body,date,page,text,path
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,1,"MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY - - MAY 3, 2005 - -7:30 P.M.
Mayor Johnson convened the regular meeting at 9:29 p.m.
ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,
Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 5.
Absent :
None.
AGENDA CHANGES
(05-196) Mayor Johnson addressed the Resolutions Appointing
Members of the Golf Commission [paragraph no. 05-207, 05-207A, 05-
207B] after Special Orders of the Day
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(05-197) Proclamation declaring May as ""Older Americans Month. ""
Mayor Johnson read and presented the proclamation to Don Oransky,
President, Mastick Advisory Board.
Mr. Oransky thanked the Council for the proclamation.
(05-198) Update on the new main library project.
The Project Manager gave a brief project update.
Vice Mayor Gilmore commended the Project Manager and staff for
keeping the project running smoothly by putting out many fires
daily.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
[Items so adopted or enacted are indicated by an asterisk preceding
the paragraph number. ]
( *05-199 - ) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on April
19, 2005 ; and the Special City Council Meeting held on April 21,
2005. Approved.
(*05-200) Ratified bills in the amount of $ 2,201,788.60
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
1
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,2,"(*05-201) Recommendation to authorize Call for Bids for Legal
Advertising for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2006. Accepted.
(*05-202) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Investment Report
for period ending March 31, 2005. Accepted.
(*05-203) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Financial Report
for the period ending March 31, 2005 and approve third quarter
budget adjustments. Accepted.
(*05-204) Recommendation to set Hearing to establish Proposition 4
Limit for Fiscal Year 2005-06 for May 17, 2005. Accepted.
(*05-205) Recommendation to accept the work of SpenCon
Construction, Inc. for Repair of Portland Cement, Concrete
Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway and Minor Street Patching Phase 5,
Fiscal Year 2004-05, No. P.W. 08-04-08. Accepted.
( *05-206) Recommendation to approve an Agreement with Alameda
County to continue participation in the Alameda HOME Consortium and
authorize the Acting City Manager to negotiate and execute
necessary documents. Accepted.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
05-207) - Resolution No. 13836, ""Appointing Ray A. Gaul as a Member
of the Golf Commission. Adopted.
(05-207A) Resolution No. 13837, ""Appointing Bill T. Schmitz as a
Member of the Golf Commission. "" Adopted.
(05-207B) Resolution No. 13838, ""Appointing Jane Sullwold as a
Member of the Golf Commission. Adopted.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved adoption of the resolutions.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented certificates of
appointment to the Golf Commission members.
(05-208 ) Ordinance No. 2940, ""Reclassifying and Rezoning Certain
Property within the City of Alameda by Amending Zoning Ordinance
No. 1277, N.S., from R-5 (General Residential) Zoning District to
C-C (Community Commercial) Zoning District, for that Property
Located at 2507 Central Avenue at Everett Street. Finally passed.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,3,"Counci lmember Daysog moved final passage of the ordinance.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which passed by unanimous
voice vote - -5.
(05-209) Recommendation to accept the West Alameda Neighborhood
Improvement Concept Plan.
The Community Programs and Housing Division Manager gave a Power
Point presentation on the Plan.
Mayor Johnson stated the Plan would make important changes to the
area; requested staff to review ways to accelerate the Plan; stated
that a member of the Housing Task Force Committee recommended that
the Committee review the Plan, provide input, and delay the vote.
Councilmember deHaan stated that the quality of life at the West
End is important because of the high population density; the Boys'
and Girls' Club brings positive steps to the area; funding sources
are important; he is always concerned with transportation issues;
the Transportation Commission needs to be engaged; requested to see
more detail on the sources of estimates for varied activities;
stated that he has no problem with delaying the acceptance of the
Plan; inquired whether the Plan could be delayed.
The Community Programs and Housing Division Manager responded there
has been an extensive public comment process the draft plan was
presented at a community meeting in February; Board and Commission
input has been requested; there is no problem in delaying the
acceptance; acceptance of the conceptual Plan is requested;
different components would be brought back to Council at various
times.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the short-term, simple
projects could be accomplished quickly.
The Community Programs and Housing Division Manager responded in
the affirmative; stated there is funding available for planting
additional trees on an infill basis, and installation of trash
receptacles at the Webster Street and Poggi Street corridor.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the trash receptacles would be
selected by Public works.
The Community Programs and Housing Division Manager responded that
BMS Design would select the trash receptacles; BMS Deign is
familiar with materials and installations throughout the City;
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,4,"the Plan was not broader.
The Community Programs and Housing Division Manager responded the
census tract has the highest concentration of minorities and low
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,5,"income. the priority was to work with residents to bring more
services into the neighborhood using Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) funds; residents voiced concern about not being able
to walk freely through the neighborhood because of the Harbor
Island Apartment and Chipman Middle School the area to the south
is not a low to moderate income neighborhood.
Councilmember Daysog stated the Plan could be used as a tool to
identify City resources that could be used to improve
neighborhoods; the sidewalks are in horrible condition; the paving
on Santa Clara Avenue is odd.
Mayor Johnson stated the name of the Plan can be changed to be more
specific; there are sidewalk, street, tree, and lighting issues
everywhere in the Cityi there is nothing more odd than the paving
on Gibbons Drive; increased sidewalk maintenance funding and more
aggressive repair schedules need to be reviewed; CDBG funds could
not be used if the Plan was expanded and could result in a thirty-
year Plan instead of a ten-year Plan; that she does not have a
problem with delaying acceptance until the Housing Task Force
Committee report is received; suggested direction be provided to
rename the Plan.
Councilmember deHaan stated expanding the scope cannot be done with
the existing funding; the West End could be reviewed further at a
later date; that he is uncertain what the impact would be in
deferring acceptance until after the Housing Task Force Committee
review.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether there are projects that are ready to
move forward; stated the Plan could be accepted with direction to
bring the matter back to Council after receiving the Housing Task
Force Committee report.
The Community Programs and Housing Division Manager responded that
tree, trash can, and bus shelter locations could begin to be
determined; staff could synchronize with the Housing Task Force
Committee and report back to Council. the Plan provides a vision of
the future and encourages residents to participate and not allow
development which might become an impediment to the implementation
of the Plan.
Mayor Johnson requested staff to review ways to accelerate the
Plan.
The Acting City Manager stated that Council could accept the Plan
with the caveat that the Plan be brought back to Council; the Plan
is dynamic; there needs to be equality in the Public Works
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,6,"infrastructure and repairs; Public Works would provide an
infrastructure report at the next City Council Meeting; Council
would receive a model showing the performance of the budget over a
period of ten years in late July or early August reports will
outline what needs to be done to correct problems i funding
recommendations can be discussed.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he would not be on the Council if
not for the support of residents south of Pacific Avenue and
Lincoln Avenue; many people needed to sell their homes with the
Base closure; the neighborhood faces a lot of development Council
would be missing an opportunity if there is no coordination with
activities occurring north of Pacific Avenue and Lincoln Avenue.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of accepting the Plan,
modifying the title to reflect the Plan's intent to target the most
needy census tract in the City and requiring that the Plan return
to Council coinciding with the Task Force report to revise concepts
in the Plan if needed.
Councilmember deHaan stated that there is $500,000 in resources
that can go towards activities right away; going forward and
accepting the Plan is prudent; the elements within the first and
third year are very straightforward.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Johnson stated that she is very concerned
with the infrastructure everywhere in Alameda; the sidewalks and
streets are not in the same condition as a few years agoi Council
needs to address the issues and set priorities on the
infrastructure deficit.
Councilmember Daysog stated re-designating the name is important;
he is fine with remaining north of Pacific Avenue and Lincoln
Avenue if the Plan is not opened up to Harbor Island Task Force.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(05-210) Wilbur Richards, Alameda, complimented the Council on the
quality of City services.
(05-211) Michael John Torrey, Alameda, stated the President is
proposing to put oil refineries on closed military bases, which
should not occur in Alameda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,7,"(05-212 - ) Rob Siltanen, Alameda, submitted a letter requesting that
the Alameda Point vision include sensible traffic solutions, middle
class housing, and a small town Alameda feel.
(05-213) - Jon Spangler, Cross Alameda Trail Steering Committee,
stated that Saturday, June 4, is National Trails Day there will be
a trail walk between Main Street and Webster Street.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(05-214) Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she and Councilmember
deHaan attended the Association of Bay Area Government conference
regarding casinos last week; there appears to be a one size fits
all negotiation strategy there is no recognition of the obvious
differences between urban and rural casinos; the Governor' S
negotiator promised that the Governor would take a hard look at
Indian tribes looking to have land restored; the negotiator was not
aware of anything pertaining to the Koi proposal on Swan Way;
stated tribal lobbying efforts have not made it all the way up the
ladder.
(
05-215 ) Councilmember Matarrese stated that there is a special
June election for a Measure A parcel tax; the tax would allow the
School District to extend the current parcel tax; requested that
Council give direction to place the matter on the next City Council
meeting agenda; stated there is a gap in School District funding a
County Financial Advisor would be required if the School District
slips into financial disarray; the City does not need a County
person advising how money is spent.
(05-216) ouncilmember deHaan stated that he is concerned that the
reservation shopping battle has just begun; some cities want to
move forward with casinos because of economic woes.
(05-217) Councilmember deHaan requested staff to review costs and
funding sources to centralize City administration particularly the
Public Works and Development Services Departments.
Mayor Johnson stated that she would support the idea.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he assumed that the matter
would be addressed with the budget and the ten-year outlook.
(05-218 ) Mayor Johnson requested that the Recreation Commission
matter [expansion of Commission size] be placed on the next City
Council Meeting agenda.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,8,"ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 10:38 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,9,"MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY - -MAY 3, 2005- -5:30 P. M.
Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 5:45 p.m.
Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,
Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5.
Absent :
None.
The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider :
(05-190) Public Employee Performance Evaluation; Title: City
Attorney
(05-191) - Worker's Compensation Claim; Claimant : James MacKey
Agency Claimed Against City of Alameda.
(05-192) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators
Human Resources Director and Craig Jory; Employee Organizations :
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers ( IBEW) and
Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) .
Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened
and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Public Employee
Performance Evaluation, the Council discussed the City Attorney's
performance; regarding Worker's Compensation Claim, the Council
gave instructions to Legal Counsel: and regarding Conference with
Labor Negotiators, the Council gave instructions to Labor
Negotiators.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Special Meeting at 7:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Special Meeting
Alameda City Council
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,10,"MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY - - MAY 3, 2005 - - - 7:05 P.M.
Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 7:45 p.m.
Roll Call - Present : Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,
Matarrese and Chair Johnson - 5.
Absent :
None.
The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:
(05-019) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation;
Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section
54956.91 Number of cases: One.
Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened
and Chair Johnson announced that the Commission obtained briefing
from staff and Legal Counsel and gave direction.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the
Special Meeting at 8:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
Secretary, Community Improvement
Commission
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Special Meeting
Community Improvement Commission
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,11,"MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY - - - MAY 3, 2005 - - - 7:25 P.M. .
Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint meeting at 8:08 p.m.
Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL -
Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners
Daysog,
deHaan,
Gilmore,
Matarrese,
and
Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5.
Absent :
None.
MINUTES
(05-193CC/05-020CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and
Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on April 19, 2005.
Approved.
Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog moved approval of the minutes.
Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
AGENDA ITEMS
(05-194CC/05-021CIC) Joint Public Hearing to consider authorizing
the City Manager/Executive Director to enter into a Disposition and
Development Agreement with Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P.
,
approval of the 33433 Report, and adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure
Project (State Clearinghouse #2004-122-042) ;
(05-194A/CC) Resolution No. 13834, ""Approving and Authorizing
Execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement Between the
Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Entertainment
Associates, L.P., and Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program. Adopted; and
(05-021A/CIC) Resolution No. 05-134, ""Approving and Authorizing
Execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement Between the
Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Entertainment
Associates, L.P., Approving Certain Mitigation Measures for the
Project, and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program. "" Adopted.
The Business Development Division Manager gave a Power Point
presentation.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
1
Community Improvement Commission
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,12,"The Development Services Director provided a brief update on the
project.
Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired about the traffic
remediation requirements.
The Development Services Director responded there was one major
traffic improvement to upgrade a signal at Santa Clara Avenue and
Oak Street; there are struggles with traffic improvements at the
intersection; modifications need to be made to all of the equipment
at the intersection because the equipment is old; the estimate to
do the work is about $100,000; the design plan will provide a nice
public environment to half the block of Oak Street by extending the
public sidewalk from eight feet to fourteen feet and providing
garage and theatre outside lighting to accommodate people, cars and
bicycles entering and exiting the garage.
Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether determining the
scope is an on-going process, to which the Development Services
Director responded in the affirmative.
Mayor/Chair Johnson opened the public portion of the Hearing.
Proponents: Christopher Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation
Society; Susan Decker, Alameda; Lars Hanson, Park Street Business
Association (PSBA) i Pauline Kelly; Barbara Marchand, Alameda Civic
Light Opera; Cathy Leong, Alameda Chamber of Commerce; Mike
Corbett, Harsch Investments and Robb Ratto, PSBA.
Opponents: Gary McAfee, Alameda; Jennifer Van Airsdale, Alameda;
Joan Steber, Alameda; John McNulty, Alameda John F. Ruake; Zach
Kaplan, Alameda; and Lucy Gigli, Bike Alameda (submitted handout) .
Expressed concern with bike safety on Central Avenue between Oak
and Walnut Streets: Robert Van de Walle, Alameda; Andy Cutright,
Alameda; Alameda; Jon Spangler, Alameda; Mark Haskett; and Jillian
Saxty, Alameda.
There being no further speakers, Mayor/Chair Johnson closed the
public portion of the Hearing.
louncilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated that the Council should
follow through with the commitment to reconfigure the parking [ on
Central Avenue between Oak and Walnut Streets) to the original
parallel state at the former historic Alameda High School.
The Acting City Manager stated that the need for diagonal parking
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
2
Community Improvement Commission
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,13,"was created because of the new gymnasium, City Hall moving into the
east wing of the high school, and the Library moving into the
middle wing of the high school; parking was increased from 32
spaces to 58 spaces; Council approved an ordinance modification for
diagonal parking; the Recreation and Park Department is the only
part of City Hall remaining in the east wing and will be moving out
within a month; the Library is projected to move out within 17 or
18 months. much of the parking demand will be eliminated; the
parking garage construction provides an opportunity to move back to
parallel parking; a parking plan would need to be brought back to
Council for approval.
Vice layor/Commissioner Gilmore stated that she has great sympathy
for bicyclists; a large segment of the youth population will either
ride bikes or take the bus to the theatre.
Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated the dollar value of
parking spaces is understood now.
Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that the parking structure would solve a
lot of the parking problems.
louncilmember/Commissioner Daysog stated that the project is good
for all of Alameda, especially the youth.
louncilmember/Commissioner Matarrese stated the theatre project is
important for the whole City; dollars would be kept in town; the
historic theatre will rot if the project does not move forward.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved adoption of the Resolution Approving and
Authorizing Execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement
Between the Community Improvement Commission and Alameda
Entertainment Associates, L.P., and Adopting a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program [paragraph no. 05-
194CC].
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution Approving
and Authorizing Execution of a Disposition and Development
Agreement Between the Community Improvement Commission and Alameda
Entertainment Associates, L.P., Approving Certain Mitigation
Measures for the Project, and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring
Program [paragraph no. 05-021CC].
Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
3
Community Improvement Commission
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,14,"voice vote - 5.
Mayor/Chair Johnson directed staff to bring the Central Avenue bike
lane issue back to Council.
(05-022CIC) Resolution No. 05-135, ""Approving and Authorizing
Payment of Certain Public Improvements to the Park Street and Otis
Drive Intersection. Adopted; and
(05-195CC) Resolution No. 13835, ""Approving and Authorizing
Execution of a Public Improvements Construction Agreement Between
the City and Harsch Investment Corporation. Adopted.
Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese stated the project is critical
to Alameda's economic engine.
Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the
resolutions.
Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired what
type of funding would be used.
The Development Services Director responded that staff recommends
using Community Improvement Commission funds for the project; the
primary benefit finding is required because the intersection is
just outside the formal boundaries of a redevelopment project area;
the improvements are tied to the form and function of the rest of
the redevelopment project area; Redevelopment Law has a provision
that recognizes that there are projects that may be outside the
boundaries which are a primary benefit to the function of the rest
of the project area.
Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether other funding
sources were considered.
The Development Services Director responded that there was a
discussion about using some sales tax dollars from the new South
Shore Shopping Center development.
Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired how the two-third, one-
third cost sharing was derived.
The Development Services Director responded that the formula was a
result of negotiations with the developer ; there was a dispute over
the assignment of the impact of the intersection; the developer
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
4
Community Improvement Commission
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,15,"felt that he should not be responsible for making all the
improvements to the intersection; traffic modeling shows that there
are other background projects not yet developed, but approved,
which would also impact the intersection; the negotiation used the
actual number of trips coming off the project and the impact on the
intersection.
Councilmember/Commission deHaan stated that there might be further
requirements for further entitlements; inquired what the affect
would be on the traffic remediation.
The Development Services Director responded that the entitlements
received for the project anticipate 112,000 square feet of new
retail square footage at the South Shore Shopping Center and would
likely increase; circulation issues related to the gas station
would need to be examined independently additional improvements
can always be made; a need for further improvements is anticipated
by 2020.
Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated that he was concerned that
the same [ redevelopment funds are being used for many issues.
inquired whether there is a detailed breakdown of where
redevelopment funding stands.
The Development Services Director responded that there are
sufficient funds; anticipated improvements can be made with
existing tax increments and not bonds.
The Acting City Manager stated that at the next meeting staff would
provide a Community Improvement Commission multi-year budget to
show how much money remains.
Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese stated the project is very
important the rationale and logic fits into the true meaning of
redevelopment that he defends the approach of taking redevelopment
funds for the Library project; his motion to adopt the resolutions
stands.
Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog stated the investment is
necessary if the money means that the City would have stores such
as Borders or Chicos.
Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that the City needs to be frugal with
redevelopment money but also needs to use the money wisely; moving
forward with projects that help continue the redevelopment and
revitalization of Alameda business areas is an appropriate use of
funds.
.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
5
Community Improvement Commission
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-05-03,16,"Counci lmember/Commissioner deHaan stated that he is comfortable
with delaying other major retail developments to allow South Shore
Shopping Center to mature; he supports and looks forward to the
renewed Center, but has concerns with funding.
Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution Approving
and Authorizing Payment of Certain Public Improvements to the Park
Street and Otis Drive Intersection [paragraph no. 05-022CIC].
Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution Approving
and Authorizing Execution of a Public Improvements Construction
Agreement Between the City and Harsch Investment Corporation
[paragraph no. 05-195CC].
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(05-023CIC) Recommendation to approve an Amended Contract with
Architectural Resources Group, Inc. by increasing the Contract
amount an additional $44,275 to provide additional pre-planning
services for the proposed Alameda Theatre Project.
Commissioner Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous
voice vote - 5.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the
Special Meeting at 9:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
Secretary, Community Improvement
Commission
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the
Brown Act.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
6
Community Improvement Commission
May 3, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf