body,date,page,text,path
CityCouncil,2008-05-27,1,"MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- - -MAY 27, 2008- - -6:00 P. M.
Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:12 p.m.
Councilmember Gilmore led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers
deHaan,
Gilmore,
Matarrese, Tam and Mayor Johnson - 5.
Absent :
None.
(08-228) Workshop on the City's Two-year Financial Plan and
Capital Improvement Projects for Fiscal Years 2008-10.
The City Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Johnson raised questions about the decline in housing sales.
Councilmember deHaan inquired what is the surcharge for Alameda
Power & Telecom (AP&T), to which the City Manager responded the
amount would be provided.
The City Manager continued the presentation.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether there is a portion of the Public
Works' budget, such as the sewer fund, that should be removed from
the General Fund, similar to Planning and Building.
The City Manager responded portions of the Public Works' budget
that come from other funds are incorporated in the General Fund;
stated staff keeps track of said funds.
Mayor Johnson stated including the funds makes the General Fund
look larger.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the funds cannot be spent on other
things.
The City Manager stated the matter could be explored.
Mayor Johnson requested that the suggestion be reviewed.
Vice Mayor Tam raised questions about revenues from parking and
speeding tickets.
The City Manager continued the presentation.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there is a breakdown of the
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
1
May 27, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-05-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-05-27,2,"transfers from other departments, to which the Finance Director
responded the amount could be provided.
Councilmember deHaan stated AP&T has the Utility Users Tax and
franchise fees; inquired whether the total amount of what AP&T
brings in is available.
The Finance Director responded that she could provide said amount.
The City Manager continued the presentation.
Mayor Johnson requested information on whether Police Department
overtime is due to the five unfilled positions.
Vice Mayor Tam requested an explanation of the disparity between
the cost to run the animal shelters at San Leandro and Alameda.
questioned whether there is the same level of service and whether
the one time donation will offset a significant portion of the
cost.
Council requested information on trends and projections of animal
shelter donations.
Regarding the animal shelter donation, Councilmember deHaan
requested information on investing the $270,000.
Councilmember Matarrese requested staff to review whether there is
any capacity in the animal shelter for people outside the City to
contract for the City's service.
Councilmember Gilmore inquired exactly how much is being saved by
reducing one Senior Dispatcher position; stated that before she
agrees to cut the position, she would like information about where
the City was and is now, and what trade-offs are involved.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the presentation talked about
guiding principles; in the past when the City was squeezed, the
Council said that it wanted to flatten the organization as a
policy; he would like the Council to consider said direction;
instead of taking from the point of service delivery, upper
management should be reviewed; people still would be supervised but
management would be consolidated; the delivery of internal versus
external services should be reviewed; the tip should go to
protecting external delivery of service; the City can live with
internal delivery of service slowing down; that he wants to ensure
that the Council reviews giving said direction as a policy or
principle; police and fire are delivering services on the street ;
he does not believe in across the board reductions if services
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
May 27, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-05-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-05-27,3,"delivered to the street are impacted.
Mayor Johnson stated a city in Alameda County has a contract to
provide jail services [to other cities ] ; inquired whether the City
could look at doing the same.
Vice Mayor Tam stated the Council should identify priority issues
that should be restored if additional savings can be found in other
parts of the budget, such as the Golf rebate on the ROI (Return on
Investments), the animal shelter, the Meyer's House, furloughing
during the holidays, or some of the other revenue enhancement
proposals that will be discussed; a way should be found to restore
direct services.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he has concerns about overtime
reduction; the past record has been flat; inquired how much the
percentage will be brought down from 4.3% and the amount that will
be saved.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he wants to be told if the
Police Chief recommends funding police officer and dispatch
positions; Council can figure out what has to go if positions
should be funded; that he would like to hear from department heads
if the City cannot do without positions the experts responsible
for the department need to inform Council what positions are really
needed and the budget needs to be worked back from that.
Mayor Johnson stated the cuts assume a 0% pay increase. ; said
assumption might not be what occurs; the issue should be considered
unless staff is confident that a 0% pay increase is a correct
assumption.
The City Manager continued the presentation.
Councilmember Matarrese requested a description of the two Fire
Department workforce changes.
Councilmember Gilmore stated overtime varies from day to day; that
she wants to know how it is managed under the scenario and how
mutual aid works under the scenario; that she is going to have to
see how the proposal works.
Councilmember deHaan stated more in depth information on call back
overtime is needed; inquired whether other municipalities have
adopted something similar [rotating fire station closures]
The City Manager responded other cities have done it on a short-
term basis.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
May 27, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-05-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-05-27,4,"Councilmember deHaan stated response time would be impacted
inquired whether there would be an active truck at each station.
The City Manager stated the information would be provided by the
Fire Chief; continued the presentation.
Following Council discussion regarding retaining Park Directors,
the City Manager stated the issue would be placed on the issue bin.
Mayor Johnson stated the tennis court light issue needs to be
addressed a lit court is needed on the eastern part of Alameda.
Vice Mayor Tam stated that she objects to eliminating the Senior
Clerk position which provides direct service to the community;
inquired whether costs of other programs could be reduced; raised
questions about the Meyer's House.
Councilmember Matarrese requested staff to explore relinquishing
the Meyer's House back to the trust.
Mayor Johnson stated the Council should adopt a resolution saying
that City money will not be used to subsidize the Meyer's House ;
further stated the Meyer's House should be moved out of
Recreation's budget and the funds should remain in Recreation.
Councilmember Gilmore clarified Mayor Johnson is suggesting the
amount [$25,000] that the City is subsidizing the Meyer's House
should remain in the Recreation and Parks Department's budget.
Councilmember deHaan requested staff to provide the total amount
spent on special events.
Mayor Johnson stated elimination of the Golf surcharge and Return
on Investment (ROI) needs to be discussed; stated not continuing
the surcharge in some form is seriously impacting the budget.
Councilmember deHaan questioned why staffing levels cannot get back
to the level five years ago; stated all departments should look at
why growth occurred.
The City Manager stated the matter was captured on the issue bin;
continued the presentation.
Councilmember Matarrese questioned whether not funding two Public
Works maintenance workers really saves money; inquired whether
maintenance would be impacted and whether the City would be adding
to its deferred maintenance.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
May 27, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-05-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-05-27,5,"Mayor Johnson stated funds that are not discretionary should be
removed from the General Fund or shown as discretionary and non-
discretionary.
The City Manager continued the presentation.
Mayor Johnson requested staff to provide information on how much
the refinancing would save per year and how much it would cost the
City; stated the net amount should be provided.
Councilmember deHaan stated some bonds have been previously
refinanced he would like to know when the bonds were refinanced
and the cost.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the issue strikes him as a guiding
principle; that he does not mind refinancing debt for hard assets;
that he objects to borrowing money for operations; he would like
Council to consider said policy.
Councilmember deHaan stated staffing increased proportionally
through all departments in 1997 when the City took over the former
Naval Air Station; he would like the numbers reviewed more in
depth.
Mayor Johnson stated a formal request should be made to the Navy to
request payment for police and fire service at the Base; the City
cannot afford to pay for the service.
Following Vice Mayor Tam's questions regarding redevelopment funds,
the City Manager stated information would be provided.
Vice Mayor Tam requested the information be posted on the City's
website.
The City Manager continued the presentation.
Councilmember deHaan raised questions about the Planning and
Building Department moving into the Carnegie Building.
Following discussion of uses of permit fees, the City Manager
stated additional information would be provided.
Mayor Johnson requested when changes for window permits are made,
the matter should be placed on a Council agenda.
Councilmember deHaan requested more detailed information on the
amount of General Fund reserves available and loaned out.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
May 27, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-05-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-05-27,6,"Mayor Johnson and Councilmember deHaan requested a formal policy
restricting use of the General Fund reserve for one-time purposes.
The City Manager continued the presentation.
