body,date,page,text,path
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2005-04-19,1,"APPROVED
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Tuesday, April 19, 2005
The meeting convened at 6:11 p.m. with Chair Johnson presiding.
2-A
1.
ROLL CALL
Present: Beverly Johnson, Chair, City of Alameda
Tony Daysog, Boardmember, City of Alameda
Doug DeHaan, Boardmember, City of Alameda
Frank Matarrese, Boardmember, City of Alameda
Marie Gilmore, Boardmember, City of Alameda
2.
Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items Only.
There were no speaker slips.
3.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
3-A.
Study Session of the FY 2005-06 ARRA Budget
Acting Executive Director, Bill Norton, gave a brief overview about the work session on the
ARRA Budget and introduced Development Services Director, Leslie Little, who introduced
staff : Nanette Banks, Jennifer Ott, and Stephen Proud.
Leslie Little gave a powerpoint presentation on the Budget Planning for Alameda Point. The
presentation focused on transition planning and preparation for the development of Alameda
Point. The information presented expresses the existing conditions in the current ARRA
budget and also the implications of some of the decisions that have been made during current
negotiations. Ms. Little discussed two options to consider: 1) how to transition in the event
that the developer (APCP) elects to proceed with the development of Alameda Point and, 2)
how to transition if APCP chooses NOT to proceed.
Ms. Little discussed the first scenarios (APCP proceeding), including the Alameda Point
Bond, and that the activities that are currently being paid from it would transfer as direct cost
to the developer; approximately 18 months. Other responsibilities would also shift to the
developer, leasing and property maintenance activities, other financials responsibilities like
project related tax increments, and current debt obligation.
The second option was discussed (APCP electing not to proceed). Ms Little noted that this
issue is a ""structural deficiency"" in the ARRA Budget. She stated that there are expenditures
that are greater than the revenues at this point. She explained that if the developer doesn't
elect to proceed, the key issues moving forward are: the Alameda Point Bond will be
1",AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-04-19.pdf
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2005-04-19,2,"exhausted some time around Sept and October; there are a number of deferred costs, or
capital costs, that are expected would be part of the developer's pro forma; and the debt
payments that began to come due in 2006. Also included in the presentation was the current
ARRA staff load on the existing ARRA budget.
Ms. Little continued to discuss some challenges to the ARRA budget. She explained that by
2006 and 7 we will have spent down our fund balance and, by 2008, we won't have enough
to balance our budget. She discussed how a large part of the ARRA budget is contributed to
municipal services -- about 1/2 of what we take in annually, $10M in revenue. She stated that
the presentation is intended to start the conversation about the need to either increase
general fund revenue opportunities to tackle some of the costs, or decrease the general fund
expenditures out at Alameda Point because we don't have the resources to continue to
support them.
Ms. Little discussed the current pro forma and its assumptions regarding new public
revenues, primarily in property tax pass thru, the sales taxes, property transfer taxes, etc.
with the sale of the homes (new development) = revenues coming into the general fund.
She concluded the presentation, summarizing that staff is preparing for APCP to move
forward in the next two months and that we will need to transition quickly negotiate a
disposition and development agreement at 18 months and move into an implementation
mode; subsequently, if APCP does not move forward, there are implications regarding
dealing with long term costs over time. Ms. Little mentioned a subsequent ""phase 2"" ARRA
Budget workshop.
Councilmember de Haan expressed concern with the Navy's inability to fulfill the
commitment to the 18 mos. transition period. Stephen Proud addressed his concern by
explaining that we are trying to expedite the time line as much as possible, to the extent that
the Navy would be able to make the property available to us sooner. He discussed various
issues on the timeline that we (ARRA) have to accomplish, specifically the environmental
review process.
Boardmembers and staff discussed general leasing issues/opportunities at Alameda Point,
with Chair Johnson mentioning activities to attract film productions.
Member Matarrese expressed concern about the ""structural problem"" of the ARRA Budget,
stating that perhaps we' ve set the system up for failure - and that we may be providing
services that we simply cannot afford given our leasing capability. Leslie Little addressed
his concern by explaining that once there is a DDA, the actual costs that are being born by
the budget now, would have to be reduced significantly, specifically the municipal services.
