body,date,page,text,path
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,1,"MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- MARCH 5, 2013- 7:00 P.M.
Mayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 7:04 p.m. Councilmember Chen led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL -
Present:
Councilmembers Chen, Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Tam
and Mayor Gilmore - 5.
Absent:
None.
AGENDA CHANGES
(13-079) Mayor Gilmore announced that the Public Hearing [paragraph no. 13-092 was
continued to March 19, 2013.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY & ANNOUNCEMENTS
(13-080) Mayor Gilmore read a statement regarding the season of non-violence word of
the day: hope.
(13-081) Proclamation Declaring March as Red Cross Month.
Mayor Gilmore read and presented the Proclamation to Harry Hartman, Red Cross.
(13-082) Proclamation Declaring March through May 2013 as Historic Preservation
Season.
Mayor Gilmore read and presented the Proclamation to Judith Lynch, Historical
Advisory Board; Robbie Dileo, Alameda Museum; and Jim Smallman.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Tam moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote
- 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph
number.]
(*13-083) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on February
5, 2013. Approved.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
1
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,2,"(*13-084) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,513,672.40.
(*13-085) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period
Ending September 30, 2012. Accepted.
(*13-086) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ended
December 31, 2012. Accepted.
(*13-087) Resolution No. 14776, ""Changing the Authorized Signors for
the City's Investment in the State's Local Agency Investment Fund."" Adopted.
(*13-088) Ordinance No. 3063, ""Approving and Authorizing Conveyance by Grant Deed
of Meyers House Museum and Garden Located at 2021 Alameda Avenue, to the
Alameda Museum, a Non-Profit Corporation."" Finally passed.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(13-089) Resolution No. 14777, ""Appointing La Donna Franco as a Member of the
Commission on Disability Issues.' Adopted;
(13-089 A) Resolution No. 14778, ""Appointing Judith Frugé as a Member of the
Commission on Disability Issues."" Adopted.
Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Chen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented a Certificate of
Appointment to Ms. Franco.
(13-090) Recommendation to: (1) Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Letter of
Support to the United States Navy for Modification to the Surplus Determination of Land
at the Former Naval Air Station Alameda; (2) Approve a Non-Binding Term Sheet
between the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the City of Alameda
in Substantial Conformance with the Proposed Term Sheet.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a brief presentation.
Mayor Gilmore inquired who currently owns the land being discussed, to which the
Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the U.S. Navy.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the Navy is contemplating a deal with the VA, which is
another federal entity.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the affirmative.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,3,"Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the transaction could go forward whether or not the
City of Alameda agrees with proceeding.
George Schlossberg, Outside Counsel, responded in the affirmative; stated property
held by the United States (U.S.) is available for federal missions; the City negotiated a
road map in 2000, which allows the City to acquire and develop surplus property; last
year, there was a boundary change and the City agreed to absorb the submerged land,
which was originally planned to go to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&WS);
when USF&WS dropped out, the Navy was looking for a way to satisfy its obligations
and the City agreed to accept the land, which will be part of the next conveyance; the
action tonight is part of the on-going boundary adjustments.
Mayor Gilmore stated that as the owners of the land, the U.S. is entitled to decide what
happens with the land; the U.S. could decide to transfer custody to another federal
entity, such as the VA, or could decide to transfer the land to the City; inquired whether
the City does not have a say in the custodial change from one federal agency to another
federal agency.
Mr. Schlossberg responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Tam stated the Council has received letters expressing concern about
public outreach and participation; requested staff to explain when the change was
contemplated and the extent of the public outreach; stated the City received a notice
about the project from the VA about two meetings which would be held on March 14th
on the USS Hornet; issues have been raised about accessibility for the disabled,
particularly disabled veterans; inquired whether there is any opportunity to provide City
facilities, which might be more accessible.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the project has been underway
for over two years; the Biological Opinion released in August 2012 addresses the
modified VA project; the matter has been in the news and there has been public
discussion; tonight is the first public hearing before the City Council in open session;
USF&WS has done outreach to environmental organizations; the decision to hold the
meetings on the USS Hornet was made by the Navy and VA; the City discussed using
the O'Club; stated the VA could explain why the USS Hornet was selected.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she hopes the Navy and VA would reconsider
holding the meetings on the USS Hornet; the meetings should be as publically
accessible as possible.
Larry Jaynes and Richard Crowe, VA, gave a brief presentation and showed Power
Point slides.
Mayor Gilmore inquired whether Mr. Crowe operated the USS Hornet lift, to which Mr.
Crowe responded that he watched the lift being operated; stated a lift operator would be
present at the meetings.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,4,"Councilmember Tam stated although the lift makes the USS Hornet accessible, uneven
surfaces on board would be difficult for people with mobility issues; inquired whether the
venue could be changed or if an additional meeting could be held at a City facility, which
is more disabled friendly.
Mr. Crowe responded setting logistics for the acquisition process takes many weeks or
even months.
Councilmember Tam stated the City would offer assistance.
Mr. Crowe noted the Congress sets the federal acquisition process.
The City Manager stated Congress would not need to approve scheduling another
meeting to satisfy community concerns; suggested either moving the meetings off of the
USS Hornet or scheduling an additional meeting at another location to allow everyone
to attend.
Mr. Crowe stated the USS Hornet is ADA accessible and the area on board being used
is flat; scheduling another meeting could be discussed.
Mayor Gilmore suggested that the VA agree to hold another meeting at an alternate site
to let the public provide additional input.
Mr. Jaynes noted a meeting was held on the USS Hornet in 2008; continued his
presentation.
Councilmember Chen inquired what would happen to the site if the Least Terns move to
another location or are taken off the endangered list.
Mr. Jaynes responded currently, the VA has no plans to develop the rest of the site.
In response to Councilmember Chen's inquiry regarding the Biological Opinion, Mr.
Jaynes stated the VA has to live by the terms of the Biological Opinion in perpetuity;
stated the VA could go through the process of asking for another Biological Opinion in
the future if the Least Tern is de-listed; at this time, there is no indication the VA would
do so.
Councilmember Chen inquired how the process works and what would trigger a request
for another Biological Opinion.
Mr. Jaynes responded the VA would have to want to do something on the property; the
current planning addresses northern Alameda County's needs; that he is not aware of
additional need.
Councilmember Chen inquired whether the VA would use bunkers for storage space
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,5,"and land for emergency drills in the off-season [when Least Terns are not breeding].
Laura Kelly, VA, responded the plan for emergency management would be to do drills
only on the developed site; there are no plans to do training on the undeveloped
property; in the event of a national emergency, the Alameda Point location would allow
supplies and people to be moved using the water; if training occurs, it would be every
14 months and would not be during the Least Tern breeding season; the VA would be
respectful of residents during training.
Councilmember Chen expressed concern about training involving large equipment and
helicopters, which could disturb the Least Tern; inquired how the VA would focus on the
effectiveness of the drill and still be sensitive to the Least Tern.
Ms. Kelly stated VA exercises are not like the Department of Defense (DOD) exercises
involving large equipment; the VA exercises involve moving simulated patients; staff
members practice moving simulated patients into the clinic and staging the patients; in
an emergency, Moffett Field is the primary location and Alameda would be the next area
if something happens to Moffett Field; equipment would be simulated during exercises;
the cost of using equipment for exercises is not conceivable.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Biological Opinion mentions the emergency
training exercises and using the bunkers for emergency supplies; however, specifics are
not included; inquired whether the 250 on-site personnel would be the only participants
in the emergency training exercises or whether outside personnel would participate;
further inquired how many people would participate in the training.
Ms. Kelly responded the participants are all VA staff volunteers; the entire staff does not
volunteer and there would be 75 to 100 participants at most.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether staff from other areas would attend, to
which Ms. Kelly responded that she would hope staff would come from other VA
facilities, but the budget would prevent outside personnel from attending training every
14 months; further stated three bunkers would be retained for storage.
In response to Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry regarding items in storage, Ms. Kelly
stated storage would be used to hold: cots, blankets, emergency generators, water and
items which would not require expiration dates to be checked.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the training exercise would be coordinated
with local emergency responders.
Ms. Kelly responded the San Francisco VA Medical Center is the federal coordinating
center for the Bay Area and has agreements with 30 hospitals; the hospitals would not
move patients to Alameda Point, but would prepare to accept patients requiring greater
care.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,6,"Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,7,"USF&WS could not move forward; then, the Navy started working with the VA.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the VA objects to designating an area as a
wildlife refuge.
Mr. Jaynes responded the VA has no intent of creating a national wildlife refuge at
Alameda Point; the matter is out the VA's control.
Mayor Gilmore stated the VA is negotiating with USF&WS to maintain the undeveloped
land; inquired what the VA's stance would be if USF&WS decides designating the
property as a national wildlife refuge is appropriate.
Mr. Jaynes responded that he is not sure; the matter has not come up before; the VA
does not intend to ask USF&WS to do so.
Mayor Gilmore stated Alameda residents and the City Council could lobby USF&WS to
make the area a wildlife refuge; the matter might be worth internal discussion at the VA.
Mr. Jaynes concurred; stated the matter should be discussed with USF&WS.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there is a reason a wildlife refuge would not
be a good neighbor to the VA, to which Mr. Jaynes responded the appearance would be
similar to current conditions.
In response to Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's further inquiry, Mr. Jaynes stated that he
believes there are reasons USF&WS never designated the area a national wildlife
refuge; the City should ask USF&WS said question.
Councilmember Chen stated that he likes the proposed map; however, there is no
guarantee the map will remain the same after 10, 20 or 50 years; noted that he is
proposing a resolution designating the undeveloped area as a wildlife refuge; inquired
whether the VA would object to the resolution.
Mr. Jaynes stated the VA is not here to support a wildlife refuge; supporting a wildlife
refuge is not the VA's purpose; stated the comments are valid and would be better
addressed as part of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental
Assessment (EA); noted experts would be present to answer questions.
Councilmember Chen requested staff to explain the staff report mentioning that the non-
binding term sheet is an agreement to take actions with regard to: infrastructure, site
access and transit.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated the term sheet contemplates future
agreements that the City and VA would enter into, which would most likely be
easements; provided examples of potential future access and utility easements.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,8,"Councilmember Chen inquired whether the letter of support legally binds the City to a
particular course of action.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the negative.
Mr. Schlossberg stated the VA's project is undergoing environmental review; until the
review is done, the VA cannot proceed; the City also needs to do environmental review;
neither party can enter into binding agreements at this time; the federal government
wants to know the City's view, however, the actions are unilateral; hopefully, the federal
government will continue to cooperate with, and listen to, the City and take the City's
interests into account; the ability to exclude the 74 acres is a unilateral action; the
nature of the action tonight is not binding and is cooperation between two governments;
binding agreements may come about from the action tonight after full NEPA and
California Environmental Review Act (CEQA) review.
Councilmember Chen stated the letter has two components: 1) redrawing the VA
undeveloped area boundary; and 2) the City asking the VA for help with infrastructure
and access; inquired what guarantees the City will have that by supporting the Navy
giving the VA the 74 acres, the City hopes to save millions of dollars in public access
and infrastructure.
Mr. Schlossberg responded neither side can give binding commitments until both sides
complete environmental review; the cooperative effort is born out of geography; to
access the federal parcel, the VA will travel through the City and Alameda residents will
travel through the VA property to access the park area; there is a mutual interest;
everything is subject to change as the environmental documents proceed, public
comment is received and alternatives are raised.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the staff report indicates the term sheet includes VA
coordination with the local transit authority; inquired whether the local transit authority is
AC Transit or the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded AC Transit.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the term sheet states: the VA shall contact the local
transit authority to seek to obtain extended public transit services to the facilities at no
additional costs to the VA and subject to the applicable federal law and the availability of
funds; inquired whether doing more than is listed in the term sheet is possible; and
whether the VA could operate a shuttle bus; stated 250 VA employees will serve around
543 patients during the weekdays and around 70 patients on weekends; in addition,
there will be special events with from 1,000 to 5,000 attendees; individual cars would be
a burden; the clause does not go far enough.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the non-binding term sheet is a
road map for how the two agencies coordinate together; City staff wanted to include
something about transit; the City is reviewing the VA's environmental document and will
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,9,"submit comments addressing transit.
Mr. Jaynes stated the VA is concerned about transportation to the facility; the VA staff
met with AC Transit staff on July 24, 2012 to review the demographics of the staff,
patients and trips; AC Transit staff indicated the route to Alameda Point could be
extended; the VA's architect designed a bus stop as part of the project; the VA will have
to submit an application to the AC Transit Board for rerouting the bus line in 11/2 to 2
years; further stated the VA will run a shuttle during the clinic's hours of operation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Biological Opinion references the City working with
East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD); that she has great concern and objection to
doing anything with EBRPD while the District is suing the City; inquired whether the
references in the Biological Opinion commit the City to any actions.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the statements do not commit
the City; stated the 150 acre park is discussed; however, a particular service provider is
not identified; the USF&WS has to approve the provider to ensure capability to operate
adjacent to an endangered species colony; nothing in the Biological Opinion or term
sheet commit the City to work with a specific provider.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there is reference to EBRPD holding a conservation
easement over the undeveloped land; that she does not believe the conservation
easement is still being considered; inquired whether or not the easement is being
considered.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded that she understands there
have been numerous conversations between USF&WS and the VA about placing a
conservation easement on federal land; a determination was made that the federal
government cannot place a conservation easement on its own land.
In response to Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry regarding the Biological Opinion
restricting the number of ferry crossings, the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point
stated Water Emergency Transit Authority (WETA) plans to lease land from the City; the
ferries stationed at the site would leave and return through the breakwater gap; the
breakwater gap might also be used if the ferry terminal is moved to the sea plane
lagoon; the language was included to build in flexibility.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the City faces risks due to a statement in
the term sheet about the VA access road being subject to the availability of funds.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded the entire VA project is subject
to the availability of funds; stated presumably, the VA would not start the project or road
construction if funds are not available.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted the clause was not included in other areas of the term
sheet.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,10,"The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated there is some risk.
The City Manager noted the VA is not included in the current sequestration.
Expressed concern with holding the meetings on the USS Hornet and urged future
meetings be held in ADA friendly locations: Audrey Lord-Hausman, Commission on
Disability Issues.
Urged changes be better explained, adequate time be provided, and there be
opportunity for meaningful public participation: Kate Quick, League of Women Voters
(submitted letter).
Urged the VA meetings and public input take place prior to Council sending the support
letter: Joe Van Winkle, Alameda.
Urged the term sheet and letter of support not be approved unless language is added to
protect the wildlife habitat: Irene Dieter, Alameda.
Opposed giving up park land; urged a longer review period and additional meetings be
held in other locations: Jon Spangler, Alameda.
Urged that the Community Reuse Plan be followed, the 512 acres be designated as a
wildlife preserve and the letter of support be delayed: Jane Sullwold, Alameda.
Questioned the the VA being able to close the trail for national security reasons; stated
species other than the Least Tern should be considered, such as the Burrowing Owl:
urged the vision be discussed more and a statement be added that the VA would look
out for all wildlife: Richard Bangert, Alameda.
Expressed concern with holding the meeting on USS Hornet; and urged a longer review
period: Carol Gottstein, Alameda.
Urged that the City not consent to the 74 acres, which were supposed to be transferred
to the City, being transferred to the VA; stated the Economic Development Conveyance
is binding a contract: Robert Sullwold, Alameda.
Urged approval of staff report Alternate 2, which is a good compromise to balance
growth and protect wildlife; stated that she supports designating the undeveloped area
as a wildlife refuge: Karen Bey, Alameda.
Expressed concern with sending a letter of support since the Council solicited the VA
two years ago, which seems like a conflict of interest, and urged better use of the
waterfront: Ferda Martin, Alameda.
Councilmember Tam noted that the Golden Gate Audubon Society and Sierra Club
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,11,"approached the City Council in 2011 advocating that the Council speak to the VA about
better ways to protect the Least Tern colony and find ways to configure the VA project
to be more protective of the birds; the issue is being considered by the VA due to the
City Council representing the environmental community.
The City Manager inquired whether the Council discussion two years ago about the
project would constitute a conflict of interest, to which the City Attorney responded in the
negative; stated a conflict of interest arises if a particular Councilmember has a financial
interest in the outcome.
Councilmember Chen inquired whether the language on the agenda complies with the
Sunshine Ordinance.
The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated the agenda items have to allow a
person of average intelligence to understand the matter being discussed; the language
on the agenda adequately gave notice; anyone interested in additional information could
have read the staff report, which was available when the agenda was published.
In response to Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry regarding the relationship between
the March 14th environmental hearings and the Council action tonight, the Chief
Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated the Navy and VA released a joint, draft
Environmental Assessment (EA); meetings are being held to discuss and receive
comments on the EA, which is part of the standard NEPA process; the term sheet lays
out a project road map, which is subject to environmental review; the finalized NEPA
and CEQA documents may change the results of the final agreement; following
environmental review, staff will return to Council with binding agreements, such as
easements.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what the City would do with the comments by the
public and City Council as the process moves forward.
The City Manager responded the process is a federal process, not a City process; staff
wanted VA staff present tonight to hear the comments firsthand.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether staff would not be summarizing the issues
and concerns raised.
The City Manager responded that staff does not intend to summarize issues and
concerns beyond the meeting minutes, which can be forwarded to the VA.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like to see more description of transit
options; the VA representative addressed communications with AC Transit and future
steps; that she was hoping to capture said comments.
The City Manager stated the City has the right to comment on the environmental
document; staff intends to submit comments consistent with the Council discussion
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
11
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,12,"tonight.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the comments would be on the Biological
Opinion or the EA.
The City Manager responded the EA.
Mayor Gilmore noted various City departments would be providing comments; Public
Works would comment on transit.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a park would still be located in the
Northwest Territories, to which the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded
in the affirmative; stated 250 acres of parks and open space are being contemplated on
the land which is intended to come to the City; said land does not include the 511 acres
of preserve area on the rest of the property.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the City's park area is along the waterfront,
to which the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated opening up public access to the waterfront is exciting.
The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated the City anticipates having an
access easement around the VA site and having a Bay Trail around the Northwest
Territories.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the land does not belong to the City yet; the public has
weighed in on the clinic and columbarium; read from the September 10, 2010 Alameda
Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Resolution (ARRA), which solidifies her motivation
to move forward with the staff recommendation; stated Veteran causes need to be
supported; the ARRA resolution indicates the VA project will create local construction,
permanent jobs and have a positive impact on local revenues.
Councilmember Chen stated that he would request the Council to consider delaying the
letter of support so that it will coincide with the wildlife refuge resolution being
considered on March 19th and to give the public time to study the staff report and EA.
Councilmember Daysog stated there is enthusiasm for the VA clinic and columbarium;
ideally all issues would be resolved; that he supports having such a facility in Alameda.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation; stated the City
Council and City staff can work on issues raised; the wildlife refuge resolution can
happen independent of the action tonight.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Tam stated that she would not support the motion;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
12
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,13,"that she concurs with Councilmember Chen; stated the letter of support and non-binding
term sheet are essentially a comment on the EA being considered at the March 14th
meetings; from a timing standpoint, including the matter as part of the City's comments
on the EA would be more organized and consolidated.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes:
Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, and Mayor Gilmore - 3.
Noes:
Councilmembers Chen and Tam - 2.
(13-091) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease
Amendment with the Artemis Racing, USA Extending Their Current Lease for Up to One
Year in Building 12 Located at 1050 West Tower, a Portion of Taxiway H and Access to
the Seaplane Lagoon at Alameda Point. Introduced.
The Economic Development Division Manager gave a brief presentation; mentioned the
Luna Rossa team would also be locating at Alameda Point.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft suggested the Luna Rossa team give a presentation.
Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved introduction of the ordinance.
Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(13-092) Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution to Certify a Final Environmental
Impact Report (EIR), Introduction of an Ordinance to Amend the Alameda Municipal
Code for the North Park Street Planning Area, and a Resolution to Approve
Amendments to the Design Review Manual Regulating Development Within the Area
Bounded by the Oakland-Alameda Estuary, Tilden Way, Lincoln Avenue, and Oak
Street. Continued to March 19, 2013.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(13-093) The City Manager announced that staff reached tentative agreements with the
Fire Managers and Police Managers Associations on the outstanding issue; the contact
would be brought to Council and job description changes would be presented to the
Civil Service Board prior to the contracts commencing on July 1st.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
None.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
13
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf
CityCouncil,2013-03-05,14,"COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(13-094) Mayor Gilmore made announcements about Councilmembers serving on
regional boards; stated that she would bring the matter back at the next meeting.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the Alameda County Associated Community
Action Program (ACAP) still exists, to which Councilmember Tam responded in the
negative; stated ACAP dissolved.
(13-095) Councilmember Tam announced that she attended the East Bay Division
League of California Cities meeting; provided meeting highlights; further announced that
she, along with Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft and Chen, attended the Beltline Tour
organized by the Recreation Director; and that she and Councilmember Daysog
attended the 30th Anniversary Memorial for Robert Davey, Junior.
(13-096) Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she, along with the Mayor and
Councilmembers Tam and Daysog, attended the grand opening of the Ala Costa Center
at Little John Park.
(13-097) Councilmember Chen announced that he attended the Alameda County
Transportation Commission retreat on behalf of Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft.
ADJOURNMENT
(13-098) There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 9:46
p.m. in memory of Ryan Kellogg.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
14
March 5, 2013",CityCouncil/2013-03-05.pdf