body,date,page,text,path
GolfCommission,2007-04-18,1,"ALAMEDA GOLF COMMISSION
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Bob Wood called the regular meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. in Room #360, Alameda
City Hall, 2263 Santa Clara Avenue.
1-A.
Roll Call
Roll call was taken and members present were: Commissioner Bill Delaney,
Commissioner Betsy Gammell, Vice Chair Ray Gaul, Commissioner Bill Schmitz,
Secretary Jane Sullwold and Chair Bob Wood. Absent: Commissioner Sandré Swanson.
Also present was Interim Golf General Manager Dale Lillard.
1-B
Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of March 21, 2007.
Correction Item 6-A:
Commissioner Gammell reported that there is an ad in the Alameda Magazine for the
month of March, should be Commissioner Gammell reported that there is an ad in the
Oakland Magazine for the month of April. The Commission approved the minutes
unanimously with the aforementioned correction.
1-C
Adoption of Agenda
The Commission adopted the agenda unanimously.
2.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
3.
COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS
The question was raised concerning the progress on the Operational Review Request for
Proposal. The Interim General Manager reported that three candidates have bee selected for the
interview process, which is taking place this week. A selection should be made by the end of the
week.
4.
AGENDA ITEMS:
4-A
Clarification of Implementation of New Tournament Rates. (Action Item)
The Interim General Manager stated that the tournament rates were increased on April 1, 2007.
There are many groups who booked and paid the deposit for events prior to April 1, 2007,
although the tournament will take place after the increase effective date. The contract states that
the rates are subject to change without notice but with the fee increases coming in spring and not
winter there are groups who have events coming up very soon and have probably already set
their budgets and received player fees. The Interim General Manager suggested the following
three options be reviewed and a decision made on the best way to proceed.
Chuck Corica Golf Complex
Page 1
4/18/07
Golf Commission Minutes",GolfCommission/2007-04-18.pdf
GolfCommission,2007-04-18,2,"1.
Honor the old rates for groups conducting their event prior to the completion of
the current fiscal year, June 30 2007. Notify groups conducting their event after
June 30, 2007 of the increased rates.
2.
Honor the old fees through the end of the calendar year for events booked prior to
the April 1, 2007 effective date.
3.
Notify all groups regardless of the event date that the new rates are in effect.
Commissioner Gammell made the motion to honor the old tournament rates for events booked up
to June 30, 2007. Vice Chair Gaul seconded the motion. The Golf Commission passed the
motion unanimously. The Golf Services Manager will notify the tournament groups affected by
the increases.
5.
ORAL REPORTS
5-A
Golf Shop and Driving Range activities report by Golf Services Manager Matt Plumlee.
No report given.
5-B
Beautification Program by Mrs. Norma Arnerich.
Mrs. Arnerich reported that the dedication date for maintenance worker Dave May's mother is
set for June 30, 2007 and the Ladies Club is will be doing plantings for two members. Mrs.
Arnerich spoke with the Superintendent and he will be using $3,000 from the Beautification
Account for planting various areas of the Golf Complex. The suggestion was made to replant the
area at the 2nd tee of the Jack Clark Golf Course where the plants were removed. Also
mentioned was the need to repaint all of the tee blocks on the courses.
6.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
6-A
Marketing and Promotions, Commissioner Gammell.
Commissioner Gammell reported that a new ad would appear in the Alameda and
Oakland Magazines for the months of May and June. The ad states ""Mothers and Fathers
Golf for Free with 3 paid Green Fees after 11:00 AM"". Mothers for the month of May
and Fathers for the month of June.
6-B
Golf Complex Financial Report, Vice Chair Gaul.
Vice Chair Gaul reported that the revenue for golf on all three courses for March 2007
versus March 2006 was up 150% and rounds of golf were up 139%. The fiscal year to
date revenue for golf was up 3.7% and rounds were up 5.6%. The Mif Albright Course
revenue was up 155% from last year and down 6.6% for the fiscal year. All other
concessions excluding golf were up 62% for the month and up 7% for the fiscal year.
Total revenue for the Golf Complex was up 103% for the month of March 2007 versus
March 2006 and up 4.5% for the fiscal year 2006/2007.
6-C
New Clubhouse Project, Commissioner Schmitz.
Chuck Corica Golf Complex
Page 2
4/18/07
Golf Commission Minutes",GolfCommission/2007-04-18.pdf
GolfCommission,2007-04-18,3,"Commissioner Schmitz stated that he would like to see a representative from
Development Services attend a meeting to get clarification on how the Clubhouse Project
is progressing and update them on the other alternatives the Golf Commission is looking
into. The Interim General Manager will contact Doreen Soto, the project manager, and
see when she is available. They do not want the Clubhouse Project to just fade away and
have received conflicting information on the status of the project. Commissioners Gaul
and Wood will be meeting with the modular building company tomorrow.
6-D
Maintenance, Buildings, Security, Albright Course and Driving Range, Secretary Sullwold.
Secretary Sullwold mentioned that she has received very positive responses regarding the
ball washers on the forward tees although there seems to be varying opinions about the
barbershop style 150-yard markers. Many players in the ladies club do not like them and
have to remove them when playing. The suggestion was made to place small flags in the
area instead. It was mentioned that last Monday when the 9-hole group was playing
some men hit into the last group and it was very dangerous. There did not seem to be any
marshals out on the course. The Interim General Manager stated that they are currently
looking to the current marshal crew to find a coordinator. If no replacement can be
secured the alternative may have to be a staff member. Also suggested were directional
signs around the shack on the Earl Fry Golf Course. Customers have trouble location the
#9 tee from the #8 green and the #14 tee from the #13 green.
6-E
City Council and Government Liaison, Commissioner Swanson.
No Report.
6-F
Front Entrance Beautification Project, Chair Wood.
Chair Wood reported that there are broken windows in the fire tower and made the
request that the Interim General Manager investigate who has jurisdiction over the
building and prepare a written report to that effect. He also stated that as long as the fire
tower continues to be an eye sore there would be no front entrance beautification.
Another concern is the utilities in the area, which will have to be moved prior to any
improvements. Chair Wood is looking into what moving them entails. The suggestion
was made to paint the tower and fix the fence. Chair Wood called painting the tower a
lame attempt at beautifying it.
6-G
Golf Complex 80th Anniversary, Commissioner Delaney
Commissioner Delaney reported that he has set the following priority list of goals for the
80th Anniversary celebration:
1.
Family Orientated
2.
Entertainment
3.
Historic Value
4.
Golf Complex as an Alamedas Icon
5.
Golf
Commissioner Delaney is in the process of identifying people in Alameda willing to
support the celebration. He was thinking of a possible 9-hole golf tournament for
Chuck Corica Golf Complex
Page 3
4/18/07
Golf Commission Minutes",GolfCommission/2007-04-18.pdf
GolfCommission,2007-04-18,4,"families and contacting local school bands to provide entertainment. He would like
to
see the Corica Family in attendance as well as the Mayor and City Council. The idea of a
time capsule was mentioned which could be buried out on the golf course and a
proclamation from the City of Alameda. Commissioner Delaney mentioned the need to
secure volunteers, possibly from the Golf Complex service clubs and community groups.
Secretary Sullwold will mention the need for volunteers to the Ladies Club tomorrow at
their general meeting. It was also mentioned to check the City of Alameda web site to
ensure that the date does not conflict with other events. The event will probably take
place in the fall and the Interim General Manager will put it in the Recreation
Departments fall brochure.
6-H
Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course.
Owner Tom Geanekos reported that the restaurant is now getting a lot of non-golf patron
business and they are working on the service problems. The kitchen is inadequate to
handle the size of the menu and he would like to remodel it eventually. He has been in
contact with the City of Alameda Building Department concerning necessary code
upgrades. Planning on introducing pizzas to the menu and purchasing a soft serve ice
cream machine. There is a new refrigerated display case for pre-made items that golfers
can purchase quickly. Mr. Geanekos also mentioned that he is currently repainting the
outside furniture and has ordered new umbrellas.
7.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. NON-AGENDA (Public Comment)
8.
OLD BUSINESS
Previously discussed.
9.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Included in the Commission packet was a memorandum to the Finance Department
showing the surcharge payment for March 2007 of $12,474. The year-to-date total to the
General Fund is $110,359 for the fiscal year 2006/2007.
10.
ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETINGS AGENDA
Clubhouse Project (Development Services)
Fire Tower Report
Modular Building Report
Marshal Program
Selection of Consultant for Operational Review
Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Budget
11.
ANNOUNCEMENTS/ADJOURNMENT
Secretary Sullwold made the motion to adjourn the meeting and Commissioner Schmitz
seconded it. The Golf Commission passed the motion unanimously. The Meeting was
adjourned at 7:54 PM.
The agenda for the meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown Act.
Chuck Corica Golf Complex
Page 4
4/18/07
Golf Commission Minutes",GolfCommission/2007-04-18.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-04-18,1,"Minutes of the Special Planning Board Meeting
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
1.
CONVENE:
7:03 p.m.
2.
FLAG SALUTE:
Board member Mariani
3.
ROLL CALL:
President Lynch, Vice President Cook, Cunningham, Ezzy
Ashcraft, Kohlstrand, Mariani, and McNamara.
Also present were Planning Services Manager Andrew Thomas, Assistant City Attorney
Donna Mooney, Executive Assistant Latisha Jackson.
4.
MINUTES:
Minutes for the meeting of March 26, 2007.
Vice President Cook noted that page 3, paragraph 1, should be changed to reflect that
while she thought the improvements in Venice, California, were terrific, they were not
necessarily appropriate for Alameda.
Vice President Cook noted that further down on page 3 should reflect that she was
concerned that the four standalone restaurants along the shore were the same scale and
type of restaurant use, and she would prefer to see a mix of size and style of restaurants
so people could bring takeout food to the shore.
Vice President Cook noted that with respect to residential parking on page 8, she wished
to clarify that she did not think it was a unique request and that similar requests would be
made in the future, and that a variance was not appropriate.
Vice President Cook noted that with the Measure A discussion on page 16, she wanted to
know what the constraints on the discussion would be. She wanted to know what the
legal constraints would be on the Board's ability to talk about Measure A on a forum. She
did not intend that to address any legal constraints on the public's discussion of Measure
A.
Vice President Cook noted that the language at the top of page 17 read, ""Vice President
Cook strongly believed that the discussion should take place in a developer-free zone.""
She noted that she intended to say that the discussion should take place before a
developer was selected for Alameda Point.
Board member Cunningham moved approval of the minutes as amended.
Board member Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 7.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 1
April 18, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-04-18.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-04-18,2,"5.
AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION:
President Lynch noted that two speaker slips and two letters had been received for Item
8-A, and proposed that it be moved to the Regular Agenda.
Board member Kohlstrand moved to remove Item 8-A from the Consent Calendar and
place it on the Regular Agenda.
Vice President Cook seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 7.
6.
STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:
6-A.
Future Agendas
Mr. Thomas provided an update on future agenda items.
6-B.
Zoning Administrator's Report
None.
6-C.
Alameda Point Station Area Planning Update
None.
7.
ORAL COMMUNICATION:
None.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 2
April 18, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-04-18.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-04-18,3,"8.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
8-A.
PDA07-0002 (Planned Development Amendment) and DR07-0006 (Design
Review) - Alameda Emergency Food Bank - 1900 Thau Way (SW). The
applicant requests a Planned Development Amendment and Design Review to
remove and replace the existing 1,440 sq ft modular building with a 2,016 sq ft
modular building which will be used to warehouse, sort, and distribute free food
to Alameda residents in need. The site is located in an M-1-PD, Intermediate
Industrial, Planned Development Combining Zoning District.
Board member Kohlstrand moved to remove Item 8-A from the Consent Calendar and
place it on the Regular Agenda.
Vice President Cook seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 7.
Mr. Thomas noted that staff recommended approval of this item, subject to the conditions
in the staff report.
The public hearing was opened.
Mr. Paul Russell, Director, Alameda Emergency Food Bank, described the operation of
the food bank, and noted that while the food was free, the cost to the clients was either in
transportation expenses or in personal dignity. Their goal for the project was to restore
dignity to the process in providing food, and he described their proposed changes to
accommodate the clients and to allow them to wait inside, instead of in the elements. The
second goal was to replace their aging building, which would make dramatic visual
improvements to the experience and neighbors. They did not wish to serve more clients,
but to improve the current environment and create a safe work environment for the
volunteers. He noted that one member of the public, who also received services, was the
only attendee of the community meeting; she was in favor of the project.