Member Gilmore asked about insurance expenses. Leslie Little explained that the tenants
themselves carry liability insurance as part of their lease requirement.
Member Daysog initiated discussion about the proposed mitigation where the general fund
reduces dependency on the ARRA and absorbs 1.8million dollars in expenses. The
municipal services funding resources was discussed.
2",AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-04-19.pdf
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2005-04-19,3,"Member Gilmore summarized the challenges of reducing the amount of expenditures in the
ARRA budget, by allowing the general fund to absorb those expenditures. Bill Norton
replied that staff provided the ARRA Board with this detail to see the impact of the changes
on the general fund.
3-B.
Recommendation to Authorize the Executive Director to Direct P.M. Realty, Acting as
Property Manager, to Enter Into a Contract with Courtney Giampolini to Waterproof
City Hall West (Building One) in an Amount not to Exceed $966,650
Nanette Banks provided photos of the extensive water damage in various locations of
Building 1(City Hall West). Building 1, like other buildings at Alameda Point, have
problems that require a lot of work, specifically asbestos remediation, lead paint and
waterproofing, roof and other capital upgrades. Ms. Banks introduced Rick Jones,
construction manager from PM Realty Group.
After Mr. Jones explained the problems with the buildings, he and Chair Johnson had
conversation about the contractor bidding process and if this process was approved by the
ARRA. Ms. Banks explained that in an exhibit to the property management agreement with
PM Realty, PM Realty is allowed to use their own process for selecting contractors for us.
Member deHaan, as well as the other boardmembers, expressed concern about the almost
$1M.cost for the building repair. Member Gilmore questioned the long-term ""guarantees"" to
this costly solution. She wanted reassurance that the same problems don't resurface in a
year, after spending $1M. Mr. Jones explained that there is a 10 yr warranty, which is pretty
standard in the industry.
Staff and boardmembers discussed other options for housing City Staff. Bill Norton
explained that there is no other space available for city staff to move into. There was also
further discussion about window replacements. Mr. Jones stated that 40 windows would be
replaced, and the other 200 are aluminum.
Member Daysog stated that the ARRA is in a fiscal crises and as such non-life threatening
projects, like waterproofing, I believe need to be delayed especially if the professional
opinion is that delay doesn't result in significant cost increases to the project.
Chair Johnson agreed with Member Daysog but stated that (Building 1) is a workplace for
our workers and we can't have our city employees working in those conditions. She also
requested a briefing for discussion of the ARRA board the bidding process and requirements.
The Board approved the staff recommendation.
Staff recommendation accepted and passed by the following voice vote: Ayes-4; Noes-1
(Daysog); Abstentions-0
3",AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-04-19.pdf
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority,2005-04-19,4,"4. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 7:37 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Irma Glidden
ARRA Secretary
G: \Comdev\Base Reuse& Redevp\ARRA)MINUTES\2005\April 19.Special ARRA minutes.doc
4",AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,1,"MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY - - APRIL 19, 2005 - - 7:30 PM
Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 8:07 p.m.
ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore,
Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5.
Absent :
None.
AGENDA CHANGES
(05-160) Mayor Johnson announced that the Resolution Commending
Alameda Police Department Sergeant Jon Westmoreland would be
presented after Special Orders of the Day.
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(05-161) Proclamation declaring April 23, 2005 as Earth Day Alameda
2005.
Mayor Johnson read and presented the Proclamation to Paul Groff,
Allegra Printing.
Mr. Groff thanked the Council for the Proclamation.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM
(05-162) Resolution No. 13828, ""Commending Alameda Police
Department Sergeant Jon Westmoreland for His Contributions to the
City of Alameda. "" Adopted.
Mayor Johnson read and presented the Resolution to Sergeant Jon
Westmoreland.
Sergeant Westmoreland thanked the Council and stated that he was
honored to have served the City.
Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Johnson announced that the recommendation to authorize the
Acting City Manager or designee to enter into an agreement for the
acquisition of real property [paragraph no. 05-166], the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
1
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,2,"recommendation to authorize the Acting City Manager to use $201,000
in Measure B ferry reserves [paragraph no. 05-169], and the
Resolution Approving the Application for Land and Water
Conservation Fund [paragraph no. 05-174] were removed from the
Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the
Consent Calendar.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
[Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding
the paragraph number. ]
( 05-163) - Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings
held on April 5, 2005 and the Special City Council Meeting held on
April 7, 2005 and April 8, 2005. Approved.
(*05-164) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,826,558.48
( *05-165) Recommendation to approve Agreement with Community
Playgrounds, Inc. in the amount of $98,930 for Leydecker Park
Playground Renovation Project. Accepted.
(05-166) Recommendation to authorize the Acting City Manager or
designee to enter into an agreement for the acquisition of real
property from the East Bay Municipal Utility District for $110,800
plus closing costs.
Councilmember deHaan requested clarification on the impacts of
drawing $110,800 from the Recreation and Park Commission's existing
budget.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that he understood that the $110,800
was coming from the Open Space Fund.
Mayor Johnson stated that the Open Space Fund was a result of the
property sold at the Harbor Bay Business Park; Council directed
that the sale proceeds be placed in a separate Open Space account.
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the money was also being used
for the Estuary Park Project.
The Acting City Manager responded in the affirmative. stated
purchasing the full amount of land [for Estuary Park] shown in the
General Plan could cost up to $5 million; there will be discussions
with the developer and the Bay Conservation and Development
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
2
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,3,"Commission (BCDC) regarding requirements for a pathway
Councilmember deHaan inquired whether having an approximate
$300,000 delta will limit the capabilities of carrying on with the
project.
The Acting City Manager responded there would be limitations in
getting a larger share of the land; discussions with the developer
and grant approval would determine how much land the City could
obtain; staff must recommend proceeding because the project is
shown in the General Plan.
Councilmember deHann moved approval of the recommendation to
authorize the Acting City Manager or designee to enter into an
agreement for the acquisition of real property from the East Bay
Municipal Utility District for $110,800 plus closing costs
[paragraph no. 05-166] and Adoption of Resolution Approving the
Application for Land and Water Conservation Fund Estuary Park
Project [paragraph no. 05-174].
Under discussion, Mayor Johnson inquired whether the grant was the
same one the City previously applied for and did not receive and
whether the chances for approval were better.
The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded the current grant
was from the Land and Water Conservation Act; the previous grant
was under the Roberti-z'Berg-Harris Urban Open Space and Recreation
Program; the State prefers to fund developments rather than
acquisitions.
Mayor Johnson requested staff to advise Council on whatever efforts
are needed to succeed.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese stated that it is
important to acquire the last strip of property before the Bay Farm
Bridge because the property completes the Bay Trail and precludes
building another house at one of the choke points of the City; the
development of Estuary Park should move forward with whatever money
is left; when the opportunity comes up with the developer, money
can be found.
The Acting City Manager stated there are ways to work with the
developer to maximize the amount of land the City can obtain; the
matter would be discussed with the developer in the next week or
two.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
3
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,4,"Accepted.
(05-169) Recommendation to authorize the Acting City Manager to
use $201,000 in Measure B ferry reserves for ferry boat repairs.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated there seems to be more ferry boat repair
issues with the Harbor Bay Ferry than the Alameda/Oakland Ferry
Service; if so, requested a review of ferry boat operators'
maintenance schedules.
Councilmember deHaan stated that the Harbor Bay Ferry costs need to
be reviewed; an Off Agenda Report notes that the Peralta was sent
back up to Washington for super structure modifications the
Peralta is a young ship; there were flaws in the materials used;
requested the review address the Peralta.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
( *05-170) - Resolution No. 13829, ""Preliminarily Approving Annual
Report Declaring Intention to Order Levy and Collection of
Assessments and Providing for Notice of June 21, 2005 Hearing
Thereof - Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2. ""
Adopted.
( (*05-171) Resolution No. 13830, ""Preliminarily Approving Annual
Report Declaring Intention to Order Levy and Collection of
Assessments and Providing for Notice of June 21, 2005 Hearing
Thereof - Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 (Marina Cove) . ""
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
4
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,5,"Adopted.
