of work and funding
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
November 4, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-11-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-11-17,4,"(*20-711) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First Amendment
to Agreement with Tri-Signal Integration, Inc. for Fire and Intrusion Alarm Monitoring,
Maintenance and Repair for a Total Compensation Not to Exceed $488,263.48.
Accepted.
(*20-712) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Second
Amendment to Agreement with Imperial Maintenance Services, Inc. for Janitorial Services
for Various City Facilities, Adding Three Years to the Term for a Total Five Year
Compensation not to Exceed $2,063,608.13. Accepted.
(*20-713) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Five-Year
Agreement with IPS Group, Inc. for Maintenance and Management of Single Space
Parking Meters in the City of Alameda, in an Amount Not to Exceed $927,835. Accepted.
(20-714) Resolution No.15722, ""Approving a Final Map and Authorizing Execution of A
Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 8500, Alameda Marina As A Condition to
Final Map Approval."" Adopted.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he has not supported this matter in the past and will
remain consistent in voting no.
Councilmember Oddie stated the matter is ministerial in nature and Council may approve
or remand; inquired the consequence should Council reject the matter and not remand.
The City Engineer responded Final Maps are typically ministerial actions; stated Council
takes a discretionary action of approving the Master Plan subsequent Tentative Map
application and associated conditions of approval; staff has processed the Final Map and
assured the pertinent conditions of approval have been met; Council does not have the
option to reject the map; however, questions may be asked or details may be provided
about whether or not the developer has complied with all conditions of approval to the
City's satisfaction.
Councilmember Oddie inquired the legal consequences should Council decide to not
approve the matter.
The City Attorney responded it is difficult to speculate the outcome; stated should Council
disagree, Council may send the matter back to the City Engineer for further review; should
Council vote no on a final map, there is a possibility of a court ordering the City to change
its mind; Council is able to review staff's work and decide on the final analysis.
Councilmember Oddie stated many times Council is provided with ministerial acts which
are voted against without knowing the legal consequences; Council is being asked to
either remand the matter back to staff with suggestions for changes or note that staff has
complied with what has been asked; discussions on ministerial acts are strange;
expressed support for the Public Works department doing its job.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 4, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-11-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-03-02,3,"(*21-126) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Three-Year
Agreement, with the Option of Two One-Year Extensions for a Total Five-Year
Compensation Amount Not to Exceed $110,000 and No More Than $35,000 in a Single
Fiscal Year, with Resource Consultants to Provide CDBG and HOME Compliance and
Program Management Services to the City of Alameda. Accepted.
(*21-127) Recommendation to Accept the Work of McGuire and Hester for Cyclic Sewer
Replacement Project, Phase 15, No. PW 03-18-10. Accepted.
(*21-128) Recommendation to Accept the Semi-Annual Report for the Period of May 1,
2020 Through December 31, 2020, on 1) Litigation and Liability Claims Settlements, 2)
Workers' Compensation Settlements, 3) Personnel Settlement, and 4) Whether Any
Records Previously Withheld from Disclosure Have Now Become Available to the
Public. Accepted.
(*21-129) Resolution No. 15748, ""Authorizing Staff to Submit an Application for the
Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program Grant for
Construction of Jean Sweeney Open Space Park - Western Phase.' Adopted.
(*21-130) Resolution No. 15749,"" Continuing the Declaration of the Existence of a Local
Emergency in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Consistent with Government
Code Section 8630(c). Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(21-131) Mayor's State of the City Address.
(21-132) The City Clerk stated a motion is needed to suspend the Rules of Order to
allow the presentation to be longer than 10 minutes.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft gave the State of the City address.
(21-133) Resolution No. 15750, ""Amending the Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-21 Budget and
Authorizing the City Manager to Redistribute Budget Appropriations between Similar
Capital Projects."" Adopted; and
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
March 2, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-03-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-03-16,4,"(*21-166A) Resolution No. 15752, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2019-21 Capital Budget
by Defunding Revenue and Expenditure Appropriations in Capital Improvement
Program 960093 by $361,000 and Increasing Revenue and Expenditure Appropriations
for Capital Improvement Program 91857706 by $361,000."" Adopted.
(*21-167) Resolution No. 15753, ""Authorizing the City Manager, Retroactively, to Apply
for and Receive up to $292,000 in Grant Funds from the Alameda County
Transportation Commission's 2022 Comprehensive Investment Plan to Construct Multi-
Use Pathway Connectors to Close Gaps in Accessing the Cross Alameda Trail in Jean
Sweeney Open Space Park; and Allocating $158,000 In Matching Funds, Should the
Grant Be Awarded."" Adopted.
(21-168) Ordinance No. 3297, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code Chapter 30
(Development Regulations) to Amend Section 30-12.2 Requiring a Distance Separation
of 1,000 Feet between Bars in Alameda to Allow No More than Three (3) Bars within
1,000 Feet of Each Other and to Require Annual Review of Conditions of Approval,
Following a Recommendation by the Planning Board.' Finally passed.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated Hunter bar is hoping to move into the previous
Paradise Pub; noted the City's ordinance allows for one bar within 1,000 feet of another
bar; stated grandfathering does not apply to this scenario; staff has been asked to
measure the distances between Wally's bar, Hunter bar, and Fireside Lounge; noted the
report has a supplement exhibit attached which shows the three bars are within 1,000
feet of each other.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether a bar would be allowed to open within 1,000
feet of another; whether a bar could have two bars located to the south and two bars to
the north.
The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated the ordinance provides that three
bars can exist within 1,000 feet of another; there cannot be four bars within a 1,000-foot
radius.
The City Manager stated two bars to the north and two to the south of another bar
would not be allowed under the ordinance.
Councilmember Daysog stated Wally's is the outlier and is the northernmost bar;
questioned whether another bar would be allowed to open within 1,000 feet to the north
of Wally's.
Councilmember Knox White stated Wally's has five bars within 1,000 feet and therefore
is breaking the limit of three bars within 1,000 feet rule; no three bars can be within
1,000 feet of a fourth bar.
Councilmember Daysog stated should there be a bar north of Wally's, the new bar must
be further than 1,000 feet.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
March 16, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-04-06,4,"(*21-223) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Purchase Ten (10) Battery Backup
Systems for Traffic Signals from JAM Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $107,555 and
Authorize Future Purchases of Up to Twenty (20) Additional Battery Backup Systems by the
End of Calendar Year 2023, for a Total Cumulative Amount Not to Exceed $322,665. Accepted.
(*21-224) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Purchase Ten (10) Video
Detection Systems for Traffic Signals from Econolite Control Products, Inc. in an Amount Not to
Exceed $199,950 and Authorize Future Purchases of Up to Twenty (20) Additional Video
Detection Systems by the End of Calendar Year 2023, for a Total Cumulative Amount Not to
Exceed $599,850; Accepted and
(*21-224A) Resolution No. 15754, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2019-21 Capital Budget by
Reducing Revenue and Expenditure Appropriations in Capital Improvement Program 91812 by
$779,448 and Increasing Revenue and Expenditure Appropriations for Capital Improvement
Program 96012 by $779,448."" Adopted.
(*21-225) Resolution No. 15755, ""Clarifying the Definition of Below Market Rate Units in
Connection with Proceedings to Alter the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes
for Community Facilities District No. 17-1 (Alameda Point Public Services District). Adopted.
(21-226) Ordinance No. 3298, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Section 4-61
(Grocery Worker Hazard Pay) to Require Large Grocery Stores in Alameda to Pay Employees
an Additional Five Dollars ($5.00) per Hour in Hazard Pay during the Novel Coronavirus
(COVID-19) Pandemic and to Include Enforcement of Emergency Hazard Pay to Grocery
Employees.' Finally passed.
[Note: The ordinance was approved by the following vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No;
Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3.
Noes: 2.]
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(21-227) Presentation by Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter (FAAS) - Annual Progress
Report.
John Lipp, FAAS, gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the program represents an important body of work.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether FAAS has any asks or a wish list for the thrift store opening
on Webster Street.
Mr. Lipp responded a wish list has been put out and includes things such as a washing
machine, dryer, refrigerator and a safe; stated the community is very generous; the items will be
listed on the FAAS Facebook page and website; noted many people have sent e-mails asking to
donate.
Vice Mayor Vella expressed support for FAAS and its volunteers.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
April 06, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-04-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-06-15,13,"(*21-413) Recommendation to Authorize the City Attorney to Execute a Three Year
Agreement With the Option to Extend for Two Additional Years, with LWP Claims
Solutions, Inc. for Professional Services as the Third Party Administrator (TPA) of the
City of Alameda's Self-Insured Workers' Compensation Program in an Amount Not to
Exceed $1,145,879 for Five Years, Plus Related Charges, and Authorize Budget
Amendments for the Fiscal Years (FYs) 2021-22 and 2022-23 Biennial Operating
Budget by Increasing the Workers' Compensation Services Line Item by $25,000 for FY
2021-22 and $30,450 for FY 2022-23. Accepted.
(21-414) Recommendation to Award a Contract for the Publication of Legal Notices for
Fiscal Year 2021-22.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern about the Alameda Sun having higher rates
across the board versus Alameda Journal; stated Council has favored awarding the
contract to the Alameda Sun in previous years; she is not opposed to supporting local
businesses; however, there is Council responsibility for expenditure of funds; there are
grants for small businesses; the circulation of Alameda Journal is greater than Alameda
Sun; the Alameda Sun has decreased circulation and increased online readership; she
cannot support spending the money to get half the service; should could support the
Alameda Sun if the contract amount was reduced.
Councilmember Daysog stated Council had the same discussion one year ago; he
previously requested the circulation numbers; there has been challenge in seeing
Alameda Sun increase circulation numbers; the decision is difficult; the difference in
circulation is pronounced; legal notices have to get out to the public; the easy way out
would be to split the difference with 50% going to Alameda Sun and 50% going to
Alameda Journal; Council must make the difficult choice and render a service to the
public; the Alameda Journal is delivered to his neighborhood once per week; he will join
the Mayor in not supporting the award of contract to Alameda Sun.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of awarding the contract to the
Alameda Sun.
Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Knox White stated that he understands the numbers
are big; expressed concern about the numbers not telling who is reading; stated that his
experience is people keeping up with City business read the Alameda Sun versus
Alameda Journal; the figures are not perfect coming out of a difficult year of COVID-19.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the year of COVID-19 has been difficult for many locally-
owned businesses; she is not aware whether the Alameda Sun has been able to avail
itself of any State or City grants; she wants to support local businesses in appropriate
ways.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 15, 2021
4",CityCouncil/2021-06-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-09-07,15,"(*21-536) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Two-Year
Agreement, in an Amount Not to Exceed $250,000, with Alameda Family Services for
Student and Family Mental Health Services. Accepted.
(*21-537) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a One-Year
Agreement with Terraphase Engineering for Environmental Consulting Services at
Alameda Point in an Amount Not to Exceed $147,458 for the First Year, with the Option
of Four One Year Extensions for a Total Five Year Agreement in an Amount Not to
Exceed $517,909. Accepted.
(21-538) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First
Amendment with Akerman LLP, Similar in Form to Exhibit 1 Attached, for Federal
Legislative Services for a Term of 13 Months with Two One-Year Options to Extend,
and Compensation for the First Amendment Not to Exceed $97,500 and Total Four-
Year Compensation Not to Exceed $367,500; and
(21-538 A) Recommendation to Execute a First Amendment with Clear Advocacy, LLC,
Similar in Form to Exhibit 2 Attached, for State Legislative Services for a Term of 12
Months with Two One-Year Options to Extend, and Compensation for the First
Amendment Not to Exceed $90,000 and Total Four-Year Compensation Not to Exceed
$322,500.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she pulled the matter from Consent in
order to bifurcate the matter and vote separately on the contracts.
Vice Mayor Vella moved approval of the agreement with Akerman.
Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the agreement with Clear Advocacy.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated that he believes a list of items were to
be included for the State advocate to look into; noted that he does not support several
matters listed; he will not support the motion.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed concern about Clear Advocacy looking into
the Surplus Lands Act; stated the Surplus Lands Act should apply; the City should not
be contesting use of the Surplus Lands Act at Alameda Point; the Act goes to providing
affordable housing at Alameda Point.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 7, 2021
7",CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-11-02,6,"(*21-686) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on October 5, 2021.
Approved.
(*21-687) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,379,752.90.
(*21-688) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First Amendment to the
Agreement with Chrisp Company Pavement Marking and Sign Replacement Project, in an
Amount Not to Exceed $110,000 for an Aggregate Amount Not to Exceed $712,218.98; and
Recommendation to Accept the Work of Chrisp Company for Fiscal Year 2017-19 Pavement
Marking and Sign Replacement Project, No. P.W. 03-19-15. Accepted.
(*21-689) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Accept the Work of NBC
Construction & Engineering, Inc. for Alameda Point Modular Restroom Building, No. P.W. 09-
20-36. Accepted.
(*21-690) Recommendation to Allow the Agreement with Centro Legal De La Raza to Expire
and to Authorize the City Attorney's Office to Provide Housing Education and Mediation
Services for Landlords and Tenants on a Pilot Basis Using Contracted Resources. Accepted.
(*21-691) Recommendation to Approve Findings to Allow City Meetings to be Conducted via
Teleconference. Accepted.
(21-692) Resolution No. 15831, ""Continuing the Declaration of the Existence of a Local
Emergency in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Consistent with Government Code
Section 8630(c). Adopted.
Note: Councilmember Herrera Spencer recorded a no vote, so the item carried by the following
vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Knox White, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Herrera Spencer - 1.
CONTINUED AGENDA ITEM
(21-693) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Sixth Amendment to the
Agreement with Cultivate, LLC to Increase Compensation by $60,000, for a Total Aggregate
Compensation Not to Exceed $354,000 to Continue Providing Technical Planning Support to
the City of Alameda General Plan Update through Housing Element Adoption.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the technical planning support being
provided includes creating a 3-dimensional video; stated that she thinks the support should
include such video to show the potential changes; questioned what rezoning all residential
districts and changing maximum heights would look like; stated that she has seen other cities
utilizing video to help visualize projects; she hopes a video is part of the technical support being
provided.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded staff is working on the next
Housing Element as part of the General Plan; stated there are plans for visual simulations; a
video has not yet been considered; staff can look into video options; the Planning Board has
also expressed the need for graphics and visual representations of what the areas will look like;
the community needs to understand what the changes will look like; staff has three different
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 2, 2021
3",CityCouncil/2021-11-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-11-16,15,"(*21-742) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with G & G
Builders, Inc. for Maintenance Service Center Interior Improvements, No. P.W. 02-21-10, in a
Not to Exceed Amount of $402,962, Including a Ten Percent Contingency. Accepted.
(*21-743) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Five-Year Agreement
with Nute Engineering for Engineering Design Services for Cyclic Sewer Rehabilitation Project,
Phase 19, in a Total Amount Not to Exceed $2,388,446. Accepted.
(*21-744) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Water Line Easement
to East Bay Municipal Utility District Across City-Owned Property and Any and All Ancillary
Documents and Direct the Recording of the Grant of Easement for Installation of the Oakland
Inner Harbor Pipeline Crossing. Accepted.
(*21-745) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Thirty-
Two Month Agreement with All City Management Services Inc. for School Crossing Guard
Services in a Total Amount Not to Exceed $1,083,456; and a Memorandum of Understanding
with the Alameda Unified School District for Partial Reimbursement of the City's Fiscal Year
2021-22 Costs in an Amount Not to Exceed $90,000. Accepted.
(21-746) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager, or Designee, to: 1) Execute an
Agreement with Terris Barnes Walters Boigon Heath Lester, Inc. (TBWBH) in an Amount Not to
Exceed $132,000 for Strategic Support, Research, Ballot Measure Development, Informational
Outreach and Other Steps Necessary to Prepare a Potential Revenue Measure for the
November 2022 Ballot; and Execute an Agreement with Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz &
Associates (FM3) in an Amount Not to Exceed $37,000 for Survey Development,
Implementation, and Associated Analysis Related to a Potential Revenue Measure for the
November 2022 Ballot; and
(21-746 A) Adoption of Amending the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget by Increasing Appropriations
in the City Manager's Office by $169,000 to Enter Into Agreements With Terris Barnes Walters
Boigon Heath Lester, Inc. (TBWBH) and Fairbank, Maslin, Metz & Associates (FM3) for
Services Related to a Potential Revenue Measure for the November 2022 Ballot. Continued to
December 7, 2021.
(21-747) Recommendation to Approve Findings to Allow City Meetings to be Conducted via
Teleconference.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the required findings needed from Council in order to
continue allowing City meetings to be conducted via teleconference.
The City Attorney responded stated the findings to be made by the Council are contained in the
staff report; Council must find that the City is still in a state of emergency as declared by State of
California and the Governor, which remains true; Council must also find that local officials
continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated some people have a different opinion of whether
meetings should be in person; noted the City of Hayward is providing a hybrid meeting option
where members can participate in person and via Zoom; stated Hayward requires proof of
vaccination in order to be in person; City of Vallejo has resumed in person meetings as of
November 16th with the requirement of masking while inside; she has heard a preference from
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 16, 2021
4",CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-05-03,11,"(*22-302) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager, or Designee, to
Accept the Improvements Completed by Alameda Marina, LLC for Tract 8500, Alameda
Marina Clement Avenue Improvement Plans. Accepted.
(*22-303) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute Two
Water Line Easements to the East Bay Municipal Utility District Across City Tidelands
Property at Alameda Marina and Any and All Ancillary Documents, and Direct the
Recording of the Grant of Easements for the Development Projects Related to Tract
8500. Accepted.
(*22-304) Resolution No. 15899, ""Approving a Final Map and Authorize the Interim City
Manager to Execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 8610, Alameda
Marina Townhomes."" Adopted.
Note: Councilmember Daysog recorded a no vote, so the motion carried by the
following vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye;
Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
(*22-305) Resolution No. 15900, ""Approving Tentative Tract Map No. 8468 and a
Condominium Plan (PLN21-0587) to Subdivide 2350 Saratoga Street into Three
Commercial Condominium Units."" Adopted.
Note: Councilmember Daysog recorded a no vote, so the motion carried by the
following vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye;
Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
(*22-306) Resolution No. 15901, ""Approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Between the Alameda Fire Chiefs Association (AFCA) and the City of Alameda for a
Forty-Eight Month Term Commencing December 19, 2021 and Ending December 31,
2025."" Adopted.
Note: Councilmembers Daysog and Herrera Spencer recorded no votes, so the motion
carried by the following vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox
White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2.
(*22-307) Ordinance No. 3318, ""Amending Alameda Municipal Code Chapter 8 and
Chapter 12 Authorizing Public Works Enforcement of Parking Provisions and Ensuring
Consistency with California Vehicle Code."" Finally passed.
(*22-308) Ordinance No. 3319, ""Levying Special Taxes within the City of Alameda
Community Facilities District No. 22-1 (Alameda Marina). Finally passed.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer recorded a no vote, so the motion carried by the
following vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye;
Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 3, 2022
7",CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-05-03,12,"(*22-309) Ordinance No. 3320, ""Levying Special Taxes within the City of Alameda
Community Facilities District No. 22-2 (Alameda Marina - Shoreline Improvements
Maintenance and Adaptive Measures).' Finally passed.
Note: Councilmember Daysog recorded a no vote, so the motion carried by the
following vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye;
Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
(*22-310) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15902, ""Confirming the Park Street
Business Improvement Area Annual Assessment Report for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and
Levying an Annual Assessment on the Park Street Business Improvement Area.""
Finally passed.
(*22-311) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15903, ""Confirming the Webster
Street Business Improvement Area Assessment Report for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and
Levying an Annual Assessment on the Webster Street Business Improvement Area.
Finally passed.
Note: Councilmember Daysog recused himself, so the motion carried by the following
vote: Councilmembers Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog - 1.
CONTINUED AGENDA ITEMS
(22-312) Recommendation to Provide Direction to City Staff on Emergency Supportive
Housing for Three City-Owned Vacant Homes at Alameda Point.
The Economic Development Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer outlined identification needs for the program; inquired
whether individuals would be housed prior to being identified and screened through
Megan's Law.
The Community Development Director responded people would be screened based on
identification provided; individuals would be supported in obtaining a license or other
form of identification and would be screened again.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like to ensure no one would be
housed until being identified and screened by staff.
The Community Development Director stated staff will house and screen individuals
based on the information provided; staff will verify the information provided and will
assist in obtaining official identification for additional screening when needed.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification about the issue related to Megan's Law.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 3, 2022
8",CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-06-07,5,"(*22-376) Ordinance No. 3322, ""Amending Alameda Municipal Code Chapter Four to Comply
with Assembly Bill 1276 Regarding Single Use Foodware Accessories and Standard
Condiments."" Finally passed.
(22-377) Ordinance No. 3323, ""Ordinance Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute a
Lease with Rhoads Property Holdings, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, dba CSI
Mini Storage for Thirty Six Months for Buildings 338, 608, and 608A C, Located at 50 and 51
West Hornet Avenue, at Alameda Point.' Finally passed.
Since Councilmembers Daysog recorded a no vote, the motion carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
(*22-378) Public Hearing to Consider Collecting of the Water Quality and Flood Protection Fees
on the Property Tax Bills; and
(*22-378A) Resolution No. 15914, ""Finding [No] Majority Protest and Approving the Continuation
and Collection of the Existing 2019 Water Quality and Flood Protection Fee on the Property Tax
Bills for Fiscal Year 2022-23."" Adopted.
CONTINUED AGENDA ITEMS
None.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(22-379) Recommendation to Authorize City Attorney to Effectuate the Transition for the
Administration of the Rent Program from the Alameda Housing Authority, who Currently Acts as
the City's Contract Program Administrator, Back In-house to the City of Alameda's City
Attorney's Office; and
(22-379A) Resolution No. 15915, ""Amending the Salary Schedule for: the Alameda City
Employees Association (ACEA) to Reinstate the Classification of Housing Specialist Il and
Approving Workforce Changes in the City Attorney's Office to Add Six New Positions: Three
Housing Specialists, One Administrative Management Analyst, One Administrative Technician Il
Position, and One Director of Rent Program; and Authorize the City Attorney to Fill the Six New
Positions Consistent with All Applicable Laws and Regulations."" Adopted.
The City Attorney gave a brief presentation.
Expressed support for the timing; stated renters have been confused about overlapping roles
and complexities; the proposed structure improves efficiency; correspondence being from the
City Attorney's office will receive proper attention: Catherine Pauling, Alameda.
Expressed concern about the housing program being managed by the Alameda Housing
Authority (AHA); stated the City rent program is controlled by City law and enforcement is
handled by the City Attorney's office; urged Council approve the staff recommendation: Toni
Grimm, Alameda.
Stated there has been confusion about the rent program being under AHA; expressed support
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 7, 2022
3",CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-01-04,3,"(05-012) - Resolution No. 13807, , ""Authorizing Open Market Purchase
from Allied Sweepers, Inc., Pursuant to Section 3-15 of the Alameda
City Charter, of Green Machine Sidewalk Cleaning Equipment. ""
Adopted.
Sherri Stieg, West Alameda Business Association (WABA) thanked the
Council for their efforts with the Webster Street project.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she was happy to see the project
progressing; she would like to see the trees replaced as soon as
possible.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he is pleased with the progress;
requested periodic progress reports on the Streetscape Project.
Mayor Johnson stated schedule updates should continue to be
provided.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
( *05-013 - ) Resolution No. 13808, ""Approving Parcel Map No. 8401
(2340 and 2350 North Loop Road). "" Adopted.
(*05-014) Resolution No. 13809, ""Reappointing T. David Edwards as
Trustee of the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District.
""
Adopted.
(05-015) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code by Amending Subsection 3-28.9 (Payment In-Lieu of Taxes -
PILOT) ; Adding a New Subsection 3-28.10 (Return on Investment in
Enterprise Funds) of Section 3-28 (Payment of Taxes) of Chapter III
(Finance and Taxation) and Adding a New Subsection 18-4.10
(Exemptions) of Section 18-4 (Sewer Service Charge) of Article I
(Sewers) of Chapter XVIII (Sewer and Water) . Introduced.
Councilmember Daysog stated that increasing the Return on
Investment (ROI) to 3% could cause some impacts; encouraged the
Council not to vote tonight and place the matter as an action item
for the next City Council meeting; $782,000 would be received from
Alameda Power & Telecom (AP&T) by staying at the original proposal
of 1% ROI; if the $782,000 is relayed back to the rate payer, the
monthly bill could be increased from $1.53 to $2.03.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
January 4, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-01-04,6,"(05-018A) Resolution No. 13810, ""Upholding the Planning Board's
Denial of Major Design Review DR04-0013 and Variances, V04-005,
V04-0015, V04-0016, V04-0017 for the Structural Expansion of a
Single-Family Residence and Construction of Rear Deck at 913 Oak
Street. "" Adopted.
The Supervising Planner provided a presentation on the background
of the project.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the garage was a two-story
structure connected to the house, to which the Supervising Planner
responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the garage was intended to be
more than a one-car garage, to which the Supervising Planner
responded that the plans indicate a one-car garage with storage on
the left side.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether there was a proposal for the
upstairs portion of the garage, to which the Supervising Planner
responded the photographs show an attic with a couple of chairs and
table.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated the garage doors are smaller than the
width of the driveway there is a vent pipe that comes down along
the side of the house and protrudes into the driveway which would
make it very difficult for a car to enter the garage.
The Supervising Planner stated many driveways are challenging in
terms of access.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she is concerned with the intent of
using the garage for the proposed use.
The Supervising Planner stated that the Parking Ordinance requires
that garages be kept free of structures to accommodate a vehicle.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the garage could abut the property
line if detached from the house; once the garage is attached to the
house, there are side and backyard setback issues.
The Supervising Planner stated the Code allows for garages to abut
both the side and rear property lines under certain circumstances
the front of the garage needs to be 75 feet from the front property
line and there needs to be a 5-foot separation between the main
house and the garage a detached garage could comply with the 75-
foot regulation; she is not sure about compliance with the 5-foot
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
January 4, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-03-01,3,"(05-099) Establishment of a Task Force that will propose strategies
to prevent future mass evictions from rental housing complexes in
the City of Alameda.
The Interim City Manager outlined the suggested structure and
mission of the Task Force; stated the Task Force would meet on a
regular basis and report back to the Council within 90 days.
Carol Martino, Alameda, stated that she would like to serve on the
Task Force.
Steven Edrington, Rental Housing Association, stated that the
matter should not overly politicized to ensure progress is made and
there is a balanced committee.
Kathy Lautz, Apartment Owners Association, volunteered to serve on
the Task Force.
Lorraine Lilley, Harbor Island Tenants Association, stated that new
laws are necessary to protect tenants; suggested that the committee
have two Harbor Island Tenant Association representatives and two
ar-large tenants.
Councilmember deHaan inquired how the nominations would be made.
Mayor Johnson responded that she would like to receive input from
Council; that Council should submit names for potential Task Force
members.
Councilmember Daysog stated there should be a specific period of
time for application submittals.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Task Force would be an informal
committee, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the
affirmative.
(05-100) Ordinance NO. 2936, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
to Increase the Composition of the Golf Commission from Five to
Seven Members by Amending Subsections 2-9.1 (Commission Created
Composition), 2-9.2 (Membership Appointment ; Removal) and 2-9.3
(Voting) of Section 2-9 (City Golf Commission) Finally passed.
Councilmember deHaan moved final passage of the ordinance.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 1, 2005
3",CityCouncil/2005-03-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-03-15,7,"(05-120) Public Hearing to consider a Citywide Zoning Text
Amendment ZA04-0001 to review and revise Alameda Municipal Code
Section 30-6, Sign Regulations, clarifying current regulations and
establishing internal consistency with various Alameda Municipal
Code sections with the primary focus on regulations pertaining to
Window Signs and
(05-120A) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code by Amending Section 30-2 (Definitions) of Article I (Zoning
Districts and Regulations) of Chapter XXX (Development Regulations)
by Adding a New Section 30-6 (Sign Regulations) to Chapter XXX
(Development Regulations) Introduced.
The Supervising Planner gave a brief report.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether a medical office not in a
commercial area is allowed to have a temporary sign, to which the
Supervising Planner responded A-frame and I-frame signs are not
permitted anywhere in Alameda.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the proposed ordinance was
for all retail areas, to which the Supervising Planner responded in
the affirmative.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the Hearing.
Proponents: (In favor of ordinance) : Robb Ratto, PSBA; and Sherri
Stieg, WABA.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the City does not have the resources
to walk down each business district street to enforce the
ordinance; the City is counting on and expecting PSBA and WABA to
help clean up the signage in town.
Councilmember deHaan stated that some of the retailers are going to
have a rude awakening; enforcement of the proposed ordinance needs
to be implemented fairly.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the proposed ordinance is
primarily for signs facing outward and not inside signs, to which
the Supervising Planner responded that signs which are part of the
interior décor would not be considered to be a sign.
Councilmember deHaan stated that tonight is monumental; thanked
staff for all of their work.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved introduction of the ordinance.
Regular Meeting
7
Alameda City Council
March 15, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-03-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-05,3,"(05-144A) Resolution No. 13826, ""Upholding the Planning Board's
Recommendation to Approve Rezoning R04-002, Variance V04-018, Use
Permit UP04-013 - and Major Design Review, DR04-101, for Construction
of a Veterinary Clinic, with an amendment to include that the
Applicant has a dog walking policy and that kenneling is limited to
clients. Adopted.
The Supervising Planner provided a brief presentation on the
project.
Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing.
Proponents (In favor of appeal) : John Barni, Jr., Appellant
(provided diagram) ; Monica Pena, Alameda; Heather Beales, Alameda;
and Joe Meylor, Alameda.
Opponents (Not in favor of appeal) : Lawrence Henderson, Alameda;
Susan Corlett, Alameda: Helen Mohr Thomas, Alameda; Diane Schaffer,
Oakland; Cathy Wydner, Applicant; Steve Busse, Park Centre Animal
Hospital Geni Manchester; Mary Applegate, Applicant; Nancy
Matthews, Alameda (submitted letter) ; and Robb Ratto, Park Street
Business Association (PSBA)
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the Public
Hearing.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the Public Works Department
reviewed the current site plan and verified that the plan met
vehicle standards for safety and setbacks.
The Supervising Planner responded that there are hundreds of
instances where buildings are up to the edge of the sidewalk in the
commercial districts; stated that she would assume there were no
restrictions since the Public Works Department reviewed the plan
and did not raise the issue.
The Acting City Manager stated that the Engineering Department
would have commented if the site distance were a problem.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the commercial area was
willing to have dogs walk in the area, to which Mr. Ratto, PSBA,
responded absolutely.
Councilmember deHaan stated dog walking in neighborhoods has always
been a problem; that he feels more comfortable with the concessions
[made by Applicant regarding dog walking] that have been made
tonight ; that he is very satisfied with the architectural design
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
April 5, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-05,12,"(05-153)
Councilmember Daysog requested that staff respond to a
resident' inquiry regarding the rules of operating a roving coffee
shop.
Mayor Johnson stated the resident wants to operate a coffee truck
in the City parking lot by the Dog Park; the resident indicated
that East Bay Regional Park representative Doug Siden supports the
idea.
(05-154) ouncilmember deHaan stated that the Cineplex and parking
structure designs are dove tailing together; requested the designs
be presented at the same time and an overall design provided.
ADJOURNMEN'T
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 11:37 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
April 5, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,6,"(05-177) - Ordinance No. 2939, ""Approving and Authorizing Execution
of Lease between the City of Alameda (Lessor) and the County of
Alameda (Lessee) for Real Property Located at 1429 Oak Street. ""
Finally passed.
Mayor Johnson stated that the County Health Center is moving into
the former Children's Library site; there is now a home for the
Recreation and Park Department and the County Health Center
thanked the Acting City Manager for finding a very good solution to
a potentially difficult problem.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that the County's opportunity
provides the City with the benefit of improvements and maintaining
a building that is a City asset; the move is a fine solution and
keeps the County services central to the bus line and the center of
town.
Councilmember Matarrese moved final passage of the Ordinance.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion.
Under discussion, the Acting City Manager stated that the Public
Works Department put in partitions and did a lot of the work in a
short period of time; the County will have a ribbon cutting
ceremony either later this week or next week; the cost of the
materials was paid for by the County; a City building has been
fixed up with a combination of City forces and County funds;
everyone came out a winner.
Mayor Johnson stated that the building was not occupied for at
least eight years and was in fairly blighted conditions.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he appreciates the Acting City
Manager's win-win solutions.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(05-178) - Discussion of the Harbor Bay ferry system.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he received many e-mails regarding
the Harbor Bay ferry; noted that the City was able to get a one
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,7,"(05-212 - ) Rob Siltanen, Alameda, submitted a letter requesting that
the Alameda Point vision include sensible traffic solutions, middle
class housing, and a small town Alameda feel.
(05-213) - Jon Spangler, Cross Alameda Trail Steering Committee,
stated that Saturday, June 4, is National Trails Day there will be
a trail walk between Main Street and Webster Street.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(05-214) Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she and Councilmember
deHaan attended the Association of Bay Area Government conference
regarding casinos last week; there appears to be a one size fits
all negotiation strategy there is no recognition of the obvious
differences between urban and rural casinos; the Governor' S
negotiator promised that the Governor would take a hard look at
Indian tribes looking to have land restored; the negotiator was not
aware of anything pertaining to the Koi proposal on Swan Way;
stated tribal lobbying efforts have not made it all the way up the
ladder.
(
05-215 ) Councilmember Matarrese stated that there is a special
June election for a Measure A parcel tax; the tax would allow the
School District to extend the current parcel tax; requested that
Council give direction to place the matter on the next City Council
meeting agenda; stated there is a gap in School District funding a
County Financial Advisor would be required if the School District
slips into financial disarray; the City does not need a County
person advising how money is spent.
(05-216) ouncilmember deHaan stated that he is concerned that the
reservation shopping battle has just begun; some cities want to
move forward with casinos because of economic woes.
(05-217) Councilmember deHaan requested staff to review costs and
funding sources to centralize City administration particularly the
Public Works and Development Services Departments.
Mayor Johnson stated that she would support the idea.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he assumed that the matter
would be addressed with the budget and the ten-year outlook.
(05-218 ) Mayor Johnson requested that the Recreation Commission
matter [expansion of Commission size] be placed on the next City
Council Meeting agenda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-17,25,"(05-247) Presentation on the City's infrastructure investment
challenges.
Mayor Johnson stated that she considers infrastructure the part of
the City's budget deficit; the maintenance of infrastructure has
declined in the last several years; although money was saved, it
creates a bigger deficit that must be dealt with in the future; the
Council needs to decide whether to continue to allow the
infrastructure to continue declining or to deal with the deficit
and prevent it from growing.
The Public Works Director gave a Power Point presentation on the
City's infrastructure.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Public Works Director had
information on the percent of streets and sidewalks not in good
condition, to which the Public Works Director responded that he
included said information for streets.
Mayor Johnson stated the information was needed for sidewalks;
sidewalks are in bad condition; sidewalks should be made a priority
in addition to streets.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the annual funding shortfall
is $2 million.
The Public Work Director responded in the affirmative; stated
currently $4 million is funded and $6.6 million should be funded;
the $2.7 million shortfall does not take into consideration the $33
million deficit; under-funding each year continues to add to the
deficit.
Mayor Johnson stated the economic result of under-funding would be
more than $2.7 million; not completing maintenance causes greater
damage.
The Public Works Director concurred; stated there is an optimum
point when resurfacing should be completed to be cost effective.
many streets are beyond the cost effective point, which results in
more costly repair, such as a repair which would have cost $1 three
years prior would now cost $4.
Mayor Johnson requested pie charts showing the condition of
infrastructure other than streets, such as sidewalks and sewers.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether only spending $750,000 on street
resurfacing during the next fiscal year would add to the deficit,
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
25
May 17, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-06-07,8,"(05-277) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Historical
Advisory Board's approval of a Landscaping Plan for planting two
Coast Live Oak trees on the vacant property at 301 Spruce Street.
The submittal of a Landscaping Plan, as part of new development
proposals, was required by the Historical Advisory Board as a
condition for the removal of one Coast Live Oak tree in 2001 and
adoption of related resolution. The site is located at 301 Spruce
Street within the R-4 Neighborhood Residential Zoning District.
Applicant: Bill Wong for Hai Ky Lam. Appellant Patrick Lynch and
Jeanne Nader. Continued to June 21, 2005.
05-278 ) Resolution No 13853, ""Confirming the Business Improvement
Area Report for FY 2005-2006 and Levying an Annual Assessment on
the Alameda Business Improvement Area of the City of Alameda for FY
2005-2006. Adopted.
Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the Resolution.
Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
( 05 -279 - ) Recommendation to accept the Donor Recognition and Names
Gifts Policy for the Library.
The Library Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the $30,000 contribution for the
mural was reflective of the cost.
The Library Director responded in the affirmative; stated that four
or five works of art have been selected for the new Main Library ;
there is funding for only one.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the proposed policy has been
patterned after other libraries, to which the Library Director
responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember deHaan commended the Library Director's ingenuity
inquired whether plaques would be placed in appropriate spots
reflecting the donation.
The Library Director responded there would be a donor wall;
individuals who donate $5,000 over their lifetime would be
recognized on the donor wall; rooms and pieces of furniture would
also be recognized; areas of the library will be built without
donations; donations can specifically name and honor the donor in a
particular area of the Library.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
June 7, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-06-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-07-19,30,"(05-367) -
Susan Potter, Alameda, requested guidance in procuring a
permit for a mobile vendor to do business in the City; stated many
companies do business without a permit.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the request was for a mobile
business at the dog park, to which Ms. Potter responded in the
affirmative.
The Acting City Manager stated the proposal is to utilize a space
at the dog park and other parks; the Recreation and Park Commission
is working on a comprehensive policy and did not want to address
the request as part of the policy; the section of the Municipal
Code dealing with rolling stores could be amended; if the Council
desires, staff could work with the Planning Board to draft an
ordinance making amendments to address the issue.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Council has to direct that the
matter be referred to the Planning Board; noted issues are unknown,
for example merchants might oppose changes.
The Acting City Manager suggested the Planning Board consider the
matter.
Mayor Johnson concurred with the suggestion.
Councilmember deHaan stated the issue of how long a business could
remain on pubic property would need to be addressed.
The Acting City Manager stated rolling stores can only use the
public right-of-way, not standing locations.
Councilmember deHaan noted Oakland allows rolling vendors on
private property.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated the Planning Board should review the
matter.
Ms. Potter noted nothing is being done about the rolling vendors
that are currently operating in the City without permits.
Mayor Johnson stated the City might need to start doing
enforcement.
(05-368) Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed speeding vehicles.
(05-369) Jon Spangler, Alameda, stated non-food services, such as
bicycle repair, should be considered when addressing mobile
businesses; noted market factors, such as demand, would not support
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
30
July 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-08-02,3,"(05-383) - Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to send a letter to
the United States Postal Service regarding the City's interest to
relocate the distribution function of the Alameda Post Office from
Shoreline Drive to another site in Alameda.
Mayor Johnson stated that the City Manager would revise the draft
letter.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he is in favor of relocating
the distribution center; that there is no reason for a warehouse
and parking lot to enjoy one of the best views of the entire East
Bay; stated that the City should retain some sway over what would
be placed at the site; there is no need for another carwash or
retail-type enterprise that would not take advantage of the
location; efforts should be made to retain a retail front within
the South Shore Center for mail transactions.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he has a concern with the
possibility that the Post Office would be relocated at Alameda
Point.
Mayor Johnson stated that the intent was to have the retail portion
of the Post Office remain at the South Shore Center and have the
sorting portion of the facility move to a more appropriate
location.
Councilmember deHaan stated that the relocation of the distribution
center is a great opportunity for the City.
Mayor Johnson stated the relocation is not certain; the matter has
been discussed for years.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by the
following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore,
Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 4. Abstentions Councilmember Daysog
- 1.
( * 05-384) Recommendation to adopt specifications for Vehicle Tow
Contract for abandoned vehicles for the Police Department Accepted.
(*05-385) Recommendation to amend the Consultant Contract with
Signet Testing Labs, Inc., modifying the scope of work and
increasing the Contract price in the amount of $54,000 for the New
Main Library Project, No. P.W. 01-03-01. Accepted.
(05-386) - Adoption of Resolution Empowering the City Attorney to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
August 2, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-08-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-08-16,25,"(05-413) The following speakers addressed the Theater Parking
Structure Public Hearing : Valerie Ruma, Citizens for Megaplex Free
Alameda; Ani Dimusheve, Alameda; Jan Schaeffer, Alameda; Rosemary
McNally, Alameda; Robb Ratto, PSBA; and Jay Levine, Alameda.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(05 -414) - Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to
the Civil Service Board, Economic Development Commission, Golf
Commission, Historical Advisory Board, Housing and Building Code
Hearing and Appeals Board, and Recreation and Park Commission.
Mayor Johnson nominated Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft and Robert F. Kelley
to the Economic Development Commission and Anthony M. Santare to
the Golf Commission.
(05-415) Councilmember deHaan stated that he received an
announcement for a Krusi Park Open House regarding an application
by Cingular Wireless to install a new wireless cell site at the
Krusi Park tennis courts; the announcement states that Cingular
does not own the existing site.
Mayor Johnson inquired who was sponsoring the Open House, to which
Councilmember deHann responded the Development Services Department.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he thought that Cingular developed
the first cell towers at Krusi Park.
The Business Development Division Manager stated that she would
investigate the matter.
(05-416) - Councilmember Matarrese stated that the Harbor Bay Ferry
has exceeded the 40% fare box for July; stated that advertisement
needs to continue; alternate fuel buying options may need to be
considered in the future.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 2:40 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
25
August 16, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-09-06,2,"(05-425) Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to send letters to
federal legislators supporting S. 1260 (Vitter) S. 113
(Feinstein), H.R. 2353 (Rogers) , and H.R. 3431 (Dent ) which amend
federal legislation to further restrict the establishment of tribal
gambling casinos.
Doug Siden, East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) thanked the
Council for the efforts to stop the gambling casino proposal at
Martin Luther King Park; encouraged continual vigilance; stated
that the Tribe's application has not been withdrawn; there has been
no response to EBRPD's communications to the Bureau of Indian
Affairs.
Mayor Johnson stated there has been a true partnership between all
the affected cities, EBRPD, and the County; the public should be
informed of federal representatives actions; read a portion of the
proposed legislation: stated local control at the federal level
means the Governor that she would prefer local control be more
local; the Governor does not have much control over casinos there
is a lot of important work being done that will help the community.
Councilmember Daysog stated that there is a slew of legislation
pushing back on casinos' efforts to enter urban areas; H.R. 3431
would ensure local governments within 15 miles of a proposed site
have a say ; encouraged H. .R. 3431 be strengthened.
Councilmember Matarrese moved to approval of the staff
recommendation
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried
by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(*05-426) Recommendatior to accept the work of Gallagher & Burk,
Inc. for repair and resurfacing of certain streets, Phase 25, No.
P.W. 05-04-06. Accepted.
(*05-427) Recommendation to approve the Request for Proposals (RFP)
for Restaurant and Bar Services at the Chuck Corica Golf Complex.
Accepted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(05-428 ) Resolution No. 13888, ""Commending Alameda Free Library
Director Susan H. Hardie for Her Contributions to the City of
Alameda. Adopted.
Counci lmember Daysog moved adoption of the resolution.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
September 6, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-09-06,4,"(05-431) Public hearing to consider an Appeal of the Historical
Advisory Board's decision to impose penalties for unauthorized
demolition. The site is located at 616 Pacific Avenue, within the
R-4, Neighborhood Residential District. Applicant/Appellant: Erwin
Roxas and
(05-431A) Resolution No. 13892, ""Granting the Appeal and
Overturning the Historical Advisory Board's Decision to Uphold the
Five-Year Stay in Development for the Property Located at 616
Pacific Avenue. Adopted.
The Supervising Planner gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Daysog stated that the site's historic designation is
Level H; inquired whether Levels A through G are before Level H.
The Supervising Planner responded that designation ""N"" is for
buildings that could be placed on the National Register, ""S"" is for
buildings that could be placed on the State Register, and ""H"" is
the lowest level for potentially historic buildings that require
further investigation.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the Hearing.
Opponent (Not in favor of appeal) : Kevin Frederick, Alameda.
Proponent (In favor of appeal) : Paul Rezucha, Alameda.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public
portion of the Hearing.
Mayor Johnson stated that she could not tell from the drawings that
24 studs were retained; the neighbor mentioned that studs from the
north and west walls were being retained; inquired whether parts of
the walls would be used in the interior of the house.
The Acting Planning and Building Director responded in the
affirmative.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether any of the exteriors walls would
remain, to which the Acting Planning and Building Director
responded that the sidewall and part of the front wall would
remain.
Mayor Johnson stated that the west and front walls appear to be
completely new.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
September 6, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-09-20,14,"(05-466) Gretchen Lipow, Alameda, submitted a handout regarding the
November ballot from The Alliance for a Better California.
( 05-467) - Delores Wells Guyton, Buena Vista Community Association,
stated that a tenant at the Santa Clara Avenue fire informed the
manager that her fire alarm did not work a year ago; annual
inspections for rental properties are important.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Fire Department does annual
inspections, to which the Assistant City Manager responded in the
affirmative.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(05-468 - ) Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to
the Civil Service Board, Economic Development Commission,
Historical Advisory Board, Housing and Building Code Hearing and
Appeals Board, and Recreation and Park Commission. Not addressed.
(05-469) Councilmember deHaan stated that there was excellent
action at the Santa Clara Avenue fire; the Red Cross moved the
families into a local church and was working with the last family
to determine where the family would spend the night the landlord
and manager of the unit had a listing of all the tenants; tenant
relocation was being considered to other units owned by the
manager ; the situation gave a strong feeling of being able to react
when necessary.
(05-470) Councilmember deHaan requested a traffic control update on
Santa Clara Avenue and Sherman Street.
(05-471) Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she received a phone call
regarding the morning traffic situation at Island Drive and
Doolittle Drive and the length of time to get off Bay Farm Island
traveling both ways; the citizen noted that he had formally
contacted the Public Works Department about the problem a year ago;
requested staff to follow up on the matter.
Mayor Johnson stated that the traffic situation has worsened
recently; inquired whether there has been a change in the timing of
the signals; noted the traffic backs up on Island Drive; the
southbound traffic on Doolittle Drive is not as bad.
Councilmember deHaan stated the morning traffic going out to Harbor
Bay is also bad.
(05-472) Mayor Johnson requested further information on the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
14
September 20, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-09-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-11-01,3,"(05-524) ) Public Hearing to accept new, revised preliminary designs
for the cineplex and a 352-space parking structure at the corner of
Oak Street and Central Avenue, within the C-C T (Community
Commercial Theater) Zoning District.
The Development Services Director gave a brief presentation on the
project.
Mr. Towey with Komorous-Towey Architects gave a Power Point
presentation.
Councilmember deHaan stated there are seven parking levels;
inquired whether the elevator tower reached up to the seventh
level.
The Architect responded in the negative; stated the previous and
current designs are the same; the seventh level was extended to
make up for some lost spaces.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the highest peak would be the
elevator tower and whether the roof level was now 70 feet.
The Architect responded that the top of the elevator tower was the
highest point.
Councilmember deHaan stated that the canopies look industrial
;
inquired whether other options were considered.
The Architect responded that the industrial nature of the canopies
could be valid, depending on execution; the historical period being
evaluated had very flat and thin awnings many were roll out
awnings; the intention is to keep the metal very flat and thin as
opposed to having a sloping top; the corrugated metal would not be
visible; the canopies could be executed to look finished.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there was another design
which could pull back the 20 inch protrusion.
The Architect responded that the previous design studied what would
occur if the protrusion had to be pulled back; twenty-five seats
and a few feet off one of the screen's sides would be lost; his
charge was to work with the approved floor plans.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing.
Proponents (In favor of the design) : Pauline Kelley, Alameda; Pete
Halberstadt, Alameda (read a list of 33 people in favor of the
design) ; Chuck Millar, Alameda; Marilyn Schumacher, Alameda; Sherri
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
November 1, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-11-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-12-20,2,"(05-579) - Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report
for the period ending September 30, 2005, for sales transactions in
the second calendar quarter of 2005.
Councilmember deHaan stated that there has been a drastic 16.5%
reduction in tax revenue generation; requested a forecast for the
upcoming quarters.
The Finance Director stated that the sales tax consultant advised
her that sales tax receipts were not reported for the
transportation and business-to-business categories during the third
quarter the non-reporting occurred throughout the State; sales tax
receipts should be reported in the next quarterly report for
businesses headquartered in the southeast Gulf area; the report
should be received the first part of January.
Councilmember deHaan stated there was an 80% reduction in the
commercial production, an overall 21.8% reduction in business-to
business, and retail dropped 16.5% inquired what attributed to the
16.5% reduction in retail.
The Finance Director stated that the reported geographic areas show
downturns on Park Street and Webster Street as well as areas south
of Lincoln Avenue; the decline could be attributed to construction
activity as well as businesses coming in and out; stated that one,
specific business was not inordinately impacted; impacts were
across the board.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the sales tax for the area
north of Lincoln Avenue dropped immensely because of the economy.
The Finance Director stated that she did not know why there was a
decline in the area; under-reporting could have occurred.
Mayor Johnson requested more information on under-reporting.
The Finance Director stated that reports were late in coming to
California for some businesses such as a multi-state business
headquartered in Mississippi.
Mayor Johnson inquired when the report would be available, to which
the Finance Director responded the first part of January.
Mayor Johnson requested an update when the final figures are
received from the State.
The Finance Director stated that the figures would be included in
the next quarterly report.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
December 20, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-12-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-01-03,3,"(06-005) Recommendation to accept the work of Golden Bay
Construction, Inc. for the Webster Street Renaissance Project, No.
P.W. 07-02-07.
Councilmember deHaan requested the item be addressed together with
the recommendation to approve an increase for the Construction
Contract with Ghilotti Brothers [paragraph no. 06-006].
Councilmember deHaan stated the Webster Street Renaissance Project
involved five blocks; the project was very successful; the vast
majority of Webster Street has improved; the Park Street
Streetscape Project involves two blocks; a lot of the work still
needs to be done; inquired how much funding was provided by the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC).
The Public Works Director responded each project received
approximately $1 million.
Councilmember deHaan stated that the remainder of the funding came
from various other sources such as redevelopment and Alameda Power
and Telecom (AP&T)
The Public Works Director stated that AP&T paid for all of the Park
Street joint trenching for electrical and cable wiring some
Measure B money covered the Webster Street sidewalk repair.
Councilmember deHaan stated the money was well spent; he has
concerns about the next phase; inquired whether more dollars were
in the cue now.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative. stated a
$700,000 federal grant would go to the Park Street Streetscape
Project specifically; he is working with the Park Street Business
Association (PSBA) and Development Services Department to determine
how the money will be spent; PSBA would like the money to go toward
more street trees and lights.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the MTC funding needs to go
toward transportation-oriented activities.
The Public Works Director responded that the funding is flexible.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether matching funds need to be
obtained for the federal grant, to which the Public Works Director
responded in the negative.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the federal grant would
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
January 3, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-01-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-01-31,3,"(06-040) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and
authorize Call for Bids for Bayport Alameda Community Building and
Park Project.
The Redevelopment Manager provided a brief presentation.
The Acting Recreation and Park Director presented drawings
outlining the schematics for the proposed park site.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the restrooms would be separate
from the community building.
The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded that the
restrooms would be separate for park access.
Councilmember deHaan stated the adjacent school property area has
asphalt; inquired whether the area would be accessible at all
times, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director responded
in the affirmative.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the proposed trees are
appropriate for the climate, to which the Acting Recreation and
Park Director responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether there would be adequate drainage.
The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded in the
affirmative; stated adequate drainage has been stressed throughout
the design process.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether sprinkler systems would cover the
infield area.
The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded that the
specifications would address specific sprinkler systems for the
site.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the older parks have a lot of tree
root issues; inquired whether root guards were considered.
The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded in the
affirmative stated the design team was very conscience of tree
type and placement.
Councilmember deHaan inquired what was the square footage of the
multi-purpose room, to which the Acting Recreation and Park
Director responded 1,700 square feet.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
January 17, 2006",CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-01-31,9,"(06-043) Brien Burroughs, Glass Eye Media, stated that he is
producing an independently financed television pilot at City Hall
on Thursday and Friday barriers sometimes come up when filming at
government sites; all his contacts in Alameda have been great ;
stated he appreciates the support.
(06-044) Patrick Lynch, Alameda, stated there is corruption in the
Planning Department a resolution was passed by the Council on June
21, , 2005 which required the owner of a vacant lot adjacent to his
home to conduct a specific soil test prior to receiving design
review; the testing was submitted; the design review was approved
and has been appealed to the Planning Board; he is unable to get a
fair hearing with the Planning Board; staff refuses to provide
accurate information; the City denies using the wrong section of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in approving the
development; he received a $100 invoice to file a new form with the
State; he received a $1600 invoice, which includes over five hours
to discuss the project with City Attorney's office; the facts are
undisputable; urged members of the Council to appeal the decision
of the Planning Board.
Mayor
Johnson stated that Mr. Lynch should communicate his concerns
with the City Manager.
Mr. Lynch stated that he spoke with the Acting Assistant City
Manager on Thursday and has not received a reply.
The Acting Assistant City Manager stated that he spoke to Mr.
Lynch, the Planning Department staff, and City Attorney's office
last week; he still has one more person to contact; he will get
back to Mr. Lynch.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(06-045
-
)
Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to
the Economic Development Commission. Continued.
(06-046) Councilmember deHaan stated streetscape funding was
discussed at the last Council meeting he hopes that electrical
provisions have been included to allow for embedded pedestrian
lights [ on Park Street] between Central Avenue and Santa Clara
Avenue when funding is available.
(
(06-047) Councilmember deHaan stated a lot of homes have been fire
damaged over a period of time; inquired whether remediation is
required within a certain amount of time; stated areas are an
eyesore and a nuisance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
January 17, 2006",CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-02-21,14,"(06-090) Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that residents living near
business districts have an issue with litter being left from fast
food restaurants; a resident sent her a link to a
newspaper article regarding Oakland imposing a mandated City
fee on business owners for trash pickup; stated she is
not suggesting imposing a similar fee but that Council should
review the strategy.
(06-091) Councilmember Daysog requested information on fire
inspection costs which he requested in the past.
The City Manager stated that she would provide Councilmember
Daysog with a copy of the fee structure.
(06-092) Councilmember deHaan stated that signs were posted
throughout the City to buy merchandise at a home on Valentine's
Day i he feels that doing so is pushing the envelop to the extreme.
stated that Kentucky Fried Chicken near Park Avenue smells of well- -
cooked oil; newly constructed restaurants have scrubbers for
ventilation; requested staff to review how the odor can be
remedied.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City could adopt an
ordinance requiring more filters.
Vice Mayor Gilmore suggesting reviewing whether another entity
regulates the issue.
(06-093) Mayor Johnson stated issues have been discussed at Youth
Collaborative meetings regarding the youth in the community;
suggested that the Council consider forming a Youth Advisory
Council or have youth representatives on to certain boards and
commissions; volunteer opportunities are available for students,
but paying job opportunities are scarce; the Golf Course had a
policy regarding not hiring students under eighteen years old in
the past; the policy has changed so that 16 year old students can
be hired; suggested that the matter be placed on a City Council
agenda.
(06-094) Mayor Johnson inquired whether anything was being done
regarding the fire cleanup at Central Avenue and Park Street.
The City Manager responded that the Planning Director was working
on regulatory remedies.
Mayor Johnson stated that blight has lasted for many years in
the downtown district.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
14
February 21, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-02-21,15,"(06-095) Mayor Johnson stated that a Councilmember Reporting
section should be added to the agenda to allow Councilmembers to
report on conferences and meetings.
Councilmember deHaan stated that the section could be added under
Communications and could include the City Manager.
Mayor Johnson stated that other Department Heads should be included
also.
(06-096) Mayor Johnson stated that she recently attended the U.S.
Conference of Mayors in Washington, D.C. ; the Conference includes
cities with populations higher than 40,000; power, Base, and
Housing Authority issues are very impacted by federal statues and
policies; the federal government is trying to turn over franchising
telecommunications to the State rather than local governments;
stated that she is on the Economic Development and Housing
Subcommittee as well as Electric Power Subcommittee.
ADJOURNMENT
(06-097) - There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned
the Regular Meeting at 10:52 p.m. in a moment of silence with
thoughts and prayers that all service members in Iraq are safe and
come home as soon as possible.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
15
February 21, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-03-07,11,"(06-130) - Councilmember Matarrese stated that Long's is working with
the Planning Department on some renovations; suggested using
creativity for the corner across from City Hall, such a mini-park.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the red windows were historic or
could be removed from the Long's site.
(06-131) - Mayor Johnson inquired whether the speed [pole-mounted
radar ] signs were mobile, to which the City Manager responded some
signs are pole-mounted and others are mobile.
Councilmember Matarrese stated he would like to have a permanent
speed sign at Lincoln Avenue curve area.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether a sign was located on Buena Vista
Avenue.
The City Manager stated that a report on locations would be
provided to the Council.
Mayor Johnson requested a temporary or permanent speed sign be
located on Buena Vista Avenue.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the signs' effectiveness could
be measured.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether speeds could be monitored, to which
the City Manager responded that she would check.
Councilmember deHaan stated a decrease in the number of tickets
issued would be a good measure of the signs' effectiveness.
(06-132) Councilmember Daysog stated that he attended a briefing
co-sponsored - by the League of California Cities East Bay, North
Bay, and Peninsula Divisions; a representative from the Governor' S
office addressed the upcoming infrastructure bond plan; Friday is
the deadline for the Governor and legislature to place something on
the June ballot.
( 06-133 - ) Mayor Johnson thanked the Recreation and Park Department
for providing information on the City facilities naming process ;
stated she would like to have the policy come back to Council for
discussion along with the street naming policy.
(06-134) Mayor Johnson welcomed David Brandt to his first City
Council meeting as Assistant City Manager.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
11
March 7, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-03-21,6,"(06-154) - Councilmember deHaan stated that the sidewalk on the Park
Street side of the Alameda Towne Centre was only three feet; five
feet would be more appropriate.
(06-155) Councilmember deHaan stated that he attended AC Transit's
hydrogen fuel cell demonstration on March 13; the bus has already
been operating in Alameda.
Mayor Johnson noted that the bus seems to be very quiet.
(06-156) Mayor Johnson inquired whether anyone attended the AP&T
electric partnership groundbreaking.
Councilmember deHaan responded that he attended; stated the
environment would be impacted if the gas was not captured.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 11:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
March 21, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-03-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-05-16,9,"(06-268 ) Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of
$1,050,505.00 to McGuire and Hester, and allocate a 10% contingency
in the amount of $105,100.00 for the construction of the Bayport 4-
acre park.
The Redevelopment Manager provided a brief presentation.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the original bidder or
challenger resubmitted a bid, to which the Redevelopment Manager
responded in the negative.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the bids were lower.
The Redevelopment Manager responded the bids for the park were
lower; stated the community building bids were higher than the
engineer's estimate; staff will recommend rejecting the bids at the
June 20 City Council Meeting.
The Acting Recreation and Park Director stated he has contacted the
School District to arrange for facilities to run the After School
Playground Program in the fall; field use will be rotated;
renovation of Godfrey Park will start after Bayport Park is opened.
Mayor Johnson inquired when the construction of the community
building would be completed.
The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded the community
building would be re-bid in the fall.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether construction could be done during
the school year, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director
responded in the affirmative.
The Redevelopment Manager stated the community building is on
school property and is subject to the Department of State Architect
standards, which are higher the original lowest bid was $730,000
the re-bid was $850,000; the engineer's estimate was in the
$600,000 range.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the renovations for Godfrey Park
would start in September, to which the Acting Recreation and Park
Director responded hopefully.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
May 16, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-06-20,9,"(06-330 - ) Written communication from the League of California
Cities requesting designation of Voting Delegate for the
League's 2006 Annual Conference.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he would be happy to serve as
the City's representative.
Vice Mayor Gilmore noted that she could not serve as the
alternate.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he would serve as the
alternate.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of Councilmember Daysog
serving as the City's delegate and Councilmember deHaan serving
as the alternate.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(06-331) Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment
to the Civil Service Board, Commission on Disability Issues,
Economic Development Commission, Historical Advisory Board,
Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board, Housing
Commission, Library Board, Planning Board, Public Utilities
Board, Social Service Human Relations Board, and Transportation
Commission.
Mayor Johnson nominated: Roberto Rocha for reappointment to the
Civil Service Board; Michael E. Soderberg for appointment to the
Civil Service Board; DuWayne A. Crone and Paulina Kirola for
appointment to the Commission on disability Issues; Judith A.
Lynch for reappointment to the Historical Advisory Board -
Community-at-Large Seat; Mark Irons for appointment to the
Historical Advisory Board - Contractor Seat; Jeff Cambra for
reappointment to the Housing and Building Code Hearing and
Appeals Board; Harold J. Holmes for appointment to the Housing
and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board; Billie Trujiilo for
reappointment to the Housing Commission; Karen A. Butter for
reappointment to the Library Board; Anne Cook and Andrew J.
Cunningham for reappointment to the Planning Board; Ann
McCormick for reappointment to the Public Utilities Board -
Engineer Seat; Michael J. Krueger and Robert L. McFarland for
reappointment to the Transportation Commission.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
June 20, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-06-20,10,"(06-332) - Councilmember deHaan stated Oakland's Ninth Street
Project was discussed last November; the impacts would be the
same as Alameda impacting Oakland Chinatown; Alameda should
voice concerns regarding closing off transportation corridors.
the Off Agenda Report on the matter should be shared with the
public; Council needs to communicate with the general public;
the Chamber of Commerce made a presentation on the matter.
(06-333) Councilmember deHaan stated the Alameda Development
Corporation (ADC) controls some efforts with the Bayport Housing
project requested an Off Agenda Report on ADC's health and
welfare and how the present individuals running ADC interface
with the developer.
Councilmember Daysog stated Council and staff would be vigilant
in ironing out any wrinkles with the ADC.
(06-334) Mayor Johnson stated Disaster Preparedness was
discussed at the Mayor's Conference; federal funding comes to
the region, not to the City; requested a report on which agency
the money goes to and how the money is distributed.
(06-335) Councilmember Daysog encouraged the public to attend
the movie by Al Gore regarding the environment; stated the movie
is very informative.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 9:39 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the
Brown Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
June 20, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-07-05,4,"(06-352D) Resolution No. 13988, ""Reappointing Judith A. Lynch to
the Historical Advisory Board - Community-at-Large Seat. Adopted;
(06-352E) Resolution No. 13989, ""Appointing Mark Irons to the
Historical Advisory Board - Contractor Seat. "" Adopted;
(06-352F) Resolution No. 13990, ""Reappointing Jeff Cambra to the
Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board. Adopted;
(06-352G) Resolution No. 13991, ""Appointing Harold J. Holmes to the
Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board. Adopted;
(06-352H) Resolution No. 13992, ""Reappointing Billie Trujillo to
the Housing Commission. "" Adopted;
(06-352I) Resolution No. 13993, ""Reappointing Karen A. Butter to the
Library Board. Adopted;
(06-352J) Resolution No. 13994, ""Reappointing Anne Cook to the
Planning Board. "" Adopted;
(06-352K) Resolution No. 13995, ""Reappointing Andrew J. Cunningham
to the Planning Board. Adopted;
(06-352L) Resolution No. 13996, ""Reappointing Ann McCormick to the
Public Utilities Board - Engineer Seat. Adopted;
(06-352M) Resolution No. 13997, ""Reappointing Michael J. Kreuger to
the Transportation Commissioner. Adopted; and
(06-352N) Resolution No. 13998, ""Reappointing Robert L. McFarland
to the Transportation Commission."" Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented
certificates to Board and Commission members.
Mayor Johnson thanked the Board and Commission members for their
willingness to serve.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(06-353) The following speakers discussed Measure A: Former
Councilmember Barbara Kerr, Alameda; Karen Butter, League of Women
Voters (submitted letter) ; Arthur Lipow, Alameda Public Affairs
Program; Ashley Jones, Alameda; Janet Gibson, Alameda; Helen Sause,
Housing Opportunities Makes Economic Sense (HOMES) ; Pat Gannon,
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
July 5, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-07-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-09-05,8,"(06-439B) Resolution No. 13010, ""Amending the Alameda City
Employees Association (ACEA) Salary Schedule by Establishing the
Salary Range for the Classification of Transportation Coordinator. ""
Adopted.
Councilmember deHaan requested that the Deputy City Manager
discussion be addressed at the next Council meeting and the
remainder of the resolutions be adopted tonight.
Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion.
Mayor Johnson clarified the motion is to adopt the resolutions,
with the exclusion of the Deputy City Manager position.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
( *06-440) - Resolution No. 14011, ""Appointing Rebecca A. Kozak to the
Bay Area Library Information System (BALIS) Advisory Board. ""
Adopted.
(*06-441) Ordinance No. 2951, ""Approving and Authorizing the Lease
of City-Owned Property at 3367 Fernside Boulevard to Arthur M.
Jawad and Julia Jawad. Finally passed.
(06-442) Public Hearing to consider Ordinance Reclassifying and
Rezoning Certain Property Within the City of Alameda from Open
Space (O) to Community Manufacturing Planned Development (CM-PD) by
Amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1277, N.S. for that Property Located
at 500 Maitland Drive. Introduced.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the City owned the property
and whether the property flipped over into the Harbor Bay
development area when Maitland Drive was changed.
The Planner III responded in the affirmative; stated over an acre
of City land on the other side of Maitland Drive moved to the
southwest side when Maitland Drive was realigned; the City sold the
land to Harbor Bay and amended the General Plan designation shortly
after; provided the exhibit to the Ordinance.
Mayor Johnson stated the proceeds of the sale went into an open
space fund.
Councilmember deHaan inquired what the new owner is proposing.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
September 5, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-09-05,18,"(06-451)
-
Councilmember deHaan stated the Tube lighting has been on
the board for at least three years and CalTrans has deferred the
project for two years; he would like the issue to be tracked; the
project needs to move forward.
(06-452) Councilmember deHaan stated the Central Avenue
[crosswalk] embedded lighting is not functioning; inquired when the
Park Street embedded lighting would be done near Boniere Bakery.
(06-453) Councilmember deHaan stated that Park Street trash
receptacles overflowed from the weekend; trash pick up should be
brought under control within the City before the rainy season.
(06-454) Councilmember Matarrese stated repairs are being made on
Lincoln Avenue and Park Street overhead wires; half of the weed-
filled triangle near Tilden Way has been shaved away; inquired
whether the other half could be shaved and landscaped.
The City Manager responded the issue would be addressed.
(06-455) Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether Long's Drug
Store was supposed to do some landscape upgrades.
The City Manager stated she should look into the matter.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to see some
landscaping on the corner across from City Hall.
(06-456) Mayor Johnson stated that large weeds have grown at the
Otis Drive median off the Bay Farm Bridge.
The City Manager stated she would talk to the Public Works Director
about the matter.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 12:55 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
18
September 5, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-09-19,5,"(06-470C) Resolution No. 14017, ""Reappointing Jo Kahuanui to the
Recreation and Park Commission. "" Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which passed by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the oath and presented certificates of
appointment.
(06-471) Resolution No. 14018, ""Endorsing and Supporting the U.S.
Conference of Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement."" Adopted.
Mayor Johnson stated the United States Conference of Mayors was
requesting a commitment for support at the local level.
The Supervising Planner stated the proposed resolution follows and
supports the resolution to join the International Council for Local
Environment Initiatives which was adopted in July 2006.
Mayor Johnson stated the matter was placed on the agenda to ensure
that there was follow through with the commitment.
Councilmember Daysog moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(06-472 - ) Public Hearing to consider ZA06-0001, Zoning Ordinance
Text Amendment City-wide; and
(06-472A) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal
Code by Amending Subsection 30-4.9A.g.8 (Off-Street Parking and
Loading Space) of the C-C Community Commercial Zone of Chapter XXX
(Development Regulations) to Add a Process for Parking Exceptions.
Introduced.
The Supervising Planner provided a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson stated downtown parking needs to be provided; she
understands the City wants to de-emphasize the automobile in the
General Plan; however, people still need places to park; Webster
Street parking needs to be addressed immediately; she agrees with
changing the requirements; a structured parking lot should be
considered.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the use runs with the owner or
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
September 19, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-09-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-11-14,3,"(06-543) Public Hearing to consider a proposal by Warmington
Homes, California for a General Plan Amendment (GP05-002) rezoning
(R05-004), Master Plan (MP05-001), Tentative Map (TM05-002), and
adoption of a mitigated Negative Declaration (IS05-0003) for
a
development of forty (40) new, detached single-family residences,
and related utilities, streets, open space and visitor parking and
an appeal of certain conditions of approval on Development Plan and
Design Review permits (PD05-02) . The project site is located at the
northwest corner of Grand Street and Fortmann Way at 2051-2099
Grand Street. Continued;
(06-543A) Adoption of Resolution Adopting the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program for the
Grand Marina Village Development Located at the Northwest Corner of
Grand Street and Fortmann Way (State Clearinghouse #2006-04-2145)
.
Not adopted;
(06-543B) Adoption of Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment
(GPA-05-02) - for Grand Marina Village to Amend the General Plan Land
Use Diagram to Change the Designation of Approximately 8.3 Acres to
Specified Mixed Use and Amend Sections 2.2, 2.3, and 2.6 and
Associated Tables of the Land Use Element to Reflect the Specified
Mixed Use Designation. Not adopted;
(06-543C) Introduction of Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning
Property Located Adjacent to the Oakland Estuary and Grand Street
from M-2, General Industrial (Manufacturing) District to MX, Mixed
Use Planned Development District (MX). Not introduced;
(06-543D) Introduction of Ordinance Approving Master Plan MP05-01
for a Mixed Use Development Including Single-Family Residential,
Recreational Marina, Maritime Commercial, and Open Space Uses,
Located within a Project Area Encompassing Approximately 8.36 Acres
of Land and Water at the Intersection of Grand Street and the
Oakland Estuary. Not introduced;
(06-543E) Adoption of Resolution Approving Tentative Map, TM05-
0002, for Property Located Between Grand Street, Fortmann Way, and
the Oakland Estuary. Not adopted; and
(06-543F) Adoption of Resolution Upholding the Planning Board
Approval of Planned Development, PD05-02 and Design Review DR05- -
0126 for Grand Marina Village. Not adopted.
Continued to be noticed for a later date.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(06-544) Bill Stremmel, ACTIA Citizen Advisory Committee, stated
there was a lack of direction and detour management during the
closure of the Posey Tube on October 31; outlined the incident
Adjourned Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
November 14, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-11-14.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-12-05,3,"(06-592) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning
Board's Approval of Major Design Review DR06-0002 for 3292
Washington Street; and
(06-592A) Resolution No. 14047, ""Approving to Send the Design Back
to the Planning Board for Consideration to Make the Addition More
Compatible with the Single Story Characteristics of the
Neighborhood; i.e., , Setting the Second Story Back in a Fashion that
Would Not Affect the Appearance from the Street. "" Adopted.
The Supervising Planner gave a brief Power Point presentation.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired how far back the bulk of the second-
story addition is from the property line, to which the Supervising
Planner responded approximately twenty feet.
Vice Mayor Gilmore requested an explanation on the historic and
non-historic design review guidelines.
The Supervising Planner stated the residential design review
guidelines have a series of guidelines for second stories the
subject building is non-historic; additional guidelines address
historic building additions.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the guidelines are more specific to
certain structures, to which the Supervising Planner responded in
the affirmative.
Councilmember Daysog stated photos show shading on December 5 at
11:30 a.m. and September 30 at 10:00 a.m. i inquired what would be
the current shade at 8:00 a.m. and how the shade would change with
a two-story structure next door.
The Supervising Planner responded reflected light would be less
with a two-story structure; stated the sky would be less visible;
no one has argued that the addition would not affect the neighbor's
livability.
Mayor Johnson inquired what is the existing square footage of the
house, to which the Supervising Planner responded approximately
1,000 square feet.
Councilmember deHaan stated a comparison is easy because a large
home already exists next to similar property; noted that there was
full sun at 10:00 a.m. today; stated similar structures were in
full shade; the kitchen and eating areas are in the center of the
house.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
December 5, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-07-17,18,"(07 - 357) Vice Mayor Tam requested that the Council meeting be
adjourned in a moment of silence in memory of Archie Waterbury
and Tom Matthews.
(07-358) Councilmember Matarrese requested reviewing the
potential for a big box ordinance; stated other communities have
ordinances which govern square footage and the amount of non-
taxable items that can be sold in the super stores; the term
""big box"" is used, but not defined, in the Northern Waterfront
General Plan Amendment and Economic Development Strategic Plan;
the term should be defined before project proposals are
discussed; the City of Livermore and other cities are reviewing
the issue.
(07- - 359 ) Councilmember Matarrese requested development of a
written policy that would make closed session material available
after a discussed items are resolved or moot.
(07-360) Councilmember deHaan stated that Council voted to
review the impact that big boxes would have on existing retail.
funding has not been available [for the study] companies should
be respective of wages and health benefits when a threshold of
100 employees is hit; he would like to have said matter included
in the big box discussions.
Mayor Johnson stated that several cities are going through the
process of adopting a big box ordinance; the City has never
defined big box; a study of impacts does not need to be
completed first; the ordinance should be brought forward soon;
suggested moving forward in reviewing ordinances in other
communities.
Councilmember deHaan stated many cities have already defined big
box; the threshold is approximately 50,000 square feet; Truckee
has defined big box accordingly [50,000 square feet].
Councilmember Matarrese stated the City of Livermore defines big
box as 90,000 square feet.
Mayor Johnson stated the matter would be brought back to Council
for discussion.
Regular Meeting
18
Alameda City Council
July 17, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-07-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-01-02,18,"(07-013B) Final Passage of Ordinance Approving Development
Agreement DA-06-0003 By and Between the City of Alameda and
Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (Successor by Merger to Catellus
Development Corporation) Governing the Development of Up To 400,000
Square Feet of Office Space; a 20,000 Square Foot Health Club; and
300,000 Square Feet of Retail Space or 50,000 Square Feet of Retail
Space and 370,000 Square Feet of Research and Development Space.
Continued to January 16, 2007; and
(07-013C) Ordinance No. 2959, ""Approving Development Agreement DA-
06-004 By and Between the City of Alameda and the Palmtree
Acquisition Corporation Governing the Development of Up To 300
Housing Units. Finally passed.
Councilmember Gilmore stated she has questions regarding the TDM
Program and the funding limits in the DDA; inquired whether the TDM
Program cap would not be reviewed again.
The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded the TDM
Program funding is in the commercial Development Agreement (DA) ,
Section 3.12 on page 20; stated the project build-out cap is
$425,000 per year with an annual Consumer Price Index (CPI)
escalator; an amendment to the DDA allowed the cap to be increased
in the event Tinker Avenue was declared infeasible; Tinker Avenue
alternatives could be explored for up to three years and the cap
could be adjusted to take into account the time to bring the
alternative on line; money would be pledged to augment the TDM
Program in the event the alternative was declared infeasible.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether mechanisms are not in place
for changing the cap other than the annual CIP if Tinker Avenue
extension is completed, to which the Base Reuse and Community
Development Manager responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the water shuttle and other
activities, including managing the program, comes out of the TDM
Program; concerns were raised that there is no mechanism for
getting more money if there is unanticipated success and the
criteria established in the program were not met.
The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated discussion
and direction addressed expanding the Master Plan conditions of
approval by adding some goals for the TDM Program; the goals have
been added; there was not a commensurate discussion of criteria to
evaluate success in meeting the goals and what might be done in the
event the goals are not achieved pursuant to the TDM Program and
whether or not lack of achievement of the goals was a function of
the funding being capped at the $425,000; the discussion can be
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
18
January 2, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-01-16,4,"(07-032A) Resolution No. 14061, ""Adopting the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program for the
Grand Marina Village Development Located at the Northwest Corner of
Grand Street and Fortmann Way (State Clearinghouse #2006-04-2145).
""
Adopted;
(07-032B) Resolution No. 14062, ""Approving General Plan Amendment
(GPA-05-02) for Grand Marina Village to Amend the General Plan Land
Use Diagram to Change the Designation of Approximately 8.3 Acres to
Specified Mixed Use and Amend Sections 2.2, 2.3, and 2.6 and
Associated Tables of the Land Use Element to Reflect the Specified
Mixed Use Designation. Adopted;
(07-032C) Introduction of Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning
Property Located Adjacent to the Oakland Estuary and Grand Street
from M-2, General Industrial (Manufacturing) District to MX, Mixed
Use Planned Development District (MX) . Introduced:
(07-032D) Introduction of Ordinance Approving Master Plan MP05-01
for a Mixed Use Development Including Single-Family Residential,
Recreational Marina, Maritime Commercial, and Open Space Uses,
Located Within a Project Area Encompassing Approximately 8.36 Acres
of Land and Water at the Intersection of Grand Street and the
Oakland Estuary. Introduced
(07-032E) Resolution No. 14063, ""Approving Tentative Map, TM05-
0002, for Property Located Between Grand Street, Fortmann Way, and
the Oakland Estuary. Adopted; and
(07-032F) Resolution No. 14064, ""Upholding Planning Board Approval
of Planned Development PD05-02 and Design Review DR05-0126 for
Grand Marina Village. Adopted.
The Supervising Planner gave a brief Power Point presentation.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether staff recommends an asphalt
path.
The Supervising Planner responded staff recommends keeping the
asphalt as long as adequate width and good transitions exist
between the asphalt and other materials.
Mayor Johnson inquired who would be responsible for the
maintenance, to which the Supervising Planner responded the Grand
Marina.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether defined maintenance levels would be
required; stated the Planning Board might have thought that asphalt
would not last as long as concrete.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
January 16, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-01-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-12-04,20,"(07-055A CIC) Resolution 07-151, ""Approving a First Addendum to the
Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report and Authorizing the Executive Director
to Amend the Disposition and Development Agreement (Alameda Landing
Mixed Use Project) with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation. "" Adopted ;
and
(07-574B CC) Introduction of Ordinance Approving Development
Agreement Amendment DA-06-0003 to the Development Agreement
(Alameda Landing Mixed Use Commercial Project) By and Between the
City of Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation, dated January
16, 2007. Introduced.
The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager provided a Power
Point presentation.
Dan Bucko with SMWM provided a brief presentation on wharf
redesign.
The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager provided a brief
summary of the proposed modifications to the Disposition and
Development Agreement (DDA)
.
Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore inquired whether utility lines
would be above ground going to Clif Bar and restaurants.
The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded the
existing 115 kV line would be relocated into the Mitchell Avenue
right-of-way; stated Catellus would perform the trenching and
install the conduit necessary for the ultimate undergrounding; the
115kV line starts at the High Street Bridge, runs the entire length
of the City's waterfront, and terminates at Pacific Avenue and Main
Street adjacent to Alameda Point.
Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired what is the estimated
insurance cost.
The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded the cost
has not been calculated; stated the idea is to obtain insurance if
available at commercially reasonable rates.
Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese inquired what would be a
commercially reasonable rate, to which the Base Reuse and Community
Development Manager responded that she would provide the
information
Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore stated the Alameda Landing tax
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse
6
and Redevelopment Authority and
Community Improvement Commission
December 4, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-02-06,14,"(07-068) Councilmember deHaan stated Council discussed setting
aside $20,000 to $30,000 to review a salt water pump station;
Alameda's housing stock would be vulnerable in an earthquake;
a
feasibility study should be conducted.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City of Berkeley conducted a
feasibility study; stated the Fire Department has not provided
Council with sufficient information; Alameda could use the City of
Berkeley's information if a study was conducted; she would like the
Fire Department to provide information on whether or not the system
is feasible.
Councilmember deHaan stated the information could be weaved into
the Disaster Plan.
The City Manager stated staff is in the process of developing the
Disaster Mitigation Plan; staff will provide a report on what other
cities are doing.
Mayor Johnson stated San Francisco is charged with developing an
Emergency Response Plan; requested that staff investigate whether
Alameda has a representative attending the meetings.
(07-069) Councilmember deHaan stated Alameda was established as an
electric City in the late 1990's; requested the program be reviewed
and reinstated.
(07-070) Mayor Johnson stated she attended the Annual Mayor's
Conference in Washington, D.C. during the week of January 23;
Community Development Block Grant/Section 8 cuts are always a
threat but are usually reinstated; interest in alternative power
sources, greenhouse gases, and global warming has increased; the
Mayor's Conference does a lot to advocate for cities.
ADJOURNMENT
(07-071) - There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned
the meeting at 10:07 p.m. in a moment of silence for Ruth Herch.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
14
February 6, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-02-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-04-03,2,"(07-146) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and
authorize Call for Bids for Godfrey Park Play Field Renovations
No. P.W. 03-07-06.
David Kirwin, Alameda, questioned who would benefit from the
proposed changes stated the trees provide shade to soccer
spectators; upgrading play structure equipment is more important
than field renovations.
Mayor Johnson requested clarification on field space.
The Recreation and Park Director stated that the Godfrey Park
reconfiguration would benefit the entire sports community; the
Field Advisory Committee was very active in the selected design;
the new design would provide more usable, smaller fields and a full
size outfield; the field has a severe gofer problem; playtime is
limited because of the old irrigation system.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the proposed renovation is
part of the Turf Management Plan.
The Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative;
stated the renovation is scheduled for the summer ; Ritter Park is
scheduled for the fall and Woodstock Park would be next.
Councilmember deHaan requested information on tree removal and area
expansion.
The Recreation and Park Director responded the Field Advisory
Committee felt more soccer space would be provided by flipping the
fields; stated all removed trees would be replaced.
Councilmember deHaan inquired what type of trees would be planted,
to which the Recreation and Park Director responded that he did not
know.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to see a timeline
for playground equipment replacement; tree replacement should be
aggressive with sufficient biomass.
The Recreation and Park Director stated staff would work with the
Design Engineering team.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that the public should be informed
when the play structure is replaced; the field is pocked from
gofers.
Mayor Johnson stated that she is surprised the field is being used.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
April 3, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-04-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-05-01,3,"(07-197) Recommendation to authorize modification of Two-Way Stop
Controls at the Clinton Avenue at Union Street, and Clinton Avenue
at Chestnut Street intersections.
Councilmember deHaan requested background information be provided.
The Public Works Director stated neighborhood residents requested
stop sign installations; the recommendation to authorize
modification of two-way stop controls [paragraph no. 07-198]
addresses all-way stop installations along Clinton Avenue; the
recommendation to authorize installation of two-way stop controls
[paragraph nos. 07-198, 07-198A, and 07-198B] address all-way stop
installations and some two-way stop installations; residents were
concerned about the amount of traffic coming through the
neighborhood and pass-through traffic being diverted off major
streets onto residential streets speed and pedestrian safety,
specifically, child safety, were concerns ; areas addressed in
[paragraph no. 07-197] are within a school area; the Clinton Avenue
corridor was reviewed and it was recommended that some stop signs
be installed to calm traffic; the whole neighborhood was reviewed
[paragraph no. 07-198, 07-198A, and 07-198B] to find a way to calm
traffic within an area abounded by Broadway, Otis Drive, High
Street and Encinal Avenue stop signs were alternated; said method
has been successfully used in other jurisdictions.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the areas had prior signals,
such as yield signs, to which the Public Works Director responded
there were no yield signs at any of the intersections.
Councilmember deHaan stated the neighborhood was reviewed in
general. inquired whether adjacent areas would be reviewed
systematically or whether resident requests would initiate the
review.
The Public Works Director responded resident requests initiate the
review; stated a system-wide approach would be used where the same
concerns are noted; having a historic grid system is fortunate and
allows alternating stops in residential neighborhoods were traffic
volumes are low.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether similar efforts have been
made in other areas, to which the Public Works Director responded
this is the first effort.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he would encourage staff to
continue the efforts; consistency is needed throughout the City;
inquired whether the Clinton Avenue warrants justify all-way stops.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
May 1, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-05-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-09-04,11,"(07-433) Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the
Social Service Human Relations Board.
Mayor Johnson nominated Regional James for appointment to the
Social Service Human Relations Board.
(07-434) Mayor Johnson inquired whether four-way stops signs have
been installed near St. Philip Neri School.
Councilmember Matarrese responded the signs were installed
recently.
(07-435) Councilmember deHaan questioned when Big Box ordinance
discussions would come to Council; stated that he anticipates that
the matter could come to Council within the next month; further
stated the priority planning process should not preclude Big Box
ordinance discussions; Council was to review other cities'
ordinances and discuss adopting a similar ordinance.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the Big Box Ordinance was to address
super stores that have more than a specific percentage of non-
taxable items.
Mayor Johnson stated Livermore and Dublin have adopted Big Box
Ordinances.
Councilmember Matarrese stated Council also had discussions on a
styrofoam ordinance.
Mayor Johnson stated Council would have an opportunity to discuss a
Green Building ordinance on Tuesday.
(07-436) Councilmember deHaan stated that he is hearing
repercussions from neighbors regarding parking concerns related to
closing off the street at St. Joseph Notre Dame High School;
requested the City Attorney to provide information about whether
there is a review process; stated another wing has been
established.
Mayor Johnson stated the area used to have all single-family homes;
many of the homes are now subdivided; residents do not have
adequate off-street parking.
Councilmember deHaan stated dialog needs to take place between
neighbors and the school.
(07-437) Vice Mayor Tam requested an update on the progress that
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
11
September 4, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-09-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-09-18,9,"(07-456A) Resolution No. 14146, ""Approving General Plan Amendment
(GPA07-0003 to Amend the General Plan Land Use Diagram to Change
the Designation of Approximately 10.77 Acres Located North of
Singleton and Mosley Avenues at 201 Mosley Avenue, from Medium
Density Residential to Parks and Public Open Space. Adopted; and
(07-456B) Introduction of Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning
Approximately 10.77 Acres Located North of Singleton and Mosley
Avenues at 201 Mosley Avenue, from R-4-G, Neighborhood Residential
(Special Government) to Open Space Zoning Designation. Introduced.
The Planner III gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson opened the public hearing.
Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed housing.
There being no further speakers, Major Johnson closed the public
portion of the hearing.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that rezoning is a great move to
protect the park; he hopes that the same can be done to protect
open space areas at the former Base.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution and
introduction of ordinance.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember deHaan stated that the site has
been a park for a long time; the park is one of the more recently
renovated parks in Alameda and will be a major asset; the site has
two soccer fields, a baseball field, and basketball courts.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(07-457) Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed mold.
(07-458) Stevon Schwartz, Alameda, suggested making the nine-hole
golf course an eighteen-hole putting course.
Mayor Johnson suggested that Mr. Schwartz attend the Golf
Commission meeting tomorrow night.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
September 18, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-09-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-10-02,2,"(07-475 - ) Proclamation declaring October 19, 2007 as Chuck Corica
Golf Complex Day
Mayor Johnson read and presented the proclamation to Jane Sullwold,
Chair of the Golf Commission.
Ms. Sullwold stated the Golf Course is going through a difficult
time; difficult decisions will need to be made; the Golf Course
will continue to serve the community if the right steps are taken.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Johnson announced that the Minutes [paragraph no. 07-476] and
the recommendation to allocate $292,400 [paragraph no. 07-478] were
removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the
Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an
asterisk preceding the paragraph number. . ]
(07-476) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held on
September 11, 2007, and the Special and Regular City Council
Meetings held on September 18, 2007.
Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of the minutes with the following
changes to Page 10 of the Regular September 18, 2007 minutes. ""the
League failed to gain the support of a bi-partisan State
Legislator"" and ""renewal of the League's grass roots network. ""
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(*07-477) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,523,628.45.
(07-478) Recommendation to allocate $292,400 from Measure B Funds
and award a Contract in the amount of $521,700, including
contingencies, to Bay Line Concrete, Cutting, Coring, and Drilling,
Inc. for the Grand Street Bridge and Ballena Boulevard Bridge
Repair and Resurfacing, No. P.W. 11-06-24.
Councilmember deHaan stated that Council requested the removal of
the cyclone fence once the Grand Street Bridge repair is completed;
inquired whether efforts would be made to eliminate the cyclone
fence.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
October 2, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-10-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-11-06,26,"(07-516C CC) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a First Amendment
to Development Agreement DA-06-003 By and Between the City of
Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (Successor by Merger
to Catellus Development Corporation) Continued to December
4,
2007.
.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the
Special Joint Meeting at 8:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and Community
3
Improvement Commission
November 6, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-12-18,8,"(07-593 ) Recommendation to accept the Corica Golf Complex
Operational Review and authorize staff to begin the process to
secure a long-term operator for the Golf Complex. Continued to
January 2, 2008.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(07-594) Jonathan
Stuart,
LaRouche
Political
Action
Committee, (submitted handout) i discussed foreclosures.
(07-595) Shawn VanLeevwen, LaRouche Political Action Committee,
discussed the Home Owners and Bank Protection.
(07-596) Robb Ratto, PSBA, stated that the Public Works Department
has always been responsive to inquiries.
(07-597 - ) John Michael Torrey, Alameda, wished everyone happy
holidays.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(07-598 ) Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to
the Youth Commission.
Mayor Johnson nominated Michelle Blackman, Hannah Bowman, Jordan
Flores, Ilya Pinsky, Anjuli Sastry, Priscilla Szeto, Ben Ulrey, and
Angela Sterling Vick.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 9:36 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
December 18, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-12-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-01-02,3,"(08-009G) Resolution No. 14172, ""Appointing Angela Sterling Vick as
a Member of the Youth Commission. Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented certificates of
appointment to Youth Commission Members.
(08-010) Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 14173, ""Amending
Master Fee Resolution No. 12191 to Revise Permit Fees Charged for
Installation of Photovoltaic Systems. Adopted.
The Building Official made a brief presentation.
Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(08-011) Public Hearing to consider an appeal of the Historical
Advisory Board's denial of a Certificate of Approval (CA06-0031) of
demolition for 433 Taylor Avenue; and adoption of related
resolution. [Continued to January 15, 2008]
(08-012 ) Recommendation to accept the Corica Golf Complex
Operational Review and authorize staff to begin the process to
secure a long-term operator for the Golf Complex.
The City Manager gave a brief presentation.
Richard Singer, National Golf Foundation (NGF) Director of
Consulting Services, provided a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired what was the extent of the Operational
Review.
Ed Getherall, NGF Project Manager, responded several days were
spent at the site; stated concentration was given to major
operational issues.
Mr. Singer stated line items were reviewed; the review was
extensive.
Mayor Johnson stated the report is more of an overview and not a
Regular Meeting
3
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-01-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-06-03,22,"(08-02 - APFA) Adoption of Resolution Approving, Authorizing and
Directing Preparation and Execution of Certain Lease Financing
Documents and Authorizing and Directing Certain Actions with
Respect Thereto. Continued.
The Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired what would be the cost of refinancing.
The Finance Director responded the cost of the additional debt
service over the new life of the issue is $594,658.75.
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired what would be the cost of issuance, to
which the Finance Director responded $150,000.
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the total cost would be
$150,000 plus $594,000.
The Finance Director responded the $150,000 is included in the
$594,000.
Councilmember/Authority Member Matarrese inquired whether $150,000
would be spent to save $203,000, extend the debt a couple years,
and pay approximately $600,000 in interest.
The Finance Director responded $600,000 would be spent over fifteen
years in order to get the first year savings of approximately
$600,000.
Councilmember/Authority Member Matarrese stated that he has a hard
time borrowing money and encumbering two extra years on someone in
the future.
Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the proposed refinancing would cost the
City money.
The Finance Director stated cash would be saved now and would be
paid over the next fifteen years.
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether refinancing would cost
$594,000.
The Finance Director responded in the affirmative; stated
approximately $600,000 would be saved in interest.
Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that she would not call it a savings
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Alameda Public
8
Financing Authority, and Community
Improvement Commission Meeting
June 3, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-02-05,7,"(08-055) - Recommendation to authorize the City Manager to execute
an Amended Contract with the National Golf Foundation to provide
Master Planning Services in an amount not to exceed $80,000.
The Recreation and Park Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired what is the status on budget and revenues.
The Recreation and Park Director responded January was not a good
month; stated the last couple of days have been better; the deficit
was $300,000 at the end of December; new marking campaign efforts
have been implemented to increase the number of tournaments.
Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether there is any hope of making up
rounds, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded there
is always hope.
Mayor Johnson stated that the Junior Golf Program needs to be
strengthened.
The Recreation and Park Director stated some work has been done to
bring the Mif Albright Course back to the original configuration.
Mayor Johnson stated that golf instruction is critical; only eight
people were at the driving range on Saturday; the driving range
should be viewed as a golf promotion.
The Recreation and Park Director stated Recreation Programs will be
linked to the Golf Course.
Councilmember deHaan stated wet weather kills Alameda's Golf
Courses; Metropolitan Golf Links and Monarch Bay are very active
one day after rain; both courses have great drainage; loyalty is
lost when players cannot play; making the Golf Course playable is
important.
Mayor Johnson stated Metropolitan Golf Link's parking lot was full
on Saturday and is directly related to the drainage.
Opponent : Jane Sullwold, Golf Commission Chair.
Councilmember deHaan stated a lot of information has already been
presented and is a matter of embellishing said information;
questioned whether utilizing marketing consultants would be worth
the money stated the Golf Commission and staff could be
supportive.
The Recreation and Park Director stated the National Golf
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council Meeting
7
February 5, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-02-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-04-01,4,"(08-138) Recommendation to discuss and finalize the City Council's
priorities for Fiscal Year 2007-2008.
Jan Perkins, Management Partners, gave a Power Point presentation.
Ms. Perkins sought Council consensus to add the eighth policy
objective [deliver high-quality services that improve and promote
the safety of the community].
Councilmember Matarrese inquired how the new objective differs from
the previous objective [continuously improve internal operations,
systems, and management practices in order to provide high-quality
customer service]
The City Manager stated continuously improving internal operations
is an effort to look at processes in every department; the
additional objective focuses on the safety of the community,
including Police, Fire and Code Enforcement.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the objective seems redundant; the
City already has high-quality public safety; there is always a need
for continual improvement regardless of the operation.
Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the previous objective focuses on
customer service and the new objective focuses on public safety.
The City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated identifying a
focus on public safety is important.
Mayor Johnson stated the new objective should be clarified.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the intent to capture the broader
idea of public safety should be clarified.
Mayor Johnson suggested that the objective be revised to read
""health and safety.
Councilmember deHaan noted that the new objective is a catch all
for the health, safety and well being of the community.
Mayor Johnson stated ""well being"" should be added.
Vice Mayor Tam suggested the language be: ""health, safety and
welfare.
Ms. Perkins stated the objective would be revised to indicate the
intent is not just Police and Fire; inquired whether there is
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 1, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-04-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-05-06,19,"(08-201) Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed global wealth.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(08-202) Consideration of Water Emergency Transportation Authority
Community Advisory Committee appointment.
Mayor Johnson suggested that Councilmember Gilmore be appointed to
the Committee and Councilmember deHaan serve as the alternate.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of appointing Councilmember
Gilmore as the City's representative and Councilmember deHaan as
the alternate.
Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
(08 -203 - ) Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to
the Planning Board.
Mayor Johnson nominated Arthur A. Autorino.
(08-204) Councilmember Gilmore stated that she attended the
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Spring General Assembly
on April 24; discussions included focused, priority development
areas; speakers explained that change should not be confused with
growth because change does not always equal growth; change can
happen without growth; growth should be discussed in terms of
quality of life, rather than number of businesses; communities
should know that change or growth may require trade offs.
(08-205) Vice Mayor Tam stated that she attended the April 2
Environmental Policy Committee for the League of California Cities;
the League is converging on supporting legislation that would
extend universal waste disposal responsibility to the original
producer so that cities and counties are not left with
responsibility and costs for disposal alternatives. the diversion
rate was also discussed; Alameda has an exceptional record; stated
that she attended the League of California Cities Legislative
Action Day on April 16; the budget overshadowed the conversation;
Finance Director Michael Genest gave his prospective on the grim,
Statewide budget; Mr. Genest stated that the Vehicle License Fee
tax cut is the most significant cause of State budget problems ; a
balanced budget is not anticipated this summer stated that she
Regular Meeting
19
Alameda City Council
May 6, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-05-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-06-03,13,"(08-250 ) Report on proposed PERS Golden Handshake Retirement under
California Government Code Section 20903. Withdrawn.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(Public Comment)
(08-251 - ) Michael John Torrey, Alameda, stated that the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) would perform a disaster
preparedness demonstration in the City of Oakland on June 25, 2008,
between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular City Council Meeting at 11:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
13
June 3, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-06-17,20,"(08-277E CC) Resolution No. 14226, ""Establishing Guidelines for
Reimbursement of Per Diem Allowance for City of Alameda Business
Travel. "" Adopted.
The City Manager/Executive Director provided a handout on issue bin
items from previous workshops and gave a brief presentation.
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired what is the cost for a Park Director,
to which the City Manager responded $25,000 per year.
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether $25,000 would fully restore
Park Directors at sites without reducing hours, to which the
Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative.
Mayor/Chair Johnson stated direction should be given to not reduce
Park Director hours; inquired how much it would cost to light
tennis courts, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded
$7,500.
Mayor/Chair Johnson stated efforts should be made to find money to
light the two tennis courts.
Councilmember/Boaro Member/Commissioner Gilmore inquired how long
it would take to go through the $300,000 restored to the Fire
Department overtime budget.
The Fire Chief responded the current overtime usage is averaging
four people per day which costs $6,000 per day for a twenty-four
hour shift.
Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore inquired how long
it would take to implement rotating a truck out of service.
The Fire Chief responded early July; stated operationally, the Fire
Department could be ready within four to six weeks; the meet and
confer process would take longer.
louncilmember/Boaro Member/Commissioner Gilmore stated adding
$300,000 would still leave a $520,000 shortage inquired how the
$520,000 would be absorbed in the budget.
The City Manager/Executive Director responded overtime would still
need to be managed stated the $520,000 would not be restored back
into the budget.
Mayor/Chair Johnson stated an engine replacement plan should be
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Alameda Public
Financing Authority, Alameda Reuse and
10
Redevelopment Authority, and
Community Improvement Commission
June 17, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-07-01,2,"(08-284A) Resolution No. 14228, ""Reappointing Patricia A. Grey as a
Member of the Film Commission. Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
(08-284B) - Resolution No. 14229, ""Reappointment Teddy Tabor as a
Member of the Film Commission. Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented a certificate of
appointment.
( (08-284C) Resolution No. 14230, ""Reappointing Aiesha P. Balde as a
Member of the Housing Commission. Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented a certificate of
appointment.
(08-284D) Resolution No. 14231, ""Reappointing Arthur A. Kurrasch as
a Member of the Housing Commission. Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented a certificate of
appointment.
( 08-284E) Resolution No. 14232, ""Appointing Gail A. Wetzork as a
Member of the Library Board. "" Adopted.
Councilmember Gilmore moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
July 1, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-07-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-07-01,7,"(08-290) Public Hearing to consider the proposed implementation of
a fuel surcharge for the City of Alameda Ferry Services, approve
the proposed fuel surcharge, and authorize the City Manager to
execute the necessary amendments to the Operating Contracts for the
Ferry Services.
The Ferry Services Manager gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired when the Water Emergency
Transportation Agency (WETA) would take over the ferries.
The Ferry Services Manager responded new legislation requires that
WETA adopt a transition plan by June 2009.
The Deputy City Manager stated WETA needs to adopt a transition
plan by July 1, 20091 the transition would take approximately one
year.
Mayor Johnson stated WETA authorized existing operators to use two
new boats; inquired whether the new boats are more fuel efficient.
The Ferry Services Manager responded both boats are under warranty
for the first year; stated insuring each boat would cost
approximately $30,000 to $35,000; additional house maintenance
would be required the first year; the boats carry fewer passengers,
but the overall footprint is approximately the same as the Peralta;
the new boats are the cleanest burning engines on the bay .
Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the interim operator would have to
incur the additional costs.
The Ferry Services Manager responded the issue is part of
negotiations; stated the City does not want to incur additional
expenses.
Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether a fuel surcharge would need to be
considered as a result of the two new boats.
The Ferry Services Manager responded in the negative; stated the
staff recommendation is based on operating the existing boats; WETA
would take care of any additional operating expenses.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the Port of Oakland has
been approached regarding an increased subsidy.
The Ferry Services Manager responded in the affirmative; stated
staff met with the Port of Oakland's Director of Commercial Real
Estate; the Director reported that sixty-eight positions are being
eliminated and that the Port of Oakland is not in the position to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
July 1, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-07-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-07-01,22,"(08-298) Written Communication from the League of California Cities
requesting designation of Voting Delegate for the League's 2008
Annual Conference.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of Vice Mayor Tam being the
City's representative and Councilmember deHaan as being alternate.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by the
following voice vote Ayes Councilmembers deHaan, Matarrese and
Tam - 3. Absent : Councilmember Gilmore and Mayor Johnson- 2. [Note:
Mayor Johnson and Councilmember Gilmore were away from the dais for
the motion. ]
(08-299) Councilmember Matarrese stated the budget was approved on
June 17, 2008; requested an Off Agenda Report summarizing where the
City is starting in terms of number of employees, impacts of the
approved budget, and a comparison between the current and previous
budget.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Vice-Mayor Tam adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 12:43 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
22
July 1, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-07-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-07-15,15,"(08-315) - Bill Hudson, Recreation and Parks Department employee,
stated that the City's well-trained - workers would be sacrificed by
contracting out services at the Golf Course.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(08-316)
ICLEI update with specific auto use and congestion issues
highlighted.
Councilmember Matarrese stated cuts made to the tree program were
almost directly counter to what was approved in the Climate
Protection Plan; requested a status report on 1) the City Vehicle
Use Policy; 2) Eco-pass for City employees, including alternatives;
and 3) biodiesel use in City vehicles; directed the Youth
Commission and Transportation Commission work on an automobile trip
reduction plan for various schools in time for the 2008-2009 school
year; stated Island Drive and Central Avenue and Oak Street have no
traffic problems during the summer; traffic problems come back when
school resumes the City discussed the matter at a joint meeting
with the School District in March 2007; Lincoln Middle School,
Alameda High School, and Chipman Elementary School were recognized
as areas that needed attention.
Mayor Johnson stated that Amelia Earhart Elementary School should
be added.
Councilmember Matarrese stated said school is tied to Lincoln
Middle School.
Mayor Johnson stated the Lincoln Middle School Parent Association
performed surveys and have encouraged students to ride bicycles and
carpool.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the ICLEI Plan is to be evaluated
bi-annually.
The City Manager stated an update is scheduled for August ; she is
not sure whether anything could be accomplished before the
beginning of the school year.
Mayor Johnson stated School Board student representatives could
meet with Youth Commission members to start putting things in place
to work on in the fall.
Councilmember deHaan stated the City Vehicle Use policy would be
coming back to Council.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
15
July 15, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-07-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-09-02,4,"(08-374) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report
for the period ending March 31, 2008.
The Interim Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson stated first quarter 2008 Alameda Towne Centre sales
transactions increased by 11.4% compared to first quarter 2007;
current sales tax revenue is less than in 1999; inquired what was
the reason for the significant drop in first quarter of 2000.
The City Manager responded Lucent Technology left; stated the
numbers are gross sales tax per capita.
Mayor Johnson stated per capita sales tax was $89.00 for the first
quarter in 1998; current per capita sales tax is $76.00; a lot of
work needs to be done; residents are spending money in other
communities.
The Interim Finance Director stated sales leakage is high.
Mayor Johnson stated that she is pleased with the numbers for
Alameda Towne Centre; the City cannot hang its hat on one tenant at
Harbor Bay Business Park.
Councilmember deHaan stated the good news is that business-to-
business has increased.
The City Manager stated that a business relocated from San Leandro
and contributed to the increase.
Councilmember deHaan stated the Bridgeside Center shows a major
increase; the work at Bridgeside has been going on for six years.
Mayor Johnson stated the work at Bridgeside started ten years ago.
The City Manager stated that this is the first time that Alameda
Towne Centre has not been reported as being under construction.
Councilmember Matarrese stated staff should be able to measure some
Theatre and parking structure investment return soon.
The staff recommendation was approved by consensus.
(08-375) Discuss and take a position on Proposition 11, the
California Voters FIRST Act.
The Deputy City Manager gave a brief presentation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
September 2, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-09-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-09-02,7,"(08-379 - ) Councilmember deHaan stated the Buena Vista Commons has
eight new owners as a result of collaborative efforts with Alameda
Development Corporation; Habitat for Humanity was the driving
force; he hopes that additional partnerships will occur in the
future.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 9:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
September 2, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-09-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-09-16,5,"(08-398) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning
Board's Conditional Approval of a Major Design Review for an
addition and a remodel that includes raising a single-family
structure and constructing a detached two-story dwelling unit at
3327 Fernside Boulevard, within the R-2, Two-Family Residential
Zoning District; and
( 08-398A) Resolution No. 14267, ""Denying an Appeal and Upholding
the Planning Board Decision Conditionally Approving Major Design
Review DR07-0086 For the Structural Expansion of a Single-Family
Dwelling and the Addition of a Second Dwelling Unit at 3327
Fernside Boulevard. Adopted.
The Planning Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the Applicant would be
limited to a thirty-foot height with the new condition, to which
the Planning Manager responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the proposed condition is the same
condition that the Planning Board rejected.
The Planning Manager responded the proposed condition is a little
different because a lower height maximum would be allowed.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Planning Board saw the proposed
condition, to which the Planning Manager responded in the negative.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the Applicant would be able
to increase the height by no more than one foot, stay within the
thirty-foot height limit, and rework the back of the house, to
which the Planning Manager responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the Planning Board discussed
the concept of reworking the back of the house but did not think it
was necessary, to which the Planning Manager responded in the
affirmative.
Mayor Johnson stated that she is confused why a new condition would
be added at this point.
The Planning Manager stated the new condition allows the Applicant
to increase the height of the building, make it architecturally
compatible, and stay within the guidelines.
Mayor Johnson inquired how long the project has been going on.
The Planning Manager responded the application went before the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
September 16, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-09-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-08-19,19,"(08340CC/ARRA/08-46CIC) Recommendation to concur with the Non- -
Binding Summary of Terms and Conditions for a transfer of the
Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with SCC Alameda Point LLC to a New
Entity with D.E. Shaw or transfer of an Ownership Interest in the
SCC Alameda Point LLC to D.E. Shaw; and
08-340A CC/ARRA/08-46A CIC) Recommendation to authorize the City
Manager/Executive Director to negotiate a Second Amendment to the
Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with SCC Alameda Point LLC .
The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager gave a brief
presentation.
Mayor/Chair Johnson opened the public portion of the meeting.
Proponents (In favor of the staff recommendation) : Michael Krueger,
Alameda Helen Sause, Housing Opportunities Make Economic Sense;
Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative.
Neutral : Richard Bangert, Alameda; Elizabeth Krase, Alameda.
There being no further speakers, Mayor/Chair Johnson closed the
public portion of the hearing.
Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that a financial partner is being
considered density and transportation issues are not relevant
tonight.
Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Tam requested clarification of
the confidentiality of the term sheet.
The City Attorney stated the term sheet is a confidential real
property document and is being negotiated; discussing the document
in Closed Session is appropriate.
Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether
the term sheet would be disclosed at some point.
The City Attorney responded the term sheet would be disclosed once
the project is finalized.
Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated everyone is
encouraged that the Master Developer is able to secure a funding
partner in difficult economic times; the Master Developer is
willing to pay for the planning process as well as the $108. 5
million conveyance cost; written assurance is being sought to
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Alameda
2
Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and
Community Improvement Commission
August 19, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-01-06,4,"(09-014 ) Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 14297,
""Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 9757 for the Purpose of
Establishing a Subdivision of Ownership to Condominium Form for Two
Detached Single-Family Dwellings on One Site Located at 1531 Morton
Street. Adopted.
The Planning Services Manager provided a brief presentation.
Councilmember Matarrese requested that the next steps be expedited;
stated the project is novel for Alameda; the historic house is
being restored; the new house has many green features the
combination of common ownership of the land and separate ownership
of the houses provides increased property tax; there is urgency to
have the houses sold.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(09-015) - ) Discussion on financial policies and principles.
The City Manager provided a statement about the City's financial
status; in response to a television advertisement, stated the City
is not filing for bankruptcy.
The Interim Finance Director reviewed the City's financial status.
Mayor Johnson inquired how much money would be left in the General
Fund after Planning and Building is removed.
The Interim Finance Director responded $8.5 to $8.7 million, not
including the equipment reserve, which is the only reserve in the
General Fund; suggested that a special meeting be scheduled on a
Saturday for a full review and discussion of the policies and
principles.
Mayor Johnson obtained the consensus of the Council regarding
holding a Saturday meeting.
The Interim Finance Director provided an overview of the policies
and principles.
David Howard, Save Our City Alameda, discussed the television
advertisement that he wrote and produced.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
January 6, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-01-20,4,"(09-029) Recommendation to authorize the City Manager to
execute an Agreement with E.S.O. Solutions for Ambulance Billing
Services and terminate the Toomay Technologies, Inc. Contract.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the current Contract
problems are with fee collection or just processing.
The EMS Director responded discrepancies were noted in reporting
patient care and billing errors; stated the timeframe for
correction is not acceptable.
Councilmember Matarrese requested that information be provided
on uncollected billing in order to have some measurement going
forward.
The EMS Director stated the proposed Contract includes remedies
regarding the issues; timeframe requirements would be provided
for correcting discrepancies.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of authorizing the City
Manager to terminate an existing agreement with Toomay
Technologies, Inc. and execute an agreement with E.S.O.
Solutions.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent : Mayor Johnson - 1. ]
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(09-030) The City Manager stated that the Public Utilities Board
(PUB) is conducing a survey regarding changing the name of Alameda
Power & Telecom; options include Alameda Municipal Power (AMP) ;
Alameda Power (AP) ; Alameda Green Power (AGP) ; Alameda Municipal
Electric (AME) ; and Alameda Community Power (ACP) ; Alameda Green
Electric was rejected because the acronym would be AGE; corporate
identification would meet three criteria: 1) cost effective; 2)
quickly implemented; and 3) endurance; no logo change is proposed;
the PUB will make the final determination; residents can express
their preference on the website.
Councilmember Tam stated the legal name is still the Bureau of
Electricity; the name change would be for ""doing business as; ""
customers will need to have their account number in order to
participate in the poll.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
January 20, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-01-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-02-03,12,"(09-052) Resolution No. 14307, ""Endorsing the Street Rehabilitation
Projects for the Federal Economic Stimulus Program and Authorizing
the City Manager to Approve Plans and Specifications and Call for
Bids for the Annual Resurfacing Project, No. 82-01-29. Adopted.
The Public Works Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam stated the City was way ahead in preparation of a
list of potential projects; Council has received emails regarding
the need to prioritize bus shelter installations; inquired how the
matter would fit into Measure B funds.
The Public Works Director responded each department was requested
to provide a wish list; the Public Works Department looked at items
on the unfunded list staff has not been able to receive funding
for bus shelters; the first round of economic stimulus funds is for
road rehabilitation only.
Speaker Michael John Torrey, Alameda.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
The City Manager stated that the Fiscal Sustainability Committee
provided a memo regarding the stimulus program for soft story
retrofit buildings funding sources will be reviewed in the future.
(09-053) - Resolution No. 14308, ""Allocating $100,000 in Measure B
Funds as the Local Match to Prepare the Estuary Crossing Project
Study Report for a Total Cost of $1 Million, and Authorizing the
City Manager to Execute All Necessary Documents. Adopted.
The Public Works Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired what the $1 million would cover.
The Public Works Director responded the Project Study Report (PSR)
for the estuary crossing.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the PSR would be a joint report with
the City of Oakland.
The Public Works Department responded the City of Oakland sits on
the Policy Advisory Committee.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City of Oakland proposes to pay
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
February 3, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-02-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-02-03,19,"(09-058) Domenick Weaver, Alameda Firefighters, discussed
brownouts stated thirteen calls have been impacted with delayed
responses the rescue boat was placed out of service in May 2008
because of mechanical issues the fire boat was placed out of
service in November 2008; direction has been given to leave the
boats in the water, which creates a deception that the Fire
Department is not being picked on and that the boats are still in
service; service levels are being reduced in the community.
(09-059) Bill Klump, Alameda Firefighters Local 689, discussed
overtime costs versus costs for full time Fire Department staff.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(09-060 - ) Mayor Johnson stated that she attended the Conference of
Mayors mid January the economic stimulus package and energy have
become very popular topics; that she hopes solar energy will become
an option for Alameda.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 12:10 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
19
February 3, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-02-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-04-07,10,"(09-142) Councilmember Tam stated that she attended the League of
California Cities (LCC) Meeting on April 3; most of the focus was
on three bills surrounding the use of plastic bags and proposed
$0.25 per bag charge; revenues from the fee would be used to
promote recycling and pay for litter clean upi San Francisco and
Oakland representatives were the most vocal about the initiative
Councilmember Jean Quan stated San Francisco banned Styrofoam and
plastic bags, imposed a fee, and were not sued; Oakland banned both
and were sued; manufacturers launched the lawsuit stating that a
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) is needed to impose the fee and ban plastic bags ;
Oakland was advised an EIR would cost approximately $500,000
discussions involved looking for a way to adjust CEQA to exempt the
ban; a city cannot exempt itself from State law; the League of
California Cities received a letter from the Governor asking for
support on six May 19 ballot measures; the Revenue and Taxation
Policy Committee recommended supporting Proposition 1A.
The Deputy City Manager stated the LCC Board recommends supporting
Propositions 1A through 1F, which includes the pay raise issue.
Mayor Johnson stated that Oakland is thinking about doing a model
EIR that other cities could use.
(09-143) Vice Mayor deHaan stated initiative circulators are over-
exaggerating the reason for signing the SunCal petition; that he
interviewed six circulators; all had a common thread of stating
that people need to sign because the Base needs to be cleaned up
and the Navy would not clean up; circulators are stating that they
want to take the process away from the City Council and that the
proposed plan is the only plan that would provide the required 15%
set aside; the City's name is being used as a supporter and
partner the issue should stand by itself [without using the City's
name].
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 11:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
April 7, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-04-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-04-21,3,"(09-157 - ) Mif Albright Course Update.
The Interim City Manager stated $21,000 would be needed to bring
the Mif Albright Course back up to a reasonable play level; Kemper
Sports has offered to maintain the Course for approximately $1,000
per month; water would be the biggest expense and would cost
approximately $18,000 for six months. total costs add up to
approximately $45,000; $69,000 was generated from June through
November last year; Council would need to approve the expenditure
at the May 5, 2009 Council Meeting to amend the budget the interim
solution would deal with the junior golf issue.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether staff would be working on a parallel
track with Kemper Sports for a long-term solution, to which the
Interim City Manager responded in the affirmative.
Speakers : Glenn VanWinkle, Alameda; Gail VanWinkle, Alameda; Norma
Arnerich, Alameda; Stephen Burnett, Alameda High School Golf Coach;
Jane Sullwold, Alameda Golf Commission.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he wants numbers to be valid
and validated; understanding that the data is good and applying
corrective actions to running the entire Golf Course is important
that he has to guess there are discrepancies for the other 36 holes
if there are discrepancies for the 9-hole Course; that he would
like a cost comparison of having the City maintain the Course.
The Interim City Manager stated that issues would be reviewed.
Vice Mayor deHaan thanked the Interim City Manager for the quick
response.
(09-158) Information Technology Report.
The Interim City Manager stated the declining condition of the
City's Information Technology infrastructure was discussed at the
February 7, 2009 workshop ; upgrading technology would produce
significant annual savings parts cannot be found for the current
phone system.
The Information Technology Director gave a Power Point
presentation.
Mayor Johnson stated the proposed plan is good.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired how ""911"" would integrate into the
system.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
April 21, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-04-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-04-21,6,"(09-159 - ) Resolution No. 14324, ""Appointing Dean Batchelor as a
Member of the Civil Service Board."" Adopted; and
(09-159A) - Resolution No. 14325, ""Appointing Dennis H. Viehweg as a
Member of the Economic Development Commission. "" Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the resolutions.
Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented certificates of
appointment to Mr. Batchelor and Mr. Viehweg.
Mr. Viehweg thanked Council for the appointment.
Mr. Batchelor thanked Council for the opportunity to serve.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(09-160) Financial ""State of the City""
The Interim City Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired how the actual revenue [ Workers'
Compensation Fund turned out to be lower than the budgeted
revenue.
The Interim City Manager responded the number will always be off
because of how claims are charged back.
Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether there is an explanation for the
major fluctuation in actual expenses.
The Interim City Manager responded the actual expense is hit when
the claim is paid; stated it may take years for a claim to be paid.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Workers' Compensation Fund
balance is a negative $2,322,784.
The Interim City Manager responded the fund balance is a projected
negative on June 30, 2009.
Mayor Johnson stated a policy needs to be in place so that the
situation does not happen again.
The Interim City Manager gave a chalk talk presentation.
Councilmember Matarrese stated understating how the situation
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
April 21, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-04-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-05-05,2,"(09-171) - Proclamation declaring May 10 through 16, 2009 as National
Police Week.
Mayor Johnson read and presented the proclamation to Chief Tibbet
and Lieutenant Boersma.
Chief Tibbet thanked Council for the proclamation; stated this week
provides an opportunity to recognize the spirit, service,
dedication, and character of Police Departments across the nation.
09-172) Proclamation declaring May 14, 2009 as Alameda Bike to
Work Day.
Mayor Johnson read and presented the proclamation to Joyce Mercado,
Bike Alameda Board Member.
Ms. Mercado thanked Council for the proclamation; stated Bike
Alameda appreciates the on-going, strong partnership with the City
in making Alameda a bicycle friendly town.
(09-173) Presentation by the West Alameda Business Association on
summer events and Farmer's Market.
Kathy Moehring, West Alameda Business Association, submitted a
handout; stated the Farmer's Market is moving to Webster Street and
Haight Avenue; the Tuesday morning market will continue; a Saturday
morning market will replace the Thursday night market; the Grand
Opening will be on May 16, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.; an additional concert
has been added at Crab Cove; the first classical concert will be
held this Friday from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Johnson announced that the recommendatior to approve
reopening the Mif Albright Course [paragraph no. 09-179] was pulled
from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the
Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an
asterisk preceding the paragraph number. . ]
(*09-174) Minutes of the Regular and Special City Council Meetings
held on April 21, 2009. Approved.
(*09-175) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,709,242.68.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
May 5, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-05-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-05-05,6,"(09-184) - Financial ""State of the City""
The Interim City Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated the Planning and Building fund increased
immensely in 2004; the fund decreased when the economy dropped.
The Interim City Manager stated a lot of money is paid up front
during the entitlement and permit process; the work continues for a
long period thereafter the key is to ensure that there is enough
core staff to continue the work while being frosty on managing
cash.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated the lagging factor could get worse.
The Interim City Manager stated the matter would be addressed in
the Fiscal Year 2009-2010 budget.
Councilmember Tam stated that she needs clarification
on
management's discretion to transfer amongst funds inquired whether
Alameda Municipal Power (AMP) paid more subsidy since Golf was not
contributing.
The Interim City Manager responded in the negative; stated money
generated by enterprise funds stays within the fund; assessments
are made against the funds in a variety of ways; budget policies
dictate how much to charge enterprise funds for the cost of
supporting the corporate whole; Council discussed reducing the
Return on Investment (ROI) for a short period of time for AMP and
Golf, which requires the ordinance to be amended; that she needs to
have a clear understanding of how to proceed in the future and to
determine how to reconcile the issue for prior years; only Council
has the authority to move money between funds.
Councilmember Tam stated Planning and Building reserves accumulated
in Fiscal Years 2005, 2006, 2007 because revenues exceeded
expenses inquired whether accumulated funds could be used for a
smoothing effect, to which the Interim City Manager responded in
the affirmative.
Councilmember Tam stated there seems to be some discretionary
earmarks within funds; Council discussed potentially retrofitting
the Carnegie Building $400,000 is held in reserve for a fire
station.
The Interim City Manager stated $400,000 in cash money is held in
the General Fund reserve; approximately $900,000 in community
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
May 5, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-05-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-05-19,7,"(09-206) Financial ""State of the City""
The Interim City Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the League of California Cities has
taken a position regarding additional cuts threatened to cities if
State propositions do not pass.
Councilmember Tam responded the League of California Cities has
taken a very strong, strident position that the State should be
balancing its budget with State funds instead of counting on
cities the League has launched a campaign to garner support for
coalition partners that depend so heavily on cities to provide some
safety net programs cities can adopt a Resolution of Hardship if
payroll cannot be made without declaring bankruptcy.
The Interim City Manager stated forty cities within California have
stated they would experience financial hardship if the State
borrows money from them; many cities do not have cash reserves ; the
convoluted logic is that cities could borrow cash with interest
from the State for money that the State took from cities.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the obligation to the State
would be discharged if a city filed bankruptcy, to which the City
Attorney responded in the negative.
Councilmember Gilmore stated bankruptcy is a creature of federal
law.
Mayor Johnson stated cities need to review the City of Vallejo's
[bankruptcy] case.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the City could be eligible to
pass a Resolution of Hardship.
The Interim City Manager responded there is no criteria stating
that a city has to be in a certain dire state to pass a Resolution
of Hardship; stated the idea behind a Resolution of Hardship is
that every dime in the reserve cash balance has been spent and the
city is operating on negative cash.
Councilmember Tam stated cities would be penalized for prudent
financial management.
The Interim City Manager stated the City would have to stay frosty
for the next few weeks to see what happens with the propositions.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
May 19, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-05-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-06-16,19,"(09-235CC/ARRA/09-22CIC City Council Resolution No. 14341, ARRA
Resolution No. 44, and CIC Resolution No. 09-160, ""Approving
Interim Expenditures Prior to Adoption of the Operating and
Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2009-2010 for the
City of Alameda, the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority,
and the Community Improvement Commission.
Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner deHaan moved adoption
of the resolutions.
Councilmember/Authorit Member/Commissioner Matarrese seconded
the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned
the Special Joint Meeting at 7:52 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
Secretary, CIC
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the
Brown Act.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and
Redevelopment Authority and Community
Improvement Commission
June 16, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-06-16,7,"(09-252) Resolution No. 14344, ""Reappointing Avonnet M. Peeler
as a Member of the Civil Service Board. "" Adopted;
(09-252A) Resolution No. 14345, ""Reappointing Paulina Kirola as
a Member of the Commission on Disability Issues. "" Adopted;
(
(09-252B) Resolution No. 14346, ""Reappointing Adrienne Longley-
Cook as a Member of the Commission on Disability Issues. ""
Adopted;
(09-252C) Resolution No. 14347, ""Reappointing Jody Moore as a
Member of the Commission on Disability Issues."" Adopted
(09-252D) Resolution No. 14348, ""Reappointing Donna Talbot as a
Member of the Historical Advisory Board. "" Adopted;
(09-252E) Resolution No. 14349, ""Reappointing Ronald Kahn as a
Member of the Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals
Board. "" Adopted;
(09-252F) Resolution No. 14350, ""Reappointing Rebecca Kohlstrand
Parsons as a Member of the Planning Board. "" Adopted
( (09-252G) Resolution No. 14351, ""Reappointing John McCahan as a
Member of the Public Utilities Board. Adopted:
(09-252H) Resolution No. 14352, ""Reappointing Jonathan Soglin as
a Member of the Social Service Human Relations Board. Adopted;
and
(09-252I) Resolution No. 14353, ""Reappointing Cynthia Wasko as a
Member of the Social Service Human Relations Board. "" Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried
by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented certificates
of appointment to Donna Talbot, Ronald Kahn, Rebecca Kohlstrand
Parsons, John McCahan, and Jonathan Soglin.
(09-253) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14354,
""Authorizing Collection of Delinquent Integrated Waste
Management Accounts by Means of the Property Tax Bills.""
Adopted.
The Public Works Director provided an updated list of delinquent
accounts and three requests for appeals; gave a brief
presentation.
Regular Meeting
7
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-07-21,13,"(09-310) Councilmember Matarrese stated the block of Clement Avenue
between Oak Street and Walnut Avenue has abandoned vehicles with
trailers attached; the abandoned property at Oak Street and Clement
Avenue going west is full of graffiti.
Mayor Johnson inquired how the Police Department monitors abandoned
vehicles.
The Interim City Manager stated an update would be provided under
City Manager Communications at a future meeting.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated some vehicles have been tagged but not
towed; one tagged recreational vehicle has been around for three
years and is just moved.
(09-311) Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether any direction has been
given regarding not watering certain areas of Leydecker Park.
The Recreation and Park Director responded water has been
concentrated on athletic fields due to the 30% water reduction
imposed by the East Bay Municipal Utility District ( EBMUD) ; the
reduction was changed to 15% on July 1; perimeter areas would begin
being watered.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated some areas probably have been left in a
state of disrepair.
The Recreation and Park Director stated hopefully, the areas will
come back.
Mayor Johnson stated the long-term issue is to put in bay friendly
landscaping.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 9:59 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
13
July 21, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-07-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-09-01,3,"(09-333A) Resolution No. 14378, ""Approving Applications for
Rezoning (R07-002) Planned Development (PD07-0002), and Parcel Map
(PM07-0004) at 3236 Briggs Avenue"" for Parcel Map No. 9326 to Allow
the Subdivision of the Property into Two Separate Parcels. ""
Adopted.
The Planning Services Manager gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired why so much time lapsed between the Planning
Board's review and now.
The Planning Services Manager responded the Applicant was working
on the maps and some site improvements.
Mayor Johnson stated two years is too long between the Planning
Board's recommendation and the matter coming to the City Council.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the Hearing.
Opponents (Not in favor of staff recommendation) : Jacqueline Riley,
Alameda; and Anne Taylor, Alameda.
Proponent ( In favor of staff recommendation) : John Medulan,
Property Owner.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public
portion of the hearing.
Following Ms. Riley's comments, Mayor Johnson inquired whether Ms.
Riley is opposed to the project or hours of construction.
Ms. Riley responded that she is opposed to the project; stated
construction hours should be limited if the project is approved.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether Ms. Riley received a notice of
tonight's public hearing, to which Ms. Riley responded in the
negative.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired what existed on the lot [in the
neighborhood that now contains a large home] when Ms. Riley moved
in two years ago, to which Ms. Riley responded nothing.
Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether the current houses [ under
consideration] are mansions, to which the property owner responded
in the negative.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated the properties [ on Briggs Avenue ]
are
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-11-03,2,"(09-433) Recommendation to Accept Transmittal of Certificate of
Sufficiency of an Initiative Petition Entitled ""Alameda Point
Development. ""
Speakers : Gretchen Lipow, played a video and submitted ahandout on
behalf of Eugenie Thomson; David Howard, Alameda; Irene Dieter
Reyla Greber, Protect the Point; Julia Liou, Oakland Chinatown
Advisory Committee.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether Council has any discretion on
placing the matter on the ballot, to, which the City Attorney
responded in the negative.
Mayor Johnson inquired about misleading comments noted by speakers.
The City Attorney responded that she has reviewed the initiative
and does not conclude that there is sufficient evidence to engage
in litigation over the matter; stated there seems to be some
confusion regarding the difference between a Council initiative and
a voter initiative, which does not require prior California
Environment Quality Act (CEQA) compliance.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether there is any basis for not placing
the matter on a ballot.
The City Attorney responded in the negative; stated Council or the
City Clerk would have been required to seek declaratory relief from
the Court to be relieved of ministerial duties to certify the
signatures and set the election.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
would be completed prior to placing the matter on the ballot.
The City Attorney responded in the negative; stated the developer
is not required by law to begin the CEQA process [before placing
the matter on the ballot] the developer has consented to pay for
the study which will not be completed prior to the election; a
Disposition and Development Agreement would not come to Council
without a CEQA analysis; the City has gone above and beyond to
attempt to initiate the CEQA process.
Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether the City Attorney has reviewed
Eugenie Thomas' letter, to which the City Attorney responded in the
negative.
Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether the City Attorney received Ms.
Thomas' letter prior to tonight, to which the City Attorney
responded in the negative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 3, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-11-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-02-03,5,"(10-052A) Resolution No. 14419, ""Authorizing Sacramento County to Act as Lead
Applicant for a Municipal Financing Program Grant."" Adopted; and
(10-052B) Resolution No. 14420, ""Authorizing the Association of Bay Area
Governments to Act as Lead Applicant for a California Comprehensive Residential
Building Retrofit Grant."" Adopted.
The Deputy City Manager gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Johnson stated the program started in Berkeley and has been very successful.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the CaliforniaFIRST Program would enable
property owners to seek loans.
The Deputy City Manager responded the City would need to join the CaliforniaFIRST
Program in order to make loans available to property owners; commercial loans would
be included also.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the School District would be included; to which
the Deputy City Manager responded all property owners would be eligible.
In response to Councilmember Tam's inquiry, the Alameda Municipal Power General
Manager responded the top ten users use approximately 20% of the City's energy.
Speaker: Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
(10-053) Public Hearing to Consider a Call for Review of the Planning Board's
Modification of a Use Permit for Extended Hours of Operation at the Kohl's Store
Located at 2201 South Shore Center, and Adoption of Related Resolution. Continued to
March 2, 2010.
(10-054) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Submit Applications
Totaling $3,465,489 to the East Bay Regional Park District Under the Measure WW
Grant Program.
The Recreation and Park Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the projects listed for the 2011 cycle could
be submitted for 2010, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded in the
negative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
February 3, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-02-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-03-02,3,"(10-097) Resolution No. 14427, ""Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Approve Fund
Pass-Through Agreement Between the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
and the City of Alameda to Receive $1,668,154 in Federal Transit Administration Funds
for the Transit and Access Plan and Implementation of Shuttle Service Improvements,
and Authorize the Use of $95,178 from Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority
Funds as Matching Funds for the First Phase of the Project."" Adopted.
The Supervising Civil Engineer gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam stated Alameda Transit Advocates' letter notes that the City's
long-range Transit Plan is out of date; inquired why the Transportation Commission has
not met for the last seven months and whether the Transportation Commission could
have done some work to update the Transit Plan.
The Supervising Civil Engineer responded last year, the Transportation Commission
established a subcommittee to work on the policy aspect of the Transit Plan; stated the
Transportation Commission has acknowledged that the Transit Plan needs to be
updated; the subcommittee met a couple of times last year.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the subcommittee met over the last seven
months.
The Supervising Civil Engineer responded that he does not know; stated staff will
provide Council with an Off Agenda Report.
Councilmember Tam inquired when the Transportation Commission would meet to
discuss the best use of the pass-through funding, to which the Supervising Civil
Engineer responded the third Wednesday of the month.
Councilmember Tam requested that staff respond to whether the 2005 Metropolitan
Transportation Commission (MTC) study is available and can be made available on line.
The Supervising Civil Engineer stated the 2005 Station Area Plan will be reviewed; staff
is not intending to ignore anything; all studies will be reviewed moving forward; internet
access is available for Alameda Point studies.
Acting Mayor Matarrese stated an explanation should be provided if the link from the
Alameda Point website to the studies is not there.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
-
3. [Absent: Vice Mayor deHaan and Mayor Johnson - 2.]
(10-098) Adoption of Resolution Opposing Proposition 16, the ""New Two-Thirds Vote
Requirement for Local Public Electricity Providers - Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
March 2, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-03-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-03-16,3,"(10-120A) Resolution No. 14430, ""Upholding the Planning Board's Decision and
Approving Modified Use Permit PLN09-0330 at 2201 Southshore Center (Kohl's).
Adopted.
Councilmember Tam stated that Councilmember Matarrese followed the protocol of
submitting a written request within the time period after the Planning Board took action
for the Call for Review for 1623 Park Street; that she does not see a written request
from Vice Mayor deHaan; inquired whether a written request is required.
The Interim City Manager responded a completed form was not received; that she has
documented the events; no one mentioned any form to her; Vice Mayor deHaan sent an
email but not the completed form; verbally, the request [Call for Review] was submitted
within the timeframe, but the email was not.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he was assured that a verbal request was fine; that he
did not provide a written request by direction of the City Attorney.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether a written request is required.
The City Attorney responded the ordinance does not require a written request; stated
written requests have been provided in the past; Vice Mayor deHaan made an
administrative request to the Interim City Manager; Vice Mayor deHaan inquired
whether the request needed to be in writing and was told the request would be followed
up in writing; however, the matter dropped between the cracks.
Councilmember Tam stated the purpose [of a written request from Council] is to give the
community an opportunity to understand the reason and background; Kohl's should
have been advised of the reason for the Call for Review; Kohl's is having to deal with a
technical issue because of an application oversight on the City's part; the issue seems
hypocritical, if the City cannot follow its own rules.
Councilmember Matarrese concurred with Councilmember Tam; stated an appeal would
not be accepted without documents in writing; requests [Call for Review] should be
required to be in writing.
Councilmember Gilmore concurred with Councilmember Tam and Councilmember
Matarrese; stated Council has had many discussions regarding the City being business
friendly; procedures need to be established and followed.
Mayor Johnson stated requiring Calls for review to be in writing is a valid point; the
same burden for filing a written request should be applied to an appeal filed using a Call
for Review process.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired why a written request was not provided.
The Interim City Manager responded that she did not know a form was required; stated
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
March 16, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-04-06,15,"(10-154) Councilmember Matarrese stated that former Councilmember George Beckam
passed away in the middle of March; requested that the meeting be adjourned in his
memory.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated that former Councilmember Beckam was voted into office
under Measure A and received the State's first Engineering Certificate.
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting in memory of
former Councilmember Beckam at 10:34 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
15
April 6, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-04-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-04-20,20,"(10-18 CIC) Conference With Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Significant
Exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9; Number of Cases:
One.
Following the Closed Session, Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that regarding Labor,
the matter was continued; regarding Alameda Point, Board Members received a briefing
from its real property negotiator and provided negotiating direction; regarding CIC
Anticipated Litigation, the Commissioners received a briefing from Legal Counsel and
staff regarding the matter and provided direction.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 12:25
a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
Secretary, CIC
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and
2
Redevelopment Authority, and Community
Improvement Commission
April 20, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-05-18,10,"(10-245) Vice Mayor deHaan stated the trees at the Golf Course are coming back;
Alameda and Monarch Bay in San Leandro use recycled water; Metropolitan Links uses
well water; East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) does not check the salt content
[of recycled water]; the cost for recycled water is 70% to 80% of the amount for potable
water.
(10-246) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations for Appointment to the Commission on
Disability Issues and Youth Advisory Commission.
Mayor Johnson nominated Kelly Harp for appointment to the Commission on Disability
Issues and Jeanette Mei for appointment to the Youth Advisory Committee.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 12:31 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
May 18, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-05-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-07-27,11,"(10-384 CC/ARRA/10-60 CIC) Recommendation to Approve the City of Alameda's Real
Estate Asset Management Policy.
The Interim City Manager gave a brief presentation.
Speakers: Jon Spangler, Alameda; and Leslie Cameron, Bay Ship and Yacht.
Following Mr. Spangler's comments, the Interim City Manager stated the policy is a
Council policy; the Authorities and Responsibilities sections have citations in terms of
policy administration; the City Manager would make administrative decisions as to what
the policy means.
Councilmember Tam stated for clarity, language should be added stating: ""before
recommending to the City Council for final approval"".
The Interim City Manager inquired where the inserted language should go.
Councilmember Tam responded on Page 5 [of the Real Estate Asset Management
Policy] under Organizational Responsibilities X-1 where it states: ""the City Manager's
office is the ultimate decision maker with respect to administrative interpretation of this
City Council policy. All transactions under this policy must be approved by this office"";
recommended inserting ""before recommending to the City Council for final approval""
after the word ""office"".
In response to Mr. Spangler's comment regarding the policy including the City's
commitment to making older City-owned buildings Leadership Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED) certified or green buildings, the Interim City Manager
stated the idea sounds good.
Following Ms. Cameron's comments, Mayor Johnson stated that the City wants to
continue to work with Bay Ship and Yacht and appreciates all the work that Bay Ship
and Yacht has done.
Councilmember Matarrese thanked the Interim City Manager, businesses that provided
input, as well as staff; stated the policy is exactly what he hoped for when he put in the
Council Referral; the earlier policy was not working; the new policy is comprehensive
and dynamic; changes and adjustments might be needed; that he wants to stay focused
on a long-term approach; taking lease revenues up to the front end to the exclusion of
others is not the way to do things.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of staff recommendation; stated the policy
could be evaluated in six months or after ""x"" number of negotiated leases to ensure that
the City is on target or adjustments need to be made.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse
11
and Redevelopment Authority, and
Community Improvement Commission
July 27, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-07-27,19,"(10-389A CC) Resolution No. 14481, ""Establishing Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year
2010-2011. Adopted;
(10-389B CC) Resolution No. 14482, ""Approving and Adopting the Operating and
Capital Budget and Appropriating Certain Moneys for Said Expenditures in Fiscal Year
2010-2011.' Adopted;
(10-63 CIC) Resolution No. 10-170, ""Approving and Adopting the Operating and Capital
Budget and Appropriating Certain Moneys for Said Expenditures in Fiscal Year 2010-
2011.' Adopted; and
(ARRA) Resolution No. 48, ""Approving and Adopting the Operating and Capital Budget
and Appropriating Certain Moneys for Said Expenditures in Fiscal Year 2010-2011.
Adopted.
The Interim City Manager/Executive Director gave a presentation.
Mayor/Chair Johnson requested clarification on call provisions.
The Interim City Manager/Executive Director stated call provisions are structured and
indentured when bond holders are able to be paid off; sometimes call provisions are
limited and conditions are structured in a municipal debt as an incentive to the buyer of
the municipal debt because no one wants to take X amount of dollars if the bond will be
called; the debt service term has not been expanded.
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether doing that kind of debt made sense at the time;
stated the 2000 AMP bonds that are being refinanced did not make sense even in 2000;
policies need to be in place to ensure that bad debt is not done.
The Interim City Manager/Executive Director stated a lot of cities do dirt bonds
[Community Facilities Districts]; the best ratio is $1 of debt for every $4 of land value;
the City needs more elaborate financial policies; municipal debt has variations.
Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the issue with the 2000 bonds is that the bonds were
taxable.
The Interim City Manager/Executive Director stated in general, taxables have been at a
higher rate; nowadays, cities can get taxables that are less than a municipal rate
because city tax credit is not as good as some taxables; government can no longer
budget for just a year.
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the bond that Council did not like a couple of
years ago and sent back a number of times cannot be refunded.
The Interim City Manager/Executive Director responded the bond would be difficult to
refund in today's market; at the time, the bond probably made sense to relieve the
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse
19
and Redevelopment Authority, and
Community Improvement Commission
July 27, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-09-07,18,"(10-427) Councilmember Tam stated for weeks Mayor Johnson, the Interim City
Manager, and the City Attorney have been asking the District Attorney through outside
counsel, Michael Colantuono, to expedite the investigation so that the City can get on
with its business; for the record, based on the letter that the District Attorney has sent
and the Island blog has published on its website, she learned that the City's special
counsel sent five letters of which she has only seen three along with her attorney; her
attorney has sent two; the City Attorney's office, through Mr. Colantuono, submitted a
letter practically every other week documenting issues and concerns they have with her
email and her communications; 285 pages; the District Attorney waited and reviewed
every single one in a very exhaustive way; they have come to the determination that
there is no legal or factual basis to support the allegations that the Brown Act has been
violated or that she has mishandled confidential information; asking the Council to
discuss issues of concern to the public, whether the public raises it, whether a City
business partner raises it, or whether an employee group raises it, is wholly appropriate
and is part of her responsibility as a City Councilmember; it is unfortunate that the City
issued a press release that does not seem to respect the exhaustive review and the
analysis of the District Attorney that has lasted over two months; it is also unfortunate
that they have produced a press release that distorts the District Attorney's findings that
the matter is closed.
(10-428) Councilmember Gilmore stated that she understands that the County is at a
very preliminary stage in discussing the potentially moving forward with Countywide
project labor agreements that would affect all cities; it might behoove the City to take a
look at the issue; that she will bring back a Council Referral for discussion.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 10:38 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
18
September 7, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-09-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-09-07,20,"(10-430 CC) Recommendation to Authorize the Community Improvement Commission
of the City of Alameda to Enter into an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with
Warmington Residential for Redevelopment of the City's Corporation Yard Located at
1616 Fortmann Way and the City's Animal Shelter Located at 1590 Fortmann Way; and
(10-67 CIC) Recommendation to Approve an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement by and between
the Community Improvement Commission and Warmington Residential for Redevelopment of
the City's Corporation Yard Located at 1616 Fortmann Way and the City's Animal Shelter
Located at 1590 Fortmann Way.
The Deputy City Manager - Development Services gave a brief presentation.
Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the project is small; inquired why the initial term of the ENA
would be eighteen months.
The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded the timeframe is more of
an issue with the City developing a relocation study and is more for the City's benefit.
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired what has been learned from the SunCal ENA.
The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded the City has standard
and good faith provisions and termination dates in all ENAs; stated the project is for two
acres and up to twenty-seven units; the ENA is simple and straightforward.
Mayor/Chair Johnson stated no developer is perfect, but no developer is like SunCal;
the City's relationship with SunCal totally broke down; inquired whether assurances are
in place to avoid a similar breakdown with Warmington Residential.
The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded Warmington Residential
has a proven track record in the City and is moving forward in very difficult economic
times; stated staff feels comfortable with Warmington Residential.
The Interim Executive Director stated staff needs to assess whether moving the two
facilities [Corporation Yard and Animal Shelter] is feasible for the City; the ENA is not as
complex as the SunCal ENA.
Commissioner Gilmore inquired whether the CIC budget includes $100,000 that would
be needed to reimburse Warmington Residential for geotechnical and environmental
testing if the project does not go through.
The Interim Executive Director responded in the affirmative; stated every year, a small
amount is budgeted for studies.
Commissioner Gilmore inquired whether the project would be subject to affordable
housing requirements, to which the Deputy City Manager - Development Services
responded in the affirmative.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and Community
2
Improvement Commission
September 7, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-09-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-09-21,11,"(10-449) Harbor Bay Parkway Bay Friendly Landscape Median Project
April Philips, April Philips Design Works, gave a Power Point presentation.
***
Councilmember Tam left the dais at 8:51 p.m., Vice Mayor deHaan left the dais at 8:52
p.m., and both returned at 8:53 p.m.
***
Mayor Johnson inquired whether plants would be planted through cardboard.
Ms. Philips responded small plants would be planted above the cardboard; stated larger
plants would be planted through the cardboard.
Mayor Johnson stated landscaping should be changed in other areas also.
Ms. Philips stated Harbor Bay Parkway is committed to having future green and
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certified projects.
Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether plants would have the same beneficial value [as
grass] in absorbing carbon.
Ms. Philips responded more carbon would be absorbed because grass would not be
ripped up; stated a carbon sink would be created by having grass decompose into the
soil; carbon is released when soil is disturbed.
Councilmember Matarrese stated lawns photosynthesizes carbon dioxide to oxygen;
plants would be just as green; inquired whether any gravel or chips would be used,
which would take away the photosynthesis, to which Ms. Philips responded the area
would have more bio mass and absorb more carbon.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the area has a huge ground squirrel problem; inquired
whether cardboard would alleviate the problem.
Ms. Philips responded the cardboard should not make the problem worse; stated a few
lavender plants were lost when Peet's Coffee was landscaped.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(10-450) Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Certifying the Final
Environmental Impact Report; Adopting Findings and a Statement of Overriding
Considerations, and Adopting Mitigation Monitoring Program; Adoption of Resolution
Amending the General Plan; Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Zoning
Ordinance; Adoption of Resolution Upholding the Planning Board Resolution to Deny
PLN 08-0160, and Approval of a Settlement Agreement Pertaining to the
Redevelopment of Property Located at 2229 Clement Avenue.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
11
September 21, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-09-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-09-21,15,"(10-455) Direct Staff to Hold a Workshop on the Brown Act; Request that the City
Auditor Perform an Audit of the Books and Records, Including, But Not Limited to, Legal
Bills, Costs, Technology (Hardware and Software) and Employee Time Expended in the
Investigation of Councilmember Tam; and Terminate the Legal Contract for the Matter.
Councilmember Gilmore gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated most Councilmembers understand the Brown Act extremely
well; that he is confident in his understanding the Brown Act; State mandates require
Council and Boards and Commissions to take a refresher course every two years; that
he does not feel the need for additional training unless interpretation problems exist.
The City Attorney stated the City Attorney's office offers Brown Act training to all Boards
and Commissions; concurred with Councilmember Gilmore regarding the League of
California Cities' ability to provide a low-cost presentation; however, a presentation by
the City Attorney's office would be at no cost.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether Boards and Commissions take refresher courses
every two years, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated the Brown Act safeguards the public; that he takes exception
if someone thinks that he does not understand the Brown Act.
Councilmember Gilmore stated she is not bringing the matter to Council as a personal
attack on what Council knows or does not know; lately, the Brown Act has been the
subject of much discussion; the workshop would not only be useful to Council, Boards
and Commissions, and staff, but the public also; training provided by the City Attorney's
office is not available to the public; the workshop could take care of the entire
population.
Mayor Johnson suggested that the City Attorney come back to Council with an idea;
stated the public may be curious; inquired whether Councilmember Gilmore is
requesting a workshop for City officials and the public.
Councilmember Gilmore responded that she is requesting a public session; members of
the public would prefer not to have the City Attorney's office perform the training, which
is why she is requesting that Terry Francke or the League of California Cities provide a
workshop.
Vice Mayor deHaan concurred with Councilmember Gilmore regarding the public's
concern with the Brown Act; stated a public briefing would be worthwhile in order to
understand constraints; perhaps a half hour presentation at a Council meeting would be
good.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he does not have any problem with a workshop,
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
15
September 21, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-09-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-09-21,18,"(10-456) Consider Taking Action Regarding Calming Traffic on Residential Streets that
Have Become Overburdened, Used as ""Cut-Throughs"" or Experience Other Traffic
Problems.
Referral was to be placed on October 5, 2010 agenda.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(10-457) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations for Appointment to the Housing
Commission, Library Board, and Planning Board.
Mayor Johnson nominated Fayleen Allen or appointment to the Housing Commission
and Nancy Lewis for appointment to the Library Board; continued the Planning Board
nomination.
Speaker: Jon Spangler, Alameda.
(10-458) Councilmember Gilmore stated that she attended the School District's
workshop regarding the parcel tax; encouraged the public to become engaged and
attend the workshops; stated the School District's funding crises is not just a school
issue, but a community issue; the community needs to come together to solve or aid the
funding crises; that she will do everything that she can; schools are a vital part of the
City's infrastructure; the community will not function well without supporting the schools.
(10-459) Councilmember Gilmore stated Council has asked for performance plans from
Council's direct reports [Interim City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk]; one was
due by tonight's meeting; that she has not received the performance plan; Council
cannot schedule performance reviews of Council's direct reports; that she wants to
know what is the hold up.
(10-460) Vice Mayor deHaan stated a lot of [election] surveys are being done;
requested that the City Clerk provide information on the source of the surveys.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 10:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
18
September 21, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-09-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-10-05,7,"(10-480) The City Attorney gave a brief presentation on the workers compensation
case, which was settled.
Councilmember Matarrese stated normally, workers compensation issues happen in
Closed Session; usually, an agreement is made by the policy board; proposed
agreements are brought to Council for a vote; inquired how the case in question is
different.
The City Attorney responded the case is very unusual; stated the injured employee filed
a claim; both sides agreed upon a medical examiner; the medical examiner submitted a
disability rating; the employee did not ask for anything else; the disability rating was not
disputed; Council has no discretion to refuse to grant the statutory compensation based
upon the agreed upon medical examiner's decision; the outcome would not have been
any different if the matter did not come to Council.
Mayor Johnson stated the 31% [disability rating] is a discretionary number that either
side could dispute.
The City Attorney stated that she discussed the matter with Outside Counsel, Keith
Epstein; Mr. Epstein has been the City's workers compensation attorney for almost
twenty years; there is case law that if parties use an agreed upon medical examiner,
then parties have agreed to accept whatever the agreed upon medical examiner's
rating; it is not Mr. Epstein's practice to check the disability rating of the agreed upon
medical examiner with Council; that she would discuss changing the process if Council
wishes.
Mayor Johnson stated that she is sensitive to the statement that there is no
discretionary act.
The City Attorney stated dulling medical opinions might occur if both sides have their
own qualified medical examiner; discussions might take place regarding settlement and
an appropriate disability rating.
Mayor Johnson stated each side could put in a provision not to agree to accept the
recommended disability rating.
Councilmember Matarrese stated Council should have a say if financial discretion is
being turned over to an agreed upon medical examiner; Council should have agreed to
the process of accepting whatever the outcome would be before marching down said
road.
The City Attorney stated that she understands the confusion; suggested Mr. Epstein be
brought to the next Council meeting, or as soon as is practicable, if Council wants to
consider changing the process; Mr. Epstein could outline how the statutory workers
compensation system works.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
October 5, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-10-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-11-16,17,"(10-561 CC/10-78 CIC) Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of
continuing the meeting past 12:00 midnight.
Vice Mayor/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
*
The Deputy City Manager - Community Development gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor/Commissioner deHaan inquired what safeguards are in place in the event
that assets [the Animal Shelter and Corporation Yard] cannot be relocated.
The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded the term of the Exclusive
Negotiation Agreement [ENA] would expire after eighteen-months.
*
Councilmember/Commissioner Tam left the dais at 12:01 a.m. and returned at 12:02
a.m.
Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore stated the staff report notes that the CIC would
reimburse Warmington Residential $100,000 for geotechnical and environmental testing
costs if Warmington Residential elects not to proceed with the project; inquired whether
the $100,000 is different than the amount for the site study to move the Corporation
Yard and Animal shelter, to which the Deputy City Manager - Development Services
responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore inquired where the money would come from, to
which the Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded the CIC budget.
Speakers: Chris Anderson, Grand Marina (submitted Power Point); Andy McKinley,
Grand Marina (submitted correspondence); and Michael McClellan, Warmington
Homes.
Following Mr. McKinley's comments, the Deputy City Manager - Development Services
stated retail would be part of the Northern Waterfront General Plan and would be
compatible; tomorrow, staff will be meeting with the Grand Marina owners regarding
lease negotiations; the ENA has sufficient flexibility.
Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese stated that he would like to see specific
Grand Marina retail incorporated in the negotiations; the Northern Waterfront is littered
with failed restaurants; that he hopes industry around the boatyard is kept; the light
industrial and retail use area that benefits the City and should be maintained.
Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse
and Redevelopment Authority and
2
Community Improvement Commission
November 16, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-11-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-12-07,6,"(10-592) Consider Directing the Interim City Manager to Finalize Negotiations for a
Lease of the Mif Albright Golf Course for Senior and Youth Play, with Designated
Representatives of the Alameda Junior Golf Association (AJGA) and/or Its Working
Subcommittee, Consistent with the Spirit of the Tentative Business Term Sheet Dated
June 3, 2010; and Authorizing Reserving $100,000 from the Golf Course Enterprise
Fund Available Cash Balance to Help Secure the $250,000 Grant Offered by
Wadsworth Golf Charities for Capital Improvements to the Mif Albright Golf Course.
Vice Mayor deHaan gave a brief presentation.
Speakers: Grace Na, Alameda; Coach Burnett; Jane Sullwold, Alameda Golf
Commission; Robert Sullwold, Alameda; David Hamilton, Alameda Golf Club and
Alameda Commuters; Jon Spangler, Alameda; Norma Arnerich, Alameda Junior Golf;
Tony Corica, Alameda; and Gail Van Winkle, Alameda Junior Golf.
Mayor Johnson stated at a prior meeting, Wadsworth representatives were asked about
contributions; that she thought Wadsworth contributions would not solely be money;
representatives described a lot of in-kind contributions and did not commit to certain
amount of money; inquired whether contributions would include money or would be all
in-kind contributions.
The Interim City Manager stated that she was under the impression that contributions
would be a combination of in-kind and cash.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether there are any updates on the matter.
The Recreation and Park Director responded a number of Wadsworth landscape
architect, maintenance, and irrigation partners would provide services.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether Wadsworth has indicated how much of the
contribution would be in-kind and how much would be cash, to which the Recreation
and Park Director responded not to him.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated the architect partner stated that they would provide in-kind
architectural services and there could be more in-kind contributions going forward; the
hard cash is $250,000.
Mayor Johnson stated that was not stated at the meeting she attended.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated Chris Seiwald, Jack London Soccer League President,
advocated for swapping the property for soccer fields; at the next meeting, Mr. Seiwald
offered a $20,000 matching grant [for soccer] but retracted the offer when he realized
how valuable the Golf Course is to youth; Mr. Seiwald then offered the $20,000 for [golf]
operations; the Alameda Junior Golf Club came up with matching funds.
The Interim City Manager read a quote from a letter from Wadsworth to confirm the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
December 7, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-12-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-12-21,5,"(10-599 CC) Resolution No. 14527, ""Approving Amendment by Extending Memorandum
of Understanding between the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)
and the City of Alameda for the Period Commencing January 1, 2009 and Ending
December 18, 2010 to March 26, 2011."" Adopted;
(10-599 A CC) Resolution No. 14528, ""Approving Amendment be Extending
Memorandum of Understanding between the Management and Confidential Employees
Association and the City of Alameda for the Period Commencing January 1, 2005 and
Ending December 20, 2008, Extended through December 12, 2009, and Extended
Again through December 18, 2010 to March 26, 2011.' Adopted; and
(10-599 B CC) Resolution No. 14529, ""Approving Amendment by Extending
Memorandum of Understanding between the Alameda Police Officers Association Non-
Sworn Unit and the City of Alameda for the Period Commencing December 20, 2009
and Ending December 18, 2010 to March 26, 2011. Adopted.
The Human Resources Director gave a brief presentation.
Proponent: Al Fortier, IBEW.
Vice Mayor deHaan moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
AGENDA ITEM
(10-600 ( CC) Resolution No. 14530, ""Appointing Jesus Vargas as a Member of the
Transportation Commission."" Adopted.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
The Honorable Judge C. Richard Bartalini administered the Oath of Office and the City
Clerk presented Mr. Vargas with a Certificate of Appointment.
(10-600 A CC) Resolution No. 14531, ""Appointing Thomas Bertken as a Member of the
Transportation Commission.' Adopted.
Vice Mayor deHaan moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
2
Community Improvement Commission
December 21, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-12-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-01-18,9,"(11-002A CIC) Recommendation to Authorize Conveyance by Quitclaim Deed of the
Property Located at 2216 Lincoln Avenue for Construction of 19 Units of Affordable
Rental Housing to the Housing Authority;
(HABOC) Recommendation to Accept the Property Located at 2216 Lincoln Avenue via
a Quitclaim Deed from the CIC;
(HABOC) Recommendation to Approve a Lease Option Agreement and Authorize the
Acting Chief Executive Officer to Execute a 75-Year Ground Lease Based on the Lease
Option with Satellite Housing and HCEB and an OPA and Other Related Documents
between the Housing Authority, CIC, Satellite Housing and HCEB;
(11-002B CIC) Recommendation to Approve and OPA and Authorize the Acting
Executive Director to Execute an OPA and Other Related Documents with Satellite
Housing, HCEB and the Housing Authority; and
(11-002C CIC) Recommendation to Approve an Appropriation of $1.4 Million from the
Business and Waterfront Improvement Project (BWIP) Affordable Housing Fund
Balance to Housing Project Development Funds;
(11-024B CC) Resolution No. 14540, ""Approving (1) the Disposition of Certain Property
Owned by the CIC of the City of Alameda at Not Less Than Its Fair Reuse Value in
Connection with Development of an Affordable Rental Housing Project on the Site, and
(2) Making Certain Findings with Respect to the Disposition of Such Property.
Adopted;
(11-002D CIC) Resolution No. 11-173, ""Approving (1) an OPA for Development of
Affordable Rental Housing, and (2) the Disposition of Certain Property Owned by the
CIC at Not Less Than its Fair Reuse Value in Connection With Development of an
Affordable Rental Housing Project on the Site, (3) Making Certain Findings With
Respect to the Disposition of Such Property, and (4) Authorizing the Executive Director
to Execute the OPA and a Quitclaim Deed to Convey Such Property to the Housing
Authority.' Adopted;
(HABOC) Resolution No. 825, ""Authorizing the Acting Chief Executive Officer to
Execute (1) An OPA Among the Housing Authority, CIC, Satellite Housing and HCEB,
(2) A Lease Option Agreement Among the Housing Authority, Satellite Housing and
HCEB, and (3) to Accept a Quitclaim Deed From the CIC for the Project Site."" Adopted;
and
(11-002E CIC) Resolution No. 11-174, ""Approving the Use of Housing Funds to Pay a
Portion of the Costs of Development of a 19-Unit Affordable Rental Project within the
City of Alameda on Certain Property Commonly Known as 2216 Lincoln Avenue.""
Adopted.
The Housing Department Executive Director; Dori Kojima, Satellite Housing Executive
Director; and Darin Lounds, HCEB Executive Director, gave a Power Point presentation.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Community
Improvement Commission, and Housing
2
Authority Board of Commissioners
January 18, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-01-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-07-05,12,"(11-033 CIC/HABOC) Recommendation to Approve a First Amendment to the Owner
Participation Agreement (OPA) for 2428 Central Avenue, Redirecting the Community
Improvement Commission Housing Bond Proceeds to Resources for Community
Development for Acquisition of the Property at 2428 Central Avenue, and Amending the
Form of the Promissory Note to Increase the Principal Amount from $1 Million to $9
Million, and Authorize the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer to Execute All
Required Documents; and
(11-033A CIC) Recommendation to Approve a Form of a Partnership Agreement
Between the Housing Authority, RCD Housing, LLC, and 112 Alves Lane, Inc. and
Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to Execute the initial Partnership Agreement and
the Amended Agreement to Include Additional Limited Partners.
The Acting Legal Counsel stated that the CIC/HABOC action to amend the OPA would
not be addressed because of new redevelopment legislation passed last week.
Commissioner Bonta moved approval of the staff recommendation regarding the
Partnership Agreement.
Commissioner Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 6.
(HABOC) Resolution No. 833, ""Amending the Housing Authority Budget to Increase the
Fiscal Year 2012 CIP GF3 Budget by $93,600 to $613,141 for the Expansion of the
Housing Authority Office Building and Additional Architectural Services (Budget
Revision No. 4); Amending and Increasing the Architectural Contract by $32,800 to
$65,800, Including Contingencies; Awarding the Contract to N.S. Construction and
Paining in the Amount of $580,800, Including Contingencies; and Authorizing the
Executive Director to Execute the Contract and Amendment."" Adopted.
AGENDA ITEM
(HABOC) Recommendation to Approve the Housing Commission's Recommendation to
Name the Proposed Affordable Housing Project at 2216 Lincoln Avenue Jack Capon
Villa.
The Housing Authority Executive Director gave a brief presentation.
Speakers: Arthur Kurrash, Housing Commission; Bernie Fitzgerald, Alameda Special
Olympics; Mathew Fitzgerald, Team of Alameda Special Olympics; Lanay Eastman,
Special Olympics; Barbara Capon, Alameda; Darin Lounds, Housing Consortium of the
East Bay.
Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Community Improvement
2
Commission and Housing Authority Board of
Commissioners
July 5, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-07-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-03-01,2,"(11-102) Philip Tribuzio, Alameda, discussed Alameda Point.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Gilmore announced that Final Passage of the Ordinance [paragraph no. 11-109
was removed from the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*11-103) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Alameda Reuse and
Redevelopment Authority Meeting and the Regular City Council Meeting held on
February 15, 2011. Approved.
(*11-104) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,386,536.65.
(*11-105) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period
Ending September 30, 2010. Accepted.
(*11-106) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Gallagher and Burk, Inc., for the
Buena Vista Avenue Street Rehabilitation Project, No. P.W. 02-09-05. Accepted.
(*11-107) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Gallagher and Burk, Inc., for the
Repair and Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 29, No. P.W. 02-09-06. Accepted.
(*11-108) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc.
for the Webster Street/Wilver ""Willie"" Stargell Avenue Intersection Project - Landscape
and Irrigation Improvements, No. P.W. 06-09-18. Accepted.
(11-109) Ordinance No. 3027, ""Amending Sections 30-6, 30-36, and 30-37, of the
Alameda Municipal Code to Improve the Design Review and Sign Ordinance Provisions
for the City of Alameda."" Finally passed.
Speaker: Christopher Buckley, AAPS.
In response to Mr. Buckley's comments, the Planning Services Manager stated the
Design Review Guidelines would be cleaned up to be consistent with the ordinance
being adopted within 30 days; Community Development is undertaking two big
initiatives: 1) review of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and 2) a comprehensive
update of the Design Review Manuals; both will take time and resources; drafts should
be done in a year; currently, buildings older than 1942 are deemed historic; the date has
been a concern, which will be tackled in the Historic Preservation Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
March 1, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-03-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-04-19,4,"(11-199) Councilmember deHaan stated the Council should keep its mind and ears
open to the community; Council has to seek input.
(11-200) Councilmember Tam announced that she attended the League of California
Cities Policy Committee meeting.
(11-201) Mayor Gilmore announced that she attended the Alameda County Mayor's
Conference and Association of Bay Area Government's Spring Assembly.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
April 19, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-05-03,2,"(11-212) Gretchen Lipow, Alameda Citizens Task Force, discussed the process to
approve MOUs.
(11-213) Janet Gibson, Alameda, submitted a handout, discussed the naming of the
Housing Authority project for the disabled.
Councilmember Johnson requested that the matter be brought to Council for discussion;
stated that she does not like the like the idea of a contest.
Mayor Gilmore stated naming the facility through a contest does not sit right.
Councilmember Johnson stated the naming process should come to the Housing
Authority Board of Commissioners (HABOC), not the Housing Commission.
Councilmember deHaan stated the City has a policy regarding naming facilities.
The Housing Executive Director stated the project is not owned by the City; the facility
naming policy applies to City owned facilities, not non-profit projects.
Mayor Gilmore stated community outreach does not appear to be very wide.
Councilmember Johnson stated the City came up with the concept for the project, has
been significantly involved and should have input in the naming of the project.
The Executive Director stated the Planning Board and other boards were notified.
Mayor Gilmore stated notifying boards is fine but it depends upon how the notification
was done; sending out an email is inadequate versus an agendized notification.
Councilmember Johnson inquired who owns the property, to which the Housing
Executive Director responded the Housing Authority.
Councilmember Johnson stated the matter needs to come back to Council.
Councilmember deHaan stated the [contest] announcement does not outline criteria.
The Acting City Manager stated staff would discuss the matter with the developer and
bring the matter to the HABOC.
(11-214) Jon Spangler, Bike Alameda, discussed bicycling in Alameda.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Gilmore announced that item payment of contribution to Associated Community
Action Program [paragraph no. 11-218] was removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
May 3, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-05-19,6,"(11-269) Discussion of Joint Lease Agreement of Fields
President Mooney inquired about the availability of City funds discussed when the
Council and Board last met in September 2010.
The Acting City Manager stated the discussion was that the City would put forward
several million dollars to help with facilities; $2 million was supposed to come from a
General Fund loan to Alameda Municipal Power (AMP), which cannot be repaid until
telecom litigation is complete; there is a $6 million funding deficit in the budget next year
and for the following two to three years; funds returned from AMP would be needed for
City services; $1 million was to come from a tax on utility meters, which requires a vote
of the people and does not seem feasible.
(11-270) Discussion of Joint Advisory Community for Recreational Facilities
President Mooney made brief introductory comments.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the joint committee would be set up to deal with only
the pool issue; stated the City has the Recreation and Park Commission to deal with
fields and facilities; Alameda citizens are on the Commission, which has regular
meetings; there is not an entity which deals with the pools because the pools are on
school property; establishing a committee to come up with a long term solution for pools
is a great idea; expanding into fields and facilities would be more difficult.
President Mooney clarified the committee would just address pools right now.
Following Board discussion, Mayor Gilmore stated it [forming a committee] is a good
idea; the Aquatics Task Force is a logical place to start, as well as the School District
forms that are available to allow other individuals to help out; having the group is
attractive because getting the Board of Education and City Council together is difficult;
the group could meet more frequently, be more nimble, and ideas would come out
faster and be brought back and discussed to make progress on the long term plan.
Vice Mayor Bonta stated it [the committee] is a good idea and should be a joint School
and City project and committee; the Aquatics Task Force should be the starting point;
community volunteers showing energy is excellent and they should be the voices in the
room; the work group could meet more often to address the issue.
Mayor Gilmore stated the group should report back to the School Board and Council
Subcommittee, which could provide more expedited feedback.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
Board of Education
6
May 19, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-05-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-09-06,7,"(11-425) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Civil Service
Board.
Mayor Gilmore nominated Marguerite M. Malloy.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
September 6, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-10-04,2,"(11-462) Sandy Sullivan, Alameda (submitted comments); Mary Anderson, Alameda;
Gregg deHaan, Fernside Homeowners Association; and Ashley Jones, Alameda,
commented on the Memorandum of Agreement [paragraph no. 11-474].
.
(11-463) Linda Fenn, Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter (FAAS), Christa Nicholas,
Alameda; and Janet Davis, Alameda, commented on the animal shelter.
(11-464) Ken Peterson, Alameda, announced that photos of 4th of July parades would
be on display at the Ken Betts Center.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*11-465) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings, and the Special
Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting Held on
September 6, 2011; and the Special City Council Meeting Held on September 7, 2011.
Approved.
(*11-466) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,270,915.48.
(*11-467) Recommendation to Approve a Consultant Agreement for $43,500 with HF&H
Consultants, LLC, for the Annual Integrated Waste Management Rate Review, Analysis
of Contractor's Compensation Application, and On-Call Services. Accepted.
(*11-468) Recommendation to Approve a Consultant Agreement for $56,689 with West
Advertising, Inc. for Preparation and Production of Multi-Media Advertisements for
Website and Written Publications. Accepted.
(*11-469) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for the Sewer Pump Station Backup Generator Installation Project, No. P.W. 04-
10-10. Accepted.
(*11-470) Recommendation to Ratify the Public Utility Board's Approval of Renewable
Energy Certificates Transfer Agreement between Northern California Power Agency
and Alameda Municipal Power and Authorize the General Manager of Alameda
Municipal Power to Execute the Agreement. Accepted.
(*11-471) Ordinance No. 3035, ""Authorizing the Execution of Lease of Real Property
between the City, as Lessor, and Alameda Swimming Pool Association, as Lessee, for
Swimming Pool Facilities at Lincoln and Franklin Parks."" Finally passed.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
October 4, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-10-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-02-07,2,"(12-037) Recommendation to Approve a One-Year Contract With Graphtek Advertising
and Design in an Amount Not to Exceed $6,000 for Technical Support for the City's
Website.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation; inquired whether the
City would be moving toward a new platform in July, to which the Information
Technology Division Manager responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the City would be free from the Graphtek
Contract, to which the Information Technology Division Manager responded in the
affirmative.
The City Manager stated he would be very disappointed if the City is not on board with a
different non-proprietary site by July 1st.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the [website] survey has been published, to
which the Deputy City Manager responded in the affirmative.
The City Manager inquired what type of comments has been received.
The Deputy City Manager responded good criticisms and critiques have been given;
stated people want a more user friendly site.
The City Manager stated the goal is to have a website that can be easily navigated with
a two-way relationship.
(*12-038) Resolution No. 14650, ""Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney for Island
City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2"". Adopted.
(*12-039) Resolution No. 14651, ""Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney for
Maintenance Assessment District 01-1 (Marina Cove)"". Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(12-040) Resolution No. 14652, ""Appointing John W. Knox White as a Member of the
Planning Board."" Adopted.
(12-040 A) Resolution No. 14653, ""Appointing Kristoffer Köster as a Member of the
Planning Board.' Adopted.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
February 7, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-02-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-02-07,12,"(12-049) D. Tillman, Task Inc., urged the Council to continue to support the homeless,
especially Veterans.
(12-050) Janet Gibson, Alameda, commented on the Crown Beach Tragedy follow up
report; suggested follow up include a City philosophy for people to be responsible, kind
citizens and development of a good Samaritan policy.
(12-051) Lily Leung stated the Alameda Little Ice Rink should have remained longer and
could be located at Alameda Point.
Mayor Gilmore noted the ice rink was a joint effort including Perforce Software,
Alameda Municipal Power, and Buestad Construction; stated the location is private
property and it is too early to pin down a new location.
Councilmember Johnson stated the City would love to have an ice rink; a business
would have to determine whether it could generate revenue; the ice rink required a lot of
subsidy.
(12-052) Kurt Peterson, Alameda, discussed the meeting times listed on agendas.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(12-053) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Social Service
Human Relations Board (SSHRB).
Mayor Gilmore nominated Michael Radding for appointment to the SSHRB.
(12-054) Mayor Gilmore stated Councilmember deHaan would serve on the Airport
Noise Forum since she cannot attend meetings.
(12-055) Mayor Gilmore inquired about the status of the City Clerk contract.
Councilmember Johnson stated that she is waiting for information from the City
Attorney's office.
(12-056) Councilmember deHaan stated the country's handling of returning veterans
has been very commendable.
(12-057) Vice Mayor Bonta stated the proposed third Measure B would be on the
November ballot; said Measure is an extension and augmentation of the current half
cent sales tax that funds Alameda County transportation projects and programs; the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
February 7, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-02-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-02-21,2,"(12-066) Jon Spangler, Alameda, thanked Council for opting in on the single-use bag
ordinance; stated ten months would provide plenty of time for outreach.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the Consent Calendar, including approval of a
revised exhibit provided for the recommendation to approve and transmit the Initial and
Second Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules [paragraph no. 12-070].
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
4. [Absent: Mayor Gilmore - 1.]
(*12-067) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting and the Special Joint City
Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting Held on January 17, 2012.
Approved.
(*12-068) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,644,680.88.
(*12-069). Recommendation to Support the Friends of the Parks Fit City Challenge
Program. Accepted.
(*12-070) Recommendation to Approve and Transmit the Initial and Second Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedules to the Oversight Board, State Department of Finance,
and Alameda County Auditor-Controller. Accepted with revised schedule.
(*12-071) Recommendation to Adopt the Legislative Program for 2012. Accepted.
(*12-072) Recommendation to Accept Staff's Responses to the Regional Sustainable
Communities Strategy - Alternative Scenarios. Accepted.
(*12-073) Resolution No. 14655, ""Supporting the FOCUS Priority Development Area
Application for the Northern Waterfront."" Adopted.
(*12-074) Resolution No. 14656, ""Rescinding Resolution No. 12611, Which Amended
Resolution No. 12567 Establishing Rules of Order Governing the Proceedings and
Order of Business of City Council Meetings, By Amending Section 1(k) Pertaining to the
Adjournment of City Council Meetings."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(12-075) Resolution No. 14657, ""Appointing Michael Radding as a Member of the Social
Service Human Relations Board."" Adopted.
Councilmember Johnson moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
February 21, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-02-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-04-17,2,"(12-167) Proclamation Declaring April 2012 as Fair Housing Month.
Mayor Gilmore read and presented the proclamation to Justine Francis and Nina Lim,
Alameda Association of Realtors.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(12-168) Kathleen Brooks, Alameda Unified School District, announced an upcoming
event for a bone marrow donor registration drive.
In response to Councilmember Johnson's inquiry, Ms. Brooks stated the test is just a
cheek swab.
(12-169) Eric Schatmeier, Alameda, discussed his concerns with AC Transit service
cuts.
In response to Councilmember Johnson's inquiry, the Public Works Director stated staff
would suggest holding a meeting of the Inter-Agency Liaison Committee (ILC); that he
would follow up with the Mayor regarding ILC membership.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Gilmore announced that the CLE Engineering contract was removed from the
Consent Calendar [paragraph no. 12-172].
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(*12-170) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on March 20,
2012. Approved.
(*12-171) Ratified bills in the amount of $740,211.35.
(12-172) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $112,800, Including
Contingencies, to CLE Engineering for the Evaluation, Analysis, and Preparation of
Engineering Documents for the South Shore Lagoon Dredging Project, No. P.W. 09-09-
27.
Councilmember Tam recused herself and left the dais.
The City Engineer gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired when the lagoon was last dredged.
The City Engineer responded certain areas of the lagoon are dredged periodically;
stated it has been quite a while since the entire lagoon was dredged.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
April 17, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-04-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-05-15,20,"(12-249) Councilmember deHaan stated that he would change his vote on the
depreciation ordinance [paragraph no. 12-246 to an aye with the caveat that it is what
the Council intended to do.
ADJOURNMENT
(12-250) There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at
12:16 a.m. in memory of Police Officer Dave Ellis and U.S. Army Sergeant Tom
Fogerty.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
20
May 15, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-05-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-05-29,2,"(12-260) Presentation on the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Budget.
The Assistant City Manager, Controller and Management Analyst gave a Power Point
presentation.
***
Councilmember Johnson left the dais at 7:20 p.m. and returned at 7:27 p.m.
Councilmember deHaan left the dais at 9:09 p.m. and returned at 9:10 p.m.
* *
During the presentation, staff responded to Council questions about PERS; City
Manager, Police, Fire, Recreation, and Library department budgets; Measure C, vehicle
replacement; budget balancing mechanisms; and impacts from the State.
Following the presentation, staff responded to Council questions about Measure C, the
Museum, Alameda Municipal Power funds, the jail, deferred maintenance, staffing cuts,
and Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB).
John Knox White, Alameda, urged Council to consider a policy to have all public
projects include maintenance and replacement costs; questioned an advertisement he
received.
Ken Peterson, Alameda, raised questions regarding the City's true deficit and closing
the gap.
The City Council discussed the proposed budget and Measure C.
Councilmember Tam left the dais at 10:07 p.m. and returned at 10:09 p.m.
Following the discussion, the City Manager suggested the June 12th meeting not be
held.
The City Council requested the meeting be held if Measure C does not pass.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(12-261) The City Manager stated the Management and Confidential Employee
Association voted for a four year contract; the Alameda City Employee Association and
and Police Officer Non-Sworn will be voting; the June 5th meeting is moved to June 6th;
Alameda will be hosting the Artimus Yacht Team for the America's Cup; a report from
the Pension Reform Task Force would be presented to Council in September.
Mayor Gilmore requested the report be presented at a Study Session.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
May 29, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-05-29.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-06-06,2,"(12-270) Presentation to the City of Alameda by the League of American Bicyclists
Designating Alameda a Bicycle Friendly Community (Bronze Level).
Bonnie Wehmann, League of American Bicyclists, gave a brief presentation and
presented the award to the Mayor.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(12-271) Richard Bangert, Alameda, urged Council to comment on the proposed fence
at Alameda Point.
(12-272) Al Wright, Alameda Resident and Business Owner, discussed the Park Street
streetscape and thanked staff for their work; urged that posts be put up on the new
lights to allow the American flags to be hung for the 4th of July.
(12-273) Ken Peterson, Alameda, commented on the City's budget.
(12-274) Bill Smith, Sierra Club, discussed the Wildlife Refuge at Alameda Point; urged
the City to reengage with East Bay Regional Park District; submitted a letter.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Gilmore announced that the recommendation to continue participation in the
Alameda County Lead Poisoning Prevention Program [paragraph number 12-278 was
removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*12-275) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on May 1,
2012 and the Special Meetings Held on May 8, 2012. Approved.
(*12-276) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,498,235.57.
(*12-277) Recommendation to Set June 19, 2012, for a Public Hearing to Consider
Collection of Delinquent Administrative Citation Fees and Vacant Building Assessments
Via the Property Tax Bills. Accepted.
(12-278) Recommendation to Authorize the City of Alameda's Continued Participation in
the Alameda County Lead Poisoning Prevention Program (ACLPPP) for FY 12-13/FY
14-15.
Councilmember Johnson suggested amendment to not require the matter to come to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
June 6, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-06-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-07-17,14,"(12-404) The City Manager announced the Target groundbreaking would be tomorrow
morning; stated all studies prepared since 2004, whether draft or final regarding
assessments of Fire service, would be posted to the City's website by Thursday; that he
would be doing a review of the International City Managers Association (ICMA) study,
which has some grave logical errors; staff is working on website difficulties that have
occurred in the past several days; the Police Department now has a drop box for
expired medicines; City Council meetings to consider the Chuck Corica Golf Complex
lease to Greenway Golf would be held next Tuesday and on July 31st, however, staff
would not bring a long term lease for Jim's on the Course.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(12-405) Carol Gottstein, Alameda, stated Councilmember deHaan had some good
points about the [Housing Element] noticing; at a public participation workshop, she
provided a bulletin by the American Planning Association on the problem of noticing the
public with planning speak; using words like Housing Element makes people's eyes
glaze over; anything that tangentially touches Measure A should mention Measure A
somewhere in the headline; outlined typographical errors in the Housing Element she
reviewed before the July 3rd Council meeting.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(12-406) Mayor Gilmore announced that she attended the Mayor's conference; the
major discussion topic was the Bay Area Plan, which is the sustainable community
strategy, job, housing and transportation plan; a representative from ABAG's planning
and research department gave the presentation.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 11:57 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
14
July 17, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-07-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-09-04,4,"(12-439A) Resolution No. 14729, ""Upholding Planning Board Resolution PB-12-04
Planning Action to Deny Modified Use Permit PLN10-0153 to Allow the Sale of Alcohol
at a Convenience Store Located at 1716 Webster Street."" Adopted; and
(12-439B) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Sections 30-4.9A of the Alameda
Municipal Code Related to the C-C, Community Commercial Zone. Introduced.
The Acting City Planner gave a brief presentation and provided a revised resolution.
Councilmember Johnson inquired why the Zoning Text Amendment ordinance is part of
the same report as the appeal; stated that she does not think the ordinance should have
been part of the report; people looking at the report might not realize changes are being
made to the City's Zoning Ordinances.
The Acting City Planner responded the items are together because both were
generated by the Applicant's desire to redevelop; stated the Zoning Amendment is
necessary if the property owner is going to redevelop the site; the actions are separate.
Councilmember Johnson questioned whether notice people would expect the
ordinance change to would be part of a staff report on a project.
The Acting City Planner stated items could be separate in the future.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the Park Street Business Association (PSBA) weighed
in on the matter.
The Acting City Planner responded PSBA weighed in on the Zoning Text Amendment,
which changes the CC zoning and affects Park Street as well as Webster Street; stated
that he believes PSBA also supports the applicant's request to allow the alcohol sales.
Urged approval of the appeal and stated that it was unknown why the original restriction
on selling alcohol was present: Daniel Hoy, Project Architect, representing Delong Hu
In response to Councilmember Johnson's inquiry regarding the West Alameda Business
Association (WABA) opinion, Mr. Hoy stated WABA supports the appeal and would like
to see as many business opportunities on the street as possible.
Councilmember deHaan inquired about a Park Street project, to which the Acting City
Planner responded the project was a convenient store and issues were related to
cigarette sales.
Mayor Gilmore provided background information on the Park Street location; inquired
about neighbors' comments at Planning Board hearings.
The Acting City Planner responded neighbors were concerned about adding more
alcohol sales in that immediate neighborhood; neighbors noted there are a large
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
September 4, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-09-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-11-07,2,"(12-523) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Submit a Comment Letter
on the Proposed Plan for Operable Unit 2C at Alameda Point, Regarding Remedial
Action Alternatives, to the United States Navy.
The matter was addressed following City Manager Communications.
(*12-524) Ordinance No. 3058, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of the Lease with Bay Ship and
Yacht Corporation for an Initial Term of 20 Years, with Two 20 Year Options and a 6
Year Option, for a Total of 66 Years, for the Tideland Property Located at 2900 Main
#2100 and Surrounding Area."" Finally passed.
(*12-525) Ordinance No. 3059, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Section 1-5.4 (Liability for Costs) of Article V (Penalty Provisions; Enforcement) of
Chapter 1(General) to Provide Reciprocity in Provisions for Recovery of Attorneys'
Fees."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(12-526) Resolution No. 14745, ""Resolution of Intention to Approve an Amendment to
Contract Between the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement
System and the City Council, City of Alameda."" Adopted.
The Human Resources Senior Management Analyst gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Gilmore requested the cost savings be outlined.
The Senior Management Analyst stated the estimated cost savings is $499,000 to the
General Fund and $497,000 to all other funds over the term of the Memorandums of
Understanding.
Mayor Gilmore thanked the employees; stated the employee contribution is being
increased by 27%.
Vice Mayor Bonta inquired whether all bargaining units have agreed to the increase, to
which the Senior Management Analyst responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Johnson moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(12-527) The Senior Management Analyst announced an upcoming event to increase
awareness of the City's new non-smoking regulations and other future outreach.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
November 7, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-11-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-12-04,5,"(12-564) Resolution No. 14748, ""Directing Staff to Develop Two-Year Budgets for Fiscal
Years 2013-2015 and All Subsequent Two-Year Periods."" Adopted.
The Controller gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired how budget adjustments would be captured if the City moves to
a two-year budget.
The Controller responded staff would continue to provide quarterly reports to Council;
stated adjustments would be done mid-cycle in February or March; the two-year budget
allows for more long-term planning.
Mayor Gilmore noted a two-year budget requires more planning on the part of the
departments.
The Controller stated the time savings is one benefit; planning ahead causes fewer
adjustments in the second year.
Councilmember deHaan inquired how the City would track performance, to which the
Controller responded the City plans to hire consultants to develop performance
measures.
The City Manager stated what is going to be measured has to be prioritized to
determine where tax dollars would be spent; a two-year budget allows an opportunity to
review measures and provides department accountability; there are incentives not to
overspend; savings can be applied to the capital budget; employees have job security
for two years instead of one year.
Mayor Gilmore inquired about community, to which the City Manager responded people
would have the opportunity to discuss the things that matter to them and Council would
prioritize the items.
Councilmember deHaan inquired how performance measure goals tracking would be
reported to the Council, to which the Controller responded in the continuing quarterly
reports.
Councilmember deHaan inquired how shortfall adjustments would be made.
The Assistant City Manager responded fiscal discipline would have to be exerted to
prevent shortfalls; stated there are incentives to save and manage appropriately.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
4.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
December 4, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-12-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-12-04,6,"(12-565) Resolution No. 14749, ""Declaring Canvass of Returns and Results of
Consolidated General Municipal Election Held on Tuesday, November 6, 2012.""
Adopted.
The City Clerk gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
4.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(12-566) The City Manager announced a meeting would be held on December 11, 2012
to consider the public safety Memorandums of Understanding.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(12-567) Mayor Gilmore commended Public Works staff for preventing flooding during
the recent storm and responding promptly to a fallen tree on her street.
(12-568) Councilmember deHaan noted the condition of the golf course has improved.
Councilmember Johnson inquired whether the improvements are behind schedule, to
which the City Manager responded the driving range and the Miff are supposed to
happen in the first years so Greenway is on schedule.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:14 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
December 4, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-12-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-02-05,2,"(13-038) Jim Franz, Social Service Human Relations Board and Alameda Collaborative
for Youth their Families, read the Season for Non-Violence word of the day.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*13-039) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on January 2, 2013.
Approved.
(*13-040) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,854,413.78.
(*13-041) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Sport Court Tennis for Rehabilitation
of Tennis Courts (Various Locations), No. P.W. 05-11-10. Approved.
(*13-042) Resolution No. 14764, ""Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney for Island
City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2."" Adopted.
(*13-043) Resolution No. 14765, ""Appointing an Engineer and an Attorney for
Maintenance Assessment District 01-1 (Marina Cove).' Adopted.
(*13-044) Resolution No. 14766, ""Supporting Extended Producer Responsibility
Whereby Producers Assume Financial Responsibility for Management of Waste
Products."" Adopted.
(*13-045) Resolution No. 14767, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Apply to the State of
California Department of Boating and Waterways for a Grant to Renovate the Encinal
Boat Ramp Under the Harbor and Watercraft Revolving Fund."" Adopted.
(*13-046) Resolution No. 14768, ""Approving Workforce Changes in the City Manager's
Office to Eliminate One Deputy City Manager Position and Add One Assistant City
Manager Position."" Adopted.
(*13-047) Resolution No. 14769, ""Supporting Assembly Bill (AB) 59."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(13-048) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14770, ""Amending Resolution No.
12191 to Change Recreation and Parks Fees.""
The Recreation Director gave a brief presentation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
February 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-02-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-04-02,2,"(13-126) Ken Peterson, Alameda, discussed the budget; expressed concern over debt.
(13-127) Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association (PSBA), thanked the Fire
Department for the quick response to the fire at Park Street and San Jose Avenue.
(13-128) Jon Spangler, Alameda, encouraged everyone to attend the upcoming Meet
Your Public Officials event.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Gilmore announced that the iManage Document Management Software Contract
[paragraph no. 13-131], the resolution regarding Park Street Business Improvement
Area [paragraph no. 13-137], and the resolution regarding the Webster Street Business
Improvement Area [paragraph no. 13-138 were removed from the Consent Calendar
for discussion.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*13-129) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on March 5, 2013.
Approved.
(*13-130) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,522,047.76.
(13-131) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a
Contract in an Amount Not to Exceed $205,000 with Autonomy, a Hewlett Packard
Company, to Purchase it's iManage Document Management Software for the City's
Electronic Records Management and Retention Program.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the three related contracts would be brought to Council
at a later time; stated, in the past, contracts which should have been one single contract
were broken up to avoid Council approval; requested the contracts be briefly explained.
The Assistant City Manager stated the contracts were mentioned in the report because
the contracts are related; there is no intention to divide contracts into pieces to fall under
the City Manager signing authority; the matter tonight is regarding Hewlett Packard
Autonomy, which is a product being purchased off the shelf; the other contracts are for
consultants; one consultant, RCS Network Solutions, will design and prepare the
program for $30,000; the other is for Innovative Computing Systems for approximately
$36,000 to install the program on computers; that he would be happy to provide reports
on the Consent Calendar even though not required; the contracts and numbers were
included to show the full cost of electronic records management.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
April 2, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-04-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-04-02,6,"(13-140 A) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Contract Between the Board of
Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City
Council of the City of Alameda to Provide the Option for Local Fire Members to
Purchase Service Credit for Permanent Career Civilian Federal Firefighter or
Permanent Career State Firefighter Service. Introduced.
The Assistant City Manager gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Daysog stated he was a little confused by the item; inquired whether
the provision would apply to firefighters who came from the Naval Air Station (NAS) and
whether the provision would allow federal service years to count towards retirement.
The Assistant City Manager responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the NAS closed in 1996; the issue was addressed in
the 2011 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU); inquired why the matter took so long
to arise.
The Assistant City Manager responded the matter was negotiated; stated the firefighters
had to request including the amendment in the MOU, which was negotiated back in
2011.
The City Manager stated the matter was one of many issues discussed for years which
sat at loggerhead; the matter was finally resolved in 2011; the subject came up again
and again in negotiations and just had not gone anywhere.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired about an exhibit amended December 31, 2012 which
references the Housing Authority.
The Senior Management Analyst responded a previous PERS contract amendment
removed the Housing Authority; stated Section 11J has been added.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Council is only addressing Section 11J
addressing public service credit for career federal/state firefighter service, to which the
Senior Management Analyst responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Chen inquired whether the matter was approved by the previous
Council in the 2011 MOU, to which the Senior Management Analyst responded in the
affirmative.
Councilmember Chen inquired whether the vote was unanimous, to which the Senior
Management Analyst responded that she did not know.
Councilmember Chen inquired whether the eligible 15 to 20 employees would have to
purchase the service credit, to which the Senior Management Analyst responded in the
affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
April 2, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-04-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-04-02,9,"(13-141 A) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Various Sections of the Alameda
Municipal Code Contained in Chapter XXX (Development Regulations) Related to the
North Park Street Planning Area. Introduced; and
(13-141 B) Resolution No. 14789, ""Approving Citywide Design Manual Amendments.
(This project regulates development within the area bounded by the Oakland-Alameda
Estuary, Tilden Way, Lincoln Avenue, and Oak Street). Adopted.
*
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft and Councilmember Tam left the dais at 8:14 p.m. and
returned at 8:16 p.m.
The City Planner gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Chen stated the issue is not just height limit, but is also aesthetic; the
area is the gateway to Alameda and is what visitors see coming across the Park Street
bridge; the height limit is coming down from 100 feet to 60 feet; inquired why the old
zoning allowed 100 feet.
The City Planner responded the height is really a reflection of changing attitudes; the
1960 General Plan for Alameda has beautiful drawings, which are almost Jetson style
showing 10-story office buildings and shopping districts all the way down Park Street
with a bridge from the South Shore end of Park Street across to South San Francisco;
there was a totally different vision of what the people of Alameda thought Alameda
should be; throughout all of the East Bay, and probably California, the 1970s
environmental movement, Save the Bay, the realization of environmental impacts and
constricting development completely changed attitudes about what is appropriate
development, but the changing to zoning very often lags; Measure A immediately put a
halt to multi-types of development; completing the zoning has taken 6 years.
Councilmember Chen stated that he understands the importance of economic
development; the gateway district is a beginning to help generate sales tax that the City
lost when car dealerships closed; he does not want Alameda to turn into a Bay Street
like Emeryville with 60 feet building on both sides of the street, which becomes a tunnel;
inquired what safeguards are in place in the event developers want to build rows of 60
foot buildings along Park Street.
The City Planner responded one thing that does not change over time very often is
parcel size; provided an example of large parcels in Jack London Square, which do not
require accumulation of multiple properties to create a pad; stated one large parcel
allows a big building; there are only a handful of sites to that would fit parking and
tenants and banks requirements for a 60 foot building on Park Street; having a whole
row of 60 foot buildings down Park Street is highly unlikely because of lot patterns; the
economics on Park Street are not there; in the past 10 years, not one single developer
has proposed a 6 to 10 story building; the economics in the area do not support such
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
April 2, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-04-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-04-02,15,"(13-142) Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of considering the recommendation
to implement the Biological Opinion [paragraph no. 13-144 after 10:30 p.m.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
*
Encouraged including a green area and the height limit be set at 40 foot with an
exception to go higher: Trish Spencer, Alameda.
Urged Island High be designated for green space: Joe DiDonato, Alameda.
Mayor Gilmore stated there is a lot of concern about the 60 foot height limit being
allowed as a right; requested an explanation of the interplay between having a 60 foot
height limit as a right and design review; inquired what prevents the City from getting a
square block building.
The City Planner responded the concept of by right is not being used correctly; stated
technically, the City does not have anything by right because every building has to go
through a discretionary design review process; the issue arises all the time with
residential construction; the City has a 30 foot height limit; large, unsightly designs
come in and people argue meeting the 30 foot height limit requires approval; staff
explains design review approval is needed, that findings must be made that the design
is appropriate for the site, creates good transitions for the neighboring buildings and the
house needs to be 25 feet to make the findings for design review even though the
height limit is 30 feet; staff would have to make findings to approve a 60 foot building;
somebody cannot just build a box because it meets the height limit.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether people might not come in with a 60 foot building
proposal due to not wanting to waste time by being at the height limit.
The City Planner responded in the affirmative; stated currently, developers come in and
ask what the City will approve; developers do not want to spend time and money going
after a wild goose chase if the project is not going to be approved; setting the height
limit at 40 feet sends the message that the City is not interested in any building over
said height even if the project is beautifully designed.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the objective of sending a message would
be better realized by having guidelines in writing similar to Santa Cruz, which outline the
criteria to go beyond perhaps a 50 foot height limit; stated the counter staff are
individuals; there are variations; from her time on the Planning Board, she understood
people who do not hear what they want from one Planner, come back another day and
ask for another Planner.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
15
April 2, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-04-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-04-02,21,"(13-144) Recommendation to Implement the Biological Opinion on the Proposed Naval
Air Station Alameda Disposal and Reuse Project by Approving (1) a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) by and between the United States of America, Acting by and
through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the City of Alameda for Funding
of the Predator Management Plan; and (2) a Memorandum of Agreement by and
between the United States of America, Acting by and through the Department of
Veterans Affairs and the City of Alameda for Implementing Lighting Measures for the
Protection of the Endangered Least Tern.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the MOU with US Fish and Wildlife Service pledges an
adequate funding mechanism to ensure predator management activities are provided in
perpetuity from March 25th through August 5th, the breeding season; however, February
27th is also mentioned; the City also entered into an agreement with the US Department
of Agriculture (USDA) to preform predatory management activities for the next three
years; inquired whether the City has funding responsibility in perpetuity, to which the
Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the affirmative.
In response to Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's further inquiry, the Chief Operating Officer -
Alameda Point stated the contract with USDA would come back to Council assuming it
could be continued.
Councilmember Tam stated the estimated annual cost is $24,500; a 30-day reserve is
required; funds come from lease revenues, not the General Fund; inquired whether the
funds would come from lease revenue in perpetuity; and whether lease revenues would
not continue in perpetuity.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded a provision in the MOU
contemplates transfer of the obligation to a third party subject to a review by the US
Fish and Wildlife Service, which would want an endowment or some sort of agreement
with a private entity ensuring that predator management services would be provided in
perpetuity; the City has to go through an additional negotiation, which US Fish and
Wildlife Service knows is likely to happen.
Councilmember Chen stated the two MOU's agree to predator management; inquired
whether $24,000 is the total cost of the management or just the City's portion.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the amount is just the City's
portion; stated the VA would have a contract to manage its parcel and the colony; the
MOU ensures that the City would not have predators on its property that are creating a
potential threat to the least terns.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
21
April 2, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-04-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-04-16,15,"(13-180) The City Manager announced dates for an upcoming brokerage event, the
budget sessions, a meeting addressing backyard farm animals and the website
conversion.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(13-181) Mayor Gilmore announced that she, the Vice Mayor and a Planning Board
member attended a hearing regarding changing the composition of the Water
Emergency Task Force Board.
Councilmember Chen inquired whether the seat is for Alameda County or the City of
Alameda, to which Mayor Gilmore responded the City.
Councilmember Tam stated one seat is represented by a person from Alameda, but the
seat is not specifically assigned to Alameda.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the proposal is to allocate three seats to three
counties, and does not include Alameda County; some proposed counties do not even
have ferry service yet.
The City Manager stated Alameda contributes more than half of the fare box revenues;
Alameda is the only city of its size in the County that does not have an interstate
highway; WETA was formed primarily out of City of Alameda assets; WETA has always
had a City of Alameda member on the board; more ferries would be good, but
eliminating Alameda's representation is bad public policy.
(13-182) Councilmember Tam announced that she attended the League of California
Cities meeting and was appointed to the task force reviewing California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) reform; Statewide efforts to ban plastic bags were reviewed to
ensure the law does not preempt local county ordinances like the stopwaste.org just
adopted.
(13-183) Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced the upcoming League of Women Voters
""Meet Your Public Officials"" event.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
15
April 16, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-04-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-05-07,2,"(13-199) Vicky Hines, Alameda, noted many Nelson Marine tenants are on the East Coast
and have not been contacted; PM Realty would not provide rent receipts and has not
cashed cashiers checks, which will no longer be good.
(13-200) Jim Franz, Alameda Collaborative for Children Youth and Families and Social
Service Human Relations Boards, made an announcement regarding the Annual Harvey
Milk Day Celebration.
(13-201) Kenneth Peterson, Alameda, discussed the budget.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Gilmore announced that the Resolution for Island City Landscaping and Lighting
District 84-2 [paragraph no. 13-206 and the Ordinance Amending the Contract Between
the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System
[paragraph no. 13-218 were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*13-202) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on April 2, 2013. Approved.
(*13-203) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,254,022.35.
(*13-204) Recommendation to Authorize Call for Bids for Legal Advertising for the Fiscal
Year Ending June 30, 2014. Accepted.
(*13-205) Recommendation to Approve a First Amendment to the Landscape Maintenance
Management Agreement with Marina Village Commercial Association in the Amount of
$544,436 for the Maintenance of the Landscape and Lighting District, Zone 6, Marina
Village. Not heard.
(13-206) Resolution No. 14795, ""Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring the
City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for Notice
of Public Hearing on June 18, 2013 - Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2.'
Adopted.
The Public Works Administrative Services Manager gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Chen inquired if sidewalk cleaning would be provided outside the seven
zones.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
May 7, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-05-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-05-07,16,"(13-234) Michael John Torrey announced an upcoming ham radio event and passed on
Mother's Day regards.
(13-235) Captain Scott Rhoads discussed activities at Nelson Marine.
(13-236) Former Councilmember Lil Arnerich, Alameda, provided a handout and
expressed concern about Comcast not providing accurate contact information.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(13-237) Councilmember Tam announced that she attended the Economic Development
Alliance briefing along with Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft and Chen.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 11:17 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
16
May 7, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-05-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-05-21,8,"(13-260) Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended: the Annual Affordable
Housing Week kickoff in Oakland on May 10th; the ribbon cutting of Park Alameda, which
is on the former Islander Motel site, on May 15th; and the Harvey Milk Celebration at
Encinal High School on May 20th.
Councilmember Tam stated soon-to-be Interim Police Chief was also in attendance;
several of the organizers and community members expressed appreciation for the
Alameda Police Department's presence and indicated they are reassured that the Police
Department will be there when there is a hate crime.
(13-261) Councilmember Chen announced a flag raising ceremony on June 8th recognizing
Filipino Independence Day.
(13-262) Councilmember Daysog announced that he attended the Not Your Mothers
Garden Party hosted by the Alameda Point Collaborative.
(13-263) Mayor Gilmore announced that she attended the annual International Council of
Shopping Centers conference in Los Vegas; the Alameda Landing project got a huge
boost as Target is slated to open in October 2013; she met with several Alameda Landing
retail tenants; the following businesses indicated stores would be opening in Alameda:
Corner Bakery Cafe, Michaels, Safeway, Sleep Train and Habit Burger Grill; stated
additional business indicated a desire to locate in Alameda, but deals are not finalized.
The City Manager stated Catellus plans on completing construction of all Phase 1
buildings by mid-2014.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:57 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
May 21, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-05-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-07-02,4,"(13-334) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a License
Agreement with Antiques By the Bay, Inc., for Five Years in the Northwest Territories
Located at 2900 Navy Way at Alameda Point. Introduced.
The Economic Development Division Manager gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Chen stated Antiques by the Bay is truly a destination spot, a regional
draw for Alameda; his relatives who live in Canada come to Alameda once a month just
to attend the antiques faire.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the City receives sales tax from the Antiques
Fair, to which the Economic Development Division Manager responded staff is working
on trying to capture as much as possible; the sales tax is based on where each vendor
booth is registered.
Councilmember Daysog stated the faire is fabulous for Alameda and draws people
throughout the Bay Area and beyond.
The Economic Development Division Manager noted approximately 13,140 booklets are
distributed detailing the faire; staff is considering advertising in the booklet in order to
provide economic information to 13,140 people.
Councilmember Daysog moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilmember Chen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(13-335) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending Section 30-2
of the Alameda Municipal Code to Allow Cottage Food Operations as Required by
Assembly Bill 1616 and Allow All Home Occupations to Include Up to One Employee
and Delete Reference to Excessive Pedestrian Traffic. Introduced.
The Supervising Planner gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Tam extended her appreciation to staff for getting
ahead of the issue and ensuring the City has guidelines in place to give clarity to those
making added income by working from home.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(13-336) Adoption of Resolution_Establishing Integrated Waste Collection Ceiling Rates
and Service Fees for Alameda County Industries, Inc. for Rate Period 12 (July 2013 to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
July 2, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-07-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-07-23,8,"(13-365) Introduction of Ordinance Approving and Authorizing a Purchase and Sale
Agreement with Catellus Alameda Retail, LLC and Joint Escrow Instructions for Sale of
Remnant Parcel. Introduced.
The Acting Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the property transfer tax for City owned land is
based on the appraised value, and whether Catellus would pay the tax.
The Acting Community Development Director responded the appraised value would be
used for the property value on the tax rolls.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the matter is addressed in Paragraph 6/1 of the closing
procedures.
The Acting Community Development Director read the paragraph: ""Buyer shall pay all
closing costs, escrow fees, recording costs and all City and County documented
transfer taxes payable in connection with the purchase and sale of the Remnant Parcel.
Buyer shall pay all premiums for the Title Policy, including costs of additional
endorsements and surveys.'
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the amount is based on the one dollar sale price or the
appraised value; stated documentary transfer tax can be read as the nominal fee paid to
record the deed of trust as opposed to a transfer tax which is often thousands of dollars.
The Acting Community Development Director responded the reference says City and
County documentary transfer taxes, so she believes the City's transfer tax is included.
Mayor Gilmore stated the term ""documentary"" gives her pause.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the amount is based on the sale price.
Councilmember Tam stated the question is whether the amount is one dollar or
$120,000.
The Finance Director stated documentary transfer tax is the transfer tax; both the
County and City are mentioned because the county component is $1.10 per thousand
and the City's rate is $15 per thousand.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the amount is based on the one dollar purchase price
or the appraised value.
The City Attorney responded that she does not know if the matter was negotiated;
stated the amount should be based on the full amount; $120,000 is the value; one dollar
is being paid, but the benefit is $120,000, so the purchase price is $120,000.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
July 23, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-07-23.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-07-23,23,"(13-369) Recommendation to Endorse Comments on Alameda Point Conceptual
Planning Guide.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Guide is really fun to read; the staff report noted
the document represents 17 years of previous planning documents and efforts; the City
has been working on the issue for a long time; moving forward is exciting; compressive
planning information has gone into the Guide; the Planning Board has suggested
specific changes to the Guide; one suggestion was to add language to clarify parks and
open space are to be used for employees as well as residents; requested an
explanation.
In response, the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated the Guide specifically
states parks are for residents; stated a Planning Board member noted parks are also for
employees; another solution would be to take out language about parks being for
residents since parks are for everyone.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted the Recreation and Parks Director's presentation
tonight revealed parks are used by residents more than nonresidents, but parks are
open for everybody; stated the list of stakeholders includes the West Alameda Business
Association (WABA), commercial and residential development professionals, Alameda
Point commercial tenants, and others; inquired why the Park Street Business
Association (PSBA) is a stakeholder.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded both WABA and the Chamber
of Commerce were included; stated PSBA was added just to be as inclusive as possible
and to have all business associations involved in the process.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted Park Street is a long way away; stated broad-based
community outreach will use the website, social media and editorial board briefings in
both the print and online media; listed media groups; questioned whether other journals,
such as the San Francisco Chronicle, East Bay Business Times, and San Francisco
Business Times, should be included; stated the net should be cast wider than the City
limits to attract potential businesses and investors; that she is pleased there is room for
new architecture in new areas while the historic nature of the historical zone would be
respected; the Guide talks about business retention and attraction and notes initially,
compromises need to be made to retain and attract business; inquired what is meant by
compromises needing to be made initially.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded one idea was regarding parking
pricing; stated transit use is encouraged in areas which have high parking demand;
customers might not want to go to a retail location which charges for parking; charging
for parking initially would only discourage people from going to the location; including
parking pricing in the City's tool kit could be used to address concerns regarding
successfully attracting retail customers long term.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
22
July 23, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-07-23.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-07-23,26,"(13-371) The City Manager announced an upcoming National Night Out would be held
on August 2nd. addressed an article regarding Marina View Towers; stated eviction
notice were given in order to complete a seismic retrofit; announced the Joint City
Council and Planning Board meeting would be held on September 25th.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether an agenda would be posted, to which the
City Manager responded in the affirmative.
The City Manager stated Councilmembers would receive the agenda, which would also
be sent to various regional agencies to ensure everyone sees what the City is doing.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(13-372) Consideration of Mayor's Appointment to the Rent Review Advisory
Committee.
Mayor Gilmore appointed Royl Roberts to the Rent Review Advisory Committee.
(13-373) Councilmember Chen announced that he would be holding a National Night
Out event at his home.
(13-374) Councilmember Tam announced that she went to San Diego and was
appointed to the Board of the League of California Cities.
(13-375) Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended a ribbon cutting at the
Alameda County Family Justice Center celebrating a new pop-up library.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 11:21 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
25
July 23, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-07-23.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-09-17,18,"(13-416) Councilmember Tam stated that she and Councilmember Daysog attended a
neighborhood watch meeting at Bayport; residents are impressed with the Police
Department; reviewed crime statistics; commended the Police Department.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 10:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
13
September 17, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-09-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-10-01,7,"(13-443) Recommendation to Amend the Consultant Contract in the Amount of
$110,000 to Anchor Engineering for Inspection Services Related to the Alameda
Landing Development.
The Assistant Engineer gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired why the original amount is being exceeded.
The Assistant Engineer responded an additional inspector was needed to meet the
opening date of the Target Store and for backbone infrastructure; stated the City will be
reimbursed by Catellus.
***
Councilmember Tam left the dais at 9:09 p.m. and returned at 9:11 p.m.
* *
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(*13-444) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Rosas Brothers Construction for
Repair of Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway, and Minor
Street Patching, Fiscal Year 2012-13, Phase 13, No. P.W. 04-12-08. Accepted.
(13-445) Resolution No. 14863, ""Amending the City of Alameda Executive Management
(EXME) Compensation Plan to Include Finance Director, and Amending the EXME
Salary Schedule to Establish the Finance Director Salary Range and Modify the Chief of
Police and Fire Chief Salary Ranges."" Adopted.
The Interim Human Resources Manager gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Chen stated that he would like the language of the resolution to be
amended to reflect that compaction issues should be brought back to the Council.
The Interim Human Resources Manager responded future salary increases have
already been negotiated and scheduled.
Councilmember Chen moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion.
Under discussion, the City Clerk noted a revised resolution was provided; inquired
whether the motion is to adopt the revised resolution.
Councilmembers Chen and Tam responded in the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
October 1, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-10-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-10-01,10,"(13-448) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease
Amendment with Turn Key Show Productions, for Two Years in Building 459 Located at
101 West Tower Avenue at Alameda Point. Not heard.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(13-449) The City Manager announced a public forum would be held on Sunday
October 13, from 1:00-3:00 p.m. at the Main Library to address health care reform.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(13-450) Spoke in favor of renewing the Joint Use Agreement with the School District
for the pools: Mary McGrath, Alameda; James Pixton, Charles Lucson, Islanders; Bob
Radecke, Alameda Island Aquatics and Encinal High Swim Team; Tim and Annie
Connors, Alameda Aquatics Swimmer; Linda Gilchrist, Alameda;; Kyle Baldie, Alameda;
Don Krause, Alameda.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(13-451) Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she and the Mayor attended a
groundbreaking for the Walgreens on Park Street.
(13-452) Councilmember Daysog suggested that the City establish two committees or
commissions to address: 1) budget advisory and 2) streets and sidewalks.
(13-453) Councilmember Chen read a letter he wrote to the Fire Department.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 10:19 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
October 1, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-10-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-10-15,4,"(13-469) Adoption of Resolution_Authorizing the City Manager to Acquire Temporary
Construction Easements in Relation to the Sewer Pump Station Renovations for
Reliability and Safety Improvements Project (All Groups). Not heard.
(13-470) Resolution No. 14864, ""Urging Congress to Enact Comprehensive Immigration
Reform."" Adopted.
Councilmember Chen gave a brief presentation.
State the symbolic gesture sends a message to Congress: Terry Sandoval, SAIU-
ULTCW.
Councilmember Chen moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(*13-471) Ordinance No. 3079, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending
Chapter 2 (Administration) Article Il (Boards And Commissions) by Repealing Section 2-
15; Amending Section 2-19.2(A), to Dissolve the Economic Development Commission
(EDC) and to Revise the Membership of the Commission On Disability Issues (CDI).'
Finally Passed.
(*13-472) Ordinance No. 3080, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease Amendment with
GFC Moving and Storage, Inc. dba All City Moving North American Van Lines for Two
Years in Building 170 Located at 1770 Viking Street at Alameda Point."" Finally Passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(13-473) Recommendation to Acknowledge the Rent Increase Concerns at 1645 Park
Street and Authorize the Mayor to Send a Letter Encouraging the Owner to Comply with
the Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC) Recommendations.
The Housing Authority Development Manager and RRAC Chair gave a brief
presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired how long the $400 per month rent had been in place before the
increase.
The RRAC Chair responded 20 years; stated the tenant, Ron Jackson, has been in the
building for 21 years; his original rent was around $200; Mr. Jackson did maintenance
work in exchange for reduced rent; the rent was increased from $200 to $400 before
and is now increasing from $400 to $600.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if there was a written agreement between the tenant
and the landlord regarding maintenance work being done to reduce the rent.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
October 15, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-10-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-11-05,3,"(13-501) Resolution No. 14869, ""Amend Master Fee Resolution No. 12191 to Revise
the Community Development Department, Public Works Department, and Fire
Department Fee Schedules."" Adopted.
The Building Official gave a brief presentation; outlined proposed changes to the
appeals fee.
Councilmember Tam inquired why the Planning and Building Department's
recommendation is still short of the full cost recovery.
The Building Official responded there is not a full cost recovery because of the reduction
in fees for solar permits and online permits.
Councilmember Tam inquired why the Public Works and Fire Departments are also
recommending less than full cost recovery.
The Public Works Administrative Services Manager responded Public Works chose an
85% cost recovery and would move full cost recovery in phases fashion so the
increases are not too steep; there is subsidy from other funds.
Councilmember Tam inquired if the Fire Department would also phase cost recovery.
The Fire Chief responded in the affirmative; stated the Department looked at the
proposed fees and does not think the consultant's recommendation is appropriate; a
majority of the Department's fees are direct costs on businesses; increasing inspection
fees would impose an undue burden on businesses; the Department chose an
appropriate 50% level, which is an industry standard and comparable to other cities.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Fire Department charges a fine for reporting false
fire alarms; she supports the idea of phasing; inquired whether Palo Alto was included
in the fee comparison in order to raise the average.
Greta Davis, NBS Consulting, responded there was a consensus between Planning and
Building and Public Works staff to select the cities included in the fee comparison;
stated selection of cities for the fee comparison is based on like-jurisdictions in terms of
proximity, population, and land development issues, not whether a city is progressive or
has high fees.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if staff selected Palo Alto, to which Ms. Davis
responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if median income and median residential prices have
been taken into account, to which Ms. Davis responded in the negative; stated specific
demographic information was not considered.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
November 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-11-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-01-07,2,"(14-007) Public Hearing to Consider Approving the Housing and Community
Development Needs Statement for the Community Development Block (CDBG) Grant
Annual Plan for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014-15.
The Housing Program Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the City received $1 million last year, to
which the Housing Program Manager responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the funds have been spent, to which the
Housing Program Manager responded the money is still being spent; stated the
program is in the second quarter.
In response to Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry regarding funding additional items,
the Housing Program Manager stated public services have a funding cap, which cannot
be exceeded; unfunded items fall under public services.
Councilmember Tam stated the City's allocation was cut by about 17% last year and an
additional 5% is being cut this year; inquired whether the cuts total approximately 22%,
to which the Housing Program Manager responded in the affirmative; stated a 5% cut is
expected this year.
Councilmember Tam stated the only programs being funded are safety net services;
inquired whether the City has noticed the impact of not having funding for other
programs.
The Housing Program Manager responded in the affirmative; noted job training is being
funded using economic development category funds.
Councilmember Daysog stated the City could use additional funding for housing;
however, he appreciates how funds are being spent on housing.
Councilmember Chen stated that he likes the homeless prevention services; expressed
his appreciation to staff and the Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB).
Stated times are tough; outlined funding cuts; stated the cuts have resulted in an
increase in Police psychiatric hold calls; the City is doing wonderful things with limited
resources and provided an example: Doug Biggs, SSHRB.
Stated Echo Housing provides counseling for tenants, education for tenants and
landlords and reconciliation services; the importance of housing counseling services
should be considered: Marjorie Rocha, Echo Housing.
Stated the shelter would not be open without receiving CDBG funding; provided an
example of funding being leveraged: Liz Varela, Building Futures with Women and
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
January 7, 2013",CityCouncil/2014-01-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-01-07,6,"(14-009 B) Adoption of Resolution Calling Special Election within the City of Alameda
Community Facilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District);
(14-009 C) Conduct Special Election;
(14-009 D) Adoption of Resolution Declaring Results of Special Election and Directing
Recording of Notice of Special Tax Lien Alameda Landing Municipal Services District;
and
(14-009 E) Introduction of Ordinance Levying Special Taxes within the City of Alameda
Community Facilities District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District).
The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Gilmore opened the Public Hearing and continued the matter to February 4,
2014.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
None.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(14-010) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Housing Authority
Board of Commissioners (HABOC).
Mayor Gilmore nominated John McCahan for appointment to the HABOC.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
January 7, 2013",CityCouncil/2014-01-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-03-18,3,"(14-089) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period
Ending December 31, 2013 Collected During the Period July to September 30, 2013.
The Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam inquired if the high leakage rate of discount department stores will
shrink now that Alameda has a Target, to which the Finance Director responded in the
affirmative; stated Target is a huge plus to reducing leakage and the hope is Alameda
will have more department stores.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
- 5.
(*14-090) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ended
December 31, 2013. Accepted.
(*14-091) Recommendation to Accept the Work of MCK, Inc. for Repair and
Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 32, No. P.W. 11-12-20. Accepted.
(14-092) Recommendation to 1) Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement
with Alameda Babe Ruth Baseball League to Provide the Operations and Maintenance
for the College of Alameda Baseball Field, in an Amount Not to Exceed $150,000; 2)
Approve an Appropriation from the General Fund for the Hardball Field Budget, in an
Amount Not to Exceed $35,000; and 3) Authorize the Transfer of the Hardball Field
Equipment to Alameda Babe Ruth Baseball.
The Recreation Director gave a brief presentation.
The City Manager noted the agreement before the Council tonight will end a 17-year
long dispute between the City and the community college district over water bills.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether the $150,000 the City will pay over the next five
years for the baseball field is in addition to the $124,000 the City is already paying.
The Recreation Director responded in the affirmative; stated the $124,000 annual
budget to maintain the hard ball field includes full time staff, leaving $15,000; the
General Fund would provide a $35,000 supplement to help make the first $50,000
payment; net savings would not happen until year three.
Stated Babe Ruth has a big task to cover costs; that she will seek grants; the quality of
the field allows the City to host tournaments; noted the College will pay for water: Pat
Bail, Babe Ruth Baseball.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
March 18, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-03-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-03-18,13,"(14-101) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations for Appointment to the Housing
Authority Board of Commissioners.
Mayor Gilmore nominated Fayleen Allen, Cullen Jones, and Stuart Rickard for
reappointment to the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 11:17 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
March 18, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-03-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-05-06,3,"(14-160) Alameda Museum Annual Report on the Meyers House and Garden.
Judith Lynch, Alameda Museum President, gave a Power Point presentation and
submitted information.
(14-161) Greenway Golf 2014 Annual Report for the Chuck Corica Golf Complex.
George Kelley and Marc Logan, Greenway Golf, gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Gilmore stated the feedback from the golf community has been positive; inquired
about work on the slough.
Mr. Logn responded only preliminary work has been done.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she volunteered at the 87th Commuters
tournament; the Golf Course is a wonderful resource.
Councilmember Tam commended Greenway for the design innovations that have
resulted in using almost 100% recycled water and a 40% reduction in water use;
inquired whether there are any challenges that require the City's assistance.
Mr. Logan responded City staff has been responsive whenever anything arises;
Greenway believes the next phase will be completed without any hiccups.
(14-162) The City Attorney introduced the newly hired Assistant City Attorney.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(14-163) Peter Fletcher, Harbor Bay Neighbors, submitted information; expressed
opposition to Harbor Bay Isle Associates plans to build a new club.
(14-164) Bob Shannon, Harbor Bay Club Member and Alameda resident, spoke in
support of relocating the Harbor Bay Club.
(14-165) Catherine Veerwidth, Harbor Bay Club Member and Alameda resident,
discussed changes at the Harbor Bay Club; stated the space has been outgrown and
needs to be updated.
(14-166) Kathy Moehring, Harbor Bay Group of Companies, read from a letter Harbor
Bay's Legal Counsel wrote dated April 24, 2014 discussing the Harbor Bay Isle Project.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Gilmore announced that the Resolution regarding Island City Landscaping and
Lighting District [paragraph no. 14-170]; the Resolution regarding Leydecker Park
[paragraph no. 14-173]; and the Ordinance [paragraph no. 14-174 were removed from
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
May 6, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-05-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-05-20,15,"(14-214) The City Manager announced a ceremony was held to honor the re-opening of
the Mif Golf Course today; urged everyone play the new course; announced a service
would be held on Memorial Day at 11:00 a.m.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(14-215) Mayor Gilmore announced that she attended the shopping center convention;
an announcement about potential retailers would be made sometime soon.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 11:11 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 20, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-05-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-06-03,8,"(14-244) Councilmember Chen inquired whether street names are approved by Council.
The City Clerk stated the policy would be forwarded to Council tomorrow.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 8:53 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 3, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-06-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-06-03,11,"(14-247 CC/14-008 SACIC) Resolution No. 14931, ""Approving and Adopting the Mid-
Cycle Update to the Operating and Capital Budget for Fiscal Years 2013-2014 and
2014-2015."" Adopted.
The Assistant City Manager and Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
In response to Mayor Gilmore's inquiry, the Finance Director stated Memorandums of
Understanding (MOUs) have two parts addressing vacation payouts: 1) employees'
balances paid upon leaving the City, and 2) employees can cash out a certain number
of hours as long as two weeks of vacation is used.
The Assistant City Manager added the vacation cash out is so that employees will not
continue to hit accrual caps; vacation extensions are no longer granted.
The Finance Director continued the presentation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the recently hired lobbyist is included in the
budget for staff advocacy in Washington D.C., to which the Assistant City Manager
responded in the negative; stated the staff advocacy budget is in addition to the lobbyist
and will be used for staff trips to Washington, D.C.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if the $50,000 staff advocacy budget is for a year's
worth of staff travel, to which the Assistant City Manager responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Chen inquired whether the staff advocacy budget is for future trips, to
which the Assistant City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated more trips are
expected this year.
In response to Councilmember Chen's inquiry, the Assistant City Manager stated all
trips will require City Manager approval.
The City Manager stated Alameda's representatives in Washington, D.C. will direct
staff; there are changes in the activity level; Alameda's representatives are more
aggressive in chasing federal funding.
The Assistant City Manager continued the presentation.
***
Councilmember Tam left the dais at 9:14 p.m. and returned at 9:16 p.m.
***
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what type of water savings measures the Recreation
and Parks Department is taking.
Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and Successor Agency
to the Community Improvement Commission
2
June 3, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-06-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-07-15,4,"(14-321) Ordinance No. 3102, ""Adopting Initiative Measure to Amend City of Alameda
General Plan Including the 2007-2014 Housing Element and the Zoning Ordinance to
Classify Approximately 3.899 Acres of Land Adjacent to Mckay Avenue to Open
Space."" Finally passed.
Mayor Gilmore proposed striking Section b) of the Fiscal Responsibility Ordinance to
ensure the General Fund is not at risk; stated Section b) makes reference to the use of
the General Fund to pay for any judgments against the City in the event of a lawsuit.
Councilmember Daysog stated there are limited resources and the Council needs to
prioritize; that he developed Section b) as a third approach; raising property taxes does
not adequately reflect the will of the voters; there may have to be cuts in services to
cover any outstanding fiscal issues; fulfilling the people's wishes is a challenge.
Councilmember Chen inquired how the City would pay for a lawsuit settlement if Section
b) is deleted.
Councilmember Tam noted the Fiscal Responsibility Ordinance states a vote of the
electorate could authorize any new revenues to pay for a judgment associated with a
lawsuit; there are options, including selling the property to a third party, which includes
the East Bay Regional Parks District (EBRPD); in 2008, EBRPD raised funds under
Measure WW to pay for the property and to pay for any judgment.
Councilmember Chen stated he likes the proposed options; inquired whether there is
enough Measure WW money to cover potential liability if the City is sued.
The City Manager responded the City does not know and the question should be posed
to the EBRPD; stated Measure WW has approximately $4.4 million allocated to
Alameda.
Councilmember Chen stated that he would like to ensure there is enough funds in
Measure WW to pay for a judgment in the event of a lawsuit; inquired whether Election
Code Section 9217 directly conflicts with the Fiscal Responsibility Ordinance.
The City Attorney responded a conflict of the Fiscal Responsibility Ordinance would
have to be determined in Court; stated Election Code 9217 provides that the Council
cannot modify or repeal a measure that is put in place by a voter initiative; if the Council
finally approves the initiative tonight, it retains the flavor of being a voter initiative; the
Fiscal Responsibility Ordinance is not a repeal or modification of the initiative, it is
intended specifically as a companion measure and to be consistent; the companion
measure does not do anything and only goes into effect if a lawsuit is brought within 120
days of its effectiveness; at which time the Council would have the ability to take certain
actions; the Fiscal Responsibility Ordinance does not require the Council to take action,
nor does it automatically put provisions into effect; therefore, the Fiscal Responsibility
Ordinance is not inconsistent.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
July 15, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-07-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-09-16,2,"(14-377) Vicky Yoshimura, Alameda, expressed concern over speeding on Maitland
Drive; urged traffic calming, including additional crosswalks and bikelanes.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Gilmore announced that accepting the work of Fort Bragg [paragraph no. 14-383]
was withdrawn from the agenda.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*14-378) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on July 15,
2014; and the Special Joint City Council and City of Alameda Financing Authority
Meeting Held on July 29, 2014. Approved.
(*14-379) Ratified bills in the amount of $6,124,432.42.
(*14-380) Recommendation to Accept a Report on Proposed Changes to the Police
Department's Draft Policy of the Use of Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs).
Accepted.
(*14-381) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $360,000, to Ellis and
Ellis Sign Systems for Alameda Point Temporary Wayfinding Signage Program.
Accepted.
(*14-382) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement
with CSG Consultants, Inc. for Professional Plan Review Services for the Term of 12
Months for a Not to Exceed Contract of $200,000. Accepted.
(*14-383) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Fort Bragg Electric, Inc. for the
Group 1 - Sewer Pump Station Renovations for Reliability and Safety Improvements
Project, No. P.W. 04-13-11. Not heard.
(*14-384) Ordinance No. 3104, ""Levying Special Taxes within City of Alameda
Community Facilities District No. 14-1 (Marina Cove II)."" Finally passed.
(*14-385) Ordinance No. 3105, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a First Lease Amendment
with Walashek Industrial & Marine, Inc. for Twelve Months in Building 517 Located at
150 West Trident at Alameda Point."" Finally passed.
(*14-386) Ordinance No. 3106, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 16, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-09-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-09-16,16,"(14-397) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Negotiate and Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a
Lease with Watertight Restoration, Inc. for Three Years in a Portion of Building 43
Located at 2440 Monarch Street, Suite 200 at Alameda Point. Continued to October 7,
2014.
(14-398) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Negotiate and Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a
Lease with Steeltown Winery LLC for Ten Years with Two Additional Five-Year Options
in a Portion of Building 43, Located at 2440 Monarch Street, Suite 100 at Alameda
Point. Continued to October 7, 2014.
(14-399) Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to the Fiscal Years 2008-2014
Community Development Block Grant Action Plans, and Authorize the City Manager to
Negotiate and Execute Related Documents, Agreements, and Modifications. Continued
to October 7, 2014.
(14-400) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Joint Use
Agreement with Alameda Unified School District for the Operation and Maintenance of
the District Swimming Pools until February 28, 2015.
The Recreation and Parks Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
(14-401) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Chapter 30 of the Alameda Municipal
Code regarding Commercial Recreational Uses, Arcades, Ground Floor Office Uses,
and the Definition of Family. This Action is Categorically Exempt pursuant to California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15305, Minor Alterations in Land
Use Limitations. Introduced.
The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Stated the Park Street Business Association (PSBA) agrees with the amendments:
Robb Ratto, PSBA.
Stated the Chamber of Commerce supports the staff recommendation: Michael
McDonough, Chamber of Commerce.
Stated the Pinball Museum supports the recommendation: Michael Schiess, Pinball
Museum.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 16, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-09-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-10-07,6,"(14-427) Councilmember Daysog stated City staff should consider working with property
owners to improve the appearance of the corners of Webster Street and Buena Vista
Avenue and Webster Street and Eagle Avenue.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:59 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 7, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-10-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-10-21,2,"(14-434) Public Works Annual Report.
The Public Works Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Daysog commended Public Works staff for partnering with the Alameda
Historic Preservation Society on the tree pruning project.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how the department received the Green Certification
for the garage.
The Public Works Administrative Services Manager responded Alameda County sends
inspectors to audit facilities on green standards, including urban runoff, recycling,
electricity and water usage; stated Alameda's garage met the standards and received
the Green Certification.
Councilmember Tam thanked staff for the presentation and for responsiveness; noted
Alameda has the highest recycling rate of the 14 cities in Alameda County and her
street is being resurfaced after fifty years.
Councilmember Chen thanked the department for their efficiency.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(14-435) Julian Abasolo, Alameda, expressed concern over his house being red tagged
by the City.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Gilmore announced that MCEA resolution [paragraph no. 14-443) would be
heard on November 18, 2014.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*14-436) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Public Utilities Board Meeting
and Regular City Council Meeting Held on September 16, 2014. Approved.
(*14-437) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,321,494.08.
(*14-438) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ending June
30, 2014. Accepted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
October 21, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-10-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-11-18,11,"(14-478) Recommendation to Approve an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with
Alameda Point Partners for Development of Site A at Alameda Point. Approved.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a Power Point presentation.
In response to Mayor Gilmore's inquiry, the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point
stated the overall cost for backbone infrastructure, trails, park improvements, and
extensive protected bikeways is $600 million, which translates to approximately $1
million per acre; the cost for the Site A base infrastructure package and land payments
is $103 million.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether there was strong opposition from the community
on the planning guide, to which the The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point
responded the negative; stated the community appreciated the plan, which focused on
jobs and deemphasized housing.
Joe Ernst, Alameda Point Partners (APP), gave a brief presentation.
Urged the matter be delayed: Mayor Elect Trish Spencer, Alameda.
Outlined details not included in the proposed ENA that he would like to see addressed,
which justify waiting for the new Council: Councilmember Elect Frank Matarrese,
Alameda.
Urged the Council to continue to conduct business and vote on the matter:
Councilmember Elect Jim Oddie, Alameda.
Expressed concern over not having an emergency water supply: Joe Cloren, Alameda.
Urged approval of the ENA; discussed the Base Reuse Plan; expressed support for
APP: Helen Sause, Alameda Home Team.
Stated that he works for Whole Foods; there is need for a food entrepreneurship center,
which could be located at Building 9: Harv Singh, Alameda.
Stated the Chamber supports the staff recommendation: Michael McDonough, Chamber
of Commerce.
Expressed concern over the infrastructure problem, business interest and traffic; urged
the matter be postponed until other development projects are complete: Michael
Karavasilis, Alameda.
Stated the Council and staff have been great supporters of parks; urged approval of the
ENA: Bill Delaney, Recreation and Park Commission.
Urged moving forward: Brock Grunt, Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
November 18, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-11-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-11-18,14,"(14-479) Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of continuing the meeting past
11:00 p.m.
Councilmember Chen seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Chen, Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft and Mayor Gilmore - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Tam - 1.
Stated that he understands Site A being a catalyst, but is concerned about the rest of
the development proceeding; expressed concern over the allocation of housing units:
Former Councilmember Doug deHaan, Alameda.
Mayor Gilmore noted the taxiway development is no longer on the table.
Stated the election was about development and the direction of the City, which shows
there is major opposition: Travis Wilson, Alameda.
Urged approval of the staff recommendation: Michael John Torrey, Alameda.
***
Mayor Gilmore called a recess at 11:02 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 11:11p.m.
***
Mayor Gilmore stated the need for housing at Alameda Point is a topic which causes
langst in the community; requested an explanation of the rationale behind housing.
James Edison, Wildan Financial Services, responded there is a lot of demand for
housing and people are willing to pay for it; housing developers have more money to
build infrastructure to support improvements; commercial development in Alameda is a
tougher sell because of constraints; financial capacity is built into the development by
housing allowing for infrastructure.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the development can lead with commercial and retail.
Mr. Edison responded Alameda would have to take on a significant debt burden to pay
for infrastructure with the commercial approach; staff decided to proceed in finding a
developer that will pay for the infrastructure up front so the City does not have to pay.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated redevelopment projects no longer
have tax increment financing; Alameda depends on private capital to finance the
project; two Request for Qualifications (RFQs) were done to test the market: one for
mixed-use residential and one for commercial; one of the four qualified commercial
developers dropped out because of uncertainty in Alameda's market and the other two
were not willing to commit to any upfront infrastructure; the residential RFQ received
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
11
November 18, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-11-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-12-02,8,"(14-502) Recommendation to Reject the Developer Finalists for Site B and Postpone
the Decision on Development of Site B at Alameda Point for Six Months. Approved.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a brief presentation.
The City Manager clarified staff would continue to be opportunistic regarding Site B, but
would not commit to bring the issue back on a specific date.
Councilmember Daysog stated staff has clear goals, but most of the issues will still be
the same six months from now; rejecting the finalists implies starting over; inquired what
the argument is against just postponing the development of Site B and not rejecting the
developers.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded rejecting the developers does
not mean staff would not approach them at a future point; stated staff does not want to
string the developers along.
The City Manager stated handing the property to a developer is not in the City's interest;
bringing the issue back at a later date when market conditions change does not change
the scenario of what the City would like at Site B; Site B is not sellable in the
marketplace due to the infrastructure.
Councilmember Daysog stated the lack of, and need to, improve infrastructure will still
be the same six months from now; staff does not need to reject the developers outright.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with the City Manager; stated the Site A
developers improving the infrastructure is a changed circumstance; staff does not want
to keep the developer on hold if they want to direct their resources to another project;
another Request for Qualifications (RFQ) could be done; the passage of time will help;
there will be more to offer.
Councilmember Tam noted when Council discussed Site A with the developers, the
developers stated they may be interested in Site B once the infrastructure is in place;
the scenario of interested developers might change once Site A is developed.
Councilmember Chen stated staff has invested many hours and money already; the
community would like to see more job creation; that he proposes to continue dialogue
until the new Council is seated; completely rejecting the developers is premature.
The City Manager stated continuing the existing process does not yield a dime; the City
would be telling other developers that Site B is not available right now in an effort to be
more open; the policy is clearly jobs first at Alameda Point; other items do not drive
economic development; the infrastructure is not there and subsidizing jobs would be
foolish.
Councilmember Chen suggested continuing the dialogue in two weeks or one month.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
December 2, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-12-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-12-02,12,"(14-504) Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of considering the budget resolution
[paragraph no. 14-506 and the Mayor's nomination [paragraph no. 14-508 after 10:30
p.m.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Chen, Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft and Mayor Gilmore - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Tam - 1.
***
Stated the development needs to be truly transit oriented; stated the Planning Board
meeting minutes should be part of the record; outlined the study's reliance on
unbundled residential parking: Mayor Elect Trish Spencer, Alameda.
Stated the project has been long awaited; there is constant reference to the General
Plan; however, 414 units are being proposed, which doubles the 200 units in the
General Plan Housing Element; the Planning Board minutes have not been approved;
other development projects should be factored in: Councilmember Elect Frank
Matarrese, Alameda.
Discussed the change from unbundled to bundled parking; stated the total units being
planned throughout the City would add at least 3,000 cars and impacts will be felt: Paul
Foreman, Alameda.
Stated lack of clear responses lead to the creation of PLAN Alameda; the majority of the
neighbors are excited to see the project proceed; however, the project needs to be
considered on a whole with the other projects; community comprehension is needed:
Heather Little, Alameda.
Stated the neighborhood has spent months studying the parking and fought hard to get
bundled parking; that she shares Councilmember Daysog's concerns about the TDM;
too much is trying to be accomplished and pinned on the Del Monte; the study should
have neighborhood input; rather than a penalty, the impacts should be monitored:
Alison Greene, PLAN! Alameda.
Stated the Chamber Government Relations Committee urges approval of the staff
recommendation; outlined project benefits: Mark Sorensen, Chamber of Commerce
Government Relations Committee.
Showed a Power Point; reviewed the State Secretary of Interior's Standards
requirements: Rion Cassidy, Alameda.
Discussed the benefits the DA would provide for the Jean Sweeney Open Space Park,
which could move forward quickly; urged approval of the DA: Bill Delaney, Recreation
and Park Commission.
Urged the Council to turn the area into a proud residential area; expressed support for
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
11
December 2, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-12-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-01-20,12,"(15-049) Public Hearing to Identify Housing and Community Development Needs for the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual and Five-Year Plans and
Approve the Community Needs Statement as Recommended by the Social Service
Human Relations Board.
The Housing Authority Program Manager provided a revised Exhibit 3; gave a Power
Point presentation.
***
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft left the dais at 10:22 p.m. and returned at 10:24 p.m.
***
***
(15-050) Councilmember Daysog moved approval of considering the remaining agenda
items.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
***
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether any of the proposals capture the young
adults who have aged out of the foster care system.
The Housing Authority Program Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the young
adults are captured in both the Affordable Housing and Public Services categories; staff
kept the categories and priorities vague in order to have flexibility; priorities are revisited
annually.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry regarding homeless veterans,
the Housing Authority Program Manager stated the Veterans Administration works with
one of the Housing Authority's service providers; stated addressing chronic
homelessness is one of the goals for the County as a whole.
Vice Mayor Matarrese requested the Alameda Police Department (APD) services be
integrated into the implementation of services funded by the grants.
The Housing Authority Program Manager responded many of the service providers work
with APD, including the Family Violence Law Center and Building Futures for Women
and Children.
Mayor Spencer opened the Public Hearing.
Stated that she came from Building Opportunities and might end up returning in order to
not become homeless again; outlined the need for senior and veteran housing; noted
her income prevents her from being eligible for Section 8, but she cannot afford market
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
11
January 20, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-01-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-02-03,3,"(15-089) Ruth Abbe, Sierra Club, discussed wage and family benefit negotiations for
Alameda County Industries (ACI) employees.
Jesus Menoz, ACI, reminded Council he and his coworkers work directly for all the
citizens of Alameda.
(15-090) Amy Defibaugh, Alameda, expressed concern over the Shoreline bicycle
project and the installation of a bus shelter in front of her building; stated the shelter
blocks views and decreased parking spaces; stated new development is not beneficial
and adversely affects commute; urged Council to consider the impacts of their
decisions.
Mayor Spencer requested staff to confirm when the Shoreline bicycle project was
approved.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Planning Board held a series of public
meetings at Lum School and all Shoreline Drive residents were invited; stated the
project is a construction zone now; the project encourages people to get out of their
cars.
Mayor Spencer requested staff to clarify when the vote to approve the project took
place.
The Public Works Director stated the public process for the project started in 2012 and
was finally approved in 2014; the project received overwhelming public support during
the public engagement process; major projects have big impacts on people, but once
construction is done, Shoreline Drive will be better; he has noticed a reduction in
speeding on Shoreline Drive due to the project.
Mayor Spencer stated the matter was decided by the prior Council and is expected to
come back for discussion.
(15-091) Gustavo Nunez, ACI, stated working in recycling is dangerous; recycling
workers do not receive the same benefits and salaries as other sanitation employees;
urged Council to change situation for recycling employees.
Pedro Sanchez, ACI, stated joining ILW Local 6 provided many changes for ACI
employees; employees now receive paid holidays and achieving a collective bargaining
unit is underway; stated employees deserve the same Alameda County standards that
other cities have; urged Council to implement the same standards in Alameda; thanked
the Council for their efforts.
Agustin Ramirez, ACI employees advocate, stated ACI employees provide an important
service to Alameda residents; urged Council's support.
Councilmember Oddie thanked the ACI workers and Ms. Abbe for supporting efforts to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
February 3, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-02-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-02-17,17,"(15-136) Consider Directing Staff to Draft a Proposed Charter Amendment Relative to
the Creation of a Mayor-Nominated and Council-Appointed Five Member Municipal
Finance Commission. (Councilmember Daysog)
Councilmember Daysog made brief comments on the referral.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he would prefer to have each councilmember appoint
a representative on a new commission; questioned what would be the ultimate
deliverable or action from the commission.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated unfunded liability needs to be periodically checked;
Council should have the front line on checking; Council ultimately has the responsibility
to approve the budget; did not know the value of the Fiscal Sustainable Committee and
would like Council to address Task C [As part of its Quarterly Meeting(s) review
progress toward reducing any major unfunded or underfunded long-term
obligations/liabilities, narrowly and specifically defined for purposes of this Commission
as: i. Retirement Pension (i.e., CalPers or any pension regime that replaces CalPers,
should CalPers be replaced); ii. Other Post-Employment Health Benefits (OPEB)]; that
he is not convinced a Charter committee is needed.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with Vice Mayor Matarrese; stated Council
should not take charter amendments lightly; Council needs to keep focus on unfunded
liabilities and OPEB; adding more meetings for the public is not necessarily increasing
transparency and increases amount of staff time; the Council can direct staff through
the City Manager; the process would be time consuming for a function already done by
Council.
Councilmember Daysog stated unfunded liabilities and long term solutions is
challenging; there should be a vehicle to track issues over time; the magnitude of the
budget requires additional community input and ranks up there as being a Charter
committee.
Mayor Spencer stated that she appreciate the goal here; staff is planning to have
budget workshop.
The Assistant City Manager stated six budget meetings are planned, including one to
discuss OPEB.
Mayor Spencer suggested trading one of the weekdays for a Saturday so it is easier for
the public to attend.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern that families with children may not be
able to attend a Saturday meeting.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
17
February 17, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-02-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-03-03,4,"(15-151) Paul Foreman, Alameda, stated that he emailed Council regarding the
lateness of meetings; expressed concern over late meetings, which is not good public
access to meetings; suggested Council do something about.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Daysog stated that he would recuse himself from voting on Clark
Services Contract [paragraph no. 15-155 and the resolution on Landscaping and
Lighting District 84-2 [paragraph no. 15-157].
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the
paragraph number.]
Councilmember Daysog left the dais.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the Clark Services Contract
[paragraph no. 15-155 and adoption of the resolution on Landscaping and Lighting
District 84-2 [paragraph no. 15-157]. .
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
4. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog - 1.]
(*15-152) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting Held on January 21, 2015; and
the Special City Council Meeting, the Special Joint City Council and Successor Agency
to the Community Improvement Commission Meeting and the Regular City Council
Meeting Held on February 3, 2015. Approved.
(*15-153) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,887,136.88
(*15-154) Recommendation to Allocate Seventy-four Thousand Dollars ($74,000) from
the Technology Services Fund (704) for a Contract with Soft Resources, Inc. for
Computer Consulting Services to Support the Human Resources Department's Needs
Assessment and Procurement of a New Human Resources Information System (HRIS).
Accepted.
(*15-155) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $130,065, Including
contingencies, to Clark Services for Cleaning and Maintenance of Park Street, Webster
Street, and Marina Village. Accepted.
(*15-156) Recommendation to Award Contract in the Amount of $175,032, including
Contingencies, to W. Bradley Electric, Inc. for Installation of Pedestrian Push Button
Upgrades Proposed for Blind or Visually-Impaired Individuals, No. P.W. 12-14-17.
Accepted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 3, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-03-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-03-03,19,"(15-170) Councilmember Oddie stated that he attended a risk management summit
regarding new taser technologies and body cameras.
ADJOURNMENT
(15-171) There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at
12:38 a.m. in memory of Rita Albright Scott and Roan Kees.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 3, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-03-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-03-17,3,"(15-190) Update on the Process Regarding Impact of Rising Rents in Alameda.
The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
In response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry, the Community Development Director
stated the community group facilitator, Jeff Cambra, will present proposed changes to
the Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC) on April 6th.
In response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry, Mr. Cambra stated the proposal from
the Alameda Renters Coalition (ARC) is going forward with some landlord support; the
process started as a collaborative process with two stakeholders: housing providers and
tenants; the City is a third stakeholder; enforcement and funding issues were not
addressed in the community process; discussion points brought to Council were
conceptual; viewing actual language ahead of time to work out small details would be
helpful; the ARC has 540 members; crisis situations are identified prior to RRAC
hearings with some issues being resolved before reaching the RRAC; Council has
ultimate decision to accept the ARC proposal.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he is concerned about adding more time to the
process; inquired what Council would get in 30 days that it does not have today.
The Community Development Director responded ARC thought it would beneficial to
have the proposal vetted prior to coming to Council; stated staff has been following the
process outlined in January and has been working on the draft ordinance to present
recommendations in May.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with Councilmember Oddie; stated renters
could provide input at the public meetings; the process began under a prior Council.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would be amenable to following Mr. Cambra's
recommendation since no one present is in opposition.
Mr. Cambra stated the 30-day extension did not go before the ARC as an official
request; he does not want to misrepresent ARC's intentions.
Mayor Spencer stated Ms. Hockabout has been very effective in representing the ARC
and would interpret that she would defer to Mr. Cambra's recommendation since she is
not present.
Mr. Cambra stated under the task force proposal, the recommendation was to come
back in May or early June; ARC has moved faster than initially anticipated and came
before the Council in January.
Mayor Spencer stated that she attended the last RRAC meeting and commended the
RRAC on resolving landlord/tenant issues; rent control would not address every tenant
issue.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 17, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-03-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-04-07,6,"(15-229) Recommendation to Receive an Update to the July 23, 2013 Report on the
City's Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Liabilities.
The City Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether evaluations are done annually, to which
the Assistant City Manager responded every 2 years.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired when this year's actuarial is expected.
Doug Pryor, Bartel and Associates, responded four to six weeks before presenting to
staff; stated his firm is still collecting data and does not have all the information to
proceed.
Councilmember Daysog stated the OPEB unfunded liability is distributed in two ways:
one for people who are retired and the other for people still working.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether assumptions on solutions and the liability
project an 8% increase in health costs per year and the same number of active
employees, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the
assumption is to continue to budget for full time staffing, but not increasing or
decreasing.
Councilmember Daysog stated people should understand that if assumptions change,
all modeling that has been done could potentially change; staffing levels and
benchmarks are important points; employee numbers maintain when the proposal
moves forward.
The City Manager stated adding another body would increase pension and healthcare
in the future which needs to be managed over the years; the full cost has to be
addressed in every decision which does not happen in local government.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is a dollar amount for unfunded PERS.
The City Manager responded he does not have the PERS amount tonight.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would like to see a written report that includes the
numbers and slides not included in tonight's presentation.
The City Manager stated everything presented tonight will also be presented to the
public on April 16th.
Mayor Spencer stated she wants to make it clear to the public that the item is coming
back to the Council at a Special Meeting on April 29th
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
April 7, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-04-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-04-21,3,"(15-256) Former Councilmember Lil Arnerich, Alameda, expressed his thanks for the
City Manager and Assistant City Manager.
(15-257) Robin Gilbert, Alameda, urged the Council to not take action on the public
safety contracts, including receiving input from a pension expert.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced that the BKF contract [paragraph no. 15-262 and the Police
boat purchase [paragraph no. 15-263 were removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the remainder of the Consent
Calendar.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*15-258) Minutes of the Special Meetings Held on March 10, 2015, and the Special and
Regular Meetings Held on March 17, 2015. Approved.
(*15-259) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,059,442.98.
(*15-260) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Report on Litigation and Liability
Claims Settlements Paid During the Period October to December 2014. Accepted.
(*15-261) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Purchase
Agreement in an Amount Not to Exceed $32,133 for the Replacement of One Park
Maintenance Mower and to Amend Equipment Replacement Fund Expense Budget by
$12,238. Accepted.
(15-262) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $205,503, Including
Contingency, to BKF Engineers for the Design of the Cross Alameda Trail, Webster
Street to Sherman Street through Jean Sweeney Open Space Park.
Councilmember Daysog stated the trail is an important project; that he looks forward to
the design; key things include a clear scope of work and expectations which can apply
to a variety of projects and workable traffic solutions.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the BKF contract is funded by a federal grant and
a local match that comes from the Measure B Transportation Sales Tax and the Open
Space Fund.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 21, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-04-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-04-21,8,"(15-267 C) Resolution No. 15022, ""Declaring Results of Special Annexation Election,
Determining the Validity of Prior Proceedings, and Directing Recording of Amendment
to Notice of Special Tax Lien - Alameda Landing Municipal Services District."" Adopted.
The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese's inquiry, the Community Development Director
stated there are two separate CFDs which assess tax on the property owners: CFD 13-
2 relates to the funding of municipal services and cost to maintain the backbone
infrastructure; the second relates to the authority to issue bonded indebtedness to
reimburse Catellus for public improvements.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether the tax assessment requires an election, to
which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated both
CFDs require an election; proceedings this evening involve the property owners.
In response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry regarding moving the USS Hornet, the
Community Development Director stated all proposed work is predicated on the need to
stabilize the existing wharf and park improvements, and is not tied to the relocation of
the USS Hornet.
Mayor Spencer opened the Public Hearing for alteration of the District.
There being no speakers, Mayor Spencer closed the Public Hearing.
In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese request for a summary of the residential
component, the Community Development Director stated Alameda Landing Phase 2 is
currently zoned as mixed-use planned development (MXPD) and is approximately 40
acres, of which 10 acres have a multi-family overlay; in addition to the MXPD zoning,
Catellus is working on master planning for Phase 2; a land use proposal is not
completed at this time; Catellus will be working with staff on the entitlement process.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired how many units are on the 10 acres, to which the
Community Development Director responded 300 units.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether zoning would be impacted, to which the Community
Development Director responded in the negative.
In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese's inquiry, the Community Development Director
stated land inventory is carried over in the 2007-2015 Housing Element as part of the
multi-family overlay approved in 2012.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution calling special election
regarding alteration of the municipal services to be financed by Community Facilities
District No. 13-2 (Alameda Landing Municipal Services District).
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 21, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-04-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-04-21,10,"(15-268) Summary Title: Complete Actions to Expand Public Improvements and
Territory for Financing District at Alameda Landing and Levy of Corresponding Special
Tax - Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 13-1 (Alameda Landing Public
Improvements)
Resolution No. 15023, ""Calling Special Election Regarding Alteration of the Facilities to
be Financed by and the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes for, and
an Increase in the Bonded Indebtedness Limit of, Community Facilities District No. 13-1
(Alameda Landing Public Improvements); Conducting Special Election."" Adopted;
(15-268 A) Resolution No. 15024, ""Declaring Results of Special Election in Community
Facilities District No. 13-1 (Alameda Landing Public Improvements), Determining that
Alteration of the Facilities to be Financed By and the Rate and Method of Apportionment
of Special Taxes for, and the Increase in the Bonded Indebtedness Limit of, the District
are Lawfully Authorized, Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a Supplement No.
1 to Acquisition Agreement, and Directing Recording of an Amendment to Notice of
Special Tax Lien."" Adopted;
(15-268 B) Introduction of Ordinance Amending and Restating Ordinance Levying
Special Taxes within the City of Alameda Community Facilities District No. 13-1
(Alameda Landing Public Improvements). Introduced;
(15-268 C) Resolution No. 15025, ""Annexation of Territory to the City of Alameda
Community Facilities District No. 13-1 (Alameda Landing Public Improvements),
Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Therein and Submitting Levy of Special Tax to
Qualified Electors; Conducting Special Election."" Adopted; and
(15-268 D) Resolution No. 15026, ""Declaring Results of Special Annexation Election,
Determining Validity of Prior Proceedings, and Directing Recording of Amendment to
Notice of Special Tax Lien - Alameda Landing Public Improvements."" Adopted.
The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Spencer opened the Public Hearing for alteration of the District.
There being no speakers, Mayor Spencer closed the Public Hearing.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution regarding alteration of
the facilities to be financed by and the rate and method of apportionment of special
taxes for, and an increase in the bonded indebtedness limit of, Community Facilities
District No. 13-1 (Alameda Landing Public Improvements).
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
Mayor Spencer asked the City Clerk to open the ballots and announce the results.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 21, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-04-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-05-05,3,"(15-301) Adoption of Resolution Amending the Alameda Municipal Power
Unrepresented Management Employees (AMPU) Salary Schedule Revising the Salary
Ranges for the Classifications of Assistant General Manager - Administration, Assistant
General Manager - Energy Resources Planning, Assistant General Manager
-
Customer Resources, and Assistant General Manager - Engineering & Operations. Not
heard.
(15-302) Ordinance No. 3124, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding
Chapter VI, Article XIII, Section 6-56 to Impose Requirements Relating to the Retention
of Grocery Workers in Certain Circumstances involving the Transfer of Ownership of
Large Grocery Establishments."" Finally passed.
Stated that he is opposed to the ordinance; expressed concern over the message being
sent to the business community, which might result in fewer jobs: Rion Cassidy,
Alameda.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the ordinance.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer stated the State court case to provide safe food
supply only applies to stores over 15,000 square feet.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(15-303) Ordinance No. 3125, ""Amending and Restating Ordinance Levying Special
Taxes within the City of Alameda Community Facilities District No. 13-1.' Finally
passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(15-304) Receive Report on the Mastick Senior Center 2014 Annual Report.
The Mastick Senior Center Director and Board President gave a Power Point
presentation.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval [of accepting the report].
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
(15-305) Resolution No. 15031, ""Adding Additional 2015 Regular City Council Meeting
Dates."" Adopted.
The City Clerk gave a brief presentation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
May 5, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-05-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-07-16,5,"(15-457) Presentation of Alameda Recreation and Parks Department Fiscal Year (FY)
2014-2015 Annual Report.
The Interim Recreation Director and Interim City Manager gave a Power Point
presentation and responded to Council questions.
Mayor Spencer suggested lights be installed at the skate park.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(15-458) The Interim City Manager made a brief announcement about City Council
meeting dates.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(15-459) Councilmember Daysog made a brief announcement regarding the AC Transit
Liaison Subcommittee meeting.
(15-460) Vice Mayor Matarrese made a brief announcement regarding the kick off
meeting of the Council/East Bay Regional Park District Subcommittee.
(15-461) Councilmember Oddie made a brief announcement regarding the first meeting
of the Council/Alameda Health Care District Subcommittee; encouraged everyone to
attend the second annual Opera in the Park on August 16th.
(15-462) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft made a brief announcement regarding a ribbon
cutting for a restaurant at Penumbra.
(15-463) Mayor Spencer announced that she would be attending a fundraiser to benefit
autism at Dragon Rouge on Saturday, the morning festivities for the Aids Walk in San
Francisco on Sunday and a Meals on Wheels fundraiser at Rock Wall on Sunday;
thanked the 4th of July Parade Committee; stated that she attended the change of
command ceremony at Coast Guard Island and a ceremony celebrating the 100th
anniversary of the Navy reserves on the USS Hornet.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
July 16, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-07-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-07-21,2,"(15-471) Diane Cristales, Alameda; Liza Gabato Morse, Alameda; Julie Morse; and
Allen Sangco, Alameda (read a letter on behalf of Gray Harris); discussed the Sister
City events with Dumaguete, Philippines and expressed support for Mayor Spencer.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the
paragraph number.]
(*15-472) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on June 16, 2015.
Approved.
(*15-473) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,703,310.26.
(*15-474) Recommendation to Approve a Letter of Support for Assembly Bill 1182
(Santiago, Bonta, Cooley and Pan) Second Hand Dealer Bill. Accepted.
(*15-475) Recommendation to Award a Fifth Amendment in the Amount of $50,247 to
Schaaf & Wheeler for the Preparation of Engineering Documents for the Upgrade of the
City of Alameda Sewer Pump Stations, Phase 2: Immediate Improvements, No. P.W.
12-10-34. Accepted.
(*15-476) Recommendation to Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize a Call for
Bids for Group 2 - Sewer Pump Station Renovations for Reliability and Safety
Improvements Project, No. P.W.03-14-10. Accepted.
(*15-477) Resolution No. 15066, ""Authorizing the Public Works Director to Submit Used
Oil Payment Program Applications to the California Department of Resources and
Recovery for All Available Payment Programs Under the California Oil Recycling
Enhancement Act for the Period of July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2020."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(15-478) Informational Report on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's
(FEMA) Proposed Revisions to Floodplain Maps Which Could Impact Alameda Property
Owners.
The Public Works Coordinator made brief comments and Eric Simmons FEMA, gave a
Power Point presentation.
In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese's inquiry, Mr. Simmons stated the proposed flood
zones are based on today's conditions, not on future sea-level rise; FEMA developed a
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
July 21, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-07-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-07-21,8,"(15-480) Summary Title: Several actions for the Master Plan for the Del Monte
Warehouse Project, which was approved in December 2014, including subdividing the
property, authorizing an agreement to transfer certain City owned land to the Housing
Authority and outlining the requirement to develop affordable housing units.
Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15067, ""Approving PLN15-0165 - a Seven-
Lot Tentative Subdivision Map at 1501 Buena Vista Avenue to Implement the 2014 Del
Monte Master Plan."" Adopted;
(15-480 A) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the Purchase Option Agreement
Between the City of Alameda and the Alameda Housing Authority and Authorizing the
Interim City Manager to Execute All Necessary Documents [Requires Four Affirmative
Votes], which Transfers 0.47 Acres of City-Owned Real Property Identified as
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 079-0383-001 and -002 Located at the Northeast Corner of
the Intersection of Buena Vista Avenue and Sherman Street From the City of Alameda
to the Alameda Housing Authority For the Construction of a 31-Unit Affordable Senior
Housing Development. Introduced;
(15-480 B) Resolution No. 15068, ""Approving An Affordable Housing Agreement
Between the City of Alameda and TL Partners I, L.P. Outlining the Requirements to
Develop 55 Affordable Units, Including the 31-Unit Affordable Rental Housing
Development on Parcel 3 at 1501 Buena Vista Avenue and Authorizing the Interim City
Manager to Execute the Agreement."" Adopted.
The City Planner and the Housing Authority Director of Housing and Development gave
a Power Point presentation.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired what would happen if funding is not secured.
The Housing Authority Director responded affordable housing funding is always over-
subscribed; if funding is not secured in the first year, it will succeed in the second year;
the State Allocating Committee recently revised regulations for smaller projects to have
a better shot; there are several other options if obtaining funding fails completely; stated
one option would be for the Housing Authority to apply for competitive tax credits and
the developer to provide gap funding; another option would be the Housing Authority
would apply for a secondary non-competitive tax credit program; the program is not as
financially lucrative; the Housing Authority would be willing to increase the contribution
of public resources subject to Board of Commissioners approval.
In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese's inquiry, the City Planner responded that the
project must provide 55 affordable housing units in any event.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry regarding the building height limits, the
City Planner stated the Master Plan establishes a 55 foot height limit; the Housing
Authority project's height is 37 feet; if the Housing Authority does not develop the
project, Tim Lewis Communities could still develop at the 55 foot limit.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
July 21, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-07-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-15,12,"(15-560) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider the remaining items, the
four Council Referrals [paragraph nos. 15-561 through 15-565].
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of considering the remaining items.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Mayor
Spencer - 1.
***
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether PERS smoothing has been estimated on the
five-year chart.
The Finance Director responded the General Fund 5 year plan has deficits after 2017; a
portion of the deficit relates to PERS smoothing impacts; the goal is to set aside part of
the funds for the shortage in future years.
Councilmember Oddie inquired how will it effect the estimated fund reserve at end of 5
years.
The Interim City Manager responded the five-year plan is a forecast; there are no plans
on how to bridge the deficit; staff is just proposing to set aside money to bridge the gap
in the out years; the other benefit is that the funds cannot be spent on anything else.
The Finance Director clarified the fund would be restricted for that particular purpose.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the PERS fund anticipates a rate of return.
The Finance Director responded there are other options; one option is a pension trust
similar to the Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) trust.
Urged Council to fund the emergency water supply: Mark lrons, Alameda.
Urged funding the salt water tenders and resurge; expressed concern over emergency:
Ken Gutleben, Alameda.
Urged approval of spending money on the emergency water support; stated more
should be spent: Bruce Carnes, Alameda.
Expressed support for funding Estuary Park; discussed the need for fields: Peter Brand,
Alameda.
Urged funding the Tidal Canal: Seth Hamalian, Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
11
September 15, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-10-06,3,"(15-582) Nikki Poosh, Alameda, discussed her rental increases; stated something has
to be done; urged a moratorium be adopted.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced that the minutes [paragraph no. 15-583 and the
recommendation to reject bids [paragraph no. 15-585 were removed from the Consent
Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the remainder of the Consent
Calendar.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(15-583) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on September
1,2015.
The City Clerk noted Council was provided expanded language for a motion in the
September 1, 2015 regular meeting minutes.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the minutes as corrected.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested task be pluralized in the
second paragraph.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(15-584) Bills ratified in the amount of $3,488,873.91.
(15-585) Recommendation to Reject All Bids and Authorize a Call for Rebid for the
Demolition and Clean-up of Vacant Apartment Buildings Located at Orion Street, West
Tower Avenue and Stardust Place at Alameda Point.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what will be done differently in issuing the
request for proposal (RFP) to avoid non-responsive bids.
The Economic Development Division Manager responded the redrafted bid language
has more, clear detail on what would disqualify a bidder.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Economic Development
Division Manager stated bids were deemed non-responsive because disposal costs
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
October 6, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-10-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-10-06,5,"(15-589) Recommendation to Accept $2,205,300 Grant from the Staffing for Adequate
Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Program and to Amend the Fire Grants Fund
Budget for Fiscal Year 2015-16.
The Fire Chief gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he would like to approve acceptance of the grant; he
would also like to prepare for when Alameda does not receive the grant or the full
amount; there may be other more needy communities.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Fire Chief confirmed the savings are $500,000
annually; Firefighters work overtime; injuries and medical disabilities are also important
costs; she is prepared to support accepting the SAFER grant.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the 2011 SAFER grant was for 2 years, to which the
Fire Chief responded in the affirmative; stated the grants are 2 years of funding; stated
the Fire Department has been able to extend the funds beyond 2 years because each
Fire Fighter only gets paid 40% while attending the five month Academy.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the City applied in 2013 or 2014. The Fire Chief
responded the full time Fire Fighter positions were filled in 2013 and 2014; stated the
grant from 2009 and 2011 covered costs; SAFER grants expire and the City is short on
people; gaps are filled with overtime costs.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the 2014 grant was denied, to which the Fire Chief
responded in the negative; stated staff has just been waiting to hear from the SAFER
program.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the staff recommendation to accept
$2,205,300 Grant from the SAFER Program and to amend the Fire Grants Fund Budget
for Fiscal Year 2015-16.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated the City has 75,000 residents and is
growing slowly; demand for services continue; on the revenue side, things are not
always readily available; the City is always scrambling; he supports accepting the grant.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he would like to amend motion to include direction for
staff to present a contingency plan to the Council if the grant is not renewed.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested input from staff on how to move forward with
Vice Mayor Matarrese's request.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
October 6, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-10-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-10-20,3,"(15-615) Recommendation to Amend the General Fund and Other City Funds for the
Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget by Allocating the $14,500,500 in Excess of 20% Reserve
Requirement from the General Fund Reserve.
Councilmember Oddie stated the $6 million, which includes $2 million for PERS
smoothing, $2 million for existing retirees and $2 million for current employees, would
return to Council for discussion.
Councilmember Daysog expressed concerns regarding money set aside for the
emergency water supply and study; stated the analysis has not been done; that he
questions spending $800,000; suggested everything but emergency water supply.
Mayor Spencer suggested a motion be done; stated multiple items which were not
unanimous are being presented as one item.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of allocating the funds; stated difference
between the recommendation and Measure O is Measure O indebted the City; money
has already been collected, the City is not asking to indebt $14 million.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion; stated Measure O has a
$10,600,000 million dollar bond; property owners voted to tax themselves.
Under discussion, Councilmember Oddie stated everything would be voted as a
package; stated originally, he voted for the water supply, in hindsight there should be
more public discussion.
Mayor Spencer stated in regards to $800,000 for the emergency water supply, there will
be a more comprehensive discussion; that she plans to support the motion; Council
operates by majority giving direction to staff; she would have liked to see the September
15th vote included in the presentation to see the breakdown; many items benefit the
public; the public will see a noticeable change and improvement in the community;
moving forward with Alameda Point buildings is critical; multiple items are important to
move forward for the benefit of the community.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he will support the motion; the community will
benefit.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with the Mayor; stated one time expenditures
are one time; with the fire season, need to look into the emergency water supply.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
October 20, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-10-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-10-20,24,"(15-629) Recommendation to Proceed with a New Development Strategy for the
Enterprise District (Formerly Site B) at Alameda Point.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Spencer left the dais at 11:03 p.m. and returned at 11:05 p.m.
Councilmember Daysog stated end users should pay their share of infrastructure costs;
the overall infrastructure cost for Alameda Point is $566 million; Phase One which, at
the time, included Site A and Site B, was estimated to cost $183 million predicated on
land use and intensity of uses; now the City is not sure of the land use; inquired how the
City is ensuring the end user will pay their fair share of infrastructure costs for Site B.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the infrastructure burden is
approximately $1 million an acre; stated it is codified in ordinances that any
development which occurs in the district would have to pay a development impact fee
equivalent to $1 million per acre; the City hopes to get land value in addition; the benefit
of being a public owner is that the value of the land can be lowered to the value of the
infrastructure; policy decisions can be made on a case by case basis.
Councilmember Daysog stated infrastructure costs are important because one of the
selling features for Alameda Point is that there will be a sports complex and a regional
water ferry; sacrifices on the land sale would be worth it because would have amenities;
inquired how cherry picking can be avoided at Site B; people will pick the sites closest
to the water.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated the City is not marketing waterfront
land; the City wants to benefit from land being developed; staff anticipates starting
closer to Main Street; ultimately the Council decides whether or not a deal is good.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he likes the approach but would like a development
agreement with a formalized description of the responsibilities of the City and the
contractor Cushman and Wakefield; goals stated the costs should include: jobs, catalyst
occupant and end user occupant; he would like 6 month reporting to measure progress
against the goals; would like to see what lease revenues are available for installing the
water main; having the costs codified is helpful, but he would still like it mentioned in the
plan and formalized in a development agreement.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated staff could include the costs in the
documents.
Vice Mayor Matarrese responded that he would like the Plan to be approved by Council,
which allows Council to measure, adjust, terminate or expand it.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
24
October 20, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-10-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-01-19,3,"(16-018) Mark Klein, Alameda, expressed concern over being prohibited from taking
pictures of harbor seals; inquired about the City policy; urged ABM Security and PM
Realty correctly enforce the policy.
Mayor Spencer requested staff to follow up on the matter.
(16-019) John Klein, Alameda Renters Coalition, provided examples of Rent Review
Advisory Committee (RRAC) cases; expressed concern over the RRAC cases being
used to collect data; suggested the City collect data on all rent; stated a definition of
mom and pop landlords is needed; there should not be a carve out for mom and pop
landlords.
(16-020) Richard Bangert, Alameda, expressed concern over citizens not be allowed to
take pictures and people being told to leave areas at Alameda Point; urged City to look
into the policy for the area.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced that the City Manager contract [paragraph no. 16-023 and
final passage of the marijuana cultivation ordinance [paragraph no. 16-031 were
removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the
paragraph number.]
(*16-021) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting Held on December 15 and
December 18, 2015, the Joint City Council and SACIC Meeting and Regular Meeting
Held on December 15, 2015. Approved.
(*16-022) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,521,114.89
(16-023) Recommendation to Approve Agreement Appointing Jill Keimach as City
Manager.
Mayor Spencer stated that she pulled the item; she does not plan to support the
recommendation by Council; with all due respect to the Council and Ms. Keimach, she
respectfully disagrees that this is the correct choice for the City.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the contract for Ms. Keimach to be the next
City Manager.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-02-29,9,"(16-086) The Interim City Manager made an announcement regarding March 3rd
mediation training being given for the Rent Review Advisory Committee.
The Interim Assistant City Manager made an announcement regarding the March 2nd
City Council/East Bay Regional Park District Subcommittee meeting.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(16-087) Sandip Jariwala, thanked the Council for their commitment to the West End;
stated the Façade Grant Program is a great program to revitalize the West End; urged
Council to reinitiate the program so that the businesses can make their establishments
more inviting and improve the business district.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(16-084 Continued) Consider Endorsing the San Francisco Bay Clean Water, Pollution
Prevention, and Habitat Restoration Program Measure, which will be on the June 7,
2016 Ballot. (Councilmember Oddie)
Councilmember Oddie stated the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority is placing a
special parcel tax on the June 7th ballot in all 9 Bay Area counties; the parcel tax will
fund urban runoff from polluting the Bay, preserve critical habitat for fish and wildlife,
enhance public access to public space and protect homes and infrastructure from
flooding; requested support for the initiative.
Mayor Spencer inquired what percentage is needed for the measure to pass.
Councilmember Oddie responded that it needs a 2/3 vote to pass.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired if the Council can endorse the initiative.
Mayor Spencer inquired if sufficient notice has been given to the public that the Council
would be taking action on the merits.
The Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Spencer stated the notice to the public is that it would be put it on the agenda in
the future for the discussion on the merits.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he anticipated that Council would endorse the
initiative.
The Assistant City Attorney stated if there are members of the public that wanted to
speak publicly on the item they might feel they were not given fair notice.
Continued February 24, 2016 Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 29, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-02-29.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-03-01,18,"(16-111) Receive Report on Results from a City of Alameda Survey Conducted in
December 2015 and Provide Direction on a November 2016 Ballot Measure.
Curtis Below, Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz and Associates, and the Interim City
Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired who will be doing the door to door residential
contact, to which the Interim City Manager responded it is to be determined; stated staff
would be working on education material.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he would like more information as to the nature of
the problem; Alameda's expenses go beyond the revenues collected through normal tax
collections; working with a deficit means changing the economy; he understands that
some amount of what would be collected is already constrained.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he agrees with assessment of sales taxes; direction
should be given to pursue legislation; the Utility Users Tax (UUT) is antiquated and
should be brought up to current utility use.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she supports staff's recommendations.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he supports staff's recommendations; needing a 2/3
vote is a struggle; he would like the lobbyists to understand Alameda's priorities.
Mayor Spencer stated that she supports staff's recommendations; inquired what
percentage of Alamedans do not have a landline.
Donald Maynard, Contract Attorney, responded about half of Alameda homes do not
have a landline; stated the problem with Alameda's ordinance is that there are no
definitions which invites companies to interpret the ordinance in different ways; most of
the money is missing because of the way wireless companies interpret the ordinance;
about 90% of cities in California have voter-approved, modern UUT ordinances;
Alameda is catching up to modern ordinances.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Interim City Manager stated the UUT is a
revenue measure that continues to decline; the tax falls under the fiscal sustainability
category.
Mayor Spencer stated that she thinks the community is supportive of the parks; the
concern is not about the parks but about an additional parcel tax.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the UUT is part of the Balanced Revenue
Index (BRI) formula, to which the Interim City Manager responded in the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 1, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-03-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-03-01,20,"(16-114) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider the remaining item: the
referral on mixed use zoning. [paragraph no. 16-117
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of considering the item.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice
vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Mayor Spencer -
4. Noes: Councilmember Oddie - 1.
Submitted information; stated that he is concerned about the RRAC structure as
proposed; a little bit of clarity could avoid conflict: John Sullivan, Alameda.
Stated the plan has technical concerns that need to be addressed; Alameda is facing a
housing crisis; urged Council to help alleviate housing stress for Alameda families:
Phillip James, Alameda.
Expressed concern over the operating cost of the ordinance; stated the fee study should
estimate a lower amount and decrease the bureaucracy: Rosalinda Fortuna, Alameda.
Stated the purpose of government is to provide justice; Council should listen to voters
and take steps to ensure everyone stays honest: Malia Vella, Alameda.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he appreciated Mr. Sullivan's handout; some of Mr.
Sullivan's suggestions would work to stymie the increased rents; adopting some ideas
would show that Council is trying to do the best for the small mom and pop landlords;
having agencies like ECHO Housing evaluate renter's habitability claims is a good
suggestion; he also likes the idea of the relocation assistance benefit being paid to the
next landlord; he would like to exempt owners of up to two residential units in relocation
assistance for family move-in.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is intrigued by Mr. Sullivan's suggestions,
but would like to pass the ordinance in the form of the first reading; she would like to
give the ordinance a chance; the current Council could make a change before the year
is up; all tenants should be protected; different classes of tenants should not be created;
fairness should also extend to all landlords.
Councilmember Oddie stated there are some mom and pop landlords that are not
behaving properly; he supports the ordinance as written; things could be improved; if
data shows the ordinance needs to be tweaked, Council could have a discussion; there
will not be hostility between landlords and tenants, it is up to each party; landlords who
behave properly will not be subject to any of the provisions of the ordinance;
encouraged all parties to have positive human relations; stated if everyone treats others
fairly, additional regulations would not be needed.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 1, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-03-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-03-01,23,"(16-117) Consider Directing the City Manager to Revise the Mix-Use Zoning
Designation and Related Policies to Aid Retention of Beneficial Commercial Uses
Citywide. (Vice Mayor Matarrese)
Vice Mayor Matarrese made brief comments on his referral.
Read a letter from Mr. DeLap, former harbor master, opposing the Bay West
development of high density housing; stated the State gives high priority to preserving
recreational and boating use of the shoreline: Peter Brand, Alameda.
Expressed support of Alameda Marinas and marine services: Joseph Woodard,
Alameda.
Provided a petition of Barnhill Marina neighbors; urged support of maintaining marina
services: Bill Cox, Alameda.
Urged support of Alameda's coast; stated the waterways are an asset: George Lythcott,
Alameda.
Stated that he is concerned about the long term outlook of the boating community;
urged support of maintaining Alameda's maritime community: Grant Hayes, Alameda.
Showed a map; expressed support of maritime services; proposed expansion of the
area to retail and recreation: Nancy Hird, Alameda.
Expressed support of the marinas and services: Paul Mueller, Alameda.
Stated Alameda's northern waterfront could have other opportunities and bring in larger
boats if dredged; urged Council to maintain the waterfront for deep water boating uses:
Andy McKinley, Alameda.
Stated that he opposes the residential development at Clement Street: Dan Goldfield,
Alameda Aikikai.
Expressed concern about loss of resources at Alameda Marina; stated that she is
opposed to development: Maggie Sabovich, Pacific Inter-Club Yacht Association.
Stated that she opposes the referral if it seeks to change the multi-family overlay zone:
Lynette Lee, Renewed Hope.
Stated his children benefit from the Aikido dojo; he does not want more development in
the Clement Street area: Matt Langwerowski, Alameda.
Stated the light industry maritime businesses bolsters the Alameda economy as it is
active worldwide; urged preservation of the marina and businesses: Liz Taylor,
Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 1, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-03-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-04-19,6,"(16-186). Recommendation to Approve the Webster Street Business Improvement Area
(BIA) Annual Assessment Report; and
(16-186A) Resolution No. 15141, ""Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment on the
Webster Street BIA of the City of Alameda for Fiscal Year (FY) 2016-17; and Set a
Public Hearing for May 3, 2016 to Levy an Annual Assessment on the Webster Street
BIA."" Adopted.
Councilmember Daysog recused himself and left the dais.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the Webster Street Business
Improvement Area (BIA) Annual Assessment Report; and adoption of the Resolution of
Intention to levy an annual assessment on the Webster Street BIA of the City of
Alameda for FY 2016-17; and set a Public Hearing for May 3, 2016 to levy an annual
assessment on the Webster Street BIA.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
4. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog - 1.]
(*16-187) Resolution No. 15142, ""Terminating and Releasing a Grant of Easement
(Waterfront at Harbor Bay). Adopted.
(*16-188) Resolution No. 15143, ""Accepting a Grant of Easement to the City of Alameda
from AMSTAR-105, LLC, for a Utility Easement Located Near the Corner of Harbor Bay
Parkway and North Loop Road (Waterfront at Harbor Bay) and Directing the City Clerk
to Record the Easement."" Adopted.
(16-189) Ordinance No. 3151, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending,
Adding and Deleting Sections of Article VIII (Sunshine Ordinance) of Chapter Il
(Administration) Concerning Local Standards to Ensure Public Access to Public
Meetings and Public Records.' Finally passed.
Mayor Spencer stated at the first reading she and Vice Mayor Matarrese opposed the
motion; her concern is regarding Section 2-91.17, public comment by members of policy
bodies; the Section includes language that could discourage members from speaking.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated he has similar concerns and does not feel the Section
adds any value to the Sunshine Ordinance or improves transparency of City activities.
Mayor Spencer stated staff added the language; it was not recommended by the
Commission.
Councilmember Oddie moved final passage of the ordinance amending Alameda
Municipal Code by amending, adding and deleting Sections of Article 8, Sunshine
Ordinance, Chapter 2 concerning local standards to ensure public access to public
meetings and records.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 19, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-06-21,3,"(16-289) Ed Wong, Rachel Guan and Ricky Yan, raised issues regarding fair housing;
stated they submitted an application for below market rate housing and were
disqualified; requested a meeting with the City Manager and the City Attorney; stated
the issue is with the Marina Shore development; they would like to discuss insufficient
financial documents with the City Manager and City Attorney.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced that the Legal Advertising Contract [paragraph no. 16-294];
the CalPERS resolution [paragraph no. 16-299]; and the IBEW MOU resolution
[paragraph no. 16-300 were withdrawn from the Consent Calendar and the Enterprise
District report [paragraph no. 16-295 would not be heard.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the remainder of the Consent
Calendar.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*16-290) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on May 17,
2016. Approved.
(*16-291) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,912,424.61.
(*16-292) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Fourth
Amendment to an Agreement with Michael Baker International, Inc. for Graphic Art and
Marketing Support for the Community Development Department, Extending the Term
for 12 Months, to June 30, 2017. Accepted.
(*16-293) Recommendation to Award Contract in the Amount of $364,090 with an
Additional Amount of $35,910 in Contingencies, to Innovative Interfaces, Inc. for the
Integrated Library System, Polaris. Accepted.
(16-294) Recommendation to Award Contract for Legal Advertising for Fiscal Year
2016-17. Accepted.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the bidding process could be reopened; stated
Council authorized the opening of bids on May 3rd which were due May 16th, which is a
short window; he is hopeful the Council can reopen the bidding process to allow the
Alameda Sun to apply and Council can compare the bids.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City Clerk informed the publisher of the
Alameda Sun what the requirements were for the bid process; the publisher plans on
bidding next year.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 21, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-06-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-06-21,8,"(16-302L) Resolution No. 15174, ""Appointing Christine Chilcott as a Member of the
Social Service Human Relations Board."" Adopted;
(16-302M) Resolution No. 15175, ""Appointing Jennifer Hastings as a Member of the
Social Service Human Relations Board.' Adopted; and
(16-302N) Resolution No. 15176, ""Appointing Samantha Soules as a Member of the
Transportation Commission."" Adopted.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented certificates of
appointment to the board and commission members.
(16-303) Resolution No. 15177, ""Approving the Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram
and Assessment, and Ordering the Levy of Assessments, Island City Landscaping and
Lighting District 84-2, All Zones."" Adopted.
Councilmember Daysog and Vice Mayor Matarrese reused themselves and left the dais.
The Public Works Management Analyst gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether, in the future, it is possible to split the areas or
if they have to be all on one resolution.
The Public Works Management Analyst responded in the affirmative.
Acknowledged the good work of the City Engineer and the Public Works staff on
developing the current Engineers Report: Dan Ready, Harbor Bay Business Park
Association.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution with direction that staff
separate the districts for the Councilmembers with conflicts next time.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 3. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog and Vice Mayor Matarrese - 2.]
(16-304) Resolution No. 15178, ""Resolution Approving the Engineer's Report,
Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering the Levy of Assessments,
Maintenance Assessment District (MAD) 01-01 (Marina Cove).'
The Public Works Management Analyst gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Daysog moved adoption of the resolution.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 21, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-06-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-06-21,24,"(16-314) Resolution No. 15182, ""Relative to Workers' Compensation Benefits for
Registered Disaster Service Worker Volunteers."" Adopted.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by a unanimous
voice vote: Ayes - 5.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(16-315) The City Manager announced that the Fire Chief had to leave the meeting to
attend to a fire at the auto upholstery shop on Park and Clement Streets; that she,
Mayor Spencer, and Councilmember Oddie attended a tour of the USS Hornet where
500 Army Reservists have been training for emergency preparedness.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(16-316) Consider Directing the City Manager to Initiate and Begin the Process with the
Planning Board to Propose Revisions to the Ordinance and Code Sections Defining
Alameda's Inclusionary Housing for Residential Development. Not heard. (Vice Mayor
Matarrese)
(16-317) Consider Directing the City Manager to Schedule a Priority Setting Work
Session. Not heard. (Mayor Spencer)
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(16-318) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Golf Commission.
Not heard.
(16-319) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested the meeting be adjourned in honor of
the victims of the Pulse Nightclub shooting in Orlando, Florida.
(16-320) Mayor Spencer thanked the Army for collaborating with the City; commended
the USS Hornet for housing the Army during training; shared a proclamation for
Juneteenth regarding freed slaves.
(16-321) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft announced the Relay for Life event would be on
Saturday at Encinal High School.
ADJOURNMENT
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 21, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-06-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-06-21,25,"(16-322) There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at
11:16 p.m. in memory of the Orlando shooting victims.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 21, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-06-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-07-05,22,"(16-343) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Three-Year
Lease with Kai Concepts, LLC, a California limited liability company, for Building 168,
Suite 300, located at 1651 Viking Street. [In accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this project is Categorically Exempt under the
CEQA Guidelines Section 15301( (c) - Existing Facilities.] Introduced.
The Assistant Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(16-344) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Ten Year
Lease with One Five-Year Extension Option with La Costa Pacifica Inc. dba Urban
Legend Cellars (ULC) for Building 25, Unit 300 Located at 1951 Monarch Street at
Alameda Point. [In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
this project is Categorically Exempt under the CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(c
-
Existing Facilities]. [Requires Four Affirmative Votes].
The Assistant Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would support the lease.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the proximity of the client would help accelerate
recognition that the area will be a future park; the 15-year lease is worth it; he is ready
to move forward.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated ULC is investing a lot of capital to bring the space
to the necessary specifications; meeting ULC half way to amortize their investment is a
good way to attract businesses; she would be happy to have the business at Alameda
Point.
Councilmember Oddie moved introduction of the ordinance.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
(16-345) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a First Amendment to a Lease and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the
Terms of a First Amendment to the Lease Agreement with Pacific Automated LLC, a
California Limited Liability Company, dba Brix Beverage (Pacific Automated, LLC) to
Include a Portion of Building 25 (Unit 100), a Small Outbuilding Known as Building 491,
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
July 5, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-07-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-07-19,5,"(16-369A) Resolution No. 15186, ""Appointing Ron Taylor as a Member of the Golf
Commission.' Adopted.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the appointments [adoption of the
resolutions].
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented certificates of
appointment to Mr. Hosmer and Mr. Taylor.
(16-370) Ordinance No. 3159, ""Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract Between the
Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS)
and the City Council of the City of Alameda to Include Provisions Pursuant to
Government Code 20516 for ""Cost Sharing"" for Local Police Members and for Local
Fire Members.' Adopted.
The Human Resources Director gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved adoption of the urgency ordinance.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(16-371) Resolution No. 15187, ""Approving the Site A Phase 1 Subdivision Tentative
Map Tract 8334 for 12 Parcels, including for Condominium Purposes on Lots 2 and 3,
on 21.35 Acres of Land at Alameda Point."" Adopted. [PLN15-0570; Applicant: Alameda
Point Partners. A Proposed Tentative Map Application to Implement the Alameda Point
Master Infrastructure Plan and Site A Development Plan].
The Base Reuse Director gave a brief presentation.
Expressed support for the project; urged Council to continue the momentum by
approving the Tentative Map as presented: Mike McDonough, Chamber of Commerce.
Stated that he is not opposed to the matter, but wants to raise an issue regarding Site
A; expressed concern that the City of Alameda does not have the revenue to support
additional housing; stated staff assured him a Community Facility Districts (CFD) would
be put in place; requested staff to provide assurance that agreements include
requirements for CFDs: Paul Foreman, Alameda.
The Base Reuse Director stated Section 3.1(c) of the Disposition and Development
Agreement (DDA) addresses a number of special taxes and public agency contributions
required by the developer; stated the section complies with the fiscal neutrality policy.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
July 19, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-07-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-07-19,17,"(16-376) Recommendation to Discuss State Budget Trailer Bill, Concerning
Streamlining Affordable Housing Approvals, and Consider Directing the Mayor to Send
a Letter Opposing the Proposal in its Current Form. Not heard
(16-377) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda
Municipal Code by Amending Chapter (Zoning Ordinance) to Streamline Improvements
to Existing Residential Properties and Minor Administrative, Technical, and Clarifying
Revisions to the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Chimneys, Accessory Buildings,
Windows, Existing Driveways and Parking, Non-Conforming Setbacks, Home
Occupation Signage, and Other Miscellaneous Amendments. The proposed
amendments are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, Minor
Alterations to Land Use Limitations. Not Heard. [Continued to September 20, 2016]
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(16-378) Consider Directing the City Manager to Initiate and Begin the Process with the
Planning Board to Propose Revisions to the Ordinance and Code Sections Defining
Alameda's Inclusionary Housing for Residential Development. (Vice Mayor Matarrese)
Not heard.
(16-379) Consider Directing the City Manager to Schedule a Priority Setting Work
Session. (Mayor Spencer) Not heard.
(16-380) Consider Directing the City Manager to Immediately Hold a City Council
Workshop on the Final Phase of the Bayport-Alameda Landing Disposition and
Development Agreement (DDA)\Development Plan. (Councilmember Daysog) Not
heard.
(16-381) Consider Directing the City Manager to Have the Social Service Human
Relations Board (SSHRB) Review City Policies and Procedures for Aiding Alameda's
Homeless in Order to Make Recommendations to the City Council for Policy Revisions
and Additions. (Vice Mayor Matarrese). Not heard.
(16-382) Consider Directing the City Manager to Initiate Revisions to the Ordinances
and Code Sections for Mixed-Use Zoning in the City of Alameda to Aid Retention of
Beneficial Commercial Uses within Areas Zoned for Mixed Use. (Vice Mayor Matarrese)
Not heard.
(16-383) Consider Directing Staff to Review Enacting a Minimum Wage Increase in
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
16
July 19, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-07-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-08-08,9,"(16-397) The City Manager thanked the AMP General Manager for his service; stated
the Assistant City Manager will be the Interim Part Time General Manager and previous
AMP employee, Julie Ann Boyer, will assist; stated the Human Resources department
has started the search process for the next General Manager.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(16-398) Maria Dominguez, ARC, stated there is a housing crisis in Alameda; she is
encouraging people to vote.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(16-399) Councilmember Oddie stated he, Councilmember Daysog and Mayor Spencer
had a chance to attend the Seaplane Lagoon event, seeing people using the Seaplane
Lagoon was great.
(16-400) Councilmember Daysog stated he, along with the City Manager and
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft, attended an East Bay Division League of Cities event
which summarized issues that will come before the voters in November.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Acting Mayor Matarrese adjourned the meeting at 8:35
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
August 8, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-08-08.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-20,8,"(16-464) Resolution No. 15200, ""Supporting the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)
General Obligation Bond Measure to Fund BART's Safety, Reliability and Traffic Relief
Program (40 Year Maximum Tax Measure). Adopted.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated she feels the public should hear about the BART
General Obligation Bond Measure on the November ballot.
Robert Raburn, BART Director, gave a brief overview of the measure.
Mayor Spencer inquired how long property owners will be paying the tax.
Mr. Raburn responded 48 years for the overall length of all the bonds.
Mayor Spencer inquired how long will the money last after the bonds are issued.
Mr. Raburn responded the plan is to issue the bonds every other year for 10 issuances;
over 20 years; State law requires deliverance of 80% of the bond measure projects,
which will be scrutinized by an independent oversight body.
Mayor Spencer inquired if the bonds will be issued over 20 years, to which Mr. Raburn
responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether 80% will be spent over 20 years.
Mr. Raburn responded the last bond would be issued 20 years from now; then, there
would be 2 years left to perform.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether property owners will be paying the tax for 48 years, to
which Mr. Raburn responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is consideration of having a station in Alameda.
Mr. Raburn responded that 90% of the bond is focused on existing infrastructure, which
is deteriorating; 10% will go towards access and planning studies.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the money will cover an engineering study, but not
build any lines, to which Mr. Raburn responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Spencer stated voters to knowing what they are voting for is important.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution supporting the BART
General Obligation Bond Measure to Fund BART's Safety, Reliability and Traffic Relief
Program.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 20, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-20,21,"(16-473) Recommendation to Provide Direction on the Approach to Phasing and
Disposition of Development in the Main Street Neighborhood (MSN) at Alameda Point,
including Review of the Draft Phasing Chapter in the MSN Specific Plan.
The Redevelopment Project Manager and Base Reuse Director gave a Power Point
presentation.
Urged Council to support the phasing plan; stated the plan will allow the Alameda Point
Collaborative to move forward and put an end to homelessness: Doug Biggs, Alameda
Point Collaborative.
Stated that she supports the phasing plan because the space will provide jobs; Alameda
Point is a jewel; encouraged Council to support the phasing plan and create more jobs
at Alameda Point: Karen Bey, Alameda.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the 67 units are leveraging market rate
housing or are the 67 units themselves the market rate housing.
The Base Reuse Director responded the 67 units are part of the Collaborative project
that will be very-low units; the market-rate development is financing the units'
infrastructure; the adjacent units will not need to provide the low and very-low
requirements; the plan is a combined project.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the 67 units are being leveraged to meet the
low and very-low income requirements, to which the Base Reuse Director responded in
the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the 25 moderate and 67 very-low income units make 92
out of 310 units affordable, which is about 30%; he would like any developments to
reach the 30% mark for affordable housing; he would like a plan to auction the units off
individually; the zoning requirement should be clear to provide a transition between the
job generating area.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated there is a limit on how many houses can be built;
inquired whether the 67 units are being subtracted from the total or if the units have to
come out of some future development's allocation; inquired whose housing allocation
the extra housing units would come from.
The Base Reuse Director responded the City is not looking to change the housing cap,
which is in the General Plan; stated the 67 units come out of the 425.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether another developer would be told the
number of units remaining.
The Base Reuse Director responded in the affirmative; stated there will be 125 housing
units to build out the rest of the Main Street neighborhood.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 20, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-10-04,18,"(16-510) Consider Directing the City Manager to Have the Social Service Human
Relations Board (SSHRB) Review City Policies and Procedures for Aiding Alameda's
Homeless in Order to Make Recommendations to the City Council for Policy Revisions
and Additions. (Vice Mayor Matarrese) Not heard.
(16-511) Consider Directing the City Manager to Initiate Revisions to the Ordinances
and Code Sections for Mixed-Use Zoning in the City of Alameda to Aid Retention of
Beneficial Commercial Uses within Areas Zoned for Mixed Use. (Vice Mayor Matarrese)
Not heard.
(16-512) Consider Directing Staff to Review Enacting a Minimum Wage Increase in
Alameda. (Mayor Spencer) Not heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:58 p.m., Mayor Spencer continued the meeting to October 4, 2016 at 6:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 4, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-10-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-10-18,9,"(16-525) Recommendation to Direct Staff to Transmit the City of Alameda 2015
Housing Element Annual Report to the State of California Department of Housing and
Community Development. Approval of an annual report is not subject to the review
under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), nor is an annual report defined
as a ""project"" under CEQA. No future review is required.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the report means that the City is agreeing to build any
housing in the future, to which the Assistant Community Development Director
responded in the negative; stated the report is telling the State what was built and what
building permits were issued.
Mayor Spencer stated there is a misunderstanding on what Council is being asked to
approve.
The Assistant Community Development Director stated under State law, the City has to
ensure Council has seen the report.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what a universal design ordinance is and when
the ordinance would come back to Council.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded subcommittees from the
Planning Board and the Housing Authority will set standards for all new housing in
Alameda to ensure that a percentage of the housing is designed in a way to either allow
someone with a disability to visit or allow someone with a disability to live
independently; stated staff anticipates the matter will come to Council in January.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of directing staff to transmit the City of
Alameda 2015 Housing Element Annual Report to the State of California Department of
Housing and Community Development.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
(*16-526) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a
Loan Agreement and Related Documents with Island City Development (ICD) for HOME
Partnership Investment Program (HOME) Funds in the amount of $248,740 at 3%
Simple Interest for the Del Monte Senior Housing Project and Appropriate $53,537 in
HOME Program Income. Accepted.
(*16-527) Recommendation to Amend the Contract with MV Transportation to Extend
the Term by One Year and Amend the Amount by $85,000 for a Total Compensation of
$301,999 Over Five Years for Paratransit Shuttle Services. Accepted.
(16-528) Recommendation to Approve the Draft Project List for the Alameda County
Transportation Commission Call for Projects.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 18, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-10-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-11-01,3,"(16-557) Former Councilmember Doug deHaan, Alameda, stated the campaign is
reminiscent of Sun Cal; expressed concern over the campaign.
(16-558) Janet Gibson, Alameda, and George Humphreys, Alameda, expressed support
for Council candidate Tony Daysog.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced the Affordable Housing Agreement [paragraph no. 16-561
was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*16-559) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on October 4,
2016. Approved.
(*16-560) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,081,401.02.
(16-561) Recommendation to Approve an Amendment to the City Affordable Housing
Agreement Standard Form and Amend and Record Five Previously Executed
Agreements.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Director of Housing and
Community Development responded the correction is administrative; a minor set of
conflicts was discovered between the State governing documents and the tax credit
allocation committee; the action is only for affordable housing rental units, not for sale
affordable housing.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired about Area Median Income (AMI) and rent and
income restriction as they relate to the categories of affordability.
The Director of Housing and Community Development responded AMI is the
metropolitan area standard that the Housing Authority must adhere to; rental or sale
price is set on the basis of median income; on the tax credit program, rents are set at
60% to 20% of the median income; for home ownership, the City program identifies
three levels for home ownership: 50%, 80% and 120% of AMI; the State publishes new
income data once a year; the Housing Authority uses current income data to establish
prices.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether rent standards reflect adjusted AMI.
The Director of Housing and Community Development responded the formula is set to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 1, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-11-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-11-01,26,"(16-575) Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of continuing the meeting past 11:00
p.m.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes - Councilmember Oddie, Vice Mayor Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 3. Noes:
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft and Councilmember Daysog - 2.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated meetings that go past 11:00 p.m. are not doing
serving the public.
***
(16-576) Consider Directing the City Manager to Immediately Hold a City Council
Workshop on the Final Phase of the Bayport-Alameda Landing Disposition and
Development Agreement DDA)\Development Plan. (Councilmember Daysog)
Refer to the first referral on inclusionary housing [paragraph no. 16- for City Manager
comments on all the referrals and public comment.
Councilmember Daysog stated the developer has not complied with the vision for
Alameda Landing and the developer should come to Council first.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of directing the City Manager to immediately
hold a City Council workshop on the final phase of the Bayport-Alameda Landing DDA.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion with a friendly amendment to remove the
word immediately
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog accepted the amendment to the motion.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the date is not specific.
Councilmember Oddie made a friendly amendment to adopt the staff's proposal for the
next steps.
Councilmember Daysog accepted the amendment to the motion.
Mayor Spencer stated there is a motion with two friendly amendment.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(16-577) Consider Directing the City Manager to Have the Social Service Human
Relations Board (SSHRB) Review City Policies and Procedures for Aiding Alameda's
Homeless in Order to Make Recommendations to the City Council for Policy Revisions
and Additions. (Vice Mayor Matarrese)
Refer to the first referral on inclusionary housing [paragraph no. 16- for City Manager
comments on all the referrals.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 1, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-11-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-11-15,8,"(16-596) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease with
Pacific Pinball Museum for Three Years with No Extension Options and an Early
Termination Right for Both the City and Tenant in Building 169, Suite 101 Located at
1680 Viking Street at Alameda Point. [In accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), this project is Categorically Exempt under the CEQA Guidelines
Section 15301( (c) - Existing Facilities.] Introduced.
Councilmember Daysog recused himself and left the dais.
The Assistant Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the change means the early termination right is
mutual, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the
affirmative.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the change is that either party can terminate the lease
after one year, the change is not mutual.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance approving a lease with
Pacific Pinball Museum.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 4. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog - 1.]
(16-597) Resolution No. 15208, ""Amending Master Fee Resolution No. 12191 to Add
and Revise Recreation and Park Fees."" Adopted.
The Recreation and Parks Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the money from the Encinal High School fees is
shared with the Alameda Unified School District.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the negative; stated the City of
Alameda schedules the use of all the facilities and keeps the fees.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the fees offset the costs of being the primary
scheduler, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative;
continued the presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether staff is requesting feedback on the Outside Contractor
Park Use program and how it interferes with community use, since the program is new.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded that staff is looking at setting up a policy
for feedback.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 15, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-11-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-12-20,5,"(16-660) Resolution No. 15217, ""Appointing Sherice Youngblood as a Member of the
Social Service Human Relations Board.' Adopted.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated all residents should be treated
equally; if people submit applications everyone should be interviewed, not just a select
few.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Matarrese, Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft - 1.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented a certificate of
appointment to Ms. Youngblood.
Ms. Youngblood made brief comments.
***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 7:13 p.m. and reconvened the special meeting at 8:39
p.m. after the City Council reorganization at the regular meeting; therefore, the following
Councilmembers were now present: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie,
Vella and Mayor Spencer.
***
CONTINUATION OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(16-661) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $179,444, Including
Contingency, to BKF Engineers to Finalize the Design of the Ralph Appezzato Memorial
Parkway and Atlantic Gap Segments of the Cross Alameda Trail (Between Main Street
and Constitution Way).
The Bicycle Coordinator stated that she was available to answer questions.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired where the Cross Alameda Trail and Atlantic Gap
are located.
The Bicycle Coordinator responded the Cross Alameda Trail and Atlantic Gap is one
block along Atlantic Avenue between Webster Street and Constitution Way.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated a landmark for the location would be the
Starbucks at Webster Square; inquired why the section is challenging for pedestrians
and bicyclists.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 20, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-12-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-01-17,3,"(17-024) Mayor Spencer announced that I Am Alameda photos are being exhibited;
urged anyone interested to submit photos.
(17-025) Mayor Spencer announced that the meeting would be adjourned in memory of
Ron Cowan.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(17-026) Gaylon Parsons, Alameda, stated that she is thrilled to see Alameda on social
media; the photo exhibit has been phenomenal.
(17-027) Marleen Gonzalez, Alameda, stated that she has been unlawfully evicted
without written notice; her rent was raised from $1364 to $2200; she was given $3,000
cash and a $3,000 check which bounced; she said she would go back to her unit and
was threatened.
(17-028) Toni Grimm, Alameda Renters Coalition (ARC), stated ARC's slogan is ""Keep
Alamedans in Their Homes""; urged the Council to increase rent protections.
(17-029) Eric Strimling, Alameda Renters Coalition, stated a tenant with a leak from the
rain provided a picture which showed a smoke alarm in the wrong place; there is a lack
in rental inspections to ensure health and safety laws are followed.
In response to Mayor Spencer's request, the City Manager stated residents should
contact the Housing Authority, as well as the Office of the City Manager or City
Attorney.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Police Department should be contacted in the
case of being physically threatened.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the
paragraph number.]
(*17-030 ) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on December 20, 2017.
Approved.
(*17-031) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,684,805.17.
(*17-032) Recommendation to Accept the Investment Report for the Quarter Ending
June 30, 2016. Accepted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 17, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-01-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-01-17,18,"(17-044) Janet Gibson, Alameda, expressed concern over Councilmembers interrupting
others speaking; suggested Council reach an agreement to not interrupt each other.
(17-045) Reverend Michael Yoshii, Buena Vista Methodist Church, stated there needs
to be space to acknowledge Alameda has not been perfect; historic covenants should
be named to give a full composite of the narrative.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(17-046) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Public Utilities
Board.
The City Clerk announced Mayor Spencer nominated Gerald Serventi for appointment
to the Public Utilities Board.
(17-047) Councilmember Oddie stated he attended a Stope Waste board meeting;
discussed debris removal; gave Kerry Parker from Public Works kudos for a great
presentation.
(17-048) Acting Mayor Vella stated that she would be attending the airport noise forum
tomorrow night.
ADJOURNMENT
(17-049) There being no further business, Acting Mayor Vella adjourned the meeting at
12:25 a.m. in memory of Ron Cowan.
Respectfully submitted,
Irma Glidden
Assistant City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 17, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-01-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-21,2,"(17-111) Proclamation Declaring February 21, 2017 as David Needle Day.
Mayor Spencer read the proclamation and presented it to Gina Ward, David's daughter.
(17-112) Proclamation Declaring February 2017 as Teen Dating Violence Prevention
and Awareness Month.
Mayor Spencer read the proclamation and presented it to Liz Varela, Executive Director,
Building Futures with Women and Children.
Ms. Varela made brief comments.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(17-113) Kenny Mai and Lauren Bulino, Alameda Youth Committee, showed a video,
gave a brief overview of the Piece and Kindness campaign and provided the
Councilmembers with information and puzzle pieces.
(17-114) Rosemary Jordan, Alameda 4 Impeachment, submitted information; urged
Council to adopt a resolution to support a congressional investigation of President
Trump.
(17-115) Gaby Dolphin, Alameda Progressives, stated that she supports a resolution for
impeachment.
(17-116) Maxwell Bunshalt, Alameda, urged Council to do everything possible to
reverse the debacle of the government and preserve democracy; stated that he
supports a petition to impeach the President.
(17-117) Richard Bangert, Alameda, expressed concern over the lack of information for
an Alameda Municipal Power planning meeting; stated having the meeting at 3:00 p.m.
on a Monday is not accessible for citizen participation and no staff reports were
associated with the agenda.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced that the Enterprise District update [paragraph no. 17-121]
and the resolution regarding Island City Lighting and Landscaping District [paragraph
no.
17-124 were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
February 21, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-02-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-21,17,"(17-137) Consider: 1) Sending a Letter to Alameda Health System and Appropriate
Health Insurance Plans regarding the Lack of Contracts Covering Many Alameda
Residents and Urging Them to Reach Agreements; and 2) Creating a Committee to
Review the Issue of Providing Access to on Island Heathcare for Alameda Residents
and Make Recommendations of How to Proceed. (Mayor Spencer and Councilmember
Oddie)
Mayor Spencer and Councilmember Oddie made brief comments.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the referral.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(17-138) Consider Directing Staff to: 1) Identify All Accounts with Wells Fargo and
Investments in Wells Fargo Securities; 2) Draft a Request for Proposal (RFP) for
Banking Services for the City of Alameda; and 3) Exclude Wells Fargo from the RFP
process and Refrain from Making New Investments in Wells Fargo Securities for a
Period of Three Years. (Vice Mayor Vella and Councilmember Oddie)
Councilmember Oddie and Vice Mayor Vella made brief comments.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, Vice Mayor Vella stated the request is to not
make any investments with Wells Fargo after Council votes on it tonight.
Councilmember Oddie stated the City Treasurer could come back with a report; some
accounts may not be feasible; he would like to know more information and be socially
responsible before issuing an RFP.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether Council should vote now or wait for a report to come
back.
The City Manager stated she interprets the item as a referral; the question is whether to
compile data and bring it back to Council to make a determination; in the meantime, the
City will not make any additional investments in Wells Fargo.
Stated massive financial institutions are making irresponsible investments; urged
Council to define the community by choosing financial institutions who exhibit socially
responsible actions: Gaby Dolphin, Alameda Progressives.
Submitted information; stated he fully supports the proposal; urged Council to consider
using a local credit union as a best choice for a banking business: Maxwell Bunshadt.
Discussed a prisoner who suffered maltreatment and died because the company that
controlled the for-profit correctional facility valued profit over human life; stated Wells
Fargo promotes the abuse of practices for private prisons; urged Council to end
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
17
February 21, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-02-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-03-07,10,"(17-157) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease with
Delphi Productions, Inc. a California Corporation, for a Ten-Year Lease with One Five-
Year Renewal Option for Building 39 Located at 950 West Tower Street at Alameda
Point. Introduced.
The Assistant Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(17-158) Resolution No. 15241, ""Requesting the Federal Aviation Administration to
Address Increased Aircraft Noise in Alameda."" Adopted.
Mayor Spencer made brief comments about the resolution.
Councilmember Matarrese stated addressing airport noise is doable because patterns
are not permanent and is something to stay on top of; he is prepared to support the
resolution.
Vice Mayor Vella stated that she serves as the alternate to the Airport Noise Forum; all
impacted communities were heard at meetings; a lot of issues specific to Alameda are
addressed in proposed plan.
Mayor Spencer stated Council is taking the matter seriously; addressing airport noise is
important to the community.
Councilmember Oddie stated addressing the issue is what citizens do; citizens petition
for redress; the issue is appropriate for Alameda residents.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(17-159) The City Manager briefly reviewed two new executive orders that have been
issued: a revised immigration executive order which removes Iraq from the list of
countries; and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revision of the 2015 Clean
Water Rule; stated the City would not participate in the voluntary immigration and
customs program.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
March 7, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-03-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-03-21,4,"(17-178) Richard Bangert, Alameda, discussed an information request he made to the
Veterans Administrations regarding plans for wetland mitigation at the former Base;
showed redacted documents; urged the Council to request the documents.
(17-179) Claudia Young, Housing Authority Director of Rent and Community Programs,
invited the community to an upcoming meeting with the local faith-based groups on April
6 at 10:00 a.m.
(17-180) Gaby Dolphin, Alameda, discussed an incident of possible harassment;
complimented the Police Chief and Department.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the
paragraph number.]
(*17-181) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on February 17, 2017 and
the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on February 21, 2017. (City Clerk).
Approved.
(*17-182) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,319,011.14.
(*17-183) Recommendation to Accept Report on Delinquent Business Accounts and
Delinquent Integrated Waste Management Accounts. Accepted. (Finance 2450)
(*17-184) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period
Ending December 31, 2016 Collected During the Period July 1, 2016 to September 30,
2016. Accepted. (Finance 2410)
(*17-185) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to
an Agreement with Russell Resources, Inc. to Extend Term until June of 2018 and to
Add the Amount of $102,500 for a Total Contract Amount of $779,900 for Environmental
Consulting Services Related to Alameda Point. Accepted. (Base Reuse 819099)
(*17-186) Recommendation to Approve the Second Amendment to the Services
Agreement between the City of Alameda and the Housing Authority of the City of
Alameda to Extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2017, and Add $50,000 for a
Rent Program Office Relocation Allowance. Accepted; and
(*17-186A) Resolution No. 15243, ""Amending the General Fund and Rent Stabilization
Fund Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2016-17."" Adopted. (Housing 265)
(*17-187) Recommendation to Approve the 2017 Legislative Agenda for the City of
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 21, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-03-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-03-21,10,"(17-196B) Resolution No. 15250, ""Calling Special Election of the Owner of Property
within the District to Approve the Levy of Special Taxes and an Appropriations Limit
Within City of Alameda Community Facilities District No. 17-1 (Alameda Point Public
Services District); Conduct Special Election."" Adopted;
(17-196C) Resolution No. 15251, ""Declaring Results of Special Election and, if Two-
Thirds (2/3) or More of the Votes Cast Are in Favor of the District, Direct Recording of
Notice of Special Tax Lien - Alameda Point Public Services District."" Adopted; and
(17-196D) Introduction of Ordinance Levying Special Taxes within the City of Alameda
Community Facilities District No. 17-1 (Alameda Point Public Services District).
Introduced. (Base Reuse 858)
The Base Reuse Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Spencer opened the Public Hearing.
There being no speakers, Mayor Spencer closed the Public Hearing.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution of formation of the City of
Alameda Community Facilities District No. 17-1 (Alameda Point Public Services
District), authorizing the levy of a special tax within the District, preliminarily establishing
an appropriations limit for the District, and submitting levy of the Special Tax and the
establishment of the appropriations limit to the qualified electors of the District.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution calling special election of the
owner of property within the District to approve the levy of special taxes and an
appropriations limit within City of Alameda Community Facilities District No. 17-1,
Alameda Point Public Services District.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk opened the ballot and announced the ballot has 170 votes in favor and
none against.
The Mayor announced being that the vote is in favor, the final actions could proceed.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution declaring results of
special election and, if two-thirds (2/3) or more of the votes cast are in favor of the
District, direct recording of Notice of Special Tax Lien - Alameda Point Public Services
District.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 21, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-03-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-03-21,20,"(17-201) The City Manager gave an update on the Jackson/Broadway design; stated
the Public Utilities Board approved seven segments for the Underground Utility District
which will come before Council in summer; congratulated the Police Department for
90% of staff completing implicit bias training.
(17-202) Mayor Spencer moved approval of continuing the meeting past 11:00 p.m.
The motion failed for a lack of second.
***
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(17-203) Pat Lamborn, Alameda, stated she feels disrespected when not able to speak.
(17-204) Janet Gibson, Alameda, stated there is something wrong with the way Council
is treating the public; Council should be more supportive of the community; suggested
changing the order of the oral communications section.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(17-205) Consider Adopting a ""Bird-Safe Buildings"" Ordinance. Not heard. (Vice Mayor
Vella and Councilmember Oddie)
(17-206) Consider Directing Staff to Provide Standards for Bird-Safe Buildings for
Council to Adopt. Not head. (Mayor Spencer)
(17-207) Consider Directing Staff to Prepare a Report on the City of Alameda
Acquiring/Taking Title to the Uncompleted Strip of Shoreline Park next to Harbor Bay
Parkway. Not heard. (Mayor Spencer)
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Not heard.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no motion to continue past 11:00 p.m., Mayor Spencer adjourned the
meeting at 10:59 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 21, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-03-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-04-04,5,"(17-229) Councilmember Oddie moved approval of continuing the meeting past 11:00
p.m.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
Mayor Spencer suggested the speakers be allowed to speak for three minutes.
Stated the RRAC did not recommend binding mediator decisions for cases under 5%,
rather the Committee would like its decision on said cases to be binding; he does not
recall the RRAC discussing increasing its membership from 5 to 7; expressed support
for the program fee, which could fund professional mediation: Branden Sullivan-Siriana,
RRAC.
Stated any amendment to just cause evictions should go to the voters: Jose Cerda-
Zein, Alameda.
Stated the Alameda Renters Coalition (ARC) has six suggestions; he would outline two
of the suggestions; relocation fees should be based on the Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) fair market value, rather than based on rent; the RRAC does not
have clear guidelines and standards; suggested disbanding the RRAC and having an
administrative judge hold private hearings: Erik Strimling, ARC.
Expressed concern over exempting fixed term leases, which causes landlords to
abandon evergreen leases; stated rent stabilization will die out from only fixed term
leases being offered; suggested removing the sunset provision and going to a formula
based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI); discussed no fault evictions; urged tenants
and landlord to work together: Paul Foreman, Alameda.
Stated the RRAC made three recommendations; one was having RRAC decisions for
tenant based cases be binding; there was no discussion of increasing the membership
from 5 to 7; outlined information in the Housing Authority database, which is available to
the public; discussed RRAC cases: Robert Schrader, Alameda.
Suggested the ordinance be given more time to work; stated landlords and tenants
need to work together; tenants should pay the fee since they benefit from the ordinance
or the program costs should be paid by the City: Penelope Schrader, Alameda.
Discussed the need for short term housing, which is why fixed term leases are needed;
expressed concern over the costs of a registration program: Frances Mok.
Stated the ordinance does not take into account people on a fixed income, such as
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
April 4, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-04-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-04-07,25,"(17-237) The City Manager outlined the numerous calls the City received related to the
storm last night; noted the golf course is temporarily closed; stated every week there is
a new federal list of sanctuary cities, so far the City is not on the federal list and the
definition does not apply to Alameda; currently, the list focuses on cities and counties
with jails.
Councilmember Matarrese requested the City Manager to repeat the announcement at
the next regular City Council meeting.
The City Manager suggested everyone sing Happy Birthday to the Community
Development Director at the end of the meeting.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(17-238) Vice Mayor Vella commended Recreation employees who saved a life on the
basketball courts at Alameda Point using one of the City's Automated External
Defibrillators (AED).
(17-239) Mayor Spencer stated the splash into spring egg scramble would be moved to
next Saturday, April 15th, due to weather conditions.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 9:03 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Continued April 4, 2017 Meeting
Alameda City Council
25
April 7, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-04-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-06-06,2,"(17-333) Conference with Real Property Negotiators - (54956.8); Property: Chuck
Corica Golf Complex, 1 Clubhouse Memorial Road, Alameda, CA 94502; City
Negotiator: Jill Keimach, City Manager and Amy Wooldridge, Recreation and Parks
Director; Organizations Represented: Greenway Golf Associates, Inc.; Issue under
Negotiation: Real Property Negotiations Price and Terms of Payment.
(17-334) Public Employee Performance Evaluation; Pursuant to Government Code §
54957; Positions Evaluated: City Manager - Jill Keimach, City Attorney - Janet Kern
and City Clerk - Lara Weisiger.
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Spencer
announced that regarding Existing Litigation direction was given to staff; regarding
Anticipated Litigation direction was given to staff on unlawful detainer action and
process in the future; regarding Real Property direction was given to staff; and
regarding Performance Evaluation the matter was discussed.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 6:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 6, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-06-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-06-20,7,"(17-387) Resolution No. 15276, ""Reappointing Ann McCormick as a Member of the
Public Utilities Board."" Adopted;
(17-387A) Resolution No. 15277, ""Reappointing Christopher Griffiths as a Member of
the Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC) (Tenant Seat). Adopted;
(17-387B) Resolution No. 15278, ""Appointing Sarah Murray as a Member of the RRAC
(Housing Provider Seat). Adopted; and
(17-387C) Resolution No. 15279, ""Appointing Claudia Medina as a Member of the
Social Service Human Relations Board. Adopted.
Mayor Spencer moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the oath of office and presented certificates of appointment
to Ms. McCormick, Ms. Murray and Ms. Medina.
Ms. McCormick, Ms. Murray and Ms. Medina all made brief comments.
(17-388) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Ordinance 3850 Approving and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the
Terms of an Amended and Restated Lease with Bay Ship and Yacht Corporation to
Clarify the Parties Obligations, Modify the Leased Premises and Adjust Rent Payments
for the Tideland Property Located at 2900 Main #2100 and Surrounding Area.
Introduced.
The Assistant Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Spencer stated at a Planning Board meeting, she became aware that Bay Ship
and Yacht is possibly working with an adjacent developer; inquired whether the
amendment has nothing to do with the Bay Ship and Yacht project.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded the leasehold mortgage
agreement could possibly apply to the project because the wording says Alameda
commercial properties and adjoining premises; the property under negotiations adjoins
to the property.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the language in the original lease.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded the language is a change to
the lease.
Mayor Spencer inquired why the language being added.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-06-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-07-05,13,"(17-431F) Resolution No. 15294, ""Appointing Cynthia Silva as a Member of the Library
Board.' Adopted;
(17-431G) Resolution No. 15295, ""Appointing Travis Wilson as a Member of the Library
Board.' Adopted;
(17-431H) Resolution No. 15296, ""Appointing Dorothy Wismar as a Member of the
Library Board."" Adopted; and
(17-4311) Resolution No. 15297, ""Appointing Laura Palmer as a Member of the
Transportation Commission."" Adopted.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
The Assistant City Clerk administered the oath of office and presented the certificates of
appointment to Ms. Barrett, Ms. Hall, Mr. Taylor, Mr. Van Winkle, Ms. Silva, and Ms.
Wismar.
***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 9:03 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:07 p.m.
(17-432) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending the
Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) between Alameda Point Partners, LLC
and the City of Alameda for Site A at Alameda Point. Introduced.
The Base Reuse Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the developer will have financing if Council
approves the ordinance.
The Base Reuse Director responded as of today, the City does not have a feasible
financing plan with the developer; the developer can answer questions from Council;
continued presentation.
Mayor Spencer stated the developer is in default, inquired why staff is not addressing
the issue of finance.
The City Manager responded the developer has until August 9th to come up with a
financial plan; stated the DDA has other options for the developer.
The Base Reuse Director stated the finances depend on the land uses; there is no
financial plan without a land use plan; all development plan changes affect the bottom
line; continued the presentation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
July 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-07-18,5,"(17-469) Recommendation to Accept Additional Information and Renderings Requested
by City Council regarding the Design Concept for the Cross Alameda Trail Gap Closure
on Atlantic Avenue between Webster Street and Constitution Way.
Expressed concern about the mid-block crossing creating traffic problems: Jim
Strehlow, Alameda.
Mayor Spencer requested clarification on the agenda item.
The City Manager responded the matter was approved by Council with a request to
bring back better drawings.
Mayor Spencer stated since the matter was already voted on and passed, Council is
only being asked to accept the drawings.
The Transportation Planner reviewed Exhibit 1.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the no right turn on red could be reviewed by staff and
modified if it is not working.
The Transportation Planner responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether a car can make a left turn to go into the Housing
Authority.
The Transportation Planner responded staff is reviewing the design and trying to arrive
at an alternative.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
(*17-470) Recommendation to Amend the Contract with MCK Services, Inc. to Extend
the Term and Increase Compensation by $5,365,739.15 Including Contingency, for a
Total Cumulative Contract Amount of $15,078,600.41 for Repair and Resurfacing of
Certain Streets, Phase 36, No. P.W. 04-17-24 5-S. Accepted.
(*17-471) Recommendation to Amend the Contract with Engineering Mapping
Solutions, Inc. to Increase the Contract Amount by $30,000, Including Contingency, for
Continued Geographic Information System Support Services for a Total Contract
Amount of $179,025. Accepted.
(*17-472) Recommendation to Award a Five-Year Contract for an Amount not to Exceed
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
July 18, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-07,2,"(17-59) Richard Jepsen, Alameda Urged Council to support the FAAS and a bond
measure to insure a sustainable shelter:
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer stated that she would vote no on final passage of the Alameda Point
DDA Ordinance [paragraph no. 17-66
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the
paragraph number.]
(*17-60) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meeting Held on January 3,
2017. Approved.
(*17-61) Ratified bills in the amount of $5,588,378.20.
(*17-62) Recommendation to Consent to the Public Utilities Board's Request to Solicit
Bids and Sell One Surplus Small Bucket Utility Vehicle and One Surplus Backup
Generator. Accepted.
(*17-63) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $3,564,002, Including
Contingency, to McGuire and Hester for Construction of Group 3 - Sewer Pump Station
Renovations for Reliability and Safety Improvements Project, No. P.W.03-14-11.
Accepted.
(*17-64) Recommendation to Approve a Five-Year Waiver of License Fees with
Alameda Point Concours for Use of the Parade Grounds at Alameda Point Located on
the Former Naval Air Station Alameda (NAS Alameda). [In accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this project is Categorically Exempt under
the CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.] Accepted.
(*17-65) Resolution No. 15226, ""Amending the Alameda Police Officers Association
Non-Sworn Unit (PANS) Salary Schedule Establishing the Classification of Crime
Prevention Technician Effective February 5, 2017."" Adopted.
(*17-66) Ordinance No. 3174, ""Amending the Disposition and Development Agreement
between Alameda Point Partners, LLC and the City of Alameda for Site A at Alameda
Point to Extend the Phase 1 Outside Closing Date from December 12, 2016 to April 11,
2017 to Allow for Additional Time to Complete Property Due Diligence and to Secure
Additional Financial Commitments. Finally Passed. [Note: Mayor Spencer voted no on
the ordinance]
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
February 7, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-02-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-10-17,17,"(17-633) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code (AMC) by
Amending Section 2-19 to Change the Name of the Commission on Disability Issues to
the Commission on Disability. Introduced.
Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(17-634) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda
Municipal Code by Amending Chapter 30 (Zoning Ordinance) to Update and Improve
the Regulations Governing the Public Art Ordinance. [The proposed amendment is
categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines 15305 Minor Alterations to Land Use Limitations]. Introduced.
The Community Development Management Analyst gave a Power Point presentation.
Urged Council to adopt the amendments in the ordinance: Carolyn West, Alameda.
Expressed how important art is to the City of Alameda; urged Council to support the
ordinance: Tina Blaine, Rhythmix Cultural Works.
***
(17-635) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider the remaining items:
Call for Review ordinance [paragraph no. 17-636 and the Sister City guidelines
[paragraph no. 17-638].
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of considering the remaining items.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Oddie inquired how many speakers are remaining.
Mayor Spencer responded there is one speaker on the Call for Review ordinance and
two speakers on the Sister City guidelines.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Urged Council to move forward with the ordinance: Wesley Warren, Alameda Artist
Group.
Urged Council to remove the cap from the Alameda art fund; expressed how important
art is for children: Jessica Warren, Studio 23/Alameda Artists.
Stated public art is important for the community; urged Council to remove the cap:
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 17, 2017
13",CityCouncil/2017-10-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-11-07,8,"(17-667) Mayor Spencer moved approval of moving the pension report to November
21st
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which failed by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmember Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 2. Noes: Councilmembers Ezzy
Ashcraft, Matarrese and Vella - 3.
Stated the AC Transit Board is supportive of the general outline of the plan: Chris
Peeple, AC Transit Board.
Stated AC Transit is willing to operate the shuttle service provided the City of Alameda
funds the annual operating costs: Elsa Ortiz, AC Transit Board.
Expressed concern over the cost challenges of the Greater Alameda Business
Association (GABA) shuttle proposal: Robert Del Rosario, AC Transit.
Gave a Power Point presentation on aerial gondolas: Randy Woolwine.
Urged Council to make the shuttle a priority: Tony Kuttner, GABA.
Stated that he supports a shuttle in Alameda: Ed Owens, GABA.
Gave a Power Point presentation on aerial tramways: Andrea Wuttke, Castro Valley.
Urged Council to complete the shuttle proposal earlier rather than later: Dania Alvarez,
GABA.
Stated that she would like staff to reach out to the community prior to implementing
projects: Dawn Jaeger, Community of Harbor Bay Isle.
Stated more people should be willing to ride Alameda transit options: Peter Fletcher,
Alameda.
Suggested a vehicle, ferry or another transit agency be able to compete against AC
Transit: Jim Strehlow, Alameda.
Stated the Chamber supports GABA's plan; urged Council to make the Alameda free
shuttle a priority: Michael McDonough, Chamber of Commerce.
Urged Council to add more buses: Jeanne Nader, Alameda.
Urged Council to make the shuttle more of a priority: Cheri Johansen, Alameda
Progressives.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
November 7, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-07,3,"(17-67) Resolution No. 15227, ""Appointing Gerald Serventi as a Member of the Public
Utilities Board."" Adopted.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution appointing Gerald Serventi.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(17-68) Resolution No. 15228, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Accept, on Behalf of the
City, Certain Surplus Federal Property, and to Accept, Execute, and Record
Conveyance Documents in Substantial Conformance with Certain Phase 3A Property
and Conveyance Documents from the United States of America, Acting by and through
the Department of the Navy, to Implement the Economic Development Conveyance
Agreement for the Former Naval Air Station, Alameda (Phase 3A Alameda Point
Conveyance)."" Adopted.
The Base Reuse Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(17-69) Resolution No. 15229, ""Establishing a Recruitment and Hiring Incentive Policy
for Lateral Police Officers in the Alameda Police Department."" Adopted.
The Police Chief gave a brief presentation.
The Human Resources Director gave a powerpoint presentation.
The Police Chief stated the hiring incentive is a tremendous advantage; getting
someone through training takes a long time; a lateral hire could work as a solo officer in
as little as six weeks, versus six months for an academy graduate.
Councilmember Matarrese stated any incentives having impact on post-employment
liabilities was not referenced; inquired whether the incentive is based on years in the
system, to which the Human Resource Director responded in the affirmative.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquiry about benefit tiers, the Human
Resource Director responded new officers receive retiree health benefits just for
themselves, not their family, which reduces liability.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether there is an expectation for lateral hires to undergo
training, even though they have had training in another agency.
The Police Chief responded in the affirmative; stated new lateral hires still have to have
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
February 7, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-02-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-11-21,8,"(17-691) Recommendation to: 1) Accept the Semi-Annual Report on Litigation and
Liability Claims Settlements, and 2) Availability of Any Documents Which Have Become
Disclosable to the Public for the Period October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017. Not
heard.
(17-692) Resolution No. 15323, ""Authorizing Preliminary and Conditional Commitment
of $500,000 Public, Education and Government (PEG) Fee Funds for One-to-One
Match with Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) Career Technical Education (CTE)
Facilities Program Grant Application to Establish a Community Media Center (CMC).
Adopted.
Mayor Spencer requested clarification on the item; inquired whether the request is that
the City contribute $500,000 from the PEG funds and whether or not it is a dollar for
dollar match with the School District.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification on the item.
The Information Technology Director responded the $500,000 is a one to one match for
the grant which AUSD is seeking.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what are PEG funds are can the funds be used
for capital and equipment purposes; stated the PEG funds are used to broadcast
meetings.
Mayor Spencer inquired what AUSD is contributing to the arrangement.
The Information Technology Director responded the grant will be used to establish a
community media center; the studio will be shared by the public and Alameda High
School, which will have a digital filmmaking and career technical education pathway
program.
Mayor Spencer inquired what hours the facility will be open to the public.
The Information Technology Director responded the details will be worked out.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the funds can be used to upgrade the Chamber's
sound and the long term plan to ensure the City has proper equipment in the Council
Chambers.
The City Clerk responded the City will have sufficient funds to cover the cost to upgrade
the Council Chambers equipment.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the funds are spent by the City Clerk's Department, to
which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the City Clerk is comfortable using the $500,000 and
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 21, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-11-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-12-05,6,"(17-731) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15332, ""Amending Master Fee
Resolution No. 12191 to Add New and Revise Existing Recreation and Park Fees.""
Adopted.
The Recreation and Parks Director gave a Power Point presentation.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry about the Recreation and Park Commission's
approval, the Recreation and Parks Director stated the matter went to Council for
contract approval; continued the presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the 3% is factored into the Fee Schedule, to which the
Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; continued the presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the Krusi Park stage can be utilized on a drop in basis
if it is not reserved.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated all picnic areas
in the park can be used on a drop in basis if not reserved; continued the presentation.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the Recreation and Parks Director will make a
presentation at the Parks Commission meeting.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated the matter will
on the December 14th agenda.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the fee for use of the Estuary Park
synthetic turf is for the whole season, to which the Recreation and Parks Director
responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired why the residential rate is lower than the non-
residential rate.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded that she does not want to price out the
non-residents or they will not utilize the field.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if the fees are valid for one year, to which the
Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated the fees can always
be changed.
Expressed concerns with the portable toilets at the Alameda gym; urged Council to not
pass the 3% fee increase: Marianne Carter, Recreation Commission.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the portable toilets are for events at
Alameda Point gym.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
December 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-12-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-12-05,19,"(17-737) Update on Tracking of Council Direction through the Referral Process.
(17-738) The City Manager made an announcement regarding the Fire Station 3 Grand
Opening.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether completed referrals would age off the list.
The City Manager responded the completed referrals will age off at the annual priority
goal setting meeting.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(17-739) Gaby Dolphin, Alameda, stated AMP and Public Utilities Board (PUB) need to
be involved in the climate plan change; expressed concern with having a nuclear
research station in Alameda.
Mayor Spencer suggested staff correct the word in the press release from nuclear to
renewable energy.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(17-740) Consider Providing Direction to Staff on Alameda Municipal Power's (AMP)
Smart Meter Program, Including Opting Out, City Manager Voting, Radio Frequency
(RF) Radiation, Maintenance and Inspection. (Mayor Spencer and Vice Mayor Vella)
Vice Mayor Vella and Mayor Spencer made brief comments regarding the referral.
Expressed concern over AMP's Smart Meter program causing serious threats to health;
discussed scientific studies and opting out: Christopher Rabe, Alameda.
Expressed concern over RF emitting from the Smart Meters; suggested a moratorium
on installations: Shelby Sheeham, Alameda.
Expressed concern over having to pay to opt out of the Smart Meter program: Lisa
Zapata, Alameda.
Expressed concern over AMP not listening to the requests of Council and the
community: Gaby Dolphin, Alameda.
Expressed concern over the safety of Smart Meters and the cost of opt out feature:
Heather Curtis, Alameda.
Expressed concern over fire and safety of Smart Meters: Nancy Gordon, Alameda.
The AMP General Manager stated due to the concerns expressed by the public, the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
19
December 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-12-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-12-19,24,"(17-774) There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting in
memory of Ed Lee at 12:28 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
22
December 19, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-12-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-07,6,"(17-79) Tammy Miller, Alameda, stated that she hopes Council and FAAS could come
to a resolution together.
(17-80) Provided a handout and presented a brief powerpoint regarding deep ocean
exploration: Liz Taylor, Alameda.
(17-81) Nara Dahlbacka, FAAS, stated she is looking forward to a good compromise
between the City and FAAS.
(17-82) Matthew Pearce, FAAS, stated FAAS has made huge gains in improving the
shelter and is offering more than 30% of the budget; he is concerned FAAS is being met
with resistance from the City; he is feeling uneasy about the process and hopes there is
resolution soon.
(17-83) Lulia, Alameda, discussed the refugee crisis and thanked Council for standing
up for refugees.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(17-84) Consider Directing Staff to Review and Update Outdoor Lighting Regulations,
also Referred to as Night Sky or Dark Sky, to Reduce Light Pollution. (Mayor Spencer)
Mayor Spencer made brief comments on her referral.
Urged Council to get an ordinance in place regarding the lights: Jim Hagar, Alameda.
Stated the core of the issue is the code does not adequately address the situation of
commercial development which abuts a residential area: Gary Thompson, Alameda.
Urged Council to pass regulation regarding the lighting and commercial development:
Pat Lanborn, Alameda.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the referral is related to the mixed use referral; he has
started re-reading the 2008 Local Area Action Plan about the interface between
commercial and residential uses; he would like to see how the referral's policies are laid
out and how it relates to the 2008 document.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the policy was not a Homeowner Association
(HOA) policy.
Mayor Spencer stated that she is requesting support from Council to submit the referral,
along with other outstanding referrals, for discussion at the priority setting workshop.
In response to Vice Mayor Vella's inquiry regarding clarification on the mixed use
referral, Councilmember Matarrese stated the mixed use referral is related because it
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
February 7, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-02-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-07,10,"(17-90) Vice Mayor Vella recognized Brett Webb and Amanda Cooper for organizing the
Islamic Center event.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 9:42 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Irma Glidden
Assistant City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
February 7, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-02-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-01-16,12,"(18-033 REOPENED) Resolution No. 15343, ""Disapproving Parcel Map No. 10275 - A
Parcel Map for the Proposed Subdivision of the Parcel at 1700 Harbor Bay Parkway
(Hampton Inn and Suites) into Two Parcels."" Adopted.
The City Attorney stated an issue needs to be clarified on the Parcel Map matter.
The Assistant City Attorney stated the map act requires the City Council to either
approve or disapprove the Parcel Map if findings are made.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether Council could move for reconsideration, to which the
Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of reconsideration.
The City Attorney stated the motion needs to be done by one of the abstainers.
Vice Mayor Vella moved approval of reconsideration.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
Councilmember Matarrese moved [adoption of the resolution] approving of the Parcel
Map.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which failed by the following voice
vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft and Matarrese - 2. Noes: Councilmembers
Oddie, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 3.
The Assistant City Attorney stated to disapprove the Parcel Map, Council needs to
make a finding that the map is inconsistent with the General Plan.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would like the findings to enumerate the multiple
reasons the map is inconsistent with the General Plan.
The City Attorney stated if Council wishes to take action tonight, it needs to be based on
the findings to disapprove the Parcel Map not being consistent with the General Plan; if
Council would like staff to work through other findings to disapprove the matter, it will
have to be brought back.
Mayor Spencer stated the reasons should be enumerated.
Councilmember Oddie stated there is a problem with the General Plan and the
Development Agreement (DA).
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
11
January 16, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-01-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-02-06,23,"(18-076) Janet Gibson, ACT, stated ACT has been advocating for a senior housing with
progressive assistance; discussed using developer impact fees for affordable housing
and rental assistance.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(18-077) Update on Tracking of Council Direction through the Referral Process.
(18-078) Consider Directing Staff to Provide Information on the Citywide Dockless Bike
Sharing Program and Return to Council with Additional Safety Requirements. Not
heard. (Mayor Spencer and Vice Mayor Vella)
(18-079) Consider Banning Motorized Commercial Vehicles, Including Robotic
Commercial Vehicles, from Sidewalks and Commercial Drone Aircraft Used for
Deliveries. Not heard. (Councilmember Matarrese)
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(18-080) Councilmember Oddie provided information on StopWaste.org.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:37 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 6, 2018
21",CityCouncil/2018-02-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-02-20,2,"(18-086) Paul Foreman, Alameda, discussed Mixed Use (MX) zoning; urged Council to
amend the ordinance to provide an enforceable, objective standard.
(18-087) Gaby Dolphin, Alameda, announced the Alameda League of Women Voters is
holding a meeting tomorrow on campaign finance; discussed the Friends of Wadi
Foquin event at the Library called ""Home Away from Home: Little Palestine by the Bay.'
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced that the Legislative Agenda [paragraph no. 18-091 was
removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Matarrese recused himself from the resolution for Landscaping and
Lighting District 84-2 [paragraph no. 18-094].
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the remainder of the Consent
Calendar.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*18-088) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on January 16, 2018 and
the Special Meeting Held on January 30, 2018. Approved.
(*18-089) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,389,460.03.
(*18-090) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Second
Amendment to an Agreement with Macks Craic Inc. (dba Mack5) to Add the Amount of
$40,000 for a Total Agreement Amount of $146,470 for Construction Management
Services for Cross Alameda Trail - Jean Sweeney Open Space Park. Accepted.
(18-091) Recommendation to Approve the 2018 Legislative Agenda for the City of
Alameda.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to consider adding the following: 1)
addressing income disparity under affordable housing as a way to assist with the high
cost of housing in Alameda; currently, there is Council direction on raising the minimum
wage, which aligns with his request to initiate action with lobbyists, the Association of
Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the League of California Cities (LCC) for tax
deductions for rent paid by people under a certain income level; 2) cannabis use under
public safety; there is a misplacement of cannabis being on Schedule 1 along with
substances like LSD and a glaring lack of scientific study; he would like to request the
National Institute on Health (NIH) conduct studies to characterize the substance, as well
as its potential uses and side effects; the results should be listed on the City's legislative
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
February 20, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-02-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-04-03,13,"(18-198) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft made an announcement regarding the East Bay
Economic Development Alliance innovators award and the City's Spring Egg Scramble.
Vice Mayor Vella made brief comments regarding the Scramble.
(18-199) Vice Mayor Vella announced that she and the Mayor met with staff regarding
the cannabis Request for Proposals to have the matter placed on the next Council
agenda.
(18-200) Mayor Spencer made an announcement regarding the non-violence speech
contest and job fair.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 10:06 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
April 3, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-04-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-04-17,7,"(18-222) Recommendation to Approve the Implementing Regulations Governing a
Request for Proposals (RFP) Process for Allocating Limited Privilege to Apply for a
Cannabis Business Permit and the Request for Proposals.
The Economic Development Manager gave a brief presentation.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Economic Development
Manager stated the panel score for each category is an average score, not a collective
score.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry regarding the July 1st State deadline for
testing labs, the Economic Development Manager stated staff recommended not
including testing labs in the RFP because of the State deadline; Council wanted to be
fair and include testing labs; as a result, any testing labs wanting to come to Alameda
will be delayed due to the RFP process.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what connection the Mastick Recreation
Manager has as the health member of the panel.
The Economic Development Manager responded the City does not have individuals
with a health background, but the Mastick Recreation Manager is covering that area
because she works with seniors on a daily basis and knows a lot about their concerns.
Expressed concern regarding the RFP process: Rich Moskowitz, Alameda Cannabis
Times.
Stated that he would love to be part of the Alameda community; he is concerned about
the time constraint with the State deadline and the Alameda RFP process: Brian
Brandley, Steep Hill Labs.
Urged Councilmembers who voted against access to cannabis to recuse themselves
from the item: Phil Redd, Alameda.
Urged Council to consider the time constraint regarding the State deadline: Thomas
Blank, Steep Hill Labs.
Stated that she would love for her company to move to Alameda: Suzanne Blank, Steep
Hill Labs.
Stated Steep Hill and CW Analytical are the two oldest and most prestigious testing labs
in the United States; Steep Hill would like to come to Alameda; urged Council to move
quickly to select the labs due to the State deadline: Cathie Bennett Warner, Steep Hill
Labs.
Urged Council to address the timeliness for selecting the testing labs; stated labs are
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
April 17, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-04-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-05-01,13,"(18-255) Recommendation to Approve City Attorney Employment Agreement.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he pulled the item because he wanted to voice
his opposition to the terms of the agreement.
The Acting City Manager stated the Human Resources Director can provide a report.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the matter was previously addressed in closed
session.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft noted the closed session vote was three to two.
Mayor Spencer moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that her no vote does not in any
way reflect her dissatisfaction with the hardworking City Attorney; it is simply her
concern that the Council had not built in time to actually do an evaluation process; for
that reason, she is voting no.
Mayor Spencer stated that she fully supports the work of the City Attorney and the
agreement.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Oddie, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 3. Noes: Councilmembers Ezzy
Ashcraft and Matarrese - 2.
(*18-256) Resolution No. 15374, ""Amending the Executive Management Employees
(EXME) Salary Schedule to Reflect the Increase in Compensation to $188,609 for the
City Clerk Position."" Adopted.
(*18-257) Ordinance No. 3212, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the Acting City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of the Lease with
Play House, LLC for Ten Years with One Five-Year Renewal Option in the Historic
Alameda Theatre, Located at 2319 Central Avenue."" Finally passed.
(*18-258) Ordinance No. 3213, ""Approving a Lease and Authorizing the Acting City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Forty-Eight
Month Lease for 44,000 Square Feet with Shimmick/CEC Joint Venture, for a Portion of
Building 170, Located at 1770 Viking Street at Alameda Point."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(18-259) Resolution No. 15375, ""Confirming the Park Street Business Improvement
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
May 1, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-05-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-05-01,19,"(18-263) The Acting City Manager announced that the City received a California Health
Care Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act/Department of Justice grant of about
$200,000 with the help of Serena Chen and staff.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(18-264) Update on Tracking of Council Direction through the Referral Process.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(18-265) Councilmember Oddie recognized the City Attorney made an announcement
about it being the Assistant City Attorney's last meeting.
The Assistant City Attorney made brief comments.
Mayor Spencer made brief comments.
(18-266) Councilmember Matarrese stated the City's Legislative Agenda includes
income disparity and tax relief for rent paid for people of a certain income level; his
referral on the matter included having Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG)
take up the issue; he would do so at the upcoming ABAG meeting.
(18-267) Vice Mayor Vella announced that she attended the Lead Abatement Joint
Powers Authority meeting; stated fees have not changed in years; the County Board of
Supervisors is contemplating looking at the fees and program needs in 2020 or after;
the Oakland Get the Lead Out Coalition has been pushing for stronger local legislation
and State legislation in regards to lead levels and blood lead testing access for parents
and students.
(18-268) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended the League of
California Cities (LCC) Legislative Action Day; stated the League is pushing funding for
housing, especially affordable housing, and preserving transportation money;
announced the vast majority of the Council served as judges at the Bay Farm School
science fair; announced that she attended the LCC East Bay Division annual fundraiser.
ADJOURNMENT
(18-269) There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at
9:19 p.m. in memory of Norma Arnerich.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
14
May 1, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-05-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-06-05,2,"(18-319) Rich Moskowitz, Alameda, expressed concern over cannabis businesses
failing to meet minimum requirements and there not being applicants for all categories;
questioned the process; suggested the process be reopened and remain rolling until
open slots are filled; suggested changes be made to sensitive sites.
(18-320) Former Councilmember Barbara Thomas, Alameda, submitted information;
suggested a revision to Council's salary be placed on the November ballot, and that
Council have part-time staff and a $150 stipend per month; expressed concern over rent
increases at Independence Plaza.
(18-321) Kurt Peterson, Alameda, discussed development and job creation.
(18-322) Catherine Pauling, Alameda, expressed concern over progressives being
targeted by landlords and investors, the culture to of the community being in a fight to
survive, high residential turnover; and funding to fight renters.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced that the Alameda Point Transportation Demand
Management Plan [paragraph no. 18-326], the Library bond resolution [paragraph no.
18-328], and the workforce change resolution [paragraph no. 18-329 were removed
from the Consent Calendar for discussion; the inclusionary housing program [paragraph
no. 18-330 would not be heard; Councilmember Oddie is abstaining from voting on the
minutes [paragraph no. 18-323]; and that she would vote against the ordinance
amending the Sunshine Ordinance [paragraph no. 18-336].
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the remainder of the Consent
Calendar.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye;
Councilmember Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Spencer: Aye. Ayes: 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(18-323) Minutes of the Special City Council Meetings Held on May 1, 2018. Approved.
[Note: Councilmember Oddie abstained from voting on the minutes. The item carried by
the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Vella and Mayor
Spencer - 4. Abstention: Councilmember Oddie - 1.]
(*18-324) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,613,439.81.
(*18-325) Recommendation to Consent to the Public Utilities Board's Request to Solicit
Bids and Sell One Surplus Small Bucket Utility Vehicle. Accepted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
June 5, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-06-19,5,"(18-367K) Resolution No. 15400, ""Reappointing Sherice Youngblood as a Member of the
Social Service Human Relations Board.' Adopted.
Councilmember Oddie requested the resolution appointing Ms. Hyman be separate.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the remaining resolutions.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
- 5.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is motion to apppoint Ms. Hyman, then withdrew
the question; stated the appointees could be sworn in.
The City Clerk administered the oath of office and presented certificates of appointment
to Mr. Barde, Ms. Kenny, Ms. Morrison, Mr. Lau, Ms. Hadid, Ms. Kay, and Mr. Rickard.
(18-368) Mayor's State of the City Address.
Mayor Spencer gave a Power Point presentation.
***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 7:59 p.m. to hold the special joint meeting and
reconvened the meeting at 9:12 p.m.
***
(18-369) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15402, ""Amending Master Fee
Resolution No. 12191 to Add and Revise Fees, Including a Rent Stabilization Program
Late Fee."" Adopted.
The Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the business license late fee is part of the master
agreement, to which the Finance Director responded in the affirmative; stated the late fee
is 10% per month, not to exceed 60%.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether it is possible to stipulate that the late fee
assessed cannot be passed on to the tenant.
The Assistant City Attorney responded an ordinance amendment would be needed to
make the stipulation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the tenant has no control over whether the fee is
paid in a timely manner; asked staff to come back with an amendment.
The City Attorney stated the rent fee is capped at a 5% increase; the landlord's costs are
not delineated; whether or not there could be pass-throughs was previously discussed;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
June 19, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-07-24,9,"(18-441C) Resolution No. 15421, ""Appointing Alysha Nachtigall as a Member of the
Transportation Commission."" Adopted; and
(18-441D) Resolution No. 15422; ""Appointing Sharon Nearn as a Member of the
Transportation Commission."" Adopted.
Stated that he would like to serve to support Alameda Municipal Power's climate
change efforts: Jeffrey Gould, Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented certificates of
appointment to Mr. Gould, Mr. Johnson, Ms. Nachtigall and Ms. Nearn.
(18-442) Presentation on Role of TetraTech EC in the Environmental Clean-Up of
Alameda Point by the United States Navy.
The Acting Assistant City Manager made brief comments.
***
Mayor Spencer left the dais at 7:42 p.m. and returned at 7:43 p.m. and left at 7:51 p.m.
and returned at 7:52 p.m.
Anthony Megliola, Navy Base Closure Manager, gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired why finding the anomaly took two years and
whether Alameda could expect something similar.
Mr. Megliola responded the Navy learned a lot from the experience at Hunters Point;
stated fraud was not expected initially; a considerable amount of time was spent
working with the contractor in good faith, getting new samples and re-doing field work,
which took a significant amount of time.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether getting information today would take
less than two years, to which Mr. Megliola responded the Navy is confident something
similar will not occur today at Alameda Point or other Navy installations; stated the Navy
has created protections to ensure it will not happen again, which include having an
independent third party contractor to oversee radiological work.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the third party contractor is doing
repeat soil testing, not just reviewing data.
Matt Slack, Navy Radiological Affairs Support Office, responded on an as needed basis,
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
July 24, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-07-24.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-09-04,4,"(18-466) Steve Slauson, Alameda, stated that he is running for Assembly; discussed
security concerns and burglaries.
(18-467) George Apostolopoulos, California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA) Open
Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE), discussed the PACE funding program; urged
the City to implement the program.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Assistant City Manager stated the matter
would come back as part of the first steps under Climate Action Plan early next year.
(18-468) Phil Redd, Alameda, expressed concern over the proposed sales tax and
discussed expanding cannabis businesses.
Councilmember Oddie requested personal attacks be avoided.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced the litigation report [paragraph no. 18-474], resolution on Bill
3036 [paragraph no. 18-476 and resolution on Bill 3250 [paragraph no. 18-477 were
removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*18-469) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on July 10,
2018. Approved.
(*18-470) Ratified bills in the amount of $13,534,714.66.
(*18-471) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Reporting
Period Ending June 30, 2018 (Funds Collected During the Period January 1, 2018 to
March 31, 2018). Accepted.
(*18-472) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a Second
Amendment to Agreement with Digital Maps for Three Years, for an Amount Not to
Exceed $36,000 per Year, for a Total Five-Year Expenditure Not to Exceed $180,000,
for Government Data Mapping. Accepted.
(*18-473) Recommendation to Accept the Annual Report on the Alameda Landing
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program and Approve City Staff
Recommendations for Program Improvements. Accepted.
(18-474) Recommendation to Accept the Report on Litigation and Liability Claims
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
September 4, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-09-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-09-18,5,"(18-500 Cynthia Bonta, Alameda Sister City Dumaguete Partnership, expressed support
of sister city Verrazze and people-to-people Sister City engagement; expressed concern
over the delay of Wadi Fodquin becoming a Sister City.
(18-501) Paula Rainey, Wadi Foquin Sister City Committee, expressed support of the
Sister City Verrazze and concern over Wadi Foquin Sister City process.
(18-502) Pamela Kurtz, Reverend, Alameda, expressed concern over the delay in
declaring Wadi Foquin a Sister City.
(18-503) Steve Slauson, Alameda, expressed concern over the City's Sanctuary City
resolution; urged it be rescinded.
(18-504) Ruth Abbe, Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda, provided a handout
and announced upcoming events.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The City Clerk announced the Otis Traffic Calming contract [paragraph no. 18-510 was
removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll
call vote: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye;
Councilmember Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Spencer: Aye. Ayes: 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*18-505) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on July 24,
2018 and the Special City Council Meeting Held on September 4, 2018. Approved.
(*18-506) Ratified bills in the amount of $7,197,993.29.
(*18-507) Recommendation to Approve a Professional Services Agreement, for an
Amount not to Exceed $50,000, to BLX Group, LLC, for Arbitrage Rebate Compliance
Services and Analysis for Various Bond Issues. Accepted.
(*18-508) Recommendation to Approve Amendment to the Agreement with George Hills
Company to Extend the Term by Five Years and Increase the Compensation for a Total
Five Year Expenditure Not to Exceed $404,300 for Third Party Claims Administration
Services. Accepted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 18, 2018
2",CityCouncil/2018-09-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-09-18,9,"(18-518) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding
Article 4-60 (Minimum Wage) to Chapter IX (Regulations Concerning Trade and
Commerce) Concerning a Citywide Minimum Wage to Raise Alameda's Minimum Wage
to $15.00 per Hour by July 1, 2020. Not introduced; and
(18-518A) Adoption of Resolution Amending the General Fund Operating Budget for
Fiscal Year 2018-19. Not adopted. Continued to October 2, 2018.
Mayor Spencer inquired if Council would consider hearing the report from staff and the
14-15 speakers, but not making a final decision until a later Council meeting due to Yom
Kippur; noted that other bodies do not meet on Yom Kippur; stated in the future, the City
Council should consider not having a Council meeting on Yom Kippur.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired if Council would be open to continuing the item.
Mayor Spencer stated it would be similar to the last item that was continued.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification.
The City Clerk explained once Council opens an item and hears public comment, the
item can be continued to a date certain; stated the public comment is typically closed,
but there is an option to decide to hear more comment.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft mentioned that due to it being Yom Kippur, she would
consider allowing the public comment to continue at the next meeting for those who
could not attend the meeting tonight.
Councilmember Oddie stated with respect for the holiday, the agenda item has been in
the works for 2 years; many letters were received for the item; people did have an
opportunity to express themselves and make their position known through written
comment; he is unsure of what the issue is with keeping the item as-is.
Mayor Spencer stated that she values public commentstated the School Board in
Alameda does not meet on Yom Kippur.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry if all the dates in the report would
remain the same if the item was continued, Mayor Spencer responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired why the issue of scheduling was not addressed earlier.
Mayor Spencer responded that by the time she was made aware of the concern, it
would have been too late to re-schedule; stated she wants to accommodate those who
wanted to speak and are present; explained that in the future Council should try not to
schedule a meeting on Yom Kippur.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 18, 2018
6",CityCouncil/2018-09-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-10-16,13,"(18-588) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute
Documents Necessary to Implement a Ten-Year Lease with SpinLaunch Inc., a
California Corporation, for Building 530, Located at 120 West Oriskany Avenue at
Alameda Point. Not heard.
(18-589) SUMMARY: Public Hearing to Facilitate a Tax-Exempt Bond Financing for
Acquisition, Construction, Improvement, and Equipping of the Site A Affordable Family
and Senior Projects by Eden Housing
Public Hearing Under the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) to Consider
Resolution No. 15447, ""Approving the Issuance of Revenue Bonds by the California
Municipal Finance Authority in an Aggregate Principal Amount Not to Exceed
$45,000,000 to Finance a 70-Unit Multifamily Rental Housing Facility for Low- and Very
Low-Income Families for the Benefit of Eden Housing Inc., or a Limited Partnership to
be Established by Eden Housing Inc. (or an Affiliate). Adopted; and
(18-589 A) Resolution No. 15448, ""Approving the Issuance of Revenue Bonds by the
California Municipal Finance Authority in an Aggregate Principal Amount Not to Exceed
$40,000,000 to Finance a 60-Unit Multifamily Rental Housing Facility for Low- and Very
Low-Income Seniors for the Benefit of Eden Housing Inc., or a Limited Partnership to be
Established by Eden Housing Inc. (or an Affiliate). These Revenue Bonds will provide
for the financing of the Site A Affordable Family and Senior Projects."" Adopted.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of both revenue bonds that are
necessary for the low and very-low income family housing adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(18-590) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15449, ""Calling a Special Election
Regarding Alteration of the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes for
Community Facilities District No. 17-1 (Alameda Point Public Services District).
""
Adopted; and
(18-590 A) Resolution No. 15450, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2018-19 Budget for the
Community Facilities District 17-1 Fund by Increasing Estimated Revenue by $174,051
and Increasing the Expenditure Budget by $35,000."" Adopted.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 9:20 p.m. and reconvened at 9:28 p.m.
(18-591) Resolution No. 15451, ""Amending Master Fee Resolution No. 12191 to Revise
Fees to Add New Cannabis Business Operator and Regulatory Fees."" Adopted;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
October 16, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-10-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-10-16,14,"(18-591 A) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending the
Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Section 30-10 (Cannabis) to (1) Add Cannabis
Retail Businesses as Conditionally Permitted Uses in the C-1, Neighborhood Business
and C-M, Commercial-Manufacturing Zoning Districts; (2) Add Two Delivery-Only
Cannabis Retail Businesses as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the C-M, Commercial-
Manufacturing Zoning District; (3) Amend Certain Portions of the Zoning Code to Enable
Cannabis Retail Businesses to Dispense Non-Medicinal or ""Adult Use"" Cannabis; and
(4) Amend Certain Portions of the Zoning Code to Eliminate the Dispersion
Requirement for Delivery-Only Cannabis Businesses. Introduced;
(18-591 B) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
Amending Article XVI (Cannabis Businesses) of Chapter VI (Businesses, Occupations
and Industries) to (1) Eliminate the Cap on Testing Laboratories; (2) Add Two Delivery-
Only Dispensaries; (3) Allow Adult Use; (4) Create a Two-Tier Buffer Zone from
Sensitive Uses for Dispensaries and Cultivation Businesses; and (5) Make Other
Clarifying Revisions. Introduced; and
(18-5591 C) Recommendation to Confirm Continued Use of Request for Proposal (RFP)
Process to Administer Cannabis Retail Dispensary Business Operators' Permit
Selection Process.
The Economic Development Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired how Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) regulations differ from
the ordinance.
The Assistant City Attorney responded that he briefly looked up the regulations; 600 feet
is discretionary and includes churches.
The Economic Development Manager continued the presentation.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, the Economic Development Manager
stated the regulation is only for the C1 zone based on the discussion from July.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if applicants, instead of the City, are required to
notify a 300-foot radius.
The Economic Development Manager responded either the City or application can do
the notification; stated an outside service would also be an option; continued the
presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired what the difference is between when the ABC denies a retail
license as opposed to what the City has proposed for cannabis.
The Assistant City Attorney responded ABC has the ability to deny a permit but not
based on the proximity or violation of the buffer; stated the City's ordinance is not
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 16, 2018
11",CityCouncil/2018-10-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-10-16,29,"(18-593) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Library Board,
Planning Board and Social Service Human Relations Board. Not heard.
(18-594) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she participated in two walk-and-roll-
to-school days at both Wood Middle School and Franklin Elementary School.
Mayor Spencer stated she participated in one at Otis Elementary.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 11:22 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
26
October 16, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-10-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-15,8,"(19-051) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda
Municipal Code by (1) Amending Section 30-10 (Cannabis) to (a) Add Cannabis Retail
Businesses as Conditionally Permitted Uses in the C-1, Neighborhood Business, and C-
M, Commercial-Manufacturing Zoning Districts, (b) Amend Certain Portions of the
Zoning Code to Enable Cannabis Retail Businesses to Dispense Non-Medicinal or
""Adult Use"" Cannabis, and (c) Amend Certain Portions of the Zoning Code to Remove
the Dispersion Requirement; and (2) Repeal Ordinance No. 3228. Not introduced; and
(19-051A) Introduction of Ordinance: (1) Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
Amending Article XVI (Cannabis Businesses) of Chapter VI (Businesses, Occupations
and Industry) to (a) Eliminate the Cap on Testing Laboratories, (b) Allow for Two
Additional Cannabis Businesses to Operate as ""Dispensary/Delivery"" (Delivery
Required, Open to the Public) within the Zoning Districts for Cannabis Retail, (c) Amend
the Dispersion Requirement to Require No More Than Two Cannabis Retail Businesses
to Operate on Either Side of Grand Street, (d) Create a Two-Tier Buffer Zone from
Sensitive Uses for Cannabis Businesses, (e) Amend Certain Portions of the Regulatory
Ordinance to Enable Cannabis Retail Businesses to Dispense Non-Medicinal or ""Adult
Use"" Cannabis, (f) Modify Requirements for Off-Island Delivery, and (g) Make Other
Clarifying or Conforming Amendments Thereto; and (2) Repealing Ordinance No. 3227.
Not introduced.
Councilmember Daysog recused himself and left the dais.
The Interim City Attorney gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if Council approves the item, will the original ordinance
still be in effect, to which the Interim City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if Council does not approve the item, will the original
ordinance still be in effect, to which the Interim City Attorney responded in the
affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if there is a plan to have a Council discussion about the
Sunshine Ordinance and where it may conflict with the Charter and the Constitution, to
which the Interim City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the previous ordinances will stand regardless of
how the Council votes, to which the Interim City Attorney responded in the affirmative;
recommended re-introduction of the ordinances; stated Council will need three votes to
reintroduce the ordinance; if there are not three affirmative votes, the current ordinances
will stay in effect, but will raise the potential of legal action.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if the youth center issue is not on the agenda, to which
the Interim City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
January 15, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-15,17,"(19-057) Recommendation to Consider Directing the City Attorney to Initiate Litigation to
Obtain a Judicial Declaration Whether Enforcement of the McKay Open Space Initiative
will Require the City of Alameda to Compensate the Owner for the Value of the McKay
Avenue Property in the event that the McKay Open Space Initiative Becomes Effective.
Councilmember Vella stated the item is premature and Council should not take action at
this time.
Councilmember Oddie suggested direction be given to put this item on a future agenda
in the event it is needed.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council should wait to provide direction until after April 9,
2019 election results.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:59 p.m., there being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft continued the
meeting to February 1, 2019 at 5:01 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk and Secretary, SACIC
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 15, 2019
4",CityCouncil/2019-01-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-03-05,17,"(19-139) Joe Loparo, Alameda Chapter of Bay Association of Realtors, announced an
application process for a scholarship has been opened; stated $28,000 was awarded
last year; the application period is open from now until May 5th; interested applicants
can visit: www.bayeast.org/foundation; the minimum award is $1,500 per person.
COUNCIL REFERRAL
(19-140) Briefly Discuss as a Council, the Logistics, Goals, and Vision Surrounding the
March 16, 2019 Priority Setting Workshop. (Councilmember Oddie).
Councilmember Oddie made brief comments regarding the referral.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Public Information Officer forwarding information from
Management Partners that notes items for the upcoming workshop; outlined e-mail
details.
Councilmember Oddie stated he has met with Management Partners and shared his
priorities but a discussion has not been had related to staff being present; expressed
concern about the decision to hold the workshop outside of Council Chambers and
agendizing the workshop.
Councilmember Daysog stated the idea of a priority setting workshop is fantastic;
inquired if Councilmember Oddie has suggestions for Council to consider; stated the
issue is not about what is going to be discussed, but how items will be discussed.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the workshop is meant to give Council a chance to meet
and discuss concerns and desires moving forward; the Council has accomplished a lot
in two months, but the workshop will be better with input forwarded to workshop
facilitators.
Councilmember Oddie stated an envisioning process should have been held by Council;
expressed concern about the workshop planning process; stated that he was not
involved in the decision making process.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she met with Management Partners; discussed a
previous Council workshop; stated the new City Manager will be in attendance to learn
more about Council's priorities.
Councilmember Vella stated the current Council is performing differently than the
previous one; it is helpful to discuss why a priority setting workshop is being held for
transparency sake; having a brief conversation about how the workshop will be run is
helpful; the detriment to being a part-time Council is not spending much time together
as a body and being able to have esoteric conversations about priorities; staff presence
will be helpful to provide context and background information; inquired whether staff
would not be present to take notes and provide feedback, whether this is the first of a
series of workshops; how Council will relay items to staff if the workshop is not taped.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
16
March 5, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-03-05,20,"(19-141) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft made an announcement nominating Vadim Sidelnikov for
appointment to the Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC).
(19-142) Councilmember Vella announced that Alameda Healthy Homes department is
looking for public events to attend, such as the Park Street festival; requested staff to
follow up with Lead Abatement staff; discussed getting Alameda County to fund training
for staff to use the paint litigation funds.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Alameda Point Collaborative residents have the opportunity
to attend the training.
Councilmember Vella stated once Alameda County has staff to do the training, a
request can be made to do training at Alameda Point Collaborative.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry regarding the RRAC nomination
[paragraph no. 19-141], the City Clerk clarified the list is typically included on the
agenda, but is just an announcement, not a Council action; noted the Resolution would
come to Council for action at the next meeting.
(19-143) Councilmember Oddie announced that he and Councilmember Daysog, as the
subcommittee addressing West Midway Project developer selection, met with staff via
phone and formulated questions to be sent to developers; discussed StopWaste, the
Climate Action Plan, and Senate Bill SB1393.
(19-144) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that the Alameda County Transportation
Commission has a new director for Caltrans District 4; stated Caltrans is looking to
support complete streets.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:16
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 5, 2019
19",CityCouncil/2019-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-04-02,22,"(19-204) February 2019 Topic Brief on Climate Action and Embodied Emissions.
[Informational Only] (Councilmember Oddie)
Councilmember Oddie briefly discussed the topic brief.
(19-205) Vice Mayor Knox White made an announcement regarding an Alameda
County Transportation Commission (ACTC) meeting that he attended discussing
proposed BART changes and a new proposed agency; discussed adoption of the
legislative work plan, including Assembly Bill AB1487 to form a regional housing
agency.
(19-206) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed the League of California Cities Housing and
Economic Development Committee meeting; stated that she met with Senator Skinner
regarding the bill; announced that she attended the opening of Everett Commons and
the opening of Littlejohn Park; discussed the Census 2020 Steering Committee and an
upcoming CASA Compact meeting.
(19-207) Status of the Emma Hood Swim Center at Alameda High School.
Vice Mayor Knox White provided an update.
(19-208) Review and Discuss Charter Amendment Timeline and Issues Proposed by
the Council Subcommittee.
Vice Mayor Knox White and Councilmember Daysog gave a brief presentation on the
list of items.
In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, Vice Mayor Knox White stated the
timeline can be discussed separately or congruently with the topics; Councilmembers
run for office every two years and timing can be difficult; outlined the upcoming primary
election ballot costs and potential dates; stated the process is a rough draft for updating
the charter.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if the League of Women Voters (LWV) has been notified,
to which Vice Mayor Knox White responded in the affirmative.
The City Clerk noted there are prohibitions to the March 2020 election; Council pay and
the Auditor and Treasurer positions are among the prohibited items, which would push
to the November 2020 election.
Councilmember Vella stated Section 2-9 relates to pregnancy; if placed on bed rest,
Alameda Hospital does not have the capacity for labor and delivery; therefore, a
pregnant Councilmember would be forced to leave the Island causing an effective
vacancy; requiring Council approval for pregnancy related items is demeaning;
expressed concern in relation to the Auditor and Treasurer positions not being held to
the same standards as Council; stated maternity leave for Councilmembers at 30
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
13
April 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-04-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-04-16,13,"(19-238 B) Final Passage of Ordinance Concerning Cannabis Regulations in Alameda
Municipal Code Article XVI (Cannabis Businesses) of Chapter VI (Businesses,
Occupations and Industries) that, Among Other Things, Establishes the Number of
Retail Cannabis Dispensaries to be Open to the Public (including Delivery), Disperses
Their Operations, Creates a Buffer Zone from Sensitive Uses, and Permits the Sale of
Non-Medicinal Cannabis; and
(19-238 C) Final Passage of Ordinance Concerning Land Use Requirements in the
Zoning Ordinance of Alameda Municipal Code Section 30-10 (Cannabis) that, Among
Other Things, Permits Retail Cannabis Dispensaries in Certain Zoning Districts Subject
to a Conditional Use Permit and Permits the Sale of Non-Medicinal Cannabis in Certain
Zoning Districts. Not heard.
(*19-239) Ordinance No. 3235, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Eliminating
Section 6-58.200, the Sunset Clause (December 31, 2019), from Ordinance No. 3148
(City of Alameda Rent Review, Rent Stabilization, and Limitations on Evictions
Ordinance).' Finally passed.
(*19-240) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute Second
Amendment to the Agreement with Susan Mayer to Extend the Term by Five Months,
for Financial Services in Connection with Completing the Implementation of the Cost
Allocation Plan and Indirect Cost Rate Proposal (ICRP). Accepted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(19-241) Presentation by the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) on AUSD's
Mental Health Needs Assessment.
The Economic Development Manager gave a brief presentation.
***
Vice Mayor Knox White left the dais at 8:29 p.m. and returned at 8:31 p.m.
***
Kristen Zazo, AUSD, gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether focus groups involved Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual,
Transgender and Questioning (LGBTQ) students, to which Ms. Zazo responded in the
affirmative; noted LGBTQ students are more at risk of suicide than other groups.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired how the District is working with County Public Health
Department.
Ms. Zazo responded most of the County Mental Health Department support is for
special education; the Districts pays the County $1.2 million for 92 students; the budget
continues to increase; discussed the billing; stated the District is looking for a different
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
April 16, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-04-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-05-21,8,"(19-320) Councilmember Daysog stated Council should have a discussion related to
carve out; inquired whether Council discussion time will be considered in full or for each
item.
The City Clerk stated when a Councilmember's time expires, a vote of four affirmative
votes has to be taken to suspend the Rules of Order.
Councilmember Vella inquired whether three votes are needed to allow a carve out, to
which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of restarting the 9 minutes after the carve-out
discussion.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which requires four affirmative votes and
failed by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Oddie and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft - 3. Noes: Councilmember Vella -
1.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is not in favor of a carve out; discussed the CASA
Compact; stated a carve out is viewed as one less protection for tenants; outlined a
meeting with the Housing Authority and housing providers; stated there are other ways
to address smaller landlords' concerns; discussed the real estate community members
creating a fund for legal fees; stated tenants are put in a vulnerable position; outlined
tenant being afraid of reporting property issues; stated the City is trying to build housing
as fast as possible; a 42% increase in the number of unsheltered individuals cannot
happen in the next two years; expressed concern over the carve out affecting 1,100
rental units.
Councilmember Daysog gave a brief Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Vella stated the stock of SFH declines if converted into a multi-unit
rental or if an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) is added; the presentation has not taken
into account communities of Santa Monica and Berkeley; there is a push to not build
SFH's in order to increase units; SFH's are not the focus of the presented carve out; the
carve out relates to a duplex or larger complex with the landlord living on-site; the
number of tenants that did not report major habitability issues was not captured in the
report; renters are vulnerable in ways homeowners are not; if a landlord is illegally
evicting tenants for discriminatory reasons or retaliation, the burden of proof falls on the
tenant, not the landlord; many California communities are passing just cause eviction
protections, such as Santa Barbara; all cases that have been raised qualify under the
proposed ordinance.
Councilmember Oddie stated a SFH exemption or carve out is not being proposed; the
proposed data shows 57 families that have been displaced from Alameda; there are 5
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
May 21, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-05-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-05-21,11,"(19-326) Councilmember Oddie stated the 2019 Stopwaste business efficiency awards
will occur tomorrow; noted two Alameda businesses being recognized by Stopwaste:
Honolulu BBQ and Semifreddis.
(19-327) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced the Alameda County Mayors' sent a letter to
the Alameda County Board of Supervisors regarding homeless assistance; outlined a
Building Futures with Women and Children event gala, which honored an Alameda
resident, Meredith Mehlberg, for her work with the Jammie Project; announced that she
attended a farm-to-table lunch at the Alameda Point Collaborative and the Christ
Episcopal church's 150th anniversary event.
(19-328) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations for Appointment to the Golf
Commission.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft nominated Claire Loud, Ron Carlson and Peter Pizzino to the Golf
Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 9:37
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 21, 2019
10",CityCouncil/2019-05-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-06-04,12,"(19-357) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft thanked the Councilmembers for attending events on her
behalf; made brief comments regarding her attendance at: the ACTC Annual Retreat,
the Emergency Preparedness Summit in Sacramento, the College of Alameda
graduation, the Memorial Day ceremony at Veterans Memorial Park, an Iftar dinner; and
the Valor Games closing; stated that she will be attending the upcoming Sand Castle
contest at Crown Beach.
(19-358) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations for Appointment to the Civil Service
Board, Housing Authority Board of Commissioners, Library Board, Public Utilities Board
and Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB).
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft nominated Donna Hom and John Nolan for the Civil Service
Board; Kathleen Kearney and Joyce McConeghey for the Library Board; and Moustafa
Aly, Sarah Lewis and Johanna Paillet-Growl for the Social Service Human Relations
Board (SSHRB).
ADJOURNMENT
(19-359) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting
in memory of the 12 victims of a shooting at a municipal building in Virginia Beach at
10:04 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
June 4, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-06-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-06-18,6,"(19-377F) Resolution No. .15554, ""Appointing Johanna Paillet-Growl as a Member of the
Social Service Human Relations Board."" Adopted.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft presented
Certificates of appointment to Ms. Hom, Ms. McConeghey, Mr. Aly, Ms. Lewis and Ms.
Paillet-Growl.
(19-378) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Memorandum of
Understanding with the Alameda Unified School District Concerning a New City of
Alameda Aquatic Facility. Accepted.
The Interim Acting Assistant City Manager/Recreation and Park Director gave a brief
presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether there is a minor typo on page 6 of the
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to which the Interim Acting Assistant City
Manager/Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative; stated an
adjustment will be made.
Councilmember Daysog moved accepting the recommendation; acknowledged Vice
Mayor Knox White, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft and members of the School Board for working
rapidly toward the MOU.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft acknowledged the Interim Acting Assistant City
Manager/Recreation and Park Director for her work related to the item, and Vice Mayor
Knox White's work with members of the pool community.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
Under discussion, Vice Mayor Knox White expressed gratitude toward the swim
community and School Board staff.
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 7:40 p.m. to convene the Special Joint Meeting
of the City Council and the Successor Agency to the Community Improvement
Commission, which adjourned at 8:44 p.m.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft reconvened the Regular meeting at 8:55 p.m.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 18, 2019
4",CityCouncil/2019-06-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-06-18,11,"(19-386) Councilmember Oddie stated that he is representing the City at the upcoming
Tobacco awards; a panel of recycling experts from different cities presented including
Public Works' staff.
(19-387) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft made an announcement regarding the League of
California Cities Housing Community Economic Development meeting related to State
housing funding; an Alameda County Transportation Commission meeting discussing
funding for complete streets, cross Alameda trail, Alameda Point bus rapid transit;
Central Avenue complete streets, Clement Avenue complete streets and the Alameda
Point Seaplane Lagoon ferry terminal.
(19-388) )Consideration of Mayor's Nominations for Appointment to the Planning Board,
Public Art Commission, Public Utilities Board (PUB), Recreation and Parks
Commission, and Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB).
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft nominated Hanson Hom and Teresa Ruiz for appointment to the
Planning Board; Laura Giuntini for reappointment to the Public Utilities Board (PUB);
Tara Navarro for appointment to the Recreation and Parks Commission, and Kristin
Furuichi Fong for appointment to the SSHRB.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 10:10
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Ashley Zieba
Deputy City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 18, 2019
9",CityCouncil/2019-06-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-07-16,5,"(19-418) Recommendation to Authorize the City Attorney to Join as Amicus Curiae on
Behalf of the City in Support of Lawsuits Concerning Topics for which the Council has
Already Taken an Official Policy Position.
The City Attorney gave a brief presentation.
Expressed concern over the proposal; urged the Council keeps its authority: Former
Mayor Trish Spencer, Alameda.
Councilmember Daysog stated that his understanding of the staff report is the City
Attorney's office is seeking ability to join an amicus brief regarding platforms related to
short-term rentals; local governments would like to regulate platforms related to AirBNB
or VRBO; Council is not granting the City Attorney's office to authorize anything related
to local control; expressed support.
Councilmember Oddie stated giving authority is a great idea, when Council does not
have the time to agendize something; requested a copy of the brief be presented as an
informational item.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:54
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
July 16, 2019
4",CityCouncil/2019-07-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-09-03,4,"(19-464) Cheri Johansen, City of Alameda Democratic Club, announced an upcoming
event.
(19-465) Richard Neveln, Alameda, expressed concern over noticing for entry into units
at Independence Plaza.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The Fire Station 5 feasibility study [paragraph no. 19-471]; ferry terminal resolution
[paragraph no. 19-476]; and ordinance [paragraph no. 19-477 were removed from the
Consent Calendar for discussion.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*19-466) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on July 2,
2019. Approved.
(*19-467tified bills in the amount of $ 24,327,141.65.
(*19-468) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Contract in the
Amount of $120,000 with Operation Dignity to Provide Mobile Outreach Services for
Alameda's Homeless Population for Fiscal Year 2019-20. Accepted.
(*19-469) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager, or His Designee, to Execute
a Ten-Year Agreement for Temporary Assignment of Vehicular Equipment with the
State of California Office of Emergency Services for a Type 1 Fire Engine to be Utilized
for Statewide Mutual Aid Response and Local Use. Accepted.
(*19-470) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute an
Agreement for the Purchase of One Horton F-550 Type I Ambulance and Related
Equipment in an Amount Not to Exceed $391,464.51. Accepted.
(19-471) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager, or His Designee, to Execute
Service Provider Agreement in the Amount of $24,970 with Shah Kawasaki Architects,
Inc. for the Feasibility Study of Fire Station 5 New Site Construction Cost.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired where the funding for construction and having an
additional Fire Station would come from; how does the funding maintain the revenue
neutral policy for Alameda Point development; stated going into a recession is not the
best time to take on additional General Fund expenditures.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 3, 2019
2",CityCouncil/2019-09-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-09-03,26,"(19-491) Councilmember Daysog made an announcement regarding attending the East
Bay Division meeting of the League of California Cities.
(19-492) Councilmember Oddie stated Stopwaste is doing a Proposition 218 election to
lower the hazardous waste recycling fee, whichwill be a mail-in only if opposed type of
election; announced that he attended National Night Out.
(19-493) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she and the City Manager toured the closed
Alameda County Glenn Dyre jail, which is being considered as a proposal to shelter
homeless persons.
(19-494) Vice Mayor Knox White stated a link has been provided for the League of
Women Voter's Charter workshops; discussed Estuary Park homeless encampment.
ADJOURNMENT
(19-495) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting
at 11:58 p.m. with a moment of silence for the victims of the dive boat accident in
Southern California, and a moment of remembrance for the victims of mass shootings
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 3, 2019
24",CityCouncil/2019-09-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-09-17,2,"(19-498) Conference with Legal Counsel - Liability Claim (Pursuant to Government
Code § 54956.95); Claimant: Grand Edibles, Inc.; Agency Claimed Against: City of
Alameda
(19-499) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government
Code § 54956.9); Case Name: Guzman V. City of Alameda, et al.; Court: Superior
Court of the State of California, County of Alameda; Case Number: RG17885538
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding Labor, Real Property and the Liability Claim, staff provided
information and Council provided direction with no vote taken; regarding Existing
Litigation, staff provided information and Council authorized the following settlement by
unanimous vote: a lawsuit filed by plaintiff Alina Guzman against AMF Bowling Center,
Inc., Challenge Security Services, the City of Alameda, and Alameda Police Department
(APD) Officers Brandon Hanson, Alyssa Schlitt, Rich Soto, and Mike Tanagataevaha
alleging 1) negligence, 2) assault and battery, 3) false imprisonment, 4) violation of civil
rights under 42 U.S. Code § 1983, 5) violation of civil rights under California Civil Code
Section 52.3 and 6) intentional infliction of emotional distress; with respect to the City
and the APD officers, the claims generally relate to the APD officers' arrest and
detention of Ms. Guzman on May 21, 2017; the City maintains that APD Officers acted
in accordance of all applicable laws; nonetheless, in order to avoid the expense and
uncertainty of litigation, the City Council authorized the City Attorney to settle the matter
with Ms. Guzman in an amount not to exceed $17,500.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 7:15
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 17, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-09-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-09-17,15,"(19-521) Consider Addressing Gun Violence by Sanctioning a Town Hall Event on
October 14, 2019, and Creating a Subcommittee to Organize the Event and Create
Policy Options for Council Discussion. (Vice Mayor Knox White and Councilmember
Oddie)
Councilmember Oddie and Vice Mayor Knox White made brief comments regarding the
referral.
Stated that he would like to volunteer to help; discussed rifle sports, teams and
scholarships, which should be considered: Gordon Taras, Alameda.
Councilmember Vella stated the issue of gun violence has been ongoing; that she is
weary of reinventing the wheel; a number of Bills have been carried both federally and
Statewide; there have been a number of conversations with community leaders;
questioned the context of the referral; stated the issue of addressing gun violence is
broad; a number of elected officials will be involved, but there is a limit to what the City
can do; questioned the goal specifically related to the City and which staff members will
be involved.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there have been three mass shootings recently in: Gilroy,
CA, El Paso, TX and Dayton, OH; a letter has been sent urging the Senate to take on
gun control safety legislation; 281 Mayors have signed the letter; California has some of
the most progressive gun safety legislation in the Country; support letters have been
offered to committee chairs and the Governor; Assembly and Senate floor alerts have
been sent; outlined 11 State Assembly Bills; stated cities are limited; expressed concern
for duplicating staff efforts; questioned whether there is a way to fold the idea and
encourage new legislation at the State and federal levels; stated lobbying for stronger
federal action is needed; the Bay Area wide United Against Hate Campaign will be in
November; community members are encouraged to participate in events to raise
awareness to spark actions that stop hate and build inclusions; outlined event topics;
questioned whether there is room to fold ideas into the United Against Hate Campaign.
Councilmember Vella questioned which staff members would be involved; stated there
has been significant work done by Christ Episcopal Church; members of City staff and
the community have reviewed the status at State and federal levels; the work has been
done by an active and involved group of women and should be recognized; expressed
support for combining events.
Councilmember Oddie expressed support for building on the work that has been done;
stated the City Attorney's office would assist with City limits; letters have been written
with no result; there is an opportunity to do something; California has some of the
strictest gun laws, but the Gilroy shooting still happened; nothing has been done at the
City level; this is a public health crisis; there still is an opportunity to solve the crisis;
people are looking to leaders for action.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a change in Washington DC needs to be made; laws have
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
13
September 17, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-09-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-10-01,2,"(19-528) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Significant exposure to
litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9; Number of
cases: One (As Defendant - City Exposure to Legal Action)
(19-529) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8); Property: 2264 Santa Clara Avenue (the Carnegie Building) and 1429
Oak Street (Foster House); City Negotiator: Debbie Potter, Community Development
Director; Negotiating Parties: City of Alameda and Carnegie Innovation Hall; Under
Negotiation: Price and terms of payment of property lease
(19-530) Conference with Legal Counsel - Liability Claims (Pursuant to Government
Code, Section 54956.9 (e)(3)); Claimant: Malia Vella; Agency claimed against: City of
Alameda
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding Pathway D and Anticipated Litigation, the Council staff
provided information and Council gave direction with no vote taken.
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 7:02 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:54
p.m.
***
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding the Carnegie Building, staff provided information and Council
provided direction with no vote taken; and regarding the Liability Claim, staff provided
information to Council; no action was taken and no direction was given.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 1:06
a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 1, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-10-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-10-01,4,"(19-536) Minoo Hamzavi, Carnegie Innovation Hall, discussed the importance of art;
urged approval of the lease.
(19-537) Kelly Saturno expressed support for the Carnegie Innovation Hall.
(19-538) Arminda Graca, Alameda, outlined issues with her Housing Authority rental.
(19-539) Jan Schlesinger, Alameda, expressed support for the Carnegie Innovation
Hall.
(19-540) Catherine Pauling, Seniors and Disabled Renters Committee, urged Council to
support each other; stated something needs to be done about the Housing Authority.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The City Attorney office staffing resolution [paragraph no. 19-545 was removed from
the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*19-541) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on September
3,2019. Approved.
(*19-542) Ratified bills in the amount of $961,382.03.
(*19-543) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Reporting
Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Funds Collected During the Period January 1 to March
31, 2019). Accepted.
(*19-544) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First
Amendment to an Agreement with Avineon, Inc., to Add the Amount of $69,900 to
Provide Analysis, Enhancement, and Refinement of 911 Geographic Information
System (GIS) Addressing Data for a Total Not to Exceed Amount of $95,000. Accepted.
(19-545) Resolution No. 15589, ""Approving a Workforce Change in the City Attorney's
Office to Create a New Classification, Chief Assistant City Attorney; Add One Position,
Chief Assistant City Attorney; and Amend the Executive Management (EXME) Salary
Schedule to Add the Classification of Chief Assistant City Attorney, Effective October
13, 2019."" Adopted.
Urged Council to table the matter and economic justification be provided: Steve
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
October 1, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-10-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-10-15,5,"(19-575) Resolution No. 15600, ""Appointing Warren DeSouza as a Member of the
Mayor's Economic Development Advisory Panel""; and
(19-575A) Resolution No. 15601, ""Appointing Gia Schneider as a Member of the
Mayor's Economic Development Advisory Panel"" Adopted.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolutions.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
4. [Absent: Councilmember Vella - 1.]
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented a certificate of
appointment to Mr. DeSouza.
(19-576) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a 33-Year Lease, with One 33-Year
Option to Renew, and Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute
Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease with the Carnegie Innovation
Hall, a California 501(c)3 Non-profit Organization, for 2264 Santa Clara Avenue (the
Carnegie Building) and 1429 Oak Street (Foster House). [Requires Four Affirmative
Votes] Introduced.
The Development Manager gave a PowerPoint presentation.
Expressed her excitement for the renovation; discussed another renovation project
done by the lessee: Kim Hayes, Alameda.
Urged approval with no further changes; expressed concern over adding a Project
Labor Agreement (PLA): J. Marlow Schmauder, Carnegie Innovation Hall.
Expressed support for the project: Susan Sperry, Alameda.
Stated that he believes in the project and the people behind it; stated the project needs
to move forward without the PLA: Bob DuBow, Carnegie Innovation Hall.
Stated that he was made aware of the project two weeks ago; outlined labor
discussions; stated issues can be worked out; expressed concern over not having
oversight: Andreas Cluver, Alameda County Building Trades.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether there are issues which were not addressed
that require the contract language to change.
Ms. Schmauder responded the biggest challenge is due to having an all-volunteer staff;
stated the ability to fundraise for the project depends on prospective fundraisers having
confidence in the project as a whole; prospective fundraisers need to see action due to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
October 15, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-10-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-10-15,11,"(19-578) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Five-Year
Agreement with Ranger Pipeline, Inc. for Cyclic Sewer Replacement Project, Phase 16,
No. PW 05-19-26 in an Amount, Including Contingency, Not to Exceed $28,924,389.83.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(19-579) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda
Municipal Code Chapter 30 (Zoning Ordinance) to Streamline Design Review for Small
Residential Additions, Window Replacements, and Green Roofs, Update Work/Live
Ordinance Requirements, Update Lot Line Adjustment Procedures, and Make Other
Miscellaneous Administrative, Technical, and Clarifying Amendments, as
Recommended by the Planning Board. Not heard.
AGENDA ITEM/COUNCIL REFERRAL
(19-580) Presentation by the Housing Authority Providing Information to the Council.
(19-581) Consider Directing Staff to Present Options to the Council on Increasing
Accountability of, and Addressing Potential Conflict of Interest Issues at, the Alameda
Housing Authority. (Councilmembers Vella and Oddie)
The City Council heard the above items together.
The Housing Authority Executive Director gave a PowerPoint presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether incentives for landlords exist in order to house
voucher holders.
The Housing Authority Executive Director responded a program exists that allows $500
for each new unit leased; outlined the philosophy of the program.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether committing City funds can be committed to
expansion of housing incentives.
The Housing Authority Executive Director responded in the affirmative; stated other
housing authorities have more flexibility; outlined Section 8 funding instances related to
damaged units and potential landlord acceptance.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the expiration details for the subsidy at Independence
Plaza.
The Housing Authority Executive Director responded the subsidy runs out in 2026;
stated the subsidized cost per year is between $1 to $1.5 million; the program has
allowed the Housing Authority to plan ahead and minimize impacts to tenants; there has
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
October 15, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-10-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-11-05,10,"(19-605) Resolution No. 15607, ""Limiting Natural Gas Infrastructure for New Residential
Construction on City Owned Property."" Adopted.
Urged Council to adopt the resolution: Melissa Yu, Sierra Club.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director outlined revisions to the resolution.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved adoption of the revised resolution.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Oddie stated it is nice to see items on the Climate
Action Plan being completed.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(19-606) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15608, ""Amending the General
Plan Business Park Classification to Clarify the Allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR) at
Harbor Bay Business Park, as Recommended by the City Planning Board.' Adopted.
The Planning Services Manager gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the Planning Board recommendation was
unanimous, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated that he would prefer to remain with
the status quo; if someone were to come in with a higher FAR they can do so through
variance or a special use permit; Council should be weary; outlined typical FAR for light
industrial and office space; stated buildings with a FAR of 0.5 will be inelegant.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Knox White, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Daysog - 1.
Vice Mayor Knox White requested clarification of the statements made.
The Planning Services Manager stated the current zoning allows most of the business
park to develop up to 2.0 FAR; there is an area along the waterfront that is limited to 2.5
FAR; the amendment attempts to change the way the General Plan describes the FAR;
the 0.5 FAR applies to the entire area of the business park.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
November 5, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-11-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-11-05,11,"(19-607) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda
Municipal Code Chapter 30 (Zoning Ordinance) to Streamline Design Review for Small
Residential Additions, Window Replacements, and Green Roofs, Update Work/Live
Ordinance Requirements, Update Lot Line Adjustment Procedures, and Make Other
Miscellaneous Administrative, Technical, and Clarifying Amendments, as
Recommended by the Planning Board. Introduced.
The Planning Services Manager gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Knox White expressed support for the switch in parking related to
development standards; questioned whether Council would allow discreet discretion in
requesting staff to look into parking requirements citywide; stated the City Attorney has
indicated the direction is permissible.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the item; stated more housing is needed;
inquired how to consider the impact on schools, if work-live studios include families with
children.
The Planning Services Manager responded State laws address the impact; stated the
issue emphasizes the term work in work-live; there are strict limitations on the living
aspect; the amendments further reinforce work spaces; the spaces are not intended for
large families.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there has been a shift toward tiny homes; it is realistic to
think that some children might be part of these homes.
The Planning Services Manager stated the units will have to keep valid business
licenses; the restrictions set in place are tailored to those that run a business out of the
space.
Councilmember Daysog stated when the ordinance was created, the emphasis was on
work, not live; the emphasis is listed in 1,000 square feet of work space; the standard is
being reduced to 500 square feet of work space; inquired whether a variance or special
use permit could be obtained when there is a request to lower the work space from
1,000 to 500 square feet.
The Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the minimum work
requirement of 500 square feet also reduces the living space.
Councilmember Daysog stated the smaller units are turning from work-live to live-work
and begin to undermine Measure A.
Councilmember Oddie expressed support for live-work options; stated the idea has
been explored previously at Alameda Point with Building 8.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
November 5, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-11-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-11-19,20,"(19-648) Consider Directing Staff to Create an Autonomous Code Enforcement Division
to Enforce All Building Code and Health and Safety Laws. (Councilmember Vella)
Councilmember Vella made brief comments regarding her referral.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification of existing policies.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated there is an existing Council
policy regarding Code Enforcement which will be brought to Council; the policy does not
prioritize residential over commercial.
The City Manager stated a report will return to Council the first quarter of 2020 for
discussion; the report will show the history of priorities and include a plan about how to
move forward, prioritize and the potential budget.
Urged approval; expressed concern over Codes not being enforced: Toni Grimm,
Seniors and Disabled Renters.
Expressed support for the referral; discussed renters living conditions: Nelson Layag,
Alameda resident and Filipino Advocates for Justice.
Expressed support for an autonomous Code Enforcement division; stated that she has
filed 5 complaints regarding noise violations; nothing has been done: Holly Lim,
Alameda.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the proposal brought forth by the City Manager
and the Planning, Building and Transportation Director is sufficient.
Councilmember Vella responded that she would like a proposal to return which
specifically addresses the creation of a separate unit and specific Council priorities, and
proposes funding mechanisms.
The City Manager stated the proposal is consistent with what will be brought forth.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he does not understand the need for a new
department.
The City Manager stated there could be a separate division of the Planning, Building
and Transportation Department that reports to the Department Director; that he has
seen Code Enforcement separate, not through the Building Official, with a supervisor
reporting to the Director.
Councilmember Daysog stated if there is something broken with the current regime,
it
should be fixed; should more funding or staff should be provided if needed; performance
is a separate issue; expressed concern about creating an entity to go after small mom
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
17
November 19, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-11-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-11-19,23,"(19-654) Vice Mayor Knox White stated that he met with Love School Parent Teacher
Association (PTA) about traffic safety; thanked the Public Information Officer for
preparing the recognition of first responders; suggested the City Clerk share the staff
presentation at Recreation and Park Commission meeting with Ms. Adams.
ADJOURNMENT
(19-655) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting
at 11:48 p.m. in memory of Benjamin Reyes and Sia Sello.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
20
November 19, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-11-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-12-03,15,"(19-678) Vice Mayor Knox White discussed an article related to affordable housing;
noted the costs of affordable housing are too high for development.
(19-679) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated more housing must be built; discussed League of
California Cities Statewide policy committee items, which she would share; announced
the upcoming annual Midway Shelter 5 kilometer run/walk.
(19-680) Councilmember Oddie stated Stopwaste is considering adopting Alameda's
straw ordinance at the County level; made an announcement regarding animal
adoption.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 3, 2019
13",CityCouncil/2019-12-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-12-17,18,"(19-715) Councilmember Vella made an announcement regarding the tree lighting and
the annual holiday home tour.
(19-716) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced two upcoming menorah lightings.
ADJOURNMENT
(19-717) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting
with a moment of silence in memory of Ann Bartalini at 10:19 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
16
December 17, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-12-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-01-07,4,"(20-010) Recommendation to Provide Advice and Consent on the Social Service
Human Relations Board (SSHRB) Work Plan for the 2020 Calendar Year.
Vice Mayor Knox White expressed support; stated the Commission on Disability would
benefit from draft work plans; discussed the Municipal Code six goals for the SSHRB;
expressed support for addressing hate crime issues in and around schools at the next
SSHRB meeting; stated there are ways for the SSHRB to potentially formalize and
strengthen processes between the City and the Alameda Unified School District
(AUSD).
In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, Vice Mayor Knox White stated that he and
Councilmember Daysog serve on the School District Subcommittee.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of the item.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
(*20-011) Recommendation to Accept Report on the Appointment of One Member to the
Open Government Commission. Accepted.
(*20-012) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Ray's Electric for Park Street
Corridor Safety and Operations Improvements, No. P.W. 03-15-03. Accepted.
(*20-013) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First
Amendment to the Agreement with SCS Engineers Extending the Term of the
Agreement by Six Months and Increasing the Compensation by an Amount Not to
Exceed $145,000, for an Aggregate Amount Not to Exceed $444,978, for Targeted Zero
Waste Technical Assistance for Commercial Businesses and Multi-Family Accounts;
Accepted; and
(*20-013A) Resolution No. 15627, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Integrated Waste
Fund Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2019-20.' Adopted.
(*20-014) Ordinance No. 3259, ""Approving a License and Authorizing the City Manager
to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a 66-Year License with
the San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority for Use of Real
Property and Submerged Land at Alameda Point.' Finally passed.
(*20-015) Recommendation to Approve Amended Employment Agreement for the City
Manager Effective January 5, 2020. Accepted.
An announcement was made regarding the contract terms.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(20-016) Public Hearing to Consider Approving the Housing and Community
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
January 7, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-01-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-01-07,11,"(20-022) Councilmember Daysog moved approval of allowing three more minutes.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there have been an increase in anti-Semitic incidents; noted
another attack at a Kosher grocery in New York; the City should not pretend an attack
will not occur; stated the Police Department is concerned with crimes greater than
package thefts.
Councilmember Vella expressed concern for giving people a false sense of security;
expressed support for receiving data specific to crime prevention; stated China is using
facial recognition technology and more biometric forms of identification are being
produced; ALPRs can be a substantial tool in solving crimes; expressed support for
seeing the trade-off; stated this is a time of increased anti-Semitic attacks; discussed
customs detainment after Iranian attacks; expressed concern about data sharing and
the vendors' discussion of photos captured by the ALPR technology; outlined potential
racial profiling examples; expressed concern for a blanket law enforcement exemption;
stated ALPRs are a tool that have the potential to be abused.
Councilmember Daysog stated the City needs to have fixed ALPRs; expressed support
for having a discussion; stated the City has previously demonstrated its ability to move
forward with ALPRs; the ability should be used as a basis for moving forward; the
community is interested in having ALPRs.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he supported mobile ALPRs; there is a difference
between mobile and fixed ALPRs; the difference is in capturing every single vehicle that
comes on and off the Island; ALPRs help solve crimes; discussed the Oikos shooter
incident; stated that he does not see how ALPRs prevent crimes; outlined potential
acceptable uses for ALPRs; stated a tremendous amount of data is needed to solve
complex crimes; a year and a half worth of data must be kept in order for ALPRs to be a
useful tool; expressed concern about the ability to scan for specific drivers and car
models based on callers identifications, which could cause a risk of racial profiling.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed an incident at a mosque in New York involving Police
with mobile ALPRs; stated only 6 months of data storage is permitted; mobile ALPRs
have stopped child abductors; expressed support for moving forward.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of the referral with additions: requesting any
information about photo [face] capture; clarification that photo [face] capture would not
be part of ALPRs; clarification of the data privacy policy; how the ALPR policy links to
align with the data protection policy in place; discussion about the public safety
exemption and how it would apply to the data collected here.
Vice Mayor Knox White clarified the motion is approval of the referral as written, with the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
January 7, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-01-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-01-21,2,"(20-033) Conference with Legal Counsel - Workers' Compensation Claim (Pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.95); Claimant: Robin Haines; Agency Claimed
Against: City of Alameda
(20-034) Conference with Legal Counsel - Workers' Compensation Claim (Pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.95); Claimant: Jill Ottaviano; Agency Claimed
Against: City of Alameda
(20-035) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9); Case Name: Boatworks V City of Alameda, et al.; Court:
Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda; Case Numbers:
RG16823346, RG16841240 RG19041531. Not heard.
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding Real Property, staff provided information and Council
provided direction with no vote taken; regarding Clark, the case involves a workers'
compensation claim by Applicant Brian Clark, a former Police Officer who joined the
City on August 14, 2012; the Applicant sustained injuries during a Police response on
September 25, 2017; the Applicant had total temporary psychiatric disability from the
date of the incident, September 25, 2017, and retired via industrial disability retirement
on July 20, 2019; the Council voted unanimously, via roll call vote, to authorize the City
Attorney to settle the pending workers' compensation claim in an amount not to exceed
$73,344.17; regarding Couch, he case involves a workers' compensation claim by
Applicant Joseph Couch, a former Police Officer who joined the City on September 23,
2014; the Applicant's injury occurred on April 18, 2015 at the UCSF Benioff Children's
Hospital, where the Officer was involved with a combative subject; the Applicant was
unable to ever return to full duty and retired via industrial disability retirement on
September 17, 2017; the Council voted unanimously, via roll call vote, to authorize the
City Attorney to settle the pending workers' compensation claim in an amount not to
exceed $32,249.50; regarding Haines, the case involves a workers' compensation claim
by Applicant Robin Haines, a former Firefighter who joined the City on August 3, 1998;
the Applicant's injury occurred on May 24, 2016 while responding to a significant house
fire and was in full personal protective equipment while coming down from the first story
roof; the Applicant was unable to return to full duty and retired on December 16, 2016
via industrial disability retirement; the Council voted unanimously, via roll call vote, to
authorize the City Attorney to settle the pending workers' compensation claim in an
amount not to exceed $62,770.78; and regarding Ottaviano, the case involves a
workers' compensation claim by Applicant Jill Ottaviano, a former Police Officer who
joined the City on May 23, 1997; the Applicant's injury occurred on October 8, 2014
when she sustained a cumulative injury after 17 years of service performing customary
Police duties and wearing a duty belt/vest; the Applicant was unable to return to full duty
and retired via industrial disability retirement on March 31, 2019; the Council voted
unanimously, via roll call vote, to authorize the City Attorney to settle the pending
workers' compensation claim in an amount not to exceed $63,177.75.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 21, 2020
2",CityCouncil/2020-01-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-02-04,2,"(20-053) Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Ezzy
Ashcraft held a moment of silence in memory of Wansiri Panyapong.
The City Clerk announced that regarding Real Property and Existing Litigation staff
provided information and Council provided direction with no vote taken.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:41
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
February 4, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-02-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-02-04,18,"(20-069) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by: (1)
Adding New Section 23-9 (Personal Wireless Service Facilities in the Public Right-Of-
Way); and (2) Amending Section 2-59.3 (Limitation and Power to Make Contracts) to
Exempt Master License Agreements for Use of Public Assets for Personal Wireless
Service Facility Installation. Introduced; and
(20-069A) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager, or Designee, to Negotiate
and Execute Master License Agreements for Use of Public Assets Consistent with Local
Law.
The Deputy Public Works Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there is a legal challenge to Senate Bill (SB) 649
moving through the courts.
The Deputy Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated the City
Attorney's office can provide further information; stated there is a legal challenge to the
2018 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ruling.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how a ruling in favor of cities would impact current
decisions and discussions.
The City Attorney responded the legal challenge is still working through the court
system; stated there is no current pending injunction against the particular federal
legislation; staff has proposed the best comprehensive local regulation that a local
agency is able to implement at this time; should a judicial ruling be received overturning
the federal regulation, staff would return in cooperation with the Public Works
Department to provide additional local control to the maximum extent possible.
Councilmember Daysog noted cell towers were proposed in 2015 at the corners of
Lincoln Avenue and Saint Charles Street, and Shore Line Drive and Grand Avenue;
stated there was much involvement from Planning Department staff at the time; inquired
whether the Planning Department is still involved or if the responsibility has shifted to
the Public Works Department.
The City Attorney responded local regulation of cell towers originate from two places:
regulation of the local right of way and regulation of private property cell towers; stated
in both instances, local control is significantly circumscribed by federal legislation; the
item presented relates to the public right of way regulations; should Council desire for
the City to implement further review of the zoning regulations on private property very
brief direction may be provided to staff.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he does not recall seeing references to the
Recreation and Parks Commission in the report; many cell towers are being placed in
parks; inquired about involving the Recreation and Parks Commission.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
16
February 4, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-02-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-03-03,15,"(20-134 A) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding
Provisions to Section 4-36 (License Requirements for Firearms and Munitions Dealers)
of Article V (Firearms and Explosives) of Chapter IV (Offenses and Public Safety),
Requiring Firearms Dealers to Provide Video Surveillance and Enhancing Enforcement
Provisions. Introduced.
The Deputy City Attorney gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether Big 5 responded to the way in which weapons
are displayed in a designated area, to which the Deputy City Attorney responded in the
negative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the sales surveillance ordinance indicates that video
surveillance will also be directed toward the parking lot of Big 5; inquired whether those
purchasing non-weapon items would be video surveilled.
The Deputy City Attorney responded it is possible; stated the ordinance is not specific
as to what extent the parking lot will be surveilled; the current language requires input
from the Police Chief; it is possible that passerby's around the parking lot area may also
be captured; Council may provide direction on the provision.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how the requirement of videotaping inside the store with
facial features recorded works with another City policy related to facial recognition
technology.
The Deputy City Attorney responded that he is unsure about the extent of the previous
decision regarding general facial recognition; stated the current policy can be narrowly
applied to only be at the premise of a firearms and not elsewhere; should Council feel
uncomfortable, general videotaping of the premises can be allowed without focus on
facial features during the transaction; facial recognition is helpful to resolve and deter in
the event straw purchases are made.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Big 5 in Alameda has a history of facilitating
straw purchases.
The Deputy City Attorney responded not that he is aware of; stated it is difficult to track
without additional data.
Vice Mayor Knox White stated that a letter has been received from Safe Alameda with
requests; inquired whether staff had a chance to review the proposed changes.
The Deputy City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated Safe Alameda sent
several proposals; the preamble can be discussed if desired, but there are substantiate
changes which include changing the word ""residence"" to ""premises"" in Section 4-32.3;
noted the change would also cover commercial premises; stated Safe Alameda also
proposes firearms be unloaded when stored; staff believes the term ""premises"" is a
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
March 3, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-03-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-03-17,2,"(20-153) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8) Property: 300 Island Drive; City Negotiators: Eric Levitt, City Manager,
and Michael Roush, Chief Assistant City Attorney; Negotiating Parties: City of Alameda
and Greenway Golf; Under Negotiation: Price and terms of lease
(20-154) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government
Code § 54956.9); Case Name: Little Sisters of the Poor V. Pennsylvania; Court: United
State Supreme Court; Case Number: 19-431
(20-155) Conference with Legal Counsel - Liability Claim (Pursuant to Government
Code § 54956.95) Claimant: Grand Edibles; Agency Claimed Against: City of Alameda
(20-156) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8) Property: Northwest Territories, approximately 1,704 acres of rentable
space on the former Naval Air Station Alameda at Alameda Point; City Negotiators: Eric
Levitt, City Manager, Lisa Maxwell, Assistant City Attorney, Debbie Potter, Community
Development Director, and Nanette Mocanu, Assistant Community Development
Director; Negotiating Parties: City of Alameda and Porsche Club of America, Inc.; Under
Negotiation: Licensing, price and terms. Not heard.
(20-157) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8) Property: Building 14, approximately 31,194 rentable square feet of
building area, located at 1800 Ferry Point at Alameda Point; City Negotiators: Eric
Levitt, City Manager, Lisa Maxwell, Assistant City Attorney, Debbie Potter, Community
Development Director, and Nanette Mocanu, Assistant Community Development
Director; Negotiating Parties: City of Alameda and Navigator Systems; Under
Negotiation: Price and terms. Not heard.
(20-158) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code section
54956.8) Property: Ballena Isle Upland Parcel APN 74-1025-3; City Negotiators: Eric
Levitt, City Manager; Debbie Potter, Community Development Director; Lois Butler,
Economic Development Manager; Lisa Maxwell, Assistant City Attorney; Maurice
Robinson, Maurice Robinson & Associates LLC; Potential Tenant: West River, Inc.;
Current Tenant: SHM Ballena Isle, LLC; Issue Under Negotiation: Real Property
Negotiations Price and Terms. Not heard.
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 6:03 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 6:08
p.m.
***
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding Gattenby, staff provided information; this matter involves a
claim filed by Shelby Gattenby, against the City of Alameda, alleging that Alameda
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 17, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-03-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-03-17,19,"(20-186) The City Manager expressed gratitude for staff and Council keeping lines of
communication open while going through COVID-19 items.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(20-187) Consider Directing Staff to Provide Health Insurance to Part-Time Employees
Working Over 20 Hours per Week in Time for Fiscal Year 2020-21. (Councilmember
Oddie)
Councilmember Oddie made brief comments regarding the referral.
Councilmember Vella stated there are currently many issues occurring; whether or not
someone has healthcare could mean the difference between getting tested or treated;
expressed support for the item.
The City Manager stated if Council moves forward with the item, direction should be
provided to staff to bring back a report with both the cost, benefits of the proposal and a
way to implement; staff can also bring back an interim option solely for testing.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the proposal; stated that she would like to
add treatment in addition to testing; should someone test positive, treatment will be
needed.
Councilmember Vella expressed support.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there is consensus to add direction to staff to
bring back the costs and benefits of the proposal, implementation, and even sooner,
covering the cost of testing and treatment for those relevant part-time employees.
Councilmember Oddie expressed support for the proposal; stated that he appreciates
the idea of acting sooner for testing and treatment of COVID-19.
Councilmember Daysog stated there needs to be a distinction between permanent part-
time from non-permanent part-time positions; some part-time staff members work all
year and some work only part of the year; any report set to return to Council should
distinguish the staff members' status.
The City Manager stated there are 30 part-time employees defined as permanent part-
time working 20-hours per week or more; the evaluation is being prepared to return for
Council consideration.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
March 17, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-03-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-04-21,8,"(20-225) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute Five, Five-Year
Agreements, in an Amount Not to Exceed $150,000 Each, Annually, to Advanced
Mobility Group (AMG); Fehr and Peers; Iteris Inc.; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.;
and Parisi Transportation Consulting for On-Call Consulting Services for Transportation
Planning and Engineering Services for Individual Total Cumulative Amounts Not to
Exceed $750,000 Each and a Combined Total Cumulative Amount Not to Exceed
$3,750,000. Not heard.
(20-226) Recommendation to Set June 16, 2020, for a Public Hearing to Consider
Collection of Delinquent Integrated Waste Management Accounts Via Property Tax
Bills. Not heard.
(20-227) Recommendation to Support Resource Recovery Coalition of California's
Emergency Solid Waste Funding Proposal, which Provides Additional Support to
Alameda County Industries in Response to Financial Impacts of the COVID-19
Pandemic. Not heard.
(20-228) Adoption of Resolution Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring
the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for
Notice of Public Hearing on June 16, 2020 - Island City Landscaping and Lighting
District 84-2 (Various Locations). Not heard.
(20-229) Adoption of Resolution Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring
the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for
Notice of Public Hearing on June 16, 2020 - Maintenance Assessment District 01-01
(Marina Cove). Not heard.
(20-230) Adoption of Resolution Approving that the Pavement Management Project be
Funded Through the State's Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account for Fiscal
Year 2020-21. Not heard.
(20-231) Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Apply for and Receive
up to Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) in Local Government Planning
Support Grant Program Funds. Not heard.
(20-232) Final Passage of Ordinance Approving a Development Agreement By and
Between the City of Alameda and Boatworks, LLC Governing the Boatworks Project for
Real Property Located at 2229 to 2235 Clement Avenue. Not heard.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(20-233) Adoption of Resolution Establishing Policies on Street Width, Lane Width,
Crosswalks and Bulb-Outs to Promote Safe, Livable Streets and Environmentally
Sustainable Transportation Choices;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
April 21, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-04-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-04-21,9,"(20-233 A) Recommendation to Provide Direction to Staff on Tools for Improving Safety
at Intersections. Not heard.
(20-234) Adoption of Resolution Recommendation to Provide Direction on Potential
Measures Amending the City Charter. Not heard.
(20-235) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda Municipal Code Chapter 30
(Development Regulations) to Modify Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations to
Implement and Comply with State Law and Make Other Administrative, Technical, and
Clarifying Amendments pertaining to Appeals and Youth Centers Definition, as
Recommended by the Planning Board. Not heard.
(20-236) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Section 1 (Part) of Ordinance No. 3226
N.S. and Section 4-60.40 of the Alameda Municipal Code to Extend from July 1, 2020 to
July 1, 2021, or to Another Date Determined by Council, the Increase in Minimum Wage
within the City of Alameda to an Hourly Rate of Fifteen Dollars. Withdrawn.
(20-237) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager, or Designee, to
Execute a Twelve Month Amendment to the Lease with Pacific Pinball Museum, a
501(c)(3) Non-Profit Organization, with the Option of Four One-Year Extensions, for
Building 169, Suite 101 Located at 1680 Viking Street at Alameda Point. Not heard.
(20-238) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
Amending Section 2-19 (Commission on Disability) to Change the Number of Members
to Seven and Change the Name to the Commission on Persons with Disabilities. Not
heard.
(20-239) Recommendation to Provide Direction to the City Attorney to Consent, Modify
or Reject Law Firm Goldfarb Lipman's Request to Waive Conflicts of Interest In
Connection with Goldfarb's Legal Representation of the City of Alameda and the
Housing Authority of the City of Alameda. Not heard.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
Not heard.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
Not heard.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
April 21, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-04-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-04-22,9,"(20-262) Recommendation to Provide Direction on Potential Measures Amending the
City Charter. Continued to May 5, 2020.
(20-263) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda Municipal Code Chapter 30
(Development Regulations) to Modify Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations to
Implement and Comply with State Law and Make Other Administrative, Technical, and
Clarifying Amendments pertaining to Appeals and Youth Centers Definition, as
Recommended by the Planning Board. Introduced.
The City Planner made a brief presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired how many Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) have
occurred in the last couple years.
The City Planner responded since 2017, 32 ADUs have been constructed; stated the
City has approved 120 applications.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City has worked hard to promote building more
affordable housing; the housing crisis in the State is not going away and is highlighted
by mandates; people should not live unsheltered; the City needs more housing; the
topic is complicated; noted San Mateo County provides a booklet related to ADUs;
inquired whether Alameda has something similar.
The City Planner responded a next step is to develop material and perform outreach.
Vice Mayor Knox moved approval of the ordinance with the omission of Subsection J.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated that he has a larger concern related
to Measure A not aligning with the City Charter; that he will abstain on the item and
come to a decision at a later date when the item returns.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated the ability for the City to pass
local rules, regulations and laws is confined by limits imposed by the State; there are
conflicts between State law and the City Charter related to housing issues; State law is
clear that ADUs cannot be considered when deciding whether density limits have been
violated.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Governor has listed housing as a main priority; cities
have been taken to court over the topic; inquired whether the motion included Section J,
to which Vice Mayor Knox White responded in the affirmative.
On the call for the question the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Abstain; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Abstention: 1.
Continued April 21, 2020 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 22, 2020
9",CityCouncil/2020-04-22.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-04-22,10,"(20-265) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager, or Designee, to
Execute a Twelve Month Amendment to the Lease with Pacific Pinball Museum, a
501(c)(3) Non-Profit Organization, with the Option of Four One-Year Extensions, for
Building 169, Suite 101 Located at 1680 Viking Street at Alameda Point. Introduced.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he would recuse himself and left the meeting.
The Assistant Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Absent; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4, Absent: 1.
(20-266) Recommendation to Provide Direction to the City Attorney to Consent, Modify
or Reject Law Firm Goldfarb Lipman's Request to Waive Conflicts of Interest In
Connection with Goldfarb's Legal Representation of the City of Alameda and the
Housing Authority of the City of Alameda.
The Chief Assistant City Attorney gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether a similar waiver has been signed by the
Housing Authority.
The Chief Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
The Community Development Director stated the Housing Authority Board of
Commissioners approved the conflict waiver last week.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is satisfied with the procedures
put in place.
Councilmember Vella stated that she understands the ethical wall; noted there are
many firms available; expressed concern about the waiver; stated that she does not
believe anyone would act unethically; expressed concern about the same firm being
Continued April 21, 2020 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
April 22, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-04-22.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-05-05,3,"(20-284) Recommendation to Approve the Webster Street Business Improvement Area
(BIA) Annual Assessment Report; and
(20-284A) Resolution No. 15649, ""Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment on the
Webster Street BIA for Fiscal Year 2020-21 and to Set a Public Hearing for May 19,
2020."" Adopted.
Councilmember Daysog recused himself from the item.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of the staff recommendation [including adoption
of the resolution].
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Absent; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4; Absent: 1.
(*20-285) Recommendation to Approve the Park Street Business Improvement Area
Annual Assessment Report; and
(*20-285A) Resolution No. 15650, ""Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment on the Park
Street BIA for Fiscal Year 2020-21 and to Set a Public Hearing for May 19, 2020.'
Adopted.
(20-286) Ordinance No. 3277, ""Amending Alameda Municipal Code Chapter 30
(Development Regulations) to Modify Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations to Comply
with State Law and Make Other Administrative, Technical, and Clarifying Amendments
Pertaining to Appeals and Youth Centers Definition, as Recommended by the Planning
Board."" Finally passed.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he would continue not to support the item.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved final passage of the ordinance.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: No; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4; Noes: 1.
(20-287) Ordinance No. 3278, ""Authorizing the City Manager, or Designee, to Execute a
Twelve Month Amendment to the Lease with Pacific Pinball Museum, a 501(c)(3) Non
Profit Organization, with the Option of Four One Year Extensions, for Building 169,
Suite 101 Located at 1680 Viking Street at Alameda Point."" Finally passed.
Councilmember Daysog recused himself and left the meeting.
Councilmember Vella moved final passage of the ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 5, 2020
3",CityCouncil/2020-05-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-05-05,19,"(20-297) Consider Directing Staff to Explore Creating a Tax-Exempt Special Fund to
Provide Gap Resources for Local Small Business, Renters and Local Organizations
Significantly Impacted by the COVID-19 State of Emergency. (Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft)
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft gave a brief presentation.
The City Manager discussed an option to partner with a foundation to create more
opportunities for business grants and reaching out for donations.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated staff is working on the item and will come back to Council
May 19th; inquired whether Council would consider directing staff to explore creating a
tax-exempt special fund to provide gap resources for local small business.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether the direction had been provided at the
previous Council meeting.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the referral.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:46
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 5, 2020
19",CityCouncil/2020-05-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-05-19,3,"(20-314) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (Significant Exposure
to Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9); Number
of Cases: One (As Defendant - City Exposure to Legal Action; Potential Plaintiffs:
Renewed Hope Housing Advocates and Arc Ecology.
(20-315) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8); Property: Alameda Theatre, Located at 2317 Central Avenue,
Alameda, CA; City Negotiators: Eric J. Levitt, City Manager; Lisa Maxwell, Assistant City
Attorney; Debbie Potter, Community Development Director; and Nanette Mocanu,
Assistant Community Development Director; Negotiating Parties: City of Alameda and
Alameda Entertainment L.P.: Under Negotiation: Price and Terms. Not heard.
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding Existing Litigation, staff provided information and provided
direction by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Knox White: Aye;
Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 4, Noes: 1, as follows: the
City has been asked to join numerous other local jurisdictions by signing on to an
amicus brief filed in the above case where the Court of Appeal for the 4th Circuit will
consider a challenge to a Trump Administration Executive Order that would give States
and localities the power to prevent refugees from being resettled in their jurisdiction; a
US District Court in Maryland granted a preliminary injunction against the Executive
Order; the amicus brief seeks to support the plaintiffs and oppose the Executive Order
because: 1) the importance and contributions of refugee community members, 2)
refugees often provide large returns on the nation's investment in them by improving
local economies, and 3) the Executive Order's deep incompatibility with the Refugee Act
by diminishing cities' input into the process and undermining Congressional intent by
making it much more likely that refugees will be resettled in inappropriate locations, if at
all, e.g. not with their families or others from their regions or in cities that are
overburdened due to opt-outs; the Council has voted to authorize the City Attorney to
sign the amicus brief as requested; regarding Site A, and Anticipated Litigation staff
provided information, Council provided direction and no vote was taken.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:51
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
2",CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-05-19,6,"(20-328) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement
with Akerman LLP for Federal Legislative Services for a Term of One Year, with the
Possibility to Extend for Two Additional Years, for a Total Three Year Compensation in
an Amount Not to Exceed $270,000. Not heard.
(20-329) Adoption of Resolution Amending the General Fund and Fleet Services
Operating Budget by $118,720 for Costs Associated with the Purchase and Installation
of In-Vehicle Data Terminals; and
(20-329A) Recommendation to Authorize Purchase of Police in-Vehicle Data Terminals,
in an Amount Not to Exceed $102,792, from DuraTech, Inc. and Authorize Installation in
an Amount Not to Exceed $15,928, by Lehr Auto Electric. Not heard.
(20-330) Adoption of Resolution_Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Cooperative
Agreement with the California Department of Transportation to Complete the Project
Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED), Plans, Specifications and Estimate
(PS&E) and Right-of-Way (ROW) for the Central Avenue Safety Improvement Project.
Not heard.
(20-331) Final Passage of Ordinance_Amending Alameda Municipal Code Chapter XII
(Designated Parking) to Improve Procedures for Management of Public Parking on City
Streets and in City Lots. Not heard.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(20-332) Resolution No. 15653, ""Confirming the Park Street Business Improvement
Area Annual Assessment Report for Fiscal Year 2020-21 and Levying an Annual
Assessment on the Park Street BIA."" Adopted.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
(20-333) Resolution No. 15654, ""Confirming the Webster Street Business Improvement
Area (BIA) Assessment Report for Fiscal Year 2020-21 and Levying an Annual
Assessment on the Webster Street BIA."" Adopted.
Councilmember Daysog recused himself from the item and left the meeting.
Councilmember Vella moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft:
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 19, 2020
3",CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-05-19,29,"(20-343) Councilmember Oddie moved approval of hearing the remaining items on the
regular agenda without a time-limit; stated that he does not know the amount of public
comment on remaining items.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like to complete the current item and move
to the regular meeting agenda including the consent calendar and regular agenda
items.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Vice Mayor Knox White expressed support for hearing the entire
regular meeting agenda.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is not willing to go past midnight; requested a
friendly amendment to hear the balance of the agenda and finish by midnight.
Councilmember Daysog expressed support for hearing the agenda and finishing the
meeting by midnight; stated there have been previous issues about late meetings;
questioned whether the public is served by Council making decisions at 12:15 a.m.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he will do his best to speak briefly.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she will not support a motion unless the meeting ends
at midnight.
Councilmember Daysog expressed support.
Councilmember Oddie stated Council speaking time should be cut from 9 to 3 minutes.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the current item requires more than 3 minutes.
Vice Mayor Knox White expressed support for the motion amendment with the
commitment to complete the West Midway Project team selection item [paragraph no.
20-334 on the regular agenda; stated should the time reach midnight and team
selection item is not complete, the expectation is to complete the item.
Councilmember Vella noted the Council Referral was cut off during a previous Council
Communication; stated the item is timely; expressed concern about further delaying the
item; stated the item should be short.
Councilmember Oddie made a substitute motion to approve hearing all items, speaking
quickly, finishing by midnight and any items not finished will be continued to tomorrow's
7:00 p.m. meeting continuation.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
20
May 19, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-05-20,20,"(20-343) Councilmember Oddie moved approval of hearing the remaining items on the
regular agenda without a time-limit; stated that he does not know the amount of public
comment on remaining items.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like to complete the current item and move
to the regular meeting agenda including the consent calendar and regular agenda
items.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Vice Mayor Knox White expressed support for hearing the entire
regular meeting agenda.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is not willing to go past midnight; requested a
friendly amendment to hear the balance of the agenda and finish by midnight.
Councilmember Daysog expressed support for hearing the agenda and finishing the
meeting by midnight; stated there have been previous issues about late meetings;
questioned whether the public is served by Council making decisions at 12:15 a.m.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he will do his best to speak briefly.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she will not support a motion unless the meeting ends
at midnight.
Councilmember Daysog expressed support.
Councilmember Oddie stated Council speaking time should be cut from 9 to 3 minutes.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the current item requires more than 3 minutes.
Vice Mayor Knox White expressed support for the motion amendment with the
commitment to complete the West Midway Project team selection item [paragraph no.
20-334 on the regular agenda; stated should the time reach midnight and team
selection item is not complete, the expectation is to complete the item.
Councilmember Vella noted the Council Referral was cut off during a previous Council
Communication; stated the item is timely; expressed concern about further delaying the
item; stated the item should be short.
Councilmember Oddie made a substitute motion to approve hearing all items, speaking
quickly, finishing by midnight and any items not finished will be continued to tomorrow's
7:00 p.m. meeting continuation.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
20
May 19, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-05-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-06-16,2,"(20-389) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (Initiation of Litigation
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9); Number of Cases: One (As Plaintiff -
City of Alameda Initiating Legal Action.
(20-390) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8); Property: Greenway Golf, 1 Clubhouse Memorial Road, Alameda,
CA; City Negotiators: Eric J. Levitt, City Manager; Michael Roush, Assistant City
Attorney, and Amy Wooldridge, Recreation and Parks Director; Negotiating Parties: City
of Alameda and Greenway Golf: Under Negotiation: Price and Terms.
(20-391) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8); Property: Encinal Terminals, 1521 Buena Vista Avenue (APN 072-
0382-001, 002 and 72-0383-03, Alameda, CA; City Negotiators: Gerry Beaudin,
Assistant City Manager; Lisa Maxwell, Assistant City Attorney, Debbie Potter,
Community Development Director, Andrew Thomas, Planning, Building and
Transportation Director, and Nanette Mocanu, Assistant Community Development
Director; Negotiating Parties: City of Alameda and North Waterfront Cove, LLC: Under
Negotiation: Price and Terms.
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding Site A at Alameda Point, staff provided information and
Council provided direction and no vote was taken; regarding Existing Litigation, staff
provided information and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 5; regarding Anticipated Litigation, staff provided information
and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog:
No; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: No; Ayes: 3.
Noes: 2; regarding Greenway Golf, staff provided information and Council provided
direction with no vote taken; and regarding Encinal Terminals, staff provided information
and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog:
No; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 4.
Noes: 1.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:54
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
June 16, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-06-16,4,"(20-396) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft read a proclamation declaring June 19, 2020 as
Juneteenth Day.
(20-397) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft, Vice Mayor Knox White, Councilmember Oddie,
Councilmember Daysog and Councilmember Vella made comments thanking the Public
Works Director for his service to Alameda.
AGENDA CHANGES
(20-398) The City Manager noted a staff person is outside for the ordinance revising the
sewer service charges.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the protests have a time limit.
The City Clerk responded there is no time specific; stated the notice informs protests
are able to be received up until the item is heard; should the matter be moved back up
in the agenda, protests may still be submitted.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether protests have been received.
The City Clerk responded that she should receive a response by the time oral
communications are heard.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(20-399) Ben Calica, Alameda, discussed contacting non-emergency Police dispatch;
stated any decision to no longer dispatch non-criminal calls should be discussed
publicly.
(20-400) Grover Wehman-Brown Alameda, expressed concern about the framing of the
June 17, 2020 special meeting; stated many reforms have been implemented and have
not worked; urged Council to keep the meeting flexible, respond to community needs,
create a process to listen and respond to the needs of Black residents, ask staff to
implement tools to ensure the community is able to transparently asses the current
status and funds being used by the Police, and consider the community proposals to
shift funding from Police.
(20-401) Amaya Edwards, Alameda, discussed organizing Alameda Youth in response
to unjust killings and harassment of Black people; urged Council to: release the names
of officers involved in the arrest of Mr. Watkins, place the involved officers on
Administrative Leave pending investigation, defund the Police, reinvest in community-
based alternatives to 911, provide a quarterly release of Police use of force and arrest
by race data, allow independent oversight to review Police conduct, remove all law
enforcement from schools and reinvest in education; and not to allow Police to turn off
body worn cameras while active.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2020
2",CityCouncil/2020-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-06-16,8,"(20-415) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Three-Year
Staffing Services Agreement Between the City of Alameda and the Housing Authority of
the City of Alameda for $1,294,970 for Fiscal Year 2020-21, $1,376,529, for Fiscal Year
2021-22, and $1,471,870 for Fiscal Year 2022-23, to Administer the Rent Control
Ordinance (Ordinance No. 3250) and Implementing Regulations for the City of
Alameda's Rent Program.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he does not support the rent control measures in
place; expressed support for the matter due to the need for program administration.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
(*20-416) Recommendation to: Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First
Amendment to the Services Agreement for Fiscal Years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021
between the City of Alameda and the Housing Authority of the City of Alameda
Amending the Scope of Work and Budget Concerning the City's Administration of
Certain Services Including the Community Development Block Grant and HOME
Programs, and Extending the Term of the Service Agreement to June 30, 2023; and
(*20-416A) Resolution No. 15659, ""Approving a Workforce Change in the Community
Development Department to Allocate One Classification, Community Development
Program Manager, Effective August 1, 2020."" Adopted.
(20-417) Recommendation to Receive the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Rent Program
Regulatory Fee Study; and
(20-417A) Resolution No. 15660, ""Adopting a Tier-Structured Annual Rent Program Fee
for the City's Rent Control, Limitation on Evictions and Relocation Payments Ordinance
and Implementing Regulations: $132 for ""Fully Regulated Units"" and $84 for ""Partially
Regulated Units"". Adopted.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he does not support the matter since it is
enhancement of the rent control regime.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the staff recommendation and related
resolution.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes, 1.
(*20-418) Resolution No. 15661, ""Amending the City of Alameda's Conflict of Interest
Code to Reflect Current Classifications and Boards, Commissions and Committees to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2020
6",CityCouncil/2020-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-07,16,"(20-469) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced a motion is needed to hear new items past
11:00 p.m.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of hearing the remaining items under the Regular
Agenda and the remainder of Public Comment, and to continue the Rules of Order
referral [paragraph no. 20-478] and sustainable landscapes brief [paragraph no. 20-479
items to the July 14th Special Meeting.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion.
Under discussion, the City Attorney noted Council should set a time-specific for the
continued items; stated staff recommends a start time of 5:59 p.m.
Councilmember Vella expressed support for the staff recommendation.
Vice Mayor Knox White requested the motion be amended to have the continued items
start at 7:01 p.m.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the 7:01 p.m. time.
Councilmember Vella accepted the amendment to the motion.
Vice Mayor Knox White agreed to still second the amended motion.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the matter empowers the City Manager to
lock the City into a 10 or 20-year agreement with ACI or would Council have to vote on
a long-term agreement.
Ms. Barbieri responded the matter does not provide the City Manager with the ability to
sign the next contract without coming back for Council approval; stated the process
allows more time for negotiations; noted the action for Council is to authorize the City
Manager to execute the extension amendment.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
16
July 7, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-07-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-07,17,"(20-470) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Disburse Money Donated
to the Fund-Wide Alameda Strong Community Relief Campaign as Follows: 60 Percent
to Small Businesses, 20 Percent to Non-Profit Organizations, and 20 Percent to
Alameda Renters.
The Economic Development Manager gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the fund; stated funds will be available.
The City Manager stated there are four funds within the relief fund for: small
businesses, renters, non-profits, and the fund currently being discussed is an allocation
to the General Fund; there is little money that has been put in the General Fund and
most money donated is specifically to one of the three listed funds.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the current total amount donated.
The City Manager responded $30,000 for business relief, $6,000 for renters, about
$2,000 for non-profits and less than $1,000 for General Fund allocation.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether people are given a sheet or slip to allow for
tax deduction when contributions are made to the East Bay Community Fund.
The Economic Development Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the funds are
tax deductible and an electronic receipt is provided showing the amount donated.
Stated there has been little marketing specifically around the fund; noted more can be
done; stated more funds could be found with better marketing; discussed the website
layout being confusing; expressed support for the program: Zac Bowling, Alameda
Comments read into the record:
Discussed sole proprietors being part of the program; stated groups of retailers are
listed as least qualified and eligible for half the amount others could receive; many retail
businesses are an important part of Alameda; noted it is the first job for many of his
employees: Ben Calica, Alameda.
Urged Council to clarify the issue of sole proprietor businesses applying for funds;
stated a brick and mortar sole proprietor with no employees should be eligible for the full
grant amount; a sole proprietor working from a residential property should be eligible for
50% of the award amount: Ronald Mooney, Alameda.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired the award breakdown for sole proprietors.
The Community Development Director responded sole proprietors working from a
residence would be eligible for 50% of the award and sole proprietors working out of a
brick and mortar store would be eligible for the full amount; stated Mr. Mooney's
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
17
January 7, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-07-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-14,19,"(20-490) Vice Mayor Knox White noted the meeting has gone past 12:00 a.m. and is
over.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the meeting may continue with a Council vote.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of continuing the meeting for an additional 15
minutes.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: No; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes. 1.
The City Attorney stated should Council desire to bring the resolution back; staff
recommends continuing the matter to a date and time certain.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether the item would be able to be worked on
without proper notice.
The City Attorney responded there would be no new documents submitted; however, at
a 7:02 p.m. meeting, Council may work collectively with staff to wordsmith a new
resolution.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he would be willing to second a motion which
declares racism as a public health emergency and a crisis affecting the City; expressed
support for not waiting on Item 2 of the resolution being part of a motion.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the portion of the resolution needs to be passed
for the City Manager.
Councilmember Oddie stated it is critical to get the emergency declaration on record.
Councilmember Vella expressed support for Councilmember Oddie's suggestion.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested the motion be re-stated.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of directing the City Manager to produce a public
report as a result of the investigation ordered by Council and any other recommended
audit from the community-led process of the policing practices and to work with
subcommittees on what the audit will include, taking into account the contents of the
resolution; declaring racism a public health crisis; directing the City Manager to identify
long-term and ongoing training; stated that she does not want to limit the training to anti-
racism training; there are a number of additional, helpful trainings; anti-discrimination
trainings are needed; expressed support for broadening training.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
19
July 14, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-07-14.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-07-21,24,"(20-539) Recommendation to De-Name Jackson Park and Direct the City Manager to
Remove the Park Sign.
The Recreation and Parks Director gave a brief presentation.
In response to Councilmember Vella's inquiry regarding timing, the Recreation and
Parks Director stated the matter should return no later than December; the matter could
return to Council sooner than December pending the timing of approvals and committee
presentations.
Councilmember Oddie inquired who will comprise the committee.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the direction from the Commission is to
create a diverse committee; noted that she has reached out to local organizations and
associations to ensure diversity.
Expressed support for renaming of Jackson Park; stated the decision is swift and easy;
Council is acting quickly: Erin Fraser, Alameda.
Expressed support; questioned the committee selection process; stated the selection
process is critical for transparency; urged Council provide a clear selection process:
Melodye Montgomery, Alameda.
Expressed support for changing the name of Jackson Park; noted that she will not take
her child to a park which marginalizes members of the community in any way; stated
steps must be taken now to eliminate systemic racism in Alameda: Meredith Hoskin,
Alameda.
Expressed support for renaming Jackson Park; stated renaming is the right thing to do
and is consistent with other recent actions from Council; this is another decision for
Council to move the ball forward on greater equality: Josh Geyer, Alameda.
Expressed support for renaming of Jackson Park; stated people need to be honest
about the real history of America and Alameda: Alexia Arocha, Alameda.
Expressed support for renaming Jackson Park and removing the park sign; urged
Council to focus on Black, Indigenous, People Of Color (BIPOC) in the conversation;
the matter is simple to push forward: Amy Chu, Alameda.
Expressed support for a memorial to commemorate those killed under Jackson's rule;
stated a memorial has not been discussed; urged Council to push for a memorial at
future meetings: James Bergquist, Alameda.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
July 21, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-10-06,4,"(20-632) Ainye Long, Alameda, discussed ordinances related to smoking; stated the
California State Assembly voted 58 to 1 to approve Senate Bill (SB) 793 banning
menthol and flavored tobacco; discussed a referendum to stop SB 793 and
misinformation being provided by signature gatherers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an
asterisk preceding the paragraph number.]
(*20-633) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on September
1,2020. Approved.
(*20-634) Ratified bills in the amount of $5,355,787.93
(*20-635) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager, or Designee, to Execute an
Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with Brookfield Bay Area Holdings and Catellus
to Develop the West Midway Project at Alameda Point. Accepted.
(*20-636) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager, or Designee, to Negotiate
and Execute an Agreement in the Amount of $350,000 with Brookfield Bay Area
Holdings LLC and/or Catellus Development Corporation to Advance Design and
Development of Backbone Infrastructure for RESHAP (Rebuilding Supportive Housing
at Alameda Point). Accepted.
(*20-637) Recommendation to Accept the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Annual Report for the
City's Rent Program. Accepted.
(*20-638) Recommendation to Accept Proposed Changes to the Emergency Rent Relief
Guidelines and Authorize the City Manager to Approve Future Changes to the
Guidelines. Accepted.
(*20-639) Resolution No. 15698, ""Amending the Capital Budget for Fiscal Year 2020-
2021 Using the Fund Balance of the Construction Improvement Fund for Krusi Park
Recreation Center Replacement in the Amount of $135,000 for Project Management
and Inspection"". Adopted.
(*20-640) Resolution No. 15699, ""Approving a Final Map and Authorizing Execution of a
Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 8524, Bay 37 as a Condition to Final
Map Approval (Alameda Landing Waterfront Development). Adopted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 6, 2020
2",CityCouncil/2020-10-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-10-06,6,"(20-644) Recommendation to Appoint Kimi Sugioka as Alameda's Poet Laureate.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft introduced Ms. Sugioka and made brief comments.
The Poet Laureate read an inaugural poem.
Discussed her experience as Poet Laureate; stated poets are the artists, visionaries and
heart of humanity and are needed; expressed support for continuing the Alameda Poet
Laureate program and the new Poet Laureate: Cathy Dana, Alameda.
(20-645) Recommendation to Receive an Update on a Strategic Plan for Addressing
Homelessness in Alameda.
The Community Development Analyst gave a PowerPoint presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether there are additional efforts in Alameda to
participate in Project Roomkey; stated a hotel on Marina Village has been discussed.
The Community Development Analyst responded in the affirmative; stated Marina
Village is still part of Project Roomkey; there has been an intent to purchase the
property so that the County can turn it into permanent supportive housing after the
pandemic; the County applied for funding to purchase the property, but the project was
not approved; the County is still optimistic that funding is available to move forward with
the property purchase.
Councilmember Oddie inquired what methods the City is providing to the unhoused
related to air quality.
The Community Development Analyst responded the Day Center is now open; stated
people have been using the Day Center as refuge from the smoke; the Day Center is
also air conditioned and is used during heat waves; the City is looking to issue
emergency hotel vouchers through funding from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act (CARES) Act and Homeless Emergency Aid Program (HEAP);
the City has been in contact with Building Futures to discuss ensuring safe distancing at
the warming shelter due to an influx of users as well as finding alternatives for
overcrowding.
Councilmember Oddie stated homeless individuals have been identified in the Climate
Action Resiliency Plan (CARP) as most vulnerable to climate emergencies; requested
clarification about boundaries within the constraints of the 2018 Boise decision by the
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Community Development Analyst stated the Boise decision constrains the City by
providing options as an alternative place to live besides encampments or the streets;
tiny cabin communities or temporary shelters options will be offered to people living in
encampments and on the streets; the City can house up to 20 individuals using tiny or
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 6, 2020
4",CityCouncil/2020-10-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-10-06,22,"(20-651) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations for Appointments to the Civil Service
Board, Commission on Persons with Disabilities and Social Service Human Relations
Board (SSHRB).
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft nominated Troy Hosmer for reappointment and April Madison-
Ramsey for appointment to the Civil Service Board; for Commission on Persons with
Disabilities, nominated Arnold Brillinger and Jennifer Linton for reappointment; and for
the SSHRB, nominated Christine Chilcot for reappointment, and Priya Jagannathan and
Anthony Lewis for appointment.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:00
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 6, 2020
20",CityCouncil/2020-10-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-10-20,14,"(20-672) Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Board's Decision to
Approve Use Permit No. PLN20-0160 to Allow the Operation of a Cannabis Retail
Dispensary at 2416 Lincoln Avenue; and
(20-672A) Resolution No. 15719, ""Denying Appeal and Approving Use Permit
Application No. Pln20-0160, Subject to Modified Conditions of Approval, to Allow the
Operation of a Cannabis Retail Dispensary at 2416 Lincoln Avenue.' Adopted.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director gave a presentation.
(20-673) The City Clerk announced Council will need to vote to suspend the rules to
allow the Appellant and Applicant 5 minutes of speaking time.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of allowing the appellant and applicant 5
minutes of speaking time.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
***
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director continued the presentation.
Gave a Power Point presentation: Enrico Meier, Project Appellant.
Stated there is a commitment to ensure the project is successful; discussed NUG's
establishments and City relations; stated NUG is currently in Oakland, San Leandro,
Sacramento and Redding; discussed letters of support; stated the presentation has a
typo; the correct math had been provided regarding the amount of customers per
month; the discussed the anticipated volume of customers being similar to the
Sacramento location; stated the Sacramento location is similar in size and parking;
NUG is able to handle the daily customer flow with no congestion; discussed images
depicting the 600 foot radius; stated actual measurements have been made by City
staff; double parking will not be allowed; the parking lot will be the primary parking
location; alternative transit will be promoted at NUG; discussed local support; stated the
project site has been in a state of disrepair for years; NUG is prepared to put significant
capital investment into the building and improve the site; discussed illicit and regulated
sales; stated illicit sales will continue unless people are able to obtain nice, high-end
stores in accessible locations: Burch Greene, John Oram, and Robert Selna, Project
Applicants, NUG Wellness.
Councilmember Daysog inquired how the applicant will prevent double parking.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
13
October 20, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-10-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-10-20,23,"(20-678) Councilmember Daysog stated AC Transit is trying to hold off on cutting
service to Alameda; made an announcement regarding an Oakland-Alameda Noise
Forum meeting.
(20-679) Councilmember Oddie made an announcement regarding flu shots and a
Health Care District liaison meeting; stated seismic construction is underway at the
Hospital.
(20-680) Councilmember Vella outlined a district-wide strike at Alameda Health
Systems Hospital, Alameda Hospital, Highland Hospital and San Leandro Hospital;
made an announcement regarding a liaison meeting with East Bay Regional Parks
District (EBRPD) and a Lead Abatement meeting.
(20-681) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft made an announcement regarding accessible voting
options and ballot drop boxes; stated City staff has been working hard under difficult
circumstances during the pandemic; announced the opening of 20 playgrounds in
parks; stated there are guidelines for park use; made announcements regarding
Halloween and social distancing protocols and a COVID-19 testing and flu vaccine site.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:35
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 20, 2020
22",CityCouncil/2020-10-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-12-01,2,"(20-733) Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Pursuant to Government Code §
54957); Positions Evaluated: City Clerk - Lara Weisiger
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding the Real Property, staff provided information and Council
provided direction with no vote taken; regarding DeFigueroa, staff provided information
with no vote taken; regarding Workers' Compensation, staff provided information by the
following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye;
Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 5: these three workers' compensation
claims were filed by a Firefighter who first joined the City on February 26, 2001 ;
applicant filed a claim for a knee injury suffered on February 22, 2017 after stepping
down from a fire engine; applicant also filed a claim for a cumulative injury to the knee
as of January 1, 2017; in addition, applicant suffered cumulative trauma to the heart as
of February 18, 2020; applicant is already retired from service with the City; the Council
authorized the City Attorney to settle the pending workers' compensation claims in an
amount not to exceed $125,000; regarding Union Pacific, staff provided information and
Council provided direction by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No;
Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 4. Noes:
1; regarding Performance Evaluation, the City Council conducted the performance
evaluation for the City Clerk.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 7:02
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 01, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-12-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-12-01,16,"(20-758) Councilmember Vella moved approval of continuing the meeting until 11:55 p.m.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy
Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
Councilmember Vella stated that she respectfully disagrees in part about the mandate of the
voters; there were many measures on the ballot and people tend to vote no when unsure or
overwhelmed; stated that the vote results do not reconcile with her receiving the highest amount
of votes and being pro housing; there is a lot of confusion around what was being voted on
based on communications received; there is a misunderstanding of RHNA allocations, Charter
allowances, how density has been obtained, funding for affordable housing and various project
approval processes; it is clear that informational sessions and meetings are needed; expressed
support for discussing funding for affordable housing, including necessary bonds for 100%
affordable housing projects; stated that she does not intend to violate the Charter; questioned
where the City is left should the Charter be followed and what it will mean to lose parks and
commercial space; stated it is disingenuous to question job creation without housing density;
matters should not be discussed in silos, but as a collective; Alameda is not unique because it is
an Island; other cities have bridge access and limitations; safety, transit and the environment
are being looked at; Council must acknowledge that the population has grown, demand for
housing is here, and planning via the ballot box has yielded the current hole Alameda is in;
Council must look at the unintended consequences; expressed concern for extreme Not In My
Backyard (NIMBY) values; stated the units are not leaving the region and subsequent impacts
will occur.
Councilmember Oddie expressed concern over restating the theme of the election; stated a no
vote did not indicate maintaining the status quo; outlined the ballot arguments for Measure Z;
stated the Charter outlines exceptions for housing and Council may proceed at its own risk;
outlined Section 3-10 of the City Charter; noted Council could not pass an ordinance which
comes up with exceptions.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the election has yielded mixed results; Measure Z was a confusing
measure; there is an opportunity to provide more community education and outreach in order to
collaborate effectively; noted seeing actual plans utilizing historic buildings is much less
intimidating; Council must work to bring the community along to allow a better understanding of
where Alameda fits in the housing crisis and what is possible to help alleviate it; there is time for
public forums; the forums should be as wide-spread as possible; the matter is important;
Council needs to both be compliant with State Law as well as help house people; the two
propositions are not mutually exclusive; efforts will be continued.
(20-759) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Lease
Amendments for Rent Relief Program with Alameda Point Beverage Group, Auctions By the
Bay, Building 43 & Associates, Faction Brewing, Group Delphi, Proximo Spirits, Saildrone and
USS Hornet Air & Space Museum via the Non-Profit Spirits Alley Program for Rent Relief in
Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic. Introduced.
The Assistant Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
The City Manager noted the Pinball Museum and Wonky Kitchen will be provided at the next
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
13
December 1, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-12-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-02-16,17,"(21-104) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15747, ""Calling Special Election
Regarding Alteration of the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes for
Community Facilities District No. 17-1 (Alameda Point Public Services District).
""
Adopted.
The Base Reuse Manager gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the proposed fees are on top of the 1% ad
valorem property tax and any other add-on property tax, to which the Base Reuse
Manager responded in the affirmative.
In response to Councilmember Herrera Spencer's inquiry, the Base Reuse Manager
stated the five acres of apartments are within the Site A property; the calculation is per
acre; however, most Community Facilities Districts (CFD) within the City are per unit;
calculations in the future will be per unit.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the property within Site A will ever
be taxed on a per unit basis or whether the area will always be taxed on a per acre
basis, to which the Base Reuse Manager responded areas [that already have land use
entitlements] will stay at a per acre basis.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the reasoning to not be taxed on a per unit
basis.
The Base Reuse Manager responded calculations are not to be retroactive; stated the
original tax method is to stay.
The Interim Community Development Director stated the original expectation for
apartment owners is per acre and the expectation should not be modified; staff is
resetting the calculation for the future.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether all units will eventually have the
same calculation and whether per acre calculation will provide less tax dollars overall.
Sara Mares, NBS, responded the calculation depends on the number of units develop
and the acreage; the math will determine whether the rate per acre ends up being less
or more than a rate per unit on the same property.
Councilmember Daysog noted part of the report shows a conversion from per acre to
per unit; stated it is possible the apartments could pay as much in a per unit basis
depending on the square footage of apartments.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the number of units on the site is known;
expressed concern about different tax schedules in different areas.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
15
February 16, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-02-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-03-02,4,"(21-133A) Resolution No. 15751, ""Amending the Salary Schedules for the Management
and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) and for Executive Management
Employees (EXME) and Approving Workforce Changes for FY 2020-21.' Adopted.
The Senior Management Analyst gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether there are matters which preclude Council
from altering the proposed amount of reserves set aside for the Other Post-Employment
Benefit (OPEB) liability.
The City Manager responded Council approval of any change to the proposed OPEB
amount should be contingent on the matter returning for final approval during the
Council Study Sessions in May; stated nothing limits Council from reducing the
proposed amount.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the assets seized as referenced in the report.
The City Manager responded the matter is defined in the mid-year budget adjustments
as an exhibit; stated the funds came from an Alameda County Regional Narcotics Task
Force; the funds go into a fund balance; Alameda Police Department (APD) requested
further funds than initially appropriated; the request for $21,000 is to increase the
appropriation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether specific assets had been seized
providing specific reimbursement.
The City Manager responded in the negative; stated the seizure of assets occurred prior
to 2020; the funds are placed into the fund balance from the Regional Task Force.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the assets seized were under narcotics
enforcement.
The City Manager responded the assets came from the Alameda County Regional
Narcotics Task Force; stated APD no longer has a member on the Task Force.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the assets seized are known, to which the City
Manager responded in the negative.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether changes or modifications from staff
occurred.
The City Manager responded there are no adjustments in the mid-year budget; stated
adjustments are being evaluated for the annual budget process; recommendations will
be presented based on reports to be provided.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 2, 2021
3",CityCouncil/2021-03-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-03-16,9,"(21-170) Recommendation to Accept Report from the Community-Led Committee on
Police Reform and Racial Equity and Provide Staff Direction on Next Steps.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated 11 items were brought forth in the report from the Steering
Committee and Subcommittees; Council will go through the list and vote on which
matters will move forward.
***
(21-171) Councilmember Knox White moved approval of waiving the nine minute
Council discussion time limit.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for a specific time limit; stated that she will not
support an open-ended discussion time.
Councilmember Knox White stated that he would like to know how much time is allowed
prior to presentations and public comments.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for Councilmember Knox White's
proposal; inquired how much time staff and the Committee will be presenting.
The City Clerk responded the Committee has 10 minutes to present, unless Council
suspends the rules of order; stated there is no staff presentation.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of allowing Council 20 minutes, with 5
additional minutes if Councilmembers are reaching the limit.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, which failed by the following roll
call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
No; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: No. Ayes: 2. Noes: 3.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of allowing Council 15 minutes and
allowing Council to vote to add 5 minutes.
Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a vote would be needed to
add more time, to which Councilmember Knox White responded in the affirmative.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
***
Steering Committee Members Cheryl Taylor, Christine Chilcott, and Al Mance gave a
Power Point presentation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
March 16, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-03-30,10,"(21-189) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced there are 38 participants on Zoom.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(21-190) Consider Establishing a New Methodology by which the Number of Housing Units
are Calculated for Parcels Zoned C-2-PD (Central Business District with Planned
Development Overlay). (Councilmember Daysog)
Councilmember Daysog gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Daysog stated the successful No on Z campaign came from the
understanding the need for more housing and modern apartments which are not consistent
with the historic Measure A however, the need to balance the amount of new housing in a
way supported by the island structure is also understood; many of the sites noted are within
the historic built-out areas within the Otis Drive, South Shore and Fernside Drive areas.
Stated the proposed methodology change would violate the State Housing Crisis Act:
Senate Bill (SB) 330; discussed the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and
Measure Z; stated Council needs to consider how these types of changes are going to
prevent meeting the needs allocation; the zoned areas in Alameda are going to be critical
for the City's attempt to have a Housing Element that conforms to State law; the task will be
made even harder for Planning staff; urged Council not to take action on the referral: Zac
Bowling, Alameda.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City is in the process of a General Plan update, which
includes an update to the Housing Element; inquired how the update meshes with the
Council Referral.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded the City is in the midst of a
Housing Element update; stated under State Law, the City is required to update the General
Plan and Zoning Code to accommodate the RHNA, which has been established at
approximately 5,400 units; the City needs to up-zone large areas of Alameda to
accommodate the State mandate; changing the way the City calculates density to reduce
the number of units on shopping centers will only increase the need to increase housing
units in other places within the City; the effort is currently underway and will take roughly
one year; matters will go to the Planning Board in the Spring/Summer of 2022 and will come
before Council in the Fall; staff can integrate proposed ideas into the broad range of
concepts being reviewed; a Planning Board subcommittee has been set up to help make
recommendations to the full Planning Board and Council; the City cannot downzone
property without up-zoning other property; the State and the City are in the midst of a
housing crisis; a State Law on the books notes that cities cannot downzone without up-
zoning elsewhere; the City is looking at an up-zone now and can integrate ideas into the
planning process; the City will eventually have to find land and zone appropriately for 5,400
units; the City will determine how many units to place on each site over the next 12 months.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the matter is part of an ongoing public process, to
which the Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded in the affirmative.
Continued March 16, 2021 Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
March 30, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-03-30.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-04-06,2,"(21-208) Erin Fraser, Alameda, discussed the dangers of allowing the sale of the armored
vehicle and an article published in BuzzFeed News.
(21-209) Grover Wehman-Brown, Alameda, discussed a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)
complaint filed by a reporter; stated the matter is consistent with others attempting to obtain
information from the Alameda Police Department (APD); discussed an article published in
BuzzFeed News; urged Council to make stronger direction to the City Manager to enforce
transparency in APD policing, data and accountability and let people know how Council will be
holding staff accountable; expressed concern about the decision to keep the armored vehicle.
(21-210) Jenice Anderson, Alameda, expressed concern over the revelations that APD is using
facial recognition technology after Council voted against allowing it; questioned who is holding
the Police accountable for their actions; discussed viewpoints held by a recently retired Officer;
stated working with the subcommittees is not a substitute for an outside investigation; the
incidents are a prime example of why the City should adopt a Citizens Oversight Commission;
the Charter needs to be amended to give citizen oversight enforcement capabilities.
(21-211) Alexia Arocha, Alameda, discussed an article published in BuzzFeed News;
questioned the message being sent with no accountability; stated APD had been told to sell the
vehicle and did not; APD was told not to use facial recognition software and did; urged Council
begin to hold APD and the City Manager accountable.
(21-212) Lynn O'Conner, Alameda, discussed Jean Sweeney Park; outlined a newspaper
article; stated without being publicized, the border is being diminished from what was originally
approved; the Park is being used; the parking lot is often full; the Park is a wonderful resource;
she would like information to be publicized, with an opportunity for public comment; the City has
the opportunity to purchase the land and increase the Park land to the original plan.
(21-213) Jennifer Rakowski, Alameda, stated it was disturbing to read on national news of a
disregard for Council direction to not use Clearview Artificial Intelligence (AI) by APD; expressed
concern about the use of free trials and equipment deteriorating the command structure of the
City and basic civil rights; urged Council to look into the matter and provide a public report;
stated all department should be expected to follow City Council policy direction.
(21-214) Mike Katz-Lacabe, Oakland Privacy, discussed APD's use of facial recognition
software; stated Council approved a policy that banned the use of such software; the matter is a
good argument using ordinances, which have the force of law; questioned the measures taken
in order to hold APD accountable for its violations of policy; stated many policies can be violated
at any time without Council knowledge; noted many APD policies are at the discretion of the
Police Chief; urged Council to hold APD accountable and to pursue an ordinance in the future.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Discussed the bills for ratification; suggested more detail be provided on Housing Authority
invoices: Matt Reid, Alameda.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that should would be voting no on final passage of the
grocery worker hazard pay ordinance [paragraph no. 21-226 and would have preferred it not be
on the Consent Calendar.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
April 06, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-04-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-04-06,5,"(21-228) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Section
2-14 (Youth Council) to Article Il (Boards and Commissions) of Chapter Il (Administration),
Establishing a Youth Council and Prescribing Membership and Duties of Said Commission. Not
heard.
(21-229) Recommendation to Review and Provide Feedback on Preliminary Goals and
Strategies for the Homelessness Strategic Plan.
The Development Manager made brief introductions.
Amanda Wehrman and Aram Hauslaib from Homebase gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like more data presented regarding the
unsheltered population pre-COVID-19 and current; questioned how much the parking lot is
utilized at Alameda Point, who is utilizing it and whether people are being connected to services;
stated the lack of data provided looks like the City is starting from zero, when the City is not; the
City has had many programs; she wants to know the results of the current programs in place;
expressed support for the responses to her inquiries be attached to the staff report; stated not
having data is a problem; the community deserves an update about the effectiveness of the
current policies as well as Steering Committee meeting information; expressed concern about
members of the Steering Committee; stated many members are from agencies that receive
money from the City, which is a conflict; expressed concern about the report's lack of data.
Discussed his experience with homelessness; stated the Safe Parking facility and individuals
running the facility provided invaluable psychological support and kept him going; many
individuals at the facility are in the same situation and have not previously been homeless; all
participants want to be on a trajectory to get back to being self-sufficient; it is difficult to rely on
social services; expressed gratitude for the services provided; urged Council continue to fund
the services, which provide safe harbor for individuals; discussed finding a temporary place to
live; expressed concern about the scattered set of resources: George Perkins, Alameda.
Suggested the City consider establishing an independent citizen led committee; stated the
committee could seek input from non-profit organizations while organizations remain
independent from potential financial conflicts of interest; questioned the data compiled by the
City regarding the number of individuals currently receiving assistance from local programs;
further questioned how the City is evaluating the programs; discussed a Public Records Act
request that she submitted; urged the City to seek the information and make it available to the
public: Carmen Reid, Alameda.
Expressed support for the City's efforts; stated that he is concerned about the potential conflict
by the stakeholders receiving public money from the process; urged the City to carefully look
into the matter; stated there needs to be an independent group; optics are important; he is not
concerned about the County; Council can only focus on City issues; having data is critical;
without data, informed decisions cannot be made; expressed support for effectively supporting
the homeless and helping those with mental health issues: John Healy, Alameda.
Stated that she appreciates the thoughtful planning going into both homelessness and
preventing homelessness; urged the plan flesh out more housing, security and the prevention of
homelessness; stated there has been unprecedented job loss under COVID-19; many who are
homeless have lost over half of their income, are burdened with high rent, are people of color
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
April 06, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-04-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-04-06,18,"(21-237) Vice Mayor Vella discussed Youth Activists of Alameda and others who helped
address the rise in hate crimes and violence against the Asian-American Pacific Islander (API)
community during a vigil; stated community members do not feel comfortable or safe moving
throughout the community and all over the Country due to being targeted; outlined her
experience with micro and direct aggressions relative to her race; expressed support for
response from the City related to comments made at the meeting.
(21-238) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft displayed posters from the Alameda County District Attorney's
special hate crimes task force; stated the head of the task force came to the first rally in front of
City Hall; posters are available in Chinese, English and Spanish and are available by e-mailing:
shenry@alamedaca.gov; made an announcement about a vaccine clinic on April 17th at Mastick
Senior Center.
(21-239) Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed gratitude for City staff in efforts to serve
the community; stated it is important to thank staff for their work.
(21-240) Mayor's Nominations for Appointments to the Housing Authority Board of
Commissioners and Recreation and Park Commission.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft nominated Philly Jones and Alice Nguyen for appointment to the
Recreation and Park Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
18
April 06, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-04-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-04-20,7,"(21-252) Laura Cutrona, Alameda, discussed the killing of Mario Gonzalez; stated thoughts and
prayers are more harmful when not followed with action; questioned the nature of the call that
initiated the fatal interaction, how Mr. Gonzalez was deemed as the potential suspect of a theft
and was there use of force; stated that she will pose the questions to Alameda Police
Department (APD); urged Council to release the body camera footage immediately, initiate an
impartial investigation and implement two recommendations from the Police Reform and Racial
Equity Committee by June 30, 2021: mental health first responders and a paid Police Oversight
Committee.
(21-253) Michael Tal, East Bay Democratic Socialists of America, stated the tone of the meeting
has been embarrassing; discussed the killing of Mario Gonzalez and the guilty verdict for Derek
Chauvin; stated militarized policing is a disease and is affecting the entire Country; Council must
invest in people and social services and the funding must come from the APD budget; urged
implementation of the mental health first responders program and release of the body camera
footage.
(21-254) Debra Mendoza, Alameda, discussed the results of the Derek Chauvin and George
Floyd case; expressed concern about the press release issued by APD regarding the death of
Mario Gonzalez; stated Alameda needs more information, transparency and immediate
community oversight; urged the body camera footage be released; stated body cameras do not
prevent State sanctioned violence; the City needs mental health first responders by July 1,
2021; urged Council take immediate action and make changes.
(21-255) James Bergquist, Alameda, expressed concern about the direction the City is headed
related to racial justice; stated it is not lost on people that the conviction of Derek Chauvin
coincides with issues Alameda is currently facing; the time is pivotal for the City and Country;
discussed APD's armored vehicle sale, an armed white man threatening the public, and the
death of Mario Gonzalez; stated transparency is crucial; urged release of the body camera
footage.
(21-256) Janani Ramachandran, discussed killings of 2021 and Mario Gonzalez; stated that she
is demanding justice and transparency; the conviction of Derek Chauvin means nothing when
there has been more than 1,000 people killed by Police since George Floyd's death; urged the
immediate release of body camera footage, initiation of an independent investigation,
development of a non-police program to respond to mental health calls and ensure Officers
involved are on leave with disciplinary measures.
(21-257) Jenice Anderson, discussed the killing of Mario Gonzalez; stated that she takes issue
with APD's repeated use of the words ""scuffle"" and ""suspect;"" 27-year olds do not die of a
medical emergency from a scuffle; details about the alleged crime are not known; no possible
threat is worth a human life; the Sherriff's office and the District Attorney are not impartial or
independent; if an independent investigator is sought, the community should be involved in
selection; the recommendations from the Police Reform Committee are imperative; the City is
not a leader on policing.
(21-258) Venecio Camarillo, Alameda, stated the incident with Mario Gonzalez is appalling and
the Press Release factors are off-putting; discussed the statement provided by the City; stated
the medical emergency induced came from the Police due to either excessive force or the use
of a deadly weapon; earlier versions of the Press Release do not state a weapon was used;
Mario did not deserve to die; the Officers involved are continuing to be paid while under
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
April 20, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-04-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-04-20,9,"(21-265) Recommendation to Approve the Webster Street Business Improvement Area (BIA)
Annual Assessment Report; and Resolution No. 15757, ""Intention to Levy an Annual
Assessment on the Webster Street BIA for Fiscal Year 2021-22; and Set a Public Hearing for
May 4, 2021 to Levy an Annual Assessment on the Webster Street BIA."" Adopted.
Note: Councilmember Daysog recused himself.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for the Webster Street BIA efforts in the
past year; stated that she would like to continue supporting moving forward.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation approving the BIA
[including adoption of the resolutions].
Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion.
The motion on Park Street BIA carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog:
Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes:
5.
Since Councilmember Daysog recused himself on the Webster Street BIA, the motion carried by
the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Absent; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox
White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 1. [Absent: Councilmember
Daysog - 1.]
(*21-266) Resolution No. 15758, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Project Budget by
Reducing Revenue and Appropriations in the Enterprise Resource Planning System
Implementation Project 90002704 by $360,000 and Increasing Revenue and Appropriations for
the Strategic Technology Plan Project 90003704 by $360,000.' Adopted.
(21-267) Resolution No. 15759, ""Continuing the Declaration of the Existence of a Local
Emergency in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Consistent with Government Code
Section 8630(c). Adopted.
Councilmember Knox White moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like staff to provide an explanation for
the matter.
The City Attorney stated under State Law, a declaration of local emergency only lasts for 60
days; every period, staff must return to Council for approval of re-declaring the local emergency
in order for it to continue; every hearing, Council has the choice to not approve an extension;
however, staff does have to return and provide the matter for consideration.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the implications for the emergency expiring.
The City Attorney responded a number of implications would occur; stated the City may have
difficulties recovering Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) money; the City also
has implemented certain renter and mortgagee protection provisions which hinge on the
continuation of the local emergency.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
April 20, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-04-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-05-04,27,"(21-312) The City Manager announced updates related to exploring and defining mental
health resources within homeless services, gas leaf blowers, a vaccine clinic May 6th and
the Central Avenue Veterans Wall project.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(21-313) Zac Bowling, Alameda, discussed AB 339; stated that he is a fan of the bill; urged
Council adopt the current proposal for AB 339; stated the bill continues the ability for public
comment and civic engagement via internet and telephone remotely; the bill is voluntary for
cities to adopt; having access during COVID-19 has dramatically allowed participation and
engagement for members of the community; discussed AB 1322.
(21-314) Tripti Jain discussed a rental property she owns in Fremont.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(21-315) Consider Scheduling a Performance Evaluation for the City Manager as Soon as
Possible. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-316) Consider Addressing the Surplus Lands Act, including Lobbying Efforts and
Assembly Bill 1486. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(21-317) Councilmember Knox White discussed Alameda County (AC) Transit transit talk
and an AC Transit Interagency Liaison Committee (ILC) meetings; stated the transit picture
is less grim for those impacted; AC Transit has a bare bones service solution being rolled
out for the summer; announced a new bus route timed with the new ferry terminal at
Alameda Point; stated there will be a direct connection for the West End that will start at the
East End; discussed AC Transit's budget and new services starting back up over the
coming year.
(21-318) Councilmember Herrera Spencer discussed a meeting from the Airport Noise
Forum; discussed the website: flyquietoak.com; stated people should report being affected
by airplane noise and traffic; the organization is working with the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) to get relief.
(21-319) Councilmember Daysog discussed the AC Transit ILC meeting; stated the
Alameda Unified School District will be sending a member to regularly attend the meetings.
(21-320) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed a meeting webinar preparing for receiving
recovery funding; stated the guidelines from the Treasury Department will come out on May
11th; discussed a Mayor's Town Hall on policing which was student-led by the Youth
Activists of Alameda; announced an upcoming Town Hall on bystander intervention training.
(21-321) Vice Mayor Vella stated the upcoming bystander training focuses on not
responding to the person that is performing hateful acts and instead focuses on the target or
victim; announced a Lead Abatement Board Healthy Homes Department meeting, which will
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
25
May 4, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-05-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-05-11,4,"(21-325) Budget Workshop for Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 to Provide Direction that
will be Incorporated into Budget Adoption Hearing Materials for City Council Consideration
in June 2021.
The Senior Management Analyst gave a Power Point presentation.
The Senior Management Analyst, City Manager and Public Works Director responded to
City Council questions.
Stated that he was proud of Council on May 8th and hopes the budget reflects the actions of
May 8th: Erin Fraser, Alameda.
Stated that she is disappointed Council did not get the message that the community wants
to fund community care, not cops; urged Council to defund the Police by 50%: Debra
Mendoza, Alameda.
Proposed that the City explore contracting with Alameda's trained Firefighters and
Paramedics, who may be more suitably equipped to handle emergency health situations, in
light of the incidents regarding policing and mental health calls: Carmen Reid, Alameda.
Stated that she hopes the Council approves funding for the Shuumi land tax; she is
concerned about funding the Police Department at a higher level: Grover Wehman,
Alameda.
Expressed concerns about the Crime Analyst position in the Police Department; stated the
people on the Subcommittees made it clear an Analyst should not be hired by or report to
the Police Department: Melodye Montgomery, Alameda.
Stated that she is concerned about the lack of mental health services available and that
Alameda cannot find $125,000 for additional mental health support students are going to
need; urged Council to give Alameda Family Services the funds they are requesting: Beth
Kenny, Alameda.
Stated that she supports prioritization of the sustainability and resiliency measures;
reminded Council that they need to be resilient, not only to the threats and vulnerabilities
related to the pandemic, racial injustice, institutional violence and the housing crisis, but
also to immediate threats of climate change: Ruth Abbe, Community Action for a
Sustainable Alameda (CASA).
Stated the purchase of the Pacific Union land would fulfill a promise to the people of
Alameda; urged Council to approve funding for the 2.8 acres of park land: Jim Sweeney,
Alameda.
Stated that he supports climate mitigation and sustainability efforts, which include improving
the City's tree protection ordinance; urged Council to resume work on the ordinance:
Christopher Buckley, Alameda.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
May 11, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-05-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-06-01,12,"(21-383) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code, Including
Section 2-22 (Open Government Commission) and Article VIII (Sunshine Ordinance) of
Chapter Il (Administration) to Establish a Hearing Officer Form of Adjudication of
Sunshine Ordinance Complaints, Clarifying Enforcement Provisions, and Providing for
Other Updates and Enhancements to the Sunshine Ordinance. Not introduced.
The City Attorney gave a brief presentation.
Stated that he has been honored to work with residents committed to the objectives of
the Sunshine Ordinance; outlined his experience on the Open Government Commission
(OGC); stated the OGC is capable of performing its functions; OGC cases have been
adjudicated efficiently; outlined the OGC being tasked with putting teeth into the null and
void provision; urged Council to adopt an interim measure recommended by the OGC:
Bryan Schwartz, Alameda.
Stated that she is surprised the matter is coming directly to the City Council without an
open public hearing first; expressed support for strong principles of good government,
including transparency and public trust; stated the proposed matter seeks to diminish
the role of appointed Commissioners from the review process and weakens the role of
the Commission; urged Council to consider options other than moving the functions to
a
Hearing Officer; outlined options for Council and staff; expressed support for the OGC
having independent legal counsel; outlined issues brought forth to the Rent Review
Advisory Committee (RRAC) : Karen Butter, League of Women Voters.
Outlined the genesis of the Brown Act; stated it is up to a City to decide how to enforce
the Brown Act; the Sunshine Ordinance is patently flawed in how it is used by the City;
there have been more complaints due to more recent violations; expressed concern
over manipulation of the OGC; stated the arguments to justify the proposed changes
are absurd; it is inappropriate to have a Hearing Officer; people in Alameda should be
able to make their own decisions: Jay Garfinkle, Alameda.
Stated that she is surprised to see the proposal on the Council agenda; she outlined
concerns in correspondence submitted; there are trust and communication issues
between the OGC and City Attorney's Office; a collaborative dynamic path is being
created; if Council desires the insight of the OGC, clearer guidance needs to be
provided; it is presumed that Council would like to receive unfiltered recommendations
from the OGC to avoid miscommunication; it is prudent for Council to consider a hybrid
or bifurcated model for adjudication rather than a Hearing Officer model; there is merit
to creating an avenue for legally nuanced complaints; Commissioners bring a lived
experience as community members engaged with local government; expressed concern
about multiple aspects of the OCG proposed revisions to the Sunshine Ordinance being
omitted; urged Council consider additional recommendations: Krystal LoPilato, OGC.
Expressed concern about the recommended changes to the OGC duties without
seeking comments from Commissioners; stated an open and honest conversation could
have led to a greater understanding of concerns; the central focus of the Commission is
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 1, 2021
11",CityCouncil/2021-06-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-06-01,22,"(21-392) Mayor's Nominations for Appointment to the Housing Authority Board of
Commissioners and Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB).
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft nominated Kristin Furuichi Fong, Dianne Yamashiro-Omi,
Samantha Green and Scott Means for appointment to the SSHRB.
ADJOURNMENT
(21-393) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting
in memory of Arnold Brillinger and the nine employees of the Valley Transportation
Authority Transit Workers killed in San Jose at 10:54 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 1, 2021
21",CityCouncil/2021-06-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-06-15,4,"(21-401 CC) Resolution No. 15782, ""Approving and Adopting the Operating and Capital
Budget for Fiscal Years (FYs) 2021-22 and 2022-23."" Adopted;
(21-15 SACIC) Resolution No. 21-12, ""Approving and Adopting the Budget for FYs
2021-22 and 2022-23""; and
(21-401 A CC) Resolution No. 15783, ""Approving Workforce Changes and Amending
the Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) Salary Schedule in
FYs 2021-22 and 2022-23 Effective July 1, 2021.' Adopted.
The Finance Director made brief comments.
The Senior Management Analyst and Supervising Senior Engineer gave a Power Point
presentation.
Councilmember/Commissione Knox White requested confirmation that the staff
recommendation is consistent with direction given at the previous workshops, to which
the Finance Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog inquired whether the $200,000 park
maintenance budget is for the resurfacing of tennis and pickle ball courts and whether
the Recreation and Park Commission will weigh-in and provide recommendations.
The Supervising Senior Engineer responded in the affirmative; stated the increase in
funding is for park improvements, with specific projects to be determined at a later date.
Councilmember/Commissioner Knox White stated that he would like to clarify the
funding is not specifically for tennis and pickle ball court resurfacing; the funding is for
projects identified by the Recreation and Park Commission, which could be beyond the
resurfacing.
Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella expressed support for the clarification.
Urged $250,000 in funding for the master planning of DePave Park; outlined benefits of
the Park: Linda Carloni, Golden Gate Audubon Society.
Stated there is a disconnect relative to direction previously provided by Council on
Police Reform and Equity; several important matters in an upcoming matter include
budget applications with no allocated funds, which is an important step in implementing
the Subcommittee recommendations; urged funding be allocated now: Jacqueline
Zipkin, Transform Alameda.
Stated there is lack of funding in the budget for the Police Accountability Committee; the
recommendations provided by the Steering Committee have been approved by Council;
funding should be included in the proposed budget; urged Council to amend the
proposed budget: Lorin Laiacona Salem, Alameda.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and Successor Agency
2
to the Community Improvement Commission
June 15, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-06-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-06-15,18,"(21-419) Resolution No. 15787, ""Reappointing Kristin Furuichi Fong as a Member of the
Social Service Human Relations Board.' Adopted;
(21-419A) Resolution No. 15788, ""Appointing Samantha Green as a Member of the
Social Service Human Relations Board."" Adopted;
(21-419B) Resolution No. 15789, ""Appointing Scott Means as a Member of the Social
Service Human Relations Board."" Adopted; and
(21-419C) Resolution No. 15790, ""Appointing Dianne Yamashiro-Omi as a Member of
the Social Service Human Relations Board."" Adopted.
Vice Mayor Vella moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office.
Ms. Furuichi Fong, Ms. Green, Mr. Means, and Ms. Yamashiro-Omi made brief
comments.
***
The City Clerk noted the procedural motion regarding the resolution declaring the
emergency [paragraph no. 21-418 required four votes and therefore failed.
***
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 9:57 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:15
p.m.
***
(21-420) The City Attorney stated that he recommends Council vote to reopen the
previous matter [resolution declaring a local emergency] due to the procedural motion
not passing.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of reopening the resolution declaring the
emergency [paragraph no. 21-418].
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
CONSENT CALENDAR CONTINUATION
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 15, 2021
9",CityCouncil/2021-06-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-06-15,19,"(21-420A) Resolution No. 15791, ""Continuing the Declaration of the Existence of a
Local Emergency in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Consistent with
Government Code Section 8630(c)."" Adopted.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer read the proposed resolution terms; stated that she
will not be supportive of continuing the state of emergency in the City; prior to COVID-
19, the State was under a state of emergency declaration due to a 2018 wildfire in
Paradise; things will happen when the City decides to lift the state of emergency; due to
cooperation from community members, the numbers of vaccinated people should
increase; the matter will return to Council in 60 days; it is important for community
members to be thinking about the appropriate time to lift the emergency declaration; the
vaccination percentage will not reach 100%.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he has previously asked the City Attorney's office to
compile bullet points on implications for renters and small landlords; the matter is
important; as long as the state of emergency is in place, small landlords and renters are
caught in certain policies put into place within the City; small landlords are suffering
from the effects of the pandemic; expressed support for extending the public health
emergency; stated impacts continue; stated the bullet points compiled by the City
Attorney's office indicate results of not extending the health emergency; concerns of
renters and small landlords will weigh heavily when the matter returns in 60 days.
Councilmember Knox White moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye;
and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS CONTINUATION
(21-421) Recommendation to Approve the City of Alameda's Investment Policy.
The City Treasurer and Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of the recommendation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she agrees with streamlining the process
going forward; Council received correspondence related to the social responsibility
aspects of the policy.
The City Treasurer stated the correspondence includes great suggestions about
modifications to consider for the environmental and social governance part of the
Investment Policy; he is open to the proposed ideas; recommended Council discuss the
proposal and vet through outside managers to ensure implementation capabilities;
stated Council can then develop a policy for annual reports; the priority this year was to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 15, 2021
10",CityCouncil/2021-06-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-06-15,21,"(21-424) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a motion is needed to consider remaining agenda
items past 11:00 p.m.; she is not supportive of continuing the meeting past 12:00 a.m.
The City Clerk stated public hearings will need to be continued to a date and time
certain.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the Call for Review [paragraph no. 21-430] is
able to be continued to another date.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft responded the matter needs to be heard by the first meeting in
July; expressed support for continuing the matter to July 6th at 6:59 p.m.
The City Clerk stated Council may continue the matter to a date and time specific; the
timing for the Call for Review allows for the matter to be heard at the July 6th Council
Meeting.
Councilmember Knox White expressed support for continuing the matter to 5:00 p.m.
Councilmember Know White moved approval of continuing the Call for Review
[paragraph no. 21-430] to 5:00 p.m. on July 6, 2021.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following
roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye;
Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
Stated the City needs to be thinking of its game plan for getting the Police budget down
over the next several years; resources need to be redistributed in order to take care of
people rather than being exposed to violence: Josh Geyer, Transform Alameda.
Discussed feedback from the pilot mental health response models; stated none of the
options stress and emphasize moving away from Police response to mental health; the
goal may be insinuated by the two Fire Department options; however, the goal is not
specifically listed; the Felton Institute requires Alameda Police Department (APD) to
respond; Council has discussed not having Police respond to mental health crisis calls
for service; urged Council to consider whether the proposed programs align with
Council direction from March 16th and whether the options proposed provide immediate
harm reduction: Savanna Cheer, Alameda.
Urged Council to reject the Felton Institute proposal as-written; stated the proposal
requires APD to respond and is directly contradictory to Council direction; it is important
to select a pilot program which can be implemented quickly; the City cannot put off
providing non-Police response to mental health crises; urged Council address how to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 15, 2021
12",CityCouncil/2021-06-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-07-06,51,"(21-464) Consider Adoption of Resolution Supporting the Goal of Reaching 100% Zero
Emission Vehicle Sales in California by 2030. (Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft) Not heard.
(21-465) Considering Having an Introduction and Update from the New Police Chief
regarding Strategies to Address Crimes. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-466) Considering Directing Staff to Provide an Update on License Plate Readers.
(Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-467) Consider Directing Staff to Publicly Share Information on Parking Recreational
Vehicles. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-468) Consider Directing Staff to Address Representation for Below Market Rate
Homeowners on Homeowner Association (HOA) Boards and with Property
Management. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Not heard.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 12:01
a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
28
July 6, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-07-20,4,"(21-476) Designation of Voting Delegates and Alternates for the League of California
Cities Annual Conference.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of selecting Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft as the
delegate and Vice Mayor Vella as the alternate.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
(21-477) Councilmember Daysog announced the names of eight Troop 73 Eagle
Scouts: Henry Banchieri, Brendan Cook, Johanthan Hildreth, Andrew and Eric Jarecki,
Zachary Quayle, Tibor Thompson, and Vander von Stroheim.
(21-478) Councilmember Herrera Spencer announced the upcoming Relay for Life at
Leydecker Park; stated there is an Airport Noise forum cellular phone application to
report loud noise from airplanes: flyquietoak.com; discussed a community piano outside
Nob Hill.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 7:47
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
July 20, 2021
2",CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-09-21,8,"(21-589 A) Resolution No. 15818, ""Appointing Dimple Kanji as a Member of the Library
Board."" Adopted; and
(21-589 B) Resolution No. 15819, ""Appointing Sara Strickler as Members of the Library
Board.' Adopted.
Councilmember Knox White moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and Mr. Lattimore, Ms. Kanji and Ms.
Stricker made brief comments.
(21-590) Presentation by the Chief of Police.
(21-591) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft suggested the Police Chief be given 20 minutes or his
presentation.
Vice Mayor Vella moved approval of allowing 20 minutes for the presentation.
Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
The Police Chief gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested clarification about the use of the term
""clearance.""
The Police Chief responded clearance is the term used to describe when clearing a
case through arrest; stated an investigation is conducted and the case is cleared when
an arrest is made.
Expressed support for the clarification of the term ""clearance;"" questioned the clearance
numbers reported for domestic violence cases; discussed her experience as a domestic
violence victim; discussed probation and court ordered violations; expressed support for
Alameda Police Department (APD); questioned why repeat violators of probation are
not being arrested: Teresa Guarino.
Expressed support for the organizational aspects of the report; discussed
correspondence sent related to the challenges experienced by the Fernside Marina;
stated the new program and organization takes serious and appropriate steps in
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 21, 2021
4",CityCouncil/2021-09-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-09-21,29,"(21-601) Consider Directing Staff to Address Representation for Below Market Rate
Homeowners on Homeowner Association (HOA) Boards and with Property
Management. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-602) Consider Directing Staff to Support Removal of the US Navy Constraints
Limiting Housing Development at Alameda Point. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer and
Councilmember Daysog) Not heard.
(21-603) Consider Directing Staff to Address Identifying New Areas at Alameda Point to
Develop a Number of Housing Units Above the Originally-Agreed Upon Numbers of the
2023-2031 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). (Councilmember Daysog) Not
heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(21-604) Councilmember Knox White discussed City Council and School Board
Subcommittee meeting; stated the School District has been meeting with Alameda
County about pushing back closing Emma Hood pool due to COVID-19; the current
closure is set for January; it is unclear whether the County is receptive; Encinal High
School is looking to put up flood lights to have backup nighttime use of the Encinal High
School pool; there is forward motion on the shared use agreement that allows the City
to use Encinal High School pool for community swimming during the day; the matter
should come before Council by the end of the year; announced a $290 million bond
being placed on the ballot in June; discussed an AFS contract with the School District;
announced 73% of students are vaccinated as of the previous week.
(21-605) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft made an announcement about a ribbon cutting for a new
apartment building at Alameda Point; stated the units are all market rate and are helping
to fund the 25% affordable units; discussed the last of the ""Starlight Movies in the Park""
event put on by the Recreation and Parks Department; stated that she attended a
beach cleanup at South Shore Beach.
ADJOURNMENT
(21-606) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting
at 12:03 a.m. in memory of Nick Bianchi.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 21, 2021
25",CityCouncil/2021-09-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-10-05,3,"(21-613) Casey Farmer, Alameda County, made an announcement regarding Alameda
County redistricting; encouraged public participation.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are
indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.]
(*21-614) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting, the Joint City Council and
Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission Meeting, the Continued
July 20, 2021 City Council Meeting and the Regular City Council Meeting Held on
September 7, 2021. Approved.
(*21-615) Ratified bills in the amount of $7,186,584.01.
(*21-616) Ordinance No. 3307, ""Amending Alameda Municipal Code Chapter XXIV
Public Health to Add Section 24-13 Prohibition on Gasoline-Powerec Leaf Blowers.""
Finally passed.
CONTINUED AGENDA ITEMS
(21-617) Recommendation to Review, Comment and Provide Direction on Preliminary
Needs Assessment and Recommendations for Development of Smart City Master Plan.
The Information Technology Director and David Huynh and Monique Fuhrman, Iteris,
gave a PowerPoint presentation.
***
(21-618) Councilmember Knox White moved approval of allowing an additional five
minutes for the presentation.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
Ms. Fuhrman and the Information Technology Director completed the presentation.
Councilmember Knox White stated the City has spent over $1 million for both Park and
Webster Streets Transit Signal Priority (TSP); inquired how the plan proposes to
implement signal priority at the same cost and whether the plan is addressing other
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 5, 2021
2",CityCouncil/2021-10-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-10-05,21,"(21-628) Considering Directing Staff to Provide an Update on License Plate Readers.
(Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-629) Consider Directing Staff to Publicly Share Information on Parking Recreational
Vehicles. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-630) Consider Directing Staff to Address Representation for Below Market Rate
Homeowners on Homeowner Association (HOA) Boards and with Property
Management. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-631) Consider Directing Staff to Support Removal of the US Navy Constraints
Limiting Housing Development at Alameda Point. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer and
Councilmember Daysog) Not heard.
(21-632) Consider Directing Staff to Address Identifying New Areas at Alameda Point to
Develop a Number of Housing Units Above the Originally-Agreed Upon Numbers of the
2023-2031 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). (Councilmember Daysog) Not
heard.
(21-633) Consider Directing Staff to Move Jean Sweeney Park Fencing.
(Councilmembers Herrera Spencer and Daysog) Not heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(21-634) Councilmember Daysog announced that he attended the Economic Forum last
week and a walk on Saturday following the Supreme Court ruling on the Texas abortion
law; encouraged the City Attorney's office to look into whether there is anything
Alameda can do regarding the matter; stated a Councilmember might want to bring a
referral.
(21-635) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft made an announcement regarding attending the League
of California Cities conference; stated that she would be at Wood School for Walk and
Roll to School day.
(21-636) Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would be at Otis School for
Walk and Roll to School day; made an announcement regarding attending the League
of California Cities conference.
(21-637) Vice Mayor Vella made an announcement about the City Council/Heath Care
District Subcommittee meeting that she and the Mayor attended; stated that she also
attended the Women's March on Saturday.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted Alameda Family Services Executive Director Katherine
Schwartz would be included in future Subcommittee meetings; stated that she missed
the March because she was meeting with the Alameda Renters Coalition.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 5, 2021
20",CityCouncil/2021-10-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-10-19,5,"(21-657 B) Resolution No. 15828, ""Appointing Dan Poritzky as a Member of the Mayor's
Economic Development Advisory Panel.' Adopted.
Councilmember Knox White moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and Ms. Jennings made brief comments.
(21-658) Recommendation to Provide Direction to Staff to Pursue One or More Options for
Reducing the Negative Impacts and Public Safety Challenges Associated with Automobile-
Oriented Events at Alameda Point.
The Assistant City Manager gave a PowerPoint presentation.
Councilmember Daysog inquired the reason the chain link fence near the Water Emergency
Transportation Authority (WETA) does not extend to cover the area where people practice
motorcycle driving.
The Assistant City Manager responded the USS Hornet (USSH) lease covers some of the
areas; the City wants to ensure alignment of the fence is as inclusive as possible without
infringing on lease rights.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated sometimes the USSH has events with many people
driving; the USSH goes beyond the available area; inquired whether the area within the fencing
would be opened for USSH events.
The Assistant City Manager responded it could be; stated the current USSH lease does not
cover the area; however, staff can coordinate with USSH representatives to address any
additional parking needs for large events; the fencing is temporary which can easily be
relocated or moved over time as needed.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated many areas have installed raised Botts' dots to address
issues; inquired why staff has not done other similar things to allow the space to be used by
law-abiding citizens; stated she is hearing staff jump to cutting off areas, making them
inaccessible to cars; the intention could be to allow pedestrians and bicyclists to use the areas.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested the Police Chief provide clarification of the problem being
addressed.
The Police Chief stated the concern being addressed is the gathering of cars; the dots would
actually deter people engaging in reckless driving of areas; noted many of the burnouts occur in
the entry chutes; vehicles can still go into the areas for people to enjoy scenery.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the entry chutes do not have speed bumps to slow
traffic; inquired why has staff not considered speed bumps or humps.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
October 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-10-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-11-16,5,"(21-729B CC) Resolution No. 15835, ""to Increase Expenditure Appropriations in the
American Rescue Plan 2021 Project (C99300) in the Capital Projects Fund (310) by
$4,640,000 and to Encumber $1,200,000 in General Funds (10061833) to Operate
Interim Supportive Homeless Housing at the Bottle Parcel Located at 2350 5th Street,
Alameda, California, for Fiscal Years 2021-22 through 2027-28"". Adopted.
The Community Development Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Elizabeth Funk, DignityMoves, and Steve Good, Five Key, gave a brief presentation.
***
(21-730) Councilmember/Commissioner Herrera Spencer moved approval of allowing
an extra 5 minutes for the presentation.
Councilmember/Commissioner Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the
following roll call vote: Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer:
Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
***
Mr. Good completed the presentation.
Councilmember/Commissioner Herrera Spencer inquired whether the population being
served will be all unhoused Alamedans.
The Community Development Director responded staff will attempt to give an Alameda
preference; stated there is potential County funds and the Coordinated Entry process
will be used.
In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's request for clarification of Coordinated Entry, the
Community Development Director stated Coordinated Entry is the County system where
each individual is registered; once registered, individuals are prioritized based on need;
needs are based on medical, age and different vulnerabilities; individuals are prioritized
for housing based on need; there is possibility for Alameda to receive individuals from
outside of the City but still within Alameda County.
Mr. Good stated that he spoke with the Alameda County Director of Services; the City
can prioritize services for Alamedans; anyone living in Alameda would be the first
priority; if the services are for permanent supportive housing, the prioritization for
Alamedans would not be possible; since the program being is interim housing, Alameda
can prioritize for Alamedans; if there are not enough eligible participants, the City can
look outside of Alameda for participants.
Councilmember/Commissioner Herrera Spencer inquired whether outreach will be
provided to ensure all of the unsheltered would be eligible for the Continuum of Care
program.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and Successor Agency
to the Community Improvement Commission
2
November 2, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-11-16,27,"(21-754) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a motion is needed to hear additional items past 11:00
p.m.
Councilmember Knox White stated November has a fifth Tuesday for the month; noted the
December 7th Council meeting agenda will be full; there is no way for Council to get through the
work; expressed support for calling a special meeting to hear the rest of the agenda.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of hearing the parking management program
[paragraph no 21- 1 and any of the remaining Council Referrals, while ending the meeting at
midnight and continuing the remaining Regular Agenda items to a special meeting.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated the Housing Element [paragraph no 21-
1
and General Plan [paragraph no 21-
should be heard at a special meeting.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern about meeting near the Thanksgiving holiday.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she will not support the motion; expressed support
for starting the Housing Element discussion.
Vice Mayor Vella expressed support for a special meeting.
Councilmember Knox White withdrew his motion.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of finishing the current matter, directing staff to find
a time that works for the most Councilmembers possible between now and December 7th to hold
a special meeting.
The City Clerk stated the date must be specified and the matters must be continued to the date
specific due to noticing requirements.
Councilmember Knox White stated the 11:00 p.m. vote is for hearing new matters after 11:00
p.m.; inquired whether the vote to continue items can occur after 11:00 p.m., to which the City
Clerk responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether consideration can be given to the proposal from
Councilmember Herrera Spencer related to starting the Housing Element discussion.
Councilmember Knox White responded that he does not see value in starting the discussion just
to stop at a random time and having public comment coming in sporadically.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of continuing the meeting until midnight
hearing the agenda as-presented.
Vice Mayor Vella stated that she would prefer not to start the Housing Element.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the Housing Element can be continued to the Continued
Item section of the agenda on the next Council agenda, to which Vice Mayor Vella responded in
the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 16, 2021
16",CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-12-21,3,"(21-838) Donna Fletcher, Alameda, urged the public receive an update on negotiations with the
Navy regarding Alameda Point.
(21-839) Zac Bowling, Alameda, discussed the opening of the warming shelter; stated new
sleeping bags are needed.
(21-840) Marilyn Rothman, Alameda, urged the Police Commission be approved prior to
adopting any new Police measures.
(21-841) Jill Staten, Alameda, discussed safety training education for pedestrians and bicyclists.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Discussed her service on the Open Government Commission: Carmen Reid, Alameda.
The City Clerk announced the appointment to the Open Government Commission matter
[paragraph no. 21-844 was removed from the Consent Calendar to allow for Oath
administration.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer removed the local emergency resolution [paragraph no. 21-
846 for discussion.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk
preceding the paragraph number.]
(*21-842) Minutes of the Special Meeting, the Joint City Council and Successor Agency to the
Community Improvement Commission Meeting and the Regular Meeting Held on November 16,
2021. Approved.
(*21-843) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,398,496.70.
(21-844) Recommendation to Accept a Report on the Appointment of a Member to the Open
Government Commission.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
Mr. Cambra made brief comments.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office.
(*21-845) Resolution No. 15851, ""Setting the 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Dates.""
Adopted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 21, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-12-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-12-21,22,"(21-855) Jim Strehlow, Alameda, discussed garbage cans on Alameda Avenue; expressed
concern about confusing motions at the previous meeting; stated that he would like clarification
about transit priorities and when Council will schedule a follow-up agenda item; noted AB 550 is
no longer active.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(21-856) Considering Directing Staff to Provide an Update on License Plate Readers.
(Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-857) Consider Directing Staff to Publicly Share Information on Parking Recreational
Vehicles. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-858) Consider Directing Staff to Address Representation for Below Market Rate
Homeowners on Homeowner Association (HOA) Boards and with Property Management.
(Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-859) Consider Directing Staff to Support Removal of the US Navy Constraints Limiting
Housing Development at Alameda Point. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer and Councilmember
Daysog) Not heard.
(21-860) Consider Directing Staff to Address Identifying New Areas at Alameda Point to
Develop a Number of Housing Units Above the Originally-Agreed Upon Numbers of the 2023-
2031 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). (Councilmember Daysog) Not heard.
(21-861) Consider Directing Staff to Move Jean Sweeney Park Fencing. (Councilmembers
Herrera Spencer and Daysog) Not heard.
(21-862) Consider Reviewing and Updating the Previous City Council's Priorities at a Regular
City Council Meeting. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-863) Consider Having the City Council Address the Zoning of the Harbor Bay Club.
(Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-864) Consider Having the City Council Review Recreation and Parks Department
Community Events. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(21-865) Consider Directing Staff to Immediately Agendize an Urgency Hearing on Senate Bill
(SB) 9. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(21-866) Councilmember Knox White discussed a community workshop related to removing the
truck ban on Interstate 580; expressed wishes for 2022 to be low-key and good.
(21-867) Vice Mayor Vella outlined information regarding the Lead Abatement meeting last
week; announced distribution of COVID-19 tests from California Department of Public Health
(CDPH) for students returning to school.
(21-868) Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for the CARE program
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
December 21, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-12-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-01-04,25,"(22-031) Consider Directing Staff to Address Identifying New Areas at Alameda Point to
Develop a Number of Housing Units Above the Originally-Agreed Upon Numbers of the 2023-
2031 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). (Councilmember Daysog). Not heard.
(22-032) Consider Directing Staff to Move Jean Sweeney Park Fencing. (Councilmembers
Herrera Spencer and Daysog). Not heard.
(22-033) Consider Reviewing and Updating the Previous City Council's Priorities at a Regular
City Council Meeting. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer). Not heard.
(22-034) Consider Having the City Council Address the Zoning of the Harbor Bay Club.
(Councilmember Herrera Spencer). Not heard.
(22-035) Consider Having the City Council Review Recreation and Parks Department
Community Events. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer). Not heard.
(22-036) Consider Directing Staff to Immediately Agendize an Urgency Hearing on Senate Bill
(SB) 9. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer). Not heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Not heard.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:59 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 4, 2022
25",CityCouncil/2022-01-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-02-01,30,"(22-042) Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6); City
Negotiators: Eric Levitt, City Manager, Gerry Beaudin, Assistant City Manager, and
Nancy Bronstein, Human Resources Director; Employee Organizations: Alameda Police
Managers Association (APMA), and Alameda Fire Chief's Association (AFCA); Under
Negotiation: Salaries, Employee Benefits and Terms of Employment.
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding the Existing Litigation, staff provided information and Council
provided direction, by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera
Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Abstain; Vella: Absent; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye;
Ayes: 3. Abstain: 1. Absent: 1; regarding Potential Litigation and Real Property, staff
provided information and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 4. Noes: 1; and regarding Labor, staff provided
information and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 3. Noes: 2.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:28
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 18, 2022",CityCouncil/2022-02-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-01-18,25,"(22-042) Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6); City
Negotiators: Eric Levitt, City Manager, Gerry Beaudin, Assistant City Manager, and
Nancy Bronstein, Human Resources Director; Employee Organizations: Alameda Police
Managers Association (APMA), and Alameda Fire Chief's Association (AFCA); Under
Negotiation: Salaries, Employee Benefits and Terms of Employment.
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding the Existing Litigation, staff provided information and Council
provided direction, by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera
Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Abstain; Vella: Absent; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye;
Ayes: 3. Abstain: 1. Absent: 1; regarding Potential Litigation and Real Property, staff
provided information and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 4. Noes: 1; and regarding Labor, staff provided
information and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 3. Noes: 2.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:28
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 18, 2022",CityCouncil/2022-01-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-01-18,8,"(22-053 B) Introduction of Ordinance Approving the Amended Encinal Terminals Tidelands
Exchange Master Plan and Density Bonus Application for Redevelopment of Real Property
Located at 1521 Buena Vista Avenue (APN 072-0382-001, 072-0382-002, 072-0383-003 and
072-0382-009). Introduced; and
(22-053 C) Introduction of Ordinance Approving Development Agreement (Encinal Terminals
Project) By and Between the City of Alameda and North Waterfront Cove, LLC Governing the
Encinal Terminals Project for Real Property Located at 1521 Buena Vista Avenue. Continued to
January 18, 2022. Introduced.
The City Manager recused himself and left the meeting.
***
(22-054) Vice Mayor Vella moved approval of allowing the Applicant to speak for 5 minutes.
Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Mike O'Hara, Applicant, gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the breakdown for the 589 units.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded the Master Plan requires that
50% of the units be mapped for sale; stated the units will be individually available for sale.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether any of the 80 affordable units will be for sale.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded the affordable housing
agreement is not done yet; stated most similar projects in Alameda have the very low and low
units for rent; the moderate units are sprinkled throughout as part of the for sale units; how the
final 80 affordable units will be distributed between rental and for sale has not yet been finalized;
the 10 workforce units will be for sale.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the proposal breakdown for the remaining 500 units.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded 50% of the 589 units will be for
sale; stated it will be safe to assume that the 50 very low and low income units will be for rent;
staff cannot assume more than the current breakdown provided.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested clarification on the townhomes.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated townhomes will likely be for sale;
stated townhomes are capped at 200 units.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether any of the rentals will not have rent control.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 18, 2022
8",CityCouncil/2022-01-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-01-18,23,"(22-058) Consider Directing Staff to Address Identifying New Areas at Alameda Point to
Develop a Number of Housing Units Above the Originally-Agreed Upon Numbers of the 2023-
2031 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). (Councilmember Daysog) Not heard.
(22-059) Consider Directing Staff to Move Jean Sweeney Park Fencing. (Councilmembers
Herrera Spencer and Daysog) Not heard.
(22-060) Consider Reviewing and Updating the Previous City Council's Priorities at a Regular
City Council Meeting. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(22-061) Consider Having the City Council Address the Zoning of the Harbor Bay Club.
(Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(22-062) Consider Having the City Council Review Recreation and Parks Department
Community Events. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(22-063) Councilmember Herrera Spencer discussed a meeting regarding a proposal to widen
the estuary to allow for a larger turning basin.
(22-064) Councilmember Daysog announced an upcoming joint liaison meeting of the City
Council and Alameda Unified School District with Councilmember Knox White.
(22-065) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed a recent hostage situation in Dallas, Texas; expressed
support for the Police Chief reaching out to support to local synagogues.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:06 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 18, 2022
23",CityCouncil/2022-01-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-02-15,5,"(22-110) Resolution No. 15863, ""Approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between
the Alameda Police Officers Association (APOA) and the City of Alameda for a Forty-Two Month
Term Commencing December 19, 2021 and Ending June 30, 2025."" Adopted.
The Human Resources Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the salary surveys are public information, to
which the Human Resources Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the staff report shows approximately $5.4 million of
increased pay for the contract; noted the five year forecast has shown that the City will begin
touching the reserves; expressed support for clarification on where the funding will come from.
The Assistant City Manager stated the MOU includes a 3.4% increase over the existing Police
Department budget for Fiscal Year 2022-2023, which will occur in the subsequent years; staff
anticipates the City can afford the recommended salary increases and associated costs; the five
year financial forecast was completed during COVID-19; staff has been conservative; revenues
have come in slightly higher than projected; staff is fairly certain that property, sales and transfer
taxes will come in where originally budgeted; staff anticipates an assumed 3.5% increase
annually on salaries; staff is recommending moving forward with the contract.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired when staff anticipates returning to Council with new
budget information.
The Assistant City Manager responded the mid-year budget will be presented March 1st; stated
the mid-cycle budget will come prior to adoption in June; staff will be sharing the surplus
revenue information in roughly two weeks.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated the pay increases are reasonable; the
agreement has a 4% increase starting January 2022; it is important to move ahead with the staff
recommendations in order to retain and recruit Officers; he appreciates the reasonable pay
increases; having fixed pay rate increases helps the City move away from the previous method
of increasing pay; previous methods were tied to increases in property and sales tax revenues,
which were typically above the reasonable amounts presented.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she has not historically supported the contract;
expressed concern about the City's ability to attract and retain Officers; stated the Department
has been under-staffed; it is important that the City try to be competitively priced; she will be
supporting the matter.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers
Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft:
Aye. Ayes: 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 15, 2022
3",CityCouncil/2022-02-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-02-15,6,"(22-111) Resolution No. 15864, ""Appointing an Engineer-of-Work and an Attorney-of-Record for
Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2 (Various Locations Throughout the City).
Adopted.
Councilmember Daysog recused himself and left the meeting. The motion carried by the
following roll call vote: Councilmembers Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye;
and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog - 1.]
(*22-112) Resolution No. 15865, ""Appointing an Engineer-of-Work and an Attorney-of-Record
for Maintenance Assessment District 01-1 (Marina Cove). Adopted.
(22-113) Resolution No. 15866, ""Rescinding Resolution No. 15829 which Authorized the
Issuance of One or More Series of Pension Obligation Bonds to Refinance Outstanding
Obligations of the City to the California Public Employees' Retirement System and Related
Matters."" Adopted.
The City Attorney gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated it is important to provide more information to the public;
inquired whether the amount of money spent on the consultant is public information.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Councilmember Herrera Spencer's inquiry within the
matter.
The City Attorney responded the call is close; stated the inquiry may be briefly answered without
Council going into a great deal of discussion; communications with the City's business
consultants are generally public records; communications with the City's attorneys are not public
records.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether a person could submit a Public Record Act
(PRA) request in order to know how much has been incurred for consultants, to which the City
Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer further inquired whether the attorney's fees are public
information, to which the City Attorney responded in the negative.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether a motion to rescind the previous decision must be
moved by a Councilmember which previously voted against the matter.
The City Attorney responded in the negative; noted rules for reconsideration only apply to the
same meeting, not across meetings; stated any Councilmember may move the staff
recommendation.
Councilmember Daysog moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Knox White stated the City is trying to address decade long
pension obligations which do not go away; the actions taken continue to put the City on the
expensive hook of paying the full costs over many years.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
February 15, 2022
4",CityCouncil/2022-02-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-03-01,26,"(22-154) Consider Directing Staff to Bring the Rent Program ""In-House"" to the City Attorney's
Office. (Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft and Vice Mayor Vella) Not heard.
(22-155) Consider Adoption of Resolution Expressing Support for the ""Brand-Huang-Mendoza
Tripartisan Land Use Initiative"" to Amend Article XI of the Constitution of the State of California
to Make Zoning and Land Use Community Affairs, and Not of State Interest. Withdrawn and not
heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(22-156) Councilmember Herrera Spencer discussed the Point in Time Count.
(22-157) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed the Point in Time Count, a Bay Conservation and
Development Commission (BCDC) Enforcement Committee meeting discussion related to
abandoned vessels in the estuary, a joint meeting of the Alameda County Mayors and the Board
of Supervisors to address homelessness, an interview held with consultants working on the
three year strategic plan for Alameda Health Systems and a meeting of the City Council and
Alameda Health Care District subcommittee.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:54 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 1, 2022
24",CityCouncil/2022-03-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-03-15,4,"(22-166) Brian Kennedy, Alameda, discussed the State and City sanctuary laws.
(22-167) Carmen Reid, Alameda, made an announcement about an April 24th fundraiser to
benefit Ukraine; encouraged interested artists to email alamedasunflowers@gmail.com
(22-168) Rosalinda Fortuna, Alameda, stated her catalytic converter was stolen and her
husband's car was broken into and damaged; neighbors' cars have been stolen; urged Council
not to defund any more of the Police Department's budget; stated the Police Department is
doing a great job.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Under Agenda Changes, the City Clerk announced the designation of negotiators [paragraph
no. 22-171 was withdrawn from the agenda.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested the commercial streets costs [paragraph no. 22-
173], Community Facility District (CFD) 22-1 [paragraph no. 22-176 and CFD 22-2 [paragraph
no. 22-177 be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion; and recorded a no vote on
the teleconference findings [paragraph no. 22-172 and the resolution amending the rules of
order [paragraph no. 22-179].
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the reminder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk
preceding the paragraph number.]
(*22-169) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on February 15, 2022.
Approved.
(*22-170) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,521,819.91.
(22-171) Recommendation to Approve Adding Lisa Fitts, Interim Base Reuse Manager, as a
Designated Real Property Negotiator for the West Midway Project and Site A at Alameda Point.
Not heard.
(22-172) Recommendation to Approve Findings to Allow City Meetings to be Conducted via
Teleconference. Approved.
[Note: Councilmember Herrera Spencer recorded a no vote, so the matter carried by the
following vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella:
Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.]
(22-173) Recommendation to Endorse Next Steps and Projected Costs for Commercial Streets
(Parklets) Two Year Extension.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director made brief comments.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she thinks the City should have k-rails like other
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 15, 2022
2",CityCouncil/2022-03-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-04-05,3,"(22-209) Jenice Anderson, Alameda, discussed not feeling safe in Alameda due to people in her
neighborhood.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Herrera Spencer recorded a no vote on the teleconference findings [paragraph
no. 22-214 and the emergency declaration [paragraph no. 22-217]; and requested the SCI
Consulting Group agreement [paragraph no. 22-215] and the power purchase agreement
[paragraph no. 22-216] be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk
preceding the paragraph number.]
(*22-210) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting, the Special Joint City Council and
Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission Meeting and the Regular City
Council Meeting Held on March 1, 2022. Approved.
(*22-211) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,918,697.98
(*22-212) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Reporting Period
Ending September 30, 2021 (Funds Collected During the Period April 1, 2021 to June 30,
2021). Accepted.
(*22-213) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Reporting Period
Ending December 31, 2021 (Funds Collected During the Period July 1, 2021 to September 30,
2021). Accepted.
(*22-214) Recommendation to Approve Findings to Allow City Meetings to be Conducted via
Teleconference.
Since Councilmember Herrera Spencer recorded a no vote, the item carried by the following
vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
(22-215) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Second Amendment to
the Agreement with SCI Consulting Group for Fee Levy Administrative Services for the 1992
Urban Runoff Fee and the 2019 Water Quality and Flood Protection Fee in an Amount Not to
Exceed $86,479 for an Aggregate Amount Not to Exceed $157,849.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the total amount the City receives from the two types
of taxes that the services agreement will continue to monitor.
The Assistant City Manager responded the 1992 fee brings in about $2.4 million per year and
the 2019 Water Quality fee brings in about $2.8 million per year.
2",CityCouncil/2022-04-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-04-05,5,"(22-219) Recommendation to Provide Direction to Staff Regarding the Draft Alameda Police
Department Policy for Fixed Automatic License Plate Technology.
The Police Chief gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the draft policy stating: ""once an alert is received, the
operator should confirm that the observed license plate from the system matches the license
plate can be revised to: ""must"" or ""shall.""
The Police Chief responded that he has no problem with replacing the word ""should"" with
""must;"" stated ""must"" captures the intent of the policy.
Commended the Police Chief for adding another safety tool; stated the policy is similar to DNA
requirements; expressed support for the tool being implemented: Rockne Harmon, Alameda.
Stated that she is disappointed the Council decided to go forward with the license plate camera
plan; studies have shown the readers do not decrease crime; expressed support for the time
and care taken with the proposed policy; discussed shorter retention: Rebecca Jeschke,
Alameda.
Urged the retention timeline be greatly reduced and auditing be done every 30 days with
oversight: Marilyn Rothman, Alameda.
Expressed support for retaining data for 30 days or less; expressed concern that a yearly audit
is not often enough and over who owns the data: Jenice Anderson, Alameda.
Stated the retention policy is too long; San Leandro adopted a 15-day policy; there is no reason
Alameda needs to retain data longer; discussed data: Mike Katz-Lacabe, Oakland Privacy.
Encouraged looking at the matter from an equity lens; urged the policy address dragnet issues,
such as parking tickets and expired tags: Jennifer Rakowski, Alameda.
Expressed appreciation for the Police Chief adding guard rails; discussed data not showing
Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPRs) are effective; suggested the data retention be based
on actual use: Brian Hofer, Alameda.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the revised policy with changing ""should"" to
""must"" in Section C on page 3.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog expressed support for staff being responsive to
questions and concerns raised; stated Alameda needs a tool like ALPRs in order to prevent
crimes.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like reassurance there will be enough
staff to preserve the data needed if retention is reduced.
The Police Chief stated staff will assess the process; he feels comfortable with the 60 day
retention period.
4",CityCouncil/2022-04-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-04-19,25,"(22-279) Recommendation to Provide Direction to City Staff on Emergency Supportive Housing
for Three City-Owned Vacant Homes at Alameda Point. Not heard.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
Not heard.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
Not heard.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(22-280) Consider Having the City Council Address the Zoning of the Harbor Bay Club.
(Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
(22-281) Consider Having the City Council Review Recreation and Parks Department
Community Events. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Not heard.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 12:20 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 19, 2022
23",CityCouncil/2022-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2022-05-17,4,"(22-350) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a $285,767 Grant
Agreement with Alameda County for Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention Grant, and
Authorize the City Manager, in the Future, to Extend the Term of the Contract up to December
31, 2023; and
(22-350 A) Resolution No. 15907, ""Amending the Grants Fund (222) Budget to Appropriate
$285,767 for the Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention Grant Project."" Adopted.
The Economic Development made brief comments.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated some of the funds requested were not approved; the
County has not approved using funds to support outreach, mental health support or flexible
funds; inquired how much funding is needed or whether alternate funding can be allocated.
The Economic Development Manager responded $50,000 is for the flexible funds; stated
$85,000 is for the mental health funds; staff has put all funding towards the overnight day
center; staff is able to house the unhoused for a longer period of time.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the City could consider alternate funding for the
programs; inquired the cost for outreach.
The Economic Development Director responded the $50,000 for flexible funds includes
outreach.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the discussion remains within the agendized parameters.
The City Attorney responded that he believes Councilmember Herrera Spencer is trying to
establish whether or not the grant should move forward; stated
the wisdom of the underlying action is not being debated; members of Council may ask
questions in order to understand whether or not a grant should be pursued.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Council is not currently directing staff to explore other
funding opportunities, to which the Economic Development Manager responded in the
affirmative.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated her inquiry appropriately falls under the grant;
discussed using parking spaces for the overnight day center; inquired how many parking spaces
are being used.
The Economic Development Manager responded that she does not have the exact count; stated
there are only few remaining spaces not being used at the day center when she last checked;
the count is up from the past.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the spaces were not being fully utilized in the past;
expressed support for the increase in count.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation [including adoption of
the resolution].
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 17, 2022
4",CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf
PublicArtCommission,2008-11-12,2,"(4B.) Adoption of 2009 Public Art Commission Calendar
The commission reviewed the proposed calendar for 2009.
Motion (lbsen)/Second (Lee) to adopt the 2009 Calendar
Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Motion passed.
(4C.) Adoption of Resolution of the Public Art Commission acknowledging Cecilia
Cervantes to the citizens of Alameda
Ms. Lee noted that there were other members of the Community that had
recently served on the Public Art Commission and they should also be
acknowledged for their service.
All other Commission members agreed.
Ms. Lee suggested that the item be continued to the next meeting to allow staff to
prepare resolutions for Katina Huston, K.C. Rosenberg, and Peter Wolfe.
Motion (Lee)/Second (lbsen) to continue the item to the next regular
meeting so that resolutions recognizing former members of the
Commission could be crafted.
Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Motion passed.
0
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
Staff reported.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
None
COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS:
Eric Ibsen and Andrea Leal have drafted a press release regarding locating public art in
Alameda which they would like to have agendized for discussion at a future meeting.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 8:17 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager/Secretary
Public Art Commission
G:\PLANNINGIPAC\Agendas_Minutes\Minutes_08/11-12-08 draft minutes.doc
2",PublicArtCommission/2008-11-12.pdf
PublicArtCommission,2008-07-09,2,"(4D.) Discussion on Development of Artist Resource List
Jon Biggs reported that Deborah Owen from the Frank Bette Art Center is willing
to work with a subcommittee of the Commission to update the Directory.
The Commission discussed providing resource information on the City's website.
Commissioner Leal requested that staff ask the Information Technology (IT)
department if it is feasible for the Commission to have a website and how and
who would be responsible for maintaining it.
Motion (Ibsen)/Second (Candelario) to continue the item for further
discussion to the next regular meeting.
Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2. Motion passed.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
Staff reported.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
None
COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS:
None
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 7:43 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jón Biggs, Planning Services Manager/Secretary
Public Art Commission
These minutes were approved at the August 13, 2008, Public Art Commission meeting.
S:\PLANNINGIPACIAgendas_Minutes\Minutes_08\PAC Approved Minutes\7-9-08 minutes.doc
2",PublicArtCommission/2008-07-09.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2008-10-02,2,"(7-A) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0035 - 1150 Bay Street. The applicant requests
a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a
historically designated residential building for the purpose of remodeling a previous
addition and adding a front porch. (DV)
(Continued from the meeting of September 4, 2008.)
Mr. Doug Vu presented the staff report.
Mr. Craig Coombs addressed the board. He reiterated the discussion from the
Historical Advisory Board meeting of September 4, 2008 and that the design adheres to
the Secretary of Interior's Guidelines. He also reminded the board that the project is
going to restore the structure and its historical elements.
Mr. Robert Mackenson addressed the board. He gave a brief history of his experience
and stated that the design is in line with the requirements of the Secretary of the
Interior's Guidelines. He pointed out several features in the neighborhood, such as the
setbacks and the landscaping, and suggested the design of the front porch will not
protrude excessively into the front yard setback relative to the other houses in the
neighborhood.
Mr. Christopher Buckley addressed the board. He felt that this item has gone on too
long and recommended that the board make a decision. He thinks that the board
should either approve the project without the front porch or deny the project.
Mr. Jerry Wilkins addressed the board. He stated that this project should be approved
because it will benefit the neighborhood and the City. He also pointed out that the
proposed work follows the guidelines and requirements of the City of Alameda and the
Secretary of the Interior.
Ms. Linda McKenna addressed the board. She mentioned some of the other projects
she has worked on and stated that this project will restore the house to its original
design and will be beneficial for the neighborhood. She also stated that it follows the
guidelines and requirements.
Ms. Dee Keltner addressed the board. She reviewed the plans with the applicants and
wondered why the owners have not attended any of these meetings. She thinks the
renovation is wonderful except for the front porch. She expressed concern regarding its
setback and feels that it will take away from the neighborhood if approved. She is also
concerned with the precedent that will be set if the porch is approved. She asked that
future foliage be limited in height, width and depth to minimize the protrusion into the
setback.
Mr. Josiah Lewis addressed the board and noted his support of the remodel.
Ms. Patricia Emerson addressed the board. She spoke to the remodel and how it will
preserve the building and increase the usability of the structure. She mentioned how
difficult it has become to navigate the historic preservation process. Some people sell
2
Minutes of October 2, 2008
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-10-02.pdf
TransportationCommission,2005-07-20,4,"(ACTIA), Catellus, Alameda Point Community Partners, and the Peralta Colleges, Congestion
Management Agency,
Ms. Marr asked that the Chamber of Commerce board members and others be given a
presentation on the project in September.
Ms Stieg wanted to know who actually are the representatives that are part of this committee
discussion and who represents Alameda's interests.
Staff Hawkins stated that they were listed on the email that is sent to them.
Ms. Steig mentioned that she and some of other people on the email list are not able to attend the
meetings. She indicated she would like to find out more about why the 13 of the 16 project
design options were eliminated. She also asked if she could obtain a list of the proposals and the
pros and cons of each before the final report is completed.
Staff Hawkins said that it would be presented to the City Council and then the City Council can
open it up for comments. She added that the Stakeholders meeting would be a good place to
express her concerns.
Ms Steig said that she was not able to make those meetings because they are on Mondays. She
asked that the Commission take no actions on this feasibility study until the Alameda business
community has a chance to review and comment on it. She expressed concern that some of the
options would have a negative impact on Alameda.
Commissioner Ratto stated that WABA was a designated stakeholder and understood some of the
scheduling problems. He asked if they have been receiving the meeting packets.
Staff Hawkins said that emails are sent to them along with the information from the meetings.
Commissioner Ratto suggested that since WABA is unable to send a representative to the
stakeholder meetings that a representative from the Chamber of Commerce be identified to
represent the Alameda business community.
Ms. Stieg supported this idea, and asked that the Chamber be added as a stakeholder.
Staff Hawkins agreed.
Public Comment Closed
Commissioner Parker said that she would like to see which proposals were discarded. She added
that the project's scope of work looks at freeway access from Alameda but does not address other
issues Alameda is concerned with, such as connectivity from Alameda to Chinatown or Jack
London Square.
4",TransportationCommission/2005-07-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-05-17,6,"(Authorize Submittal of Application for Payment Programs and Related Authorizations). ""
Adopted.
(16-247) Resolution No. 15151, ""Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring
the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for
Notice of Public Hearing on June 21, 2016 - Island City Landscaping and Lighting
District 84-2 (Various Locations). Adopted.
Vice Mayor Matarrese and Councilmember Daysog recused themselves and left the
dais.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution preliminarily approving
the Annual Report declaring the City's intention to order the levy and collection of
assessments and providing for notice of Public Hearing on June 21, 2016 - Island City
Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
3. [Absent: Councilmembers Daysog and Matarrese - 2.]
(*16-248) Resolution No. 15152, ""Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring
the City's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for
Notice of Public Hearing on June 21, 2016 - Maintenance Assessment District 01-01
(Marina Cove). Adopted.
(*16-249) Ordinance No. 3152, ""Amending Ordinance No. 1277, N.S. to Rezone 101-
223 Brush Street and 150-284 Maple Way (Esperanza - APN 74-475-1-7) and 719-727
Buena Vista Avenue and 718-746 Eagle Avenue (Rosefield Village - APN 73-426-5) to
Remove the ""G"" (Government) Overlay Zoning District. [The Proposed Amendment is
Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, Minor Alternations to Land Use Limitations.]"" Finally
passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(16-250) Recommendation to Consider an Informational Report on City's Facility
Condition Assessments.
The Deputy Public Works Director gave a Power Point quiz and presentation.
[Note: Mayor Spencer left the dais at 7:31 p.m. and returned at 7:32 p.m.]
Mayor Spencer inquired how a member of the public or Council could view the report on
Facility Condition Assessments.
The Deputy Public Works Director responded that anyone could reach out to Public
Works and ask to look at the report.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 17, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-05-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-06-24,5,"(BWIP) Agreement; the Agreement was negotiated in 1991 when the project area was
established; a small portion of the capital comes from another project area.
Commissioner deHaan inquired whether Peralta Community College has a similar
breakdown, to which Mr. Doezema responded the split is unique to AUSD.
Commissioner Matarrese inquired how AUSD became the recipient of housing money
and if so, what was the rational, to which Mr. Doezema responded that he does not
know the background.
The Economic Development Director stated staff has tried to piece together the story;
nobody is around today to explain the issue; other redevelopment agencies were doing
the same thing because recruiting teachers was difficult due to California's high cost of
living; San Jose also did some teacher housing to deal with the issue in the late 1990's;
that she is not sure how and who decided that AUSD wanted to have a housing fund.
Commissioner Matarrese inquired how easy it would be to change the Agreement.
The Economic Development Director responded the Agreement cannot be altered;
stated the contractual arrangements were made before State law changed to stop
negotiated agreements between redevelopment agencies and school districts; AB 1290
requires all contractual negotiations to stop and everyone has formulated pass
throughs.
Commissioner deHaan inquired whether AUSD puts any money away for housing, to
which the Economic Development Director responded not to her knowledge.
Commissioner deHaan stated the situation is unique; 65% of the funds go to housing.
The Economic Development Director stated the Redevelopment Agency is obligated to
ensure that the money goes into housing.
Commissioner Tam stated Former Assistant City Manager David Brandt explained to
her that the Mastick Senior Center location belonged to the School District; an
agreement was made which included providing housing for the School District.
The Economic Development Director stated the Agreement is separate; that she is not
sure how the issue came about; the City agreed to take Mastick Senior Center in
exchange for giving other things to the School District; the City pledged to provide cash
and additional support for the construction of Ruby Bridges school and traded a lease at
the Encinal Terminal area; the School District collects revenue off the lease.
Chair Johnson stated the School District has leased property at the former Naval Base.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council, Alameda Public
Financing Authority, Alameda Ruse
5
and Redevelopment Authority, and
Community Improvement Commission
June 24, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-06-24.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-04-15,7,"(C-M-PD) ;
(08-164A) Resolution No. 14198, ""Upholding the Planning Board
Approval of Final Development Plan, Mayor Design Review and Planned
Development Amendment (File No. PLN 07-0061) at 2800 Harbor Bay
Parkway. Adopted, and;
(08-164B) Resolution No. 14199, ""Approving Tentative Map 9689 (File
No. PLN 07-0061) for the Subdivision of a 29.31 Acre Parcel into 14
Parcels fort he Development of 10 Office Buildings, Associated
Parking, Landscaping and Other Improvements. Adopted.
The Planning Services Manager gave a Power Point presentation and
submitted a handout outlining three additional conditions of
approval.
Councilmember deHaan stated that 5,500 square feet is a good size
for a restaurant and is almost twice the size of Applebee's.
The Planning Services Manager stated that staff wants to provide
the neighborhood with the ability to review potential restaurants;
Council could consider a lower threshold.
Vice Mayor Tam stated the staff report notes that the existing
Business Park has an overage in parking; she sees the possibility
of a spill over from the ferry parking lot into the proposed
development; inquired whether shared parking would be possible.
The Planning Services Manager responded the Ferry Terminal parking
lot capacity is 225 cars and is full on some days.
Councilmember deHaan stated the Ferry capacity is at 50% and only
runs during commute hours.
The Planning Services Manager stated the City is not prepared to
buy the property to expand the Ferry Terminal parking lot; most
ferry operators want better shuttle service, which would increase
ridership.
Councilmember deHaan stated satellite parking and shuttle services
are important.
The Applicant gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing.
Proponents (In favor of Appeal) : Tom Lynch, Alameda; Reyla Graber,
Appellant Harvey Wilson, Residents for Responsible Development
Regular Meeting
7
Alameda City Council
April 15, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-04-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-11-02,25,"(Councilmember Herrera Spencer). Not heard.
(21-709) Consider Directing Staff to Support Removal of the US Navy Constraints Limiting
Housing Development at Alameda Point. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer and Councilmember
Daysog). Not heard.
(21-710) Consider Directing Staff to Address Identifying New Areas at Alameda Point to
Develop a Number of Housing Units Above the Originally-Agreed Upon Numbers of the 2023-
2031 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). (Councilmember Daysog). Not heard.
(21-711) Consider Directing Staff to Move Jean Sweeney Park Fencing. (Councilmembers
Herrera Spencer and Daysog). Not heard.
(21-712) Consider Reviewing and Updating the Previous City Council's Priorities at a Regular
City Council Meeting. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer). Not heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(21-713) Councilmember Herrera Spencer discussed her pin; announced a jewelry sale event
hosted by the Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter.
(21-714) Councilmember Daysog discussed the unveiling of two art pieces in Jean Sweeney
Park; announced that he attended a the School Board Subcommittee meeting with
Councilmember Knox White; stated there is a report which indicates traffic safety measures and
should come before Council.
(21-715) Councilmember Knox White discussed the School Board Subcommittee meeting;
noted the matter related to traffic enforcement [paragraph no. 21- ] which was not
heard
is
part of significant concerns voiced by parents; stated that he would like to see a public
workshop to discuss the Shuumi Land Tax.
(21-716) Councilmember Daysog stated Council should discuss traffic impacts from the
Oakland Athletics stadium.
(21-718) Councilmember Herrera Spencer announced that she attended the County Day of
Remembrance with Councilmember Daysog.
(21-719) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended an event called Here I Am and a
workshop put on by the Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA); discussed a Diablo
Magazine interview; noted Contra Costa County has recently developed a Countywide transit
safety plan; announced a fundraiser at Books Inc. for the Friends of the Alameda Library.
(21-720) Vice Mayor Vella announced it is Family Literacy Month; discussed an East Bay
Regional Park District Subcommittee meeting and a ribbon cutting for the anniversary of Alley
and Vine.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted the owners of Alley and Vine are happy to be in Alameda.
ADJOURNMENT
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 2, 2021
22",CityCouncil/2021-11-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-10-03,22,"(Councilmember Oddie)
Councilmember Oddie made brief comments regarding the referral.
Mayor Spencer inquired when staff plans to report back.
The City Manager responded staff will discuss preliminary data at the WETA meeting;
the matter will go to the Transportation Commission in November and return to Council
in December.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether representatives from other agencies will be present, to
which the City Manager responded WETA and AC Transit will be present.
Mayor Spencer inquired why Councilmember Oddie requested a workshop instead of a
regular agenda item.
Councilmember Oddie responded that he requested a workshop to have a regular
dialogue instead of having speakers only have 3 minutes to speak and Council not
engage with the speakers.
The City Manager stated the workshop would be a special meeting.
Mayor Spencer inquired when the workshop would take place.
Councilmember Oddie responded that he has no preference.
The City Manager stated the workshop is scheduled for the first meeting in December.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether Councilmember Oddie would like the workshop to
occur prior to the regular Council meeting, to which Councilmember Oddie responded a
lot of people cannot make a 6:00 p.m. meeting.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the regular City Council meeting could be recessed to
allow the back and forth dialogue, then return to the regular meeting.
The City Clerk expressed concern with having to juggle the meetings with other
agencies involved.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the workshop could occur in between the regular City
Council meeting, to which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative.
The City Attorney stated conducting the meeting in said manner would be messy.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the workshop should be a Saturday meeting; he
would also like to address the rest of the north shore development issues with WETA
and BCDC and the water taxis at the same meeting.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
20
October 3, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-10-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-09-02,4,"(ENA) to Develop Site A at Alameda Point.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Tam left the meeting at 8:08 p.m.
Mayor Gilmore inquired what could be expected from the Public Open House in
September.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded staff would like to focus on the
developer's qualifications based on previous projects; stated all four developer teams
will have a station to provide information on key projects and allow the public to meet
them; for newcomers to the process, she and the City Planner would also be available
to answer questions about the planning process; only one Open House is scheduled
which includes both sites in order to maximize time and space.
In response to Mayor Gilmore's inquiry, the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point
responded the event is truly an open house; the public can drop by any time; there is no
itinerary or presentation; the teams will be available to talk to the public.
Mayor Gilmore inquired when the property would be contemplated to be sold to a
development team.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the ENA is the engagement
period, and the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) is the marriage;
ownership will take place after DDA is signed.
Mayor Gilmore noted the DDA is the roadmap for phasing and how land will be
developed over a number of years.
In response to Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Chief Operating Officer -
Alameda Point stated the Open House is scheduled for Monday, September 29, 2014 at
the Main Library.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested that each developer team identify the status of
their projects at the Open House.
Councilmember Chen inquired why the $200,000 ENA deposit is lower than the
Alameda Unified Commercial (AUC) ENA deposit.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the developers will be
spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on transaction and planning costs during the
six month DDA and development plan process; she would rather the developer spend
money on entitlements and on a good plan instead of up front as part of a deposit.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 2, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-09-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-07-03,2,"(Film/Video Experience Seat) as a Member of the Film Commission.
Adopted
( 07-309J Resolution No. 14121, ""Appointing Ronald Kahn as a Member
of the Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board.""
Adopted;
(07-309K) Resolution No. 14122, ""Reappointing Nancy Gormley (Senior
Tenant Seat ) as a Member of the Housing Commission.' Adopted
(07-309L) Resolution No. 14123, ""Appointing Mike Hartigan as a
Member of the Library Board. "" Adopted;
(07-309M) Resolution No. 14124, ""Reappointing Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft
as a Member of the Planning Board. "" Adopted;
(07-309N) Resolution No. 14125, ""Reappointing Gina Mariani as a
Member of the Planning Board."" Adopted;
(07-3090) Resolution No. 14126, ""Reappointing Katina Huston as a
Member of the Public Art Commission. Adopted;
(07-309P) Resolution No. 14127, ""Reappointing Cathy Nielsen as a
Member of the Social Service Human Relations Board. Adopted; and
(07-309Q) Resolution No. 14128, ""Reappointing Henry Villareal as a
Member of the Social Service Human Relations Board. "" Adopted.
Mayor Johnson thanked Board and Commission members for all of their
hard work.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented certificates of
appointment to Board and Commission members.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(07-310 ) Presentation regarding the Façade Grant Program.
The Development Services Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired what is the budget for the Façade Grant
Program, to which the Development Services Director responded the
budget was $200,000 last year.
Mayor Johnson stated the Park Street and Webster Street
improvements have made a huge difference.
Regular Meeting
2
Alameda City Council
July 3, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-07-03.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-08-04,7,"(Following the meeting, Staff reviewed the HAB by-laws in the City Charter Sec. 28-6.-B which
states: Three (3) members shall constitute a quorum and a decision of the Board shall be
determined by a majority vote of those members present at the meeting.) Staff informed the
Board that the Certificate of Approval CA05-0016, for 1501 Buena Vista is approved by a
majority vote.
5. Consideration of penalties for unauthorized demolition at 616 Pacific Avenue.
Emily Pudell briefly reviewed staff report as presented. Ms. Pudell stated that an application for
Major Design Review was approved in 2004. The description of work that was provided on
application stated that the scope of work would affect a significant portion of the existing
structure; however demolition of the structure was not specifically called out in the project
description. The applicant felt that he had obtained all necessary permits to ""dismantle"" the
house. Staff feels that there was a miscommunication with the applicant. Although this building
was listed on the Historical Building Study List with an (H) designation, which means that it
may have Historical importance because of it's age or location or similarity to other buildings
done by important architects or builders, staff was unable to find any historical significance to
warrant the inclusion of 616 Pacific Ave. on the list.
Staff has received several letters from the neighbors opposing the 5-year stay in development.
Staff is recommending waiving the 5-year stay in development with conditions stated in draft
Resolution.
Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing.
Birgitt Evans, Kevin Frederick, Nancy Hird, spoke in opposition of waiving the 5-year stay in
development.
Bill Smith spoke on penalties of unauthorized demolition occurring in the City of Alameda.
Paul Rezucha, spoke in favor of waiving the 5-year development stay.
There were no more speakers. Chair Anderson opened the floor to Board discussion.
Ms. Pudell informed the Board that staff is currently undergoing revisions to the Historical
Ordinance, most importantly the Interim Review section and penalties section. They intend to
bring this to the Historical Advisory Board for public hearing very soon.
In response to Chair Anderson's question regarding the process of modifying a structure on the
Historical Building Study List, Ms. Eliason responded that Staff would evaluate the application
with the Building Official to determine if it meets the criteria for a Certificate of Approval for
demolition. Currently the definition of a demolition is set at 30% of the value. If so, it would
need to have HAB approval as well as Design Review.
Minutes of August 4, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
7",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-06-21,7,"(IBEW) and the City of Alameda.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated that he appreciates the set 3%.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmember Daysog, Matarrese, Oddie and Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. Noes: Mayor
Spencer - 1.
(*16-301) Ordinance No. 3155, ""Amending Alameda Municipal Code Section 5-7.1
Penalty for Nonpayment of Annual, Quarterly or Semi-Annual Business License.' Finally
passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(16-302) Resolution No. 15162, ""Reappointing Cheryl Saxton as a Member of the Golf
Commission. Adopted;
(16-302A) Resolution No. 15163, ""Appointing Lynn Jones as a Member of the Historical
Advisory Board."" Adopted;
(16-302B) Resolution No. 15164, ""Appointing Thomas Saxby (Registered Architect) as
a Member of the Historical Advisory Board.' Adopted;
(16-302C) Resolution No. 15165, ""Reappointing Stephanie Shipe as a Member of the
Housing Authority Board of Commissioners."" Adopted;
(16-302D) Resolution No. 15166, ""Appointing Kenji Tamaoki as a Member of the
Housing Authority Board of Commissioners."" Adopted;
(16-302E) Resolution No. 15167, ""Appointing Fayleen Allen (Tenant) as a Member of
the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners."" Adopted;
(16-302F) Resolution No. 15168, ""Appointing Sandra Kay (Senior Tenant) as a Member
of the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners."" Adopted;
(16-302G) Resolution No. 15169, ""Appointing Ronald Curtis as a Member of the
Planning Board.' Adopted;
(16-302H) Resolution No. 15170, ""Appointing Adam Gillitt as a Member of the Public Art
Commission."" Adopted;
(16-3021) Resolution No. 15171, ""Reappointing Sherman Lewis as a Member of the
Public Art Commission."" Adopted;
(16-302J) Resolution No. 15172, ""Reappointing Mary Sutter as a Member of the Public
Utilities Board."" Adopted;
(16-302K) Resolution No. 15173, ""Appointing Milton Friedman as a Member of the Rent
Review Advisory Committee."" Adopted;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 21, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-06-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-04-15,9,"(MSAC) will be participating more with WABA activities to be better informed.
The Economic Development Manager responded the two businesses are invited to all
WABA events; the level of participation they would like to be involved in is their choice.
Councilmember Tam inquired if the two businesses were inspired by the conversations
about the value of participating in WABA events.
The Assistant City Manager responded the two businesses left the meeting fully aware
of the program; staff suggested having events at their businesses, but they were not
open to the idea at this time.
Councilmember Tam moved introduction of the ordinance.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
- 3. [Absent: Councilmembers Chen and Daysog - 2.]
(14-149) Recommendation to Approve the Webster Street Business Improvement Area
(BIA) Annual Assessment Report;
(14-149 A) Resolution No. 14913, ""Resolution of Intention to Levy an Annual
Assessment on the Webster Street BIA of the City of Alameda for Fiscal Year 2014-15.
Adopted;
(14-149 B) Set a Public Hearing on June 17, 2014 to Levy an Annual Assessment on
the Webster Street BIA.
Councilmembers Chen and Daysog recused themselves and left the dais.
The Economic Development Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the staff recommendation, and adoption of
the resolution.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 3.
[Absent: Councilmembers Chen and Daysog - 2.]
(14-150) Recommendation to Approve Outline for Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and
Form of Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) for Two Development Sites at
Alameda Point.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired when potential developers' financial capability would be
examined.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded staff would follow the RFQ for
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
April 15, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-04-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-05-20,10,"(NCRIC) would customize record deletion to meet Alameda's retention policy.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Alameda Police Department (APD) would
share data with other regional surveillance programs such as Homeland Security, to
which the Police Chief responded in the negative; stated if APD enters an MOU with
NCRIC, other participating agencies would have mutual access.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Homeland Security has an MOU with
NCRIC, to which the Police Chief responded he does not know.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether APD intends to enter an MOU with NCRIC,
to which the Police Chief responded in the affirmative.
In response to Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Police Chief stated the MOU with
NCRIC does not have to be approved by Council.
In response to Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Police Chief stated participating
agencies would have equal rights and access to the system and can request data from
a specific time.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether NCRIC would retain a copy of the data
beyond the six-month retention, to which the Police Chief responded in the negative;
stated NCRIC will comply with APD's retention schedule.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether audits could be done every six months, to
which the Police Chief responded in the affirmative; stated NCRIC audits once a year; if
Alameda does an audit at six months, audits would be every six months.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 20, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-05-20.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2017-12-14,8,"(Ord. No. 3029 N.S., § 1, 4-5-2011)
2-12.4 - Duties of Commission.
It shall be the duty of the Recreation and Park Commission to:
a. Advise the Director of Recreation and Parks, the City Council and the
Board of Education on all matters pertaining to the establishment and
operation of community recreation programs, activities and facilities.
b. Hold hearings and do all things necessary to inform itself with respect to
the promotion and successful operation of City recreational activities.
C. Establish necessary or proper regulations and rules to carry out the
provisions of this section including, but not limited to, the recommendation of
rates, fees, and charges in connection with the use of facilities or participation
in recreational programs, which shall be included in the City's annual Master
Fee Resolution for adoption by the City Council.
(Ord. No. 3029 N.S., § 1, 4-5-2011)
AMC Section 2-12.4c is directly on point. It clearly states that the Commission's duties,
among other things are to make ""recommendation of rates, fees and charges in
connection with the use of facilities or participation in recreational programs.
""
Some confusion on this point has arisen from the language in the Bylaws in Chapter 1,
Article 1, Section 2(2) which states:
""The Recreation Commission has the responsibility for setting fees and
charges.""
It is well within the authority of the Commission to adopt a set of Bylaws to help govern
its activities. Such authority is granted in AMC Section 2-12.3(a). However, to the
extent that the Bylaws have been interpreted to mean that the Commission sets the
fees as opposed to making a recommendation to the City Council concerning rates and
fees, then that interpretation is in error. The Commission cannot grant itself more
authority that was delegated to it by the City Council. The City Council's delegation in
AMC Section 2-12 gave the Commission the authority to make ""recommendation of
rates, fees and charges in connection with the use of facilities or participation in
recreational programs. AMC Section 2-12 was last amended on April 5, 2011, had
the City Council wanted to expand the authority of the Commission, it could have done
so in 2011.
Presenting Commission Recommendations to City Council
As discussed above, the Commission has a statutory advisory role. However, for the
Commission to effectively carry out that role, its recommendations must be fairly and
objectively presented to the City Council for the Council's consideration. In my
3",RecreationandParkCommission/2017-12-14.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-12-02,5,"(RMS) including the Acquisition of Hardware and Software in an Amount Not to Exceed
$995,000.
The Police Captain gave a brief overview of the system.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired where the funds would go if not used for the CAD
and RMS upgrade.
The Assistant City Manager responded the funds come from the equipment
replacement account which is already budgeted; the Police Department contributes to
the fund, which is an internal service funds; if the funds are not spent, the money can be
rolled over to the next year.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted the Sunnyvale Police Department is using the program
and staff was able to see it in action.
Councilmember Tam inquired what would happen if the system fails.
The Police Captain responded the Police Department would not be able to function.
Councilmember Daysog stated as a matter of policy, anything above $500,000 should
be on the Regular Agenda, not on the Consent Calendar.
In response to Mayor Gilmore's inquiry, Councilmember Daysog stated his comment is
a recommendation moving forward.
Stated the contract is a large amount; questioned whether the contract would create a
savings, such as overtime: Kurt Peterson, Alameda.
Mayor Gilmore stated the contract is not being brought forward as a cost saving
measure; rather it is a necessary upgrade because the software is at the end of its life
and requires upgrade.
The City Manager stated the trend for overtime has been very good over the past
several years.
The Police Chief stated staff has done a pretty good job of managing overtime; some
overtime is generated for circumstances beyond control, such as court appearances;
commented on the report time savings.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember seconded the motion, with direction for staff to place items over
$500,000 that have not gone to bid on the Regular Agenda in the future.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
December 2, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-12-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-04-15,8,"(RRD) i Patricia Gannon, RRD (submitted letters) i Gerry Long, RRD i
May Johnston, Alameda; Corrine Lambden, RRD (submitted comments) ;
Michael Robles Wong, Community of Harbor Bay Isle Owners
Association; Melissa Plaisance, Headlands Homeowners Association:
Richard Rutter, Alameda; Annie Rutter, Alameda; Chad Otten,
Appellant (submitted petition) ; Brenda Harrigan, Alameda; Anda
Bockis, Alameda; Ewart Wetherill, Alameda. Ignacio Goyret, Alameda;
Nancy Ross, Alameda: and Anna Faria-Poynter, Alameda.
Opponents (Not in favor of Appeal) : Art Autorino, Alameda; Mel
Grant, SFX Preferred Resorts; Eric Ibsen, Alameda; John McManus,
Cushman and Wakefield; Scott Newman, SRM Associates; Sandy
Sidorsky, Alameda; Adam Howard, Bank of Alameda; Neil Sekhri,
Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP, Applicant's Attorney; Gary Fanger,
Alameda; Andy Tung, Gracepoint Fellowship Church; Edward Kang,
Gracepoint Fellowship Church; and Clement Chu, Cantamar Homeowners
Association.
Neutral : Michael John Torrey, Alameda.
* * *
(08-165 - ) Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of continuing the
meeting past midnight.
Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public
portion of the hearing.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether fast foot restaurants can
be prohibited.
The Planning Services Manager responded the City does not have a
definition of fast food restaurants.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether a definition could be
established in order to prohibit fast food restaurants.
The Planning Services Manager responded a definition could be
established.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he is concerned that fast food
restaurants create trash and drive-through traffic; a pre-
construction biology survey is one of the additional conditions of
approval provided tonight ; inquired whether the Applicant is
willing to do the necessary regulation activity if the survey finds
Regular Meeting
8
Alameda City Council
April 15, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-04-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-06-05,12,"(SSHRB) Community Needs Assessment Final Report.
The SSHRB Members Kale Jenks and Jennifer Hastings gave a Power Point
presentation.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry regarding housing discrimination, Mr.
Jenks stated 48% were renters and 22% were property owners.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft expressed her appreciation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of accepting the SSHRB Community
Needs Assessment Final Report.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer expressed her appreciation.
Councilmember Oddie expressed concern over housing discrimination.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, Ms. Hastings stated the survey included links
and contacts for finding help with housing discrimination.
Mayor Spencer stated the information should be on the City's website.
Vice Mayor Vella stated trends are continuing; expressed her appreciation.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the SSHRB does some of the toughest work; the
report is extremely important to the Council.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye; Councilmember
Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Spencer: Aye. Ayes: 5.
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 8:53 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:04 p.m.
(18-341) Recommendation to Receive the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-19 Rent Program
Regulatory Fee Study; and
(18-341A) Resolution No. 15388, ""Setting a Rent Program Fee for the City's Rent
Review, Rent Stabilization and Limitations on Evictions Ordinance and Implementing
Policies for Fiscal Year 2018-19."" Adopted.
The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
June 5, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf
TransportationCommission,2015-11-18,12,"(four lanes of traffic and uncontrolled crosswalks) as the area around Maya Lin School. He said
kids think it is safe to go and someone driving 35 mph can take them out. He felt two lanes with
a center turn lane is a big difference than a two lane road. He explained that he use to live south
of Central Avenue and motorists only have to go across one lane to get into the center lane and
merge. He went on to say if Caltrans approved a project it is not a takeover of the bicycle groups.
Ultimately, he supported the project.
Karen Bay, 5th Street and Taylor Avenue resident, said she is a 15-year ferry rider. She explained
that she attended a transportation meeting on November 16 and was told that the ferry
experienced a 30 percent increase in the last two years and she has seen it. She has also seen a lot
of people riding their bikes to the ferry and a lot of children riding their bikes to school. She said
the problem with Santa Clara Avenue is that it is not safe infrastructure for cyclists. So, she
approved the project because it is important for students and commuters going to the ferry and
for Alameda Point as whole.
Peter Baron stated that he organized the first bicycle symposium in Cambridge Massachusetts in
the 1970s and he spent his career doing waterfront redevelopment and restoration. He said he has
never seen a town with more bikeway and pedestrian potential unrealized than Alameda. He felt
the potential for the Alameda Point circumference trail is extraordinary and people will be
coming across the island and around the state to go there.
Lee Huo, Bay Trail Project Planner, said he supports completing the trail along Central Avenue.
He explained that the idea of the trail is to get along the shoreline on a Class I separated trail as
often as possible. He pointed out that you do see alignments such as Central Avenue where the
project essentially completes the trail between Pacific Avenue and Crown Drive. He thanked
City staff and the consultants who worked diligently with the concept. Furthermore, he said the
trail is a regional recreation trail and significant commute alignment adopted in the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission (MTC) regional bicycle plan and Alameda County Transportation
Commission (ACTC) bicycle and pedestrian plan.
John McKeenan stated that the Commission studiously paid attention to all the speakers and he
does not see that often. He said Indianapolis, Indiana known for motor cars and racing has put
together a tremendous complete street program in the last five years and has gone from
completely no infrastructure to trend setting infrastructure. He cited cities such as Copenhagen in
Denmark having 55 percent of its commuters bicycling and the rest commuting by public transit
or private vehicles. He felt bicycling and public transit is the way the community can survive on
this planet. He ultimately supported the project.
Commissioner Miley stated that he would like staff to respond to a few statements made by the
speakers. He explained that the last speaker hit the nail on the head about the fact that
multimodal communities are the future. He said he heard the concerns about loading zones
within the business district and the loss of travel lanes on Central Avenue. He understood that
people may double park on Webster Street more often when loading, SO he asked staff to address
and explain the plan moving forward.
Staff Payne replied the area of concern is along Webster and Page Streets and the northwest
corner, which was mentioned. She referred to page 4, cross-section I, which is right next to the
Page 12 of 17",TransportationCommission/2015-11-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-04-05,12,"*
Councilmember deHaan left the dais and returned at 11:18 p.m.
Vice Mayor Bonta stated all loopholes should be closed; that the City should be very
aggressive on the issue; all four policy areas should be addressed; he does not see an
outright prohibition for condominiums.
The Senior Management Analyst stated condominiums could be 100% smoking
prohibitive.
Councilmember Tam stated fourteen cities within the County have already addressed
the issue; suggested using Union City's ordinance as a model.
The Senior Management Analyst stated Union City staff was directed to do whatever
necessary to get an A.
Councilmember Tam stated that her direction is the same.
Vice Mayor Bonta stated Council should give direction to get an A+; Union City is not
doing anything regarding sidewalks.
Mayor Gilmore stated dining areas would be one of the seven areas targeted for
protection; inquired whether smoking on an outdoor patio would be prohibited or would
be extended to the front sidewalk, to which the Senior Management Analyst responded
whatever Council wants.
In response to Mayor Gilmore's inquiry, the Senior Management Analyst stated
secondhand smoke is not considered a nuisance at the State level; declaring
secondhand smoke at the local level would lower the threshold for proof of injury.
Mayor Gilmore stated only two cities have declared secondhand smoke a nuisance.
The Senior Management Analyst stated the issue is an emerging issue for cities;
Richmond has stated that it would be easier to enforce a misdemeanor than an
infraction.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether cities are shying away because of legal
issues.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
April 5, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-04-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-12-19,2,"*
Mayor Johnson called a recess at 8:15 p.m. and reconvened the
regular meeting at 8:40 p.m.
REORGANIZATION OF COUNCIL
Installation
(06-603) The Honorable Judge C. Richard Bartalini administered the
Oaths of Office to:
Office of Mayor
Beverly Johnson
Office of City Councilmember
Frank Matarrese
Lena Tam
Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers
deHaan,
Gilmore,
Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5.
Absent :
None.
Consideration of Appointment of Vice Mayor
06-604) Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of appointing Lena
Tam as Vice Mayor.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Mayor Johnson noted that selecting Councilmember Tam continues the
tradition of appointing the Councilmember who received the highest
number of votes.
Comments by New Council
(06 5-605 - ) Councilmember Matarrese, Mayor Johnson and Vice Mayor Tam
each made comments and thanked their supporters.
AGENDA CHANGES
None.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
December 19, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-12-19.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-06-02,2,"*
Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the
Planning & Building Department, at 510.747.6850 or 510.522.7538 (TDD
number) at least 72 hours before the meeting to request an interpreter.
*
Accessible seating for persons with disabilities (including those using wheelchairs)
is available.
Minutes of the meeting are available in enlarged print.
Audiotapes of the meeting are available upon request.
Please contact the Planning & Building Department at 510.747.6850 or
510.522.7538 (TDD number) at least 48 hours before the meeting to request
agenda materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable
accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy the benefits of
the meeting.
G:\PLANNING\HAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05\09-01-05 draft Agenda. HAB.doc",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-07-15,22,"***
(08-40) - Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of continuing the
meeting past midnight.
Chair Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
***
Chair Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing.
Proponents (In favor of the staff recommendation) : Robb Ratto, Park
Street Business Association (PSBA) (provided handout) ; Kathy
Moehring, West Alameda Business Association (WABA) ; Patty Jacobs,
Greater Alameda Business Association (GABA)
.
There being no further speakers, Chair Johnson closed the public
portion of the hearing.
Chair Johnson inquired why is PSBA's Landscape and Lighting
assessment reduced.
Mr. Ratto responded the assessment was not utilized for a number of
years and resulted in a surplus, which has run out PSBA was going
to request a 100% increase in the Landscape and Lighting
assessment; property owners are not in support of an additional fee
since the passing of Measure H.
Chair Johnson inquired how much PSBA spends on marking and
promotion, to which Mr. Ratto responded approximately $90,000.
Chair Johnson inquired whether PSBA pays the electric bill [for the
streets ] through the Landscape and Lighting assessment, to which
Mr. Ratto responded in the affirmative.
Commissioner Tam stated that Landscape and Lighting assessment
income is reduced from $69,850 to $57,417; the Business Improvement
Area (BIA) income is reduced from $102,317 to $83,000; PSBA income
is reduced from $147,755 to $121,500; and the grant fund amount
would be increased from $108,020 to $111,446.
Mr. Ratto stated PSBA leaves a $20,000 cushion when event budgeting
is prepared just in case something happens most of the $20,000
goes back into the promotion budget.
Following Ms. Moehring's comments, Chair Johnson inquired how much
WABA spends on marketing and promotion, to which Ms. Moehring
responded $71,000.
Special Meeting
Community Improvement Commission
3
July 15, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-07-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-09-16,13,"***
(14-396) Councilmember Daysog moved approval of continuing past 11:00 p.m.
Councilmember Chen seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Chen, Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft and Mayor Gilmore - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Tam - 1.
***
Mayor Gilmore stated that she is not a proponent of the community process, which
would not give her the data needed to make a decision; a community process would be
a slower process as there may have to be another process to get data; no process that
the City sets up will work unless people believe the group represents their issues; if
Renewed Hope is having difficulty finding tenant representatives, it would be hard for
the City to find staff to find tenant representatives; that she has doubts the community
process will play out, but thinks Council should give the community group a shot; she
will vote in favor of the community process.
Councilmember Chen stated both groups want the same result; the community could
provide the fastest and most accurate data.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of having a community group facilitated by Mr.
Cambra to scope out the process and provide the framework or hard core data that
needs to be gathered through some effort with the City; at that point, if a task force is
necessary, a city-formed appointed task force could be revisited.
Councilmember Tam stated there needs to be clear data to get policy changes; that she
is not confident the community discussion would produce the data which may need to
be handled by staff; the community discussion is needed to help the data-gathering
effort; a lot of the data would be anecdotal; the community group may not have access
to needed resources.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the matter would come back to Council, to which
Councilmember Tam responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Council would task the community group
with obtaining statistical data, to which Councilmember Tam responded in the negative;
stated Council would be tasking the group to scope out data.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the motion does away with a proposed task
force, even if it is augmented by EBHO.
Councilmember Tam responded the need for a task force would be revisited following
the community discussion; if people are not in agreement about the composition of their
group, it is harder for them to come to agreement over tougher issues; it may come
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 16, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-09-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-05-05,14,"***
(15-310) Mayor Spencer stated a vote is required to continue the meeting past 11:00
p.m.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval [of continuing the meeting.]
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
***
The City Attorney explained the Costa Hawkins Rental Housing Act, California Civil
Code 1954.50 et. sec., is a law passed by State legislature which authorizes limited rent
control provisions.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of doing a study to analyze the impacts of rising
rents on Alameda residents and the data points raised by the Mayor.
Mayor Spencer stated other Councilmembers also had data points.
The City Attorney stated staff has noted the requested data points; the points do not to
be re-stated unless Council wants to vote on them.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether a vote is needed or direction should be given, to which
the City Attorney responded giving direction to staff is fine.
The City Attorney inquired whether Council would like the study to come back at the
same time as the re-drafted ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
14
May 5, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-05-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-20,16,"***
(16-470) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider remaining items.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of considering only the remaining
regular agenda items [paragraph nos. 16-472, 16-473, and 16-474].
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry regarding the Emergency Operations
Center, the City Manager stated the item is an update Council requested.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he would have preferred to also address the
referrals.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Mayor
Spencer - 1.
***
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft left the dais at 10:19 p.m. and returned at 10:22 p.m.
Stated zoning and permitting issues need to be addressed; there needs to be
regulations on the height of trees and buildings in backyards: Susan Fitzgerald,
Alameda.
Stated there is not enough information to proceed; the City must have all the facts
before decisions are made: Marc Knass.
Urged Council to use the proceeds from the sale to improve public access: Dan Siskind,
Alameda.
Stated homeowners have not been able to make improvements for decades; urged
passage: Edward Payne, Waterfront Homeowners Association (WHOA).
Stated the WHOA tried to leave the City with no outparcels; WHOA has tried to gauge
whether they will have the financial resources to purchase any of the outparcels; in the
event that WHOA is stuck with the parcels, they will try to work with the adjoining
property owner to take ownership of the parcel; WHOA realizes they might be stuck with
the parcels for an extended period of time with the hopes that subsequent owner will be
interested in owning the parcel; he hopes the community is not driven by fear when
making decisions; opportunity to save money by putting the parcels into place; requests
Council to not leave deadlocked tonight; stated the issue has gone on for over 3
decades; the owners desperately want to see the transaction move forward; thanked
the Assistant City Attorney for the work done on the project; stated no predecessors
have stepped up to take on the issue: Seth Hamalian, WHOA.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 20, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-07-05,25,"***
(17-434) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to continue past 11:00 p.m.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of continuing the meeting past 11:00 p.m.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
***
Vice Mayor Vella stated there are risks; if Council votes against the project, the City will
not receive all of the benefits, like infrastructure and the ferry; she is concerned for the
feasibility of Phase 3 and the sports complex payment; she would like to work with staff
to ensure the City meets the commercial goals; she is prepared to vote in support of the
project.
Mayor Spencer stated the charge when the U.S. Navy gave the City the property was to
replace 14,000 jobs; without the guarantee that Phase 3 will happen, Phase 1 and 2 are
housing projects, not a job project; she will not support the project; the financing should
be for all three phases; Alameda needs jobs; the property is the people's property and
Alameda needs the commercial project.
Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of ordinance amending the DDA
between Alameda Point Partners, LLC and the City of Alameda.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by the following
voice votes: Ayes: Councilmembers Matarrese, Ezzy Ashcraft, Oddie and Vice Mayor
Vella - 4. Noes: Mayor Spencer - 1.
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 11:03 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 11:12 p.m.
***
The Assistant City Attorney requested clarified from Council that the vote is on the
second amendment as amended.
Council responded in the affirmative.
(17-435) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease with Friends of Alameda Animal
Shelter. Introduced.
The City Manager stated the item is only an extension of the previous approval by
Council; the second reading will happen in the next meeting.
Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
24
July 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-11-07,12,"***
(17-669) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to continue the meeting past 11:00
p.m.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
***
Vice Mayor Vella requested a friendly amendment to the motion that the Main Street
gap become a priority.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated all comments from Council should be incorporated
into the motion.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the motion means the Transportation
Choices Plan will not be approved as written tonight and that items will be added and
that will be what Council is approving.
The City Manager responded Council could make a conditional approval, staff would
make redline changes and bring the matter back on the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Matarrese agreed with doing so.
The City Manager stated if anything is missed by staff, Council can remove the item
from the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether anything added will return to Council with
redline and will return on Consent Calendar at the next Council meeting, to which the
City Manager responded the item will not return at the next Council meeting.
The Base Reuse Director stated staff will incorporate the changes with a redline version
and bring the item back on the Consent Calendar.
Mayor Spencer requested clarification whether Council agrees to make GABA's idea of
the shuttle a first priority.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded the motion includes Councilmember
Matarrese's proposal to add the proposed shuttle into the plan for exploratory purposes;
stated phrasing does not mean the shuttle will definitely be done.
The City Manager stated the word exploratory means looking into funding.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether Councilmember Oddie is suggesting to have AC
Transit partner with GABA, which is not GABA's proposal, to which Councilmember
Oddie responded the two agencies should have a discussion.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
November 7, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-05-15,16,"***
(18-301) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider the referral on crime
[paragraph no. 18-305].
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of considering the item.
Mayor Spencer seconded the motion, which failed by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmember Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 2. Noes: Councilmembers Ezzy
Ashcraft, Oddie and Vella - 3.
Mayor Spencer stated the OGC had a good suggestion to not read the entire
proclamation; having flexibility is key; being able to suspend the rule is helpful.
Vice Mayor Vella suggested adding language that states staff will work with the groups
ahead of time so Council will know to make adjustments to the agenda.
Mayor Spencer stated that she and staff already work together on the timing of each
agenda item; adding language about staff working with the recipient groups is not
necessary.
Councilmember Matarrese concurred with Vice Mayor Vella's suggestion; stated it goes
along with the 15 minute hard limit and removes the need for the two-minute time limit.
Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft and Oddie also concurred with Vice Mayor Vella's
language amendment.
Mayor Spencer stated it seems Council does not want her to work with the recipient
groups as she has been doing.
Vice Mayor Vella stated Mayor Spencer could still work with them; her amended
language can include ""the Mayor or staff"".
In response to the City Clerk's inquiry, Mayor Spencer stated the language should
include ""the Mayor and staff will prepare recipients
""
Councilmember Matarrese stated the language should include ""staff and/or the Mayor""
in case there are situations where there are other draws on time for either the staff or
the Mayor.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding the public comment 15 minute limit,
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated instead of trying to tailor a rule to a specific
circumstance, the suspension of rules could apply; Council cannot anticipate everything
that will occur; if the situation warrants it, there can be a vote to suspend the rules.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 15, 2018
16",CityCouncil/2018-05-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-06-18,7,"***
(19-379) Public Hearing to Establish the Proposition 4 (Appropriations) Limit for Fiscal
Year 2019-20; and
(19-379 A) Resolution No. 15558, ""Establishing the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year
2019-20.' Adopted.
The Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
(19-380) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15559, ""Amending Master Fee
Resolution No. 12191 to Add and Revise Fees."" Adopted.
The Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for eliminating library late fees; requested
further explanation for no longer charging library late fees.
The Finance Director outlined the effects of late fees; stated not charging late fees helps
keep patrons returning to the library for services.
Discussed the Impact Fees litigation; encouraged the City Council to create a new study
and start over in the process; stated existing studies are flawed: Tom Roth, Boatworks.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
(19-381) Public Hearing to Consider Collection of Delinquent Integrated Waste
Management Accounts Via Property Tax Bills.
The Public Works Coordinator gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether anyone is contesting the assessment, to which
the Public Works Coordinator responded in the negative; stated payment plans are
being established for those who need to resolve accounts.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 18, 2019
5",CityCouncil/2019-06-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-03-16,10,"***
(21-172) The City Clerk stated a motion is needed to allow the presentation to go
beyond 10 minutes.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of allowing the presentation to be
completed.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following
roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye;
Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
***
Mr. Mance and Jolene Wright continued the Power Point presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether bi-annual training represents an occurrence
every two years or twice per year.
Mr. Mance responded every two years.
Councilmember Daysog inquired the Committees' expectations; stated there is a lot of
analysis; questioned whether the desire is to have Council move forward to have staff
provide further analysis and frame the issues to return with a staff report and
recommendations.
Mr. Mance responded the desire is to have Council instruct staff; stated many cities are
taking similar actions; the work being done as volunteers is provided happily; noted
professional help is necessary; one of the recommendations is for Alameda to hire
professionals to continue the work moving forward; the recommendations provided by
the Committees are sound and good; the Committees do not have the collective
experience; noted the recommendation is to instruct staff to write a report regarding
implementation of professional help; another recommendation being made is to have
specific, dedicated staff implementing recommendations to ensure matters do not fall by
the wayside; discussed a 1991 commission; stated not much came from the previous
1991 commission; the truly difficult work is ensuring the changes actually occur; the
opportunity is fantastic; Alameda is a great town where people are involved; there is
opportunity for a conversation between the public and the Police; disinterested parties
need to be involved to help bridge the gap.
Ms. Chilcot stated the recommendations presented are limited; noted there are
recommendations in-full from all Subcommittees.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for a discussion related to
additional recommendations.
Urged Council to direct staff to accept all the recommendations from the
Subcommittees; stated it is important to review and remove all the laws that criminalize
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
March 16, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-05-11,6,"***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 8:20 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:36 p.m.
***
(21-326) Budget Workshop for Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 to Provide Direction on
Capital Improvement Program Budget.
The Public Works Director and Supervising Senior Engineer gave a Power Point
presentation.
The Public Works Director, City Manager and Supervising Senior Engineer responded to
City Council questions.
Urged Council to do a traffic calming project between Park Street and High Street on Otis
Drive: Marilyn Rothman, Alameda.
Stated the Urban Forest Plan is so important for the City and needs to be fully funded: Ruth
Abbe, CASA.
Stated improvements are needed to the Shoreline Park path on Parcel 4 since it is badly
degraded; urged Council to commit to funding: Patricia Lamborn, Alameda.
Stated that he concurs with Ruth Abbe regarding the Urban Forest Plan; discussed ongoing
tree maintenance: Christopher Buckley, Alameda.
Expressed support for the Urban Forest Plan and tree maintenance improvements;
expressed concern about the expense of painting of the Great Whites: Carmen Reid,
Alameda.
The City Manager and Public Works Director responded to City Council questions.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of directing staff to come back with
funding for particular needs including Pickle Ball and any paving for smooth surfaces to
allow skating and bicycle riding.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion.
Following discussion, Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she is happy to modify
her motion to make it broader; she would like to look at allocating more funds to improve the
recreational facilities.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the amended motion.
The proposed funding was discussed.
The City Manager stated the general Council direction is to bring back the items on May
20th
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
May 11, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-05-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-10-01,10,"***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 8:35 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:45
p.m.
(19-548) Recommendation to Approve the Design Concepts for Up to Six Public Access
Pathways Along Fernside Boulevard and Eastshore Drive.
The Recreation and Parks Director gave a brief presentation reviewing staff report
Exhibit 2.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether maintenance will be included.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated details have not
been finalized for the submerged land; the goal is to provide ownership to the area
around property owners' existing docks; when ownership occurs, permits through the
City may be obtained for improvements.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether restrictions have been added; outlined property
owners' potential dock repair scenarios.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the intention is not to impede repairs and
maintenance, but to maintain the views of the water from the viewing areas; outlined
restrictions for dock repairs.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired other City options for Pathway C.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded another option is signage; stated signage
has limited capacity, but does provide legal coverage; there is also the option of a view
corridor; other potential options have not been reviewed and would need to be creative.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether there is a way to maintain the City easement
without actively improving or encouraging use at this time.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded her initial conversations with legal
counsel suggest the pathway should be closed off if the City does not make
improvements.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether it is possible for the property owner to still use
the pathway in the event of closure and whether it is possible for the City to decide a
use at a later date.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the option is possible; stated a gate will
need to be installed beyond the driveways.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
October 1, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-10-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-04-16,15,"***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 9:02 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:11
p.m.
(19-242) Public Hearing to Consider Endorsing: 1) an Annual Report on the Status of
the General Plan and Housing Element, and 2) an Annual Report on the Status of the
Transportation Choices Plan and Associated Work Program Priorities.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Discussed climate change and needed policy changes: Denyse Trepanier, Bike Walk
Alameda.
Discussed various plans and encouraged Council to provide leadership: Ruth Abbe,
CASA.
Discussed traffic and the importance of providing safe modes of transportation: Heather
Little, Alameda.
Discussed needed changes: Pat Potter, Alameda.
Urged Council to keep the City moving forward with meaningful transportation changes:
Lucy Gigli, Bike Walk Alameda.
Councilmember Vella stated the City needs to stop acting like a Homeowner
Association engaging in vigorous design review; people need to select from options; the
process needs to be streamlined and more affordable to allow construction to occur;
time needs to be spent creating options; Council should discuss how many units will be
available for purchase versus rental property; not allowing the middle class to buy in
Alameda is a problem; the City declared and should continue to focus on vision zero;
discussed and encouraged daylighting at intersections, road repairs and bike share;
expressed support for crossings; stated the bicycle/pedestrian crossing needs to
happen on the West End and would not be solved by a gondola; shuttle bus expansion
should connect to areas like the McKay Avenue site.
Vice Mayor Knox White stated the City is not reaching its affordable goals under the
Housing Element; not enough market rate housing is being built; the viability of
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) should be increased; only 38 have been proposed
and 20 are moving forward; suggested changes to the law be considered; stated land
use has one of the top impacts on climate, which needs to be addressed in the General
Plan and Housing Element; the transit goals are very oriented toward Alameda Point,
not Fruitvale, BART or downtown Oakland, which are the City's problem areas; there is
a development plan for Alameda Point; transportation planning should focus on having
people not drive to BART; the plan needs a robust protected bike lane network; the City
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
April 16, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-04-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-06-17,13,"***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess to the meeting at 8:23 p.m. and reconvened the
meeting at 8:40 p.m.
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated people need to talk to each other and listen; there have
been recent moving demonstrations; outlined emotional comments related to racial
prejudice and a conversation with the President of the Alameda Police Officer's
Association; expressed support for convening a facilitated forum for Police Officers to
hear experiences; stated that she has requested Robbie Williams help in finding youth
leaders; noted Regina Jackson, Chief Executive Officer of the East Oakland Youth
Development Center and President of the Oakland Police Commission and Reverend
Jaqueline Thompson, Senior Pastor, Allen Temple Baptist Church, Oakland helped
facilitate the forum; stated the Police Chief and three Officers attended the forum; stated
youth members want to be involved and share views; outlined the forum proceedings
and youth experiences with Police Officers; stated recurring themes of the forum were
related to knowing the community; the concept of community policing is not just being
present while in uniform; expressed support for a Police Athletic League; stated youth
leaders provided suggestions involving psychological evaluations for Police Officers,
ideas of power, attitude and disdain; Councilmembers remain fair in protecting all
members of the community; there is a need for mental health screenings during the
course of a career, not just initially; APD should offer courses on civil rights and race
relations; Officers should show up not just in bad times, but in good times as well;
people need to act with intentionality; it is important for Police to know the history of
race relations in the community where employed; Police need more training and mental
health resources; a lot is asked of Officers and some tasks would be better suited by
others; expressed support for looking into the CAHOOTS program and for implicit bias
training; stated people are afraid of being in the presence of Officers; everyone
experiences facts in different ways; Officers and Councilmembers will always be judged
by the worst actions of their peers; outlined comments about the Police Chief from both
Ms. Jackson and Ms. Thompson; stated the onus is on Officers to change their behavior
and change the perception of Police; none of the Officers encountering Mr. Watkins
knew who he was; expressed support for a Youth Advisory Group; stated that she
believes in the concept of restorative justice; stated the Officers involved in the arrest of
Mr. Watkins are willing to sit down in a facilitated setting with Mr. Watkins to understand
the experience; fundamental fairness to everyone is needed.
Councilmember Vella stated that she received positive feedback from the forum; noted
clarifications are needed for the benefit of the public; stated Councilmembers are
sincerely listening to the community; all Councilmembers interact differently; these are
difficult conversations; the City has set up a larger set of conversations.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft signing onto the Mayor's
Pledge by former President Barak Obama with the caveat of the Pledge being less than
Council has stated will be completed;
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
13
June 17, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-06-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-09-11,2,"***
Mayor Johnson called a recess at 12:20 p.m. and reconvened the
Special Meeting at 12:37 p.m.
The Library Development Services, Alameda Power & Telecom, Parks
and Recreation, Administration, Planning and Building, and Public
Works work plans were reviewed.
Ms. Perkins facilitated the priority setting exercise and outlined
the next steps.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
ADJOURNMENT
( 107 - 441 ) There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned
the Special Meeting at 2:00 p.m. in a moment of silence for
September 11, 2001.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
September 11, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-09-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-08-19,2,"***
Mayor Johnson called a recess at 7:58 p.m. to hold the Special
Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and
Community Improvement Commission Meeting and reconvened the Regular
City Council meeting at 8:41 p.m.
***
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(08-344) Presentation by the League of Women Voters on the
Redistricting Measure.
The League of Women Voters members gave a Power Point presentation.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5. [Note: Councilmember Gilmore abstained from voting
on the minutes. ]
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding
the paragraph number. . ]
( *08-345) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on
August 5, 2008. Approved.
[Note: Councilmember Gilmore abstained from voting on the minutes. ]
( *08-346) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,807,590.17
(*08-347) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Investment Report
for period ending June 30, 2008. Accepted.
(*08-348)
Recommendation to award a Contract in the amount of
$166,183, including contingencies, to Chrisp Company for Annual
Striping, Phase 6, No. P.W. 10-07-31. Accepted.
(*08-349) Recommendation to accept the work of Golden Bay
Construction, Inc. for repair of Portland cement concrete sidewalk,
curb, gutter, driveway, and minor street patching, Fiscal Year
2006-2007, Phase 8, No. P.W. 08-06-18. Accepted.
(*08-350) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and
authorize Call for Bids for Citywide sewer mains and laterals video
inspection, Phase 2, No. P.W. 07-08-19. Accepted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
August 19, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-09-06,13,"***
Mayor Johnson called a recess at 9:01 p.m. and reconvened the
Regular City Council Meeting at 9:10 p.m
The Acting Planning and Building Director stated that the Applicant
is unable to redesign the house; the house is designed for an
elderly person in a wheelchair; the hallways are 5 feet wide;
several bathrooms have a turning radius for a wheelchair.
Mayor Johnson stated redesigning the sidewall would make the house
look better noted the wall looks like a factory wall.
Councilmember deHaan concurred with Mayor Johnson stated that an
architectural separation between the stories would not be that
costly.
The Acting Planning and Building Director stated that the Appellant
could be requested to consider a different exterior sidewall
design.
The Appellant agreed.
Mayor Johnson stated the building could look a lot better than the
drawings; less detailed work is easier for an owner-builder; making
the building look better is worth the effort; the larger issue of
design review needs to be addressed; awareness of neighborhood
compatibility needs to be addressed in the design review process.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
( 05-432 - ) Resolution No. 13893, ""Empowering the City Attorney to
Employ Special Legal Counsel. "" Adopted and
(05-432A) Recommendation to approve Policy regarding Hiring
Procedures for Special Legal Counsel.
Councilmember Daysog extended his appreciation to the City Attorney
for addressing some of the Council's issues; stated that the
resolution is not just for the Council but for the City for many
years.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
13
September 6, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-10-04,13,"***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 10:17 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:25 p.m.
***
(16-502)! Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider items past 10:30 p.m.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of hearing the Introduction of Ordinance first
[paragraph no. 16-503], then address the Housing Element Annual Report [paragraph
no. 16-505]. .
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer inquired if more items could be added at 11:00 p.m.
The City Clerk responded in the negative.
Mayor Spencer stated that she prefers to hear the Public Art Fund item first because
there are people in the audience to speak on the issue.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion.
On the call for the question, the motion failed by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Matarrese and Oddie - 2. Noes: Mayor Spencer - 1. Abstentions:
Councilmember Daysog and Ezzy Ashcraft - 2.
There was a brief discussion about the vote.
Mayor Spencer moved approval of hearing the Public Art Fund item. [paragraph no. 16-
503
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired about potential November 1st
agenda items, to which the City Clerk responded potential items include Phase Zero
and the homeless encampment.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Oddie - 1.
REGULAR ITEMS
(16-503) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
Amending Chapter 30 (Zoning Ordinance) to Facilitate the City's Ability to Disperse
Public Art Funds, and Amend the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Public Art Fund Budget by
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
October 4, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-10-04.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-03-21,18,"***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 10:30 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:33 p.m.
The Finance Director continued the Power Point presentation.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Finance Director stated the contributions to
the OPEB Trust will be proportionately spread based on the number of employees.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Assistant City Manager stated library
employees have a pension and a very small OPEB liability.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether there will be less money for library services for the
public, to which the Finance Director responded having less money could potentially be
the case.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Finance Director stated if the Trust is not
funded now, there will eventually be cuts to services when it is time to make payments
in the future; the objective is to try to prevent the cuts from happening in the future.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the City Manager stated budgets of each
department are being reviewed as a whole; staff is requesting Council to look at a
proactive way to address the unfunded pension and OPEB liability.
Mayor Spencer stated the Council is being asked to adopt a very specific policy.
Councilmember Oddie stated if the liability goes from $15.6 million in FY16-17 to $35.5
million in FY22-23, there may not be a library or public safety departments by then if
something is not done now.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Finance Director stated all
employees contribute to pensions, and Police and Fire employees contribute to OPEB.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether employees contribute the same amounts, to which
the Finance Director responded the contribution amount depends on the employee's
salary; stated employees also do a cost-share; public safety employees currently pick
up 6% of the employer contributions and miscellaneous employees pick up 1.868% of
employer contributions.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, the Finance Director stated the goal is
to set up a trust policy; staff is not asking Council to allocate funds tonight.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the City can make contributions
anytime during the year, to which the Finance Director responded in the affirmative.
In response to Council Member Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Finance Director stated the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 21, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-03-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,18,"***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 6:12 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 11:36 p.m.
***
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Spencer
announced that regarding Real Property, direction was given to staff.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:29 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 6, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-07-07,4,"***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 7:34 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:36 p.m.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented Ms. Giuntini, Mr.
Davenport and Mr. Sorensen with Certificates of Appointment.
(15-440) Update and Follow-Up on Harbor Seal Haul Out Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) Between the City of Alameda and the Water Emergency
Transportation Authority (WETA) at Alameda Point.
The Economic Development Division Manager gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired who is on the committee, to which the Economic
Development Division Manager responded WETA contacts the members, which
include: Mark Klein, Richard Bangert, Lenora Feeney and Irene Dieter.
Thanked staff and WETA for putting in a diligent effort: Richard Bangert, Alameda.
Councilmember Oddie inquired the status of the Bay Conservation and Development
Commission (BCDC) hearing to approve the permit.
The Economic Development Division Manager responded there is no hearing; a follow-
up meeting would be held to informally ask BCDC what will be required from the City
and the next steps.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the City will be submitting a preliminary support
letter expressing the importance to Alameda.
The Economic Development Division Manager responded the Dr. Harvey transmittal
letter stated the work is of the Alameda community, City of Alameda, and WETA; stated
BCDC is interested in seeing the project succeeding which has never been done before;
BCDC is providing Alameda with a road map to complete the project.
Councilmember Oddie inquired what is the timeframe, to which the Economic
Development Division Manager responded a tentative schedule was drafted but staff
will return to Council if a full court press is needed.
Mayor Spencer thanked staff for proceeding with the project; stated she is hopeful it will
work and would like updates to be monthly or quarterly.
The Economic Development Division Manager inquired whether going through the City
Manager's office with written correspondence until milestones are reached would be
sufficient, to which Mayor Spencer responded in the affirmative.
(15-441) Resolution No. 15062, ""Approving the Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
July 7, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-07-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-11-27,7,"***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 8:14 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:21 p.m.
Stated taking away a tobacco licenses is killing businesses; stated his father's ability to
pays for his college will be impacted: Didar Bhullar, Alameda.
Expressed support for the buffer zones; urged support of health over profit: Shea
Overstreet, Alameda.
Expressed support for the flavored tobacco ban and concern for small businesses;
suggested starting January 1, 2020: Michael McDonough, Chamber of Commerce.
Stated the issue comes down to money; expressed support: John F. Sykes, Alameda.
Stated taking away tobacco licenses will not solve the problem; suggested businesses
be given time to sell: Anil Pandey, Alameda.
Stated no one will lose their license; stated new owners purchasing businesses will be
aware: Lizzy Velton, American Heart Association.
Outlined cities that have adopted similar measures; stated local measures are needed:
Philip Gardner, Alameda.
Stated city governments have reduced tobacco use; expressed sympathy for
merchants: Serena Chen, Alameda.
Stated tobacco companies cannot advertise, so marketing occurs in stores: Holly
Schneider, Alameda County Public Health Department (ACPHD).
Expressed support for changing the guidelines to door to door, exempting certain stores
and meeting with businesses: Raed Abdulah, Alameda.
Expressed concern for businesses: Robert Todd, Alameda.
Discussed marketing tactics of tobacco companies: Irene Nikka, American Cancer
Society Cancer Action Network.
Stated the ordinance has a big flaw; people selling stores will be impacted: Ann Sekhon,
Alameda.
Discussed his business: Shapoor Zazai, Alameda.
Stated small businesses will be impacted; urged reconsideration; suggested the
effective date change to 2020: Theresa James, Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 27, 2018
5",CityCouncil/2018-11-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-12-05,11,"***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 8:55 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:11 p.m.
***
(17-733) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda
Municipal Code by Repealing Section 30-5.15 (Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and
Cultivation) in Its Entirety and Adding a New Section 30-10 (Cannabis) to Conditionally
Permit Specific Types of Cannabis Businesses in Certain Zoning Districts. Introduced.
The Community Development Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired how the one mile is measured for the one mile
separation.
The Community Development Director responded path of travel.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether path of travel is the same as door to door.
The Community Development Director responded stated path of travel is defined in the
ordinance.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the one mile is door to door.
The City Manager responded the one mile is door to door.
The Assistant City Attorney noted the language reads door to door.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would like the language to be consistent.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the language is written anywhere.
The Community Development Director responded the language is in the regulatory
ordinance that has been adopted; continued the presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether there are any changes from the Planning Board.
The Community Development Director responded the Planning Board did not make any
changes to the proposed zones; continued the presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how is compliance of a personal cultivation area
determined according to Building, Fire and Safety Codes.
The Community Development Director responded Code Enforcement operates on a
complaint based system.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
11
December 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-12-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-15,7,"***
Mayor Spencer left the dais at 8:43 p.m. and returned at 8:44 p.m.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry regarding timeframe, the Chief
Operations Officer - Alameda Point stated given the complexity, 18 months is realistic;
building consensus takes time and effort; other transportation efforts will not stop;
learning and integrating efforts will continue; the City is already coordinating efforts and
working in partnership with AC Transit to use funds from new developments to restore
bus lines; there is a Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Grant to implement
the Alameda Point TDM strategy; some recommendations are already germane to the
program.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the intra-island shuttle system should be broadened;
understanding vulnerabilities and that Alameda is constrained by roadways on and off
the island is important; he would like a risk assessment for alternatives in the event of a
major earthquake.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding cost and funding, the Chief
Operations Officer - Alameda Point stated the cost could range; the RFP requests
budget and cost saving strategies up front.
Mayor Spencer stated $200,000 will come from the General Fund, inquired where the
other $50,000 to 100,000 would come from.
The Chief Operations Officer - Alameda Point responded the other funds would come
from Public Works dedicated funds, Base Reuse, and lease revenue funds.
Councilmember Oddie stated Council wants to know more funds will not be requested
from the General Fund.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would expect a consultant to inform the City that a bus
system connecting Alameda Point to mass transit, such as BART and the ferries, is
necessary; inquired when such a plan would be implemented.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
September 19, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-15.pdf
PlanningBoard,2017-01-23,15,"*None*
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Köster adjourned the meeting at 11:13pm.
Approved Minutes
Page 15 of 15
Planning Board Meeting
January 23, 2017",PlanningBoard/2017-01-23.pdf
PlanningBoard,2021-07-26,16,"*Prescient Teague reminded him to stay on topic and told him to bring up these issues in
the Oral Communication section.
Mike Van Dine thought it was a beautiful design but felt that the designer had wasted an
opportunity to embrace the history of the building.
Lis Cox wanted to know what area of the building the homeless would be welcomed into
the building to use the resource center on an appointment basis. She also wanted to know
if there would be a screening area for the public who did not have an appointment.
Harvey Rosenthal, a neighbor, said he had received no notification of this Design Review
meeting and thought that was unfortunate. He then discussed how the nature of the
program had changed over time. He wanted to know more about how the homeless would
be homed.
Scott Hamilton thought it was a beautiful building but it did not match the neighborhood or
the history of Alameda. He also thought that the designer could have done more to honor
the original history of the building and the Merchant Marines.
President Teague, before closing public comments, asked Celena Chen, City Attorney's
Office, and Staff Counsel, if public notice for this Design Review had been sent out and
how far was it noticed.
Counsel Chen deferred to the staff for comment on the public noticing of this item.
Staff Member Dong answered that public notice was sent out to all properties within 300
feet of the project site.
President Teague made a last call for public speakers and asked if the board wanted to
hear from Ms. Reid a second time.
Board Member Curtis said why not since it was a public hearing and others agreed.
Carmen Reid thanked the board for the opportunity to talk. She addressed that there was
a
violation of public access, the Zoom link for tonight's meeting was broken. She wanted
the board to know that the public had not been able to fully access this meeting. In regards
to the Design Review, she discussed the goals for the 2040 General Plan, CC-18 ""Building
Renovation and Reuse"" talked about reusing existing buildings.
President Teague thanked her for only discussing the design. He then closed the public
comments and opened board discussion and potential action. He also asked the staff to
confirm that the meeting ID that was published matched the meeting ID. He wanted to
ensure that this was a properly accessible meeting.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 16 of 21
July 26, 2021",PlanningBoard/2021-07-26.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2005-01-13,3,"-
During deliberations the Commission will make the distinction between protecting
park property and keeping it as an integral part of the community.
-
Service issues to the community.
-
Do not discount size or anything else in terms of evaluating what benefits non-park
and recreation programs in the neighborhood. Neighborhoods should not be
deprived of potential services just because of park size.
Chair Ingram asked Mr. Phillips if he knew that Alameda is way underserved as far park
acreage in the community, more so than a lot of other cities. Mr. Philips stated that he is
very well aware.
Chair Ingram asked Mr. Phillips the status of rebuilding the Boys and Girls Club. Mr.
Phillips stated that they have prepared a proposal for the School District. Everything
seems acceptable with the School District. The proposal needs to go before the School
Board.
B.
Discussion and Selection of Joint Meeting Dates with City Council -
(Discussion/Action Item)
RSM Lillard stated that the staff and City Clerk are still trying to confirm a date for the Joint
Meeting with Council.
C.
Discussion of Annual Commission Goals, Objectives, and Accomplishments
Including Park Master Plan - (Discussion/Action Item)
Chair Ingram stated that he would like to have the list of Goals, Objectives, and
Accomplishments for the Joint Meeting with Council.
Suggested list of accomplishments were:
-
Marina Waterfront Park
-
DeWitt Officers' Club has been fully utilized. Is booked six months to one year in
advance.
-
Small Dog Park - Development of Small Dog Park Website/installation of bulletin
board.
-
Dog Park Drainage
-
Creation of Sport Advisory Committee
-
Use of Coast Guard park field easing shortage of athletic fields.
-
Collaborated with Friends of Franklin Park for funding additional improvements to
Franklin Park Playground Renovation.
-
Design and Renovation of Littlejohn and McKinley Park Play Areas as well as the
Alameda Point Multi-Purpose Field.
-
Initiated discussion with the Peralta Community College District (PCCD) for use of
the soccer field and track at the College of Alameda.
3
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
Minutes
Thursday, January 13, 2005
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service",RecreationandParkCommission/2005-01-13.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2021-03-11,37,"-
Full Name
Zip code
Signature
LilyLeung
94502
Jackie Cungug
COT seang
fly
94502
geta
Barbara Besions
94502
Chanya Bartel
bysic14@ad
Belisped
94601
chuangsakulde
Byahae lir
Karis Kim
94582
canskim207@gmail.com
22
Trinity Zhang
94502
trinityzhancy@live.com
B
Wesley Omi
94502
Wesley so 1106e
Louisa Chew
buisashewe
egm
Welfa
94502
Marie Fung
94502
mfungusl eyahooon
Marie Favor
Vicki Majhor
94501
rpmremeant.com
Uniki mahn
Randy Friedman
94502
randy-fnedman
Rob Currier
94.500
citagehotmail.com
Randy Freedman
Refurtar
Tommy Wong
94502
oh =tom
Elizabeth Becht
94501
Nancy Gordon
94501
revn)o
Santh
994542
bloss@gmail.com
oriko
94502
sto20200@yahoo.com
off blossack
lawa Sumrall
94501
msmitchrolattnet
summall
Laura
Mitchell Sumt
94501
Mitchcoblue@attric
Mondall
summal
94501
L",RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2005-09-15,2,"-
Letter from Miriam Sundheim, Alameda resident, regarding construction of cell
phone towers at Krusi Park.
-
E-Mail from Carol Wallace regarding construction of cell phone towers at Krusi Park.
5.
NEW BUSINESS
A.
Washington Park Recreation Building Conceptual Drawing -
(Discussion/Action Item)
AD Lillard provided to the Commission the conceptual drawing for the new recreation
Building at Washington Park. Several years ago the old recreation building burned down
and a temporary building was installed. The temporary building has deteriorated and we
are unable to run programs at the park.
The new building will be funded with Prop 40 monies and will be a modular building. This is
the first modular building to be built in the City.
M/S/C
REEVES/OLIVER
(approved)
""That the conceptual drawing for the new modular building at Washington Park be
accepted.""
Approved (5):
Ingram, Johnson, Kahuanui, Oliver, Reeves
B.
Request to Install Cingular Cell Tower in Krusi Park at the Tennis Courts -
(Discussion/Action Item)
Bruce Knopf, Redevelopment Manager, presented to the Commission plans for installing a
Cingular Cell Tower in Krusi Park at the tennis courts.
Approximately two years ago the tennis court lights on the left side of the court (facing the
tennis courts from Otis Dr.) were replaced with new lights that have cell towers inside the
new light poles. With this proposal, the three old tennis court lights on the right side of the
tennis courts would also be replaced with additional cell towers inside the new light poles.
Cingular is making this new proposal.
Mr. Knopf provided the Commission with a map of Alameda showing other cell tower sites
(e.g., Alameda Hospital, top of former Alameda Drug, College of Alameda, Christ Episcopal
Church, Wood Middle School, Washington School, etc.) located in Alameda. There are a
lot of other places that do not go through the process that the City does for City owned
property and do not go through the City-wide public notification process that the City uses.
The City has collected approximately $91,000 over the last two years from the current Krusi
Park cell tower carrier. An initial deposit of $25,000 went to the Recreation and Park
Department with an additional half of the monthly lease revenues also going to the
Department.
2
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
Minutes
Thursday, September 15, 2005
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service",RecreationandParkCommission/2005-09-15.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2005-01-13,4,"-
Made significant progress in cost recovery.
7.
REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK
DIRECTOR
A.
Park Division
Alameda Point Gymnasium: Community use of the gymnasium by Alameda sponsored
organizations has increased 20 percent this year. Beginning in January, Encinal High
School and St. Joseph Notre Dame High School will share court time after school for
basketball practices through March. FUTSAL (indoor soccer) will begin its 5th season at
the gym commencing in January. Approximately 40 teams participate in this league. All
games are scheduled on weekends and are open to the public.
Also, the Golden State Warriors will be holding a basketball camp at the gymnasium from
December 20-23, for boys and girls between the ages of 8-16. The focus of this camp is
individual skill development, learning proper fundamental skills, and development of a
healthy team attitude. This camp will also feature appearances by current and former
Warriors players and coaches.
Franklin Park: Friends of Franklin Park purchased three beautiful Victorian picnic tables
with benches which have been installed. The Park Division staff worked with the
Recreation Division and Friends of Franklin Park to find the best location for the tables.
Also, a new driveway was installed at the entrance to Franklin Park. This work has
enhanced the appearance as well as the safety of the location.
Veteran's Building: Meetings are continuing between a local Veteran's Committee and
City staff to develop plans to renovate the kitchen. Staff has been informed by the
Alameda County Health Department that a commercial kitchen will be required and an
onsite meeting with the Health Department is scheduled for Thursday, December 16. This
project will be financed by the Veteran's Committee, who plan to hold fundraising events
and obtain donations from local businesses.
Leydecker Playground Renovation: A Request for Proposal (RFP) for the relocation of
the Leydecker Playground was recently completed and is being reviewed. This project will
include relocating the existing playground to the volleyball court area and removal of the old
play equipment once the project is completed. This project will be funded by the 2002
Resources Bond Act-Per Capita Block Grant (Proposition 40) and is expected to be
completed by May 2005.
Alameda Point Multi-Purpose Field: The Public Works Engineering Department has
hired a new contractor to finish the park. The Park is still under construction and
Engineering is working hard to have the new contractor complete the project. The park is
already looking better and should be ready for limited baseball use in March 2005.
4
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
Minutes
Thursday, January 13, 2005
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service",RecreationandParkCommission/2005-01-13.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2008-11-13,2,"-
October 9, 2008 Recreation and Park Commission Meeting
M/S/C
KAHUANUI/MARIANI
(approved)
""That the October 9, 2008 Recreation and Park Commission Meeting Minutes be
approved.""
Approved (4):
Brown, Kahuanui, Mariani, Sonneman
Abstention (2):
Cooper, Restagno
Absent (1):
Ogden
4.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA
(Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the
Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda.)
None.
5.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
6.
NEW BUSINESS
None.
7.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A.
Review and Discussion of Drought Field Use Policy - (Discussion/Action
Item)
Director Lillard and PM McDonald provided an update on the conditions of the fields during
the
drought restriction. Staff is recommending that the Drought Field Use Policy stay in
effect until February 2009 when EBMUD will have their water readings.
PM McDonald stated that when the restrictions are lifted, we need to be careful because
the requests from outside leagues to use our fields have drastically increased.
Outside/non-resident single groups are not as much of a concern as the outside/non-
resident league field users/requests.
M/S/C
SONNEMAN/MARIANI
(approved)
""That the Drought Field Use Policy continues until February 2009. In February 2009
the policy will be reviewed again.""
Approved (6):
Restagno, Brown, Cooper, Kahuanui, Mariani, Sonneman
Absent (1):
Ogden
- 2 -
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg
Minutes - Thursday, November 13, 2008",RecreationandParkCommission/2008-11-13.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-06-19,7,"- 1.
(18-370) Public Hearing to Establish the Proposition 4 (Appropriations) Limit for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2018-19 and Resolution No. 15403, ""Establishing the Appropriations Limit for
FY 2018-19.' Adopted.
The Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(18-371) Public Hearing to Consider Collection of Delinquent Integrated Waste
Management Accounts Via the Property Tax Bills.
The Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer inquired whether there has been any contact from
owners regarding their ability to pay, to which the Finance Director responded in the
negative.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft noted the list seems shorter than in previous years.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(18-372) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15404, ""Approving the Engineer's
Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering the Levy of Assessments,
Maintenance Assessment District 01-1 (Marina Cove). Adopted.
The Public Works Coordinator gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Vella moved adoption of the resolution
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
June 19, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-07-18,35,"- 1.
Mayor Spencer called a recess to hold the joint meeting at 2:48 a.m. and reconvened
the meeting at 2:49 a.m.
The City Attorney requested Council to clarify the action taken on the Public Hearing;
stated the ordinance was adopted with the amendment; the amendment language is
added to the Master Plan as a condition; the ordinance adopts the Master Plan
amendment but the language should be in the Master Plan itself.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of clarifying the action taken.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese Oddie and Vella - 4. Noes: Mayor Spencer -
1.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(17-486) The City Manager stated the results from the Registrar of Voters (ROV)
verified 129.88% valid signatures on the referendum; Council's would have the choice
to either rescind Ordinance No. 3180 or place the ordinance on the ballot for the voters
to decide.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(17-487) Brian McGuire, Alameda, expressed concerns for the lengthy Council
meetings.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(17-488) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations to the Commission on Disability Issues,
Historical Advisory Board, Planning Board and Public Art Commission.
Mayor Spencer nominated Pat Lamborn and Alan Teague for appointment to the
Planning Board.
ADJOURNMENT
(17-489) There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at
2:53 a.m. in memory of Florence Hoffman.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
July 18, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-11-01,4,"- 5.
(*11-528) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,236,355.23.
(*11-529) Recommendation to Accept the Annual Investment Report for Fiscal Year
2010-2011. Accepted.
(*11-530) Recommendation to Approve a One-Year Contract with ECS Imaging, Inc. in
the Amount Not to Exceed $32,859 for Laserfiche Services and Maintenance. Accepted.
(*11-531) Resolution No. 14632, ""Approving the Third Amended and Restated Northern
California Power Agency Metered Subsystem Aggregator Agreement."" Adopted.
(*11-532) Resolution No. 14633, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Submit an Application
to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of $2.5 Million in
Funding from the 2012 Regional Transportation Improvement Program for the
Broadway/Jacksor Project and to Execute All Necessary Documents."" Adopted.
(*11-533) Resolution No. 14634, ""Approving Final Parcel Map No. 10006 (2601-2901
Harbor Bay Parkway."" Adopted.
(*11-534) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of Lease of Real Property
Located at 1525 Bay Street Between City, as Lessor, and Karen Zimmerman and
Kenneth Edgerly, as Lessee, for Operation of ABC Preschool. Introduced.
Note: Vice Mayor Bonta recused himself from voting on the item.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(11-535) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the City of Alameda Municipal Code by
Repealing Section 24-5 (Smoking Control) of Section XXIV (Public Health) and By
Adding Section 24-11, (Smoking Prohibitions in Places of Employment and Public
Unenclosed Places), and Section 24-12 (Smoking Prohibitions in Multi-Use Housing).
Introduced.
The Senior Management Analyst gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Johnson moved approval of limiting public speaker comments to two
minutes.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Proponents: Amanda Khoo, Youth Advisory Commission (YAC) (submitted comments);
Danielle McGuinness, YAC; Carrie Huang, YAC (submitted comments); Jeanette Mei,
Alameda; Amy Raffle, Alameda (submitted comments); Michael John Torrey, Alameda;
Beth Hoch, Alameda; Gayle Thomas, Alameda; Joyce Carol, Alameda; Janice Louie,
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
November 1, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-11-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-05-20,7,"- 5.
Thanked the Council for approving the MOU: Bill Garvine, EUPA.
(14-209) Resolution No. 14925, ""Approving a Compensation Plan Between Alameda
Municipal Power Unrepresented Management Employees (UME) and the City of
Alameda for the Period Commencing February 23, 2014, and Ending December 26,
2015.' Adopted.
The Administrative Services Director gave a brief presentation.
Stated AMP's strategic plan emphasized the need to attract and retain employees;
thanked Council and staff for support; urged approval: Doug Draeger, UME.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
- 5.
(14-210) Recommendation to Approve City-wide Bench Marks and Performance
Measures.
The City Manager and Assistant City Manager gave a brief presentation.
The Assistant City Manager clarified the two exhibits; stated Exhbit 1 is the
Performance Measures presented to the Council in December which includes
comments from the Council and the community; Exhibit 2 is the Performance Measures
proposed for Council approval tonight.
Mayor Gilmore inquired how the number of website visits and the number of website
complaints are related.
The Assistant City Manager responded the number of website visits provides analytic
data regarding whether information on the website is being presented in a useful way;
stated the complaints are broad and are tracked differently.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification on the Public Works performance
measure ""percent of public service requests responded to in one business day"".
The Public Works Administrative Services Manager responded the measure
encompasses many different requests including reports of potholes, garbage on the
street, repairs needed; stated the focus is providing a substantive response and
acknowledgement to the requestor; the measure tracks acknowledging the requests,
not when they are remedied.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 20, 2014",CityCouncil/2014-05-20.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2017-02-23,8,"- County Transportation
Commission",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2017-02-23.pdf
TransportationCommission,2014-09-24,6,"- Ferry terminal access
- I-880/Broadway/Jackson project
- AC Transit to present Alameda Service Plan
- BART shuttle services
7.
Announcements/ Public Comments
Staff Payne provided a summary about the Transportation Commission's Ferry Access
Improvement subcommittee, which consists of Commissioner Bellows, Commissioner Bertken,
and Commissioner Schatmeier. She also explained that they met with the Water Emergency
Transportation Authority (WETA), Lucy Gigli of Bike Walk Alameda, AC Transit
representatives, Doug Biggs of Alameda Point Collaborative and Amy Wooldridge, Alameda
Recreation and Parks Department Director. They will reconvene in November when they have
more details.
Commissioner Schatmeier replied that there was great consensus on the goals that were to be
achieved. Moreover, he felt that they recognized ridership increases, associated issues with
increased ridership and parking as main issues.
Jon Spangler stated that the back route into the Frank Otis Elementary School Campus near
Court Street contains an old sign with no reflectors on the diamond yellow sign. Thus, motorists
drive rapidly down the street to drop students off on time. He also said if one were to make
another right turn there was a big drop off zone and that corner needed work. Additionally, he
stated that there was a fence around the facility that did little to protect parked bikes. Ultimately,
he would like Public Works to look at the street and the adjoining intersection to see if safety
could be improved.
Jim Strehlow stated that the intersection of Fernside Boulevard and Versailles Avenue contained
a pedestrian blinking light across Fernside Boulevard, which was working wonderfully. He saw
people obeying the traffic control and he thanked the City for the newly tarred roadway along
Buena Vista Avenue near the Edison Elementary School.
8.
Adjournment
8:30 pm
Page 6 of 6",TransportationCommission/2014-09-24.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2005-02-10,5,"- Football
$ 75/Season (additional $10 Non-Resident Fee)
- Basketball
$ 65/Season (additional $10 Non-Resident Fee)
- Soccer
$ 60/Season (additional $10 Non-Resident Fee)
6.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A.
Continued Discussion and Consideration of Request from Mayor and City
Council to Develop a Park Use Policy - (Discussion Item)
RSM Lillard reviewed the draft proposal that was included in the Commission packet.
Commissioner Johnson commented that the document was very well done and addressed
the items that the Commission had identified. Commissioner Ingram stated that the
document was good but added that he wanted to make sure that the finished product
included wording similar to #4 in the City of Seattle example regarding recovery of
associated costs. RSM Lillard agreed to incorporate the item and to bring the next revision
back to the Commission in April.
B.
Discussion and Selection of Joint Meeting Dates with City Council -
(Discussion/Action Item)
RSM Lillard informed the Commission that the City Clerk's Office had contacted staff with
regard to scheduling the Annual Joint Meeting with Council. It was originally proposed to
meet on a Wednesday evening in March, but the Council is unable to attend any of those
dates. The Clerk's office is now attempting to schedule a date in April.
C.
Discussion of Annual Commission Goals, Objectives, and Accomplishments
Including Park Master Plan - (Discussion/Action Item)
RSM Lillard reviewed the draft copy of the Commission Goals and Objectives with the
Commission. After discussion the following items were included under Accomplishments
and Goals:
Accomplishments
Completion of the Marina Water Front Park
Renaming of the former Officers' Club in honor of former Vice-Mayor Albert H. Dewitt
Approval of the Public Art pieces for the Library Project
Inclusion of the Water Station in the Drainage Project at the Dog Park
Opened discussions for use of Alameda Point fields by local youth organizations
Continue growth towards increasing cost recovery through introduction of new
Programs
Goals
Note that SB2404 related to equality for girls and women's sports.
7.
REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK
DIRECTOR
5
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
Minutes
Thursday, February 10, 2005
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service",RecreationandParkCommission/2005-02-10.pdf
TransportationCommission,2013-04-24,6,"- Wednesday, May 22 public hearing tentative date
Potential Future Meeting Agenda Items
-
Draft Regional Transit Access Study (RTAS): Overview of Study Corridors, Transit
Demand, and Services
-
Residential Appeal of Public Works Staff's Decision to Not Install Street Sweeping
Signs on La Jolla Drive
- Traffic Control and Contingency Plan during Construction for I-880/29th Avenue/23rd
Avenue Interchange Improvement Project in Oakland: Public Information Program and
Transit Impacts
- Bikes on BART - Second pilot study by BART reviewing bicycle restrictions
- Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant Application(s)
- Robert Davey Jr. at Channing Drive Traffic Calming - Phase II
- AC Transit Line 51A Performance Initiative Grant
7.
Announcements/ Public Comments
Jon Spangler, Alameda resident and a League of American Cycling Instructor, reported on the
BART Bike Pilot 2.0 that occurred March 18-22. He said the results worked very well and the
first three trains were reserved for non-bike passengers. When he was reviewing the pilot, he
talked with bicyclists at the Fruitvale BART Station that took their bikes to work and they had no
problems finding space. He also mentioned that BART has a new tool that would allow
passengers to see how crowded the cars are. The tool could be found on their website. Also, the
BART Board is scheduled to review the staff evaluations. Robert Raburn is Alameda's
representative on the BART Board.
Jim Strehlow explained that he is a member of Bike Walk Alameda. Thursday, May 9 is Bike to
Work Day. There will be energizer stations at Bay Farm Bridge, Park Street at Peet's Coffee and
College of Alameda beginning at 6:30 a.m. for commuters going to work.
Commissioner Vargas thanked Staff Payne for sending the Commissioners the bike month
activities in Alameda.
John Urgo, AC Transit Staff Liaison, introduced himself.
Commissioner Schatmeier requested an update of the AC Transit Line OX, and would speak with
John Urgo after the meeting or in the future.
8.
Adjournment
8:10 pm
Page 6 of 6",TransportationCommission/2013-04-24.pdf
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2005-10-05,2,"- a representative from AAPS requested a reuse study be included in the PDC for the historic
buildings
- a representative from the APC expressed their interest in continuing to be involved in the
development plan process
-
a representative from Operation Dignity expressed concerns about the Board accepting the
PDC in draft form
- representatives from HOMES and the Sierra Club expressed their appreciation and support
with the progress of the PDC compared to other developments.
Member Matarrese thanked the staff for providing the input and revisions. He agreed with the
speaker who mentioned that the Board should not approve a draft document; and rather, approve a
final document. He would like to see more information on a green standards plan and a plan for
sustainable communities and expressed concern about the word ""feasibility study"", afraid it might be
dismissed because it does not ""comply"" with the PDC. He further stated that the PDC document is
still conceptual. Members Gilmore and Daysog agreed with Member Matarrese's statements.
Member Daysog would like to see more information on the fiscal implications of the PDC, especially
on Phase II and Phase III.
Member deHaan reminded folks that there was a community reuse plan prior to this PDC, which
included the development of commercial and industrial spaces to maximize transportation.
Member Matarrese motioned for Council to direct staff to simulate the comments that were made
and produce a final document for approval. He requested the document be in red-line/strikeout
format so that revisions are clearly seen in the document.
City Manager, Debra Kurita, recommended that the draft revisions be text-only to save cost. It was
agreed by all Boardmembers to just bring back the document at the regular ARRA Board meeting in
November; there was no need to make a motion for this action.
Steven Proud, Alameda Point Project Manager, clarified some points to the Board. He stated that the
PDC is a component of the conditional acquisition agreement (CAA) that we have with APCP. Other
components include getting a conveyance agreement structure set forward with the Navy and then the
completion of the preliminary development concept. Based on the timing with regards to meeting
with the Navy, Mr. Proud recommended the revised document be brought back at the December
meeting, instead of November. All Boardmembers accepted this recommendation.
4.
ORAL REPORTS
4-A. Oral report from Member Matarrese, RAB representative.
There was no report, as Member Matarrese stated the meeting was the following day.
5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)
Bill Smith spoke about various topics.
2",AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-10-05.pdf
PublicArtCommission,2006-06-07,2,"-NONE
5.
New Business
-NONE
6.
Old Business
A. Alameda Towne Centre
The Commission discussed conformity issues with regard to the Conditions of
Approval. It was also confirmed that the artwork's identification plaque include
the City's logo, as required by the Public Art Ordinance. Concern regarding
maintenance of the artwork and public access (with regard to ADA) was also
addressed.
The Commission considered the success of the applicant's proposed interpretive
historic panels for the Towne Centre in meeting the Ordinance's criteria. After a
thorough discussion of the proposal, the Commission confirmed the interpretive
panels' success in meeting the criteria. In addition, C Huston stated the desire
for the piece to include a plaque that identified the artist and included a statement
about him, including his photograph.
The Commission then considered the success of the applicant's proposed Brad
Rude sculpture for the Towne Centre in meeting the Ordinance's criteria. The
sculpture's color, size, scale, and artistic merit were subjectively evaluated in
addition to its adherence to the Ordinance's criteria. The Commission agreed the
sculpture was more pleasing as opposed to provocative and would complement
the color scheme and surrounding environment of the Towne Centre.
M/S/C
Huston/Lee
(approved)
""That the public art proposal for the Alameda Towne Centre by the
applicant, Harsch Investment Properties, consisting of the interpretive
panels by John Larsen and the sculpture by Brad Rude meets the approval
criteria of the City's Public Art Ordinance.""
Approved (4) - Huston, Lee, Rosenberg, Wolfe
Absent (1) - Cervantes
7.
Subcommittee Reports
CM Rosenberg reported that the subcommittee would review proposals for the
parking garage wall media project on June 26, 2006 and report back to the
Commission at a later date with a recommendation.
PAC Meeting Minutes
2
June 7, 2006",PublicArtCommission/2006-06-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-06-01,6,".reasonable improvements subject to Planning Board approval. "" in order to provide
limitations on any potential future reimbursement costs.
Councilmember Daysog inquired the risks associated with releasing the information
contained in the confidential memorandum.
The City Attorney responded staff is sharing the risks with Council; stated the
information is generally for Council to make decisions and determinations; any time
attorney-client privileged information is released, there is the risk of providing
information to outside entities wishing to bring potential litigation to the City; Council is
not being asked to make a determination about whether Charter Section 22-12 applies;
Council may not need to address said question in deciding whether or not to enter into
the lease.
Discussed her experience as a real estate agent and resident in Alameda; urged
Council to support the matter; stated the Golf Course is an asset to the community;
urged Council approve Greenway Golf's request; stated the derelict tower reflects
poorly on Corica Park and the City and is an eyesore; the proposed project would
revitalize the neighborhood and attract visitors: Catherine Bierworth, Alameda.
Stated the beautification project will benefit patrons, neighbors, and the community at-
large; Greenway Golf wants to improve the fire tower space in order to create an
entrance which represents the evolution of Corica Park over the years; the project will
foster a sense of civic pride and be a draw for citizens; the project will give the right first
impression; the Fire supports the project; the project is an opportunity for collaboration
and is designed for inclusivity; the proposed mural is intended to honor first responders;
Greenway Golf has collected over 1,000 signatures in support for the proposed
renovation and has worked with staff to address Council's valid concerns; urged Council
to support the second lease amendment: Umesh Patel, Greenway Golf.
Stated the ownership of Greenway Golf has high integrity; the Golf Course design has
been nationally recognized; urged Council to consider the improvements already made
to the Golf Course; stated the project will be great for the community: Patrick Harris,
Alameda.
Stated the fire tower is a nice landmark; expressed support for Greenway Golf's efforts
to enhance the appeal of Island Drive; urged Council to approve the staff
recommendation: Mark Swartz, Alameda.
Stated the proposed improvements will be great for the community, City, and Golf
Course; many customers have expressed support for the project: Shawn Shelby,
Alameda Golfworks.
Stated Alameda Chamber of Commerce is working on a ""Visit Alameda"" project in
partnership with the City; Corica Park Golf Course is one of the main attractions; the
Golf Course is important for visitors, is one of the top courses in California and is
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 1, 2021
5",CityCouncil/2021-06-01.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2014-01-09,9,"0
C
Gazebo
Restrooms
Picnio
Park Entry
60 parking spaces
40 parking
spaces
Great Lawn
Nitdoor Classroom
Main Plaza
Landscape
Natural Playground
BMX Bike Park
Pavilion
Picnio
5
0
to
Ctemel nt Plaza
Train
Depot
Maintenance
Yard
Masterplan Diagram
ALAMEDA JEAN SWEENEY OPEN SPACE PARK
5",RecreationandParkCommission/2014-01-09.pdf
PensionBoard,2015-04-27,1,"00
the
The
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE
PENSION BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
HELD 4:30 P.M., APRIL 27, 2015
ALAMEDA CITY HALL
2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE, ALAMEDA
CONFERENCE ROOM 391
1.
The meeting was called to order by Chair Trish Herrera Spencer at 4:35 p.m.
2.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Trustees: Trish Herrera Spencer, William Soderlund, Nancy Elzig, and
Jill Kovacs. Absent: Bruce Edwards
Staff: Elena Adair, Finance Director; Brad Farmer, Acting Financial Services
Manager, and Lelia Faapouli, Human Resources.
3.
MINUTES:
The minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 26, 2015 was moved for approval
by Member Soderlund and seconded by Member Elzig. Passed 4-0.
4.
AGENDA ITEMS:
4-A. Pension Payroll and Financial Reports - Quarter Ending March 31, 2015
and City of Alameda Police & Fire Pension Funds Financial Reports for the
Period Ending March 31, 2015 were accepted as presented and moved for
approval by Member Soderlund and seconded by Member Elzig. Passed 4-0.
Finance Director Adair brought up a question from the auditors: Do we need to
have a separate annual financial report for the Pension Funds? The Pension
Ordinance does not say we need to have separately audited financial statements
for 1079 and 1082 Pensioners. The Ordinance requires Finance to provide the
Board with a report as we are doing now, but does not ask for a separate annual
financial report. This raises the question, should we continue to have auditors
issue a separate report for these particular Pension plans or can we stop these
reports, which cost the City $10,000. Acting Financial Services Manager Farmer",PensionBoard/2015-04-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2006-11-13,8,"0073 which include redevelopment of the southeast corner of the center (Shoreline area), a
new approximately 147,000 square foot retail structure (Target), a three level parking
garage, new signage and various other improvements. The purpose of this workshop is for
discussion purposes only. No action to approve or deny the project will occur at this
meeting.
Item 8-B was heard before Item 8-A.
Mr. Garrison requested a recess to address a technical issue.
President Lynch called for a ten-minute recess.
Mr. Garrison summarized the staff report and displayed a PowerPoint presentation.
President Lynch noted that on the illustrated plan, a parcel was identified as a gas station at the
intersection at Otis Drive. He suggested that the wording be changed to ""proposed gas station.""
Mr. Randy Kite, Harsch Investment Properties, displayed a PowerPoint presentation to describe the
actions in Items 8-A and 8-B and the plans for the site. He noted that they were 30% into the
construction, and that substantial redevelopment would be accomplished in 2007.
Mr. Jan Taylor, project architect, described in detail the building design elements of this redesign
and remodel project. He displayed a PowerPoint presentation to illustrate the proposed changes,
including vehicle and public transportation circulation
Vice President Cook requested visuals of buildings 800 and 900. Mr. Garrison noted that he could
look for some. Mr. Taylor noted that the loading dock for building 800 would be removed and
tucked into the building. He noted that the metal arcade would be pulled off, and wood trellises and
two bump outs would be added to frame the entrance. He noted that building 900 (the former
Mervyn's) would be examined in the future for remodeling, and plans had not yet been produced.
The public hearing was opened.
President Lynch noted that more than five speaker slips had been received.
M/S Cunningham/Kohlstrand and unanimous to limit the speakers' time to three minutes.
AYES - 5 (Mariani, McNamara absent); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0
The public hearing was opened.
Ms. Claire Risley expressed concern the Planning Department has recommended approval of items
that had been specifically disapproved by the Planning Board. She believed that Planning Board
Resolution 03-40 specifically disapproved Phases 3, 4-B and later phases. Buildings 400 and 500
were included in Phase 4-B, and she believed that resolution did not allow for this phase. She
believed that a new Environmental Impact Report and traffic study, new Planned Development
Planning Board Minutes
Page 8
November 13, 2006",PlanningBoard/2006-11-13.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-07-09,4,"012 and UP06-0013; - Applicant: Safeway, Inc. 2234 Otis Drive (adjacent
Alameda Towne Centre) (DG). The applicant requests approval of Planned
Development Amendment, Major Design Review and Use Permits allowing the
demolition of an existing bank building and redevelopment of the property with a
gas station. The project includes three covered pump islands, each containing three
pumps, for a total of eighteen pumping stations. Fuel will be stored in three 20,0000
gallon underground storage tanks. In addition to the approximately 7,500 square-foot
canopy covering the gasoline pumping facilities, the project includes an
approximately 625 square-foot building, housing the cashier's desk, restrooms and
retail sales of convenience items. The applicant is proposing twenty-four hour
operations and the sale of beer and wine. An Initial Study / Mitigated Negative
Declaration has been prepared for this project. Mitigation measures have been
identified that will reduce potentially significant impacts to a less than significant
level. The site is located within a, Central Business District with Planned
Development overlay Zoning District (C-2-PD). (Continued from the meeting of
June 25, 2007.)
Mr. Garrison presented the staff report and recommended approval of this item.
The public hearing was opened.
Dan Goldwin, project architect, noted that on June 23, 2007, the Board requested that the
number of pumps be reduced. He noted that they accomplished their goal of keeping the
driveway openings to less than 70 feet, and that they were now 62 feet.
In response to an inquiry by Board member Mariani regarding peak hours, Mr. Thomas
replied that Condition 14 stated that they would be 7:00-9:00 a.m. and 4:00-6:00 p.m. on
weekdays. On weekends, peak hours would be 11:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m. No fuel trucks
would be allowed to make deliveries between those hours.
Dorothy Reid spoke in opposition to this project, and noted that from the beginning of the
project, she believed this would be the worst possible location for this gas station. She
noted that it backed up into a very narrow roadway, and that traffic jams were already
occurring with the center being 50% leased. She believed the gas station would be better
located in the corner of the center. She inquired how much room for error there was in the
truck turning space, and noted that she was very concerned about the two second left
turns. She inquired how the tanker truck could leave the center without if couldn't turn
into the gas station to get onto Otis Drive. She was also concerned about where the
Safeway.com trucks would be parked. She expressed concern about Mitigation 6 on page
8, which stated that the traffic light would be installed in 10 years. She realized that the
stoplight was included in the CIP, and that the 10-year period would give the City some
leeway, but she did not understand why a mitigation would take 10 years to install.
She requested clarification of Mitigation #7, which stated that the applicant will have Otis
Drive go right in and out if a traffic signal is installed. She understood that a traffic signal
must be installed, and inquired when that would occur. She believed that the five-year
monitoring period in Mitigation #8 was too short a period of time, and believed the
Page 4 of 11",PlanningBoard/2007-07-09.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2020-10-07,4,"05/10/2018
2018-1420-01
Permit Technician I
04/19/2018
2018-3000-01
Police Lieutenant - Promotional
04/30/2019
2019-4020-01
Public Works Maintenance Foreperson
02/20/2020
2020-2555-01
Service Lineworker
04/27/2018
2018-7765-01
4.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:
4-A-i. Activity Report - Period of December 1, 2019 through February 29, 2020.
FULL-TIME HIRES
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION
12/02/19
Finance
Accountant I
12/09/19
Finance
Senior Management Analyst
12/16/19
AMP
Electrical Engineer
12/23/19
AMP
Electrical Maintenance Technician
01/06/20
City Attorney
Deputy City Attorney Il
01/14/20
Public Works
Maintenance Worker Il
01/21/20
Police
Telephone Operator-Receptionist
01/27/20
Planning, Building, &
Combination Building Inspector
Transportation
02/10/20
AMP
Apprentice Lineworker X 3
02/10/20
AMP
Senior Account Manager
PROMOTIONS
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION
12/23/19
Planning, Building &
Senior Combination Building Inspector X 2
Transportation
01/04/20
Fire
Fire Captain
02/02/20
Police
Police Sergeant
02/16/20
Police
Senior Public Safety Dispatcher",CivilServiceBoard/2020-10-07.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2017-07-12,4,"06/13/2016
2016-18B
4-A-iv. LIST OF SPECIFICATIONS
Existing Classification Specification Revision:
-
None
New Classification Specifications:
- None
Member Brandt moved to approve Consent Calendar items 4-A-i, 4-A-ii, and 4-A-iii.
Motion was seconded by Vice President Malloy which was passed by a 3-0 vote.
5.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
5-A. Activity Report - Period of March 1, 2017 through May 31, 2017
FULL-TIME HIRES
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION
3/20/17
AMP
Energy Resources Analyst
3/21/17
Police
Police Officer (2)
3/21/17
Public Works
Associate Civil Engineer
4/17/17
Police
Animal Control Officer
5/01/17
Public Works
Program Specialist II
PROMOTIONS
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION
3/20/17
Community Development
Permit Tech II
3/20/17
Public Works
Public Works Superintendent
4/02/17
Information Technology
IT Systems Analyst
5/01/17
Base Reuse
Administrative Technician II
5/01/17
Public Works
PW Project Manager III
5/28/17
Fire
Fire Captain
5/28/17
Police
Police Sergeant
APPOINTED TO NEW POSITION
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION
4/16/17
AMP
Utility Construction Compliance Specialist
CERTIFIED TO CIVIL SERVICE (FROM CPM BACKFILL)",CivilServiceBoard/2017-07-12.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2012-10-10,8,"07/30/12
Public Works
Assistant Engineer
07/30/12
Library
Supervising Librarian
08/14/12
Police
Police Officers (3)
PROMOTIONS
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION
06/04/12
City Clerk
Assistant City Clerk
07/29/12
Fire
Administrative Technician Il (2)
08/26/12
Alameda Municipal Power
Senior Electrical Engineer
TRANSFERRED JOB CLASS PER CIVIL SERVICE ARTICLE IX
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION
07/01/12
Alameda Municipal Power
to Utility Energy Analyst
From Senior Management Analyst
DEMOTION TO FORMER POSITION
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION
07/01/12
Alameda Municipal Power
to Stock Clerk
From Apprentice Line Worker
07/02/12
Community Development
to Planner I
From Planner II (in lieu of lay off)
G:\Personnel\CSB\All Minutes/2012 Minutes/2012-10-10 CSB Minutes-FINAL.doc",CivilServiceBoard/2012-10-10.pdf
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2011-01-05,1,"1
UNAPPROVED
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
The meeting convened at 7:02 p.m. with Chair Gilmore presiding.
1.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Chair Marie Gilmore
Boardmember Lena Tam
Boardmember Doug deHaan
Boardmember Beverly Johnson
Vice Chair Rob Bonta
2.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(*11-001) Approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 1, 2010.
(*11-002) Approve a Waiver of License Fee for Michaan's Auctions for Use of Portions of
Building 20.
Member deHaan moved for approval of Item 2-A of the Consent Calendar. Member Tam
seconded the motion, which carried by voice vote - 4, Abstentions - 1 (Bonta).
Member deHaan moved for approval of Item 2-B of the Consent Calendar. Member Tam
seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or
adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.]
3.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
None.
4.
ORAL REPORTS
(11-003) Oral report from Member deHaan, Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) representative
- Highlights of December 2, 2010 Alameda Point RAB Meeting.
Member deHaan did not attend the December 2, 2010 RAB meeting and has no report.
Member deHaan will attend the next RAB meeting on January 6, 2011 and will provide a report
at the February ARRA meeting. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services will also
attend the January 6th RAB meeting.
5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)
There were no speakers.
6.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS
(11-004) Mayor Gilmore asked the Deputy City Manager - Development Services to provide an
update on the Lawrence Berkeley Lab (LBL) RFQ for a 2M square foot campus, with Alameda
Point in consideration. The RFQ was sent out on January 3 and is due March 4th. Staff and
a",AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-01-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-07-21,3,"1% to 0.43363% for Fiscal Years 2006-07 through 2009- - 10 and
Exempting the Golf Fund's Return on Investment Entirely, Effective
Fiscal Year 2010-11. Finally passed.
(*09-302) Ordinance No. 2999, ""Amending the Community Improvement
Plans for the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project and the
West End Community Improvement Project to Make Technical Clarifying
Changes. Finally passed.
(*09-303) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14368,
""Approving Tentative Tract Map No. 8015 (File No. PLN08-0507) at
the Alameda Towne Centre. Adopted.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(09-304) FY 08-09 Year End and FY 09-10 Annual Budget - Remaining
Challenges.
The Interim City Manager gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Gilmore stated the State will not get serious about
fixing budget issues until City, County and Redevelopment Agency
funds are depleted.
Councilmember Matarrese stated school boards, councils, and special
districts have had to raise taxes to survive; budgets cannot be
prepared using previous year plus growth.
The Interim City Manager stated every day will be a conscious
budget day.
In response to Councilmember Matarrese's request, the Interim City
Manager stated at the beginning of the year, PERS advised the City
that rates could increase by 2% to 6% now, PERS is saying that
rates could increase by 6% to 12%; the City will need approximately
$5.5 to $6 million in Fiscal Years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 to pay
for past PERS' obligations.
Mayor Johnson stated PERS modified some investment strategies and
parameters; people need to understand that PERS takes no risk; PERS
comes back to cities for more money when investments go bad.
The Interim City Manager stated losses discussed earlier in the
year were based on the [stock] market crash and did not include the
real estate market; PERS has become a quasi-banking entity in
California; cities will drop out of PERS in the future.
In response to Mayor Johnson's inquiry, the Development Services
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
July 21, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-07-21.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2009-09-10,8,"1,2010.
Recreation and Park Commission discussed the Alameda Boys & Girls Club project and
whether they felt it qualified to be on the list of Measure WW funded projects.
Commissioner Brown suggested sending a letter to City Council with the Commission's
recommendation.
M/S/C
KAHUANUI/RESTAGNO
(approved)
""That the Recreation and Park Commission will send a letter to Council stating
that the Commission strongly urges the City Council to respect the directive of
the voters who supported Measure WW. The voters approved (with their votes)
the allocation of funds (through Measure WW) to maintain, acquire and improve
the city's Recreation and Parks facilities and grounds.""
Approved (6):
Ogden, Restagno , Brown, Cooper, Kahuanui, Sonneman
Absent (1):
Mariani
4.
ADJOURNMENT
Recreation & Park Commission Special Mtg.
5
Minutes - Thursday, September 10, 2009",RecreationandParkCommission/2009-09-10.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-03-06,8,"1,600 bleachers, to which the Planning Services Manager responded that he has looked
into sports fields, not bleachers.
In response to Councilmember deHaan's inquiry, Ms. Bail responded that she was
requested to inquire about a 501c3 non-profit corporation for possible development at
North Loop Road.
Councilmember deHaan inquired what sport groups Ms. Bail represents, to which Ms.
Bail responded that she does not officially represent any sport; stated that she is
pursuing the matter as an individual.
Vice Mayor Bonta inquired what the plan would be for memorial trees under [staff
report] Option 1, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded to either new
trees would be planted along the driveway or trees with plaque designations would
relocated.
Ben Blake, Vice President KemperSports, stated that he understands that new trees
would be planted along the driveway.
Mr. Hoppen stated the trees would be relocated to the new Mif Albright Course if
possible and/or trees that could not be relocated would be replaced with a new in-kind
tree.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the redwood trees at the entrance to the Golf
Course would be removed, to which Mr. Hoppen responded said trees were special to
Ms. Arnerich; whether the trees were memorial or not was not the concern in talking
with Ms. Arnerich.
Vice Mayor Bonta left the dais at 11:55 p.m. and returned at 11:57 p.m.
Councilmember Tam stated that she cannot support the swap; the swap would come at
too high a price for the community; the community would rather fund a sport field in
some other way than trading golf property; moved approval to direct staff to negotiate
with KemperSports and Greenway Golf and pursue the non-exchange option [Option 2]
to infuse the much needed capital for the Golf Complex.
Vice Mayor Bonta seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Vice Mayor Bonta stated the swap concept was initiated as a
creative, out-of-the box way to potentially ensure that a 45-hole golf course would be
sustainable for many years and a youth sports field would be added to the inventory; in
the end, there are too many unintended consequences; both issues need to be
addressed on two separate tracks to find successful solutions for the community.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
March 6, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-03-06.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2006-10-05,3,"1.
Details should be consistent with the original style of the building.
2.
Rafter tails need not be exposed. However the applicant wishes to handle the
gutters will be acceptable.
3.
Hip roof on garage,
4.
All windows that are visible from the street should be visually consistent to the
original structure.
Ayes:
5;
Noes:
0;
Absent:
0;
Motion
carries.
Mr. Garrison stated the Board's suggestions will be presented to the owner and if the
owner agrees he will incorporate their suggestions into the final design.
2.
Certificate of Approval - CA06-0030 - Grand Marina - Corner of Grand Street
and Fortman Way contained within Tract 7723 - Applicant: David Day for Warmington
Homes, California. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for 100% demolition
of eight existing pre-1942 accessory buildings. The site is located within an M-2,
General Industrial (Manufacturing) District.
Chair Anderson would like to recuse herself from this item due to a conflict of interest
with her employer.
Simone Wolter, Planner I, presented the staff report. Ms. Wolter informed the Board
that the 3.51-acre site of the proposed demolition is part of a larger 8.36-acre area that
would be covered by a new Master Plan encompassing the entirety of the Grand Marina
facility.
The review of city records shows that only two out of eight structures have obtained
building permits. It is reasonable to assume that all buildings were constructed prior to
1942. During a site visit to the property, staff noted that the structures at 2041-2051
Grand Street are severely dilapidated and other than 2051 Grand Street, none of the
structures appeared to be in active use.
Staff has determined that these structures lack integrity and would not qualify for local,
state or national registers.
Staff is recommending approval of Certificate of Approval CA06-0030, for the demolition
of eight existing pre-1942 accessory buildings located at Grand Marina, Tract 7723.
Vice-Chair Miller opened the public hearing.
Andy McKinley, 2219 Grand St., spoke in favor of project. He stated that the buildings
are not only run down, but are unsafe.
Minutes of October 5, 2006
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
Page 3",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf
GolfCommission,2007-07-18,2,"1.
Do nothing until the capital account has sufficient funds to pay for a new facility.
2.
Make Cosmetic improvements to the existing facility and construct minor
kitchen improvements. Cost estimate $275,000.
3.
Construct a temporary banquet facility, upgrade the existing kitchen facilities and
make cosmetic improvements to the existing facility. A concrete foundation
would need to be built; electrical, plumbing and gas service would need to be
installed to the tent structure to accommodate power, heat and running water.
Cost estimate $1,850,000 to $2,350,000.
4.
Develop and build new clubhouse facility of 11,500 square feet: a 4,500-
square-foot restaurant, 4,500-square-foot banquet room, and a 2,500-
square-foot clubhouse/pro shop using the capital account and a bank loan
or other funding source for the remaining funds needed. Cost estimate
$5,500,000.
5.
Construct a modular building banquet facility including kitchen, foundation,
water, electrical, plumbing and gas to be included. Cost estimate
$1,750,000 to $2,000,000.
6.
Convert the existing clubhouse space to enlarge and modernize the Food
Service capabilities of the City of Alameda's Golf Complex. Cost estimate
is
unknown. (Two proposed alternative schemes prepared by Chair Wood)
After discussion the Golf Commission agreed to concentrate on options 5 and 6. The
motion was made to invest $3,000 to $5,000 to have a cost estimate report done for
option 6. The Golf Commission approved the motion unanimously.
5.
ORAL REPORTS
5-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by Golf Services Manager Matt Plumlee.
The Interim General Manager reported that the Pro Shop staff is gearing up for the
annual ""Demo Day"" to be held on July 21, 2007. The event will host nine major golf
club vendors including the Cleveland Golf Tour Van. The East Bay Junior Golf
Championship, one of Northern California's premier junior events will be held at the
Chuck Corica Golf Complex on July 23rd and 24th Staff is working with Integrated
Business Systems (IBS) to set up the online tee time reservation system through the
Internet and it should be operational soon. The Driving Range ball dispenser machines
are now operating electronically through the E-Range system and no cash is accepted
at the machine. Customers now pay at the Driving Range Pro Shop and are given a
six-digit number to enter at the machine and the balls are then dispensed. The range
cards have been replaced by an E-Key, which keeps track of the balance of funds on
the customers account and is scanned at the ball machine to deduct the proper amount
of the transaction selected.
Chuck Corica Golf Complex
Page 2
7/18/07
Golf Commission Minutes",GolfCommission/2007-07-18.pdf
GolfCommission,2007-04-18,2,"1.
Honor the old rates for groups conducting their event prior to the completion of
the current fiscal year, June 30 2007. Notify groups conducting their event after
June 30, 2007 of the increased rates.
2.
Honor the old fees through the end of the calendar year for events booked prior to
the April 1, 2007 effective date.
3.
Notify all groups regardless of the event date that the new rates are in effect.
Commissioner Gammell made the motion to honor the old tournament rates for events booked up
to June 30, 2007. Vice Chair Gaul seconded the motion. The Golf Commission passed the
motion unanimously. The Golf Services Manager will notify the tournament groups affected by
the increases.
5.
ORAL REPORTS
5-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by Golf Services Manager Matt Plumlee.
No report given.
5-B
Beautification Program by Mrs. Norma Arnerich.
Mrs. Arnerich reported that the dedication date for maintenance worker Dave May's mother is
set for June 30, 2007 and the Ladies Club is will be doing plantings for two members. Mrs.
Arnerich spoke with the Superintendent and he will be using $3,000 from the Beautification
Account for planting various areas of the Golf Complex. The suggestion was made to replant the
area at the 2nd tee of the Jack Clark Golf Course where the plants were removed. Also
mentioned was the need to repaint all of the tee blocks on the courses.
6.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
6-A
Marketing and Promotions, Commissioner Gammell.
Commissioner Gammell reported that a new ad would appear in the Alameda and
Oakland Magazines for the months of May and June. The ad states ""Mothers and Fathers
Golf for Free with 3 paid Green Fees after 11:00 AM"". Mothers for the month of May
and Fathers for the month of June.
6-B
Golf Complex Financial Report, Vice Chair Gaul.
Vice Chair Gaul reported that the revenue for golf on all three courses for March 2007
versus March 2006 was up 150% and rounds of golf were up 139%. The fiscal year to
date revenue for golf was up 3.7% and rounds were up 5.6%. The Mif Albright Course
revenue was up 155% from last year and down 6.6% for the fiscal year. All other
concessions excluding golf were up 62% for the month and up 7% for the fiscal year.
Total revenue for the Golf Complex was up 103% for the month of March 2007 versus
March 2006 and up 4.5% for the fiscal year 2006/2007.
6-C
New Clubhouse Project, Commissioner Schmitz.
Chuck Corica Golf Complex
Page 2
4/18/07
Golf Commission Minutes",GolfCommission/2007-04-18.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2011-01-13,4,"1.
Restrict the use of the Premium Taxi Service and MRTIP to within Alameda
County.
Chair Restagno asked if they considered those who live on the outskirts of Alameda
County and their doctor may be in the Contra Costa area closer to them. To have a 30
mile radius might make more sense. Ms. Payne stated that eligible participants are
residents within the City of Alameda. People in the City of Alameda have doctors that
are within the City of Alameda or Oakland area. This will not affect too many people.
2.
Limit the use of MRTIP to five vouchers per month for each eligible resident.
Ms. Payne stated that currently people are allowed to use this service an unlimited
amount of times. Most people visit their doctor a few times a month and those are the
individuals that we are targeting.
Vice Chair Brown stated that there are instances where someone may have an
immediate/emergency and need to go for six weeks, once per week, will that qualify.
Ms. Payne stated yes. Participants can accumulate vouchers. They will get five
vouchers per month and if they plan ahead can accumulate the vouchers needed.
3.
Require the City of Alameda Paratransit Transportation providers to install taxi
meters in their lift-equipped vans.
Ms. Payne stated that when individuals use a taxi there is always a meter. Those that
use a lift-equipped van, the vans do not have meters which have made it difficult to
calculate the fare.
Director Lillard asked how the vans were charging now. Ms. Payne stated that they
charge $2.60 per mile. The user has to trust the driver and whatever is on the
speedometer.
Commissioner Mariani stated that there may be an issue because if the company is
charging the minute they are using the lift then they are actually charging them for lifting
into the van and lifting out of the van. This could be discriminatory because you are
charging a person more because you are charging when the lift goes up/in and when
the lift goes off as opposed to a person who is ambulatory. That may be a City Attorney
question. Ms. Payne said she would look into that issue. Director Lillard stated or the
meter flag should not be dropped until the van starts rolling.
4.
Place expiration dates on both the Premium Taxi Service and MRTIP Travel
Vouchers.
Ms. Payne stated that the expiration dates would be for a year. It would still allow
individuals to accumulate the vouchers if needed for special needs. This is important to
do to determine travel/budgetary needs.
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
4
Minutes - Thursday, January 13, 2011",RecreationandParkCommission/2011-01-13.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-07-05,18,"1.
The Base Reuse Director responded 674.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether 674 of the 800 units are a part of Phase 1, to which
the Base Reuse Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the housing is affordable housing by
design.
The Base Reuse Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the units are smaller and are priced
accordingly.
The Base Reuse Director responded the developer has stated the units fall in the
market rate pricing based on size; if the market value goes up, the unit price will go up.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the development of more market rate
housing is due to requests by Council.
The Base Reuse Director responded in the affirmative; stated there is also demand for
smaller units in the current market; continued the presentation.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired why the infrastructure being expedited affects the Main Street
neighborhood and Alameda Point Collaborative projects.
The Base Reuse Director responded both projects depend on infrastructure; stated the
projects tie into the infrastructure.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired how the Main Street neighborhood and Alameda Point
Collaborative projects would be affected if the Site A project does not go through.
The Base Reuse Director responded without Site A, the Main Street neighborhood and
Alameda Point Collaborative projects would have to find a way to build infrastructure,
such as a sewer line.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether both projects would have to be redone.
The Base Reuse Director responded other options would need to be reviewed;
continued the presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated AUSD is a separate entity than the City; the City
has no control over what AUSD does; inquired whether there is a Plan B if the School
District project does not go through.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
17
July 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-04-23,14,"1.
The number of pumps will be reduced to 12;
2.
No more than 70 feet be devoted to driveway access on the south side
property line, with the rest being raised sidewalk; and
3.
Tanker delivery would be limited to non-peak hour periods.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 3.
Noes: 1 (Kohlstrand) Absent: President Lynch, Vice President Cook, Board member
Mariani. The motion failed.
Board member McNamara moved to continue this item to the meeting of May 14, 2007.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which passed with the following
voice vote - 4. Absent: President Lynch, Vice President Cook, Board member Mariani.
10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee
(Board Member Mariani).
Board member Mariani was not in attendance to present this report.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board
Member Kohlstrand).
Board member Kohlstrand advised that no further meetings had been held.
C.
Oral Status Report regarding the Alameda Climate Protection Task Force
(Acting President Cunningham).
Acting President Cunningham noted that the next meeting would be May 16, 2007 at
which time the draft of the Task Force's findings would be reviewed.
12. ADJOURNMENT:
11:09 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
These minutes were approved at the May 14, 2007, Planning Board meeting. This
meeting was audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 14
April 23, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-04-23.pdf
TransportationCommission,2017-04-26,5,"1. Accept the Annual Report on the Alameda Landing and Marina Shores Transportation
Demand Management Program and Progress on the Citywide Transportation Management
Association
Staff Payne explained that staff has just a couple of agenda items for the next meeting and they
want to present the draft Alameda Transportation Plan in July. So, most likely the May meeting
will be cancelled.
7.
Announcements/Publio Comments
Jim Strehlow would like to have more information about the Estuary Shuttle because it is going
to be ended. He would like to know if there will be a plan to have free transportation on AC
Transit only between Webster Street and Atlantic Avenue and say 8th Street and Harrison Street.
He wants to know if there will be a policy or will bicyclists have to pay to go through AC Transit
lines. With the shuttle being gone, he wants to know if there will be some sort of granted
exception for these segments and if that happens how will that be advertised to the general
public.
Commissioner Bellows replied you could still ride your bicycle through the tunnel.
Jim Strehlow stated that a lot of people will not and they have been riding the shuttle.
Commissioner Bellows asked staff to address this.
Staff Payne replied that staff included a similar recommendation in the draft citywide
transportation plan on how to get cyclists between Alameda and Oakland. It is a request to AC
Transit of a policy change that bicyclists would ride the bus for free just through the tube. In the
interim, bicyclists can still use the tube and could use their bikes on the bike racks for AC Transit
buses along Webster Street. There are buses traveling during peak times every few minutes
through the tubes and AC Transit can accommodate many of those bicyclists.
8.
Adjournment
7:44 p.m.
Page 5 of 5",TransportationCommission/2017-04-26.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2022-03-24,2,"1. Assess and provide input on the community's social service needs
2. Review CDBG Public Service funding recommendations
3. Report to the City Council on recommended allocations
Alameda County has a critical need to assist older adults who are at risk of, or are
already experiencing homelessness, require high-acuity care, or hospice
SSHRB's Needs Statement identified the following priority areas:
Housing and Homeless services
Domestic Violence
Information and Referral Services
Legal Information Services
Mental Health and Crisis Intervention
Disaster Related Cash Grants
Food Pantries and Food Security
COVID-19 Diagnostic Tests
Public Service funding comes from 15% of the following:
Entitlement Allocation from HUD
Program Income received in the previous fiscal year
Staff Recommendations:
Fund the public services at the proposed levels.
Use CDBG administrative funds for the Eden Information & Referral
contract.
Pay for $25,000 of the Midway Shelter contract with Permanent Local
Housing Allocation Funds.
Adjust CDBG funding recommendations on a pro rata basis once the
CDBG allocations have been announced.
Pending the completed Community Needs Assessment, return to a two-
year funding cycle for FY 23-24 and FY 24-25, which will be the last two
years of the Five-Year Consolidated Plan.
Next Steps:
May 3, 2022: City Council holds a Public Hearing to consider the full
CDBG funding recommendations for FY 2022-23, including the Non-
Housing Public Service recommendations reviewed tonight.
After May 3, 2022: Once approved, staff will obtain FY 2022-23 budgets
and prepare amendments to the Service Provider Agreements.
July 1, 2022: Funded agencies may begin making use of the funds.
President Lewis opened the floor for clarifying questions and public comment.
Board member Means asked for additional information regarding the reallocation of
Permanent Local Housing Allocation Funds (PLHA).
Staff member Fonstein read public comment received (via email) by Marjorie Rocha,
Executive Director for Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity (ECHO).
""Dear President Lewis and Members of the SSHRB: We appreciate City
staff's recommendation of $22,000 to fund Fair Housing and Tenant/Landlord
Services. As always, it is a pleasure to provide services for City of Alameda
renters. As a Qualified Fair Housing Enforcement Organization, we deliver
fair housing counseling and investigation services to the City. In addition, we
are a HUD-approved Housing Counseling Agency, and take pride in our
ability to deliver critical tenant/landlord counseling and mediation services to
low-income renters and housing providers in Alameda. Thank you for your",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-03-24.pdf
PublicArtCommission,2007-07-26,1,"1. CONVENE:
7:06 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Chair Huston, Vice-Chair Lee, Commissioners Rosenberg
and Wolfe
STAFF PRESENT:
Douglas Vu, Planner III; Shana Nero, Recording Secretary
3. MINUTES:
Minutes for the Regular Meeting of July 26, 2007
Chair Huston called for a review of the April 25, 2007 and May 23, 2007 meeting
minutes.
After reviewing the minutes Chair Huston offered following the summation of the
Alameda Towne Centre History Panels project.
A letter had been sent to Mr. Savinar stating that the Historic Panel was not seeing
a deficit in the area of diversity. Which is the stories were focused on white
males primarily and there was no mention of anyone non-European decent. The
commission's concerns were brought up at the beginning of the commissions
regarding diversity. The revised edition came through with no revisions that
included anyone of color.
Mr. Larson offered a response, that he had worked overtime on this project and
that it was beautifully crafted and well written. Mr. Larson stated he had
researched extensively and the commission agrees with all the assertions. Mr.
Larson mentioned that people with forms did not have cameras to take pictures;
therefore there is little or no record of diversity in Alameda. In addition, the
documenting of diversity that he offered was ""ugly"". That the public record of
people of color was racist and unacceptable in a public art forum and so part of
the challenge is how to prevent history. His criteria for the search was that he
needed documented and supportive storage outside of the dominant community
and those that did exist were brutal and finding some way to explaining the
discussion.
Doug Vu offered to listen to the April 25, 2007 meeting minutes to accurately
clarify the discussion regarding the Public Art Panel. Chair Huston stated that she
would like the minutes to reflect the fact that Mr. Savinar was responding to a
letter requesting greater representation to proceed in the history panel.
No further amendments were made to the April 25, 2007 minutes.
Chair Huston motioned to approve the April 25, 2007 minutes as amended. Vice
Chair Lee seconded the motion.",PublicArtCommission/2007-07-26.pdf
PlanningBoard,2020-03-23,7,"1. Change reference to 24 parking spots on Clement to zero
2. Page 6, # correct typo
3. Include on page seven the maintenance fees for the HOA
4. Clarify that the Universal Design Ordinance is applicable to the project.
5. All attempts to optimize vertical and horizontal open space must be explored
6.
Provide a more uniform distribution of affordable units with the multi-family
building should be explored
7. Guest Parking be designated along the waterfront
Roll Call vote was taken to approve with these conditions, the motion passed 7-0.
8.
MINUTES
None
9.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
9-A 2020-7824 Planning, Building and Transportation Department Recent Actions and
Decisions
ittp://alameda.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?m=l&id=/matter.aspx?key=9525
9-B 2020-7825 Oral Report - Future Public Meetings and Upcoming Planning, Building
and Transportation Department Projects
Director Thomas said they hope to have a meeting on April 13, 2020. However, with Covid-
19 it is unsure what the future holds. These meetings need to be open and available to
the public for them to attend.
Board Member Teague said he wants to do whatever he can to make this a true digital
meeting in the future.
10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
Board Member Saheba was pleasantly surprised by an email about Board Member
Rothenberg having won the 2020 Thomas Jefferson award for public architecture.
12.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
13.
ADJOURNMENT
President Curtis adjourned the meeting. (Recording cut out 9:01pm)
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 7 of 7
March 23, 2020",PlanningBoard/2020-03-23.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-04-07,4,"1. Mr. Lynch's concern with the issuance of the grading permit does not fall under the
prevue of the Historical Advisory Board.
2. To resolve Mr. Lynch's concern regarding the size of the trunk diameters of the
replacement trees, the Board can extend the landscaping maintenance agreement to five years
and require the replacement tree to be larger than 10"" diameter.
3. His issue with staff's decision that this project is exempt from CEQA guidelines do not
fall under the prevue of this Board and should be addressed during the design review process.
4. According to city records, the Certificate of Approval CA01-08 was valid on the day the
tree was removed. The Board approved the request with the condition that two new oak trees
be planted on the property. The Board also required the submittal of a landscaping plan for
review and approval when new construction is proposed. The current owners have submitted
a proposal to construct a single-family residence on the site. A landscaping plan for the
planning of two new Oak trees has been prepared in conformance with Resolution HAB-01-
08. The plans for the new construction are currently under review by Design Review staff.
Conditions of approval for the Design Review will require protection of the existing trees per
the arborist and landscape architect's recommendations, as well as the recordation of a
Landscape Maintenance Agreement to ensure maintenance of the oak trees on the property.
Staff understands that Mr. Lynch has enjoyed living next to a vacant lot, but the owner is
entitled to develop his lot.
Ms. Altschuler advised the Board that the decision before this Board tonight is to approve the
location of the replacement trees as stated in the Landscaping Maintenance plan.
Board member Tilos opened the floor to Board discussion.
Board member Miller is in favor of extending the Landscaping Plan to 5 years. He is also in
favor of requiring the replacement trees to be bigger than a 10"" diameter.
The Certified Arborist, Chris Bowen was present. He suggested that the replacement trees be
24"" box, which would be close to 8 ft tall when planted. He feels this would improve the
property value.
M/S to approve the Landscaping Maintenance Plan with the following revisions: (1) Change
the replacement trees from two 10-gallon trees to two 24"" box trees. (2) Extend the
Landscape Maintenance Agreement from 3 to 5 years.
REPORTS
3. Consideration and comments on design of proposed 352 space parking structure to be
constructed as part of the rehabilitation of the Alameda Theatre and construction of a new
Cineplex. The parking structure would be built at 1416 Oak Street within the CC,
Community Commercial District. (continued from 2-3-05mtg.)
Minutes of April 7, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
4",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-03-03,2,"1. Project approvals
While the Council's authority over land use cannot be contracted away, the
settlement is structured so that the benefits of the settlement will only occur if the
Council and Planning Board grant certain regulatory approvals; the approvals
are:
a. Tentative map, development plan, development agreement with 15 year
term, and density bonus, Final Map authorizing a182 unit project with:
21 affordable units (13 very-low; 8 moderate);
Generally consistent with the 2016 development plan previously
approved by the City;
Approximately two acre waterfront open space, to be maintained by
a
Homeowners Association (HOA) but open to public; no longer on
lands owned by the Army Corps; and no longer requiring Bay fill.
b. Rezoning two acres of open space as ""R2-PD"" (planned development).
At each approval, both sides have the opportunity to agree to
modifications or cancel the settlement.
C. Other necessary approvals, including building permits.
2. Dismissal of lawsuits, and a release of all past claims
The dismissal and full release only occur if:
1. City Council first grants the above approvals.
2. Boatworks submits a different project than what is agreed to here or
subsequently; or
3. 15 year passes and nothing happens at the property.
3. Settlement Payment
The City would pay a total of $1.8 million to Boatworks generally phased to
coincide with the issuance of qualifying building permits for the project.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:57
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 3, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-03-03.pdf
TransportationCommission,2007-10-24,6,"1. The relocation of the stops away from the Ferry Terminal was not supported by City
policies, which encourage intermodal connections. It would also undermine the potential
for people to use those connections.
2. The elimination of the direct service to Encinal High School was also problematic. The
partial reroute away from the school during the day would enable about half the riders to
be served with the school times; people in the neighborhood would lose transit access as
a result of that. The school prefers to have the students board in front of the school, so the
staff can monitor them while they wait.
3. Relocating the buses to the perimeter of Alameda Towne Centre would affect some very
heavily used stops. There were over 400 boardings and alightings per weekday at those
three stops. Staff recommended that they not be relocated at this time.
Staff recommended that if the new bus is available, that it be run on a pilot basis for up to 12
months. If the pilot service is implemented, the Transportation Commission should continue to
work with City staff, AC Transit and community stakeholders to develop a recommended
reconfiguration of the route. Alternative configurations should include, at a minimum, rerouting
the Line 63 onto Shoreline Drive between Grand Street and Willow Street; servicing Alameda
Landing, and splitting the route into two separate pieces to more effectively serve the destination
points along the line.
Commissioner Krueger wished to stress that with respect to staff not wanting to endorse the
options for the Ferry Terminal, the direct service to Encinal High, and the relocation of the stops
at Alameda Towne Centre, from the subcommittee's perspective, these were last-resort options
that they did not mention lightly. They considered these to be options in the event that nothing
else worked, and nothing else could be done.
Chair Knox White noted that under ""Funding"" in the staff report, it was suggested that a move to
Shoreline would require the establishment of new bus stops on Shoreline. He noted that they
currently had bus stops used by the W. Staff Bergman noted that was a more general reference
regarding any route changes.
Chair Knox White inquired whether the surveys and fliers were actually posted at the bus stops
on Willow and Grand. Staff Bergman replied that he did not believe they were, and that they
focused more on the origin and destination points, such as Alameda Towne Center and the
hospital.
Chair Knox White inquired whether the survey gathered address information from the
respondents, Staff Bergman replied that they received at least intersection information.
Chair Knox White inquired what the daytime off-peak ridership on the Encinal High School line,
Staff Bergman replied that it was about half the total.
Transportation Commission
Page 6 of 19",TransportationCommission/2007-10-24.pdf
TransportationCommission,2007-10-24,5,"1. The stops be relocated away from the Ferry Terminal to Main Street;
2. Implementing the changes at Encinal High School throughout the entire day; and
3. To relocate the stops from the interior to the perimeter of Alameda Towne Centre.
The subcommittee stressed that they felt these were undesirable changes, but was necessary. He
noted that the initial reluctance by AC Transit to add an additional bus on the route had to do
with the impact it might have on farebox recovery, and whether this poor performance might
impact the future viability of the route. The subcommittee also recommended that Line 63 should
be rerouted from Otis Drive to Shoreline Drive, between Grand and Willow, once the run time is
available, and once the capital improvements have been made at the bus stops, particularly on the
south side of Shoreline Drive. This potential service change should be part of any discussions
regarding how an extra bus might be used.
Staff Bergman noted that another recommendation was: Since the schedule could not currently
accommodate the additional runtime required to serve Shoreline, bus stops should be installed at
the intersections of Otis and Sandcreek, as well as Otis and Willow to support the City's bus stop
spacing guidelines. This was a change from the TC's previous recommendation to install stops at
Pond Isle. The change was in response to the shift in position by the Alameda Police
Department, which determined that the Otis and Sandcreek location was the preferred bus stop
location.
Staff Bergman noted that the final recommendation from the subcommittee was that the
westbound bus stop at the intersection of Whitehall and Willow should be made the highest
priority for improvements at bus stops in the City. There is not currently a sufficient landing area
for people to stand while boarding the bus.
Staff Bergman noted that staff analysis addressed the farebox recovery issue that was a concern
to the Commission, that an additional bus would reduce farebox recovery, and that the might
impact the future of the line. AC Transit's data indicated that the 63 currently exceeded the
minimum standards for buses along its route; it is ranked in the middle with respect to passengers
per service hour and farebox recovery. While the additional bus would affect the performance, it
is not clear what the impact would be at this time.
Staff supports the following recommendations outlined by the subcommittee: The elimination of
the portion of the Alameda Point route; the modified service to serve Encinal High School at
peak school hours only. If AC Transit determines that an extra bus would be available, staff
recommended that this should be done on an interim basis, enabling the Transportation
Commission to develop a plan to best utilize that bus over time. That would enable the route to
stay on schedule and serve the existing route, as well as to enable the Transportation
Commission to develop a longer term strategy to serve the West End's upcoming development in
the next few years. Also, the line would be more effective and less convoluted.
Staff had significant concerns about some of the more severe cuts that the subcommittee
recommended be implemented if needed:
Transportation Commission
Page 5 of 19",TransportationCommission/2007-10-24.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-06-23,12,"1. The structure shall not exceed 30 feet in height regardless of the addition of any
architectural detail.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that it would be impossible for her to consider a guideline
that she had not read prior to the meeting. She did not wish to be unfair to the applicant, and
wished to do the most responsible job possible in making a determination regarding this
application. She noted that if the applicant was comfortable with what the Board has come up
with, that was fine; otherwise, they could request a continuance.
Board member Cunningham seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 5. Noes: 0
Absent: 2 (Lynch, McNamara); Abstain: 0. The motion passed.
President Cook called for a recess.
9-D. PLN08-0181 - Grand Marina Village Residential Development Master Plan
Amendments. Proposed Master Plan Amendment to reduce the number of affordable
housing units required on the site from ten to five, and allow for five slightly larger lots.
Applicant is also seeking a finding that the Island High School site, 2437 Eagle Avenue,
is suitable for affordable housing, and the purposes of the Affordable Housing
Requirements would be better served by construction of at least nine affordable units at
the Island High site rather than five affordable units at the Grand Marina site. The Grand
Marina site is zoned MX (Mixed Used Zoning District). The Island High site is zoned M-
1 (Intermediate Industrial Manufacturing District). (AT)
Mr. Thomas summarized the staff report.
An extensive discussion about the details of the staff report ensued.
The public hearing was opened.
Mr. David Day noted that although he was a member of the Board of Education for the Unified
School District, he was speaking on his own behalf rather than that of the District. He could not
speak to the merits of below-market-rate housing in the City, but stressed his opinion that this
Draft Resolution would be good for the District. He invited any questions related to the School
District.
Vice President Kohlstrand inquired who initiated moving the affordable units off-site. Mr. Day
replied that the School District first heard about this issue the previous Friday evening, and asked
for more notice from City staff in the future. He noted that the City and District had been
discussing affordable housing on the Island High site for many years, and that the site had been
vacant. He believed this project would increase their opportunities.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that she was in favor of affordable housing at the old Island
High School site. She noted that was something that other cities such as Santa Clara and San Jose
had done for school district employees. She understood that the site was not currently zoned
Page 12 of 23",PlanningBoard/2008-06-23.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-02,6,"10
Councilmember Vella inquired if Council has to approve the ballot question this evening
as drafted.
The City Clerk responded in the affirmative; outlined a previous rent initiative on the last
ballot, which Council approved, then revised it at a later date.
The Interim City Attorney stated Council has the authority to revise the ballot question,
but the question cannot be more than 75 words, and needs to be as neutral as possible,
to not be argumentative or misleading.
In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry regarding choosing the April election date,
the Interim City Attorney stated Friday, January 11, 2019 is the deadline for an April
election.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if a special meeting needs to be called.
The Interim City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated the meeting could be a
continuation.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired if Council has until Friday, January 11, 2019 at 5:00pm
to approve the final 75 word ballot question; to which the City Clerk responded in the
affirmative.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired if polls need to be open or if an all-mail ballot is an
option.
The City Clerk responded Election Code requirements must be met in order to call an
all-mail ballot, which cannot be met, therefore there will be polls open on Election Day;
those who vote absentee will still have the option to mail ballots.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired if there is a way to call an all-mail ballot, to which the
City Clerk responded in the negative.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired if there are insights from East Bay Regional Parks
District (EBRPD) related to what land is considered to be the park boundaries.
The Assistant City Attorney responded the subdivision did not occur until after Measure
WW had been placed on the 2008 ballot; stated the Federal government planned to
subdivide the parcel and dispose of Neptune Point first; EBRPD knew as early as 2005
or 2006 that the government would subdivide the parcels even though it did not occur
until later; the intent was clear to both the Federal government and EBRPD before
Measure WW went to the voters in 2008.
Councilmember Daysog inquired if the subdivision occurred in May 2016, to which the
Assistant City Attorney responded the Quitclaim Deed is dated 2015.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-02.pdf
TransportationCommission,2012-03-28,7,"10-15 years and the on-going cost to manage the devices is estimated to be $5,000 to $6,000 per
year. Regarding on-going maintenance, funds should be available under Alameda CTC's
Measure B expenditure plan, Vehicle Registration Fee, and the Smart Corridor program.
Commissioner Miley questioned whether the Smart Corridor funds would be competitive or
allocated based on population.
Staff Khan stated that the Alameda CTC manages the Smart Corridor program and there are a
handful of projects in the county. Furthermore, the City is part of the Smart Corridor
Consortium.
Commissioner Miley asked if the countywide agency would provide all the maintenance funds
for the few smart corridors in the county.
Staff Khan confirmed that the City will work with the Alameda CTC to obtain funding for the
maintenance funds.
Commissioner Moehring said she has maintained an interest in this project and she believes the
corner of Pacific Avenue will definitely benefit from the project. She noted that the cameras are
not recording personal information, but will be used for safety and emergency response
situations to efficiently circulate vehicles and allow emergency vehicles to pass. Since there are
55,000 daily vehicles that go through the Webster Tube, anything the City can do to make that
commute safer is great.
4C. Quarterly Report on Activities Related to Transportation Policies and Plans
Staff Khan presented the quarterly report on the following activities related to transportation
policies and plans:
The Bicycle Facility Design Guidelines will be presented to the Planning Board sometime
after May.
The City received $464,000 in funding for the Shoreline Drive and Westline Drive bike
lanes project. The project will take one of the lanes in each direction of Shoreline Drive
and convert the lanes to parking and bike lanes. Staff has met with Bike Alameda and they
will help take this concept to the community. The first public meeting about the proposed
project will occur on May 2, and a more detailed description of the project will be
presented at next month's meeting.
There are 20 bike lockers that were installed at the Fruitvale BART station some time ago,
and they have gone over their useful life and are now a fire hazard. The City is partnering
with BART and Oakland to remove the lockers and replace them with new electronic
lockers.
Staff has ordered an additional 20 racks as part of the Park Street Streetscape Project, and
staff is looking at more rack locations around Park Street. The total number of new bike
Page 7 of 12
Transportation Commission Minutes
Wednesday, March 28, 2012",TransportationCommission/2012-03-28.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-10-22,10,"10-A. Appointment of a Planning Board Member to assist in the selection of a
consultant for the North of Lincoln Strategic Plan for the Park Street Business
District.
Member Mariani suggested that Member McNamara be involved in the selection. Member
McNamara replied that she would not be able to perform this duty during the day.
Member Ezzy Ashcraft volunteered to assist in the selection of the consultant.
Member Cunningham moved to nominate Member Ezzy Ashcraft to assist in the selection
of a consultant for the North of Lincoln Strategic Plan for the Park Street Business
District.
Member McNamara seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 6. Absent: 1
(Kohlstrand). The motion passed.
Mr. Thomas noted that the Planning Board had a plan at the dais that Catellus wanted the
Planning Board to approve on September 24, and noted that Attachment 3 had been
approved. He described the drawings on the document and stated that as part of
Catellus's appeals included a compromise plan. That plan included a sidewalk running
along the edge of the parking lot; he displayed that proposal to the Board.
Member Mariani did not care for that at first look, and did not want Catellus to sidestep
the Planning Board.
Mr. Thomas described the tree well, surrounded by the curb, and bisected by the sidewalk
at the same level.
In response to an inquiry by President Cook whether the City had a definition for a
sidewalk, Mr. Thomas replied that it did not, but that a sidewalk must be five feet wide.
The City Council may uphold the Planning Board's decision, overturn that decision, or
remand it back to the Planning Board.
Member Mariani was concerned that Catellus was not honoring the Planning Board's
process, and had noted a difference in how the new person handled the interaction.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
10:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Page 10 of 11",PlanningBoard/2007-10-22.pdf
GolfCommission,2018-05-08,4,"10.
ANNOUNCEMENTSIADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:00 p.m.
The agenda for the meeting was posted seven days in advance in compliance with the
Alameda Sunshine Ordinance, which also complies with the 72-hour requirement of the
Brown Act.
4
Golf Commission Minutes - -Tuesday, May 8, 2018",GolfCommission/2018-05-08.pdf
PlanningBoard,2006-01-23,9,"10.
BOARD COMMUNICATION
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Northern Waterfront Plan (Vice President Cook).
Vice President Cook advised there was nothing new to report.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board
Member Mariani).
Board member Mariani was not in attendance to present this report.
c.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board Member
Kohlstrand).
Board member Kohlstrand advised that there had been no further meetings since her last report.
11.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
a.
Update on Northern Waterfront General Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact
Report.
Mr. Thomas advised that the EIR would be released within one or two weeks, and that it would be
brought before the Board for action after that time.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
9:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathy Woodbury, Secretary
City Planning Board
These minutes were approved at the February 13, 2006 Planning Board meeting. This meeting was
audio and videotaped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 9
January 23, 2006",PlanningBoard/2006-01-23.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-03-12,14,"10.
BOARD COMMUNICATION
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee
(Board Member Mariani).
Mr. Thomas noted that the next meeting would be held the following Thursday, March 15,
2007. A status report would be received from ACTIA on the Broadway-Jackson Project
Study Report (PSR). Staff had invited the Chair of the Alameda Transportation
Commission, John Knox-White, to attend the meeting, because the Transportation
Commission had taken the lead for the City of Alameda in pressing for a second look at the
CEQA thresholds for transportation impact analysis. He noted that the mitigations needed to
be examined more closely. They would be looking for consultant teams who could provide
good ideas and advice on the CEQA threshold issue. He noted that Chinatown was very
excited about that as well.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board
Member Kohlstrand).
Member Kohlstrand advised that there was nothing new to report.
Mr. Thomas noted that the subcommittee might not exist any more, and added that the
Northern Waterfront item had been removed from Board Communications. He noted that
he would check with Public Works and the Transportation Commission to find out
whether this item should be retained on the agenda.
C.
Oral Status Report regarding the Alameda Climate Protection Task Force
(Board Member Cunningham).
Member Cunningham advised that a meeting had been held two weeks before, and that
another one would be held on March 21, 2007. He noted that their packets contained
a
lost of goals and actions to identify the top priorities.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 14
March 12, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-03-12.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2005-04-14,8,"10.
ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA
-
Housing Authority Request to include additional parking by Using Part of Neptune
Park.
-
Discussion about $1 Million Designated for Open Space.
-
Follow Up on Ballena Bay.
11.
SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING
Thursday, May 12, 2005
12.
ADJOURNMENT
8
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
Minutes
Thursday, April 14, 2005
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service",RecreationandParkCommission/2005-04-14.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2006-04-13,4,"10.
ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA
11.
SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING
May 11, 2006 at the DeWitt O' Club
12.
ADJOURNMENT
- -4- -
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg
Minutes
Thursday, April 13, 2006",RecreationandParkCommission/2006-04-13.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2011-06-09,4,"10.
ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA
11.
SET NEXT MEETING DATE:
Thursday, September 8, 2011
Recreation & Park Commission decided not to meet in July or August unless it was
deemed necessary.
12.
ADJOURNMENT
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
4
Minutes - Thursday, June 9, 2011",RecreationandParkCommission/2011-06-09.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2005-05-12,6,"10.
ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA
AD Lillard stated that the following would be on the next agenda:
-
Bayport Park and Community Building Plans.
-
A request to place a mobile coffee dispensing business at Lower Washington
Park.
11.
SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING
Thursday, June 9, 2005
12.
ADJOURNMENT 9:40 p.m.
6
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
Minutes
Thursday, May 12, 2005
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service",RecreationandParkCommission/2005-05-12.pdf
GolfCommission,2008-01-16,5,"10.
ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING'S AGENDA
Presentation to the Alameda Girl's Golf Team.
Report on Mif Albright Course redesign and rate structure.
Report from Interim General Manager Dale Lillard regarding cost estimates from
Saylor Consultants for renovation of clubhouse and restaurant.
Discussion regarding improvements to front entrance.
11.  NNOUNCEMENTS/ADJOURNMENT
The Meeting was adjourned at 8:02 PM.
The agenda for the meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown Act.
Chuck Corica Golf Complex
Page 5
1/16/08
Golf Commission Minutes",GolfCommission/2008-01-16.pdf
GolfCommission,2010-01-21,8,"10.
ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING'S AGENDA
Status Report on RFP
Discussion of proposal to operate Mif Albright course through a non-profit
Update of Golf Complex finances
Consideration of a Memorial Bench program for the Golf Complex
11.
ANNOUNCEMENTSIADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:36 p.m.
The agenda for the meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown
Act.
- 8 -
Golf Commission Minutes - -Thursday, January 21, 2010",GolfCommission/2010-01-21.pdf
GolfCommission,2009-06-17,5,"10.
ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING'S AGENDA
Update on Golf Complex finances
Discussion regarding long-term planning for the Golf Complex
11.
ANNOUNCEMENTSIADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:54 p.m.
The agenda for the meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown
Act.
- - 5 -
Golf Commission Minutes - Wednesday, June 17, 2009",GolfCommission/2009-06-17.pdf
GolfCommission,2009-10-21,5,"10.
ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING'S AGENDA
Update on Golf Complex finances
Discussion regarding long-term planning for the Golf Complex
Consideration of a Memorial Bench program for the Golf Complex
11.
ANNOUNCEMENTSIADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:23 p.m.
The agenda for the meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown
Act.
- -5- -
Golf Commission Minutes - Wednesday, October 21, 2009",GolfCommission/2009-10-21.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2008-10-09,5,"10.
SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING
Thursday, November 13, 2008
11.
ADJOURNMENT
-5 - -
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg
Minutes - Thursday, October 9, 2008",RecreationandParkCommission/2008-10-09.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2007-12-06,11,"10.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
Mr. Biggs gave the Board information on upcoming workshops and conferences.
Board Member Iverson inquired about the status of historic plaques. Mr. Biggs noted that
he would report back to the Board with that information.
Vice Chair Miller requested that staff provide a list of future projects coming before the
HAB.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
This meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted by:
Cynthia Eliason,
Secretary, Historical Advisory Board
Minutes of December 6, 2007
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
Page 11",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf
PlanningBoard,2006-07-24,20,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION:
This item was continued.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATION:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding potential future Planning Board Measure A Forum
(President Cunningham).
This item was continued.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Northern Waterfront Plan (Vice-President Cook).
This item was continued.
c.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board
Member Mariani).
This item was continued.
d.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board Member
Kohlstrand).
This item was continued.
12.
STAFF COMMUNICATION:
This item was continued.
13.
ADJOURNMENT:
11:37 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Caths Woodbury
Cathy Woödbury, Secretary
Planning & Building Department
These minutes were approved at the August 14, 2006, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was
audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 20
July 24, 2006",PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf
PlanningBoard,2021-07-12,18,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
None.
12.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Chris Buckley requested that notifications for the General Plan get properly sent out. He
had some issues with notifications and had not received one for this meeting.
Director Thomas said the issue was being looked into.
13.
ADJOURNMENT
President Teague adjourned the meeting at 10:40 p.m.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 18 of 18
July 12, 2021",PlanningBoard/2021-07-12.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-06-11,13,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
Mr. Thomas advised that the comment period on the Harbor Bay Village VI EIR closed
on June 5, 2007, and a public hearing had been held by the Planning Board a month ago.
Staff had received several requests to extend the comment period, which was extended
for another month. He noted that a very large number of letters, comparable to the Target
proposal, had been received. Staff and the consultant team had begun to go through the
letters and scoping out the amount of additional work that would be necessary to
complete to respond to the comments. Staff will meet with the applicant to establish the
budget for that process.
President Lynch suggested that in staff's discussions with the applicant, that they strongly
consider what they had heard so far. Mr. Thomas confirmed that the applicant would
reimburse the City as they go through the process.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board
Member Mariani).
Board member Mariani was not in attendance to present this report.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board Member
Kohlstrand).
Board member Kohlstrand advised that the next meeting of the Pedestrian Task Force
would be held June 26, 2007, from 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. She believed it would be held in one
of the conference rooms on the third floor of City Hall.
In response to an inquiry by President Lynch whether the task force addressed the
physical attributes of the crosswalks, Board member Kohlstrand replied that it was more
at the General Plan level. She noted that it had been an unusual process, because the
update to the Transportation Element was initiated by the Transportation Commission,
rather than staff. She noted that Public Works took the process back under its purview,
and believed the next task force meeting would examine a work scope that may be
adopted for further pedestrian analysis.
Mr. Thomas advised that a Draft Transportation Element update had been prepared by the
Transportation Commission, which City staff has begun to review. Staff believed it was a
solid first draft, and that a series of subplans for Transportation Demand Management
and the pedestrian and transit aspect of the subplans were also to be addressed. He noted
that he had met with the transportation planners in the Public Works Department, and
they hoped to look at Alameda in two different way: one of the established area of the
Island with good pedestrian facilities, and the problematic areas of those facilities; and
other large areas of Alameda undergoing complete redevelopment, such as the Northern
Waterfront and Alameda Point.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 13
June 11, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-06-11.pdf
PlanningBoard,2005-10-10,8,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
Ms. Eliason advised that a letter from Carol Ireland regarding the Cineplex was placed on the dais.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATION:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Northern Waterfront Plan (Vice-President Cook).
Vice President Cook noted that there had been no further meetings since her last report.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Golf Course Committee (Board Member Piziali).
Mr. Piziali noted that there had been no further meetings since his last report.
c.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board
member Mariani).
Ms. Mariani noted that they had discussed options and ways to improve traffic through Chinatown,
and how it affects Alameda, downtown Oakland and Chinatown. They planned to prepare a formal
resolution to present to both the Alameda and Oakland Planning Boards. They planned to make
concrete suggestions on how to achieve those goals.
Mr. Lynch noted that this was a stipulated effort pursuant to filed litigation. He was very concerned
with the authority of this body, given the type of development currently taking place in Oakland, has
taken place since the body was formed, and will take place. He noted that development has taken
place rapidly, and added that focus was primarily placed on Alameda, which he found regretful. He
noted that Chinatown was only one community that suffered from the traffic congestion, and wanted
the proceedings to be fair to the citizens of Alameda.
Ms. Mariani noted that a wide variety of issues were discussed, and believed that the committee was
working well together; everyone realized their proper role in the process. She complimented Mr.
Thomas on his skills in facilitating.
Mr. Lynch was very concerned that the Port of Oakland was not involved in this body, because the
Port was the major developer.
Ms. Mariani noted she would bring that issue before the Committee.
Vice President Cook noted that the Chamber of Commerce would hold a public presentation on the
Oak to Ninth Project, and shared Mr. Lynch's concerns regarding the effect of Oakland's buildout
on traffic in Alameda.
Ms. Eliason noted that Mr. Thomas would be able to provide the details to answer Vice President
Planning Board Minutes
Page 8
October 10, 2005",PlanningBoard/2005-10-10.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-09-22,10,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
Board members may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or
make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, the Board may provide a referral
to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body
at a subsequent meeting concerning a City matter or, through the chair, direct staff to
place a request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda.
The Board requested staff provide an update on the status of Alameda Landing. Staff
responded that negotiations with Clif Bar and Target are continuing.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
10:53 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
This meeting was audio and video taped.
Page 10 of 10",PlanningBoard/2008-09-22.pdf
PlanningBoard,2009-09-10,4,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
10:15 p.m.
Page 4 of 4",PlanningBoard/2009-09-10.pdf
PlanningBoard,2010-04-26,5,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m.",PlanningBoard/2010-04-26.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-03-26,25,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
President Lynch noted that numerous pieces of correspondence had been received, and
requested that the writers confirm their facts before committing them to paper.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATION:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee
(Board Member Mariani).
President Lynch advised that Board member Mariani had left the meeting and would
report on this item at the next meeting.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board
Member Kohlstrand).
Board member Kohlstrand noted that no further meetings had been held since her last
report.
c.
Oral Status Report regarding the Alameda Climate Protection Task Force
(Board Member Cunningham).
Board member Cunningham noted that the Task Force met the previous Wednesday to
review target values for common emission reductions. He noted that the next meeting
would be held on Wednesday, April 18, 2007 at the Alameda Free Library.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
11:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew
Andrew Thomas, Sécretary
City Planning Board
These minutes were approved at the April 18, 2007, Planning Board meeting. This
meeting was audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 25
March 26, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-03-26.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-05-14,14,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATION
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee
(Board Member Mariani).
Board member Mariani noted that they would hold the next meeting at 3:30 p.m. on May
17, 2007, at the Asian Health Center in Chinatown.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board
Member Kohlstrand).
Board member Kohlstrand noted that there was nothing further to report.
C.
Oral Status Report regarding the Alameda Climate Protection Task Force
(Board Member Cunningham).
Board member Cunningham advised that the next meeting would be held on Wednesday,
May 16, at 7 p.m. at the Library.
Board member Cunningham noted that many mail notifications of project had been
received, and he would be happy to access the notifications on line o save mailing
expenses.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft suggested printing materials on both sides of the page to
save paper.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
10:56 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Anderson
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
These minutes were approved at the May 29, 2007, Planning Board meeting. This
meeting was audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 14
May 14, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-05-14.pdf
PlanningBoard,2005-08-08,10,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATION:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding Northern Waterfront Plan (Vice President Cook).
Vice President Cook was not in attendance to present this report.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Golf Course Committee (Board Member Piziali).
Mr. Piziali advised that there was nothing new to report.
c.
Oral Status Report regarding Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board
member Mariani).
Ms. Mariani advised that there was nothing new to report.
12.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
Regarding the comments made during Oral Communications regarding big box stores, Ms.
McNamara inquired whether the City had a current definition of a big box store.
Ms. Eliason advised that the General Plan did not have any differentiation, and did not recognize ""big
box"" as a definition, but the retail strategy report may have some definitions that have not been
included in the General Plan. She noted that the definition was usually based on square footage, and
staff would research that issue for the Board.
13.
ADJOURNMENT:
8:22 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul Benoit, Interim Secretary
City of Alameda Planning Board
These minutes were approved at the August 22, 2005, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was
audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 10
August 8, 2005",PlanningBoard/2005-08-08.pdf
PlanningBoard,2005-09-12,11,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATION:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Northern Waterfront Plan (Vice-President Cook).
Vice President Cook advised that there was nothing new to report.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Golf Course Committee (Board Member Piziali).
Mr. Piziali advised there was nothing new to report.
c.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board
member Mariani).
Ms. Mariani was not in attendance to present this report.
d.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board member
Kohlstrand).
Ms. Kohlstrand advised that a meeting had been held on August 17, 2005, and noted that it was led
by the Chair of the Transportation Commission. She believed he was trying to establish a new
classification system for the roadways in Alameda. A very useful discussion was held, and people
leaned toward a recommendation of using a more multimodal type of classification system; both
vehicles, buses, bicycle and pedestrian use would be included. They anticipated presenting a
proposal for street classifications at the next meeting.
12.
STAFF COMMUNICATION:
Ms. Eliason advised that a special meeting would be held on Thursday, September 29, 2005 to hear
the Use Permits associated the Alameda theatre and Cineplex. Staff wanted to ensure that everyone
could be accommodated, and that the Elks Club was secured for an overflow crowd.
13.
ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION:
8:31 p.m.
13-A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to (b) of section 54956.9 number of cases: 1
14.
ADJOURNMENT:
9:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Planning Board Minutes
Page 11
September 12, 2005",PlanningBoard/2005-09-12.pdf
PlanningBoard,2005-09-26,9,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATION:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Northern Waterfront Plan (Vice-President Cook).
Vice President Cook was not in attendance to present this report.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Golf Course Committee (Board Member Piziali).
Mr. Piziali advised there was nothing new to report.
c.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board
member Mariani).
Ms. Mariani advised that the next meeting would be held Thursday, September 29, 2005.
d.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board member
Kohlstrand).
Ms. Kohlstrand advised that there had been no meetings since her last report.
12.
STAFF COMMUNICATION:
Ms. Eliason advised that the packets for the Special Meeting on Thursday, September 29, 2005, were
placed at the Board members' chairs.
13.
ADJOURNMENT:
7:41 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul Benoit, Interim Secretary
Planning & Building Department
These minutes were approved at the October 10, 2005, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was
audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 9
September 26, 2005",PlanningBoard/2005-09-26.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-05-29,17,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee
(Board Member Mariani).
Board member Mariani was not in attendance to present this report.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board
Member Kohlstrand).
Board member Kohlstrand advised there was nothing new to report.
c.
Oral Status Report regarding the Alameda Climate Protection Task Force
(Board Member Cunningham).
Board member Cunningham noted that the previous meeting had been cancelled, and the
next meeting would be held in mid-June.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
11:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
These minutes were approved at the June 25, 2007, Planning Board meeting. This
meeting was audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 17
May 29, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-05-29.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-04-28,15,"10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None.
a.
Report on Alameda Point Station Area Plan
Mr. Biggs presented the staff report, and noted that it was provided to the City Council by
the City Manager. He noted that the report was available on the City's website.
The public hearing was opened.
Mr. David Howard suggested that this study was justified on the basis of having to
respond to the Oakland-Chinatown lawsuit against the City of Alameda. He noted that
Section 3.3 of the Settlement Agreement called for a study of transportation alternatives,
which had been presented by the Planning Director many times that outside money was
used to conduct the study to satisfy the requirements of the agreement. He hoped that the
Planning Board or Planning staff would refer this study to the Oakland-Chinatown
Advisory Committee for review, as part of responding to this agreement. He noted the
concerns expressed by the Chinatown Agreement as part of the settlement agreement
regarding automobile traffic. He noted that the transit-enhanced third alternative
translated to twelve buses per hour coming out of Alameda Point, presumably mostly
coming through the Tube. He believed the Advisory would want to review whether they
intended to trade automobiles for buses.
Mr. Howard addressed Board member Cunningham's previous comments about the
balance of jobs and housing at Alameda Point, and noted that the concept was not
adequately addressed in the report. He did not observe any efforts in Alameda to attract
a
big campus user. Regarding the Housing Element, he understood that 71% of Alameda
residents left the Island to get to work each day. He noted that the top ten employers in
Alameda employed only about 4,000 people out of a day population of 38,000 people. He
believed that looking at more housing at Alameda Point would aggravate the current
housing/jobs balance. He supported the idea of reusing the buildings, and bringing jobs at
a range of pay scales that would not require people to leave the Island; he believed that
might solve some of the traffic and transit considerations.
Mr. Howard expressed concern that the report continued to promulgate the notion which
he did not believe had been substantiated or justified, that Measure A precluded any
historic buildings from being reused. He spoke specifically of the Bachelor Executive
Quarters and the Bachelor Officer Quarters. He cited Article 3 of Chapter 30 of the
Alameda Municipal Code (Development Regulations): Multiple Dwelling Units
-
Rehabilitation, remodeling or alteration of existing structures provides that existing
multiple dwelling units may be rehabilitated or remodeled, provided they comply with
the provisions of the chapter, and no building shall be altered to increase the number of
multiple dwelling units contained therein."" He believed that legislation has been
conveniently ignored by every study of what to do with the BEQ and the BOQ. He
believed it was not substantiated that the BEQ and the BOQ could not be reused through
that legislation. He believed that should be studied, and has heard Planning staff and
Page 15 of 17",PlanningBoard/2008-04-28.pdf
PlanningBoard,2016-12-12,11,"10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
11-A 2016-3673
Subcommittee with Commission on Disability Issues regarding Universal
Design Ordinance
Board Member Burton gave an update on their recent meeting and that progress was
being made on the draft ordinance.
11-B 2016-3681
Subcommittee for Alameda Marina
*None*
Board Member Knox White said he met with the owners of Big O.
Board Member Köster asked if the color on the projector could be improved as the board's
holiday present.
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Köster adjourned the meeting at 10:50pm.
Approved Minutes
Page 11 of 11
Planning Board Meeting
December 12, 2016",PlanningBoard/2016-12-12.pdf
PlanningBoard,2017-07-24,9,"10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
11-A 2017-4583
Subcommittee for Alameda Marina
*None*
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Trish Spencer shared information about the passing of resident Dick Rutter.
13. ADJOURNMENT
President adjourned the meeting in memory of Dick Rutter at 10:41 pm.
Approved Minutes
Page 9 of 9
July 24. 2017",PlanningBoard/2017-07-24.pdf
PlanningBoard,2019-12-09,7,"10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
10-A 2019-7518
January 13, 2020 Public Forum to Discuss Measure A Land Use Regulations
11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
None.
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Curtis adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 7 of 7
December 9, 2019",PlanningBoard/2019-12-09.pdf
PlanningBoard,2012-07-23,10,"10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
Board member Köster inquired about 1700 Park Street, stating that partial painting has
occurred on the rear of the building.
Mr. Thomas stated that the applicant is looking at colors, the scaffolding went back up
because of the cosmetic work needing to be done, and trim needs to be added to the
rear of the building.
Board member Köster inquired about the old Wienerschnitzel building.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft responded that the restaurant is now BBQ and the paint
scheme is the only façade change.
Board member Knox White requested that the Board be notified in advance when an
item is going to be continued.
12. ADJOURNMENT
11:07 p.m.
Approved Meeting Minutes
Page 10 of 10
July 23, 2012",PlanningBoard/2012-07-23.pdf
PlanningBoard,2022-04-11,9,"10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None
11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
Board Member Hom announced that he would be unable to attend the May 9th meeting.
Vice Chair Ruiz announced that she had submitted Alameda's ADU Policy to The Urban
Land Institute for a leadership award. She also announced that the Housing the Bay
Conference was coming up.
Board Member Hom believed that Alameda's General Plan should be put forth for an
American Planning Association Award and the deadline was coming up.
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
13. ADJOURNMENT
Vice President Ruiz adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 9 of 9
April 11 2022",PlanningBoard/2022-04-11.pdf
PlanningBoard,2012-04-23,8,"10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None
11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
Board member Knox White stated that the Target status report was confusing and not
clear on Board's purpose with this item. It seemed like a public hearing on the design.
Not clear on how to give direction to staff on a status report when the direction is coming
from one person not the entire body.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft stated that in the future design review should not be
approved until it has met all the Board's standard. Suggested that staff review the
pedestrian past at the shopping district on Bay Street in Emeryville, which may give
guidance on pedestrian pathway protection.
President Zuppan stated that the piecemeal approach is sometimes too isolated and the
Board needs to have all the context in order to make decisions. Requests that
guidelines for status report be drafted so the Board better understands of what the
expectations are.
Vice President Burton concurs that bringing items to the Board earlier is the best solution
so the Board has a chance to review and change as necessary. Developers and
designers would want issues identified as early as possible to help keep projects on
track.
Board member Köster asked if the Board will review the final site plan that was approved
with conditions
Mr. Thomas affirmed that the Board will be presented with a final site plan review. Will
take Board comments to staff for review to come up with the best approach to receive
final approval but keep the project on task.
12. ADJOURNMENT:
9:33 p.m.
Approved Meeting Minutes
Page 8 of 8
April 23, 2012",PlanningBoard/2012-04-23.pdf
PlanningBoard,2020-01-27,6,"10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
Board Member Teague said he would be meeting with the Vice Mayor and others
regarding paths forward on Article 26.
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Curtis adjourned the meeting at 8.55 p.m.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 6 of 6
January 27, 2019",PlanningBoard/2020-01-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2015-04-13,10,"10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
10-A
2015-1545 Transportation Commission Report on Point-to-Point Car Sharing
Policy: None
11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
11-A 2015-1543
Report from the Alameda Point Site A Ad-Hoc Subcommittee
President Henneberry said that the subcommittee has not met yet.
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
13. ADJOURNMENT: President Henneberry adjourned the meeting at 11:05 P.M.
Approved Regular Meeting Minutes
Page 10 of 10
April 13, 2015",PlanningBoard/2015-04-13.pdf
PlanningBoard,2015-01-26,6,"10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None
11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
11-A. 2015-1235
Report from the Alameda Point Site A-Ad Hoc Sub-Committee
President Henneberry announced that the Sub-Committee has not met yet.
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None
13. ADJOURNMENT: President Henneberry adjourned the meeting at 9:05 p.m.
Approved Regular Meeting Minutes
Page 6 of 6
January 26, 2015",PlanningBoard/2015-01-26.pdf
PlanningBoard,2013-06-10,8,"10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None
11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
President Burton commented on an Alameda Point Town Center & Waterfront
Subcommittee and he would like the committee to be himself, member Knox White and
asked member Alvarez-Morroni to be an addition to this group.
11.A. Report from Alameda Landing Residential Design Review Ad-Hoc Sub-
Committee - Nothing to report
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None
13. ADJOURNMENT: President Burton adjourned the meeting at 10:50 p.m.
Approved Regular Meeting Minutes
Page 8 of 8
June 10, 2013",PlanningBoard/2013-06-10.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-02-25,14,"109,280 square feet in floor area with a total of 384 parking spaces to be constructed on a
9.22 acre site.
Board Member Cunningham seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 5.
Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Abstain - 1 (Cook). The motion passed.
10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
Vice President Kohlstrand would like the resolution thanking Gina Mariani for her service
on the Planning Board to be presented at the next Planning Board meeting. Mr. Thomas
agreed, and noted that would take place.
11-A. Oral Status Report regarding the Alameda Point Advisory Task Force (Board
Members Cook/Kohlstrand)
President Cook noted that there had been no further meetings.
11-B. Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board
Member McNamara)
Mr. Thomas noted there was nothing to report.
11-C. Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation Subcommittee (Board Member
Kohlstrand)
Vice President Kohlstrand noted that there had been no further meetings since her last
report.
President Cook requested that if there had been no further meetings under Board
Communications, that they be removed from that meeting's agenda. Mr. Thomas
concurred with that suggestion.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
10:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
Page 14 of 15",PlanningBoard/2008-02-25.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-03-05,16,"10:24 p.m.
***
Vice Mayor Knox White moved adoption of the Master Fee resolution with direction that
the Master Fee Schedule increases the fees being approved and ensuring billing is
done in time increments, not hours.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Know White, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Daysog - 1.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution approving workforce changes
to add one Division Chief Position to the Fire Department Fire Prevention Services
Division effective March 6, 2019, for an annual cost of $355,000.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Knox White, Oddie and Vella - 3. Noes: Councilmember
Daysog and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 2.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution amending the budget.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Knox White, Oddie and Vella - 3. Noes: Councilmember
Daysog and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 2.
Vice Mayor Knox White requested an off-agenda report on the billing and fee collection
be provided on a 6-month basis.
Councilmember Vella inquired the duration, to which Vice Mayor Knox White responded
until Council decides the update is no longer needed.
Councilmember Vella inquired if it is possible to coordinate the update with the mid-year
budget; expressed support for reporting back to Council.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for Vice Mayor Knox White's proposal;
proposed a report every 6-months for the first year, then syncing with other fee
reporting.
Councilmember Vella expressed support for Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's proposal.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
None.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
March 5, 2019
15",CityCouncil/2019-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-10-06,20,"10:50 p.m. in honor of former Councilmember Barbara Kerr.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
20
October 6, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-10-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-02,7,"11
Councilmember Daysog stated there is a parcel number for one parcel for all seven
acres that goes until 2015/2016; requested the change in parcel numbers from
2015/2016 to 2016/2017 be noted.
The Interim City Attorney stated when a deed is recorded, the County Assessors' office
does not always make the change immediately, which may be the reason there is a
slight discrepancy between when the Quitclaim Deed was recorded and when the
Assessors' parcel map was modified to show two different parcels.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if a ballot argument would be due January 16, 2019, to
which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie stated the language needs to be created here and now or a
subcommittee needs to be formed.
Discussed the proposed Alameda Point Collaborative (APC) project and support; urged
the proponents to withdraw the initiative: Doug Biggs, APC.
Discussed Measure WW; expressed concern over pressure to withdraw the initiative;
discussed the homeless project; urged adoption of the ordinance or placing the
measure on the November 2020 ballot: Angela Fawcett, Friends of Crab Cove and
Initiative Proponent.
Expressed support for caring for others and neighborly relations; urged the initiative be
withdrawn to work together: Cindy Acker, Alameda.
Discussed Measure WW; stated a writ was filed; discussed meeting with Mayor Ezzy
Ashcraft: Liza Gabato Morse, Friends of Crab Cove.
Discussed taking care of homeless seniors; urged the proponents to withdraw the
initiative: Eric Strimling, Alameda.
Urged all people be supported; expressed support for withdrawing the initiative:
Elizabeth Middleberg, Alameda.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she did meet with proponents of the project, Ms.
Fawcett and Ms. Gabato Morse; urged both sides to sit down, talk and find a
compromise.
Councilmember Vella stated there has been no Brown Act violation; that she has not
spoken to any other Councilmembers about the item or her opinion of it; Measure WW
was put on the ballot by EBRPD, not the City of Alameda; if there are concerns about
Measure WW, there is a public board of elected officials which members of the public
can hold accountable; whether or not the land is within the definition of becoming
available for EBRPD is debatable; outlined the process for surplus land; stated
encouraged constituents to work and speak with the EBRPD Board or come to liaison
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-02.pdf
PlanningBoard,2017-09-11,9,"11-A 2017-4657
Subcommittee for Alameda Marina
President Mitchell asked for an update on the project.
Staff Member Thomas said they are conducting an independent analysis of the costs of
rehabilitating the seawall and infrastructure of the site and are working on a number of
other issues with the applicant.
President Mitchell asked if they still need the subcommittee.
Staff Member Thomas said he did not believe so and that the analysis would come back
to the full board.
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Mitchell adjourned the meeting at 9:34pm.
Approved Planning Board minutes
Page 9 of 9
September 11, 2017",PlanningBoard/2017-09-11.pdf
PlanningBoard,2019-11-25,5,"11-A 2019-7483
Discussion of 2019 New State Housing Laws
Andrew Thomas, Planning, Building and Transportation Department Director, introduced
the item.
Board Member Teague gave a presentation. The presentation can be found at:
https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4232063&GUID=BDF57CFD
4667-45D4-854F-FEE31409DB12
President Curtis asked if the state laws on tenant protections supersede Alameda's
ordinances.
Staff Member Thomas said that state laws take priority and that City staff are planning to
bring an update to Alameda's policies to bring them in line with state law. [Note: At the
1/27/2020 Planning Board meeting, President Curtis stated that the City Attorney's
office has since made clear that the statewide tenant protections would not override
local ordinances with stronger tenant protections.]
Staff Member Thomas gave a report on the changing landscape of state housing laws.
Board Member Teague noted that ADUs do not count towards, nor are they effected by
density requirements.
President Curtis asked if state law would preempt R-1 zoning within half a mile of a bus
stop.
Staff Member Thomas said it would not change the zoning, but would allow a JADU and
an ADU on the property.
President Curtis said it would be helpful to edit the two presentations together and share
the video with the community to help understand how the state laws are influencing what
happens here.
Board Member Rothenberg said people who go ""off the grid"" and rent out rooms and do
not comply with regulations have an impact on density and quality of life.
Staff Member Thomas said they would be having a workshop on code enforcement and
short term rentals with the City Council.
Board Member Ruiz asked when the Planning Board would be reviewing the Objective
Design Standards again.
Staff Member Thomas said they are targeting January for bringing those standards back
to the board.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 5 of 6
November 25, 2019",PlanningBoard/2019-11-25.pdf
PlanningBoard,2017-04-10,9,"11-B 2017-4171
Subcommittee with Commission on Disability Issues regarding Universal
Design Ordinance
*None*
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Köster adjourned the meeting at 10:42pm.
Approved Minutes
Page 9 of 9
April 10, 2017
Planning Board Meeting",PlanningBoard/2017-04-10.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-02-11,12,"11-C. Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation Subcommittee (Board Member
Kohlstrand)
Vice President Kohlstrand noted that there had been no further meetings since her last
report.
11-D. Oral Status Report regarding the Alameda Climate Protection Task Force (Board
Member Cunningham)
Board member Cunningham noted that there had been no further meetings since his last
report. The report was presented to City Council the previous week, and they had asked
staff to reconsider the format of the next committee. The action plan had been approved.
Mr. Thomas noted that the Council would consider whether to set up a permanent Board
or Commission for Climate Protection, and that it would have to be reconstituted with
different members.
Mr. Thomas added that Mayor Johnson had not yet made a nomination for a replacement
Planning Board member.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
9:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
This meeting was audio and video taped.
Page 12 of 12",PlanningBoard/2008-02-11.pdf
PlanningBoard,2005-08-22,19,"11.
BOARD COMMUNICATION:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Northern Waterfront Plan (Vice-
President Cook).
Vice President Cook advised there had been no further meetings.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Golf Course Committee (Board Member
Piziali).
Mr. Piziali advised there was nothing new to report.
c.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee
(Board member Mariani).
Ms. Mariani advised that she did not have any further information. She noted that she
would speak with President Cunningham and the City Council because she was having
some trouble making all of the meetings; there is no backup replacement at this time. She
noted that Ms. McNamara had been the backup, and is no longer; in addition, the WABA
representative is no longer on the Committee.
d.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board
member Kohlstrand).
Ms. Kohlstrand advised that she was not in attendance at the meeting due to her vacation.
She noted that the meeting date was set with very short notice.
12.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Eliason advised that there will be a Transportation Master Plan meeting of the Task
Force on Wednesday, August 24, 2005, at 7:30 p.m. The meeting would address streets
and circulation plans.
13.
ADJOURNMENT:
10:10 p.m.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 19
August 22, 2005",PlanningBoard/2005-08-22.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-08-25,9,"11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
Board members may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or make
a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, the Board may provide a referral to
staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body at
a subsequent meeting concerning a City matter or, through the chair, direct staff to place
a request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda.
Board member Lynch requested staff look into options that limit skateboarding in front of
the theatre as it can be hazardous to pedestrians.
Vice President Ezzy Ashcraft suggested signage stating ""No skateboarding on
sidewalk"" be placed near the theatre to address Board member Lynch's concern. She
asked staff to provide clarification to the Board on the public misconceptions regarding
the Boards action on the Grand Marina housing project.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
10:31 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
This meeting was audio and video taped.
Page 9 of 9",PlanningBoard/2008-08-25.pdf
PlanningBoard,2013-02-11,3,"11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
11-A Planning Board Sub-Committee Statuses
Mr. Thomas commented on the difference between Ad-hoc sub committees and
permanent sub- committees. The Planning Board currently has 2 Ad Hoc sub-
committees for Alameda Point Visioning consisting of President Zuppan, Vice
President Burton, and Board Member Henneberry, and Alameda Landing
residential design review Ad Hoc sub-committee consisting of Vice President
Burton, Board members Knox White, and Köster.
President Zuppan gave a brief update of the Alameda Point Visioning Ad Hoc
sub-committee meeting.
Vice President Burton gave a brief update on the Alameda Landing residential
design review Ad Hoc sub-committee meeting.
12.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
None
13.
ADJOURNMENT: 8:12 P.M.
Approved
Planning Board Minutes
Page 3 of 3
2/11/2013",PlanningBoard/2013-02-11.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-10-27,5,"11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
Board members may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement
or make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, the Board may provide a
referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to
the body at a subsequent meeting concerning a City matter or, through the chair, direct
staff to
President Kohlstrand asked that in the future staff provide an update on Del
Monte, Conformance Rezoning and the Work Program. She also requested a
monthly update on SunCal be provided to the Board.
12.
ADJOURNMENT: @ 10:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
This meeting was audio and video taped.
Page 5 of 5",PlanningBoard/2008-10-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2009-03-09,11,"11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
Board members may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or make a
brief report on his or her activities. In addition, the Board may provide a referral to staff or other
resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body at a subsequent
meeting concerning a City matter or, through the chair, direct staff to place a request to
agendize a matter of business on a future agenda.
None
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
a 10:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
This meeting was audio and video taped.
Page 11 of 11",PlanningBoard/2009-03-09.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-03-24,8,"11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
President Cook noted that a Preservation Alert from the Alameda Architectural
Preservation Society had been received regarding the charrette and community visioning
for the North of Lincoln area. She believed their comments were very interesting.
President Cook thanked staff for removing the ""non-reports"" from the Board
Communications agenda item.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
8:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jon Biggs, Secretary
City Planning Board
This meeting was audio and video taped.
Page 8 of 8",PlanningBoard/2008-03-24.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-11-26,8,"11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Alameda Point Advisory Task Force (Board
Members Cook/Kohlstrand)
President Cook noted that there had been no further meetings.
Mr. Thomas advised that the next meeting would be held December 13, 2007, at the O Club.
He noted that practical multiple scenarios would be presented.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board
Member Mariani).
Member Mariani noted that the November meeting had been cancelled. She added that
during the October meeting, there had been some discussion about the focus of the
Committee, and whether it should address Chinatown alone, or Chinatown and the
extended surrounding areas.
Mr. Thomas noted that the City of Alameda had taken the lead for seven years on
attempting to get the County and Oakland to examine different scenarios on improving
the connection between the Webster and Posey Tubes, and the I-880 freeway. He noted
that the area was built-up, and that a 2000 study concluded that there was no good
solution. He displayed and described the proposed transition from the Tube to I-880 and
to Fifth Street. He noted that traffic and speed control issues had been discussed.
Member Lynch inquired how many doors and roofs the City of Oakland had approved in
the last 10 to 15 years, and how many were currently working their way through the City
of Oakland's Planning Department. He would not want to allocate or spend any more
funds on further studies on this particular issue. He believed the issue was being talked
around, and that the core of the issue was not being addressed; he believed that was a
waste of public funds.
Mr. Thomas suggested that this item be agendized.
He recalled the origins of the traffic study in the Oakland Chinatown area, and noted that
because the 880 freeway was constrained other options such as pedestrian and transit
must be studied. He believed it was important to bring in other regions to the study as
well.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Vice President
Kohlstrand).
Vice President Kohlstrand noted that a meeting for the Pedestrian Task Force had been held
two weeks earlier, and added that Gail Payne, who joined the City as the bicycle and
pedestrian coordinator, presented her first draft to the subcommittee. She identified the
missing links in the pedestrian network, and would establish a criteria system to make an
Page 8 of 10",PlanningBoard/2007-11-26.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-08-27,11,"11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
a.
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board
Member Mariani).
Board member Mariani was not in attendance to present this report.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Vice President
Kohlstrand).
Vice President Kohlstrand advised that there had been no meetings since her last report.
c.
Oral Status Report regarding the Alameda Climate Protection Task Force (Board
Member Cunningham).
Board member Cunningham noted that as the report on the dais indicated, the report
would go into a draft local action plan mode, and will return to the Task Force for review.
He believed it would go through the various Boards for their review and comment, which
was not noted in the summary. He noted that it contained a wide range of action plans
and suggestions, and that it would go to City Council for review and possible approval.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft requested information regarding the newly remodeled
Long's on Santa Clara Avenue, which did not appear to have any bike parking outside.
Ms. Woodbury noted that it was not required on the plans, but she would discuss it with
Long's. She felt confident that they would install a bike rack.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
8:42 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
These minutes were approved at the September 24, 2007, Planning Board meeting. This
meeting was audio and video taped.
Page 11 of 11",PlanningBoard/2007-08-27.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2009-06-11,2,"11.
SET NEXT MEETING DATE:
Thursday, July 9, 2009
12.
ADJOURNMENT
SPECIAL NEEDS SERVICES
Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the Recreation and
Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538, at least 72 hours
prior
to the meeting to request an interpreter.
Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact
the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant.
Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available.
Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print!
Audio Tapes of the meeting are availáble upon request.
Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY
number 522-7538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an
alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to
participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution
of
the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Alameda Recreation and Park
Department, 2226 Santa Clara Avenue. during normal business hours.",RecreationandParkCommission/2009-06-11.pdf
PlanningBoard,2006-09-11,8,"11.
STAFF COMMUNICATION:
None.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
8:37 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathy Woodbury
- Cathy Woodbury, Secretary
Planning & Building Department
These minutes were approved at the September 25, 2006, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was
audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 8
September 11, 2006",PlanningBoard/2006-09-11.pdf
PublicArtCommission,2006-11-29,3,"11.
STAFF COMMUNICATION:
The following is the current status of the projects identified in the February 2006
Status Report:
1. 2515 Blanding Ave. -- A work/live project.
2. Bridgeside -- Commission approved the proposal with a condition regarding
specific programming agreements. Commission expressed concern that the final
executed resolution failed to accurately identify the condition of approval
regarding the agreed upon programming.
3.
Alameda Towne Centre -- Opening in phases. Art has not been installed yet due
to construction delays. Vice Chair Lee suggested press releases for all new
artwork open to the public.
4. Summer House (Harbor Island Apartments) -- No formal application for public art
filed as of the February 2006 status report. The Commission expressed concern
about the lack of initiative to include public art and also was curious about the
temporary Certificate of Occupancy.
5. Alameda Landing (Catellus Project) -- Still in entitlement phase. The project will
go to City Council on December 5, 2006.
6.
Alameda Theater/Parking Structure -- Mural was removed from project due to
removal of sheer wall. Commission expressed concern about what the
developers are going to do to include public art in the construction of the parking
structure and the Alameda Theater.
They were concerned about
""grandfathering"" to avoid being obligated to include public art in the project.
7.
Washington Park Recreation Building - Doug Vu will follow up to see if The Park
and Recreation Department has submitted an application for public art.
The following projects are still in the entitlement phase:
1.
Boatworks - Submitted application for rezoning to allow 242 dwelling units.
2.
Harbor Bay Village - Submitted application for rezoning to allow 104 single-
family homes. Currently in EIR phase.
3.
Bayport
4.
Bay Ship & Yacht
Finally, D. Vu reminded the Commissioners that the AB 1234 ethics training
needs to be completed by the end of calendar year 2006.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
8:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Douglas Vu, Planner III
Planning & Building Department",PublicArtCommission/2006-11-29.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-03-12,15,"11.
STAFF COMMUNICATION:
a.
Future Agendas and work program
Mr. Thomas distributed the list of 106 applications that were currently on file in the
Planning & Building Department to the Board members. He noted that many projects did
not come to the Planning Board. In terms of upcoming agendas, he noted that they
intended to limit the agendas to only one major item, plus other less challenging items.
On March 26, the Northern Waterfront EIR and General Plan Amendment would be
heard. A design review on Haight Avenue would also be heard.
Mr. Thomas noted that the workshop would be held on March 29, which was designed to
generate a lot of good information and would focus on two alternatives to the PDC. One
alternative would be relieved of the Measure A constraint, and one would not be relieved
of the Measure A constraint but would address changing the plan to be more supportive
of transportation.
Mr. Thomas noted that April 18 would be a special meeting held in lieu of the April 9
meeting cancelled due to vacation schedules. He noted that would conflict with the
[ICLEI] Task Force meeting. The major item on that agenda was the EIR public hearing
on Harbor Bay Village VI General Plan Amendment, and that a decision would not be
made at that meeting. A very large turnout was expected at that meeting. The other three
items were expected to be fairly easy, and may be placed on Consent Calendar, with the
possible exception of the Hawthorne Suites parking exception.
Mr. Thomas noted that the Safeway gas proposal would be held on April 23, 2007, and
staff anticipated being ready for the Alameda Landing Phase I development plan. Site
planning issues would be discussed, but architectural issues would not be discussed. The
shopping center may be discussed.
Mr. Thomas noted that the May 29 meeting may contain the Transportation Element
update, and that a joint meeting may be held with the Transportation Commission for that
item.
Member Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a Zoning Administrator would be hired. Ms.
Woodbury noted that the role of Zoning Administrator was fulfilled by the Planning and
Building Director, or someone designated by the Planning and Building Director.
Member McNamara inquired about the status of Long's Ms. Woodbury noted that it was
a façade renovation, and that an Art Deco theme to the exterior had been developed. She
noted that all the design review letters would be sent to the Planning Board members, and
noted that several parking spaces would be lost.
Member Ezzy Ashcraft inquired about the street trees in front of the library. Ms.
Woodbury believed there had been a delay in getting the planter boxes.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 15
March 12, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-03-12.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-01-08,13,"11.
STAFF COMMUNICATION:
a.
Status Report on upcoming Public Forum related to Measure A and Alameda Point.
The public hearing was opened.
Ms. Jean Sweeney noted that she was dismayed at the amount of support she has seen for overturning
Measure A. She believed that issue should go to the voters, and she would not like to see further
public sessions in pursuit of that goal. She believed that overturning Measure A would increase the
density in Alameda, which she opposed. She did not want Atlantic Avenue widened to eight lanes,
which would greatly impact entrances to the Tube.
Ms. Diane Lichtenstein, representing Homes, believed the recommendation was to fold the forum into
the station area plan that would come before the public soon. She believed that would not be the best
way to approach this issue. She noted that Ms. Woodbury's memo based the station area plan on
transportation and transit orientation. She believed the conceptual development plans with and
without Measure A would be discussed as well. She believed that if Measure A was folded into the
community forums as a discussion point, it would dominate the purpose of what the station area plan
was, which was to discuss transportation and transit, not Measure A. She requested that the Board go
forward with the proposal to hold a forum, and noted that it had been three years since the last forum
at Kaufman Auditorium. She believed it would be fair to hear the public's views on such a hot issue,
especially since many things had changed since then.
Mr. David Howard objected to the use of MTC funds to explore non-Measure A-compliant
alternatives. He also objected to the Measure A forums being combined with the station area plan
discussion, and also objected to the existence of the Measure A forums in general. He was concerned
that a study of a non-Measure A-compliant alternative as proposed may eventually undermine
Measure A. He did not believe that was a good use of funds, and did not want it to become a
backdoor way to undermine Measure A.
Ms. Helen Sause, representing Homes, complimented the Board's plans to schedule a hearing on the
impacts of Measure A across the City, not just Alameda Point. She believed it was important to
separate this hearing from the work that will be done by WRT in analyzing the transportation
development alternative for Alameda Point. She noted that it was encouraging to allow people to
speak about the impacts of Measure A. She was concerned that linking it with the transportation
study, that polarized positions would result, and added that no one was suggesting eliminating it. She
believed that citywide, people deserved to have the chance to speak their minds about the possibility
of modifying Measure A. She hoped the issue could be discussed civilly.
The public hearing was closed for Board discussion.
Member Mariani believed that while the speakers had opposite points of view, they did agree that the
discussions should not be held together in a combined forum.
Member Cunningham did not believe the issues could be examined effectively without considering
Planning Board Minutes
Page 13
January 8, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-01-08.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-02-12,10,"11.
STAFF COMMUNICATION:
a.
Work Program Status Report
Mr. Thomas summarized the staff report, and noted that Items 11-a and 11-b would be
agendized each meeting. He noted that items could move to different dates because
applicants can change their minds, and there could be changes within staff's involvement
in the items. He noted that this report would give the Board an opportunity to look three
months ahead. The Board would be able to maintain a list of every item being considered
by the Planning Board and that may be brought to City Council. Staff would like to have
a database of every application on file, which generally numbers between 100- 125
projects.
President Lynch noted that there were lingering questions regarding Alameda Town
Centre, and noted that the gas station application may not be addressed because of the
number of questions. He suggested scheduling a status report on the Town Centre before
March 26, 2007, in order to maintain the timeline. Mr. Thomas noted that staff would like
to schedule a study session to examine the Town Centre issues, including a walk around.
Member Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the study session could be held on the same
evening. She noted that she was pleased to see the study session for green building
ordinances for March 12, 2007, which she had lobbied for; she did not believe the City
needed to reinvent the wheel in that regard, and noted that many other cities had added
green building ordinances. She would like to see the draft ordinances brought back to the
Board, with a date certain to submit it to the City Council for their approval. She would
also like to see the next steps beyond the initial step.
Member Kohlstrand complimented staff on the list, and noted that the April 9, 2007,
meeting occurred during spring break. She was concerned that may not be a good date to
have major items on the calendar. She also wanted to ensure there was a reasonable
transportation network to support Alameda Landing, which she believed the
Transportation Commission should examine. She noted that Clif Bar needed to move
ahead before further action. Mr. Thomas noted that the approved Master Plan included
many transportation issues, including the street cross-sections, model, and open space
development concept. He noted that the bigger items would be presented for evaluation
before the smaller items such as Clif Bar could be addressed.
Member Kohlstrand noted that the May 29 meeting would address the Transportation
Element Update Study Session, and believed it would be a good idea to revisit those since
the City Council had adopted some transportation policies.
Vice President Cook noted that there was no Measure A forum on the list, and believed
that it should be addressed, or that a discussion why it would not be addressed should be
held. Ms. Woodbury noted that a workshop would be held, and that further workshops
may be spun off if needed. Vice President Cook believed it should be on the agenda, or if
not, that reason should be discussed.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 10
February 12, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-02-12.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2021-11-04,5,"11. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Saxby adjourned the meeting at 8:15 pm.
HAB Meeting Minutes
November 4, 2021
5",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-11-04.pdf
GolfCommission,2009-01-21,4,"11. ADJOURNMENT 7:32 p.m.
-4 -
Golf Commission
Minutes - -Wednesday, January 21, 2009",GolfCommission/2009-01-21.pdf
PlanningBoard,2019-07-22,11,"11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Curtis adjourned the meeting at 9:37 p.m.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 11 of 11
July 22, 2019",PlanningBoard/2019-07-22.pdf
PlanningBoard,2016-03-14,6,"11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Knox White adjourned the meeting at 7:16pm.
Approved Minutes
Page 6 of 6
March 14, 2016
Planning Board Meeting",PlanningBoard/2016-03-14.pdf
PlanningBoard,2017-06-26,8,"11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
11-A 2017-4461
Subcommittee with Commission on Disability Issues regarding Universal
Design Ordinance
Did Not Meet. Staff Member Thomas said they could officially disband that subcommittee.
11-B 2017-4462
Subcommittee for Alameda Marina
*None*
Board Member Knox White shared that the accessory dwelling unit and shared living
ordinances were passed by City Council.
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Alan Teague asked what time the tour was and if the public was invited.
Staff Member Thomas said it was at 530pm and open to the public.
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Köster adjourned the meeting at 9:28pm.
Approved Minutes
Page 8 of 8
June 26, 2017
Planning Board Meeting",PlanningBoard/2017-06-26.pdf
PlanningBoard,2019-09-09,11,"11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Curtis adjourned the meeting at 10:35 p.m.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 11 of 11
September 9, 2019",PlanningBoard/2019-09-09.pdf
PlanningBoard,2009-05-11,6,"11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
Board members may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or
make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, the Board may provide a referral
to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body
at a subsequent meeting concerning a City matter or, through the chair, direct staff to
place a request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda.
Board member Cook attended the Climate Action Summit on behalf of the Planning
Board and passed on the information collected at the Summit.
12. .ADJOURNMENT:
9:22 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
This meeting was audio and video taped.
Page 6 of 6",PlanningBoard/2009-05-11.pdf
PlanningBoard,2021-10-11,7,"11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
None.
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Saheba adjourned the meeting at 8:57 p.m.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 7 of 7
October 11, 2021",PlanningBoard/2021-10-11.pdf
PlanningBoard,2022-02-14,10,"11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
Vice President Ruiz brought to the staff's attention practical application challenges with
moving to all electrical, especially for Multi-Family. She wanted the staff to plan and work
with Public Works and AMP to see how to work out the rules and regulations so that all
the departments are ready for the challenges.
Staff Member Tai discussed what the city was already doing.
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Saheba adjourned the meeting at 10:05 p.m.
Draft Planning Board Minutes
Page 10 of 10
February 14, 2022",PlanningBoard/2022-02-14.pdf
PlanningBoard,2015-03-23,7,"11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
Board Member Knox White said that employees at Safeway at Alameda Landing are
parking their cars near the bike racks, which hinders bicyclists from parking. There are also
issues with the shopping carts locking up in the parking lots. Mr. Thomas said that staff will
follow up with the store regarding both issues.
11-A 2015-1462
Report from the Alameda Point Site A Ad-Hoc Subcommittee
President Henneberry said that the subcommittee has not met.
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None
13. ADJOURNMENT: President Henneberry adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.m.
Approved Regular Meeting Minutes
Page 7 of 7
March 23, 2015",PlanningBoard/2015-03-23.pdf
PlanningBoard,2014-04-14,4,"11.A. Report from Alameda Point Town Center Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee - None
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None
13. ADJOURNMENT:
8:47 p.m.
Approved Regular Meeting Minutes
Page 4 of 4
April 14, 2014",PlanningBoard/2014-04-14.pdf
PlanningBoard,2014-07-14,4,"11.A. Report from Alameda Point Town Center Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee: None
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None
13. ADJOURNMENT: President Burton adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
Approved Regular Meeting Minutes
Page 4 of 4
July 14, 2014",PlanningBoard/2014-07-14.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-02,8,"12
meetings if they feel there has been misuse of Measure WW funds; outlined additional
costs not related to a special election that also must be considered by Council; stated
that she cannot support adopting the ordinance and would like to pursue submitting the
ordinance to voters; it is a misnomer to state a special election is due to actions of
Council; questioned if Council waits to place the election on the next general election at
a lower cost, what other costs are accruing in that time; stated Council has fiduciary
obligations that must be considered; the previous agenda item stated the project is a top
need; that she would like to discuss the ballot question.
Councilmember Daysog stated the issue is straight-forward; Council should respect the
wishes of those who signed the initiative; a special election is far too costly; the vote
should be placed on the November 2020 ballot; Friends of Crab Cove are asking for the
vote to be placed on the November 2020 ballot.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he was struck by Ms. Middelberg's comment stating:
""we can do better as a City;"" expressed support for holding the election; stated the City
cannot be held responsible for what was said in order for Measure WW to pass;
discussed the previous agenda item relating to the current item; stated the issue should
be resolved sooner rather than later; the project will go forward; if the vote is pushed to
November or 2020, the City's liability is much more than $600,000; that he hopes both
sides can keep talking and come to a solution; the area will become a homeless facility,
but it will become urban blight if nothing is done.
The Interim City Attorney stated if Council concedes at this point, it is not an automatic
taking of the property.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired if Council moves to place the item on the ballot, are the
proponents able to withdraw, to which the Interim City Attorney responded in the
affirmative.
Vice Mayor Knox White stated if the item does not move forward, the wellness center
will lose tens of millions of dollars that have already been committed; Alameda is caring
as a community; homelessness is a major issue; the need is well documented; the best
way to find a solution is to sit down and address the issues and concerns; the initiative
is not support community-wide; requested clarification about the allocation of Measure
WW funds; stated that he believes there are factual misstatements in the initiative that
need to be challenged; now is a time for healing.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City and the County are in the midst of a housing crisis;
outlined a meeting with the Oakland Mayor; the proposed project is a well thought out
way to shelter the most vulnerable homeless individuals; expressed support for going
forward with a special election, due to funding commitments the project has acquired
which will not exist in November 2020; outlined funding opportunities; stated projects
are competing for the funding opportunities; the proponents are able to withdraw the
petition any time up to January 11, 2019 at 5:00pm; Council has not expressed a desire
to adopt the ordinance; inquired the process if members of the Council would like to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-02.pdf
PlanningBoard,2014-09-22,7,"12 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Thomas said that the study of Del Monte would be
ready by the Board meeting on October 27th
.
13 ADJOURNMENT: President Burton adjourned the meeting at 10:43 P.M.
Regular Meeting Minutes
Page 7 of 7
September 22, 2014",PlanningBoard/2014-09-22.pdf
PlanningBoard,2020-09-28,4,"12 months after opening. Board Member Curtis seconded and the motion passed 4-
0.
7-B 2020-8321
PLN20-0100 - Recommendation to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Rezoning
- 2350 Fifth Street - Applicant: City of Alameda. Public Hearing to consider a
recommendation to the City Council to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and rezone
a 0.82-acre site at 2350 Fifth Street from M-X, Mixed-Use to R-4, Neighborhood
Residential. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared to analyze
the environmental effects of the project in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
Andrew Thomas, Director of Planning, Building, and Transportation, gave a presentation.
The staff report and attachments can be found at
https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4644330&GUID=9E5D6C6C
240E-4C7B-AEF9-9D883E75AEEO&FullText=1.
Board Member Curtis asked if Measure Z passes would they be able to build more units
on the lot.
Director Thomas said no if Measure A gets removed from the Charter all the existing
zoning stays in place. He then explained how Article 26 affected zoning and housing.
Board Member Ruiz asked if the City had reached out to City College of Alameda about
their opinion on this site.
Director Thomas said yes the City had tried to sell this location for years. City College was
comfortable with either residential or commercial purposes for the lot.
Board Member Hom asked if the tennis courts nearby would create any noise or lighting
complaints from residents in the future due to sporting events.
Staff Member Thomas talked about how staff had handled past similar situations. Staff
would be working closely with the applicant and they do require the applicant to disclose
everything to possible residents upfront.
Staff Member Tai said that staff had reached out to the school district about an 11 pm cut-
off time for outdoor sporting events.
Board Member Hom asked if the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)
would be incorporated in the resolution.
Director Thomas said the MMRP would be referenced in the resolution.
Staff Counsel Celena Chen also agreed that it was a great idea to incorporate the MMRP
into the Planning Board's resolution.
Vice President Saheba opened up the public comment.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 4 of 6
September 28, 2020",PlanningBoard/2020-09-28.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-03-12,16,"12.
ADJOURNMENT:
10:09 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
These minutes were approved at the Planning Board meeting of March 26, 2007. This
meeting was audio and videotaped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 16
March 12, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-03-12.pdf
PlanningBoard,2005-06-13,24,"12.
ADJOURNMENT:
11:26 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul Benoit, Interim Secretary
City Planning Department
These minutes were approved at the June 27, 2005, Planning Board meeting. This
meeting was audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 24
June 13, 2005",PlanningBoard/2005-06-13.pdf
PlanningBoard,2005-07-11,5,"12.
ADJOURNMENT:
7:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul Benoit, Interim Secretary
Planning & Building Department
These minutes were approved at the July 25, 2005, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was audio
and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 5
July 11, , 2005",PlanningBoard/2005-07-11.pdf
PlanningBoard,2009-01-26,9,"12.
ADJOURNMENT:
8:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
This meeting was audio and video taped.
Page 9 of 9",PlanningBoard/2009-01-26.pdf
PlanningBoard,2005-05-23,17,"12.
ADJOURNMENT:
9:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jerry Cormack, Interim Secretary
City Planning & Building Department
These minutes were approved at the June 13, 2005, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was audio
and video taped.
:PLANNINGIPB\Agendas_Minutes)Minutes.05\May 23_Minute
Planning Board Minutes
Page 17
May 23, , 2005",PlanningBoard/2005-05-23.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-01-08,16,"12.
ADJOURNMENT:
9:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathy Woodbury
FCathy Woodbury, Secretary
City Planning Board
These minutes were approved at the February 12, 2007, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was
audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 16
January 8, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-01-08.pdf
PlanningBoard,2006-02-27,15,"12.
STAFF COMMUNICATION:
Ms. Woodbury advised that Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft had been nominated to the Planning Board at the
last City Council meeting, and would be accepting the nomination at the next City Council meeting.
Ms. Woodbury noted that the land tour schedule was still being developed, and that two consecutive
Fridays were being considered. She added that two different tours or a Saturday tour were also being
considered.
President Cunningham noted that this had been Ms. Harryman's last meeting, and thanked her for
her service to Alameda.
Ms. Woodbury advised that Donna Mooney would be working with the Planning Board in Ms.
Harryman's place.
In response to an inquiry by Member Kohlstrand whether the Planning Board members were
required to go to a work session related to Planning Boards that were compensated for their
meetings, Ms. Woodbury advised that she would check into that issue and report back.
President Cunningham clarified that none of the Board members were compensated.
Ms. McNamara inquired about the status of the Bridgeside project, and added that it was going very
slowly. Ms. Woodbury did not have the current status available, but knew that the site was very wet.
13.
ADJOURNMENT:
9:37 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathy Woodbury Secretary
Planning & Building Department
These minutes were approved at the April 10, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was audio and
video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 15
February 27, 2006",PlanningBoard/2006-02-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2006-07-10,14,"12.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
This item was continued to the next meeting.
13.
ADJOURNMENT:
11:38 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathy Woodbusy
- Cathy Woodbury, Secretary
Planning & Building Department
These minutes were approved at the July 24, 2006, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was audio
and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 14
July 10, 2006",PlanningBoard/2006-07-10.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2011-07-14,2,"12. ADJOURNMENT
SPECIAL NEEDS SERVICES
Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the Recreation and
Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 72 hours prior
to the meeting to request an interpreter.
Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact
the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant.
Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available.
Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print.
Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request.
Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY
number 522-7538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an
alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to
participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of
the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Alameda Recreation and Park
Department, 2226 Santa Clara Avenue, during normal business hours.",RecreationandParkCommission/2011-07-14.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2011-08-11,2,"12. ADJOURNMENT
SPECIAL NEEDS SERVICES
Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the Recreation and
Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 72 hours prior
to the meeting to request an interpreter.
Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact
the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant.
Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available.
Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print.
Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request.
Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY
number 522-7538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an
alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to
participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of
the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Alameda Recreation and Park
Department, 2226 Santa Clara Avenue, during normal business hours.",RecreationandParkCommission/2011-08-11.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2011-09-08,2,"12. ADJOURNMENT
SPECIAL NEEDS SERVICES
Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the Recreation and
Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 72 hours prior
to the meeting to request an interpreter.
Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact
the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant.
Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available.
Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print.
Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request.
Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY
number 522-7538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an
alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to
participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of
the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Alameda Recreation and Park
Department, 2226 Santa Clara Avenue, during normal business hours.",RecreationandParkCommission/2011-09-08.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2011-05-12,2,"12. ADJOURNMENT
SPECIAL NEEDS SERVICES
Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive
Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to request an
interpreter.
Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact the Recreation and
Parks Executive Assistant.
Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available.
Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print.
Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request.
Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least
48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable
accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of the agenda packet
are available for public inspection in the Alameda Recreation and Park Department, 2226 Santa Clara Avenue,
during normal business hours.",RecreationandParkCommission/2011-05-12.pdf
PlanningBoard,2009-03-23,12,"12. ADJOURNMENT:
10:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
This meeting was audio and video taped.
Page 12 of 12",PlanningBoard/2009-03-23.pdf
PlanningBoard,2016-06-22,9,"12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Knox White adjourned the meeting at 11:34pm.
Approved Meeting Minutes
June 22, 2016
Page 9 of 9",PlanningBoard/2016-06-22.pdf
PlanningBoard,2017-02-13,10,"12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Al Wright said Andrew Thomas is a real asset to Alameda. He said that we need to find a
way to even out our water supply. He said requiring on-demand water heaters for new
construction and remodeled building could save a lot of water.
President Köster asked if we want to to discuss mandating Zero Net Energy beyond the
state requirements.
Board Member Mitchell said he would support that.
Staff Member Thomas reviewed the ordinances that staff is working on getting back before
the board which are taking up much of staff's time.
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Köster adjourned the meeting at 10:20pm.
Approved Minutes
Page 10 of 10
February 13, 2017
Planning Board Meeting",PlanningBoard/2017-02-13.pdf
PlanningBoard,2017-06-12,10,"12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Brian McGuire said housing advocates understand that new housing constructed is
expensive, but that all levels of the housing market are connected and new housing at any
price level helps alleviate the shortage.
13. ADJOURNMENT
Board Member Mitchell adjourned the meeting at 11:38pm.
Approved Minutes
Page 10 of 10
June 12, 2017
Planning Board Meeting",PlanningBoard/2017-06-12.pdf
PlanningBoard,2017-01-09,7,"12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Brian McGuire said that the board should be mindful of using the term workforce housing
and that residents making moderate, low income, and very low income are part of the
workforce and should not be left out when describing workforce housing. He said housing
for people making 120-150% of median income is upper middle class housing.
13. ADJOURNMENT
Board Member Mitchell adjourned the meeting at 9:30pm.
Approved Minutes
Page 7 of 7
Planning Board Meeting
January 9, 2017",PlanningBoard/2017-01-09.pdf
PlanningBoard,2019-11-12,5,"12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Curtis adjourned the meeting at 8:28 p.m.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 5 of 5
November 12, 2019",PlanningBoard/2019-11-12.pdf
PlanningBoard,2021-04-26,18,"12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Teague adjourned the meeting at 10:08 p.m.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 18 of 18
April 26, 2021",PlanningBoard/2021-04-26.pdf
PlanningBoard,2021-03-08,12,"12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
13. ADJOURNMENT
President Teague adjourned the meeting at 9:51 p.m.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 12 of 12
March 8, 2021",PlanningBoard/2021-03-08.pdf
PlanningBoard,2012-02-27,18,"12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
Mr. Thomas and Board member Zuppan thanked President Ashcraft and Vice President
Autorino for their work on the Planning Board.
13. ADJOURNMENT:
12:10 AM
Approved Meeting Minutes
Page 18 of 18
February 27, 2012",PlanningBoard/2012-02-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-07-17,17,"123
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND
ALAMEDA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY (APFA) MEETING
TUESDAY- -JULY 17, 2012--6:59 P.M.
THIS MEETING WAS CANCELLED.
AGENDA ITEM
(12-377 CC) Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Approving Proceedings to
Finance and Refinance Improvements to the City's Municipal Sewer System, Approving the
Issuance and Sale of Sewer Revenue Bonds by the Alameda Public Financing Authority for
Such Purposes and Approving Related Documents and Official Actions; and
(12-02 APFA) Adoption of Authorizing the Issuance and Sale of Sewer Revenue Bonds to
Finance and Refinance Improvements to the City of Alameda's Municipal Sewer System and
Approving Related Documents and Official Actions. NOT HEARD.
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and Alameda
Public Financing Authority",CityCouncil/2012-07-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-06-20,21,"12th.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(17-398) Alan Teague, Alameda, urged the Council to direct staff to participate in the
Mills Act, which pertains to preservation and enhancement of historic buildings.
(17-399) Andrew Huntoon, Alameda, urged the Mayor be treated with respect when
chairing meetings.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(17-400) Consider Directing Staff to Create a ""Straws on Request"" Ordinance and
Review Ordinance No. 2977 to Address that ""To Go"" Food Ware, Including Straws, be
Compostable or Recyclable. (Mayor Spencer)
Mayor Spencer made brief comments regarding the referral.
Stated that he does not use straws unless driving in his car: Andrew Huntoon, Alameda.
Stated the School District banned straws; urged the City to interpret the City's existing
ordinance as preventing straws since they are required to be recyclable; outlined Clean
Water Funds de-packaging program: Ruth Abbe, Community Action for a Sustainable
Alameda.
Stated she is passionate about the ordinance; she is making art pieces with the
enormous amount of straws discarded at the beach: Pat Lamborn, Alameda.
Councilmember Oddie named off a number of options for the ban on straws; requested
staff to return with a goal to reduce all disposable food ware.
Vice Mayor Vella stating adding the intent to include all other disposable food ware into
the existing ordinance would be helpful; education is key; she would like the City to work
with the local fast food restaurants on the issue and also be mindful of people who need
to use straws due to a disability; people should be educated on other straw material
options.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated public education is important.
(17-401) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider the remaining items
after 10:30 p.m. the cannabis referral [paragraph no. 17- ] and the League delegate
[paragraph no. 17- ].
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of considering the remaining items.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 20, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-06-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-02,9,"13
review and update the ballot question.
The Interim City Attorney responded the Council may continue the item to the following
week, and appoint a committee of Councilmembers and staff to come up with new
language that could then be brought back to Council for final action.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft proposed a subcommittee of herself and Councilmember Vella to
draft new language and ballot arguments.
The City Clerk stated the item may be continued with the direction to form a
subcommittee.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the process to formally not adopt the ordinance, but want
to go forward to the voters.
The City Clerk stated it has been expressed; the directive is to continue the meeting to a
date specific, with a new, revised ballot question to review.
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 9:05 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:14
p.m.
***
The City Clerk stated the recommendation is for the Council to proceed with adopting
the resolution calling the election on April 9, 2019 with direction that the ballot question
be amended and return at a date specific, with the recommended date being January
10, 2019.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the reason for Council to current adopt the resolution.
The City Clerk responded in order to set the argument deadlines, the election must be
called now.
Councilmember Oddie clarified that Council is bringing back the 75 words and the
proposed ballot argument.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion.
Under discussion, the City Clerk inquired the time specific the item is being continued
to, to which Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft responded 6:00pm.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if the revised 75 words will be posted and if there is
a
deadline to provide to the public.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-02.pdf
PlanningBoard,2021-09-13,9,"13.
ADJOURNMENT
President Saheba adjourned the meeting at 10:56 p.m.
Approved Planning Board Minutes
Page 1 of 10
September 13, 2021",PlanningBoard/2021-09-13.pdf
PlanningBoard,2006-08-14,9,"13.
ADJOURNMENT:
8:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathy Woodbury
-
Cathy Woodbury, Secretary
City Planning Board
These minutes were approved at the August 28, 2006, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was
audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 9
August 14, 2006",PlanningBoard/2006-08-14.pdf
PlanningBoard,2016-10-24,9,"13. ADJOURNMENT
Board Member Mitchell adjourned the meeting at 11:05pm.
Approved Minutes
Page 9 of 9
Planning Board Meeting
October 24, 2016",PlanningBoard/2016-10-24.pdf
PlanningBoard,2015-10-12,9,"13. ADJOURNMENT
President Knox White adjourned the meeting at 11:00pm.
Page 9 of 9
Approved Minutes
October 12, 2015
Planning Board Meeting",PlanningBoard/2015-10-12.pdf
PlanningBoard,2015-02-23,9,"13. ADJOURNMENT: President Henneberry adjourned the meeting at 10:35 p.m.
Approved Regular Meeting Minutes
Page 9 of 9
February 23, 2015",PlanningBoard/2015-02-23.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-06-21,6,"13860, ""Authorizing Collection of Delinquent Integrated Waste
Management Accounts by Means of the Property Tax Bills.
Adopted.
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the Hearing.
Opponents : Nancy Schlegel, Alameda; Leo Beaulieu, Alameda;
Pamela Jones, Alameda.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public
portion of the Hearing.
Following Nancy Schlegel's comments, Mayor Johnson suggested
that Ms. Schlegel discuss her garbage problem with the Acting
City Manager.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he was concerned that Ms.
Schlegel's garbage problem had been on going for two years.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that space allotted for recycling
bins is the Home Owner Association's responsibility the City
can address the lack of response and communication between the
contractor and the City.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether Ms. Schlegel received any
notification.
Ms. Schlegel responded that she has returned unopened statements
and left messages but has not been called back.
The Public Works Director stated notification is via the bill; a
late notice is sent 45 days after a bill has not been paid;
there have been eight notifications over two years based upon
information provided by Alameda County Industries (ACI)
Following speaker Leo Beaulieu, the Public Works Director stated
the integrated waste management rate pays for all services
residents can use one or all of the services; there are no
longer exemptions for green waste; the contract with ACI allows
for vacation exemptions it is necessary to call ahead of time
to stop and start service.
Mayor Johnson suggested that Mr. Beaulieu discuss the matter
with the Public Works Director.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
June 21, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-06-21.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-02-20,2,"13907 [paragraph nos. 07-086 and 07-086A] were removed from the
Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the
Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5. [ Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an
asterisk preceding the paragraph number. . ]
( * 07-076) - Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings
held on February 6, 2007. Approved.
(*07-077) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,803,536.53.
(*07-078) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report
for the period ending September 30, 2006. Accepted.
(07-079) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Investment Report
for the period ending December 31, 2006.
Vice Mayor Tam stated the County Auditor-Controller offered to
review the City's investment portfolio and facilitate a meeting
with the County Treasurer to review investment opportunities
The City Treasurer gave a briefing on the City's Investment Report.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the two manager's performances
differ.
The City Treasurer responded the difference is very small; stated
one manager manages longer term bonds, which gives a little higher
return over time.
Mayor Johnson requested that the City Treasurer review the City's
Investment Policy when meeting with the County Auditor-Controller
or that he conduct his own review.
The City Treasurer stated the Finance Director is very bright and
continues to investigate the investment arena.
Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of the staff recommendatior with
direction that the City Treasurer meet with the County Auditor-
Controller and County Treasurer to review the City's investment
portfolio and policy and to report back to Council in the next
Quarterly Report or sooner.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
February 20, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-02,10,"14
The City Clerk responded it can be posted at any time due to Council having the ability
to edit the question at the continued meeting; the final language must be adopted at the
January 10, 2019 meeting.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if a revised staff report will accompany the language for
Council to review ahead of time, to which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he wants to ensure items are properly noticed.
The City Clerk stated the item is being continued; Council has the ability to edit the
ballot question on the spot if needed.
Councilmember Vella stated the item is going to be properly noticed; the goal is to give
everyone enough time to weigh-in if needed.
Vice Mayor Knox White stated it would be fair to close public comment at the continued
meeting since public comment has occurred; inquired if public comment could be re-
opened.
The City Clerk responded in the affirmative; stated public comment is typically closed for
continued items.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he will oppose the motion because he believes the
decision to place the item on the November 2020 ballot at a $25,000 cost is far superior
than spending roughly $630,000 that City Hall does not have for an April special
election; the project proponent never explicitly stated the project is at risk of losing
project funds if the election is held at the November 2020 election.
Councilmember Vella stated other funds are at risk; if the ordinance were adopted, the
City has other parks in jeopardy; questioned where the funds for the new open space
park would come from and if a park bond would need to be obtained; outlined current
park project needs.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Knox White, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Daysog - 1.
Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of appointing Council a subcommittee of two
members at Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's discretion to write the ballot argument.
The City Clerk stated Council can designate authority to let two members decide who
will sign.
The Interim City Attorney stated there is not adequate time to draft the ballot argument
and have it on the regular meeting on January 15, 2019; a special meeting will have to
be called.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2007-04-17,7,"14082, ""Authorizing Open Market Negotiation of Contract Pursuant to
Section 3-15 of the Alameda City Charter and Purchase of a Modular
Recreational Building and Site Improvements at Bayport, Project No.
83110100, and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into Such an
Agreement. "" Adopted.
(*07-179) Resolution No. 14083, ""Vacating a Portion of a Ten-Foot
Wide Power Easement and Recordation of Quitclaim Deed Within Parcel
2, Parcel Map 2542 (Alameda Towne Centre) "" Adopted.
(
07-180) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda Municipal Code
Subsection 23-6.2 (Operation of Power Boats) of Section 23-6 -
(Harbor and Tidelands) of Chapter XXIII (Parks, Recreation Areas
and Public Property) by Repealing Subsection 23-6.2 in Its Entirety
and Adding a New Subsection 23-6.2 (Operation of Power Boats) that
Incorporates Speed Limits for Vessels Propelled by Machinery in an
Estuary or Channel and Continues the Prohibition of Power Boats in
Lagoons. Introduced.
Jim Silver, Alameda, stated the Estuary is highly policed; he does
not feel ticketing is needed; warnings are adequate.
Timothy Corfey, Alameda, stated police presence is not excessive on
the Estuary; he has an issue with the speed limit speeds are
difficult to determine.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the proposed ordinance would be
enforceable by other agencies that patrol the waterways, to which
the City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Johnson stated that she received a call from someone
associated with the Oakland Strokes an incident occurred on the
waterway during practice yesterday; the Oakland Strokes strongly
support the proposed ordinance.
Councilmember Gilmore requested clarification on how the speed
limit is gauged.
The Police Lieutenant stated the speed limit is gauged by the
distance away from a launch ramp or a dock; the ordinance does not
prevent a boater from driving any desired speed down the center of
the Estuary as long as they are not within one hundred feet of a
dock; the Harbors & Navigation Code is used for repeat offenders
the District Attorney's office has dismissed all citations issued
under the Harbors & Navigations Code; the District Attorney's
office would be more inclined to prosecute the cases if the City
had an ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
April 17, 2007",CityCouncil/2007-04-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-02,11,"15
Vice Mayor Knox White withdrew his motion.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the subcommittee believes the language can be ready by
January 8, 2019.
Councilmember Vella stated if she were not on the subcommittee, she would want to
read the language prior to adding her name to it; that she is willing to get the language
back to the City Clerk by January 8, 2019.
(19-017) Adoption of Resolution Submitting to the Voters an Ordinance Entitled ""McKay
Avenue Open Space Fiscal Responsibility Measure"" at the Special Election to be Held
in the City of Alameda on Tuesday, April 9, 2019. Not adopted; and Consider Authoring
a Direct and Possible Rebuttal Argument.
Vice Mayor Knox White proposed hearing the fiscal responsibility measure and Caring
Alameda Act [paragraph no. 19-018] together.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if combining the items is permissible, to which the Interim
City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
The City Clerk gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if Council could approve the item or is voter approval
needed to direct the City Attorney as described.
The Interim City Attorney responded if the voters approve the fiscal responsibility
measure, the voters would have directed the City Attorney to file an action to find out if
there was a taking and what the value is.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if Council can give the same direction after the election
is certified, to which the Interim City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
The City Clerk noted if taken to the voters, Council can state the voters approved this
funding requirement and mechanism.
The Interim City Attorney stated if the item is challenged, the court could presumably
give greater weight to what the voters approved versus Council.
Councilmember Vella requested clarification that Council would be authorizing putting a
ballot initiative forward, potentially for funding.
The Interim City Attorney stated if the voters approve the measure, there would be a
process to move ahead and find out if there was a taking; if there was a taking, there
would be a process for determining a funding source.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-02,12,"16
Councilmember Vella expressed concern if a bond measure is required for funding;
inquired why the term bond measure was not included.
The Interim City Attorney responded sources other than bond measures could be used.
Councilmember Vella inquired if Council could require going to court to find out if it is
a
taking, and then going through a bond process, so funds would not come from General
Fund or other sources.
The Interim City Attorney responded in the affirmative; expressed concern the funding
source could be left up in the air causing limitations if the bond measure did not pass.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if Council were to approve the proposed ballot measure
and limit the funding source to only a bond measure, would the City be in legal jeopardy
if faced with a taking or some other action if the bond measure did not pass.
The Interim City Attorney responded said concern is a possibility.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if the funding is related to possible compensation to the
owner; to which the Interim City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Stated that he offered to meet with Councilmember Daysog prior to the Council
meeting; delay of the project will cost APC; the cost impact study is flawed and runs a
risk if not passed; the issue is about homeless people; urged the community to serve
the homeless; expressed support of the Caring Alameda Act: Doug Biggs, Alameda
Point Collaborative.
Discussed the opposition to the senior center; stated his understanding is the project
would assist those on the verge of homelessness; stated if more people cared about
other people, things would be better: Geoffrey Burnaford, Alameda.
Councilmember Vella expressed concern about wording; stated it is difficult to follow
and nuanced; suggested Council can give direction to legal counsel now; outlined the
process that would be followed; urged caution in adding items to the ballot that can be
completed through an act of Council instead.
Councilmember Oddie concurred with Councilmember Vella; stated that he does not
wish to put the fiscal responsibility measure on the ballot.
Vice Mayor Knox White stated that he would not like to put the fiscal responsibility
measure on the ballot; questioned what the City gains by giving direction now; stated
that he would rather put the Caring Alameda Act on the ballot.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated giving voters three measures to vote on can be complicated
and confusing; expressed support for the Caring Alameda Act, which should be taken to
the voters.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-07-05,3,"16-330] and the final passage of the ordinance [paragraph no. 16-336 were removed
from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the remainder of the Consent
Calendar.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*16-327) Minutes of the Special, Regular and Successor Agency to the Community
Improvement Commission Meetings Held on June 7, 2016. Approved.
(*16-328) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,959,969.81.
(*16-329) Recommendation to Accept the Investment Report for the Quarter Ending
March 31, 2016. Accepted.
(16-330) Recommendation to Approve a Nine Month Agreement in the Amount of
$148,085 with Strategic Economics to Prepare an Economic Development Strategic
Plan for the City of Alameda, and Reappropriate $50,000 from Unspent Fiscal Year
2015-16 Funds for the Agreement.
Councilmember Daysog stated the project is based on the 2000 Economic
Development Strategic Plan; he looks forward to discussing how to alter the Transient
Occupancy Tax (TOT) rate and still be competitively positioned.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the plan is a staff-driven activity; Council just appointed
the Mayor's Economic Development Advisory Panel (MEDAP) on June 7th. Council
should give specific direction that the process be driven by expertise just gathered; he
would like the plan to be a community-driven exercise.
In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese's inquiry, the Economic Development Manager
stated staff plans to use an ad hoc committee and the MEDAP; after community input
and direction from the Panel, the plan will go to the Planning Board, then back to
Council.
Mayor Spencer inquired who will choose the members of the ad hoc committee, to
which the Economic Development Manager responded staff would put together the
committee.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Economic Development Manager stated
one person from the Mayor's Advisory Panel would be on the ad hoc committee.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired why there would be only one person from
MEDAP, to which the Economic Development Manager responded there was only one
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
July 5, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-07-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-02,13,"17
Councilmember Vella stated that she would like to hear from Council about funding;
inquired if the measures are able to tie into a the initiative measure Council voted to put
on April 9, 2019 Special Election; expressed concern about asking a negative question
in one and a positive in the other.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated it is important to let voters know of the action already
approved by Council; having the two measures side-by-side gives a clearer choice.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of not placing the McKay Avenue Open Space
Fiscal Responsibility Measure on the ballot and [Council] directing the City Attorney [to
proceed] as the proposed measure directs.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion; requested input from the Interim City
Attorney.
Under discussion, the Interim City Attorney stated if the initiative passes, the City
Attorney is to file the action in court within a six-month period to determine whether or
not it was a taking and determine the value.
Councilmember Oddie stated the direction gives the ballot argument authors another
possible approach if desired.
Vice Mayor Knox White questioned what is being gained; stated the importance of the
fiscal responsibility ballot language is that voters would say do not enact the open space
initiative until funding is found; direction is given in order to figure out if it is a taking and
how much is it going to cost the City; questioned the benefit.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the propositions are not mutually exclusive, Council can
give direction to the City Attorney now and include the costs in opposition to the
measure.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired what is being proposed.
Councilmember Vella expressed concern about an additional item to agendize and
discuss post-election; stated the question before voters, in part, is where is the money
would come from; Council would like to know if this is a taking, what are the costs if it is
a taking, and how will funding be outlined; inquired what could potentially be lost from
giving direction to the City Attorney.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired if the issue has been properly agendized.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if the option can be included on the January 10, 2019
meeting.
Councilmember Daysog stated the Jean Sweeney initiative was not to be enacted
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-02.pdf
PlanningBoard,2011-10-10,5,"17. Security guards shall be provided at events in the following ratios to insure
compliance of patrons, caterers, and staff with all mandates of this resolution.
Between 100 - 200 attendees - Minimum of one security guard
Greater than 200 attendees - Minimum of two security guards
Security services and its staff shall be uniformed, and visible during all events held at
this facility. Security guards must be on duty at the facility and parking areas before
any event commences and be employed to stay on duty during all events and remain
on duty until the last patron leaves the immediate common parking area.
18. The applicant shall be responsible for educating patrons and employees to not
park vehicles in private residential areas.
Staff also suggests using a modified level of review needed to recall use permit to the
Planning Board as follows:
22. This Conditional Use Permit PLN08-0479 as amended on October 10, 2011 will
be reviewed by the Alameda Planning Board upon the receipt of a verifiable
complaint which cannot be resolved by the Community Development Director on an
administrative level.
23. Planning staff shall mail a notice indicating the date, time, and location of any
review required in condition #22, to all property owners, tenants, and homeowner
associations within 500 feet of the project site so interested parties are notified and
may to attend these meetings.
And condition #25 which states that the Use Permit will expire in two years is removed as it
is no longer applicable to the subject property.
Board member Kohlstrand asked whether or not the adjacent yacht clubs were allowed to
have amplified music.
Ms. Kavanaugh-Lynch replied that she had heard from the residents that they do have
amplified music.
Board member Kohlstrand asked if staff had discussions with the club managers or the
adjacent residents during the reworking of the conditions.
Ms. Kavanaugh-Lynch replied that she didn't speak to the club managers but spoke to one
of the neighbors numerous times regarding the revised conditions.
President Ezzy-Ashcraft asked if the yacht clubs have made any of the complaints
regarding the venue.
Ms. Kavanaugh-Lynch replied that the Police Department can't release the source of the
complaints.
Page 5 of 12",PlanningBoard/2011-10-10.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-02,14,"18
unless funding revenue sources were found; the discussion about a taking has become
moot.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that is one of the distinguishing features between the Jean
Sweeney initiative and the current item.
The Interim City Attorney stated the noticing issue is valid; there is a distinction between
the voters enacting and Council enacting; recommended adding a separate agenda
item; stated Council can take action not to put the fiscal responsibility act on the ballot,
but giving direction to the City Attorney should be deferred to the January 10, 2019
meeting.
Councilmember Oddie inquired how the agendizing notice issue is resolved by putting it
on the January 10, 2019 meeting agenda.
The Interim City Attorney responded the item can be addressed at a special meeting on
January 10, 2019.
Councilmember Vella requested a friendly amendment to the motion to have the item to
January 15, 2019 to allow the item to be properly agendized.
Councilmember Oddie revised his motion to not put it on the ballot and to agendize
giving direction to the City Attorney at a special meeting on January 15, 2019.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion.
On the call for the question the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Knox White, Oddie, Vella and Ezzy Ashcraft - 1. Abstention:
Councilmembers Daysog - 1.
(19-018) Resolution No. 15474, ""Submitting to the Voters an Ordinance Entitled ""Caring
Alameda Act"" the Special Municipal Election to be Held in the City of Alameda on
Tuesday, April 9, 2019, that Proposes to Have the Voters Confirm Resolution No.
15461, which Amended the General Plan Text and Land Use Diagram, and Ordinance
No. 3234, which Amended the Citywide Zoning Map for the Property on McKay Avenue
(APN 74-1305-26-2) to Allow for Senior Assisted Living and Support Services for
Homeless Individuals; and Consider Authoring a Direct and Possible Rebuttal
Argument."" Adopted.
The matter was discussed at the same time as the fiscal responsibility measure
[paragraph no. 19-017].
Vice Mayor Knox White moved [adoption of resolution] to place the Caring Alameda Act
on the ballot and to ask the subcommittee if they are willing to look at the [ballot
question] language to bring back to the January 10, 2019 meeting for approval.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-02,15,"19
The Interim City Attorney stated the subcommittee would also craft the arguments.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired if Councilmember Oddie would work with him.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Caring Alameda Act subcommittee would be Vice
Mayor Knox White and Councilmember Oddie.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Oddie stated of the many people he has
encountered discussing the topic, none have been opposed; people are concerned
about the issue, which needs to be put on the ballot so voters can understand the clear
choice between having services which are desperately needed and not having them;
expressed support.
Councilmember Vella expressed concern over the appearance if the same
subcommittee drafts the argument to the other measure; stated it is important to
separate the two items so there is no confusion; whatever Council puts forward relative
to the ballot question must be balanced and fair.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he will vote no on the item because he supports a
November 2020 election; the project proponent did not specific state that the project will
lose funding should it go on the November 2020 election.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired if Councilmember Daysog would support the election if
it were run on the November 2020 ballot; to which Councilmember Daysog responded
in the negative.
Vice Mayor Knox White inquired if anything could be clarified to ease concerns.
Councilmember Daysog responded there are three issues: 1) 6,000 residents support
the initiative, 2) leaders of Friends of Crab Cove are okay with a November 2020
election, and 3) there is no compelling evidence that the project will crater if the election
is held in November 2020.
On the call for the question the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Knox White, Oddie, Vella and Ezzy Ashcraft - 1. Noes:
Councilmembers Daysog - 1.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
None.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-11-02,23,"19 ridership numbers yet; the numbers are starting to bounce back slowly; she does not park at
BART due to the ease of taking AC Transit directly to the Fruitvale Station; stated people are
good about wearing masks on BART and AC Transit; discussed parking and construction in the
area of Coffee Cultures and the assisted living facility across the street.
Vice Mayor Vella stated many cases have ample parking lots and parking alternatives; there are
many ways to get to and from locations in the Park Street corridor; expressed support for the
matter.
Councilmember Daysog stated the current ordinance has a system in place which forces
developers to come to the City and ask for lower parking standards; the current proposed
ordinance would make it easier for developers to reduce parking requirements; the current
system is not burdensome on developers; there is no reason to change it; the current system
allows for a lessening of parking requirements in an effort to make housing more affordable;
many developers of large projects have been accommodated; he does not see a compelling
reason to change the current ordinance; the City should not make matters easier for developers.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers
Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye.
Ayes: 3. Noes: 2.
The City Planner stated the work performed by staff is fully supported by the State Senate Bill 2
Planning Grant; the City will seek reimbursement.
(21-702) Recommendation to Authorize the Chief of Police to Update Section 310 of the
Existing Alameda Police Department Policy Manual to Conform to Existing Best Practices and
Statutory Requirements Mandating Notification to the California Department of Justice in Certain
Officer Involved Shootings.
The Police Captain gave a brief presentation.
Stated that he is not a fan of Lexipol; the City should be defining its own police manual; the
drafts show fields at the bottom of the proposal which were not fully replaced: Zac Bowling,
Alameda.
Stated the policy indicate death whether or not the method was from a shooting: Marilyn
Rothman, Alameda.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested clarification about the policy indicating shootings
and deaths; stated that she understands there is an importance in keeping the language as-is.
The Police Captain stated the policy is a Department of Justice change and is directly related to
officer-involved shootings; the policy is specific to shootings; the policy is not related to any
other type of death which may occur.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested clarification that the policy language will reflect any
needed updates.
The Police Captain stated the language software includes a mask which allows the City to edit
the policy within the program; the fields will automatically repopulate to the proper language.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
November 2, 2021
20",CityCouncil/2021-11-02.pdf
PlanningBoard,2006-04-24,14,"1910; he believed it should be upgraded. He discussed the failures of cripple walls, which were part of
older buildings. He believed there should be incentives for homeowners to be able to fix those types
of conditions. He took exceptions of not having engineers looking at buildings pushing the three-story
limit. He expressed concern about poor workmanship by fly-by-night contractors.
The public hearing was closed for Board discussion.
Mr. Lynch could not see any work being done without an engineer's and architect's stamp, and
believed that was a liability problem. He believed this should be the homeowner's cost, and not the
City's He would be open to the Planning & Building Department waiving the plumbing, mechanical
and electrical codes, but does not want to see any lessening of the fire codes. He was not sure the
parking requirements would help the City reach the objective.
President Cunningham echoed Mr. Lynch's comments and agreed with Mr. Rutter. He did not believe
the City should give away free parking at the expense of seismic retrofitting. He believed they were
two important, but different issues. He noted that it was important for an engineer to look at each
building, and that each building was different.
Ms. Kohlstrand noted that the Board was not being asked to ultimately take action on the codes. Ms.
Woodbury noted that was true, and that any changes in Chapter 30 would eventually come to the
Board. The other incentives did not need to come to the Planning Board; the parking and design
review requirements would come before the Board.
Mr. Lynch believed the parking component should come back before the Board as a separate piece.
Ms. Kohlstrand believed it was a positive idea to encourage people to make seismic retrofits. She did
not believe that relaxing the parking was a bad idea. She was concerned about relaxing the design
review requirements unless there was more structure surrounding those requirements.
Ms. Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a fast track process could be added for seismic retrofit projects.
Ms. Woodbury did not believe that was realistic, and that it would be more logical to waive fees
associated with these projects.
Ms. Kohlstrand noted that San Francisco had a low interest loan program, and that they had a difficult
time getting people to take them out. Mr. McFann noted that he had examined that program, and that
their only incentive was financial, which led to the program difficulties.
Mr. Lynch inquired whether the City reviewed engineering structural documents. Mr. McFann
confirmed that it did, and that it was not the primary issue of this matter. He added that it was
difficult to find an engineer and architect to do small projects such as these, which were expensive. He
believed that was a disincentive to do retrofits.
Mr. Lynch believed that a piecemeal approach would not be the answer, and he believed this was a
Planning Board Minutes
Page 14
April 24, 2006",PlanningBoard/2006-04-24.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2019-12-12,21,"191210 Alameda De-Pave Park Support
As described above, the project would have a significant impact on climate change.
Every year that goes by without increasing our wetlands contributes to climate change and
poses more risks to wildlife and people while raising the price tag of doing what is needed. We
urge the Commission to recommend to the Council that the planning and development of De-
Pave Park be given the highest priority.
GOLDEN GATE AUDUBON SOCIETY
Leora Feeney
Linda Carloni
Leora Feeney
Linda Carloni
Co-Chair, Friends of the Alameda Wildlife Reserve
President, Board of Directors
GOLDEN GATE AUDUBON SOCIETY
2530 San Pablo Avenue, Suite G, Berkeley, CA 94702
phone 510.843.2222 web www.goldengateaudubon.org
email ggas@goldengateaudubon.org",RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2011-12-01,5,"1942 properties considered for demolition could then be added to the study list. Also,
accessory buildings issue are also challenging to resolve, the need to save water towers
and carriage houses, but not other utility buildings that are not worthy of preservation. He
also noted that the interior alteration purview issue was mostly in error. However, he is
open to allow owners to voluntarily allow interior purview if the Board felt that it was
warranted.
Board member Hoffman and Rauk support that the owner should have to support interior
purview.
Board member Lynch was ambivalent towards interior purview, but would believe that
some persons would find the interior purview an honor.
Ms. Kavanaugh-Lynch noted that landmark status, including items of significance would
run with the land, not with the individual property owner.
Board members discussed items noted by the AAPS presentation, including;
a. Relocation of structures on and off of lots and/or on other places in the lot.
b. Findings should be added for actions of the Board.
C. Offer Building Official the ability to allow a limited emergent demolition as part of the
policy discussion.
d. Consider the Historic Preservation Permit - zoning and potential conflict between
purview of the Planning Board. Could add findings to allow certain examples where
a restoration of a monument would be allowed to exceed development standards.
e. Trees. Board noted that trees that are noted in the municipal code are protected,
however not clear as to which Board would be best for this work or if it could be
done by staff.
There was also some discussion that the document should be reviewed by the State
Historic Preservation Office early in the process.
This discussion item was continued by the Board members to the February meeting.
7-F
2012 Historical Advisory Board Meeting Schedule - The Historical Advisory
Board will consider and approve the Historical Advisory Board meeting schedule for
2012.
Motion by Chair member Owen to approve item to 7-F second by board member Lynch.
Motion carries 5-0.
8.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS/ STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
Approved Meeting Minutes 12/1/2011
Page 5 of 6
Historical Advisory Board",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-12-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-09-21,9,"1980 staff report assumed a 75% collection rate; that she does not think the [current]
collection rate is at 75%; residents use County services; the City should find a way to
pay for the services; that she is bothered by the three options because the options are
presented as financial calculations; information is not provided regarding impacts;
inquired what would happen to response times if the County provided ALS services;
stated the issue is not just dollars and cents; two-thirds of the City's calls for service are
medical; inquired how many calls utilize ALS versus BLS services; stated that she
cannot see going to a lesser service if ALS service is utilized; inquired whether more
overtime would be needed; inquired what was the glitch in not reporting on the last 911
response calls.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the $6.6 million [annual cost in providing
the ALS program] is the result of $2.3 million in recovered revenues for ambulance
transport services and $4.3 being contributed from the General Fund, to which the
Interim City Manager responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the City would lose $2.3 million in revenue
if the City's ambulance service ceases.
The Interim City Manager responded the City would lose $2.3 million in revenue;
however, fire-staffing demands would be less; $6.6 million is the total cost for the
services.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he agrees with Councilmember Gilmore; the item
needs to be brought back with accounting data in order to make a decision.
Councilmember Tam stated the 1983 memo [from the Assistant City Manager] is very
helpful; the community cannot afford to have the Contract in a log jammed position for
something as important as ambulance service; in 1982, voters voted 80% to establish a
paramedic service and bring critical life saving medical treatments to the City; the vital
service is worth the added cost, especially since Alameda has the highest percentage of
people over 65 years old; BLS is not sufficient; the Fire Department can provide a
service level that surpasses the County's response times; the County is offering a
solution through annexation; Alameda is the last City holding out on being part of the
EMS District; Measure P funds should be used to help pay for the difference between
service costs and insurance reimbursements; ALS service is the highest priority for
community public health and safety and is a must have; stated that she would like to
direct the City to enter into negotiating a contract.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated Council has had prior Closed Session discussions on
legalities of the matter, which have not been flushed out; elements need to be
understood before moving forward; Alameda's service level is superior; the County
believes that the City has fallen into a $6.6 million hole; legal and financial information is
needed; that he is not sure whether said information can be discussed in open session.
The City Attorney stated that she has not seen the County counsel opinion regarding
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
September 21, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-09-21.pdf
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2011-01-05,2,"2
consultant team are working together to respond to the RFQ. Placeholders have been put on all
Council/ARRA agendas before the March due date in case policy direction is needed. The
Deputy City Manager - Development Services summarized the RFQ, stating that the initial
phase is for 500,000 sq. ft. of space. Staff is working closely with the Navy (property owners)
on policy issues that may need to be discussed with the Board. The short list will be in April.
The Deputy City Manager - Development Services will discuss the developer solicitation
process on the 18th in response to the RFQ, and before the short list. Other bases have been
jump-started by large institutional user like LBL, it is a great catalyst and opportunity to get
Alameda Point started.
Member Johnson asked about the location and competitors. The Deputy City Manager
-
Development Services responded that the location was very specific: 20 - 25 minutes from
blackberry gate; and that the biggest competitor is LBL's own property at Richmond Gild
Station, 90 acres along the waterfront. The cities of Berkeley and Emeryville are also included.
Member deHaan inquired if LBL is looking for land site or adaptive reuse. The Deputy City
Manager - Development Services explained that since LBL needs state of the art R&D facilities,
they want to find new construction. In initial conversations, the area that stands out is the area
south of Atlantic. Construction would start in July 2013 in areas without cleanup issues. Chair
Gilmore requested the RFQ be posted on the City's website so that the Board can access it and
be prepared to get questions answered.
The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated that the Golden Gate Yacht Club and
Oracle Racing announced that the America's Cup #34 will be held in San Francisco in 2013. In
anticipation of the event, staff sent event organizers a letter reemphasizing the city's support for
the San Francisco bid, and where Alameda can be helpful, i.e., host supportive services on
Alameda Point for the America's Cup - hangars, ferries, potential economic benefit, strong
marine industry, sailing syndicates, and being involved in the planning process.
Member deHaan asked if the Board is taking the lead with regard to the community support
efforts, or if there is a separate professional organization taking the lead. The Deputy City
Manager - Development Services replied that it has been a cooperative effort - specific
community members are involved in the maritime and sailing world and have the connections
that staff doesn't. There are shared ideas and support. The City and staff lends credibility as a
government entity to their interests.
The Acting City Manager discussed the website which was developed by a community member
who is connected to the sailing world and is leading the charge, working with the City for bigger
mobilization in support of America's Cup #34. The business community wants to get involved,
and a partnership of residents, business and the city could help bring some aspect of the event
to Alameda.
Member Bonta commented on the amazing efforts from the community, recognizing Jack
Boeger and Bob Naber. Member Bonta stated that he looks forward to working with staff and
the community to maximize this opportunity and realize the full potential economically and
otherwise.
Member Tam requested to be informed of any opportunities for the elected body to get involved.
Chair Gilmore requested that updates of the event be placed as a regular item on the ARRA
agenda.",AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-01-05.pdf
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2009-01-07,2,"2) the amount of the Community Improvement Commission (CIC) investment in the Alameda
Point project and whether or not that investment of redevelopment dollars adversely impacts the
City's general fund which is responsible for financing critical city services.
Ms. Potter discussed the Presidio conveyance model - a transfer from military ownership via
special legislation to the National Park Service and was not subject to BRAC requirements - it
was determined that the same conveyance model is not feasible for Alameda Point. Alameda
Point is subject to BRAC, was previously screened for other federal agency uses, was screened
pursuant to the McKinney-Vento act for homeless uses, and is required to be conveyed at fair
market value for private ownership and reuse. The ARRA is working with the Navy to negotiate
a conveyance term sheet to transfer the property and provide for its ultimate reuse as a mixed-
use community that generates jobs, provides housing for all incomes, and opens up the
waterfront and creates new recreational opportunities for Alameda and the region. To achieve
that goal, the City entered into an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with SunCal.
Ms. Potter addressed the issue of tax increment funds, clarifying that there cannot be a pledge
of tax increment funds without a DDA, approved by the City Council and CIC in public following
a public hearing, therefore, any approval of tax increment funding will only happen after input
and participation from the community. If tax increment funds are raised through the sale of tax
increment bonds, those bonds are secured and repaid solely by tax increment funds generated
in the Alameda Point Redevelopment Project Area (APIP), and in no way obligate the City's
general fund. Based on current projections of the property value to be created by the build-out
of the master plan, staff anticipates that a maximum of $184 million of tax increment will be
created over the life of the project. This number is well short of the $700 million being
referenced in the community. It should also be noted that large portion of the $184 million is
restricted to the production of affordable housing.
Furthermore, several years ago, the City Council adopted a resolution stating that all base reuse
activities must pay for themselves and be fiscally neutral to the City's general Fund. The
Council recognized the task of integrating former military property into the larger Alameda
community would have a cost in terms of a need for the increase police and fire services, more
demand on Parks and public libraries, and increased maintenance of new roads and
infrastructure, and that cost should be borne by the new development. SunCal's draft Master
Plan is supported by a Business Plan that provides for fiscal neutrality.
Ms. Potter introduced Pat Keliher, SunCal's Alameda Point Project Manager, who presented the
draft Master Plan via Powerpoint presentation. Following the presentation, there were several
speakers who discussed various issues about the draft Master Plan.
Member deHaan is concerned about some issues in the draft Master Plan, specifically regarding
the plans for residential development, the sea level rising, and transportation issues. He also
discussed the plans for the Sports Complex and that the plan has not changed, except for the
price. He continues to have strong reservations.
In response to public comment, Member Gilmore asked SunCal to explain its financial viability,
the effect of the bankruptcies of other projects, predevelopment funding and where that money
comes from, what happens during the predevelopment period if SunCal doesn't come up with
the money, and how SunCal sees the financing unfolding once we get to a DDA.
Mr. Keliher explained that throughout ENA period, SunCal is required to reimburse the City for
any expenditures, and deposit money to spend on predevelopment dollars. This is done every
quarter and is audited. Once we get through the ENA period, and the DDA period, and",AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2009-01-07.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2017-12-14,14,"2-12 - RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSION.°
Footnotes:
--- (7)
Editor's note- Ord. No. 3029 N.S., § 1, adopted April 5, 2011, amended 2-12 in its entirety and enacted
new provisions as set out herein. The former 2-12 pertained to Housing Commission and derived from
Ord. No. 2387 N.S.; and Ord. No. 2533, § 14.
2-12.1 - Commission Created; Purpose.
There is hereby created a commission which shall be known as the Recreation and Park
Commission, whose purpose shall be to advise, coordinate and give guidance to the acquisition,
development, maintenance and operation of parks, playgrounds, and other recreational facilities in the
City of Alameda for the promotion of a sound program of community recreation and vocational activities,
using to the greatest practicable extent the land, equipment and personnel of the City of Alameda and the
Alameda Unified School District.
(Ord. No. 3029 N.S., § 1, 4-5-2011)
2-12.2 - Membership; Appointment; Term of Office; Removal; Vacancies.
a.
The Commission shall consist of five (5) members, all of whom shall, at the time of their appointment
and continuously during their incumbency, be residents of the City.
b.
Upon nomination of the Mayor, the City Council shall appoint, between May 1 and July 1. of each
year, such members as are necessary to maintain a full Commission, for terms commencing on the
first day of July following such appointment and continuing for four (4) years thereafter until the
successor of such member is appointed and qualified.
C.
No person shall be eligible for the office held by that person for two (2) consecutive terms
immediately prior to the term for which the person seeks appointment.
d.
A member of the Commission may be removed by the vote of a majority of the Council. A vacancy in
the office of a member shall be filled for the unexpired term by nomination and appointment by the
Mayor and the City Council, respectively, for the duration of the unexpired term of office.
(Ord. No. 3029 N.S., § 1, 4-5-2011; Ord. No. 3050N.S., § 1, 7-5-2012)
2-12.3 - Meetings; Officers; Voting.
a.
The Commission shall meet as necessary to perform the duties outlined in subsection 2-12.4.
Meetings shall be held on a fiscal year schedule, running July 1 through June 30. The Commission
shall have the power to establish rules for its proceedings. The Commission shall select from its
regular membership a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson, who shall serve in such office for a term
of one (1) year commencing July 1 and until their successors are selected and qualified.
b.
The votes of a majority of the entire membership of the Commission shall be necessary to take any
action thereof.
(Ord. No. 3029 N.S., § 1, 4-5-2011)",RecreationandParkCommission/2017-12-14.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-06-01,9,"2-71.5 (b) (3) would stay; Section 2-71.6 would be struck; Section 2-71.7 would have
the Housing Authority added and language would be clarified to make it abundantly
clear that it means any contract; the effective date would be the date of final passage.
Vice Mayor deHaan moved introduction of the ordinance with amendments.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese requested that the proposed ordinance be
posted on the website and the Sunshine Task Force be invited to comment; stated that
he would welcome input; adjustments can be made at the second reading.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers deHaan, Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 3. Noes: Councilmembers
Gilmore and Tam - 2.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(10-264) Michael John Torrey, Alameda, invited everyone to attend ARRL Field Day on
June 26th
.
(10-265) Philip Tribuzio, Alameda, discussed the America's Cup.
Councilmember Tam left the dias at 8:17 p.m. and returned at 8:20 p.m.
***
(10-266) Jane Sullwold, Alameda Junior Golf, submitted a letter, urged that approval of
a Lease be placed on a Council agenda as soon as possible.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(10-267) Councilmember Gilmore stated Council passed a policy urging residents and
the City to shop Alameda first; the City has not been good at offering opportunities to
residents and businesses; some web designers are upset that they have not been given
the opportunity to compete for contracts.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated in the past, monthly financial reports showed the amount
spent locally; requested that the report be provided regularly.
Councilmember Matarrese stated competitive bidding has been discussed in the past
and should be added to the list.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
June 1, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-06-01.pdf
GolfCommission,2007-04-04,2,"2-B
Approval of the Chuck Corica Golf Complex Policy Changes. (Action Item)
The Golf Commission reviewed the following policy changes:
1.
30/21 day advance reservations (res/non).
2.
9-hole rate on weekdays at anytime on the Jack Clark Course.
3.
Service club members charged according to residency when playing in
club events.
Policy number one would allow City of Alameda Preferential Starting Time
holders to call and make reservations 30 days in advance and all other customers
the ability to call 21 days in advance. The benefits of extending the time is that
customers can call to reserve a tee time further in advance and make plans
accordingly. The question was raised regarding how many times the system
allows a customer to book during the 30/21 time frame. The Golf Services
Manager stated that the current computer system is unable to restrict the number
of tee times a customer can book, although the Preferential Starting Time policy
states that a member can book one weekday and one weekend time or two
weekday times a week. Secretary Sullwold made the motion to accept the policy
changing the advance reservation period to 30 days for Preferential Starting Time
holders and 21 days for all other customers. Commissioner Gammell seconded
the motion. The Golf Commission passed the motion unanimously. The new
policy will be effective May 1, 2007. Policy number two would allow customers
to pay for and play 9-holes of golf at anytime Monday through Friday on the Jack
Clark Golf Course. The Golf Services Manager stated that the problem with
allowing the 9-hole rate all day as opposed to the first 2 hours of the day which is
the current policy is that there is no way to monitor the golfers to ensure that they
do only play 9-holes and not 18. Commissioner Gammell made the motion to not
change the 9-hole rate policy and continue to allow only play the first 2 hours of
the day. Secretary Sullwold seconded the motion. The Golf Commission passed
the motion unanimously. The third policy for review would be to have the service
club members pay the appropriate fee according to residency when playing
in
club events. The current policy is that service club members pay the age
appropriate resident rate when playing in group events. There has been a problem
in establishing whether a player is a senior or not and it was suggested that the
golf starters check identification for all players when they check in. It was stated
that the Service Clubs bring a large number of golfers to play at the Complex on a
regular basis and they should be rewarded by paying a reduced rate.
Commissioner Gammell made the motion to set a policy stating All service clubs
members shall be charged the ""Resident"" (according to age) rates when playing in
club events. Secretary Sullwold seconded the motion. The Golf Commission
passed the motion unanimously.
2-C
Review Draft of the March 8, 2007 Special Meeting Minutes.
Chuck Corica Golf Complex
Page 2
4/4/07
Golf Commission Minutes",GolfCommission/2007-04-04.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2018-05-03,2,"2.
A gap between the glass wind panels is preferred over the use of caulked
joints.
3.
The glass panels should be taller than 5-feet to provide better wind
protection.
7-B 2018-5520
1100-1250 Marina Village Parkway Public Hearing to Review and Comment on the
Shipways Residential Project Draft Environmental Impact Report and Project Design -
Applicant: The Cavallari Group, Inc.
A public hearing to review and comment on the adequacy the Draft Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) and project design for the Shipways Residential Project application. The
Shipways Residential Project Draft EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2017042021) evaluates
the potential environmental impacts associated with the approval and construction of the
proposal, and this public hearing is being conducted pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The Board provided comments to staff and the applicant but no action was
required.
7-C 2018-5522
Public Hearing to recommend that the City Council approve an amendment to Alameda
Municipal Code Section 13-21 to increase protection of historic/heritage trees, including
adding a requirement for certified arborist review, establishing review standards, clarifying
protected trees, and other miscellaneous administrative and clarifying amendments. The
proposed amendment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3 and 15308.
CONTINUED TO FUTURE DATE 3-0, Sanchez motioned, Jones seconded.
8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
*None*
11. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourned the meeting at approximately 9:00 p.m.
Approved Action Minutes
Page 2 of 2
May 3, 2018
Historical Advisory Board",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2018-05-03.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-08-04,3,"2.
CA05-0010, 1815 Sherman Street, Applicant: Jules Garabaldi. The applicant is
requesting a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the historic
structure, located at the above address, for the purposes of remodeling the existing single-family
dwelling. The site is located at 1815 Sherman Street, within an R-2, Two Family Residence
Zoning District. (EP) (re-hearing from 7-7-05 mtg.)
Ms. Pudell, Planner II, briefly reviewed the staff report as presented. On July 7, 2005 the HAB
denied this application, in part, because they did not like the design of the new construction. Per
the City Attorney Office, the Historical Advisory Board does not have purview over the design
of new construction; however, the Board may provide their comments to staff to consider during
the Design Review approval process.
Ms. Pudell informed the Board that the original plans have been revised to maintain the first
fifteen feet of the building. Although this structure does have some local significance, it does not
warrant its inclusion on the State Historic Research Inventory. Staff recommends approval of the
Certificate of Approval for the partial demolition of a single family residence located at 1815
Sherman St. with conditions as stated in the draft Resolution.
Chair Anderson opened the Pubic Hearing.
Jeff Hamon, contractor, informed the Board that the design has been revised according to the
comments made at the July hearing.
Christopher Buckley - AAPS, spoke in favor of the revised design. He stated that AAPS would
like to submit comments during the design review process.
There were no speakers opposing this project. Chair Anderson opened the floor to Board
discussion.
Board Member Lynch stated that it is important for this Board to see what is being proposed in
order to make an informative decision whether the historical character of the building will be
altered, and the new development will be harmonious with existing buildings and neighborhoods.
Board Member Miller stated that he understands that design issues are not the purview of this
Board, but feels without the knowledge of what is being proposed, he would most likely deny
any application for demolition.
Ms. Pudell stated that currently staff is working with the City Attorney's office on possible
revisions of the Historical Preservation Ordinance, which will be on a future agenda.
The Board may provide any comments on the proposed design to staff for consideration in the
Design Review approval process.
Minutes of August 4, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
3",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-11-03,2,"2.
Certificate of Approval, 500 Central Avenue, Applicant: Tony Wong. The applicant is
requesting a Certificate of Approval for the unauthorized removal of more than thirty percent
(30%) of the value of the historic structure, located at the above address. According to AMC
Section 13-21, removal of more than 30% of the value of the structure, is defined as demolition.
Without prior approval of a Certificate of Approval, the property is subject to a five year stay in
the issuance of any building or construction-related permit. The site is located at 500 Central
Ave. within the R-5, General Residential Zoning District. (Applicant is requesting this item be
continued to the December 1, 2005 mtg).
Ms. Eliason informed the Board that the applicant has requested a continuance to the December
1, 2005 meeting. Mr. Wong is currently working with Staff to develop a compliance plan to
resolve the outstanding historic preservation issues that are associated with this site.
Board Member Lynch fears the structure will continue to deteriorate if left untouched for another
month.
Ms. Eliason advised the Board that staff is currently working with the applicant to stabilize the
building to prevent any further deterioration
M/S (Miller, Anderson) to continue this item to the December 1, 2005 meeting. 4-0-1.
Ayes:
4;
Noes:
0;
Absent:
1; (Tilos).
Motion carries.
REPORTS:
3.
Historical Advisory Board's consideration of whether to recommend to the City Council
that it designate the structure at 2320 Lincoln Avenue as a Historical Monument. (EP).
Emily Pudell presented the staff report. This item is before the Board at the request of Board
Member Lynch. In 2003 a historical evaluation of 2320 & 2322 Lincoln Avenue was performed
by the Architectural Resources Group (ARG). The report concluded that neither building
maintains all aspects of integrity as set forth by the National Register of Historic Places.
In addition, this property has also been evaluated in the New Alameda Free Library Project
Property Acquisition for Parking EIR, and researched by members of Alameda Architectural
Preservation Society (AAPS). Based on the information provided, the building at 2320 Lincoln
Avenue has been determined to be the oldest commercial structure in Alameda that is still intact,
and was believed to be part of Alameda's former Chinatown district.
Because the structure is listed on the Historical Building Study list, it is subject to demolition
control protection under the Historical Preservation Ordinance. Staff has recently met with the
property owners and they have indicated that they do not support the recommendation
to
Minutes of November 3, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
2",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities,2017-12-13,2,"2.
MINUTES
2-A Approval of Minutes for the October 11, 2017 Meeting
Beth Kenny: Thank you. Agenda item number two. The minutes, does anybody have any changes
they would like to make from the minutes from our October 11th, 2017, meeting?
Arnold Brillinger: I make a motion that we accept the minutes.
Beth Kenny: I'll second that motion. All in favor?
Arnold Brillinger: Aye.
Beth Kenny: Any opposed? Minutes approved.
3.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS/NON-AGANDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)
Beth Kenny: Do we have any non-agenda public comment? Any speaker slips?
Laurie Kozisek: No.
4.
NEW BUSINESS
4-A Retreat Planning
Beth Kenny: Okay. New business, first thing is we need to select a date for the retreat. Jenn, you
haven't experienced this before. Because the City is dark in August, we don't get to meet then, so we
make up that meeting in the winter time having a retreat where we just talk about goals for the
commission and go over some sunshine ordinance and Brown Acts, stuff like that. It takes place on
a Saturday at Mastick. Laurie has spoken to Jackie Krause from Mastick, and she said she could do
a Saturday in February, but that January is a bad month for them. Does anyone have a Saturday in
February they need to rule out?
Laurie Kozisek: Madam Chairman, may I also mention that you have a meeting, a regular meeting
in February on the 14th.
Beth Kenny: Okay.
Arnold Brillinger: Is it possible to do it in March?
Beth Kenny: I don't believe that we checked with Jackie about that. I imagine that it would be, I
think that my thought was that we try and plan for the year. And so it might be good to have it
before our first meeting of the year.
Arnold Brillinger: Okay. Makes sense.
Beth Kenny: Could we do the first Saturday in February?
12/12/17
Page 2 of 10",CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2017-12-13.pdf
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities,2016-06-08,2,"2.
MINUTES
Kerry Parker: Before we look into approval of the minutes for last meeting of April 13th, I just
want to say a quick note about edits to the minutes. If it's a spelling change, why don't you tell me
later, well just tell me offline, and I will change it. But to keep the meeting as short as we can, or as
concise
as we can, let's see if we can If it's substantive change where you say, ""You said I was
here and I wasn't here."" Then that's something we should add to the meeting. So, go ahead.
Beth Kenny: Does anyone have any content changes to the minutes from our last meeting? Then I
move we approve the minutes from Wednesday, April 13th, 2016.
Susan Deutsch: I second.
Beth Kenny: Thank you. All in favor?
S?: Aye.
Beth Kenny: Anyone opposed? It passes unanimously.
3.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS/NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)
Beth Kenny: So our next item is oral communications, non-agenda. Do we have any speakers?
Kerry Parker: We do not.
Beth Kenny: Tonight, we have a few items on the agenda, but we would like to try and keep this
meeting as short as possible. We want to give everything the proper amount of attention, but we
really want to try and really focus in on what's being presented and to use our time wisely, and
succinctly.
4.
NEW BUSINESS
Beth Kenny: So given that introduction, let's start with new business. And I'd like to welcome Gail
Payne up to discuss the expanding transportation options, transit and the TDM plan.
Gail Payne: Good evening, commissioners, I'm Gail Payne, the city's Transportation Coordinator.
And I thought it was funny that you just talked about being succinct, because I was fretting about
the number of slides that I have, and not wanting to take too much of your time. So I will do the
best I can not to belabor all my points. And I'm here to discuss a new planning effort that we're
undergoing at the city, it's a city-wide Transit and Transportation Demand Management Plan. And
we're just starting out this effort, it's expected to take 18 months. So I'll talk about the background
of this effort and the purpose of it. And since we're just beginning, we're beginning with existing
transportation conditions, so I'll be going over those with you and asking for your input, what more
you'd like to see, or less. And then also, we're looking at the preliminary draft goals and objectives
of this planning effort, and we'd love to get your input on what we have so far on that front.
08/17/16
Page 2 of 19",CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2016-06-08.pdf
GolfCommission,2010-07-21,2,"2. A 36-hole renovation with the Mif closed.
3. A 27-hole renovation (3 nines) with the Mif being operated by a non-profit.
4.
A 27-hole renovation (3 nines) with the Mif closed.
5. A 27-hole renovation (3 nines) plus a new nine hole short course with the Mif
closed.
Per John Vest, Kemper has submitted responses to three of the scenarios, but has
not yet completed the remaining two. These scenarios were puzzling because they
seem inconsistent with the direction given by the City Council at their meeting of
March 16, 2010. Chair Sullwold read aloud a portion of the minutes from that
meeting: ""Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of negotiating with both
parties with the understanding that components are needed for a par 3, driving
range, and two 18-hole championship courses; stated the starting point would be
two 18-hole courses and looking for financial feasibility; direction is to come back
with a business term sheet based on the starting point, incorporating the non-profit
aspect for operating the par 3 and working backwards from there."" The motion was
passed 4-0, with Councilmember Tam abstaining.
At this point, two gentlemen entered the meeting. Chair Sullwold informed them
what the Commission was discussing at that point. Joshua Sherman asked what the
status was of the Mif Albright course. Joe Van Winkle gave a synopsis regarding
what had transpired since the inception of the proposal for a non-profit to operate the
course. Mr. Sherman then asked when the deadline was for responding to the RFP
and Chair Sullwold responded that it had been in the fall of 2009.
4
AGENDA ITEMS
4-A Status Report on Long Term Lease and Mif Albright Negotiations
including Golf Commission recommendations
See Commission Communications
4-B
Update on Golf Complex Finances
Bob Sullwold stated that total rounds were up in June from May, but the rounds on
the Fry course were down 500 rounds from the previous year. For the fiscal year,
net income from operations was $759,000 and net cash was $724,000. Payments
to the City for the fiscal year were $889,000. The drawdown on the Enterprise Fund
was $292,000, leaving a balance of $937,000. There was a decline on the Clark
Course this year compared to last year of about 15% and on the Fry Course a
decline of about 8%. This year, there have been 44 rain days compared to 30 rain
days in the same period last year. Revenue from operations was down about 10%
this year compared to last. The largest decline was in golf shop sales which were
down about 27%. John Vest stated that some of the decline could be due to the golf
cart situation and the rough mower constantly breaking down.
- 2 -
Golf Commission Minutes - Wednesday, July 21, 2010",GolfCommission/2010-07-21.pdf
SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard,2016-06-27,8,"2. Broadband is definitely a key to regional economic development. It affects companies'
decisions to locate and remain in the region, significantly impacts companies' ability to
grow, enables the emergence of Broadband related industry clusters, and is required for
robust research, development, and technology transfer.
3. The Public Policy Institute of California publishes a study on the demographic
breakdown of the digital divide in California. According to this study, the percentages of
people on the wrong side of the digital divide include:
Asian - 27%
Black - 24%
Latino - 42%
White - 16%
Low-income - 40%
Disabled - 44%
Over 55 - 37%
Naturalized - 36%
Noncitizen - 49%
The geographic breakdown for the percentage of people on the wrong side of the digital
divide in the East Bay is as follows:
Alameda - 23.5%
Contra Costa - 17.4%
Solano - 24.5%
East Bay - over 20%
CA - over 25%
4. Digital Medicine is the future of health care and the East Bay is a leader in Telehealth,
with Kaiser Permanente, Sutter Health, and John Muir all taking leadership. However,
Digital Medicine and Telehealth all require a digitally literate clientele.
5. Social Services are also increasingly relying on Broadband, online applications, and
records, but this reliance also requires a digitally literate clientele.
6. Broadband is transforming education with flip class rooms where students view
teacher's presentations on line, new curriculum, self-directed learning, parent portals,
and other approaches, but these innovations require Broadband devices in students'
homes, digital literacy, parent engagement, and multi-institutional support.
7. Broadband is essential for community participation, public safety, and emergency
services and progress is being made, but this requires a digitally literate community and
the addressing of inter-agency operability, record access, and other issues.
4",SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2011-01-24,3,"2. Building Types and Neighborhood Character -- What should new buildings and
neighborhoods in Alameda Point look like?
3. Parks and Open Space - How should parks and open space be designed to improve
the lives of all Alameda residents?
4. Historic Character, Preservation and Adaptive Reuse -- How should we honor and
preserve the history of the former Naval Air Station?
5. Transportation and Access - How should people travel to and from Alameda Point?
6. Community Benefits - Which community benefits are the most important?
The City held three community workshops in the fall of 2010. The content and materials
presented at the three workshops located at three different locations throughout the City
(i.e., East, Central and West Alameda) was identical. This format allowed residents,
business owners, and other interested stakeholders from different neighborhoods to provide
ideas and feedback on lessons learned and suggest new concepts for Alameda Point. The
forums occurred on:
November 9, 2010 - East Alameda - Bay Farm Island -- Grand Pavilion
November 18, 2010 - Central Alameda - Mastick Senior Center
December 8, 2010 - West Alameda - The O'Club
The forums were well attended (approximate 70-100 participants at each forum) and
discussions were animated. There is also an online interactive workbook. Staff will also be
holding an Alameda Point Tenant Forum on February 8, 2011. The results of the forums will
be summarized and made available to the public in March 2011.
President Ezzy Ashcraft asked how many workbooks have been completed so far.
Mr. Thomas did not have an accurate count but said he had two boxes full of the hard copy
workbooks completed and had not yet received a tally from the online participants.
Mr. Thomas reported that during the months of January and February 2011, City staff is
planning to shift the focus of the community engagement process from ""community forums""
to the City's Boards and Commissions. Staff is requesting that the relevant Boards and
Commissions with primary responsibility for planning, transportation, economic
development, parks and open space, and historic preservation participate in the process at
a regularly scheduled meeting.
In March staff will publish a going-forward summary of the Fall Forums, the on-line
workbook results, the Board and Commission input, and the result of the Alameda Point
Tenants Forum. Through the ""Going Forward"" Summary, staff will create a consolidated
summary of ""lessons learned"" and recommendations for preparing a vision for Alameda
Point. Staff is hoping to have the synthesis complete in time to present the summary to the
APPROVED MEETING MINUTES
3 OF 8
PLANNING BOARD 1/24/2011",PlanningBoard/2011-01-24.pdf
TransportationCommission,2019-09-25,10,"2. Electric Vehicle Adoption
3. Line 19 Promotional Program Evaluation
4. Long-term Goals and Objectives for AC Transit Service in Alameda
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PUBLIC COMMENT
Jim Strehlow told a story of bicycling in the park above the Transbay Terminal on a quiet
Saturday morning. He said multiple police officers stopped him for riding his bicycle even
though there was no signage saying it was not allowed. He asked if this body was the right
place to find out if cycling was permitted there or not, since he has not had success getting
responses from AC Transit in the past.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Soules adjourned the meeting at 9:44 p.m.
10",TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2005-04-07,3,"2. Review of the Landscaping Plan for planting two Coast Live Oak trees (Quercus
agrifolia) on the vacant property at 301 Spruce Street. The submittal of a Landscaping Plan
(as part of new development proposals on the site) was required as a Condition of Approval
by the Historical Advisory Board under Resolution HAB 01-08, which approved the removal
of one Coast Live Oak tree in 2001, The site is located within an R-4 Neighborhood
Residential District.
Ms. Altschuler gave a brief history of the project. In 1988, the previous owner damaged an
Oak tree through extensive trimming. The owners were required to preserve the tree despite
it being severely pruned. In 2001 the tree showed signs of deteriorating health, and the
Board approved a new owner's request to remove the damaged tree in order to allow a
proposed residential development, with the condition that two new oak trees be planted on
the property. The Board also required the submittal of a landscaping plan for review and
approval by the Board when new construction is proposed on the site. The Board's approval
was subsequently appealed to the City Council, where the Board's decision was upheld upon
the Council's finding that there was no merit to the appeal.
The applicants have secured the services of a Landscape Architect as required by the Board
in 2001 to prepare a landscaping plan and recommendations for the location of the two new
trees. The applicants have also secured services of a certified arborist who has provided
recommendations for protecting the existing trees during construction.
Board member Tilos opened the floor for public comment.
Patrick Lynch, 305 Spruce St., spoke in opposition of this project. He has several issues with
this application. He stated that the Board should be aware that the conditions contained in
CA-01-08 have not been complied with and his requests to the City for enforcement have
been ignored. In 2002 a grading permit was issued for the development project at the site
without requiring replacement trees. He is concerned with the recent changes to Alameda's
Historical Preservation Ordinance that allows Oak Trees with a trunk diameters less than 10""
to be removed without a Certificate of Approval. The proposed replacement trees will not
likely have trunk diameters of this size for 10 to 20 years, and could be removed at the end of
the period required for the landscape maintenance agreement. He therefore requests that the
replacement trees have a diameter greater that 10"" at 4,5 ft. above the ground. He also
disagrees with staff's decision that this project is categorically exempt from the CEQA
guidelines. The tree removal together with the proposed single-family home project may
cumulatively cause additional and substantial adverse change in the condition of the
remaining oak trees.
Ms. Altschuler addressed Mr. Lynch's concerns as followed:
Minutes of April 7, 2005
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
3",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf
TransportationCommission,2020-09-23,2,"2. Wednesday, November 18
3-E Alameda Active Transportation Plan: Latest info at www.ActiveAlameda.org
3-F Alameda County Safe Routes to Schools online resources, activities, and webinars during
coronavirus pandemic: :http://www.alamedacountysr2s.org/covid-19
3-G Alameda Slow Streets program web page: http://www.slowstreetsalameda.org
3-H Alameda Commercial Streets program web page: www.alamedaca.gov/commercialstreets
3-I COVID 19 Get Around Safe Pledge: www.alamedaca.gov/AlamedaPledge
3-J Vision Zero Program: www.alamedaca.gov/VisionZero
3-K
Community
Emergency
Response
Team
(CERT)
2020
Trainings:
ps://www.alamedaca.gov/Departments/Fire-Department/Alameda-CERT
3-L Emergency Alerts for Alameda - Subscribe at AC Alert web page:
https://www.acgov.org/emergencysite/
3-M
Regional
Emergency
Transportation
Alerts
-
Subscribe:
https://511.org/alerts/emergencies/511Alert
3-N Clipper Card (adults) - order online or at Walgreens or set up Autoload to add value
automatically: https://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/getTranslink.do
3-0 Clipper Card Discounts for youth, seniors and people with disabilities
-
https://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/discounts/index.do
3-P FasTrak or new toll tag for upcoming I-880 Express Lanes scheduled to open late summer
2020: online or at Walgreens (except not Park Street location) and then register online:
https://www.bayareafastrak.org/en/signup/signUp.shtml
4. Announcements/ Public Comments
None
Approved Minutes - Transportation Commission
September 23, 2020
2",TransportationCommission/2020-09-23.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-04-02,4,"2.5%: Rob Hayes, Alameda.
Expressed support for rent stabilization; discussed his rental situation and wages:
Keegan Tatum, Alameda.
Stated the Council gave unions 9% raises over four years; outlined the School District
salary increases; stated in four years, rent could increase 20%: Al Wright, Alameda.
Compared her rent increases to her Social Security increases: Toni Grimm, Alameda.
Stated that he is not opposed to rent control; suggested a process allow Ordinance
3148 to sun set and create new regulations: Jay Garfinkle, Landlord.
Expressed concern over the 5% rent cap: Steve Scheisser, Alameda.
Stated that she supports just cause eviction in the CASA Compact; a rent cap below 5%
is needed; a rate of return for landlords should not be guaranteed: Laura Thomas,
Renewed Hope.
Discussed his friend being priced out of Alameda: Bill Rowen, Alameda.
Discussed her rental situation: Irma Garcia-Sinclair, ARC.
Stated a lower rent cap is needed; expressed concern over the years included in the
Ellis Act: Catherine Pauling, ARC.
Stated that she has been a landlord for 30 years; she would prefer to sit down together
and work things out; large corporations are usually the problem: Karen Bey, Alameda.
Discussed the rent cap and landlord expenses: Tony Charvet.
Discussed Ordinance 3148 and 5% not being enough for landlords: Malcom Lee.
Stated existing renters need to be protected from large rent increases and evictions
without cause: Sophia DeWitt, East Bay Housing Organization.
Discussed Section 8, which should be continued; stated some landlords need to raise
rents: Leslie Carter, Alameda.
Discussed fairness: Richard Neveln.
Expressed support for rent control and concern over how she will pay her rent increase:
Abeba Moldemuriam, Alameda.
Discussed his rental situation; urged adoption of just cause; stated 5% is too high:
Rasheed Shabazz, Alameda.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
April 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-04-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-17,7,"2/17/17 WORKSHOP FACILITATOR NOTES
2020: 3 YEAR VISION
* Maintain City: engaged; physical aspects - infrastructure
*
Airbnb: made it work
* Social progress: cultivate it
*
Alameda Point development: Site A - infrastructure, homes, jobs, recreation
* Find partners, efficiencies, other options for services
* Meet housing and employment needs and maintain quality
* More use of public transit and other access
*
14 referrals addressed",CityCouncil/2017-02-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-17,9,"2/17/17 WORKSHOP FACILITATOR NOTES
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION
* Low hanging fruit
* Workload of staff
* Urgency
* Can they be grouped - bundled
* Dependencies on other City projects
* Fit in 2020 Values
* How does it fit within out legal requirements, strategies
Process used for ranking referrals:
2
3
Urgent
1
4
Important",CityCouncil/2017-02-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-17,10,"2/17/17 WORKSHOP FACILITATOR NOTES
KEY CITY STRATEGIES
* Housing/homelessness
* Transport
* Fiscal solvent
* Quality of life/environment
* Business development/economic development",CityCouncil/2017-02-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-17,6,"2/17/17 WORKSHOP FACILITATOR NOTES
OPPORTUNITIES
* Limits to resources: $
* Sea level rise
* Fiscal sustainability
* Public transportation
* Capacity: transportation, resources, quality of life
* Natural disasters
* General economy and impacts on City
* Impacts of election
* Jobs and wage equality
* Outstanding work
*
Housing/homelessness
* Alameda Point - 33%
*
Long-term liabilities - unfunded pension liabilities, payroll
* Pedestrian/bike safety
* Responsibilities grow without resources or with cuts to resources",CityCouncil/2017-02-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-17,11,"2/17/17 WORKSHOP FACILITATOR NOTES
RANKING OF REFERRALS
Key (from Criteria for Evaluation): 1 = Not urgent, not important
2 = Urgent, not important
3 = Urgent and important
4 = Not urgent, important
Referral
1
2
3
4
1 Airbnb
XXXX
X
2 Plan Board Process
XX
X
X
X
3 Affordable Housing Ordinance
XXXX
X
4 Bayport - Alameda Landing
XX
X
XX
5 Homeless
XXXX
X
6 Commercial Dev - MX
X
XXXX
7 Minimum Wage
XXX
XX
8a FAAS
X
X
X
XX
8b Cannabis
XX
X
XX
9 Outdoor Lighting
XX
X
XX
10 Assisted Living
XXX
XX
11 Tree Ordinance
XX
X
XX
12 Immigrant/Refugee
XXXXX
Top 4 Priorities: 3, 5, 6, 12
Next Highest Priority: 7
Middle Priorities (further ranked below): 2, 4, 8a, 8b, 9, 11
Lowest 2 Priorities: 1, 10
FURTHER RANKING OF MIDDLE PRIORITY REFERRALS
Referral
1
2
3
4
2 Plan Board Process
XX
XXX
4 Bayport - Alameda Landing
XXX
X
X
8a FAAS
XX
X
XX
8b Cannabis
X
X
XXX
9 Outdoor Lighting
XX
X
XX
11 Tree Ordinance*
XX
X
XX
Top 2 Priorities: 2, 8b
Middle 2 Priorities: 8a, 9, 11
Lowest 2 Priority: 4
*Note: This item was revised after the workshop to correct a vote that had been
recorded incorrectly.",CityCouncil/2017-02-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-17,5,"2/17/17 WORKSHOP FACILITATOR NOTES
STRENGTHS
*
Our people: energy, proactive, positive
* Compassion - love this community
* Engaged - small enough for meaningful conversations
*Accessible - people want to be involved
*
Quality of life: safe welcoming community, low crime rate, not afraid to be different
* Appreciate historic elements
* Location - Island/shoreline
*
Business districts - people want to spend time there
* Schools
* Good infrastructure
* Makes us desirable place to live
* Great Council
* Safe: strong public safety
*
Deliver high quality services - high quality staff
*
Volunteer work of community",CityCouncil/2017-02-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-02-17,8,"2/17/17 WORKSHOP FACILITATOR NOTES
WHAT WORKED WELL
* No wasted words
*
Didn't rehash
*
No one answer - try to figure out best fit; eliminate options without support
* Modified ideas as a Council
* Able to listen to each other
* Was a sense of urgency
Positions versus interests [Do not focus on positions, focus on interests]",CityCouncil/2017-02-17.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-01-02,16,"20
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(19-019) Information from the Committee to House the Bay Area (CASA) Compact.
(Councilmember Oddie)
Councilmember Oddie stated he will submit a referral for staff to report on solutions the
City can provide.
(19-020) Councilmember Vella stated that she recently attended a Lead Abatement
Joint Powers Authority meeting; outlined issues with do it yourself (DIY) projects
involving lead paint; discussed issues related to funding from lead paint litigation;
outlined a City of Berkeley DIY home renovation pamphlet for older homes; stated soil
contamination is fairly high in the City of Alameda and she would like a City of Alameda
lead information pamphlet based off of the City of Berkeley's example.
(19-021) Vice Mayor Knox White expressed gratitude to Councilmember Oddie for
bringing forth the information on the CASA Compact; stated there is an upcoming
workshop for the hiring of the City Manager; inquired at what point and time Council can
sit as a group to prioritize and focus on key items.
(19-022) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated her first event as Mayor was opening the warming
shelter at the Christ Episcopal Church on Grand Street; expressed concern about the
Government shutdown and federal employees in Alameda not receiving paychecks;
inquired said members of the community can be assisted.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 10:23
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 2, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-01-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-02-20,20,"20
February 20, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-02-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2006-02-07,13,"2005 allocation and the infrastructure plans.
Mayor Johnson requested that a street resurfacing schedule be
provided.
Councilmember deHaan requested that a sidewalk resurfacing schedule
be provided.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the field renovation included
sprinkler systems in addition to drainage, to which the Public
Works Director responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Johnson stated that certain trees, such as eucalyptus trees,
grow rapidly and pruning of the trees is costly; suggested
reviewing the possibility of replacing trees that are too expensive
to maintain.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether project timelines would be
brought back to the Council, to which the Public Works Director
responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember deHaan stated that residents have to pay an $85
permit fee to repair a sidewalk square; inquired whether the fee
could be lowered to encourage homeowners to take care of the
replacement.
The Public Works Director responded both property owner and City
responsibilities are identified when sidewalk inspections are
performed; homeowners are given the option of using the City's
contractor; in which case, the City would cover the encroachment
permit.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired what was the outcome of the rubberized
sidewalk experiment, and whether the City was contemplating having
rubberized sidewalks.
The Public Works Director responded that the feedback has been
positive; currently, the City is not doing any rubberized
sidewalks the Council would receive a proposal for installing
rubberized sidewalks; a $90,000 grant would be applied to
sidewalks; the intent is to piggyback on the City of Oakland's
Contract for rubberized sidewalks.
Councilmember Daysog stated a level of complexity exists in terms
of the timing of available dollars; oversight is needed; there are
two types of budgeting issues: 1) the two-year budgeting process
and midyear adjustments, and 2) dedicating dollars when the reserve
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
3
Community Improvement Commission
February 7, 2006",CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf
GolfCommission,2006-09-20,2,"2006 there are 143 Miracle League Organizations across the country. The field is
constructed of a cushioned rubberized material and is flat throughout, the dugouts
are wheelchair accessible and there is an accessible restroom. Currently there are
41 completed rubberized fields and 61 fields under construction. The league
is
looking for land in Alameda to construct a field and was interested in the land on
the Golf Complex near the cross-airport roadway behind #5 green and #6 tee on
the Jack Clark Course. The Miracle League requested that the Golf Commission
consider endorsing the league as the first step towards approval. The Golf
Commission made a motion to endorse the Miracle League as an organization
unanimously. The Golf Commission directed the General Manager to research
the process necessary for assisting the Miracle League.
3-C
Discussion on Change in Venue and Time for the Golf Commission Regular
Meetings. (Action Item)
The General Manager stated that the suggestion was made at a previous meeting
to change the time and venue for the monthly regular Golf Commission meeting.
The suggestion was to have the meeting in the restaurant, Jim's on the Course, or
in the Ladies Lounge at the Golf Complex. The meetings would continue to be on
the third Wednesday of the month although would start at 5:30 p.m. It was stated
that having the meetings at City Hall makes it a more formal atmosphere. The
Golf Commission approved changing the venue and time of the regular meetings
to the Ladies Lounge at 5:30 p.m. for a trial period until the end of the year. After
the trial period the item will be placed on the agenda for final approval.
3-D Approval of Agenda and Golf Commission Recommendation for the Special Joint
meeting with the Alameda City Council. (Action Item)
The General Manager passed out a draft agenda for the joint meeting for the Golf
Commissioners review. The General Manager would like to have each Golf
Commissioner give a report. The Golf Commission decided to postpone approval
of the agenda and recommendation until after the next work session. Also
decided was to postpone the Special Joint Meeting to a later date to allow the Golf
Commission to be better prepared. The Golf Commission needs to prioritize what
the main concerns are facing the clubhouse development. It was mentioned that
a lot of time and money has been spent on the Clubhouse Project and nothing has
come out of it. The Golf Commission needs to find out from City Council how
much money and what projects can be accomplished since the Clubhouse Project
is no longer deemed feasible. The Golf Commission would like to present a
recommendation to City Council asking for a decrease in the concessions the Golf
Fund makes to the General Fund. The additional revenue could be used to help
the Golf Complex fund the clubhouse and other necessary Capital Improvement
Projects (CIP's). It was suggested to have another work session meeting with the
Golf Commission prior to the joint meeting to discuss the recommendation. Chair
Gammell asked Commissioner Schmitz and Commissioner Sullwold to compose
the recommendation for review at the work session.
Page 2 of 5",GolfCommission/2006-09-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-05-06,5,"2008 - Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2.""
Adopted.
(*08-190) - Resolution No. 14203, ""Preliminarily Approve Annual
Report Declaring Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of
Assessments and providing for Notice of Public Hearing on July 1, ,
2008 - Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 (Marina Cove) . ""
Adopted.
(*08-191) Resolution No. 14204, ""Directing Staff to Take Necessary
Steps to Proceed with the Dissolution of the Non-Profit
Corporation, Alameda Senior Citizens, Inc. Adopted.
( *08-192) Resolution No. 14205, ""Approving Continued Participation
in the Alameda County HOME Consortium and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute the HOME Consortium Cooperative Agreement with
Alameda County. "" Adopted.
(08-193) Resolution No. 14206, ""Supporting Measure H, the Alameda
Unified School District Temporary Emergency Parcel Tax. Adopted.
David Forbes, Alameda Unified School District Board of Education,
expressed appreciation to the Police Department in providing
services to the School District; stated the State budget is in
worse condition than on January 10; a parcel tax is the only way
the School District can raise revenue; the recommended parcel tax
equates to $10 per month [per parcel ] for four years; requested
Council support.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution.
Vice Mayor Tam stated the City's quality of life is tied to the
quality of schools; it is incumbent upon the community to support
Measure H; waiting for the State to solve the budget will cause
students to suffer.
Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese stated Assemblymember
Swanson held a hearing on Saturday at Encinal High School; the
State budget is in bad shape; fixing the budget will take a long
time.
Councilmember deHaan noted that the Recreation and Park Department
also supports the School District.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following
voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
5
Alameda City Council
May 6, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-05-06.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2011-12-01,5,"2011
FINAL
2010
CDBG
CDBG
CDBG
CDBG
Organization
Activity
Initial
Allocation
Funded
Increase
Funded
after
Amount
Amount
reduction
Alameda
Alameda Food
Food Bank
$ 33,000
$ 29,339
$ 3,899
$ 33,238
Bank
operating
costs
Building Futures
With Women and
Midway
$ 50,000
$ 44,452
$ 5,908
$ 50,360
Shelter
Children
Family
Family Violence
Violence
Law Center
$ 17,300
$ 15,382
$ 2,009
$ 17,391
Prevention
(FVLC)
Services
Total
$ 11,816
$ 83,598
3-B. WORKGROUP PROGRESS REPORTS
Assessment and Awareness Workgroup - Nielsen
Member Nielsen announced that the survey would be launched in a few days, and also acknowledged
Ms. Young's request for the board to convene a DV Taskforce meeting, stating she saw this being
relevant to both ATAH and the A&AWG.
Alamedans Together Against Hate Workgroup - Villareal
Member Holder said that ATAH and the AMCCC are working together to present three NIOT
screenings, and, with other partners, produce a 2012 Harvey Milk day event.
4. BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
Member James let us know this was his last meeting on the Board, and expressed his appreciation for
being able to work with us over the past four years.
All members and staff acknowledged Member James' value and unique contributions to the board. We
wish him well and he will be missed.
6. ADJOURNMENT
Motion to adjourn M/S James / Dailey Unanimous
Meeting adjourned at 9:50
Respectfully Submitted: Jim Franz - Secretary
2011\MINUTES December 2011.doc",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2011-12-01.pdf
OpenGovernmentCommission,2021-02-01,14,"2011 through 2019; urged working together to figure out what would be an effective
replacement for the null and void remedy; he would like whatever the solution is to
encourage transparency and accessibility.
Commissioner Chen there was an accountability that was completely removed and the
Commission just wants to see what that accountability can look like.
The Assistant City Attorney inquired whether there is any desire to bifurcate the items
directed to staff; stated the issues related to the annual report can be at a subsequent
meeting; the null and void questions posed by Commissioner LoPilato and Vice Chair
Shabazz can be discussed at a next meeting.
Chair Tilos responded both subjects are pretty meaty and concurred with the Assistant
City Attorney; inquired whether two separate, dedicated meetings could be done.
The Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative, stated since there is no
requirement on follow-up with respect to the annual report, the item can be on an April
meeting; the null and void remedy item can be the focus of the March meeting so no
momentum is lost; he suggests converting the questions that have been posed by
Commissioner LoPilato and Vice Chair Shabazz in a motion to direct staff to come back
with a staff report to address the items; addressing Vice Chair Shabazz's comments, once
information is laid out regarding other jurisdictions, it might provide the Commission with
some ideas about the universe of options out there.
Vice Chair Shabazz stated he likes the suggestion of finding other jurisdictions and other
possible options; he is willing to put some energy collaboratively towards drafting a flow
chart; seeing it visually may assist with understanding the process at each step.
In response to Chair Tilos' inquiry regarding consensus on bifurcating the topics at two
separate meetings, Vice Chair Shabazz stated he is opposed to having the next meeting
solely on the null and void issue; there is currently an effort to do some police reform to
address racial equity and subcommittees have been going to some of the different
commissions; there are some things that may align with some of the issues of the OGC;
it would be beneficial to provide a space to discuss the issue within the OGC context.
Chair Tilos inquired whether Vice Chair Shabazz is recommending that the topics should
be heard together in March or April.
Vice Chair Shabazz responded it goes back to his comments about making a work plan
with goals and priorities and how that would reflect the timing; he suggests meeting in
March, April, and May to address all the issues, but prioritize the issues based on what
reaches the goals of what the Commission is about; there is conversation to be had about
oversight, which very much aligns with some of the functions of the Commission; based
on the timeline and priorities, he suggests providing a forum in March for the Commission
to learn about oversight issues, address the null and void issue in April, then address the
annual report in May or June.
Meeting of the
Open Government Commission
February 2, 2021
14",OpenGovernmentCommission/2021-02-01.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2015-05-07,2,"2014, Satisfies Environmental Review for this Action Pursuant to
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Mr. Eric Fonstein, Economic Development Manager, gave a presentation. He
introduced consultants Mr. Pierluigi Serraino and Mr. Lorenzo Apicella to give a
presentation on the selection of a paint palette. During the presentation, Mr. Serraino
passed out samples of the paint color schemes proposed for the hangar buildings. He
explained how each color would be used for certain parts of the buildings.
Chair Owens asked how his team included the public in the color selection process. Mr.
Fonstein replied that there were several focus group meetings with the current business
tenants in the historic district. Mr. Serraino added that the feedback from the public
outreach led to the selection of colors that respected the history of the buildings while
providing opportunities to highlight their unique features.
Chair Owens asked if these color guidelines would also be used in the residential
subarea known as the Big Whites. Mr. Fonstein said that the colors would not be
brought over to residential areas because those residential buildings are unique and
were historically painted white. The color palette and guidelines are for the shop and
hangar areas, because those subareas are very similar in nature.
Vice Chair Rauk asked staff if existing tenants were given paint samples. Mr. Fonstein
replied in the affirmative, and explained that two focus groups looked at the paint colors
and gave the team comments. Vice Chair Rauk said she noticed the new signage at
Alameda Point. Mr. Apicella replied, saying that the proposed color schemes on the
signs are meant to attract attention, and the colors on the buildings are likewise meant
to attract attention to them. The colors are meant to induce effortless orientation for
those at former naval air station. Mr. Serraino said that his team plans on using three
base colors being used at Alameda Point.
Vice Chair Rauk asked Mr. Serraino if his team was leaning towards clear or opaque
colors for the buildings. Mr. Serraino said that he is working with the tenants on
determining their preferences. Chair Owens asked Mr. Tai if tenants would have to
confirm their paint colors with staff. Mr. Tai said that there is no permit needed to paint a
building, but there would probably be a conversation between the tenants and staff
about what paint product substitutes would be considered appropriate if they differed
from the paint palette.
Mr. Serraino explained that the colors were chosen because of the surrounding marine
environment. He said that it is reasonable to talk to Sherman Williams about making the
cost of paint affordable.
Board Member Piziali asked Mr. Serraino about his conversation with the tenants. Mr.
Fonstein explained that the tenants were shown the color palettes, and staff asked for
their input.
Approved Meeting Minutes 05/07/2015
Page 2 of 4
Historical Advisory Board",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2015-05-07.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2016-10-05,4,"2015-86c
Police Officer
12/16/2015
2015-77
Police Officer
12/16/2015
2015-86c
Police Officer
12/16/2015
2015-84PTc
Police Officer
12/16/2015
2015-87c
Police Officer
12/16/2015
2015-76
Senior Communications Specialist
01/12/2016
2015-80
Meter Reader
02/04/2016
2016-03
Electrical Distribution Technician
02/24/2016
2015-79
4-A-iv. LIST OF SPECIFICATIONS
Existing Classification Specification Revision:
-
Energy Resources Analyst
-
Substation Technician
New Classification Specifications:
-
Public Safety Information Technology Systems Analyst
-
Information Technology Systems Analyst
-
Crime Prevention Technician
-
Meter Technician
President Batchelor moved to approve Consent Calendar items 4-A-i, 4-A-ii, and 4-
A-iii. Motion was seconded by Members Nolan and Brandt which was passed by a
4-0 vote.
Vice President Malloy requested to pull item 4-A-iv for further discussion. Vice President
Malloy noted that all the strike outs for the Energy Resources Analyst were in the areas
where the employee would be assisting with certain tasks and wanted to know who would
now prepare them. Senior Human Resources Analyst, Chris Low responded that the
bargaining unit had last minute questions for this classification and that this spec should
have been pulled back for this meeting and be brought back in the January 2017 Civil
Service Board meeting.
Human Resources Director Bronstein wanted to make note that for the Meter Technician
and Substation Technician classifications, both have been modified to say that you must
have good color vision instead of freedom from color blindness, to allow for the interactive
process.
Vice President Malloy wanted to understand the reason for the new specification, Crime
Prevention Technician. HR Director Bronstein answered that currently sworn officers are
doing some of the duties, even though it is not a sworn position, and then office managers
are doing some of the duties. It made sense to have one position with all the
responsibilities. Vice President Malloy expressed concern that the position only requires
a High School diploma considering the responsibilities. Due to the minimal requirements,",CivilServiceBoard/2016-10-05.pdf
OpenGovernmentCommission,2021-02-01,16,"2019 meeting; the term ad hoc committees is not defined and does not exist anywhere in
the Brown Act; the use of the term ad hoc has no relevance to the Brown Act; he suggests
the Commission put together a play book or set of instructions and guidelines for
members of the public: Matt Reid, Alameda.
Stated that he is concerned about ad hoc committees being exempt from the Brown Act;
it is clear that they cannot be legally exempt; provided an example as to where
transparency could help out with respect to the Police Reform committee; an online
survey that has no scientific validity was put out by the committee; the survey results
cannot be trusted; the public needs to be able to see and comment on groups operating
officially as part of the government and doing the work of the people; he was disappointed
in a tweet by Vice Chair Shabazz that the ad hoc committee issue was racially motivated:
Michael Divine, Alameda.
Stated that his main concern is the lack of transparency in much of the government
activities; he is thrilled that Commissioner Reid brought her proposal forward; the
Commission should concentrate on making it work to improve transparency; urged the
Commission to set up a working group comprised of members of the public and two
members of the Commission to find ways to improve transparency and allow public
oversight access of all committees: Jay Garfinkle, Alameda.
Stated the City Attorney has already confirmed that ad hoc committees are not subject to
the Brown Act; the formation of committees is different than the terminology the Brown
Act covers; the formation of the Police Reform committee was done by staff and endorsed
by the City Manager, it was not an action of a legislative body: Zac Bowling, Alameda.
Stated it is clear that the creation of ad hoc committees seems like a major loophole and
very controversial: Amy Lee, Alameda.
In response to Chair Tilos' inquiry, the City Clerk stated the item is similar to the Council
Referral process; because the Council directs the work plan of the Commission, the action
the Commission could possibly take is to seek Council direction on whether or not the
Commission should take up the issue; the concept from the individual Commissioner is
being presented and shared tonight; the Commission as a whole can decide whether or
not there is enough interest in the proposal to seek Council advice on whether to pursue
any changes.
Chair Tilos inquired whether the next move is to ask Council if the Commission should
make a move on the issue, to which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative; stated
the Council provides direction on whether or not to move forward on an issue brought
forward by a Commission.
The Chief Assistant City Attorney concurred with the City Clerk; stated the City Council
will be the final body to determine a work plan, namely if the City Attorney's office will be
asked to develop any analysis or staff report.
Meeting of the
Open Government Commission
February 2, 2021
16",OpenGovernmentCommission/2021-02-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2020-09-15,21,"2020; announced staff has been working on the Posey Tube encampments; an
encroachment permit was issued by Caltrans for garbage bins to be placed at the
location; staff is looking into the issue of vehicles being parked at the site and providing
services to individuals; announced the Chamber of Commerce Economic Forecast will
be on September 25th at 11:30 a.m. via Zoom.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(20-614) Resolution No. 15697, ""Amending Section 6 of Resolution No. 15382, which
Adopted Rules of Order Governing City Council Meetings."" Adopted. (Mayor Ezzy
Ashcraft and Councilmember Oddie)
Councilmember Oddie made brief comments.
Vice Mayor Knox White stated this is a common sense approach; expressed support for
the referral and for encouraging concise presentations.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated encouraging concise presentations is not disparaging, it is
encouraging a positive of brevity.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the Council Referral [including adoption of the
resolution].
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(20-615) Vice Mayor Knox White announced that many members of Fire Department
staff have been off on mutual aid fighting wildfires; stated wildfires are an unfortunate
annual occurrence; expressed gratitude for staff.
(20-616) Councilmember Oddie announced Jean Nader gave a Stopwaste presentation.
(20-617) Stopwaste June 2020 Topic Brief: Sustainable Landscapes. (Councilmember
Oddie)
Councilmember Oddie made brief comments.
(20-618) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft made an announcement regarding the Plan Bay Area
report from the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Regional Planning
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
18
September 15, 2020",CityCouncil/2020-09-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-10-15,17,"2020; stated Code Enforcement related to habitability is difficult to define and tackle.
Vice Mayor Knox White stated that he would like to confirm that Council has the
capacity and the issue would not bump other items out of priority; expressed support for
feedback brought forth at the next Council meeting.
Councilmember Vella stated there are differences between basic habitability versus
personal likes; City accountability is needed in terms of basic habitability that can be
documented.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the information can be included in Housing Authority
feedback to be provided.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the City Manager's recommendations,
including consideration of an incentive program to help with the 75 vouchers.
The City Manager stated that he recommends bringing back research of how Oakland
pays for vouchers.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote:
ayes - 5.
AGENDA ITEMS (continued)
(19-583) Recommendation to Accept the Fiscal Year 2018-19 Annual Report for the
City's Rent Program; and
(19-583A) Resolution No. 15602, ""Establishing a Revised Temporary Relocation
Payment Schedule.' Adopted.
The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
***
Vice Mayor Knox White left the dais at 11:46 p.m. and returned at 11:49 p.m.
***
Urged keeping the relocation fee: Madeline Howard, Western Center on Law and
Poverty.
Councilmember Vella moved approval of the annual report.
Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Knox White, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Daysog - 1.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern about Exhibit 2 to the staff report related to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
15
October 15, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-10-15.pdf
GolfCommission,2005-11-16,2,"23 groups in the first wave and 21 in the second wave. There were holes
in the tee times, which made it difficult to keep the pace of play going
although many groups finished in less than four hours. Most groups were
happy with the pace of play but a few felt rushed. Also noted there were
no rounds after 3:00 pm. To monitor the groups and the pace of play more
coordination is necessary and six Marshals are needed on the course. In
summary there was no increase in the number of rounds, which in turn
means no increase in revenue. The program is also very labor intensive
for the Pro Shop and the Marshals. The General Manager stated that it is
probably better to try the split tees in the spring. The suggestion was
made to have the split tees on the Earl Fry Course due to the demand for
the peak times on that course. The General Manager spoke with
customers about the program and it was suggested to alternate between the
two courses. The important marketing point is the four-hour round of
golf. Customers not interested in playing that fast can play on the other
course with straight tee times.
4.
ORAL REPORTS
4-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by Head Golf Professional
Matt Plumlee.
The Head Golf Professional reported that the new flags have been placed
on the practice greens in the clubhouse area and the new practice green is
open at the Driving Range. The Head Golf Professional also mentioned
that two new employees have been hired in the Pro Shop. They are Julio
Leon and Timothy Harris, both of whom have prior golf course
experience.
4-B
General Manager Dana Banke's report highlighting maintenance and
operational activities for the month at the Golf Complex.
The General Manager reported that the maintenance crew is currently
improving the drainage on the #5, #6, #8, #10 and #14 of the Earl Fry
Course. Also the green on #8 of the Mif Albright Course is being redone
as well as the green on #4 and the new tees on #1 and #4. The work
should be completed by spring. The aeration completed by Planet Air
recently was successful although a few spots have to be lightly aerated due
to some thatch growth. The Superintendent will be covering the broken
windows at the fire tower this week to help prevent water damage.
Economic Research Associates (ERA) will be conducting a complex fee
comparison report for the clubhouse project. The report will be looking at
the fees of local golf facilities to determine how the fees at the Chuck
Corica Golf Complex can be changed. Treadwell and Rollo came and
drilled the bores for the soil analysis for the clubhouse project and the
Page 2 of 4",GolfCommission/2005-11-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2012-05-15,2,"234
were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the remainder of the consent calendar.
Councilmember Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
- 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*12-229) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on April 17,
2012. Approved.
(*12-230) Ratified bills in the amount of $3,355,777.28.
(12-231) Recommendation to Award Emergency Police Tow Contract to Ken Betts
Towing Service.
The Police Chief gave a brief presentation.
In response to Vice Mayor Bonta's inquiry regarding the tow company's location, the
Police Sergeant stated San Leandro Street in Oakland.
Vice Mayor Bonta inquired about the length of the contract, to which the Police
Sergeant responded the contract is for five years.
Vice Mayor Bonta inquired if the contract is the fourth five-year contract, to which the
Police Sergeant responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Bonta inquired if any minimum requirements were set forth by the Request
for Proposals (RFP) regarding subcontracting.
The Police Sergeant responded companies are not allowed to subcontract work.
The Police Chief stated subcontracting was a bone of contention; Ken Betts has never
had to subcontract the towing service and has the equipment available to tow vehicles
up to 60,000 pounds which could be motor homes, big rigs and AC transit busses;
however, AC transit would tow their own vehicles; the police department is responsible
for handling something that Ken Betts Towing Service cannot tow.
Vice Mayor Bonta inquired whether those types of vehicles have been towed in the past
15 years Ken Betts has had the contract, to which the Police Chief responded in the
negative; stated the City does not have that type of vehicle here.
Vice Mayor Bonta inquired what were the main concerns about the other two
companies.
The Police Sergeant responded San Leandro Tow's secondary location would be where
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
May 15, 2012",CityCouncil/2012-05-15.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-06-05,35,"237
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- -JUNE 5, 2018- -5:00 P.M.
Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 5:04 p.m.
Roll Call - Present:
Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie, Vella and
Mayor Spencer - 5.
[Note: Vice Mayor Vella was present via teleconference from
the Hilton at 10000 Beach Club Drive, Myrtle Beach, South
Carolina 29572.]
Absent:
None.
The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:
(18-310) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Significant exposure to
litigation pursuant to subdivisions (d)(2) and (e)(1) of Government Code Section
54956.9; Number of cases: One (As Defendant - City Exposure to Legal Action)
(18-311) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code section
54956.8); Property: Northwest Territories, Alameda Point; City Negotiators: Elizabeth D.
Warmerdam, Acting City Manager; and Jennifer Ott, Director of Base Reuse &
Transportation Planning; Potential Tenant: East Bay Regional Park District; Issue Under
Negotiation: Real Property Negotiations Price and Terms of Payment. Not heard.
(18-312) Public Employee Appointment/Hiring Pursuant to Government Code § 54957;
Title/description of positions to be filled: Acting City Manager and City Manager
(18-313 ) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Initiation of litigation
pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code; Number of
cases: One (As Plaintiff - City Initiating Legal Action)
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding Public Employee Appointment/Hiring and Initiating Legal
Action, the City Council gave direction to staff by the following roll call vote:
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye; Councilmember
Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Spencer: Aye. Ayes: 5; and regarding
Exposure to Legal Action, the City Council gave direction to staff by the following roll
call vote: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: No; Councilmember Matarrese: No;
Councilmember Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Spencer: Ayes. Ayes:
3. Noes: 2.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 5, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-06-05,36,"238
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 6:47 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 5, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-01-20,21,"24 years and getting new blood in is good; approving the contract also saves the City
approximately $32,000 over five years.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
***
(15-057) Mayor Spencer inquired what Council thinks about addressing the balance of
the agenda.
Councilmember Daysog suggested continuing the referrals to tomorrow; stated Council
will be fresher and the public will be better served.
The City Attorney inquired whether staff and Council agree to continue all remaining
referrals to the Special Meeting on January 21st.
Mayor Spencer responded the referrals should go first; other items that cannot wait
could also be discussed tomorrow.
In response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry, the City Attorney stated there should
be a motion to continue items to a specified date.
The City Manager stated the quarterly reports [paragraph nos. 15-054, and 15-067
CC/15-001 SACIC and the bond report [paragraph no. 15-058 could be continued to
February 3, 2015.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of continuing the remaining items [the Council
Referrals and Council Communications Item] to the Special Meeting on January 21st ,
except for the quarterly reports and the bond report.
Mayor Spencer clarified Council Referrals and Council Communications are being
continued to January 21st.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes:
Vice Mayor Matarrese - 1.
Mayor Spencer stated the January 21st meeting would convene at 6:30 p.m. in the
Council Chambers.
(15-058) Recommendation to Accept Report on Sale of Successor Agency to the
Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda 2014 Bonds. (Continued
to February 3, 2015)
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
20
January 20, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-01-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2019-05-20,1,"245
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY--MAY 20, 2019-- -6:00 P.M.
(19-297) A special meeting was called to allow the Council to attend a Community
Public Comment Meeting on the Climate Action and Resiliency Plan.
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 20, 2019",CityCouncil/2019-05-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-12-20,6,"25 sites have been identified for bike parking.
Councilmember deHaan stated the public wants to have different tree varieties planted
in the Park Street area.
The Public Works Director stated a survey was conducted; staff would meet with a
landscape architect; the matter is tentatively scheduled for the January 9th Planning
Board meeting.
Mayor Gilmore stated park tree inventory was compiled a while back and should be
presented to the Recreation and Park Commission along with the guidelines.
Councilmember Tam stated the staff report notes that a property owner would be
notified of a newly planted [street] tree and would be responsible for watering; inquired
whether the City would step in if proper care is not given, to which the Public Works
Director responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Bonta stated the suggested improvements are significant and welcome; that
he does not see a material difference between the need to remove a tree for safety to
the general public and removing a tree that would present an imminent threat to public
safety; a tree that would present an imminent threat to public safety should not require
noticing.
The Public Works Director stated the intent would be to notify the property owner prior
to removal.
Vice Mayor Bonta suggested adding ""notice when feasible or practical"".
The Public Works Director stated ""when feasible"" would be added to the noticing
requirement.
Councilmember Johnson stated the matter could be clarified by not using the term
""imminent threat"" in both areas; a tree could be dead but not be at risk of falling.
Vice Mayor Bonta stated that he likes Mr. Buckley's recommendations to delete the
three day noticing requirement for trees that are dying and have significant decay and
clarifying that 70% decay would be determined by the cross section of a tree.
The Public Works Director stated if noticing is the same [three days], separate sections
would not be needed.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether an email interest list has been established for people
interested in tree issues, to which the Public Works Director responded that a list would
be developed.
Councilmember Johnson inquired whether every tree is pruned on a five-year; to which
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
December 20, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-12-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-01-06,12,"25% over the amount of staff desired on duty to deal with vacancies
due to vacations, sickness, training, and whatever takes an
employee away from the job; the City staffs for 27 people; adding
25% would be six to seven additional positions, which is how the
number was reached; what leads to overtime is anything that takes a
person away from the workplace; in the City's case, it is primarily
vacation and the usage of compensatory time that people have
earned, secondly people on injury leave, and then sick leave; the
City only has 31 people assigned to a shift on average, which means
overtime is used if more than four people are off on any given day;
there were a lot of vacancies last year; nine people were hired in
the spring which cut the overtime in half; vacancies reduce salary
spending and cause overtime to go up; hiring people causes salaries
to go up, but lowers overtime.
Councilmember Tam stated standard procedure is to send an engine
with a paramedic as the first responder then, an ambulance is
sent; inquired whether the full complement is sent for every case,
such as an indigent, intoxicated person needing a ride to a medical
facility.
The Fire Chief responded in the affirmative. stated the current
Countywide practice set by the Medical Director requires that any
type of medical call, regardless of priority or severity, requires
an engine and ambulance.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether there is any flexibility.
The Fire Chief responded currently, there is no flexibility; there
are discussions to try to create some flexibility; the Medical
Director realizes the lowest priority of calls that might not be
true emergencies do not need the same level of response.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether fire calls go to County
dispatch, to which the Fire Chief responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether dispatch determines what
needs to be sent out, to which the Fire Chief responded in the
affirmative.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether 18 people are sent to a
fire, to which the Fire Chief responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired what happens if all 18 people are
not needed.
The Fire Chief provided a Power Point presentation outlining the
response.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
January 6, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,1,"27
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- - JANUARY 19, 2021--7:00 - P.M.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:04 p.m. Councilmember Spencer led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL -
Present:
Councilmembers Daysog, Knox White, Spencer, Vella, and
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: The meeting was
conducted via Zoom]
Absent:
None.
AGENDA CHANGES
None.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(21-028) Proclamation in Recognition of Alameda Rotary's 100th Anniversary.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft read the proclamation.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(21-029) Erin Fraser, Alameda, discussed events of white supremacist terror; questioned why
the City of Alameda and Interim Police Chief have presumably done nothing; urged Council to
take action should the current Interim Police Chief not resign.
(21-030) Jay Garfinke, Alameda, expressed concern about a lack of transparency with various
ad hoc committees; discussed a report from the Police Reform Committee; urged more be done
to provide the public an opportunity to review ad hoc committees.
(21-031) Jenice Anderson, Alameda, stated that correspondence has been sent inquiring
whether Alameda Police Department (APD) Officers supported the Capitol insurrection in-
person or online; expressed concern about the lack of response to e-mails; outlined the lack of
response by APD to a report of an armed man during a Martin Luther King Jr. Day peaceful
protest.
(21-032) Grover Wehman-Brown, Alameda, urged the City Manager take proactive steps to
investigate Officer call-outs on January 6th and general Officer conduct on social media to see
whether support has been provided to the attempted coup; expressed concern about Officers
being part of a wider trend of Police and military support and involvement; discussed social
media; urged the City to take proactive steps; expressed concern about an armed man present
during a peaceful protest with no APD response or follow-up.
(21-033) Laura Cutrona, Alameda, stated that she would like to understand what the City of
Alameda is doing to investigate the ties between any City employees and the insurrectionist
group of the failed coup from January 6th; discussed related activities occurring in Alameda and
a peaceful protest where an armed man was present; questioned the reason for delayed APD
response.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,2,"28
(21-034) Alexia A-B, Alameda, discussed the armed man at the peaceful protest and the
attempted coup on January 6th; questioned the City's response; stated Alamedans should care
more about the dichotomy of responses from APD.
(21-035) Carly Stadum-Liang, Alameda, urged Council to request APD to investigate whether
any Officers or staff members were present at the Capitol insurrection on January 6th or offered
support; expressed concern about the unwillingness to conduct such investigation; stated APD
failed to respond to an armed man outside a peaceful protest.
(21-036) Debra Lewis Mendoza, Alameda, expressed concern about a lack of leadership; noted
that she receives alerts when the tunnels are closed, but does not receive an alert about an
armed person in her neighborhood; stated that she is waiting for leadership from Council and
City staff.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion: minutes
[paragraph no. 21-037]; Police security camera system [paragraph no. 21-039]; Tentative Map
Tract 8534 resolution [paragraph no. 21-045]; lease amendment final passage [paragraph no.
21-048]; and zoning amendment final passage [paragraph no. 21-049].
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Spencer: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy
Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the
paragraph number.]
The City Clerk noted a member of the public would like to comment on the bills [paragraph no.
21-038]
(21-037) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on December 15,
2021. Approved.
Councilmember Spencer noted that she would abstain.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the minutes.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Spencer: Abstention; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Abstention: 1.
(21-038) Bills for ratification.
Stated many of the bills relate to vehicles; questioned whether the expenses have not been
made for the APD armored vehicle: Erin Fraser, Alameda.
The City Manager stated Council may pull the matter and have it return on February 2nd; noted
that he cannot attest to specific repairs and vehicles; stated that he would prefer the matter
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-02,13,"282
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- - -JUNE 2, 2015- - -7:00 P.M.
Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 7:11 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL -
Present:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese,
Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 5.
[Note: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft arrived at 7:13 p.m.]
Absent:
None.
AGENDA CHANGES
None.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(15-358) Proclamation Declaring May 30 through June 7, 2015 as Alameda Elks' Bike
Safety Week.
Mayor Spencer read and presented the Proclamation to Dean Seaquist with the
Alameda Elks.
Mr. Seaquist made brief comments.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(15-359) Gretchen Lipow, Alameda, submitted information; urged providing Senior
Housing at Alameda Point, which generates less traffic; expressed concern over
CalTrans' seismic standards.
(15-360) Jim Heggar, Alameda, expressed concern over lighting.
Mayor Spencer requested staff to review issue; stated the project might not have had
permits.
(15-361) Michael John Torrey, Alameda, announced the upcoming Relay for Life Event
and Armature Radio Club Field Day Event.
(15-362) Ken Peterson, Alameda, expressed concern over juvenile justifications be
used at Council meetings.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 2, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-02,14,"283
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*15-363) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meeting Held on May 5,
2015; and the Special City Council Meeting Held on May 6, 2015. Approved.
(*15-364) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,771,504.10.
(*15-365) Recommendation to Approve the Agreement between the Housing Authority
and the City of Alameda to Provide Housing Services for the City and Additional
Policing Services for the Housing Authority and Authorize the Interim City Manager to
Execute the Agreement. Accepted.
(*15-366) Resolution No. 15048, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Power
Unrepresented Management Employees (AMPU) Salary Schedule by Revising the
Salary Ranges for the Classifications of Assistant General Manager - Administration,
Assistant General Manager - Energy Resources Planning, Assistant General Manager -
Customer Resources, and Assistant General Manager - Engineering & Operations.""
Adopted.
(*15-367) Ordinance No. 3126, ""Revising the City's Sewer Service Charge."" Finally
passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(15-368) Recommendation to Receive Update on City's Water Reduction Plan.
***
Councilmember Daysog left the dais at 7:27 p.m. and returned at 7:29 p.m.
***
The Management Analyst and Doug Linney, East Bay Municipal Utility District
(EBMUD), gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether businesses receive recognition for
outstanding improvement in water use reduction.
Mr. Linney responded EBMUD has a program for businesses that discover new ways to
save water, and notices are sent to customers for outstanding efforts.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry regarding Lincoln Avenue work,
Mr. Linney stated Alameda's main water main runs down Lincoln Avenue; replacement
of 60 to 70 year-old pipes on Lincoln Avenue is important to provide greater assurance
for reliable water supply in a disaster.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 2, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-02,15,"284
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the emergency water supply would be
drinking water or to fight fires, to which Mr. Linney responded both drinking water and to
fight fires.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, Mr. Linney stated purple pipes
are separate pipes with recycled water which is filtered and cleaned; purple pipe water
can be used for landscaping but is not potable.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether purple pipes will be added to newer
development.
Mr. Linney responded there are no details yet but a master plan could spread the use of
recycled water through the District; purple pipes could be used for the landscaping
portion of new development.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he is encouraged by Alameda citizens' progress of
cutting 14% of water usage; receiving citizen emails to help the fight and be prepared is
important; 50% water use is environmental; consumers can make the difference by
being vigilant.
Mr. Linney concurred with Councilmember Oddie; stated water is not just for residents,
it is also for animals, fish, wildlife and to conserve for the future.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Management Analyst stated the 25% water
savings has then been translated by EBMUD to 20% of the 2013 baseline; Alameda has
achieved the goal and will continue going forward.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, Mr. Linney stated the overall savings goal is
divided by District depending on performance; EBMUD has a 20% goal.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether there will there be an increase in cost for the same
amount of water.
Mr. Linney responded the EBMUD is in the process of adjusting conservation rates to
purchase additional water supply and to make up for 80% of the cost to replace and
repair pipes.
Mayor Spencer requested an estimate of the rate increase and the effective date.
Mr. Linney responded the rate increases will start at the end of July, depending when
meters are built.
Sherrie Hong, EBMUD, noted an 8% rate increase is scheduled for July 1st. there will be
a drought surcharge of 25% on volume.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 2, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-02,16,"285
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding the rate increase impact on the
budget, the Interim City Manager stated staff received advanced notice and the 25%
increase is in the budget.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, Mr. Linney stated EBMUD did a past-bills
comparison during the last drought cycle; a comparison will not be done this drought
cycle; the more people save, the less they will be impacted.
(15-369) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Negotiate and
Execute a Five Year Agreement with Taser International for the Acquisition, Support
and Maintenance of 80 Body Worn Digital Video Cameras and a Digital Evidence
Management System and Appropriate $424,752.61 from the Police Departments' Fiscal
Year (FY) 2014-15 Budget to Finance the Acquisition.
The Police Chief gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the agreement should not have come to Council
without a draft use policy; a full blown forum is not necessary, but the body camera
issue is a high profile item; the Council and public want to know what the City is
acquiring and how the equipment will be used; the City of San Leandro purchased the
same type of equipment and had a use policy; the City of San Jose is simultaneously
developing their policy; she appreciates the Police Chief's offer to bring the use policy
back to Council, but does not want to put the cart before the horse; she understands the
grant money process and does not want to disadvantage the department, but in order to
have her vote, a draft policy needs to come back to Council before the end of the Fiscal
Year and before cameras are used in the field.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the policy should include the use of the camera and
access to the data the camera collects; that he would like assurance in writing that the
data is stored and protected and Taser International can prove the data is protected.
The Police Chief stated the data belongs to the City; Taser is simply holding it; data
would be deleted on the City's schedule based on the retention policy.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether the use policy would include the Freedom of
Information or Public Records Act rules, to which the Police Chief responded in the
affirmative.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated
she would prefer not to deploy the equipment until a use policy is brought before the
Council by the end of the Fiscal Year.
Councilmember Oddie stated it is an issue of civil rights; that he is sympathetic to the
timeline to develop policy; there is nationwide debate and policy makers know what is
going on; Assembly Bill (AB) 66 would create Statewide standards; keeping the public
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 2, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-02,17,"286
safe and protecting the Police Department is important; that he supports the item and
will vote to move it forward today.
Councilmember Daysog stated Alameda is a safe City because of effective law
enforcement; the equipment is practical; that he supports the Police Chief's position that
Alameda needs the equipment to protect citizens and the department.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Police Chief stated Alameda
will get new cameras if a better camera is available in the 5 year period and if cameras
break, they will be replaced.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft noted Evidence.com cloud based storage is a subsidiary;
stated that she hopes the parameters of what can be done with the data is included in
the agreement.
The Police Chief stated there is no possibility that the City's data would be given or
disclosed to anyone; the City owns the data and the storage security is military grade;
there have not been any data breaches countrywide.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Police Chief stated the use policy will be
submitted for Council acceptance when it is ready; the policy could be put on the City
website for the public to view; there are no plans to have public meetings similar to the
License Plate Readers (LPRs).
Mayor Spencer stated that she would like to have an informal process and give the
public an opportunity to discuss the issue.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the item could come back as a regular agenda
item instead of on the consent calendar to allow Council and public input.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he supports what the Police Chief thinks is best.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the body cameras are an important purchase; the
LPRs were different in that there was a lot of concern of infringement of civil liberties
since the LPRs are non-discriminating; the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) were
skeptical of LPRs but support body cameras; that she supports a robust discussion but
questioned why the discussion could not happen at a Council meeting.
Mayor Spencer stated if Councilmembers are not interested in holding a public forum,
she would reach out to other community organizations like Alameda Citizens Taskforce
(ACT) to hold a public forum in the library; inquired whether the Police Chief would be
interested in addressing the public.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he leaves it to the Police Chief's discretion on how he
wants to proceed.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 2, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-02,18,"287
Mayor Spencer commended the Police Chief and officers for attending a County event
to improve relations of police and community members; stated that she fully supports
funding the item, but that she does want to work on policy.
The Police Chief stated having control of the data does not make people feel better
about how the data is managed; nothing is hidden; trying to balance privacy and
technology, and still instill confidence in the public is a hard conversation.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether review is built into the policy, to which the Police Chief
responded in the affirmative; stated the LPR policy follows federal and State law; any
policy changes would be made to reflect current law.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the Council has ability to review the policy, to which
the Police Chief responded in the affirmative; stated former Councilmember Chen
requested additional internal policy review for the LPRs; assured Council a similar
provision would be included in the use policy on the body cameras.
Stated that she questioned the automatic license plate readers, which are indiscriminate
and track people's movement; body cameras differ and do not require as much
attention; there should be public disclosure of being filmed and some oversight: Carol
Gottstein, Alameda.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the staff recommendation to authorize the
Interim City Manager to negotiate and execute a Five Year Agreement with Taser
International for the acquisition, support and maintenance of 80 body worn digital video
cameras and a digital evidence management system and appropriate $424,752.61 from
the Police Departments' FY 2014-15 budget to finance the acquisition, with the caveat
that it not be deployed until Council reviews the policy before the last meeting in July.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer inquired whether Council approves or just reviews
the policy.
The Interim City Manager responded typically the Police Chief develops the policy for
review by the Council.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would like Council to approve the policy.
The City Attorney stated the policy is operational and the Police Chief has control of his
department; Council does not manage or operate the Police Department.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether the Council could vote to not approve the
contract if they do not like the policy, to which the City Attorney responded in the
affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 2, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-02,19,"288
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(15-370) The Interim City Manager discussed the City's progress in meeting regional
housing requirements; stated Alameda scored second to last for the period 2007
through 2014; clarified the requirements for an Engineer to approve plans for City
projects, including the Shoreline cycle track; discussed Public Works staff qualifications.
Councilmember Daysog commended the Public Works Director for his work on the Main
Library.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the Interim City Manager would clarify
the wireless telecommunications facility report [addressed on May 19].
The Interim City Manager stated the Radio Frequency (RF) study for 1777 Shoreline
Drive was included in the Engineer's report, which was included in the staff report.
Councilmember Daysog stated the report was 350 pages which included two RF studies
for 1801 Shoreline Drive; it was reasonable for him to think the second RF study was
the RF study for 1777 Shoreline Drive.
Councilmember Oddie commended the Public Works Director.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern over personal attacks; urged
decorum.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(15-371) Councilmember Oddie announced that he attended a Stopwaste.org meeting
and would be asking the Council for a position on the plastic bag ban.
(15-372) Councilmember Daysog announced that he attend the League of California
Cities Easy Bay Division meeting with Mayor Spencer and Councilmember Ezzy
Ashcraft at which the City's Community Development Director gave a presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Community Development Director gave the
Walnut Creek Community Development Director a tour of Harbor Bay Business Park to
help the renovation process of their old business park.
(15-373) Vice Mayor Matarrese stated a delegation from Dumaguete, Philippines would
be hosted this weekend.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 2, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-02,20,"289
(15-374) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations to the Civil Service Board, Commission
on Disabilities, Golf Commission, Library Board, Planning Board, Public Art
Commission, Public Utilities Board, Recreation and Park Commission, Social Service
Human Relations Board, and Transportation Commission; and Mayor's Appointment to
the Rent Review Advisory Committee.
Stated that hopes to continue serving on the Transportation Commission: Chris Miley,
Alameda.
Mayor Spencer made brief comments on the candidates and process; nominated Jan
Brandt and Cookie Robles-Wong for appointment to the Civil Service Board; Edward
Downing and Ronald Carlson for appointment to the Golf Commission; and Karin Lucas
for appointment to the Rent Review Advisory Committee.
The City Clerk clarified that the Rent Review Advisory Committee appointment would
not return to Council.
Mayor Spencer stated members of the public could continue submitting applications.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for Mr. Miley and encouraged
diversity.
Councilmember Oddie expressed support for Mr. Miley and urged he be reappointed.
Mayor Spencer stated the City has a diverse pool of applicants and that she is working
with staff and the community; she welcomes more board and commission applications.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(15-375) Linda Weinstock, discussed the drought and water saving measures that
should be implemented in new development and urged implementation of rebates.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether staff could look into the matter.
The Interim City Manager stated EBMUD has rebates.
(15-376) Ken Peterson, Alameda expressed his appreciation for the Police and Fire
budget presentations; discussed the amount of money spent on public safety; stated
Joe Ernst gave a presentation to the Alameda Citizens Task Force; discussed energy
efficiency and clean energy.
ADJOURNMENT
(15-377) Councilmember Oddie requested the meeting be adjourned in memory of
School Board member Neil Tam; made brief comments.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 2, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,3,"29
return following confirmation.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of reconsidering approval of the bills and having
the matter return on February 2, 2021.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: No; Knox White: Aye; Spencer: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy
Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1.
(21-039) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Purchase
Agreement, or in the Alternative a Lease Agreement, for a New Security Camera System from
ICU Technologies for the Police Administration Building and Off-Site Property Storage Facilities
in an Amount Not to Exceed $274,075.97.
Councilmember Knox White questioned why the matter is being brought for Council
consideration six weeks prior to hearing from the community on prioritizing APD funding and
services; stated an increase in the APD budget is recommended; expressed support for the
matter coming back as part of the budget; stated the system is 10-years old and is not a priority;
there have been issues of vandalism; however, the matter is not rising to increase public safety;
expressed support for hearing the policy process before spending funds on a video system.
The City Manager stated the matter came forward last August; the matter has been delated due
to budget concerns.
The Police Captain stated the system is outdated; its primary function is to protect and provide
situational awareness to employees and citizens visiting the APD building; outlined a vandalism
from November 2019; stated the footage obtained from the vandalism was of poor quality and
time consuming; there are challenges in off-site storage of property and evidence and a desire
to add layers of security with additional cameras for current storage locations; noted the
upcoming key-card access program for City buildings has the capability to work with camera
footage as an added layer of security.
The City Manager stated the matter is being brought forth outside of the budget since existing
system, which is not functioning properly, would be replaced; the matter was held back due to
economic uncertainty from COVID-19; with a better economic outlook today, the matter is being
brought forth; noted there have been salary cost issues in a variety of departments.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired how far into the parking lot camera 2 would cover.
The Police Captain responded the camera captures the vehicle gate for patrol vehicles; stated
there is a way to angle the camera not to capture portions of the public serving lot; the camera
will help capture the storage facility within the City lot.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the cameras are listed as garage bay 2 or garage bay 1.
The Police Captain responded in the negative; stated those cameras are focused on the doors
and inside of building locations.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-02,21,"290
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft made brief comments to honor Mr. Tam.
Councilmember Daysog extended his condolences to the family and made brief
comments.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated it is fitting to adjourn the meeting in Mr. Tam's memory.
Mayor Spencer stated she was honored to serve with Neil Tam on the School Board.
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting in memory of
Mr. Tam at 9:06 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 2, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-02.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-07-10,1,"298
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY--JULY 10, 2018- -4:00 P.M.
Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 4:01 p.m.
Roll Call - Present:
Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie, Vella and
Mayor Spencer - 5.
[Note: Vice Mayor Vella was present via teleconference from the Hilton Minneapolis,
1001 Marquette Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403]
Absent:
None.
The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:
(18-389) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government
Code § 54956.9); Case Name: Zachary Ginsburg V. City of Alameda; Court: Superior
Court of the State of California, County of Alameda; Case No.: RG15791428
(18-390) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government
Code § 54956.9); Case Name: Boatworks V City of Alameda, et al.; Court: Superior
Court of the State of California, County of Alameda; Case Nos.: RG14746654,
RG16823346 & RG16841240
(18-391) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government
Code § 54956.9); Case Name: Area 51 Productions V City of Alameda, et al.; Court:
Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda; Case No.: RG14741702
(18-392) Public Employee Appointment/Hiring Pursuant to Government Code § 54957;
Title/description of positions to be filled: Acting City Manager and City Manager
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that regarding Ginsburg and Boatworks, the City Council received an update
on the cases status; regarding Area 51 Productions, the Council unanimously voted
to
approve a settlement with direction for notice to the codefendant.
***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 6:01 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 12:25 a.m.
***
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk
announced that Appointment/Hiring direction was given to staff by the following roll call
vote: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft: No; Matarrese: No; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and
Mayor Spencer: Aye; Ayes: 3; Noes: 2.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
July 10, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf
CityCouncil,2018-07-10,2,"299
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:42 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
July 10, 2018",CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf
TransportationCommission,2006-08-30,4,3,TransportationCommission/2006-08-30.pdf
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2011-01-05,3,"3
7.
REFERRALS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY
(11-005) Referral from Chair Gilmore to change the order of the ARRA meetings.
Member Johnson moved to approve the referral to change the order of the ARRA
meetings. Member Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote 5.
8.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY
(11-006) Member Tam commented that with the emerging opportunities, the ARRA should focus
on reshaping its Going Forward process and be more ""shovel ready""- more prepared with
property, parcels, and infrastructure to maximize its competitiveness at Alameda Point.
Chair Gilmore requested a timeline of the Going Forward process so that the Board and the
public can makes comments and any changes necessary. The Deputy City Manager -
Development Services stated that an update will be presented at the 2/2 ARRA meeting, and
the ARRA predevelopment budget would be presented at the 2/15 mid year budget adjustment.
Member deHaan asked if staff has interfaced with the new owners of Catellus, TPG Capital LP.
The Deputy City Manager - Development Services replied that the Economic Development
Director and City Manager were getting up to speed with the new partner. A designated project
manager is working with staff. TPG Capital will likely need to come to the Council/CIC because
they are changing the development entity in agreement with the CIC. The Deputy City Manager
- Development Services discussed that there will be a staff report, update, and presentation
from the new partner in the next couple of months.
Member deHaan inquired about the interview timeline for the Alameda Point RFQ consultants.
The Deputy City Manager - Development Services explained that there were two days of
interviews with four consultants: real estate economics, master planning, sustainable design
and green infrastructure consultants, and transportation consultants. Contracts will be
negotiated in January and will be brought back as part of the mid year budget adjustment to
demonstrate to the ARRA how the project will be paid for. There are also plans to come back
with community feedback in March.
9.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:37 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Irma Glidden
ARRA Secretary",AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2011-01-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-07-23,4,"3
July 23, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-07-23.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2014-01-23,2,"3) Employment
As part of an effort to increase food security in Alameda, last Saturday, more than 300 community members,
including students and families, gathered to help create Jean Sweeney Community Garden adjacent to the City
of Alameda Food Bank. Another effort in helping our community attain food security is the Alameda
Backyard Growers, an organization available to pick fruit from Alameda homeowners' trees, making the food
available to the Alameda Food Bank for distribution to its low-income clients.
The Board was invited to join the ""New War on Poverty"" as a co-sponsor. Board members were also
invited
to attend a Children's Poverty Forum in early March.
President Biggs noted that there is a direct correlation between poverty and health, and added that Alameda
Point was identified as one of the five poorest neighborhoods in the Bay Area. He said that the War on
Poverty seems to have turned into a ""War on the Impoverished"", and that hopefully this new campaign can
change the dialogue.
It was moved and seconded that the Social Service Human Relations Board sign on as a co-sponsor of
Supervisor Chan's ""New War on Poverty Campaign"".
M/S Williams/Villareal
Unanimous
3-B.
CITY OF ALAMEDA PARATRANSIT SHUTTLE SERVICE MODIFICATION
PRESENTATION BY GAIL PAYNE, TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR -
CITY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Ms. Payne explained that each year Public Works staff conducts a review of the City of Alameda's Paratransit
Shuttle and Taxi Service. This review includes ridership details for the services provided, marketing efforts,
outreach results, and a financial update on the program.
She then shared the report, which included the following recommended changes to the Alameda Paratransit
Shuttle program:
1. Revise Tuesday - West Loop Route: To help provide a more reliable and timely service, and to
serve the new Kate Creedon Center for Advanced Wound Care Center and Target, two on-demand
stops in West Alameda will be eliminated. For this current fiscal year, these two stops were changed
from fixed route to on-demand stops. So far, no customers have requested to use these on-demand
stops.
2. Open the Alameda Paratransit Shuttle to the Public: Although a stable ridership base exists for
the Alameda Paratransit Shuttle, the shuttle bus is underutilized. Currently, the shuttle is open to the
public on a one-year trial basis. Staff would like to allow the public to use the Alameda Paratransit
Shuttle on a permanent basis. So far, the use of the shuttle by the general public has not impacted
seniors and individuals with disabilities. This recommendation is consistent with Alameda CTC's
Paratransit Program Implementation Guidelines.
3.
Benches, Poles and Signs: Staff will work with the adjacent residents, tenants and property owners to
install shuttle bus stop benches, bus stop signs/poles and schedule display signs, where appropriate.
The Board voiced its concern regarding the effect that opening the Paratransit Shuttle service to the public
B\PACKETS\2014January2014)MINUTES January 2014.doc",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2014-01-23.pdf
GolfCommission,2005-10-19,2,"3-B
Discussion on Split Tees on Weekends and Holidays.
The General Manager reported that with the winter months and shorter
days approaching, using the split tees on Saturday, Sunday, and holidays
would allow more golfers to get out on the golf course at the premium
times. Currently, the course can get 32 players out in one hour. The split
tees would double that amount and allow for 128 players in a two-hour
period. The tee times would run for the first two hours of the day and then
the course would be closed for approximately 2 hours prior to the next
wave of tee times. The General Manager stated that the split tee times
would be done on a trial basis to see if it improves attendance. The hope
is that the players will have golf rounds of 4 1/2 hours. Prior to the trial
period, a meeting with the Marshal staff will be held to inform them of the
program and what to tell the customers. A marshal will be stationed at the
first and tenth tee to ensure the pace of play. Fivesomes will still be
allowed to play. The proposed trial will be on November 5, 2005 and
possibly the weekend after that. The General Manager will report on the
program at the next Golf Commission meeting.
4.
ORAL REPORTS
4-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by Head Golf Professional
Matt Plumlee.
The Head Golf Professional passed out a report that was requested by
Commissioner Gaul detailing the amount of merchandise inventory
purchased and the amount sold for last quarter between July 1 and
September 30, 2005. Also mentioned was that the Jack Clark Pro-Am will
be held at the Complex on October 24, 2005. The event benefits the
Alameda Junior Golf Club and currently 27 teams have registered. The
Merchandise Manager, Corinna Zanetti has accepted a full-time position
with Golf Mart and her last day was today. Mike Robason will take over
the buying for the Golf Shop as well as handling the tournaments.
4-B
General Manager Dana Banke's report highlighting maintenance and
operational activities for the month at the Golf Complex.
The General Manager reported that new flags have been placed on the
putting greens at the Clubhouse. The maintenance crew is scraping the
front entrance to prepare it for paving. The General Manager was
contacted by the East Bay Business Times regarding placing an ad in their
Best of the Bay issues due out in December and is considering doing so.
The Chuck Corica Golf Complex was voted The Best of the Best Golf
Course for 2005 and is read by many business people locally. The
Page 2 of 5",GolfCommission/2005-10-19.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2018-06-28,2,"3-B
Eric Fonstein introduced himself and presented on the proposed minimum
wage ordinance. SSHRB members provided the following comments on the
ordinance:
Chilcott attended the presentation to the nonprofit Executive Directors.
She expressed concern over the proposed timetable of the rollout.
Nonprofits develop their budgets for the entire year before the fiscal
year starts. Implementing the increase in March will create a bump up
in personnel costs in the middle of the fiscal year that is not budgeted.
As well, nonprofits will not have a corresponding revenue source to
offset the costs because program fees are not changed in the middle
of the fiscal year. Fundraising revenue projections are also done by
fiscal year.
Sorensen commented that the minimum wage proposal will impact the
business community as well. If wage is bumped up too quickly it will
affect businesses. He recommend a gradual, stair-step increase.
Sorensen also expressed concern over training issues that this might
cause.
Fonstein responded that businesses have divergent viewpoints about
minimum wage.
Jenks echoed Chilcott's concern about the timetable. He raised the
compaction issue and the impact it will have on the exempt versus
non-exempt staff. Non-exempt staff's wages would have to be
increased commensurately.
Chilcott said that an unintended consequence of a fast jump may be
loss of staff.
Sorensen expressed that Santa Clara County is not a good
comparison because it is already paying higher wages, as is
Emeryville. An increase to $15 for these cities was set for 2015, so
they are already there. Alameda is doing a catch up, and the impact is
greater.
Hastings commented that for the workshops with businesses, it would
be meaningful to know of the businesses that are articulating great
concern about the proposal. It would be a shame to lose businesses in
Alameda due to the rapid change. Fonstein responded that the survey
may address this.
Hyman inquired about outreach to partner organizations to publicize
the survey e.g. school district. Hyman commented that lots of
businesses have non-English-speaking workers and asked that the
survey be translated and to make sure workers are aware of the
survey.",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2018-06-28.pdf
GolfCommission,2005-06-15,2,"3-B
Monthly Reporting Assignments for the Golf Commissioners.
Chair Swanson stated that that due to the increase in Golf Commissioner's the
decision was made to reassign the reporting duties for the monthly meetings.
Chair Swanson read the suggestions for the new Golf Commission assignments:
Secretary Betsy Gammel-Marketing and Promotions
Commissioner Ray Gaul-Financial Report
Vice Chair Tony Santare-Men's and Senior Club Liaison
Commissioner Bill Schmitz-Golf Clubhouse Project
Commissioner Jane Sullwold-Maintenance, Buildings, Security, Albright Course
and Driving Range
Chair Sandré Swanson-Council and Government Liaison
Commissioner Bob Wood-Front Entrance Beautification Project
The Commission approved the new assignments unanimously.
4.
ORAL REPORTS
4-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by Head Golf Professional
Matt Plumlee.
The Head Golf Professional stated that the busy golf season has arrived
and many golf tournaments are scheduled. The East Bay Conversion and
Reinvestment Commission (EBCRC) Golf Tournament is scheduled for
this Friday and the East Bay Junior Golf Tournament will be held next
Monday and Tuesday. The Alameda Chamber of Commerce held their
tournament in May and it was a big success. Also upcoming is the
Women's Golf Club Invitational Golf Tournament on July 28, 2005. The
twilight leagues have been canceled due to a lack of interest. The leagues
will be revisited next year. The maintenance crew is sweeping the Driving
Range regularly to keep the debris down.
4-B
General Manager Dana Banke's report highlighting maintenance and
operational activities for the month at the Golf Complex.
The General Manager referred to questions brought at last month's
meeting. The tee sign on #14 of the Earl Fry Course has been put in place,
although the sign is in the middle of the tee area and hard for the ladies to
see. The suggestion was made to plant more ice plant along the edges of
the lakes and sloughs. The General Manager reported that the sloughs and
lakes fall under the Urban Runoff Capital Improvement Project (CIP).
The engineering firm of Moffett and Nichols has been hired to look at the
site and make suggestions to combat the erosion. Also mentioned was that
the trees on the right side of #13 of the Earl Fry Course are dead and it",GolfCommission/2005-06-15.pdf
OpenGovernmentCommission,2019-12-18,2,"3-B. Action on Open Government Commission's Written Decision Following a Hearing on
a Sunshine Ordinance Complaint Concerning a Failure to Respond Timely to a Public
Records Act Request
Acting Chair Schwartz inquired whether Commissioner Shabazz is recusing himself.
Commissioner Shabazz responded in the affirmative; inquired at what time is he required
to recuse himself, during voting or discussion.
The Chief Assistant City Attorney responded as the Complaintant, Commissioner
Shabazz would be required to recuse himself from the vote and discussion, but could
present to the Commission as the Complainant.
In response to Acting Chair Schwartz's inquiry regarding public comment, the Chief
Assistant City Attorney stated the Complaintant is given an opportunity to verbalize their
position; the Commission can ask questions; the City would make its presentation and
have an opportunity to respond; the Commission could then have discussion and reach
a decision regarding the issue.
Mr. Shabazz stated he would like to clarify that he filed his complaint as a member of the
public and not as a Commissioner; he would like to address two specific issues: 1) the
efforts to resolve the issue informally and any additional facts that existed, and 2) the
statement that there is no evidence of subsequent violations, which is inaccurate; cited
examples of potential violations included in the staff report; expressed concern about
resolving violations informally discouraging folks from bringing issues before the
Commission; stated that he chose to move it forward just to set a precedence; inquired
how the City Attorney's office could improve its internal process for an increased sense
of transparency.
Acting Chair Schwartz requested more details about Mr. Shabazz's requests from
February 22 and 27, 2018.
Mr. Shabazz responded on February 27, 2018 he made a request for bodycam footage
of an incident that occurred on August 21, 2017 regarding a robbery and Alameda Police
drawing firearms; stated the response he was given from the Police Department was that
he would not be able to access the bodycam footage.
Acting Chair Schwartz inquired whether Mr. Shabazz had issues with the response failing
to address his request timely or at all and whether he had to be persistent and follow up.
Mr. Shabazz responded he cannot answer at the moment because he submitted several
public records requests on separate issues, but can get the information from his computer
and provide it later.
Commissioner Little stated that she recalls asking the same questions at the last meeting.
Meeting of the
Open Government Commission
December 18, 2019
2",OpenGovernmentCommission/2019-12-18.pdf
OpenGovernmentCommission,2020-06-24,2,"3-B. Discuss and Provide Recommendations Concerning Potential Amendments to
Article VIII (Sunshine Ordinance) of Chapter Il (Administration) of the Alameda Municipal
Code, as Amended, Concerning the Replacement of the ""Null and Void"" Remedy.
The City Clerk gave a brief presentation.
Stated that he is concerned that the matter of the OGC authority has been an issue for
almost two years; he is upset that the extent of the collaboration was to scrutinize his
submission: Paul Foreman, Alameda.
Stated he would like to speak on the noticing requirements for special meetings: Jay
Garfinkle, Alameda.
Chair Schwartz stated there are many issues regarding the Sunshine Ordinance that will
be addressed; the first issue is the Commission's authority over violations; the second is
noticing requirements for special meetings, which is later on in the agenda.
Commissioner Shabazz requested that Chair Schwartz or staff briefly summarize each
agenda item while progressing through the agenda.
Chair Schwartz concurred with Commissioner Shabazz's request and briefly summarized
the first item regarding the Commission's authority.
Commissioner Tilos stated he was leaning toward Vice Mayor Knox White's suggestion
about having the issue re-agendized on the next reasonable agenda; the issue would
allow another opportunity for public comment.
Commissioner Little concurred with Commissioner Tilos's comments; stated that she
appreciates the efforts of Councilmember Vella and Paul Foreman; the one aspect she
feels is missing is how the Commission could pause the situation to avoid being in the
same spot as two years ago; she would also appreciate including the language provided
by Vice Mayor Knox White.
Chair Schwartz stated that he was under the impression, as suggested by the City
Attorney, that Vice Mayor Knox White's language is the sole amendment to be re-
agendized and that Mr. Foreman's proposals be rejected.
Commissioner Little stated she would like to see some sort of combination between the
two; there is a lot of good language in Councilmember Vella and Paul Foreman's
submission; she does not feel it should be just one or the other; she would appreciate
having the language that was submitted, then, add a clause which addresses the issue
Vice Mayor Knox White brought up.
In response to Chair Schwartz inquiry, Commissioner Tilos stated that he would be in
support of Vice Mayor Knox White's language as the simplest proposal, but is not
Meeting of the
Open Government Commission
June 24, 2020
2",OpenGovernmentCommission/2020-06-24.pdf
OpenGovernmentCommission,2020-11-16,2,"3-B. Discuss and Provide Recommendations Concerning Potential Amendments to
Article VIII (Sunshine Ordinance) of Chapter Il (Administration) of the Alameda Municipal
Code, as Amended, to Replace ""Null and Void"" Remedy.
The Chief Assistant City Attorney stated what is being presented tonight is in response to
the Commission's comments and recommendations; the City Attorney's office did hire
outside counsel, James Harrison, as requested by the Commission to review the proposal
put forth by Paul Foreman; Mr. Harrison has provided comments which were incorporated
in the agenda report; the item is intended to provide the Commission with the opportunity
to respond to what staff has presented; further comments or amendments will be
considered and moved forward to the City Council.
In response to Commissioner Shabazz's inquiry, Chair Schwartz stated Mr. Harrison is
outside Counsel from Olson Remcho hired by the City Attorney's office.
Chair Schwartz stated it appears the chief authorities cited against the Commission's
proposal to add teeth to the Sunshine Ordinance, being cited by the City Attorney's office
and its outside counsel for the notion that the Commission's proposal would violate the
principle of ""non-delegation,"" are a case from 1904 (when 10% of Alameda was 600
people) - where, unlike today, sending back an ordinance would have cost two years -
and another case, from over 50 years ago.
Chair Schwartz inquired whether the cases are the chief authorities, to which the Chief
Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Chair Schwartz inquired whether when drafting the recommendation the Chief Assistant
City Attorney read the June OGC minutes when the Commission discussed their
recommendations for over an hour, to which the Chief Assistant City Attorney responded
in the affirmative.
Chair Schwartz stated City Attorney staff weighed in on independent legal counsel even
though it was not an issue the Commission put forward; inquired why it was included.
The Chief Assistant City Attorney responded it was included as a response to Mr.
Foreman's proposal; stated it was a good idea to address all his concerns.
The Assistant City Attorney stated that he understands that Chair Schwartz felt the issue
did not need to advance; he went back to listen to the recording and it was actually part
of the motion.
Chair Schwartz stated that he does not believe that is correct, but now it explains why
staff had a different understanding; his impression was that part was not recommended
by the Commission.
Meeting of the
Open Government Commission
November 17, 2020
2",OpenGovernmentCommission/2020-11-16.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2010-10-28,2,"3-B. REPORT ON 100 BEST COMMUNITIES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE AWARD
CELEBRATION EVENT, AND REQUEST BY PRESIDENT WASKO TO HAVE
BOARD CONSIDER CO-SPONSORING AND PLAYING A ROLE IN
ASSISTING WITH FACILITATION OF EVENT.
President Wasko distributed a flyer for the November 6 Celebrate Alameda Youth event,
which will take place on the Hornet from noon to three. In addition to the award
presentation ceremony, there will be entertainment by school bands and other student
performers, free ""healthy"" food, story telling and other activities for children and
families, and a community resource area to inform families of the many activities and
resources available to them. Elected officials (Pete Stark, Sandre Swanson, etc) may
attend or send a representative to present Proclamations. Amy Rogers, Vice-President of
America's Promise Alliance will be there to present our 100 Best Communities for
Young People award. Rec. & Park will provide a Shuttle to bring attendees from Webster
St., Ruby Bridges, and a location near APC. We are already being covered on Blogs, and
Press Releases have been sent to newspapers. President Wasko is asking that the Board
Co-Sponsor the event and that members participate as they are able.
A Motion to Co-sponsor was made by Member James.
M/S James/Nielsen Unanimous
3-C. REVIEW OF JOINT WORKGROUP WORK SESSION MEETING NOTES
AND DISCUSSION OF NEXT STEPS, INCLUDING PLANNING AND
IMPLEMENTING 2011 NEEDS ASSESSMENT
After a review of the notes, it was decided that each member would send staff the
questions they planned to ask representatives of the Commissions they would be
contacting by November 8.
Rather than asking the same ""general"" questions to each Commission, the questions
would be tailored to the work / mission of the Commission. Staff would share each
member's questions with the Board for comments, and receive feedback by November
15. Members would then contact the Commission Representative, and have responses to
share at the January meeting.
4. BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
Member Biggs announced that the Transportation Commission met and had a
presentation regarding the upcoming A.C. Transit reductions in service. There will be a
community meeting on this issue at the Alameda Multi-Cultural Community Center on
November 8. There is also a community effort to form a Transit rider's Union (Alliance
for Community Empowerment ACE). On November 17 A.C. Transit will meet to make
decisions.
Staff reported that Member Biggs has turned in his Ethics Test documentation. All
members are required to complete this test.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
NONE",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2010-10-28.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2011-01-27,3,"3-B. REQUEST FROM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR BOARD TO REVIEW AND
PROVIDE COMMENTS ON:
A. CITY OF ALAMEDA PARATRANSIT SHUTTLE SERVICE MODIFICATIONS
B. CITY OF ALAMEDA PARATRANSIT TAXI SERVICE MODIFICATIONS
Gail Payne -City of Alameda Public Works Department made a presentation regarding proposed
modifications to the city of Alameda Paratransit Shuttle Service program and the city of Alameda
Paratransit Taxi Service. Last year the Board had the opportunity to make recommendations regarding
the Paratransit Shuttle Service while it was still in the planning stage. After conducting a survey of
both programs, Public Works is recommending some cuts and Taxi Service, and focusing funds on
improving the Shuttle Service. (Staff reports regarding modifications to these two programs are
available to board members who did not receive them at the January meeting) that cuts to the taxi
service would be primarily related to frequency of participant access to the program, and the changes
to the Para-transit shuttle program are related to modifying some routes and adding a new one.
In response to questions from the board, Ms. Payne:
Agreed to have Public Works look into considering exceptions for health related need for
frequent taxi service.
Agreed to work on creating a map of the routes.
Explained that the number of seniors in the ""Otis Corridor"" that are participating in the
program was calculated with the help of a survey of homeowners associations.
A staff person at Mastick Senior Center schedules the taxi service and provides information
regarding the shuttle program.
Board members acknowledged the value of both programs, and the benefits that will result from the
modifications to each.
3-C. REPORT ON PLANNED SEASON FOR NON-VIOLENCE ACTIVITIES IN ALAMEDA,
AN UPDATE ON THE MARCH 12 ANTI-BULLYING WORKSHOP IN PARTNERSHIP WITH
ACCYF AND AUSD AND OTHER COMMUNITY GROUPS, AND A REQUEST BY PRESIDENT
WASKO TO HAVE THE BOARD CONSIDER ALLOCATING SSHRB FUNDS NOT TO
EXCEED $750 TO ASSIST WITH THE FACILITATION OF THE WORKSHOP.
At the request of President Wasko, staff provided an update on season for nonviolence activities in
Alameda and plans for a bullying prevention workshop on March 12. Starting next week, a number of
elementary and middle schools in Alameda will use the SNV daily word and readings at the beginning of
each school day. School board and city Council meetings will also begin with the daily reading throughout
the season for nonviolence. Plans are also underway to have elementary and middle schools conduct their
own school speech contest. The winners of these contests will compete in the speech contest finals at the
Alameda library on May 14.
Plans are also underway for the bullying prevention workshop at Wood middle school on Saturday, March
12. After taking into consideration all input received, the planning committee has contracted with Cary
Trivanovich to be the keynote speaker / performer. In addition to the SSHRB, the Youth Collaborative,
Alameda Police Department, and AUSD will be cosponsors of the event.
In addition to Cary, the workshop will include presentations by Chief Noonan, Diana Kenney from Encinal
high school, and Matthew Giles-AUSD's school psychologist. After the performance and the
T:\Granicus\Social Service Human Relations Board/2011 SSHRB\2011-01-27 SSHRB MINUTES.docMINUTES",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2011-01-27.pdf
OpenGovernmentCommission,2021-03-01,2,"3-B. Recommendation to Provide Feedback on Draft Recommendations from the
Community-Led Committee on Police Reform & Racial Justice
Commissioner Chen recused herself and left the meeting.
The Chief Assistant City Attorney stated Commissioner Chen made the decision to recuse
herself after being advised by the City Attorney's office due to a common law conflict of
interest; further clarified that due to the virtual method of the meeting, members who
recuse themselves are not participating and are not ""in the room.""
The City Clerk confirmed she is able to move recused members into a waiting room where
they are unable to hear or participate in the meeting discussion.
Commissioner Shabazz stated at a previous meeting, there was concern about ad hoc
committees; he is concerned that tonight's discussion might later be claimed to be in
violation; he wants to make sure things are being done in order and requested input from
staff on the matter.
The Chief Assistant City Attorney stated the only item agendized is the Subcommittee
presentation; the Commission should not go beyond said scope; the item is a presentation
from Subcommittee members and not a meeting of the Subcommittee.
Chair Tilos clarified that the presentation requires no action and is being presented as an
opportunity for Commissioners to provide feedback.
Steering Committee Members in attendance: Al Mance, Christine Chilcott, and Jolene
Wright
Subcommittee Members in attendance: Amy Gong Liu, Andrea Carlise, Ayse Sercan,
Bassy Obot, Beth Kenny, Debra Mendoza, Erin Fraser, Gavin Maxwell, Heather Reed,
Jennifer Rakowski, Jono Soglin, Madlen Saddik, Melodye Montgomery, and Venecio
""Vinnie"" Camarillo.
Christine Chilcott gave a PowerPoint presentation.
Chair Tilos thanked the Steering and Subcommittee members for the presentation and
for attending the meeting.
In response to Commissioner LoPilato's inquiry, the City Clerk stated Commissioner
questions should be done prior to public comment; then, Commissioner discussion is after
public comment.
Commissioner Shabazz stated that he wants to express solidarity with Mali Watkins,
George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and many others that catalyzed getting to this moment; he
appreciates everyone who put in the work and staff for getting the word out about tonight's
meeting and engaging people.
Meeting of the
Open Government Commission
March 1, 2021
2",OpenGovernmentCommission/2021-03-01.pdf
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2008-10-01,3,"3-B. Report on Restoration Advisory Board Comment Letter on Installation Restoration
Site 1.
Ms. Potter summarized that at the ARRA meeting on September 10, the Board received several
letters regarding Site 1. Staff was directed to work with the environmental consultant, Dr. Peter
Russell, to prepare a response to RAB letters. The ARRA's position is that land fill should be
dug up and hauled off, this position has been consistent during the public comment process,
which is not concluded. A final draft Record of Decision (ROD) is due on Oct. 28th, which will
give us further opportunity to provide comments on the final draft ROD. However, as all of this
work has been going on, the results of the additional trenching did not reveal waste, so the sense
is that there is no longer a landfill at Site 1. We would like to send a letter to the Navy
requesting they do a little more work to determine whether a land fill is still present at Site 1.
The Navy began remediation on groundwater contamination.
Member Matarrese reminded staff that the original concern expressed was, not that there was a
landfill, but that it was uncharacterized and unknown. He wants to make sure all contaminated
materials are removed, and inert ones remain in place. Ms. Potter stated that we must go through
the CERCLA process, and that the time-critical removal was for the material down to two feet.
Member Matarrese asked how Site 1 could be closed if there is still objectionable material there.
Ms. Potter responded by stating that the work effort and investigation as part of IR Site 32 work
includes going further than two feet, and the moving of the materials allows the changing of the
boundaries of the IR sites and what they are studying. Member Matarrese would like a risk
assessment provided to the City with anticipated development in mind - to build a case for the
ultimate price tag for the property, i.e., if the property goes to auction, the contamination status
would affect the price.
There were two speakers on this item. James Leach, RAB member for 9 years, is there
voluntarily because they are experts and have done clean-up and provide oversight to a high
degree. George Humphreys, Co-Chair of the RAB, commented on Dr. Russell's evaluation of
the Site 1 issue.
Member Matarrese motioned to accept the report with future reports to include a risk
assessment of the significant issues being discussed from a technical standpoint. The
motion was seconded my Member deHaan and passed by the following voice votes: Ayes -
5, Noes - 0, Abstentions - 0.
Ms. Potter discussed two additional recommendations included in the staff report; first was the
request for authorization to request that the Navy further explore issue of whether there is still a
landfill, and second, that staff be given authorization to prepare and send a letter on the draft
final ROD. Since there is no opportunity to provide back to ARRA before it's sent, Member
Matarrese suggested it come back to the Board at a the second Council meeting in November
(November 18).
Member Matarrese motioned to approve the two additional recommendations, seconded by
Member deHaan and passed by the following voice votes: Ayes - 5, Noes - 0, Abstentions -
0.
4.
ORAL REPORTS
4-A. Oral report from Member Matarrese, Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)
representative.
- Highlights of September 4 Alameda Point RAB Meeting.",AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2008-10-01.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2014-04-24,4,"3-C.
REQUEST FOR BOARD TO CONSIDER CO-SPONSORING ALAMEDA'S 5th ANNUAL
HARVEY MILK DAY CELEBRATION PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES
STAFF ON BEHALF OF VICE-PRESIDENT VILLAREAL
Staff shared that this item has been placed on the agenda at the request of Vice-President Villareal, who is also
serving as co-chair of this year's 5th Annual Alameda Harvey Milk Day Celebration Committee. Since the
inception of this Alameda community celebration in 2010, the Board has been one of its co-sponsors. Other
co-sponsors for this year include AUSD, ACCYF, and congregations from Alameda's faith community.
This year's Celebration will take place over a period of 11 days, starting with a free screening of MILK at the
Alameda Theater on May 21, and concluding with an event at the Alameda Free Library on Saturday May 31st
at which time the Committee will present books and other resource materials to help provide the community
with a better understanding of the LGBTQ community. On May 22, the Encinal High School Drama
Department will present a production of The Laramie Project, and on May 30, First Congregational Church
will host the Oakland East Bay Gay Men's Chorus.
Vice-President Villareal requested in addition to signing on as a co-sponsor of this year's events, that the
Board authorize expenditure not to exceed $500 to be used for the purchase of books and other educational
materials to be given to the Alameda Free Library, to augment its collection of materials related to the LGBTQ
community. Staff shared that these funds are available in the SSHRB budget for 2013/14.
A
Motion was made to have the SSHRB co-sponsor events and activities of the 5th Annual Alameda Harvey
Milk Day Celebration, and that an expenditure not to exceed $500, be used for the purchase of books and
other materials related to the LGBTQ community, to be given to the Alameda Free Library.
M/S Robles-Wong/Williams Unanimous
4. BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA - Information - 10 minutes
Member Robles-Wong shared that the second annual Alameda Pacific Islander Cultural Festival to be held on
Sunday May 18 At South Shore Center.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 PM. M)S Williams\Radding UNANIMOUS
Respectfully submitted by:
Jim Franz
Secretary
B\PACKETS\2014Apri 24, 2014)MINUTES April 24, 2014.doc",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2014-04-24.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2013-12-04,3,"3-C.
WORKGROUP PROGRESS REPORTS
A joint meeting of the Human Relations and Alamedans Together Against Hate Workgroups came to
a tentative agreement that the Human Relations Workgroup would focus on developing a survey and
identifying proactive projects to help cultivate mutual understanding in the community, and that the
Alameda's Together Against Hate Workgroup would continue their work in areas of discrimination, and with
the relationships with the school district and the LGBTQ community. In the event of a hate crime or other
significant human relations issue in the community, both workgroups would come together to to work on the
issue.
4.
BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA - NONE
5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - NONE
6.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8 o'clock. M)S Watkinson)Robles-Wong UNANIMOUS
Respectfully submitted by:
Jim Franz
Secretary
B\PACKETS\2013December2013\MINUTES December 2013.doc",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2013-12-04.pdf
OpenGovernmentCommission,2018-10-01,2,"3-C. Accept the Annual Report
Commissioner Henneberry moved approval of accepting the annual report.
Commissioner Little seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Commissioner Henneberry: Aye; Commissioner Little: Aye; Chair Dieter: Aye; Ayes: 3.
[Absent: Commissioners Foreman and Schwartz - 2.]
COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS
Chair Dieter stated that she wanted to follow up on two items after rereading the
minutes: 1) changing the City Council webpage to let the public know to copy the City
Clerk on meeting correspondence they want it published; 2) adding an asterisk for
deviating records retentions timeframes; she does not feel super strongly about it, but
thought it might be helpful for items that are not clear; gave a report on the City Council
adopting most of the Commission's suggestions on the Rules of Order; outlined
changes, including Council giving themselves nine minutes and cutting comment time to
two minutes for matters with seven or more speakers; she and Commissioner Little sent
a letter to Council, which was included in the record; the Council also decided to end
meetings at 11:00 p.m.
Commissioner Little expressed concern over Council reducing the time for speakers;
stated that she disagrees with automatically reducing the time.
Chair Dieter stated that she was dissatisfied that matters in the letter were not included;
using Rosenberg's Rules of Order is turning out to be a really good thing.
Commissioner Little inquired whether the recommendations seem to be working and
whether there has been training and education.
The City Clerk responded a nine minute timer for Council has been implemented; the
Mayor explains the time limit to the public when the speaker threshold is reached so
that they are aware before speaking; the Council has voted to suspend the rules and
hear additional items past 11:00 p.m. a couple of times.
Chair Dieter stated the two things she has noticed is the Chair needs to ask for a motion
right away once public comment is closed and three motions can be on the table at a
time.
Commissioner Henneberry stated that he attended a meeting; most of the
recommendations were implemented and seemed to make the meeting run much
smoother; he does not like that Council increased their time to nine minutes; speakers
can fit a lot into two minutes, which could work for all public comment.
Meeting of the
Open Government Commission
October 1, 2018
2",OpenGovernmentCommission/2018-10-01.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2011-08-04,2,"3-C. REPORT ON AUGUST 3, 2011 ALAMEDA SERVICES COLLABORATIVE
MEETING
(Member James needed to leave the meeting during this discussion, and excused himself)
President Wasko made a presentation on the August 3, ASC special meeting to provide agencies and
organizations the opportunity to discuss the impact of funding cuts and reductions on their programs.
This was a follow-up meeting to one held in May. At that time, many agencies were not yet aware of
how deep the cuts in programs and services would be for FY 11/12.
The Food Bank was recently informed they would receive a 30% cut in FEMA Emergency Food and
Shelter Grant Funds, in addition to the 11% CDBG funding cut already announced. They are
planning to use reserve funds, so they will not reduce their service delivery at this time. New client
families are currently averaging 3 to 5 per day, and, on one day, had 9 families come in to sign up.
Midway Shelter has experienced other cuts (besides their CDBG and FEMA reductions) and
currently are looking to community volunteers to come in during the day to provide coverage and
programs. Without this help, they will need to close during the day, putting women and children on
the streets during that time. Some would go to the library: others to the parks. Other program funding
will not be picked up next year.
Other examples of funding cuts and layoffs included the College of Alameda One Stop, and possible
delays in affordable housing projects due to the reduction or elimination of Redevelopment Funds.
While the ASC meeting included some good news regarding job training and other programs, stories
of losses certainly outnumbered them.
The Board discussed effective advocacy measures that would lead to change, rather than having
agency clients come in, tell their story, and then have nothing happen. Discussion included the
frustration of seeing a Council Chamber full of Golf Course and Dog Park advocates, compared to
the challenge of gathering forces to advocate for those in need. The need to get the support of
individuals with resources and ""stature"" in the community and ways to inform and motivate the
council in a way that they will become advocates was also discussed.
M/S (Wasko / Dailey) To empower the Board to conduct outreach to elected officials and staff of
other agencies to increase community awareness of the shredding of the safety-net of services,
including writing letters as appropriate and consistent with the Board's Charter. Unanimous
3-D. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
At the May 2011 meeting President Wasko and Vice-President Villareal were nominated to continue
in their positions. No other nominations were made.
M/S (Biggs/Dailey Motion for President Wasko and Vice-President Villareal were nominated to
continue in their positions. Unanimous
3-E. WORKGROUP PROGRESS REPORTS -
Resource Sharing Workgroup - Biggs
Member Biggs announced that West Alameda Group discussion will continue next week with a
meeting with Irene Kudarauskas, Executive Director of AFS, regarding collaborative, coordinated
T:\Granicus\Social Service Human Relations Board)201 SSHRB\2011-08-04 SSHRB Minutes.docMINUTES",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2011-08-04.pdf
TransportationCommission,2020-01-22,2,"3-D Alameda Active Transportation Plan Web page: www.ActiveAlameda.org
Existing
conditions map link for input: https://tooledesign.github.io/F0061-Alameda-City-ATF
3-E Emergency Alerts for Alameda - Subscribe at AC Alert web page:
https://www.acgov.org/emergencysite/
3-F
Regional
Emergency
Transportation
Alerts
-
Subscribe:
https://511.org/alerts/emergencies/511Aler
3G. Clipper Card (adults) - order on line or at Walgreens or set up Autoload to add value
automatically: https://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/getTranslink.do
3H. Clipper Card Discounts for youth, seniors and people with disabilities
-
ttps://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/discounts/index.do
3I. Mastick Senior Center Transportation 101 - Tues, Feb 11 at 1 p.m.
3J. FasTrak or new toll tag for upcoming I-880 Express Lanes scheduled to open late
summer 2020: on line or at Walgreens (except not Park Street location) and then register
on line: https://www.bayareafastrak.org/en/signup/signUp.shtml
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
4-A 2020-7648
Approve Meeting Minutes - November 20, 2019
Commissioner Kohlstrand moved approval of the minutes; Commissioner
Nachtigall seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-0.
5. NEW BUSINESS
5-A 2020-7649
Endorse the Transportation Choices Plan Year 2 Annual Report and the West Alameda
Transportation Management Association Year 5 Annual Report (Andrew Thomas, Director
of Planning, Building and Transportation)
Commissioner Yuen recused herself from the discussion regarding the West Alameda
TMA because she is a resident of Alameda Landing.
Staff Member Payne gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found
at: ttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4306960&GUID=6660FA4F-
B751-454E-9296-7EA4262ED671&FullText=1
John Atkinson, Executive Director of the West Alameda TMA, spoke about the history of
the TMA.
2",TransportationCommission/2020-01-22.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2014-11-20,4,"3-D.
REQUEST FROM ATAH FOR BOARD TO CO-SPONSOR SCREENING OF ""FACING
FEAR"" ON JANUARY 20, 2015.
Vice-President Villareal reported that ATAH is requesting the Board co-sponsor a free screening of the
Academy Award nominated documentary ""Facing Fear"", which will take place at the Alameda Theatre
& Cineplex on Tuesday, January 20.
The film is about 13 year-old Matthew Boger, who was thrown out of his home for being gay. While living
on the streets of Hollywood, he was savagely beaten in a back alley by a group of neo-Nazi skinheads. Boger
managed to survive the attack and escape life on the streets. Twenty-five years later, Boger found himself in a
chance meeting with a former neo-Nazi skinhead, Tim Zaal. The two men soon realized that they had met
before Zaal was one of the attackers who beat Boger and left him for dead. With their worlds turned upside
down, the two embarked on a journey of forgiveness and reconciliation that challenged both to grapple with
their own beliefs and fears. Neither could imagine that it would to lead to an improbable collaboration. and
friendship. The documentary's director, Jason Cohen, and both of the film's subjects, Mathew Boger and
Tim Zaal, will be present for a Question and Answer session with the audience after the screening.
Vice-President Villareal shared that ACCYF and AUSD have already agreed to co-sponsor the film, and that
AUSD will provide funds set aside to support ACCYF events and activities to assist with the expenses
associated with the screening. He requested that the Board also authorize an amount not to exceed $500 to
support this event. Total expenses are expected to be between $1,500 and $2,000.
After a brief discussion, a motion was made for SSHRB to co-sponsor the free screening of ""Facing Fear"",
at
the Alameda Theatre & Cineplex on Tuesday, January 20, and to authorize an amount not to exceed $500 to
support this event.
M/S Hyman / Williams Unanimous
4.
BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
Staff shared that low-income families are signing up to receive Holiday Toys for their children, and that the
distribution will take place on Saturday, December 20. Volunteers and donations are welcome.
Member Williams shared that she has been in contact with the family of six, four of them children, displaced
by the arson fires, to identify their needs, and assist them. She reached out to parents at Bay Farm School, and
has been able to help the family. The mother and children have come to her home, met her children, and
received dozens of bags of clothing, and some cash donations. They continue to need housing, and are staying
in the unheated garage of a family member in Richmond.
5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- NONE
6.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 PM. M)S Radding \ Hyman UNANIMOUS
Respectfully submitted by:
Jim Franz
Secretary
4",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2014-11-20.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2016-09-22,3,"3-D. WORK GROUP PROGRESS REPORTS
Assessment and Awareness Workgroup
Member Blake reported that the Workgroup met with Doug Biggs on August 30 to continue
development of the 2017 Community Needs Survey (CNS). Mr. Biggs advised the workgroup to
structure the survey so that it ties in with CDBG service allocations and to look at other cities
who created surveys based on their CDBG programs. He added that services/questions should
be within the purview of SSHRB. He agreed to share the draft survey at the November meeting
of the Executive Directors Roundtable.
The workgroup will also share the draft survey with appropriate city boards\commissions and
other community groups, and also work on assuring that the survey is available in a number of
languages. Questions regarding services that would qualify for CDBG funds but currently may
not be receiving funds because of cutbacks are also planned to be included.
Human Relations Workgroup
Member Hyman shared that the Human Relations Workgroup is continuing to work on a final
report for the Quality of Life Survey that was conducted in 2015.The plan is to provide the report to
the Council after the first of the year.
Ms. Hyman added that the 3rd Annual City of Alameda Community Service Awards nomination
Forms are due today. The awards event will be held on Thursday evening, October 27, at
the Alameda Elks Lodge, and will take the place of the Board's regular October Board meeting.
4. BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
6.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 PM
M/S Sorensen/Chilcott Unanimous
Respectfully submitted by:
Jim Franz, Secretary
3",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2016-09-22.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2012-02-23,3,"3-D. WORKGROUP PROGRESS REPORTS -
Assessment and Awareness Workgroup - Nielsen
The workgroup has been almost totally focused on the survey. The survey was created by informing the
community of its efforts through reports at ASC, ACCYF and other community meetings, and through
contact with other Boards / Commissions such as the Transportation Commission, Commission on
disabilities, and Mastick Board. Alameda Currents has offered to produce a video in which we could
present various social service groups, show the interaction of these groups, and demonstrate how,
working together, they make up a safety net of social services for the residents of Alameda. It could also
explain the current state on our safety net. The film could educate and inform the public and possibly be
used at an event, followed by a discussion. Over time, as safety net services change, we might be able to
update the film. This would help with the roll out of the survey report.
It would also be helpful to make better use of the media (news papers, Alameda Magazine, bloggers)
for the roll out and other efforts.
Alamedans Together Against Hate Workgroup - Villareal
A flyer was distributed that is being used to promote a series of three Not In Our Town films, and a
Harvey Milk Day Celebration, all events co-sponsored by SSHRB / ATAH. Mayor Gilmore and Vice
Mayor Bonta have been invited to speak at the first screening in March. Vice Mayor Bonta has
responded that he will attend. AUSD has come onboard to sponsor all of these events. Two of the three
will be at the College of Alameda, and the College is playing a vital role. SSHRB has co-sponsored
events at and with the College in the past.
Resource Sharing Workgroup - Biggs
The workgroup has not met recently, and Member Biggs asked that an Action Item be placed on the
March Agenda for the Board to consider dissolving the Resource Sharing Workgroup.
4.
BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
President Wasko asked that staff poll the Board to see if there is interest in starting the meeting at 7:00
or earlier. Staff will poll the Board regarding an earlier start time, and also check with the City Clerk to
see if there is any action other than a majority vote needed to make this change.
President Wasko also asked staff to arrange for a Work Session the Board and Mayor / Council at their
earliest convenience.
Staff announced that he will bring applications from Alamedans who had applied for the Board, but
were not selected.
5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
6. ADJOURNMENT
Motion to adjourn M/S Holder / Villareal Unanimous
Meeting adjourned at 8:40
Respectfully Submitted: Jim Franz - Secretary
i:\Comdev\SSHRB\PACKETS\2012)February 2012\MINUTES February 2012.doc",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2012-02-23.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2011-05-26,3,"3-G. NOMINATIONS OF OFFICERS
Member Biggs nominated President Wasko for President and Member Holder nominated Vice
President Villareal for Vice President.
M/S (Wasko/James) that nominations be closed. Unanimous
3-H. WORKGROUP PROGRESS REPORTS -
Resource Sharing Workgroup - Biggs
Member Biggs updated the Board on follow up to the meeting on the West End to discuss more
collaboration and resource sharing. The focus that has come out of that meeting is developing cross-
collaboration in mental health services. West End providers have many clients / participants in
common who are in need of mental health services. Patricia Murillo, ED for AIA made a
presentation at the June ACCYF meeting held at the Boys & Girls Club. A follow-up to the West
End providers meeting will be the week of June 13, and Supervisor Chan's office has expressed
interest in getting involved and possibly providing some funding. The hope is to develop a ""No
Wrong Door"" approach to accessing mental health services on the West End, and to avoid
duplication of services.
Sister City Workgroup - Wasko
Frank Matarrese is now President of the Alameda Sister City Association. President Wasko directed
staff to determine what action, if any, is needed to dissolve the Sister City Workgroup.
4. BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
Member James announced that the College of Alameda Child-Care Center will be closing due to
State budget cuts, and that tomorrow, May 27th will be their last day. Head Start will continue to
have a program at the College, and parents with children now in the College of Alameda program
will be able to access services at Laney College.
Member Holder announced that the school district is moving the Multi-Cultural Center to a portable
at Woodstock. Island High, the McKinney Vento program, AFS, and the Teacher's Store will also be
part of this campus, which is already the site for AIA and the new Boys & Girls Club.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 M/S (Wasko / Holder) Unanimous
Respectfully submitted by:
Jim Franz
Secretary
T:\Granicus\Social Service Human Relations Board/201 SSHRB\2011-05-26 SSHRB Minutes.docMINUTES",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2011-05-26.pdf
TransportationCommission,2019-05-22,2,"3-G. Transportation Commission Meeting: Wed, July 24 at 7 p.m.
3-H. Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) 2019 Trainings in September and
October: register on Fire Department web page
Scott Wikstrom, City Engineer, provided an update regarding City Council requests for
an updated policy for daylighting intersections. He said they would be bringing the item
to the City Council on July 2nd.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
4-A 2019-6924
Draft Meeting Minutes - March 27, 2019
Commissioner Kohlstrand moved approval of the item. Commissioner Nachtigall
seconded the motion. The motion passed without objection (6-0.)
5. NEW BUSINESS
5-A 2019-6925
Approve Otis Drive Traffic Calming and Safety Improvement Project
Design Concept Recommendations
Staff Member Payne announced that Commissioner Johnson would have to recuse
himself from the item due to the proximity of his business to the project area.
Staff Member Wikstrom gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be
found at:
ttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3948357&GUID=5FF05DC7-
3762-4F80-AEF9-1B58E7661A5C&FullText=1
David Parisi, project consultant, continued the presentation of the draft concept.
Commissioner Kohlstrand asked for more information about the impact of a roundabout
on pedestrians, noting that pedestrians would not have a protected cycle.
Mr. Parisi explained how the roundabout would work, noting the shorter crossing
distances and slower vehicle speeds.
Commissioner Nachtigall also expressed concern about safety for pedestrians on the
roundabout.
Chair Miley asked for clarification of what decisions staff was looking for tonight.
Staff Member Wikstrom said staff was looking for recommendations on the short term
improvements and feedback on the alternatives for the Rittler Park section.
Transportation Commission draft minutes
Page 2 of 10
May 22, 2019",TransportationCommission/2019-05-22.pdf
TransportationCommission,2020-02-26,2,"3-K Clipper Card (adults) - order on line or at Walgreens or set up Autoload to add value
automatically: https://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/getTranslink.do
3-L Clipper Card Discounts for youth, seniors and people with disabilities
-
ps://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/discounts/index.do
3-M FasTrak or new toll tag for upcoming I-880 Express Lanes scheduled to open late
summer 2020: on line or at Walgreens (except not Park Street location) and then register
on line: https://www.bayareafastrak.org/en/signup/signUp.shtm
Public Comment:
Maria Gallo spoke about her ongoing efforts to address traffic calming along Fernside
Blvd. She asked that the traffic engineers answer the question about which configuration
of Fernside (west or east of High Street) is safer.
Jim Strehlow renewed his question from the January meeting about crossing the solid
lines of the bike lane on Broadway at Clement. He said he disagrees with the position of
the previous speaker regarding the Fernside corridor. He said the no right on red sign
added on High Street would divert traffic through the Marina-Windsor neighborhood.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
None
5. NEW BUSINESS
5-A 2020-7745
Endorse The City Council's Adoption of a Resolution Establishing Policies on Street Width,
Lane Width, Crosswalks And Bulb-Outs to Promote Safe, Livable Streets and
Environmentally Sustainable Transportation Choices; and, Give Direction to Staff on Tools
For Improving Safety At Intersections.
Brian McGuire, Transportation Planner, gave a presentation. The staff report and
attachments
can
be
found
at:
https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4337173&GUID=77514CDC
901E-48B2-A86E-047864BE44D5&FullText=1
Commissioner Johnson asked if the example ""ladder"" crosswalk would be the standard
for all crosswalks going forward.
Staff Member McGuire said the criteria for what types of crosswalks would be used in
which places was being developed internally and as part of the ongoing planning
processes, but were not part of the resolution before the Commission tonight.
Commissioner Weitze asked what the drivers say contributed to the child-involved
collisions.
2",TransportationCommission/2020-02-26.pdf
TransportationCommission,2019-09-25,2,"3-L
Regional
Emergency
Transportation
Alerts
-
Subscribe:
 ttps://511.org/alerts/emergencies/511Alert
3-M Clipper Card (adults) - order on line or at Walgreens or set up Autoload to add value
automatically: https://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/getTranslink.do
3-N Clipper Card Discounts for youth, seniors and people with disabilities -
https://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/discounts/index.do
3-O FasTrak or new toll tag for upcoming I-880 Express Lanes: on line or at Walgreens
(except not Park Street location) and then register on line:
https://www.bayareafastrak.org/en/signup/signUp.shtm
Chair Soules recognized and congratulated Commissioner Kohlstrand on her recent
retirement and described some of the highlights of her career in Transportation Planning.
Commissioner Kohlstrand said she looks forward to giving back to the community during
her retirement.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
4-A 2019-7280
Draft Meeting Minutes - July 24, 2019
Commissioner Nachtigall made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner
Kohlstrand seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0.
5. NEW BUSINESS
5-A 2019-7281
Uphold the Public Works Director's Decision to Remove One Parking Space at the Corner
of Walnut Street at San Antonio Avenue to improve intersection visibility and safety
Scott Wikstrom, City Engineer, gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can
be
found
at:
ttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4139789&GUID=7EAB8214-
OBE2-4480-A488-5C82AE7E4927
Commissioner Kohlstrand asked if the request for improved visibility came from someone
in the neighborhood.
Staff Member Wikstrom said that the request came in via SeeClickFix.
Commissioner Weitze noted that in 2012 the warrants for an all way stop sign were not
met and asked if that was still the case.
2",TransportationCommission/2019-09-25.pdf
TransportationCommission,2008-12-10,2,"3.
AGENDA CHANGES
There were none.
4.
COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS
No task forces met since the last meeting.
5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
There were none.
6.
OLD BUSINESS
6A.
Parking Management Strategy for the Park Street and West Alameda Business
Districts.
Eric Fonstein, Development Services Department, summarized the staff report and detailed the
background and scope of this item. He noted that West Alameda Business Association and the
Park Street Business Association expressed concerns that the Alameda Municipal Code did not
reasonably take into consideration the type or size of the business, or its location, when applying
the minimum parking requirements. The members also believed that the City's in lieu fees were
burdensome and expensive, especially for small businesses. The third concern was raised by
residents in the neighborhoods regarding lack of adequate on-street parking. He noted that in
response to those concerns, the City hired Wilbur Smith & Associates to conduct a parking
study, which measured occupancy, turnover and duration of both on-and off-street parking in the
two districts. He noted that the study was completed before the completion of the new Civic
Center parking structure and Movie Theater, although those facilities were included in the future
parking demand calculations.
Mr. Fonstein advised that the study found high on-street occupancy levels several times during
the day; City-owned parking lots A and C were also highly used, and that many of the private
lots were highly underused; and there were high occupancies in the residential areas near the
downtown area. Similar findings were found in the West Alameda district. He noted that the
goals of the parking strategy were:
1. Management of the existing supply should be enhanced, and that the bargain hunters and
employees should be moved from the on-street parking spaces and into the private and
public lots through pricing mechanisms, and to open up the on-street parking for the
shoppers, which benefit the district; and
2. Lower the barriers to private investment and business expansion in the districts.
Staff Fonstein noted that the infrastructure and supply were in place, but that the resource
management tools must be sharpened. He noted that on-street parking was an underpriced, finite
resource, which was capable of being exploited or sold out. He noted that an appropriate price
point for on-street parking should be found, so that merchants and employees did not monopolize
the on-street parking; parking structures and off-street lots would be preferable. He noted that by
appropriately pricing the on-street parking, the turnover rate would be optimized. He noted that
2",TransportationCommission/2008-12-10.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2017-02-23,2,"3.
AGENDA ITEMS
3.-A
CITY OF ALAMEDA PARATRANSIT
PROGRAM PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR
2017-18
PRESENTATION BY GAIL
PAYNE,
TRANSPORTATION
COORDINATOR - CITY OF ALAMEDA
BASE REUSE & TRANSPORTATION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Ms.
Payne began her presentation by
introducing Victoria Williams, the new
Traffic Coordinator for
the City of Alameda. Ms. Williams has 30 years
of experience working with seniors, her
office
will be at Mastick Senior Center, and she will be
coordinating the Paratransit Shuttle and
Taxi
Voucher Program.
Ms. Payne then provided a PowerPoint
presentation (Attachment A) that
provided an overview of
the Paratransit Program Shuttle Service, Taxi
Services, Group Trips, and Scholarship
Programs.
Some of the program changes staff plans to
implement are increased frequency of
the shuttle
service, rebranding the shuttle name as
""Alameda Loop"", increasing premium tax
subsidy to 70%
per trip, and increasing the cost of a premium
taxi voucher to three dollars.",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2017-02-23.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2006-05-04,3,"3.
Certificate of Approval - CA06-0009 - Applicant: Mohamed Elhashash - 1530 & 153 2
Ninth Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent
(30%) of the value of three historically designated single-family homes, located at the above
addresses for the purposes of remodeling and restoring the buildings. The site is located at 1530
and 1532 Ninth Street within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. (EP)
Ms. Pudell summarized staff report. Staff is recommending approval of Certificate of Approval
CA06-0009, with conditions as stated in draft resolution.
Chair Anderson opened the public hearing
Li-Shung Fu, Architect, spoke in favor of the Certificate of Approval.
Dick Rutter, 2205 Clinton Ave., stated that the golden mean has not been properly applied. He is
not in favor of approving the Certificate of Approval.
Birgitt Evans, AAPS, concurs with Dick Rutter. She is not in favor of approving the Certificate
of Approval.
Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St., is not in favor of approving the Certificate of Approval.
There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson opened the floor to board discussion.
Board Member Lynch stated that there should be more detail around the windows to match other
Victorian cottages built around the same time. She would like the new siding to match the
existing. She is not in favor of approving this application.
Vice-Chair Miller stated that if this was a restoration, then they should restore it back to original.
He stated that raising the house would drastically change the appearance of the building. He is
not in favor of approving this application.
Board Member Iverson is not in favor of approving the application.
Chair Anderson would like all windows replacements to be wood. She agrees with the Board
and is not in favor of approving this project.
Ms. Woodbury requested the Board re-open the public hearing to allow Miriam Delegrange,
DSD, to speak.
M/S to re-open the public hearing. 4-0-1.
Ayes: 4;
Noes:
0;
Absent:
1.
Motion carries.
Minutes of May 4, 2006
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
Page 3",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-05-04.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2006-11-02,3,"3.
Certificate of Approval - CA06-0031 - 433 Taylor Ave. - Applicant: Sally Harman.
The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to demolish more than thirty
percent (30%) of a residential structure that was built prior to 1942 but is not on the
Historic Building Study List. The site is located at 433 Taylor Avenue within an R-3,
Garden Residential Zoning District. (DB)
Dennis Brighton, Planner III presented the staff report. Staff has received two letters
regarding this application, which were included in the packet. Staff is recommending
approval of CA06-0031.
Board member Lynch provided a page from the George Gunn book, Buildings of the
Edwardian Period, which stated that the building was constructed in 1906.
Chair Anderson stated that the letter from the neighbor, which was included in their
packet, refers to the concerns she has with the proposed plans, and questioned why
there were no plans with the packet. How can this Board review the letter and listen to
her concerns without reviewing the plans?
Ms. Woodbury stated that according to the City Attorney, people who attend public
hearings often want to speak about a number of different things, which are outside of
the Boards purview. In this case, the Board may direct staff to take this information and
use it in the consideration of the Design Review.
Board Member Lynch stated that she had a different recollection of the conversation
with the City Attorney. The Municipal Code states that the Historical Advisory Board
charge is to ensure that new construction is harmonious with the surrounding
neighborhood. The Historical Advisory Board is being asked to allow this demolition,
without even knowing what is being proposed.
Chair Anderson stated that in order to make an intelligent decision, she would like to
recommend that this item be continued until they receive more information.
Ms. Woodbury stated that when there are changes to a potentially historic building, then
the Board is looking at the rehabilitation to make sure it is consistent with the guidelines
that are in place. When it is a complete demolition, the Board is starting from scratch,
and what is proposed is not a historic building. In this case, it is not the rehabilitation of
an historic building, but completely new construction, which would be under the purview
of staff or the Planning Board.
Board Member Irons stated that it is his understanding that Design Review is never
under their purview.
Chair Anderson opened the public hearing.
Minutes of November 2, 2006
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
Page 3",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard,2006-03-02,5,"3.
Certificate of Approval, CA06-0002; Applicant: Frank Do for Alice Young - 1813 St.
Charles Street. The applicants request a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent
(30%) of the value of a historically designated residential duplex, located at the above address
for the purposes of legalization of remodeling work. The site is located at 1813 St. Charles
Street within an R-2, Two-Family Residence Zoning District.
Emily Pudell presented the staff report. She informed the Board that this structure is not listed
on the Historical Building Study List; however, it is before this Board because it was built prior
to
1942. Staff found that the proposed ""Colonial Revival Cottage"" design of the remodeled
home would be more characteristic of and compatible with the other homes in the neighborhood.
Staff is recommending approval of Certificate of Approval, CA06-0002, with conditions as
stated in draft Resolution.
Acting Chair Tilos opened the public hearing.
Chris Buckley stated that the plans are inconsistent, which has been an ongoing problem. He
feels that this building has craftsman elements, not colonial revival as the staff report states.
There were no more speaker slips. Acting Chair Tilos closed the public hearing.
Board member Iverson does not feel that the bay window or the columns have any historic style.
In response to Board member Lynch's question regarding the handrails, Ms. Pudell stated that
the Major Design Review process has not been completed. A letter of incompleteness which
addressed the issues which have been brought up tonight has been mailed to the applicant.
Board member Lynch feels that the proposed design is an improvement. She would also like to
make sure that the Oak tree will be protected as a condition of approval.
Acting Chair Tilos approves of the proposed design.
Ms. Eliason stated that the Board's comments will be considered in the design review process.
M/S (Lynch, Iverson) to approve Certificate of Approval, CA06-0002 with conditions as stated
in draft Resolution. 3-0-2.
Ayes:
3;
Noes:
0;
Absent:
2.
Motion carries.
5.
Review and Comment on Proposed Revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance.
Staff is requesting this item be continued to the April 6, 2006 meeting to allow staff time for
further research.
M/S (Iverson, Lynch) to continue this item to the April meeting. 3-0-2.
Minutes of March 2, 2006
Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting
Page 5",HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf
PlanningBoard,2011-10-24,5,"3.
Construction and operation of 12 acres of active recreational facilities and public
sports fields on 12 acres of land located in the Harbor Bay Business Park on
North Loop Road. Under the proposal, the 12 acres on North Loop Road will become
part of the City's public park system and developed with public sports fields.
Also, the City's General Plan would need to be amended to change the Land Use
designation of the North Loop Road parcels from ""Business Park"" to ""Parks and Public Open
Space,"" and the City's Zoning Map would be amended to change the Zoning District
classification of the North Loop Road parcels from ""C-M-PD (Commercial-Manufacturing
with a Planned Development Overlay)"" to ""O - Open Space."" Preliminary plans for the site
include two soccer fields and two baseball fields and supportive facilities such as public
restrooms, a concession stand, and off-street parking areas could be accommodated on the
North Loop Road parcels.
Mr. Thomas mentioned that the City received over 150 letters of opposition to the land swap
project.
Board member Zuppan asked how the Park Maintenance Fund was going to pay for the
additional sports fields and will there be a tipping point with the traffic study regarding the
impact during a lane closure on Island Drive. She also asked who would be paying for the
EIR and additional studies concerning the project.
Mr. Thomas responded that that one of the unanswered questions regarding the project is
how is the City going to fund the maintenance of the new sports fields. He acknowledged
that the impacts of a lane closure should be looked at in the traffic study. He reported that
all studies and staff expenses will be paid for by the applicant.
President Ezzy Ashcraft asked where the number of 130 homes came from.
Mr. Thomas responded that HBIA came up with the total.
Board member Henneberry asked why the Planning Board was hearing the item if no action
was being taken.
Mr. Thomas stated that the project has caused a lot of public outcry and the City wanted to
get all of the information out to the residents prior to it being heard by the City Council.
Board member Burton asked if a study has or will be done to attest that the Golf Complex
improvements will bring in more rounds/revenue to the facility. He also questioned the $7.2
million dollar amount to build the sports fields yet the actual cost has not yet been
determined and can that original amount be increased should future studies show the cost
to be more.
Mr. Thomas responded the National Golf Foundation (NGF) analyzed the Golf Complex in
2008 and recommended that improvements would help with the revenue and rounds. He
stated that the $7.2 million dollar amount is certainly open for discussion.
The motion was made and seconded to limit the speaker time to 3 minutes due to the large
Page 5 of 8",PlanningBoard/2011-10-24.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2009-09-10,2,"3.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA
(Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the
Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the
agenda.)
None.
4.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
5.
NEW BUSINESS
A.
Review of FY 2009-10 Budget for the Alameda Recreation & Park
Department- (Discussion Item Only)
Director Lillard provided an overview of the FY 2009-10 Budget for the Recreation &
Park Department. This new budget is in a different format. Budget is much more
detailed/clear by breaking out all of the budget categories. This will be a much more
effective tool to monitor the budget. Budget has been approved by City Council.
Pat Bail, Alameda resident, asked if there will be any more loss of staff. Director Lillard
stated not at this time. We will have to see what the State does for FY 2010-11.
Planning for FY 2010-11 will begin soon.
B.
Status of East Bay Regional Park District Measure WW monies -
(Discussion Item Only)
Director Lillard provided the Commission information on the request from the Alameda
Boys & Girls Club for $2 million of the Measure WW monies for the construction of their
new facility. This item went to the City Council at their meeting on September 1, 2009.
There were a number of speakers and questions that came out of that meeting. There
are a number of questions regarding the eligibility of the project, cost, etc. Council has
asked staff (Interim City Manager & ARPD Director) to meet with East Bay Regional
Park District (EBRPD) and the Alameda Boys and Girls Club and come back to Council
on September 15, 2009 with answers to some of their questions.
This item will be on the September 15, 2009 City Council Meeting Agenda. There will
be EBRPD representatives at the meeting to answer any additional questions. The
Interim City Manager will provide answers to the original questions that the Council
asked at their meeting on September 1, 2009. Discussion will be opened and then
Council will take whatever action they choose.
Commissioner Kahuanui asked for clarification that the priority list from the November
2009 meeting still existed. Director Lillard stated that the list is still active. The list of
potential projects that we have far exceeds the $3.4 million we would receive from the
Measure WW funding source.
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
2
Minutes - Thursday, September 10, 2009",RecreationandParkCommission/2009-09-10.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2008-09-11,2,"3.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA
(Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the
Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda.)
None
4.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
-
Complimentary letters of summer recreation programs.
5.
NEW BUSINESS
A.
Presentation by SunCal on Update of Sports Complex Master Plan -
(Discussion/Action Item)
Director Lillard introduced Mr. Kosla and Mr. Chavez, SunCal Representatives, who
provided a presentation to the Recreation and Park Commission regarding the Update of
the Sports Complex Master Plan.
Comments that came from the public meetings were:
-
Having some kind of BMX Bike trail.
-
Having a football field with a soccer field overlay.
-
Have 5 soccer fields (6 fields were in original plan) with a soccer warm up area
and would leave room for additional parking.
-
Have a softball complex
-
Have one or two baseball fields.
-
Have covered pool for year-round use.
Once all comments are received a new draft plan will be brought back to the Commission.
In late October, early November SunCal will come back with a more final product and
possibly have costs associated with the complex.
SunCal representatives asked for comments from the Commission.
Chair Ogden asked what turf would be used. Mr. Kosla stated that would depend on
requests/comments.
Commissioner Cooper stated that there is a huge need for soccer fields. All the
stakeholders need to sit down and figure out what really is needed.
Director Lillard stated that everything that can be lighted should be. Also, the total of tennis
courts could be 2 or 3 instead of 6.
Commissioner Restagno asked if money generated from the batting cages is feasible or
had been discussed. Mr. Kosla stated it may be something that can be looked at.
Linda Gilchrist, Alameda resident, stated that the pool should be an indoor pool. The
weather out there is very cold. Also, it would be a better revenue generator for the City.
The pool could then be used year-round.
Margaret McNamara, Alameda resident, suggested possibly building a pool above ground.
- 2 -
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg
Minutes - Thursday, September 11, 2008",RecreationandParkCommission/2008-09-11.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2005-02-10,2,"3.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA
(Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the
Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda.)
None.
4.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
5.
NEW BUSINESS
A.
Annual Review and Adjustment of Fees for Recreation and Parks -
(Discussion/Action Item)
RSM Lillard provided the 2005 Fee Schedule and Surveys for the Recreation and Park
Commission's review.
Ron Matthews, Alameda Little League, Alameda Babe Ruth, and Alameda High School
representative stated that the groups he represents donate a lot of time and materials to
help keep the fields that they use in good condition. Charging a per player charge may
influence the Boards of the different organizations as far as how much they will be willing to
donate. He commented that what extent will the Boards be willing to invest grant monies,
if they are paying the per player charge. The Commission needs to keep their registration
fees in mind.
Nino Borsoni, Alameda Soccer representative, stated that Alameda Soccer has invested
over $350,000 to date. Conceptually the group understands what is driving the fee, but
feels that the Sports Advisory Committee needs more information and better research.
Questions raised were: What is the operating budget? What are the groups bringing in?
And, how does that offset the budget? A lot of the youth play multiple sports. Will they be
charged multiple times for the different sports they are playing? Conceptually the group
understands the fee and is not opposed to it, but want to make sure that there is equity
consideration. They groups would like to see more research done before the fee is
implemented.
Commissioner Reeves stated that between soccer groups represented by Mr. Borsoni and
baseball teams represented by Mr. Matthews that is approximately 98 percent use of the
fields. So assuming Mr. Reeves wanted to go out and play baseball with a group of friends,
he would not be able to because the fields would be in use by these groups. These groups
are the only ones using the fields and they need to be maintained. These fields are being
maintained for these organizations. The Commission is open to alternatives. Your groups
are using the fields and they need to be maintained. Fields are being maintained for their
2
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
Minutes
Thursday, February 10, 2005
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service",RecreationandParkCommission/2005-02-10.pdf
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2009-05-19,2,"3.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT)
There were no speakers.
4.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE GOVERNING BODY
Vice Chair deHaan and Member Matarrese attended the last RAB meeting and had
concerns about the Navy's cleanup direction - whether it is predicated on the PDC, or if
the Navy is remediating according to SunCal's concept plan. Member Matarrese
requested clarification of their method and also requested this item be agendized and
brought back to the ARRA at its next regular meeting.
5.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 8:04 p.m. by Chair Johnson.
Respectfully submitted,
Irma Glidden
ARRA Secretary",AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2009-05-19.pdf
PublicArtCommission,2005-06-23,2,"3.
Oral Communications
(Any person may address the Committee in regard to any matter over which
the Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is
not on the agenda.)
None
4.
Written Communications
Staff will obtain the artist list, sent by Mary Oliver, from the City of
Emeryville. An art consultant compiled the list. The list will be included on
July's agenda.
5.
Old Business
A. Update on Alameda West Gateway and the Theater and
Parking/Garage Projects from Jennifer Ott of Development
Services - (Discussion Item)
-
Jennifer Ott, Development Manager from Development Services
Department, stated that an application for artwork on the parking
structure facing Santa Clara Avenue had been submitted to
Alameda Recreation & Parks. The artwork would consist of a
temporary mural, using billboard technology. The installation of the
art would coincide with the building of the garage. The billboard
would be vinyl and the dimensions would be left to the discretion of
the Public Art Advisory Committee. The art would be digitally
transferred and could be reproduced and placed in a different
location. Ms. Ott explained that the piece could last up to or
exceed two years, since it would be facing north. She went on to
state that there had been previous discussions about using a
historical picture; however, a more contemporary image was
requested.
CM Wolfe asked what the project budget would be. Ms. Ott stated
that the budget would be $10,000. CM Wolfe expressed his
concern that the Public Art be accessible to the public, even those
who do not pay $7.00 to enter the theater. His understanding was
that the Development Services Department was going to allot
Public Art funds for the restoration of the theater, and that it should
be done in a publicly accessible area.
C Huston asked if the work would be displayed on a single panel or
on multi-panels. Ms. Ott stated that the issue was open to
discussion; however, the installation specifications would need to
PAAC Meeting
2
Minutes
June 23, 2005",PublicArtCommission/2005-06-23.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2005-03-10,6,"3.
Status Report on Transportation Master Plan Committee (Commissioner
Johnson)
No report at this time.
8.
STATUS REPORT ON ONGOING PROJECTS
None.
9.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL
Acting Director Lillard stated that the Alameda Point Multi-Use Field is now open for play.
10.
ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA
11.
SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING
Thursday, April 14, 2005
12.
ADJOURNMENT 9:40 p.m.
6
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
Minutes
Thursday, March 10, 2005
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service",RecreationandParkCommission/2005-03-10.pdf
CityCouncil,2014-07-15,20,"3. I pay rent to:
Galagher & Li
OMM, Inc. Ma
Harbor Bay Re
1
Lapham
Landlord
65%
Other
Harbor Bay Realty
3%
Galagher & Lindsey
5%
OMM, Inc., Mason Management
5%
Lapham
1%
Landlard
Other
21%
4. What was the amount of your rent increase in the past 12 months?
0% rent increase - 42% of respondents
1 - 5% rent increase - 23% of respondents
6 - 10% rent increase - 19% of respondents
11 - 20% increase - 8% of respondents
21 -30% rent increase - 6% of respondents
30 +% rent increase - 1% of respondents
Unknown - 2% of respondents
5. Concerns about your rent increase
I was one of the 84 tenants evicted from XXX in June 2013. We had no protection contrary to what the
Alameda City Manager stated at a City Council Meeting. We did have financial hardship. The only
benefit we received was an offer to pay for moving expenses not beyond 3 hours. The time over the
three hours was to be paid by the tenant. We only had the use of one elevator either morning or
afternoon. For additional relocating costs and higher deposits I am out $5000+. In addition, what many
of us thought odd was how fast permits were approved for the current demolition and retrofitting. This
is generally not the norm for the permit process in Alameda. Just watch citizens approach the planning
board to improve a personal property and it practically takes an act of Congress. I am personally for
rent control. I am an active citizen who contributes both time and money to many organizations in
Alameda.
I am not yet concerned, but I am aware of the trend in Alameda and have much anxiety due to a limited
income.
Rent Survey for City of Alameda - Summary of Survey Results as of July, 15, 2015
2
www.RenewedHopeHousing.org
I
RenewedHopeHousing@gmail.com
I
Laura Thomas (510)522-8901",CityCouncil/2014-07-15.pdf
GolfCommission,2005-08-17,2,"3. Proper golf attire required. No tank tops or cut-off shorts.
4. Golf or tennis shoes only.
5. No fivesomes allowed.
6. No spectators under 12 years old allowed.
7. Please play ""ready"" golf.
The following are revisions for consideration:
1. All players and spectators must check-in at the Pro Shop before starting play.
2. WARNING! Do not enter water hazards or sloughs.
3. AED Medical Response units are located at EF #9, JC #5, Pro Shop and
Driving Range buildings.
4. No coolers! Outside food and beverage is not permitted. Please use the Golf
Complex restaurant facility.
5. Appropriate attire required.
6. Golf or tennis shoes only. No multi-purpose athletic cleats allowed.
7. Observe all ""Pace of Play"" rules. Please stay within one shot of the group
directly ahead of you.
8. Please play ""ready"" golf.
The discussion ensued and the following additions were made:
All players and spectators must check-in at the Pro Shop 15 minutes before
starting play to guarantee your tee time.
Please use cell phone etiquette.
Please obey course marshals at all times.
Disorderly conduct will result in ejection.
90° cart rule in effect at all times.
Play at own risk.
The suggestion was made to have one policy board in a central location at the
Complex although the concern is not to have a large obtrusive board. The
General Manager mentioned the possibility of placing clocks on the courses to
help with the pace of play. Another suggestion was to have the tee marshal go
over the basic rules with groups before they tee off. The suggestions will be
added to the policies and the decision will be made at the next meeting.
3-B
Approval of the Management Practice for the Practice Area. (Action Item)
The General Manager reported that the new short game practice area is up
and running. The purpose of this management practice is to establish and
clarify procedures regarding the Golf Complex Short Game practice area.
It is required that the Chuck Corica golf professional staff establishes
operational policies and procedures to control and maximize the safe use
of the Golf Complex short game practice area. The Management Practice
established for it is as follows:",GolfCommission/2005-08-17.pdf
PlanningBoard,2011-03-14,7,"3. Staff shall work to identify if Plane Trees are the best choice for street trees for the
subject property. This includes attempting to find species of Plane Trees that are
more resistant to disease.
4. The architect will investigate the possibility of adding solar collection panels that can
be installed on top of the shade structures on the building's south elevation. These
panels shall be added to the project, if feasible.
5. The staff of the property management company, (Resources for Community
Development, RCD) will create a report six months after issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy, describing the status of the project, as well as issues of concern
regarding the interface of the tenants and the surrounding community. This report will
be given to City of Alameda Housing Staff for review and comment.
Board member Kohlstrand moved to approve the project as amended above,
seconded by board member Ibsen. Approved as Amended (5-0).
9-C
29th Avenue/23rd Avenue/l-880 Improvements. The Planning Board will receive a
presentation on the proposed improvements to the 23rd Avenue and 29th Avenue on
and off ramps to Interstate 880. The presentation is for informational purposes. No
action by the Planning Board is required.
Discussion only no action taken
Mr. Matt Todd, Alameda County Transportation Commission representative, explained the
overhead freeway replacement project between 23rd and 29th Avenue. The project
addresses the height of several overpasses, on- and off-ramp alignments, and sound wall
proofing to protect the adjacent neighborhood.
Mr. Wrights, project designer, showcased the reconfiguration of 23rd and 29th Avenues over
880 freeway, as well as alterations on Clement Avenue in Alameda and the Park Street
triangle with images and graphics. The phased project will have detours that will lead
through Oakland. Construction will start in late 2012.
Board member Zuppan asked what the level of service will be during the construction
period.
Mr. Wright, stated that there will be a reduction in service in the 23rd Avenue corridor during
am/pm peak hours by 2035. He also elaborated on the analysis undertaken to evaluate
traffic impacts.
Board member Kohlstrand asked why this project is going forward, if it causes long-term
reductions of level of service for Alamedans. She also asked for clarification on whether
there is a net reduction of ramps.
APPROVED MEETING MINUTES
7 of 10
PLANNING BOARD 3/14/2011",PlanningBoard/2011-03-14.pdf
TransportationCommission,2007-10-24,4,"3. The current route goes up Park Street, down Encinal, up High over to Fernside, and
out to Fruitvale BART. The idea was discussed of a more direct line to Fruitvale
BART, going up Broadway (saving considerable time); that would be implemented in
conjunction with other modifications. AC Transit is in the process of evaluating Line
51.
4. It was suggested that the 63 be shifted to Shoreline Drive between Grand Street and
Willow Street, as there is more housing density and greater ridership potential.
5. The route by Encinal High School went to Pacific, Marshall, Lincoln, down Webster
Street. A more direct route would be to continue straight down Central. While a fairly
dense corridor, and therefore it was not recommended.
6. With respect to operations near the Ferry Terminal, the route currently ran along
Main Street, went into the Terminal, stops, and exits to Alameda Point. The option
was to establish stops along Main Street, away from the Ferry Terminal, which would
require a 600-foot walk to the terminal from its present location. That option would
save approximately one minute in each direction.
7. They discussed maintaining the existing route along Otis Drive and relocating the
stops to Otis Drive, removing them from Alameda Towne Centre. That was estimated
to save approximately two minutes in one direction, one-and-a-half minutes in the
other, and eliminates the bus having to slow down for traffic and pedestrians through
the route. The major disadvantage would require shoppers to take their groceries out
to Otis Drive.
Staff Bergman noted that subcommittee's recommendations were as follows:
1. To eliminate the portion of the Alameda Point route along Monarch Street, saving
approximately two minutes;
2. To implement the reroute away from Encinal High School during the non-peak hours
associated with the school.
He noted that AC Transit indicated that if it was not possible to make sufficient cuts to reduce
run time that they may be obligated to add an extra bus because of their obligations to their
drivers. The subcommittee did not reach a consensus regarding how to proceed given this
scenario. Two options were discussed by the subcommittee: 1) The additional bus could operate
on Line 63 on an interim basis, while the Transportation Commission would have a specified
amount of time to develop a plan to use that bus most effectively. If no plan is developed, the
additional bus should be removed, and more drastic cuts be implemented. 2) The additional bus
should not be run on an interim basis, but only if a plan is already in place for utilizing the
additional bus.
In both scenarios, the subcommittee agreed that if a satisfactory plan could not be developed to
make use of the additional bus, that the following additional service cuts be made to Line 63, in
the following order, only as necessary to provide additional run time:
Transportation Commission
Page 4 of 19",TransportationCommission/2007-10-24.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2005-06-09,7,"3. There will be a $3 per player fee assessed per organization. The minimum fee will
be $500 per group.
4. For organizations with memberships larger than the $500 minimum, there will be an
additional $3 per player fee assessed.
5. Groups will have the option to work off their assessment by completing field
improvements or providing goods or services equal to their assessment. The value
of such improvements will be determined by the Park Manager.
6. Groups failing to either submit payment or completing work projects will not be
issued permits for future seasons until the assessment is cleared.
All groups (Alameda Soccer, High Schools, Little League, Babe Ruth, Football, newer
leagues) agreed to support the proposed Field Use Fee.
AD Lillard stated that he felt that the organizations who traditionally do a lot of work will
work off the debt and smaller organizations will pay.
Commissioner Kahuanui asked if that included schools. AD Lillard stated yes that includes
the schools.
Chair Ingram stated that he received a call from Nino Borsoni, Alameda Soccer
representative. Mr. Borsoni had some questions with regard to the fee.
Questions were as follows:
-
Will this be a once per year fee, or once per season? AD Lillard stated it would
be per season.
Will kids that participate in multiples sports (e.g., soccer, baseball, football, etc.)
be expected to pay the fee for each sport in which they are registered. AD Lillard
stated yes, because they would be using the field for each sport they participate
in.
Will youth organizations that have already done projects be given credit for what
has already been done? If so, will there be a deferred start date given upon
credit already received? AD Lillard stated no, it would be starting from today. It
would not be feasible to try and credit items from prior years.
How will the collected fee be applied to field maintenance? Will certain fields be
given priority? If so, on what basis and terms? AD Lillard stated that it would be
determined based on need. We could generate a yearly list of fields and items
that need to be done for additional tracking if needed.
It has been determined that in lieu of fees the sports groups could do field
maintenance work themselves. If that is the case how will the work assignments
be made? Who will establish the value of each assignment? Is the Risk
7
Recreation & Park Commission Mtg.
Minutes
Thursday, June 9, 2005
Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service",RecreationandParkCommission/2005-06-09.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2016-04-28,2,"3.-B
WORK GROUP PROGRESS REPORTS -
Reporting on the Alamedans Together Against Hate (ATAH) Workgroup, workgroup chair Vice-
President Williams shared that the Muslim Students in America event at the Kofman Auditorium,
on April 11, was a success, with more than 200 in attendance. SSHRB co-sponsored the
event, and helped underwrite some of the expenses. The evening featured a screening of the film
Fordson, presentations by Sameena Usman, Government Relations Coordinator, Council on
American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), and Christina Craig, Educational Equity & Family Engagement
Coordinator, Encinal Jr & Sr High School. A panel discussion on Muslim students in Alameda was
led by Gene Kahane, English teacher, Encinal Jr & Sr High School. Panelists included Ms. Usman
and students from Encinal High School's Muslim Student Association (MSA). Questions were also
taken from the audience.
Vice-President Williams added that the workgroup had met with Alameda Police Department
(APD) Chief Rolleri to discuss what may have been an act of vandalism (a broken window)
across the street from the Islamic Center of Alameda last December, and reports that APD may
be conducting a ""sweep"" of the homeless encampments at Nob Hill shopping center and the
site of the future Jean Sweeney Park.
Chief Rolleri shared that a representative from the Islamic center called to report the broken
window, and that the incident was investigated as an act of vandalism. Had there been graffiti
and\or other evidence that this may have been a hate crime, it would have been investigated as
such, but none was found or reported. Regarding the homeless encampments, Chief Rolleri
shared that, while there have been some complaints regarding both encampments, there are no
plans to conduct a ""sweep"" and remove the homeless individuals and their belongings.
President Biggs, Assessment and Awareness Workgroup (A&AW) chair, announced that it has
been five years since the Board has conducted a Community Needs Assessment survey. The
A&AW has historically taken the lead on coordinating the survey process, but all Board members
have participated. He suggested that the survey be placed on the agenda in either May or June, as
he and Member Radding, both on the A&AW, will be leaving the Board at the end of June.
4.
BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
Staff suggested that the May meeting be set aside as a Board Work Session, to identify new
Leadership of the A&AW moving forward, and to calendar Board projects and activities for
FY 2016 - 17.
President Biggs related that a homeless woman was found dead, trapped in a clothing donation
bin on the property of the Nob Hill shopping center. It appears that she was trying to retrieve
items from the bin, and the cover closed on her, asphyxiating her. He asked that staff check
and see if these type of containers, placed throughout Alameda, are properly permitted, and if
there is a process to assure that they are safe. Staff said he would follow through and report
back at the next meeting.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
2",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2016-04-28.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2017-04-27,3,"3.-B WORK GROUP PROGRESS REPORTS
Assessment and Awareness Workgroup:
President Blake shared that the survey is nearing completion and will be released in late
August\early September.
Human Relations Workgroup:
Staff shared that the 2nd Annual Unity Picnic is planned for September 23 at Crab Cove. In addition
to the Black Achievers Alliance (BAA), SSHRB, the Alameda Collaborative for Children, Youth, and
their Families (ACCYF), and Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) roundtables will assist in
coordinating this year's event. The workgroup will meet with ACCYF members to discuss
conducting an ""In the Mix"" event in the spring of 2018.
Homeless Action Plan Committee Workgroup;
Member Youngblood announced that APD will post 30-day notices at Jean Sweeney Park in June,
in preparation for an eviction of homeless individuals encamped in the park. She added that
Operation Dignity has been providing case management and referrals to those living in the
encampment, and some of the residents have already been placed in temporary or permanent
housing. The challenge will be to continue to provide services to these individuals once they have
been evicted from the park. Long-term, additional funds will certainly be needed to continue
providing adequate services. The workgroup will work to develop a draft of policies and procedures
for serving Alameda's homeless population, and plan to present that draft to the Council by the end
of the year.
4.
BOARD/STAFF COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA - NONE
5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - NONE
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 PM
M/S Blake / Chilcott Unanimous
Respectfully submitted by:
Jim Franz, Secretary",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2017-04-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,4,"30
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the cameras referenced are mounted outside the motor
cage.
The Police Captain responded in the affirmative; stated camera 2 is on the southeast corner
which captures part of the public parking lot in between the Police Department and City Hall; the
camera is directed more toward the APD vehicle gate for patrol cars.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether there is a reason to capture the vehicle gate.
The Police Captain responded the need is a security concern; stated the gate is pressure
activated from the inside and remains open; should someone walk in behind an exiting vehicle,
APD staff can view the entrance.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the vendor has provided ways or diagrams to angle the
cameras and what public areas would be filmed, to which the Police Captain responded in the
negative.
Vice Mayor Vella stated potential recorded areas could include Councilmember and public
parking due to incorrect mounting or mounting location changes.
The Police Captain stated it is not the intention to capture Councilmember and public parking
spaces; APD staff will do everything possible to prevent incorrect filming and will primarily focus
on the Police Administrative Building (PAB).
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there may be security concerns from people that work late at night.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired how long videos are maintained.
The Police Captain responded per State law, videos are maintained up to one year.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the timing is in compliance with the City's data retention and
privacy policies, to which the Police Captain responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired who would have access to the footage and whether the footage is
subject to a public record request.
The Police Captain responded access to the current system is limited; stated there are one to
two people with access to the footage; the proposed system allows more access to employees;
however, the accessibility can be limited; the custodian of records will perform purges and are
the only ones who can delete or purge information; an Officer who does not typically have
access will be able to live view the proposed system should a concern arise.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the direction of cameras be changed once installed and the
process for changing.
The Police Captain responded once the cameras are mounted they are intended to stay in
place; stated should the cameras need to move, a call must be made to the vendor for
repositioning.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2011-09-20,3,"30, 2011.
Councilmember deHaan stated some investments are not bringing in the amount of
money forecasted.
The Controller stated PFM Asset Management and Chandler Asset Management are
the City's registered investment advisors; both advisors have taken advantage of some
one-time capital gains which has helped to boost the City's interest income this year;
interest income dropped tremendously in Fiscal Year 2010-2011.
Councilmember deHaan inquired what was the interest rate in Fiscal Year 2009-2010,
to which the Controller responded approximately 1.25%.
In response to Councilmember deHaan's inquiry, the Controller stated revenue for
Fiscal Year 2009-2010 was $1.1 million for the General Fund and $3.8 million for all
funds; revenue for Fiscal Year 2010-2011 will be approximately $600,000 for the
General Fund and approximately $2.3 million for all funds.
The Assistant City Manager stated revenue estimates for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 are
conservative; staff did a lot of work in the spring to ensure there would not be any
problems later.
Councilmember deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 3.
[Absent: Councilmember Johnson and Mayor Gilmore - 2.]
(*11-440) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager or His Designee to Enter into
Purchase and Finance Agreements for an Amount Not to Exceed $3,241,824 for the
Replacement of Fire Department Apparatus and Fire and Police Department Radios.
Accepted.
(*11-441) Recommendation to Reject All Bids and Authorize a New Call for Bids for the
Upgrade of the City of Alameda Sewer Pump Stations, Bay Farm Island Pump Station
Rehabilitation, No. P.W. 12-10-35. Accepted.
(*11-442) Resolution No. 14617, ""Authorizing Execution of an Agreement with the State
of California for Landscape Maintenance within the State Highway Right-of-Way of
Route 260 for the Webster Street/Wilver ""Willie"" Stargell Avenue Intersection Project.""
Adopted.
(11-443) Resolution No. 14618, ""Approving a Revised Memorandum of Understanding
between the Alameda Fire Management Association and the City of Alameda for the
Period Commencing February 28, 2010 and Ending June 29, 2013."" Adopted.
The Human Resources Director gave a brief presentation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
September 20, 2011",CityCouncil/2011-09-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-11,2,"303
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
THURSDAY--JUNE 11, 2015--7:00 P.M.
Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 7:01 p.m.
ROLL CALL -
Present:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese,
Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 5.
Absent:
None.
AGENDA CHANGES
None.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(15-383) Proclamation Declaring June, 2015 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender,
and Queer/Questioning (LGBTQ) Pride Month.
Mayor Spencer read the Proclamation and presented it to Dr. Henry Villareal, Social
Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB) and Dawna Dowdell-Dos Santos.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(15-384) Candy DeWitt, Voices of Mother, discussed mental illness and expressed
support for endorsing Assembly Bill 1421 - Laura's Law [paragraph no. 15-386]. .
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced the letter supporting Assembly Bill 1421 [paragraph no. 15-
386 was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
-
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*15-385) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting Held on May 12, 2015.
Approved.
(15-386) Recommendation to Approve Sending a Letter to the Alameda County Board
of Supervisors Endorsing Implementation of Assembly Bill (AB) 1421 (Laura's Law).
Stated the Board supports AB 1421; discussed 5150 Police calls; expressed support for
the treatment program; stated Alameda County needs to implement the law: Doug
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 11, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-11,3,"304
Biggs, Social Service Human Relations Board.
Councilmember Oddie inquired which two County Supervisors are in favor, to which the
Interim Assistant City Manager responded Supervisors Chan and Miley.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft discussed why Alameda County is not implementing the
law; stated that she would like the Council to have the supplemental information that the
Board of Supervisors has requested, which is more akin to what San Francisco is doing;
the City should endorse all possible avenues; she would like to see something done
effectively and efficiently; the City should urge the Supervisors to consider the
stakeholder report they requested; suggested the recommendation be amended to
support implementing AB 1421 and/or the Stakeholder Planning Response and
Implementation Plan.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the letter is urging the Supervisors to implement the law
without telling them how to implement it.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation to send the letter on
behalf of the City endorsing AB 1421.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft noted AB 1421 allows counties to decide whether or not
to implement the law.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated a number of credible leaders want to
see action; the necessity of the law is understood; Alameda would like the law
implemented sooner rather than later; stakeholders have been involved; that he
supports moving forward.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Interim Assistant City Manager stated the
bill was passed by the California State Legislature in 2002.
Mayor Spencer stated Alameda County has one of the highest rates of 5150s; the
system is not working; that counties have not stepped up is wrong; something needs to
be tried since the current system is not working.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she will support the recommendation; she
hopes the Board of Supervisors pass something; the solution is not simple and black
and white.
Mayor Spencer stated that she requested the matter be placed on the agenda because
it is imperative that the City step up; 15 years is too long.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 11, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-11,4,"305
(*15-387) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Fort Bragg Electric, Inc. for the
Group 1 - Sewer Pump Station Renovations for Reliability and Safety Improvements
Project, No. P.W. 04-13-11. Accepted.
(*15-388) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $330,000, Including
Contingency, to Cratus Inc. for Construction of City of Alameda Facility Lateral
Replacement Project, No. P.W. 03-15-05. Accepted.
(*15-389) Resolution No. 15050, ""Approving a Second Amendment to the Agreement
with the California State Coastal Conservancy for Funding to Implement Spartina
Eradication and Mitigation Measures and Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute
all Required Documents."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(15-390) Presentation on the City of Alameda Homeless Survey by the Social Service
Human Relations Board (SSHRB).
Doug Biggs, SSHRB, gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft complimented Mr. Biggs on his approach; encouraged
people to call the Police Department if they see families or people in need; stated the
Police Department will provide assistance.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the next count would indicate whether the
same people from the first county are still homeless.
Mr. Biggs responded a number of the people interviewed last time already had case
management in other jurisdictions; stated follow up questions will be asked if the same
people are encountered.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry regarding the veterans, Mr. Biggs stated
Operation Dignity was already tied and providing services; there has been a huge influx
of veteran services; that he would follow up.
Councilmember Daysog stated the City being proactive has come a long way and tries
to support those most vulnerable.
Vice Mayor Matarrese expressed concern over the vacant buildings at Alameda Point
being used for shelter; stated removal of the buildings needs to be addressed, as well
as adding housing.
Mayor Spencer stated staff would be returning to Council to address the buildings at
Alameda.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the matter should be accelerated.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 11, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-11,5,"306
The Interim City Manager stated the process includes an inventory to determine which
buildings need to come down and prioritize the order; staff needs to do some planning
and will proceed as quickly as possible.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry regarding resources, Mr. Biggs
stated Alameda County put significant amount of money into rapid rehousing; the
chronically homeless need permanent, supportive housing; the City is close to providing
a solution.
Mayor Spencer gave a recount of her experience; encouraged more members of the
community to participate in the next count.
(15-391) Public Hearing to Consider Collection of Delinquent Business License Taxes
and Delinquent Integrated Waste Management Accounts Via the Property Tax Bills.
The Finance Director submitted updated information and gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the people on the list were notified of the
hearing date, to which the Finance Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether prior Council waived the late fees if the
business license is paid, to which the Finance Director responded the fee is included on
the Master Fee Schedule and Council can decide whether or not to waive the fee.
The Interim City Manager stated the fee has generally been waived for first offenders in
the past.
Mayor Spencer stated the list does not differentiate first time offenders.
Councilmember Oddie inquired which are first offenders, to which the Interim City
Manager responded that she does not know.
Councilmember Daysog inquired about Legacy Partners, to which the Finance Director
responded Legacy Partners has rental properties and has a history of making payments
late.
Councilmember Daysog requested additional information on the late fee being
excessive.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether Legacy Partners is a first-time offender or reoccurring,
to which the Finance Director responded that she does not have said information, but it
could be provided.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how the late fee compares to other cities.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 11, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-11,6,"307
The Finance Director responded the business license fee is included in the Master Fee
Schedule; stated the late fee is 20% per month up to 100%.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Finance Director stated the amount cannot
exceed 100% per year.
Discussed the business license fee due for his duplex and the history of the City's
regulations; expressed concern over the penalty: Dennis Wong, Utah.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether Mr. Wong paid his license, to which Mr. Wong
responded that he paid the fee, but has not paid the penalty; made further comments.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether Mr. Wong is requesting that the late fee be
waived, to which Mr. Wong responded in the affirmative.
The Interim City Manager noted there was a change in the fee; the penalty was created
since people were not paying on time.
Expressed his opposition to the penalties; stated that he did not receive a notice until
penalties and past years were included: Peter Todd Wehmann, Alameda.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether Mr. Wehmann understands the amount, to which Mr.
Wehmann responded the letter he received indicated he owes $154.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding the $14 amount, the Finance Director
outlined the fees.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry regarding Mr. Wehmann's specific case,
the Finance Director responded that she would have to review the backup information,
which could be provided to Council.
Councilmember Daysog inquired how an in-law unit does not count as a single family
house.
The Finance Director responded the County records identify the number of units.
Mr. Wehmann stated the City is assuming the in-law unit is being rented.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the City Attorney stated the
ordinance has been on the books for many years, has had many modifications and
could be cleaned up; outlined how the rental fee applies to in-law units.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he does not have to pay a business license since
he only rents part of the single family house he lives in; the law seems quirky; that he
would change the law to require that people in his case would have to pay the fee; the
rule should be clarified.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 11, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-11,7,"308
Mr. Wehmann stated that he would like to be able to pay the $25 renewal fee, but
cannot because of the outstanding amount due; the first notice he received included the
penalties, which does not seem fair.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how long Mr. Wehmann has lived on Central
Avenue, to which Mr. Wehmann responded since 2006.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how long the unit has been rented, to which Mr.
Wehmann responded the unit has been rented on and off; stated that he was told he is
being charged for fees back to 2011 and he never received any notice that he was
required to pay the fee; suggested sending a notice or having a disclosure when
properties with two units are sold or have Alameda Municipal Power send a notice to
properties with two accounts.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he is inclined to waive the late fee for the two
individuals [Mr. Wong and Mr. Wehmann]; he is not inclined to waive the late fee for
Legacy Partners; the Code is byzantine and needs to be revamped; the Council should
direct staff to start the process and provide a timeline, along with a notification and
disclosure process.
The City Attorney noted staff can update the ordinance but a vote of the people would
be required since the business license is a tax.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether Mr. Wehmann has paid something, to which
Mr. Wehmann responded that he paid the business license and the late fee after he
received the first notice.
Councilmember Oddie stated staff cannot explain the outstanding amount; the
information should be provided to Council.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, Mr. Wehmann stated that he is asking to
waive all of the penalties that go back to 2011; he paid the fee and will renew when the
unit is rented; all back amounts should be waived since this was his first offence.
The Finance Director noted the ordinance allows staff to collect unpaid business license
fees going back three years.
Mr. Wong stated he and Mr. Wehmann offer their assistance.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the letters should be more informative; the City
should reach out to the community in a wide variety of ways, including the website; the
business license fees should be clear to the average citizen.
Mayor Spencer stated there were no comments on the waste fee.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 11, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-11,8,"309
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of approval of the integrated waste management
liens.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft noted the amount owed has
decreased.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he would support the motion since no one has come
to dispute or clarify the charges.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Councilmember Oddie stated the list shows 17 delinquent business licenses.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of placing the lien for the 15 others and waiving
the late charges for Mr. Wong and the $156.62 due for Mr. Wehmann.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft noted the number of entities is less
because Legacy Partners is listed four times.
Mayor Spencer stated that she would prefer not including parcels 1 through 6 on the list
because the penalties exceed the fee by over 100%; she does not know whether the
individuals are aware.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the 100% cap is on the late charge; the fee was
set by ordinance.
Mayor Spencer expressed concern over the amount being charged to people who may
not have received notice.
Councilmember Daysog discussed the application of the business license fee for single
family owner occupied rentals; stated if a tax were paid, it could fund the Rent Review
Advisory Committee; expressed support for reviewing the business license.
Mayor Spencer concurred with the suggestion.
The Interim City Manager noted staff could not require return receipt notification.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested the motion be restated.
Councilmember Oddie stated the motion is to approve attaching 15 of the 17 liens and
waiving Mr. Wong and Mr. Wehmann's amounts per their request.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 11, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,5,"31
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the City has another video surveillance service system for
other City buildings.
The City Manager responded the City has limited surveillance systems; stated this is the only
vendor being used; the key card system being implemented is with a separate vendor.
The Assistant City Manager stated the public parking garage has a video recording system; the
system is not working well; when the time comes to replace the system, staff will likely look to
this vendor.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the vendor is providing surveillance at any other City
buildings, to which the Assistant City Manager responded not at this time.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired which other City buildings have video surveillance or other
technology.
The Assistant City Manager responded in addition to the APD cameras, there is currently video
surveillance at the parking garage, the maintenance service center, and Alameda Point; stated
the Alameda Point surveillance is for a vacant building.
Councilmember Spencer inquired the reason the matter is not being included in the budget.
The Police Captain responded the project initially started November 2019 after a PAB
vandalism; stated review of the footage made it clear that the system needed an upgrade; the
process of reaching out to vendors began; COVID-19 hit causing a delay; the process was not
planned, was a discovered need, and wrapped up around the end of last August.
Councilmember Spencer inquired whether there was the single vandalism incident.
The Police Captain responded two recent vandalisms have occurred in the last three weeks
including graffiti and a broken window; both incidents were captured using the current system
with poor, insufficient quality video.
Councilmember Spencer inquired when the matter would return to Council should it not be
approved at this meeting.
The City Manager responded the matter would return at either the mid-year budget or at the
next two-year budget in the spring.
Councilmember Spencer inquired how soon the mid-year budget will be heard, to which the City
Manager responded February 16th
Expressed support for not purchasing a new security camera; stated security footage does not
help; urged Council to wait on the matter: Erin Fraser, Alameda.
Urged Council not spend public dollars on surveillance of the community; stated security
cameras do not prevent crime, they record crime; expressed support for a community debate for
the matter as part of the budget discussion; stated the proposal costs a lot of money during a
time when many are struggling: Grover Wehman-Brown, Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2009-11-17,16,"31, , 2009 is being compared to the same seven months in the prior
three years.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the tables should be labeled
accordingly.
The Fire Chief continued the presentation.
Councilmember Tam inquired whether it is fair to say that the
Fire Department's ability to comply with the National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) standards for the months of April
through October was a little over 70% of the time [previously]
and in 2009, the yellow and red bar shows that the Department
was out of compliance with the NFPA [standard] 90% time, to
which the Fire Chief responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor deHaan stated District 5 is less than 10% [in
compliance with NFPA standards] inquired why the City selected
the area.
The Fire Chief responded Station 5 was selected because of the
low call volume.
Councilmember Matarrese stated statistics are pointers, not the
total picture of assessing outcomes; performance was worse in
2006 than 2009 with the brownout situation; the matter begs all
sorts of questions; that he wants to know impacts.
The Fire Chief stated monthly reports show the number of
affected calls throughout the City; impacts are noted;
fortunately, significant impacts have not occurred due to
delayed response times.
Councilmember Tam stated the dice are being rolled by being out
of compliance.
The Fire Chief stated studies were conducted by Citygate in 2004
and by the International City/Council Management Association
(ICMA) this year; the data matched the City's data; the City was
hitting the same response time back then and now; continued the
presentation.
In response to Councilmember Matarrese's inquiry, the Fire Chief
stated response times [in prior years] improved because of
improved technology; response times this year dropped because of
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
16
November 17, 2009",CityCouncil/2009-11-17.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-02-12,8,"31.
Member Kohlstrand noted that the staff comments and Board communications were
currently scheduled at the end of the meeting, and inquired whether those items could be
moved to the beginning of the meeting. Ms. Mooney noted that those rules of agenda
order may changed by Board resolution.
Member Mariani noted that when the meetings run very late, it was difficult to address
staff and Board communications at that late hour. She suggested that they be considered
earlier on the agenda.
Vice President Cook noted that when she reviewed the meeting tapes for South Shore,
there were many hours of audiotapes to search through. She suggested that the meeting
audio be available on CD so they could be reviewed in the car or on a home CD player.
Ms. Woodbury replied that was a good point, and added that since the meetings were
available on streaming video, perhaps a CD could be produced.
President Lynch suggested contacting the IT Department to diversify the sources.
Member Mariani noted that the shelf life for videotapes was limited, and agreed that they
be archived on DVD and CD.
Ms. Woodbury noted that the preparation for the Planning Board/City Council joint
meeting continued to move forward. She noted that President Lynch had inquired about
the Planning Board's role in relation to the economic development of a project.
President Lynch inquired about staff's concept of how that meeting would take place.
Ms. Woodbury replied that Planning staff was working with the City Manager's office,
and that previous meetings were not on the City Council regular agenda. She noted that in
the past, member of the public have attended, and that staff preferred that the previous
formats continue. She noted that the meeting may be held at the Library, or other
locations depending on the date and time.
President Lynch noted that members of the public have often commented about their
desire for clarity on issues such as economic development as they relate to land use and
other Planning issues. He suggested that joint meeting with the EDC and other bodies
may focus the discussion in a beneficial manner.
Member Kohlstrand would like to see some follow-up on the parking discussions held in
conjunction with the EDC.
Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that she had been appointed to the Big Box Retail
Committee, and that no meetings had been held yet. Ms. Woodbury noted that would be a
standing item for follow-up on future agendas.
President Lynch suggested considering adding a status report on projects that had
Planning Board Minutes
Page 8
February 12, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-02-12.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-11,9,"310
Mayor Spencer stated that she will not support the motion since she has concerns
about some of the others on the list.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, and Oddie - 4. Noes: Mayor
Spencer - 1.
(15-392) Recommendation to Provide Input to Avery & Associates on the Qualifications
of a City Manager, the Recruitment Brochure and the Selection Process.
The Administrative Services Director gave a brief presentation.
***
Mayor Spencer left the dais at 8:39 p.m. and returned at 8:41 p.m.
Councilmember Daysog stated the Council should be informed of attributes which are
not legally allowed.
The Administrative Services Director stated attributes cannot include any bias about
race, sex, age or any protected classifications, including disabilities; continued the
presentation.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Administrative Services
Director stated that she is seeking input.
Mayor Spencer stated that she supports making all applications available for Council
review; she will be looking forward to receiving applications from current employees and
Alamedans.
In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese's inquiry, the Administrative Services Director
stated Mr. Kimura would be back in the Bay Area tomorrow.
Councilmember Oddie expressed support for the Town Hall meeting to allow public
input, the process the City used last time with various panels, and Mr. Kimura holding
individual meetings with Councilmembers; stated that he is open and hopes to have a
wide range of applicants; having applicants with knowledge of the Bay Area would be
helpful.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is looking for a City Manager who can
work with a Council of strong individuals with opinions; the selection is the most
important decision the Council will make; she is looking for someone who will work
equally with all members of the City Council; she supports the panels, but the selection
should rest with the City Council.
Councilmember Daysog outlined things unique to Alameda, such as Alameda Point and
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 11, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-11,10,"311
a municipal electric utility; stated that he wants to hear how applicants have dealt with
similar things and have relevant cross over experience.
Mayor Spencer stated that she expects to receive a draft and provide feedback;
information on Alameda from previous brochures is valid and done nicely.
The Administrative Services Director stated that she would like to proceed with the
survey.
The Council expressed support.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
None.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(15-393) Councilmember Oddie announced that he attended the Alameda County
Waste Management Authority meeting and the Boys and Girls Club annual meeting.
(15-394) Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the City has a signed Memorandum of
Understanding with Dumaguete after hosting a delegation this past weekend.
(15-395) Councilmember Daysog announced that he attended an event recognizing
Filipino Independence Day and he attended the League of California Cities meeting in
Sacramento.
(15-396) In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry about Assembly Bill
1335, Councilmember Oddie provided a brief update.
(15-397) Mayor Spencer made an announcement regarding hosting the delegation from
Dumaguete, the USS Hornet hosting an Amway China event and attending the
Alameda County Mayors Conference; noted the issue of Alameda County
Transportation Commission doing socially responsible investing would be forthcoming.
(15-398) Selection of Council Liaisons on the City Council/School Board Subcommittee
and the City Council/City of Alameda Health Care District Board Subcommittee.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 11, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-11,11,"312
Stated the Health Care District has been reviewing its mission; expressed support for
having a liaison committee: Jim Meyers, Health Care District Board.
Mayor Spencer suggested addressing one at a time; outlined the history of the School
Board Subcommittee.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would be willing to serve on the
Subcommittee.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether there is room for an alternate, to which Mayor
Spencer responded in the affirmative.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, Mayor Spencer stated the
tradition has been that the Mayor serves on the Subcommittee.
Councilmember Daysog stated having the Mayor serve is important.
Mayor Spencer moved approval of having Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft and herself
serve as the representatives with Councilmember Oddie as the alternate.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he would be interested in serving on the Health Care
Subcommittee.
Mayor Spencer stated the Mayor and a Councilmember should serve and there should
be an alternate.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he could be the alternate if someone else wants to
serve.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he would be the alternate.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for Councilmember Oddie being the
representative and Councilmember Daysog being the alternate.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval.
Mayor Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk requested the motion be clarified.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the motion was to have the Mayor and Councilmember
Oddie serve with Councilmember Daysog as the alternate.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 11, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-11,12,"313
Councilmember Daysog noted the Mayor and Vice Mayor serve on the East Bay
Regional Park District Subcommittee.
Mayor Spencer noted the vote occurred.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she was not clear on the motion.
On the call to re-consider the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Matarrese, Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft - 1.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 9:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 11, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-11.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-16,1,"314
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY-JUNE 16, 2015- -7:00 P.M.
Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL -
Present:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese,
Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 5.
[Note: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft arrived at 7:01 p.m.]
Absent:
None.
AGENDA CHANGES
None.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(15-399) Proclamation Declaring June 2015 as Elder Abuse Awareness Month.
Mayor Spencer read and presented the proclamation to Dena Andrew, Alameda County
District Attorney's Office - Elder Abuse Unit, and Vanessa Baker, Alameda County
Adult Protection Services.
Ms. Baker and Mr. Andrew made brief comments and submitted information.
(15-400) Mayor Spencer announced that a survey is posted on the City's website
regarding the City Manager recruitment and a Town Hall meeting would be held next
Wednesday, June 24th in the Council Chambers.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(15-401) Kurt Peterson, Alameda, expressed concern over unions influencing the City.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*15-402) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on May 19,
2015. Approved.
(*15-403) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,290,947.36.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-16,2,"315
(*15-404) Recommendation to Approve an Amendment to the Claims Administrator
Agreement with York Risk Services Group, Inc. for Professional Services as the Third
Party Administrator of the City of Alameda's Self-Insured Workers' Compensation
Program, Extending the Term through June 30, 2020. Accepted.
(*15-404) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $100,000 to
Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc. for City Engineering Services. Accepted.
(*15-405) Recommendation to Award Contract for Legal Advertising for Fiscal Year
2015-16. Accepted.
(*15-406) Resolution No. 15051, ""Requesting and Authorizing the County of Alameda to
Levy a Tax on All Real and Personal Property in the City of Alameda as a Voter-
Approved Levy for the General Obligation Bonds Issued to Refund the Original Bonds
Issued Pursuant to the Authorization Given at a General Election held November 7,
2000 for the Alameda Library."" Adopted.
(*15-407) Resolution No. 15052, ""Amending the City of Alameda Executive
Management (EXME) Compensation Plan to Establish the Classification of Information
Technology Director."" Adopted. [700-20]
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(15-408) Resolution No. 15053, ""Appointing Jan Brandt as a Member of the Civil Service
Board."" Adopted;
(15-408A) Resolution No. 15054, ""Appointing Cookie Robles-Wong as a Member of the
Civil Service Board.' Adopted;
(15-408B) Resolution No.15055, ""Appointing Ronald Carlson as a Member of the Golf
Commission.' Adopted; and
(15-408C) Resolution No.15056, ""Appointing Edward Downing as a Member of the Golf
Commission. Adopted.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented a certificate of
appointment to Ms. Robles-Wong.
(15-409) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No.15057, ""Upholding the Planning
Board Resolution No. PB-15-09 Approving a Development Plan for the 68-Acre Mixed
Use Development Plan in the Waterfront Town Center Plan Area Referred to as ""Site A""
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-16,3,"316
at Alameda Point and Approving a Density Bonus Waiver."" Adopted;
(15-409A) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Disposition and Development
Agreement (and Related Documents) between the City of Alameda and Alameda Point
Partners, LLC (APP) for the Site A Development at Alameda Point. Introduced; and
(15-409B) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Development Agreement between the
City of Alameda and Alameda Point Partners, LLC for the Site A Development at
Alameda Point. Introduced.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a Power Point presentation and
submitted information.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point -
stated the developer revised the housing chart to show a larger range of units from 500
square feet to 1100 square feet.
Mayor Spencer inquired how many more units would be added on the lower end, to
which the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated the developer has not
committed to a certain number of units and sizes, which is determined in the design
review process.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the shift to offer units for those who qualify with an
income of $65,000 as opposed to $90,000 is reliable on the chart, to which the Chief
Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the affirmative; stated the developer
has confirmed the shift.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point continued presentation.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Chief Operating Officer -
Alameda Point stated the developer agreed to create more moderate income units if
there is profit participation and the project is successful.
Joe Ernst, APP, gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired what the impacts are to the tenant base and City
finances if the project fails.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded Alameda Point has failing
infrastructure and it would be difficult to attract private investment, jobs, and potential
new leases without the prospect of amenities the development would provide; stated the
City has to rely on the private sector to fund development without redevelopment public
financing sources; increased liabilities to the City and potential issues for the General
Fund could be created if a project is not moved forward.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-16,4,"317
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point -
stated the developer created a condominium map overlay for all apartments to create
potential for smaller ownership as part of Site A.
Mayor Spencer inquired what the income percentage is by housing type, to which the
Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the percentage is 60% excluding
very low and low income.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the City Attorney stated the apartments cannot
be subject to rent control because they are being built after 1995 and can be converted
to condominiums.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point
stated the intent of the Thompson Dorfman business model is to retain ownership of
apartments, but selling them is an option.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point
stated Thompson Dorfman is based in Mill Valley.
Mayor Spencer stated the City's Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC) has poor
results with rent increase issues and out of town landlords; inquired whether the
apartments would have a representative that would be able to come to Alameda to
negotiate rent issues, to which Bruce Dorfman responded all properties have onsite
management; stated all residents will be income qualified; that he does not anticipate
rent increase issues for a long time.
Expressed support of moving forward with the Site A Project: Assemblymember Rob
Bonta, Alameda; Kristoffer Koster, Planning Board; Matt Regan, Bay Area Council;
former Mayor Marie Gilmore, Alameda; former Mayor Beverly Johnson, Alameda;
former Mayor Bill Withrow, Alameda; Bruce Knopf, Alameda; Kathy Moehring, Alameda;
Patricia Riley, Alameda; Anne Cevallos, Alameda; Robert Del Rosario, AC Transit; Vicki
Sedlack, Alameda; Anne Cook, Alameda; Tony Berg, Alameda Association of Realtors.
Bill DeMar, Alameda; Leslie Cameron, Bay Ship and Yacht; Andreas Cluver, Building
Trades Council of Alameda County; Dean Santner, Alameda Point tenant; Lucy Gigli,
Bike Alameda; Robert Doud, Alameda; David Burton, Alameda; Kari Thompson,
Alameda Chamber of Commerce; Andrew Slivka, Alameda and Carpenters Union; Pam
Riley Chang, Alameda; Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative; Sarah Oddie,
Alameda; Ernest Sanchez, Water Emergency Transportation Authority (submitted
information); Uri Pachter, Greenbelt Alliance; Doyle Saylor, Renewed Hope.
Councilmember Daysog stated the County area median income, adjusted to household
size, is used for qualifying for the affordable housing units; he believes Site A is a
project that speaks to moderate income and anyone in Alameda.
Mayor Spencer stated she is more concerned with the distribution of the units.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-16,5,"318
Expressed support of moving forward with the Site A Project: Doug Linney, Alameda;
Jerry Serventi, Alameda; Gabrielle Dolphin, Alameda; Lois Pryor, Renewed Hope; Mark
Sorensen, Alameda Chamber of Commerce; Victor Rollandi, Alameda Business Owner;
Preston Dula, Alameda; Mike Henneberry, Alameda, UFCW Local 5 and Planning
Board; Michael McDonough, Alameda Chamber of Commerce.
***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 9:50 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:06 p.m.
***
Expressed support of moving forward with the Site A Project: Alan Pryor, Alameda;
Pamela Tozer, Alameda; Heather Chicoine, Alameda; Alexandra Cohn, Alameda; Su-
Lin Hennecke, US Green Building Council; Jon Spangler, Alameda; Irma Garcia,
Alameda; Ty Hudson, Unite Here Local 2850.
***
(15-410) Mayor Spencer stated a vote is needed to consider remaining agenda items
[paragraph nos. 15-412, and 15-413]. .
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval [of considering the remaining items].
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
Expressed support of moving forward with the Site A Project: Jennifer West, TransForm
(submitted information); Irving Gonzales, Alameda; John Knox White, Alameda; Angela
Hockabout, Alameda Renters Coalition (ARC); Anne Debardelaben, Alameda; Karen
Bay, Alameda.
Councilmember Daysog noted that he placed a referral on tourism on the next meeting
agenda.
Expressed concern that the average person would not qualify for housing except for low
and very low; urged Council to wait for existing development to prove a transportation
strategy: Kurt Peterson, Alameda.
Expressed support of moving forward with the Site A Project: Dania Alvarez, Alameda;
Allen Michaan, Antiques by the Bay/Michaan Auctions; Garfield Kincross, ARC.
***
(15-411) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to continue the meeting past 11:00
p.m.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval [of continuing the meeting].
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-16,6,"319
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote - 5.
Expressed support of moving forward with the Site A Project: Paul Kangas, US Navy
Union; Helen Sause, Alameda Home Team; former Councilmember Doug deHaan,
Alameda; Janet Gibson, Alameda Citizens Taskforce (submitted information).
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Warriors victory tonight is a good omen; that
she is prepared to make findings on the ordinance tonight; the project is a catalyst for
economic opportunity which creates 1,472 permanent specialty jobs; implementing a
Project Labor Agreement (PLA) will generate jobs over the life of the project; the labor
and development team represent a collaborative, constructive spirit; findings are well
documented in voluminous readings; Site A has attracted regional attention; Council
should take the proactive next steps and realize the potential of the City now and for the
future; now is the time to act by approving the proposed development of Site A.
Councilmember Daysog stated APP's project honors the military past and preserves
historic structures at Alameda Point, which is important for local heroes like Jimmy
Doolittle; providing a reasonable mix of market and affordable housing is important;
APP listened to the concerns of Alameda residents and businesses; he sought out
policy changes in the EIR that are still in place today; the economics of housing is
important and benefits the average household in Alameda.
Councilmember Oddie concurred with former Mayor Johnson's statement that the
current Council is the luckiest Council in 24 years; recognized all the prior Councils;
stated Site A is part of the community vision and APP faced a lot of pressure to solve
every social ill of Alameda; folks should realize a 60-acre site will not cure every
problem; everything about the project reflects the values of the Council and community;
everyday workers are not special interest people; the vote on Site A is monumental; that
he plans to support it.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he will vote in favor of the Site A project which is a lot
more fun than the last vote he had on a development; he is not in favor of a town center;
the project has $103 million in infrastructure; self-funding is not practical; he would
rather see a commercial industrial center instead of 800 housing units, but housing pays
for infrastructure; he is glad that his compromise regarding North Housing is being
honored; the highest priority is delivering jobs to Alameda Point; a PLA delivers short
term jobs; $10 million does not buy a ferry, and the Water Emergency Transportation
Authority (WETA) has not made a commitment to the location; that he appreciates the
negotiations and cannot underscore the significance of a PLA; he would like the money
go to more affordable housing in 600 units not designated as affordable housing in
Phase 1; the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point did an extraordinary job leading
the project; there is more to be done; reminded folks that Site A is a small piece of the
entire City.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,6,"32
Urged Council to vote no on approving new security cameras for APD; stated that she questions
other potential beneficial uses for funding; expressed concern about the pressing need for
security cameras in light of nearby protests: Alexia A-B, Alameda.
Stated the matter should be part of the regular budget process; the steering committees are
coming back with recommendations; should the current system be in working condition, the
system can be kept in place for another month to allow the steering committee's report to be
heard; questioned the items APD would consider cutting in order to fund the new system: Jenice
Anderson, Alameda.
Stated that she does not support new security cameras for APD; the system upgrade seems like
a ""nice to have"" not a ""need to have"" item; questioned whether the cameras will be replaced
entirely or whether the system is being added to; repairing vandalism costs less than the
proposed system upgrade; the $275,000 should be used elsewhere; urged the decision be
deferred to the budget to have APD fund the system: Laura Cutrona, Alameda.
Urged Council to respect the committees work, wait until the reports are turned in and see
whether the funding can be found through unbundling services: Melodye Montgomery,
Alameda.
Urged Council not approve the new security camera system; stated the new system costs
nearly $275,000; many people are struggling due to COVID-19 and many are demanding a
divestment from policing with a reinvestment in the community; the funding must be spent
where there is need; APD should pay for a new system out of its own budget: Isabel Sullivan,
Alameda.
Expressed concern about the matter being on the Consent Calendar; stated the matter was not
part of an open bidding process; the vendor is a reseller of camera products; discussed other
vendors providing similar services and products; stated that he would like to see competitive
bids: Zac Bowling, Alameda.
Urged a thorough review process as part of the annual budget; stated the City spends an
inordinate amount on policing; urged Council to look at how funds are spent: Steve Perez,
Alameda.
Stated the budget request should be denied; the request seems out of touch with reality;
expressed support for the funding being used on underfunded City services which improve and
increase community safety; expressed concern about the cameras being used to survey
protestors and for the matter being heard prior to the report back from the Police
subcommittees: Carly Stadum-Liang, Alameda.
Stated that she opposes granting additional City funding to APD; the funds would better support
the community; urged APD use department funds for technical needs; stated the City should not
grant any additional funding until any staff have been confirmed to not have been part of the
violent attack at the Capitol: Meredith Hoskin, Alameda.
Stated that he opposes giving almost $275,000 to APD; the matter timing is bad; expressed
concern about protestor identity recording; urged Council vote against the recommendation:
Vinny Camarillo, Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-16,7,"320
Mayor Spencer stated that she is concerned about meeting the needs of the entire
community; townhomes and condos are beyond median income; income level is just
under the median for apartments.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, Mr. Ernst explained the distribution segments
and what will happen in the future; stated the next phase is design review; floor plans
will be laid out; market studies will be updated; where there is too much or too little
product, the team will determine the product mix design of the buildings.
Mayor Spencer stated she is concerned the units that fall below Alameda's median
income of $75,000 are the low and very low units.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated Alameda County's median income
varies; Alameda's is about $65,000.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether APP would continue to look at the community to figure
out a way to help families with children continue to live in Alameda.
Mr. Ernst responded in the affirmative; stated APP can and will look for ways to help
retain families; the project is large enough to have a diversified project mix and different
unit sizes; APP would like the project to serve new and existing Alamedans.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding the condominium overlay, Mr. Ernst
stated the option to convert apartments to condominiums is preserved if the opportunity
arises; with success of Phase 1, there could be opportunity in Phase 2.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether APP has given thought to supporting a transit similar
to Emeryville's Emery Go Round, to which Mr. Ernst responded in the affirmative; stated
that he hopes building the Site A infrastructure becomes a blueprint for other Alameda
projects.
Mayor Spencer stated houses should be made comfortable for all abilities, including
aging; inquired what percentage of the houses would be universal design.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the design issue was coming back to
Council, to which the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the
affirmative; stated the Development Plan has universal design provisions.
Mr. Ernst responded 100% of apartments, and a minimum of 10% of townhomes will be
universal design.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, Mr. Ernst stated senior housing is important
and necessary; he does not think separate senior housing would be provided in Site A,
but Council has the opportunity to do it.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-16,8,"321
Mayor Spencer inquired whether APP has considered having solar energy, to which Mr.
Ernst responded APP has not looked at solar strategies, but is reviewing renewable
energy options; APP would like to partner with AMP.
Mayor Spencer stated being aware of other projects that are 100% solar is good; that
she is looking forward to working with Mr. Ernst to meet the needs of all Alamedans.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution upholding the Planning Board
Resolution No. PB-15-09 Approving a Development Plan.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
Councilmember Oddie moved introduction of ordinance approving a Disposition and
Development Agreement (and related documents) between the City of Alameda and
Alameda Point Partners, LLC (APP) for the Site A Development at Alameda Point.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call
vote: Councilmember Daysog: Aye; Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Matarrese: Aye; Oddie: Aye;
and Mayor Spencer: Aye; Ayes - 5.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved introduction of Ordinance approving a
Development Agreement between the City of Alameda and Alameda Point Partners,
LLC for the Site A Development at Alameda Point.
Mayor Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmember Daysog: Aye; Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Matarrese: Aye; Oddie: Aye; and
Mayor Spencer: Aye; Ayes - 5.
***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 12:18 a.m. and reconvened the meeting at 12:26 a.m.
***
(15-412) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda
Municipal Code (AMC) Section 30-17 Density Bonus Ordinance. The Proposed Zoning
Amendments are Exempt from CEQA Pursuant to Guideline Section 15061(b)(3).
Introduced.
The City Planner gave a brief presentation.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the City Planner outlined the ordinance
amendments.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether parking allocation have been changed, to which the
City Planner responded in the negative; stated the numbers have not changed; the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-16,9,"322
amendment just clarifies zoning must meet the City's parking ordinance; if the City's
ordinance is not met, State law is the fall-back.
Mayor Spencer inquired what the local law is, to which the City Planner responded the
law varies: residential parking is two spaces, commercial zoning is one and a half
spaces, and affordable or senior housing is shaped to fit the project.
In response to Vice Mayor Matarrese's inquiry, the City Planner stated a separate
document or application is required, which is brought to the Planning Board for action.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the scenario of a deficient application would no longer be
an issue and the project would not be entitled without a complete application.
Councilmember Daysog moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(15-413) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda
Municipal Code (""AMC"") Section 30-4.17 G, Special Government Combining District
and Zoning Map to Ensure Consistency between the City of Alameda Municipal Code
and Zoning Map and the NAS Alameda Reuse Plan for 37.36 Acres of Federal Property
Located on Singleton Street at the Former Naval Air Station. Pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162, No Further Environmental Review is Required. Introduced.
The City Planner gave a brief presentation and submitted a revised ordinance.
Expressed concern over the downzoning and meeting the State regional units: Lynette
Lee, Renewed Hope.
The City Planner stated the City still has a surplus of units with the downzoning.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated delivering 90 more affordable housing units and meeting
agreement with the Navy and Housing Urban Development (HUD) buy-in was a good
trade.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether there was a plan to put the 800 units of Site A
in the Housing Element, to which the City Planner responded Site A is already in the
Housing Element; changing the zoning is all that is being done; the Housing Element is
still in conformance with the State.
Councilmember Oddie stated he appreciates Vice Mayor Matarrese's leadership, which
put Council in a position to ultimately approve Site A without adding any additional
housing to the Housing Element.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved introduction of the revised ordinance amending Alameda
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-06-16,10,"323
Municipal Code Section 30-4.17 G, Special Government Combining District and Zoning
Map to ensure consistency between the City of Alameda Municipal Code and Zoning
Map and the NAS Alameda Reuse Plan for 37.36 Acres of federal property located on
Singleton Street at the former Naval Air Station.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(15-414) The Interim City Manager announced the Park Street Bridge is open tonight.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(15-415) Councilmember Oddie announced the City received a one-time reimbursement
of $605,785 from the Department of Finance for costs incurred in complying with the
State's unfunded mandates prior to 2004.
(15-416) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations to the Commission on Disability Issues,
Library Board, Planning Board, Public Art Commission, Public Utilities Board (PUB),
Recreation and Park Commission, Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB),
and Transportation Commission.
Mayor Spencer nominated Laura Giuntini to the PUB and Daniel Davenport and Mark
Sorensen to the SSHRB.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:51 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
June 16, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,7,"33
Stated vandalism is cheap to fix, terrorism is not; discussed a local terrorist; urged a focus on
locating terrorists and not on vandalism: Morgan Bellinger, Alameda.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the timing is unfortunate for a number of reasons; there is a need to
protect buildings which house and store evidence; expressed support for considering
reexamining the scope and funding in the future.
Councilmember Daysog stated reports and recommendations are prepared for serious reasons;
staff has recommended the matter be considered by Council; he is inclined to support staff's
recommendation; noted there appears to be more support for holding off for several weeks,
which is understandable; noted issues raised regarding quality of the system and privacy; stated
the staff report indicates the system will be in compliance with the City's privacy, data collection
and facial recognition policies; the need is present for the upgrade given the number of
vandalism cases against the APD building; expressed support for the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of continuing the matter until the mid-year budget
cycle and including direction that Council wait until after hearing from the community groups
before making decisions on prioritizing funding; stated the matter has waited ten years and can
wait months longer; this is not a major public safety issue.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the process for direction to staff.
The City Manager responded the matter could come in the mid-year or two year budget cycle,
but not be implemented until after the Police committees have reported and provided
recommendations to Council; noted that the matter will likely be brought with the two year
budget cycle to allow sufficient committee report timing.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she has heard recommendations for finding funding within the
APD fund budget; inquired whether the recommendation is included as part of the motion's
direction to staff.
Councilmember Knox White responded that is his preference; stated money spent from the
General Fund should not be in competition with parks or other unbundled services; expressed
support for an understanding of how the matter will be prioritized for additional General Fund
funding; stated APD is funded by the General Fund.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there is a separate portion of APD's budget which is not under the
General Fund.
Vice Mayor Vella expressed concern about the matter being a second APD request for
surveillance equipment which has not gone through an open bidding process; outlined the
process for approving projects and purchases through open bidding; expressed support for an
open bid process being used relative to surveillance equipment; expressed concern about the
desired filming areas; stated that she is concerned about free speech issues related to
surveillance; expressed concern about access to surveillance footage and retention; stated that
she would like more information about filming of public parking areas; noted that the idea of
filming areas in light of a number of demonstrations is problematic; stated the request is
extensive; system proposals tend to be piecemeal throughout the City and technology is
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,8,"34
acquired in segments as opposed to across the board; not having a coherent system is odd and
should be looked at; noted the current proposal is not something that she is prepared to support
as-is; stated the expenditure is fairly high; expressed support for a discussion relative to the
two-year budget and for hearing from the Police committees; questioned whether the matter has
been presented to the Police committees; stated the scope of filming is extensive and beyond
what she is comfortable with; a balance between privacy, overreach and safety concerns should
be achieved.
Councilmember Spencer expressed concern about the Police committees not returning to
Council until March; stated that she has a problem with secret meetings happening behind
closed doors; the incidents of concern have been public and are issues of the public; the non-
public meetings skirt the Brown Act; the meetings should be public; expressed support for
hearing from the Police committees sooner rather than later and for hearing from APD and the
public; noted there have been many speakers on matters related to Police; stated that she is
concerned about supporting the motion; Council will inevitably decide the direction to take on
policing matters; noted many people are installing Nest camera systems due to safety concerns;
stated the quality of the system footage can be used.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification about whether public forums are occurring with the
Police reform process and subcommittees.
The City Manager stated reports from the committees will be released starting this week with a
series of surveys and public meetings; the first public meeting will be Friday; the committees will
report to the Transportation Commission and the Social Service Human Relations Board
(SSHRB) for input and feedback.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the public access forum is this Friday, January 22nd at 6:30 p.m.;
a
report with surveys will be released Thursday, January 21st
The Assistant City Manager stated searching ""police reform and racial equity City of Alameda""
will yield the webpage with Zoom participation information.
The City Manager stated the public survey will be released this week.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification about the lack of an open bidding process.
The Police Captain stated ICU Technologies is a General Services Administration (GSA)
approved company which goes through a vetting process; the vendor will come in at or below
the lowest bid which would be received during a Request for Proposal (RFP) process.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested staff to address concerns which have been raised about the
facial recognition capabilities for surveillance cameras and first amendment rights.
The Police Captain stated it is not the intention to use facial recognition software technology;
members of the public are not intended to be recorded on systems; the intention for the system
is to help keep employees safe, provide situational awareness and help protect or investigate
evidence and property if tampering occurs; the new system will allow live-streaming and better
screening.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,9,"35
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested a friendly amendment to the motion to add direction to staff to
return with a refined use policy for the equipment that will address concerns about facial
recognition.
Councilmember Knox White accepted the amendment; stated the City has a surveillance policy
that requires a report to accommodate such a request for purchase of equipment; noted the
staff report did not contain the policy; the required policy should accompany the staff report in
the future.
Vice Mayor Vella expressed concern about the vendor selection process.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the matter should be put out for an RFP.
Vice Mayor Vella responded there are potential issues with compliance in the existing policy
should the vendor not meet requirements previously set forth by Council.
Councilmember Knox White proposed direction be provided to staff to confirm with the
recommended vendor that the City's facial recognition ban and other related ordinances are
understood for compliance; stated the GSA process has pros and cons; if an RFP is required,
the process will take an additional year and a half to return; expressed concern about a delay.
Councilmember Spencer inquired whether Council will hear from the Police subcommittees prior
to the mid-year budget.
The City Manager responded Council will hear from the subcommittees prior to the current
matter being approved; stated the mid-year budget will come before Council mid-February; the
regular budget will come before Council.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers
Daysog: No; Knox White: Aye; Spencer: No; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes:
3. Noes: 2.
(*21-040) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Fourth Amendment to
the Agreement with Nute Engineering for Engineering Design Services for Cyclic Sewer
Rehabilitation Project, Phase 18, in an Amount Not to Exceed $411,500 for an Aggregate
Amount Not to Exceed $1,556,321. Accepted.
(*21-041) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Third Amendment to
the Agreement with NBS for Administrative Services for Special Financing Districts in an
Amount Not to Exceed $80,319 for an Aggregate Amount Not to Exceed $146,158. Accepted.
(*21-042) Recommendation to Expand the City's Sick Leave Benefit Authorizing Use of Parental
Leave and Increasing the Sick Leave Cap for Protected Leave to Care for a Family Member to
480 Hours. Accepted.
(*21-043) Resolution No. 15735, ""Amending the City of Alameda's Employer/Employee
Relations Resolution and Superseding the Following Resolutions: 7476, 7477, 7684 and
14894."" Adopted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-20,19,"35 feet hardline with regards to the six parcels.
The Assistant City Attorney thanked City staff who worked on the project.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved introduction of Ordinance amending the Alameda
Municipal Code by amending Chapter 30, Section 30-4.21 E, Estuary District.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolution approving a Negative
Declaration and Tentative Map #8337 for a 99 lot subdivision located along the Oakland
Inner Harbor Tidal Canal from approximately 1,800 feet northwest of the Park Street
Bridge to approximately 2,300 feet south of High Street.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved introduction of the ordinance authorizing the City
Manager to: (1) execute a Memorandum of Understanding, Quitclaim Deed and all other
necessary documents between the City of Alameda and the United States of America
acting by and through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to acquire 94 parcels of semi-
submerged and submerged land on the Alameda side of the Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal
Canal (""Tidal Canal""); (2) execute Purchase and Sale Agreements, Quitclaim Deeds
and all other necessary documents between the City of Alameda and various
purchasers to sell approximately 92 parcels on the Tidal Canal at fair market value.
Mayor Spencer seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog requested the motion be amended to include
pending due diligence review, the six parcels outside of tonight's decision have been
added to parcel 2, and will return to public access use, should have a width of 35 feet,
to serve as panoramic view corridors and water access points.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she will not accept the amendment; the
matter is already coming back to Council.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the matter will be coming back to Council.
The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated the matter will come back to
Council after the City has done its due diligence and worked with the six property
owners.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is a goal of trying to get 18 feet or 35 feet.
The City Attorney responded the City will do its due diligence and come back to Council
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 20, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-20.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,21,"357
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY--SEPTEMBER - 1, 2015- -5:30 P.M.
Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 5:30 p.m.
Roll Call -
Present:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie
and Mayor Spencer - 5.
[Note: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft arrived at 5:32 p.m. and
Councilmember Daysog arrived at 5:52 p.m.]
Absent:
None.
The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:
(15-494) Conference with Labor Negotiators (54957.6); City Negotiator: Elizabeth D.
Warmerdam; Employee Organizations: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers,
Local 1245 (IBEW), Electric Utility Professional Association of Alameda (EUPA),
Alameda City Employees Association (ACEA), Alameda Police Officers Association
Non-Sworn Unit (PANS), and Alameda Management and Confidential Employees
Association (MCEA); Under Negotiation: Salaries and terms of employment
(15-495) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Significant exposure to
litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9; Number of cases: Two (As
Defendant - City Exposure to Legal Action)
Following the Closed Session the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Spencer
announced that regarding Labor, direction was given to staff and regarding Anticipated
Litigation direction was given to staff on two cases.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 6:58 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,1,"358
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- - - SEPTEMBER 1, 2015- -7:00 P.M.
Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL -
Present:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese,
Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 5.
[Note: Councilmember Daysog arrived at 7:01 p.m. and
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft arrived at 7:02 p.m.]
Absent:
None.
AGENDA CHANGES
(15-496) The City Manager suggested the Wetlands Bank matter [paragraph no. 15-
526 be heard on October 6th
Mayor Spencer pulled the CSG Consulting Agreement item [paragraph no. 15-505 for
discussion.
Councilmember Daysog pulled the Quarterly Sales Tax Report item [paragraph no. 15-
502] for discussion
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft suggested that the Sunshine Ordinance amendments
[paragraph no. 15-521 be heard at the end of the regular agenda.
Mayor Spencer summarized the changes, including the items removed from the
Consent Calendar.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(15-497) Proclamation Declaring September 1, 2015 as Housing Authority Appreciation
Day for 75 Years of Service to Lower Income Alameda Residents.
Mayor Spencer read and presented the proclamation to the Housing Authority Executive
Director and Art Kurrasch and John McCahan, Housing Authority Board of
Commissioners.
(15-498) Proclamation Declaring September 1, 2015 as Alameda Fights Back Day to
Promote Awareness of the Fight Against Cancer and the Alameda Relay for Life.
Mayor Spencer read and presented the proclamation to Jess Nelson, Deanna Huie, and
Anne Marie Fourre, Relay for Life.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,2,"359
(15-499) Jim Hager, Alameda, discussed lighting concerns at Harbor Bay related to VF
Outdoors.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Spencer announced the sales tax report [paragraph no. 15-502], the plan check
agreement [paragraph no. 15-505], and the ordinances regarding rents [paragraph nos.
15-516 and 15-517 were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the
paragraph number.]
(*15-500) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on July 7, 2015; the
Regular
City Council Meeting Held on July 16, 2015; and the Special and Regular City Council
Meetings Held on July 21, 2015. Approved.
(*15-501) Ratified bills in the amount of $8,938,594.14.
(15-502) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period
Ending June 30, 2015 Collected During the Period January 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015.
The Finance Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Daysog commented on two of the top sales tax generators at the
Harbor Bay Business Park.
Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
(*15-503) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ending June
30, 2015. Accepted. [330-50]
(*15-504) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Purchase
Agreement not to Exceed $130,452 for the Replacement of One Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) Bus for the Paratransit Program. Accepted.
(15-505) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute an
Agreement with CSG Consulting Services for Professional Plan Check Services for a
12-Month Term in an Amount not to Exceed $300,000.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,10,"36
(*21-044) Resolution No. 15736, ""Amending the Alameda City Employees' Association (ACEA)
Salary Schedule to Add the Classification of Police Records Specialist and Reclassifying the
Four Intermediate Clerks in the Police Records Division to Police Records Specialist, Effective
January 19, 2021.' Adopted.
(21-045) Resolution No. 15737, ""Approving Tentative Map Tract 8534 and Density Bonus
Application PLN19-0448 to Subdivide a 1.29-Acre Property into Twelve Lots Located at 2607 to
2619 Santa Clara Avenue and 1514 to 1518 Broadway.' Adopted.
Councilmember Daysog stated the matter involves a density bonus for a residential project;
discussed previous tennis instruction provided at the project site; expressed concern about the
project taking advantage of the density bonus ordinance; stated the project is taking advantage
in ways that do not meet the reasons for the density bonus ordinance; the idea behind the
density bonus is that construction of affordable housing is so exorbitant and in order to
encourage building affordable housing, State law allows developers to build additional units; the
project is not constructing very low income housing; instead, two of the existing units will be
designated as very low income housing units; no costs are being borne by the developer; nine
market rate units will be built; however, in order to qualify for the density bonus, the developer
had to trigger the requirement before receiving the density bonus; the project as characterized
does not meet the density bonus; nine units can still be built should two very low income units
be of new construction.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft proposed Council receive a staff report.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director gave a brief presentation.
The Assistant City Attorney stated State law requires a deed restriction for the two units for a
minimum of 55 years; noted if an inclusionary ordinance requires longer than 55 years, the
longer term will be effected.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated the restriction rolls in Alameda
serving in perpetuity; State law does not require the units to be new construction; density bonus
can be applied to a condominium conversion of an existing building.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted the provision provides an economical way to provide low income
housing.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated the approach provides two units
immediately into the affordable housing pool and identifies existing tenants who qualify,
resulting in no displacement.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the units will apply towards the Regional Housing Needs
Allocation (RHNA) requirement, to which the Planning, Building and Transportation Director
responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Spencer requested clarification about design of the two existing units.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated both units are one bedroom; the
entitlements are structured where the property developers and owners need to execute an
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,3,"360
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Community Development Director stated
25% of Alameda's projects are complicated and need to go to outside engineers for
plan check services; CSG Consulting is the same plan check service the Fire
Department uses; there is no impact to the General Fund; the position may be
underfilled with a plans examiner; Alameda has an efficient model in place based on
analysis.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the City has engineers on staff, to which the
Community Development Director responded in the negative; stated the Planning
Department does not have a structural engineer.
Mayor Spencer stated she prefers to have one engineer as part of our staff, counter to
what the plan currently is; letters to the editor were sent regarding City engineers.
The Interim City Manager stated the letters to the editor were regarding Public Works
engineers, not Planning Department engineers.
The Community Development Director stated it is more efficient to have access to
multiple structural engineers during busy period; certified plans examiners are what is
needed internally.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Daysog Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by the following
voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Oddie - 4.
Noes: Mayor Spencer - 1.
(*15-506) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Rosas Brothers Construction for the
Repair of Concrete Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway, and Minor Street Patching, FY14-
15, Phase 15, No. P.W. 04-15-08. Accepted.
(*15-507) Recommendation to Award Three Separate Contracts in the Amount of
$75,000 Each (Total Expenditure of $225,000) to the Following Providers: Salas
O'Brien, YEI Engineers, Inc., and Schaaf & Wheeler, for On-Call Mechanical
Engineering Services. Accepted.
(*15-508) Recommendation to Award Three Separate Contracts in the Amount of
$75,000 Each (Total Expenditure of $225,000) to the Following Providers: Salas
O'Brien, YEI Engineers, Inc., and The Engineering Enterprise, for On-Call Electrical
Engineering Services. Accepted.
(*15-509) Recommendation to Amend the Term of the Contract for Brown Reynolds
Watford (BRW) Architects to Provide Professional Services for the Design, Construction
Documents, and Contract Management for the Emergency Operations Center/Fire
Station 3. Accepted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,4,"361
(*15-510) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount Not to Exceed $305,698
to AECOM Technical Services, Inc. for Containment, Off-Haul, Disposal, and Reporting
of Hazardous Soil at the Project Site of the Emergency Operation Center/Fire Station 3,
1809 Grand Street. Accepted.
(*15-511) Recommendation to Award Two Separate Three Year Contracts with up to
Two Optional Three Year Extensions to Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in an
Amount Not to Exceed $200,000 for City of Alameda Occupational Medical Services
and to Preferred Alliance, Inc., in an Amount Not to Exceed $30,000 for Drug Testing
Services
in Conjunction with Services Provided by Kaiser Permanente Medical Center (Total
Expenditure of $230,000). Accepted.
(*15-512) Resolution No. 15069, ""Amending the Electric Utility Professionals
of
Alameda (EUPA) Salary Schedule Establishing the Classifications of Utility Analyst and
Utility Project Manager. Adopted.
(*15-513) Resolution No. 15070, ""Amending the City of Alameda Executive
Management (EXME) Compensation Plan to Eliminate the Classification of
Administrative Services Director."" Adopted; and
(15-513A) Resolution No. 15071, ""Approving Workforce Changes in the Human
Resources Department,"" Adopted.
(*15-514) Resolution No. 15072, ""Electing to be Subject to the Public Employees'
Medical and Hospital Care Act at an Equal Amount for Employees and Annuitants to
Include Non-Represented, Part-Time Employees into the CalPERS Public Employees
Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) Health Program Due to the Employer Shared
Responsibility Provision ""Pay or Play"" Rule of the Affordable Care Act ""ACA"". Adopted.
(*15-515) Resolution No. 15073, ""In Support of New Sustainable Funding for State and
Local Transportation Infrastructure by the State of California."" Adopted.
(15-516) Ordinance No. 3131, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding
Article XIV to Chapter VI Concerning the Review of Rent Increases.' Finally passed.
(15-517) Ordinance No. 3132, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding
Section 2-23 to Article II Concerning the Creation of a Rent Review Advisory Committee
(RRAC).' Finally passed.
Mayor Spencer requested the rent increases and RRAC ordinances be address
together.
Outlined her rent increases; urged Council to implement a law to protect residents: Ute,
Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,1,"361
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- - -SEPTEMBER - 6, 2016- -7:00 P.M.
Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 7:06 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL -
Present:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese,
Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 5.
Absent:
None.
AGENDA CHANGES
None.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(16-405) Proclamation Declaring September 17, 2016 as Coastal Cleanup Day.
Mayor Spencer read and presented the proclamation to James Frank, East Bay
Regional Park District, who made brief comments.
(16-406) Proclamation Declaring October 2 through 8, 2016 as Public Power Week.
Mayor Spencer read and presented the proclamation to Laura Giuntini, Public Utilities
Board, who made brief comments.
Expressed concern over climate change: Ken Peterson, Alameda.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(16-407) Jim Hager, Alameda, questioned whether the City has regulations to prohibit
noise and light control when industries move next door to neighborhoods.
(16-408) Heather Little, Alameda, discussed a bike versus auto accident on Main Street;
stated that she would like the Council to bring adopt Vision Zero.
Mayor Spencer stated Vision Zero is to have zero traffic deaths.
The City Manager stated the matter would come to Council.
(16-409) Kristin Welch, Alameda, expressed appreciation for flashing pedestrian
crosswalk lights near schools; stated people are still speeding and something needs to
be done to protect pedestrians.
The City Manager stated staff is looking at improvements to the area to separate
bicyclists from vehicles.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 06, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,2,"362
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the City Manager is referring to the
Main Street ferry terminal.
The City Manager responded Main Street and Singleton Avenue to the ferry; stated the
City is currently looking to fund the project in the next year's budget.
Mayor Spencer inquired if the Police rotate enforcement around different schools at the
beginning of the school year.
The City Manager responded that the Police do ongoing enforcement; stated the issue
is a combined effort of enforcement and capital improvements to separate bicyclists.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*16-410) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on July 5,
2016 and July 19, 2016. Approved.
(*16-411) Ratified bills in the amount of $14,979,660.44.
(*16-412) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Rosas Brothers Construction for the
Repair of Concrete Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway, and Minor Street Patching, Fiscal
Year (FY) 2015-16, Phase 16, No. P.W. 04-15-08. Accepted.
(*16-413) Recommendation to Amend the Contract with Ranger Pipeline Inc. to
Increase the Contract Amount by $4,504,757.51, Including Contingency, for Cyclic
Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Phase 13, No. P.W. 05-16-08, for a Total Compensation
of $13,326,486, for Cyclic Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Phases 11, 12 and 13.
Accepted.
(*16-414) Recommendation to Amend the Contract with Engineering Mapping
Solutions, Inc. to Increase the Contract Amount by $74,525, Including Contingencies,
for a Total Compensation of $142,250 for Continued Geographic Information System
Support Services. Accepted.
(*16-415) Recommendation to Amend a Contract to Extend the Term for One Year to
Lucity, Inc. for a Comprehensive Computerized Maintenance Management System.
Accepted.
(*16-416) Recommendation to Amend a Contract to Extend the Term for One Year to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 6, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,5,"362
Expressed concern over Alameda residents being displaced: Barbara Duncan,
Alameda.
Expressed concern over Section 6-56.10, which prevents landlords from implementing
rent increases for one year for failure to appear: Doug Smith, Rental Property Owner.
Outlined rent control benefits: Garfield Kincross, Alameda.
Outlined a suggestion to modify the ordinance which he submitted in a letter dated
August 13th: Steven Pahl, California Apartment Association.
Stated she is a retired teacher and had to have her daughter co-sign to get a lease in
Alameda; urged Council to find out what is working in other cities: Karen Wald,
Alameda.
Stated people with disabilities are greatly impacted and have a more difficult time
moving: Patricia Nash, Alameda Renters Coalition (ARC).
Stated that she would like to see an ordinance passed; the ordinance does not address
30 and 60 day notices to vacate; renters are concerned the ordinance will not do
enough; the conversation needs to continue: Angela Hockabout, ARC.
Stated people are being evicted so landlords can double rents: Jason Buckley,
Alameda.
Encouraged not taking a one size fits all approach; urged balance: Grover Rudolf.
Stated his apartment was just purchased and he just received notice of a 30 to 50% rent
increase; outlined his history of managing the property: Gary Barlow, Alameda.
Urged the Council to do something to address rent increases: Sawar and Lucia Tariq,
Alameda.
Submitted a letter; outlined his concerns with Section 6-56.10; urged the Section be
placed on hold and reviewed: John Sullivan, Alameda.
Outlined her recent rent increases; stated that she feels like she is being asked to leave:
Linda Weinstock, Alameda.
Read a letter on behalf of a real estate broker outlining concerns over rent increases:
Arminda Graca, Alameda.
Outlined the lifestyle changes she has had to make to pay her rent increases: Stephanie
Chenard, Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,6,"363
Outlined a letter she received about her apartment building being purchased, including
new requirements to pay garbage, sewer and water; a 50% rent increase; and
renovations to her patio, but she does not have a patio; shared a picture of sewer back
up in her bathroom: Crystal Felder, Alameda.
Expressed support for the ordinance; stated the ordinance should go further and
landlords should be watched; reviewed correspondence submitted regarding the
agenda item: John Klein, Alameda.
Stated that she rents the unit she lives next to and would like some consideration given
to buildings under four units: Lisa Brown, Alameda.
The Community Development Director gave a brief presentation.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the speakers gave emotional testimony;
requested a report at the end of the year on what other cities are doing to address the
rent increase problems.
The Community Development Director responded that staff will be looking at best
practices and impacts of rent increases and provide a report to Council.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he understands all the issues raised; housing is a
basic need; it is disappointing that the issue came to the Council and has taken 15
months to get going; there is a larger problem; apologized to tenants, stated the needle
is not moving to where it needs to be; landlords do not have to mediate, they just have
to show up; Council has not really done anything to stop egregious rent increases; there
is no teeth to the ordinance; if there is a bigger pattern of massive increases, the
Council will be forced to act; if citizens put something on the ballot, it will be far worse
than what is going on now.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with Councilmember Oddie; stated the rent
increase reports are alarming; it is not a level playing field; she is moved and impressed
with so many citizens; encouraged landlords to make a difference; agreed with Angela
Hockabaout that the ordinance is a ""good first step, but should not be the last"".
Councilmember Daysog stated the ordinance is a first step, and he would ultimately like
to take stronger steps; he would like to see specific language on just cause evictions
and a moratorium on rent increases; Alameda will lose the working class flavor if
something is not done; the rent increases is a crisis; he looks forward to passing the
ordinance, but also to specific action in the future.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated changes should be evaluated in the next six months; there
is no reason to delay as stories are getting worse; the Council has to protect citizens in
manner of fairness; he has heard that Santa Rosa is looking at rent control; Council has
to act fairly or there will be a ground swell of action.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,3,"363
Water Works Engineers for Engineering Services During Construction for the
Abandonment and Relocation of Existing Sanitary Sewer Main and Lagoon Seawall,
No. P.W. 01-12-03. Accepted.
(*16-417) Recommendation to Amend a Contract with RMC Water and Environment to
Increase the Contract Amount by $25,032, for a Total Compensation of $98,042, for
Sanitary Sewer System Management Plan Support Services. Accepted.
(*16-418) Resolution No. 15191, ""Grant of Utility Easement to Pacific Gas & Electric
Company within Neptune Park"". Adopted.
(*16-419) Resolution No. 15192, ""Amending the Alameda City Employees Association
(ACEA) Salary Schedule to Amend the Work Week of Customer Service Representative
and Lead Customer Service Representative Classifications from Thirty Seven and a
Half (37.5) Hours Per Week to Forty (40) Hours Per Week.' Adopted.
(*16-420) Resolution No. 15193, ""for the Mayor's Signature Reaffirming the Authority
Previously Delegated to the City Manager, in Resolution No. 13135 Approved on
September 7, 1999, to Make Application for Industrial Disability Retirement for Local
Safety Members with the California Public Employment Retirement System."" Adopted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(16-421) Public Hearing to Consider Call for Review and a Resolution Upholding
Planning Board Resolution No. PB-16-16 Approving Amendment (PLN16-0165) to the
Esplanade Final Development Plan (PLN15-0092) to Allow Senior Assisted Living as a
Permitted Use at 2900 Harbor Bay Parkway (Project: Westmont of Harbor Bay Assisted
Living). Not adopted. [Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines Section 15162, there have been no significant changes in circumstances
that require revisions to the previously certified Environmental Impact Report.]
The Assistant Community Development Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired if the space has always been zoned open space, to which the
Assistant Community Development Director responded in the negative; stated the site is
zoned commercial.
Councilmember Daysog stated the City of Alameda entered into an agreement in 2002
with the Port of Oakland; inquired if the Port of Oakland or the Citizens League for
Airport Safety and Serenity (CLASS) lawyers provided input on the project.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded that he has not spoken to
the CLASS lawyers but he has spoken directly with Port of Oakland staff to determine
whether the proposed use is consistent with the Settlement Agreement; stated the Port
confirmed the project does not violate any prior agreements; the City does not believe
there is a conflict.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 06, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,4,"364
Councilmember Daysog inquired if there is a letter or official confirmation, to which the
Assistant Community Development Director responded there is email confirmation.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, the Assistant Community Development
Director stated the Planning Board passed a resolution that the site is appropriate for
assisted living and office use; the Council needs to decide whether or not to uphold the
Planning Board's decision.
Councilmember Oddie inquired how the decision differs from the November 9, 2015
decision.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded the November 9, 2015
decision was not a decision on the property, rather it clarified the Zoning Code; the
question is whether assisted living is permitted under the Zoning Code.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether or not the assisted living facility is in
conformance with the commercial use zoning is not what has been appealed, to which
the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated the
Council can question the use on the particular site.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether a traffic and parking study was done for the
site; and if numbers compare traffic under the assisted living use and the original 2006
office building.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the use has 41 spaces during morning peak
hours and afternoon versus 205 for the previously approved plan, to which the Assistant
Community Development Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired what type of parking design is required for the facility.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded the parking is lower density
compared to the 2006 office plan; assisted living generates a lot less parking demand.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the project would provide 60 parking spaces;
and whether the Code requires 43 spaces, so the plan is 17 spaces over the required
amount, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the
affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if the use is within the Airport Land Use Compatibility
plan, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the
affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the Water Emergency Transportation Authority
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 6, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,7,"364
Councilmember Daysog moved final passage of the first ordinance [adding Article XIV
to Chapter VI concerning the review of rent increases].
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer stated Council has received emails and other
communications about landlords using another tactic and charging utilities; inquired
whether utilities can be included in the definition of base rent.
The Assistant City Attorney responded in the negative; stated if changes are made
tonight, the ordinance would have to be reintroduced and have a second reading; the
report brought back in December could fine-tune the definition.
Mayor Spencer thanked Jeff Cambra and the people who participated in multiple
hearings; stated there is a change in the landscape; she has been renting the same
home for 16 years; the approach is trying to address all renters; encouraged review of
Costa Hawkins and for people to participate in the process.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved final passage of the ordinance creating the
RRAC.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -
5.
***
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 8:47 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:58 p.m.
and announced that the Sunshine Ordinance amendments [paragraph no. 15-521
would be continued to October 6th
***
(*15-518) Ordinance No. 3133, ""Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Deleting
Section 25-2.4 Concerning the Accrual Of Sick Leave By Part Time Employees.' Finally
passed. [360-50]
(*15-519) Ordinance No. 3134, ""Approving and Authorizing an Option and Purchase
Agreement Between the City of Alameda and Alameda Housing Authority and
Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute All Necessary Documents."" Finally
passed. [NF: 600-30]
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(15-520) Resolution No. 15074, ""Appointing Arnold Brillinger as a Member of the
Commission on Disability Issues."" Adopted;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,8,"365
(15-520A) Resolution No. 15075, ""Reappointing Susan Deutsch as a Member of the
Commission on Disability Issues."" Adopted;
(15-520B) Resolution No. 15076, ""Appointing David Mitchell as a Member of the
Planning Board.' Adopted;
(15-520C) Resolution No. 15077, ""Appointing Sandy Sullivan as a Member of the
Planning Board.' Adopted;
(15-520D) Resolution No. 15078, ""Reappointing Daniel Hoy as a Member of the Public
Art Commission."" Adopted;
(15-520E) Resolution No. 15079, ""Appointing Ronald Limoges and as a Member of the
Recreation and Park Commission."" Adopted;
(15-520F) Resolution No. 15080, ""Appointing Adam Trujillo as a Member of the
Recreation and Park Commission."" Adopted;
(15-520G) Resolution No. 15081, ""Reappointing Chris Miley as a Member of the
Transportation Commission."" Adopted.
Read a letter she submitted regarding a Planning Board applicant: Dania Alvarez,
Alameda.
Expressed support for Dania Alvarez: Walt Jacobs, Alameda.
Expressed concern over the process for incumbents; outlined the history of incumbents
being reappointed; expressed support for Dania Alvarez: Lorre Zuppan, Planning Board.
Expressed appreciation for Dania Alvarez; discussed the process; urged the Council to
take ownership of making appointments: John Knox White, Planning Board.
Expressed support for Dania Alvarez: Larry Witte, Alameda.
Discussed past vacancies on the Planning Board; urged Council to keep Dania Alvarez
on the Planning Board: Krisoffer Koster, Planning Board.
Expressed his support for Dania Alvarez and expressed concern over previous Mayoral
appointees not being reappointed: Mike Henneberry, Planning Board.
Expressed support for Dania Alvarez and urged she be reappointed: Nancy Gordon,
Alameda.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he requested the Planning Board nominees be
present to answer questions for due diligence; moved adoption of the resolutions
appointing the members of the Commission on Disability Issues, Public Art
Commission, Recreation and Park Commission and Transportation Commission.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,5,"365
(WETA) has expressed any interest in the property; and whether WETA or the City has
the ability to take the property.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded WETA has indicated it does
not have funding to purchase the property; stated eminent domain does not mean
taking the property, the property has to be bought; WETA, the City and residents are
working together to improve access to the ferry terminal; if the City took the property by
eminent domain, the City would have to buy the land.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry regarding a parking lot, the Assistant
Community Development Director stated the City is not interested in dragging more cars
into the neighborhood.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if the project has gone before the Bay Conservation and
Development Commission (BCDC) and whether the project complies with BCDC
agreements and land use.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) found any
nesting birds or plants of special interest, to which the Assistant Community
Development Director responded in the negative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if jackrabbits are a protected species, to which the
Assistant Community Development Director responded in the negative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if the EIR is bogus, to which the Assistant Community
Development Director responded in the negative; stated the EIR reviewed the entire
Harbor Bay development; the City updates the EIR for traffic, airport noise and biology
for every development; all three of updates were done for the project.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if the project has received an approval letter
from the Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission regarding compliance with
safety noise and height development, to which the Assistant Community Development
Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a noise analysis was done by AGD
Acoustic stating the project met City, State and County noise level requirements, to
which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether residential is not permitted at the site.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded under the Zoning Code and
settlement agreements, residential housing is not allowed at the site.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the job imbalance is part of the General Plan.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 06, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,6,"366
The Assistant Community Development Director responded the General Plan directs
the City to work towards a job/housing balance to address traffic congestion; more jobs
on the Island helps traffic congestion; there is currently a poor job/housing balance in
Alameda; the Planning Board decreased the assisted living and increased the office
space to have the project create more jobs.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry about the type of jobs, the Assistant Community
Development Director stated the jobs would be low salary jobs, assisting seniors with
daily living.
Councilmember Daysog inquired if assisted living is addressed in the Housing Element.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated
residents are requesting more senior housing.
Councilmember Daysog inquired if the residents at the assisted living could register to
vote, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the
affirmative.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated assisted living places are often polling places.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether an assisted living complex could be built in an area
zoned for housing in Alameda, to which the Assistant Community Development Director
responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired about the units in the assisted living facility; inquired
whether 60 to 75% would be one or two bedroom apartments and the rest a memory
care facility, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the
affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the senior housing units can be applied to the
Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), to which the Assistant Community
Development Director responded in the negative; stated the units are not considered
residential units.
Mayor Spencer inquired what type of modification would have to occur for the units to
be counted towards housing.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded unit defined as residential
count toward the RHNA, but residential units would not be able to go on the project site.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether some units have kitchens, to which the Assistant
Community Development Director responded units do not have full kitchens.
Chris Garwood and Michael O'Rourke, Pacific Union Land Company, gave a
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 6, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,9,"366
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer stated that she would like to exclude the
Transportation Commission reappointment.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated there is a motion on the floor and called for the
question.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Mayor
Spencer - 1.
Councilmember Oddie asked questions of the two Planning Board applicants.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he would have preferred Dania Alvarez to be
reappointed; asked a question of the Planning Board applicants.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft asked a question of Ms. Sullivan.
Mayor Spencer stated the questions reminded her why she nominated the Planning
Board applicants.
Vice Mayor Matarrese asked a question of the Planning Board applicants.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated she has known Dania Alvarez a long time; she is
troubled that Ms. Alvarez is not being reappointed to the Planning Board and that Mayor
Spencer wants to appoint people who share her own political perspective; she would
want qualified individuals who would render objective decisions rather than voting the
way the Mayor would want them to in order to be reappointed; similar sentiments were
shared by members of the public and other board and commission members; she would
like the Mayor's decision to be reversed and reappoint Ms. Alvarez; failing that, Council
should make a careful decision about tonight's vote.
Councilmember Oddie stated that he is distressed that Ms. Alvarez was not
reappointed; she has an independent voice; all other members of Planning Board
agreed that Ms. Alvarez should not be replaced; he appreciates all applicants;
presented options, including: appointing both nominees, choosing one only one
nominee, or rejecting both nominees.
Mayor Spencer stated that she appreciates Ms. Alvarez's service over two years; she
interviewed everyone who applied to the commission; she attends many board and
commission meetings, listens to the public, and tries to make very balanced
nominations; it is not true that she did not reappoint anyone from the prior
administration; Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's comment about choosing people based
on her political views is not true; applications are public information; she appreciates
that Councilmember Oddie asked questions of the two nominees, it reminded her why
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,7,"367
presentation.
Mayor Spencer inquired about the distance to the hospital.
Mr. O'Rourke responded that the hospital is 3.5 miles away from the project site.
Councilmember Oddie stated the project site is within half a mile from a Fire station with
a full service ambulance.
Kaitlin Bishop, Pacific Union Land Company, and Alan Rose, RGD Acoustics, continued
the presentation.
Councilmember Daysog inquired how far away the project is from the 65 decibel line.
Mr. Rose responded that he did not measure the feet, but the current noise level is
close to the 65 decibel line.
Councilmember Daysog inquired how the 65 decibel line is determined.
Mr. Rose responded a noise modeling program projects aircraft activity; stated the noise
level is projected 20 years into the future.
Councilmember Daysog inquired if the decibel line is currently at 65 decibel or if 65
decibels was modeled in the future.
Mr. Rose responded the plan looks at a 20 year horizon; stated the recent contours are
from 2015.
Councilmember Daysog inquired if there are plus/minus factors to the contour levels;
and are there margins of error to be confident the noise level is within the line.
Mayor Spencer inquired if the there is an illustration showing the line in relation to the
homes and proposed development.
Mr. Rose presented a slide.
Stated the assisted living facility is a good idea, but not at the proposed site; workers
will have difficulties finding transportation to the facility: Dorothy Freeman, Alameda.
Stated there is a need for an assisted living facility in Alameda; the traffic will be
substantially different with the project: Kevin Hester, Alameda.
Stated the Council should look at the use and not the EIR; the proposed facility is not an
appropriate use of the site; parking would be an appropriate use for the area; the focus
should be on increasing ferry ridership and parking for ferry riders: Tim Neilson,
Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 06, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,10,"367
she nominated them; she stands by her nominations and hopes Council will support
her.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he is saddened that Ms. Alvarez is not being
reappointed; the Charter is clear about the process; the Mayor chooses the nominees;
whether there is a political agenda or not, the consequence comes with the territory;
although he prefers Ms. Alvarez stay on the Planning Board, he is prepared to support
the Mayor's nominations.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated there has been good discussion regarding qualifications;
the nominees are qualified; he appreciates Councilmember Oddie's initiative to have the
public hear the nominees present themselves; he is confident the nominees can make
discretionary decisions on the Housing Element and Density Bonus; it is healthy to have
new faces on the Board and he would like to move forward.
Councilmember Daysog moved adoption of the resolutions appointing Ms. Sullivan and
Mr. Mitchell.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded, the motion which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 3.
Noes:
Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft and Oddie - 2.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Mr. Brillinger, Ms. Sullivan, Mr.
Mitchell and Mr. Miley.
(15-521) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by
Amending Various Sections of Article VIII (Sunshine Ordinance) in Chapter Il
(Administration) and Adding New Sections 2-90.3, 2-90.4 and 2-91.18 Concerning Local
Standards to Ensure Public Access to Public Meetings and Public Records. [Not heard.]
Following the 8:47 p.m. recess, Mayor Spencer announced the matter would be moved
to October 6, 2015.
(15-522) Summary: Review of 100-Room Hotel Development at the Harbor Bay
Business Park.
Public Hearing to Consider (1) an Appeal by UNITEHERE! Local 280 Challenging the
Planning Board's Approval of Final Development Plan and Design Review for
Construction of a 100-Room Hotel at 2350 Harbor Bay Parkway, (2) Mayor Spencer's
Call for Review of the Planning Board Action, and (3)
(15-522A) Resolution No. 15082, ""Upholding the Planning Board Resolution PB-15-16
Approving a Final Development Plan and Design Review to Allow the Construction of a
100-Room Hotel on the Harbor Bay Business Park Shoreline at 2350 Harbor Bay
Parkway (PLN14-0305)."" Adopted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,8,"368
Stated the parcel of land should be used for ferry ridership; the assisted living facility
could be placed elsewhere in Alameda: Steve Cvitanovic, Alameda.
Stated that he strongly supports the project; there are not enough affordable assisted
living facilities in Alameda; assisted living facilities do not have a lot of traffic: Larry
Williams, Alameda.
Showed a video in support of the project: Matt Tunney; Becca Perata; John McManus;
and Josh Reed.
The City Attorney stated showing the video is not a violation of the Brown Act.
Mayor Spencer requested that in the future speakers be present to speak instead of
showing a video.
Stated the Harbor Bay Business Association supports the project; urged Council to
uphold the Planning Board's decision: Dan Reidy, Harbor Bay Business Association.
Stated the property is not appropriate for an assisted living facility; assisted living under
State law is called residential care for the elderly; the zoning is not appropriate for the
property: Dana Sack, Alameda.
Stated that he does not support the project; the facility is residential, not medical; an
assisted living facility is an incompatible use for the project site because of the airport
noise: George Humphries, Alameda.
Showed maps; stated the use is incompatible with the project site; the decibel level area
is not an area to put seniors with health issues: Reyla Graber, Alameda.
Urged Council to deny the Planning Board decision; stated noise is not good for elderly
individuals with Alzheimer's or memory problems; noise causes problems in sleep
patterns, which is not healthy for elderly with memory problems: Patricia Gannon,
Alameda.
Submitted a letter; urged Council to not approve the Planning Board decision; stated
people with Alzheimer's are very sensitive to noise: Marie Kane, Alameda.
Submitted documents; stated that she is opposed to the assisted living facility on the
proposed project site and concerned about the safety of seniors, the City's legal liability,
the environmental impacts, and sea level: Pat Lamborn, Alameda.
Stated that he strongly supports the project; the noise and safety issues have been
addressed by the Building Code; the City and WETA are not going to buy the property
to make a parking lot for the ferry riders; the call for review process has become
unacceptable: Michael McDonough, Chamber of Commerce.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 6, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,11,"368
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he was recusing himself and left the dais.
The City Planner gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the option for hotel parking is near Gardner
preschool, to which the City Planner responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Spencer inquired what the lease radius is, to which the City Planner responded
1000 feet.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether it is possible to be stuck with an empty building
if the owner is unable to get a lease, to which the City Planner responded it is
theoretically possible; stated an easy fix is Council can change the condition so that the
trigger is building permit, not occupancy.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the disadvantages of a dedicated
asphalt lot will be discussed.
The City Planner responded the Planning Board took six months to approve the plan;
the issue of shared and permanent parking came up; the Planning Board determined
there was enough space on the site to not require another site to be paved over as
another lot.
Councilmember Oddie noted that neighbors are not yet aware there may be a parking
lot next to their homes; they may come to the Council with light pollution issues; inquired
what are the options to keep the project moving if Council does not choose a permanent
parking lot.
The City Planner responded that he recommends the Council direct staff to change the
condition on the parking plan; certain things need to happen before a building permit
can be issued: property purchase, parking lot design and lighting, anddesign review
approval; if there is no design review approval, the project would have to come back to
Council.
***
(15-523) Mayor Spencer announced a motion is needed to considering the remaining
agenda items.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of considering the remaining items.
Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Mayor
Spencer - 1.
***
The City Planner completed his presentation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,12,"369
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the project is directly on the water, to which the
Assistant City Attorney responded in the negative; stated there is a pathway between
the structure and the water.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the City Planner stated the Balboa Park case is
important because the court stated the structure is surrounded by a park which is urban
use; in Alameda's case, the building is surrounded by business offices and an urban
park which is considered urban use.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the project is an appropriate exemption to CEQA, to
which the City Planner responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the exemption would have applied to
the Hampton Inn, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Spencer inquired how many floors the Hampton Inn has, to which the Assistant
City Attorney responded that she does not know but will find out.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the City Planner stated the current project is a
five-story building at 63 feet and there are no other buildings in the area that are 63 feet;
the height limit for the project is 100 feet, which is in the zoning for the Harbor Bay
Business Park adopted in the early 1980's.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether Council could revisit the building height issue to which
the City Planner responded in the affirmative; stated the development agreement
expires in 2019 and Council can address the height issue at that time.
Discussed issues that have been addressed with VF Outdoors; expressed concern over
the hotel impacts, including traffic, parking and lighting: Gary Thompson, Alameda.
Urged the appeal be rejected; outlined the need for the hotel: Kari Thompson, Chamber
of Commerce and Alameda resident.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Assistant City Attorney stated a reason
does not have to be specified when filing an appeal; stating a reason implies taking a
position on the project.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how would Councilmembers prepare to address
an appeal when they do not know the grounds for the appeal.
The Assistant City Attorney responded an appeal is different than calling something for
review; stated Unitehere! had a detailed letter when they filed their appeal.
The City Attorney stated it is a de novo review on a call for review, which means
anything can be addressed in the review.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,9,"369
Stated that he is in favor of the project; the project has a very low amount of parking;
urged Council to vote on what is best for the entire City, not a select few: Bob Osteman,
Alameda.
Stated that he strongly supports the project; the project will produce a very low traffic
impact; the assisted living facility is better than a parking lot on the project site: Robert
Doud, Alameda.
Stated that he has been to the project site many times and the airport noise is not
noticeable; urged Council to support the project; stated an assisted living facility will
help the people who already live in Alameda stay in the area: Brock Grunt, Alameda.
Stated the zoning and use are in compliance; there is a high demand for the proposed
project; urged Council to uphold the Planning Board decision: Kristoffer Köster,
Alameda.
Stated that she supports the project; the site will be developed; the call for review
process needs to be changed: Kari Thompson, Alameda.
Stated that he is concerned with the traffic and parking; he lives close to the site and
can hear airplane noise; there is a better site for an assisted living facility: Tom Krysiak,
Alameda.
Read letter on behalf of Kevin Connolly from WETA: WETA is working with City staff
and Harbor Bay Homeowners Association to address parking concerns; WETA has
increased bike rack capacity and installed bicycle lockers; WETA strongly supports the
project: Bruce Meyers, WETA.
Stated assisted living facilities are good places for seniors to live; that she strongly
supports the project; residents were concerned with the noise level and safety of a past
project, which is now thriving: Alice Lai-Bitker, Peace of Mind Home Care.
Stated seniors with Alzheimer's need a quiet surrounding; there is a need for senior
housing but not at the proposed project site: Gretchen Lipow, Alameda.
Stated the assisted living facility should be located in a different location: Rosemary
McNally, Alameda.
Stated the assisted living facility should not be located at the project site; the Zoning
Ordinance as currently written does not authorize an assisted facility in the proposed
project site: Steven Gurtler.
Stated the project is a residential facility; traffic and airport noise have increased; bird
migrations have shifted; sea rise will happen; urged Council to demand a current EIR;
stated the site is not suitable for an assisted living facility: Joe Van Winkle, Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 06, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,11,"37
affordable housing agreement with the City of Alameda prior to a final map or pulling building
permits; all details have not been fully negotiated yet which is standard for the project's stage.
In response to Councilmember Spencer's inquiry regarding parking, the Planning, Building and
Transportation Director stated the applicant is eligible to waive the parking requirements under
the density bonus; however, the applicant will maintain existing parking for all 22 units and
provide two parking spaces per unit for the nine new units.
Councilmember Spencer inquired whether the neighbors have filed complaints or concerns.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded a letter from an existing tenant
concerned about the loss of tennis courts was sent to the Planning Board; stated the new nine
units are being developed on land used by the former property owners; the Planning Board and
applicant worked together to create a new common open space; the new space will be available
to existing tenants as well.
Councilmember Spencer inquired whether the new units will have balconies or private outside
space, to which the Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded in the affirmative.
Stated that he likes the proposal better than earlier designs; the project is a great use of space
and will help with the City's RHNA numbers: Zac Bowling, Alameda.
Stated that he would like clarification about whether the existing units are owned by a single
party; whether the developer does not have to buy or pay for the two affordable housing units;
and whether the project will count as nine market rate and two affordable units for the RHNA
numbers: Jay Garfinkle, Alameda.
The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated the City will receive nine new units,
plus two affordable units; the existing 22 units and 11 buildings are all located on one large
parcel; the proposed tentative map creates 11 parcels for the existing buildings and a 12th
parcel for the nine new units.
Councilmember Knox White stated that he understands the matter to be approving a tentative
map and density bonus application; neither of the approvals are tied to the approved
development plan; Council cannot dictate the appearance of the project in approving the matter;
the matter is ministerial.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the density bonus and tentative map [adoption
of related resolution].
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Spencer stated it appears there are already plans to add
balconies and outdoor areas for units; expressed support for the staff recommendation; stated
private areas are important; expressed support for the parking and neighbors being supportive.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers
Daysog: No; Knox White: Aye; Spencer: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes:
4. Noes: 1.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,13,"370
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether other issues can be addressed that were not
brought up in the appeal.
The City Attorney responded there are two issues: an appeal by Unitehere on a specific
matter, and the call for review by the Mayor, which opens up the entire issue for review.
Expressed support for the project; discussed business travel: Robert Sanger, Marriott.
Expressed his support for the applicant; stated that he has experience and has not seen
parking be a problem: Chris Clark, Texas.
Stated meeting space is needed; Penumbra tells employees to use shuttles: Joy Bose,
Penumbra.
***
(15-524) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to continue the meeting past 11:00
p.m.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of continuing the meeting.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Mayor
Spencer - 1.
***
Stated that he submitted a letter and resolution from the Business Park Board;
discussed the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): Daniel Reidy, Harbor Bay
Business Park.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding CEQA, the City Planner stated a new
CEQA exemption was used on top of the EIR, which was backed by environmental
studies done this year.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the CEQA addresses traffic impacts, to which the City
Planner responded in the affirmative.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the City Planner stated staff determined the
traffic generated by the hotel would be much less than what was originally assumed to
be on the site and in the business park.
Expressed concern over jobs and the employer; discussed the reason for the appeal as
outlined in the letter from Corey Briggs: Ty Hudson, Appellant.
Stated the exemption is not being used appropriately; outlined concerns about the hotel:
Pat Lamborn, Alameda and UNITEHERE.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,10,"370
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 9:51 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:59 p.m.
***
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how current is the EIR and the difference
between a convalescent home and assisted living.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded the EIR was updated in the
three areas: traffic, airport noise and biology; stated sea level rise will be addresses as
a standard condition of approval if the project is approved; the Planning Board has
authority to determine if a use is substantially similar.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated there was a great deal of opposition to other
projects; people are opposed to change; staff is working on more ferry parking; the
assisted living facility would alleviate some housing issues; the proposed use relates
well to the General Plan; that she does not believe having seniors in the area will cause
a disruption in the neighborhood; she supports the project; the project will be an asset to
the business park and the community; thanked the Planning Board.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated there is doubt about whether the project is in compliance
with the zoning; assisted living is closer to residential than to a rest home or
convalescent home; the model is great, but should be in another location in Alameda;
the project is not appropriate for the site.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he is concerned with placing residential units in an
area where the City has an agreement with Oakland Airport saying there would be no
residential.
Councilmember Oddie stated having people submit a video for public speaking is the
same as having residents read letters for other people who cannot be present; there will
be 80% less traffic from the project; the project fits in with the goal to reduce parking;
the noise level is within acceptable limits; the Oakland Airport has said the project does
not violate the agreement with the City; the property is privately owned; a parking lot will
not be placed on the site; the use is appropriate for the site; there is a demand for
assisted living facilities in Alameda.
***
(16-422) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider the remaining items:
Boatworks [paragraph no. 16-423]; the lease [paragraph no. 16-425]; the Transit Plan
[paragraph no. 16-426]; the Council Referrals [paragraph nos. 16-428 through 16-434],
and the League of California Cities Resolution [paragraph no. 16-435].
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of addressing Boatworks, the lease, and
the Transit Plan; and having the League of California Cities Resolution on the next
agenda Consent Calendar.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 6, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,14,"371
Expressed concern over appeal trying to use CEQA to stop the project; discussed
parking, building height and lighting; urged the project move forward: Michael
McDonough, Chamber of Commerce.
Outlined her positive experience as a union hotel worker; expressed concern over the
hotel not being union run: Maria Aguilar, UNITEHERE.
Expressed concern over traffic and hotel employees not having benefits, vacation, sick
and holiday pay: Melody Li, Alameda resident and UNITEHERE.
Discussed the quality of jobs at non-union hotels; expressed concern over parking;
questioned why the lease has not been secured: Wei-Ling Huber, UNITEHERE.
Outlined his concerns about the project, including the site being too small to
accommodate the hotel: Mike Henneberry, Alameda.
Stated the Association Board has concerns over the appeal, when the project complies
with the Planned Development and meets all requirements; the Bay Area Conservation
and Development Commission (BCDC) approved the project: Joe Ernst, Harbor Bay
Business Park Association.
In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, the City Planner stated the applicant
would not be able to open without a lease; staff has been assured that the applicant can
get the lease; if she has a problem, she should not build the hotel; staff has never
required an executed lease.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether light pollution would be an issue, to which the
City Planner responded in the negative; stated there is no lighted signage on top of the
hotel; a lighting plan will be submitted with building permits.
Teresa Ruiz, SB Architects, addressed the Council regarding lighting; stated a staff
member could do a final approval on site.
Mayor Spencer recommended bifurcating the two votes on the item.
Councilmember Oddie moved approval of denying the appeal called on CEQA grounds.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer stated significant issues were raised regarding CEQA
which warrants more than an exemption; she does not support the City waiving
something very critical.
The Interim City Manager clarified the traffic analysis on the project was done in 2014.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,11,"371
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer stated the referrals and the League item would return
on September 20th
Councilmember Oddie suggested an amendment to the motion to not hear the Transit
Plan since Council still needs to return to closed session.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft and Mayor Matarrese agreed to amend the motion.
Mayor Spencer summarized the motion; to hear Boatworks and the lease and have the
League item return on the Consent Calendar.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
***
Mayor Spencer stated if the project site is not appropriate for regular residential, the
project site is not appropriate for a vulnerable population; the assisted living facility is
not an appropriate use for the project site.
Mayor Spencer moved approval of overturning the Planning Boards decision.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the distinction is that assisted
living fits under commercial zoning; the Council is trying to determine if the location
could have market rate housing.
Mayor Spencer stated the Council was informed the location is not appropriate for
residential; an assisted living facility is more residential; the flight pattern in the area is
increasing.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if something from the Oakland Airport could would
alleviate Councilmember Daysog's concern.
Councilmember Daysog responded in the negative; stated the number of planes is
increasing and the noise level will increase; the site is not appropriate for residential
use.
Councilmember Oddie inquired if the agreement with the Airport limits the number of
planes.
Councilmember Daysog responded there are a lot of elements to the agreement; noted
planes fly overhead at all hours.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 06, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,12,"372
Councilmember Oddie inquired if Vice Mayor Matarrese would accept the staff
recommendation if the developer changes the design.
Vice Mayor Matarrese responded changing the design would address one problem;
stated the assisted living facility still would not work on the project site due to sea level
rise and the noise level; the facility would work in another location where environmental
concerns are not an issue.
Mayor Spencer summarized the motion is approval of overturning the Planning Boards
decision.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 3. Noes: Councilmembers
Ezzy Ashcraft and Oddie - 2.
(16-423) Public Hearing to Consider: Resolution No. 15194, ""Denying Application to
Extend Boatworks Tentative Map #8060 (Originally Approved in 2011) for an Additional
Two Years."" Adopted, and
(16-423A) Resolution No. 15195, ""Upholding Approval of Development Plan and
Density Bonus Application PLN15-0582 and Open Space Design Review Application for
2229, 2235 and 2241 Clement Street (APN 071 029000100 AND 071 028900500),
Known As the ""Boatworks"" Property, to Construct 182 Residential Units, Internal
Roadways and Alleys and a Waterfront Park on a 9.48-Acre Property."" Adopted. An
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been completed for the project in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The Assistant Community Development Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Daysog inquired what types of commitments the project has made with
regard to transit uses, alternative transit uses and transit goals; how are the transit
goals going to be measured.
The Assistant Community Development Director responded there will be annual transit
payments; stated all units would have AC Transit passes; there will be annual reporting
on the effectiveness and usage of transit; there will also be waterfront access.
In
response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry, the Assistant Community
Development Director stated the original floor plans were not approved; the Planning
Board resolution limits the total number of housing units to 182.
***
(16-424) Mayor Spencer moved to continue the meeting past 11:00 p.m.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 6, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,15,"372
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft and Oddie - 3. Noes: Mayor Spencer - 1.
[Absent: Vice Mayor Matarrese - 1.]
Councilmember Oddie expressed that he would rather remand the matter back to the
Planning Board, but would support the motion in order to have conditions added.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution documenting the
Council action for 2350 Harbor Bay Parkway with the conditions or additional tasks that
Council has given staff to address.
The Interim City Manager stated the tasks should be included in the record.
Councilmember Oddie clarified the additional tasks include that the parking is resolved
either with a signed contingent lease or some other executable contract.
The City Planner stated the condition is there be an executed lease prior to building
permit.
Councilmember Oddie stated the lease would be for 24 hour lease parking or an
approved parking lot that has gone through the Design Review process.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft clarified that her motion does not include paving over
something to just be a parking lot.
Councilmember Oddie stated Council should be clear a parking lot is not desired.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated she means lease-shared parking.
Councilmember Oddie stated if it does not get approved, there is no project.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft concurred; stated the ball is in the applicant's court.
Councilmember Oddie clarified the lighting issue is also included in the motion.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the applicant could return to Council if the
lease is not done, to which the City Planner responded in the affirmative; stated the
applicant could ask Council to reconsider the motion.
The City Planner stated that he has been talking to the architect; the lighting has to be
reviewed.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft clarified what Council wanted addressed is avoiding the
impact on the neighbors.
The City Planner stated there is no need to uplight the building.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,16,"373
By consensus, on the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice
vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft and Oddie 3. Noes: Mayor
Spencer - 1. [Absent: Vice Mayor Matarrese - 1.]
Mayor Spencer called a recess at 12:12 a.m. and reconvened the meeting at 12:19 a.m.
(15-525) Public Hearing to Consider the Planning Board's Recommendation to Approve
a Vesting Tentative Map and Density Bonus Application to Permit Construction of 52
Units on a 2.78 Acre Parcel Located at 2100 Clement Avenue, and
(15-525A) Resolution No. 15083, ""Approving Vesting Tentative Map 10305 and Density
Bonus Application for the Development of 52 Homes on 2.78 Acres of Land at 2100
Clement Avenue."" Adopted. The Proposal is Categorically Exempt from Review Under
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15332 Infill Development Projects.
The City Planner gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Spencer left the dais at 12:23 a.m. and returned at 12:24 a.m.
In response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry, the City Planner stated the State
density bonus law is structured so that it is the applicant's choice regarding the
minimum inclusionary requirement; if the applicant wants a bonus or waiver, they could
choose to give more affordable and in which category they want; in Alameda's case, the
applicant chose to do very-low income which is a 20% bonus.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the City Planner stated the number of required
parking spaces is based on the number of units; there are two parking spaces, plus six
guest spaces, per unit.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether resident's could use their two-car garage for storage if
they only own one or no cars, to which the City Planner responded in the affirmative;
stated the language as it is currently written allows using the garage for storage, but not
for business offices or workshops, or living quarters.
Outlined changes made to improve the project; discussed changes in development;
urged approval of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R) requiring cars be
parked in garages: Dorothy Freeman, Alameda.
Discussed parking and urged CC&Rs included the parking requirement: Joseph
Woodard, Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,13,"373
On behalf of the Applicant, Phil Banta, Robert McGillis and Nicolet Collins gave a Power
Point presentation.
In response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry regarding the aging in place, Mr. Banta
stated the design can be changed.
Stated the development has not adhered to Alameda standards; the developer has
disregarded instructions on how to make the project acceptable for Alameda; urged
Council to deny the request for another extension to the developer: Dorothy Freeman,
Alameda.
Stated the project should follow the inclusionary housing clause: Brian McGuire,
Alameda.
Stated the developer has submitted a tentative map that meets the requirement; an
extension is not futile: Shona Armstrong, Applicant's Attorney.
***
Mayor Spencer announced that the lease [paragraph no. 16-425 would not be heard
tonight.
***
Councilmember Daysog inquired if the parking standards used for the project were 1.5
spaces per unit, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in
the affirmative
Councilmember Daysog inquired what is requires under the zoning, to which the
Assistant Community Development Director responded the conditional approval is 1.5
spaces.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether zoning language specifies a range, to which
the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether apartments could have two cars, to which the
Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether a bundle package is being pursued, to which
the Assistant Community Development Director responded only for the multi-family
units.
Councilmember Daysog inquired how many units are bundled, to which the Assistant
Community Development Director responded 30% of the 180 units.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the developer has the aging in place design.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 06, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,17,"374
Stated the project has improved; expressed support for the addition of the CC&R
requirement: Andrew Warner, Applicant (City Ventures).
In response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry regarding density bonus, Mr. Warner
responded a 1/2 mile radius walking distance to services shows the project is a great
place for density; the Chamber of Commerce and business association agreed to
having more houses in the project; there are great transportation opportunities; the
project area is where Alameda should have more density and City Ventures wanted to
get the most density as possible; the number of overall units was reduced from 58 to 52;
the Housing Element predicted 53 homes.
Mayor Spencer inquired what the breakdown of bedrooms are in the project, to which
Mr. Warner responded there are four homes that have two bedrooms each, and the rest
are a mix of three to four bedrooms.
The City Planner stated the parking code has existed and been in use in Alameda for a
long time; the code was not created specifically for the project; exceptions were not
made for the project.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there will be opportunities to park on
the Clement Street frontage, to which Mr. Warner responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Oddie stated he would like to address the neighbors' concerns about
keeping as many trees as possible, and keep the bike path all the way to Clement
Street.
The City Planner stated Council is not approving architecture or the final street tree plan
tonight; the Planning Board still has to do the public process and approvals at a future
meeting.
In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, Mr. Warner responded the
affordable units will be interspersed throughout the development, and will look like the
market rate homes.
Discussed the CC&Rs requiring cars be parked in garages; discussed the importance of
enforcement: Ginni Dofflemyer, Alameda.
Expressed support for the development and the developer; outlined the need for
housing; urged approval: Helen Sause, Alameda Home Team.
Discussed the need for housing; expressed support for the project: Karen Bey,
Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,15,"375
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the
Terms of a First Amendment to the Lease Agreement with Pacific Automated LLC, a
California Limited Liability Company, dba Brix Beverage (Pacific Automated, LLC) to
Include a Portion of Building 25 (Unit 100), a Small Outbuilding Known as Building 491,
and Additional Parking Common Areas as Part of the Original Premises at 1951
Monarch Street at Alameda Point. [In accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the project is Categorically Exempt under the CEQA Guidelines
Section 15301 (c) - Existing Facilities.] Not heard.
(16-426) Recommendation to Discuss the Existing Conditions and Goals/Objectives of
the Citywide Transit and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan. Not heard.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(16-427) The City Manager stated the Finance Department was recognized for the
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR); the Certificate of Excellence for the
CAFR will come to Council for recognition; announced the Love the Island campaign
ribbon cutting would be September 15th.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired where people can obtain pins for the Love the
Island campaign.
The City Manager stated there will be handouts at the ribbon cutting.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(16-428) Consider Directing the City Manager to Initiate and Begin the Process with the
Planning Board to Propose Revisions to the Ordinance and Code Sections Defining
Alameda's Inclusionary Housing for Residential Development. (Vice Mayor Matarrese)
Not heard.
(16-429) Consider Directing the City Manager to Schedule a Priority Setting Work
Session. (Mayor Spencer) Not heard.
(16-430) Consider Directing the City Manager to Immediately Hold a City Council
Workshop on the Final Phase of the Bayport-Alameda Landing Disposition and
Development Agreement (DDA)\Development Plan. (Councilmember Daysog) Not
heard.
(16-431) Consider Directing the City Manager to Have the Social Service Human
Relations Board (SSHRB) Review City Policies and Procedures for Aiding Alameda's
Homeless in Order to Make Recommendations to the City Council for Policy Revisions
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 06, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,18,"375
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated what she likes about the project is that seven of
the 52 units are very affordable; the project will improve the neighborhood; she
applauds the work of the Planning Board and is prepared to support the project.
Vice Mayor Matarrese stated he wanted to make sure the language, as written, is
included in the conditions of approval of the tentative map; the project is a model for
Alameda; he likes the creation of open space and parking, and making the appearance
match the neighborhood; he is ready to support the project.
Councilmember Oddie concurred with Vice Mayor Matarrese on all points and is
prepared to support the project.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he is not ready to support project; more hard work
needs to be done.
In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the City Planner stated the final designs of
homes have not yet been approved.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the tentative map and density bonus
application with the condition of approval include the CC&Rs distributed at the meeting.
Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Spencer stated her proposed changes are not being included.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Oddie - 3. Noes: Councilmember
Daysog and Mayor Spencer - 2.
(15-526) Response to City Council Referral Regarding a Possible Wetlands Mitigation
Bank at Alameda Point. Continued to October 6, 2015.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(15-527) The Interim City Manager announced the City's permit tracking system has
been linked to Zillow.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(15-528) Nicole Goehring, Associated Builders and Contractors, expressed concern
over Project Labor Agreements (PLA); invited Council to tour their training facility;
offered services if Council plans to include contractors in negotiations.
(15-529) Eric Christen, Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction, stated PLAs
contain discriminatory aspects which make it difficult for non-union workers and
contractors to bid on projects; urged Council to allow all workers to have a fair chance to
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2016-09-06,16,"376
and Additions. (Vice Mayor Matarrese) Not heard.
(16-432) Consider Directing the City Manager to Initiate Revisions to the Ordinances
and Code Sections for Mixed-Use Zoning in the City of Alameda to Aid Retention of
Beneficial Commercial Uses within Areas Zoned for Mixed Use. (Vice Mayor Matarrese)
Not heard.
(16-433) Consider Directing Staff to Review Enacting a Minimum Wage Increase in
Alameda. (Mayor Spencer) Not heard.
(16-434) Consider Directing Staff to Renegotiate the Terms of the Friends of the
Alameda Animal Shelter (FAAS) Lease and Relocate/Modernize the Shelter Facility,
including Addressing Funding. (Mayor Spencer) Not heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(16-435) Written Communication from the League of California Cities (LCC) regarding
the October 5 through 7, 2016 Annual Conference Resolution: Committing the LCC to
Supporting the Vision Zero, Toward Zero Deaths, and Other Programs or Initiatives to
Make Safety a Top Priority for Transportation Projects and Policy Formulation, while
Encouraging Cities to Pursue Similar Initiatives. Not heard.
(16-436) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Commission on
Disability Issues and the Social Service Human Relations Board.
Mayor Spencer nominated Lisa Hall for appointment to the Commission on Disability
Issues and Kale Jenks for appointment to the Social Service Human Relations Board.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 11:33 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 6, 2016",CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,19,"376
bid projects.
(15-530) Dania Alvarez, Alameda, submitted a letter in support of revising the Board
appointment process
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(15-531) Consider Directing the City Manager to Draft a Policy or Strategy to Increase
the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Above the Current Rate of 10%, with a Portion, or
All, of Revenues Attributable to the Rate Above the Original 10% Dedicated to Specified
Visitor-Serving Activities. (Councilmember Daysog) Not heard.
(15-532) Consider Directing the City Manager to Draft Policies with Regard to AirBnb
and Related Temporary Lodging Activities in Residential Homes and Zoning Districts.
(Councilmember Daysog) Not heard.
(15-533) Consider Requesting an Update on Project Stabilization Agreements (PSA)
and Consider Providing Direction on the Priority, Deadline and Parameters of PSA for
Alameda Point and Public Works Projects. (Councilmember Oddie) Not heard.
(15-534) Consider Directing Staff to Review the City's Process for Board and
Commission Appointments. (Councilmember Oddie) Not heard.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(15-535) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft announced that Supervisor Wilma Chan will
host a conservation workshop on September 12th from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at
Alameda High School.
(15-536) Councilmember Oddie announced he attended the Alameda County Lead
Prevention Program meeting on August 27th
(15-537) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations to the Commission on Disability Issues,
Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and Library Board.
Mayor Spencer nominated for Carol Gottstein and Tony Lewis appointment to the
Commission on Disability Issues; John McCahan for appointment to the Housing
Authority Board of Commissioners, and Gertrude Woods and Kathleen Kearney for
appointment to the Library Board.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2015-09-01,20,"377
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 1:22 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 1, 2015",CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,12,"38
(*21-046) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with
Landscape Structures Inc. in an Amount Not to Exceed $285,862 for Construction of the
Bayport Park Playground Project. Accepted.; and
(*21-046 / A) Resolution No. 15738, ""Amending the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Capital Budget for the
Playground Replacement Project (91621) by Appropriating an Additional $150,000: (1) a
Donation from the Alameda Friends of the Parks Foundation in the Amount of $10,000, and (2)
Fund Balance of the Bayport Park Municipal Services District 03-1 in the Amount of $140,000.'
Adopted.
(*21-047) Resolution No. 15739, ""Amending Resolution No. 15728 Setting the 2021 Regular
City Council Meeting Dates."" Adopted.
(21-048) Ordinance No. 3295, ""Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Lease Amendments for
Rent Relief Programs to Rock Wall Winery and St. George Spirits through the Loan Conversion
Assistance Program for Rent Relief in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic."" Finally passed.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation [final passage of the
ordinance].
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Spencer: Abstention; Vella: Aye; and Mayor
Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Abstentions: 1.
(21-049) Ordinance No. 3296, ""Amending the Zoning Map Designation for the Property at 2350
Fifth Street (APN 74-1356-23) from M-X, Mixed Use to R-4, Neighborhood Residential District to
Facilitate Residential Use of the Property, as Recommended by the City Planning Board.'
Finally passed.
Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation [final passage of the
ordinance].
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Councilmembers Daysog: No; Knox White: Aye; Spencer: No; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy
Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2.
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 9:06 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:22 p.m.
***
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(21-050) Recommendation to Rename Former Jackson Park to Chochenyo Park.
The Recreation and Parks Director, Raquel Williams, Jessica Santone, and Rachel Brock gave
a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Spencer inquired how many meetings were publicly noticed.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the matter has been discussed at a Recreation
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-09-05,17,"381
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- - - -SEPTEMBER 5, 2017--7:00 P.M.
Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 9:43 p.m.
ROLL CALL -
Present:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese,
Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 5.
Absent:
None.
AGENDA CHANGES
(17-495) Mayor Spencer discussed changes to the Consent Calendar.
The City Attorney stated if the Councilmember is voting no on a Consent item, the vote
can be recorded without pulling the item.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the Anti-Semitism referral [paragraph no. 17-523
could be heard before the referendum item [paragraph no. 17-515].
Mayor Spencer stated that she does not support moving up referrals.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the referendum item could be heard first on in the
Regular Agenda since it needs to be voted on tonight.
Mayor Spencer stated she is not in favor of the request.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Oddie concurred with the request.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(17-496) Proclamation Declaring September 16, 2017 as Coastal Cleanup Day.
Mayor Spencer read the proclamation and presented it to the Public Works Program
Specialist, who showed a photograph of the beach.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(17-497) Gaby Dolphin, Alameda, submitted information; read a statement and
suggested renaming Calhoun Street after Heather Hyer who was killed in
Charlottesville, South Carolina.
(17-498) Angela Hockabout, Alameda, urged doing more to develop housing.
(17-499) Jennifer Geema, Alameda, discussed her rental situation.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-09-05,18,"382
Mayor Spencer stated that she would vote no on final passage of the ordinance
[paragraph no. *17-514].
Councilmember Oddie stated that he would vote no on the 5 Bars resolution [paragraph
no. *17-511].
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5, with
the two exceptions noted above. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an
asterisk preceding the paragraph number.]
(*17-500) Minutes of the Special City Council Meetings Held on June 20, 2017 and July
5, 2017, and the Regular City Council Meeting Held on July 5, 2017. Approved.
(*17-501) Ratified bills in the amount of $14,213,204.80.
(*17-502) Recommendation to Award a Five-Year Contract for an Amount not to Exceed
a Total Five-Year Expenditure of $250,000, Subject to Budget Approvals, to Hinderliter
de Llamas (HdL) for Review and Analysis of Sales and Use Tax Revenues. Accepted.
(*17-503) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period
Ending June 30, 2017 Collected During the Period January 1, 2017 to March 31, 2017.
Accepted.
(*17-504) Recommendation to Accept Report on the Appointment of Bryan Schwartz as
a Member of the Open Government Commission. Accepted.
(*17-505) Recommendation to Award a One-Year Contract, with the Option of Four
One-Year Extensions, for an Amount not to Exceed $93,319.86, for a Total Five Year
Expenditure not to Exceed $485,640.33, to Clean Lakes, Inc. for Vegetation
Management, Debris Management, and Water Quality Monitoring for the South Shore
Lagoons. Accepted.
(*17-506) Recommendation to Award a One-Year Contract, with the Option of Four
One-Year Extensions, for an Amount not to Exceed $20,698.92, for a Total Five-Year
Expenditure not to Exceed $107,718.02, Subject to Budget Approval, to Dream Ride
Elevator for Full Service Elevator Maintenance and Repairs in City Buildings (Various
Locations). Accepted.
(*17-507) Recommendation to Award a One-Year Contract, with the Option of Four
One-Year Extensions, for an Amount not to Exceed $105,600, for a Total Five-Year
Expenditure not to Exceed $549,546.65, Subject to Budget Approval, to Prime
Mechanical for Annual Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning System Maintenance
at City Facilities. Accepted.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-09-05,19,"383
(*17-508) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Rosas Brothers Construction for the
Repair of Concrete Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway, and Minor Street Patching, Fiscal
Year (FY) 2016-17, Phase 17, No. P.W. 05-16-18. Accepted.
(*17-509) Recommendation to Amend the Contract with Ranger Pipeline Inc. to
Increase the Contract Amount by $4,048,544.03, which Includes a 10% Contingency,
for Cyclic Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Phase 14, No. P.W. 05-17-27, for a Total
Authorized Amount of $17,375,030, for Cyclic Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Phases 11,
12,13 and 14. Accepted.
(*17-510) Recommendation to Enter into an Agreement Between the City of Alameda
and Waste Management of Alameda County Inc. for Solid Waste Transfer and Disposal
Services for a Ten-Year Period (Ending June 30, 2027); and Adoption of Resolution
Setting Per Ton Rates for Solid Waste Transfer and Disposal Services with Waste
Management of Alameda County, Inc. Accepted.
(*17-511) Resolution No. 15301, ""Authorizing the City Manager to: (1) Execute a
Professional Services Agreement and a License Agreement (the ""Agreements"") With
XG Communities, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company DBA 5 BARS
Communities (""5 BARS"") Each for a Term of Five Years with Four Five-Year Extensions
for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Consulting, Marketing and Management and
Services for City Assets in Exchange for a Thirty-Five Percent (35%) Share of
Generated Revenue"" and (2) Execute Auxiliary Documents and to Perform Any and All
Acts Necessary or Desirable to Permit 5 BARS to Perform the Services."" Adopted.
[Note: Councilmember Oddie voted no, so the motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Oddie - 1.]
(*17-512) Resolution No. 15302, ""Approving the City of Alameda's Continued
Participation in the Alameda County HOME Consortium, Authorizing the City Manager
to Execute the Revised HOME Consortium Cooperative Agreement with Alameda
County and Rescinding Resolution No. 15287. Adopted.
(*17-513) Resolution No. 15303, ""Authorizing the City Treasurer, the City Finance
Director and the City Finance Services Manager to Order the Deposit or Withdrawal of
Monies in the State Local Agency Investment Fund on Behalf of the City and Repealing
Resolution No. 14776."" Adopted.
(*17-514) Ordinance No. 3188, ""Approving Master Plan Amendment to Include a
Maritime Commercial and Residential Variant for Approximately 39 Acres of Land with
the Bayport/Alameda Landing City of Master Plan. [A Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report for the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project was Certified
in Accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (State
Clearinghouse #2006012091) in 2006. An Environmental Assessment for the Proposed
Actions has been Prepared.] Finally passed.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-09-05,20,"384
[Note: Mayor Spencer voted no, so the motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie and Vella - 4. Noes: Mayor Spencer
- 1.]
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(17-515) Recommendation to Accept the Certificate of Sufficiency for Referendum
Petition Against Ordinance No. 3180; and Select One of the Following Options: 1)
Introduction of Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 3180 in Its Entirety. Introduced; or
2) Adoption of Resolution Calling an Election in the City of Alameda for the Purpose of
Submitting to the Electors Ordinance No. 3180 Amending the Alameda Municipal Code
by Amending Various Sections of Article XV of Chapter VI Concerning (a) Review of
Rent Increases Applicable to All Rental Units and Rent Stabilization Applicable to
Certain Rental Units and (b) Limitations on Evictions and the Payment of Relocation
Fees Applicable to all Rental Units (Eliminating ""No Cause"" Ground for Eviction and
Requiring Landlords to Pay Relocation Fees at the Expiration of Certain Fixed Term
Leases). Not adopted.
Stated the ordinance should be rescinded to work on a better ordinance: Eric
Strimmling, Alameda Renters Coalition.
Stated the rent ordinance needs to be amended; urged Council to push through the
petition against Ordinance 3180: Lester Cabral, Alameda.
The City Attorney gave a brief presentation.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the City Attorney could review the implications of
what happens if Council rescinds versus putting the matter on the ballot.
The City Attorney responded the Council can place the ordinance on the ballot in April,
June or November of 2018 at different costs; Ordinance 3180 would be not in effect;
Ordinance 3148 continues to be in effect; the voters would decide if Ordinance 3180
would go into effect; if the Council decides to rescind the ordinance, there would be a
first reading tonight; the referendum prohibits the Council from doing an action
substantially similar to the provisions in Ordinance 3180 for one year; if Council puts the
matter on the ballot and the people decide to rescind Ordinance 3180, then, the year
period starts.
Mayor Spencer inquired if Ordinance 3180 is rescinded, is Ordinance 3148 still in effect,
to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated Ordinance 3148 is
unaffected by Ordinance 3180.
Councilmember Oddie inquired what defines substantially similar.
The City Attorney responded the Elections Code prohibits Council from doing anything
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-09-05,21,"385
substantially similar; any provisions in Ordinance 3180 cannot be amended for one full
year.
Councilmember Oddie requested staff to provide Council case law so that Council does
not come up with changes that are not allowed.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired if there are any impacts to the fee.
The City Attorney responded that the fee is not included in the ordinance, so the fee is
unaffected.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the provision to pass on part of the fee to renters is
now withdrawn, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the landlords can withdraw the ballot
measure if an agreement with the renters is reached.
The City Attorney responded the signatures for the referendum have been certified and
cannot be modified.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of accepting the Certificate of Sufficiency for
Referendum Petition against Ordinance No. 3180.
Mayor Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is a motion for the second part of the item.
Vice Mayor Vella and Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated they would like to have
more discussion.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would still like to make changes to
Ordinance 3148; not allowing no cause evictions protects residents; Alameda needs
more housing and the City needs to help the people who are in their homes now; she
will not support the rescission.
Councilmember Oddie stated an eviction in the Bay Area today is the equivalent of
being homeless; he stands by Ordinance 3180.
Vice Mayor Vella stated that she would like landlords and tenants to sit down and have
a conversation on possible solutions for everyone involved; she is saddened that
families are being displaced.
Mayor Spencer stated that she supports having more conversations with the landlords
and tenants.
Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance rescinding Ordinance
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-09-05,22,"386
3180.
Mayor Spencer seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Oddie inquired if the two groups come to an
agreement to put something on the ballot would be permissible.
The City Attorney responded she will have to get back to Council on the answer.
The City Clerk stated Elections Code Section 9241 states: ""the ordinance shall not
again be enacted by the legislative body for a period of one year,' which might allow the
Council could put the matter on the ballot.
Councilmember Oddie inquired whether there is anything the City could do to assist the
tenants at 470 Central Avenue.
The City Attorney responded no cause eviction entitles tenants to relocation benefits,
which is the case in some instances at 470 Central Avenue; there have been some for
cause eviction notices at 470 Central Avenue where the landlord claims breach of the
lease; it is not within the purview of the City to determine the accuracy of those claims;
the Housing Authority does monitor that the landlord is conducting business properly
according to Ordinance 3148.
***
(17-516) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider remaining items.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of hearing the two encroachment
ordinances [paragraph no. 17-519].
Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion which FAILED by the following vote: Ayes:
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft, Councilmember Oddie and Vice Mayor Vella - 3. Noes:
Councilmember Matarrese and Mayor Spencer.
Mayor Spencer moved approval of hearing the balance of the agenda, minus the WiFi
referral [paragraph no. 17-522].
.
Councilmember Matarrese stated he will second the motion only if it is amended to not
hear both referrals.
Mayor Spencer accepted the friendly amendment to the motion.
On the call for the question, the motion FAILED by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmember Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 2. Noes: Councilmember Ezzy
Ashcraft, Councilmember Oddie and Vice Mayor Vella - 3.
Mayor Spencer moved approval of hearing the resolutions of appointment and the two
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-09-05,23,"387
encroachment ordinances.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which FAILED by the following voice
vote: Ayes: Councilmember Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 2. Noes: Councilmember
Ezzy Ashcraft, Councilmember Oddie and Vice Mayor Vella - 3.
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she hopes the landlords and tenants get
together to come to a solution.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired what is the City's involvement because the matter is a
referendum of a City ordinance.
The City Manager responded cost.
Vice Mayor Vella inquired what the cost is to the City.
The City Manager responded that is dependent on which election the Council decides to
put on the item; the June election would be more expensive than placing the item on the
general election in November.
Mayor Spencer inquired what the specific cost would be.
The City Clerk responded it would depend on how many other items are on the June
ballot; worse case would be around $700,000; if the item is added to the November
ballot, the cost would be approximately $25,000 for printing and typesetting costs.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Matarrese, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes:
Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft - 1.
(17-517) Adoption of Resolution Appointing Patricia Lamborn as a Member of the
Planning Board; and
(17-517A) Adoption of Resolution Appointing Alan Teague as a Member of the Planning
Board. Not heard.
(17-518) Recommendation to Appoint Gene Kahane and Cathy Dana as Alameda's
Poet Laureates. Not heard.
(17-519) SUMMARY: Introduce Two Ordinances that Resolve Two Encroachment
Issues on City Property in Order to Facilitate the Start of Construction of the Cross
Alameda Trail Project along Ralph Appezzato Memorial Parkway, Between Main and
Webster Streets.
Introduction of Ordinance Approving an Amended and Restated Lease and Authorizing
the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of an
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-09-05,24,"388
Amended and Restated Lease Agreement with Mr. Hi Chi Chen and Mrs. Lena Muy
Chiv, a Married Couple, dba Hometown Donuts for 1930 Main Street; and
(17-519A) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Grant of Non-Exclusive Easement and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the
Terms of Grant of Non-Exclusive Easement to Alameda Boys & Girls Club (ABGC) and
Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) for Access and Maintenance. Not heard.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(17-520) Update on Tracking of Council Referrals. Not heard.
(17-521) The City Manager stated one Firefighter and one Police Officer from the City of
Alameda have gone to assist with Hurricane Harvey; the City did not apply for the
Justice Assistance Grant for funds for Police Department equipment due to the
application having requirements to give information about immigrant citizens to the
federal government; items that are going on at the federal level which might impact the
City: the Executive Order that prohibited military equipment to be sold to local Police
Departments has been rescinded; the federal regulations to manage flood control have
been revoked; a bill has been designed to drastically cut illegal immigration and revise
the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) to allow immigrant children to have
citizen status in the future.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(17-522) Consider Directing Staff to Explore Offering Free Public WiFi Throughout the
City. Not heard. (Mayor Spencer)
(17-523) Consider: 1) Adoption of Resolution Condemning the Increased Incidents of
Bias, Prejudice, Discrimination, Violence and Anti-Semitism; and 2) Direct Staff to
Provide a Status Update on Hate Crime Training and Possible Training of Community
Members; and Direct the City Manager to Provide Periodic Reports to Council on Hate
Crimes. Not heard. (Vice Mayor Vella and Councilmember Oddie)
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(17-524) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations to the Historical Advisory Board (HAB)
and Public Art Commission (PAC).
Mayor Spencer nominated Lynn Jones and Norman Sanchez to the Historical Advisory
Board and Mark Farrell to the Public Art Commission.
(17-525) Mayor Spencer stated that she signed a letter against bias, discrimination and
anti-Semitism with the U.S. Mayor's Conference; the Temple has an open house on
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2017-09-05,25,"389
September 17th, , from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.; the Alameda Running Festival is also on
September 17th.
(17-526) Report Out from Stop Waste on the Fix It Clinic. (Councilmember Oddie)
Councilmember Oddie encouraged having a Fix It Clinic in Alameda.
Mayor Spencer inquired whether the Alameda Library will have an event like the Fix It
Clinic.
Jane Chisaki, Library Director, responded the Alameda Library does not do fix it clinics
due to possible damage to carpeting; Mastic Center has expressed an interest in
holding a fix it clinic.
(17-527) Vice Mayor Vella stated that she that received emails regarding trying to
diversify the Economic Development Strategic Plan Board; she also received emails
questioning why cannabis is not included in the plan.
The City Manager responded that she understood the direction for the Economic
Development Strategic Plan is to be grassroots; additional citizens have been invited to
participate to make the group more diverse.
(17-528) Councilmember Matarrese stated that he and Mayor Spencer represented the
City at the East Bay Regional Parks District (EBRPD) liaison committee; EBRPD is
putting a lot of money into Alameda.
(17-529) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she attended the lead poisoning
prevention commission meeting; noted that she is grateful that Alameda did not cede
local control over cell phone towers to the telecommunications industry.
(17-530) Mayor Spencer announced the Alameda Theater is showing the film Fallen,
sponsored by the Police Officers Association, on Monday, September 11th.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 10:52 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
September 5, 2017",CityCouncil/2017-09-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2021-01-19,13,"39
and Parks Commission meeting; stated Council voted to de-name Jackson Park in June and
July; noted the Recreation and Parks Commission previously voted to recommend de-naming
Jackson Park.
Councilmember Spencer inquired how many subcommittee meetings were publicly noticed.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the subcommittee is an ad hoc committee and is
not subject to meet under the Brown Act or Sunshine Ordinance.
In response to Councilmember Spencer's inquiry, the Recreation and Parks Director stated
meetings were held weekly from September to early January.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification for the role of the ad hoc committee and public
input; stated a survey and other opportunities for public input have been provided; the majority
votes of the public were a factor; however, it was not a determining factor in the choice of
recommended name.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated broad public outreach to solicit names was provided;
the committee took responses, vetted names, and provided a poll in November with a brief
Survey Monkey; the committee compiled all data; a number of different data points were used to
compile information.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted there has been some confusion related to public input.
Councilmember Knox White in stated the committee held two or three workshops beyond the
Recreation and Parks Commission meeting which were publically available.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated the committee did hold a publically noticed
community forum in November.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether any of the presenters are from the [park] neighborhood.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the negative; stated the committee did have a
member from the neighborhood; however, the person is not presenting.
Councilmember Daysog stated there is an emphasis on addressing issues of past racism;
inquired whether there have been any other frames considered for selecting names.
Ms. Santone responded the committees focus has been thinking about diversity, equity and
inclusion; stated the committee considered the three points working together in addition to
carefully understanding Alameda's history; colonization is an ongoing process and is still alive
and present for indigenous community members; the framing placed on the process was
focused on refuting the history of a violent and racist president with a more inclusive, equitable
and diverse response to history.
In response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry, Ms. Santone stated the committee discussed
applied criteria with considering other possible names of places, trees, and things specific to
Alameda; the committee ultimately decided the additional considerations were not part of the
desired recommendation.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
January 19, 2021",CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf
TransportationCommission,2017-09-27,2,"3F Alameda Bike for the Parks: Saturday, October 7, 2017 at 9:00am (Washington
Park)
3G Climate Action Plan at Public Utilities Board: Monday, October 16, 2017 at
7:00pm (City Hall, Council Chambers)
Staff Member Payne said this item has been postponed to November 13th.
3H Transportation Commission Meeting: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 at
7:00pm
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
4A 2017-4752
Approve Meeting Minutes - July 26, 2017 (Action)
Commissioner Vargas asked if we could insert the dollar range of parking ticket
violations on page 4 of 6 for future reference.
Commissioner Soules made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner
Vargas seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0-2 (Vice-Chair Miley and
Commissioner Hans abstained due to their absence from the 7/26/17 meeting.)
5. NEW BUSINESS
5A 2017-4753
Elect Chair and Vice Chair (Action)
Vice-Chair Miley said Commissioners Bellows and Vargas have a lot of experience and
he feels they would make an excellent chair and vice-chair. He said he spoke with Chair
Bellows and confirmed that she would like to stay on as chair. He said he would like to
make that motion when the time comes, after discussion.
Commissioner Vargas said he tried to convince a young man to be chair, but he
declined.
Vice-Chair Miley said he appreciated the offer, but was not in a position to commit the
time necessary to be chair.
Vice-Chair Miley made a motion to appoint Commissioner Bellows as chair, and
Commissioner Vargas as vice-chair for the next year. Commissioner Soules
seconded the motion. The motion passed 6-0.
5B 2017-4754
Approve Draft Transportation Choices Plan (Action)
Staff Member Jennifer Ott gave the staff presentation. The staff report and attachments
can be found at:
2",TransportationCommission/2017-09-27.pdf
TransportationCommission,2020-05-27,2,"3J. FasTrak or new toll tag for upcoming I-880 Express Lanes scheduled to open late
summer 2020: on line or at Walgreens (except not Park Street location) and then register
on line: https://www.bayareafastrak.org/en/signup/signUp.shtn
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
4-A 2020-7983
Approve Meeting Minutes - February 26, 2020
Commissioner Nachtigall made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner
Kohlstrand seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-0.
4-B 2020-7984
Approve Meeting Minutes - January 22, 2020
Commissioner Kohlstrand made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner
Nachtigall seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-0.
5. NEW BUSINESS
5-A 2020-7985
Recommendation to Approve the Updated Clement Avenue Safety Improvement Project
Concept.
Andrew Thomas, Planning, Building and Transportation Director, gave a presentation. The
staff
report
and
attachments
can
be
found
at:
 ttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4541945&GUID=6AD344D4-
CC4B-4286-A626-32E7B35CCDFB&FullText=1.
Gail Payne, Senior Transportation Coordinator, reviewed the feedback received by the
public and explained staff's position related to each.
Commissioner Kohlstrand asked for clarification about which portions would be resurfaced
or rebuilt.
Jake Gunther, CDM Smith, said they are planning to widen sidewalks around power poles
and fix driveways and intersections as necessary.
Commissioner Kohlstrand asked what criteria was being used for having the elevated
cycle tracks.
Brian McGuire, Transportation Planner explained that the cycletrack would be raised in
two places to in front of the Alameda Marina project in order to access the Bay Trail and
one other access point into the new development.
Chair Soules opened the public comment:
2",TransportationCommission/2020-05-27.pdf
TransportationCommission,2020-11-18,2,"3M. Emergency Alerts for Alameda - Subscribe at AC Alert web page:
https://www.acgov.org/emergencysite/
3N. Regional Emergency Transportation Alerts - Subscribe:
https://511.org/alerts/emergencies/511Alert
30. Clipper Card (adults) - order on line or at Walgreens or set up Autoload to add value
automatically: https://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/getTranslink.do
3P. Clipper Card Discounts for youth, seniors and people with disabilities
-
ittps://www.clippercard.com/ClipperWeb/discounts/index.do
3Q. FasTrak or new toll tag for upcoming I-880 Express Lanes scheduled to open late summer 2020:
on line or at Walgreens (except not Park Street location) and then register on line:
https://www.bayareafastrak.org/en/signup/signUp.shtm
3R. City Adaptation Project - web links
www.alamedaca.gov/ShorelineWebsterPoseyTubes
www.alamedaca.gov/ShorelineDoolittleDr
www.alamedaca.gov/ShorelineVeteransCt
4. Announcements / Public Comments
No public comment.
4A. Transportation Commissioner Appreciation of Service Resolution for Commissioner David Johnson
(Information Item)
Chair Soules recognized former Commissioner David Johnson's work on the Transportation Commission
by reading the Appreciation Resolution as shown here:
https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4692142&GUID=6E20E869-87B5-4AAA-9151-
CF52B01073CF
5. Consent Calendar
5A. Approve Special Meeting Minutes - October 28, 2020 (Action Item) as shown here:
https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4692143&GUID=6C38C6E2-F113-44B3-B7A
OFBC34881B33&FullText=1
No changes proposed. Commissioner Nachtigall moved to approve as is. Commission Yuen seconded. The
motion passed 5-0.
6. Regular Agenda Items
6A. Recommendation to Approve the Central Avenue Safety Improvement Project Final Concept (Action
Item)
Gail Payne, Senior Transportation Coordinator and Stefan Schuster of CDM Smith, gave a presentation.
The staff report and attachments can be found at:
  https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4692144&GUID=26A3562E-9A47-432D-9624-
973193AAOBFO&FullText=1
Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes - November 18, 2020
2",TransportationCommission/2020-11-18.pdf
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2005-12-07,4,4,AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-12-07.pdf
GolfCommission,2009-03-18,2,"4
AGENDA ITEMS
4-A
Discussion of Potential Uses for Mif Albright Course
John Vest stated that it would cost roughly $3,000 to $4,000 for new
amenities, including new cups, holes and mats for the tee boxes. The greens
have fungus and he does not feel it would be worth trying to bring them back.
At least six out of the nine greens need to be rebuilt at a cost of approximately
$6,000 per green. Aerifying, topdressing and daisy eradication would cost
about $3,000, and fertilizing would cost about $4,000. The biggest expense
would be tree work on the right side of the range, costing about $20,000.
Fixing the irrigation problems would cost between $8,000 and $12,000. Also,
Mr. Vest believes that the barrier fence on the right side of the range should
be raised about 20 feet for safety, and that could cost $10,000 to $20,000.
He would like to replace the plastic mats with real grass tees, but doesn't yet
have a figure for that, nor does Kemper yet have a figure for annual
maintenance costs. Based on information he received from EBMUD, there is
no possiblity that reclaimed water could be used for irrigation. Chair Sullwold
advised that Mif Albright revenue for the fiscal year 2007/2008 was $121,549;
$131,481 for 2006/2007; and $130,117 for 2005/2006. She also advised
John Vest to be prepared to address a question from Mayor Beverly
regarding turning the golf complex into a 27-hole facility, allowing a par 3
course to be created from the other 9 holes. The Golf Commission decided
that Kemper's estimates were too preliminary and incomplete to enable the
Commission to make any final recommendations, so the Commission decided
to hold a special meeting on April 2, 2009 at 6:30 p.m., to allow it to respond
to Kemper's final report.
4-B
Update on Effect of Rate Increases
Chair Sullwold stated that total rounds on both the Fry and Clark courses
for the month of February declined by 22%, but revenue declined by only
11% as a result of the rate increases.
5
ORAL REPORTS
5-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report
John Vest stated that the email database used is not being utilized up to its
potential, so he is working on improvements. Further, recognizing that our
website costs were much too high, he renegotiated and reduced the monthly
cost to $175, down from the current charge of $795, for an annual savings of
about $7,000. A Demo day was held last weekend, and this coming weekend
the golf shop will have a sidewalk sale to attempt to get rid of stale
merchandise. He also stated that they are using keys again to alleviate any
problems with someone jumping in and taking off in a cart without paying. A
- 2 -
Golf Commission Minutes - Wednesday, March 18, 2009",GolfCommission/2009-03-18.pdf
GolfCommission,2009-07-15,2,"4
AGENDA ITEMS
4-A
Golf Complex Financial Report through June 2009
Bob Sullwold stated that rounds and revenue decreased in June 2009 compared to
the same period last year. During the first seven months of fiscal year 2008/2009,
play on both courses was up 8.8%. Play on both courses was down for the last five
months. Total rounds decreased by 3% over the same period last year, although
revenue for both courses was up by 3.29%. The financial statement received from
the City showed income from Golf last year in the amount of $500,000, whereas last
year's number was a wash. The Enterprise Fund was drawn down by $400,000, as
opposed to the $700,000 that was anticipated. From an income standpoint, the fee
increase had a positive effect on the bottomline. Nine-hole rounds increased from
September to June for both courses. 18-hole rounds decreased on both courses,
more on the Clark than the Fry. Tournament rounds were up especially for
Tournament Senior Weekdays. Monthly passes sold were down, but revenue was
up.
4-B
Discussion/recommendation re long-term management of Golf Complex
Commissioner Sullwold stated that Ann Marie Gallant would be consulting with NGF
in the preparation of the RFP. She also described the points she intended to make
at the closed session on July 21.
4-C
Review of Request to slightly expand the area of the current Cell Tower
Lease
John Vest stated that the area of the current cell tower was to be slightly expanded
to allow for the addition of a generator. A representative from the company that
would be installing the generator was present, and confirmed that it would not be
expanding into an area that would disrupt play on the Mif Albright course. The Golf
Commission concurred with John that this expansion was reasonable.
5
ORAL REPORTS
5-A Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
General Manager John Vest announced a major demo day coming up on July 18,
and indicated that the event is being promoted with email blasts and cart signs. He
stated that recently a lot of carts have been failing as a result of battery problems.
Each cart needs six batteries, each of which costs $102. Although these arguably
are under warranty, the paperwork necessary to document claims has not been
adequate to this point. Staff training is underway concerning preventive
maintenance. Someone asked how the course handles large tournaments that
require more carts than we have -- extras are rented on a temporary basis and the
cost is passed on to the tournament. On Sunday morning, a cart was found
abandoned in a lake, but they located the identity of the renter. John also stated that
- 2 -
Golf Commission Minutes - Wednesday, July 15, 2009",GolfCommission/2009-07-15.pdf
GolfCommission,2009-11-18,2,"4
AGENDA ITEMS
4-A
Golf Complex Financial Report through October 2009
Bob Sullwold stated that the revenue for the Mif Albright is $65,320 through the end
of October. The estimate for expenses at the time the course reopened was
$50,000 for six months, an estimate that John Vest still thinks is pretty accurate, so it
appears that revenues will exceed expenses. The bad news, however, is that both
rounds and revenues on all three courses declined in October 2009, both compared
to the previous month and compared to the same months in 2008. For the first four
months of FY 2009/10, rounds are on the Fry course were down 8.66%, Clark
rounds were down 11.92%, and Mif rounds were down 21.04%, with an overall
decline of 11.89%. Revenue for the period was also down, but not as much: 6% on
the Fry course, 1.24% on the Clark and 3.58% on the Mif, for an overall total of
4.04%. Mr. Sullwold also stated that the Commission has yet to see the final figures
from the City for FY 2008/09.
4-B
Discussion re status of Request for Proposals for long-term lease of
Golf Complex; appointment of Golf Commissioners to evaluation committee(s)
Chair Sullwold noted that Bob Sullwold's email to Ann Marie Gallant suggested that
the RFP schedule was too compressed. Ms. Gallant responded that the schedule is
in the City's control and if is too tight, it can be amended. The responses are due
tomorrow, November 19, 2009. The Golf Commission appointed Jane Sullwold and
Bill Schmitz to represent the Golf Commission in the selection process, with Ray
Gaul to serve as back-up.
4-C
Consideration of a Memorial Bench program for the Golf Complex
John Vest stated that benches run from $400 to $600 apiece. Norma Arnerich
stated that she would like the benches to be uniform on the golf course. John will do
some more investigation and make a further report at next month's Golf Commission
meeting.
4-D
Election of Officers for 2010
Commissioner Gammell suggested that the Commission retain Jane Sullwold as the
Chairperson. A motion was made, seconded and unanimously passed to keep the
Commission the same for the next year, which is Jane Sullwold as Chair, Bill
Schmitz as Vice Chair and Jeff Wood as Secretary.
5
ORAL REPORTS
5-A Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
John Vest reported that the policy of requiring monthly pass holders to sign the back
of the pass, acknowledging the terms and conditions, has been working very well. In
- 2 -
Golf Commission Minutes - Wednesday, November 18, 2009",GolfCommission/2009-11-18.pdf
GolfCommission,2010-08-18,2,"4
AGENDA ITEMS
4-A
Status Report on Long Term Lease and Mif Albright Negotiations
including Golf Commission recommendations
Chair Sullwold said she had been advised that face-to-face negotiations between the
City and KemperSports will finally commence at the end of August, five and one-half
months after City Council gave direction to do so.
4-B
Update on Golf Complex Finances
Chair Sullwold stated that rounds and revenues on all three courses increased in
July compared to June. Compared to July 2009, Fry rounds were lower but
revenues were similar; Clark rounds were similar, but revenue was lower; and on the
Mif Albright course, both rounds and revenues were lower.
The City's financial reports that were supplied to the Golf Commission in July
showed that the Enterprise fund balance as of June 30, 2010, was $937,961.26.
The reports produced this month, however, showed that, as of July 1, 2010, the fund
balance was $813,878.38, a difference of nearly $125,000 in one day. This is one of
the anamolies that the Golf Commission hopes will be explained by Ms. Gallant at
the September meeting. Chair Sullwold pointed out some other issues, including the
fact that the budget for the past fiscal year that ended June 30, 2009, is completely
different in the two sets of financial reports provided to the Golf Commission in July
and August.
4-C Presentation on 2010/2011 Budget
Joe Van Winkle stated that the 2010/2011 budget was listed on the City Council
agenda for July 27, 2010, under the City Manager's Report. It is not clear whether
Council approved the budget because the minutes of that meeting are not yet
available. The budget was that was presented to the City Council is different from
the one that is included in the City's financial reports to the Golf Commission for this
meeting. Chair Sullwold stated that both budgets appear to reflect an increase in
revenue on both the Fry and Clark courses, but they project a substantial decrease
in revenue on the Mif with no explanation. Both budgets also show an increase in
services compared to the previous fiscal year, with no explanation. Both also show
payments to the City of $202,220 for payment in lieu of taxes but nothing for return
on investments. The budget that was presented to the Council show payments of
$105,000 for surcharge, and the budget that was attached to the Golf Commission
agenda shows $171,960 for surcharge. Both budgets show transfers to funds other
than the General Fund in the amount of $159,130 The budget that the Council
received described these funds as Island City Maint 84-2 Zone 5 ($13,120), Capital
Improvement Administration ($15,000), and Deck FVC 2008 Refinance Project COP
($131,010). It is not clear what these items represent. All of these issues will be
addressed next month.
2 -
Golf Commission Minutes - Wednesday, August 18, 2010",GolfCommission/2010-08-18.pdf
GolfCommission,2010-06-16,2,"4
AGENDA ITEMS
4-A
Status Report on Long Term Lease and Mif Albright Negotiations
including Golf Commission recommendations
In response to a question from Chair Sullwold, John Vest advised that Kemper had
submitted its proposals to the City for operation of the Golf Complex in early June.
Chair Sullwold presented a draft letter to City Council with Golf Commission
recommendations regarding the long term lease. Several suggestions were made
for additions and changes to the draft. Vice Chair Schmitz moved and
Commissioner Gaul seconded that Chair Sullwold be authorized to finalize the letter
with the changes that were discussed and send it to City Council. The motion
passed unanimously.
4-B
Update on Golf Complex Finances
After Bob Sullwold stated that the Commission had not received the City's financial
information, John Vest advised that they had been received late and were put on the
table before the meeting. The problem was that the reports showed a negative
number under the expense category for services, which required investigation. The
Finance Department eventually determined that the City had funded Kemper twice in
one month instead of over two months as should have been done. Bob Sullwold
took a quick look at the reports and advised that the cash balance of the Golf
Enterprise Fund, which had been reported as slightly below $500,000 at the end of
April, was now, as a result of this accounting entry, over $1 million at the end of May.
He advised that the Golf Commission will probably never know the actual amount
available in that account because of the peculiar mix of cash and accrual accounting
methods used by the City's Finance Department, and because the Finance
Department apparently does not book expenses when they are received.
Regarding the rounds analysis, Mr. Sullwold stated that 1,500 more rounds were
played on the Jack Clark course in May than in April, and 700 more than were
played last May. John Vest stated that the greens on the Fry course were aerified in
May, decreasing play on that course, and specials had been run on the Clark course
during certain times, which further increased play there. On all three courses rounds
were up compared to the previous month. The Clark course rounds were up
compared to last year, the Fry course rounds were down and the Mif was not open
all of May last year, so there is no comparison. Year to date, on the Fry course,
rounds are down by 15.5%, revenue is down by 12.75%; on the Clark course,
rounds are down 8.74% and revenue is down by 4.8%.
5
ORAL REPORTS
5-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
- 2 -
Golf Commission Minutes - Wednesday, June 16, 2010",GolfCommission/2010-06-16.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-02-01,4,"4
February 1, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf
GolfCommission,2012-06-12,2,"4
WRITTEN/ORAL REPORTS
4-A
Maintenance activities report by Matt Wisely
Tree pruning has been completed, and the Mif greens will be aerated next week. Over
the next couple of months, bird nesting boxes will be added to the course, which is a a
requirement to get the course certified by the Audobon Society.
4-B
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
May revenue was up as compared to May of 2011. Range revenue is continuing to
increase. They have been rotating out old range balls with new ones and selling off
the old balls. Green fee and cart revenue is also up over prior year, and merchandise
is up 14% over prior year. Rounds for May were 11,650 compared to 10,459 for May
2011.
Current promotions include $35.00 with cart after 12:00 p.m., $25.00 after 3:00 p.m.
and $15.00 after 5:00 p.m. on weekdays. They plan to also run a U.S. Open special.
Lesson revenue is up 26% from prior year.
In May, Mike Winkenbach booked $50,000 future tournament revenue. Tournaments
in the calendar year to date have generated 600 more rounds and $25,000 more in
revenue than the same period last year.
4C
Beautification Program and Junior Golf Club by Mrs. Norma Arnerich
Norma Arnerich stated the first summer junior tournament will be tomorrow. There will
be one more memorial bench donated to the course.
4-D
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
None
5
AGENDA ITEMS
5-A
Status Report on long term lease negotiations, including Golf
Commission recommendations, if any.
Chair Sullwold spoke with George Kelley of Greenway Golf earlier in the day, who
advised that negotiations with the City are moving slowly. He said that he still expects
an agreement will be reached, but it will probably be slightly after the 45-day period
that City Manager John Russo projected.
5-B
Update on Golf Complex Finances
Bob Sullwold analyzed the City's financial statements for fiscal year 2011-2012
through April. Rounds and revenues for April 2012 were similar to the prior year.
2
Golf Commission Minutes - Tuesday, June 12, 2012",GolfCommission/2012-06-12.pdf
CityCouncil,2010-01-05,3,"4 in Exhibit F of the initiative lists very general public benefits, including on site and off site
traffic and transit improvements; SunCal is stating that streets within the development itself
should not be included; however, the language does not conclude that [streets within the
development are excluded]; subdivision streets, as well as soft costs, are included based
on the language in the initiative.
Councilmember L. Tam stated the election report refers to the development of a
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan; inquired how the TDM plan that SunCal
developed was incorporated in the City's analysis and model.
The Public Works Director responded staff used what is in the initiative, which does not
include a specific TDM program; stated staff worked with consultants to develop a TDM
program that makes sense for the type of mixed use development proposed; staff could
have done modeling if the initiative spelled out the TDM program; staff is concerned that
the caps may not have sufficient funds for public benefits and on going maintenance of
public infrastructure.
In response to Mayor Johnson's inquiry regarding SunCal's estimate of the TDM program,
the Public Works Director stated there is nothing in the initiative.
Mayor Johnson stated TDM program costs could create a large discrepancy between the
City and SunCal.
The Interim City Manager stated soft costs are not a made up delta; soft costs include
architecture, engineering, contingency and other costs that are not hardscape; capital
projects include all costs, not just hardscape.
Mayor Johnson stated the public would expect an extensive TDM program, which would be
very costly; a lot of resources would have to be dedicated to a TDM program to make it
work.
The Public Works Director stated the initiative lists bus rapid transit that would travel to
BART; staff came up with a per mile cost; identifying costs for cue jump lanes is difficult
without knowing the location of lanes.
The Interim City Manager stated nearly a dozen other cities were surveyed to check
calculations; the City used a methodology that made sense and was not made up.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the 2% cap would limit existing parcel taxes or prevent
new parcel taxes.
The Interim City Manager stated the 2% cap does not indicate what portion would fund the
infrastructure or operational shortfall; the 2% cap includes existing taxes for the hospital,
school and sewer that total under 0.2%; whether a future parcel tax would go above the 2%
depends on the development phase.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
3
Board of Education
January 5, 2010",CityCouncil/2010-01-05.pdf
PlanningBoard,2011-03-14,4,"4 of 10
PLANNING BOARD 3/14/2011",PlanningBoard/2011-03-14.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-10-13,3,"4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. (DB) Staff is requesting a
continuance of this item to the meeting of October 27, 2008.
8-B. Planned Development Amendment, Major Design Review - PDA05-0004,
DR05-0073 - 523 South Shore Center - Harsch Investment Corp. The
applicant requests approval of Planned Development Amendment and Major
Design Review entitlements and certification of an Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for redevelopment and expansion of Alameda Towne Centre. The project
includes redevelopment of the site, resulting in full build-out of up to
approximately 706,650 square feet of gross leasable floor area, construction of a
new parking structure, pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements, new
signage and other minor site improvements. (DG). (Continued from September
22, 2008). Staff is requesting a continuance of this item at the applicants'
request.
The public hearing was opened.
Claire Risley requested the Board ensure, when a new date is set for this item, that the
hearing not be scheduled between November 16, 2008 and January 13, 2009 when
many citizens will be out of town. She requested the notices be mailed to interested
parties three weeks prior to the hearing and the notification radius be expanded to
greater than the current 500 feet. She also requested the hearing not be scheduled for
a date when the agenda is full.
The public hearing was closed for Board discussion.
Board member Cook asked staff if a hearing date for the item had been set.
Director Woodbury responded no.
Board member Cook asked if information previously requested by the Board regarding
this item would be provided prior to the future hearing date.
Staff responded yes.
Board member Cook reiterated her prior request for information on previous approvals
regarding this project which included a request for a summary detailing the differences
between previously granted entitlements and recent requests by the applicant. She
also specifically would like the applicant to provide the number of square feet currently
occupied at Alameda Towne Centre and she requested staff review the information
provided by the applicant.
Director Woodbury responded that staff is preparing a response to the Boards previous
request and confirmed that this information would be provided to the Board.
Page 3 of 7",PlanningBoard/2008-10-13.pdf
GolfCommission,2019-08-13,2,"4-A
Beautification Program and Junior Golf Club
Connie Wendling asked about pots of roses in the breezeway and patio. Marc Logan
stated that they are looking to install some planters but are still determining what types
of plants.
She mentioned that the Junior Golf Club had a successful year and their last
Wednesday tournament will be held tomorrow. She also stated that there were no
complaints regarding the layout of the north course, regarding having to replay holes.
The East Bay Junior Golf Tournament was held which included 131 players from
around the area. Their Club championship was held in August on the south course.
Scholarships will be given out in September.
The Jack Clark will be held on Wednesday, September 18 on the south course.
She thanked Greenway Golf and the shop for all their assistance for the season and
also thanked Jim's for their Friday lunches.
4-B
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
See 7-B
5
AGENDA ITEMS
5-A
Review and Comment on Event Center Landscape Plan and
Furnishings/Fixtures
Amy Wooldridge stated that Tom was given 60 days from the signing of the second
amendment to provide the Event Center Landscape Plan and Furnishings/Fixtures
which he complied to. Ms. Wooldridge went over the attachment that was provided for
discussion. Commissioner Carlson made a motion to approve the plans and was
seconded by Commissioner Saxton, and the motion passed unanimously.
5-B
Update on South Course Cart Path Completion
Marc Logan stated that the cart path work was originally going to start today, but the
subcontractor had another job, and is looking to reschedule, but since the course is
booked two weeks out, there is a challenge in coordinating the job. As soon as there is
a confirmed date, he will update accordingly.
5-C
Update on Clubhouse Exterior and Restrooms
Marc Logan stated that he unable to give them a timeline for the clubhouse exterior
and restrooms project, due to several factors, one being finances and also the time
involved, and they still have to get the final review from the City, which their architect is
finalizing. The project will be mostly cosmetic and also to bring it up to ADA standards,
and the design of the interior is not completely determined.
2
Golf Commission Minutes - -Tuesday, August 13, 2019",GolfCommission/2019-08-13.pdf
GolfCommission,2008-11-19,2,"4-A
Discussion on City Council Action for Golf Course Management.
Chair Sullwold reported that the City Council, at its November 6, 2008 meeting,
approved the proposal from Kemper Sports Management to manage the Golf
Complex Operations for an interim period of one year. The City of Alameda will
save approximately $32,000 by having the Complex managed. The City of
Alameda has offered golden handshake retirement packages to eligible
employees. Alan Elnick, the union business agent, advised Council that as many
as six employees will accept the retirement packages. The ACEA union
employees that retire will be replaced with non-union employees hired by Kemper
Sports. Chair Sullwold noted a maximum of about $170,000 could be saved by
the City of Alameda should all six of the employees accept the offer immediately,
but that is unlikely. The one positive note is that Kemper Sports is very
experienced in managing golf courses. Ron Salsig encouraged the Golf
Commission to voice their support for the retention of the teaching professionals at
the Complex under the existing compensation scheme. The Mif Albright Course
will be closed permanently on November 30, 2008. Mrs. Arnerich stated that all of
the trees on the Mif Albright Course were donated and dedicated to the memory of
loved ones.
4-B
Update on the Rate Increases.
Secretary Delaney stated that he has noticed an increase in play on the Earl Fry
Golf Course and a decrease on the Jack Clark Golf Course that could be due to
the rate increase. Mike Robason suggested a more likely explanation is the
relatively poor condition of the Clark course recently. Sales of monthly passes are
down considerably over last year. Mike reported that many local golf courses are
offering specials this time of year to attract play, and this may be luring our
monthly customers away. The Golf Commission asked Mike to put together more
special packages for the Chuck Corica Golf Complex to increase play and stay
competitive. Chair Sullwold reported that for the first four months of fiscal year
2008/2009 actual revenue exceeded that predicted in the budget by $273,000.
Although the number of rounds played in November 2008 are slightly lower than in
November 2007, revenue has held steady due to the rate increases.
5.
ORAL REPORTS
5-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by Assistant Golf
Professional Mike Robason.
Mike Robason reported that another $245 was received from the Youth on the
Course Program, bringing the total received from the NCGA to $4, 165 for the year.
The tee times for Thanksgiving Day will be in a shotgun format, and the Pro Shop
will be having a large merchandise sale over the weekend.
5-B
Golf Complex Maintenance activities report by Superintendent Doug Poole.
No report.
Chuck Corica Golf Complex
Page 2
11/19/08
Golf Commission Minutes",GolfCommission/2008-11-19.pdf
GolfCommission,2016-03-08,3,"4-B
Beautification Program and Junior Golf Club by Mrs. Norma Arnerich
Mrs. Arnerich stated that junior golf applications are being received. 13 junior golfers
from the program are currently under college scholarships.
Commissioner Carlson asked Mrs. Arnerich what their plans are if both putting greens
are closed, how this would affect their tournaments, and she stated that they don't
have a plan as yet, but will work it out. Mr. Campbell stated that the rebuilding of
these putting greens will be sometime this fall.
Mrs. Arnerich that two of their junior golfers are now members of the LPGA and
another is a member of the Symetra tour.
4-C
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
Tom Geanekos stated that he been in contact with Greenway and they are discussing
future plans, and also that they have already started working on the kitchen facilities,
and mirrors in the bathrooms have been replaced.
5.
AGENDA ITEMS
6.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (Public Comment)
None
7.
OLD BUSINESS
None
8.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None
9.
ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING'S AGENDA - April 12, 2016
10.
ANNOUNCEMENTSIADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:43 p.m.
The agenda for the meeting was posted seven days in advance in compliance with the
Alameda Sunshine Ordinance, which also complies with the 72-hour requirement of the
Brown Act.
3
Golf Commission Minutes - -Tuesday, March 8, 2016",GolfCommission/2016-03-08.pdf
GolfCommission,2010-01-21,5,"4-B
Discussion of Proposal to operate Mif Albright Course through a non-
profit corporation
Joe VanWinkle has put together an organization plan including establishing teams in
the areas of legal risk, ground finance accounting, golf expertise, fundraising and
corporate sponsorship, and programming which involves kids, golfers and non-
golfers which all represent opportunity. An action plan has been put together and
has started dealing with the people who are doing these different streams of work.
He briefed Norma Arnerich for Alameda Junior Board and that will be calendared
when they are ready. An alignment of a calendar of events has been made through
next summer. A business plan has been drafted which includes segmentation,
targeting and benchmarking various ideas that other Par 3 courses are doing across
the country. In 1985 the City of Baltimore decided to form a non-profit corporation
which included five major golf courses. San Antonio also did this a few years ago
which included seven major golf courses. Buttonhole in New Jersey has been
operating since 2001 with good sponsorship programs. It is only open half of the
year and all the funding works. Competitive analysis has been done in the local
market, and he has looked at the operations issues in terms of office and turf
management, golf course maintenance and landscaping, and water issues. He has
received verbal approval for a grant from a local entrepreneur in Alameda and also
has a list of other grants and other fundraising ideas. Joe believes they might not
have to hire any full time employees, it can be done with contracted services.
Regarding the financials, the course is basically at a breakeven point without the
overhead allocation. The breakeven amount for the month is $5,000 with last month
only bringing in $4,000. 122 rounds were $1.00 each, but if they are an NCGA
member, we receive $7.00 from the NCGA. If 50% percent of the Seniors Club,
Men's Club and Ladies Club play this course once a month (300 players) that
equates $32,000 annually. He asked the Golf Commission to provide the data to
him and permission to organize volunteers through posting a flyer on the premises.
Chair Sullwold stated that she believed that would have to be permitted by the City
Manager and that she would follow up if they have permissions to post such flyers.
Joe then asked the Junior Golf Club to possibly have an ""Opening Day"" to sign up
more juniors. Chair Sullwold asked Joe if any other non-profit organizations have
been asked if they were willing to take over this facility. He stated that he had been
in contact with Alameda Junior Club, The First Tee and a non golf non-profit
organization. Operating the course through a First Tee affiliation was discussed.
Norma Arnerich stated that the Alameda Junior Golf Club would like to have a
chance at looking at operating the course. Another organization discussed was Pro
Kids which doesn't run courses, but brings in tournaments and other events. Mrs.
Arnerich also stated that she wants to set up a meeting with David Betters who runs
a non profit course at the fairgrounds and is willing to work with the Junior Golf Club.
Chair Sullwold thinks the Golf Commission should be ready with a presentation to
City Council at the time of the RFP recommendation. Discussion ensued as to who
would be in charge, who would maintain it and what amount of capital would be
needed. Chair Sullwold stated that this topic was brought up at an Alameda
Women's Golf Club general meeting last Thursday and she received commitments
of donations in the amount of $2,175 for the start-up costs and since then another
- 5 -
Golf Commission Minutes -Thursday, January 21, 2010",GolfCommission/2010-01-21.pdf
GolfCommission,2009-08-26,2,"4-B
Discussion/recommendation re long-term management of Golf Complex
John Vest said he heard that the Request for Proposals for a long-term lease of the
Golf Complex will be sent out in September.
5
ORAL REPORTS
5-A Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
John Vest announced that Richard Hudner has joined the PGA Apprentice program.
There has been vandalism on the golf course the last month, including damage to
the AED unit, and carts being found out on the course when they were put away in
the cart barn the night before. Mike Winkenbach is working on ways to increase
midday play between 11:00 AM and 1:00 PM as that seems to be our most quiet
time. Tee times can be booked on our website for any time, whereas Golf Now only
books in those down hours. Mike is also reaching to several groups for midweek
tournament play. John has been working with Jim's for a lunch/golf special. The
left ball dispenser at the range has been damaged and has been replaced. The
course is participating in the PGA Golf Ready program, which offers five lessons for
$99.00 either as a group or individually. The Complex will again celebrate Patriots
Day on September 4th through the 7th, and will accept cash donations for military
personnel. The cart batteries continue to be a serious problem, with 20 carts
currently out of service. EZ-GO will be coming out shortly to test them. John and
Matt Wisely have been looking into various options to control the goose problem at
the Complex. They have heard that some courses keep a dog on property at all
times. Connie Wendling noted that the Fire Tower has a lot of graffiti right now, and
said she thought there was a City ordinance requiring such graffiti to be removed
within 24 or 48 hours. John indicated he would investigate whether Fire Tower
graffiti clean up is the responsibility of the Golf Complex or the Fire Department.
5-B
Golf Complex Maintenance activities report by Matt Wisely
In Matt's absence, John announced that the backflow devices on the Clark Course
that had illegal taps have been fixed. He also reported that the Public Works
Department ran a test to try and find a leak, which resulted in the ponds being
drained.
5-C
Beautification Program and Junior Golf Club by Mrs. Norma Arnerich
In Norma's absence, Connie. Wendling reported that the last Junior tournament will
be held September 5, 2009 on the Clark Course, and the Jack Clark Memorial
tournament will be held October 12, 2009 on the Fry Course.
5-D
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
None
- 2 -
Golf Commission Minutes - Wednesday, August 26, 2009",GolfCommission/2009-08-26.pdf
GolfCommission,2012-05-22,2,"4-B
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
April range revenue was up 3% from prior year, green fees were up 5% and cart fees
were up 6%. The course is still dealing with customers taking carts straight out of the
cart barn. Merchandise sales from January through April are S up $20,000 over the
same period last year. Rounds for April were up 200 over prior year.
Current promotions include $35.00 with cart after 12:00 p.m., $25.00 after 3:00 p.m.
and $15.00 after 5:00 p.m. on weekdays. Lesson revenue is up 36% from prior year.
Over $85,000 in future tournament revenue was booked in April.
4C
Beautification Program and Junior Golf Club by Mrs. Norma Arnerich
There are three upcoming tree dedications. Junior Golf conducted a successful
junior/adult tournament last Saturday. Approximately ten of our juniors are being
trained as volunteer workers at the upcoming U.S. Open. The USGA will pay for the
clothing for its junior volunteers, whereas adults have to buy their own.
4-D
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
None
5
AGENDA ITEMS
5-A
Status Report on long term lease negotiations, including Golf
Commission recommendations, if any.
None
5-B
Update on Golf Complex Finances
Bob Sullwold reported that net operating income for March was $1,231. According to
the City finance department report, the expense item for Kemper services and supplies
in March was double the monthly average. Kemper's own report does not show
a
similar phenomenon, and John Vest stated there were no extraordinary expenses in
March that would explain the City's number.
For the nine months ended March 31, 2012, total rounds were up 22.7% compared to
the prior fiscal year, led by a 29.03% increase in Fry rounds. For the same period,
revenue from greens fees was up 12.94%. The explanation for the discrepancy
between round and revenue growth is that revenue per round declined by 7.95%.
Overall, for the nine months ended March 31, 2012, net operating income was
$751,156. Payments to the City totaled $562,834, and debt service totaled $171,286.
(The charges for PILOT have continued this calendar year). As of March 31, 2012, the
cash balance in the Golf Enterprise Fund was $803,221, which is about the same as it
was at the beginning of the fiscal year. Chair Sullwold asked if there was a possibility,
based on historical data, that the Enterprise Fund would be back up to $1,000,000 by
2
Golf Commission Minutes - Tuesday, May 22, 2012",GolfCommission/2012-05-22.pdf
GolfCommission,2012-08-14,2,"4-B
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
John Vest stated that Greenway has asked the City to take care of some items before
Greenway takes over, including some trip hazards around the golf shop and patio.
The Junior Golf Office has been cleaned of all mold and will be finished soon.
Revenue for July is up 6% over prior year. Range revenue is up 2% over prior year
and up 14% year to date. Merchandise is being liquidated in the golf shop,
contributing to a 17% increase in revenue over prior year. Rounds are up 200 over
prior year and tournament rounds are up 574 over prior year.
4-C Beautification Program and Junior Golf Club by Mrs. Norma Arnerich
Chair Sullwold advised that Norma had a serious fall at home and injured her
shoulder. The Golf Commission extended its best wishes for a speedy recovery. In
Norma's absence, Connie Wendling reported that the Junior Golf club championship
will be held on Wednesday, August 15.
4-D
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
Chair Sullwold reported that she spoke during non-agenda Communications at the City
Council meeting on July 23rd, asking Council to direct the City Manager to continue
negotiations with Jim's on the Course for a long-term lease and renovations to the
restaurant.
5
AGENDA ITEMS
5-A
Status Report on long term lease negotiations, including Golf
Commission recommendations, if any.
Chair Sullwold said she has not heard anything since the July 31st City Council
meeting when Greenway was awarded the long term lease, other than that the plan is
for Greenway to begin with the Mif and the Driving Range renovations.
John Vest reported that he and Patti Straass have been hired by Greenway.
Regarding other staff, Greenway will be at the Golf Complex in the coming week for
interviews. Commissioner Schmitz asked about the marshal program and Mr. Vest
stated that he was not sure what the program was going to be under Greenway.
5-B
Update on Golf Complex Finances
Bob Sullwold reported that for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, rounds on the Fry
course were up 28%, Clark rounds were up 12%, and Mif rounds were up 4%.
Revenue on the Fry was up 20%, and revenue on Clark and the Mif was up up 2%.
Overall, from this year to last, rounds were up 19% which increased revenue 12%.
2
Golf Commission Minutes - Tuesday, August 14, 2012",GolfCommission/2012-08-14.pdf
GolfCommission,2012-01-10,2,"4-B
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
John Vest stated that there has been positive feedback on the condition of the greens.
December revenue was up 76% from last year due to the great weather. Revenue
was $272,000, with over 8,300 rounds. Christmas Day generated 99 rounds and
about $4,000 in revenue. The golf shop holiday sale, offering free gift wrapping, was
successful. The three days of the sale generated about $5,000 in revenue, with total
sales of $27,000 for the month.
The ballast and light kits on the range will be replaced next month at a cost of
approximately $7,000. Installation will involve some closure of the range.
A promotion in December in conjunction with Jim's on the Course included green fee,
cart fee, sandwich and a fountain soda for $35. The ""Wacky Wednesdays"" promotion
is still running well.
-
Tournaments generated about $15,000 in December revenue. 2011 tournaments
generated over $30,000 more in revenue and 648 more rounds than 2011, thanks in
large part to the work of Mike Winkenbach.
4C
Beautification Program and Junior Golf Club by Mrs. Norma Arnerich
None
4-D
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
None.
5
AGENDA ITEMS
5-A
Status Report on long term lease, Mif Albright negotiations, and proposal
for Golf Complex reconfiguration by Ron Cowan and Harbor Bay Isle
Associates, including Golf Commission recommendations, if any.
Chair Sullwold reported that she attended and participated in the mandatory pre-bid
meeting of prospective golf vendors last Thursday. Dale Lillard advised that there
were eight separate companies represented at the meeting. The City Controller was
present to answer or make note of financial questions, of which there were many. The
meeting went well and it seems that there a number of companies are interested. The
bids are due on February 10.
Norma Arnerich stated that, at the request of the Alameda Junior Golf Board, she sent
a letter to John Russo and the City Council members stating that the Board believes
the Par 3 course should be under one umbrella and be run by the operator of the
Complex, and not by Alameda Junior Golf. She gave a copy of her letter to Chair
Sullwold, who read the letter aloud at the meeting.
2
Golf Commission Minutes - -Tuesday, January 10, 2012",GolfCommission/2012-01-10.pdf
GolfCommission,2012-07-10,2,"4-B
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
John reported that two staff members in the golf shop are leaving.
Three carts were damaged a couple of weeks ago by three kids playing bumper cars.
He met with the parents of the three and they are going to pay for the damages.
Three wedges were stolen from the shop, but the video enabled pro shop staff to
identify the thieves. After one was contacted by the police, he agreed to pay for the
wedges.
Per the City's request, before the Greenway takeover, the debris piles will be removed
from the property, the Junior Golf office in the pro shop will be repaired, and concrete
work is going to be done around the buildings where there are trip hazards.
Revenue for June was up 12% over prior year and the range revenue was up 8%. He
is working with Greenway to determine what merchandise will be kept. Rounds for
June were 12,735, which is up from June 2011. There was a successful July 4th
promotion that included a hot dog and a drink from Jim's. Tournament revenue for
June was over $42,000.
4-C
Beautification Program and Junior Golf Club by Mrs. Norma Arnerich
Norma advised that a bench will be dedicated in memory of Al George at a ceremony
on July 21st for Al George. Over the years, Al donated over $9,000 from collecting
cans.
The East Bay Juniors tournament is coming up on July_23rd and 24th; 147 have already
signed up. The Elks organization will provide lunches and trophies for the juniors
through a grant they received.
4-D
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
John Vest stated that he had been advised by Dale Lillard that the City and Jim's could
not reach an agreement for the long term lease, and negotiations have ended.
5
AGENDA ITEMS
5-A
Status Report on long term lease negotiations, including Golf
Commission recommendations, if any.
Chair Sullwold stated that she had been told by both Lisa Goldman and Dale Lillard
that the City expects a deal with Greenway to be penciled out by Thursday. At the
Council meeting on the 17th, Council will ask that its meeting on July 24 th be
designated as a regular meeting instead of a special meeting, because the first
reading of a proposed long-term lease must be done at a regular meeting. Assuming
it is approved on the 24th the lease will be presented for final approval at a special
meeting on July 31st.
2
Golf Commission Minutes - -Tuesday, July 10, 2012",GolfCommission/2012-07-10.pdf
GolfCommission,2008-02-20,2,"4-B
Report on Mif Albright Course redesign and rate structure.
The Interim General Manager reported that the maintenance crew has returned the Mif
Albright Course to its original layout. The Pro Shop staff has placed flyers up around the
Complex announcing the changes to the course and the promotional rates. Also an
email blast will be sent out through the web site. The putting green at the Driving Range
will remain open. The Interim General Manager also mentioned that he is working with
Alameda Power and Telecom (AP&T) and Harbor Bay Business Park to get the
information included in their newsletters for no cost. The AP&T newsletter requires any
information go to the Public Utilities Board for approval prior to inclusion, so there is a
little delay. There may also be a possibility of getting the information in the Community of
Harbor Bay newsletter, The Gull's Call, although it is completed through May already.
The Interim General Manager mentioned that there might be a way to let the collar grow
out on the Jack Clark Putting Green in the clubhouse area and the area used for chipping
practice. The question was asked how long the promotional rates would be in effect on
the Mif Albright Course. The rates are currently only reduced for the month of March and
they will be reevaluated at the end of the month.
4-C
Report from Interim General Manager Dale Lillard regarding cost estimates from Saylor
Consultants for renovation of clubhouse and restaurant.
The Interim General Manager reported that he received a call from Saylor Consulting
saying that someone would call him back tomorrow and that was 10 days ago. Chair
Sullwold will contact Bob Wood to see if he could follow up with the company.
4-D
Discussion regarding improvements to front entrance.
The Interim General Manager reported that he has heard nothing further on the
issue. Chair Sullwold asked if the Fire Department has abandoned the property or
are they still using the fire tower? The Interim General Manager will check to see
if it is still being used. The Interim General Manager also mentioned that he is
looking at replacing the signs at the front entrance and will try to get a drawing
prior to the next meeting.
5.
ORAL REPORTS
5-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by Assistant Golf Professional Mike
Robason.
The Assistant Golf Professional reported that he is currently setting up ""Demo
Days"" for the Complex to be held every month as opposed to once or twice a year.
The major ""Demo Day"" will be held on July 19, 2008. Other vendors currently set
up are as follows:
March 15, 2008:
McGregor Golf
April 2008:
Callaway
May 2008:
Nike and TaylorMade
Chuck Corica Golf Complex
Page 2
2/20/08
Golf Commission Minutes",GolfCommission/2008-02-20.pdf
GolfCommission,2018-05-08,2,"4-B Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
Tom Geanekos stated that instead of replacing all the windows, which are still in good
condition, they are going to paint the aluminum black to coincide with the pro shop
prior to the opening of the south course. Also, the fire pits will be installed as well.
They are also reconfiguring the snack area which will be smaller but more functional
as there will be two registers to move customers through more quickly.
The plans for the event center should be submitted to the building department next
week. They are hoping to begin construction by the end of July and hope to be open
by September or October. The back of the restaurant will be cleaned up when the
patio is finished, and then that area will be fenced off. The event center will be
shipped when they have received final approval and will arrive in about 30 days.
5-A Discuss Corica Park Marshall/Ambassador Program
Chair Downing recused himself as he is currently a Marshall. Ken Campbell stated
that he met with the marshall leads for their feedback, and the question came up
regarding free golf with the new south course opening, and he stated that there were
still be privileges, but will be due to availability, but will be finalized in the next few
weeks.
5-B
Facility and Renovation Report by Greenway Golf
Mr. Campbell introduced Alex Iguchi, the new Director of Golf.
Mr. Campbell stated that the windows for the pro shop have been reordered and will
be installed when they arrive, and there will be a grand opening at that time.
Discounts will be given to Alameda residents as well as the service club members for
the Linksoul merchandise in the pro shop.
The patio is almost complete, and should be ready the end of next week. The
dedicated gas lines have been completed, so the firepits can be installed. The putting
green drainage is being completed and then can be sand capped and seeded.
June 25th is the date for closing nine holes of the north for renovation. They will be
offering nine hole play, showing a plan of the hole layout. The fee structure will be for
unlimited play for the day. Cart rates will be reduced to $10.00.
Signs are being prepared as well as photos for the upcoming south opening, as well
as setting up the POS system for tee times. An online tee time portal will be available
for Alameda residents. Early reservation fees will be charged at $10.00 per person for
tee times made 8-30 days prior. An Alameda County resident card will be available for
$159 per year which will give them Alameda resident rates. NCGA members will
receive a preferred rate.
June 22 will be opening day for the south course, with several events being held prior
including a media day on June 20. The Founders club will be playing on the Monday
2
Golf Commission Minutes - -Tuesday, May 8, 2018",GolfCommission/2018-05-08.pdf
GolfCommission,2012-09-11,2,"4-B Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
Revenue for the month of August was $410,000 and year to date revenues are up
$290,000 from previous year. Range revenue is also up, along with green fee and cart
fee revenue from prior year. The golf shop has been having a blow out sale for the
merchandise that still belongs to the City. Rounds were down slightly from 2011.
Tournament rounds year to date were up 620 from prior year.
Questions were asked regarding when the closure of the range will take place. There
have been several dates discussed, but John has not heard exactly when the closure
will take place.
John announced that Mike Winkenbach has been retained as Operations
Manager/Assistant General Manager, and Greenway is looking to hire some other new
staff to fill vacant spots. There will also be a new marketing director retained in the
near future, possibly someone already working for Greenway at another location.
There will be changes to the marshal program, including not being able to play for free
on the weekends. There will be a couple of paid positions for First Tee Hosts.
4-C Beautification Program and Junior Golf Club by Mrs. Norma Arnerich
Connie Wendling, reporting in Norma's absence, said that Norma is doing well. The
Adult/Junior tournament was held last Saturday with 50 teams. The Jack Clark
Memorial tournament is coming up on September 24, 2012.
4-D
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
Dimitri Geanekos stated that the wedding with approximately 500 people was a
success. The tent they put up cost about $20,000, and was paid for by the bridal
party.
Chair Sullwold announced that after negotiations between Jim's and the City broke
down, she went to the City Council to encourage reopening them.
5
AGENDA ITEMS
5-A
Status Report on long term lease negotiations, including Golf
Commission recommendations, if any.
The Commission discussed whether to rename this standard agenda item for future
meetings, and decided to rephrase it as ""Status Report on Golf Complex Renovations,
including Golf Commission recommendations, if any.' There was nothing to discuss
this month that had not already been covered in John Vest's report.
2
Golf Commission Minutes - -Tuesday, September 11, 2012",GolfCommission/2012-09-11.pdf
RecreationandParkCommission,2017-03-09,2,"4-B Report on Child & Youth Services from Christina Bailey, Recreation Services Specialist
Christina Bailey, Recreation Services Specialist, gave a report on the ARPD child and youth services. Christina
gave information about the 6 months to Pre K programs which include Wee Play, Preschool Programs, and
Summer Camps; the Kindergarten through 5th grade Recreation Afterschool Program, (RAP), the Parks and
Playgrounds Program and the non-school day programs, TGIF & Days in the Park; the Kindergarten through 5th
grade summer programs that include Day Camp, Parks and Playgrounds, field trips, and World of Wonder,
(WOW). Christina also gave information about special events she is responsible for such as the February Dance
Party for girls and their fathers or other role models, April Splash into Spring Egg Scramble and the December
Breakfast with Santa. Christina shared the follow up success of the Godfrey Playground renovation that was
done in 2016 in which Vice Chair Delaney cut the ribbon in June on the Grand Opening. The park has become
busier as the kids are enjoying the new play structure. The new fence is now up with the Friends of the Park sign
on the fence.
Commissioner Limoges was impressed with Christina's work and said her ability to balance all the programs at
once is absolutely wonderful. He asked about the scholarship program and requested a copy of the information
for the scholarship program that ARPD offers for Commissioner Carter and himself.
Commissioner Carter said great presentation and asked Christina how she has seen it change over the last 10
years and going forward what is Christina's vision or dream for the programs she runs? Christina said the Rap
program has grown and that is exciting. She also noticed there is not as many young people applying for jobs
which makes staffing a challenge. Christina said that her wish is that everybody who comes through our
programs would have a great time and tell another person.
Chair Tilos said he has watched the ARPD events grow and become better and it makes him proud to be on the
Recreation and Park Commission because of all the programs we provide. He mentioned the ARPD Summer
Camp Expo on April 1, 2017.
Vice Chair Delaney applauded Christina and said her coordination of the programs is phenomenal, that the staff
at ARPD is a true treasure and it is quite amazing what they accomplish. Vice Chair Delaney said Friends of the
Park is pleased to be able to sponsor the ARPD programs.
Director Amy Wooldridge said she is impressed with Christina's work and said that she always goes above and
beyond. It is because of her that the programs keep growing.
REPORTS
A. Recreation Commission Reports
Commissioner Limoges and Director Wooldridge met with Jennifer Ott to discuss the upcoming parks at Alameda
Point. On March 28, 2017 he will be taking a tour with Jennifer Ott to look at the parks. The Piece and Kindness
Community Project will be unveiling the puzzle pieces at the Veterans Building on March 17, 2017 which he will
attend. He also visited Littlejohn Park and talked to many people, of whom requested to have the lines on the
basketball court relined. Commissioner Limoges will be going to the Lincoln Parks' Pickleball classes. He will be
following up with Commissioner Carter about the scholarship programs for ARPD.
Vice Chair Delaney attended the February 27, 2017 Planning Board meeting to see the Catellus presentation for
the Alameda Landing Waterfront plan which includes eight acres of open space and parks. He would like to have
Catellus do a presentation for the Recreation and Park Commission.
2",RecreationandParkCommission/2017-03-09.pdf
GolfCommission,2011-01-19,4,"4-C
Beautification Program and Junior Golf Club by Mrs. Norma Arnerich
None. Mrs. Arnerich is recovering from surgery, and the Golf Commissioners sent
her their best wishes for a speedy recovery.
4-D
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
Written report was submitted by Jim's on the Course (attached).
5
AGENDA ITEMS
5-A Status Report on Long Term Lease and Mif Albright Negotiations
including Golf Commission recommendations
Commissioner Gammell: ""First of all, I knew there was a meeting of the non-profit
group, mainly Jane and Joe, met with some of the Junior Board members, and since
Norma wasn't able, our Vice President Bill Wehr was there, and they met about,
well, I wasn't there, but I have knowledge of what they met about. Dale Lillard called
me today to ask me what was happening with the Mif, did the Junior Board say
forget it, I said, no, absolutely not as far as the non-profit went. And, so, he asked
me questions, so I told him the same thing. He hadn't heard from Joe or Jane. I
said I'm sure you'll hear from them and that he should call Bill Wehr. He said that's
a good idea, he'd do that. So, I said, are we still having the special meeting on
January 25th, and he said, yes, but there'll be a closed session first, and then the
meeting. And I said, I hope it's not really late, because I'm going on vacation. And
he said, well he'd hope not, too, because he was paying for them to come from
Chicago. And, I thought yeah, that's out of our golf fund. So Kemper is coming and
they will discuss the different options and then the City Council will take it under
advisement and we'll go from there."" Tim Scates: ""So, for my understanding, is
Kemper going to present options or the one they prefer?"" Commissioner Gammell:
""I would assume the one they prefer, maybe, they might say we'll do this or this, and
then the City Council will make a decision. And he did mention the 27 holes was
definitely one of the options.""
Commissioner Schmitz: ""So, we should get that report the Thursday before."" Chair
Sullwold: ""Not necessarily, because it's a special meeting, and special meetings
require only 24 hours notice under the Brown Act, so, if possible, although the
Sunshine Task Force recommended that all special meetings also be given 72 hours
notice. That was one of their central recommendations when they concluded their
work. So, it's not clear when it will be on the agenda.'
Commissioner Schmitz: ""Well, that will be our first clue as to what will be proposed
Tuesday night will be the written report. It may not be that specific, it could be very
vague. It could include a draft contract attached to it, but it could not also. But, that
will be our first indication of what's being proposed. We should be able to get that
before the meeting, ideally we could get that tomorrow."" Chair Sullwold: ""Since it's
an outside entity and not a City staff recommendation, it's possible that it will simply
4
Golf Commission Minutes -Wednesday, January 19, 2011",GolfCommission/2011-01-19.pdf
GolfCommission,2009-10-21,3,"4-C
Request for repayment of $300,000 from Measure WW Funds
Dale Lillard stated that this particular bond was for purchase of new park lands or for
renovation of large areas of traditional parks. He expressed his opinion that the East
Bay Regional Park District, which controls distribution of Measure WW funds, would
not be inclined to approve renovation projects on ""profit-generating"" park lands such
as the Golf Complex. Dale had spoken to Interim City Manager Ann Marie Gallant
regarding the loan to the City of $300,000 from the Golf Enterprise Fund. He said
that Ann Marie would be happy to attend a future meeting of the Golf Commission to
address issues relating to the $300,000 loan and possible repayment. The Golf
Commission agreed to place this item on the November meeting agenda, and asked
John Vest to coordinate the date with Ann Marie.
5
ORAL REPORTS
5-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by John Vest
John Vest stated that, as of October 21, there have been 787 rounds played at the
Complex in October, generating $6,321 in total revenue. He advised that the cart
barn had recently been broken into, and the intruders scattered 10 to 15 carts over
the golf courses. A side of the cart barn fence had to be repaired, along with the
gate. About four cart battery chargers were damaged at a cost of $300 each. John
reported that a professional cleaning service has been hired on a temporary basis;
they are taking care of all the bathrooms. Receipts are still being checked on the
course to reduce the number of non-registered, non-paying golfers. Monthly cards
will now be stamped with a statement that the card may be revoked if misused; the
purchaser will be required to sign an acknowledgement of the revocation policy at
the time of purchase. The driving range has continued to stay busy in the evenings.
The Get Ready for Golf program has been going well, as we are heading into the
second session.
5-B
Golf Complex Maintenance activities report by Matt Wisely
Matt Wisely advised that the grass was growing faster than expected due to the 3 1/2
inches of rain we received last month. Now that things are slowing down, the
equipment issues he discussed last month are somewhat easier to deal with. He
has looked into renting equiment on a short term basis, but has located no vendor
who will rent this type of mowing equipment for a short period of time. Aerification is
completed on the north course; unfortunately the rain stopped them from aerifying
the south course, as the greens need to be dry. The recycled water has been shut
off due to the rain, but Matt believes the ponds have sufficient water to get us
through. No trees were lost in the recent storm, but some large limbs came down.
The City's maintenance workers were recently given layoff notices as of the end of
the year; immediately after receiving the notices, six workers called in sick. John
said they will be looking for 12 people to start work in January.
- 3 -
Golf Commission Minutes - Wednesday, October 21, 2009",GolfCommission/2009-10-21.pdf
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard,2019-02-27,5,"4-C
Workgroup Progress Reports
Assessment and Awareness Workgroup-Hastings / Jenks: none
Homeless Action Plan Workgroup-Harawitz/ Hyman: none.
5. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
5-A
Fonstein provided an update on the 2019 Season for Nonviolence. Daily
readings are being done at schools, City Council, and other public
meetings. The Speech Contest for middle school and high school
students is scheduled on Saturday, March 16 starting at 10:00 am at City
Hall. Boardmember Harawitz has already volunteered to serve as a
judge. Kiwanis and Rotary Club are sponsoring the event, which enabled
staff to increase the cash prizes.
5-B
Fonstein provided an update on the Youth Career and Job Fair scheduled
on Thursday, March 21, 2:30-4:30 p.m. at Encinal High School. Twenty-
five organizations have already signed-up, which include businesses,
nonprofits, and City departments offering 25-55 paid positions. This year,
there is a Mayor's Challenge to offer 200 paid summer positions by 2020,
and over 50 agencies have signed-on and are included in the Mayor's
Honor Roll. Fonstein is also reaching out to Career Educational
Pathways.
5-C
Update on Homeless Programs and Initiatives
Bagtas provided the following updates on the programs that support
Alameda's homeless:
On January 15, the City Council approved staff's recommendation
for the Interim City Manager, working through staff, to coordinate
with SSHRB on finalizing the projects that will be funded through
the Homeless Emergency Aid Program (HEAP) and oversee their
implementation. SSHRB approved the establishment of a HEAP
Ad Hoc Committee at its January 24 meeting to lead this effort.
The HEAP Ad Hoc Committee is getting formed, and the first
meeting will be sometime in March.
The Point In Time count was conducted throughout Alameda
County on January 30. Bagtas thanked those who volunteered to
do the count on the island. Alameda was well-covered with
volunteers. Preliminary results will be issued by EveryOne Home
sometime in April with the release of the final report this summer.",SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2019-02-27.pdf
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities,2012-12-03,2,"4-C.
CDI Attendance / 2013 Meeting Schedule (Secretary Akil)
Secretary Akil and Chair Lord-Hausman stressed the importance of attendance.
5.
OLD BUSINESS
5-A.
Goals and Objectives 2012 (Chair Lord-Hausman)
Think about individual CDI involvement and vision for 2013.
5-B. Universal Design Work Group Update (Vice Chair Harp)
Stated that the next work group meeting is Jan. 14, 2013 at 6:30 pm
5-C.
Park Street Bench Project (Chair Lord-Hausman)
Chair Lord-Hausman stated that the City and PSBA are all supportive of the benches
project, which will roll out in 2013.
5-D. City Council Meeting Report (Commissioner Fort)
No report out
5-E.
Planning Board Meeting Report (Chair Lord-Hausman)
No report out
6.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS (Secretary Akil)
Secretary Akil thanked the CDI for their support over the past year.
7.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
7-A.
Chair Lord-Hausman stated that Alameda Recreation and Park Department has given Ala
Costa space for their program.
7-B. Chair Lord-Hausman stated that Jackie Krause requested that Chair Lord-Hausman
review appropriate language for the Leisure Club's Rules & Regulations.
7-C.
Chair Lord-Hausman stated that a local autism community group is working with
Alameda theatre to bring in special sensory films for people with autism. They've
requested support from the CDI and the effort is moving forward.
2",CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2012-12-03.pdf
OpenGovernmentCommission,2021-11-01,16,"4-C. Report to City Council on Issues Arising from Implementation of the Sunshine
Ordinance
Commissioner Chen gave a brief presentation.
Commissioner LoPilato stated that she does not think the report is quite in shape to send
to the City Council; it was a huge undertaking; she is refining her thoughts on it; the
Commission is required to do the reports at least once annually; Complaints are still
coming in for 2021; suggested moving the plan to finalize the report closer to January;
she is mindful that certain things already feel outdated; specifically Recommendation #3,
the City already is publishing the legislative agenda.
Commissioner Chen stated work on the Complaint Procedure and form took out half of
the recommendations; she feels the relationship with the City Attorney's office is much
improved; the report can be updated on an ongoing basis; she concurs with
Commissioner LoPilato regarding the timing.
Chair Tilos stated the Commission could hold off until January.
Commissioner Chen stated things can be lost during the turnover of members; the report
is a living document like the Bylaws.
Commissioner LoPilato stated the report should be grounded in the statute; some of the
recommendations read like directives; leading with an explanation and background of
what the Sunshine Ordinance actually says may be a better approach; the
recommendations could be reviewed item-by-item; it is important to look at the accuracy
and weight that is given to some of the language; the Commission's role should be
neutral; the report seems more like an advocacy piece; it might be better received and
more effective if it is more neutral and has a gatekeeper tone; the City Council needs to
give direction to the Commission and staff on what work the Commission should do in
addition to hearing Complaints; the expectations of what the Commission does is a bit
limited.
***
In response to Chair Tilos's inquiry, the City Clerk stated a vote was needed to consider
new items at 10:30 p.m. but since it was missed, the next item could be bumped; a vote
is needed to continue past 11:00 p.m.
***
Commissioner Chen stated she would like to have the report come back on the January
agenda.
4-D. Consider Amending the Sunshine Ordinance Complaint Form. Not heard.
STAFF UPDATE
Meeting of the
Open Government Commission
November 1, 2021
16",OpenGovernmentCommission/2021-11-01.pdf
OpenGovernmentCommission,2022-01-11,2,"4-C. Report to City Council on Issues Arising from Implementation of the Sunshine
Ordinance
Commissioner Chen gave a presentation.
Commissioner Montgomery moved approval of allowing five more minutes for the
presentation.
Chair Tilos seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote:
Commissioners Cambra: Aye; Chen: Aye; Montgomery: Aye; Tilos: Aye; Chair LoPilato.
Ayes: 5.
Commissioner Chen completed her presentation.
Commissioner Montgomery stated the orientation packet should be moved to the success
portion of the report since she received one when she became a Commissioner.
Vice Chair LoPilato thanked Commissioner Chen for her huge undertaking in providing a
well-structured and comprehensive report; stated that she would like to add a link to the
Brown Act and Public Records Act in the Bylaw; she would like clarification about what
the Commission/staff partnership should look like.
The City Clerk stated she will add the links to the bylaws.
In response to Commissioner Chen's inquiry regarding posting the bylaws online, the City
Clerk stated the bylaws for Boards and Commissions are not typically posted, but she
would be happy to post in on the Commission's webpage.
Commissioner Chen stated she would like the bylaws to be posted online.
In response to Chair Tilos's inquiry regarding the four-year maximum term limit, Vice Chair
LoPilato stated the section regarding the term limits is from the original bylaws; it is a
piece that the Commission does not have the ability to revise since it requires City Council
action; quoted the language, a term that is concurrently linked with the service of the
appointing City Council member but in no event shall exceed four years.
""
The City Clerk stated the key language is that a single term cannot exceed four years.
Vice Chair LoPilato stated that she was wondering about development of a ten-year plan;
questioned whether problems, such as lack of continuity in institutional memory, might be
solved in a less labor-intensive way; she thinks it is a great aspirational request, but fears
it will be bumped to the bottom of the priority list given everything else staff has to do.
Commissioner Chen stated for her personally and as a resident of Alameda, it would be
Meeting of the
Open Government Commission
January 11, 2022
2",OpenGovernmentCommission/2022-01-11.pdf
GolfCommission,2011-11-08,3,"4-D
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course
None.
5
AGENDA ITEMS
5-A
Status Report on long term lease, Mif Albright negotiations, and proposal
for Golf Complex reconfiguration by Ron Cowan and Harbor Bay Isle
Associates, including Golf Commission recommendations, if any.
Chair Sullwold stated that the three appraisals of the Mif Albright Golf Course did not
come out as high as hoped. Peggy Darnell, who had done the original appraisal, did a
reappraisal based on the assumption that the property would be sold fully entitled for
130 homes with no required compliance with Alameda's low income housing
ordinance, which raised the value from $9.1 million to $15.3 million; the appraiser from
Sacramento appraised the property at $13 million; and the third appraiser (from
Alameda) came in with a low ball figure of $6.6 million.
Commissioner Gammell reported that Mayor Gilmore will be presenting a City Council
referral at the Council meeting on November 15, asking Council to amend its previous
motion regarding the land swap to direct staff to seek alternative options to the
property exchange that would still provide for the long term financial sustainability of
the Chuck Corica Golf Complex.
5-B
Update on Golf Complex Finances
Chair Sullwold stated that City's October financial reports on the Golf Complex came
in the week after the November Golf Commission meeting. She asked the finance
department whether it would be possible to receive such reports prior to the new
regular meeting date of the Golf Commission (the second Tuesday of each month),
and was told the City cannot prepare these statements until the 15th of the month at
the earliest. There are two options: discuss the reports a month late or change the
meeting to the fourth Tuesday of every month. Unfortunately, the men's club meets on
the fourth Tuesday, so it was decided that the Commission will stick with the second
Tuesday. Chair Sullwold stated that the October financial reports show the net
available Enterprise Fund balance at $931,000.
Chair Sullwold also reported on the ongoing request to the City to explain and justify
the legality of the City's surcharge and payment in lieu of taxes transfers. PILOT was
originally meant to be a charge that is assessed based upon the net fixed asset value
of the Golf Complex as of September 1993, which at that point was about $1.5 million.
In 1996, the net asset value was increased to $15 million based upon a reassessment,
and the PILOT payment has been based on that value ever since. In 2005, however,
Council passed a new ordinance regarding PILOT that again referred to the net fixed
asset value as of 1993, and did not mention the 1996 revaluation. Assistant City
Manager Lisa Goldman finally responded to Chair Sullwold's May email request for an
explanation on November 1, 2011. She stated: ""In May 1996, the City performed an
appraisal which was to be used as the revised basis for the Golf Fund's annual
3
Golf Commission Minutes - Tuesday, November 8, 2011",GolfCommission/2011-11-08.pdf