In response to an inquiry by Board member Kohlstrand, Mr. Russell noted that 400-500
households are served in a month. He noted that a photo I.D. and proof of residency such
as a utility bill were required to receive services. He noted that in his timeframe, there
had been no police activity except a case of a stolen bicycle.
Board member Kohlstrand commended the work of the food bank in Alameda.
President Lynch noted that once the litigation for the Alameda Beltline project has been
concluded, he noted that that a further lease agreement may be crafted, and that the City
would expect the Food Bank to stay until that lease has concluded.
Mr. Thomas noted that an inaccurate reference to the Parking Code Section, and should
be AMC30-7.6(c)2.1
Planning Board Minutes
Page 3
April 18, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-04-18.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-04-18,4,"be used to warehouse, sort, and distribute free food to Alameda residents in need.
Board member Cunningham seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 7.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 4
April 18, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-04-18.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-04-18,5,"9.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:
9-A. GPA04-0002/R04-0001/DA04-00001 - Harbor Bay Isle Associates - 1855
North Loop Road (CE). Public comment hearing on the Draft Environmental
Impact Report for a proposed Amendment to the Alameda General Plan Land Use
Diagram from Business Park to Medium Density Residential and to change the
General Plan Land Use Element Text and Tables projecting the City's
development build-out by land use category to the year 2010. To be consistent
with the proposed change in land use designation, the proposed Rezoning would
change the 12.2-acre site from ""C-M-PD"" (Commercial-Manufacturing District
Planned Development) to ""R-2-PD"" (Medium Density Residential Planned
Development). A Development Agreement Amendment will also be considered.
The proposed development involves the eventual construction of approximately
104 new residential units.
Mr. Thomas summarized the staff report and presented an overview of the purpose of the
public hearing, which was to submit comments. He noted that while comments and
questions would be collected, there would be no response to the comments.
Mr. John Torrey, Contract Planner, elaborated on the staff report and noted that no action
would be taken at this time. He described the EIR process, and described the scope of the
proposed project.
Mr. Steve Brimhall, project applicant, introduced himself.
President Lynch wished to hear the Board's opinion on when the applicant could speak.
Board member Kohlstrand noted that this hearing was intended to hear from the public,
and suggested that would be an appropriate time for the project sponsor to come forward.
Mr. Brimhall provided an overview of the background of this project, and described the
various agreements that stated that a residential development could be built if the noise
could be mitigated to a level of 45 dB inside the homes.
President Lynch noted that 15 speaker slips had been received.
Board member Kohlstrand moved to limit the speakers' time to three minutes.
Board member Cunningham seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice
vote - 7.
The public hearing was opened.
Ms. Patricia Gannon expressed concern about building 104 homes in a noise impact zone,
and believed it would be a dangerous precedent to allow this to occur.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 5
April 18, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-04-18.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-04-18,6,"Mr. Ringo Lui expressed concern about the traffic congestion that would be created with
the addition of over 100 residents units.
Ms. Rayla Graber was concerned that there may be a request for further housing units,
and noted that the EIR stated what the cumulative effect on the environment would be;
she believed it would be significant. She was also concerned about emergency vehicle
access and how it would affect the neighborhood. She noted that the document stated that
no neighborhood should be divided by a project, and noted that Village 6 would be
divided. She was concerned that it may be vulnerable to criminal activity. She noted that
trips from the project to Harbor Bay Isle shopping center would affect Maitland Avenue.
Ms. Avis Cherapie has found it more difficult to walk to the Bay because of the
increasing development, and added that the streets have become very crowded. She was
concerned that this development would make it worse, and was concerned about
pollution from cars, the airport, and powered garden equipment. She was also concerned
about increased difficulty in evacuating the island in an emergency.
Mr. Jim Grimes, V.P. Operations, Peet's Coffee and Tea, expressed concern that the
Draft EIR does not address the residential impact on the businesses. He noted that when
residential uses get too close to businesses there can be traffic and safety issues with
tractor-trailer traffic on North Loop Road. He added that there was also a quality of life
consideration, including noise from the trucks backing up in pre-dawn hours.
Ms. Susan Davis, CEO, Don SueMor, noted that her company recently left Emeryville
due to its conversion to a residential city, and came to Alameda because of the industrial
park. She noted that there were significant safety concerns with children and other
pedestrians occupying the same road as the delivery trucks.
Mr. Red Wetherall, Vice President of CLASS, and a Board member of nonoise.org, noted
that he had recently attended a noise conference in New York City. He expressed concern
about the low frequency noise that was very difficult to mask, even with the windows
closed.
Ms. Sharon Gardner expressed concern that airplane noise and pollution would be
significant for the proposed homes, as well as the rest of Alameda. She noted that the
FAA has changed departure and arrival routes to avoid overflight of Alameda. She did
not believe this development should be noncompliant with those efforts and regulations.
She believed that the health and safety of Alameda residents should be the primary
concern.
Ms. Cathy Smith expressed concern about the noise, pollution and additional traffic that
would be created by the new homes.
Mr. Dave Nido noted that CLASS sent a letter to City Council in 2005 stating their strong
objections to this development, and represented over 4000 residents who object to the
development. He expressed concern about the low-frequency noise and the specifics of
Planning Board Minutes
Page 6
April 18, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-04-18.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-04-18,7,"the project as outlined in the EIR; the FAA has only recently declared the low-frequency
noise to be a negative impact, and there are currently no construction mitigations to
reduce that sleep-disturbing low-frequency noise. He believed that Alameda needed low-
income, not market-rate housing, and that the City jobs/housing balance needed more
jobs, not more housing. He did not believe that an environmentally challenged areas
should be rezoned. He did not believe the City should build homes in a low-frequency
noise area generated by the Port and the airport. He did not believe that the doors and
windows should have to be closed all the time. The City would lose its leverage with
Port and airport with respect to noise it if chose to build homes in this area. He noted that
the City would have to issue a Statement of Overriding Considerations. He requested a
complete discussion of the Southeast Plan of the Airport and low-frequency noise in the
EIR, and noted that this was not a necessary project. He did not believe there was a need
to change the General Plan
Mr. Ron Lappa submitted a speaker slip but was not in attendance to speak.
Ms. Nita Rosen noted that she has lived on Bay Farm Island for 42 years and opposed
changing the zoning of the business park in order to build homes. She noted that Amelia
Earhart and Bay Farm Schools have added so many modular rooms to accommodate
more students that the playgrounds have become much smaller. She expressed concern
about the effects of earthquakes on the fills.
Ms. Leslie Robey believed the home design was very nice, but did not believe they
should be built in this area. She was very concerned about air pollution from the planes
and the cars, as well as the noise.
Ms. Betty Anderson noted that her home faced Catalina, and added that the vibration
noise from the freight planes between 2 a.m. and 4 a.m. often knocked her pictures
askew. She was concerned about the carcinogens from the planes, and did not believe this
was an appropriate site for homes. She cited the study from SeaTac regarding pollution
other than noise, and had suggested it be included in the study of this site. She opposed
the rezoning of this business park.
The public hearing was closed for Board discussion.
Mr. Thomas noted that the Board may submit comments, but that a dialogue would not
be appropriate at this time. He added that they may be provided in writing before May 4,
2007.
Member Mariani supported submitting comments in writing.
Member Kohlstrand noted that the public comments about noise were well made, and
was sure that the noise analysis met the CEQA requirements. She was interested in Mr.
Nido's comments regarding low-frequency studies, and would like to see new
methodologies explored in that area, even though it was not required by the EIR or the
FAA. She was cautious about further contributing to the impacts by the Port and the
Planning Board Minutes
Page 7
April 18, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-04-18.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-04-18,8,"airport. She noted that the document had a comprehensive noise analysis. She inquired
whether any comments by the Alameda Airport Commission or the Port had been
received. Mr. Thomas replied that those comments had not been received yet, but would
not be surprised if they did submit comments.
Member Kohlstrand believed the level of service numbers in the documents should be
scrutinized further. She expressed concern about the traffic levels at Island Drive and
Doolittle, which often backed up at Lincoln School as a result of people trying to go to
the school so that traffic could not pass through the intersection. She suggested that that
intersection be examined more thoroughly. She was very concerned about circulation,
and understood the residents' concerns about Catalina Drive. She was concerned about
creating a residential community with limited access to the rest of the Island, and that had
to interact with the business park. She would like those limitations to be addressed in the
EIR.
Vice President Cook agreed with Member Kohlstrand's comments, and would submit
many of her comments in writing. Her concerns had to do with safety for pedestrians and
bicyclists. She would like to see those concerns addressed in a staff report if they were
not appropriate for the environmental document. She was concerned about traffic signals
and noise, and believed there were different ways that noise was perceived and studied.
She had questions about the Land Use section regarding the recreational goals for open
space, and wanted to be sure it met the General Plan requirements for parklands.
Member Ezzy Ashcraft believed that common sense should be exercised in examining
this document, and noted that the developer was proposing a private enclave that would
be cut off from other residential units. She was concerned that isolated, fragmented
neighborhoods would result from this layout. She noted that the stated objective of home
ownership did not also mention the purchase price range for these homes, and did not
know whether they would be entry-level, affordable or market-level homes. She noted
that the business park still had a notable vacancy rate, and was concerned that if the
acreage were to be eliminated to build homes, it would stifle the enlivening of the
business park. She was surprised to see windows that did not open included in the
document.
Member Cunningham noted that the fiscal analysis should be examined carefully, and
believed there should be more in-depth analysis to validate the reasons why this project
was being considered. He believed that the low-density residential and private school
options should also be considered, so that the highest and best use of this land could be
identified. He believed the criteria should be identified more clearly.
Member McNamara was interested in hearing how a mechanical ventilation system
would create quality of life in a residential neighborhood, and could not imagine not
being able to open the windows at home. She also was concerned about compatibility
with an industrial park, and she had hoped to hear from the two child care centers
regarding the impacts construction would have on their operation.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 8
April 18, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-04-18.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-04-18,9,"Member Ezzy Ashcraft Kohlstrand understood that the private high school was not such a
viable option, and inquired whether it was still in the running.
Mr. Thomas noted that the discussion of the alternatives analysis in the EIR could be
expanded in the staff report and the Final EIR.
President Lynch believed the community wanted to hold a more qualitative discussion.
Mr. Thomas noted that the potential change of the General Plan raised many issues and
brought forward many discussions surrounding it. He noted that it would be a challenge
for staff to address all the environmental needs, and that this policy decision would be
carefully considered by the Planning Board and City Council.
President Lynch noted that comment periods were often extended, and that a
supplemental document may also be considered.
No action was taken.
10.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None.
11.
BOARD COMMUNICATION:
a..
Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board
Member Mariani).
Member Mariani noted that a meeting would be held on April 19, 2007, and noted that
Transportation Commission Chair John Knox White would make a presentation on
transportation in Alameda.
b.
Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board Member
Kohlstrand).
Member Kohlstrand understood that this committee was defunct and noted that they
would not hold further meetings until after they received the transportation report. Mr.
Thomas noted that he would follow up on that issue.
C.
Oral Status Report regarding the Alameda Climate Protection Task Force (Board
Member Cunningham).
Member Cunningham noted that a meeting had been held this evening to collect citizen
comments on issues the Task Force should address, in order to cultivate an action plan. It
also planned to address language for a motion to send to City Council relative to the
master developer for Alameda Point being a green developer. He noted that the next
meeting would be held the following month, and that the meetings were held in the new
library and were open to the public.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 9
April 18, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-04-18.pdf
PlanningBoard,2007-04-18,10,"Member Ezzy Ashcraft would like to retain the green building ordinances on the front
burner, and inquired whether green building codes would be addressed. Member
Cunningham confirmed that would definitely to addressed, and the Task Force's
recommendations would be brought forth by July.
Member Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether bike racks could be added to the newly
renovated Long's building on Santa Clara.
Member Mariani noted that she had previously requested an update for this project, for
which the Planning Board had no input. She noted that it was a major design project, and
would like to see more information on it.
Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that the next meeting would be held May 16, 2007.
11.
STAFF COMMUNICATION:
a.
Future Agendas and work program
None.
12.
ADJOURNMENT:
9:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Anderson
Andrew Thomas, Secretary
City Planning Board
These minutes were approved at the May 29, 2007, Planning Board meeting. This
meeting was audio and video taped.
Planning Board Minutes
Page 10
April 18, 2007",PlanningBoard/2007-04-18.pdf