Mayor Johnson stated there is not a real reserve because there are
outstanding obligations are not being paid for; the budget needs to
acknowledge said obligations.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he would like to know the current
amount of deferred maintenance what the City is facing should be
included in the budget.
The City Manager continued the presentation.
Mayor Johnson questioned whether there is more that can be done now
to balance the Golf budget requested a report on the status of
using the reserves for operating expenses; stated there should be a
report to the Council; further stated direction should be given to
the Golf Commission that the Council expects the Commission to come
up with a short-term - plan.
Councilmember Gilmore suggested holding another joint meeting with
the Golf Commission.
Mayor Johnson stated two Councilmembers could work with the Golf
Commission if scheduling a meeting is difficult.
The City Manager suggested that the Golf Commission could be
invited to attend the Council meeting when the Master Plan is
presented stated staff would provide suggestions and ideas about
how to move forward.
Councilmember Matarrese stated the Golf Commission reports to
Council; the matter should be placed on an agenda and the Council
should vote to give direction for the Golf Commission to establish
a short-term plan by a certain time.
Mayor Johnson requested that the Golf Commission be informed that
the matter is being placed on a Council agenda; stated the matter
needs to be brought to the Council very soon; stated giving
direction should be placed on the second meeting in June.
The City Manager stated the matter would be put on the issue bin;
staff would determine the best way to follow up; continued the
presentation.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
May 27, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-05-27.pdf
CityCouncil,2008-05-27,7,"Domenick Weaver, Alameda Firefighters Local 689 President, stated
that he is in strong opposition of the Fire Department budget cuts;
urged Council to hire full staff to control overtime.
Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association, challenged Council to
make the cuts as minimal as possible; stated the Police and Fire
Department are essential to the business community Council should
find a way to fund positions and have the Police and Fire
Department at full strength in three years; urged the City to look
into corporate sponsorships.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Special Meeting at 10:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
May 27, 2008",CityCouncil/2008-05-27.pdf
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities,2008-05-27,1,"APPROVED
COMMISSION ON DISABILITY ISSUES
MEETING MINUTES OF
May 27, 2008
TIME
The meeting convened at 6:40 P.M.
PRESENT
Chair Lord-Hausman, Commissioners Longley-Cook, Fort, Kirola, Kreitz, Berger
and Robinson.
ABSENT
Vice-Chair Moore
MINUTES
The April 28, 2008 minutes were approved with the following correction: under Oral
Communications/Nor Agenda Items, item number four was edited to indicate that the non-working
disabled handicap button is located outside and that additional changing tables should be installed in
more than one of the library bathrooms to allow more space for the disabled.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
There was no written communication.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Draft ADA Transition Plan Update (Lucretia Akil, ADA Coordinator; Jim Fruit, Project
Manager, Sally Swanson Architects):
Lucretia Akil, ADA Coordinator/Board Secretary provided the introduction and overview of the
City's draft ADA Transition Plan Update. Darrell Handy, Risk Manager, also participated in the
presentation, informing the Commission of the goal and purpose of the community meeting,
which was to address the access and facility improvements within the content of the plan and
that specific questions or concerns regarding disability issues may be addressed and responded
to separate form the meeting. Jim Fruit, Project Manager, Sally Swanson Architects (SSA),
concluded the presentation of the Transition Plan with detailed review of the technical data
contained in the facilities and public intersections reports of the Plan, as well as Federal and
State laws of Title II ADA compliance with public agencies.
Secretary Akil informed the Commission that following tonight's community meeting and
receiving specific input from the Commission, the Transition Plan Update would be taken to the
City Council for final adoption based on recommendation from the Commission on Disability
Issues.",CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2008-05-27.pdf
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities,2008-05-27,2,"Commission on Disability Issues
May 27, 2008
Minutes
Page 2 of 6
Commissioner Berger asked what defines an individual with a qualified disability, to which Mr.
Fruit replied that any person who has a physical or apparent disability would be considered to
have a qualified disability.
Commissioner Berger asked if the same consulting firm (SSA) could be used for future updates
to the Transition Plan to which Mr. Handy responded that the computer software that SSA offers
would enable the City to update the Transition Plan on an annual basis via the ADA Coordinator
(Lucretia Akil). The ADA Coordinator will attend the yearly Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) kick-off meeting to ensure that ADA updates are included within future CIP projects.
Commissioner Berger asked about the sampling and new projects identified within the
Transition Plan to which Secretary Akil responded that the City's Public Works Department staff
are the managers of the CIP program and that she would ensure that those items identified be
included with the annual CIP updated project lists.
Commissioner Longley-Cook asked if Tinker Avenue extension is part of the Transition Plan
update to which Mr. Handy responded that Tinker is part of the future Planning of Alameda
Point and is not included in the Plan update.
Commissioner Berger raised the inoperability of the Main Library disabled handicap button at
the rear of the building to which Secretary Akil replied that particular item will be addressed
directly with the Library Director and all other ADA accessible items identified in the Transition
Plan have been repaired in the Main Library.
Commissioner Berger asked how are all accessibility issues handled such as ramps that may not
work for everyone, to which Mr. Fruit replied that architectural accessibility is modeled on
individuals who have moderate strength and are mobile. Architectural features do address
certain linear feet issues; however, it becomes a personal choice of the individual in terms of
traveling certain paths or distances across things such as ramps. Most of the population is
covered through these architectural features based on the ADA.
Mr. Handy responded that many ramps are less taxing and more up to code than past years, but it
does not always affect the length of the ramp and that is where personal choice would occur on
whether or not one is willing to travel the distance of the ramp.
Commissioner Berger stated that hidden disabilities need to be addressed such as arthritis, to
which Mr. Fruit responded that comes with aging. Commissioner Berger responded that perhaps
more signage would be helpful to which Mr. Fruit replied that he could offer the ADA
Coordinator information on ""way-finding"" to assist those with hidden disabilities.
 G:\Lucretia)CommDisability\Minutes(2008\Minutes_May 27 2008.doc",CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2008-05-27.pdf
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities,2008-05-27,3,"Commission on Disability Issues
May 27, 2008
Minutes
Page 3 of 6
Chair Lord-Hausman asked if there is one individual in the Public Works Department for the
ADA Coordinator to work with to which Secretary Akil replied yes, Laurie Kozisek, Associate
Civil Engineer who works directly with the Capital Improvement Project program in the City.
Commissioner Berger stated that since there is great detail in the Plan, what is the method of
selecting a project, to which Mr. Fruit replied that the data consists of specific detail of each
facility, so any decision to select a project would be based on the information and level of
priority identified in the Transition Plan.
Commissioner Berger asked if any furnishings are included within the facilities reports of the
Transition Plan update to which Mr. Fruit replied that only if the furnishing is fixed within the
structure. Only then is the item addressed within each report of the Transition Plan. If the item
is loose or not affixed to the facility, then there is no reasonable accommodation that needs to be
addressed under any disability issue as the item can be moved from one place to another.
Commissioner Kirola thanked City staff and the consultant for all the work that went into the
project recognizing that it was a difficult task. The finished project is much appreciated.
Chair Lord-Hausman confirmed that the Public Works Department also participated in the
Transition Plan update.
Chair Lord-Hausman asked what type of Federal and grant funding would the City be able to
draw upon in order to fund the various ADA improvements to which Mr. Fruit replied that it
would probably consist of road and gas tax, which is apportioned by population. Those funds
must be used for specific earmarks such as street surfacing, curb ramp improvements,
intersection, etc. as they are obligated by the State. Other possible funding could be
redevelopment funding, which could include street, electrical and sidewalk improvements.
Commissioner Robinson asked about receiving fees from developers to which Mr. Fruit replied
that if an agency chooses to tax a developer, it becomes difficult and the City may not attract
developers to work on projects within the City, or the costs could actually be offset onto the City
under construction costs.
Mr. Handy stated that the ADA Transition Plan projects are integrated within the CIP program.
ADA projects will get done as other projects are completed within the City's CIP program, such
as sidewalk and street repairs, which must be ADA compliant with any improvements.
Everything that is built and designed will be ADA compliant as the City's overall commitment
to the Transition Plan is a priority for the City Council. As the ADA Coordinator, Ms. Akil will
ensure that this happens as often as the CIP program is updated.
Chair Lord-Hausman stated that the ADA Transition Plan is a good living document and that any
hidden disability resulting from aging will evolve with the Plan and be addressed over years.
G:\Lucretia)CommDisability\Minutes(2008\Minutes_May 27 2008.doc",CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2008-05-27.pdf
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities,2008-05-27,4,"Commission on Disability Issues
May 27, 2008
Minutes
Page 4 of 6
Commissioner Berger sated that she is very impressed with the Plan.
There were no other comments received from the public or commission.
Chair Lord-Hausman motioned to recommend that the Commission forward the draft ADA
Transition Plan Update to the City Council for final adoption. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Longley-Cook and passed with the following vote: Ayes - 6; Nay - 0; Abstain -
0.
Secretary Akil, Mr. Handy and Mr. Fruit thanked the Commission for their input and
recommendation.
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business for discussion.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Commission on Disability Internet Link (Chair Lord-Hausman/Secretary Akil):
Secretary Akil provided updated information to the Commission regarding the addition of an
accessibility link onto the City's website. The City is in the process of putting out an RFQ to re-
vamp the current website and that process will not be finalized before fall. With costs escalating and
the current budget problems facing the City, these factors will delay the start-up of this project along
with the delay in overhauling the entire website. Secretary Akil stated that following the adoption of
the City's budget, this item will be re-agendized for future discussion.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS/NON-AGENDA ITEMS
1. Chair Lord-Hausman confirmed that the 2008 dates for the summer Concert at the Cove events
are June 13, July 11 and August 8. Commissioner Longley-Cook will represent the Commission
on June 13 and Commissioner Berger, August 8. Chair Lord-Hausman stated that she would
confirm who would be in attendance for the July 11 event.
2.
Commissioner Kreitz provided information regarding the Bike Plan Task Force committee. The
committee has not yet formally met as the first meeting had to be rescheduled, but she will keep
the Commission updated as they meet.
3. Commissioner Berger requested that the members of the CDI be given another tour of the
Alameda Theatre now that it is open to the public. Secretary Akil stated that she would check
G:\Lucretia)CommDisability\Minutes/2008\Minutes_May 27 2008.doc",CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2008-05-27.pdf
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities,2008-05-27,5,"Commission on Disability Issues
May 27, 2008
Minutes
Page 5 of 6
with the former Project Manager to determine if the request can be accommodated.
4. Commissioner Berger asked that Vice-Chair Jodi Moore's absence from the Commission be
addressed at a future meeting. Chair Lord-Hausman responded that Jodi has had some personal
challenges, however, she will contact her to discuss going forward with the Commission.
5. Commissioner Longley-Cook stated that the Peanut Butter and Jam Festival and Alameda
Hospital Health Fair's are approaching and wanted to confirm the Commission's participation.
Chair Lord-Hausman stated that she will contact the hospital regarding the date and follow up
with Commissioner Kreitz regarding her progress on the Master Calendar of events for the
Commission.
Commissioner Kirola suggested the CDI's participation in the Art and Wine Fair on Park Street
to which Chair Lord-Hausman responded that the Commission should agree to participate in
events with the most chance of exposure. The Chair will contact Jackie Krause, Manager of the
Mastick Senior Center regarding a possibility of co-partnering with the CDI for community
events.
6. Chair Lord-Hausman stated that the disabled spot on Everett and Park Street has been painted.
7. Chair Lord-Hausman read an article from the National Federation of the Blind concerning the
consequence of operating the energy-saving hybrid and electric cars that are so quiet, pedestrians
often cannot hear their approach. The Federation is proposing legislation.
8. Chair Lord-Hausman requested that the parking/re-stripping along Central Avenue in front of the
AUSD office and high school be agendized for future discussion since up to three disabled
parking spaces are gone due to the elimination of diagonal parking to parallel parking.
9. Commissioner Berger stated that she had not received a response from the Alameda Civic
Lighthouse Opera (ACLO) regarding the removal of disabled parking.
10. Chair Lord-Hausman stated that she received an invitation for the Commission to participate on
the Alameda County Developmental Disability Council. The Chair acknowledged that this is
positive recognition for the Commission to be on their distribution list.
11. Commissioner Berger stated that she would like for the Commission to invite a representative
from the College of Alameda to discuss parking for students with disabilities.
ADJOURNMENT",CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2008-05-27.pdf
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities,2008-05-27,6,"Commission on Disability Issues
May 27, 2008
Minutes
Page 6 of 6
The meeting adjourned at 8:20 P.M. The next scheduled meeting is Monday, June 23, 2008, at 6:30
P.M. in Room 360 at City Hall.
Respectfully submitted,
Lucretia A. Akil
Commission Secretary",CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2008-05-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-05-27,1,"Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
1.
CONVENE:
7:01 p.m.
2.
FLAG SALUTE:
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft.
3.
ROLL CALL:
Acting President Kohlstrand, Board Members Autorino,
Cunningham, Ezzy Ashcraft, and McNamara.
Also present were Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, City Attorney Donna Mooney;
Gail Payne, Public Works; Althea Carter.
President Cook and Board member Lynch were absent from roll call.
Acting President Kohlstrand welcomed Art Autorino to the Planning Board.
4.
MINUTES:
a.
Minutes for the meeting of April 14, 2008 (pending).
These minutes will be considered at a later meeting.
b.
Minutes for the meeting of April 28, 2008.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that page 13, paragraph 4, should be changed to read, ""Board
member Ezzy Ashcraft would like to hear more about forum- form-based codes.
""
Board Member Ezzy Ashcraft moved to approve the minutes of April 28, 2008, as amended.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 4. Noes:
0
Absent: 2 (Cook/Lynch); Abstain: 1 (Autorino). The motion passed.
c.
Minutes for the meeting of May 12, 2008 (pending).
These minutes will be considered at a later meeting.
5.
AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION:
Acting President Kohlstrand noted that speaker slips had been received for Item 8-A, and suggested
that it be moved to the Regular Agenda.
Acting President Kohlstrand recommended that 8-C be pulled from the Consent Calendar and be
placed on the Regular Agenda.
6.
PRESENTATIONS:
a.
Staff Communications - Future Agendas
Page 1 of 6",PlanningBoard/2008-05-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-05-27,2,"Mr. Thomas provided an update on future agenda items.
b.
Zoning Administrator Report
There was no report.
7.
ORAL COMMUNICATION: None.
8.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
8-A.
UP06-0010 - 1310 Central Avenue. Required Six Month Review of Use Permit for the
extended hours of operation for the Alameda Valero Gas Station. The subject property is
located in the R-4 (Neighborhood Residential) Zoning District. (DV)
Mr. Thomas presented the staff report. Staff recommended that the Planning Board accept the
Six-Month Review and find that Alameda Valero Gasoline was in conformance with the
conditions of the Use Permit. The station would continue under the terms of the Use Permit, and
no further reviews would be required. Any violations would initiate Code Enforcement actions,
up to and including revocation of the Use Permit.
The public hearing was opened.
Mr. Phil Gravem, 1344 Sherman Street, spoke in support of this project. He noted that he lived
across the street from this gas station. He noted that the shortened hours had been beneficial, and
added that he was concerned about cars that were parked outside the bays and on the streets. He
stated that things had generally been going well.
Ms. Patricia Kinzel, 1307 Central Avenue, noted that she was undecided about this issue. She
thanked Barbara Price of Public Works for changing the timing on the lights.
Mr. Luon Zergser, applicant, Alameda Valero, 1310 Central Avenue, noted that some customers'
cars were parked on the street when they did not come to pick them up before the station closed.
He did not want to lock the cars in the garage in the event the customers came after hours for
their cars.
In response to an inquiry by Board member McNamara why some of the cars were parked
partially out of the garage, Mr. Zergser replied that because of the configuration of the smog
check testing equipment, the rear of the cars being tested must be outside the garage. He noted
that other than the smog check, no servicing of the cars was performed outside the garage.
In response to an inquiry by Board member Ezzy Ashcraft whether he could post a sign asking
the customers not to park on the street, Mr. Zergser replied that he could do that.
Acting President Kohlstrand noted that the condition prohibiting any cars being parked outside
was almost impossible to meet.
Page 2 of 6",PlanningBoard/2008-05-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-05-27,3,"Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that it would be preferable for a customer to pick up their car
on the parking lot after hours, as opposed to on the street.
Board member McNamara noted that the applicant performed a public service by allowing the
nearby church to use their parking lot.
The public hearing was closed for Board discussion.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that she understood the applicant's comments about the cars
being outside the bay. She wanted the ""no street parking"" requirement to be followed, and
believed it was reasonable for the owner to ask the customers not to park on the street.
Board member McNamara understood that the nature of smog check work required that part of
the car be outside the garage. With respect to Condition 8, she believed that the Board should
consider allowing some parking on the lot in an overnight situation, but not on the street.
Board member Cunningham suggested that another six-month review be implemented, in order to
address the neighbors' concerns.
Board member Autorino noted that the requirement to not allow parked cars on the lot overnight
was put in place for a reason, and believed that more input would be needed before making such
a change.
Acting President Kohlstrand noted that any changes to the conditions had not been noticed, and
believed it would be inappropriate to change the conditions at this time.
Mr. Thomas suggested that direction be given to staff and the applicant that another six-month
review be implemented. The applicant should keep track of this specific situation, and that it be
made clear that the preference was to not leave cars on the lot overnight. In six months, staff
would return with that information for discussion, and a new resolution which would be noticed
if the condition were to be changed.
Acting President Kohlstrand suggested that a condition be added to address the work being done
inside the bays.
In response to an inquiry by Board member McNamara regarding overnight parking, Mr. Thomas
stated that if a customer's car was not picked up in time, that it was preferred that it be parked on
the lot rather than on the street. Any complaints should be directed to the City's Code
Enforcement department, which would also keep track of the calls.
Ms. Mooney noted that with the information gathered, it could be decided whether any changed
in conditions would be agendized.
Acting President Kohlstrand noted that she was uncomfortable directing staff not to enforce a
condition. She would be more comfortable implementing a six-month review, when additional
reporting on conditions 6 and 8 would be available. If the Board intended to change the
conditions at that time, the neighbors would have a chance to speak up. She added that any
complaints would be fully investigated, and that
Page 3 of 6",PlanningBoard/2008-05-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-05-27,4,"Board member Autorino noted that if a customer did not show up, it should be considered as a
contingency only, and that the owner should keep track of those incidents. He noted that would
give better data for the next review.
Board Member Ezzy Ashcraft moved to accept the Required Six Month Review of Use Permit
for the extended hours of operation for the Alameda Valero Gas Station, and that the owner be
directed to track how many cars were stored overnight on-site; that information will be
incorporated into a future review to occur within 6 months.
Board member McNamara seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 5. Noes: 0
Absent: 2 (Cook/Lynch); Abstain: 0. The motion passed.
8-B. PLN07-0031 and DR07-0086 - RHP Design Group - 2424 Encinal Avenue (KFC
Restaurant). The project entails the complete demolition of the existing 2,366 square
foot restaurant and a Design Review for the construction of an approximately 2,016
square foot new restaurant. The restaurant will contain a drive-through, which requires a
Use Permit pursuant to AMC 30-4.9A.c.l(r) A parking exception is required for this
project, because the eight parking spaces provided for this project are less than the
required 20 parking spaces pursuant to AMC 30-4.9A.g.8. The project is located in a C-
C-T, Community Commercial Theatre District.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft requested that this item be presented on the Regular Agenda when
it has been re-agendized.
Board Member Cunningham moved to continue this item to a future meeting date.
Board member McNamara seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 5. Noes: 0
Absent: 2 (Cook/Lynch); Abstain: 0. The motion passed.
8-C.
Finding of Consistency for 860 Atlantic. A proposed finding of the consistency for the
use of the property and buildings at 860 Atlantic Avenue in the Marina Village Master
Plan area for use by the Peralta Community College District for educational purposes.
(AT)
Mr. Thomas presented the staff report, and recommended approval of this item.
Board Member Cunningham moved to approve the item.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 5. Noes: 0
Absent: 2 (Cook/Lynch); Abstain: 0. The motion passed.
8-D.
Green Building Guidelines - City of Alameda, 2263 Santa Clara Avenue.
Recommendation to the City Council to approve a resolution providing, as official City
reference documents, the Alameda County Residential Green Building Guidelines, U.S.
Page 4 of 6",PlanningBoard/2008-05-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-05-27,5,"Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEEDTM)
Rating System, and Bay Friendly Landscape Guidelines.
Board Member Cunningham moved to recommend to the City Council to approve a resolution
providing, as official City reference documents, the Alameda County Residential Green Building
Guidelines, U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
(LEEDTM) Rating System, and Bay Friendly Landscape Guidelines.
Board member McNamara seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 5. Noes:
0
Absent: 2 (Cook/Lynch); Abstain: 0. The motion passed.
9.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:
9-A.
Draft Pedestrian Plan. A request for Planning Board review and recommendation on the
City of Alameda Pedestrian Plan. The Pedestrian Plan establishes improvement and
funding priorities for improvements for pedestrian facilities throughout the City to make
Alameda a more walkable community and encourage walking as an alternative to the
automobile. The draft plan was prepared by the City of Alameda Pedestrian Task Force
and the City of Alameda Pubic Works Department. (GP).
Ms. Payne, Public Works, summarized the staff report and described the components of the
Pedestrian Plan in detail.
The public hearing was opened.
There were no speakers.
The public hearing was closed for Board discussion.
Acting President Kohlstrand noted that she had served on the Pedestrian Task Force, and
commended Ms. Payne on the incredible amount of work that she did on this study. She noted that
there was concern about the possible funding, and that it was good to see the list of outside funding
sources identified in the report.
Board member Autorino noted that this was an extremely impressive document.
Board member Cunningham noted that this was a very thorough document, and inquired whether
there was language or direction to develop the pieces of land. Ms. Payne noted that would be
presented in the fall.
Board member McNamara complimented Ms. Payne on the thoroughness of this report.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that times had changed, and that not every child could walk to
school. She supported education about pedestrian and crossing issues, and encouraged people to
walk more. She supported incentives to increase pedestrian uses.
Board Member Cunningham moved to support a recommendation on the City of Alameda
Pedestrian Plan that child safety be reviewed for all schools not just public schools. The
Page 5 of 6",PlanningBoard/2008-05-27.pdf
PlanningBoard,2008-05-27,6,"Pedestrian Plan establishes improvement and funding priorities for improvements for pedestrian
facilities throughout the City to make Alameda a more walkable community and encourage
walking as an alternative to the automobile..
Board member McNamara seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 5. Noes: 0
Absent: 2 (Cook/Lynch). The motion passed.
9-B. Estuary Crossing Feasibility Study Update. A presentation and update on the City of
Alameda Estuary Crossing Feasibility Study. The study examines alternatives for
improving pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access across the Oakland Alameda Estuary on
the West End of Alameda in the vicinity of the Webster and Posey Tubes. The
presentation is for informational purposes. No action by the Planning Board is being
requested at this time. The City of Alameda Public Works Department is preparing for
the study. (GP)
Ms. Payne presented the staff report.
The public hearing was opened.
There were no speakers.
The public hearing was closed for Board discussion.
No action was taken
10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS:
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
8:53 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
This meeting was audio taped.
Page 6 of 6",PlanningBoard/2008-05-27.pdf