(*05-172) Resolution No. 13831, ""Approving Tentative Map, TM04-
0004, for a Sixteen Lot Subdivision at Harbor Bay Business Park.""
Adopted.
(*05-173) Resolution No. 13832, ""Approving the Association of Bay
Area Governments (ABAG) Report ""Taming Natural Disasters"" as the
City of Alameda's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Adopted.
(05-174) Resolution No. 13833, ""Approving the Application for Land
and Water Conservation Fund Estuary Park Project. Adopted.
Refer to comments and motion under the recommendation to authorize
the Acting City Manager or designee to enter into an agreement for
the acquisition of real property [paragraph no. 05-166].
(*05-175) Introduction of Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning
Certain Property within the City of Alameda by Amending Zoning
Ordinance No. 1277, N.S., from R-5 (General Residential) Zoning
District to C-C (Community Commercial) Zoning District, for that
Property Located at 2507 Central Avenue at Everett Street.
Introduced.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(05-176) Public Hearing to consider a recommendation to adopt FY
2005-06 through FY 2009-10 Consolidated Plan, adopt FY 2005-06
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Action Plan, amend FY
2004-05 CDBG Action Plan, and authorize the City Manager to
negotiate and execute related documents, agreements and
modifications and
(05-176A) Recommendation regarding CDBG public service
recommendations
Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the Hearing.
Speaker: Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public
portion of the Hearing.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
5
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,6,"(05-177) - Ordinance No. 2939, ""Approving and Authorizing Execution
of Lease between the City of Alameda (Lessor) and the County of
Alameda (Lessee) for Real Property Located at 1429 Oak Street. ""
Finally passed.
Mayor Johnson stated that the County Health Center is moving into
the former Children's Library site; there is now a home for the
Recreation and Park Department and the County Health Center
thanked the Acting City Manager for finding a very good solution to
a potentially difficult problem.
Councilmember Matarrese stated that the County's opportunity
provides the City with the benefit of improvements and maintaining
a building that is a City asset; the move is a fine solution and
keeps the County services central to the bus line and the center of
town.
Councilmember Matarrese moved final passage of the Ordinance.
Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion.
Under discussion, the Acting City Manager stated that the Public
Works Department put in partitions and did a lot of the work in a
short period of time; the County will have a ribbon cutting
ceremony either later this week or next week; the cost of the
materials was paid for by the County; a City building has been
fixed up with a combination of City forces and County funds;
everyone came out a winner.
Mayor Johnson stated that the building was not occupied for at
least eight years and was in fairly blighted conditions.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he appreciates the Acting City
Manager's win-win solutions.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice
vote - 5.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(05-178) - Discussion of the Harbor Bay ferry system.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he received many e-mails regarding
the Harbor Bay ferry; noted that the City was able to get a one
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
6
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,7,"year reprieve; suggested a Town Hall meeting be held regarding the
ferry system in three to four months; stated that some riders feel
out of the loop regarding ferry issues; noted that a Town Hall
meeting would provide a better sense of timetables for improving
ferry services and costs issues; suggested a more formal way of
communicating with riders be developed by the Transportation
Commission or an adhoc committee that reports to City Council.
Councilmember Matarrese concurred with Councilmember Daysog;
suggested that the Town Hall meeting occur soon; stated that the
city cannot afford to lose the ferry service; traveling across the
Bay Farm Island Bridge would affect commuters and is unacceptable:
stated that informing commuters that everything will be done to
keep the ferry in service is an urgent matter and maintains
credibility for transit solutions at Alameda Point.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he is in favor of having the Town
Hall meeting sooner, but that it is important to collect
information for presentation.
Mayor Johnson stated that she does not see any advertising for the
ferries; noted that fuel cost issues should be investigated; stated
that the City will not lose the ferry service; that there is a
long-term possibility that the Water Transit Authority will operate
the
ferries; the City needs to continue operating successfully
until then; there should be a Council briefing on the state of the
ferries and then a public workshop.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the maintenance issues are
important; noted if the ferry is out of service, commuters find
other means of commuting and it is difficult to get them back once
habits have changed.
Councilmember Daysog suggested that the Council Meeting be the Town
Hall meting.
Councilmember deHaan stated that there was a fare box increase of
25% and 40% is needed; the capacity of the ferry service and
parking limitation is a difficult dynamic to solve; that the
Alameda/Oakland Ferry Service was successful because parking
spaces were increased and ridership improved.
Mayor Johnson stated that she has never seen the parking lot full;
noted that more riders are needed; stated that ridership went down
significantly after the dock closure.
The Acting City Manager stated that staff worked very hard and came
up with a solution that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
7
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,8,"staff and Grant Allocation Committee endorsed; more work needs to
be done to refine the information; there are plans to have a Town
Hall meeting next week or the following week; then staff will
provide a status report to Council; a better job can be done on
marketing the ferry.
Mayor Johnson stated that when the ferry problem became apparent,
the Acting City Manager immediately took action and set up meetings
with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission; thanked the Acting
City Manager for the efforts taken to negotiate one more year.
Vice Mayor Gilmore requested that e-mails be sent to concerned
citizens [regarding the Town Hall meeting] in addition to the
normal noticing procedures.
(05-179) Consideration of Mayor's nominations (3) for appointment
to the Golf Commission.
Mayor Johnson nominated Ray Gaul, Jane Sullwold, and Bill Schmitz
to the Gold Commission.
Councilmember deHaan stated that he was extremely impressed with
the applicants' depth; he would hope that the individuals look at
other commissions and boards.
Mayor Johnson concurred with Councilmember deHaan.
(05-180) - Consideration of the Mayor's nomination for appointment
to the Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board.
Continued.
(05-181) Selection of alternate to serve on the Alameda County
Lead Abatement Joint Powers Authority Board.
Mayor Johnson stated that Councilmember deHaan has indicated an
interest to serve as the alternate.
Vice Mayor Gilmore moved that Councilmember deHaan serve on the
Alameda County Lead Abatement Joint Powers Authority Board.
Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by
unanimous voice vote - 5.
(05-182) Councilmember Daysog noted that today is the City of
Alameda's 151st birthday.
(05-183 - ) Councilmember deHaan requested a report on the Lincoln
School drop off area situation; there is concern with the next
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
8
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,9,"generation of remediation intruding into the existing field area.
Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the School District staff is
presenting a plan to the School Board on April 26.
The Acting City Manager stated that the meeting may be sooner than
April 26 and that he would verify the date.
Mayor Johnson inquired whether the plan intrudes into the field
area, to which the Acting City Manager responded that the plan goes
partially into the field area and basketball paved area.
Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired how the plan would effect putting in a
full size regulation soccer field, to which the Acting City Manager
responded the matter would be addressed at the meeting and City
staff would bring back information.
Mayor Johnson stated that she has informed a couple of School Board
members and the Superintendent that she is concerned about taking
away field space; noted that the basketball courts are not just
used by the school.
(05-184) Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the window display
ordinance came back to Council, to which the Acting City Manager
responded that there is 30-day implementation period to allow
people time to adjust before enforcement.
(05-185) Mayor Johnson requested that increasing the size of the
Recreation and Park Commission be placed on the next agenda.
(05-186) Mayor Johnson stated the Finance Director is working on a
more aggressive policy to buy in Alameda; noted that the check
registers indicate how much the City spends outside of Alameda and
are very disturbing stated that sales tax revenue is being given
to other cities a purchasing position might be needed to
coordinate better prices and ensure that purchasing is done in
Alameda as much as possible.
(05-187) - Mayor Johnson stated the Council should consider a
Business Recruiter position in the next budget.
Councilmember deHaan stated that every Economic Development
Commission study indicated a Business Recruiter as a top priority;
noted that buying in Alameda is important.
(05-188 - ) Councilmember Matarrese stated important projects are
coming forward; requested staff reports reference applicable plans,
such as the General Plan, Economic Development Strategic Plan, the
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
9
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,10,"Downtown Vision Plan, the Bicycle Master Plan, etc; staff reports
should have a section that reviews basic conformance to the policy
documents that have been adopted for non-conformance there should
be an explanation of the pros and cons; noted the plans may need to
be updated; projects such as the Theatre, Bridgeside Shopping
Center and the Base need to check conformances to existing plans.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the
Regular Meeting at 8:57 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger
City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Regular Meeting
Alameda City Council
10
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,11,"MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY- - -APRIL 19, 2005- -7:27 P.M.
Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:56 p.m.
ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners
Daysog,
deHaan,
Gilmore,
Matarrese,
and
Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5.
Absent :
None
MINUTES
(05-157CC/05-016CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and
Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on April 5, 2005.
Approved.
Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore moved approval of the minutes.
Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
AGENDA ITEMS
(05-158CC/05-017CIC) Recommendation to approve the Annual Operating
and Capital Budget for the Bayport Project.
The Acting City Manager stated the budget scenario is considerably
better based upon the profit participation section that allows
participation in some of the developer's profit.
The Development Services Director gave a brief report on the
project.
ouncilmember/Commissioner Daysog inquired whether bond issuance is
not required because revenue generated would cover public
improvements and still provide an $800,000 profit.
The Development Services Director responded that one bond was
issued early in the project; the project's bottom line does not
require using any other bonds to finish the project.
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether bond capacity is freed up for
other potential uses in the future.
The Development Services Director responded in the negative; stated
the existing agreement does not just contemplate the current phase
the obligations of the projects are linked; any project proceeds
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
1
Community Improvement Commission
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,12,"that flow from Phase I tax increments are obligated to Phase II
unless negotiated differently.
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether Phase II has been negotiated,
to which the Development Services Director responded Phase II has a
Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) .
Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the DDA provisions could be
renegotiated, to which the Development Services Director responded
in the affirmative.
Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the bottom
line of the next phase is more favorable.
The Development Services Director responded that a developer
advance is not required; available funds would be required to be
put into the infrastructure in a different pattern.
Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the Research
and Development Park and Business Park look more favorable, to
which the Development Services Director responded that she could
not respond; there are other issues related to the economics.
Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the profits
rolling into the next project allow for a more favorable situation,
to which the Development Services Director responded possibly.
Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the price of
homes is the principal factor for the current situation, to which
the Development Services Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated the break-even point was
$650,000.
The Redevelopment Manager noted the average sale price of the homes
was $725,000.
louncilmember/Commissioner Daysog stated that news is good overall;
profit participation was initially questionable.
Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the staff
recommendation
Counci lmember/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which
carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative (APC), stated that the APC
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
2
Community Improvement Commission
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,13,"was originally granted 39 units to meet housing needs for the
homeless: APC entered into an agreement with the City to replace
the original units in east housing near the corner of Atlantic
Avenue and Fifth Street the City told APC that there are no funds
to build the 39 units; the City is contemplating financing a 39- -
unit project through other funds instead; the City specifically
designated project revenues from the Catellus Project as the
primary source for the 39 units, including $2 million from the sale
of land; that designation of funds is not shown in the accounting
presented tonight; without the agreement with APC to relocate
units, the Bayport Project would not have happened; the use of the
Catellus funds could go a long way toward making units more
affordable and serve the homeless.
buncilmember/Commissioner Matarrese requested an Off Agenda Report
in response to Mr. Biggs' comments.
(05-159CC/05-018CIC) Joint Public Hearing to consider authorizing
the City Manager/Executive Director to enter into a Disposition and
Development Agreement with Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P.
,
approval of the 33433 Report, and adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure
Project (State Clearinghouse #2004-122-042).
(05-018A/CIC) Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing
Execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement Between the
Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Entertainment
Associates, L.P., and Approving Certain Mitigation Measures for the
Project and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program; and
(05-159A/CC) Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing
Execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement Between the
Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Entertainment
Associates, L.P., and Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program. Continued to May 3, 2005.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the
Special Joint Meeting at 8:06 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
Secretary, Community Improvement
Commission
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown
Act.
Special Joint Meeting
Alameda City Council and
3
Community Improvement Commission
April 19, 2005",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf
CityCouncil,2005-04-19,14,"APRIL 19, 2005 JOINT HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD
OF COMMISSIONERS AND ALAMEDA PUBLIC
FINANCING AUTHORITY MINUTES PLACEHOLDER
The April 19, 2005 Joint HABOC/APFA Meeting Minutes have
not been approved.",CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf