body,date,page,text,path
CityofAlameda-ACTransitInteragencyLiaisonCommittee(ILC),2018-01-03,1,"Alameda/AC Transit Inter-Agency Liaison Committee
January 3, 2018 Meeting Notes
Attendees: President Ortiz, Chris Peeples, CM Ashcraft
AC Transit Ridership
Gail - Line 96 increase in ridership likely due the start of EasyPasses at the
collaborative
CM Ashcraft - why is transit ridership dropping
Line 51A
Capital improvements
Gail - bus stop relocations were a key to this project
Ortiz - what do we do to remedy customer complaints - how do we change culture?
Sal talked about courtesy
Ashcraft - how do we address pass-ups?
Robert - can't add buses and operators, but we can adjust fleet size
Sal - ride-a-line will come into affect
Peeples - can we put artics on the 51a?
Andrew Thomas - is there correlation between ridership and customer
complaints
Ashcraft - is there a correlation between customer feedback and ridership?
Peeples - if you compare complaints to ridership, the 51 could be the
lowest percentage of complaints
Ortiz - we take complaints such as no-shows very seriously
Thomas - if you add the Line 19 into the 51 ridership looks similar to what it was
before
Maria Gallo - alameda needs to increase its advertising of transit
Elsa - there will be marketing this year of transit (Gail concurred)
Tony Cuttner - the predictions are often inaccurate
Line 96
Gail explained the potential for extending Line 96 for employees at Alameda Point, but
need to keep the service cost neutral
Peeples - what is the employee population of Alameda Point compared to Marina
Village?",CityofAlameda-ACTransitInteragencyLiaisonCommittee(ILC)/2018-01-03.pdf
CityofAlameda-ACTransitInteragencyLiaisonCommittee(ILC),2018-01-03,2,"Andrew has reached out to Marina Village
Ashcraft - reach out to individual businesses include Alameda Unified; there is a
potential for younger riders due to the type of businesses available in Marina Village
Andrew - wants all of these businesses to be EasyPass holders
Ashcraft - willing to discuss with the school board; she is the liaison
Gail - line 19 could cover much of the loss of the 96
Andrew - can we issue easy passes to businesses outside of the buffer zones in easy
pass
Peeples - the premise for the buffer is to ensure that we don't issue
EasyPasses that the public won't use
Ashcraft - lime bikes can help with the first and last mile issues
Line 21
Gail - service is not hundred percent reliable
Ashcraft - has a reputation of being unreliable
Thomas - should we change approach and focus resources elsewhere?
Ortiz - only 8 passengers? Should we focus this much resource here?
Ashcraft - we were hoping that AC Transit would be a good solution to a change in the
parking policies
Ortiz - what is the harbor bay ridership
Michael G - about 600-700
Ortiz - how are they getting there?
Michael G - completing ridership survey shortly
250 parking spaces were filled; also walking or riding bikes
Ashcraft - charging for parking helps but it may not pay for the shuttle
Thomas - ferry passengers are coming from nearby; is the line 21 a correct solution?
Michael gougherty - people who aren't driving have other options. Parking policy can
better balance demand - hired cdm smith to conduct a parking fee study based on a
set of principles that WETA board approved. Harbor bay will be a pilot program to
meet the principles/goals. Hope to implement in August of 2018.
Elsa - does WETA have authority to charge parking?
Michael - yes, we have authority
Ashcraft - does not see an issue with this
Andrew - want to provide options
Gail - look into marketing all of the alternatives, including Line OX",CityofAlameda-ACTransitInteragencyLiaisonCommittee(ILC)/2018-01-03.pdf
CityofAlameda-ACTransitInteragencyLiaisonCommittee(ILC),2018-01-03,3,"Michael G - appreciate the effort to improve the service; and it is a difficult connection
to make with the ferry. Goal of the parking fee is to encourage other modes to connect
to the ferry.
AHSC
Moving forward this month
Looking for a larger bus for Llne W
High-street
Non-issue - buses are meeting regulations and the issue is the maintenance of the
bridge; need to check with the county to improve
AVL Status - testing the mini fleet right now
Ortiz - will we have our own app?
Sal - unsure. If there is an additional cost, then no
Ashcraft - target date
Mini fleet will start at the end of January for 30 days; start full installation in
February if mini-fleet is successful
Alameda Shuttle
Ortiz - do we have a cost for the shuttle proposal?
Kuttner - we have rough numbers but not exact
Ortiz - how would you finance?
Kuttner - need everyone to pay (businesses, residents) but free to the
end user. Need funding source to be consistent.
Peeples - everyone likes the shuttle, but only a third are willing to pay
Ashcraft - the study is supposed to look at funding sources and other planning
logistics
Kuttner - everyone wants this
Ashcraft - impressed with emery go-round service, but there is a cost
Maria Bella - commends the effort; AC transit is large, but this is what works for City of
Alameda
Kuttner - AC and Alameda will be cooperative
Transbay Tomorrow
Gail - commends AC Transit for the effort and is opposed Line OX
RM3 Update
Poll financed by MTC shows support for going forward
Ortiz - drive is to go with the June 2018 ballot",CityofAlameda-ACTransitInteragencyLiaisonCommittee(ILC)/2018-01-03.pdf
CityofAlameda-ACTransitInteragencyLiaisonCommittee(ILC),2018-01-03,4,"Kuttner - can we break out the complaints as a percentage of ridership?
Gail - city budget allows for an increase with Easy Pass program. Is Island
continuation or service sector employees an option?",CityofAlameda-ACTransitInteragencyLiaisonCommittee(ILC)/2018-01-03.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2018-01-03,1,"City of Alameda Page 1
Civil Service Board Minutes
Regular Meeting January 3, 2018
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE
CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA
WEDNESDAY, January 3, 2018
1.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 5:04 p.m. by Vice President Malloy.
2.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Vice President Marguerite Malloy, Members Jan Brandt, John Nolan,
Human Resources Director and Executive Secretary of the Civil Service
Board, Nancy Bronstein
ABSENT:
President Dean Batchelor, Member Troy Hosmer
STAFF PRESENT: Chris Low, Senior Human Resources Analyst
Sabina Netto, Human Resources Analyst II
Jessica Romeo, Human Resources Analyst I
Steven Woo, Human Resources Analyst I
Nafisah Ali, Administrative Technician II
Alan Cohen, Assistant City Attorney II
3.
MINUTES:
Approval of Minutes of the Regular meeting of October 18, 2017.
Member Brandt moved to accept the October 18, 2017 Minutes. Motion was
seconded by Member Nolan which was passed by a 3-0 vote.
4.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
4-A. SUMMARY REPORT FOR EXAMINATION ELIGIBLE LISTS AND
CLASSIFICATIONS FOR OCTOBER 18, 2017
4-A-i. ELIGIBLE LIST ESTABLISHED
DATE ESTABLISHED
EXAM NO.
(September 1, 2017 - November 30, 2017)",CivilServiceBoard/2018-01-03.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2018-01-03,2,"City of Alameda Page 2
Civil Service Board Minutes
Regular Meeting January 3, 2018
Assistant General Manager - Energy Resource
Planning
09/19/2017
2017-31
Construction Inspection & Survey Supervisor
11/16/2017
2017-3080-01
Executive Assistant - AMP
11/08/2017
2017-7003-01
Fire/Building Code Compliance Officer
10/24/2017
2017-2077-01
Firefighter
10/23/2017
2017-4500-01
Line Working Supervisor
09/18/2017
2017-24
Maintenance Worker I
10/19/2017
2017-2510-01
Senior Transportation Coordinator
11/15/2017
2017-3147-01
Utility Energy Analyst
10/30/2017
2017-7630-01
Police Officer
Addy, Jermaine
09/11/2017
2017-4040-02
Southwell, Beau
09/11/2017
2017-4040-02
Pirnie, Jaime
09/15/2017
2017-4057-02
Nemah, Patrick
09/15/2017
2017-4057-02
Migo, Leo
09/15/2017
2017-4057-02
Masuoka, Tim
09/15/2017
2017-4057-02
Gatti, Joshua
09/15/2017
2017-4057-02
Balaburova, Petya
09/15/2017
2017-4057-02
Yi, Tae
09/22/2017
2017-4057-02
Thau, Mikael
09/22/2017
2017-4057-02
Marques, Shawn
09/22/2017
2017-4057-02
Leyva, Anthony
09/22/2017
2017-4057-02
Han, Benny
09/22/2017
2017-4057-02
Diaz-Smitherman, Julian
09/22/2017
2017-4057-02
Alvarez, Serena
09/22/2017
2017-4057-02
Yamsuan, Jose
09/28/2017
2017-4057-02
Wright, Sydney
09/28/2017
2017-4057-02
Nunn Jr., Jason
09/28/2017
2017-4057-02
Kumar, Vaneesh
09/28/2017
2017-4057-02
Ha, Tuan
09/28/2107
2017-4057-02
Sun, Lu
10/12/2017
2017-4057-02
Lofthouse-Wolf, Cheyenne
10/12/2017
2017-4057-02
Hayes, Windrell
10/12/2017
2017-4057-02
Wood, Taylor
10/12/2017
2017-4040-01
Tozier, Evan
10/12/2017
2017-4040-01
Lee, Michael
10/12/2017
2017-4040-01
Shing-Chun, Harrison
10/13/2017
2017-4040-02
Vanderbilt, Michael
11/07/2017
2017-4040-01
Seaborn, Kalin
11/07/2017
2017-4040-01
Ly, Daivy
11/07/2017
2017-4040-01
Campana, Nicholas
11/07/2017
2017-4040-01
Villas, Benjamin
11/07/2017
2017-4057-02
Paracha, Samir
11/07/2017
2017-4057-02
Hayden, Christopher
11/07/2017
2017-4057-02
Bryant, Alanna
11/07/2017
2017-4057-02
Sutten, Tyler
11/09/2017
2017-4057-02
Saffarian, Dariush
11/09/2017
2017-4057-02
Saephan, Justin
11/09/2017
2017-4057-02
McCall, Dylan
11/09/2017
2017-4057-02
Kavehkar, Amber
11/09/2017
2017-4057-02
Blach, Garren
11/09/2017
2017-4057-02",CivilServiceBoard/2018-01-03.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2018-01-03,3,"City of Alameda Page 3
Civil Service Board Minutes
Regular Meeting January 3, 2018
Arrizon, Anna
11/09/2017
2017-4057-02
Stalker, Nicole
11/17/2017
2017-4057-02
Spieth, Trevor
11/17/2017
2017-4057-02
Rodriguez-Aguila, David
11/17/2017
2017-4057-02
Perez, Ivan
11/17/2017
2017-4057-02
Hadidian, Taylor
11/17/2017
2017-4057-02
Daspit, Jonathan
11/17/2017
2017-4057-02
Baker, Kyle
11/17/2017
2017-4057-02
Allington, Jacob
11/17/2017
2017-4057-02
Riosbaas, David
11/17/2017
2017-4040-01
Moore, Michael
11/17/2017
2017-4040-01
Kennedy, Joseph
11/17/2017
2017-4040-01
Gleese, Kenneth
11/17/2017
2017-4040-01
4-A-ii. ELIGIBLE LIST EXTENDED
DATE ESTABLISHED
EXAM NO.
Administrative Technician II
10/10/2016
2016-46
Custodian
11/28/2016
2016-53
Fire Captain
11/22/2016
2016-34
4-A-iii. ELIGIBLE LIST EXPIRED/
DATE ESTABLISHED
EXAM NO.
CANCELLED/EXHAUSTED
Account Clerk
05/24/2017
2017-19
Administrative Services Coordinator - AMP
05/11/2017
2017-15
City Engineer
03/03/2016
2016-02
Combination Building Inspector
08/31/2017
2017-3245-01
Customer Service Representative
04/26/2017
2017-18
Division Chief
09/23/2015
2015-16PR
Engineering Manager
04/26/2017
2017-14
Human Resources Analyst Il
11/14/2017
2017-1260-01
Human Resources Manager
11/02/2015
2015-70
Public Works Superintendent
01/30/2017
2016-64PR
Redevelopment Project Manager
10/20/2015
2015-52
Public Works Project Manager III
03/13/2017
2017-10PR
Utility Information Systems Billing Specialist
05/03/2017
2017-13
Utility Project Manager
05/09/2017
2017-07
4-A-iv. LIST OF SPECIFICATIONS
Existing Classification Specification Revision:
- None
New Classification Specifications:
-
Park Maintenance Supervisor
-
Park Maintenance Worker II
Vice President Malloy moved to approve Consent Calendar items 4-A-i, 4-A-ii, and
4-A-iii. Motion was seconded by Member Brandt, which was passed by a 3-0 vote.
Items under section 4-A-iv were pulled for further discussion. Per Member Nolan's
request, a copy of the Recreation and Parks Department organizational chart was passed.
out. HR Director Bronstein stated that she and HR Analyst Netto are working with the",CivilServiceBoard/2018-01-03.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2018-01-03,4,"REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
5-A. Activity Report - Period of September 1, 2017 through November 30, 2017
FULL-TIME HIRES
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION
9/13/17
Police
Crime Prevention Technician
9/18/17
Police
Police Officer
9/18/17
Community Development
Combination Building Inspector
9/19/17
Public Works
Maintenance Worker II (x2)
9/25/17
Recreation & Parks
Gardener
10/18/17
City Attorney
Assistant City Attorney Il
11/27/17
Finance
Intermediate Clerk
PROMOTIONS
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION
9/3/17
Fire
Fire Apparatus Operator
10/1/17
AMP
Line Working Supervisor
11/27/17
Human Resources
Human Resources Analyst II
11/28/17
Public Works
Public Works Supervisor
RETIREMENTS
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION
9/16/17
Police
Police Officer
9/30/17
Police
Police Sergeant
SEPARATIONS
DATE
DEPARTMENT
JOB CLASSIFICATION",CivilServiceBoard/2018-01-03.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2018-01-03,5,"City of Alameda Page 5
Civil Service Board Minutes
Regular Meeting January 3, 2018
9/12/17
Public Works
Maintenance Worker I
9/22/17
Public Works
Traffic Signal Maintenance Technician
10/3/17
Police
Police Officer
10/5/17
Finance
Intermediate Clerk
10/7/17
AMP
Meter Reader
10/26/17
Community Development
Administrative Technician I
10/28/17
AMP
Assistant General Manager -
Engineering & Operations
11/1/17
AMP
System Operator
5-B. Correction in Article VIII Section 3 of the Civil Service Rules
Vice President Malloy moved to accept the correction to the Civil Service Rules.
Motion was seconded by Member Brandt, which was passed by a 3-0 vote.
6.
GENERAL DISCUSSION OF CIVIL SERVICE RULES
Member Nolan asked for clarification on the Civil Service Rules Section 1e of Article VII
where it describes that those in a police academy or apprenticeship program may be
placed on an eligible list by the HR Director. HR Director Bronstein explained that Police
Officer Recruit is a part-time classification. Once the academy is completed in six (6)
months, they are moved into the full-time Police Officer position without a new
recruitment. HR Director Bronstein continued to explain that Firefighters are initially
hired in a full-time Firefighter position while attending the academy. She also explained
that apprentices are hired full-time then moved up. For example once the four (4) year
apprenticeship program for an Apprentice Lineworker is completed, they are moved into
the Lineworker classification.
Vice President Malloy stated that addressing updates and questions on the Civil Service
Rules may require several sessions. HR Director Bronstein agreed that it will be
beneficial to go piece by piece over multiple meetings so staff can go back and work on
the revisions and ultimately put together a final packet for Council approval.
Article I Section 2 - Vice President Malloy noted that Military or Veterans status was not
listed. HR Director Bronstein agreed it was important update the language in
accordance with the law.
Article II Section 1 - Vice President Malloy suggested update the language ""salary
increase"" and perhaps changing it to ""increase in compensation pay"" or ""increase in
wage rate"" because there are salaried and hourly paid employees.
Article II Section 3 - Vice President Malloy asked for clarification if appointments are
formerly made by Council. HR Director answered that Council approves the funding of
the position and the City Manager signs off on all the hires.
Article II Section 9 - Vice President Malloy would like to see a definition distinguishing
""employee"" and ""Civil Service Employee"". She also asked what makes someone ""legally",CivilServiceBoard/2018-01-03.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2018-01-03,6,"City of Alameda Page 6
Civil Service Board Minutes
Regular Meeting January 3, 2018
appointed"". HR Director Bronstein answered for a Civil Service position, it is a position
that Council has approved as part of the budget process. Positions are not filled if not
first approved by Council.
Article II Section 13 - Vice President Malloy would like to change ""no benefit
entitlement"" to ""not a Civil Service position"". HR Director Bronstein added that laws do
provide benefits so the language needs to be updated. Vice President Malloy was not
clear if the process of how part-time employees are selected was left out intentionally
from this section. HR Director Bronstein explained that someone fills out an application
for a specific part-time position then goes through an interview and reference check. So
it does not go through an opening and closing of a recruitment nor establishing an
eligible list. Vice President Malloy suggested perhaps adding the part-time hiring
process.
Article II Section 14 - Member Brandt thinks perhaps replacing ""permanent employee""
as no one is permanent in a position.
Article II Section 15 - Vice President Malloy would like to define the term ""position"" with
sub-categories such as part-time position or temporary position.
Article Il Section 17 - Vice President Malloy asked if it would be beneficial to add
language that speaks to the length of the probationary period. HR Director Bronstein
answered that since probationary periods are negotiated, they can reference this in the
section.
Article II Section 19 - Vice President Malloy would like to include the term ""promotional
exam"" in Article II Section 11 since it is listed in this section.
Article II Section 20 - Vice President Malloy would like to update the sentence to ""The
involuntary separation of an employee and would like to add language that the
employee is being separated from the position held verses just separating the
employee.
Article II Section 22 - Vice President Malloy would like to update the sentence to ""The
involuntary temporary separation.
""
Article II Section 23 - Vice President Malloy suggested to clarify the language which
describe a position that is being filled is of a limited duration verses a person filling the
position for a limited time.
Article II Section 24 - Vice President Malloy would like to see consistency when using
""separation"" verses ""discharge"" and changing ""work completion"" to ""work assignment"".
Assistant City Attorney Alan Cohen believes the second sentence is vague.
Article II Section 25 - Vice President Malloy understood this section to mean that an
employee can move from department to department if the position is similar. HR",CivilServiceBoard/2018-01-03.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2018-01-03,7,"City of Alameda Page 7
Civil Service Board Minutes
Regular Meeting January 3, 2018
Director Bronstein believe this section applies to positions that have similar
qualifications such as a Utility Accountant at AMP and an Accountant with the Finance
Department. One person can possibly move from one position to another without going
through a recruitment. The language overall was suggested to be reviewed for
clarification.
Article IV Section 1 - Vice President Malloy would like to see the term ""Position
Classification Plan"" defined in the document.
Article V Section 3 - Vice President Malloy would like to change ""salary range"" in the
second sentence to ""wage range"" or something similar since everyone is not paid on a
salary. She also wanted clarification on the second sentence on the usage of
""classification"".
Article VI Section 1 - Vice President Malloy noticed in the second paragraph that
references applications being signed by the applicant which is not applicable anymore.
There also needs to be an update on language on when an application is rejected. Vice
President Malloy asked if applicants are given notices of rejection. HR Director
Bronstein confirmed applicants will receive a notice letting them know they are not
selected.
Article VI Section 3 - Vice President Malloy asked if it is at the discretion of the HR
Director if applications are received after the time limit as described in the second
sentence. Assistant City Attorney Cohen added for due process purposes there should
be parameters established. HR Director Bronstein added that if one applicant is allowed
to amend their application then we allow all to amend in similar circumstances.
Article VI Section 4 - Vice President Malloy suggested updating the language for the
examination components.
Article VI Section 5 - Vice President Malloy wanted clarification for the term ""City
employees"" and whether that means part-time, full-time, or Civil Service employee. It
was agreed to update the language and to define ""promotional examination"" used in this
section.
Article VI Section 7 - Vice President Malloy suggested to update the language since
results of examinations are not ""posted"" anymore.
Article VII Section 6 - Vice President Malloy suggested adding that if you accept the job
your name will be removed off the eligible list if that is in fact the practice.
Article VIII Section 3 - Vice President Malloy asked if it may be beneficial to refer to the
probationary term as the number of hours worked verses months to help account for
those who are absent for a period of time. HR Director Bronstein responded that is
something to think about as there are overtime hours to consider as well. Assistant City
Attorney Cohen added that there would need to be a cross reference against the",CivilServiceBoard/2018-01-03.pdf
CivilServiceBoard,2018-01-03,8,"City of Alameda Page 8
Civil Service Board Minutes
Regular Meeting January 3, 2018
various MOUs and Municipal Code that reference the probationary period.
Article VIII Section 4 - Vice President Malloy asked if the second paragraph is intended
to allow someone to go back to their ""held position"" or only if they've tenured in the
position. HR Director responded said they will look at the language to clarify. Member
Nolan asked if there is a time limit to re-hire an employee. HR Director Bronstein
answered that once the promotional probationary period is complete and the disciplinary
action resulting in discharge occurs after this period, they do not have return rights.
Article VIII Section 5 - Assistant City Attorney Cohen suggested updating the language
that refers to arbitrary termination since someone cannot be arbitrarily terminated.
Article VIII Section 6 - Vice President Malloy wanted clarification on what happens to an
eligibility list if no one is hired from the list and whether you can bring back a temporary
person if it exceeds one (1) year. It was suggested to look at temporary verses
provisional language for this section.
Article IX Section 1 - Vice President Malloy suggested updating the language that a
transfer can happen at any time to a transfer can happen based on departmental needs.
HR Director Bronstein said all the above changes will be worked on where it can be
brought back and reviewed again.
7.
CIVIL SERVICE BOARD COMMUNICATIONS (COMMUNICATIONS FROM STAFF)
Assistant City Manager, Liz Warmerdam gave a presentation about the City's housing,
traffic, infrastructure, and the A1 bond measure addressing affordable housing. There has
been outreach to various boards and commissions, as well as surveys given to the public
about what is going on in the community and what issues are a priority to them.
8.
CONFIRMATION OF NEXT CIVIL SERVICE BOARD MEETING
The April meeting was confirmed for Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 5:00 PM. The July 4th
meeting was postponed to July 11th.
9.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 5:58 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Nancy Bronstein, Human Resources Director
and
Executive Secretary to the Civil Service Board",CivilServiceBoard/2018-01-03.pdf
PublicArtCommission,2018-01-03,1,"APPROVED MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
CITY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC ART COMMISSION
Wednesday, January 3, 2018 6:00PM
1. ROLL CALL
Present: Chairman Daniel Hoy, Mark Farrell, Adam Gillitt
2. MINUTES
Approved. Motion made by Adam Gillitt and seconded by Mark Farrell 2nd. The motion carried,
3-0.
3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
4. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
4-A 2017-5039: Public Art Selection Panels. A request to appoint members to the Ad Hoc Public Art
Commission Committees.
Ms. Amanda Gehrke, Economic Development staff, gave a presentation on the proposal evaluation
process and the role of the selection panel. Ms. Gehrke explained that there will be two selection
panels, one for Cultural Arts and Arts Programming and the other for Physical Art, and both will have
five members: two from the Public Arts Commission and three will be outside members.
Ms. Gehrke then explained the process for recommending the outside members, gave a short
background for each of the recommended panelists, and asked for the PAC to appoint the
recommended panelists to the selections panel.
Ms. Gehrke also asked for approval a change to the Cultural Arts' selection panel: removing
Commissioner Brandy Graham and adding Commissioner Mark Farrell, per Commissioner Graham's
request.
Following Ms. Gehrke's presentation to Commissioners there were follow-up questions and answers
Commissioner asked: Where will the finalists be displayed?
Ms. Gehrke responded that the location is still to be determined.
Commissioner asked: Do all six panel members live in Alameda?
Ms. Gehrke responded that all but one of the recommended panelists live in Alameda.
Commissioner Gillitt asked if there will be 3 finalist per funding level?
Ms. Gehrke responded that yes, there would be 3 finalists per funding level.
Page 1 of 2
DRAFT MINUTES
PUBLIC ART COMMISSION
January 3, 2018",PublicArtCommission/2018-01-03.pdf
PublicArtCommission,2018-01-03,2,"Public Speaker(s):
Brett Pedersen, a local resident and artist expressed support for the program and offered support in
assisting in some fashion.
Public Comments closed
Commissioner Gillitt made a motion to appoint the recommended panelists, including the appointment
of Commissioner Farrell to the Cultural Arts panel to replace Commissioner Graham.
Commissioner Farrell seconded the motion.
The motion carried 3-0.
4-B 2017-5051: Staff Presentation on Repairing Alameda's Aging Infrastructure and Related Survey
Lois Butler, Economic Development Manager, began by asking if the panel if they've taken the
infrastructure survey and asked about familiarity of the survey. All members were aware of the survey.
She explained that the survey tool and the presentation is online to view.
5. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Butler stated she is the new secretary as of this meeting
6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Butler stated there was written communication via email about the Buena Vista Avenue Public Art.
7. COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman Daniel Hoy thanked Mark Farrell for being there.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 of 2
DRAFT MINUTES
PUBLIC ART COMMISSION
January 3, 2018",PublicArtCommission/2018-01-03.pdf